WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 4/30: Draft Recap, Pats Draft Class Breakdown, Dane Brugler Interview  

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>This is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Lazar and Alex Barth and Lazarre.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Hell everybody nailed it, joined us always by our Bara.

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex bars I.

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I know Ben Jonson's a nerd and they don't like

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>running guys the way they operated in Detroit. I think

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he may be one of these nerds that is a

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>little softer on the running back thing than everybody else.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But you will disown that guy so fast from the

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>nerd community.

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:44.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you take a running this is what you

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 2>you you if you want until they you dumb nerd

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 2>stuff and then you just own them and you.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Say, because it's not like a nerd, but all do,

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but this isn't.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 2>That's not nerd. Of they didn't do it, neither team

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 2>they Yeah, you're right, Jaguars not exactly full nerd. Trading

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 2>up and giving up capital is not usual. No, No,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 2>that's a RAMS thing. A lot of value in the

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>picks is actually more of a nerd thing. But that's okay.

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Travis Hunter not a running back last time I checked.

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Colston Lovelin not a running back last time they're.

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Coting to play Travis Hunter both ways full time is

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big nerd thing because you're not accounting the

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>human element of stamina. You're just looking at what the

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>data tells you he can do.

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Because Travis Hunter has had no success at a high

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 2>level of football, doing.

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>Is the NFL is a little different than the Big twelve.

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Anyways, Travis Hunter, Jaguars Catch, excited to do it. This

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 2>is not Jaguars Catch. So hello everybody. On that note, Hi, Hello,

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 2>Evan Lazar, Alex Barth with you for the next couple

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>hours here a very special exciting show today, post draft show,

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 2>big show for us, and I just want to lay

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 2>out the agenda here today. Alex and I are going

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 2>to do our normal show for the first like hour

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 2>forty hour, forty five minutes here today, and then at

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 2>the end of the show you're going to want to

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 2>stay all the way to the end because yesterday we

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>were able to sit down with Dan Brugler from The

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Athletic the Beast himself and discuss the Patriots draft class

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>and why Dane ranked the Patriots as the best draft

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>in the entire NFL. So we're jam packed today, so

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>that means calls and emails I'm not sure we're going

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to get to those today because we want to go

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 2>pick by pick through all eleven picks, and then obviously

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 2>you guys all want to hear what Dane has to

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 2>say at the end of the show as well, So

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>we got a lot to get to. On that note,

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I do want to start with just our big picture

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on the draft, and I would just start by saying,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>we're all very excited about what the Patriots have done

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 2>this offseason. We're all very optimistic about this ero with

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Mike Rabel and Elliott Wolf and Ryan Cowden and Stretch

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and the whole gang and draft they put together was fantastic.

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not that's not Sunshine dot com Like, I

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 2>really thought it was a great draft. Yeah, I thought

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>it was a great draft that they had. That said,

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I do want to keep expectations a little bit in check.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I hear a lot of playoffs conversations right now about

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 2>this team. Yeah, we're let's see what the team looks

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>like in training camp in the preseason before we start

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 2>talking about playoffs. All right, It's we got a ways

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 2>to go until that's, you know, back to back four

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>win seasons to playoffs. But they're headed in the right direction.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>The most encouraging thing I thought from a big picture

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>standpoint with this draft, Alex was the feel for the board,

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>and the feel for the board married with UH getting

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 2>their needs checked, but also doing it with the board

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 2>in mind right and not reaching for need or missing

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>runs on positions of need or anything like that that

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>maybe we saw a little bit of in the twenty

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>four draft. The twenty five draft, it seemed a lot more.

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>To use Elliott what Wells word organized, Like, they felt

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 2>more organized. The draft made more sense. It felt more

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>routine for them. So when he came out and said

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 2>this was more organized this process, it showed you could

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>feel it. It was tangible. There was evidence of it

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 2>being more organized. So that's all very exciting. Like I said,

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to the individual picks as we go here today,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>But what were your big picture thoughts on the draft?

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, kind of the same thing. I thought. The biggest

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>thing that stood out to me was the big debate

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>beyond the players themselves, Like the big philosophical debate for

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>me for the Patriots in this draft was drafting for

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>need versus best player available, and then how much should

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you value premium position. How much ald premium position factor

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>into that? And I thought they walked the line between

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>those two things incredibly well. You know, you look at

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>their first pick and Will Campbell. That was not to

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 1>say he wasn't arguably the best player available, you know,

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for what they had, but you know, ash Gent, he

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>would have been the pure best player available pick. Right,

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about that. But they go out, they address

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>their biggest need at a premium position right off the top,

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and then what do they do. They come back at

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>pick thirty eight, and that was a pure best player

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>available pick if Luther Burden wasn't on their board. And

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you could debate whether or not that's right, but I

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>think we all kind of assumed they weren't going to

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>draft Luthor Burden. So if Luther Burn's not on their board,

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a real argument they're right there at Trevion Henderson's

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>just best player available, so you know, and they kind

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of went back and forth on that. And I thought

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is they did a really good job

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of supporting Drake may I thought this draft helped out

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Drake May a ton and I said this a lot

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>into the lead up, and I'll say it again, what's

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>best for the football team is what's best for Drake

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>May and vice versa. At this point, Drake May is

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>their best asset. They need to maximize him. They last

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>time they draft a quarterback. Now there were other issues there,

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>but last time the draft a quarterback, they did not

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>do that. This felt like them doing that, especially after

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>free agencies and people were nervous, and I get why,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Like they signed all these defensive players and didn't at

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Moses. I think the ones true starter they added

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>in free agency on offense, which is fun, step on

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to roll, like the initial Waight Yeah, Stefan Diggs just

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a good point. But like I think a lot of

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>these picks. You know, you go out, you get a

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>really good yards after catch receiver, you get a three

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>down running back who's a home run threat. You get

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>obviously starting left tackle, right, starting later, starting center. So

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that they did a lot to invest in

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Drake May. Now May has to prove that those investments

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are worthwhile, right, which we all think he can do.

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>But they invested in Drake May, which I love.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 2>All Right, let's get to it. Let's get to the

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 2>nitty gritty. Yeah, you it's not waste any time here

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 2>today deliberating big picture thoughts. But I think the we've

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 2>talked so much about Will Campbell over the last five months. Yeah,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a ton to add on Will Campbell,

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>So I don't want to spend a ton of time

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 2>on Will Campbell. I do feel like though, you know,

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm writing our future series that we'll have on every pick,

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>all eleven picks. We're gonna start rolling those out soon

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>on the website. And I have talked to his offensive

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 2>line coach at LSU, Duke Mannyweather, some other people that

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 2>have worked with Will Campbell have been around Will Campbell.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>I got to spend ten minutes with him even on

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Patriots Unfiltered last week. So I've now that I've gotten

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 2>to know him a little bit just from talking to

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>people in his life. I understand the intangible even more.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 2>And we talked a ton about the intangible stuff. We

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>talked a ton about the tangible the football on this show,

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>and we have deliberated and debated all the different pros

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 2>and cons and poked every single hole in Will Campbell's

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>game that we possibly could. But what I think I

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 2>keep coming back to his offensive line coach Brad Davis

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 2>at LSU told me that he re established the culture

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>of the LSU offensive line room, you know, in terms

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 2>of work ethic and competitiveness and putting in those extra

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 2>you know a couple minutes you know, after practice and

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>in the weight room and in the film room and

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 2>in the cold tub and in the you know, with

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the doctors and the nutritionists and like all these different things.

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 2>And when you start to think about it, and his

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>offensive line coach even pointed out to me that he

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>actually spent a lot of his own money, his NIO money,

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 2>on working with specialists, you know, physical therapists, trainers, you know,

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>things like that. This guy, as he as Dave has

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 2>put it to me, has been a pro for like

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>two or three years already at LSU because he's been

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 2>conducting himself that way and completely re established or built

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the culture back up from twenty nineteen when they won

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 2>the Joe Moore Award, you know, Joe Burrow and Jefferson

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and had a great offensive line in twenty nineteen, they

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 2>took a little bit of a step back for a

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 2>couple of years. Will Campbell arrives on campus and then

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>they are, you know, one of the better offensive lines

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 2>in the country from that point on. So as much

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 2>as I feel like fans here, let's talk about all

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.560
<v Speaker 2>this leadership and and tangible stuff, And they say, well,

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>if that's the first thing you're saying about the player,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 2>then he might maybe is he not really that good

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 2>of a football player?

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Three months talking about how good of a football player.

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 2>This is on top of the fact that he is

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 2>a really good football player, And that's what gets you

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 2>as an offensive lineman or as last year, I heard

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the same things when I did the

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 2>feature on Drake May It's that's how you get to

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 2>be the number four overall pick. You don't go number

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 2>four overall most of the time simply just because you're

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>an overwhelming talent. A lot of the time you go

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 2>for overall because of the entire package that you bring to.

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>The table a program player. Yeah, and I think that's

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:49.480
<v Speaker 1>what they're getting in Will Campbell. And you're, like you said,

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>we've covered him extensively for last four months. I don't

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>know how much more there is to really add at

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this point, but I'm with you in the sense that

0:09:58.040 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know he's going to be good for the program.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect there to be much of a learning

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>curve with him in terms of, you know, being a rookie,

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>being a kid and figuring things out. I think he

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of has it all, you know, outwardly, it seems

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>like he has a lot figured out at this point,

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>which is very impressed at twenty one years old. That's

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I'll remind people because I think you

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>hear so much about his leadership and his experience and

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this and that, but you know, people talk about I

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>think people don't realize he just turned twenty one in January.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is a young guy. And from a football standpoint, like, wow,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you could have yeah, breaking thing, no idea, what do

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we do it? From a football standpoint, he has a

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of room to get better physically because he's only

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty one.

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a good point and something that I've gravitated towards.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 2>And this is not just because they've done it a

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 2>lot recently, but you know, I've gravitated towards the young breakout,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the true junior declare is like those types of guys.

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 2>And now the Patriots have had three in a row.

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Christian Gonzales, Drake may, Will Campbell, and those are the

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 2>guys that have that upper echelon, blue chip level talent

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 2>and they break out early, and then they're able to

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:10.719
<v Speaker 2>come out early and then go to the NFL at

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>a young age, and that that's where Will Campbell's at.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 2>You have something else to say, Oh, all right, let's

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 2>move on. I don't want to talk too much.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>About you spend because we've got a lot of players

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 1>to get to him. We've talked about it.

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>We've spent five months talking about Will Campbell. All right,

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 2>next pick here, Travon Henderson from Ohio State, running back,

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 2>thirty eighth overall. A couple of things that stand out

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 2>to me about Trevon Henderson when I watched him pre draft.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 2>First of all, you mentioned it off the top home

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 2>run hitter. Right, This is a guy that can take

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>a pass behind the line of scrimmage from sixty five

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 2>yards out and house it and put it in the

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>end zone. Did it against Oregon, did it against Texas

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 2>and the college football Playoff. So we're not talking about

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 2>him doing it against you know, Long Beach Polytech, right,

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about him doing it against a big time

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 2>competition with other fell players on the field. The other

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>things that stood out to me. I think he's a

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 2>really loose or fluid mover in space. I wouldn't say

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 2>that he's a jump card jump cut artist.

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Like.

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he's overly elusive necessarily, but what he

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 2>is is very you know, dynamic in his movements, and

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>he can create separation as a receiver. He can get

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>out in space and he can either eliminate pursuit angles

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 2>or run through tackles or things of that nature. I

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>think that he's one of those players that's in a

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 2>similar mold, you know, if you want to, we always

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 2>talk about like ceiling, realistic comps, floor comps. Right for

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 2>these types of players. The ceiling of this archetype is

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Jamier Gibbs. I think he's the right now, at least

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. He's the top guy in this mold

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>in what Trayvon Henderson is hopefully going to bring to

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots, the realistic comp that I made for him.

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 2>And again this is all, this is not all. The

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Patriots drafted this guy, so now I'm gonna gast him up.

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Was Breese Hall with the Jets, right, A guy that

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 2>can do both, that can run the football, catch the ball,

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 2>out of the backfield, big play threat whenever he touches

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 2>the football. So I look at those two backfields David

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Montgomery and Jamier Gibbs and Braylan Allen and Breese Hall

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>in New York, and I say, Ramondroe, Stevenson Traveon Henderson.

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 2>So I know a lot of people have talked about

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 2>his pass protection. He is a very good pass protector,

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 2>highlight the underselling, high level bits, pick up guy, no

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 2>doubt about it. I love that element of his game.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a really big part of getting him

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 2>on the field on third down early on in his career.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not underrating it or trying to make little

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of it, but almost like with receivers, you're not drafting

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 2>him to block, Okay, you're drafting him to house the

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 2>ball from seventy five yards out like that. That's what

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>you're hoping to get with the player. And when you

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 2>take him thirty eight overall, that's what you're hoping to

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 2>get out of t On Henderson. So I'm very excited

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 2>that one they looked at it and said, we need

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 2>big plays on offense, we need explosiveness on offense, and

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 2>this certainly did it. As did Kyle Williams. But I'm

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 2>also really excited about the pairing with Remandre. I think

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the two of those guys together are thunder and lightning.

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Like they have a power downhill back with Remandre and

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 2>now they have a real explosive back with Traveon.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Henders, and they can kind of get back to that

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>early down passing down back thing too. Certainly, both guys

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are relatively rounded. I think Henderson's incredibly well rounded. But

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the interesting thing. Like people are gonna compare him

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to James White. That was a lot of it after

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the draft, and I think he can play that James

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>White role, but he can do it differently because he's

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a better traditional run player than the players the Patriots

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>have usually had in that role. James White wasn't somebody

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you were getting under center and handing it off to

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in the a gap, right, There wasn't a ton of that.

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And look, it was because they won the Super Bowl.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>But like if you remember in twenty eighteen, one of

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the big storylines that year was based on the running

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>back usage the offense becoming too predictable. I think they

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>were running the ball like sixty something percent of the

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>time when Sony Michelle was on the field, which again

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they won the Super Bowl ultimately whatever, but they don't

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly have the offensive line now that they had then.

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So what Tradeon Henderson does is he removes some of

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that predictability and Ramonder Stevenson to an extent as well,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>because he's gonna handle himself in the pass game. He's

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 1>not quite the receiver Henderson is, but he's not somebody

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, Henderson's in the game, you know, because

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing in the huddle, you're not seeing it as

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a defense. When they break to the formation. You know,

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>James White goes in the huddle, all right, let's go light,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna pass. Let's get ready to match up. Henderson

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>could be in the huddle and you're thinking, all right,

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they're going pass, let's go nickel, let's go dime, whatever.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And now they come out under center and they motioned

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the tight end in and suddenly they're ready to run

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>power or something like that. So you weren't necessarily doing

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that with guys like James White, or guys like Danny

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Woodhead or guys like Shane Vereen. So as long as

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they've kind of done this dichotomy of early down passing down.

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>The early down back is usually the lead back, and

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy that's gonna be on the field more.

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So this might look a little different where I think

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it'll still be early down passing down, but the passing

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>down back is going to be the lead back. He's

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's gonna play more. I don't think Henderson's

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a feature back. That was the big concern at High

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>or one of the big concerns Ohio State. He had

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>some durability issues early in his career. That's what part

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of the reason they went out and got Quinn Shawn

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Judkins in the transfer portal. But I don't think Henderson

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a feature back. He's not somebody that

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>needs to carry the ball three hundred times in a

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>season to justify that pick. So, but lead back means

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get the majority. He's gonna be the starting

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>running back, if you want to call it that, even

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>though you know he is not necessarily gonna start every game.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think he can be the lead back wherez

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Stevenson will still play a significant role, but it might

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not be as big. He might be the second running

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>back on the roster.

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 2>So It's interesting because I agree with you, and I've

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 2>heard a lot about him as receiving ups and yeah,

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>that's certainly a big part of it. He averaged over

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 2>eleven yards per catch at at Ohio State for his career.

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Like I said, awesome, pass protector, awesome and blitz pick up.

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 2>But I don't think it's correct or fair, I guess

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 2>is the better word. I don't think it's fair to

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>call Henderson a receiving back. I think Henderson is a

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 2>true change of paceback, like he's a true speedback, change

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 2>of pace back. And one of the things that I've

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 2>been thinking about with this pick is that we have

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>seen especially last year, and maybe it changes with Josh

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>McDaniels and as they get this thing up and running

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 2>and they have better players around him. But there's no

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>doubt about it in my mind that Drake may is

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 2>more comfortable in the shotgun than he is under center.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 2>And that's just the nature of the beast. With these

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>young quarterbacks these days, they're all in these spread offenses,

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>these air raids, these RPOs, things like that, Like they're

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 2>all doing the same stuff in college football for the

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 2>most part. So that's the beast, right now you have

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>to be able to cater your offense to that type

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of team. And if the Patriots are going to be

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 2>a gun run team, if they're going to be heavy

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 2>in that respect in terms of shotgun versus under center split,

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 2>then I love Ramandre Stevenson as a player. I think

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 2>last year was a blip. I think he's a better

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 2>player than what he showed on tape in twenty twenty four.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 2>But he's not necessarily a gun run back. Gun run

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 2>backs are water bugs. Gun run backs have great speed

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 2>instance stop start acceleration because they don't get a run

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 2>up to the line of scrimmage. Like if you're under

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 2>center and you're in a power eye or whatever and

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the back is all the way, you know, eight yards

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 2>in the backfield, then they have that run up to

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>the line of scrimmage to come up and hit the

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 2>line of scrimmage harder. When you're in the gun, you're

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.239
<v Speaker 2>at a standstill, you're sitting offset to the quarterback, and

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 2>you don't have that run up. So you need to

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 2>have guys that have really good explosiveness and really good

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.679
<v Speaker 2>ten yard splits. You also want guys that can dance,

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, out of early penetration and things like that.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 2>So when I start to look at the way they

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 2>might build this offense under Josh McDaniels with Drake May

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 2>and think about the Travon Henderson pick, Travon Henderson is

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 2>a classic gun back, like, he's a classic gun run

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 2>RPO read option that type of running back. So if

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 2>they're going to lean into that sort of way of

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>doing things offensively, then they needed somebody in this mold

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>like they needed somebody that could do that sort of thing.

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I am sure. I just we've both had Josh McDaniels

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>in our football worlds for a very long time. I

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 2>am sure there will be a time and place where

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be Remondra Stevenson in the power eye with

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 2>a full back in front of Yeah, there will be

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 2>a time and place for all of that. But my

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 2>guess is that we are going to see a lot

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 2>more shotgun than maybe they did with McDaniels in the past.

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if that's the case, then this is

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 2>the type of running back that fits that type of mold.

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 1>My guess is, when I was just kind of looking

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>up some usage how McDaniel's split running backs in the past,

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>my guess is, once they get it going, and maybe

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they east Henderson into it, we'll see, depending on where

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:16.679
<v Speaker 1>he's at a camp. But like, if they get it

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>where they want to get it, my guess is it's

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be like sixty forty Henderson.

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd call it.

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Fifty five thirty five with the other ten percent going

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to Gibson or Lean laris In or somebody.

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 2>And that's basically what it is in Detroit at this point,

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>is that Jamir Gibbs is the featured back, but it's

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily the volume that you might see it for.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, true Bell.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Caek So feature to me is bell cow I used

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>this terminology earlier. I don't know if this is like

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>how everybody does it. This was his mine. So feature

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>back is remember that they asked Bill about they Corey

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Dillon in two thousand and four. Feature back is Derrick Henry.

0:20:56.720 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>Feature back is right. Lead back just means the majority,

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's not, okay, like a heavy usage.

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 2>That's but I.

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Would That's That's where I'm at with Henderson. I don't

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 1>think he's a feature back, but I think he'll end

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>up being the lead back.

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with you, I really again, it's a

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>stylistic thing to me more than anything that if they're

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 2>going to play that kind of authensic cater to Drake May,

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 2>then he's their guy.

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>He's the type of guy we're going to go under center.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>More like, they still needed speed even from under center.

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>They needed more speed, especially at that position, and they

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>got more speed and breakaway ability.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, yeah, all right, speaking to speed, this

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 2>is a good pace. We're not we're not getting bogged

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 2>down too much yet we will.

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>We're twenty minutes in two picks. Okay, we're doing ten

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes a pick.

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not bad Like normally this would be like us

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 2>deliberating a pick for like twenty and.

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It'll also get a little shorter as we go. But

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get to the udfas. Don't want

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we have time.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 2>For me too. All Right, the next pick, I'm gonna

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 2>do a golf clap. I want you to take a

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 2>victory lap. I want you to go ahead. I'm going

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to clear the decks for you right now. Kyle Williams

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>six ninth. Overall, nice, nice to the Patriots from Washington State,

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 2>and I'm doing the golf clap. Yeah for Alex here

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>because you told me about Kyle Williams before the Senior Bowl.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 2>This was your guy. You were on it, and he

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>just quickly crept up the board or not so quickly, honestly.

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>It was just kind of all of a sudden, like

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like steadily is a better word. Yeah, crept up

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 2>the board. Great Senior Bowl week that I slept on.

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Feel bad about that.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you next year, just remember this. The last

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>guy up in the reps. Yeah you don't, because you're

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>like onto the next thing, right, Yeah, the last guy

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>up in there, because I'm guilty of this a training camp.

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>The last guy up in the reps. You gotta pay

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>attention to. So because he just lapped.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Up like every sneaky sneaky good Senior Bowl when ESPN

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 2>was going commercial and everybody comes out of the Senior

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Bowl week asking of Jalen Nole for rightfully, so he

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 2>had a great week. He's a good player. I still

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 2>like Jalen Nole a lot, and nobody you know, he

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 2>was kind of still gotten a little bit. There he

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>goes to the combine, he puts down the four to four.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Then people started to rewatch the film maybe or even

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>just get to the film in general. Like me that

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 2>was late to it. I will give it kills me.

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 2>It pains me to do this, like one percent of

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the credit to Chris Simms, because Chris Simms came out

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 2>and ran ranked him as like the second best receiver

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 2>in the class, and everybody said, whoa, Kyle Williams second

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 2>best receiver in the class? What am I missing here?

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 2>But nobody, nobody was earlier to Kyle Williams than this man.

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>The Washington State coaching staff was we got to get

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that credit. But from a draft point of view, yeah,

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I And again we'll have that interview with Dane later

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and I actually kind of asked him about why maybe

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>that was. And there's a couple different reasons, but the

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>big thing for me to get to Kyle Williams's pick.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I won't go back and read through the text I

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>sent you on.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 2>January enough stroking your ego twenty fifth.

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>When I said, why is this guy eight hundred on

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the consensus board? What am I missing? Eight hundred on

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>the cons his sport. But the big thing for me,

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>so I think part of the reason he went later

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>he's a late breakout player He's at UNLV for three years,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>transferred to Washington State in twenty twenty three. He had

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a solid year, he had eight hundred yards, like he

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't bad, but last year goes off top ten in

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the nation and receiving all of that. And I actually,

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote about this on ninety eight five the

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sports sub dot com if people want to check it out.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I actually I asked him after the pick, like, what

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>changed for you? Right? Did he focus on something or

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>emphasize something in his game to allow that breakout season happen?

