WEBVTT - Best Of - Patrick Mahomes vs. Josh Allen DEBATE, Russell Westbrook's ALL-TIME ranking, NBA schedule reaction | Nick Wright

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the best of the week for What's Right

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Right the best takes and moments from this

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>week on the show. Enjoy Dan Orlovsky. Credit to Dan,

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>who again I know a tiny, tiny bit. Everyone who

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>does know him speaks about what a great guy he is.

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>He is. Some of his opinions have been the subject

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of my scorn over the years, but it's never been

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a personal thing with Dan. I think, I hope I

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>would assume he knows that. So he discusses in Credit

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to him for having an opinion people care about. To

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>where I'm discussing it here he ranked. I'm gonna read

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>his words exactly. I ranked the top ten quarterbacks by

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>seven different traits arm strength, ball placement, mechanics, decision making,

0:00:55.240 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>pocket presence, second reaction, second reaction, creativity, pardon me, and ability.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>These lists are based on current performance and expectations for

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty sixth season. It's how I would rank

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the QB group at this exact moment. I only included

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>starters and leaned on what I see on tape to

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>form the rankings. Okay, great sounds fun. I'm gonna jump

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>right to the reason we're discussing this and then we're

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna do a bigger picture chat on it. Briefly the

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>category decision making with the football, and he then describes

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it as here are the league's top problem solvers. Being

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a good decision maker means making the right choice when

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>things are going to plan, but it also means making

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the only choice when things are falling apart. Find the

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>correct outlet, but avoid mistakes, turnovers, and negative plays. Okay,

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the number one decision making with the football quarterback in

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Year of Our Lord twenty twenty six, according to

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan Orlovsky, is Josh Allen. And this is where so

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>much of my Josh Allen frustration comes from. I think

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the same you guys. At this point I'm in reruns.

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the second best quarterback in the league.

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Of all the quarterbacks in the league who don't have

0:02:56.160 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>a Super Bowl ring, the one that I him, I

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>think has the best chance of getting one over the next.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say ever, because the younger guys

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>have an edge there, but over the next five years

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>is Josh Allen. Josh Allen at his best is the

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>only quarterback in the league that if both guys play

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>their best can go toe to toe with Patrick, that

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>is Josh. I have given him, I think a ton

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:36.000
<v Speaker 1>of credit for those things. But the frustration that you

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>guys hear in my voice when discussing discussing Josh Allen

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so often comes from the way he is covered in

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the media. And I've already had to hear that from Greene.

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>No one's ever played the position better. I've had to

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>hear from folks for years that he's the best quarterback

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in football. And now what I considered to be one

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of his only weaknesses decision making, not panicking, avoiding awful mistakes,

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the only actual verifiable weaknesses the player has.

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dotie's the best in the league at it, the

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>best number one. The last game we saw him play,

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>he had one of the worst turnovers in playoff history,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't the pick that lost him the game.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>The the last playoff game he played against the Chiefs

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>AFC Championship game two years ago, tried to throw picks

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>on the two of the first three passes of the game,

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and the year before that fumble the ball three times.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Since he's come into the league, no player in the

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>league has turned the ball over more and he's number

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>one at decision making, like that's it's just crazy, It's

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>just and again I think he's such a great player.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>But this is damn near the sports version of gaslighting,

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>where we're taking one of the player's only fair weaknesses

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>or critiques and saying, not only is it not a weakness,

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>he's the best in the world at it. Like I

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>don't even think Josh Allen thinks Josh Allen is the

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>best decision maker in football. It's just baffling to me.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And then we can and then we get to the

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the other piece of this Orlovsky list that is a

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>little frustrating, which is again, according to this to Orlovsky's rankings,

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>there is not a single quarterback trait, not one of

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the seven, not one that Patrick Mahomes is better than

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:41.039
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen att not one. Arm strength Mahomes five, Allen one, fine,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>so be it arguable, but fine, ball placement Allen seven,

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes on ball placement not top ten in the league. Okay,

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mechanics this one, I actually probably agree with Allen. Number nine,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes not ranked in the top ten decision making a

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>guy who again I'm not gonna read Mahomes resume decision

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>making Allen number one, Patrick number nine, Patrick a worst

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>decision maker. They end Burrow and Lamar and Dak and

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Jaden and Drake May and Jordan Love and Matthew Stafford

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and of course Josh Allen. Pocket presence pocket presence Josh

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not ranked. Mahomes not ranked number one pocket presence somehow

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is Drake May, who we just watched get sacked a

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand times in the playoffs and they were not all

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>snapsacks number one Pocket presence Drake May. Mahomes not ranked.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Second reactionability Mahomes number three. Oh, finally something he's better

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>than Alan that Nope, Allen number one. Rushing ability fine,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes number seven, Allen number two. I this is what

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>again writes about second reactionability. I'm looking for creativity here

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>as well as the ability to throw from weird arm

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>angles and platforms. Mahome's not Listen, Mahome's pretty good at

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that creativity and weird arm angles and platforms, but he's

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>no Josh Allen. I mean, what are we doing? Like?

