WEBVTT - A Day In The Life

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>The Senate is heading for a nailbiter vote on whether

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to call additional witnesses or to end this impeachment trial

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>once and for all. The Senator and I sit down

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in daylight for a change to get his strategy before

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he heads to Capitol Hill. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz.

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Verdict with Ted Cruz. I'm Michael Knowles, Senator.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember the last time I saw you in daylight. Well,

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>hopefully the sunshining indicates we're near the end of this journey.

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your thoughts on the likelihood of that.

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your strategy on the last day

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of questions today. There are some reports coming out that

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>John Barrasso, the number three Republican in the Senate, says

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>that the momentum is heading in the direction of not

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>calling additional witnesses. There are other reports that we might

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>get a fifty fifty vote perfectly split, in which case

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to know who breaks the tie. You know,

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's an open question. It is close right now. We

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>need fifty one votes to definitively say the trial is done.

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't need additional witnesses. Let's move on to final judgment.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>If we have fifty one votes, we can wrap this

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>up in the next couple of days. If we don't,

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and I hope the momentum's going that way. As we

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about in the last podcast, I think they're at

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>least two Republicans who are pretty clearly going to vote

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>with the Democrats, Mitt Romney and Susan Collins. That means

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they have forty nine votes. There are the two next

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>most likely or Lisa Murkowski and Lamar Alexander. I don't

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>know where they're going to be. They're very They're holding

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>their cards very close to the vest. They could end

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>up on either side of that, and I think they're

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>considering it carefully. They seem to be genuinely struggling with

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this decision. If it ends up fifty fifty, we're in

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of uncharted territory under the scheduling order

0:01:56.680 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>we adopted. I think Republican leadership argument would be fifty

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty means witnesses or not in order. In other words,

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>let's move on. I can't have additional witnesses, okay. I

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>am certain that the Democrats will argue if it's fifty fifty,

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>it means witnesses are in order, so who decides them?

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. Look, look, there's not a whole lot of

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>precedent here. There's under the Senate rules, it's not I

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can make the arguments on both sides of that. I

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>understand the arguments on both sides of that. It is

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>possible the Chief Justice will have of you. It is

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not clear. So the Chief Justice doesn't play the role

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:35.919
<v Speaker 1>of the Vice president. You know, normally in the Senate,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the vice President breaks ties. That's not the Chief Justice's role.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>The Chief Justice's role is to preside. Now, there's some

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>historical precedent for the Chief Justice breaking a fifty fifty tie.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>That happened in the impeachment of Andrew Johnson twice. But

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>then the Senator's got unhappy with that, and the Chief

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Justice receded and said, Okay, I'm not going to do

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>that anymore. So, as with so many aspects of this trial,

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we really don't have a lot of precedent to go on.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>We are in on charted territory. If if Chief Justice

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Roberts decided to vigorously assert himself and make a ruling,

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what would happen. I don't think that's

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>all that likely. I think, you know, you may recall

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>it as confirmation hearing. He used the analogy of wanting

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to be an umpire in baseball. I think that's what

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>he wants to do. And so one of the nice

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>things he did, which he didn't have to do. But

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but yesterday he enforced a five minute time limit on

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>answers to question. That was the same thing Ranquist had done.

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing the rules that makes him do five minutes. Yeah,

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>but I think every senator was grateful because if it

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been a five minute time limit, he would have

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>just seen the lawyers on both sides filibuster forever and so,

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and you would have only gotten into a handful of

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>questions instead of all okay. But that's an example where

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that was within his discretion. Although that being said, if

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>enough senators disagreed, fifty one of us could have overruled it. Right,

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's that sort of ruling is a perfect

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>example of everyone agreed with it. So it was fine.

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But where it runs into problems if the chief Justice

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is is disagreeing with the majority. By the way, you

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>saw the House managers suggest something last night. They said,

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we're perfectly fine with the Chief Justice deciding everything, deciding

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>evidentry emotions, deciding everything. Now, look, you gotta understand that

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>argument makes perfect sense when you're in the minority. They're

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>forty seven Democrats. On any party line vote, they're gonna lose.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>They know that. Remember we had eleven motions on day one.

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>They'll host all eleven. They understand that. So if you're

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>going to lose on any party line vote, it's in

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>your interest to find any other decision maker. Give the

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>power away, let somebody else make them. Even if they

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're not going to win with the Chief, they

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>got a better chance if they know that they're outvoted.

