WEBVTT - Where’s the Volatility?

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>My name is Mike Reagan. I'm a senior editor at

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and Ilana Hi reporter on the Cross Acid team.

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>This week on the show, well, a few weeks ago,

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the U turn that had happened in markets,

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>with some of the moves triggered by optimism about vaccines

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and the reopening of the economy reversing and going the

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:39.319
<v Speaker 1>other way. Well, strap on your chin straps because it's

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>all going back the other way now. Value in cyclical

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>stocks are outperforming once again and the yield curve is

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>once again stepening. So what's going on? Is the new

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>old the old new again? And can we expect these

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>trends to continue? We'll get into it with Chris Gaffney,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>who's the head of World Markets at t I A

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>A Bank and of Wars. Will close out the show

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>with the craziest thing we saw in markets this week,

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And remember, if you see anything crazy, give us a

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>call on the podcast hotline at six or six three

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to four, three four nine zero, leave us a voice,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>bail and maybe we'll play your craziest thing on the show. Well,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don one thing that's crazy. Is this weather? This is

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the type of weather where an old guy like me

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is forced to ask the age old question. You're ready,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm read well. I was actually just before we started chatting,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a story from one of our colleagues

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and one of the quotes really struck me was about

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the heat wave that's hitting New York City this week

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>where where I live, and it said all the cement

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to radiate heat indoors. It will be life,

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>life threatening situation, which is my goodness, you just took

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this to a very dark place. I was hoping for

0:01:55.360 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>some and now, well, the cement that's only to radiate

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>heat indoors is that's the part that struck me. I

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>probably shouldn't have read the second part. Didn't mean to

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>scare you. Well. I like that your answer was grounded

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in well and well sourced reporting. They're not just not

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a nothing off the top of the head. For Wildonna,

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>she comes with the actual reporting. My secret is, and Vildonna,

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this is something as a Jersey native you'll appreciate. My

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>secret is Italian ice. I can take any type of

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>weather as long as the Italian Ice store is open.

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And we got a good new one in town. So

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you've got as good of an Italian

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>ice selection as we do here in New Jersey and

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>New York. Are you talking about Rita's that's like New

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Jersey ridis is good. I'm talking about They're actually a

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 1>friend of the family to Cosmos. They only have two stores.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>They've been making Italian ice, or as we call him,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>Philly Wooter ice w W O O D E R.

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>What are ice s ide? No, no one knows what

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, but in Philly they do uh hundred

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and five years they've been making Italian ice and Elizabeth

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and now new store. In a touching, I didn't mean

0:02:58.000 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>this to be a plug for the Cosmos, but so

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>me it. My friends, my local friends will laugh because

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of obsessed with them. I I've got a

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of an Italian nice problem, but in this heat,

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the best remedy. Even if I don't know what

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the concrete is gonna start melting on us or something.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You're telling me, honestly, you have me sold in the

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.679
<v Speaker 1>water ice water ice, What do I all? Right? Well,

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>even with even with the melting concrete, that that should

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be enough to keep us. Cool, But let's bring in

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>our guest, um first time on the show. As I said,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he's from t I A A Back. His name is

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Chris Gaffney. Chris, welcome to the show. Thanks much. I

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you the invitation and I look forward to the

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>discussion today. Yeah, Chris, I'm gonna start off with an

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>easy question. I just want to know I'm not very

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the World Markets department of t I A Back. UM,

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing note some four X services that that type

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of thing talk us through what what your your group

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>does and what your role is there. So we offer

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>individual investors the ability to invest into currencies um, both

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>for transactional purposes and for an investments, and then precious metals.

