WEBVTT - Decoding Genetic Cancer Risk with Dr. Susan Domchek

0:00:17.130 --> 0:00:17.610
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:24.170 --> 0:00:29.050
<v Speaker 2>This show is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis,

0:00:29.210 --> 0:00:33.650
<v Speaker 2>or treatment. It is for informational purposes. Please consult your

0:00:33.690 --> 0:00:36.729
<v Speaker 2>healthcare professional with any medical questions.

0:00:37.970 --> 0:00:41.370
<v Speaker 1>My mom was diagnosed with breast cancer in her fifties. Luckily,

0:00:41.409 --> 0:00:44.889
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't complicated and she quickly went into remission. But

0:00:44.970 --> 0:00:48.449
<v Speaker 1>this April, she was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, one of

0:00:48.530 --> 0:00:51.849
<v Speaker 1>the most lethal and hardest cancers to treat. It was

0:00:51.930 --> 0:00:57.210
<v Speaker 1>devastating news. I assumed it wasn't a hereditary cancer. Most aren't,

0:00:57.850 --> 0:01:01.410
<v Speaker 1>but some cancers can be caused by genetic mutations like

0:01:01.490 --> 0:01:05.690
<v Speaker 1>the Brca one and Brca two genes, sometimes referred to

0:01:05.730 --> 0:01:09.090
<v Speaker 1>as the Braca genes. These are genes that normally protect

0:01:09.090 --> 0:01:13.170
<v Speaker 1>cells from damage, but when they don't work, cancerous skyrockets.

0:01:14.970 --> 0:01:18.130
<v Speaker 1>Years ago, I was actually testing myself for Brocca mutations.

0:01:18.450 --> 0:01:20.450
<v Speaker 1>I sent off blood work for genetic testing with a

0:01:20.490 --> 0:01:23.810
<v Speaker 1>private company. I never got the results back, and I

0:01:23.850 --> 0:01:26.810
<v Speaker 1>sort of forgot about it. That is until my mom's

0:01:26.810 --> 0:01:29.650
<v Speaker 1>doctors tested her blood and found out that she carried

0:01:29.730 --> 0:01:35.370
<v Speaker 1>a Broco one mutation. Her cancer had a genetic heritable element.

0:01:36.490 --> 0:01:38.890
<v Speaker 1>I contacted the testing company that I had sent my

0:01:38.930 --> 0:01:43.530
<v Speaker 1>blood work to years earlier, and I finally got those results.

0:01:44.010 --> 0:01:47.890
<v Speaker 1>I was positive for a BRCA one mutation. Myself, I

0:01:47.890 --> 0:01:51.410
<v Speaker 1>would have been livid. If I wasn't so scared. I'd

0:01:51.450 --> 0:01:54.330
<v Speaker 1>already had my own battle with HPV related cancer in

0:01:54.370 --> 0:01:57.650
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one, and as a pelvic surgeon, I know

0:01:57.810 --> 0:02:02.090
<v Speaker 1>too well the realities of ovarian cancer. Within weeks, I

0:02:02.170 --> 0:02:06.570
<v Speaker 1>had my ovaries and fallopian tubes removed. The wildest part.

0:02:07.210 --> 0:02:10.170
<v Speaker 1>I have a PhD in genetics. I worked with some

0:02:10.250 --> 0:02:12.610
<v Speaker 1>of the best vision icians and scientists in the world.

0:02:13.090 --> 0:02:16.810
<v Speaker 1>I am an expert in ovarian cancer, yet this potentially

0:02:17.329 --> 0:02:22.010
<v Speaker 1>fatal mutation when undetected in me for nearly sixty three years.

0:02:24.130 --> 0:02:27.649
<v Speaker 1>I'm doctor Elizabeth Pointer. And this is Decoding Women's Health,

0:02:27.929 --> 0:02:31.690
<v Speaker 1>a show from Pushkin Industries and the Atria Health Institute.

0:02:32.130 --> 0:02:36.130
<v Speaker 1>This elevating the conversation about women's health in midlife and

0:02:36.169 --> 0:02:39.970
<v Speaker 1>frankly challenging some of the status quote information out there.

0:02:40.649 --> 0:02:43.490
<v Speaker 3>As a medical and cologist, I was really interested in

0:02:43.530 --> 0:02:46.609
<v Speaker 3>breast cancer and I was seeing so many young women

0:02:46.850 --> 0:02:50.530
<v Speaker 3>with breast cancer and a family history, so trying to

0:02:50.929 --> 0:02:54.610
<v Speaker 3>help people not have to face these terrible situations that

0:02:54.609 --> 0:02:57.209
<v Speaker 3>they found themselves in was really compelling to me. So

0:02:57.570 --> 0:03:00.410
<v Speaker 3>it was really being able to see how devastating this

0:03:00.570 --> 0:03:03.489
<v Speaker 3>can be in families and at the same time, how

0:03:03.489 --> 0:03:04.330
<v Speaker 3>he doesn't have to be.

0:03:04.929 --> 0:03:08.490
<v Speaker 1>That's doctor Susan Domchuk. She's the executive director of the

0:03:08.530 --> 0:03:13.010
<v Speaker 1>Bachsor Center for Braka at the Universe Pennsylvania. She's an

0:03:13.010 --> 0:03:18.450
<v Speaker 1>oncologist who specializes in research, treatment, and prevention of BRCA

0:03:18.570 --> 0:03:21.570
<v Speaker 1>related cancers. I wanted to have her on the show

0:03:21.570 --> 0:03:25.090
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the importance of knowing your family history,

0:03:25.130 --> 0:03:28.330
<v Speaker 1>when you should get tested, who should get tested, and

0:03:28.410 --> 0:03:32.049
<v Speaker 1>what to do if you, like me, discover you carry

0:03:32.049 --> 0:03:35.650
<v Speaker 1>a BRACA mutation. I realize that this can be a

0:03:35.770 --> 0:03:39.290
<v Speaker 1>really scary topic for people, but I hope you leave

0:03:39.330 --> 0:03:43.930
<v Speaker 1>this conversation like I did, feeling empowered. There are so

0:03:44.050 --> 0:03:47.290
<v Speaker 1>many ways we can be proactive about our health, and

0:03:47.410 --> 0:04:03.490
<v Speaker 1>simply having more information can make a big impact. So

0:04:03.530 --> 0:04:05.610
<v Speaker 1>what do women need to know about their family history?

0:04:05.650 --> 0:04:07.850
<v Speaker 1>Is that three generations back? You know? Sometimes when I

0:04:07.850 --> 0:04:10.970
<v Speaker 1>take a family history, people will say, Oh, my immediate

0:04:11.050 --> 0:04:13.210
<v Speaker 1>family doesn't have any cancer, but I have some aunts

0:04:13.210 --> 0:04:15.530
<v Speaker 1>and uncles that may have had cancer. So what do

0:04:15.610 --> 0:04:17.410
<v Speaker 1>women need to know about their family history.

0:04:18.010 --> 0:04:21.410
<v Speaker 3>So this is such an important point, is knowing your

0:04:21.450 --> 0:04:26.050
<v Speaker 3>family history and knowing this in more detail than previously

0:04:26.130 --> 0:04:29.849
<v Speaker 3>has been understood. It's important to know who had cancer

0:04:29.969 --> 0:04:33.849
<v Speaker 3>at what ages, going back three generations, as we say,

0:04:33.930 --> 0:04:40.010
<v Speaker 3>so looking at cousins and grandparents and more distant relatives

0:04:40.130 --> 0:04:43.409
<v Speaker 3>is extremely important. The second thing is that it's not

0:04:43.570 --> 0:04:47.050
<v Speaker 3>just breast cancer. For br SA one and ber C two,

0:04:47.650 --> 0:04:50.730
<v Speaker 3>those stand for breast cancer one and breast cancer two

0:04:50.849 --> 0:04:55.050
<v Speaker 3>because we're just not creative, so BRCA one and BRSA two.

0:04:55.570 --> 0:04:59.130
<v Speaker 3>But when we speak about those two specific genes, which

0:04:59.170 --> 0:05:02.690
<v Speaker 3>are the most common cause of reditary breast and ovarian cancer,

0:05:03.330 --> 0:05:06.409
<v Speaker 3>the cancers that are seen are breast cancer, ovarian cancer,

0:05:06.849 --> 0:05:13.130
<v Speaker 3>pancreatic cancer, and prostate cancer. So really having a complete understanding.

0:05:13.490 --> 0:05:17.529
<v Speaker 3>In addition, as you're alluding to, people in past generations

0:05:17.570 --> 0:05:21.969
<v Speaker 3>didn't necessarily talk about cancer, so finding out why Aunt

0:05:22.050 --> 0:05:25.330
<v Speaker 3>Martha died at forty is really important even if the

0:05:25.370 --> 0:05:27.730
<v Speaker 3>family didn't talk about it. So having an open conversation

0:05:27.810 --> 0:05:30.810
<v Speaker 3>with your relatives about the family history. And by the way,

0:05:30.890 --> 0:05:33.969
<v Speaker 3>genetics isn't just about BERC one and two. People die

0:05:34.010 --> 0:05:37.289
<v Speaker 3>of colon cancer and they're in colon cancer susceptibility genes,

0:05:37.450 --> 0:05:41.850
<v Speaker 3>there's early onset cardiovasclar issues. And finally, individuals who are

0:05:42.010 --> 0:05:45.450
<v Speaker 3>Ashkenazi Jewish descent have a much higher chance of having

0:05:45.529 --> 0:05:48.850
<v Speaker 3>a BRC one or two mutation. That risk is one

0:05:48.969 --> 0:05:52.250
<v Speaker 3>in forty as opposed to one in two hundred in

0:05:52.250 --> 0:05:57.529
<v Speaker 3>the general population. So knowing your ethnicity, knowing your family

0:05:57.650 --> 0:05:59.570
<v Speaker 3>history are all really important.