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like, all right, an election recounts. Have

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you noticed that when an election is close, the prevailing

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>party never calls for a recount, right like whoever has

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>been declared the winner, even if by one vote. You

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see that person saying we need a recount. It's

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>always the guy who's lost. Yes, because if you've lost,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>recount is the only thing that can benefit you. That's

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a little bit the same as what's going on here.

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So obviously then today is going to matter a lot

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>before we get to this vote. The reason I wanted

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to sit down today before we get to the impeachment

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>trial is I want to hear a little bit about

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>your strategy, how you prepare when you're going in, when

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you're writing these questions, What are you trying to accomplish?

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 1>What are you going to ask today when you get

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to the hill. Well you're looking at all, right, what

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>parts of the story haven't been told, What hasn't been

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>told as effectively as it should, What additional facts need

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to be brought out? What weaknesses in the defenses or

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the house manager's case. Should you shine a light on

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>some of what I'm looking at some of the areas

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that there are still aspects of the evidence of corruption,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of corruption a bearisma the Ukrainian Natural Gas

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>company of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden that that still

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't been fleshed out. And then I think need to

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>um so for example, uh, there there is an email

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>exchange that that happened when when Chris Hines. So, Chris

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Hines is the stepson of John Kerry. John Kerry was

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was Obama's Secretary of State. Chris Hines was business partners

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>with Hunter Biden and with this guy Devin Archer, who

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>was Chris Hines's college roommates. Three of them were business partners.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>First Devin Archer and then Hunter Biden both joined the

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>board of Barisma. They both are getting paid a million

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 1>bucks a year. And Chris Hines does a couple of things.

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Number One, he sends an email to the to his

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>stepfather's chief of staff, to John Kerry's chief of staff,

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and and and he says, apparently Devin and Hunter both

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>joined the board of Barisma and made a press and

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a press release went out today. I can speak to

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 1>why they decided to do so, but there was no

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>investment by our firm in that company. Trying to clear

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>his name, to associate himself, It's fascinating that he sends

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this email. It's also fascinating John Kerry's chief of staff.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Notice he doesn't say Devin Archer and Hunter Biden. He

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>says Devin and Hunter. So the chief of staff knows

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly who these guys are. He knows what Barisma is.

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't explain Barisma is this Ukrainian company. You may

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not know it. Chief of staff knew exactly what Barisma was,

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>knew exactly who Devin and Archer was, and what did

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Hines do? He went on to say he terminated

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>his business relationships with Hunter and Biden, and he said

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it was unacceptable to work for Barisma. Now, the White

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>House Defense team briefly got into this, but the House

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.559
<v Speaker 1>managers have never had to ask a question and answer

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a question on this. They've they've never had to address. Now,

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>wait a second. If Chris Hines thought it was unacceptable

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to work for Barisma, did John Kerry think that? Did

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>his stepfather think that? And did Joe Biden that? And Look,

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the things to keep in mind also what

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>really matters legally? We've talked about in any litigation, you

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>want to simplify. Your enemy is getting so complicated and

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you get bogged down in the weeds. You want to

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>simplify the question that matters. You know, I did Sean

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.559
<v Speaker 1>Hannay a couple of days ago, and he had five

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>points that are critical. Remember, look, that's fine, I said, Sean,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>there's one you want to simplify to what matters? What

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>matters legally? As does a president have the authority to

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>investigate corruption and credible evidence of corruption? If the answer

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is yes, that's game over. This this case is done now.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And on the fact side, it's worth remembering that. Listen,

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the question is not really whether Hunter Biden is corrupt.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden, by all appearances, has led a troubled life.

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>This is someone with who's made some unfortunate decisions in

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>his life. The question is whether Joe Biden made decisions

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 1>that made him part of that corruption. And I don't

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>think so far the connection as to why this is

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden's decision. I'll give you another example. So there

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>was a question and I joined it. It was a

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>question that Josh Holly asked that I joined, and the

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>two of us asked together, and it was about did

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden never seek an opinion from the White House

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Counsel's office if he could keep being the point man

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on Ukraine while his son was getting paid a million

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>bucks a year from Barisma. And the White House team said,

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>not that we know it, We have no you know,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things one does in government,

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>if one has a potential conflict, you should go to

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers and say, hey, do I got a conflict here?