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So I've run a currency and precious metals desk UM.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of unique. You you know, the institutions play

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in that field a lot um, but typically investor individual investors, uh,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, have a tougher time finding uh the availability

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of currency investments in and precious metals. So we're big

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>on diversification obviously, so we we think they're they're good

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>asset classes. And I've been in this uh doing this

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>job for I guess, uh, thirty plus years, thirty five

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>years now, so I've been in in a while, still

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a rookie, you huh. Yeah. And Chris, I was going

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to ask you. You and I chat from time to time,

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 1>and I really enjoy our conversations. I always turned to

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you when something's going on with markets and I need

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>an explainer, And so I was hoping you could sort

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of start us out just giving us a sense of

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>how you're making sense with what's going on with the

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>stock market, because coming into August, I remember, the was

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>tons of fear about the sort of seasonal volatility factor.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>In August was supposed to be a much choppier month,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and here we are, We're record highs. It's been sort

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>of tranquil. So how are you making sense of everything

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that's going on? It's been great markets, I mean, and

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it all goes back to the economic environment here in

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the US. I mean, this is just a fantastic economic

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>environment for companies, and and stock performance always goes back

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to the earnings to company earnings. So um, you know,

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got low interest rates, we've got um pent up demand,

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got extremely strong consumer and corporate balance sheets.

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>So all those add up to markets that are you know,

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I use the words flogging higher because it's it's not

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic rise that we've seen. Certainly, the numbers are

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty eye popping when you compare it to you know,

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the depths of the fall. But uh um, you know

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 1>we're just marching higher. Uh continually marching higher. And something

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you brought up about Choppingess, we we expected a lot

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>more choppiness in these markets. I mean we we thought

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>volatility was going to be pretty high, um with all

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the push pulls that we're seeing. But you know, we've

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we've really just seen a slow and steady increase in

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>these markets, almost almost boring at times. I you know,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>I hate to use that because now we'll see a

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>dramatic swing, but uh um, you know they've just been

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>marching higher. Well, one shoppiness I'm guessing your team must

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.359
<v Speaker 1>have had their eye on was that that plunge and

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>goal to start the week? Um, even before the week started.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess what was it Sunday night? Uh? You know, yeah,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the precious metals prices. You know, conspiracy theorists will tell

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you that, you know, they're they always move on the

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>weekends because the markets are you know, uh, there's less

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>liquidity out there, and the big moves always come on

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the weekends. And but honestly, we we you know, we

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't figure out exactly what drove that drop. Um

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was the jobs data, you know, the coming

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in stronger and um looking, you know, the the focus

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of investors shifted from a worry about you know, about

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown to act a strong labor, strong GDP growth,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's not necessarily positive for for the precious metals.

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, gold is seen as a risk hedge and

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>along with inflation hedge. So um, good strong markets, good

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>strong labor growth probably weighed on the pricycle And Chris,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned you guys had thought that the market

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a lot more choppy. There's so

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>many superlatives we can say about this market. One that

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>has been standing standing out for me in recent days is,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're up more than from the previous peak

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that we had reached before the pandemic. And so I'm

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>just wondering why it's been so hard to call what's

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>been going on with with the market, with stocks just

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>continuing to I forget the word you used, trudge higher, Yes,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>slog higher. Yeah. Um, you know, I think it comes

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>back to you know we expected shopping is because um,

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we're an unprecedented times obviously, and when when you're trying

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to project where the markets are going to go or

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>even economic data, UM, you typically rely on models and

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the economic models. When when you have the dramatic shutdown

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of an economy and absolutely stopping everything, um, and then

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the fairly rapid recovery, those models just don't work. Um.

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So you know, trying to project where we're gonna be

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to even even free cash flows. I mean, you

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>know when when companies have to shut down and then

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>start back up. Um. You know, the the base effect

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on is one item that you know, the numbers were

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>so bad that of course they're going to be really

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>good on the recovery. Um. But another thing is the comparisons.

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>You you just can't make those comparisons, and it's kind

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of thrown the models out of wax. So uh, projections.

