WEBVTT - Beating the Book: The 2024 NFL Draft Betting Preview

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning, April twenty second, twenty twenty four. It is

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the Beating the Book podcast. NFL Draft for twenty twenty four,

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's Gill Alexander. This is always one of my favorites

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>during the year and has been, with the exception of

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, among our most consistently profitable. In fact, we

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>always had a profitable NFL draft until last year. Still

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>looking for where I can cash my CJ. Stroud going

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to get pick number one tickets all three at plus

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>money prices somewhere. I'm sure it's available today. On the show,

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>something Old, something New that has done to NFL drafts

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>with us before is Drew Dinsik. You know Whale Capper

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, Whale Underscore Capper of course co host of

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the Deep Dive podcast with a Moletor and NBC Sports

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>at the Edge, which he does with Jake Croucher. Drew,

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you for being here, as always.

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Us an honor and privilege. The Megapod Draft edition. You

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 2>haven't talked football and so long. This is going to

0:00:58.320 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 2>be super.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Fun, super fun and new to the show, new to

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the pod. I just had him on a Numbers game

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>last week. We've had him in previous years on the

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>radio side, but never on the podcast side. You know

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>him from Twitter as Vegas Refund. It's Luke Swayne. How

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>you doing, Luke, Thanks for doing this.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me. I'm excited for this.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 3>He draft is common.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And you too. Right, let's just start there. We were

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>going through your NBA draft and your NFL draft profits

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>over the last three years. It's all plus money except

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>for last year's NFL draft.

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yes, And last year's NFL draft was cha Austin

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 4>here we are. I feel like the last year's NFL

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 4>draft was kind of the reset we needed because we

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 4>have two acts, maybe three acts, the amount of markets

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 4>this year compared to last and I'm willing to throw

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 4>that one in the bag if it means that we're

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 4>back to.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Norm Okay, well, let me let me just start with

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and we were deciding where do we go with this

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>because obviously some numbers are gone, some are still available.

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But let me I guess through what you said off air.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with that you feel like this

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>is a little different of a draft for you than others.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean like yes, the last uh you know,

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 2>two drafts ago was probably uniquely awesome. That was the

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 2>one where Trayvon Walker went first, and you know, a

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks before the draft, he was like sitting

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>there at thirty three to one, and you know you

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>had some real deal like good info buzz.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 5>That was coming from teams. Uh.

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And then last year that was I think also the case.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it definitely was pretty telegraphed that Bryce Young

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 2>was going to go one. By the day of the draft,

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, there was huge disagreement about what the Texans

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 2>were going.

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 5>To do obviously with the you know, pick number two.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>And ultimately I'm still not sure I know the true

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 2>full story of exactly how they landed on CJ. Stroud

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>at number two, but you know, it gave them the

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to kind of box out the Titans, who were

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 2>going to trade up to three for Stroud, and then

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>they traded up to Read because they had the best offer,

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 2>and they get Will Anderson as well, and the rest

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 2>is history as far as kind of putting in two

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 2>foundational pieces offensive defense to build your franchise. So it's

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>you know that that was an interesting draft and just

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of the fact that things unfolded so late for

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 2>them getting those second and third picks really kind of

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 2>did change the entire fabric. And yeah, so that was unpredictable,

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>It was fun, it was interesting. I lost a decent

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 2>chunk on the on that particular outcome. Although Anthony Richardson

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 2>going forth was a huge makeup for me because I

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of under I think was four and

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a half or five and a half for Richardson and

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 2>that was a huge, a huge relief. But yeah, last

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 2>year there was just it felt like a lot of

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 2>noise maybe but just a lots of speculation, lots of

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>people had like information and opinions, and this year it

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 2>feels very much the opposite. I think everything we've gotten

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 2>to this point in this draft cycle, as far as

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the information goes, has been coming from agents. It's been

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 2>coming from you know, represent player, probably a rep, camps, publicists,

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 2>things like that. And you know, if you put sort

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 2>of the people who are in the NFL space, like

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the checkters of the world, like I kind of assume

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 2>he gets almost all of his information from agents and

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 2>pr people, uh, and so you're.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 5>Only getting half the story.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Just just just what is their vibe, how, how do

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 2>they think teams are evaluating them, Where do they likely

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 2>think they are going to go and very very very

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 2>little is coming from the NFL side of things. And

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 2>if you know, this cycle comes and goes and there's

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.559
<v Speaker 2>like a like a you know, kind of a fourth

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>page sports section story on like Sunday, that's like, yeah,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 2>So the NFL had like a sent a memo out

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 2>to all the teams, and I was just going to

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 2>double down how important it was not to leak information,

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 2>Like if that kind of comes to light after the draft,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll be oh, Okay, Now this all makes makes a

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 2>lot more sense because outside of a couple of kind

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 2>of the usual suspects, the Pittsburgh Stealers of the world,

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the cults of the world, where they're kind of telegraphing

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 2>where they're going positionally, like, there is just lots of

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 2>speculation based on team need only, based on you know,

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 2>agents trying to wrap their players, and that stuff is

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 2>notoriously poor information to bet on in my opinion.