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And he mentioned after the catch specifically, he said he

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>wants to extend plays. He specifically said being able to

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>turn a five yard hitch into a sixty yard touchdown,

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a three yard screen into a sixty yard touchdown, which he.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Literally did at Washington State. Right, one was against Syracuse.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 2>In the other one, I'm blanking on the team he

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 2>was playing against, but he.

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>Literally Syracuse one was a slat. But I know you're

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about. Yeah, So he went from averaging

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>five point five yards per carry in or five point

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>five yards after the catch for his career. That number

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>jumped to eight point four in twenty twenty four. The

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Patriots meanwhile ranked twenty fifth as a whole in yards

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>after the catch in the NFL last year the wide

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>receivers alone, so as a team they averaged five flat

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>after the catch. The wide receivers alone averaged four, So

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Williams last year Washington State was more than double that.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>That's why I love this pick. He's going to be

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>able to play all three spots X Z slot he

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>gets open, he has separation metrics improved a lot last

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>year as well, and then because he gets so open,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he can run after the catch. Now it's one year

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>of production, so he's a little less proven and I

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think the drop issues are as big as some

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>people are making them. But he's not exactly the most

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>short handed guy, so that's why he fell. But if

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they can get that figured out, and by the way,

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I think him working with Stefan Diggs is going to

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>be amazing because there are some similarities there. Certainly, at

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>least to me. I think he's a guy that can

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be maybe a low end number one, certainly a high

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>end number two. I you know, doesn't quite have the

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>size to be that true like number one X guy,

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but just his ability to create after the catch, which

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>he clearly worked on a lot last year. They desperately

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.239
<v Speaker 1>needed that. I don't know the last time. The reason, Like,

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm so nervous to say I like, I feel like

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>they're in a position to maximize Kyle Williams. Yeah, and

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm nervous to say that because we've seen how it's

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>gone for wide receivers the last few years. But I

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know the last time they had a wide receiver

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with this makeup. Like, he's not the big slot, He's

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.360
<v Speaker 1>not Jalen Polk, he's not a contested catch X. He's

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>not Jaevon Baker, Nikhil Harry. He probably profiles closest to Pop,

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.479
<v Speaker 1>But Pop's not going to be outside playing the X.

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Pop's not running you know, some of the deeper rats

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that he's running. So this is the kind of wide

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>receiver we've wanted them to invest in for a long

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>time that they just haven't.

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he's a great fit for Josh McDaniels, who

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 2>I agree that. You know, one of the things with

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 2>the draft is there's always these coin flip decisions, right,

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 2>Like they pick Kyle Williams. I had Jalen Nole in

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>full disclosure, I as with a higher grade than with

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Williams, you know, higher up my rankings, I should say,

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 2>uh than Kyle Williams. So the honest question for people

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 2>that followed us pre draft and you know, looked at

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 2>my spreadsheet and my rankings and stuff, is well, why

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden are you now you know, big

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Williams guy right, like you know what, shouldn't you

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 2>be saying that they should have drafted Jalen Nole? But

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the coin flips and one of

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the decisions here is about why did they draft the

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.679
<v Speaker 2>player in Kyle Williams over Nol? And I think the

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 2>biggest reason is something that you hit on, is that

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Williams has a little bit more ability to project

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 2>as an outside receiver.

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a little bit more there in terms

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 2>of him playing on the outside, whether it's as a

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 2>true X or whatever you want to call it. Then

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 2>with Noel Noll, I think profiled for pretty much ever

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 2>everybody as a true speed slot like he was an

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 2>inside receiver. That was what he was going to be

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. Level. With Kyle Williams, there's a lot

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 2>of really encouraging release work as an outside receiver. That

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 2>gives you hope that he maybe can play closer to

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>like a fifty to fifty split ideally, especially in this offense,

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>he is a chess piece that Josh McDaniels is moving

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 2>all around the formation to get him free release off

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 2>the line of scrimmage. Whether it's in motion, it's a stack,

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 2>it's a bunch, it's a slot rep, you know, whatever

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the case may be, just hunting re releases all over

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the field because when he gets those free releases, like

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 2>the play against Syracuse. Yeah, the Patriots have historically called

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>that too lane. It's they have that concept in their

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 2>offense where the receiver on the line of scrimmage kind

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 2>of runs a vertical, but he's really running a pick

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 2>like he's kind of running a rub right, and that's

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 2>going to create that pocket of space underneath the defense.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 2>And Kyle Williams actually has an option on that route.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>He can break in, or he can break out, or

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 2>he can settle against zone coverage, and he's just going

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to rede leverage of the defender. So when the defender

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 2>sets up outside of him and he just breaks into

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the field and then he's then he's

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>on the runway right, he's just shot out of a

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 2>cannon and houses it against against Syracuse in the Bowl

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>game last year. Those types of routes are typically run

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 2>by the Z receiver in this offense. But that's allus like,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of not here North there. It doesn't really matter.

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 2>The point is is that you can see Kyle Williams

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 2>doing things that easily translate right into Josh mcdaniels's scheme,

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 2>whereas I don't know if you could necessarily do that

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 2>with their past picks at receiver. What was Nikhil Harry's

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 2>fit in Josh mcdaniels's.

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Office, It never made sense, right.

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 2>What was Taekwon Thornton's fit? A sacrificial But he drafted

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 2>a sacrificial X with the fiftieth.

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And he kept part of that too, is his injuries

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>kept getting hurt.

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, But it just didn't feel like he wasn't a technician.

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 2>He he was in a great yards after catch guy.

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't a quick hitter guy. He wasn't an early separator.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't a quick separator off the line of scrimmage.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 2>They drafted a vertical X receiver to play in an

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 2>offense that doesn't feature vertical X receivers. With Jalen Polk,

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I think there was a little bit more translation of

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 2>what they used to do in the past, but probably

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 2>not as much translation in an Alex Van Pelt offense,

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>which is what they were drafting for at the time.

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 2>So it just seems like this player has a great

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>marriage between what he does well, what McDaniels wants to feature,

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 2>and what the team needed, and all three of those

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 2>things kind of came together with Kyle Williams in a

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>really nice way. So the rep that I keep going

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 2>back to other than the Syracuse one just because it's

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 2>a concept that I've seen the Patriots run a million

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 2>times is twenty twenty three when he runs right by

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 2>Travis Hunter. Like that ability on the outside to just

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 2>stack and separate on a go route outside the numbers

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 2>on the best cornerback in the name like that, you

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 2>hope is going to translate a little bit more then

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 2>let's say, like a Jail and Nole would have done.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Whereas you know, Nole is probably a little bit more

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 2>polished as a route runner right now in terms of

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the technique and the top of the route and all

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff. So I wanted to try to

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 2>do comps for most of these guys. I think it

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 2>helps people understand. I think the archetype the ceiling of

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 2>this mold is Garrett Wilson. And I don't know if

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 2>he's Garrett Wilson, like I've heard that comp with him.

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Wilson was I believe the eleventh or twelfth overall

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 2>pick in his draft, absolute stud offensive, Rookie of the Year,

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 2>perennial Pro bowler. That is a very high bar for

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the sixty ninth overall pick in the draft. I don't

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 2>know if Kyle Williams is going to get to Garrett

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 2>wilson territory.

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Williams also had much more runways just you know, yeah,

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>he broke out younger.

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 2>So I would say the guy that I've gravitated towards,

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and just because from a measurable standpoint and a play

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>style standpoint, is you shot Bateman in Baltimore, And I know,

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Rashat Bateman sounds like a bust when you say the

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 2>name ra Shod Bateman. He had a really nice year

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 2>last year for Baltimore when he was finally healthy. He's

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 2>battled injuries in Baltimore. There's no doubt about that. But

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm just talking about turning on the film and watching

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 2>the player, like not necessarily slistically, right, taking on all

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the injury baggage and stuff like that. If you watch

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Rashat Bateman last year with the Baltimore Ravens, he was

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 2>like a top twenty, top twenty five receiver in the league.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's not forget not only was has he been heard

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 2>They don't throw the ball a ton in Baltimore, right,

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 2>so you have to adjust a lot of their numbers

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 2>for the fact that they are a run heavy offense.

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 2>So I like Rashaw Baby maybe a little bit more

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 2>than other people, but I think that Kyle Williams is

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 2>a similar kind of player. Really, just a lot to

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 2>like about the pick in terms of the schematic fit

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and all those different things. The last thing I wanted

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 2>to say about Kyle Williams, where do we see this going?

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Because right now I think they have like eleven or

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 2>twelve depending on the UDFA signings wide receivers on the roster.

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 2>This is going to be probably the number one question.

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you remember a couple of years ago, was it

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>last year? Two years ago? They literally didn't have enough

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>receivers in like the spring because some guys were hurt.

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they have twelve. I have them with twelve

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 2>receivers right now, and this is including udfhase, which are

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 2>not official. I should put that out there.

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>This is they signed what reportedly signed with three.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Three So yeah, I'll just rd them off quickly. Diggs, mccollins,

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Pop Douglas, Kyle Williams. I think those four guys I

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 2>had them at the top of the list because they're

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be on the roster in some way, shape

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 2>or form. Digs might be on pup, but he's going

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 2>to be on the team. We know that. Kendrick Bourne,

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Kashawan Boody, the picks last year, Polkin Baker, John Giles

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 2>is still kicking around, e FT and Chisholm. Who I

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 2>want to get to when we get to the udfas

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 2>demere blankh Moosy blank of Moosey.

0:33:58.000 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah wait, hang on, I got I know I

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>can pronounce it if I'm reading it.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Very sorry. I think it's Blank Music, Blank Museum and

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Jeremiah Webb. Those are their twelve receivers right now, including

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the udfas. How do we see on April thirtieth, with

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 2>absolutely zero practices that we've watched or witnessed at this point,

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>how do you see this room shaking out? Or I

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 2>think a better question is for right now, you know,

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 2>who's the one guy that you really feel like is

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 2>going to be an odd man out. I think it's

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.240
<v Speaker 2>hard right now just to sit here and say without

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 2>seeing even any OTA's exactly how they look at the room.

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so those four off the top right,

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I still think people are gonna criticize me for this

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>because he's been my guy for I still think Kendrick

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Horne is a good shot to make the team because

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it went so well with him and Josh McDaniels last time.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 1>And I just think McDaniels likes him. So that's five, right,

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And then it comes down to Kashawan, Boody and the

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>two rookies for that last spot or the two rookies

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from last year for that last spot. They've shown it

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they're not afraid of significant roster turnover. That was another

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>takeaway for me from this draft and just the way

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they kind of went about and really the off seas

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. People were, you know, talking back in

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>January about you know, you got a clean house. How

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>much the roster can they change people? Kind of facetiously

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>saying keep Drake, keep Christian Zalez, move on from the rest.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And I was there saying, like, realistically, like forty to

0:35:22.000 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>forty five percent is a pretty significant roster turnover from

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one year to another in the NFL generally, that's the case.

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're going beyond the typical here. I

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be well in this is I'm talking

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 1>forty to forty five percent. That's fifty three man roster

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>week eighteen to fifty three men roster week one. We

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>still got a ways to go before we get to

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the initial fifty three man roster, but it might be

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>over fifty percent. So you know, Born Booty, Pulk Baker.

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of those guys are safe, especially

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, just one of the udfases, Eft and Chisel

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>make a push. So it's those four are gonna make it.

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Pop Hollins Digs if he's not on pup, and then

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Williams, right, those four will make it. After that,

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's wide open for one, maybe maybe two spots.

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be some guys that get cut that I

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know surprise is the right word, but.

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Have some NFL talent NFL ability. I've come around to

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Kayshawan Boody a little bit, just because stylistically, again, if

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 2>you need that sacrificial X, like that true sacrificial X

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen here in the past with Josh McDaniels,

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Nelson Aguilar, right, like, someone like that, that's kind of

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Kaysehan Boody to me is a guy that can run

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 2>verticals on the outside, do a pretty good job with it,

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe occasionally catch a slant or something underneath off of

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the vertical stem, and every once in a while he's

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:51.319
<v Speaker 2>gonna sneak behind Derek Stingley for a bomb, right And

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 2>if that's all that role is in this offense moving forward,

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 2>then he showed last year that he has the ability

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 2>to do that at an NFL level. So has Javon

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Baker proven that. No has Jalen Polk, even though I

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 2>think he'll get a really really strong chance as a

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 2>second round pick in his second year. Neither one of

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 2>those guys have shown yet that they can do anything

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:18.919
<v Speaker 2>NFL caliber like Keayshawn Booty has. So it seems odd

0:37:18.960 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 2>to me. And this it's a trade, and because he

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 2>has the most value in a trade, that could maybe

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 2>make some sense that they deal Booty to get some

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 2>something better.

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Unless they just think Mac Collins is gonna do that.

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe I feel like Booty gets down the field

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.399
<v Speaker 2>a little bit better than Mac Collins. But I could

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 2>see that. I just out of all these guys, I

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.040
<v Speaker 2>feel like Booty I've come around the most two uh

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 2>being on the team.

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Javon Baker blank demere blank emcy blank emcy.

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Uh, Javon Baker is squarely on the bubble like that.

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna need a really really good camp. I would

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 2>say he's probably gonna need a really good offseason, like

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna OTAs included mini camp, training camp all the

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 2>way through. He's gonna have to be consistent and he's

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna to be good.

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>It's even on the bubble or is he on the

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>outside looking at.

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Probably on the outside looking yeah, to be more fair

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 2>about it, all right, anything else on Kyle Williams.

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:10.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that's other than your victory kind of

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 1>killed their pace there, No.

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 2>That's okay, that was worth it. That was a good pick.

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, next one here, Jared Wilson, ninety fifth overall

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 2>center from Georgia.

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Let me point out first real quick. They traded down

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>twice to get him. Yeah, so I was harping future picks,

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 1>future picks, future picks.

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Got one they got on twenty twenty six, fourth.

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, So nice pick, and some people think the Bears

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>might be really bad. I was kind of surprised how

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:37.280
<v Speaker 1>many people were, like, that could be a top hundred

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>ten pick, but like you take that, they also a

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>future sixth and seventh. Yeah, if the Bears are bad

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>enough that fourth plus that sixth, maybe you're back in

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the top one hundred.

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, it's a it's it's not a bad a

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 2>bad asset to have. Yeah, in the old tool belt, Okay,

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 2>Jared Wilson. I I feel a little bit like, because

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 2>he's a center, people are not talking enough of about

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Jared Wilson as a part of this foursome of offensive

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 2>players that they drafted out the top. It's not the

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 2>fourth overall pick, it's not too flashy skill players. So

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 2>I get it. I get that it's a center, But

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.800
<v Speaker 2>besides Campbell, I feel like there's a really nice floor

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.320
<v Speaker 2>to Jared Wilson where I feel pretty comfortable projecting Jared

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Wilson as a starter at some point. I don't know

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 2>if it will be right out of the gate. It

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 2>might be midway through his rookie year, his second year,

0:39:29.239 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 2>even maybe he's the sixth man on the offensive line

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 2>next year as like a three interior three interior spot player.

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 2>But everything that I've watched of him and everything I've

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 2>heard of about Jared Wilson is that this is a

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 2>center that is really dynamic. And when you talk about centers,

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.319
<v Speaker 2>just like a Mike linebacker on defense, the center kind

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 2>of sets the pace for the offensive line in the

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 2>run game. So if you want to be dynamic downhill

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 2>run scheme that can get to the second level, and

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.959
<v Speaker 2>you want to get out up to the second level

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 2>and get those interior guys into combinations and get them

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 2>up to the second level, or you want to run

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 2>stretch or outside zone to get to the numbers, the

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 2>center is the one that's setting the pace of that.

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to do those types of things,

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 2>which I think the Patriots want to do more the

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 2>former than the latter, an athletics center really helps. And

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 2>when you look across the league at guys that have

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 2>his level of athleticism, whether you know it's Eric McCoy

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and New Orleans or you know, Jason Kelsey's kind of

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 2>the apex of that, right, you know, he's the top

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 2>tier of this. When you look at those types of guys,

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 2>it just opens a lot of what you are able

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 2>to do schematically, whether it's run game, screen game, moving pockets,

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.359
<v Speaker 2>things like that. So that's why I would say that

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm really excited or high on the pick with Jared

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Wilson is because of his athleticism. Center position, you're not

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 2>normally covered these days, like maybe there's a shade over

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 2>your outside shoulder that you have to in a slide

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to get to, or on a reach or

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 2>something like that. On the line of scrimmage double team

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 2>obviously you're getting to. But you're not a lot of

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.240
<v Speaker 2>hit up rushers anymore these days over the center, especially

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 2>on early downs, and teams don't play with a ton

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:26.359
<v Speaker 2>of zero technique nose tackles. So he's more of an

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 2>athletic center. Wide body, like his frame, like the way

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 2>he carries the weight as well. I just think that

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 2>this guy has a really nice floor to him as

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the ninety fifth pick. When you pick ninety five, he's

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of two ways to go about it. You can

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 2>either pick a guy that has first round traits but

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.759
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a first round pedigree, or you can pick

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 2>a guy that's getting on base right. You can go

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 2>both ways. Jared Wilson kind of splits the atom to

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 2>me because he's got the athleticism to have a high upside,

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 2>and he's young and he only had that one year

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.600
<v Speaker 2>of starting at Georgia. But he's all also a guy

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 2>that I feel like could probably start at center, Like

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 2>if they had an honest competition between him and Garrett

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Bradbury in camp, I think Jared Wilson might win the competition.

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>And I think they might have that competition. Yeah, to me,

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that's what this is all about. How long can get?

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:19.760
<v Speaker 1>So we talk sometimes about you know, day one starter,

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Year one starter, right, where a day one starter is

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a guy Will Campbell. How many's gonna be the left

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 1>tack was no question about it. Year one starter is

0:42:26.640 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy that, okay, like he might not be ready

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to go week one of his rookie year, but by

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>the end of his rookie year he should be the starter.

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Jared Wilson is in that category. Yeah, he's

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a year one starter. It's just about how long Bradbury

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>can hold him off. And maybe who knows, maybe it

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is week one. But like I think Jared Wilson is

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be the starting center by the end of

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the year. I know Elliott Wolf said that they think

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>he can play some guard. To me, that's probably more

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 1>an emergency thing. Yeah, and you know, if they really

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>need somebody. I don't think he's going to be fully

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in there competing for that left guard role. I think

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>it's more if they need him there, fine, but they

0:42:57.840 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>want to develop as a center because he has the

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>ability to be a long term center in the NFL.

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the athleticism. The other thing is he's an

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 1>incredibly smart football player. Yeah, and the commands going back

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to the quarterback. We think with Josh McDaniels were last

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.319
<v Speaker 1>year it was the center setting all those protections. But

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the center is still going to help in that and

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the center's still gonna help communicate along the offensive line.

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Guy that's really smart, really athletic. If he was a

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:24.760
<v Speaker 1>two year starter, I think he probably goes top fifty. Yeah,

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was the first center off the board.

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think what was tough for him is in

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>this draft there is a lot of experience lineman. Two

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>three four year starters on the offensive line, his one

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:38.800
<v Speaker 1>year starter and he really didn't play a ton before

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>that at all at Georgia. Like, he's really raw. So

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if you you know, read the scouting reports that are

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>on there, they talk about hand placement, they talk about,

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, his footwork and things like that. I'm not

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:53.439
<v Speaker 1>saying that those knocks are wrong, but it's he looks

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like a guy that hasn't played a lot of football

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>because he hasn't a lot of that stuff is very fixable.

0:43:57.239 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just gonna come with reps. The preseason is gonna

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 1>be huge for him. He will be one of the

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>most important players to watch this preseason and we'll see

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:05.720
<v Speaker 1>if he can kind of learn quickly and grow quickly.

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he can push Bradberry sooner rather than later.

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think the biggest thing with him, like you said,

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, I just looked it up real quick. Drew

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Kendall from Boston College. You went to the Eagles. He

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 2>had thirty seven career starts at Boston College. At center.

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Wilson only had twelve at Georgia. So especially when you

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 2>talk about centers and you talk about the responsibility mentally

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:33.920
<v Speaker 2>on centers. Normally, when you get guys in the draft

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 2>that play center, unless they're like Zabel, who's like a

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 2>tackle or a guard that's moving to center. Guys that

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.919
<v Speaker 2>were career centers that are getting drafted as centers, those

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 2>guys are like three, four, sometimes even five year starters,

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 2>like they might have upwards of forty to fifty starts

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 2>in college. So you're talking about guys that have a

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 2>ton of experience. That's not Jared Wilson. He's a guy

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that has a ton of upside and a ton of ability,

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 2>but doesn't have the experience. Now, the one thing that

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:02.239
<v Speaker 2>did make me feel a little bit better when I

0:45:02.280 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 2>was talking to some of his coaches at Georgia, they

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 2>pointed out in practice over the last couple of years

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 2>he's been running scout team until this most recent year,

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 2>think about the Georgia interior defensive lineman that he's been

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 2>facing on scout team for his freshman and sophomore year.

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 2>They the way they put it to me was that

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 2>practice might have been harder than some of the games

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 2>that he was going to be playing in. Now it's

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 2>a different energy, right, it's a different moment, it's a

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.239
<v Speaker 2>different environment. But in terms of the skill and the

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.320
<v Speaker 2>talent he was going up against in practice at Georgia,

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 2>they obviously have a ton of just ridiculous players there

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:42.439
<v Speaker 2>that have come through there on the interior defensive line.

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 2>So in some ways, like he's almost battle tested, but

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 2>just behind the scenes in a weird way, so that

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 2>that would be interesting. You mentioned Guard. I agree with

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 2>you well that long term, there's no doubt about it,

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that centers his best position and having like I said earlier,

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 2>having a dynamic center that can do different things on

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the move, and I can also really quickly side note,

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 2>we're watching Good Morning Football on this side screen and

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Trags was just on Good Morning. Oh yeah, saw the

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's Go track, the Clinton is Mike flag and everything. Anyway, sorry,

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:23.480
<v Speaker 2>that was just distracting, uh our guy track shout out Trags. Uh.

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Like I said earlier, you know, just letting him just

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 2>unlocking him at the center position to climb to get

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.320
<v Speaker 2>out in front of blocks in the screen game. I

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 2>go watch him against Tennessee, just like you know, clipping

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 2>guys in space right, Like, that's what he does at

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 2>his best, and I think that he gets the most.

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:45.360
<v Speaker 2>You get the most out of that if he plays center.

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:48.759
<v Speaker 2>So I would assume he's going to play center long term.

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 2>But is there a world where their best five includes

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 2>him and Bradbury?

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I think there is, there could be. I mean,

0:46:58.080 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe he.

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Plays a little bit of left guard as aokie.

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I would just say, like they got I get wanting

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>guys to be able to play multiple positions. I'm not

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 1>against that philosophically, but there is a tipping point where

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:13.879
<v Speaker 1>the guy's got to learn the position he's gonna play.