0:06:00.089 --> 0:06:02.409
<v Speaker 1>Let's tat a little bit about if a Broka wan

0:06:02.490 --> 0:06:04.690
<v Speaker 1>or brock A two gene mutation is being passed down

0:06:04.770 --> 0:06:07.330
<v Speaker 1>the father side of the family, it can be a

0:06:07.370 --> 0:06:10.010
<v Speaker 1>little bit more challenging to look at, right because your

0:06:10.050 --> 0:06:12.650
<v Speaker 1>father is not going to get ovarian cancer. He may

0:06:12.690 --> 0:06:15.369
<v Speaker 1>get breast cancer, but it can make it a little

0:06:15.409 --> 0:06:18.170
<v Speaker 1>bit more challenging to look at these family histories and

0:06:18.210 --> 0:06:20.810
<v Speaker 1>interpret them. Can you just talk about that a little bit.

0:06:21.250 --> 0:06:23.729
<v Speaker 3>In the past, people felt that it was only the

0:06:23.770 --> 0:06:26.929
<v Speaker 3>mother's side that mattered, that it was only breast cancer

0:06:26.969 --> 0:06:30.529
<v Speaker 3>that mattered when you were thinking about family history and

0:06:30.570 --> 0:06:33.489
<v Speaker 3>the risk of having a genetic susceptibility. But none of

0:06:33.490 --> 0:06:36.050
<v Speaker 3>that is true. You're really looking at both sides of

0:06:36.089 --> 0:06:40.729
<v Speaker 3>the family. Fifty percent of all cancer genetic susceptibility genes.

0:06:40.930 --> 0:06:43.490
<v Speaker 3>They will come from the dad, not the mom. If

0:06:43.490 --> 0:06:46.729
<v Speaker 3>you line up every r C mutation carry in the world,

0:06:47.010 --> 0:06:50.250
<v Speaker 3>half our men. And we can't emphasize this point enough

0:06:50.289 --> 0:06:53.570
<v Speaker 3>since it's so often missed. So we can see families

0:06:53.650 --> 0:06:56.729
<v Speaker 3>which are really male dominated in which there's a ton

0:06:56.849 --> 0:07:00.849
<v Speaker 3>of early on set prostate cancer, and that is justice concerning.

0:07:01.650 --> 0:07:05.089
<v Speaker 3>It's also important to recognize that family size matters. So

0:07:05.289 --> 0:07:08.210
<v Speaker 3>if it's just your dad and he was an only

0:07:08.289 --> 0:07:12.090
<v Speaker 3>child and his father was an only child, cancer susceptibility

0:07:12.130 --> 0:07:15.210
<v Speaker 3>genes can be hidden in those types of families. I

0:07:15.250 --> 0:07:18.090
<v Speaker 3>want to also emphasize, and this may be a different point,

0:07:18.090 --> 0:07:21.370
<v Speaker 3>that we have lower and lower thresholds to do genetic

0:07:21.490 --> 0:07:24.689
<v Speaker 3>testing all the time, so sometimes we get a little

0:07:24.690 --> 0:07:27.810
<v Speaker 3>caught up in these issues of the exact family history

0:07:27.810 --> 0:07:31.010
<v Speaker 3>that we meet for genetic testing. But really it's just

0:07:31.050 --> 0:07:35.690
<v Speaker 3>a matter of knowing anything about your family history, including well,

0:07:35.930 --> 0:07:38.770
<v Speaker 3>I have a tiny family on my dad's side and

0:07:39.170 --> 0:07:42.730
<v Speaker 3>I am concerned about having a genetic susceptibility for whatever reason.

0:07:43.370 --> 0:07:46.250
<v Speaker 3>We also recognize that not everybody knows their family history

0:07:46.330 --> 0:07:49.890
<v Speaker 3>if they're adopted, or for instance, the Holocaust may have

0:07:49.970 --> 0:07:53.050
<v Speaker 3>taken out an entire generation, so we have a much

0:07:53.090 --> 0:07:55.650
<v Speaker 3>lower threshold for testing in those situations.

0:07:56.250 --> 0:07:59.369
<v Speaker 1>When we talk about this generic genetic testing for cancer,

0:07:59.530 --> 0:08:01.130
<v Speaker 1>what are we talking about in.

0:08:01.050 --> 0:08:03.890
<v Speaker 3>The old days, if you will, you know, fifteen years ago,

0:08:04.250 --> 0:08:08.250
<v Speaker 3>we would be testing for two genes, generally BARC one

0:08:08.330 --> 0:08:11.530
<v Speaker 3>and br C two. But what we've learned since the

0:08:11.650 --> 0:08:14.730
<v Speaker 3>nineties is that there are other genes that are also

0:08:14.810 --> 0:08:19.690
<v Speaker 3>associated with breast cancer. One of those is pretty like beer,

0:08:19.770 --> 0:08:22.650
<v Speaker 3>say one and two. It's called PALBI two. But there

0:08:22.650 --> 0:08:26.490
<v Speaker 3>are some other genes, notably genes called CHECK two and ATM,

0:08:26.810 --> 0:08:30.810
<v Speaker 3>which increase your risk of breast cancer only modestly. So

0:08:30.930 --> 0:08:33.330
<v Speaker 3>with beer, say one and two, that lifetime risk is

0:08:33.410 --> 0:08:37.090
<v Speaker 3>seventy percent, with check two it's about twenty to twenty

0:08:37.090 --> 0:08:40.370
<v Speaker 3>five percent. So now when people get genetic testing, they

0:08:40.370 --> 0:08:43.850
<v Speaker 3>are almost never tested for just two genes. They're tested

0:08:43.929 --> 0:08:47.370
<v Speaker 3>for a panel of genes that will include not only

0:08:47.410 --> 0:08:50.250
<v Speaker 3>beer say one and two, but other genes associated with

0:08:50.410 --> 0:08:55.410
<v Speaker 3>breast cancer risk. There's colon cancer susceptibility genes as well.

0:08:55.650 --> 0:09:00.530
<v Speaker 3>There's kidney cancer susceptibility genes. So in general, we send

0:09:00.569 --> 0:09:03.290
<v Speaker 3>sort of a panel of genes that hits the most

0:09:03.290 --> 0:09:07.450
<v Speaker 3>common cancers. The specific genes on those panels are looking

0:09:07.650 --> 0:09:11.330
<v Speaker 3>for what we call a pathogenic variant otherwise and as

0:09:11.330 --> 0:09:15.650
<v Speaker 3>a mutation in a gene that basically makes the protein

0:09:15.770 --> 0:09:18.890
<v Speaker 3>not function and that's what increases the risk of cancer.

0:09:19.210 --> 0:09:21.050
<v Speaker 1>And these genes that we're testing for are pretty much

0:09:21.050 --> 0:09:22.929
<v Speaker 1>all what we call tumor suppressor genes.

0:09:22.970 --> 0:09:26.050
<v Speaker 3>Correct. That's correct. So what we mean by that is

0:09:26.090 --> 0:09:29.490
<v Speaker 3>that all of us are born with two copies of

0:09:29.530 --> 0:09:35.250
<v Speaker 3>each gene and in general cancer sceptibility genes. Say, beer

0:09:35.370 --> 0:09:39.570
<v Speaker 3>SA one is good. Beer C one actually helps ourselves

0:09:39.689 --> 0:09:43.650
<v Speaker 3>repair a specific type of DNA damage called bubble strand

0:09:43.689 --> 0:09:46.450
<v Speaker 3>and break. So BERSA one and ber C two are

0:09:46.490 --> 0:09:49.729
<v Speaker 3>good for us. They help us. It's only when we

0:09:49.850 --> 0:09:53.410
<v Speaker 3>lose them where you are at increased risk or cancer.

0:09:55.370 --> 0:09:57.010
<v Speaker 1>I just want to pause for a moment here and

0:09:57.050 --> 0:10:01.010
<v Speaker 1>walk you through this. These concepts can feel so overwhelming

0:10:01.170 --> 0:10:03.890
<v Speaker 1>and frankly terrifying for women who are trying to better

0:10:03.970 --> 0:10:07.770
<v Speaker 1>understand their family history and their own risk. So you

0:10:07.890 --> 0:10:11.610
<v Speaker 1>might have been surprised to hear doctor Domchek say Brako

0:10:11.689 --> 0:10:14.850
<v Speaker 1>one and Broko two are good for us. But she's right,

0:10:15.450 --> 0:10:19.530
<v Speaker 1>Broca genes aren't cancer causing genes. They're cancer preventing genes.

0:10:20.010 --> 0:10:23.330
<v Speaker 1>They're actually helpful. They protect us by fixing damaged DNA.

0:10:24.490 --> 0:10:27.130
<v Speaker 1>Like doctor John Chuck said, we're all born with two

0:10:27.170 --> 0:10:30.690
<v Speaker 1>copies of those genes. People with Brocca mutations have a

0:10:30.689 --> 0:10:33.969
<v Speaker 1>broken copy of the gene. Most of the time, that

0:10:34.050 --> 0:10:37.010
<v Speaker 1>one working copy is enough to keep you safe, but

0:10:37.090 --> 0:10:40.290
<v Speaker 1>if something happens to damage or turn off that second

0:10:40.410 --> 0:10:45.170
<v Speaker 1>working copy, then you don't have any protection. When working properly,

0:10:45.370 --> 0:10:49.890
<v Speaker 1>these genes literally suppress tumors. You can imagine. It's almost

0:10:49.929 --> 0:10:52.729
<v Speaker 1>like having security guards that keep cancer from getting in.

0:10:53.490 --> 0:11:00.570
<v Speaker 1>Only when you lose both guards can cancer develop. Briefly,

0:11:00.610 --> 0:11:03.970
<v Speaker 1>what can you tell us about the biology of inherited cancers.

0:11:03.970 --> 0:11:06.130
<v Speaker 1>They're a little different. They present a little bit earlier,

0:11:06.250 --> 0:11:08.650
<v Speaker 1>so people a little bit younger when they're diagnosed, and

0:11:08.689 --> 0:11:10.370
<v Speaker 1>they may have a little bit of a better outcome

0:11:10.410 --> 0:11:11.530
<v Speaker 1>to treatment. Correct.