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And you get an opinion and they tell you what

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>to do, and sometimes they tell you recuse yourself, don't

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>be involved. So Joe Biden could have said, you know what,

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't look good a ton of countries on planet Earth.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna stay to Ukraine stuff. I'll worry about

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 1>all the other countries. I'm not going to get involved

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine because my son's getting rich off of Ukraine

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe it's not right for me to do this.

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So the house managers, the Democrats did not have to

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>answer this question yesterday, and you're going to ask it today.

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly. Are you worried that Adam Schiff listens to

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>this podcast and he's going to get a heads up?

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You know? No? Um and And look, I will say

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this though Schiff is talented, he's good on his feet,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's interesting the questions that rattle him. The questions

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that rattle him are when you're getting close to the target.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to ask this question, are you going

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>are there going to be questions on the same topic

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you're hitting, or are you going to change it up

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 1>and go after another angle in question time today as well? Well, Look,

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you another example. So Joe Biden told reporters

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that he's never discussed his son's business dealings with him

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and that it was discussed yesterday. But what wasn't discussed

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is there somebody who disagrees with that. And that's somebody

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>who disagrees with that is Hunter Biden. And Hunter Biden

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>said that he talked to his dad about his serving

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Barisma board and Hunter said, quote, dad said,

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope you know what you're doing. So one of

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the guys said I do. So why is it that

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden and Hunter Biden are telling different stories that

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe says he's never talked to about it and Hunter's like, oh, yeah,

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I talked to you about it. One of these guys

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is lying, Joe Biden or Hunter Biden, They're not telling

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the truth another way to put it so, well, this

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sounds very interesting. I mean, I assume that the Democratic

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>House managers are going to just try to evade the

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>question and filibuster, but it sounds like you've got a

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>couple different angles to come at today. I want to know,

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>beyond the impeachment trial you have, you have more work

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to do than just sit on this impeachment trial. What

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>is is a day in the life waking up doing

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever you do in the morning, then going to the

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>impeachment trial. I know what you do from ten pm

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>until about two in the morning. But what does a

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 1>day in the life look like? All right, So let's

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>take yesterday. Yeah, yesterday I got up. First meeting I

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>had was at nine was a meeting with Benjamin nah

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister of Israel. And so he's staying at Blair House,

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the residence right next to the White House.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So I went over to Blair House and met with

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>him from nine to nine thirty. And I know Babie

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>quite well. I've met with him many times in Israel

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and in the US. We're friends. When he and I meet,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's nice because they're one on once. We don't

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have staff in there, just the two of us. We

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sat and had a cup of coffee. We talked. We

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>talked some politics. Look, he's in a crazy situation in Israel.

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>They keep having elections that he hasn't been able to

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>form a government, and so I was getting his thoughts

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on what's going on on that and what the dynamics are.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>We also talked a lot about Iran. I think Beebe's

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>leadership when it comes to stopping a rand from getting

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons has been extraordinarily important, particularly when Obama was president,

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and when Net and Yahoo we invited him to speak

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Joint Session of Congress and he called out

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the danger of the Ayatola Kamayee with nuclear weapons, and

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the adjective I've used a bunch of times for Net

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and Yahoo is church Chillian, because it was like Winston

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Churchill when the Nazis were a gathering storm that he

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>spoke out. He spoke out with a clarity, spoke out

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with a gravity and a weight, and it helped stiffen

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the spine, frankly of a lot of members of Congress.

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons Trump pulled out of the Obama

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>nuclear deal is because Beebe was so strong that he

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>had that. You didn't have Republicans in Congress just to

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>give up on it, say oh well, this is this

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>is done. Let's move on. And so I think that

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was very important. So I started the day meeting with Beebe,

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>met with him from nine to nine thirty, then went

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and met with my staff, my team, and we talked

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>strategy for the impeachment hearing. We worked on questions for

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the impeachment hearing. We just went back and forth. Okay,

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>where do we want to press and spend about an

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>hour doing that. Then I went back back to the

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>White House and and was there we talked yesterday about

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the signing of the USMCA, the US Mexico Canada trade agreement,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that was out on the south lawn of the White House.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>President was there, Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, was there.

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of senators, a bunch of House members were there.

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, wait, look, it was fun. We heard heard speeches.

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>The President gave him, gave a pretty good speech. He

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>was He was pretty funny. Actually, he was almost like

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a stand up comedian. He was spending a lot of

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>times sort of almost tongue in cheek, kissing up to

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the senators and saying, hey, I need your votes, guys,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>my fate is in your hands. And what was amusing

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is he said, House members, I don't need you, guys.