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I think most people thought economists weren't going to be

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>able to really dial in where we were going. But uh, um,

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>it's I'm glad to say we've been marching steadily high,

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. Chris I'm wonder the perspective of some of

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>your clients, UM, who might be internationally focused. UM. You know, obviously,

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the big themes we heard a lot about

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year and and sort of at the beginning

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of the year, UM was a lot of people were

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>bracing for sort of an outperformance of international equities outside

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of the US. UM. To some degree, we've kind of

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>seen that, you know, I'm looking at the Bloomberg screen

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>here of developed markets, US is about eleventh place out

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of twenty four. You know, there's a lot of European

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>markets Austria, Sweden, Netherlands, France that mark doing doing better.

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>What's kind of what's kind of the sentiment at this

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>stage of the year in the game, is there has

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that bullishness for sort of the rest of the world

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>worn off. I don't think so, you know, but personally

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm still bullish on your And it's really about the reopening.

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the US was first to really really well.

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 1>China was first, but then the US came in and

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>reopened and uh, you know, with our vaccine policy or vaccinations,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>although it's stalled out now, we were able to reopen

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>more quickly than Europe. Europe was a little slower to reopen,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we we probably hit that reopening UM

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.840
<v Speaker 1>surge faster than Europe. And and I still think Europe

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 1>is gonna gonna come back. And I think there's opportunities

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>also valuations just favor UM some other UM, other markets

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.959
<v Speaker 1>besides the US. And then on top of all of that,

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got the dollar. And you know, anytime you you

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>invest internationally, unless you had your currency exposure, you're also

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>investing in the currency of of that market that you're

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>investing in. So UM. You know, the dollar going into

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>this UH was very strong and its not even stronger

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the pandemic because we saw a

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of safe haven buying of the US dollar. International

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>investors into the dollar came to treasuries. UM we're still

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>seeing them. The tenure market yesterday was was bought by

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>UH central banks, so UM and and outside investors, so

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>we're still seeing some of that. UM. The dollar declined

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>over over last year, but so far this year it's

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>starting to move higher again. So UM, I still think

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see a dollar decline, and mainly

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>due to interest rate differentials. UM. But UM, I do

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's opportunities overseas still, although the US market is

0:11:50.040 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>still I think gonna gonna Marke car And speaking of

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>international markets, I think you and your team are favorable

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>towards China or and correct me if I'm wrong, But

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'm wondering if you think what's been happening and

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>playing out with China over the last couple of weeks

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>really is more of a localized event or maybe something

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially spill over into other parts of the world.

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And how are you thinking about the Chinese markets. I

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think there are randan by whichever you want to call it.

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese currency UM is still a goodbye. I think

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's a currency that will continue to perform

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>if if the if the government of China lets it UM.

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that the Chinese markets, I mean, I mean

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the second largest some by some measures, the

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>largest economy. UM. The delta baron is certainly probably having

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.440
<v Speaker 1>an impact there and so we could see some slow down.

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But uh, specifically on the regulation, I think it's you know,

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you can look at it two ways. It's it's either

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government and being heavy handed and trying to

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>get control UM of their economy, which in a way,

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you understand that the governments want to control

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in their economy. Um, but you know,

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>are they going to go too far and try to

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>take it back into the communist I don't believe that.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I I think that they'll continue to walk this tight

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>rope between capitalism and communism and and try to keep

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>their markets free and open. Uh as as much as

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>they are. You could argue that they're not, but uh UM,

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the regulation is just a sign of a

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>maturing economy and a maturing market. They know that in

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>order to truly take their place among the world stage,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>investors have to rely and and trust on economic data,

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 1>trust on company reports, trust that there's no fraud, if

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you will. And so some of the regulations that they're

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>passing UM are actually positive and I think a sign

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that they are trying to you know, mature that market

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and trying to um be able to give investors confidence. Now,

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's caused the the opposite impact. Investors have worried

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to come in and maybe take control

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of certain industries, and that's certainly a concern and could

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>grow into something bigger. UM. But right now, I think

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese economy continues to do very well, growing at

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a good clip, and as long as they don't get

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>too heavy handed, I think it will continue. They've got

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>just a huge consumer demand in China. UM got good

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>uh good exports into the rest of Asia and in

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the US and Europe. So as the US and Europe recovers,

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I think China continues to do well. Yeah, the regulation,

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's made all the headlines, all all these

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>every day you wake up to a new sort of

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>crackdown on some industry in China, and and to me,

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that strikes me as at least for now dominantly a

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>domestic risk to say Chinese assets, you know, equities, especially

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>UM maybe to some degree to the equiporate bod market.