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I just I I am verklempt. No, that's the wrong word.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I think verklempt means hold on. Uh oh no, that's okay.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>He usually is positive, not always with this, and again

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>credit to Orlovsky, he got me going. But there's not

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a single thing on the football field. Patrick Malmes is

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>better than Josh Allen, and Josh Allen's got the best

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>decision making of anyone in the league. Come on, I mean, really,

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you ever notice everything keeps going up? Rent's going up,

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>streaming services going up, even your favorite Burrio spots charge

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>and your extra for suls It's outrageous. Not with boost Mo.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>With Boost Mobile, you and your phone build on play

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the will this go up soon?

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Game?

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Why? Because boos mool was unlimited talk, text and data

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>plan at a price that'll never go up. In fact,

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same price you'll pay for life. So switch

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>now for unlimited wireless at a price that'll never go up.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Only at Boost Mobile. After thirty gigs, customers may experience

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>lower speeds. Customers will pay twenty five dollars per month

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>as long as they remain active on the boost Unlimited plan.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>The other big news yesterday is Russell Westbrook finally calling

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.079
<v Speaker 1>it finally sounds meaner than I want to to. After

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen years in the league, Russell Westbrook calling it quits,

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know he was still to the bitter end.

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>If you gave Russ minutes, he was going to give

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you some level of production. Now it wouldn't always be

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 1>efficient production, obviously, but even last year in Sacramento playing

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes a game fifteen, six and six basically, And

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of ways to discuss Russell Westbrook's career.

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:47.199
<v Speaker 1>I it's one of the most interesting careers ever, it's

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the most unique careers ever. It also is

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a career that I think will be misremembered as far

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>as at his peak how good he was. Really. So

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>if you take Russ what I consider his peak, which

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is his first full year back after the knee injury,

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>through his one year in Houston, that year in Houston,

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>he was All NBA and was underrated. In those six seasons,

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>his averages were twenty six, nine and ten. He won

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>an MVP, had three other top five finishes, and in

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>those six seasons was All NBA every season, two time

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>first team, two times second team, two time thirteen and

0:11:54.120 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>critically speaking, in those seasons, his team was decidedly better

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>with him than without him. And that's the part of

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Russ that I think, because of how the career ended,

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and because some of the analytical numbers are so garish,

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>people are going to act as if his style never

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>led to any winning And that's a more complicated discussion

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>than it actually seems like. But as far as was

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>having Russell Westbrook on the court good for your team,

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>undeniably yes, throughout the entirety of his prime. Gets a

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>little trickier in the playoffs, and we'll get to that.

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>But Russ is during his prime in particular, availability, crazy

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>high minutes for the era, absolutely endless energy and effort.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>He was an absolute son of a bitch to deal with.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And while people can parse all in twenty seventeen, MVP

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>should have been this guy. He was absolutely a super

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>nova that first season in Oklahoma City without Durant. It's

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>not only that he averaged a triple double, first guy

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to do it since Oscar Robertson, And it wasn't only

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>that he broke Oscar Robertson single season triple double record,

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, the game in which he broke

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that record, he had a fifty point triple double and

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the buzzer beating three to win the game. It was

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that that Oklahoma City teams entire plan every game was

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Russ create fifty some points of offense for us, and

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he did it. He won the scoring title, scoring thirty

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>one and a half a game, second scoring title of

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>his career, I believe. And then also was a terror

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>on the glass and despite the insane usage rate, didn't

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>wear down and followed those seasons up with two years

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>in a row where he won the assists title while

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>averaging double digit rebounds. And then after that year in Houston,

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>once he got to Washington, I think we're post prime.