0:11:11.689 --> 0:11:13.930
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a great point, and this is where not

0:11:14.250 --> 0:11:18.770
<v Speaker 3>all genetic susceptibility is equal. BRSA one is different than

0:11:18.850 --> 0:11:22.370
<v Speaker 3>Chuck two. And the reason I emphasize this is because

0:11:22.410 --> 0:11:26.089
<v Speaker 3>when we lump it all together, patients can make decisions

0:11:26.130 --> 0:11:28.010
<v Speaker 3>that may not make sense for them. So it's really

0:11:28.050 --> 0:11:32.530
<v Speaker 3>important to get gene specific information. BRSA one and two

0:11:32.770 --> 0:11:36.809
<v Speaker 3>related cancers generally do occur earlier. The median onset of

0:11:36.850 --> 0:11:40.370
<v Speaker 3>the cancers is in the early forties. But you're right

0:11:40.410 --> 0:11:43.170
<v Speaker 3>that these tumors for BARSA one and two do seem

0:11:43.210 --> 0:11:46.650
<v Speaker 3>to be more sensitive to chemotherapy, and so specifically, an

0:11:46.689 --> 0:11:50.570
<v Speaker 3>ovarian cancer outcome is better with ovarian cancer if you

0:11:50.650 --> 0:11:53.650
<v Speaker 3>have a br SA one art mutation. In breast cancer,

0:11:53.770 --> 0:11:57.370
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of complicated because of the different types of

0:11:57.689 --> 0:12:01.290
<v Speaker 3>breast cancer, but in ovarian cancer that prognosis is clearly

0:12:01.450 --> 0:12:04.209
<v Speaker 3>better if you have a BRSA one on mutation. So

0:12:04.250 --> 0:12:07.570
<v Speaker 3>the reason people with cancer should be tested is because

0:12:07.610 --> 0:12:10.570
<v Speaker 3>we have drugs available that we can give them that

0:12:10.650 --> 0:12:15.010
<v Speaker 3>will make their cancer do better. Every single person with

0:12:15.130 --> 0:12:19.770
<v Speaker 3>ovarian cancer needs to have testing. Every single person with

0:12:19.809 --> 0:12:25.090
<v Speaker 3>pancreatic cancer, with metastatic prostate cancer. That's enough. We don't

0:12:25.130 --> 0:12:27.690
<v Speaker 3>have to think for a minute about family history. Those

0:12:27.730 --> 0:12:33.050
<v Speaker 3>are sufficient for people to get genetic testing for breast cancer. Absolutely,

0:12:33.090 --> 0:12:36.689
<v Speaker 3>anyone under fifty and more recently sort of anyone under

0:12:36.770 --> 0:12:40.930
<v Speaker 3>sixty five is a candidate for genetic testing, and anyone

0:12:40.970 --> 0:12:43.929
<v Speaker 3>with a certain type of breast cancer called triple negative

0:12:43.970 --> 0:12:47.929
<v Speaker 3>breast cancer should get genetic testing. We should not leave

0:12:48.050 --> 0:12:51.410
<v Speaker 3>a single person in those categories behind. They should all

0:12:51.410 --> 0:12:55.490
<v Speaker 3>get genetic testing. At big academic medical centers. We're doing

0:12:55.530 --> 0:12:57.970
<v Speaker 3>better and better. We keep track of our metrics, and

0:12:58.010 --> 0:13:00.650
<v Speaker 3>we're at over eighty percent in any of those, but

0:13:00.770 --> 0:13:05.410
<v Speaker 3>across the country those numbers are terrible. For ovarian cancer,

0:13:05.450 --> 0:13:09.290
<v Speaker 3>it's under fifty percent, and it's hard to imagine why

0:13:09.330 --> 0:13:14.010
<v Speaker 3>that is, because it actually helps us make decisions about therapy.

0:13:14.450 --> 0:13:16.650
<v Speaker 3>So if anyone out there that's listening, if you fall

0:13:16.689 --> 0:13:18.890
<v Speaker 3>into any of those groups, or any of your family

0:13:18.890 --> 0:13:21.930
<v Speaker 3>members DOE, you absolutely should get genic testing.

0:13:23.130 --> 0:13:29.290
<v Speaker 1>Let's face it, getting a cancer diagnosis is devastating, but

0:13:29.330 --> 0:13:33.530
<v Speaker 1>a better understanding of any underlying genetic cause can significantly

0:13:33.650 --> 0:13:39.730
<v Speaker 1>improve treatment outcomes coming up. If genetic testing can save lives,

0:13:40.170 --> 0:13:44.690
<v Speaker 1>why are we all getting it done? Decoding women's health

0:13:44.689 --> 0:13:58.730
<v Speaker 1>will be right back. Welcome back to Decoding women's health.

0:13:59.130 --> 0:14:01.849
<v Speaker 1>You might be surprised to learn, as I was, that

0:14:01.890 --> 0:14:05.250
<v Speaker 1>even when genetic testing is offered, many people are slow

0:14:05.250 --> 0:14:08.370
<v Speaker 1>to take it up. Doctor Susan Donchek has been engaged

0:14:08.370 --> 0:14:10.370
<v Speaker 1>in some really important work around this.

0:14:11.210 --> 0:14:15.890
<v Speaker 3>Increasingly, there's discussion about what we call population screening, which

0:14:15.970 --> 0:14:18.770
<v Speaker 3>is offering everybody if you will be or s one

0:14:18.809 --> 0:14:22.410
<v Speaker 3>and two testing. The complications with that is that it's

0:14:22.490 --> 0:14:27.090
<v Speaker 3>not entirely clear how many people really want to do

0:14:27.170 --> 0:14:30.970
<v Speaker 3>that right now, and also how we actually will get

0:14:30.970 --> 0:14:35.570
<v Speaker 3>it done. We've done some studies to offer genetic testing

0:14:36.010 --> 0:14:39.210
<v Speaker 3>to if you will, anyone who's of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.

0:14:39.730 --> 0:14:42.490
<v Speaker 3>The uptake wasn't as much as we thought. We did

0:14:42.490 --> 0:14:45.530
<v Speaker 3>a study a few years ago testing about four thousand

0:14:45.610 --> 0:14:47.930
<v Speaker 3>individuals in that situation, and they didn't have to have

0:14:47.970 --> 0:14:51.050
<v Speaker 3>any family history. We thought it would take about three

0:14:51.090 --> 0:14:54.010
<v Speaker 3>months to test four thousand people in for cities, and

0:14:54.050 --> 0:14:56.810
<v Speaker 3>it took us three years. And other data have really

0:14:56.810 --> 0:15:01.050
<v Speaker 3>suggested that it matters if your doctor recommends this to you.

0:15:01.410 --> 0:15:03.570
<v Speaker 3>And this is why this is so important to get out.

0:15:03.570 --> 0:15:06.730
<v Speaker 3>We need to educate patients people out there in the

0:15:06.770 --> 0:15:10.330
<v Speaker 3>community about the potential risk, and we also need to

0:15:10.450 --> 0:15:13.770
<v Speaker 3>educate for to have a really low threshold to do

0:15:13.890 --> 0:15:17.890
<v Speaker 3>genetic testing if there's a family history or again if

0:15:17.890 --> 0:15:20.970
<v Speaker 3>people are of Ashkenazi Jewish to sent we're just going

0:15:21.010 --> 0:15:24.850
<v Speaker 3>to the electronic health record and pulling out individuals who've

0:15:24.850 --> 0:15:27.610
<v Speaker 3>told their providers that they have a family history and

0:15:27.690 --> 0:15:31.450
<v Speaker 3>sending them messages saying you should consider getting genetic testing.

0:15:31.890 --> 0:15:35.450
<v Speaker 3>And just in our preliminary data, just that simple effort,

0:15:35.810 --> 0:15:39.450
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent of people schedule appointments to get genetic testing.

0:15:39.570 --> 0:15:42.050
<v Speaker 3>So people are interested, they just don't know about it.

0:15:42.490 --> 0:15:46.410
<v Speaker 3>I think that we can use simple solutions of asking

0:15:46.450 --> 0:15:49.130
<v Speaker 3>people at the right time and then immediately referring them

0:15:49.130 --> 0:15:52.930
<v Speaker 3>to genetics. Our primary care doctors have a lot to do,

0:15:53.410 --> 0:15:56.890
<v Speaker 3>so this idea that we can expect them to also

0:15:57.330 --> 0:16:01.050
<v Speaker 3>do a great screening for these things and get people tested.

0:16:01.930 --> 0:16:03.890
<v Speaker 3>It might happen, but it's a lot we need to

0:16:03.930 --> 0:16:05.170
<v Speaker 3>help our primary care doctors.

0:16:05.410 --> 0:16:08.330
<v Speaker 1>About what age did you start to consider genetic testing?

0:16:08.610 --> 0:16:10.010
<v Speaker 1>Twenty two to twenty five.