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But one thing I've read this week out of China

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that construct me is maybe something that the rest of

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the world needs to worry about, is the credit credit

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>expansion credit and China growing at at sort of the

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>weakest pace since the height of the pandemic. And I

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>know this is something that a lot of internationally focused

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>investors look at, is the credit impulse in China. UM

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>as sort of a symbol of You know, for years

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we've all been focused on experts out of China, but

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you have to start thinking about that domestic demand, the

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>imports into China, that consumer demand, like you talked about,

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is credit expansion in China, anything that you keep your

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>eye on, is it any you know? Does this slowdown?

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Where are you at all? Yeah? It certainly does, because

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously the world runs on credit. Consumers, especially UM run

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>on credit, so UM, you know, slowdown would mean our

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>our would signal maybe a possible slowdown in the overall economy.

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Some of that is due to though them raining in

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the UM credit markets and tightening down control

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>on some of the credit uh that that was going

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on there. So you know, slowdown isn't necessarily really concerning

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to me right now, but certainly keeping an eye on it.

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And it absolutely is something we we monitor across the

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>global economy. It's one of the things that UM drives

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>currency obviously and demand for currency, so certainly something we

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we monitor. And just to bring us back to the

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>US and speaking of consumers, my team and I were

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at some research reports of just consumer behavior and

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>credit card spending and Apple mobility data and some of

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>those things just over the last week, over the last

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>two weeks with the delta variant, and it's sort of

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a mixed picture right now. You know, you have reopenings obviously,

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>but then at the same time mask man needs in

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>certain areas and so on. So how should we be

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the delta variant, especially as it relates to

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>the market. So yeah, I think the delta variant is

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>really the largest risk to the to the markets right now. Um.

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as as we see UM hospitalizations climb,

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>although you know they seem to be peaking now, it's

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly something that that concerns the market now. You know,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Southwest recently announced that their bookings are down

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>because of the delta variant. And if we start to

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>see restrictions more restrictions and and um not, I don't

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to get the lockdowns. I just don't

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>think uh of the public is going to uh going

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to go that route. Um, they're they're gonna um, you know,

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we we we've seen in St. Louis where I live,

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a big rise in in covid it in Missouri was

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>one of the big hot states. So um, you know,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to wear masks again. And and starting some

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of those, but the the more harsher lockdowns and closings

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think we're gonna get there, but it's

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly a risk and uh, you know, it's something that

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to continue to deal with. Uh.

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the booster may be good or or

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just getting those those vactination rates up I think is

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the key and hopefully we'll we'll see that increase. You know, Chris,

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get back to that that notion of

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>of FX. You know, you made a great point that obviously,

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>when you know, take an equity position in the in

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>an overseas market, you're you're taking on that FX risk too.

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit of a pretty interesting year for the dollar,

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. I'm looking at this sort of the dollar

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>versus all the major g T and currencies. It's pretty

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>strongly against all of them on the year. But it's

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>been kind of a wild ride, you know that the

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Bloomberg Dollar Index, it you know, started

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the first say court of the year very strong, that

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it came back down the sort of flat line. Now

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's back up again near the highs of the year.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering. You know, I always think of that that

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>what they call the dollar smile theory. You know that

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it dollar does real well sort of in when the

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>world's going to hell and everything's risk off, but then

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it also does really well when you know things are

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>going well, but the U s seems to be doing

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>even better than than the rest of the world. Is

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>it that latter part that we're seeing now in the

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>dollar strength and walk us through kind of what you

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>think has been pushing the and pulling the dollar around

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this year? Uh? Well, this year, Yeah, it's definitely about

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the rebound and the US. The strong gains we saw

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US that that attracts investors, It attracts international investors,

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course to buy the stock market in the US,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they have to buy dollars. So um, I think it's

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>all about the strength we've seen so far this year

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>is all about, um, the the equity performance and investors

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>coming into the US and in the out performance maybe

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of of of our economy and early recovery. The main

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>thing we look at for for currencies, though, one of

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the main things is interest rate differentials, and um, you know,

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>we were in an odd place over the past uh,

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a few years, probably probably five to seven years where um,

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, the dollar was in US interest rates were

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>actually lower. UM, are are higher than most of the

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. So um, you know the interest rates.