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But in Houston, you know, it was twenty two, eleven

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and eleven, and on those silly eighty two and zero

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>games or whatever, they treat him like a god for

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>that one year. One year in Washington. He had a

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>great career and he worked his ass off and all

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>time great players that I think, you know, not the

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>full list, but that I think he undeniably had a

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>better career than and was a better player than mellow

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Dominique Dwight A. D. Gary Payton, Steve Nash, Clyde Drexler,

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>guys that I think he is right behind as far

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>as his full career tricky one. But Kawhi Iverson, Clyde Fraser,

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kidd, Patrick Ewing, that's the group. I have him

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>right behind. He's one of the you know, what's my

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>full list of guards better that have had better careers

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>than Russ, the full list, Michael Magic, Kobe Steph those

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>are obvious ones. I just don't want to leave anybody out. Zeke,

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paul, Dwayne Wade, Shay West, and Jerry West, Oscar Robertson,

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Stockton Harden. Those are the twelve guys that, to me

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>like the only twelve guys that reguards that definitively are

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>definitively higher on the pyramid than Russ. I think kids

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him, you know the I think Iversen's a

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 1>touch ahead of him, And I said, SGA right, SGA

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him. But so he's, you know, somewhere thirteen fourteen,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>fifteen sixteen, depending on how you want to do it.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's an unbelievable career. It also is, you know,

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>young elite or aspiring elite athletes can learn a lot

0:17:56.080 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>from both sides of Russ's career. You can learn what

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>endless energy, effort intensity, what that can do for you

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in a positive way. Now, obviously you can't learn his

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>absolutely freakish athleticism where there was during his prime he

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>was a can sit for a decade, maybe a top

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>three just raw athlete in the league. Can't learn that,

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But the other stuff you can learn the flip side.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And I wanted to do this last, not first, because

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't listening. He's one of the fortiest greatest players ever.

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I just said, you know, he's one of the thirteen, fourteen,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen greatest guards of all time. You don't want to

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>spend it and the like, here's what was wrong with

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>him on the front end, but it is part of

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>his story, is the stubbornness and the hard headedness and

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>the refusal to evolve once he no longer was the

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>league's best raw athlete, and how that's a big part

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>of the reason that in the final decade of his career,

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 1>teams he was on went on one.

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, one, two, three, four, five.

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Six, two to eight in playoff series from that first

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>year without Durant to retirement, and those two playoff series

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>wins were one year in Houston by the skin of

0:19:52.880 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>their teeth over the young young OKC team and the Clippers.

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry the Nuggets seven game victory over the Clippers

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>last Round one. That's it. And where you know, if

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>you russ over that last decade of his career in

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the postseason was so wildly inefficient that it really really

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:36.959
<v Speaker 1>hurt his teams. From the MVP year through the end

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of his career, fifty three playoff games, thirty eight percent

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>from the field, thirty percent from three on five threes

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>a game, four turnovers a game, not ideal, and it

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is not nothing that for a guy who had that

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>much just unbelievable talent, work, ethic, competitive spirit, all of it.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>When it came to overall team winning, underachieved because he

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was a bit of his own worst enemy. That's not

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like an unfair statement, and there's a lesson in that

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. But overall, you know, eighteen years in the.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 2>League one MVP won, there's seven, six, ten, nine time

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 2>All NBA, two time first team, five time second team,

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>two time third team, four consecutive Top four, Top five.

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Pardon me, MVP finishes and as an added bonus, one

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>of the greatest off the court guys as far as

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>how he treated people on teams and the work he

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>did in the community, all those things when I treat

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:37.959
<v Speaker 1>people that worked for teams those things. One of just

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the greatest guys in the league for twenty years and

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a first ballot Hall of Fame career, and anybody that's

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>arguing he's not a Hall of Famer is a moron.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I can't even say they're just trolling. They they just

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>don't understand how the Hall of Fame works. And this

0:22:55.400 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>is he is a no doubt walk right in immediate guy. Hey, everybody.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:08.199
<v Speaker 1>With Russell Westbrook announcing his retirement after eighteen years this week,

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we decided we wanted to drop back into your guys feeds.

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>The piece we did and we were doing the fifty

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>greatest Players of the last fifty years. So it's about

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>four years ago on the pod. The conceit of the

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>piece was basically kareem through that moment in NBA history.

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 1>So like twenty twenty two is twenty three the fifty

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>greatest players of you know that the modern era of

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the NBA At that moment, Russell Westbrook came in thirty

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>fifth on those rankings. That's honestly right about where he

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>would be today. Like the only guys who weren't on

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the list who would have jumped him would have been

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Shay and Joker, and so he'd still be right around there.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:00.479
<v Speaker 1>And he hasn't had any massive postseason or regular season

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>moments since then. And so this is a look at

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the Russell Westbrook pod from his spot on the fifty

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Greatest Players of the last fifty years, now that he

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 1>has retired, player number thirty five, Number thirty five, Russell Westbrook.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>Russ was maybe the single hardest player to reign of

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>this entire enterprise because so Russ's regular season accomplishments are

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>up there with the twelve to fifteen greatest players ever.

