WEBVTT - S4E18: Adam Grant and The OG Ponzi Scheme

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly the kind of weaponization of charisma that makes

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>me extremely uncomfortable. In fact, I need to go take

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a shower right now.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Can you hold.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.240
<v Speaker 3>No, we can't wait for you to take We're gonna

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 3>have to go with you into the shower. I'm afraid

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 3>it's just the rules. That's also very creepy. All right,

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Snafu, your favorite podcast about history's greatest screw

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 3>ups and a little bit of reflection about what those

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>screw ups say about us as human beings. Spoiler alert,

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 3>most of it's not good. Most of the podcast is

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>very good. What it says about us not so good.

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm at Helms, your host, and today I am joined

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 3>by someone I've gotten to know over the past several years,

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 3>mostly through a delightful pattern of us helping each other

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 3>out with our book events, and last spring he even

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 3>hosted me at Wharton and Philly to talk about my

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Snafu book, which I think makes me a visiting scholar

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>at Wharton. Don't fact check that he's also best selling author,

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 3>a tenured professor at the Wharton School of Business, an

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>organizational psychologist, and truly one of the most thoughtful, perceptive

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 3>voices on human behavior and culture. His latest book, Hidden Potential,

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 3>The Science of Achieving Greater Things, debuted as a New

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 3>York Times bestseller, which, by the way, is his sixth

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.559
<v Speaker 3>book to do so. I believe he is the wise, witty,

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 3>and dangerously insightful Adam Grant. Adam, thanks so much for

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 3>being here.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's quite an introduction. I feel like if I fail,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll be living up to the podcast, but not my bio.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>I gotta ask the work you do falls under this

0:01:55.080 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 3>rubric organizational psychology, which to me like I I feel

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>like I have a sense of what you do, but

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 3>that term is still kind of cryptic to me. How

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 3>do you define it exactly?

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 3>What is your area of expertise? Exactly?

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm here to figure out why your closet is

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a mess and then clean it up. No, I think

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the easiest way to describe what I do is I

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>study how to make work not suck.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 3>And do you have a pithy answer? Is it just

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 3>pay people more?

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 2>I try to reform the Michael Scott's of the world.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>That's one I can I get. I can latch onto that.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>In your capacity as a business school professor, it's about

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>sort of just deconstructing why and how people behave in

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 3>good or bad ways? I guess is that fair?

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Put, that's what I should have said. Okay, good, thanks

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for writing my lines for me.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Ed Well, I also just copyrighted that so so I

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 3>can't use it. You can, but you just have to

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 3>pay me, that's all.

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 3>I should start by saying, I think you're the perfect

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 3>guest for today's story because we're going to talk about scams,

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 3>and it strikes me that your training and research and

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 3>expertise in human behavior and psychology. Would that make you

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 3>bulletproof from scams?

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>No, it just makes me better at analyzing why I

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>fell for them.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, it makes you more arrogant as you walk right

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 3>into them.

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm immune to this. This will never affect me.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>And then oh, I have the language and the evidence

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to explain exactly where I just made it.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 3>Wait, so have you ever? Have you fallen for any

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 3>scams You've been taken in in some way?

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I've fallen for a major scam like

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>those Nigerian prints emails or a Ponzi scheme, but I've

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely been duped by people who take advantage of my

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>tendency to trust other people. So sure I overpaid for

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>my first car, did not realize it was possible to

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>negotiate my first job offer. I don't know if those

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>are scams, but I definitely got the short end of

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the stick in those situations.

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel like some of that that stuff kind of

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 3>rides into scammy territory. Like I agree with you, I

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 3>feel pretty vigilant about this kind of thing in general.

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 3>But I had a plumber up sell me on this

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>huge water filter system, and like I had hired him

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to do this thing, and then he was like, by

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 3>the way, you don't have a water filter in your house,

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 3>and if you thought about it in your neighborhood, you

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 3>should have it. I was like, yeah, okay, great, and

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 3>then I wound up having to hire another plumber like

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 3>six months later for a different little job, and he

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 3>immediately launches into his water filter speech, and I was like,

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 3>oh God, and I felt like kind of a sucker.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. And also, as I'm ADHD, and I

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 3>feel like there's so much out there that sort of

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 3>tries to prey upon the ADHD mind in a way

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 3>that's like supposed to help an ADHD person.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 2>So interesting.

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I never connected this to neurodivergence before, but yeah, I

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>can see the shiny object sort of put it in

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>front of you.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh I want one of those.