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>You already voted. So you're like, yeah, I can ignore you.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>But hey, the senators, you know, I mean it was

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and so he signed it. He was giving out signing pens.

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got a sighting pen from USMCA. So that was fun.

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And then from there went back to the back to

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol and we went into the trial. Trial started

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>at one o'clock and the trial went from one o'clock

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>till about eleven fifteen at night. Yeah, stayed in the

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>cloak room for about forty five minutes trying to see

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>if we could find a deal to get us to

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty one and end this trial. So it was negotiating

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>with other senators. Got in the truck headed over here.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>We recorded the podcast. I got home, oh, probably about

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>two in the morning last night, turned on the DVR,

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and watched about a quarter of the Rockets Jazz game.

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't tell me who won. I only watched the quarter

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and then although if I will be amazed if the

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Rockets won, because we're so shorthanded, we're missing Harden and

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook and Capella, so if we want to it's a miracle.

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But I have to believe in miracles. I have to

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>admit I missed the Rockets Jazz game last night. I'll

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>try to catch it tonight. And then went to sleep

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about two thirty. Woke up this morning. First thing I

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>had this morning was a text for my scheduler saying, Hey,

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay grit Graham, Ney's talk to you on impeachment. So

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I called Lindsay. Lindsay had just gotten off the phone

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>with the President, and so we talked about he and

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I are both working to see is there a way

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the senators who are not sure where they

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>are on additional witnesses, to get them, get them to yes,

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to get them to ending this trial now. And so

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we're continuing to negotiate and discuss that. And then I

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>headed back to see you. Then you came here. We

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>had a cup of coffee and did the show. This

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>brings up a fascinating point because in the way that

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I was imagining how impeachment goes, and I think for

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Americans, it's all kind of pre planned.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It's all scripted. Nothing is happening in the moment. Nobody

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>needs to wake up and call the White House and

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>then call your other senator friend and this and yet,

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>from what you're describing to me, running into the cloakroom,

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>hearing something, writing down a new question, calling Lindsey Graham,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>he's on the phone with the President. A lot of

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>this is happening in real time. It's not inevitable. We

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really know how this story ends. But look, I

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's very much right and that's not true of

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>every senator. There are a lot of senators who are

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>just kind of sitting there listening. They're going to cast

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>their vote and that's it. I like to be active,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I like to be engaged. As as as I told

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Lindsey this morning, I have to admit I'm I'm having

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>a hell of a lot of fun now. It's not

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>good for the country. I don't want to see it

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.199
<v Speaker 1>dragged on. I'd like to see it ended. But but

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it is. These are complicated, tough, strategic, legal, political factual

0:17:52.640 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>questions that are there nuanced. They're difficult, and and I

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to end up in the right place,

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the president being acquitted. But how long that takes,

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>how long that takes and how we get there is

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a different story. Could you just take us really quickly through.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You're going to get this vote tomorrow, I guess, And

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>whether to call additional witnesses. If they vote no no

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.239
<v Speaker 1>additional witnesses, what do the next two weeks look like?

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So if we vote no additional witnesses, if we get

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty one who say no additional witnesses, that we've heard enough.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I expect that the Democrats will have kind of paroxysms

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>of rage. So we'll see several motions. Then the motions

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>will kind of be screw you. It'll be there's something like,

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe you did this to me, so I

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have another motion, I have another motion. And some of

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>it is the Democrats will just need to get that

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>out of their system. And one of the strategies Mitch

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>McConnell is employed, which I actually think is has been

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>wise and the right thing is to make this long

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and brutal and painful to all one hundred senators. Mitch

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>just told us a hundred times this is not going

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to be pleasant because he wants the senators to want

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to end this. That's exactly right, and there are a

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 1>few things more motivating. This is a strange place. So

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>typically we fly out Thursday afternoons to get back home,

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're in our home states Fridays through the weekends.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Often how things get done in the Senate is is

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>you're getting to Thursday, everything's at an impass. People are

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a roadblock, and then people want to get out.