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Two time first team All NBA, five time second Team

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>All NBA, two time third Team All NBA, so he's

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>nine time All NBA. He won an MVP three other

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>times he came in top five. He has two scoring

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>titles and three assists titles. One of the only players

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>in league history, Tiny Archibald, Ostar Robertson, Lebron James, and

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Russell Westbrook are the only guys to ever do it once.

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Russ's on it. Two scoring dials, three assist titles average

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a triple averaging a triple level hadn't been done in

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. Russ did it three straight seasons, then took

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>a year off, did it a fourth straight season. He

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be known for the triple doubles, so

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>let's dig in there for a moment. He has won

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and ninety four career regular season triple doubles

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>as of this recording. That's not only the most all time.

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Only Lebron, Jason Kidd, Magic, and Oscar Robertson even have

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred career playoff career regular season triple doubles. Russ

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>is likely going to finish his career well north of

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>two hundred career triple doubles. In the playoffs. He's third

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>all time in triple doubles. Okay, so that's the good

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of Russ. We'll get to the bad in a moment.

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>But you guys know how much playoff stuff matters for

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>me on this. It's unfair and disingenuous to act like

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Russ never had good playoff moments. He did. So let's

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>just we're gonna go in chronological order, and we're gonna

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>need some time here. In the twenty twelve Finals, the

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>only game the thunder one in that series, he was

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, eight and eleven as a kid in the finals.

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>In that in game four of those finals, which they lost,

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>he was the best player on his seam by mark

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>with no dispector Duran. He was forty three seven and

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>five on twenty of thirty two from the field in

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>game four of those finals forty three, seven and five

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to try to stay alive instead of falling down three

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to one, but they end up losing. For that for

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>his first finals ever, he's twenty seven his only finals

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, six and seven. So we can't act like

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>that that didn't happen. Now, let's move on to twenty fourteen.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Twenty fourteen, he's twenty seven, ten and sixteen on just

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>sixteen shots in game seven of the first round against

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Memphis helped them propelled them what would have been a

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>disastrous loss for them. In that same year, Western Armorg

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Semis the next round. You guys, remember everyone remembers the

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>CP three meltdown game. Say the Clippers have the big lead.

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>CP three tries to draw the foul. He doesn't get it,

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but gets forgotten is Russ in that game went to

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>totoe with Chris Paul and ate him up. He was

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight, five and six and got fouled at the

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>very end of the game as the Clipper from Melting

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Down hit all three free throws to win the game.

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>That very next round Western Arference Finals, the Thunder a

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>down two to one to the Spurs. The Spurs were

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>going to win the title. Russ was forty five, ten

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and five up to this point. Yes, he was a

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>little inefficient, a little careless with the ball, but nobody

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>was killing Russ. So that's twenty fourteen. Let's go to

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen. That's the year the seventy three win Warriors

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>were down three to one to Russ and Katie's Thunder.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's all about what he did there in Round one

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>against Dallas thirty six, twelve and nine to send Dallas home.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Average for games five and six of the Western Armand

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Semifinals against the Spurs to send them home average thirty two,

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>seven and twelve in those two games. So again, it's

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all going good. To go up three to one on

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors in the Western Armence Finals average twenty seven,

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>seven and twelve, including thirty six, eleven and eleven in

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Game four to go up three to one. The problem

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is since then she's gone real sideways since then, since

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the Klay Thompson game, since that moment and then Katie leaves,

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it's been bad, and it's been bad in the playoffs

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for five six years. So Round one versus Houston, the

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>first year without Durant, he did have a fifty one

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.479
<v Speaker 1>ten and thirteen, sixty one ten and a fifty one

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 1>tripled in the playoffs average for the series thirty seven

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to twelve and eleven. But despite that, they lost in five.

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Why did they lose him five? Because even though Russ

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>was averaging all those points and assists and rebounds, he

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>shot thirty nine percent from the field and twenty seven

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>percent from three, and he was shooting ten threes a game.

