WEBVTT - TikTok Deal Nearer Finish Line After Trump, Xi Call

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Edla Low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Headlines out on a call between US President Trump and

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Chinese President Jijingping about a framework agreement for TikTok's US operations.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>We will break it down.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Plus Apple rolling out its new iPhone designs in stores today.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 4>We'll discuss what the customer and the stock reaction is.

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 3>And we sit down with FCC Commissioner and A Gomez

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 3>to discuss the suspension of the Jimmy Kimmel Show and

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>much more. iPhone seventeen on sale today. Caro went down

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 3>to the store. We'll get the details in video. We're

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 3>watching because we have not had any headlines out of

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 3>that conversation with President Trump and Jijingping. Whether we in

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>video is discussed or not, but that's what the market's watching,

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 3>and I.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Throw oracle up.

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 3>We have had a headline out of that call. It

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 3>is from China's news agency Jinhoar and it says that,

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 3>according to Jijingping, China is prepared to respect the wishes

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>of the companies that are involved in the TikTok deal.

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>It has been reported that Oracle is part of the

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 3>coalition and it's trading at a record high, but we

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>do not have confirmation on the specifics, Caro. We're just

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 3>watching that because it's the publicly traded name.

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, there are following headlines coming out from that readout

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 4>of the call. She has asked for the US to

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 4>refrain from taking unilateral trade measures, a cleif clear focus

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 4>there for on tariff measures. She on TikTok, saying they

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 4>welcome business talks following market rules, and she also saying

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 4>on TikTok that the Chinese government respects the wishes of companies.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 4>Perfect person to discuss all of this is Bloomberg Senior

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 4>Tech editor Mike Sheppard, who joins us from Washington. What

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 4>do you make of the readout, Oll, Carol.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 5>We're still looking at this readout as it comes in

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 5>and as we're trying to interpret its meaning. We are

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 5>not seeing a clear cut signal that China has given

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 5>its blessing to this framework agreement that was unveiled by

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Chinese negotiators and US negotiators after two days of talks

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 5>in Madrid.

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 2>There were very few details.

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 5>On that accord at the time, but our reporting has shown,

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 5>as Ed has pointed out just now that Oracle, as

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 5>well as and recent Horowitz and silver Lake Capital Management,

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 5>would be among the US buyers of TikTok's US operations

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 5>should approval actually come down from the Chinese side. Donald Trump,

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 5>for his part, of course, is eager to see see

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 5>this deal go through. He wants TikTok to stay viable

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 5>in the US. He credits it with his election comeback victory.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 5>But we have not heard from the President yet.

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Chet more headlines than another red headline on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 3>G has asked the US to avoid undermining the outcomes

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 3>from recent talks. I think that's a signal politically right.

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>And remember these headlines are from a readout from China's

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 3>state news agency. We also have another headline on TikTok.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>China would like to see the company's find resolution to

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 3>the TikTok issue, according to G Again, Mike, we're following

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 3>this in real time, but we're learning about China's attitude.

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>We still don't have the concrete details of what the

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 3>structure of a US TikTok is.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's right, and it also doesn't sound like China

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 5>is giving its full thumbs up there. It sounds like

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 5>Hi Jimping is signaling that there are still some objections

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 5>and that maybe something came up during the call with

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 5>President Donald Trump that gave China pause. We did even

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 5>hear from Trump yesterday a bit of a non committal tone,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 5>not quite a full walk back of what we heard

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 5>at the beginning of the week following this framework agreement

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 5>between the two sides on trade but especially on TikTok,

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 5>but he was saying we'll see those were his exact

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 5>words in a Fox interview, and let's use signal from

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 5>the president that there may be more work to do.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 5>So we're still waiting to hear what the US version

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 5>of events is and whether they think that they are

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 5>any closer or perhaps further away when it comes to talks.

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 5>It does sound like there are a lot of business

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 5>issues still to resolve, including from the Chinese point of view.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 6>Ed.

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 5>Remember this is key to understand. China does not want

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 5>to sell TikTok. It wants to see byte dance hold

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 5>on to this, and if it is sold, it wants

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 5>to keep control of the algorithm and not see its

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 5>company byte Dance is considered a real star in the

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 5>Chinese tech universe. It does not want to see it

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.799
<v Speaker 5>diminished in any way, so there has to be a

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 5>hefty price paid for this, and it also does not

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 5>want to see the valuable algorithm transferred in any way

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 5>to US owners.

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 4>We're just going to try and bring up a chart

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 4>because Oracle is still triading higher, but only by a

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 4>percentage point. Now it is actually pulled back from its

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 4>highs directly on the readout coming from the Chinese state

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 4>press right now. Now, of course, Oracle's name in the

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 4>mix for any sort of coalition of companies that were

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 4>looking to be buying TikTok's US unit. Now we can

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 4>see that it's just come off of its highs. So

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 4>it looks as though, as you interpret, Mike, then indeed

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 4>this doesn't feel like a done deal yet, and indeed

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 4>that we are still trying to get the intricacies of

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.359
<v Speaker 4>what China says it likes to see companies to find

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 4>resolution to TikTok issue. Of course, we need the US

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 4>interpretation of all of this next steps, Mike. Therefore, because

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 4>we were hoping that maybe other things were being considered

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.119
<v Speaker 4>in their pohlm call, not just TikTok, but in video

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 4>them anymore.