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And last year's coaching staff was way too In across

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 1>training we talked about this. There was you know, you're

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get Kate Wallace to move from right to left.

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>You're playing right left, you're playing MC guard. It's like, no,

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 1>he has learn he has to play the position you're

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 1>trying to teach him. And so with Jared Wilson, he's

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:33.080
<v Speaker 1>best long term at center. So if they think that's

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what's best for him to play center long term, fine,

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:38.280
<v Speaker 1>But if it's not that much of a gap between

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 1>him and whoever the next best left guard is I

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 1>would almost just let him keep working at center, just

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's really where you need him to develop and learn. Now,

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe that is playing left guard. Maybe they think the

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>best way to do that is by playing left guard.

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:53.879
<v Speaker 1>But I would make all my decisions regarding him about

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 1>getting him ready to be Drake may center for the

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:56.399
<v Speaker 1>next ten years.

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:58.279
<v Speaker 2>Fair Enough. The only reason why I brought up the

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 2>left guard thing, because I mostly agree with what you

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 2>just said, is because he might be the best blocker

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 2>to play that position. And if he's really ready, but

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:12.560
<v Speaker 2>you don't feel like he's mentally ready to be the center,

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 2>then he can play left guard where he has none

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 2>of the mental you're you're still getting him on the

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 2>field and he's still playing.

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not rolling out entirely. I just I think that

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>there's tremendous value in him playing center, and I want

0:48:25.160 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that to be where he hands up long term.

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's move on to day three. We're we're

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 2>cruising a little bit. We've got a little bit bogged

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 2>down there, but we're all right. Uh. Craig Woodson in

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the fourth round, one of six overall from cal Now,

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 2>to be perfectly honest, if I had to grade the

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Patriots draft, Yeah, I would give them an A minus.

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:46.800
<v Speaker 2>And the reason why I wouldn't give them an A

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 2>is because I didn't love this pick. This was not

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 2>the pick I would have personally made. Now that doesn't

0:48:52.719 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 2>mean anything. In two to three years, they could Craig

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Woodson could end up being really good exactly.

0:48:59.520 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 2>But with that being said, this was the only pick

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 2>in the entire draft that they broke off consensus. So

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 2>this is the only pick that they kind of went

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 2>out on a limb on a little bit, both you

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and I and I want to speak for you, but

0:49:12.600 --> 0:49:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this is the case. Saw Billy Bowman

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and Malchai Moore as better players than Craig woods Yeah,

0:49:20.760 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 2>and they went right after Craig Woodson in the fourth round.

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:25.919
<v Speaker 2>There was a little run on safeties, so they read

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:30.319
<v Speaker 2>the run correctly. They I believed that maybe there was

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 2>some interest in Kevin Winston, the Penn State safety that

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 2>went at the end of Day two, So they read

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 2>the run correctly. They jumped on Woodson before the kid

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:48.919
<v Speaker 2>from Ohio State went. Was it Latham Lately, Ransom, Malchi Moore,

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:53.359
<v Speaker 2>Billy Bowman, all those guys Williams dinner. They all went

0:49:53.400 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 2>in like the span of like thirty two picks. Yeah,

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 2>so they read the run and they got their guy

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 2>in Woodson, unless it was Winston in the third round,

0:50:02.080 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 2>but they ended up getting one of their guys in Woodson.

0:50:05.000 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 2>To start on the positives with Woodson and then I

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:10.960
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about kind of unpack why they might

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:13.800
<v Speaker 2>have went with Woodson instead of more or Billy Bowman,

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:18.040
<v Speaker 2>who we liked better Woodson when I watched him on tape,

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:20.759
<v Speaker 2>what I liked the most about him was his reactions

0:50:20.800 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 2>in space or his instincts in space. I think he's

0:50:24.080 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 2>got a really good motor, athleticism, physical nature to his game.

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.799
<v Speaker 2>Could play demeanor, can strike the football, can separate the

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 2>ball from receivers coming over the middle of the field,

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:39.479
<v Speaker 2>really good at rotating into the box or starting down

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 2>low and run support, screen support, perimeter support, all those

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.560
<v Speaker 2>different types of things that you do. He's got some

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 2>experience at Nickel. I'll get to that in a second.

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 2>I think there are is and you got a lot

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of this question. I'm sure you did too. You know,

0:50:54.160 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 2>could he be Deron Harmon right?

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Can he play free safety over the top? I do

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 2>think he can do that. I don't think it's he's

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.320
<v Speaker 2>not going to be Devin mccorty. He's probably gonna be

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 2>closer to de Ron Harmon, But I do think he

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 2>has the ability to do that. They played a lot

0:51:09.200 --> 0:51:12.920
<v Speaker 2>of split safety coverage in cal but they rotated their safeties.

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that we've heard a lot

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:18.319
<v Speaker 2>about from the Patriots coaching staff and a couple times

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 2>we've gotten to speak with the position coaches is that

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 2>they want to be interchangeable at the safety position. They

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:27.240
<v Speaker 2>don't want this guy's free safety, that guy's strong safety,

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 2>this guy's playing post, that guy's playing robber, and to

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 2>have teams be able to predict which ones which on

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 2>a down to down basis. So when it comes to

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:38.839
<v Speaker 2>why they took Whitston over Bowman, why they took him

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:41.400
<v Speaker 2>over more, I think the main reason is his size.

0:51:41.440 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Like he's got a little bit more size. He's over

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 2>six feet two hundred and five pounds. Bowman and Moore

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 2>were like five ten five eleven one ninety ish. So

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 2>if they're going to be interchangeable at safety, and they're

0:51:53.200 --> 0:51:56.919
<v Speaker 2>going to want him to rotate down and fly down

0:51:56.960 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 2>into the box, and put his hat his hat in

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the run game. He's got a little bit more size

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and a little bit more kirk to him and you know,

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.680
<v Speaker 2>mass to his frame to be able to handle the

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 2>run responsibilities of doing that. So, if I had to guess,

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 2>it's probably like a size profile that they just preferred

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 2>with Woodson over the guys we like.

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:20.400
<v Speaker 1>They didn't. Yeah, we wanted a true free safety. They

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:22.359
<v Speaker 1>wanted somebody like you said, he can do both a phil.

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Phil Perry pointed out some similarities to guys like Kevin

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Byerd and Kenny Vacaro, who Mike Rabel obviously had in Tennessee.

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think we're gonna maybe it's Marcus EPs

0:52:33.960 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 1>like situationally, but I don't think we're gonna see that

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>true dedicated free safety this year. I think it's still

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:42.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be rotating with Dougar and Peppers and Woodson and

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>moving guys around there.

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Now, the other thing that he had to done a

0:52:45.840 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 2>little bit Woodson is play the nickel, and Elliott Wolf

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 2>alluded to it after the draft or one of his

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I'll kind of bund it together one of

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:57.480
<v Speaker 2>his pre draft press conferences or post draft press conferences

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 2>excuse me. Over the weekend, he alluded to the big

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:04.120
<v Speaker 2>nickel being in this defense and having a guy that

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 2>isn't Marcus Jones body type, but is more of like

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:10.279
<v Speaker 2>a Craig Woodson body type frankly right, like a guy

0:53:10.320 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 2>that's maybe pushing over two hundred pounds that can cover.

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:53:13.760 --> 0:53:16.280
<v Speaker 2>The one thing that I hesitated with with with Woodson

0:53:16.960 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 2>UH and that role is I thought his man coverage

0:53:19.160 --> 0:53:23.920
<v Speaker 2>tape was a little bit inconsistent, UH watching him against Syracuse, UH,

0:53:23.960 --> 0:53:27.880
<v Speaker 2>he faced Gats in their tight end a handful of times,

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and I thought Gatson got the better of the matchup.

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:33.279
<v Speaker 2>I thought he struggled in man coverage against him. So

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.000
<v Speaker 2>that's a that's a receiving tight end, Like, that's what

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Gatson's really like, a big slot receiver.

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:38.400
<v Speaker 1>He was.

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that that's his specialty. But I don't know

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:45.239
<v Speaker 2>if I saw the transitions or the smoothness and his

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:48.520
<v Speaker 2>hips uh and his in his transitions to be able

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 2>to stick in man to man coverage against dynamic tight ends.

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll see maybe maybe they cleaned that up. Maybe that

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:57.840
<v Speaker 2>was just one game and he cleans that up moving forward.

0:53:57.880 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 2>But I wouldn't necessarily say I thought he was a

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 2>high end man coverage player. I thought he was a

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit on the lower end in that vein. But

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:09.160
<v Speaker 2>what I did like about him a lot, like I said,

0:54:09.200 --> 0:54:11.600
<v Speaker 2>was his ability to track the football in terms of

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 2>like having eyes in the backfield on the quarterback and

0:54:14.960 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the backfield action and then making place.

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 1>He also talked about Woodson himself set some long lines

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:23.879
<v Speaker 1>like I love contact, I'd love to hit people, whatever

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that means. Like his athletic profile, that demeanor. He's going

0:54:26.600 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a stud on special teams.

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's probably part of it.

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:34.280
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's a great point. Fourth round pick probably

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:36.320
<v Speaker 2>projects as like a third safety.

0:54:36.280 --> 0:54:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Third safety, key special teamer. You know, they'll see when

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 1>those Duggers and Pepper's contracts start to run up, you know,

0:54:42.440 --> 0:54:44.160
<v Speaker 1>steps into a bigger role in a couple of years.

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:46.479
<v Speaker 1>But I see what they're going for with to pick,

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I understand why they made it. I personally would

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>have gone in a different direction, but like you said,

0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter what we would have done.

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Yep. Fair enough. And just last thing on Woodson and

0:54:57.239 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 2>that that point, I the consensus. The consensus. I think

0:55:02.760 --> 0:55:06.479
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's fair to share that information. Like I said,

0:55:06.520 --> 0:55:08.759
<v Speaker 2>this was the first pick that really broke from consensus. Well,

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 2>but he was in like the one eighties on most

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:11.319
<v Speaker 2>consensus board.

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 1>No, but didn't a lot of like like Brugler had

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:16.879
<v Speaker 1>him fourth round, right, Dane had a sixth round.

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:18.719
<v Speaker 1>I thought I saw some of the national guys.

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 2>So the one, the one national guy that had him

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 2>higher was Daniel Jeremiah. Daniel Jeremiah was really big on Woodson.

0:55:25.760 --> 0:55:28.160
<v Speaker 2>He had really nice things to say on the broadcast

0:55:28.200 --> 0:55:30.840
<v Speaker 2>about how he didn't see what everybody else was missing

0:55:30.840 --> 0:55:33.040
<v Speaker 2>with you know, he thought he was crazy thinking that

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 2>this guy was better than everybody else did. And he

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:38.359
<v Speaker 2>was really high on the pick. So hopefully DJ ends

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:41.000
<v Speaker 2>up being right. You know that tends to Yeah, So

0:55:41.520 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that that's Craig Woodson. Oh yeah, this was the other

0:55:45.239 --> 0:55:47.200
<v Speaker 2>thing I wanted to say about him before we move on.

0:55:48.480 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there's a lot of conversations out there

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:53.480
<v Speaker 2>about safety not being in need, and I feel like

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 2>we were all over safety as a potential need not

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 2>to like toot our own horns. But Kyle Duggart did

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:01.040
<v Speaker 2>not have the or that they wanted him to have

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:03.879
<v Speaker 2>last year, he was hurt, he didn't play well when

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 2>he was out there. We all know what happened with

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Jabrill Peppers off the field. Like, there's not a whole

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:11.799
<v Speaker 2>lot of security right now in terms of those two

0:56:11.840 --> 0:56:14.320
<v Speaker 2>guys like being what they thought they were going to

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 2>be when they signed those extensions. So as much as

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't necessarily see Woodson pushing either one as like

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a starting safety to begin with, I don't think that

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:25.920
<v Speaker 2>it's that crazy that they targeted a good.

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Spots have depth. I thought, well, I was saying safety

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in the need of the you know, free safety kind

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of thing, but yeah.

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right. Joshua Farmer one of my favorite picks

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:39.160
<v Speaker 2>of the draft. Both these guys, I thought, just the

0:56:39.280 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 2>value that they got out of Farmer and Swinson picking

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.919
<v Speaker 2>them where they did, probably at least in Farmer's case,

0:56:45.920 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe more like a half around later than people expected. Swinston,

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I would say, a round or two later than a

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of people expected. So really good value with both

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:57.080
<v Speaker 2>these players. And what I like about both of them

0:56:57.080 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 2>together is that one sort of like a hybrid tweeer

0:57:01.520 --> 0:57:05.160
<v Speaker 2>defensive end defensive tackle. One's like a true edge rusher,

0:57:05.440 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's off the outside the tackle. So like

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:12.840
<v Speaker 2>together they make a nice kind of situational player.

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, where if they're gonna they're gonna be high five

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and a lot coming on and off the field.

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So Farmer can play on inside, you know, defensive end,

0:57:21.040 --> 0:57:23.520
<v Speaker 2>like I said, hand the dirt end or handing the

0:57:23.560 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 2>dirt defensive tackle on early downs. Swinson can be a

0:57:26.360 --> 0:57:28.720
<v Speaker 2>pass for a specialist on third down. And you have

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:32.200
<v Speaker 2>this nice little like you said, high fiving each other

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of reminds me different positions, but like similar to

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:38.880
<v Speaker 2>like Anthony Jennings and Joshua uch right, or like together

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:43.640
<v Speaker 2>they're a complete player. Like they aren't good complete players individually,

0:57:43.800 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 2>but together they're a complete player. With Farmers specifically, a

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 2>couple of things that stand out. On the positive end,

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:54.160
<v Speaker 2>his upper body twitch and power and length are just

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:57.560
<v Speaker 2>very noticeable. The second debt you turn on the tape,

0:57:57.600 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 2>he has thirty five in charms. So this is a

0:58:00.520 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 2>long armed, powerful, well built human being that really didn't

0:58:06.960 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 2>necessarily play to his trades all the time. But I

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:14.800
<v Speaker 2>love the chance that they're taking here with Ray Bowl

0:58:14.840 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 2>with Terrell Williams. Like, give Terrell Williams right the raw

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 2>tools the guy, and let's see if Terrell Williams can

0:58:20.600 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 2>seizon him up and can round about his game farmer,

0:58:24.160 --> 0:58:27.080
<v Speaker 2>very strong at the point of attack, very good length,

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 2>very good pressing, shed ability, Like there's a ton of

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 2>evidence of him just rocking an offensive lineman back and

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 2>just throwing him to the side, right and just discarding

0:58:36.080 --> 0:58:39.280
<v Speaker 2>guys in the run game. In the pass rush, there's

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 2>speed to power there. There's obviously bowl with the longer arms.

0:58:42.720 --> 0:58:44.360
<v Speaker 2>There's a little bit of a swim move that he

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 2>can go to and a swipe. But when he was

0:58:47.240 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 2>rushing off the edge, he likes to swipe. So I

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:51.440
<v Speaker 2>think he can play a little bit of four three end.

0:58:51.560 --> 0:58:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I think you can play a little bit of three technique.

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I like the versatility and I love the tools. Now

0:58:57.200 --> 0:58:59.640
<v Speaker 2>there's some work to be done here in terms of

0:58:59.640 --> 0:59:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the tech which we can get to. But on the

0:59:01.520 --> 0:59:03.440
<v Speaker 2>positive end, that that's what I see with him.

0:59:03.640 --> 0:59:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and a guy that I think you kind of

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>allude to. It can play multiple positions along the defensive line,

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:09.919
<v Speaker 1>and it is very athletic. Was better as a run

0:59:09.920 --> 0:59:12.760
<v Speaker 1>stopper at Florida State, but just because of his athleticism,

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 1>probably has some pass rush upside. Yeah, I think the

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 1>idea is you put him bar more Milton Williams keyon

0:59:18.800 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>white and that's your front. Right. Those are four guys

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that are athletic. Those are four guys that can move around.

0:59:23.840 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 1>We know they're not going to blitz a ton. Mike

0:59:25.360 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Rabel kind of alluded to that. I think it was

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in his introductory press conference early on. Yeah, you know,

0:59:29.680 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of asked his philosophies on the blitz

0:59:31.640 --> 0:59:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and said, it's more about when you do it than

0:59:33.520 --> 0:59:35.560
<v Speaker 1>how often you do it. So you got to generate pressure.

0:59:35.840 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are guys you can run a ton of games with.

0:59:37.760 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You can move them around, you're gonna keep offensive lines

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>on their toes. So he's just another piece that fits

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>that mold. They're a little small up front now, which

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I do worry about. I thought they might add another

0:59:47.440 --> 0:59:52.040
<v Speaker 1>nose tackle. But because Farmers a better run stopper than

0:59:52.040 --> 0:59:54.520
<v Speaker 1>his size would suggest, which makes me like, like, like

0:59:54.560 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this pick a little more than just getting the average

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:58.760
<v Speaker 1>toolsy rusher, because they do need guys who can play

0:59:58.760 --> 0:59:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the run.

0:59:59.200 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So he's six three three oh five with the

1:00:02.720 --> 1:00:05.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty five inch arms. Yeah, so even though he's only

1:00:05.160 --> 1:00:07.200
<v Speaker 2>three oh five and thirty five inch arms helped create

1:00:07.240 --> 1:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>that separation for blocks and create the distance so that

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:12.840
<v Speaker 2>they can't get up underneath him and drive him off

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 2>the ball, which helps him kind of make up for

1:00:15.520 --> 1:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he's only three oh five, right, So

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 2>that helps. Now with that being said, you know, on

1:00:20.280 --> 1:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>the other side of the coin, because we're when you

1:00:22.840 --> 1:00:25.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about a player like this and you're speaking so highly, well,

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>he went in the fourth round, so there has to

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:29.680
<v Speaker 2>be a reason he wasn't a higher pick. I thought

1:00:29.680 --> 1:00:31.200
<v Speaker 2>some of the things you know that I wrote down

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>in my notes, just you know, he will get washed

1:00:33.920 --> 1:00:35.960
<v Speaker 2>out by double teams. I don't think this is a

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:38.880
<v Speaker 2>guy that you really want him to get vertical into

1:00:38.920 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the block and really attack the base block, right. You

1:00:41.800 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>don't want him trying to hold the point of attack

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>and posting.

1:00:44.920 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Up and so the opposite of the defensive tackles that

1:00:48.240 --> 1:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they've had, like they would have never drafted this guy

1:00:51.480 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>under built. And that doesn't mean he's bad players. Stylistically,

1:00:53.920 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he's very different than what Patriots fans are used to

1:00:56.160 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing at the defensive.

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so as much as he's got a powerful upper

1:00:59.520 --> 1:01:02.400
<v Speaker 2>body and good twitch off the ball, and he's got

1:01:02.400 --> 1:01:04.320
<v Speaker 2>good snap quickness to really get into the line of

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>scrimmage and fire his hands. But if you're asking him

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:10.280
<v Speaker 2>to eat blocks, like that's not his game. He's not

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>a block eater. He's more of like a reset the

1:01:12.800 --> 1:01:15.000
<v Speaker 2>line of scrimmage kind of guy and then use his

1:01:15.080 --> 1:01:18.160
<v Speaker 2>upper body power to shed the block. I would also say,

1:01:18.200 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, just in the pass rush, his pads will

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:22.600
<v Speaker 2>get up and then that will sap his power. So

1:01:22.640 --> 1:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>like when he goes to bull rush guys, he gets

1:01:24.640 --> 1:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>a little high with his pads and then then he

1:01:27.440 --> 1:01:29.800
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have the bull rushing power that you would probably

1:01:29.880 --> 1:01:32.320
<v Speaker 2>like to see out of him as like a foundational

1:01:32.400 --> 1:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>rush in his pass rush. So there's some technique stuff

1:01:35.320 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 2>in general, block anticipation technique stuff that they will need

1:01:38.960 --> 1:01:43.480
<v Speaker 2>to you know, round out or improve as his career progresses.

1:01:44.360 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>But like I said earlier, I just I love the

1:01:46.520 --> 1:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>idea of giving a guy like this to Terrell Williams.

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Like I think Terrell Williams will fix a lot of

1:01:50.680 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>those types of things or work to mitigate them, you know,

1:01:54.640 --> 1:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of like Bill style, where you just hide them

1:01:56.800 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>instead of maybe you can't get it out of him.

1:01:59.040 --> 1:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>So you just kind of hide him. But the one

1:02:01.080 --> 1:02:05.040
<v Speaker 2>thing I will say, I didn't think that he consistently

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>played to his physical ceiling, Like he has a much

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 2>higher physical ceiling than what he showed at at Florida

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>State at times. But I think that he can get

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 2>there with the right type of coaching. So I'm excited

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:21.640
<v Speaker 2>about seeing Terrell Williams work with a player like this

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:24.439
<v Speaker 2>all right in the fifth round bright In Swinson from

1:02:24.640 --> 1:02:28.240
<v Speaker 2>lsu A, is it fair to call him a media darling?

1:02:28.280 --> 1:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>He's kind of a media darling, Like I feel like

1:02:29.840 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the draft media was very high.

1:02:31.320 --> 1:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think I'm very because of how much he fell. Yeah, right,

1:02:34.040 --> 1:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy that was. I don't even think Consts's top

1:02:35.960 --> 1:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred. I think in sins Hiss top seventy five.

1:02:37.840 --> 1:02:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I had him in the top one hundred for short.

1:02:39.800 --> 1:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And to get him at one forty six, I think

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that was a big part of it. Was just like

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>there's always those players here and there in the draft. Evan,

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've experienced it, especially once you get into

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Day three, the picks or something coming so quick, and

1:02:50.760 --> 1:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you're following what your team's doing, and you know you'll

1:02:53.200 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>see a guy get drafted. He hadn't gotten yet. Yeah,

1:02:55.840 --> 1:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I think CJ. Dupree is a UGFA with somebody

1:02:58.360 --> 1:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>like that for me. But I think Swinson a lot

1:02:59.640 --> 1:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of people probably you know, you're doing what you're doing

1:03:02.520 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on day three and you're not necessarily tracking each individual pick,

1:03:05.560 --> 1:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to catch up every you know, five ten minutes

1:03:07.520 --> 1:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly it's wait, he hadn't gone yet, And I

1:03:09.640 --> 1:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>think he was one of those guys.

1:03:10.880 --> 1:03:13.480
<v Speaker 2>So I had him eighty seventh in my top one hundred.

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Him and Jordan Birch from Oregon were really close for me.

1:03:16.680 --> 1:03:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Like there Birch go, I think he went a little

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:22.640
<v Speaker 2>bit earlier, but similar players, you know, similar type.

1:03:22.680 --> 1:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Birch went. Well know you have them similar some

1:03:25.360 --> 1:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>curiosies for the point of the value. Birch went seventy eight. Yeah,

1:03:28.480 --> 1:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's not a little bit sooner.

1:03:30.200 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll let I'll let Dane talk about some of the

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:34.600
<v Speaker 2>reasons why he might have fallen.

1:03:34.680 --> 1:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Swinston was seventy one on the consensus.