0:16:10.850 --> 0:16:14.890
<v Speaker 3>There's really two reasons to test. The first reason is

0:16:14.930 --> 0:16:18.410
<v Speaker 3>because you're going to change your medical decision making, and

0:16:18.970 --> 0:16:22.330
<v Speaker 3>for most cancer susceptibility genes, you know, we don't start

0:16:22.370 --> 0:16:26.050
<v Speaker 3>doing anything different medically until age twenty five. That's when

0:16:26.050 --> 0:16:30.410
<v Speaker 3>we start. For instance, restmeris for BERC one mutation cares. Now,

0:16:30.410 --> 0:16:32.970
<v Speaker 3>there are sometimes where there's a particularly early onset in

0:16:33.010 --> 0:16:35.730
<v Speaker 3>the family where we would potentially do it earlier, but

0:16:35.810 --> 0:16:38.570
<v Speaker 3>in general, we have twenty five in our heads. There's

0:16:38.610 --> 0:16:42.090
<v Speaker 3>another reason to get genetic testing for BRSA one two

0:16:42.130 --> 0:16:46.370
<v Speaker 3>and other cancer sceptibility genes, and that's for reproductive decision making,

0:16:47.050 --> 0:16:51.290
<v Speaker 3>and that takes on two different pieces. One pre implantation

0:16:51.450 --> 0:16:55.050
<v Speaker 3>genetic testing, So this is when individuals go through in

0:16:55.210 --> 0:17:00.370
<v Speaker 3>vitro fertilization, screen the embryos and only reimplant the embryos

0:17:00.650 --> 0:17:04.010
<v Speaker 3>that don't have the BRC one or BRC two mutation. Well,

0:17:04.050 --> 0:17:06.970
<v Speaker 3>some people are not interested in this, but this technology

0:17:07.330 --> 0:17:10.730
<v Speaker 3>is available. So there are times that you know, women

0:17:10.770 --> 0:17:14.130
<v Speaker 3>are interested in starting their families before their twenty five

0:17:14.690 --> 0:17:19.130
<v Speaker 3>So that's another reason to consider screening. In addition, several

0:17:19.290 --> 0:17:21.530
<v Speaker 3>of the genes that we're talking about, and I'll give

0:17:21.570 --> 0:17:25.649
<v Speaker 3>br C two as an example. In rare situations, a

0:17:25.730 --> 0:17:29.170
<v Speaker 3>baby can inherit two bad copies of ber C two,

0:17:29.330 --> 0:17:32.649
<v Speaker 3>one from each parent, and when that occurs, there's a

0:17:32.690 --> 0:17:35.169
<v Speaker 3>twenty five percent chance that the baby will have a

0:17:35.210 --> 0:17:39.449
<v Speaker 3>condition called fincnianemia, which is a serious medical condition. So

0:17:39.490 --> 0:17:42.649
<v Speaker 3>these are all reasons to consider genetic testing sort of

0:17:42.650 --> 0:17:44.969
<v Speaker 3>at the time you're starting to think about your family

0:17:45.450 --> 0:17:48.290
<v Speaker 3>or medical decision making, and so that matters for the

0:17:48.330 --> 0:17:50.929
<v Speaker 3>men too, because in general, we don't really start much

0:17:51.010 --> 0:17:54.530
<v Speaker 3>for men in terms of their personal screening until closer

0:17:54.570 --> 0:17:58.330
<v Speaker 3>to forty, but when they're ready to start having their children.

0:17:58.530 --> 0:18:00.970
<v Speaker 3>If one of their parents has a BERC mutation, then

0:18:01.129 --> 0:18:04.530
<v Speaker 3>we certainly talk about screening before they start having their kids.

0:18:04.730 --> 0:18:07.169
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's really important that people know that

0:18:07.290 --> 0:18:10.010
<v Speaker 3>even if their doctor doesn't bring it up, that it

0:18:10.129 --> 0:18:12.650
<v Speaker 3>still may be real to them, and that they can

0:18:12.690 --> 0:18:15.409
<v Speaker 3>either talk to their doctors about it they're gynecologists, a

0:18:15.490 --> 0:18:19.609
<v Speaker 3>primary care doctor, or see a genetic counselor for testing.

0:18:20.050 --> 0:18:23.050
<v Speaker 3>There are also direct to consumer approaches to genetic testing,

0:18:23.090 --> 0:18:26.850
<v Speaker 3>where people can just go online and order the tests themselves.

0:18:26.890 --> 0:18:29.930
<v Speaker 3>There are pros and cons to those approaches, but right

0:18:29.970 --> 0:18:32.530
<v Speaker 3>now you know it's all hands on deck. There are

0:18:32.609 --> 0:18:35.129
<v Speaker 3>multiple ways to get this testing done, and we should

0:18:35.330 --> 0:18:40.850
<v Speaker 3>make sure that people know about all of them.

0:18:41.170 --> 0:18:44.249
<v Speaker 1>I took the direct to consumer route myself. There are

0:18:44.290 --> 0:18:47.050
<v Speaker 1>plenty of companies that offer easy to use at home

0:18:47.090 --> 0:18:49.210
<v Speaker 1>testing kits that you can just mail in and get

0:18:49.210 --> 0:18:53.450
<v Speaker 1>the results online. The benefit is that it's quick, easy,

0:18:53.570 --> 0:18:57.490
<v Speaker 1>and relatively inexpensive. The problem is is that you don't

0:18:57.490 --> 0:19:01.250
<v Speaker 1>have guidance and support necessarily that comes with getting tested

0:19:01.290 --> 0:19:04.730
<v Speaker 1>with a personal physician. So if you go this route,

0:19:04.930 --> 0:19:09.770
<v Speaker 1>I strongly advise connecting with the genetic counselor beforehand. Even

0:19:09.810 --> 0:19:11.970
<v Speaker 1>if you think that you're prepared to learn that you

0:19:12.050 --> 0:19:16.170
<v Speaker 1>carry a genetic mutation, actually getting that result can still

0:19:16.250 --> 0:19:20.410
<v Speaker 1>pack a huge emotional punch. Having an expert in your

0:19:20.530 --> 0:19:23.770
<v Speaker 1>corner helps you understand what the result means and what

0:19:23.890 --> 0:19:27.810
<v Speaker 1>steps to take next. The National Society of Genetic Counselors

0:19:27.850 --> 0:19:30.649
<v Speaker 1>has a registry where you can find professionals to guide you.

0:19:31.330 --> 0:19:34.609
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, in an ideal world, everyone would be

0:19:34.650 --> 0:19:38.810
<v Speaker 1>guided through genetic testing in person by a physician they trust,

0:19:39.369 --> 0:19:41.330
<v Speaker 1>but one of the barriers to this sort of testing

0:19:41.369 --> 0:19:46.410
<v Speaker 1>for many patients is cost. In some cases, patients can

0:19:46.450 --> 0:19:49.570
<v Speaker 1>get the testing paid for by their insurance. The National

0:19:49.609 --> 0:19:53.490
<v Speaker 1>Comprehensive Cancer Network provides guidelines for testing that include the

0:19:53.490 --> 0:19:57.330
<v Speaker 1>big factors that we've discussed today, If you're of Ashkenizi

0:19:57.410 --> 0:20:00.570
<v Speaker 1>Jewish descent, if you've had blood relatives with a confirmed

0:20:00.609 --> 0:20:03.810
<v Speaker 1>cancer causing gene variant, or if you or a family

0:20:03.850 --> 0:20:07.010
<v Speaker 1>member has a personal history of a rare or multiple cancers.

0:20:08.490 --> 0:20:11.570
<v Speaker 1>I asked doctor Domchek, what about patients are women who

0:20:11.609 --> 0:20:13.210
<v Speaker 1>don't fall into these categories.

0:20:13.650 --> 0:20:18.210
<v Speaker 3>If people don't meet those guidelines at most labs, there

0:20:18.250 --> 0:20:23.050
<v Speaker 3>are still self pay options that cost about three hundred dollars.

0:20:23.690 --> 0:20:26.690
<v Speaker 3>But I will say that navigating this can sometimes be

0:20:26.770 --> 0:20:30.290
<v Speaker 3>frustrating and complex for patients. So I think that when

0:20:30.330 --> 0:20:33.570
<v Speaker 3>people meet clear criteria for JANK testing, everything goes through

0:20:33.730 --> 0:20:36.970
<v Speaker 3>very well. If people are more on the bubble, self

0:20:37.010 --> 0:20:39.770
<v Speaker 3>pay options are actually going to be cheaper than if

0:20:39.810 --> 0:20:41.810
<v Speaker 3>you will going through insurance where it may not be

0:20:42.129 --> 0:20:42.770
<v Speaker 3>covered at.

0:20:42.650 --> 0:20:45.050
<v Speaker 1>All, for people who may not be able to afford

0:20:45.050 --> 0:20:47.449
<v Speaker 1>the three hundred dollars. Are you aware of any support

0:20:47.490 --> 0:20:49.010
<v Speaker 1>services for these individuals?

0:20:49.770 --> 0:20:54.250
<v Speaker 3>Yes, there are, and oftentimes the labs have held there

0:20:54.250 --> 0:20:57.530
<v Speaker 3>are various programs that exist. It does get a little

0:20:57.570 --> 0:21:01.050
<v Speaker 3>bit complicated if people do not have insurance at all.

0:21:01.290 --> 0:21:03.850
<v Speaker 3>It can be tricky because even if we could get

0:21:03.890 --> 0:21:06.970
<v Speaker 3>someone free testing, we're not able to then get them

0:21:07.010 --> 0:21:09.889
<v Speaker 3>the medical care that they need. So that is a

0:21:10.010 --> 0:21:13.770
<v Speaker 3>big gap right now. Is people who are completely uninsured.

0:21:14.210 --> 0:21:18.330
<v Speaker 3>We really do struggle because even if we could test them,

0:21:18.690 --> 0:21:21.210
<v Speaker 3>we would not really be able to care for them,

0:21:21.330 --> 0:21:25.890
<v Speaker 3>and that doesn't feel great. So hopefully all insurance problems

0:21:25.890 --> 0:21:27.609
<v Speaker 3>in the United States will be fixed and we won't

0:21:27.609 --> 0:21:29.129
<v Speaker 3>have to worry about it. But I'm not going to

0:21:29.170 --> 0:21:30.490
<v Speaker 3>hold my breath right now for that.

0:21:30.970 --> 0:21:33.649
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of upside to genetic testing allowing you

0:21:33.690 --> 0:21:35.330
<v Speaker 1>to do some planning, and we'll move into that in

0:21:35.369 --> 0:21:35.850
<v Speaker 1>just a moment.

