WEBVTT - Rep Ro Khanna on Fossil Fuel Subsidies

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>A drilled listeners, Happy Earth Day, and bringing you a

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>little preview of a hearing that's happening in Congress today.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>The focus of that hearing is fossil fuel subsidies, what

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they are, why we have them, how they block climate action,

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and what can be done to get rid of them.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>This should be interesting because for years the industry has

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>claimed that it doesn't actually get any subsidies. So I'm

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>not quite sure how they're going to argue against getting

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>rid of a thing they claim they don't have. But

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we'll see how that plays out. I have

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>with me today.

0:00:57.960 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Rep.

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Ro Kanna, you represent Silicon Valley in Congress, and has

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>called this hearing. He's the chairman of the House Committee

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on Oversight and Reforms Subcommittee on the Environment. The title

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of this hearing, which is the first one being held

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in Congress today Earth Day, is titled the Role of

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel Subsidies in Preventing action on the Climate Crisis.

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>You might remember this being a big topic of conversation

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>during the election. People were shocked that Joe Biden would

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>suggest such a thing, and it does sound kind of shocking,

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>but it also seems like a pretty obvious first step

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to doing anything on climate. According to Conna, under President Trump,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the fossil fuel industry received between ten point four billion

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars and fifteen point two billion dollars of direct pandemic

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>relief funds. I'll stick a link to the hearing in

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the show notes. Highly recommend you tune in to that

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this morning. And in the meantime, here is a little

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of a sneak peek with Rep. Row Conna.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm ro Conna. I represent Silicon Valley in the United

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 3>States Congress. I'm the chair of the Environment Subcommittee for

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 3>the Oversight Committee, and on Earthday, we are having a

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 3>hearing focused on ending fossil fuel subsidies as part of

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 3>the infrastructure built. President Biden, as you know, ran on

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 3>eliminating all fossil fuel subsidies, and to his credit, his proposal,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 3>the Infrastructure Plan has the elimination of those fossil fuel subsidies.

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 3>So the hearing will drill down in exactly what does

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 3>that mean, making sure that we're comprehensive in getting rid

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 3>of these subsidies, and we want to insist that this

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 3>is going to be part of infrastructure, that it's not

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>taken out by a Senator got it.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Can you explain what some of these specific subsidies are

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:24.399
<v Speaker 4>because I know the American Petroleum Institut likes to say

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 4>the fossil fuel industry doesn't have any subsidies, so they

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 4>should be fine with this.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, they have a lot of subsidies. There are subsidies

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 3>for tax preferences that allow industries to drill, that allow

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 3>them to deduct for drilling costs. There is accounting basically

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 3>it's a last in and first out accounting for fossil

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>fuel companies that allow them to manipulate and take advantage.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 3>There's a cost of depletion which they have used. There

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>are offshore drilling leases that they can deduct the use

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.599
<v Speaker 3>of loss of royalties for So I know some of

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 3>this is technical, but when you look through the code,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 3>there are a number of these provisions.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Who is going to be speaking at the hearing? What's

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the plan for that?

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 3>So we have Greta Thunberg, which we're very excited about,

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 3>and that we have a number of other experts who

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 3>have really looked at what the fossil fuel subsidies are

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 3>and what needs to be eliminated.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 4>Is there any thinking around, you know, the fact that

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 4>this getting rid of fossil fuel subsidies could have a

0:04:55.880 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 4>follow on a fact in terms of how investible fossil

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 4>fuel projects are forks.

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, no, absolutely. I mean here you have the government's

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 3>actually lagging. I mean you have the financial industry saying

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 3>carbon is a risk and we ought to be getting

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>out of carbon, even you know Blackrock with Larry Fink

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 3>and even some of the Exon even the new Exon

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>CEO is talking about how they need to diversify and

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 3>get out of some of the high carbon areas. And

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 3>so that at the time where you have the private

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 3>sector finally having one of these moments, you still have

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 3>the government putting our thumb on the scale favoring the

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 3>fossil fuel industry. It makes no sense. And so what

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 3>we're saying is, if you're not going to do the

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 3>trillions of dollars the.

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 5>Favor renewable energy, which we should, but if you're gonna

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 5>if you're going to do one thing, at least stop

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 5>putting your hand on the scale on the side of

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 5>fossil fuels.

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 3>At least create a level playing field, right right? Is there? What?

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 4>But has kind of the industry response been to this

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I know this call is not new, it's been it's

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 4>been around for a while.

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>But what are they kind of saying now about about

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>this push?

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>The call is not new. I mean they have the

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 3>same arguments that it's going to hurt jobs, that it's

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 3>going to hurt business. What is new is that the

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 3>President of the United States is putting it in their plan.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 3>And what is new is that we have a House

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 3>of Representatives committed to passing it. That would be historic,

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 3>and I think this may be one of the first

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 3>hearings and comprehensively ending fossil fuel subsidies. But we will

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 3>take on some of these myths about why this is

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 3>not going to lessen jobs, if anything, is going to

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 3>incentivize the creation of a lot more jobs in by

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 3>the way, the very areas where ch have fossil fuel industry,

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 3>there is there are more jobs to be had in

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 3>making those areas environment only sustainable than there are in

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 3>the current jobs created by these subsidies.

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, one thing I always hear about this is

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 4>concerned that the price of gas will go up.

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>How do you kind of answer that that worry?

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 3>That is the biggest worry in polling suggests that too

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 3>more than jobs, more than anything. As people's concerned about

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the price of gas, and our view is that the

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>studies show that this isn't going to have that impact,

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>that the subsidies aren't large enough to have that impact

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 3>on the price of gas. And to the extent that

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>there is some increase, I think we ought to be

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 3>providing a worker tax credit or some credit to mitigate that,

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 3>and so there are ways to do it without raising

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 3>the price of gas.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I always think about like when I think about that,

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 4>that you know, there have been in the past where well,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, I feel like there have been many

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 4>times in the past where the industry will sort of

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 4>artificially to press the price of gas themselves if they

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 4>want to spur demand. So it makes me laugh a

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 4>little bit when they bring that one up.

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 3>That's a great point. That's a great point.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Anything else that people should know about this?

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 4>What can kind of the general public do if they

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 4>want to learn more?

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, we have eighteen environmental groups around the country mobilizing

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 3>behind this, So this is a big deal for the

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 3>environmental movement. I believe it's the highest priority in the

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure bill, which is saying stop helping fossil fuels become

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 3>a bigger presence and the people listening and tuning in one.

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 3>They can tune into the hearings, share what the experts

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 3>are saying, Share share what Greta Thunberg is saying. Two,

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 3>they can insist that the end of fossil fuel subsidies

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 3>has to be part of modern infrastructure, that that is

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 3>a non negotiable.

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, thank you very much for talking with me.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Drilled is a Critical Frequency production.

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 4>The show is produced and reported by me Amy westerveldt

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Our first Amendment attorney is James Wheaton.

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate the support of all of our listener members

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>on Patreon. Your contributions are helping us to do work

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>like this.

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 4>You can find that link to support our work in

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 4>the show notes. Patrons also get access to add free

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 4>episodes and early releases of episodes.

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening and we'll see you next time.