1:03:36.480 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 2>We asked Dan about Swinson, who was his favorite Day

1:03:39.600 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 2>three pick out of the Patriots Hall, and he had

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>some good intel on why he might have fallen. So

1:03:44.560 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 2>you guys will hear that at the end of the show.

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:51.880
<v Speaker 2>But in terms of Swinson's skill set, I describe him

1:03:51.880 --> 1:03:53.960
<v Speaker 2>as a speed to power rusher, Like that's sort of

1:03:53.960 --> 1:03:56.160
<v Speaker 2>how I see him. Other people see him as more

1:03:56.160 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>of a pure speed guy with a great bend. I

1:03:58.080 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>think he's got a little bit of both his game. Look,

1:04:01.360 --> 1:04:04.800
<v Speaker 2>he had sixty pressures last year at LSU, So sixty

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>pressures in the SEC is not something to it's.

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Not light work.

1:04:08.120 --> 1:04:08.919
<v Speaker 2>That's not light work.

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't have to face the short arm tackle.

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, he only did in practice, So sixty.

1:04:14.480 --> 1:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Se LSU put out a picture of the two of

1:04:16.200 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>them in practice, like going at each other. Yeah, that's

1:04:18.760 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>always cool.

1:04:20.040 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Sixty pressures and thirty one stops too in twenty twenty

1:04:24.280 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>four at LSU. That's really good production. And what I

1:04:28.960 --> 1:04:32.040
<v Speaker 2>like so much about Swinson and players of this mold,

1:04:32.480 --> 1:04:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I think when you look at the players that succeed

1:04:34.520 --> 1:04:37.000
<v Speaker 2>in the past rushing in the NFL, most of them

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>win with speed and win with bent. It's not a

1:04:41.280 --> 1:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>lot and sometimes it happens like like hand up, I

1:04:46.280 --> 1:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of not miss, but like was lower than I

1:04:48.600 --> 1:04:50.800
<v Speaker 2>should have been on Jared Verse because Jared versus a

1:04:50.800 --> 1:04:52.800
<v Speaker 2>straight through you to the quarterback kind of guy, right,

1:04:52.800 --> 1:04:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Like he is a power rusher and a lot of

1:04:56.600 --> 1:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the times you get burned by those guys Tyree Wilson, Right,

1:05:00.040 --> 1:05:02.240
<v Speaker 2>that's the guy in Vegas that they drafted like eight

1:05:02.280 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 2>to oh level a couple of years ago. That would

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>just ragged all people. Well, you can do that at

1:05:06.400 --> 1:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the college level, you can't necessarily do that at the

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:10.840
<v Speaker 2>NFL level. Well, I like so much about Swinton is

1:05:10.840 --> 1:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>that he does have speed off the line, and he

1:05:12.960 --> 1:05:16.360
<v Speaker 2>has bent so he can win with pure speed on

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 2>the edge. I think he can also generate or create

1:05:19.640 --> 1:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>or convert speed to power. He has a really good

1:05:22.440 --> 1:05:25.320
<v Speaker 2>first step. He has decent length on the edge about

1:05:25.320 --> 1:05:28.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, average to above average length. So I think

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that he's a guy that, even though there's some knocks

1:05:30.760 --> 1:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>on him in the run defense in terms of setting

1:05:33.200 --> 1:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>the edge and posting up and being thirty out there

1:05:36.000 --> 1:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and all that kind of stuff, when you see him,

1:05:38.440 --> 1:05:40.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, off the weak side, being able to get

1:05:40.520 --> 1:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>downhill at the line of scrimmage, he can run through

1:05:44.040 --> 1:05:46.520
<v Speaker 2>blockers and he can make plays in the run game

1:05:46.560 --> 1:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>that way. Short term, his best path to getting on

1:05:52.880 --> 1:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the field or making an impact on the team is

1:05:55.080 --> 1:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>rushing the passer. There's no doubt about that. He's definitely

1:05:57.840 --> 1:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>a situational third down rusher on in his career. But

1:06:01.280 --> 1:06:03.800
<v Speaker 2>similar to what we do with Uch over the years,

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>like can he get good enough against the run to

1:06:07.120 --> 1:06:09.400
<v Speaker 2>be a three down player? That's gonna be the question

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:11.560
<v Speaker 2>with him. I have no doubt in my mind he's

1:06:11.560 --> 1:06:13.560
<v Speaker 2>going to stick in the league as a pass rusher. Yeah,

1:06:13.600 --> 1:06:15.800
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be a third down situational pass rusher

1:06:15.840 --> 1:06:18.120
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL. The question is is he going to

1:06:18.200 --> 1:06:21.360
<v Speaker 2>be able to be more than that? That's I don't know.

1:06:21.560 --> 1:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a fair question. But for where they took

1:06:23.560 --> 1:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>him to get a situational pass rusher there and they

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>needed more pass rush depth, So it makes sense to me.

1:06:29.800 --> 1:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he's another guy too that if the coach

1:06:34.480 --> 1:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is like, this is a coaching staff that's kind of

1:06:36.720 --> 1:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>coached up guys with these row trades and got in

1:06:38.400 --> 1:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a high level. So he mentioned he was excited to

1:06:40.480 --> 1:06:42.439
<v Speaker 1>work with the Patriots coaching staff when when we talked

1:06:42.440 --> 1:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to him after the pick. Yeah, so we'll see, but

1:06:44.520 --> 1:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there is untap potential there.

1:06:45.960 --> 1:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's over two hundred and fifty pounds, So he's

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:50.919
<v Speaker 2>not tiny. It's not like he's six three, two fifty five.

1:06:51.000 --> 1:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>So he's a well built guy.

1:06:52.480 --> 1:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>He's not built like if you think like speed rusher, like,

1:06:54.880 --> 1:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>he's not built like any of those guys just flying

1:06:57.440 --> 1:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>around the edge, right, And.

1:06:58.360 --> 1:07:01.840
<v Speaker 2>He's not built like a guy that couldn't be better

1:07:01.880 --> 1:07:03.680
<v Speaker 2>against the run right right, Like, he's not a two

1:07:03.720 --> 1:07:07.880
<v Speaker 2>ordred He's not Jasiah Stewart, where he's six and forty

1:07:07.920 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 2>pounds soaking wet. I just thought some of the things

1:07:10.520 --> 1:07:14.080
<v Speaker 2>that he struggled with in the run game. He's a

1:07:14.240 --> 1:07:17.440
<v Speaker 2>he's a he's a head ducker into contact. So like

1:07:17.480 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>when he comes off the ball and he sees the block,

1:07:19.960 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna duck his head into contact, and that's to

1:07:22.720 --> 1:07:25.520
<v Speaker 2>generate power and force right into the block, right. But

1:07:25.880 --> 1:07:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the problem when you do that is is that you

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>lose sight of the football. So what happened to him

1:07:30.880 --> 1:07:33.360
<v Speaker 2>is he would duck his head into contact, he would

1:07:33.440 --> 1:07:36.560
<v Speaker 2>create movement, but then the guy would bounce out of

1:07:36.560 --> 1:07:38.360
<v Speaker 2>his edge and he wouldn't see it coming, right, He

1:07:38.360 --> 1:07:40.720
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't have eyes in the backfield, or it would be

1:07:40.760 --> 1:07:43.040
<v Speaker 2>like a zone read and he wouldn't see the quarterback

1:07:43.120 --> 1:07:46.080
<v Speaker 2>keep it, so he'd lose the edge that way. Those

1:07:46.080 --> 1:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>were the things that you saw with some of the

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:51.160
<v Speaker 2>head ducking with him on tape, a couple of the

1:07:51.160 --> 1:07:54.880
<v Speaker 2>other things just I discipline, you know, misdirection, you know,

1:07:55.360 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 2>those are the things that I thought were you know,

1:07:58.000 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of had him. Anchor was a little hit or

1:08:01.000 --> 1:08:04.439
<v Speaker 2>miss in the run game as well. So even though

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:06.840
<v Speaker 2>the anchor, I don't know if that's gonna asking brew.

1:08:06.880 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it does. Maybe he adds more mass in play

1:08:08.680 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>strength in the NFL NFL strength and conditioning program, as

1:08:11.960 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Paul Pirella likes to say. But in my mind that

1:08:14.960 --> 1:08:18.560
<v Speaker 2>if he can just be more eyes in the backfield

1:08:18.600 --> 1:08:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and head up in eyes in the backfield, and more

1:08:21.160 --> 1:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>focused on the ball in the backfield, I actually don't

1:08:23.760 --> 1:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>think he necessarily needs to be super strong on the edge,

1:08:26.840 --> 1:08:28.559
<v Speaker 2>especially in a scheme like this. It's going to allow

1:08:28.640 --> 1:08:30.879
<v Speaker 2>him to get up the field. So I think Swinson's

1:08:30.880 --> 1:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be a solid gift for them in the

1:08:32.120 --> 1:08:35.920
<v Speaker 2>fifth rounding. Most people do all right, it's your time

1:08:35.960 --> 1:08:39.639
<v Speaker 2>to shine again. The kicker. Yeah, how excited are you

1:08:39.760 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that the Patriots drafted the kicker Alex So.

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I like the way they did this. A lot of

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>people are nervous. We're talking Andy Boorgallis from Miami Automatic

1:08:49.400 --> 1:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Andy as they called him. I like that, which is

1:08:52.560 --> 1:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>is is fair because he Jeremy Springer when we talked

1:08:55.680 --> 1:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to him last month, said consistency. That was like the

1:08:58.960 --> 1:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>big thing he kept talking out when he's asked about kickers, consistency, consistency, consistency.

1:09:03.720 --> 1:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Borgallis the most consistent kicker in the draft. He doesn't

1:09:06.880 --> 1:09:10.639
<v Speaker 1>have necessarily the highest highs compared to some other guys,

1:09:11.040 --> 1:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but he never like Ben Saals, was my guy for

1:09:14.640 --> 1:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>a while, right. Ben Saals did have a pretty bad

1:09:16.560 --> 1:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, Like he was not good in twenty

1:09:18.880 --> 1:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, rebounded in a big way in twenty twenty four.

1:09:22.960 --> 1:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Borgallis was just steady Eddy, steady Andy, like he his

1:09:27.200 --> 1:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>numbers took a jump in twenty twenty four was his

1:09:29.720 --> 1:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>best season. But he never really had You don't really

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>look at him having a bad year. He just kind

1:09:34.280 --> 1:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of got progressively better every year. So that's why I

1:09:36.640 --> 1:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>think they took him. And I get people might be

1:09:40.400 --> 1:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>nervous after what happened with Chad Ryland a couple years ago,

1:09:45.760 --> 1:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>so where it's a little different. They took Chad Rylands

1:09:48.000 --> 1:09:51.519
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth round. He was there I think fifth pick,

1:09:51.600 --> 1:09:52.519
<v Speaker 1>fourth or fifth pick.

1:09:52.640 --> 1:09:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:09:53.280 --> 1:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>They took Andy Borgallis in the sixth round as their

1:09:56.320 --> 1:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>eighth pick I believe seventh or eighth, So it's a

1:09:59.800 --> 1:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>lot lot less risk for a guy that I think

1:10:02.439 --> 1:10:04.479
<v Speaker 1>is a better kicker. The other thing is Borgoalis is

1:10:04.479 --> 1:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the first kicker off the board. The Patriots actually kicked

1:10:07.240 --> 1:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>off the kicker and Tyler Lup went to the Ravens

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a few picks later. The reason the Patriots took Ryland

1:10:11.720 --> 1:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>as high as they did in that draft was the

1:10:15.320 --> 1:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>forty nine ers reached on Jake Moody, who also hasn't

1:10:18.560 --> 1:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>been great. They took Jake Moody in the top one hundred,

1:10:21.040 --> 1:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>so that was more reactionary pick than anything else. The Patriots.

1:10:24.520 --> 1:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They this was not like, shoot, we got to get

1:10:27.000 --> 1:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a kicker, and you know, drafting somebody higher because you're afraid. No,

1:10:29.680 --> 1:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>they took the kicker when they wanted to take the kicker.

1:10:31.920 --> 1:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know he should beat out John Parker Romo

1:10:34.960 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>for the job. He's a guy that doesn't have the

1:10:38.120 --> 1:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest leg, but has a big leg. I think you

1:10:40.160 --> 1:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable fifty to fifty one fifty two. I don't

1:10:44.600 --> 1:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>know that he's somebody you're going to in the like

1:10:48.720 --> 1:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven fifty eight range, but you know, I know

1:10:52.880 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you feel strongly about this. You and the past have

1:10:55.439 --> 1:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>been okay with that because you want them going for

1:10:57.720 --> 1:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it in that range. You don't want some kicking field goals.

1:11:00.120 --> 1:11:01.880
<v Speaker 2>So come on, stretch, do it for me.

1:11:02.080 --> 1:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>His career on stretch, his career long is fifty six.

1:11:06.080 --> 1:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>He's been pretty good from fifty when he's tried it,

1:11:08.400 --> 1:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>but it's mostly low fifties. So it's not like Nick Folk,

1:11:12.600 --> 1:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, forty and in he's automatic, anything like forty

1:11:15.920 --> 1:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>nine plus, you're just not going to try he'll step

1:11:18.160 --> 1:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>into that fifty range. But he's consistent, he's experienced, and

1:11:22.880 --> 1:11:25.519
<v Speaker 1>he also one of his coaches talked about an interview

1:11:25.560 --> 1:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like he has a linebacker mentality. Jeremy Springer talked about

1:11:28.200 --> 1:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be important that kickers can cover kickoffs

1:11:30.200 --> 1:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>now in this new rules, and this is the thing

1:11:33.400 --> 1:11:35.879
<v Speaker 1>he's willing to do that. Yeah, the one question, obviously,

1:11:36.400 --> 1:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>can he kick in the colt? And that's not something

1:11:38.280 --> 1:11:40.599
<v Speaker 1>we can answer during training. Cam right, We're not gonna

1:11:40.600 --> 1:11:42.559
<v Speaker 1>get answer that till we get an answer, I will say.

1:11:43.400 --> 1:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>When he was asked about it, I loved his answer

1:11:45.680 --> 1:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of kickers get asked about that and say, well,

1:11:48.320 --> 1:11:50.479
<v Speaker 1>kicking is kicking, Like I'm not really worried about it,

1:11:50.840 --> 1:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he said, I understand it's a question, and I'm looking

1:11:53.800 --> 1:11:55.960
<v Speaker 1>forward to prove people wrong because it's not the same.

1:11:56.280 --> 1:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Kicking today when it's seventy degrees in Sonny is not

1:11:59.240 --> 1:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the same as kicking the snowstorm is not the same

1:12:01.439 --> 1:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>as kicking when it's driving rain and forty degrees with

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:06.599
<v Speaker 1>twenty mile an hour winds. It's not And he's going

1:12:06.680 --> 1:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to have to learn how to do it. It's going

1:12:08.320 --> 1:12:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to be an adjustment. But and this isn't me saying

1:12:11.120 --> 1:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>he can do it again. This is the kind of

1:12:12.720 --> 1:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>thing where you don't know till you know. But I

1:12:15.960 --> 1:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do like that he's taking the approach of not saying, well,

1:12:19.160 --> 1:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't really care about it, like he clearly cares.

1:12:21.360 --> 1:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>He clearly understands it's different. Said, He's looked up to

1:12:23.479 --> 1:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Adam and Terry, so he has some understanding of that.

1:12:26.280 --> 1:12:27.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll just have to see if he can do it.

1:12:27.640 --> 1:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think can they put him in like the

1:12:29.200 --> 1:12:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Rocky ice box maybe, Like I've always thought that that

1:12:31.960 --> 1:12:34.519
<v Speaker 2>was something that Bill would do eventually, is like, yeah,

1:12:34.640 --> 1:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>just turn the act and like you do is practice

1:12:39.400 --> 1:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>in the in the meeting. Well, the Saints did that

1:12:41.800 --> 1:12:43.760
<v Speaker 2>with their quarterbacks last year before game in Green Bay.

1:12:43.800 --> 1:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember that they put it. They cleared out

1:12:45.840 --> 1:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>they cleared out the big walk in fridge in the cafeteria. Yeah,

1:12:48.720 --> 1:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and they had like a walk through in the in

1:12:50.640 --> 1:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the freezer. Yeah, so well you need more room to

1:12:52.680 --> 1:12:54.599
<v Speaker 1>kick the ball. But maybe they're building this new facility.

1:12:54.720 --> 1:12:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe they are real like climate control.

1:12:57.120 --> 1:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, and then they get it down to ten degrees,

1:12:59.040 --> 1:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>get the fans blown and I'm just on a simulator.

1:13:01.960 --> 1:13:05.160
<v Speaker 2>It's it seems like something that Bill would do, and

1:13:05.200 --> 1:13:06.800
<v Speaker 2>it kind of seems like something very able would do

1:13:06.800 --> 1:13:08.600
<v Speaker 2>because he's kind of cut from the same cloth that

1:13:08.640 --> 1:13:10.880
<v Speaker 2>they would figure out a way to get bork Oz,

1:13:10.960 --> 1:13:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Like maybe they'd send him to like someplace else, you know,

1:13:13.680 --> 1:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>to to like get experience, like where is it winter

1:13:17.400 --> 1:13:20.120
<v Speaker 2>all the time? I don't know, Antarctic North Pole?

1:13:20.160 --> 1:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, so something Springer talked about when I asked him

1:13:22.000 --> 1:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>about this, was like for him, it's about how well

1:13:24.600 --> 1:13:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the guy strikes the ball. And think about this with quarterbacks, right,

1:13:28.040 --> 1:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>When a lot of people think about arm strength, they

1:13:30.040 --> 1:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>think about how far you can throw the ball. And

1:13:33.000 --> 1:13:35.639
<v Speaker 1>that's one interpretation of arm strength, or that's one function

1:13:35.720 --> 1:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. Another is, you know, five yard slant. Your

1:13:40.439 --> 1:13:43.719
<v Speaker 1>arm strength still matters because are you throwing the ball,

1:13:44.640 --> 1:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, sixty miles now or fifty miles now? Like

1:13:46.960 --> 1:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>how long is it going to take to get there?

1:13:48.800 --> 1:13:50.599
<v Speaker 1>And so what Springer had said was when he looks

1:13:50.600 --> 1:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>at these guys, he kind of looks at how does

1:13:52.600 --> 1:13:54.799
<v Speaker 1>their foot hit the ball? Yeah, what kind of contact

1:13:54.840 --> 1:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>do they make? So a guy who was big leg strength,

1:13:58.560 --> 1:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, leg strength can be a function of maybe

1:14:00.320 --> 1:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not hitting sixty yardfield goals, but when he hits

1:14:03.080 --> 1:14:06.519
<v Speaker 1>the ball, he makes really solid contact. It has good rotation,

1:14:06.960 --> 1:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It is good velocity because that's going to cut through

1:14:09.760 --> 1:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the wind and the rain and the snow.

1:14:11.280 --> 1:14:14.120
<v Speaker 2>So you can kind of scout it without being in

1:14:14.160 --> 1:14:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the right It's.

1:14:15.000 --> 1:14:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Not perfect, but it's something that will help you tell

1:14:17.680 --> 1:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It translates and one of the reporters down in Miami

1:14:20.520 --> 1:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>put out a tweet after Borgallis was drafted that basically,

1:14:23.920 --> 1:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to see if I can find the exact tweet,

1:14:26.520 --> 1:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but he basically said, like Borgallis was the second most

1:14:29.080 --> 1:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>impressive player at Miami's pro day, obviously behind cam Ward

1:14:33.479 --> 1:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>because it sounded like a gunshot, that that was the

1:14:37.720 --> 1:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>cannon fire guy, yeah, or cannon fire whatever cannon fired.

1:14:41.360 --> 1:14:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I saw that as well. I like that line.

1:14:43.760 --> 1:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay. So that's something where you look at and

1:14:46.640 --> 1:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this with with Bryce Barrier. Yeah, when

1:14:49.840 --> 1:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>they drafted him was when the ball hits it, and

1:14:52.439 --> 1:14:54.519
<v Speaker 1>if you go way back to Quinn Nordina, Quinn Nordean

1:14:54.560 --> 1:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't nearly as accurate. Yeah, but this is a guy

1:14:57.120 --> 1:14:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that the ball comes off as foo's strong, so there's

1:14:59.680 --> 1:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be as much room for the wind to

1:15:01.240 --> 1:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>knock it around.

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:05.559
<v Speaker 2>So that's Brgalis And I don't think you're gonna get

1:15:05.960 --> 1:15:08.360
<v Speaker 2>any more thorough of a kicker breakdown than that. So

1:15:08.520 --> 1:15:13.120
<v Speaker 2>you're welcome for that. One seventh round to twenty overall.

1:15:13.240 --> 1:15:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Marcus Bryant, left tackle from Missouri, started his career at SMU,

1:15:18.320 --> 1:15:25.679
<v Speaker 2>was at Missouri last year and they were so confident,

1:15:25.720 --> 1:15:27.439
<v Speaker 2>I guess is the word or so comfortable. I think

1:15:27.439 --> 1:15:31.519
<v Speaker 2>it's a better word. And Marcus Bryant that they didn't

1:15:31.520 --> 1:15:36.400
<v Speaker 2>flip Membo, and they had talks at Missouri about potentially

1:15:36.439 --> 1:15:39.559
<v Speaker 2>flipping Membo, Memb who played left tackle in high school.

1:15:40.000 --> 1:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>They were thinking that maybe they were going to flip him.

1:15:43.280 --> 1:15:46.559
<v Speaker 2>Then they end up getting Brian in the portal from

1:15:46.600 --> 1:15:48.120
<v Speaker 2>SMU and they're like, all right, well, we have this

1:15:48.200 --> 1:15:51.599
<v Speaker 2>experience left tackle coming from a decent level of football

1:15:51.600 --> 1:15:54.599
<v Speaker 2>at SMU and good program, so we feel pretty good

1:15:54.600 --> 1:15:57.000
<v Speaker 2>and we're gonna not mess around with Membo and we're

1:15:57.000 --> 1:15:59.479
<v Speaker 2>going to keep him on the right side. So Marcus

1:15:59.520 --> 1:16:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Bryant ends up playing left tackle for Missouri last year,

1:16:03.720 --> 1:16:05.360
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years, right, I think.

1:16:05.200 --> 1:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It was just last last year. I think it was

1:16:06.720 --> 1:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>just last year. But he Javon Foster two years ago.

1:16:11.920 --> 1:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>What I like about the Bryant pick is that this

1:16:15.439 --> 1:16:20.519
<v Speaker 2>is again a bet on tools, like this is a

1:16:20.560 --> 1:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>trade s based prospect. Is a guy that's got good measurables,

1:16:24.280 --> 1:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, six seven three three twenty uh requisite arm.

1:16:28.320 --> 1:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Length beyond requisite thirty five ines.

1:16:30.920 --> 1:16:32.599
<v Speaker 2>I think it's all. I think it's thirty four plus.