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, it's targeting your shame. It's like the thing

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 3>that has brought you this like sense of discomfort or

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>shame or sort of fear in the world. And they're

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 3>saying like, here's a like this app will fix it

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 3>for you or this whatever.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I feel like this is the appropriate time to

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>tell you about the productivity app that I've been building.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 3>I would trust you. Today's story is about a man

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 3>whose legacy is so shady that practically every major grift

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 3>of the last century bears his actual name. And yes,

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about the patron saint of financial flim flam

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 3>ladies and gentlemen, the one and only Charles Ponzi. So

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 3>buckle up. We're going to dive into sort of the

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>origin of the Ponzi scheme and it is. It all

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 3>starts with this guy, Charles Ponzi born in eighteen eighty

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 3>two in Lugo, Italy as Carlo Pietro, Giovanni Guglielmo Tebaldo

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Ponzi and that's that's a lot of name right there.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:20.119
<v Speaker 3>They're not messing around with that. His family had once

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 3>been comfortable, but by the time he was in college

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 3>at the University of Rome, they were not so well off.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 3>Instead of studying, the young Ponzi spent most of his

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 3>time schmoozing with his rich friends in cafes and drawing

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 3>down with little cash he had. Upon graduation. Broken restless,

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 3>he did what generations of dreamers have done. He bet

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 3>on America, and so off he went, landing in Boston

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen oh three. After a few years bouncing between

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 3>odd jobs, he drifted north to Canada, and that, as

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 3>it turned out, is where his real financial education would begin. Now, Adam,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 3>people who knew Ponzi just described him as unbelievably charismatic,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 3>like he's the kind of guy who could charm the

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>paint off a wall. And I feel like we've all

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 3>known these people and they can really cast the spell

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 3>on us. So I'm just curious, like, from your vantage point,

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 3>how do you see that level of charisma? Is it

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 3>in an innate wiring or is it conditioning, or is

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 3>it something we can sort of learn. I would imagine

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>in a business school. Charisma is an extremely hot commodity.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>It can be so it is, it being a mix

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>like everything else in human psychology of nurture and nature.

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Some people are born more naturally charismatic than others. They

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>exude energy and enthusiasm, and they're very quick on their

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>feet and flattering, and they often have superficial charm. But

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it does turn out to be a teachable skill. Wherever

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you start, you can improve from that baseline. Actually, it's

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 1>some experiments by John Antinachus and colleagues where they take

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>students and they teach them kind of the memes of charisma.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>They you know, they teach them to like to use

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the right vocal inflection and to make eye contact at

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>critical moments, and you know, to master the nonverbal cues

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their gestures. And then they show that

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>even six weeks later, when those students are giving a speech,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they're judged is more charismatic.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>And huh.

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd become more and more reluctant to teach that skill because,

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>as I think your description of ponzi is foreshadowing, it

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>can be used for evil as well as good, and

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>even if the intentions of the person wielding it are good.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>It tends to shut down the critical thinking of the audience.

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>There's a paper on the awestruck effect that I loved

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>showing that if if you're talking to somebody who's charismatic,

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you actually scrutinize their message less carefully. And so I

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like to think of that as the dumbstruck afact, and

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I think we should all be cautious about that.

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that is fascinating.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've look when we were talking earlier about

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have I ever been scammed? Like, the closest I've been

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>scammed is kind of falling, falling for the spell of

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's very charismatic. Sure, and I think the best

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>defense against that spell is not to interact with somebody directly.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>It's to read their writing, because then you strip away

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the you know, a lot of the

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of the irrelevant information that they might use to

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>seduce you. And frankly, AI tools that made that much

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>more difficult now. But I almost only want to teach

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>charisma to people who have already demonstrated generosity, humility, integrity,

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the basic foundations of character.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Wow, that's really cool. I have to say, if we

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.559
<v Speaker 3>could teach those people to be the most charismatic, then

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 3>we might have hope for humanity. There was that famous

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Neil Strauss right The Game. The Game, which was essentially

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 3>a version of this right, a kind of teaching of

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 3>teaching people to like pick up women was a a

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:05.319
<v Speaker 3>very sort of skeazy version of charisma, I guess.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>A twisted version of it, where you wear odd clothes

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like goggles on your head to signal I'm above worrying

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>about what other people think of me.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I set my own trends. I'm a nonconformist.

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And then you go and insult women because it suggests

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>that you're out of their league, and then all of

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, they, in some cases seem to take an

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>interest in you. And that's exactly the kind of weaponization

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of charisma that makes me extremely uncomfortable. In fact, I

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>need to go take a shower right now, can you hold.

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 3>No, We can't wait for you to think we're gonna

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 3>have to go with you into the shower. I'm afraid

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 3>it's just the rules. That's also very creepy. So in

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 3>nineteen oh seven, Ponzi landed in Montreal and scored a

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 3>job as an assistant teller at a small bank serving

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Italian immigrants, and it was there that he witnessed the

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 3>original model of the scam he would later perfect. His boss,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Luigi Zorosi, lured depositors with absurdly generous interest rates, and

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 3>amazingly he would pay them, of course, by funneling new

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>deposits straight to the earlier investors. It was a beautifully

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 3>unsustainable system. So when the bank inevitably crashed and Zorosi

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 3>bolted for Mexico to avoid accountability, Ponzi was left behind,

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 3>unemployed but newly educated in the fine art of financial

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 3>tom foolery. Now most of us would look at this

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 3>whole mess and think, okay, well that backfired. Maybe crime

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 3>doesn't pay. What can you tell us about the psychology

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 3>of someone who definitely does not learn that lesson, in

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 3>fact sort of learns the opposite lesson of like here's

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 3>more opportunity. I mean, do you see like sociopathy at

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 3>play or is it just sort of that healthy or

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 3>or maybe unhealthy ego with a kind of rules don't

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 3>apply swagger. I mean, how dark is that?