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Then next year in the first round against I think

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it was Utah with Paul George, he had a forty

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>five to fifteen and seven to stay alive and a

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>forty six ten and five in Game six, And if

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you go back and look at it, that forty six

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>ten and five where they lost, he wasn't good. And

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that was with Paul George. And then the next year

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Dames sends him home and then Paul George leaves him,

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>so his career averages for the playoffs are twenty five, seven,

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and eight, which are exceptional, and his career playoff percentages

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>are forty percent from the field and thirty percent from three,

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>which are awful. So what do you do with Russell

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>west I still feel like because it's been so bad

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>as of late, and this last year with the Lakers,

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>with such a disaster, people forget how dominant he was

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>at his peak. Flawed but dominant. The MVP's got to matter.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>The triple doubles might have been slightly overrated, but they

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>have to matter to a degree. He was the single

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hardest player to rank in this entire enterprise. He's player

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>at number thirty five from Russell Westbrook. And now we

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have a surprise questionnaire. No one has told me who

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>this is. Let's see what the Russell Westbrook question is.

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Nick, you nobody else. We're not a akl from

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>White Plains. Here Russell Westbrook at thirty five. We love

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 3>the effort, We love mister triple double. But Russ at

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 3>thirty five, Come on, neck, You've got James Worthy, big game,

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 3>James ten spots down the list. At forty five, you

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 3>have George Gervin never been to an NBA final. Ahead

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of Big Game, James, you have Gary Payton, who won

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 3>a NBA title.

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Is a parting. I had a big game, James.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 4>You have Sidney MOKRII, who I loved one of the

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 4>triple tremarkets all had a big game James, but Russe

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 4>at thirty five. Big Game James at forty five, one

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 4>Finals appearance for Russ. Big Game James three titles, most

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 4>valuable player in one of the great game seven performances

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 4>in the history of the National Basketball Association. His numbers

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 4>in the postseason leaps and bounds the regular season. This

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 4>guy got it done when it was the most important

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 4>time to get it done, while Russ has been a

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 4>shrieking Violet. Moved that camera up a little closer.

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>In words that I know only you can understand this

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>old man. He ain't lying, all right. That's the greatest

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>sports radio caller ever, my friend Alan white Planes. Unfortunately,

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Alan white Planes, instead of really asking me Russell Westbrook question,

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>he used his time to really just make the case

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for James Worthy. James Worthy was a hard one to

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>rank as well as we talked about it. If you

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>want to go back and listen to the episodes. James

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Worthy doesn't have the All NBA and the MVP votes

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff because of the team he was on,

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but he was unbelievable in the biggest moments. So I

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>do understand the kind of reversal there. So you have

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>one guy who has all the regular season stuff, all

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of it, and not a lot of the playoff stuff

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in Russ, and another guy who has all the playoff

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff but not a whole lot of the regular season stuff,

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and James So am I overvaluing the regular season? I

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>would agree, possibly if a Russ didn't have any substantial

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>playoff moments. But I think I laid out that early

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in his career, up until Game five of the twenty

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>sixteen playoffs forward game five of the Western Urbans Finals,

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I should say, basically from the moment Katie left to now,

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>up until then, he was actually a very valuable playoff performer.

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think that. So I think Russe. Let me

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>put it like this, Russ's playoff resume, one can make

0:32:55.600 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>a strong case, is heftier than James Worthy's regular season resumes,

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and Russ's regular season resume is eye to eye with

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>James Worthy's playoff resume, Russ's regular season resume is that

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of an all time guy. So again, though I said

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning that Russ was maybe the hardest player

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to rank, I'm comfortable with Russell Westbrook being the thirty

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>fifth best player of the last fifty years. All right,

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk NBA Opening Night. Go ahead. So the full.

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 5>NBA schedule releases Thursday, but they've already announced some big days.

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 5>So Opening Day we've got Pistons at Celtics, Sixers at Knicks,

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 5>Thunders at Spurs, and then Christmas Day you've got Spurs

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 5>at Nicks, Heats at Celtics, Sixers at Lakers, Thunders at Timberwolves,

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Nuggets at Warriors. Which these games are you eyeing or

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 5>looking forward to?

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, so massive takeaways all over the spot. First of all,

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna jump right to you know what, We'll get

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to the snubs later. Let's talk about the positives. Five

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>teams got both Marquis Days, Thunderspurs, six Ers, Nicks, Celtics.