1:16:32.680 --> 1:16:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say, and a really good testing. Yeah,

1:16:39.520 --> 1:16:42.840
<v Speaker 2>good tester as Wester. So you put on Would you

1:16:42.880 --> 1:16:45.240
<v Speaker 2>tell me about his RAS score? It was high, right,

1:16:45.479 --> 1:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>was it? I can't remember text as too many numbers.

1:16:49.520 --> 1:16:51.919
<v Speaker 2>It was good. I remember it being good like elite,

1:16:52.000 --> 1:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>like in their elite range.

1:16:53.560 --> 1:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Bryant's taught this was from you. I don't know

1:16:55.800 --> 1:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>if you were being facetious or not. Marcus Bryant's top

1:16:58.320 --> 1:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>RAS comparisons are Oh I remember this now, Yeah, that

1:17:01.400 --> 1:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>was Joe Thomas and Jonathan Ogden and then you throw

1:17:03.840 --> 1:17:04.599
<v Speaker 1>any Andrew Whitworth.

1:17:04.960 --> 1:17:06.960
<v Speaker 2>It was the three. And I'm dead serious. And this

1:17:07.080 --> 1:17:09.839
<v Speaker 2>obviously is cut his tongue in cheek, but I'm dead serious.

1:17:09.840 --> 1:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I pulled up his RAS card. RIS is Relative athletics score.

1:17:14.120 --> 1:17:17.480
<v Speaker 2>It's the best thing going right now to put combine

1:17:17.600 --> 1:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>numbers into context. And when I like so much about

1:17:20.520 --> 1:17:23.680
<v Speaker 2>RIS is. First of all, it's it's weight adjusted. So

1:17:24.000 --> 1:17:26.880
<v Speaker 2>if you're a three hundred and fifty pounds tackle, it

1:17:26.960 --> 1:17:29.120
<v Speaker 2>adjusts for the fact that your three hundred fifty pounds

1:17:29.120 --> 1:17:31.920
<v Speaker 2>and somebody else might be three hundred pounds, right, which matters.

1:17:32.160 --> 1:17:34.160
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that I like about it is. It's

1:17:34.160 --> 1:17:37.799
<v Speaker 2>not just gauging the forty like it takes into account

1:17:38.160 --> 1:17:41.439
<v Speaker 2>the jumps, the agilities the forty and to get an

1:17:41.479 --> 1:17:44.679
<v Speaker 2>all encompassing number, because let's face it, it's not just about

1:17:44.760 --> 1:17:47.320
<v Speaker 2>how fast you run forty yards, right, Like, that's not

1:17:47.439 --> 1:17:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the only gauge of athleticism. So Bryan tested really well.

1:17:51.320 --> 1:17:55.120
<v Speaker 2>He measured really well, and his best comps for the

1:17:55.200 --> 1:17:57.759
<v Speaker 2>names you just named. Now, he's not going to be those.

1:17:57.600 --> 1:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Guys like a it was a joke, ribbing fun.

1:18:00.360 --> 1:18:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh, he's not gonna be those guys. Uh, but he

1:18:03.400 --> 1:18:05.479
<v Speaker 2>if you're gonna take a flyer on the seventh round

1:18:05.479 --> 1:18:07.240
<v Speaker 2>and if they were gonna double dip a tackle, I

1:18:07.280 --> 1:18:08.840
<v Speaker 2>don't know if this is truly a double dip when

1:18:08.880 --> 1:18:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you pick somebody in the seventh round, but it's two tackles.

1:18:12.439 --> 1:18:15.280
<v Speaker 2>If you're gonna technically, if you're gonna take a second tackle,

1:18:15.600 --> 1:18:18.040
<v Speaker 2>this wasn't this the type of tackle you wanted to take,

1:18:18.320 --> 1:18:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Like you took the the Will Campbell pick is the

1:18:21.320 --> 1:18:26.360
<v Speaker 2>the safe, uh well rounded, great kid, high in tangible,

1:18:26.439 --> 1:18:31.439
<v Speaker 2>high high football character uh SEC. Powerhouse tape, you know,

1:18:31.520 --> 1:18:35.519
<v Speaker 2>great tape against great players all the all the boxes

1:18:35.600 --> 1:18:38.360
<v Speaker 2>checked with Will Campbell, if you're gonna double dip that tackle.

1:18:38.360 --> 1:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>We were talking about Charles Grant, Anthony Belton, you know

1:18:41.880 --> 1:18:44.000
<v Speaker 2>those types of guys pre draft. They waited a little

1:18:44.000 --> 1:18:46.400
<v Speaker 2>bit longer, but they got a guy with a lot

1:18:46.400 --> 1:18:49.679
<v Speaker 2>of raw talent that they can hopefully develop maybe into

1:18:49.720 --> 1:18:51.639
<v Speaker 2>a backup or a swing tackle at some point.

1:18:51.680 --> 1:18:53.599
<v Speaker 1>So that's the big thing for me with Marcus Bryant

1:18:53.640 --> 1:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is is he's athletic. He's got experience on the right

1:18:56.120 --> 1:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and left side. We talked about this, they needed backups

1:18:58.920 --> 1:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and Darian Lowe maybe he can be your backup left tackle,

1:19:02.040 --> 1:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>but he can't play on the right side. Kayden Wallace

1:19:04.400 --> 1:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>can be your backup right tackle, but he can't play

1:19:06.280 --> 1:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on the left side. So if Marcus Bryant can prove

1:19:09.120 --> 1:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he can be a backup caliber player, it saves you

1:19:11.680 --> 1:19:14.559
<v Speaker 1>having to keep a tackle. I think ideally long term,

1:19:14.680 --> 1:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Like my ideal projection for him, this ideal ideal. You know,

1:19:18.280 --> 1:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a big, powerful guy. He can be proves he

1:19:20.320 --> 1:19:22.400
<v Speaker 1>can be a starting right tackle in the Patriots system

1:19:22.760 --> 1:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if he's gonna play long term, like that's where he's

1:19:25.120 --> 1:19:27.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna stick. Because he does have experience on both sides.

1:19:27.479 --> 1:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think, like, what would be great if he

1:19:29.200 --> 1:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>can just be your backup tackle, and maybe they still

1:19:31.240 --> 1:19:33.880
<v Speaker 1>keep Kyden Wallace because they want to develop a long

1:19:33.960 --> 1:19:36.479
<v Speaker 1>term right tacklet with a much higher ceiling. They want

1:19:36.479 --> 1:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>to develop a long term right tackle behind Morgan Moses,

1:19:39.680 --> 1:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but like if they just want to, you know, in

1:19:43.680 --> 1:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of basic depth, Marcus Bryant's the only guy on

1:19:46.640 --> 1:19:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the roster that can play both tackle spots. So if

1:19:49.360 --> 1:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>he can prove he can be a backup caliber player,

1:19:51.280 --> 1:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it saves you a roster spot because now you don't

1:19:53.120 --> 1:19:55.200
<v Speaker 1>have to carry and they still might you don't have

1:19:55.280 --> 1:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to carry a backup right tackle and a backup left tackle.

1:19:58.520 --> 1:19:59.719
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna fill both spots.

1:20:00.360 --> 1:20:03.400
<v Speaker 2>It was definitely something I was considering. I put together

1:20:03.479 --> 1:20:07.280
<v Speaker 2>my roster, you know, re configured the ninety man roster,

1:20:07.520 --> 1:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and I like to do it too deep on the

1:20:09.800 --> 1:20:12.280
<v Speaker 2>depth chart. And when I was doing the too deep

1:20:12.360 --> 1:20:14.960
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that, I was thinking about tackle. So

1:20:15.080 --> 1:20:18.559
<v Speaker 2>right now, Campbell and Moses obviously are your starters left

1:20:18.600 --> 1:20:21.559
<v Speaker 2>and right. Uh Vederian Lowe is a left tackle. Only

1:20:21.640 --> 1:20:24.519
<v Speaker 2>we know that, you know, like you said, Cayden Wallace,

1:20:24.560 --> 1:20:27.160
<v Speaker 2>who we I agree I think Caden Wallace is worth

1:20:27.240 --> 1:20:30.160
<v Speaker 2>keeping around to develop as a long term right tackle option.

1:20:30.800 --> 1:20:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe he can't start down the road. Demadri Jacobs has

1:20:34.360 --> 1:20:36.960
<v Speaker 2>played a little bit of both. But I say this

1:20:37.000 --> 1:20:38.719
<v Speaker 2>with all due respect, I don't know if Demantre Jacobs

1:20:38.720 --> 1:20:39.440
<v Speaker 2>an NFL.

1:20:39.200 --> 1:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>Player right, well, you just have more upside with Brian.

1:20:41.680 --> 1:20:43.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, he's kind of a practice squad guy to me,

1:20:43.960 --> 1:20:46.559
<v Speaker 2>and then you have Bryant, right, So really, when you

1:20:46.560 --> 1:20:49.519
<v Speaker 2>think about it, they're going to keep Campbell, They're gonna

1:20:49.560 --> 1:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>keep Moses. Yeah, we think they're probably gonna keep Wallace,

1:20:53.120 --> 1:20:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the third round pick in his second year, didn't really

1:20:55.160 --> 1:20:58.200
<v Speaker 2>play as a rookie. He probably is gonna stay.

1:20:58.280 --> 1:21:00.519
<v Speaker 1>Well. Wallace could also move inside of guard too, like

1:21:00.560 --> 1:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they had kind of talked about that a little bit

1:21:02.000 --> 1:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>last year, maybe being something that never happened because they

1:21:03.960 --> 1:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>just need to tackle so bad and he got hurt.

1:21:05.760 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So you don't have to keep four, right, If they

1:21:08.360 --> 1:21:13.040
<v Speaker 2>do keep four, would it make more sense. Let's let's

1:21:13.080 --> 1:21:15.840
<v Speaker 2>say Will Campbell comes out of the gate and training

1:21:15.880 --> 1:21:19.360
<v Speaker 2>campus is an absolute stud and you're you never think

1:21:19.360 --> 1:21:21.680
<v Speaker 2>twice about it about setting and forgetting him.

1:21:21.760 --> 1:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>It would be nice.

1:21:22.880 --> 1:21:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, then do they really need to keep ve Darian Lowe,

1:21:27.800 --> 1:21:29.600
<v Speaker 2>who is kind of is who he is and is

1:21:29.600 --> 1:21:32.240
<v Speaker 2>only a one position backup right over a guy like

1:21:32.320 --> 1:21:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Marcus Bryant who has some upside, has some tools and

1:21:35.840 --> 1:21:37.920
<v Speaker 2>might be a multi position.

1:21:37.720 --> 1:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Back as long as Bryant can can prove he can

1:21:40.200 --> 1:21:40.759
<v Speaker 1>be that player.

1:21:40.840 --> 1:21:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yep, And go back to his RIS scores eight

1:21:43.840 --> 1:21:45.439
<v Speaker 2>point nine to six out of ten, which is an

1:21:45.439 --> 1:21:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the elite range for Bryan. Great explosiveness, vertical jump of

1:21:52.479 --> 1:21:54.760
<v Speaker 2>thirty one and a half at six seven and three

1:21:54.800 --> 1:21:57.599
<v Speaker 2>twenty which is a good number, and a four nine

1:21:57.640 --> 1:22:01.519
<v Speaker 2>seven forty yard dashub five forty yard it's insane at

1:22:01.560 --> 1:22:05.680
<v Speaker 2>six seven, So that's moving. That's moving. So when you

1:22:05.680 --> 1:22:08.280
<v Speaker 2>look at Campbell, when you look at Brian, and you

1:22:08.280 --> 1:22:11.439
<v Speaker 2>look at Jared Wilson, they got some athletes on the

1:22:11.439 --> 1:22:14.559
<v Speaker 2>offensive line, like those guys are not just you know,

1:22:15.520 --> 1:22:17.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not just the film with those guys, Like those

1:22:17.200 --> 1:22:20.840
<v Speaker 2>guys have great measurables in athletics traits as well. All right,

1:22:21.439 --> 1:22:28.440
<v Speaker 2>moving on back to you and Julian Ashby the long snapper.

1:22:28.680 --> 1:22:31.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad this kind of happened before the show. Joe

1:22:31.520 --> 1:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Cardona released yesterday. Yeah, we should mention that ten year patriot,

1:22:35.800 --> 1:22:39.639
<v Speaker 2>two times super Bowl champ, the last two or three.

1:22:41.160 --> 1:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Three times super got here in fifteen, right, so two.

1:22:45.360 --> 1:22:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, two time super Bowl champ, longest tenured Patriot, the

1:22:49.920 --> 1:22:51.960
<v Speaker 2>last Patriot on the roster to have won a Super

1:22:51.960 --> 1:22:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Bowl in New England.

1:22:53.040 --> 1:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Last one to beat teammates with Tom Brady in New England.

1:22:55.200 --> 1:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Last one to be the teammates with Tom Brady in

1:22:56.840 --> 1:22:57.360
<v Speaker 2>New England.

1:22:57.720 --> 1:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But they do have somebody who won a Super Bowl

1:22:59.400 --> 1:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with Tom Brady on the roster in Tampa. In Tampa,

1:23:02.080 --> 1:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Carlton Davis.

1:23:04.680 --> 1:23:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Should mention Ron Burton Award winner for Community service. Just

1:23:10.160 --> 1:23:12.280
<v Speaker 2>a really I know he's a long snapper. I know

1:23:12.320 --> 1:23:14.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not the most valuable position or anything like that,

1:23:14.760 --> 1:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>but just a really well rounded guy, like a really

1:23:16.840 --> 1:23:21.120
<v Speaker 2>well rounded patriot. Obviously a patriot as well, you know,

1:23:21.160 --> 1:23:24.880
<v Speaker 2>with military stuff, but in general, great in the community,

1:23:25.640 --> 1:23:28.640
<v Speaker 2>great on the team, team captain last year. Just a

1:23:28.640 --> 1:23:30.960
<v Speaker 2>good dude. I wish Cardona the best. I hope that

1:23:31.479 --> 1:23:34.360
<v Speaker 2>he sticked someplace else. But the reason why they cut

1:23:34.400 --> 1:23:37.519
<v Speaker 2>Joe Cardona was because they drafted a long snapper. If

1:23:37.520 --> 1:23:39.360
<v Speaker 2>you're going to draft and use a draft pick on

1:23:39.400 --> 1:23:41.360
<v Speaker 2>a long snapper, he's going to be the long snapper

1:23:41.400 --> 1:23:44.360
<v Speaker 2>most likely. So what can you tell me about Julian Ashby?

1:23:44.640 --> 1:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So he's really athletic, he had an elite another elite

1:23:48.280 --> 1:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>RAS guy. He had a faster ten yard split in

1:23:50.280 --> 1:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the forty than I know.

1:23:54.320 --> 1:23:55.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the fun one.

1:23:55.439 --> 1:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about this a little bit yesterday. Yeah,

1:23:58.120 --> 1:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>because he is a little undersized, which people but this

1:24:00.880 --> 1:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is the way teams are using the long snapper now.

1:24:03.800 --> 1:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And Joe Cardona talked about this last year. If you

1:24:05.960 --> 1:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>remember when he goes down he forces the fumble in

1:24:07.800 --> 1:24:10.559
<v Speaker 1>the opener against Cincinnati, he was talking about and said, yeah,

1:24:10.560 --> 1:24:12.559
<v Speaker 1>like I'm actually going down the field now because under

1:24:12.560 --> 1:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill that's not how they used the long snapper. The

1:24:15.040 --> 1:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>long snapper stayed back and blocked, and it was one

1:24:16.760 --> 1:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of the last guys down the field. Didn't really make tackles,

1:24:19.200 --> 1:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't make plays on the football. It was more of

1:24:20.800 --> 1:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a protector. But there's this other philosophy where because the

1:24:23.640 --> 1:24:26.519
<v Speaker 1>long snapper, you can't line up directly over him, and

1:24:26.560 --> 1:24:28.759
<v Speaker 1>he's the one snapping the ball and getting the play started,

1:24:29.080 --> 1:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he kind of has a head start getting down the field,

1:24:30.960 --> 1:24:33.479
<v Speaker 1>so with some teams do now instead of finding more

1:24:33.800 --> 1:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>blocking prototype long snappers, they find these quicker guys who

1:24:38.040 --> 1:24:39.680
<v Speaker 1>can go down the field and be the first down

1:24:39.720 --> 1:24:41.719
<v Speaker 1>there and make a play. And if you watch Julian Ashby,

1:24:42.240 --> 1:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he does a lot of that. Brian Hins from Pats

1:24:44.040 --> 1:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Polpit has some clips of this, including two against Alabama.

1:24:47.240 --> 1:24:49.479
<v Speaker 1>So this is more the kind of player that I

1:24:49.479 --> 1:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>think Jeremy Springer wants is the guy who's going to

1:24:51.800 --> 1:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>be an athlete snapped the ball. He's beating the gunners

1:24:54.479 --> 1:24:57.559
<v Speaker 1>down the field. At Vanderbilt, he's beating the gunners usually

1:24:57.560 --> 1:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like the fastest guy on the team. He's beating those

1:25:00.240 --> 1:25:02.120
<v Speaker 1>down the field to make plays on the ball. He's

1:25:02.120 --> 1:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a solid tackler. So I think it's it's a stylistic change.

1:25:05.840 --> 1:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>They want a guy that can go and be a

1:25:07.280 --> 1:25:09.719
<v Speaker 1>factor in coverage and not just the guy who's gonna

1:25:09.720 --> 1:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>snap and protect. And that's what Ashby's gonna do.

1:25:12.080 --> 1:25:15.360
<v Speaker 2>So when you talk about being the first down the field,

1:25:16.000 --> 1:25:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the fastest way is a straight line, right, So the

1:25:18.640 --> 1:25:21.560
<v Speaker 2>guys on the outside obviously have to come in and

1:25:21.680 --> 1:25:23.920
<v Speaker 2>they also have to be blocks on the outside. So

1:25:23.960 --> 1:25:26.479
<v Speaker 2>the long snapper is uncovered and he's right up the gut.

1:25:26.920 --> 1:25:29.599
<v Speaker 2>So if you kick the ball right into the middle

1:25:29.640 --> 1:25:31.479
<v Speaker 2>of the field, which usually you don't want to do,

1:25:31.800 --> 1:25:33.479
<v Speaker 2>But if you kick it right up the middle, then

1:25:33.520 --> 1:25:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the long snapper and stands the reason would be the

1:25:35.360 --> 1:25:36.160
<v Speaker 2>first one down there.

1:25:36.200 --> 1:25:38.519
<v Speaker 1>So the thing about that, and different people will tell

1:25:38.520 --> 1:25:41.519
<v Speaker 1>you different things on this, but yes, usually don't want

1:25:41.560 --> 1:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to kick it down the middle of the field if

1:25:43.280 --> 1:25:45.519
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to pin a team, right, if you're punting

1:25:45.520 --> 1:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>from around the fifty, you're trying to pin a team.

1:25:49.160 --> 1:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>The sideline can be a friend or a foe. It

1:25:51.880 --> 1:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>gives you another place where the ball can go out.

1:25:53.920 --> 1:25:56.479
<v Speaker 1>But it also is like if you kick it too short,

1:25:56.920 --> 1:25:58.479
<v Speaker 1>you might not get the bounce because it's going to

1:25:58.600 --> 1:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>roll out. So get us some more opportunities to down balls,

1:26:01.880 --> 1:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the middle of the field instead of cough

1:26:03.800 --> 1:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and cornering, which is unfortunately becoming a lost art in

1:26:06.439 --> 1:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the NFL.

1:26:07.360 --> 1:26:09.400
<v Speaker 2>So this guy's a pretty good athlete for a long stow,

1:26:09.479 --> 1:26:12.960
<v Speaker 2>really good athlete. Yeah, he's eight point five to three

1:26:13.080 --> 1:26:15.720
<v Speaker 2>RAS score out of ten uh four nine?

1:26:16.360 --> 1:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>What's his so the RAS breaks some things down. What's

1:26:19.800 --> 1:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>his size grade within that?

1:26:21.240 --> 1:26:24.439
<v Speaker 2>So he's uh, he's small. He's okay, size six one

1:26:24.560 --> 1:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>two thirty one, and the two thirty one is below thresh.

1:26:27.400 --> 1:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So he's a elite I think in all the other categories, right.

1:26:30.160 --> 1:26:32.719
<v Speaker 2>Great, great, an elite lead speed great.

1:26:33.200 --> 1:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's probably closer to a nine RS when you

1:26:36.040 --> 1:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>don't factor in his size.

1:26:37.200 --> 1:26:39.040
<v Speaker 2>So the big number is the one point five to

1:26:39.080 --> 1:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>six ten yard split, Yeah, which is moving like that's

1:26:41.920 --> 1:26:43.439
<v Speaker 2>moving out of the he gets out of the the

1:26:43.479 --> 1:26:45.960
<v Speaker 2>blocks and goes Yeah, that's a really good number. That

1:26:46.000 --> 1:26:49.000
<v Speaker 2>would be a good number for like receivers, right, yeah,

1:26:49.000 --> 1:26:51.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's a really good number. One point five six,

1:26:51.080 --> 1:26:54.880
<v Speaker 2>that's a individually, that's a perfect ten out of ten score.

1:26:54.960 --> 1:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he'll actually have a decent rating in Maden since

1:26:57.960 --> 1:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't recognize long snappers and make them tight ends.

1:27:01.120 --> 1:27:01.880
<v Speaker 2>They still don't do that.

1:27:01.920 --> 1:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>They still don't do that. That's crazy, I know, and

1:27:03.880 --> 1:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>doing the college game either. So I finally got to

1:27:05.800 --> 1:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>do I've been waiting ten years tweet out all the

1:27:08.840 --> 1:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>overall ratings for all the Patriots draft picks, poor Julian

1:27:12.000 --> 1:27:14.759
<v Speaker 1>ash Everybody I think was eighty five or higher except

1:27:14.800 --> 1:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>poor Julian Ashby. I have to do a fifty six

1:27:17.400 --> 1:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>with an asterisk because it's still tight ends. They don't

1:27:20.000 --> 1:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>recognize them as long.

1:27:20.760 --> 1:27:22.680
<v Speaker 2>A sam Well. Is that just because they don't want

1:27:22.680 --> 1:27:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to put in the work to actually evaluate the long snappers.

1:27:25.040 --> 1:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Probably, but like you could we just broke it down,

1:27:27.200 --> 1:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like there's things you could put in to make it

1:27:29.280 --> 1:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>a thing that's true.

1:27:31.920 --> 1:27:32.360
<v Speaker 2>All right?

1:27:32.680 --> 1:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>They three ninety overall guys from NCA.

1:27:34.680 --> 1:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>By the way, it was a good draft.

1:27:37.240 --> 1:27:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:27:37.760 --> 1:27:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Last one mister irrelevant himself, Kobe Minor, Yeah, from Memphis.