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So there are three traits that would normally predict being

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>attracted to that kind of that kind of scheme and

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>The psychologists call them the dark Triad, and you hit

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on one of them pretty closely. Anyway, they're being a narcissist,

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>being Machiavelian, and being a psychopath. H And I think

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we're probably talking about Machiamelianism here more than we are

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>being a narcissist or a psychopath or sociopath, because what

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of scheme is really about is it's about

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>manipulating other people and using them for personal gain. And

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to have a giant inflated ego to

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. You don't have to feel no

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>empathy for other people. You just have to be a

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit callous around, feeling like, you know what, I

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>can use other people a little bit. And in fact,

0:12:58.080 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I think part of the appeal of a Ponzi scheme

0:12:59.920 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is you look at that and you say, well, you know,

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.079
<v Speaker 1>if I can keep it going, actually I'm going to

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>profit and no one else is going to get hurt

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because each like each each former investor is going to

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>get their money back because of a new one. And

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>so all I have to do is perpetuate it. And

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm just I'm exploiting a loophole in the system.

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not exploiting people so much. And I think if

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>you tell yourself that story, you probably sleep at night.

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't it doesn't require much more than a

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>little bit of machiavellianism.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 3>Now we're still in Montreal. Ponzi happened to wander into

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>a one of the former client's office from the failed

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 3>bank he had been working at, and he found it

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>completely unattended peak early nineteen hundred's security at work. He

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 3>poked around, spotted an unguarded check book and thought, well,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 3>no mind of ad and he wrote himself a check

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 3>for four hundred and twenty three dollars and fifty eight cents,

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 3>which I love the specificity because that seems so official.

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 3>That's like such an amount, right, it seems like something

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 3>that would be like, oh, that's a no, one would

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 3>just make up that number. But that's a lot of money.

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 3>It's worth about fifteen grand in today's money. So he

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 3>forged the manager's signature and he strolled out just like

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 3>he'd been picking up dry cleaning. He was caught almost

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 3>instantly because he spent this dolen money so loudly that

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Montreal police were basically like, how is this broke guy

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>suddenly like flashing wads of money and eating in fancy restaurants.

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 3>So Ponzi was arrested and he spent the next three

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>years in a bleak penitentiary outside of Montreal. Not a

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 3>great return on investment so far. Here's a mug shot

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 3>from nineteen ten. Let's take a look. I mean, how

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 3>do you not love this guy? Look at the twinkle

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 3>in his eye and the mustache. This is a mug

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>shot and he looks like someone I want to just

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 3>have a beer with.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I will not be joining you for that vier ed there,

0:14:59.080 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 2>tell me about.

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 3>His smirk under that mustache. That's like it's got a

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 3>little charmed to it. Yes, wedding.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>He sort of reminds me of mister Bean. Mister Bean,

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>he could be Rowan Atkinson in love.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>Actually, there you go. That's what I'm seeing.

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>That's not as flattering a the piction. Now this part

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>kills me. Rather than tell his mother that he was

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 3>in prison, Bonzi wrote home to Italy, proudly announcing he'd

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 3>landed a job as a special assistant to the warden,

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 3>thus explaining his the letters coming from a prison. I

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 3>think we all lie to our parents, right just to

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of make ourselves feel better or look good in

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a situation. Any memorial occasions. Memorable occasions, Yeah, Adam Grant

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 3>lying to mom or Dad.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I told a white lie to my mom after

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Halloween one year, that I didn't sneak candy with a

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>friend from the candy drawer.

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 3>That's as bad as it gets.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>It's the worst one. I felt so much shame after that.

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Never again.

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's funny these formative things like at that moment,

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 3>how old were you? You were young enough that the

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 3>steaks felt catastrophic.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I was ten, and the friend started it,

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the drawer was open, and I felt like, okay.

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, go for it.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I remember my friend took like, stole a pack of

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 3>his mom's cigarettes and we were I think I was

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 3>about ten, and and he was like, let's smoke a cigarette.

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, are you insane? This is crazy.