0:21:36.210 --> 0:21:41.770
<v Speaker 3>Any downsides, Sure, this is information that can be extremely

0:21:41.810 --> 0:21:45.929
<v Speaker 3>difficult to learn. I had a physician once tell me

0:21:46.369 --> 0:21:49.770
<v Speaker 3>she felt that the genetic testing both saved your life

0:21:49.770 --> 0:21:51.689
<v Speaker 3>had ruined it. And she didn't really mean ruin it,

0:21:51.730 --> 0:21:54.770
<v Speaker 3>but she just at dealing with this information making the

0:21:54.770 --> 0:21:57.730
<v Speaker 3>decisions she had to make well really difficult. And so,

0:21:58.369 --> 0:22:00.490
<v Speaker 3>first of all, we always like to emphasize that when

0:22:00.530 --> 0:22:03.810
<v Speaker 3>you get your genetic test result back, if it's positive,

0:22:04.250 --> 0:22:06.850
<v Speaker 3>that was always there. You were positive from the time

0:22:06.850 --> 0:22:09.050
<v Speaker 3>you were born. You know, you didn't change on a

0:22:09.129 --> 0:22:11.649
<v Speaker 3>dime day to day. We also like to talk about

0:22:11.690 --> 0:22:14.609
<v Speaker 3>lifetime risks. So when we talk about lifetime risk of

0:22:14.690 --> 0:22:17.650
<v Speaker 3>cancer as highly seventy percent, that's not your risk tomorrow,

0:22:17.890 --> 0:22:20.290
<v Speaker 3>that's your risk over your whole life. But you can

0:22:20.330 --> 0:22:25.010
<v Speaker 3>imagine that feeling getting that information is really overwhelming, and

0:22:25.050 --> 0:22:28.250
<v Speaker 3>so our job is to try to counsel people through it.

0:22:28.369 --> 0:22:30.930
<v Speaker 3>To focus on the immediate next steps of what needs

0:22:30.970 --> 0:22:35.210
<v Speaker 3>to happen. Currently, the only effective strategy for a varying

0:22:35.330 --> 0:22:40.609
<v Speaker 3>cancer risk reduction is early surgery, so premenopausal to me

0:22:40.730 --> 0:22:43.369
<v Speaker 3>removable of your ovaries before you or otherwise we go

0:22:43.410 --> 0:22:48.290
<v Speaker 3>into menopause, and that has significant issues for women. We

0:22:48.330 --> 0:22:50.330
<v Speaker 3>try to get people through it as best we can,

0:22:50.690 --> 0:22:52.770
<v Speaker 3>but it's still fun to have to consider these things

0:22:53.210 --> 0:22:57.730
<v Speaker 3>and then deciding whether to continue to screen or do astectomy.

0:22:58.050 --> 0:23:01.449
<v Speaker 3>That can be challenging for parents to get tested. We

0:23:01.490 --> 0:23:05.129
<v Speaker 3>see a lot that when individuals get tested that have children,

0:23:05.530 --> 0:23:09.689
<v Speaker 3>they can feel very sad and sometimes guilty about the

0:23:09.730 --> 0:23:12.929
<v Speaker 3>potential that they've passed this belong to their children. Of course,

0:23:13.010 --> 0:23:15.450
<v Speaker 3>we all pass along good and bad genes to our kids.

0:23:15.490 --> 0:23:17.170
<v Speaker 3>In this case, you just kind of know what it is.

0:23:17.450 --> 0:23:19.650
<v Speaker 3>But these are real issues that we know that people

0:23:19.770 --> 0:23:22.170
<v Speaker 3>struggle with, and our job is to try to help

0:23:22.170 --> 0:23:25.450
<v Speaker 3>people through this time and really focus on the fact

0:23:25.450 --> 0:23:28.530
<v Speaker 3>that this information can be life saving, but at the

0:23:28.530 --> 0:23:31.530
<v Speaker 3>same time acknowledge the grief that's involved in having to

0:23:31.530 --> 0:23:32.650
<v Speaker 3>make these decisions.

0:23:33.170 --> 0:23:36.090
<v Speaker 1>So I'm diagnosed with the bracket one mutation in twenty

0:23:36.090 --> 0:23:40.050
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, what does taking action look like as a

0:23:40.090 --> 0:23:42.170
<v Speaker 1>younger woman, as a primin apausal woman.

0:23:42.810 --> 0:23:46.369
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and so in twenty twenty five, there are clear

0:23:46.490 --> 0:23:50.770
<v Speaker 3>things that women can do, but we are actively hoping

0:23:51.010 --> 0:23:53.850
<v Speaker 3>for better options. So right now, at twenty five, all

0:23:53.930 --> 0:23:56.770
<v Speaker 3>someone needs to do is get a breast MRI once

0:23:56.770 --> 0:24:00.010
<v Speaker 3>a year. The risk of developing breast cancer prior to

0:24:00.090 --> 0:24:02.450
<v Speaker 3>age thirty when you're a twenty five year old beer

0:24:02.490 --> 0:24:05.170
<v Speaker 3>C one mutation carries less than five percent, but that's

0:24:05.170 --> 0:24:08.369
<v Speaker 3>still much higher than an average woman. So brust emri

0:24:08.570 --> 0:24:11.970
<v Speaker 3>once a year. At thirty, we have to mammogram, so

0:24:12.010 --> 0:24:16.330
<v Speaker 3>that every six months you're getting an MRI or a mammogram. Unfortunately,

0:24:16.369 --> 0:24:20.810
<v Speaker 3>between age thirty five and forty women should undergo remove

0:24:20.850 --> 0:24:23.889
<v Speaker 3>all the pilopian tubes and ovaries. So this is for

0:24:23.970 --> 0:24:27.250
<v Speaker 3>bars one now. Risk reducing mass tec to me or

0:24:27.290 --> 0:24:30.730
<v Speaker 3>prophylactic masks tec to me can be done at any

0:24:30.730 --> 0:24:32.930
<v Speaker 3>time with an individual with a br c in one

0:24:33.010 --> 0:24:36.409
<v Speaker 3>or two or other gene mutations. Some women are not

0:24:36.490 --> 0:24:39.250
<v Speaker 3>interested in mask tec tomy at all and will continue screening,

0:24:39.530 --> 0:24:42.170
<v Speaker 3>so we like to have an honest conversation about their

0:24:42.210 --> 0:24:46.850
<v Speaker 3>goals about body image, about sexuality, and other quality of

0:24:46.930 --> 0:24:49.609
<v Speaker 3>life issues as people make their decisions.

0:24:50.129 --> 0:24:52.889
<v Speaker 1>What about just removal of the pelopian tubes alone, without

0:24:52.930 --> 0:24:55.290
<v Speaker 1>removing the ovaries. Is that data mature enough for us

0:24:55.330 --> 0:24:56.650
<v Speaker 1>to make that recommendation now?

0:24:57.369 --> 0:24:59.330
<v Speaker 3>Not? Yeah, but boy, I want it to be.

0:24:59.690 --> 0:24:59.810
<v Speaker 1>So.

0:25:00.129 --> 0:25:02.770
<v Speaker 3>The theory behind this, as you're alluding to, is that

0:25:02.810 --> 0:25:07.010
<v Speaker 3>there's data that many ovarian cancers arise in the philopian

0:25:07.090 --> 0:25:12.490
<v Speaker 3>tube and that potentially if we just remove the philippian tubes,

0:25:12.570 --> 0:25:15.450
<v Speaker 3>we can decrease the risk of ovarian cancer. And there's

0:25:15.490 --> 0:25:18.730
<v Speaker 3>some interesting sort of data out there, including a study

0:25:18.770 --> 0:25:21.889
<v Speaker 3>that's being done in British Columbia where every woman who's

0:25:21.930 --> 0:25:26.370
<v Speaker 3>coming in to have her tubes tied just has their

0:25:26.410 --> 0:25:30.330
<v Speaker 3>tubes removed, and again the very early data suggests that

0:25:30.330 --> 0:25:32.730
<v Speaker 3>there's a decrease in ovarian cancer risk. We call that

0:25:32.770 --> 0:25:36.090
<v Speaker 3>an opportunistic salve in theectimy. So that I think nobody

0:25:36.129 --> 0:25:38.290
<v Speaker 3>should have their tubes tied anymore, you know, in the

0:25:38.330 --> 0:25:41.209
<v Speaker 3>general population or beer sacres, they should have their tubes

0:25:41.250 --> 0:25:44.209
<v Speaker 3>removed if they're using that for their family planning and

0:25:44.290 --> 0:25:48.730
<v Speaker 3>first control. The question becomes in beer sacres, how certain

0:25:48.770 --> 0:25:51.810
<v Speaker 3>are we about this? Because again, ovarian cancer has no

0:25:51.890 --> 0:25:55.730
<v Speaker 3>effective screening and Most women who are diagnosed with ovarian

0:25:55.770 --> 0:25:58.090
<v Speaker 3>cancer are diagnosed at elite stage, and most women with

0:25:58.290 --> 0:26:00.929
<v Speaker 3>a late stage ovarian cancer die of their disease. So

0:26:01.050 --> 0:26:03.450
<v Speaker 3>this is where the challenge is. The studies are ongoing,

0:26:03.970 --> 0:26:06.810
<v Speaker 3>but when will we feel strong enough to recommend that

0:26:06.850 --> 0:26:10.010
<v Speaker 3>as a routine care when we know how bad ovarian

0:26:10.010 --> 0:26:13.930
<v Speaker 3>cancer is. Right now, again, we don't have data sufficient

0:26:13.970 --> 0:26:17.409
<v Speaker 3>to tell people that they can avoid having their ovaries removed.

0:26:17.410 --> 0:26:19.570
<v Speaker 3>So what we're seeing more and more of is that

0:26:19.730 --> 0:26:21.889
<v Speaker 3>a b r C one Karen might have her twos

0:26:21.930 --> 0:26:24.650
<v Speaker 3>removed at thirty five and then her ovaries removed at forty.

0:26:24.850 --> 0:26:27.490
<v Speaker 3>For a br C two care, that's more like forty

0:26:27.530 --> 0:26:28.210
<v Speaker 3>and forty five.

0:26:28.570 --> 0:26:29.850
<v Speaker 1>When do you think that data is going to be

0:26:29.890 --> 0:26:32.609
<v Speaker 1>mature five years, ten years, twenty years.

0:26:32.930 --> 0:26:36.530
<v Speaker 3>Here's my worry that if people are getting their twos

0:26:36.609 --> 0:26:39.169
<v Speaker 3>removed at thirty five and then they still get their

0:26:39.210 --> 0:26:42.690
<v Speaker 3>ovaries removed at forty one, we won't have the data.