1:27:42.479 --> 1:27:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Kind of cool, mister irrelevant thing. Yeah, fun, Kobe Minor

1:27:46.880 --> 1:27:49.880
<v Speaker 2>from Memphis. I think the the thing that stands out

1:27:49.920 --> 1:27:53.680
<v Speaker 2>to me about this pick, oh, you know, besides him

1:27:53.720 --> 1:27:57.880
<v Speaker 2>being mister irrelevant, which is notable, right, is uh, we've

1:27:57.920 --> 1:28:02.720
<v Speaker 2>talked a little bit about slock Corn and maybe you know,

1:28:02.760 --> 1:28:06.360
<v Speaker 2>what's Marcus Jones's role in this defense is what's his fit?

1:28:06.479 --> 1:28:09.880
<v Speaker 2>What's his future with the Patriots? They could probably use

1:28:09.880 --> 1:28:12.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of depth in the slot. I mentioned

1:28:12.360 --> 1:28:15.479
<v Speaker 2>earlier that I was trying to put together my depth

1:28:15.560 --> 1:28:19.080
<v Speaker 2>chart the other day on Monday, and I didn't really

1:28:19.120 --> 1:28:22.160
<v Speaker 2>feel great about who to put behind Marcus Jones in

1:28:22.240 --> 1:28:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the slot. It's probably Isaiah Bolden is the guy I

1:28:25.920 --> 1:28:28.559
<v Speaker 2>feel the best about is like a bigger slot corner.

1:28:28.880 --> 1:28:31.360
<v Speaker 2>He's practiced a little bit some in the slot with

1:28:31.439 --> 1:28:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots the last couple of years. Kobe Minor doesn't

1:28:34.160 --> 1:28:37.719
<v Speaker 2>have great top end speed, but he's got coverage ability.

1:28:37.720 --> 1:28:41.320
<v Speaker 2>He's got zone coverage ability. He can handle those responsibilities,

1:28:41.800 --> 1:28:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think that a lot of people project him

1:28:44.840 --> 1:28:47.800
<v Speaker 2>to play be better off inside because of the lack

1:28:47.880 --> 1:28:49.880
<v Speaker 2>of long speed. So I do wonder if they're going

1:28:49.960 --> 1:28:51.960
<v Speaker 2>to have him come in and compete as a slot corner.

1:28:52.400 --> 1:28:54.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that certainly seems like yet also a guy that's

1:28:54.560 --> 1:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a good athlete. I think in somebody that they probably

1:28:56.840 --> 1:28:59.599
<v Speaker 1>have ear marked for a special team's role primarily, but yeah,

1:28:59.640 --> 1:29:01.759
<v Speaker 1>they need did slot corner depth. He's going to compete.

1:29:02.040 --> 1:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Paul, a guy, undrafted guy from Texas State, has

1:29:04.880 --> 1:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>been listed a lot of places of safety, yeah, but

1:29:07.240 --> 1:29:11.120
<v Speaker 1>primarily played slot corner for the Bobcats last year. There's

1:29:11.120 --> 1:29:12.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an interesting competition there.

1:29:12.720 --> 1:29:16.479
<v Speaker 2>You see a lot of you know, scrappy physical I'm

1:29:16.520 --> 1:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>not afraid to stick his hat in in the run game,

1:29:19.240 --> 1:29:20.880
<v Speaker 2>and when you hear those types of things, you know

1:29:21.000 --> 1:29:25.559
<v Speaker 2>nowadays Nicole leven personnel. You know, new strong sidelinebacker. Like

1:29:25.680 --> 1:29:28.080
<v Speaker 2>you think about the slot and guys like that playing

1:29:28.080 --> 1:29:30.600
<v Speaker 2>a spot a slot, especially if they don't have the

1:29:30.640 --> 1:29:33.240
<v Speaker 2>top end speed to hang as outside corners. You can

1:29:33.280 --> 1:29:35.720
<v Speaker 2>move him back inside and maybe get something out of

1:29:35.760 --> 1:29:38.439
<v Speaker 2>him a flyer. You know, we'll see what happens with him. Obviously,

1:29:38.520 --> 1:29:40.519
<v Speaker 2>last pick in the draft. You're not expecting a ton

1:29:40.880 --> 1:29:42.880
<v Speaker 2>So that's the draft class. That was good. Look at

1:29:42.880 --> 1:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>that Look at that pace.

1:29:44.360 --> 1:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty good.

1:29:45.040 --> 1:29:46.920
<v Speaker 2>That was one of our best ever. Like normally this

1:29:46.960 --> 1:29:51.000
<v Speaker 2>show takes we saw the UDF phase, but that was

1:29:51.040 --> 1:29:53.640
<v Speaker 2>a good pace. I'm proud of us. I really am

1:29:53.840 --> 1:29:56.680
<v Speaker 2>so about those u DFAs. Yeah, so the Patriots have

1:29:56.720 --> 1:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>signed an unbelievable quite a few ud fas. Uh, what

1:30:00.960 --> 1:30:03.839
<v Speaker 2>are we up to now? Like like almost seventeen seventeen,

1:30:03.880 --> 1:30:06.680
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say, right, we're getting to a high

1:30:06.800 --> 1:30:09.600
<v Speaker 2>number here. So I have a couple that I'm higher on.

1:30:09.680 --> 1:30:12.439
<v Speaker 2>I know you have a couple as well. I think

1:30:12.439 --> 1:30:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the ones that are the most notable, uh to me

1:30:15.960 --> 1:30:20.000
<v Speaker 2>are Efton Chishom's got to be on the list. Land

1:30:20.040 --> 1:30:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Larrison's got to be on the list. I think those

1:30:21.680 --> 1:30:25.679
<v Speaker 2>two guys are on everybody's list. Jack Connonlly from Boston

1:30:25.680 --> 1:30:30.240
<v Speaker 2>College I find interesting. And then of course the full

1:30:30.280 --> 1:30:33.920
<v Speaker 2>back Brock Lamb also c J Deprie. Oh, I can't

1:30:34.200 --> 1:30:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably the highest on CV and I just forgot

1:30:36.880 --> 1:30:39.160
<v Speaker 2>ce Ja Prie. So I would say those five are

1:30:39.160 --> 1:30:41.760
<v Speaker 2>probably the guys that I look at. Oh and uh

1:30:41.920 --> 1:30:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Elijah Ponder.

1:30:43.000 --> 1:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so six, we'll throw the one in on defense.

1:30:45.120 --> 1:30:46.559
<v Speaker 1>It's mostly an offensive class.

1:30:46.640 --> 1:30:49.759
<v Speaker 2>So those six guys I look at and say probably

1:30:49.840 --> 1:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>have the best chance to push for roster spots. Who

1:30:55.040 --> 1:30:57.160
<v Speaker 2>is your favorite? You know, we have a couple of minutes,

1:30:57.200 --> 1:30:59.040
<v Speaker 2>so you can, we can go on all six, But

1:30:59.080 --> 1:31:00.000
<v Speaker 2>who is your favorite?

1:31:01.920 --> 1:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>My personal favorite is probably Larison. I think the guy

1:31:07.040 --> 1:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like this feels like a lazy take. Evan, I don't know.

1:31:08.960 --> 1:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>You tell me. Brock Lampi's the most likely to make

1:31:11.280 --> 1:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the team because he's on the top of the depth chart,

1:31:13.400 --> 1:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so like he's gonna make it because they need a

1:31:15.040 --> 1:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>full back and he's a fullback. Beyond him, Larison's super

1:31:19.000 --> 1:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>fun reminds me a ton of Brandon Bolden. I think

1:31:22.000 --> 1:31:25.439
<v Speaker 1>he's a physical ballcarrier. He can run between the tackles,

1:31:25.479 --> 1:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>he can catch the football. I think he's gonna be

1:31:27.000 --> 1:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a stud on special teams. I think he ends up

1:31:29.840 --> 1:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>making the team. There could be like three or four

1:31:31.800 --> 1:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of these guys who make the team. CJ. Dupree. We

1:31:34.800 --> 1:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about this guy a lot during the pre draft process.

1:31:37.160 --> 1:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Turned out they got him as a UDFA primarily blocking

1:31:39.920 --> 1:31:43.559
<v Speaker 1>tight end, but has some receiving upside you can tap into.

1:31:44.080 --> 1:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Really was like the late Day three Mitchell Evans who

1:31:46.840 --> 1:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we liked but then obviously end up going undrafted. I

1:31:49.840 --> 1:31:52.720
<v Speaker 1>think to a lot of people's surprise. So I think

1:31:52.720 --> 1:31:55.599
<v Speaker 1>he has a good chance. Chisholm, I mean just cut

1:31:55.640 --> 1:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and dry, Josh McDaniel, slicker receiver. I don't know how

1:31:57.920 --> 1:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>much more we need to say there and then I

1:32:00.800 --> 1:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>also like Connolly can play four spots. We'll give you

1:32:04.040 --> 1:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>some depth. We talked about the importance there. Wilfrid Pinay

1:32:08.080 --> 1:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>will be an interesting one. I also like, I kind

1:32:10.240 --> 1:32:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of just mentioned him. Is Jordan Polk from Texas State.

1:32:15.160 --> 1:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>A ton of slot experience, some of it's at the

1:32:16.960 --> 1:32:20.679
<v Speaker 1>FCS level, but has a ton of slot experience. Plays physically.

1:32:20.760 --> 1:32:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I think he forces three or four fumbles last year.

1:32:23.120 --> 1:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So they need a backup slot corner, and I think

1:32:25.320 --> 1:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be right there in the mix of the competition.

1:32:27.000 --> 1:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Can play some safety as well, and should be a

1:32:28.920 --> 1:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>good player on special teams. So there's a little g

1:32:30.520 --> 1:32:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Scott too, Like if they want a more of receiving

1:32:32.800 --> 1:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>tight end, I think he's certainly got'd like to keep

1:32:34.840 --> 1:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on the practice squad and developed for a year. There's

1:32:36.960 --> 1:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys that you look at. So I'll

1:32:38.960 --> 1:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>have my list out tomorrow on ninety eight five the

1:32:41.200 --> 1:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Sports of dot Com. Of like udfa's with the most

1:32:44.400 --> 1:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>realistic path to the roster. I had ten guys that

1:32:47.720 --> 1:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I can see like having a realistic path to making

1:32:50.160 --> 1:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the team. It doesn't mean they all will. They won't.

1:32:52.439 --> 1:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna have ten udfas, But like, there's ten

1:32:55.000 --> 1:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>guys that I would not be surprised if they made

1:32:57.240 --> 1:32:57.599
<v Speaker 1>the team.

1:32:58.280 --> 1:33:01.000
<v Speaker 2>So I'll go in order of guys that basically I

1:33:01.000 --> 1:33:03.880
<v Speaker 2>thought were drafted to not you know, guys that are

1:33:03.920 --> 1:33:07.000
<v Speaker 2>lower on my list. But suj Dupre, I'm shocked he

1:33:07.000 --> 1:33:11.640
<v Speaker 2>didn't get drafted. And yeah, this happens deep tight end class.

1:33:12.040 --> 1:33:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Someone's gonna fall through the CACS crack. Someone's not going

1:33:14.680 --> 1:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>to get drafted. That's just the way it works in

1:33:16.880 --> 1:33:21.040
<v Speaker 2>deep classes. Duprie was one of those guys. For my money,

1:33:21.040 --> 1:33:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I thought dupri was one of the best inline blockers

1:33:24.880 --> 1:33:27.240
<v Speaker 2>on day three in the class. Put him right up

1:33:27.280 --> 1:33:31.360
<v Speaker 2>there with you know, Jackson Hawes and Latchie from Iowa

1:33:31.439 --> 1:33:34.439
<v Speaker 2>and like those guys. I thought he blocked really really well.

1:33:34.720 --> 1:33:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I know there's some questions about finish and sort of

1:33:38.200 --> 1:33:41.200
<v Speaker 2>power to sustain and things like that. I didn't see

1:33:41.200 --> 1:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>that in a couple of games of his that I watched,

1:33:43.200 --> 1:33:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I thought that he finished really well. I put a

1:33:45.280 --> 1:33:47.960
<v Speaker 2>clip up on Twitter of him just kind of throwing

1:33:47.960 --> 1:33:49.959
<v Speaker 2>a guy out of the club, you know, on the sideline.

1:33:50.000 --> 1:33:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I put another one up of him comboing up on

1:33:52.640 --> 1:33:55.200
<v Speaker 2>an inline block of and him just burying the dude

1:33:55.200 --> 1:33:57.160
<v Speaker 2>into the ground and flexing on him, Like this is

1:33:57.200 --> 1:33:59.320
<v Speaker 2>the guy that can really block. If you're gonna make

1:33:59.320 --> 1:34:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the team as a third tight end, blocking and special

1:34:02.040 --> 1:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>teams is your path, right, Like, that's the way to

1:34:04.080 --> 1:34:06.280
<v Speaker 2>do it. And I think du pre can do both

1:34:06.320 --> 1:34:08.240
<v Speaker 2>of those things. You know, play on the wing on

1:34:08.320 --> 1:34:10.880
<v Speaker 2>special teams, on the protection units and things like that,

1:34:11.200 --> 1:34:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and then also block in line on as a third

1:34:13.920 --> 1:34:16.080
<v Speaker 2>tight end. He has a little bit of juice, like

1:34:16.120 --> 1:34:18.920
<v Speaker 2>he's a four to six ish guy. In the forty

1:34:19.000 --> 1:34:23.599
<v Speaker 2>yard dash, it wasn't a terrible time, above average speed

1:34:23.640 --> 1:34:26.920
<v Speaker 2>at straight line speed. He was an afterthought in Alabama's

1:34:26.960 --> 1:34:29.920
<v Speaker 2>passing game, as you would expect with all the six nine,

1:34:30.040 --> 1:34:32.800
<v Speaker 2>all the talent they have at that school. But he

1:34:32.960 --> 1:34:34.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, they would dump them off, you know, tight

1:34:34.800 --> 1:34:38.280
<v Speaker 2>end screens, little you know, slipouts into the flats, things

1:34:38.360 --> 1:34:40.519
<v Speaker 2>like that, and let him run with the ball. And

1:34:40.800 --> 1:34:42.320
<v Speaker 2>he was pretty good with the ball in his hands.

1:34:42.320 --> 1:34:44.679
<v Speaker 2>And he's got a little bit of straight line speed

1:34:44.720 --> 1:34:50.919
<v Speaker 2>to get down the field. So you split was, yeah,

1:34:50.920 --> 1:34:53.400
<v Speaker 2>they'll have races. I thought that Dupre was going to

1:34:53.439 --> 1:34:54.759
<v Speaker 2>get drafted because of his blocking.

1:34:54.920 --> 1:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, me too, And he's.

1:34:56.080 --> 1:35:01.840
<v Speaker 2>A really good blocker. Efton Chisholm. I just it makes

1:35:01.840 --> 1:35:04.519
<v Speaker 2>me feel whole again that we're doing eft and Chisholm,

1:35:05.040 --> 1:35:09.519
<v Speaker 2>because this is the Riley McCarron's of Austin cars. This

1:35:09.760 --> 1:35:13.080
<v Speaker 2>is the Brax and Barrioses of Gunner O Chefsky's. Yeah,

1:35:13.320 --> 1:35:15.760
<v Speaker 2>this is uh, give me another one.

1:35:16.200 --> 1:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're out of him unless you want to

1:35:17.840 --> 1:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>go to Julian Edelman.

1:35:19.880 --> 1:35:21.920
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't want to go to Julian Edelman, but.

1:35:23.439 --> 1:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Austin Carr, Braxton Barrios, Riley McCarran, Gunner, Gunner, Well, I

1:35:28.920 --> 1:35:31.519
<v Speaker 1>don't think Gunner was more like Gunner was a converted corner.

1:35:31.600 --> 1:35:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Gunner was a little different. But there's more back

1:35:36.680 --> 1:35:39.120
<v Speaker 2>in the day. Like I was mentioning Riley McCarron and

1:35:39.160 --> 1:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Austin Carr and Paul yesterday on PU laughed and said,

1:35:43.200 --> 1:35:47.479
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking of different guys because there's so many guys.

1:35:47.840 --> 1:35:53.960
<v Speaker 2>But anyways, uh, not true slot, not like the Truton

1:35:54.040 --> 1:35:58.439
<v Speaker 2>Chisholm is your classic quick, not fast Patriots slot receiver.

1:35:58.840 --> 1:36:02.559
<v Speaker 2>He ran a four to seven. He has got no juice, right, like,

1:36:02.920 --> 1:36:05.519
<v Speaker 2>no straight line juice down the field, and it's not

1:36:05.600 --> 1:36:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot after the catch. I will give him this

1:36:07.840 --> 1:36:11.360
<v Speaker 2>after the catch though. He is really good at making

1:36:11.360 --> 1:36:14.559
<v Speaker 2>the first guy miss in a phone booth. Then he

1:36:14.600 --> 1:36:17.320
<v Speaker 2>gets caught from behind every single time. But like he'll

1:36:17.360 --> 1:36:19.599
<v Speaker 2>give you those extra like two or three yards by

1:36:19.680 --> 1:36:20.920
<v Speaker 2>just eluding that first hill.

1:36:21.000 --> 1:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Also like, and I mean this is at the FCS level,

1:36:23.840 --> 1:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>but he'll drag guys like he doesn't just go down. Yeah,

1:36:26.360 --> 1:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>he's he wants the contacts there because he gets caught,

1:36:29.360 --> 1:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>but like he'll he'll make him work to bring him down.

1:36:32.640 --> 1:36:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Really where he shines those his route running and he's

1:36:35.320 --> 1:36:38.680
<v Speaker 2>a jitterbug like he's got he's an absolute jitterbug quickness.

1:36:39.200 --> 1:36:41.720
<v Speaker 2>He's got that ability to separate at the top of

1:36:41.760 --> 1:36:45.719
<v Speaker 2>the routes. If he's gonna there's gonna be a preseason game.

1:36:46.120 --> 1:36:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you right now where they're gonna run

1:36:48.360 --> 1:36:50.160
<v Speaker 2>hass and he's gonna be number three and he's gonna

1:36:50.200 --> 1:36:52.240
<v Speaker 2>run the juke and he's gonna win over the middle

1:36:52.280 --> 1:36:54.479
<v Speaker 2>on a linebacker and we're all gonna just be like

1:36:54.760 --> 1:36:57.360
<v Speaker 2>there he is there, it is right, Like it's gonna

1:36:57.400 --> 1:37:01.679
<v Speaker 2>be like pop the corks right like that. That's chisholm uh.

1:37:01.800 --> 1:37:05.280
<v Speaker 2>He's he was fun. I liked watching watching him at

1:37:05.320 --> 1:37:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Eastern Washington. I posted this on Twitter, like red on

1:37:08.760 --> 1:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>red red jerseys on a red field, Like come on

1:37:11.720 --> 1:37:16.559
<v Speaker 2>Eastern Washington, Like, no, that's the red field, okay, but

1:37:16.640 --> 1:37:18.519
<v Speaker 2>you can't wear red jerseys on a redkin.

1:37:19.600 --> 1:37:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever seen the thing with Boise State where

1:37:21.640 --> 1:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the guy lies down on the on the kick that

1:37:25.439 --> 1:37:27.679
<v Speaker 1>should be it's a whole field advantage.

1:37:27.720 --> 1:37:31.040
<v Speaker 2>If this organization did that, I.

1:37:31.000 --> 1:37:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Don't want to see colored fields in the NFL.

1:37:32.880 --> 1:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>This organization did that back in the day, there would

1:37:35.400 --> 1:37:38.400
<v Speaker 2>be a Supreme Court hearing.

1:37:38.400 --> 1:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Of the pack the Jets can do it. There's not

1:37:41.200 --> 1:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>smart enough to actually, I think a guy in the

1:37:43.760 --> 1:37:45.599
<v Speaker 1>NFL did do that. Lie down in an enzign.

1:37:45.720 --> 1:37:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I know he did. He did, Yeah, he did. So

1:37:48.360 --> 1:37:52.080
<v Speaker 2>that's Efton Chishlm. Classic Josh McDaniel slot receiver, the red field.

1:37:52.360 --> 1:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>It's so classic Josh McDaniel slot that you just know

1:37:56.680 --> 1:37:59.280
<v Speaker 2>that McDaniels was somewhere in this building when they do

1:37:59.360 --> 1:38:01.280
<v Speaker 2>UDF a is or flying and he was like, can

1:38:01.280 --> 1:38:02.559
<v Speaker 2>you just give me Chisholm Like.

1:38:02.520 --> 1:38:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And you just just you said he started asking for

1:38:04.960 --> 1:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that for the UDFA. He's probably one f seven. They

1:38:07.880 --> 1:38:08.920
<v Speaker 1>probably to rip the phone away.

1:38:09.000 --> 1:38:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was probably like, I'm telling you, this Eastern

1:38:11.439 --> 1:38:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Washington kid is exactly what I need. Just give me

1:38:13.720 --> 1:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>this kid.

1:38:14.160 --> 1:38:16.479
<v Speaker 1>When does he release the first workout video with Edelman?

1:38:17.040 --> 1:38:18.679
<v Speaker 1>You know Edelman is going to start going and working

1:38:18.680 --> 1:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>out with him.

1:38:19.680 --> 1:38:21.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited about him. I'm not gonna lie. He's going

1:38:21.680 --> 1:38:23.599
<v Speaker 2>to be a training camp guy we all know that,

1:38:24.320 --> 1:38:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Land Larison. I can see it with him a little

1:38:27.080 --> 1:38:30.320
<v Speaker 2>bit too. Again, another guy that just fits that mold

1:38:30.360 --> 1:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>for the Patriots. Really good quickness, like he can really

1:38:33.280 --> 1:38:36.360
<v Speaker 2>elude and jump out of cuts. I wouldn't say he's

1:38:36.400 --> 1:38:38.559
<v Speaker 2>the fastest either in a straight line, like he's not

1:38:38.560 --> 1:38:41.920
<v Speaker 2>going to run through defenses or take out pursued angles

1:38:41.920 --> 1:38:44.640
<v Speaker 2>like Trevon Henderson, but he's going to be able to

1:38:44.760 --> 1:38:46.960
<v Speaker 2>jump cut out of tackles. He's gonna be able to

1:38:47.000 --> 1:38:48.640
<v Speaker 2>catch the ball a little bit out of the battlefield,

1:38:49.360 --> 1:38:51.599
<v Speaker 2>you said, Brandon Bolden. He told me I was lazy

1:38:51.640 --> 1:38:54.439
<v Speaker 2>by comping him to Rex Burkhead. I'm gonna do it anyways, right,

1:38:54.479 --> 1:38:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I think.

1:38:54.720 --> 1:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>He gets bigger than I forgot. I looked at that.

1:38:57.560 --> 1:38:59.519
<v Speaker 1>I said, Larius is like a big guy.

1:38:59.720 --> 1:39:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I didn't realize that. Yesterday on PU I I

1:39:02.680 --> 1:39:04.680
<v Speaker 2>screwed up and I called him Danny Woodhead. He's much

1:39:04.680 --> 1:39:07.120
<v Speaker 2>bigger than Danny wood He's like six foot two fifteen. Yeah,

1:39:07.200 --> 1:39:10.479
<v Speaker 2>Rex Burkhead, Rex Perkin. Yeah, there's a there's comps of

1:39:10.960 --> 1:39:14.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a comps. There's clips of him like running angle

1:39:14.120 --> 1:39:16.000
<v Speaker 2>routes and stuff like that. Out of the backfield and

1:39:16.040 --> 1:39:19.080
<v Speaker 2>paying some separation on linebackers. He's he's Rex burt Head.