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Those are the five teams that are playing Opening Day

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and Christmas. The only I guess somewhat surprised there is

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics' brand equity, being that strong. I mean again, like,

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't think the Celtics would be left out. And

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics are one of the greatest franchises in the

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>history not just of the NBA of sports, and they've

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>got a superstar in Jason Tatum, and they're supposed to

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:41.720
<v Speaker 1>be good, really good. But it surprised me a little

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>bit that the Celtics were. Let me put it like this,

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>of the five teams that got double dips, the Celtics

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 1>were the most surprising, even if it's not that surprising

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 1>at all, so that you know, that jumped out to me.

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>The five other teams that got a single game were

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Pistons, more on them in a moment, the heat

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>more on them as well, then Timberwolves, Nuggets, Warriors. Okay,

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>so in no particular order. My immediate first takeaway is

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we have a bunch four years face of the league conversations,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and then every single year the NBA tells us, yeah,

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Bron, Yeah, it's just Bron. In fact, we can't

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>even do the schedule until Lebron signs, and then when

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he does sign, we're gonna give his team the premiere

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>spot on Christmas Day, the three PM Chris or five pm.

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>The third game on Christmas, the Marquee Christmas Day game? Hey,

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna do rematch of the finals? No, we'll

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>put that in the morning, all right? Are we gonna do?

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>What are other options here? We're gonna how about how

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 1>about Lebron with you know, with his one game back

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles? How about that's the Marquee game? Okay,

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>that's Christmas? All right? What about opening night? Opening night?

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 1>What are we doing? Are we doing the rematch of

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the finals?

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 2>There?

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>No, we're not gonna do that there. Okay. Are we

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:29.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do Jail and Brown Jason Tatum that you know that? No,

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll find another spot for that. How about Lebron against

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the defending champs? How about the defending champs when they

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>get to open their drop their banner? Lebron's there? Sound

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>good for everyone? Think people will watch, good for ratings,

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>good for business. Cool? What are we doing with Wimby?

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>We'll put them on after? What about? What about? What

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>about on Christmas Day? We'll put them on in the

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>morning when be as opening their presence. We gotta make

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>like I again, I'm not even saying this is not

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>an evaluation of whether or not this is what they

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>should do. This is an evaluation of what they will do,

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and what they are telling you is the NBA universe

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>still revolves around Lebron James, right or wrong, and they're

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>scheduling it accordingly. So that's first takeaway. Second takeaway, Steph

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Curry's star power is real because of the fifteen teams,

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>not fifteen ten teams pardon me, that have games Opening

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Day or Christmas. The worst team by a mile is

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Golden State and they're you know, they were never going

0:37:42.200 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>to be left out. Like every other team listed, there

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>should be somewhere from really good to excellent. And then

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there's the Warriors in a game that nobody even thinks

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Butler will be back for and they are the

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>final game on Chris miss Day, so shout out to

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:09.959
<v Speaker 1>them on that to step on that front. Couple other

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>small takeaways surprising to me, demands that we're gonna have

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a Christmas Day and Opening Day, by the way, but

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:27.720
<v Speaker 1>focus on Christmas. For there's five games with no Durant,

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:36.760
<v Speaker 1>like I can't the I can't remember the last time

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Durant's team with the Suns. Maybe I don't think so, though,

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>because those seems were like and Durant are on a

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>good team. The Rockets are Rockets are a good team.

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>To have no Durant on Christmas Day is noteworthy to me.

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I and again, there the only I don't

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 1>know that there were snubs. I'm sure the Calves are

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a little annoyed, and I bet the Rockets are a

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>little annoyed. But that's really all that jumps out to me.

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you. I am also sur I'm a

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>little surprised that the Pistons got invited to the party,

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 1>even though it's the three pm, middle of the day

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>opening day game. That and maybe they didn't work. It's

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a little surprising the Pistons are there. I would have

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe the heat with Giannis would have gotten both,

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Opening Day and Christmas Day. But I guess

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>if heat at Celtics's Christmas, you're not gonna have Celtics

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>heat opening night. So that's where they mix in the Pistons.

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 1>But it is surprising to me even that the Pistons

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:00.960
<v Speaker 1>got that slot over Cleveland, or hell over Houston.

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 5>Like that is right to see Detroit and Cleveland.

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>No, I the NBA clearly agrees with you, like the

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 1>NBA clearly agrees with you. So here are my other

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh general takeaways. I do think for opening Night,

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>six Ers next thunder Spurs is awesome strategically by the

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>league because for most people and by the Vegas odds,

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>those are the projected conference finals. So an opportunity for

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the NBA season to start with those four teams basically

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and end with those four teams. I like that. I

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>also would be remiss if I didn't recognize who wasn't

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>playing on Opening Day that we haven't mentioned, So to

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Mon's go ahead, because you have a fun little fact

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>here in stature.