0:26:43.369 --> 0:26:46.369
<v Speaker 3>People have to keep their ovaries in long enough for

0:26:46.490 --> 0:26:49.530
<v Speaker 3>us to prove it works right sort of past forty

0:26:49.530 --> 0:26:51.890
<v Speaker 3>five or even un till each fifty. And I think

0:26:52.010 --> 0:26:54.170
<v Speaker 3>this is the tension I always have in the clinic

0:26:54.770 --> 0:26:57.810
<v Speaker 3>I'm really a clinician. First, I'm taking care of my patients.

0:26:58.090 --> 0:27:01.410
<v Speaker 3>I'm a bit of a researcher. Second, for my patients,

0:27:01.530 --> 0:27:03.530
<v Speaker 3>I don't want her to keep her overrays in. But

0:27:03.690 --> 0:27:07.050
<v Speaker 3>from a research perspective, and less enough people continue to

0:27:07.129 --> 0:27:08.890
<v Speaker 3>keep their ovaries, we're not going to have the data.

0:27:08.970 --> 0:27:11.010
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's going to be a little bit tricky,

0:27:11.290 --> 0:27:13.369
<v Speaker 3>and it might be a little bit entirely.

0:27:15.410 --> 0:27:17.689
<v Speaker 1>Once I found out that I was a Brocco one carrier,

0:27:18.090 --> 0:27:22.170
<v Speaker 1>the decision to remove my uterus, ovaries and fallopian tubes

0:27:22.170 --> 0:27:25.770
<v Speaker 1>for me was straightforward. I was older, I'd already had

0:27:25.850 --> 0:27:31.330
<v Speaker 1>children and experienced menopause. For younger women, making the same

0:27:31.410 --> 0:27:35.410
<v Speaker 1>choice means two things. First, no further chance to conceive,

0:27:36.090 --> 0:27:40.369
<v Speaker 1>and second, entering menopause overnight. These are big decisions and

0:27:40.410 --> 0:27:43.330
<v Speaker 1>surgery might not be the best course of action for everyone.

0:27:44.690 --> 0:27:47.290
<v Speaker 1>When we come back from the break, we'll discuss other

0:27:47.330 --> 0:27:50.850
<v Speaker 1>preventive strategies for women to lower their risk, and we'll

0:27:50.890 --> 0:27:55.010
<v Speaker 1>talk about some groundbreaking new treatments on the horizon. More

0:27:55.090 --> 0:27:58.290
<v Speaker 1>from my conversation with Darja Susan Domchek in just a moment.

0:28:11.650 --> 0:28:14.369
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the show. I'm speaking with doctor Susan

0:28:14.450 --> 0:28:18.209
<v Speaker 1>damchek All about genetic testing. Her work is at the

0:28:18.250 --> 0:28:22.010
<v Speaker 1>forefront of cancer prevention, cutting edge strategies that seek to

0:28:22.010 --> 0:28:25.490
<v Speaker 1>stop cancer in its earliest stages. But before we get

0:28:25.490 --> 0:28:28.449
<v Speaker 1>to that, I wanted to ask doctor Domck about some

0:28:28.609 --> 0:28:33.250
<v Speaker 1>newer methods for identifying genetic risk. Let's move into just

0:28:33.290 --> 0:28:35.570
<v Speaker 1>the different types of genetic testing that are out there

0:28:35.609 --> 0:28:39.050
<v Speaker 1>now in terms of polygenic risk scores and whole genome sequencing.

0:28:39.570 --> 0:28:42.290
<v Speaker 1>Can you speak to these newer forms of genetic testing

0:28:42.330 --> 0:28:42.770
<v Speaker 1>a little bit?

0:28:42.930 --> 0:28:46.330
<v Speaker 3>Sure, So let's start with polygenic risk scores. And but

0:28:46.450 --> 0:28:50.850
<v Speaker 3>that is a single alteration in FUERCA one increases your

0:28:50.930 --> 0:28:53.610
<v Speaker 3>risk of breast cancer by up to seventy percent. It

0:28:53.650 --> 0:28:56.650
<v Speaker 3>increases your risk google veering cancer up to forty five percent.

0:28:57.250 --> 0:29:03.170
<v Speaker 3>Polygenic risk scores look at small, little changes throughout your DNA.

0:29:03.690 --> 0:29:07.330
<v Speaker 3>The challenges of polygenic risk scores are that they're very

0:29:07.410 --> 0:29:11.610
<v Speaker 3>dependent on ethnicity, and so in the United States when

0:29:11.650 --> 0:29:15.970
<v Speaker 3>people are often sort of ethnically diverse, we haven't really

0:29:16.050 --> 0:29:19.370
<v Speaker 3>figured it all out yet. Okay, So moving on a

0:29:19.410 --> 0:29:22.970
<v Speaker 3>whole genome. So what is that? So, just as a reminder,

0:29:23.210 --> 0:29:26.730
<v Speaker 3>we have a certain number of genes over twenty thousand.

0:29:26.770 --> 0:29:30.250
<v Speaker 3>But when we test for genetics astibility, what we usually

0:29:30.370 --> 0:29:34.370
<v Speaker 3>do is focus on genes known to be associated with cancer.

0:29:34.450 --> 0:29:36.290
<v Speaker 3>So that can be a twenty five gene panel or

0:29:36.290 --> 0:29:39.050
<v Speaker 3>an eighty gene panel or something like that. There is

0:29:39.130 --> 0:29:42.370
<v Speaker 3>an approach that you can take called whole xome sequencing,

0:29:42.650 --> 0:29:46.530
<v Speaker 3>which just sequences the known genes, but it sequences all

0:29:46.610 --> 0:29:50.290
<v Speaker 3>the nome genes. And then there's whole genome sequencing, which

0:29:50.410 --> 0:29:54.490
<v Speaker 3>sequences the whole genome. If you do a whole xome sequencing,

0:29:54.850 --> 0:29:57.890
<v Speaker 3>you will find stuff. Most of us have stuff. The

0:29:58.050 --> 0:30:02.050
<v Speaker 3>question then becomes does that stuff matter? And it might

0:30:02.210 --> 0:30:05.570
<v Speaker 3>seem obvious that that stuff should matter, right that if

0:30:05.610 --> 0:30:09.050
<v Speaker 3>you find something that it obviously should matter. But it

0:30:09.130 --> 0:30:13.250
<v Speaker 3>turns out that genetics is not that simple as we

0:30:13.370 --> 0:30:16.970
<v Speaker 3>sometimes say. Genetics is not destiny. Just because you have

0:30:17.130 --> 0:30:20.250
<v Speaker 3>an alteration in some finding doesn't mean that you're going

0:30:20.330 --> 0:30:22.530
<v Speaker 3>to get that condition. And there are a lot of

0:30:22.650 --> 0:30:26.370
<v Speaker 3>genes where the risks associated with those genetic mutations aren't

0:30:26.450 --> 0:30:30.250
<v Speaker 3>very high. An example I'll give is something called SDHA

0:30:30.930 --> 0:30:34.330
<v Speaker 3>alterations in that gene predispose you to certain types of

0:30:34.490 --> 0:30:37.450
<v Speaker 3>rare tumors, but the risk of that happening if you

0:30:37.530 --> 0:30:41.490
<v Speaker 3>have an SDHA mutation is less than five percent. So

0:30:41.690 --> 0:30:45.490
<v Speaker 3>if we identify someone with that, generally speaking, we don't

0:30:45.610 --> 0:30:48.770
<v Speaker 3>do anything about it unless there's a family history consistent

0:30:48.850 --> 0:30:51.410
<v Speaker 3>with it. I'm only using that as an example to

0:30:51.530 --> 0:30:54.250
<v Speaker 3>show how you can get into trouble with things like

0:30:54.330 --> 0:30:57.330
<v Speaker 3>collexm and whole genome sequencing, which is we're going to

0:30:57.370 --> 0:31:00.130
<v Speaker 3>find a lot of stuff, but we won't necessarily know

0:31:00.330 --> 0:31:02.770
<v Speaker 3>exactly how to use it for that individual patient.

0:31:03.090 --> 0:31:06.090
<v Speaker 1>Let's move into prevention strategies, right for the woman who's

0:31:06.130 --> 0:31:10.010
<v Speaker 1>not ready for prophylactic surgery, undergoing some screening, birth control pills,

0:31:10.330 --> 0:31:13.130
<v Speaker 1>even life style. What are the impact of these strategies

0:31:13.170 --> 0:31:15.250
<v Speaker 1>for women who carry brocka wan and Brocketo mutation.

0:31:15.690 --> 0:31:18.450
<v Speaker 3>I think lifestyle is you know, the effects in berca

0:31:18.530 --> 0:31:20.930
<v Speaker 3>in one and two mutation carriers may be modest, just

0:31:21.050 --> 0:31:23.970
<v Speaker 3>because the genetics stuff is driving a lot of the risk.

0:31:24.210 --> 0:31:29.930
<v Speaker 3>Having said that, healthy weight, minimizing alcohol, regular exercise, not smoking,

0:31:30.050 --> 0:31:33.610
<v Speaker 3>these are all excellent things to do for women. There's

0:31:33.770 --> 0:31:36.290
<v Speaker 3>a lot of debate about what safe level of alcohol is,

0:31:36.370 --> 0:31:39.209
<v Speaker 3>but there has been some suggestion that you know, up

0:31:39.290 --> 0:31:41.770
<v Speaker 3>to three drinks a week. The risk is very very low,

0:31:42.490 --> 0:31:44.970
<v Speaker 3>so that's lifestyle always a good thing to do. The

0:31:45.090 --> 0:31:49.530
<v Speaker 3>data for medications such as tamoxifin, loxifen, and another drug

0:31:49.610 --> 0:31:52.490
<v Speaker 3>called exemesting in terms of decreasing the risk of breast

0:31:52.530 --> 0:31:55.810
<v Speaker 3>cancer is limited in beer CA carriers, although it does

0:31:55.930 --> 0:31:58.850
<v Speaker 3>seem like there is an impact in terms of ovarian

0:31:58.930 --> 0:32:03.209
<v Speaker 3>cancer risk reduction. Oral contraceptive pills do seem to decrease

0:32:03.250 --> 0:32:06.130
<v Speaker 3>the risk of a virile cancer. They also do slightly

0:32:06.290 --> 0:32:09.450
<v Speaker 3>increase the risk of breast cancer, so it's a risk

0:32:09.530 --> 0:32:15.450
<v Speaker 3>benefit decision. People have endometriosis or terrible heavy bleeding or

0:32:15.850 --> 0:32:18.530
<v Speaker 3>just really terrible cycles in general, and birth control pills

0:32:18.570 --> 0:32:21.770
<v Speaker 3>are really helpful or they need birth control, and particularly

0:32:21.850 --> 0:32:23.930
<v Speaker 3>in this day and age in the United States, it's

0:32:23.970 --> 0:32:26.530
<v Speaker 3>really important that people have access to affective birth control.