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's right.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 5>There are a host of trade issues between the two

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 5>sides to resolve, and I'm glad you brought up in

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 5>video because the question of export controls that have restricted

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 5>the chip maker's ability to sell its AI products in

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 5>China have been a major sticking point between the two sides.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 5>We've seen Jensen Wong really advocate here in Washington over

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 5>the past nine months for a relaxation of the US

0:05:56.920 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 5>export controls, but he's also run into some headwinds in China,

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 5>which is also moving to discourage Chinese companies from buying

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 5>the company's chips. So there is a lot at stake,

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 5>and it's unclear whether Donald Trump used this call to

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 5>try to go to bat for Jensen Wang and Nvidia.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 5>The President has signaled his openness to the idea of

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 5>perhaps selling a downgraded version of the new Blackwell line

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 5>of AI chips in China, but again, that is a

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 5>multi step process in terms of relaxing those export controls,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 5>and it's unclear whether this would factor into the conversation.

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 5>Jensen Wong, for his part, certainly would like it to.

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.480
<v Speaker 5>They're feeling the sense of urgency in China where Huawei

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 5>is really moving ahead by leaps and bounds when it

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 5>comes to developing its AI chips and finding ways to

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:47.719
<v Speaker 5>deploy them in a way to better compete with Nvidia,

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 5>as we just saw yesterday.

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 4>Kara, Mike Shephard, we thank you for the breakdown instant analysis.

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Let's get more instant analysis for you. Sam Sak, Senior

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 4>fellow at the New America Institute who has worked on

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Chinese technology policy for over a decade, So your viewpoint

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 4>and expertise crucial.

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Hair.

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 4>It feels as though maybe a deal isn't done. How

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 4>do you interpret what really the outcome of a phone

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 4>called can be sad.

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 6>The pathway to a deal, and I don't just mean

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 6>a TikTok deal, but a broader US China trade deal

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 6>is strewn with obstacles. Both sides clearly want something that

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 6>they can deliver. But let's break it down what's in

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 6>the way. China realizes that they have real leverage here

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 6>and they're not going to give into this easily. They

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 6>know that Trump wants to take home something to his

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 6>audience at home. The second thing is that there are

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 6>hawks all over Congress in the administration who also work

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 6>very hard to ban TikTok, only to see Trump look

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 6>to trade it away. And they've raised hell about the

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 6>idea that there are supposed national security concerns that are

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 6>going to go unresolved about data access, about online content.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 6>So there's a real sort of complex web of issues

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 6>that both leaders are going to have to work through

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 6>to bring home the political win for their respective constituents.

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>A political win.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Thus far, had been signaled to the market that a

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 4>US part of TikTok would form as a different app.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Entirely the users one hundred and seventy million of them

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 4>would migrate to a different app as reporting goes, and

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 4>would be controlled by US investors. But how hard is

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 4>that sort of a pill for China to swallow? There

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 4>had been reports, of course, that China or byte Dance

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 4>would license the underlying algorithm. Why has TikTok become like

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 4>the lynchpin to so much more in US China relationship.

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 6>The algorithm for a long time was the secret sauce.

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 6>It was something that byte Dance was able to do

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 6>far more effectively than its peers. But keep in mind

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 6>this saga with TikTok has been playing out for about

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 6>five years now, and so at what one time was

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 6>seen as ahead of the game in getting users hooked

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 6>on the app, the flywheel effect of then collecting more

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 6>of their data. It's no longer really as cutting edge

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 6>as I'd say it was five years ago when this

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 6>first became an issue. But that doesn't mean that Beijing's

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.719
<v Speaker 6>going to let it go so easily. This is a

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 6>Chinese brand that has succeeded globally beyond China's markets at

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 6>a time when that's key to China's asserting influence in

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 6>the world, and they're at the beginning of being able

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 6>to field companies that market that consumers out China outside

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 6>of China actually want. So they're not going to just

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 6>give this over easily to the US, as much as

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 6>they want to secure a deal as well. Also, they

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 6>have big wants still on the table. They want export

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 6>controls lifted. Mike mentioned about the Nvidia chips. Maybe they're

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 6>holding out to see what exactly they can exert from Trump.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 3>Sam, I'm going to go back to the news because

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 3>we are literally digesting what is a readout from China

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 3>State News Agency and According to that read out, President

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 3>g says that the Chinese government will respect wishes of

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 3>companies in the context of TikTok, that on TikTok, they

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 3>welcome business talks following market rules, and the final headline

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 3>is that China likes to see companies find a resolution

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 3>on the TikTok sale. We yet to get the readout

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 3>from the United States side, but as somebody that's looked

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 3>at Chinese technology policy, both from within the US government

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 3>and from the private sector, is this a positive signal

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 3>she's making or is it a negative signal, a warning.

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 6>That She's administration has not changed its position. They're saying

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 6>that now, but actually the reality is they've been saying

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 6>that for a long time. I don't think that they

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 6>care that much about TikTok, to be honest, but I

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 6>think they know that Trump cares about it, and they

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 6>see this as the lynchpin to opening up a broader

0:10:52.240 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 6>set of asks beyond TikTok, export controls, tariffs lifted, they

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 6>want access to the US market for more investment. There's

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 6>a litany of things, and then it becomes it becomes

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 6>a game of chicken. Who's going to blink first? And

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 6>China knows they have something here.