1:39:19.520 --> 1:39:22.559
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Conley, Jack Conley from Boston College. You knew

1:39:22.600 --> 1:39:24.360
<v Speaker 2>they were going to get one BC guy in here.

1:39:24.880 --> 1:39:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Jack Conley's the guy. What I like about Jack Conley

1:39:28.160 --> 1:39:33.400
<v Speaker 2>And I talked to to the guys at New England

1:39:33.400 --> 1:39:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Football Journal, you know, Kevin and yeah, Den, I was

1:39:38.439 --> 1:39:40.080
<v Speaker 2>trying to I wasn't gonna be able to pronounce his

1:39:40.120 --> 1:39:43.360
<v Speaker 2>last name, sorry. John. John's a big offensive line guy,

1:39:43.960 --> 1:39:46.080
<v Speaker 2>coaches offensive line, so he knows what he's talking about.

1:39:46.080 --> 1:39:47.760
<v Speaker 2>And we were at PC's pro day and he was like,

1:39:48.240 --> 1:39:50.599
<v Speaker 2>I think Conley, you know, is a is an interesting

1:39:50.680 --> 1:39:53.160
<v Speaker 2>like seventh round UDF A flyer. He is on it.

1:39:53.439 --> 1:39:55.720
<v Speaker 2>And the big reason why John told me that is

1:39:55.760 --> 1:39:58.160
<v Speaker 2>because of his versatility. Like if you if you're going

1:39:58.240 --> 1:40:00.400
<v Speaker 2>to back up in the NFL, you better be able

1:40:00.439 --> 1:40:02.600
<v Speaker 2>to back up multiple spots, right, Like you have to

1:40:02.600 --> 1:40:06.120
<v Speaker 2>be a four position backup like Conley. Conley played every

1:40:06.160 --> 1:40:09.000
<v Speaker 2>position at Boston College beside center. Yeah, he played in

1:40:09.040 --> 1:40:11.720
<v Speaker 2>a college game at He also played a little bit

1:40:11.720 --> 1:40:14.120
<v Speaker 2>of muscle tight end, like jumbo tight end, you know,

1:40:14.520 --> 1:40:17.719
<v Speaker 2>tackle eligible type of stuff. As the sixth offensive lineman.

1:40:18.040 --> 1:40:20.799
<v Speaker 2>So this is a guy that projects as a backup,

1:40:21.520 --> 1:40:24.200
<v Speaker 2>that can back up multiple positions. I think he's got

1:40:24.240 --> 1:40:26.920
<v Speaker 2>good power, good play strength to him. You know, he's

1:40:26.960 --> 1:40:31.200
<v Speaker 2>got a rock solid kind of anchor and thud into

1:40:31.280 --> 1:40:33.560
<v Speaker 2>contact and all that kind of stuff. He's got to

1:40:33.600 --> 1:40:36.160
<v Speaker 2>work on. He's a wastebender and he like leans over

1:40:36.200 --> 1:40:38.439
<v Speaker 2>his skis and gets off balance. I have to work

1:40:38.439 --> 1:40:40.639
<v Speaker 2>on that, but I think he can be a backup

1:40:41.000 --> 1:40:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in the league. So to prea chisholm uh Lampy With Lampy,

1:40:47.400 --> 1:40:50.800
<v Speaker 2>it's more of a of an offense stylistic thing, right,

1:40:50.880 --> 1:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Like that's all it is. If they're gonna go with

1:40:53.160 --> 1:40:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the full back, you know, that's the type of thing

1:40:55.240 --> 1:40:58.439
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to Uh, they're gonna want, you know,

1:40:58.520 --> 1:41:00.960
<v Speaker 2>in Lampy. You know I turned on his tape against

1:41:00.960 --> 1:41:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame last year at Northern Iowa and they ran

1:41:06.360 --> 1:41:09.080
<v Speaker 2>lead iso right full back right through the the A

1:41:09.240 --> 1:41:12.280
<v Speaker 2>gap or the B gap up on the linebacker you know,

1:41:12.400 --> 1:41:15.959
<v Speaker 2>thwack right behind him, right. You know that play. Everybody

1:41:15.960 --> 1:41:17.920
<v Speaker 2>knows it. If you play pee wee football, it's like

1:41:17.960 --> 1:41:20.400
<v Speaker 2>a day one install from like the fifth grade on

1:41:20.680 --> 1:41:24.720
<v Speaker 2>right is lead ISO. Then right after a couple of

1:41:24.720 --> 1:41:27.120
<v Speaker 2>plays later they play actioned off of it and I

1:41:27.560 --> 1:41:29.800
<v Speaker 2>was like, I was pants off. I was like, hell yeah,

1:41:29.960 --> 1:41:32.840
<v Speaker 2>full back's back, baby. He did do a little bit

1:41:32.840 --> 1:41:35.280
<v Speaker 2>of things on the wing like you do, some wing

1:41:35.320 --> 1:41:38.080
<v Speaker 2>blocking and some inline blocking as well. So there's some

1:41:38.120 --> 1:41:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of that versatility or like H back versatility to him

1:41:41.040 --> 1:41:44.000
<v Speaker 2>as well. But if they want that traditional full back,

1:41:44.040 --> 1:41:46.400
<v Speaker 2>that's just him. The one thing I would say about

1:41:46.439 --> 1:41:49.080
<v Speaker 2>him as a receiver, I thought his ball skills were decent.

1:41:49.160 --> 1:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Like he made a low catch against Notre Dame where

1:41:51.040 --> 1:41:53.880
<v Speaker 2>he got yeah, where he went to the ground and

1:41:53.920 --> 1:41:55.840
<v Speaker 2>made a catch. I thought that he Know he's not

1:41:55.880 --> 1:41:58.280
<v Speaker 2>a dynamic receiver. It's not Kyle used check right, You're

1:41:58.320 --> 1:42:00.280
<v Speaker 2>not going to get that level out of him. But

1:42:00.360 --> 1:42:02.000
<v Speaker 2>I do think he can catch the ball. You know,

1:42:02.000 --> 1:42:04.400
<v Speaker 2>if he elits into the flat and he's you know,

1:42:04.640 --> 1:42:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the fifth read on the backside, and there's just nobody

1:42:07.240 --> 1:42:09.439
<v Speaker 2>covering him over here, like they'll he'll be able to

1:42:10.600 --> 1:42:13.240
<v Speaker 2>be serviceable. He'll catch the ball, he'll get upfield, he'll

1:42:13.240 --> 1:42:14.000
<v Speaker 2>get the yards he can get.

1:42:14.160 --> 1:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>He's not a true h back, but he is somebody

1:42:15.760 --> 1:42:17.519
<v Speaker 1>who can trust with ball in his hands in the

1:42:17.560 --> 1:42:21.520
<v Speaker 1>right situation. So I think it's that perfect mold between

1:42:21.720 --> 1:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>what McDaniels wants, which is a guy that can just

1:42:23.760 --> 1:42:25.720
<v Speaker 1>get into the A gap and meet a linebacker, but

1:42:26.280 --> 1:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not somebody like he's all somebody the defense is going

1:42:28.680 --> 1:42:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to have to account for.

1:42:29.840 --> 1:42:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Last one I wanted to bring up was Elijah Ponder

1:42:32.960 --> 1:42:37.000
<v Speaker 2>from cal Poly. I thought that Elijah Ponder had draftable talent,

1:42:37.520 --> 1:42:42.479
<v Speaker 2>draftable trade, certainly a really good tester. Again, hammer in

1:42:42.520 --> 1:42:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the testing here, nine point seven rass Orris really elite

1:42:49.640 --> 1:42:53.240
<v Speaker 2>in all categories, you know, elite speed, elite explosiveness, elite agility.

1:42:53.520 --> 1:42:55.760
<v Speaker 2>This is a guy that ran a six point nine

1:42:55.800 --> 1:42:58.400
<v Speaker 2>to nine second three cone at six two two fifty.

1:42:58.479 --> 1:43:01.120
<v Speaker 2>That's really good. Yeah, sub seven three cone at that

1:43:01.200 --> 1:43:04.840
<v Speaker 2>size is really impressive. Defensive end prospect handing the dirt

1:43:04.880 --> 1:43:08.719
<v Speaker 2>four to three end, good power, good explosiveness off the line,

1:43:08.760 --> 1:43:12.600
<v Speaker 2>can really gain ground early in his pass rush. I

1:43:12.640 --> 1:43:15.599
<v Speaker 2>think that there obviously is going to be some level

1:43:15.600 --> 1:43:19.439
<v Speaker 2>of competition, question marks and jumping competition and technique stuff,

1:43:19.479 --> 1:43:22.400
<v Speaker 2>But a guy that can really rush the passer and

1:43:22.479 --> 1:43:26.000
<v Speaker 2>really has some speed to power and some athleticism to

1:43:26.080 --> 1:43:27.640
<v Speaker 2>his game so I think he's got a chance just

1:43:27.720 --> 1:43:31.280
<v Speaker 2>on raw tools to potentially make the roster. So if

1:43:31.280 --> 1:43:34.400
<v Speaker 2>I had to guess, besides Lampy, like you said, that's

1:43:34.400 --> 1:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>its own thing. Besides Lampy, if I had to guess,

1:43:37.240 --> 1:43:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I would say Dupree's probably got the best chance to

1:43:39.120 --> 1:43:40.479
<v Speaker 2>make the team as a third tight end.

1:43:40.560 --> 1:43:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but Larison and Chisholm are right there too. I

1:43:43.800 --> 1:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's the big that's the and Conley that's like

1:43:47.400 --> 1:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the group you're looking at, and then some other guys

1:43:49.400 --> 1:43:50.479
<v Speaker 1>more just for depth.

1:43:50.560 --> 1:43:52.080
<v Speaker 2>If I had to put a guess on it, I

1:43:52.080 --> 1:43:55.040
<v Speaker 2>would say Dupre third tight end, blocking tight end behind

1:43:55.120 --> 1:43:57.679
<v Speaker 2>Hunter Henry and Austin Hooper. You can he beat out

1:43:57.760 --> 1:44:01.799
<v Speaker 2>Jahem Bell as more of a tradition inline blocker, whereas

1:44:01.880 --> 1:44:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Jackeen Bell is kind of this you know flex h

1:44:05.200 --> 1:44:06.000
<v Speaker 2>back moved right.

1:44:06.120 --> 1:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>But I guess it becomes tough. Are you gonna So

1:44:08.560 --> 1:44:10.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to me like, if they're going to

1:44:10.360 --> 1:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>carry a move tight end and h back, you probably

1:44:13.080 --> 1:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to keep Lampy. Yeah, So it's Dupre or

1:44:16.160 --> 1:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Lampy depending on if Bell fills the full back rolling right.

1:44:19.120 --> 1:44:21.559
<v Speaker 2>So it's kind of a trickle down effect of like

1:44:22.200 --> 1:44:25.479
<v Speaker 2>Belle Lampy dupre those three guys. Do they want the

1:44:25.560 --> 1:44:29.040
<v Speaker 2>traditional full back? Do they want an extra inline blocker? Yeah?

1:44:29.280 --> 1:44:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Those would be the conversations that we're gonna have all

1:44:33.160 --> 1:44:36.240
<v Speaker 2>summer long, all summer long about this team in this

1:44:36.280 --> 1:44:40.160
<v Speaker 2>fifty three man roster. Really exciting group all around. And

1:44:40.439 --> 1:44:42.920
<v Speaker 2>we have one more special treat for you, so don't

1:44:42.960 --> 1:44:45.800
<v Speaker 2>sign off just yet. Dame Broker from the Athletic is

1:44:45.880 --> 1:44:50.760
<v Speaker 2>up next. He's gonna break down. What's that? Oh? I

1:44:50.800 --> 1:44:52.720
<v Speaker 2>need to do the read. I need to do the

1:44:52.760 --> 1:44:56.240
<v Speaker 2>read first before we throw it to day. Support the

1:44:56.240 --> 1:44:59.200
<v Speaker 2>home team. Join New England's events staff here at led Stadium.

1:44:59.439 --> 1:45:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Season open visions available in food, beverage, parking and security.

1:45:03.439 --> 1:45:08.559
<v Speaker 2>Visit www dot thecraftgroup dot com, slash careers and apply today.

1:45:08.720 --> 1:45:12.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, guys, here's Dan Brugler. We are joined now

1:45:12.160 --> 1:45:15.960
<v Speaker 2>by Dame Bruger of the Athletic, the Beast himself. Dane,

1:45:15.960 --> 1:45:19.519
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much for joining us, and you're we got

1:45:19.560 --> 1:45:21.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fans of you here right now because

1:45:21.479 --> 1:45:24.439
<v Speaker 2>you ranked the Patriots as the number one draft class

1:45:24.439 --> 1:45:26.840
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, so we had to have you y'all

1:45:27.040 --> 1:45:29.000
<v Speaker 2>to talk about that, but thanks so much for doing this.

1:45:30.080 --> 1:45:31.360
<v Speaker 3>No, Hey, pleasures online.

1:45:31.400 --> 1:45:35.000
<v Speaker 5>It was a fun draft season, fun three days. And yeah,

1:45:35.000 --> 1:45:38.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm really lated what the Patriots did. So excited to

1:45:38.080 --> 1:45:39.559
<v Speaker 5>talk about that class with you.

1:45:39.760 --> 1:45:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's start with that right off the top. So

1:45:42.000 --> 1:45:45.960
<v Speaker 2>you published a ranking of all thirty two teams draft

1:45:45.960 --> 1:45:48.400
<v Speaker 2>classes and you had those New England Patriots up there

1:45:48.439 --> 1:45:51.400
<v Speaker 2>at number one. Why did you think the Patriots had

1:45:51.400 --> 1:45:52.639
<v Speaker 2>the best draft in the NFL.

1:45:55.280 --> 1:45:56.760
<v Speaker 5>First of all, they just drafted a lot of the

1:45:56.760 --> 1:45:59.360
<v Speaker 5>players that I had ranked in my top one hundred.

1:45:59.360 --> 1:46:02.720
<v Speaker 5>I think six we're in my top one hundred. And

1:46:02.800 --> 1:46:06.920
<v Speaker 5>I think they just matched up really well with the

1:46:07.040 --> 1:46:09.080
<v Speaker 5>needs and what's going to make this team better, you know,

1:46:09.120 --> 1:46:11.240
<v Speaker 5>And like what I do, because I don't do draft grades,

1:46:11.280 --> 1:46:12.639
<v Speaker 5>I just do it one through thirty two.

1:46:13.040 --> 1:46:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Here are my favorite draft classes.

1:46:14.560 --> 1:46:17.400
<v Speaker 5>And really it just comes down to who do I

1:46:17.439 --> 1:46:21.120
<v Speaker 5>think made the biggest jump based off of what they.

1:46:21.040 --> 1:46:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Did on draft weekend?

1:46:22.080 --> 1:46:24.800
<v Speaker 5>And I think you look at the Patriots. You get

1:46:24.800 --> 1:46:27.360
<v Speaker 5>your love tackle with Will Campbell, you come back, you

1:46:27.400 --> 1:46:31.840
<v Speaker 5>get a couple of playmakers in on Day two with

1:46:31.960 --> 1:46:35.559
<v Speaker 5>Travon Henderson Kyle Williams, and then to get Jared Well

1:46:35.640 --> 1:46:38.760
<v Speaker 5>trade back and then get Jared Wilson. I just tremendous

1:46:38.800 --> 1:46:41.360
<v Speaker 5>value in my opinion. Wilson, He's going to be a

1:46:41.360 --> 1:46:43.639
<v Speaker 5>starter in this league for a long time. I compared

1:46:43.640 --> 1:46:46.120
<v Speaker 5>to him a Rodney Hudson, you know, a guy that

1:46:46.760 --> 1:46:48.960
<v Speaker 5>maybe won't make a Pro Bowl, but he's going to

1:46:49.000 --> 1:46:51.160
<v Speaker 5>be a solid starter for a lot of years. And

1:46:51.560 --> 1:46:55.680
<v Speaker 5>that's he's going to bring competition from day one. And

1:46:55.760 --> 1:46:58.320
<v Speaker 5>so that's what if you're the Patriots, that's exactly what

1:46:58.400 --> 1:47:01.559
<v Speaker 5>you want. You want to an offensive line that is

1:47:02.080 --> 1:47:05.160
<v Speaker 5>really get the five best out there based off of competition.

1:47:05.280 --> 1:47:07.400
<v Speaker 5>And so I think they did a really nice job

1:47:07.520 --> 1:47:10.920
<v Speaker 5>first two three rounds and then into Day three just

1:47:10.960 --> 1:47:14.760
<v Speaker 5>adding really good football players and at positions where they're

1:47:14.800 --> 1:47:17.720
<v Speaker 5>going to directly impact this team in twenty twenty five.

1:47:18.080 --> 1:47:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And Dan kind of along those lines. And I don't

1:47:19.760 --> 1:47:21.800
<v Speaker 1>know if you factor this into your grade, just how

1:47:21.840 --> 1:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>teams maneuver the board and work the board. But five trades.

1:47:25.160 --> 1:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>That was a big part of the talking point coming

1:47:27.000 --> 1:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the draft. It was I believe Elliott Wolf

1:47:30.040 --> 1:47:31.840
<v Speaker 1>after the draft talked about they wanted to make sure

1:47:31.840 --> 1:47:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they were picking in spots where the players lined up

1:47:34.280 --> 1:47:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for them. Did you factor that into your evaluation, if not,

1:47:37.360 --> 1:47:39.960
<v Speaker 1>just your thoughts on how they were able to manipulate

1:47:40.000 --> 1:47:42.479
<v Speaker 1>the board to get the class that they wanted to get.

1:47:43.680 --> 1:47:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that's that's certainly part of it.

1:47:45.560 --> 1:47:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Like I said, to trade back and get Wilson the

1:47:47.960 --> 1:47:53.400
<v Speaker 5>way they did was awesome. It's it's always tough because

1:47:53.520 --> 1:47:54.640
<v Speaker 5>if you like a player.

1:47:54.479 --> 1:47:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Enough, just take them.

1:47:55.439 --> 1:47:58.479
<v Speaker 5>But at the same time, if they are teams calling

1:47:58.600 --> 1:48:01.640
<v Speaker 5>about possibly moving up, then you know, it's it's a

1:48:01.640 --> 1:48:04.040
<v Speaker 5>conversation about, hey, well we can pick up an extra

1:48:04.080 --> 1:48:06.759
<v Speaker 5>fourth or an extra fifth and move back ten twelve

1:48:06.800 --> 1:48:09.160
<v Speaker 5>spots and we still feel like we'll get the same guy.

1:48:09.240 --> 1:48:11.960
<v Speaker 5>Now there's risk involved obviously that the player will still

1:48:12.000 --> 1:48:12.400
<v Speaker 5>be there.

1:48:12.840 --> 1:48:14.719
<v Speaker 3>But I think the Patriots and what.

1:48:14.560 --> 1:48:18.320
<v Speaker 5>They did over the weekend was a good example of

1:48:18.560 --> 1:48:21.639
<v Speaker 5>it working out to their advantage and letting the board

1:48:21.680 --> 1:48:25.640
<v Speaker 5>fall to them, not forcing things, not being you know,

1:48:25.720 --> 1:48:28.320
<v Speaker 5>like was it member last year in the second round

1:48:28.400 --> 1:48:31.720
<v Speaker 5>when you know they traded back, you know, wait from

1:48:31.800 --> 1:48:34.759
<v Speaker 5>lad McConkey, and they know all the you know, noise

1:48:34.800 --> 1:48:38.080
<v Speaker 5>about that decision. Well, that didn't carry over to this

1:48:38.160 --> 1:48:40.160
<v Speaker 5>year where they were scared to move back if they

1:48:40.160 --> 1:48:42.800
<v Speaker 5>felt like that was the right move. And you know

1:48:42.880 --> 1:48:46.720
<v Speaker 5>that that's something to be said about just not manipulating

1:48:46.760 --> 1:48:51.360
<v Speaker 5>the board, but not drafting scared. You know, you are

1:48:51.400 --> 1:48:54.600
<v Speaker 5>going to trust your grades, trust all the work that

1:48:54.640 --> 1:48:57.080
<v Speaker 5>your scouts did, and you know the rest of your

1:48:57.080 --> 1:49:01.160
<v Speaker 5>front office, your coaches, and build the team with players

1:49:01.200 --> 1:49:03.360
<v Speaker 5>that you had high on your board. And they were

1:49:03.439 --> 1:49:05.120
<v Speaker 5>able to do that, and I think they were the

1:49:05.200 --> 1:49:08.200
<v Speaker 5>value because the draft's all about value. The value they

1:49:08.240 --> 1:49:10.919
<v Speaker 5>got at every level the draft was really impressive.

1:49:11.240 --> 1:49:14.000
<v Speaker 2>So, Daniel, you listed out your favorite pick of the

1:49:14.080 --> 1:49:16.040
<v Speaker 2>draft for each team and then your favorite kind of

1:49:16.160 --> 1:49:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Day three sleeper pick, and your favorite pick of the

1:49:18.680 --> 1:49:21.000
<v Speaker 2>draft for the Pats was Kyle Williams, who I think

1:49:21.000 --> 1:49:23.880
<v Speaker 2>we're all pretty excited about here. Not the type of

1:49:23.960 --> 1:49:26.800
<v Speaker 2>receiver that they've had here in a while, you know,

1:49:26.880 --> 1:49:30.240
<v Speaker 2>speed separation ability. But what was it about Kyle Williams

1:49:30.400 --> 1:49:32.120
<v Speaker 2>that you thought he was the best pick of the

1:49:32.200 --> 1:49:33.520
<v Speaker 2>draft for them?

1:49:34.320 --> 1:49:38.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and just summed it up, speed separation. Just going

1:49:38.320 --> 1:49:41.599
<v Speaker 5>back to the Senior Bowl and watching Kyle in person,

1:49:42.400 --> 1:49:46.880
<v Speaker 5>the releases off the line, his ability to separate early,

1:49:47.439 --> 1:49:48.599
<v Speaker 5>mid and late was.

1:49:48.560 --> 1:49:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Just really impressive.