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 5>So the Lakers have played on an opening night every

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 5>year since twenty nineteen. How do you think that they

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 5>missed the cut this year?

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>So what happened in twenty nineteen? This kind of goes

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 1>back to my original point. Bron signed there, Bron left,

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Lakers all of a sudden like, sorry, guys,

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't have a spot for you. Like Lakers at

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Celtics is sitting right there for anybody that wants it

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of Pistons at Celtics. And you guys know how

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>much I the Oh yeah, Lebron got there in twenty eighteen,

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>signed in twenty eighteen. Pardon me, you guys know how

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>much I how much I like Luca. But the fact

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Lakers have been supplanted in the Western Conference

0:41:56.880 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>by the two small market Juggernauts thunder Spurs, and that

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>they just for the first time in eight years or

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:10.920
<v Speaker 1>seven years, they're not an Opening Night is I guess

0:42:10.960 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>somewhat noteworthy to me. Well, listen, I I think it is.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm really interested in what Luca can do this year.

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I they also, you know, they they looked at the

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 1>team that Luca took to the NBA Finals with Dallas

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago and said, how can we best

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>remake that? And that's what they tried to do. I

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's been I spent a lot of time

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>while you were on paternity to leave talking about how

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I thought the Lakers could have handled the final year

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of Lebron better to where maybe he would have signed

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 1>with them for the minimum rather than signing with the

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Sixers for the minimum. But that that's water under the

0:42:53.200 --> 0:42:58.280
<v Speaker 1>bridge at this point. But the the league is making

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>very very clear to you through this schedule, at least

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 1>in my eyes, that they view right now they are

0:43:08.920 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 1>three biggest attractions as the Sixers, the Spurs, and the Knicks.

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the metal stand with also receiving votes being the

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Thunder and the Celtics, and they I'm I'm very I'm

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>in i am very interested in how the Thunder, what

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the Thunders coverage is like in national TV games and

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:48.080
<v Speaker 1>all those things are like this year because they were

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:52.879
<v Speaker 1>never an overwhelmingly popular team outside of their own fan

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:55.960
<v Speaker 1>base to begin with. But when it's like, yeah, but

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:59.319
<v Speaker 1>they're the champs, they're the best. They're the juggernaut that

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, gives you a cachet that gets removed a

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bit when you don't win the title again, when you

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>don't make the finals again. And now it feels like

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the Spurs having beaten them and being a team on

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the upswing, while the Thunder it feels like lost some

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, semi valuable parts and some pieces. Are a

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>team that is potentially at least not on the down swing,

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but just a not quite as good as they were

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. So that's interesting. And then

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the teams we haven't really discussed here. I

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the Heat that I thought maybe they could have

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:47.760
<v Speaker 1>gotten the double dip opening day on Christmas, aunt LaMelo

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 1>and the Timberwolves. They host the Thunder on Christmas Night

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>and then Joker against Steph as the nightcap, with two

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>teams that only either one really thinks they have a

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>real shot at winning the championship, despite having in Jokers case,

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe the best player in the world and in the

0:45:10.400 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Warriors case with Steph, one of the greatest players ever.

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to these other questions, did you, Demonde,

0:45:16.800 --> 0:45:19.319
<v Speaker 1>did you have anything that jumped out to you or

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that or you want it about your Celtics or anything

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about the opening few nights? Uh?

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 5>No, I was surprised that they got at it to

0:45:26.640 --> 0:45:29.719
<v Speaker 5>both to both of those days, considering how the last

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 5>couple of years has went. But I am really looking

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:34.799
<v Speaker 5>forward to seeing how the Timberwolves look this year. I'm

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 5>very high on them.

0:45:36.200 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Oh but uh but yeah, no, oh oh yeah, because

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you so, I mean that'll be that seeing aunt LaMelo

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a show, that's for sure. Do

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we not have any details on the first six or

0:45:53.120 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Celtics games. That's the other thing that to me is interest.

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 5>The fact that Jalen Brown is going to be able

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 5>to guard Jason Tatum all year over there.

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, back and forth exactly. And so now listen, they're

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna play each other four times, but if they that

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is the other so that you know what, I just

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>stumbled upon. My other big takeaway that the league decided,

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 1>instead of having if they wanted to have Bron in

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the sixers as the premiere Christmas game, the third Christmas game,

0:46:37.400 --> 0:46:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the five PM slot, that they didn't make that sixer Celtics,

0:46:42.640 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>that they they they prioritized Lebron's one game back in

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>La over what could have been Jalen Brown's first game

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>back in Boston. Yeah, you know what I mean, like

0:46:56.560 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you well, I mean, yeah, I mean, that's definitely true,

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but it is, but it also feels like there's more.