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Sam Sachs from the New America Institute, fascinating to have

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 4>you on amid the breaking news. We thank you. Coming up,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 4>we're going to be breaking down the week there was

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 4>and tech markets we're still at record highs empowers. Martin

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Norton joins them that next this Bloomberg Tech breaking news.

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Some headlines coming across the Bloomberg terminal that Chinese President

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 4>She is asking for the US to avoid undermining outcomes

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 4>from recent talks. Mex Tyler Kennell joins us. Now from

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 4>the White House, we've had to read out from the

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Chinese state press regarding that phone call between she and Trump.

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 4>Now we await Trump's reaction. What do you make of

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 4>the headlines? Right exactly?

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 8>Caroline and her White House official tells us that we

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 8>will get at the White House formal response and a

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 8>post on truth social So our eyes at the moment

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 8>are peeled on President trump social media feeds. But as

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 8>you read that main headline here that Chinese state media

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 8>is reporting that Jijingping says that the US should avoid

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 8>undermining any recent progress in the talks, but that also

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.479
<v Speaker 8>the US should refrain from taking any sort of restrictive

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 8>trade measures, and there's a few different angles and threads

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 8>that we could really dig into when it comes to

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 8>that idea that it appears that Jijingping is trying to portray,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 8>including that we saw really both sides ramping up the

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 8>pressure ahead of those talks in Madrid earlier this week,

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 8>including for example, the US adding some twenty three Chinese

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 8>companies to its entity list over the weekend. You were

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 8>talking in your earlier segment about this idea around the

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 8>messaging of export controls, and we've also seen the US

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 8>really harden its rhetoric when it comes to so called

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 8>secondary tariffs against China, urging our allies to impose them

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 8>over their imports of Russian energy supplies. We have to

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 8>keep in mind put this into the context that our

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 8>reporting has long showed that China has been upset, has

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 8>been dismayed at this idea that they have been treated

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 8>differently from other trading partners.

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 9>That's why you'll recall it.

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 8>Was so significant when that thirty four percent so called

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 8>reciprocal tariff came back down to ten percent, but of

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 8>course we still have twenty percent tariff related to fetanyl

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 8>still on the table. And it's actions like those that

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 8>perhaps will see some sort of movement on as we

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 8>wait the readout on the White House's side. Now, as

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 8>you well know, and we're discussing, the focus of today's

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 8>call appear to be really on any sort of movement

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 8>around TikTok. But when it comes to these other trade concessions,

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 8>our analysts at Bloomberg Economics point out, we really haven't

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 8>gotten many signs up to this point that there has

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 8>been movement on that because most of these talks have

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 8>really been about keeping that de escalation in place. Caroline

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 8>and ed. Yesterday, President Trump suggested that he is considering

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 8>extending that tariff truce deadline it's set to expire on

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 8>November tenth. That comes just weeks after a potential face

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 8>to face meeting. This call was largely seen as perhaps

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 8>setting the stage for them that we're eyeing could potentially

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 8>take place next month end of October in South Korea

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 8>on the sidelines of the APEX summit.

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 3>I've been both Tyler Kendall at the White House, Thank

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 3>you very much. It's really hard to interpret carry the

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 3>market response here. The S and P five hundred has

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 3>paired what we're modest gains to basically trade flat, and

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>yields have ticked higher since we got those headlines. We

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 3>were waiting for this this phone called. Martin Norton is

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 3>chief investment strategist at Empower and joins us now for more.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean that trade headline is the main one both

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 3>that g is calling on the President of the United

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>States not to go back on what was discussed in talks.

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.479
<v Speaker 3>And you heard Tyler's reporting there as a market participant,

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 3>where you braced and ready to move this morning, or

0:14:41.920 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 3>did we get what we expected?

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 10>You know, we're in a kind of a world where

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 10>there's a bit of a shoving match, and I think

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 10>it's largely to be expected. There's not a massive clarity

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 10>around what this could look like, and it's continued back

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 10>and forth at this point in time.

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 9>I think what we're seeing more broadly is the.

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 10>Degree to which geopolitics is entering and becoming another source

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 10>of volatility for the markets, something that impacts individual companies

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 10>and the market more broadly. And the news is sudden

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 10>and it catches folks off.

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Guard, it does yep, sorry, ed you go no, no, no,

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to point out the other red headline

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 3>right because the news is just flying through the terminal

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 3>as we speak. The other one is that President g

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Marta says that he wants the United States to refrain

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>from taking unilateral trade measures. Again, we're trying to interpret

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a readout from China State News Agency, But what is

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 3>your interpretation of that comment.

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it certainly seems like there are bigger things

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 10>at play right now. I think the reporting that you

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 10>all have just shared showing that, yes, TikTok is something

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 10>that's a primary concern, but there are other primary concerns

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 10>as it relates to the broader trade relationship, and right

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 10>now both sides are trying to find these points of

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 10>leverage to determine what can be pushed to gain kind

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 10>of the greatest advantage in this conversation.

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 9>So it seems like we're kind of listening into.

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 10>One part of the conversation, but it's part of a

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 10>much broader discussion that's been going on and continues to

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 10>go on.

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Madre, it's interesting timing that JP Morgan Asset Management has

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 4>put out this thought that actually what Trump's geopolitical risk

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 4>right now is the AI story, and if we get

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 4>a bad set of numbers, of any earnings look weak

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 4>in some of these AI stars. That's where the market

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 4>volatility really comes from. But actually the whole story around

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 4>semiconductors is so intertwined with geopolitics as well, So how

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 4>do you distinguish the two?