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>When when the US interest rates are higher, US investments

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>usually are risk free, they're they're the cream of the crops.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So usually the interest rates in the US are a

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>little lower than the rest of the world. UM. That

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that changed, and with the Europe going negative interest rates

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.119
<v Speaker 1>and and a lot of you know, Japan going negative

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, we saw the US interest rates higher and

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that caused this dollar strength, and it caused a five

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>or six years of dollar strength. UM that started to

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>reverse last year. The mentality was, um, US was gonna start, um,

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, keep rates lower for longer. We kept hearing

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul say lower for longer, lower for longer. The US

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>rates are gonna stay down here and the rest of

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the world starting to HiPE rates. UM. I think we're

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna get back to that thinking. Um, as the US

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>holds holds the line on on interest rates, we're already

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>starting to see you know, Norway and and some of

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the other Australia and New Zealand start talking about raising rates,

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>even Canada. So as you see these other countries start

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates and interest rate ferential is gonna switch

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>back to the foreign currency. So that is is one

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I'm basing my thought that the

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar um will start sliding again as as you see

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>those interest rates different will start to change. So UM,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the dollar UM. You know, it's strong right now,

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and if if we see of some of these risks

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about come back, I think you'll see

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.199
<v Speaker 1>safe haven flows. Um. But again, in my opinion, you know,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>there's there's other markets that are going to start performing

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.400
<v Speaker 1>well as they come out of the pandemic, and that's

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>going to help their currency. So I think the dollar

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>will start to define again towards the end of the year. Mike,

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>can I admit something embarrassing? Oh? Absolutely. I've asked Chris

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to to define interest rate differentials at least thirty different

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>times for me, and every single time, I'm like, yep,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I got it. But that was a really great explanation.

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping for something really embarrassing. Vildata like this embarrassing,

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like you're wearing bell bottom jeans or something. I don't

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>know that that that's not just if I can It's

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not just straight interest rates. I mean, you know, you

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>can go to Brazil and get you know, some pretty

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>high interest rates, but they have high inflation also, So

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at the real interest rate. You

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>have to look at the difference between UM between the

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>nominal rate and and inflation rate, and uh, you know

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it's that's what really drives investors. So um, typically they're

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna go for the you know, they're the typical carry

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>trade is where an investor goes for real interest rates

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that are higher UM, invest in the currency and and

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, thinks that the currency is gonna move higher

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and along with getting that positive carry on the on

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate. Yeah, because I wonder how noisy that

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>potentially can can get when you've got you know, uh

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of the if you're a believer in that and

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that the supply bottlenecks are a big part of the

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>inflation story right now, you know, as it seems to

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>me like maybe bottlenecks could start resolving in certain bographies

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and not others. You know, where we're gonna have say, uh,

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 1>transient inflation being a little bit longer in one spot

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>than the other. You know, is is that a you know,

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is that a risk that of sort of false signals

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>being sent by inflation data that comes back to earth

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in some places spikes up again and others, but but

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>at all being sort of noise compared to what you know,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we can expect in the longer term. Great point, And yeah,

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. Um, it can be very tough.

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, back to my um previous comment about you know,

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we're an unprecedented times. Uh, the supply bottlenecks when you

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>when you shut everything down and not everything can open

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>up right away and then um, you know, shipping and

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, even opening some of the commodity minds.