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>We can't smoke. Say, we're children. Cigarettes and candy the

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 3>things that get us in trouble as children. Okay. Charles

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 3>gets out of prison and he heads back down to Boston,

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 3>and this is where he would hatch the truly epic

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 3>scam that would make him a legend, and it all

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 3>began with a quirky little nugget of postal Beueru incracy

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 3>known as the International Reply coupon. This was basically a

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 3>prepaid postage voucher, so you'd buy one at your local

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 3>post office, stick it in your letter to someone overseas,

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.919
<v Speaker 3>and then they could exchange it in their country For

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 3>these stamps needed to write you back, so it was

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 3>kind of like putting a prepaid envelope in your letter

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to someone so that they could write you back more easily.

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Here's where things got interesting. The system was created in

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 3>nineteen oh six with fixed exchange rates, but after World

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 3>War One those rates went completely out of whack across Europe.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 3>So cut to nineteen nineteen. Ponzi received a reply coupon

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>from Spain which had been purchased for about one cent

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 3>in Spain, but it was redeemable for six cents worth

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 3>of US stamps, and that tiny arbitrage flicked a switch

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 3>in Ponzi's brain, so he launches a company to buy

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 3>reply coupons in bulk overseas, send them back here to America,

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 3>and then redeem them for a tidy prophet. Not a

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 3>bad idea. But then comes the big leap. Ponzi scales

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 3>up like bigle He invites investors, promising and eye popping

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent return in forty five days. Bostonians are flocking

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 3>to him, and soon he has started a company called

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 3>the Securities Exchange Company, which has a very sophisticated and

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 3>legit ring to it, and he had offices stretching from

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:32.719
<v Speaker 3>Maine to New York. Now it's worth pointing out that

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 3>this business model was definitely cheeky, but it was not illegal.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Investors were getting paid as promised. In fact, and this

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 3>is very wild. A few government officials who went poking

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.960
<v Speaker 3>around to verify the legitimacy of Ponzi's operations actually ended

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 3>up investing with him. For a while there, everything was

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 3>coming up Ponzi. You know, he's got all this newfound

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 3>wealth and in a tasteful new mansion with enough room

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 3>for his wife Rose and his mother, who he brought

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 3>over from Italy. I mean, come on, this guy's what

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 3>a gentleman. He's taking care of his own mother. But

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Ponzi's projected squeaky clean, charitable image was not going to last.

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>What's happening behind the scenes is actually getting pretty shady,

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 3>and even the pros who are coming to investigate him

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 3>are missing the signs. So I'm just curious, like from

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 3>your Wharton perspective, like, what are the red flags that

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 3>you can actually you know, like you talked about the

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 3>what was it the triangle of the dark triad? The

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 3>dark triad? Excuse me, but those are things that might

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 3>exist in someone that we can't immediately perceive. So what

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 3>are red flags that we might jump out at us

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 3>when somebody might be perpetrating a scam apart from the obvious,

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 3>like you know, mustache twirling, et cetera.

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the best data on this actually are hedge fund

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>managers being interviewed, where you see that the most self

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>centered ones, the ones who are most likely to take

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>advantage of other people, are the ones who just spontaneously

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>start grinning when talking about other people failing.

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>And if you feel.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>That kind of shot in freuda and you enjoy seeing

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>other people flop in your language, ed, if like seeing

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's snafu makes your day, that is I mean

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>that to me is a huge red flag.

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Wow, yeah, that feels that feels like pretty much everyone

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 3>we see on the news these days. There's just like

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 3>gloating is a real problem right now, gloating, which is

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>essentially sort of like the what it's like the bragging response,

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 3>the bragging articulation of schadenfreude.

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then there's a there's a cousin of that

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>in some ways moral grandstanding, you know, kind of like

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of self promoting as just morally superior to other people,

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which tends to go hand in hand with narcissism, and

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we also see a lot of that today

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in scammers. If you believe that you operate a higher

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>moral plane than other people, then it's very easy to

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>justify and rationalize what you're doing.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Eventually, Ponzi's activity caught the canny eye of New York

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 3>City Postmaster Thomas G. Patton, now, being a master of

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.919
<v Speaker 3>the post patent, knew a thing or two about international

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 3>reply coupons, like, for instance, there simply weren't enough in

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 3>circulation to explain the magnitude of Ponzi's outrageous earnings. So

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 3>it just like his business model was completely incompatible with

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 3>the amount of money he was making objectively, just by

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 3>the math. Patten wasn't the only one to notice funny

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>math here. It seems one of the business secrets Ponzi

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 3>kept closely guarded was that he was not buying many

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>reply coupons at all. Rather, to maintain the illusion of

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 3>abundant prosperity, Ponzi was using deposits from new investors to

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 3>pay out the returns to old investors. And there you

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 3>have it, the classic Ponzi scheme. Adam. What blows my

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 3>mind is that the Ponzi scheme isn't just risky, it

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 3>is literally impossible to sustain. Like it's a financial Jenga

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 3>tower and it's definitely going to fall over. Why do

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 3>smart people convince themselves that somehow it won't.