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 10>Right, It's a pretty fascinating time. I mean, we're looking

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 10>at company after company that seems to be very in

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 10>tune to what the Trump administration wants, and I think

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 10>it underscores this idea that AI isn't just a form

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 10>of secular growth for companies and for the economy, but

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 10>it's something that is akin to the space race in

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 10>terms of sovereign interest, and so I think it adds

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 10>this whole another dimension that we have to consider as

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 10>we think about those sources of volatility. I think one

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 10>consideration here is what does demand look like if we're

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 10>looking at a more bifurcated world where potentially US and

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 10>China aren't necessarily buying from each other as much as

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 10>they are jocking with each other when it comes to AI.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 10>I'm not sure that necessarily changes the whole AA narrative.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.400
<v Speaker 10>We know that there's massive, massive amounts of demand even

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 10>here just domestically, but I think it's a whole new

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 10>dimension that we have to consider as we take a

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 10>look forward and try to project expectations, and.

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 4>We try to stum up the fact that we're up

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 4>sixteen percent year to date and then as that one

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 4>hundred and we're a record highs So with all the

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 4>underlying risks, should you be buying into this market?

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 10>You know, in my mind at this juncture, we're at

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 10>a point where it makes some sense to rebalance, to

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 10>take some profits. We've had this tremendous run since April eighth,

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 10>where we've seen a lot of these companies recover or

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 10>even something like the Mags, even which had a much

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 10>bigger hit in the first part of the year due

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 10>to Deep Seek, even that area of the market is

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 10>beginning to look pracy now. Companies have delivered, the earnings

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 10>has been there, the investment in the future that Capex

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 10>has been there. We're seeing demand from the hyperscalers based

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 10>on AI workflows.

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 9>So there's a lot of positives to point to.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 10>But it really wouldn't take much something coming out of

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 10>left field like we saw with Deep Seek to maybe

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 10>have people pull.

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 9>Back a bit.

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 10>And I think when we think about these innovation periods.

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 10>It shouldn't be a straight line higher that would defy reality.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 10>It ought to be something that has fits and starts

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 10>and moments of doubt. So I think when we're at

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 10>a period where it feels somewhat euphoric, it's time to

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 10>position for a potential moment of doubt.

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.719
<v Speaker 4>Not an alton of EmPATH. Great to have you on

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 4>amid these moments of doubt you are looking currently it

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 4>pictures of the Apple store in New York and Fifth Avenue.

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 4>Earlier today, the company was rolling out several new iPhones

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 4>signs that kind of the biggest overhaul that we've seen

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 4>since twenty twenty. I was there as the Apple CEO,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 4>Tim Cook, walked around the store. There were NBA players there,

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 4>and there were influencers, and there was me trying to

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 4>get a moment with Tim Cook talking about perhaps some

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 4>of the issues they had with getting enough iPhone pros

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 4>into people's hands on the day. Of course, we're knowing

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 4>that some of the timelines being pushed back, but it's not.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 9>Just the cue.

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 4>The enormous queue that I saw lining the streets of

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.639
<v Speaker 4>New York, but that was replicated in London, wasn't It

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 4>was over in Asia as well.

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Yep, it was.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 3>And it's interesting because you followed the clock around the world.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's bring in Bloomberg's consumer tech editor Dana Wolman, and

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 3>let's start on that piece. We have the information from

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Asia into Europe, now the United States. What's the reaction

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 3>to iPhone seventeen launch day?

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 11>So definitely some long lines in all the major markets

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 11>where reporters have visited stores, and a relatively few of

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 11>the customers who we interviewed mentioned the iPhone Ra, which

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 11>is the skinny iPhone that got so much media attention

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 11>ahead of the launch. It turned out that most of

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 11>the customers who we interviewed were looking for the iPhone

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 11>seventeen Pro or the Pro Max, which makes sense given

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 11>that these phones are for pro users, power users and

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 11>early adopters and tech enthusiasts are precisely the sort of

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 11>people who might feel motivated to line up in front

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 11>of a store around dawn the day of a launch.

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 4>It's interesting that in the eye of the storm is

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 4>of course the supply chain that Apple has largely based

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 4>in China. We are getting more breaking news of the

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 4>readout coming from the Trump She talks on the phone

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 4>with President Trump, putting on Social that he's just completed

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 4>a very productive call with President she. But I'm interested

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 4>in more broadly, how you're seeing the supply chain impact, Dana.

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 4>What's happening on the ground with the sales of the

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 4>iPhone pro and how quickly or not we're able to

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 4>get them in our hands, and some of the issues

0:20:48.840 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 4>perhaps scratching of them over in China.

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 11>So far, not many shocks in terms of delays or

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 11>shipment times. Shipment times have slipped by a couple weeks

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 11>in certain markets for very popular models. Nothing that seems

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 11>too extraordinary. The iPhone error has been delayed in China,

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 11>seemingly over the eSIM, which is not a widely used

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 11>technology in China, and the iPhone is the only of

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 11>the iPhone models that exclusively uses that as opposed to

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 11>a physical sim being an option.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Bloomberg's Dana Woman, thank you very much. We have

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 3>more breaking news from the call between President Trump and Gijingping,

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 3>posting on truth Social, President Trump says that he has

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 3>agreed to meet with Jijiping and that meeting would take

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 3>place at the APEX Summit. Caroline, my understanding is the

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 3>APEX Summit is October thirty one November one. On TikTok,

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 3>Trump says that they made progress on the approval of

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 3>a TikTok deal. Trump adds that he appreciates the TikTok approval.