0:32:27.370 --> 0:32:31.130
<v Speaker 3>So the birth control discussion with the risk benefit profile

0:32:31.250 --> 0:32:34.610
<v Speaker 3>just needs to be individualized, so no easy answers there.

0:32:35.050 --> 0:32:38.890
<v Speaker 3>We're obviously really interested in other approaches, so this new

0:32:39.010 --> 0:32:42.250
<v Speaker 3>era of getting people better options is super important.

0:32:42.690 --> 0:32:46.130
<v Speaker 1>Screening strategies, so breast screening is pretty well established with

0:32:46.330 --> 0:32:52.410
<v Speaker 1>MRI mammogram ultrasound ovarian cancer screening a mind filled anything

0:32:52.490 --> 0:32:53.490
<v Speaker 1>that you're excited about.

0:32:53.810 --> 0:32:56.410
<v Speaker 3>Oh, varian cancer screening, it's just so difficult. As you know,

0:32:56.530 --> 0:33:00.010
<v Speaker 3>we've been through other blood tests in the distant past, overshore,

0:33:00.130 --> 0:33:02.290
<v Speaker 3>overseek over one, and I don't even remember all the

0:33:02.370 --> 0:33:05.130
<v Speaker 3>OVAs that came and went over the years that weren't

0:33:05.130 --> 0:33:08.890
<v Speaker 3>good tests. You know, I think that these new multi

0:33:08.970 --> 0:33:12.850
<v Speaker 3>cancer early detection tests are interesting but as yet unproven

0:33:13.090 --> 0:33:18.610
<v Speaker 3>and ovarying cancer early detection. This is why, unfortunately everyone

0:33:18.730 --> 0:33:23.330
<v Speaker 3>feels so strongly still about removal of the oversease. It's

0:33:23.370 --> 0:33:26.530
<v Speaker 3>because we don't have this well established the issue of

0:33:26.570 --> 0:33:30.130
<v Speaker 3>transnagal ultrasend. They really just don't work very well at all,

0:33:30.650 --> 0:33:33.410
<v Speaker 3>and there's a lot of false positives associated with them

0:33:33.490 --> 0:33:36.890
<v Speaker 3>because pre menopausal women have all sorts of cysts depending

0:33:36.930 --> 0:33:39.730
<v Speaker 3>on the timing of their cycle. So you know, the

0:33:39.850 --> 0:33:42.370
<v Speaker 3>guidelines have sort of been all over the map given

0:33:42.410 --> 0:33:45.650
<v Speaker 3>the absence of data. But a common strategy is to

0:33:45.690 --> 0:33:48.690
<v Speaker 3>start ovarian cancer screening sort of at the time you

0:33:48.730 --> 0:33:52.250
<v Speaker 3>would start considering removal of the ovarias, so like thirty

0:33:52.290 --> 0:33:54.730
<v Speaker 3>five for BARC one or forty for br C two,

0:33:55.290 --> 0:33:57.890
<v Speaker 3>in which case a false positive that led you down

0:33:57.970 --> 0:34:00.610
<v Speaker 3>to removal of the ovarias. I'm not saying is not

0:34:00.730 --> 0:34:03.250
<v Speaker 3>so bad because it's we're still taling with the impact,

0:34:03.490 --> 0:34:05.250
<v Speaker 3>but it's in the range that we would consider that.

0:34:05.370 --> 0:34:08.130
<v Speaker 3>So I'm curious about your approach to it, but that's

0:34:08.210 --> 0:34:10.130
<v Speaker 3>often the approach that we take in the absence of

0:34:10.170 --> 0:34:10.650
<v Speaker 3>better data.

0:34:11.050 --> 0:34:15.730
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to research and development of new screening tools.

0:34:15.850 --> 0:34:19.370
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know twenty five ultracent. We use them,

0:34:19.490 --> 0:34:22.290
<v Speaker 1>employ them, but realize that they're limited. But as the

0:34:22.330 --> 0:34:25.090
<v Speaker 1>best we can do. Have to be super careful though

0:34:25.130 --> 0:34:29.450
<v Speaker 1>in terms of caution, interpretation of results, really really really careful.

0:34:29.890 --> 0:34:32.130
<v Speaker 1>But I want to get into your really exciting work

0:34:32.210 --> 0:34:35.930
<v Speaker 1>with cancer interception and cancer vaccines. You know, our family

0:34:36.050 --> 0:34:38.730
<v Speaker 1>history is pancreas cancer. You can't take out you're pancreas,

0:34:38.970 --> 0:34:42.450
<v Speaker 1>and screening for pancreas cancer is limited and not well proven.

0:34:42.650 --> 0:34:47.090
<v Speaker 1>So talk to me about cancer interception and cancer prevention vaccines.

0:34:47.490 --> 0:34:50.730
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Sure, So this phrase cancer interception, what does it

0:34:50.810 --> 0:34:53.650
<v Speaker 3>even mean anyway, It's a way to try to differentiate

0:34:53.810 --> 0:34:56.490
<v Speaker 3>from prevention. You know, when we talk about prevention, if

0:34:56.530 --> 0:34:59.890
<v Speaker 3>it's a little bit like you don't smoke because smoking

0:35:00.170 --> 0:35:03.930
<v Speaker 3>causes those changes that lead to cancer. Right, So prevention

0:35:04.170 --> 0:35:06.770
<v Speaker 3>is you don't smoke, so you don't even start those changes.

0:35:07.490 --> 0:35:10.890
<v Speaker 3>Cancer interception, which was going by Loose Blackburn and no

0:35:11.210 --> 0:35:15.450
<v Speaker 3>prize winning scientists. It's trying to target the earliest stages

0:35:15.490 --> 0:35:18.290
<v Speaker 3>of cancer development. The cancer has just started, but you

0:35:18.370 --> 0:35:21.050
<v Speaker 3>can't detect it yet, and so that's cancer interception. So

0:35:21.170 --> 0:35:24.690
<v Speaker 3>the idea here is that we try to target those

0:35:24.810 --> 0:35:27.570
<v Speaker 3>first cells that are turning into cancer in a beer

0:35:27.650 --> 0:35:30.770
<v Speaker 3>C carrier, so maybe I've lost the second copy of

0:35:30.850 --> 0:35:34.970
<v Speaker 3>beer C for instance. So when you think about potential strategies,

0:35:35.450 --> 0:35:39.530
<v Speaker 3>one of those strategies could be immune interception. So we

0:35:39.850 --> 0:35:42.730
<v Speaker 3>really have a better understanding over the last you know,

0:35:42.890 --> 0:35:47.370
<v Speaker 3>fifteen plus years that the immune system is incredibly important

0:35:47.570 --> 0:35:49.930
<v Speaker 3>in cancer in a way that would have been you know,

0:35:50.090 --> 0:35:52.730
<v Speaker 3>laughed at twenty five years ago. But we know that

0:35:52.850 --> 0:35:56.130
<v Speaker 3>we can use immune therapies to help treat cancer. So

0:35:56.650 --> 0:35:58.970
<v Speaker 3>one of the strategies that we're trying is to develop

0:35:59.010 --> 0:36:03.930
<v Speaker 3>a vaccine that might develop immune cells that find those

0:36:04.010 --> 0:36:07.330
<v Speaker 3>earliest cancer cells. You know, they're surveying your body and

0:36:07.410 --> 0:36:09.610
<v Speaker 3>then as soon as that cell develops, they they target

0:36:09.690 --> 0:36:12.810
<v Speaker 3>it and kill it. So we recently completed a study

0:36:13.170 --> 0:36:17.810
<v Speaker 3>where we did vaccinate healthy BRC carriers using something called

0:36:17.850 --> 0:36:21.530
<v Speaker 3>the DNA plasmid vaccine. What we were vaccine two isn't

0:36:21.570 --> 0:36:24.370
<v Speaker 3>specific to BRC carriers, but it's the idea that you

0:36:24.450 --> 0:36:27.489
<v Speaker 3>could identify a group that's at a high enough risk

0:36:27.850 --> 0:36:31.210
<v Speaker 3>to try this. So the vaccine was safe, and now

0:36:31.330 --> 0:36:34.770
<v Speaker 3>we're waiting to get the imminology results and then figure

0:36:34.770 --> 0:36:36.970
<v Speaker 3>out our next phase. So that's sort of one approach.

0:36:37.290 --> 0:36:40.650
<v Speaker 3>Let's use the immune system, let's target different types of

0:36:41.010 --> 0:36:45.130
<v Speaker 3>immune strategies. We are also looking at mRNA types of

0:36:45.210 --> 0:36:48.810
<v Speaker 3>approaches to vaccines. I mean, I do not view vaccines

0:36:48.810 --> 0:36:50.210
<v Speaker 3>as a dirty word here, but if you want to

0:36:50.250 --> 0:36:53.330
<v Speaker 3>call it immune interception as opposed to vaccines, I'll take

0:36:53.370 --> 0:36:56.970
<v Speaker 3>that as well. But there's other ways to think about interceptions.

0:36:57.050 --> 0:37:01.610
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer. The risk

0:37:01.650 --> 0:37:04.690
<v Speaker 3>of pancreatic cancer's highest in br C two rather than

0:37:04.770 --> 0:37:07.969
<v Speaker 3>BRC one mutation carres, although the risk is elevated in both,

0:37:08.370 --> 0:37:10.770
<v Speaker 3>and as you said, pancreatic cancer is a tough cancer.