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are a couple of ways to

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>explain this. One is, you know, it's just a sort

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of tunnel vision, right, You're only focusing on getting the

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>next investor on board, and you're not looking far enough

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>into the future or maybe wide enough to see that

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody is about to come and knock over your Jenka tower,

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or if even one block it gets pulled out, you're screwed.

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that maybe one one factor I play it.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think another one that that stands out though, that

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about enough is what psychologists call the

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>availability biased, which is the tendency to weigh events in

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>terms of how easy they are to think of instead

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of how likely they are. And if you've never seen

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody go down for a Ponzi scheme, you can persuade yourself,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna get caught. You know this, like this

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is not even something people go to jail for, right,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's especially surprising in Ponzi's case because he's

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>already done time.

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's paid for it. Well, he paid for a

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 3>false check. But his his previous boss was was, you know,

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 3>caught for it.

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I wonder, I wonder if then he saw

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>his boss make some really odd, obvious mistakes and thought, well,

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>if I avoid those, I'm clear.

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, to your point about sort of the dark

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 3>side of charisma, Sometimes I think there are people who

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 3>believe they can charm their way out of anything, right,

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 3>or or charm or sort of bulldoze, like they can

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 3>rely on their personalities to just plow through anything. I

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know, there's something unhinged about that, and the ability

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 3>to kind of keep going and doubling down further and further.

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he was opening branch offices up and down

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 3>the East coast, like just scaling up in this massive way,

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 3>and then eventually just not even buying the coupons anymore.

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Just fully Ponzi scheming. If I were trying to run

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 3>a Ponzi scheme, the guilt would be weighing on me

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 3>so much. I just be this sweaty, blubbering mess the

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 3>whole time. But then you have someone like Ponzi who

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 3>just like smiles and shakes your hand and can just

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 3>look you in the eye and crank through all of it.

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 3>It's so bewildering to me.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just think you just hit on something really

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 1>critical here, which is we often describe someone like Ponzi

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>as shameless, but I think they're better characterized as guiltless.

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Being guiltless is I don't even know if I've ever

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>heard the term guiltless. But when you said I would

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>feel guilty, I think about the psychology of guilt versus shame,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and the basic distinction is when people feel guilt, they

0:25:29.760 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>think I did a bad thing. When they feel shame,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they think I'm a bad person. And shame actually tends

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to have pretty negative effects in most cultures, you know,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 1>when you start to feel ashamed, you either attack or

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you withdraw. Together, you feel small and you either want

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to obliterate whoever's making you feel small or you want

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to withdraw from the situation. Guilt is much more functional.

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 1>When you feel guilty, you think, Okay, I've got to

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>right my wrongs. I have to repair whatever harm was done.

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to try to recover my reputation. And Ponzi

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>sounds like somebody who just was maybe immune to guilt,

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>or you know, at least didn't have a normal human

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>response to it, because from the pattern of behavior you're describing,

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound like he really felt any remorse around the

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>people that he was screwing over.

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 3>But isn't that like, isn't that the definition of a

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 3>sociopath or a psychopath.

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly one of the foundations of it, right, I

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's possible to be guilt free without

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>being a sociopath. Basically, I think most sociopaths would be guiltless,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but not all guiltless people are sociopaths.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Would be maybe the way to capture it.

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he has convinced himself that he's taking care of

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>each investor as he brings on the next investor, and

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>so the you know, whatever guilt he feels ends up

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>quickly evaporating.

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 3>And also there there you get so much reinforcement as

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 3>your sort of as your wealth increases, so does your

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 3>position in society and your you know, your physical presentation,

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 3>your clothes, your style, your cars, all these things these

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 3>sort of signals of success just being a successful human.

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, you're well groomed, all these things, these sort

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 3>of like ancillary, uh, just details of your life start

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 3>to have this like resonant vibration of like you're fantastic,

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 3>You're just a great person. Yeah, and you can kind

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 3>of convince yourself of that.

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's validating.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>And you also have all these clients who love you,

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>your your investors, they're so pleased with you, like they're

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>actually they're fueling your narrative. They're making the rationalization easier. Wow,

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>look at all these people I've helped. Yeah, that tracks

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>So the suspicions that Ponzi's business were fraudulent were eventually

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 3>confirmed with a damning expose that ran in The Boston

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Post on August second, nineteen twenty penn by Ponzi's own

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 3>publicity man William H. McMasters. In the multi page spread,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 3>McMasters condemned Ponzi as hopelessly insolvent and fest up to

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 3>his own contribution to Ponz's confidence campaign. Definitely kind of

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 3>a dick move here, just selling out Ponzi to try

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 3>to get your nose clean, I guess. But here's the thing, McMasters.

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 3>He had only worked for Ponzi for one week at

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 3>that point, and during that one week, McMasters had accompanied

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Ponzi to various meetings with his investigators and had been

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 3>privy to what he determined to be damning inconsistencies. McMasters

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 3>claimed that Ponzi was well over two million dollars in

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 3>debt and I haven't done the day calculation on that, but.