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>They've got a plane flight. And so the phrase is

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>jet fumes are in the air, and when jet fumes

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>are in the air. You got a bunch of senators

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and some of them are in their seventies and eighties.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>They're looking to get out of here, and they'll agree

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.479
<v Speaker 1>to damn near anything to get out of here. Some

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of the angriest I've ever made my colleagues is on

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>fights trying to limit out of control spending when I've

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 1>ended up saying no, I'm going to object, and it's

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>ruined their weekend plans. And I mean, you cannot overstate

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 1>how I mean how screaming and in race you're joking,

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I am not at all, I mean literally screaming at

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the top of their lungness. Mitch knows that that's being

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>used right now. By having these be long, grueling days,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>what he is counting on his senators, both wobbly Republicans

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats, will say I gotta get out of here

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>enough already that they won't want to extend things forever. Tomorrow,

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>if we have a vote no additional witnesses, I think

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll see several Democratic motions. By the way, each motion

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got an hour on each side to argue it,

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>so it will be I expect tomorrow is likely to

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>be a long night, but then I think we we

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>will move to the final judgment, so that would be

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be Saturday. You would say, yeah, there's there's

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a period of deliberation, and that deliberation is in close session,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>so the TV cameras are off, the reporters are thrown out,

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's just senators giving speeches and talking to each other,

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and then we vote. I'm not sure the exact timing

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of a vote, but but if we if we conclude

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that the additional witnesses are not needed, I am confident

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that that by Monday, this will be Stay of the

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Union is Tuesday, right, and and so if if we

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>conclude there are no additional witnesses, I have full confidence

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>we will push through whatever is necessary to get this

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>resolved before the State of the Union. And it will

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>be a very funny State of the Union if this

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>is all resolved before then what if it's not What

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>if they vote to call more witnesses, what are the

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>next two, three, four weeks look like? Nobody knows. I

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>mean it is presumably you'll have a motion from the

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats to call John Bolton. If they're fifty one who

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>just voted for more witnesses, you have to assume they're

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty one for that, presumably you'll have a motion on

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the other side to call Hunter Biden. I am very

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>confident we'll get fifty one for that. You know, Chuck

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Schumer's telling reporters there will never be fifty one to

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>call Hunter Biden. He is full of it, really, I

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>mean it is total spin because he's saying, well, our

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Democrats will vote. Now, we'll look even if four Republicans

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>join with the Democrats in calling Bolton, those four are

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to say we will only call prosecution witnesses

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and not defense witnesses. I'm confident if we're calling witnesses,

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>if John Bolton is getting called, that we'll have at

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 1>least fifty three votes to call Hunter Biden. By the way,

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mansion also said he might vote Democrat from West Virginia.

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>He might vote for Hunter Biden. The point is, if

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we go down this road, we'll have at least those

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>two witnesses. An interesting bit of speculation. I've heard several

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Senators say this in the cloak room, that they think

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are voting for more witnesses but hoping, desperately

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>hoping they lose that vote because a lot of these

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are terrified if we open the door to more

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>witnesses and we bring in, say Hunter Biden, or we

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>bring in Joe Bide, or we bring in the whistleblower,

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that things get really bad because what they've managed to

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>do in the House proceedings is cover up all of

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of corruption. We start bringing in witnesses and

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>suddenly that corruption. You know, it's going to be real

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting seeing Hunter Biden on the floor of the Senate

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>be asked million bucks a year? What'd you do for that?

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>What services did you provide for a million bucks a year?

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.199
<v Speaker 1>And what'd your dad do to help you out that?

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>This almost has me hoping for more witnesses. But I

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>just want to be clear. If more witnesses are called,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to continue to be in every

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>single day, ten hours a day now. I think that's right.

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So if the Senate votes to subpoena let's say that

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we subpoena both John Bolton and Hunter Biden, that's going

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to take some time to shake out. Then those subpoenas

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>will be served. I think it's likely you'll see litigation,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>at least on the John Bolton side with the White

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>House asserting executive privilege try to block his testimony. That

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>could take weeks or even months. And so I think

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>what is likely as the Senate would go back to

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>regular business for a period of time until such time

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>as those witnesses can come. And by the way, usually

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>with witnesses, you have a deposition first, and then you

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have trial testimony. So if we go down the road

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of more witnesses, I would anticipate that being sometime in

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>the future minimum of a couple weeks. Okay, so we'll

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit of a break, and then the

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Senate has to go from this very intense trial back

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>into the normal business of the Senate, back into possibly

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>removing the president from office. Yep, that seems like a

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of whiplash. It is. And listen, I think there

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of Democrats really nervous about the direction

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>these facts are going. I'll give it example. Yesterday, in