0:37:11.170 --> 0:37:14.130
<v Speaker 3>We do offer screening with either a endoscopic ulture sound

0:37:14.210 --> 0:37:17.090
<v Speaker 3>or abdominal MRI, but as you mentioned, you know, it

0:37:17.250 --> 0:37:20.969
<v Speaker 3>is limited, but almost all pancreatic cancers develop something called

0:37:21.170 --> 0:37:25.330
<v Speaker 3>k Wrass mutations. So we actually also have work being

0:37:25.410 --> 0:37:27.850
<v Speaker 3>done in the pass Or center looking at whether or

0:37:27.890 --> 0:37:31.330
<v Speaker 3>not k wrass inhibitors in mice can decrease the risk

0:37:31.450 --> 0:37:35.170
<v Speaker 3>of developing pancreatic cancer. So those are some some of

0:37:35.250 --> 0:37:37.930
<v Speaker 3>the ideas that we have. There's other work going on.

0:37:38.170 --> 0:37:41.730
<v Speaker 3>Could we use short doses of apartment hit er, these

0:37:41.810 --> 0:37:44.250
<v Speaker 3>drugs that we use in the advanced cancer setting and

0:37:44.410 --> 0:37:47.530
<v Speaker 3>in high risk breast cancer setting, could we use those

0:37:47.690 --> 0:37:52.170
<v Speaker 3>intermittently to if you will, weed the garden and take

0:37:52.250 --> 0:37:55.170
<v Speaker 3>out all those weeds before they develop into something, right,

0:37:55.290 --> 0:37:58.850
<v Speaker 3>intermittently getting rid of all of those pre cancerous cells.

0:37:59.410 --> 0:38:01.930
<v Speaker 3>So more to come, but it's a really exciting area

0:38:02.010 --> 0:38:02.730
<v Speaker 3>that we're working on.

0:38:03.610 --> 0:38:07.410
<v Speaker 1>If listeners could take away one point from this conversation,

0:38:07.890 --> 0:38:09.890
<v Speaker 1>what would you like it to be to.

0:38:09.970 --> 0:38:15.210
<v Speaker 3>Be proactive about getting your family history taken seriously? I

0:38:15.290 --> 0:38:18.850
<v Speaker 3>think that patients can be, if you will, a little

0:38:18.890 --> 0:38:20.610
<v Speaker 3>put off and be like, oh, don't worry about that.

0:38:20.770 --> 0:38:23.410
<v Speaker 3>That's not enough to get genetic testing. And the fact

0:38:23.570 --> 0:38:27.050
<v Speaker 3>is is that most doctors out there learned about genetic

0:38:27.090 --> 0:38:30.290
<v Speaker 3>testing in medical school, you know, fifteen or twenty years ago,

0:38:30.810 --> 0:38:33.410
<v Speaker 3>and they're not entirely up to date. It's not their fault.

0:38:33.490 --> 0:38:35.810
<v Speaker 3>There's too much to do. But there's a lot of

0:38:35.890 --> 0:38:39.010
<v Speaker 3>resources out there, and you can self refer to a

0:38:39.050 --> 0:38:42.170
<v Speaker 3>genetic counselor to get more information if you're not getting

0:38:42.170 --> 0:38:43.130
<v Speaker 3>the answers that you want.

0:38:43.810 --> 0:38:47.610
<v Speaker 1>Are there resources for our listeners actually in terms of

0:38:47.730 --> 0:38:49.210
<v Speaker 1>where they can go to learn more about this.

0:38:49.650 --> 0:38:52.970
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we do at faster dot org so BA s

0:38:53.170 --> 0:38:57.010
<v Speaker 3>ser dot org. We have a lot about why genetic

0:38:57.090 --> 0:39:01.090
<v Speaker 3>testing can be helpful and have provided some resources, including

0:39:01.650 --> 0:39:06.490
<v Speaker 3>any large comprehensive cancer center will have genetic counselors available.

0:39:06.930 --> 0:39:10.570
<v Speaker 3>There are plenty of physicians, gecologists, and primary care directors

0:39:10.690 --> 0:39:13.290
<v Speaker 3>who comfortable with this and do you do it? So

0:39:13.450 --> 0:39:16.730
<v Speaker 3>asking your primary care doctor first can always make sense,

0:39:17.170 --> 0:39:19.210
<v Speaker 3>But if your primary care doctor doesn't know a lot

0:39:19.250 --> 0:39:22.290
<v Speaker 3>about it or it's not really offering it to you,

0:39:22.410 --> 0:39:24.730
<v Speaker 3>don't stop there. There are lots of different ways to

0:39:24.770 --> 0:39:25.330
<v Speaker 3>get this done.

0:39:29.730 --> 0:39:31.450
<v Speaker 1>I had cancer and I had seen some of the

0:39:31.530 --> 0:39:34.570
<v Speaker 1>best physicians in the country for treatment. None of them

0:39:34.730 --> 0:39:39.490
<v Speaker 1>ever mentioned to me genetic testing. I am literally a geneticist,

0:39:39.570 --> 0:39:42.570
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't think that this applied to me. If

0:39:42.650 --> 0:39:47.730
<v Speaker 1>you have family members with breast ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancer,

0:39:48.410 --> 0:39:51.570
<v Speaker 1>it's worth it to consider genetic testing, even if your

0:39:51.610 --> 0:39:55.050
<v Speaker 1>doctor hasn't suggested it, Even if you've been tested in

0:39:55.090 --> 0:39:57.810
<v Speaker 1>the past a ten years or so, I'd recommend thinking

0:39:57.890 --> 0:40:01.930
<v Speaker 1>about testing again. Technology is getting better and better each day.

0:40:02.570 --> 0:40:05.090
<v Speaker 1>We're aware of more cancer causing genes than we were

0:40:05.130 --> 0:40:07.810
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago, and we have more tools to treat

0:40:07.850 --> 0:40:12.410
<v Speaker 1>those specific diseases. Your health insurance may cover genetic testing

0:40:12.450 --> 0:40:14.970
<v Speaker 1>if you fall into a high risk group, but if not,

0:40:15.210 --> 0:40:17.370
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of alternative ways that you can get

0:40:17.410 --> 0:40:21.330
<v Speaker 1>genetic information you need. Direct to consumer options like I

0:40:21.490 --> 0:40:24.610
<v Speaker 1>did are quick and easy, but I would always recommend

0:40:24.650 --> 0:40:27.450
<v Speaker 1>connecting with a genetic counselor to help interpret your results.

0:40:28.250 --> 0:40:31.490
<v Speaker 1>If you are positive for genetic mutation, there are a

0:40:31.650 --> 0:40:34.970
<v Speaker 1>multitude of preventative measures that you can take, from prophylactic

0:40:35.010 --> 0:40:40.290
<v Speaker 1>surgeries to risk reducing drugs like tomoxifen or reluxaphene. Ultimately,

0:40:41.050 --> 0:40:43.890
<v Speaker 1>you are responsible for your own health. You have to

0:40:43.970 --> 0:40:47.810
<v Speaker 1>advocate for yourself, but you don't have to do it alone.

0:40:48.490 --> 0:40:50.890
<v Speaker 1>There are amazing places like the beast Or Center that

0:40:50.930 --> 0:40:55.970
<v Speaker 1>can help you navigate this, Organizations that have testing, genetic counseling,

0:40:56.450 --> 0:41:01.410
<v Speaker 1>treatment options, and positive communities all in one place. Taking

0:41:01.490 --> 0:41:03.970
<v Speaker 1>that first step could save your life or the life

0:41:04.010 --> 0:41:12.930
<v Speaker 1>of someone you love. Coming up on the next episode

0:41:12.970 --> 0:41:16.730
<v Speaker 1>of Decoding Women's Health, I speak with a world renowned

0:41:16.930 --> 0:41:20.170
<v Speaker 1>expert in medical cannabis. You are not going to want

0:41:20.170 --> 0:41:20.810
<v Speaker 1>to miss this one.

0:41:21.250 --> 0:41:23.730
<v Speaker 4>The top three indications for medical cannabis use across the

0:41:23.810 --> 0:41:27.450
<v Speaker 4>country are chronic pain, mood or anxiety, and sleep disruption.

0:41:28.210 --> 0:41:31.050
<v Speaker 4>Not surprisingly, these are the three top conditions we hear

0:41:31.130 --> 0:41:35.170
<v Speaker 4>about in individuals who are either perimenopausal or postmenopausal.

0:41:35.890 --> 0:41:38.690
<v Speaker 1>Decoding Women's Health is a production of Pushkin Industries and

0:41:38.770 --> 0:41:42.730
<v Speaker 1>the Atria Health and Research Institute. This episode was produced

0:41:42.770 --> 0:41:46.330
<v Speaker 1>by Rebecca Lee Douglas. It was edited by Amy Gaines McQuaid,

0:41:47.370 --> 0:41:51.410
<v Speaker 1>mastering by Sarah Buguer. Our associate producer is Sonia Gerwit,

0:41:52.130 --> 0:41:57.050
<v Speaker 1>backchecking by doctor David Dodick. Our executive producer is Alexandra Garreton.

0:41:57.650 --> 0:42:01.410
<v Speaker 1>Our theme song was composed by HANNS. Brown. Concept and

0:42:01.490 --> 0:42:05.810
<v Speaker 1>creative development by Shavn O'Connor. A special thanks to Alan

0:42:05.890 --> 0:42:13.170
<v Speaker 1>Tish David Saltzman, Sarah Nix, Eric Sandler, More Ratner, Amy Hagdorn,

0:42:13.730 --> 0:42:18.370
<v Speaker 1>Owen Miller, Jordan McMillan, and Greta Cohne. If you have

0:42:18.530 --> 0:42:22.050
<v Speaker 1>questions about women's health and midlife and want expert advice,

0:42:22.650 --> 0:42:25.770
<v Speaker 1>leave us a voicemail at four FI five two oh one,

0:42:26.170 --> 0:42:29.090
<v Speaker 1>three three eight five, or send us a message at

0:42:29.130 --> 0:42:33.610
<v Speaker 1>Decoding Women's Health at pushkin dot FM. I'm doctor Elizabeth Pointer,

0:42:33.770 --> 0:42:35.770
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for listening. Until next time,