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot.

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be a lot, millions and millions upon millions.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 3>It all came crashing down. On August ninth. The Massachusetts

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 3>State Commissioner of Banks, Joseph t Allen, ordered the Hanover

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 3>Trust Company to cease paying out checks signed by Charles Ponzi.

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 3>They said the account was overdrawn, but the final nail

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 3>in the coffin of Ponzi's reputation came two days later.

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 3>On August eleventh, when the Boston Post definitively identified Charles

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Ponzi as a former convict and further revealed his past

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 3>alias Charles Bianci, under which he had committed all kinds

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:51.959
<v Speaker 3>of various tom foolery and flim flammery and pick your

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 3>period euphemism for a crime, Adam, Is there a kind

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 3>of sense of dissociation that comes from using it alias?

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Potentially?

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're you're basically trying to separate your identity

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from your actions, and if if you're playing a character,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that becomes really easy to do.

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I do use an actual alias, Like in my life

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 3>sometimes if I if I feel like if I'm attending

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 3>a scheduled event and I know that autograph seekers might

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 3>be there, then I might use an alias for my

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 3>hotel reservation or what you know, restaurant reservation or whatever.

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 3>And uh, I'm not going to tell you what it.

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Is, but tell me. Wait, but I'm going to guess it.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>It's Suprice, isn't it Superrice?

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Good? Yes, it's a good. Guess. It's a little too

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 3>close to home though.

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Actually, here's to me the most interesting version of this question.

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So you know I watched you during your entire run

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>as Andy Bernard. Do you ever take on some of

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Andy's qualities and feel like you know whatever you do?

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>If you just came from a long day of shoot

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.479
<v Speaker 1>or a couple of weeks where you were in character

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot, do you start to feel some distance from

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Ed Helms?

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Like I've often said that Andy Bernard is it is me,

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>but with less less self control and less of a

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of self editing mechanism. So I sort of have

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Andy Bernard's similar instincts, which I'm not proud to admit,

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 3>but it's true, and I just in Andy. In playing Andy,

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 3>I was able to sort of like just exercise all

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 3>of those demons and get it all out there. And

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 3>then in the real world I'm a much more sort

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 3>of like you know, I just carry myself with more

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 3>self awareness and presence or whatever. But if anything, it's

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 3>more the opposite, where playing Andy Bernard makes me realize

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 3>that there's more of Andy Bernard in me than I

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 3>want there to be sometimes or then I might care

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 3>to admit, and.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Therefore makes you less like him. It sounds like, what

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>do you mean looking in the mirror and saying I

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>don't like this reflection? Does that then motivate you to

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>overcome whatever those tendencies are.

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes and no, although I think yes, certainly, I was

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 3>able to sort of bring insights that Andy Bernard gave

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 3>me into my therapy sessions and unpack things a little bit.

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 3>But I'll also say this, which is that I very

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 3>consciously tried to endow Andy Bernard with a good heart

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 3>and a good and like good intentions and a kind

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 3>of an underlying warmth. And I was at times more

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 3>or less successful in doing that, But it was my intention,

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>and I think that actually opened a little window from

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 3>additional self compassion for myself.

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 2>I love that.

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 3>August twelfth, nineteen twenty, Ponzi was arrested and later charged

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 3>in court with eighty six counts of mail fraud. Despite

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 3>thinking he could charm his way out of it, he

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 3>pled guilty at his wife's urging and took a five

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 3>year sentence. He assumed that plea would shield him from

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 3>state charges. It did not. While in federal prison, Massachusetts

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 3>hit him with twenty two counts of larceny. He appealed

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 3>all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled he

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 3>was not immune from state prosecution. It took three trials

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 3>for the charges to finally stick. In the first, he

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 3>represented himself and walked on ten counts. In the second,

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 3>the jury deadlocked, and then the third his luck ran out.

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 3>He was convicted and given another seven to nine years.

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the hubris of representing oneself might have

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 3>been his downfall?

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it did him any favors from what

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I've heard. Yeah, so wild.

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 3>September nineteen twenty five, he finished his federal sentence and

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 3>was released on bail while appealing his state conviction. And

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, no lessons learned. He immediately high tailed it

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 3>to Florida, where he tried to enact the same essential

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:13.720
<v Speaker 3>scheme selling tiny parcels of swamp land. Scammers just somehow

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 3>have this incredible ability not to adapt to negative reinforcement.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>There's a longstanding trend in psychology to talk about the

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>bad is stronger than good phenomenon, or it's sometimes called

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>negativity bias, where the same bad experience or snafo or

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.720
<v Speaker 1>failure is going to weigh on us much more heavily

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>than an equivalent good event or success. And we you know,

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of evolutionary handwaving about this. It's like Okay,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't pay attention to the threat in the jungle,

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you literally could not survive to pass on your genes.