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>questioning Adam Schiff said early on he said, if any

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the president's motivation is corrupt, then that's enough

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to convict Hi. No, does this mean there is a

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>big angle on this Yesterday, which was the difference between

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>a private motive and a public motive you know, private

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>interest or the national good. So and I think actually

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Dershowitz did a really good job of sort of breaking

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>out three scenarios. Yeah, there is one scenario, which is

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the sort of mother Teresa that you're making a decision

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>because of love of humanity and the greater good, no selfishness,

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>no selfishness. And he said, look, there are not a

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in politics making a lot of decisions

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. And he is right in that, right, he said,

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>there's the other scenario that is the corrupt and venal

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that your motive is purely selfish. Look it's give me

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>a bag of cash. It's bribery or for that matter,

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>look that's what's alleged about Joe Biden. Give my son

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a bag of cash. I mean it is. You want

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the three scenarios. The Biden allegations at

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a minimum are in category three, and then category two

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is the big one, and it's mixed motives where you

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>have some public interest, you want to do good, but

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.959
<v Speaker 1>you're also looking to political self interest. And one thing

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind, listen with elected politicians, just about

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>everything you do, one of the considerations you're thinking about

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is will the folks back home like it, and will

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this help me get reelected? And that Look, I think

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>politicians think about that far too often. I'm a big

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>believer in the proposition that good policy is good politics.

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>If you do the right thing substantively, it'll play well back.

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But you see, you know, we just passed the USMCA.

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of senators, a bunch of House members voted

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>for that. A big reason they voted for that is

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>their constituents want them to. It's good politics just about everything.

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, let me ask this, Let's apply the Adam

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Schift test. If any part of the motive is corrupt,

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>and by corrupt he means thinking it will advance his

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>partisan interest, that it's impeachable and you should remove him

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>from office. Me ask you a question, Michael, do you

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>believe any part of Adam Shift's motivation is partisan? Oh?

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It couldn't possibly be, not at it? Well? Maybe yes,

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we would all have to say, of course,

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>part of Adam Shift's motivation is partisan. What a ludicrous standard, right?

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>He literally argued if the president had even the tiniest

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>bit of political motivation, he should be impeached and removed

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>for office. For high crimes and misdemean So if the

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>politician had a political motivation at all, in any degree,

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>then he's got to be thrown out. A look, it

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>shows this is a game. They know it's a game.

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>They know that standard. You know, no politician could survive

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that stage. Look, I'm shocked, shocked, there's gambling in Casablanca.

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>But I mean that. Do you remember the compliment that

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>was made of Bill Clinton that he's an exceptionally good liar? Yeah? Yes,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to leave it at that. I'm ready.

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even going to connect that thing. We'll just

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>leave it at that. And it seems as though you

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>might be paying somebody a compliment. We have got to

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>get you to Capitol Hill. We've run a little late anyway,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and we need to make sure that you ask all

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of those questions of the House impeachment managers, and then

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>we will be right back tomorrow to see how it

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>all turns out. I do have to make one point. Okay,

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we talked before about milk. This is the most important point.

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Two liquids are allowed on the Senate floor. I need

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to tell you a major landmark currents this week. Please

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>go on, let's make some news. Yesterday, I was looking

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>over at Richard Burr from North Carolina, and I looked

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>over at his desk. On his desk, a page brought

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>him chocolate milk. Chocolate milk, What what is the well?

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So I took one of the witness cards, the question

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>cards that you write to the Chief Justice, and I

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>wrote out a question from Senator Cruz, Mister Chief Justice,

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is is it the case that Senator Burr is the

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>first Senator in the history of the US Senate to

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have chocolate milk at his desk? And I didn't send

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it to the Chief Justice, but I did pass it

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>over to Richard, who cracked up laughing. So we have

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>apparently made a new precedent that I don't think has

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>ever occurred, and the Nestle's precedent has been set. When

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the historians look at this moment, they might say, third

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>time ever that a president was impeached, first time ever

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a president was impeached without being accused of a crime.

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be a footnote because the big precedent

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is the first time ever chocolate milk was drunk on

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the Senate floor. And next podcast asked me about what

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>John Thune and I are planning to do about this, Khalua.

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to wait and see to find out. I'm

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael Knowles. This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. This episode

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought to you

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 1>by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack, a political action committee

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty two, Jobs Freedom and Security Pack plans

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party across the nation.