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 2>We're continuing to.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Get a lot of headlines, but not seeing any immediate

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 3>market action or anything that contradicts some of the statements. Cara,

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 3>if you want to jump in on what we had earlier,

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe we'll go back to break.

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 2>And we'll see what the markets are doing.

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Oracle, I'm still training at about one point four percent high

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 4>on the back of that meant to be cause a

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 4>part of that consortium buying TikTok. But the key news

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 4>is that they have agreed to meet again next month.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 12>And I read some places that the networks were ninety

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 12>seven percent against me again, ninety seven percent negative, and

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 12>yet I won easily.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 7>It were all seven spake stays. I've going to have

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 7>won everything.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 12>And if they're ninety seven percent against, they give me

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 12>Holy Bard publicity oppress, and then they're.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Getting a license.

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 12>I would think maybe their license should.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 7>Be taken away.

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>That was President Trump saying US Broadcast Network should face

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 3>scrutiny over their licenses if they're too critical of him.

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 3>His comments came not long after Jimmy Kimmel's show was

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 3>put on indefinite hold by Disney following reactions to comments

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 3>the comedian made accusing Republicans are trying to gain political

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 3>points from the killing of GOP activist Charlie Kirk. Bloomberg

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 3>reporting that Kimmel met with Disney executives yesterday. According to sources,

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 3>the soonest the show could return is September twenty second.

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 3>I want to get out to Bloomberg's media reporter, Hannah Miller.

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Let's start on what we know in the news, which

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 3>is that meeting between kim l and Disney.

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 2>What are the details we need?

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so we know they're discussing the fate of his

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 13>show and whether there will be an apology or not.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 13>You know, Kimmel might be made to go on air

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 13>apologize for his comments, and that might be something he

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 13>doesn't want to do.

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, as we wait for the reaction of the host himself, Hannah,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 4>you've been putting out from really strongly who heard in

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:49.239
<v Speaker 4>reporting talking about basically the war that President Trump is

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 4>having with the media. Set the context for us.

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, the Trump administration has a very contentious relationship with

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.400
<v Speaker 13>the media. We can see that in lawsuits, settlements, federal

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 13>cuts to funding for public broadcasting. You know, it's been

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 13>battle after battle, and a lot of what's happening here

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 13>is that many of the news organizations being targeted have

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 13>business stakes at play, and that's sort of being weaponized

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 13>against them here.

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 4>Bloom Megs Hannah Meller, it's a really thoughtful piece. Please

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 4>go and read it. Let's get you another viewpoint now.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:26.239
<v Speaker 4>Anagomez is the sole Democratic commissioner at the FCC, one

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 4>of three commissioners that are currently on the FCC. Been

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 4>there is twenty twenty three. You've put out a very

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 4>strongly worded statement following what seemed to be Jimmy Kimmel's

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 4>show being put on ice indefinitely, and you really talk

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 4>about it having been led to a shameful show of

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 4>cowardly corporate capitulation by ABC that has put the foundation

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 4>of the First Amendment in danger. So you think this

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 4>is a corporate responsibility at this moment.

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.959
<v Speaker 14>What we are saying is this administration use whatever levers

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 14>of power it has in order to bring broadcasters to

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:02.439
<v Speaker 14>heal and the news media as you mentioned. They have

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 14>sued The New York Times, they have sued the Wall

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 14>Street Journal, they have gone after ABCNBCCBS, and they are

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 14>pressuring companies to change how they report the news and

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 14>what their content is in direct violation of the First Amendment,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 14>which guarantees a freedom of speech. And what happens every

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 14>time we see this cowardly corporate capitulation is a further

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 14>frame of a foundation of our democracy, and that's freedom

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 14>of speech and freedom of the press.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Now and what we understand to have occurred is that

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Disney moved after local stations had perhaps pushed back. This

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 4>is all erupted after well, the head of the Commission,

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 4>SEC Chair Brennan Carr, joined a podcast and really articulated

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 4>perhaps what could happen because of the words of Jimmy

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 4>Kimmel on thet his broadcast, but also what he said,

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 4>we can do this the easy way or the hard

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 4>way on that Benach on some podcast when it seemed

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 4>to be talking about the next stop TEGNA deal. Is

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 4>that how you interpret it, is that how the market

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 4>and the media should be interpreting what SEC Chair Brendon

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 4>car is trying to make it.

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 14>I think It's really important to note that the FCC

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 14>does not have the authority, the constitutional right, nor the

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 14>ability to take action against broadcasters because of their content.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 14>We have very limited media regulation, usually designed to protect

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 14>children programming and things like that, but we cannot retaliate

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 14>against broadcasters for legal content. And this is all legal content.

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 14>So what threats are meant to do is to get

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 14>the companies to alter their practices in order to cover

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 14>this administration in the way that they want. And that

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 14>is what these corporations need to keep in mind every

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 14>time they capitulate. They are our democracy.