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you underreacted to a celebratory event, nothing bad happens.

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 2>And so we're kind of wired.

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:55.760
<v Speaker 1>To write to be vigilant in the face of threats.

0:34:56.320 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>But there's obviously variation in the population. We know is

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that the kinds of people who tend to reverse the

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:08.759
<v Speaker 1>bad is stronger than good pattern and really respond to

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>rewards and be extremely optimistic, tend to be highly extroverted

0:35:14.280 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and low in neuroticism. And actually America is I think

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the most extroverted country on Earth in the national comparisons.

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>And the argument around that is, well, the the kind

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of tendency you had to have to sail off for

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a new land based on the promise of a very

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>uncertain upside, like you got to be pretty reward seeking

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and optimistic to do that. And so you know, we

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>see a parallel in Ponzi jumping ship literally the US,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder, is this somebody who's extraordinarily extroverted, who

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, experiences the dopamine rush but not the punishment cues,

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>not the sense of threat and fear associated with being

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>put away, even after he's had to be in jail

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a lot of years. He did three years in Montreal,

0:36:08.600 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 3>seven years in Massachusetts. It's adding up. And now he's

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 3>caught and charged and found guilty yet again in Florida,

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 3>but he gets off on appeal after posting bond, and

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 3>this time Ponzi tries to flee the country on a

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 3>ship bound for Italy, but he wound up getting arrested

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 3>in New Orleans, where the ship was making a final

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:33.720
<v Speaker 3>port of call. He was returned to Massachusetts to serve

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.280
<v Speaker 3>seven more years in prison until his release in nineteen

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty four, when he was immediately deported to Italy on

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 3>October seventh. His wife Rose stayed behind and they eventually

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 3>divorced a few years later. Whatever lucky penny he'd been

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 3>carrying around for the last decade, it finally fell out

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 3>of his pocket. Charles Ponzi would die in a charity

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 3>hospital in Rio de Janeiro, yes, all the way down

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 3>in Brazil, on January eighth, nineteen forty nine, with only

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 3>just enough to his name to cover his burial. The

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 3>dude was just scamming around the world right there, all

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 3>the way to the end.

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 3>And for their dogged pursuit of the Ponzi story and

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 3>the investigative journalism that aided in his arrest, the Boston

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Post was awarded the nineteen twenty one Pulitzer Prize in

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Public Service. And that Adam Grant concludes the story of

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Charles Ponzi. It's quite a whirlwind, you.

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Know, now that I kind of know the ending to

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the story, one thing we haven't talked about yet is addiction.

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one version of Ponzi's arc is he is

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a gambler. He's chasing the next high every time he loses. No, no, no,

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>If I just double down like double or nothing, right,

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I can turn this thing around. And you know, I

0:37:56.000 --> 0:37:58.680
<v Speaker 1>wonder if this was an outlet for a form of

0:37:58.680 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a gambling addiction.

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 3>That's so that's that's a really interesting.

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Chasing the thrill.

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 3>It's so interesting to think about someone like Charles Ponzi

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 3>and how they might fit into modern society. Obviously, there

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 3>have been so many huge Ponzi schemes, Bernie made Off

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 3>being one of the most famous ones. And again and

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:27.160
<v Speaker 3>and there's he's a fascinating study in psychology. Have you

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 3>do you know much about his story.

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 2>A little bit, not as much as you do history buff.

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, I I know just enough to know that I

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:41.320
<v Speaker 3>want to know more. But it's Yeah, he's a fascinating figure,

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 3>and I think he definitely falls into the category of

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 3>the delusion that he wasn't harming people, or at least

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 3>that's what people who've interviewed him seem to think. The

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 3>scale of his operation. That's what's so mind blowing is

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 3>that like the buy in from so many different people,

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 3>like the goodness to want, like the desire for this

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 3>to be true is and for this all to be

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 3>like a functioning, healthy way to make money. It's like

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 3>the things we can force ourselves to believe, like he's

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the perpetrator, Ponzi or Bernie made off like they're the perpetrators.

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 3>They're either deluding themselves or they're just like criminals or

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.239
<v Speaker 3>whatever they're whatever's going on with them. I mean, there's

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 3>the investors who are just pure victims. But then there

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 3>are people who are in the organization, right, they're in

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.319
<v Speaker 3>the running of these things, and they have to have

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 3>a sense of like this doesn't add up, or it's

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 3>just like I'm gonna keep my head in the sand.

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna like this spreadsheet looks weird to me,

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.720
<v Speaker 3>but I'm just not gonna ask, because, boy, it feels

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 3>good to trust this, like nice old man Bernie, who

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 3>just seems to know who's been venerated by the great

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 3>financial institutions.

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>For decades, there are terms that have been coined to

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>describe what happens to a lot of people in the

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>orbit of a ponzi or a madeoff BENDERA called it

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>moral disengagement. Ten Brunzel and Mesk have called it ethical fading,

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>where you just you stop applying a principled lens to

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>the situation you're in because other people are accepting it,

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and you assume, well, you know, surely these are not

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>bad people.