1:49:49.560 --> 1:49:53.760
<v Speaker 5>And I go back to North Carolina when Drake May

1:49:54.040 --> 1:49:56.960
<v Speaker 5>not the twenty twenty three season, but the twenty twenty

1:49:57.040 --> 1:50:01.000
<v Speaker 5>two season, his top target was Josh Downs, and Downs

1:50:01.080 --> 1:50:03.000
<v Speaker 5>was kind of a similar guy where he just got

1:50:03.040 --> 1:50:05.960
<v Speaker 5>open consistently, a little bit of a smaller target, just

1:50:06.000 --> 1:50:08.559
<v Speaker 5>like Kyle Williams, but Downs was able to get open

1:50:08.960 --> 1:50:13.120
<v Speaker 5>and May trusted that implicitly, and that was a big

1:50:13.160 --> 1:50:16.160
<v Speaker 5>part of that North Carolina offense he was missing that

1:50:16.280 --> 1:50:18.800
<v Speaker 5>last year. And that's what I think Kyle Williams can

1:50:18.880 --> 1:50:21.800
<v Speaker 5>be for Drake May, helping him take that next step

1:50:21.800 --> 1:50:25.719
<v Speaker 5>in his development, be a high volume pass catcher, receive

1:50:25.760 --> 1:50:28.000
<v Speaker 5>a lot of targets, even as early as his rookie season.

1:50:28.360 --> 1:50:31.000
<v Speaker 5>So you know, Kyle Williams was an interesting player throughout

1:50:31.000 --> 1:50:33.280
<v Speaker 5>the process because he blew He had a great senior year,

1:50:33.320 --> 1:50:36.000
<v Speaker 5>blew up the Senior Bowl, and then had a really

1:50:36.040 --> 1:50:38.360
<v Speaker 5>good forty time four to four to zero at the combine,

1:50:38.400 --> 1:50:41.200
<v Speaker 5>but then he got hurt the hamstring, so cut the

1:50:41.200 --> 1:50:44.640
<v Speaker 5>combine short, couldn't work out of the Pro Day. But

1:50:44.920 --> 1:50:47.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, he was a really popular guy with thirty

1:50:47.200 --> 1:50:49.639
<v Speaker 5>visits and workouts as teams tried to figure him out,

1:50:49.880 --> 1:50:51.560
<v Speaker 5>and so for the Patriots to get him in the

1:50:51.640 --> 1:50:53.479
<v Speaker 5>third really liked the value there.

1:50:53.880 --> 1:50:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Just along those lines, why do you think, you know,

1:50:55.960 --> 1:50:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you're so dug in this from the beginning, and a

1:50:58.680 --> 1:51:01.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of people they start looking maybe around the Senior

1:51:01.240 --> 1:51:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Bowl and I remember looking at and the consensusport is

1:51:03.920 --> 1:51:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what it is. It's a tool, it's not everything. But

1:51:06.120 --> 1:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he was like eight hundredth on the consensus sport going

1:51:08.400 --> 1:51:10.640
<v Speaker 1>into the Senior Bowl, and even coming out of that,

1:51:11.000 --> 1:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, was not getting that same kind of attention.

1:51:13.080 --> 1:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't until two three weeks ago that people really

1:51:15.400 --> 1:51:17.640
<v Speaker 1>start talking about this guy. Is it just you know,

1:51:18.240 --> 1:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Pack two conference playing out on the West coast late

1:51:21.000 --> 1:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>games or why do you think this guy didn't have

1:51:23.040 --> 1:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>as much external buzz during the process as he clearly

1:51:26.120 --> 1:51:27.720
<v Speaker 1>did with teams going as high as he went.

1:51:29.240 --> 1:51:31.759
<v Speaker 5>I think that's a big part of it, just people

1:51:31.800 --> 1:51:35.160
<v Speaker 5>not paying attention to Washington State football because of you know,

1:51:35.200 --> 1:51:38.680
<v Speaker 5>just the conference realignment in Washington State Oregon State kind

1:51:38.680 --> 1:51:41.680
<v Speaker 5>of being left out in the cold. But yeah, I

1:51:41.720 --> 1:51:45.439
<v Speaker 5>mean Williams he started at UNLV three years there, transferred

1:51:45.439 --> 1:51:48.280
<v Speaker 5>to Washington State, had an okay year in twenty twenty three,

1:51:48.479 --> 1:51:52.040
<v Speaker 5>but wasn't really looked at as a draftable player. So

1:51:52.160 --> 1:51:55.120
<v Speaker 5>going back to the summer watching him, it was like, Okay,

1:51:55.280 --> 1:51:57.760
<v Speaker 5>solid player, but looks like a camp body. You know,

1:51:57.760 --> 1:51:59.880
<v Speaker 5>it looks like he has some speed, but you know,

1:52:00.120 --> 1:52:03.400
<v Speaker 5>production is just okay. And then this year as a senior,

1:52:03.520 --> 1:52:06.000
<v Speaker 5>it's like, really things started to click for him, and

1:52:06.280 --> 1:52:08.800
<v Speaker 5>so it was a little bit of a see. I mean,

1:52:08.880 --> 1:52:11.160
<v Speaker 5>I liked him going into the Senior Bowl, but the

1:52:11.200 --> 1:52:12.960
<v Speaker 5>Senior Bowl is really where it was like, Okay, this

1:52:13.000 --> 1:52:15.800
<v Speaker 5>guy's a little bit different. Jalen Nole to me, was

1:52:15.840 --> 1:52:18.040
<v Speaker 5>the best receiver I saw on mobile. Kyle Williams was

1:52:18.080 --> 1:52:20.320
<v Speaker 5>a close second. Those two. Both of them were really

1:52:20.360 --> 1:52:23.599
<v Speaker 5>dynamic the entire week and then you know, just kind

1:52:23.600 --> 1:52:25.439
<v Speaker 5>of getting better and better throughout the process. But it

1:52:25.479 --> 1:52:27.800
<v Speaker 5>was kind of out of sight, out of mind, not

1:52:27.840 --> 1:52:30.240
<v Speaker 5>seeing him during the season for most fans. And then,

1:52:30.280 --> 1:52:32.320
<v Speaker 5>like I said, he got hurt at the combine, so

1:52:32.560 --> 1:52:34.559
<v Speaker 5>we didn't see him go through a lot of those drills,

1:52:34.600 --> 1:52:36.960
<v Speaker 5>position drills, testing drills, and then he didn't have a

1:52:36.960 --> 1:52:38.840
<v Speaker 5>Pro Day, so you know, he was kind of a

1:52:38.840 --> 1:52:41.519
<v Speaker 5>little bit out of sight, out of mind, but yeah,

1:52:41.520 --> 1:52:43.760
<v Speaker 5>he was a team and then for teams too.

1:52:43.840 --> 1:52:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Like it was.

1:52:44.720 --> 1:52:46.680
<v Speaker 5>It was not like love at first sight. It was

1:52:46.720 --> 1:52:49.080
<v Speaker 5>something that you know, kind of grew on teams as

1:52:49.120 --> 1:52:50.280
<v Speaker 5>the process played out.

1:52:50.520 --> 1:52:53.200
<v Speaker 2>So your your favorite to move down the board here

1:52:53.240 --> 1:52:56.240
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. Your favorite Day three pick was Brandon

1:52:56.280 --> 1:52:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Swinson from LSU, and I think all of us were

1:52:59.400 --> 1:53:02.040
<v Speaker 2>collectively pretty surprised that he made it all the way

1:53:02.400 --> 1:53:05.320
<v Speaker 2>to the fifth round. So to part question here, why

1:53:05.360 --> 1:53:08.720
<v Speaker 2>did you like Swinson? And why do you think he

1:53:08.880 --> 1:53:10.200
<v Speaker 2>fell a little bit in the draft?

1:53:11.520 --> 1:53:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

1:53:11.760 --> 1:53:14.479
<v Speaker 5>And really, I mean there were a couple Joshua Farmer

1:53:14.479 --> 1:53:17.720
<v Speaker 5>in the fourth I thought was you know, terrific value.

1:53:17.840 --> 1:53:20.160
<v Speaker 5>I think Craig Woodson will hear from as a rookie.

1:53:20.320 --> 1:53:24.000
<v Speaker 5>So a couple of Day three picks should play a

1:53:24.040 --> 1:53:26.720
<v Speaker 5>factor in the twenty twenty five season for the Patriots.

1:53:27.000 --> 1:53:29.639
<v Speaker 5>You know, Swinston was tough because you know, he had

1:53:29.840 --> 1:53:32.040
<v Speaker 5>he had plenty of love. I think in the media side,

1:53:32.640 --> 1:53:36.040
<v Speaker 5>teams weren't quite as high on Swinson compared to some

1:53:36.080 --> 1:53:38.320
<v Speaker 5>of the media, and I'm part of it. You know,

1:53:38.360 --> 1:53:41.000
<v Speaker 5>he was a good player at LSU, but you know,

1:53:41.160 --> 1:53:42.560
<v Speaker 5>was he going to be a full time player in

1:53:42.600 --> 1:53:44.559
<v Speaker 5>the NFL? Is he more of a sub package guy,

1:53:45.360 --> 1:53:47.040
<v Speaker 5>you know, six three and a half two hundred and

1:53:47.040 --> 1:53:51.040
<v Speaker 5>fifty five pounds. What hurt him a little bit was

1:53:52.040 --> 1:53:55.559
<v Speaker 5>choosing not to work out at the Pro Day. He'd

1:53:55.560 --> 1:53:59.200
<v Speaker 5>even weigh in, and so I've heard from several teams

1:53:59.240 --> 1:54:02.640
<v Speaker 5>that were just like not happy just that because he

1:54:02.640 --> 1:54:04.400
<v Speaker 5>didn't he did I think the short shuttle in the

1:54:04.439 --> 1:54:06.280
<v Speaker 5>three cone at the combine. Then it goes to the

1:54:06.320 --> 1:54:09.479
<v Speaker 5>Pro day and ops to just do nothing, and that

1:54:09.640 --> 1:54:11.760
<v Speaker 5>rubbed some scouts the wrong way. Now, is that the

1:54:11.840 --> 1:54:14.120
<v Speaker 5>reason he fell? I you know, I don't, I don't,

1:54:14.160 --> 1:54:16.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't know. I think he was viewed as more

1:54:16.400 --> 1:54:19.720
<v Speaker 5>of a fourth round guy for teams, so you know,

1:54:19.840 --> 1:54:21.720
<v Speaker 5>to get him in the fifth, you know, I thought

1:54:21.720 --> 1:54:24.320
<v Speaker 5>it was trific value there. But it's just I go

1:54:24.439 --> 1:54:27.880
<v Speaker 5>back to what this team needed and you look at

1:54:28.000 --> 1:54:30.800
<v Speaker 5>just adding some more pass rush jees. So even if

1:54:30.880 --> 1:54:34.080
<v Speaker 5>you know Swinston's not a full time player, He's going

1:54:34.120 --> 1:54:35.960
<v Speaker 5>to come in and be part of the rotation and

1:54:36.160 --> 1:54:40.240
<v Speaker 5>give you some of that quickness off the edge. He's

1:54:40.280 --> 1:54:43.200
<v Speaker 5>not just a super physical player in the run game,

1:54:43.280 --> 1:54:45.960
<v Speaker 5>but he gives effort, so you know, he he is

1:54:46.000 --> 1:54:48.840
<v Speaker 5>a player that you know has to mature both, you know,

1:54:49.000 --> 1:54:51.680
<v Speaker 5>on the field. Off the field, he his past year,

1:54:51.760 --> 1:54:55.280
<v Speaker 5>he butted heads with coaches a few times. You know,

1:54:55.320 --> 1:54:57.480
<v Speaker 5>he was suspended for the first quarter of the Florida

1:54:57.520 --> 1:55:01.680
<v Speaker 5>game for you know, just not eating the with the

1:55:01.720 --> 1:55:04.400
<v Speaker 5>team expected of him. So there's growing up to do

1:55:04.640 --> 1:55:07.760
<v Speaker 5>with this player. But talent is there for him to

1:55:07.960 --> 1:55:10.400
<v Speaker 5>come in and make an impact getting after the quarterback.

1:55:11.320 --> 1:55:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Late in the draft, the Patriots make the two special

1:55:13.240 --> 1:55:17.879
<v Speaker 1>teams editions kicker Andres Borgalis and then Ashby the long snapper.

1:55:18.600 --> 1:55:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Anytime the Patriots take a special teamer, especially after the

1:55:22.360 --> 1:55:24.600
<v Speaker 1>way went Chad Rownd a couple of years ago, it's like, well,

1:55:24.640 --> 1:55:26.800
<v Speaker 1>did they need to invest draft capital here? What are

1:55:26.840 --> 1:55:29.000
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on those two guys in Are they players

1:55:29.000 --> 1:55:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that you think if the Patriots wanted they had to

1:55:31.520 --> 1:55:32.320
<v Speaker 1>take them where they did?

1:55:34.720 --> 1:55:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Well?

1:55:35.000 --> 1:55:37.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think when you were talking, especially with

1:55:37.200 --> 1:55:39.760
<v Speaker 5>Ashby in the seventh round, it's okay, do we really

1:55:39.760 --> 1:55:41.800
<v Speaker 5>want to get into a bidding war to make sure

1:55:41.800 --> 1:55:43.480
<v Speaker 5>we get him a free agency or you know, a

1:55:43.520 --> 1:55:45.680
<v Speaker 5>team like the Patriots that had so many picks, we

1:55:45.680 --> 1:55:47.440
<v Speaker 5>can just use a seventh rounder on him.

1:55:47.600 --> 1:55:49.000
<v Speaker 3>And you know, Ashby is one.

1:55:48.880 --> 1:55:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Of what five guys long snappers that you know were

1:55:54.640 --> 1:55:58.120
<v Speaker 5>part of that combine that they had with the specialists.

1:55:58.680 --> 1:56:03.040
<v Speaker 5>A little undersize and thirty one pounds, but I think

1:56:03.120 --> 1:56:05.840
<v Speaker 5>that you know, you're thinking about adding weight and you

1:56:05.960 --> 1:56:09.240
<v Speaker 5>look at the athlete and just the consistency that he

1:56:09.320 --> 1:56:12.560
<v Speaker 5>brought that those were kind of the athleticism, consistency, those

1:56:12.600 --> 1:56:14.640
<v Speaker 5>are two words that came up when you know, just

1:56:14.680 --> 1:56:17.440
<v Speaker 5>talking about Ashby. And then you know with the kicker,

1:56:17.920 --> 1:56:20.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, bory Gollis was my rate, my top ranked

1:56:20.640 --> 1:56:23.840
<v Speaker 5>kicker this year. Thought he could go anywhere between the

1:56:23.880 --> 1:56:25.080
<v Speaker 5>fifth and seventh rounds.

1:56:25.360 --> 1:56:27.080
<v Speaker 3>So where the Patriots got him?

1:56:27.080 --> 1:56:30.760
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's always you know, some some teams look

1:56:30.760 --> 1:56:32.800
<v Speaker 5>at it and say, we'll never draft a kicker. Other

1:56:32.800 --> 1:56:34.760
<v Speaker 5>teams look at it and say, you know, if we

1:56:34.920 --> 1:56:35.680
<v Speaker 5>like the player.

1:56:35.520 --> 1:56:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Enough, we'll go that route.

1:56:37.320 --> 1:56:39.880
<v Speaker 5>And I think with bor Gollis, he did enough during

1:56:39.920 --> 1:56:42.560
<v Speaker 5>his college career, he did enough during the pro day

1:56:42.640 --> 1:56:46.720
<v Speaker 5>during the workouts that said, hey, I'm a starter at

1:56:46.720 --> 1:56:49.560
<v Speaker 5>the next level. And so you know, I I'm not

1:56:49.600 --> 1:56:51.440
<v Speaker 5>going to push back and say like they made the

1:56:51.480 --> 1:56:53.920
<v Speaker 5>wrong move or anything. Time will play out, but I

1:56:53.960 --> 1:56:56.520
<v Speaker 5>certainly understand why they went that direction, all.

1:56:56.520 --> 1:56:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, Dan, last one for you. The Patriots have got

1:56:59.440 --> 1:57:02.360
<v Speaker 2>a pretty good history of undrafted rookies making the roster

1:57:02.480 --> 1:57:05.800
<v Speaker 2>making an impact. What are some of the guys that

1:57:05.840 --> 1:57:08.240
<v Speaker 2>stood out to you out of their class there?

1:57:08.560 --> 1:57:08.720
<v Speaker 1>You know?

1:57:08.840 --> 1:57:12.680
<v Speaker 2>CJ. Duprieze one guy that I had actually watched before

1:57:12.720 --> 1:57:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the draft and thought maybe he'd get drafted at tight end.

1:57:15.680 --> 1:57:17.840
<v Speaker 2>But is there anyone out of that group that you like?

1:57:19.640 --> 1:57:24.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, Chisholm was my top ranked non combine

1:57:24.520 --> 1:57:25.520
<v Speaker 5>receiver this year.

1:57:26.160 --> 1:57:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Him running in.

1:57:26.840 --> 1:57:29.320
<v Speaker 5>The four sevens at the Pro Day really kind of

1:57:30.160 --> 1:57:33.920
<v Speaker 5>probably eliminated any chances of getting drafted. But he's not

1:57:34.080 --> 1:57:36.800
<v Speaker 5>a long speed guy. He is a short area quickness

1:57:36.840 --> 1:57:40.800
<v Speaker 5>type of player. He I mean, the production he put

1:57:40.840 --> 1:57:44.280
<v Speaker 5>up at Eastern Washington was outstanding, and then he goes

1:57:44.320 --> 1:57:48.320
<v Speaker 5>to the East West Shrine game and was fantastic. That

1:57:48.440 --> 1:57:51.400
<v Speaker 5>short area quickness out of the slot helps him get open,

1:57:51.880 --> 1:57:54.520
<v Speaker 5>give his quarterback a target. And so I'm eager to

1:57:54.520 --> 1:57:57.360
<v Speaker 5>see what he can do in training camp and see

1:57:57.360 --> 1:58:00.640
<v Speaker 5>if he can possibly earn a role with you on CG.

1:58:00.800 --> 1:58:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Dupree He to me he was.

1:58:02.960 --> 1:58:06.000
<v Speaker 5>The better of the two Alabama tight ends oots actually

1:58:06.000 --> 1:58:08.200
<v Speaker 5>got drafted by the Seahawks in the fifth round. I

1:58:08.200 --> 1:58:11.760
<v Speaker 5>believe Dupre I thought was the better of the two.

1:58:11.840 --> 1:58:13.080
<v Speaker 5>He's the better pass catcher.

1:58:13.800 --> 1:58:13.960
<v Speaker 3>You know.

1:58:14.000 --> 1:58:17.400
<v Speaker 5>He's a really well built kid, six y five, two

1:58:17.440 --> 1:58:18.640
<v Speaker 5>hundred and fifty six pounds.

1:58:18.960 --> 1:58:19.920
<v Speaker 3>He was one of the best.

1:58:20.600 --> 1:58:23.080
<v Speaker 5>His dad's really big into weightlifting, and so so was

1:58:23.160 --> 1:58:25.400
<v Speaker 5>he and so he I think it was like thirty

1:58:25.440 --> 1:58:28.600
<v Speaker 5>two reps on the bench that really stood out. He

1:58:28.680 --> 1:58:32.840
<v Speaker 5>wasn't a high volume target in that Alabama offense. He

1:58:32.880 --> 1:58:36.000
<v Speaker 5>only had twenty one catches this past year, but I

1:58:36.040 --> 1:58:39.120
<v Speaker 5>think you have a good size, speed athlete. When he

1:58:39.200 --> 1:58:41.600
<v Speaker 5>was targeted, he caught the ball, and I think he

1:58:41.680 --> 1:58:43.720
<v Speaker 5>was good enough as a blocker that you thought, all right,

1:58:43.760 --> 1:58:48.080
<v Speaker 5>if I want a true wide tight end, prototypical hand

1:58:48.080 --> 1:58:52.000
<v Speaker 5>in the ground, inline guy, this guy could potentially be that.

1:58:52.360 --> 1:58:54.760
<v Speaker 5>So a little surprised he didn't get drafted, because I

1:58:54.840 --> 1:58:58.080
<v Speaker 5>think he has the what a lot of teams are

1:58:58.080 --> 1:59:00.440
<v Speaker 5>looking for as a blocker and receiver to earn a

1:59:00.520 --> 1:59:01.160
<v Speaker 5>roster spot.

1:59:01.400 --> 1:59:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, I was surprised too. So that's why we

1:59:04.160 --> 1:59:06.839
<v Speaker 2>had you on Dan, because we went a whole interview

1:59:06.840 --> 1:59:09.360
<v Speaker 2>did not mention Will Campbell's name once because we wanted

1:59:09.400 --> 1:59:12.360
<v Speaker 2>to talk to you about the deep the deep cuts,

1:59:12.360 --> 1:59:14.560
<v Speaker 2>as we do on this show. You had all two

1:59:14.680 --> 1:59:17.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty six guys in the Beast again this year,

1:59:17.520 --> 1:59:21.440
<v Speaker 2>right fifty seven, Yeah, to fifty seven. I short turned

1:59:21.480 --> 1:59:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to you one guy there, but it must.

1:59:23.440 --> 1:59:26.320
<v Speaker 5>Have gotten It was close there that final pick by

1:59:26.320 --> 1:59:28.600
<v Speaker 5>the Patriots. I was, you know, you never know, it

1:59:28.600 --> 1:59:31.400
<v Speaker 5>could be someone that I overlooked, but it was my

1:59:31.520 --> 1:59:35.080
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and twenty seventh corner with Kobe Minors, so

1:59:35.680 --> 1:59:39.120
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't someone that I had ranked highly. But you know,

1:59:39.200 --> 1:59:41.120
<v Speaker 5>I hope he ends up making the roster and has

1:59:41.120 --> 1:59:41.839
<v Speaker 5>a good career.

1:59:41.880 --> 1:59:43.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'm just happy you was in the Beast.

1:59:43.720 --> 1:59:43.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:59:44.000 --> 1:59:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, So you can read Dan at the Athletic of course,

1:59:46.960 --> 1:59:50.120
<v Speaker 2>and the Beast. The Athletic subscription is worth it just

1:59:50.200 --> 1:59:53.600
<v Speaker 2>for the Beast alone every single year, So make sure

1:59:53.640 --> 1:59:56.040
<v Speaker 2>to give Dan a follow and give him a subscription

1:59:56.120 --> 1:59:58.400
<v Speaker 2>as well. That's going to do it for today's episode

1:59:58.440 --> 2:00:01.280
<v Speaker 2>of Patriots Catch twenty two, and I will be back

2:00:01.320 --> 2:00:03.960
<v Speaker 2>next week. Very special thank you to our very special

2:00:03.960 --> 2:00:06.520
<v Speaker 2>guest Dame Brugler, and we'll see you guys next week.

2:00:06.520 --> 2:00:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for watching.

2:00:10.200 --> 2:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, this is Fred thanks for tuning into the show.

2:00:12.680 --> 2:00:15.200
<v Speaker 4>If you really want to help us, make sure that

2:00:15.280 --> 2:00:18.320
<v Speaker 4>you like us wherever you get your podcasts, like Apple

2:00:18.400 --> 2:00:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Podcasts or Spotify, and also make sure you follow us

2:00:22.400 --> 2:00:25.280
<v Speaker 4>on the New England Patriots YouTube page to see this

2:00:25.400 --> 2:00:28.440
<v Speaker 4>show and everything else that we do here What the Patriots.

2:00:28.720 --> 2:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Thanks a lot,