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Commissioner Gomez, I'm grateful for you coming on the program

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.400
<v Speaker 3>and what you just said about the remit and authority

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 3>of the FCC. The basics that our audience want to

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 3>understand is why is the FCC involved here. It is

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 3>a panel or a committee, right that debates issues, usually

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 3>proposed by the chair in the public forum or in

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 3>written communications, and then you vote on the passing of

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 3>measures or actions and stop me when I'm wrong on that.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 3>But you outlined what the authority of the FDC is

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 3>not in this case. What is your role in this

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 3>situation between Disney, Jimmy Kimmel and the comments that he made.

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 14>So the FCC, as you note, does meet as a

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 14>commission and it votes to adopt rules or to issue licenses.

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 14>But a lot of the actions that you're seeing from

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 14>this commission right now, particularly when it comes to trying

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 14>to bring media to heal, is being done at the

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 14>staff level. And what's so dangerous about that is where

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 14>we initiate investigations until those investigations actually get to a

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 14>final commission decision, there is no judicial review to ensure

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 14>that the FCC doesn't overstep its bounds, which is exactly

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 14>what we're doing right now. And you mentioned the next

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.679
<v Speaker 14>Star transaction, which is actually not currently before the FCC,

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 14>but will be filed before the FCC. The FCC has

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 14>been using any time a party comes in to seek

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 14>a transfer of a license or some type of permission

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 14>from the FCC to pressure them to alter their practices,

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 14>directly affecting the First Amendment and getting them to voluntarily

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 14>commit to making changes to how they report the news

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 14>or whether they have diversity, equity and inclusion practices, which

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 14>themselves have a strong basis in the First Amendment.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Commissioner invited the chair mister Carr onto this program as well,

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 3>and I wanted to be to be known that that's

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the case.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 2>There is an.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Example or case study that our audience wants us to

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 3>ask you about, and that is, if mister Carr and

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 3>the President wanted to initiate the revocation of a station's

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 3>license based on that station airing of the Kimmel comments,

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 3>for example, what needs to happen? Would there need to

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 3>be an outside complaint filed to the FCC then you

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 3>review it. Just explain that that scenario.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 14>Please, yes, So revocations of licenses are extremely rare. We

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 14>do have rules about under what circumstances we might revoke

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 14>a license, and it is a very high standard because

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 14>it is such a serious thing to do. That is

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 14>why the broadcasters fear so much any type of action

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 14>by the FCC. Yes, we can initiate an investigation based

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 14>on a complaint that is filed. We can also initiate ourselves.

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 14>But let me be clear, there is no basis for

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 14>revoking any licenses because of the Jimmy Kimmel content or

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 14>because of normal editorial decisions from a broadcaster. The last

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 14>time I can think of that we revoked a license

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 14>was for failure to air a particular broadcaster for more

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 14>than a year.

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Well Commissioner in Caroline, I'm sorry to jump in here.

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, there are many Republicans and non Republicans who

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 3>feel that Kimmel's comments pushed went past the line, they

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 3>crossed the line and mischaracterized in the public domain the

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 3>motivations of the shooter in the Charlie Kirk case, and

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 3>the FCC takes that into account or it does not.

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 14>So we have to keep in mind that Jimmy Kimmel

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 14>show is satire.

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 7>It is not news.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 14>It is not itself trying to inform the public about

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 14>a particular newsworld the event. And what some of these

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 14>people are claiming is that what Jimmy Kimmel said was

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 14>news distortion. That really does not meet the standard for

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 14>news distortion. So if a complaint were filed, the commission

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 14>would have to look at it and make a decision

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 14>about whether any rules were violated. I can tell you

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 14>today there were no violations under the law or with

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 14>these facts.

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 4>Have any complaints been filed?

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 14>I believe a complaint was filed today. There is a

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 14>partisan legal group that has been filing complaints against all

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 14>the media companies getting more and more outlandish in their complaints,

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 14>normally for news distortion. They're the same ones that filed

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 14>the complaint against sixty Minutes for the Kamala Harris interview.

0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 14>They're the same ones that filed a complaint against NBC

0:31:55.040 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 14>because of Saturday Night Live, the sutn Night Live showing

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 14>with Vice President Harris. So they're a partisan organization that

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 14>just keep filing these complaints and the FCC has not

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 14>acted on all of them. They are very numerous. I

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 14>would say we get at least once a week.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it's right to put in the context that

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 4>last year Disney indeed did pay fifteen million dollars to

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 4>settle a defamation laws who brought by President over comments

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 4>that one of its hosts had already made. There have

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 4>indeed been several settlements, and as Hannah Miller Reportrait put

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 4>in their story, then often there are deals in m

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 4>and A involved. Is that the interpretation that we should

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 4>make at this moment that deals in some way hinge

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 4>upon settling of such cases and concerns.

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 14>I think that the administration will use the deals to

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 14>pressure companies one way or another, whether it's to settle

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 14>lawsuits or to give up their rights as organizations. When

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 14>the FCC approved the Paramount Skybance deal, for example, the

0:32:56.360 --> 0:33:02.719
<v Speaker 14>parent company of sixteen of CBS, Paramount agreed to install

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 14>what I call a truth arbiter, an ambudsman reporting to

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 14>the president of Paramount, who will field complaints about media

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 14>bias for example. That is really chilling because that is

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 14>exactly the type of interference and the freedom of the

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 14>press that is not healthy for our democracy and for

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 14>our discourse. So yes, I think this administration will weaponize

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 14>any transaction. Anytime you see a party coming before the FCC,

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 14>you are going to see some kind of a demand

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 14>to bring them to heal and to change how any

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 14>broadcaster reports on this administration to make it favorable to

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 14>the administration and not otherwise.