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I see them, you know, the their.

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Decent parents and partners and carrying bosses, and you know

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.439
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't be doing anything bad, and you lose sight

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of the lines that are being crossed. I think that

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that could be part of what's happening in their orbit.

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And maybe the other piece of this is I was

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>thinking about Maria Kanakova, a psychologist turned poker champ who

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called The Confidence game. And there's a

0:40:51.880 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>quote in that book that shook me. Maria wrote, the

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 1>true con artist doesn't force us to do anything. He

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>makes us complicit in our own undoing.

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Adam, what are you and I complicit in right now

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 3>that we have no idea? Is part of our own doing?

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I really hope nothing.

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, just thinking about what happens to the

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 1>early employees, in the early clients, they are to recruit

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>other people into the scheme. Of course, you you try

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to get your friends hired at this great company.

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 2>You try to get your you know, your.

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Family to invest in this you know, this fund with

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>incredible returns, and pretty soon you have a strong incentive

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to see no evil.

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to bring this into the present moment a

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit. I love digging into this story because of

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 3>how hyper relevant it feels today in the age of

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Internet scammers and just this sort of like new generation

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 3>of con artists that have emerged. I mean, it's it's

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 3>funny to think of Charles Ponzi as perhaps now him

0:41:49.560 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 3>being like an Instagram influencer, you know, who's just like

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 3>taking people in. But here's just a few stats. The

0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 3>FBI reported that Americans lost sixteen point six billion dollars

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.239
<v Speaker 3>to online scams, which is a thirty three percent increase

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 3>from twenty twenty three. Do you think that there is

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 3>also a way that sort of the online distance from

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 3>a con artist and like us when we're in our

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 3>own bubble and we don't have other people to sort

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 3>of cross reference with or bounce an idea off of,

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:37.440
<v Speaker 3>does the solitary nature of internet interaction make us additionally

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:42.320
<v Speaker 3>more vulnerable or less vulnerable? Or I mean, does seem

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 3>like the Internet is just a cesspool of scam Yeah.

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I would love to see some data on this. I

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>have not seen a good analysis. I think I have

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a similar hunch to yours, which is the isolation can

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>make it really easy to fall for a scam. I

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think the other piece of it is you're missing some

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of the cues that would normally you know, sort of

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if you didn't recognize them consciously. You know,

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you interact with a con artist face to face, and

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you start to get a gut feeling sometimes like I don't.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Quite trust this person.

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why, but you know, maybe maybe I

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>should verify or maybe I should you know, wait a

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and you're just deprived of a lot of

0:43:26.640 --> 0:43:28.800
<v Speaker 1>those cues over the internet. Sometimes you don't even know

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's a human or a bot that's you know,

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that's pitching you. And so I think that that probably

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder for people to use whatever intuition they

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>have around judging people's trustworthiness. What's the what's the New

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Yorker cartoon on the internet? No one knows you're a dog?

0:43:44.640 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course, Well that's more of a catfish joke. No,

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 3>but I guess it's uh, I guess it works here

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:58.840
<v Speaker 3>just as well, Adam Grant, This has been really, really

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 3>fun and I just love going down these curiosity rabbit

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 3>holes with you, and I love that your response to

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 3>my questions it very often starts with I'd like to

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 3>see the data on that. Thank you so much for

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 3>coming on Snafoo.

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me.

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I leave it to your listeners to judge the number

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of snaffooss committed recordinated this podcast.

0:44:21.400 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Snafu is a production of iHeart Podcasts and Snaffo Media,

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 3>a partnership between Film Nation Entertainment and Pacific Electric Picture Company.

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Post production and creative support from good Egg Audio. Our

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:37.800
<v Speaker 3>executive producers are me Ed Helms, Mike Falbo, Glenn Basner,

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Andy Kim, and Dylan Fagan. This episode was produced by

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Alyssa Martino and Tory Smith. Our managing producer is Carl Nellis.

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Our video editor is Jared Smith. Technical direction and engineering

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 3>from Nick Dooley. Additional story editing from Carl Nellis. Our

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 3>creative executive is Brett Harris. Logo and branding by Matt

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Gosson and the Collected Works. Legal review from Dan Welsh,

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Meghan Halson and Caroline Johnson. Special thanks to Isaac Dunham,

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Adam Horn, Lane Kleine and everyone at iHeart Podcasts, but

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 3>especially Will Pearson, Kerrie Lieberman and Nikki Ator. While I

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 3>have you, don't forget to pick up a copy of

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 3>my book, Snaffoo, The Definitive Guide to History's Greatest screw Ups.

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 3>It's available now from any book retailer. Just go to

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Snaffoo dashbook dot com. Thanks for listening, and see you

0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 3>next week.