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>It's tough. But uh, um, you know, the inflation I

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>think is transient. A lot of the inflation is trans

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and and and I was I really liked Paul's explanation

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of what transient is. He was asked, uh at the

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>at his last press conference about transient And it's not

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that the prices are going to go back down. He's

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not expecting prices to shift back down. They just

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>won't keep increasing as quickly as we've seen. Now, you

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>know what could make inflation not transient is is wage growth.

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>If we if we see continued strong wage growth, UM,

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that puts more money and consumers pockets on a permanent

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>basis um, and that will lead to higher prices as

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:34.200
<v Speaker 1>demand comes back. So um, the supply bottlenecks getting back

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to it though, Yes, absolutely, their supply bottlenecks in certain sectors.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh that's gonna drive obviously, when you cut supply,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and demand is still there, you're gonna see

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>um swings and prices in order to alleviate that the difference.

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>So um, I think it's tough to read. Again, Uh,

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the economic data is pretty tough. It can be really noisy. Um.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I'm looking forward to when we we

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>get all this behind us and it starts, uh getting

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>back to normal. If you will, Chris to educate Fildona

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on rate differentials, I'm gonna I'm gonna dig up some

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>stories from the European debt crisis, Fildana, to show you

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>how how ridiculous it can get. You know, that was

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that was that was fun times. I mean when when

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you had uh, um, you know, but again, you know,

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the the interest rates. Uh, we we remember back in

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the European debt crisis, I think it was Greece or

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Italy had uh interest rates. They were just riding on

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>on the German backing the implicit German guarantee of their debt,

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and their their debt was trading well below US at

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>at one point, which uh again drove the dollar higher,

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>um because of that, you know, and and uh when

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>you could buy US investments at at a better real

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:56.440
<v Speaker 1>interest rate than than Greece or Italy, it definitely uh

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>moved the market. Well, you look at some of those

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>spread back then, you know, double digit percentages. It looked

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like you're you know, it looked at the time like

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Europe was going to fail, that the euro Union was

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 1>going to fail completely. And uh it's remarkable to think

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>where we are now compared to that. I mean, I

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>guess it's just the magic of the ECB money printer

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to some degree. I mean they stabilized it. I mean,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, you go back to you know the Germans

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>uh in in Uh the ECB boy, I just I

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely Uh it's not le guard It was did

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>a great job. You know, he was gonna do anything

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>he could to support the euro. Um. You know, you

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 1>had the UK trying to leave at the time. So

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot going on those days, and uh, yeah,

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was volatile markets, very volatile markets. We

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>saw some really wide swings and interest rates. Whatever you

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>send me, Mike can be my end of some of

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the treating you'll have nightmares about. Uh. But that was

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that was the uh. That was the driver of all

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>markets at time, was the spread between either Italian and

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>German debt yields or Greek Greek in Portugal and the

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>German yields. I will, we'll get you up to speed

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 1>on that fill dot and then that's gonna be the

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>thing you worry about the most. I guarantee it. I

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to meet it any how. We just get

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>past stuff like that too, though, isn't it. I mean,

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that is in the rear view mirror and and nobody

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>ever talks about it anymore. So it's it's it's kind

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of crazy how those those um, you know, situations that

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you think are going to be around, you know, and

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>going to cause these dramatic swings all of a sudden

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>go away. Yeah. I think that draggy posture of whatever

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it takes is. I think every central banker around the

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.040
<v Speaker 1>world wrote down those words in a notebook somewhere and said,

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the party line you gotta take at times

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>like last year. Stand clear of the craziest things we

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>saw in markets this week, Chris, Uh, great stuff. Really

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate all your insights, but now comes the big test

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for you, and that is, uh, we got to hear

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the craziest thing you saw in markets this week. Um,

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You're not allowed on the podcast unless you come with

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a crazy thing. I've been in the business a long time.