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 3>FCC Commissioner Anagomez, we appreciate your time joining us on

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloombo Tech. Thank you very much, Caroline. I just want

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 3>to go to shares a. Disney very quickly. In the

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 3>course of that conversation, the stock actually hit a session

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 3>low of two percent, now down one point nine percent.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 2>We did report just before the.

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Conversation with the Commissioner about the meetings that are taking

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 3>place between Disney executives and Jimmy Kimmel. One of the

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 3>ideas or questions being an apology or not. We also

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 3>have to go back to the breaking news because we've

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 3>got a full readout from the President on the conversation

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 3>with Jijing ping productive call. He says they made progress

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 3>on issues including trade, fentanyl, the need to bring the

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 3>war between Russian and UK to an end, and for

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 3>this program bling big tech, the approval of the TikTok deal.

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 3>He agreed with President Ji that they would meet at

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.280
<v Speaker 3>the APEX summit in South Korea. I believe that's October

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 3>thirty one through November one, and that he would go

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 3>to China. This is the bit we didn't get to

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 3>yet that he says in his true social pros the

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 3>President he will go to China early next year. The

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 3>call a very good one. They will be speaking by

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 3>phone again, and the President says, in his words, we

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 3>appreciate the TikTok approval and both look forward to meeting

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 3>at APEX. That's the one the market was waiting for

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 3>this week.

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 4>It is a lot of people who are investors in

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 4>semiconductor shares, for example, in video, will it be able

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 4>to continue to sell it to China. Coming up, we're

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 4>talking exactly that about AI Magnetar's senior managing partner, David S.

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Ninemans with us. He's going to talk about the investing buildout,

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 4>the AI build out, the scale of that magnetor of

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 4>course a key investor in Careweed stick with us this

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Tech.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.359
<v Speaker 3>AI is hungry for power, and so is everything else,

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 3>from computing and transportation to industry. Energy demand is reaching

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 3>historic levels, and batteries are emerging as the backbone of

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 3>modern infrastructure, enabling reliable, low cost storage at scale.

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 2>JB.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Strawball's CEO of Redwood Materials, which deploys these strategic resources,

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 3>spoke to Bloomberg's Judy Fine at Bloomberg NIF yesterday in Houston.

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 15>Energy storage is evolving in batteries in particular, are evolving

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 15>to play I think an incredibly central part of the

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 15>story for the e of data center energy availability, but

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 15>for the grid overall, and increasingly, I think people are

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.399
<v Speaker 15>beginning to sort of see that that opportunity where if

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:14.799
<v Speaker 15>you can have the flexibility that energy storage provides, that

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:18.760
<v Speaker 15>gives you the chance to have access to more energy

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 15>from the grid, and it also gives you a chance

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 15>to manage and adjust the transience from some of these

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.320
<v Speaker 15>new loads, especially AI training loads.

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk more about infrastructure now, but let's talk about

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 4>the data center side of it. Davis Snydeman's here with

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 4>us seeing a managing partner at Magnetar Global head of

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.959
<v Speaker 4>Alternative Credit and fixed Income. Magneta has called twenty billion

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 4>dollars in assets under management, key investor in AI compute

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 4>provider Core Weave, And you've just come off the heels

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 4>of an investor day. It's a twenty year anniversary. And

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 4>how much is the demand from your investors to get

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 4>more into AI data center, to get more into compute

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 4>and the way in which you finance it.

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, First, thank you again for having me. I've always

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 16>love to come on the show. You know, we, like

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 16>you said, we had our twenty year investor day yesterday

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 16>and just to take you into the room, I think

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 16>we had six different companies present on six different industries,

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 16>everything from you know, healthcare finance to restaurant finance and

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 16>then like you said, AI infrastructure and our newest investments

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 16>in energy. And you know, for us, the way we

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.919
<v Speaker 16>invest the formula has always been the same, it's really

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 16>by being value added to our portfolio companies.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:33.759
<v Speaker 4>And so, how are you value added to a cool weave?

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 4>How are you thinking about financing the GPU the compute

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 4>they need to go out and buy to fill their

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.240
<v Speaker 4>data centers for example.

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 7>That's right.

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 16>So for us, it's it's really about thinking about the

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 16>asset first, right, understanding the value of that asset, understanding

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 16>the customer contracts, and then helping the companies unlack value

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 16>from there.

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:53.920
<v Speaker 7>But you know, I think what you know, AI.

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 16>Infrastructure, We talked about it a reasonable bant yesterday and

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 16>it really comes down to, you know three things. It's skill,

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 16>it's scale, and it's scarcity. So I'll start with scale,

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 16>Like when we started investing in core Weave, we were

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 16>talking about one hundred GPU clusters and we thought that

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 16>was going to be difficult. You know, now they're putting

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 16>one hundred thousand GPU into clusters and they're going to

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 16>do million GPU into clusters, and so the scale is

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 16>just massive.

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 16>Then you go to the skill, and what you can

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 16>compare it to is it's like an F one car

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 16>instead of you know, your family sedan. This is really

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 16>really hard to do. So companies like core Weave, they're

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 16>one of the few in the world that can actually

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 16>do this. And then to your question, is the scarcity.