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I don't think it's fair to call

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it bad blood between the Lakers and Lebron. It might

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>not be great blood, but I don't think it's bad

0:47:15.120 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like it what you know they did.

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:17.479
<v Speaker 5>You don't think that's pretty either.

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:18.640
<v Speaker 1>There hasn't been.

0:47:19.000 --> 0:47:21.480
<v Speaker 5>The Jalen Brown situation with the Celtics, what do you mean?

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 5>And Lebron with the Lakers, like just feeling like the

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:28.000
<v Speaker 5>team has not done well by you. You know, like,

0:47:28.040 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 5>I feel like they both didn't have like.

0:47:29.960 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Crazy bet I didn't Jalen Brown feel yeah. I mean yeah,

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Jalen Brown feels done dirty and has like

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's been little, you know, semi public sniping between

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the sides Lakers and Lebron and Luke and all that

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 1>publicly has all been super positive. You know, thank you

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:54.520
<v Speaker 1>for a great run. We appreciate it. There he did.

0:47:54.760 --> 0:47:57.799
<v Speaker 1>He didn't get traded away, so you know it just

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:02.240
<v Speaker 1>even if below the surface there is you know, carping

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 1>about the other side to people, it's not as obvious

0:48:07.640 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as I think the Celtics Jalen Brown thing. And I'm

0:48:10.680 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 1>really interested. So that's the game that isn't listed here

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that I am most interested in singing Jalen Brown's first game,

0:48:20.440 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>not against Boston necessarily first game in Boston, Like he

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:30.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously should get a standing ovation from the crowd. I

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:34.879
<v Speaker 1>imagine he will, but seeing him and Tatum go head

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to head I think will be you know, really fun

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and really interesting. And so yeah, I think the you know,

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>shout out to the NBA. Also the what are the

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 1>other opening week games that we know about? Demonse?

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 5>So we got Lebron versus Cleveland, Denver at OKC, and

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 5>Knicks at Celtics. Do you think that any of those

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 5>should have made Opening Night?

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>No? I think these are all exactly you know, we've listen,

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's been playing against the Calves without being on the

0:49:08.200 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Calves for almost a decade now, So like we don't

0:49:10.760 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>need that one. Denver at OKC, I mean that was

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is a good matchup in a good

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>series historically, has been a good series potentially, But no,

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>so oh you know what the game that So this

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:34.040
<v Speaker 1>one does jump out to me now that I think

0:49:34.040 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. We have Thunder at Timberwolves and Nuggets at Warriors.

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Nuggets at Timberwolves seems like, you know, the one of

0:49:46.600 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the prime rivalries right now, and you know they've played

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs a bunch of times, so I think

0:49:53.680 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that one you maybe could have done Thunder against the Warriors,

0:49:57.040 --> 0:50:00.319
<v Speaker 1>but they probably wanted to give the Thunder up that

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>more likely to be a good game, and they think

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the Timberwolves will be better than the Warriors. But it

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>does feel like Nuggets Timberwolves is the more heated rivalry

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're not I don't know when we're getting that

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:18.959
<v Speaker 1>and oh, one other note, the only team with top

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>ten title odds to not be in one of these

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 1>games is the Raptors. Now, I think that's twofold. One

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is I think it is because the way television ratings work,

0:50:34.200 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>anytime you do a Canadian team, it kind of it's

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:40.759
<v Speaker 1>not great for the rating because you get such a

0:50:40.760 --> 0:50:43.719
<v Speaker 1>boost from the home market, But the home market when

0:50:43.719 --> 0:50:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you do a Canadian team's not measured because it's not

0:50:45.920 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>the US. So I think that's a small piece of it.

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But the other piece of it is whatever's going on

0:50:51.560 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with Kawhi. I think that if they put the Raptors

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>on Opening Night, or if they feature the Raptors in

0:50:58.760 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 1>any of this, Adam Silver would be accused of either

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.960
<v Speaker 1>putting his finger on the scale or tipping his hand

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like about what penalty is or isn't coming. So I

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think they felt it was easier to just leave the

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Raptors out of it. Plus again, like the Raptors aren't

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>great for television ratings purely because they're a Canadian market.