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I go to a lot of investment conferences and back

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in the day, Um, there was an investment booth that

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was selling ostro j egg's and it was back in

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the mid nineties. You can and buy a buy an

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>ostro jag, and they were encouraging people to become ostrich ranchers,

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and literally ostro jags that were going for I think

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen bucks apiece all of a sudden shot up. I

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>mean it was just everybody was getting into the market

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and they shot up to three thousand dollars. Um. This

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was back in the mid nineties. But then as everything

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>does it like the Toolip craze, it it met a

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:56.239
<v Speaker 1>very dramatic end and those three thousand dollars ostro jiggs Uh,

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>you know went back to uh fifteen or or twenty bucks,

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>so it was a dramatic fault. Well, I just read

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>an article where they're starting to come back. I guess

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:10.719
<v Speaker 1>people that you know, we're during COVID wanted new paths,

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are wanting to find a way to to make some

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>extra money around the house and and so especially in

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>taxas where there's bigger ranching. Um. We we're seeing a

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of um interest in the in the ostra Jack's. Unfortunately,

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it may end up um the same way

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>as before. I mean, you know, but we're starting to

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>see people, uh, doctors and lawyers starting to try to

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>flip ostriches. Uh. This might be my favorite craziest thing

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of in the history of crazy. Well, I gotta find

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the prices of the Ostrojacks. I don't think we have

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the ticker on the Bloomberg. I couldn't find it on Bloomberg.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>They're not what what what would what would be the ticker?

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We got we gotta have you ever

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>seen one? They're huge jaggs. I mean, and this this

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>boot used to have them right there on. You know,

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they would show you what the Oscar jagg looked like.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know they're used for meat and leather and

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so there's some good uses. But I think they're pretty

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>mean birds too. So I was gonna say, yeah, well,

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we gotta find the data set on this. I need

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>some price discovery on on Oscar jaggs. And yeah, I was.

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I always sat there, pretty wordery birds. I don't know

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>if i'd want one as a pet. And what do

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you get? You gotta go out and sit on an

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Oscar jagg yourself for for a few days. That's you

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>gotta go steal it. And then I guess you you know,

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you steal it from the bird, and they don't like that.

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this, this is fantastic. I gotta look

0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>further into that. This that is my kind of story

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>right there. If they'll thought it, we'll do it. That's

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a hard one to follow. I gotta say, I know

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that's really that's a really good one. If if you

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>admit it, if you had a real time price quote

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>for me, it would have been better. But I I'll

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll get that. We'll get that. I'll get I'll find

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a broker. I'll find a broker somewhere. Yeah, that one,

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that one was really I can't can't really follow. I

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>was gonna give us my my favorite headline that I

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>saw on the Bloomberg terminal this week, which is about

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the garages that are being sold in New York City.

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So they're going for about three d fifty dollars per

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>parking spot in certain for certain garages in the city,

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>which is just crazy. But I was going to ask you, Mike,

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>how you think that stacks up with the the the

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>average the medium price of of single family homes, which

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is another number that came out this week, which which

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is higher, Yeah, which is higher parking space in Manhattan

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>or a single family home. Man, that's a that's a

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>tough one. I know, I know the single family home

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>price has been going up. I'm gonna say the parking

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>space at three fifty is still still a little higher

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>than the median home price. Not much, but a little bit.

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not it's not the median home price is slightly higher,

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but they're just about even. So the number that came

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>out this week for the median home price is that

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the prices rose something like which is another crazy story.

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, they rose to to an all time

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>high three fifty seven thousand dollars, so just slightly above.

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize they had gone up that much. I

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>knew they were in the three hundreds this year, but jeesus,

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what you really want a car in New

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>York City, though, I guess just to get away on

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the weekends. I would never want to drive in that city. Ever.