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 16>People say there's not enough GPUs and they're not enough power,

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 16>But the issue is the demand.

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 7>The demand is just off the charts today.

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:53.400
<v Speaker 16>Every company we talk to, you know, our entire channel

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 16>check just as everyone needs more more GPUs.

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 3>David, can we talk about how magnetol muff in on

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 3>any project. The headlines that cross the Bloomberg on a

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 3>weekly basis at the moment are about the great scale

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 3>AI neocloud infrastructure projects. But you have like legacy finance

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 3>coming in hard strategic partners because the size of the

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 3>check to get the project off the ground is getting

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:20.760
<v Speaker 3>bigger and bigger and bigger.

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 7>That's right, and it's a great question.

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 16>You know, a lot of a lot of the capital

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 16>that's come into private credit has been this one size

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 16>fits all. You know, let's make sure the mandate fits

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.240
<v Speaker 16>into insurance company type of money.

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, that's just not what we do.

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 16>What we do is we go in and we want

0:39:37.760 --> 0:39:40.760
<v Speaker 16>to be value added to partners and help unlock value.

0:39:40.960 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 16>So we want to sit with management teams and talk

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 16>about how to lower their cost of capital over time,

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 16>and that's why they bring in a magnetar.

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 3>David, where and what is the next call week for you?

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 16>You know, for us, it's a diversified portfolio approach, so

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 16>we're always thinking about downside first, so we're going to

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 16>look at the assets and kind tracks, but then it's

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 16>how do we help unlock value? And so even yesterday

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 16>that a tourist energy, a tensor wave. But these are

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 16>the companies that are up and coming right now, and

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 16>you know they spoke very eloquently about their businesses yesterday.

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 2>David.

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Is there an opportunity for you? And are you literally

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 3>going to participate in what was announced from the United

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Kingdom this week all the heavy infrastructure investment from America's

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 3>biggest technology companies.

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 16>For us, we're looking across all projects and again, if

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 16>we're not really value added and helping lower the cost

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 16>of capital, that's not where our skill set lies best.

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 16>And so for us, it's really getting involved with management

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.440
<v Speaker 16>and helping them make decisions given the data that we

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 16>have inside of our firm.

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 4>There's almost a care wave just launched in the UK

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 4>and scale I mean again a cryptomnor that pivots into compute.

0:40:50.440 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Are they the sort of companies that are interesting?

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 7>Sure?

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 16>I remember having dinner with n Scale call it six

0:40:56.560 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 16>months ago in Chicago at Morton's. That's right, that those

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 16>are exactly the type of companies that are interesting. And

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 16>for us, we have to really make sure that we're

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 16>thinking about our capital and we're thinking about our investors

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 16>and making the appropriate allocations just for.

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Our audience that is savvy on financing and is savon

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 4>ai data centers, how do you lower the cost of financing?

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 16>So it's it's really about the customer mix and the

0:41:18.200 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 16>asset mix, and so we're really trying to think about,

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 16>you know, how we take a customer mix. So if

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.359
<v Speaker 16>you have all non investment great customers, that's a much

0:41:27.480 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 16>that's a much more difficult portfolio to finance. Now you

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 16>want to have non investment investment customers because they grow

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 16>very quickly. So now we have to think about the

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 16>mix of customers underlying your portfolio and help you make

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 16>those allocation decisions. I think that's how we can get

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 16>involved with the companies themselves. We can be value added

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 16>and really unlock value for them over time.

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 3>David's not have been managing partner at Magne's Health Capital.

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Great to heavy back on the program.

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Thank you know.

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Google brings Gemini throughout the Crome browser.

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Got more in that story.

0:41:57.719 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 10>Next.

0:41:58.200 --> 0:41:59.320
<v Speaker 2>This has been by tech.

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Time now for Talking chech. First up, Google brings Gemini

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 4>throughout the Chrome browser for users in the United States,

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 4>just two weeks after dodging an anti trust case that

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 4>could have broken up the company. It will also be

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:21.280
<v Speaker 4>integrating Gemini with other Google apps like Calendar, YouTube, and maps.

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Mimi Chami will deploy an over the air software fixed Directify,

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 4>a problem in its advanced driver assistance technology installed in

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 4>almost forty percent of the Su seven electric sedans int

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 4>his Soul Now. The recall comes nearly six months after

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 4>a fatal crash involving a standard version SU seven sedan

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:42.439
<v Speaker 4>that in its autopilot function turned on, and Softbak's Vision

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 4>Fund is considering cutting as much as twenty percent of

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 4>its staff, according to a source. Now, the reduction extends

0:42:48.120 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 4>years of cutbacks at the Vision Fund as the unit

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 4>shrank in importance next to growing appetite for big ai

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 4>bets from founder Masayoshi's son ED.

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Blaeburg Tech Cara

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 3>and what an addition it has been.

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:03.760
<v Speaker 2>What a week it has been.

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.760
<v Speaker 3>We broke the headlines from the call between President Trump

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 3>and China's Ujingping. That was what the market was waiting for.

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget check out the podcast. This was an episode

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 3>worth recapping. You know where to find it on.

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 2>The Bloomberg platforms Bloomberg dot.

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Com, the Terminal, and online at Apple, Spotify and iHeart.

0:43:20.000 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 3>From San Francisco and New York, this is Bloomberg Tech