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I might buy one of those parking spots and then

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll buy one of those tiny homes you know, have

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you seen these things, and I'll park it in the

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 1>parking spot, and I might have that. I might end

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>up with the nicest place in Manhattan with that. I

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know, what do you think you can open up

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 1>your your I'm doing quotes backyard for drinks and tap

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>us or something like that. Yeah, we have lots of

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Western boys. So I was amazed one of my first

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>trips to New York and I had never seen him

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.959
<v Speaker 1>stacked cars, um, you know, and open parking lots, and

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what the heck is that? And yeah,

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>there were all these just parking condos. I guess it's

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, and elevators up, and I thought that was

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just the wildest thing. Ever, but I see, I guess

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 1>there's there's huge demand this. That's amazing. Three for parking,

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I imagine you have to pay some monthly you know,

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>parking spot sweeping fee on top of that too. It's

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>probably a thousand bucks a month. But these are these

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>are both pretty good. I'll give you mine. I think

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I might end up taking the bronze in this episode,

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'll give you mine. But that As you know,

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been keeping a very close eye on AMC the

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>movie theater stock just because you talk about crazy things.

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And uh, this week it reported earnings. Uh. The CEO

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously has really embraced the whole Reddit day trader crowd,

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>which I think you have to if you're that guy.

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, uh, you know your company is gonna win

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>or fail based on what Reddit decides to do next.

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So on this conference call after the earnings, he decided

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to take questions from individual retail traders. I think they

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>only took one question from an analyst and the rest

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of were from They call themselves the Apes, you know,

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the the AMC faithful are known as the Apes. I

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a reference to the planet of the Apes.

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>So here's my question, um My favorite question from one

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:27.919
<v Speaker 1>of the apes, uh, and the executive the CFO read

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>out the question from a guy named Aaron and it said,

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Aaron asks, and I promised, this is not a sarcastic question,

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>but can you guys make the AMC mascot officially a gorilla?

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 1>And the response from the CEO atam Aaron is just

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>so priceless, you know, He's like, how do you answer

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>these questions? You don't want to offend any of these guys,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, uh, well, it's an interesting question. I

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't think we're ready for a mascot though. Uh.

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>You said, we're gonna watch what I're doing doing with

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>our marketing programs, and I think you'll be pleased with

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>what AMC is gonna do. But he wouldn't commit Bilboa

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to making an ape mascot, which I think might explain

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that the drop in the stock price after the conference call.

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm just saying, well, our our Boomberg

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.879
<v Speaker 1>opinion colleague Mount Levin had a hilarious column about this

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>where he laid out a bunch of those questions, and honestly,

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I was I was laughing reading it. And you're right.

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 1>The very last question I believe was from an analyst,

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and there was only one, but it begs the question,

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think we need a mascot for the podcast? Oh, definitely,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>let's open it up to the Twitter Twitter Ostrich an Ostrich.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think an Ostrich is in Uh, is definitely in contention.

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>And if we get anything, Chris has got a deal

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for us. Bill Donna, you're just gonna have to sit

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 1>on the egg in your apartment for a few months.

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>You can do that, right, If I sit on it,

0:36:52.000 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll break the egg. I don't know, but I have

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that they probably sit on their eggs for

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>like years or something. Yeah, I wouldn't do. The good

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>thing is that if we get anything wrong, we can

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just bury our head in the ground. And uh And

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of didn't happen, but all right with if and

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if you anyone on Twitter, call the hotline if you

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:15.440
<v Speaker 1>have a better mascot for us than an Ostrich. But

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the lead. That's our lead mascot contender

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Sure, So thanks for that, Chris, and

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>we really appreciate your time on the show this week.

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Really insightful stuff and hopefully we can get you back

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to do it again. I look forward to it. I'd

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>love to come back. What Goes Up We'll be back

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>next week. And so that you can find us on

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, website and app wherever you get your podcasts,

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>We'd love it if you took the time to rate

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and review the show on Apple podcast so more listeners

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 1>can find us. And you can find us on Twitter,

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>follow me at Rea Anonymous. Wild A high Rich is

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:01.120
<v Speaker 1>at Wildta high Rich. You can also follow Boomberg Podcasts

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.479
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts and thank you to Charlie pelleto Bloomberg Radio

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and the voice of the New York City Subway System.

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up is produced by Tofur Foreheads. The head

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesco Levy. Thanks for listening. To

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:13.919
<v Speaker 1>see you next time.