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Well so that you brought it there before I could

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>get to it, because to me, the takeaway is is

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this by design by the league with the you know,

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>not only the advent of gambling becoming legalized in twenty eighteen,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but now like the NFL. Finally you know, these many

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>years later getting oh people bet on this stuff, them

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>doubling down on this. It does. It does sort of

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, tip us off to that is a possibility

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it is by design where the NFL is saying, listen,

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>let's tamp down on this, let's not come out and

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>say stuff. And if that's the case, if we believe that,

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>then is this going to be the case with drafts

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>moving forward as well. I'm not sure how you feel

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>about it.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Luke, Yeah, I think last year was a great learning

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 4>experience where I don't know if it's just gambling becoming

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 4>more mainstream, but it does feel like the leaks in

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 4>the past were kind of like.

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>The lower level like coaches or scouts, et cetera.

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 4>Where I don't think those lower level leaks in the

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 4>past are getting the same information that they might have

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 4>in the past, probably based off of it. And honestly,

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 4>like I feel more confident this year with less like

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 4>smoke out there.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I like it.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 4>It feels this one feels like almost like an NBA

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 4>draft where we kind of just like know who's going

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.359
<v Speaker 4>to go in the top ten or maybe even the

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 4>top thirty two. And just figuring out that order is

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 4>of course the hardest part. But there's way more, excuse me,

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 4>way less like land mines in my opinion, that can

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 4>like jump in and create chaos that would cause a

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 4>domino effect the years past. And I don't know if

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 4>that's just because we have less info or there's less

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 4>intel out there, et cetera, or what, but it just

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 4>feels a lot different than last year, which is probably

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 4>a good thing.

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well let's let's actually let's start there then, so

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we know Caleb. We all are convinced Kaylin Williams is

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>going number one to the Chicago Bears. We all agree

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on that. Okay, after that, and I think, if I'm

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>proud of myself for one thing in this draft, because

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a bunch of bets. But there was a

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>couple markets that I didn't expect to enter at all,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and one of them was who's going to get picked second?

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And I am a Washington commodore's fan by birth, and

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I was convinced along they would take Jaden Daniels. And

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>then we saw this weird movement last week at the

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>end of last week where the money went away from

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Jayden Daniels the price crashed it. I think it got

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>as low as minus one fifteen or minus won ten

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>even Friday morning, I did a numbers game and I

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>did the whole first segment on this, and I bet

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Jayden Daniels at minus one twenty five, not at its bottom.

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>But I was like, well, I wasn't gonna bet this

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at all, but now you guys have forced me to

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>bet this, right, so I sort of let the draft

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>come to me. There are you as convinced as I am?

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'll get my reasons a minute, But are you

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>guys as convinced as I am that Jayden Daniels is

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>going number two to wash it?

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't have any skin on this one because kind

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 2>of to Luke's ploy, like, well, number one, liquidity was

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>always a little poor in this market. Uh they you know,

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 2>it was the only market up offshore for weeks and

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>weeks and weeks, but it was tilted pretty heavily. Jaydan Daniels,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>he was in the minus three hundred range when there

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>was a price crash and people were kind of getting

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>in at at rock bottom prices on him that it

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>was only legal shops. It wasn't offshore, that I can

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 2>tell you, and so yeah, it was you know, I'm

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I you know, whatever order two and three go. You know,

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 2>as long as there are two quarterbacks, it doesn't really

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 2>change my outcome whatsoever here And uh, I don't know.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of the a lot of it

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 2>was just speculation, again coming from his agent and his

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 2>team because they were, you know, kind of rankled that

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 2>the the the commodoors, as you put it, we're flirting

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>with other quarterbacks instead of just kind of making it

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 2>clear that they had their guy and number two was

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>very clearly Jayden Daniels and his team is uh, you know,

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>is a little uh just a little wrinkled.

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I don't, I don't. I don't really care

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 5>how it goes.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, standpoint, well I do now because again I entered

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it when I wasn't going to. But it's my thinking

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>was simply this, and you're right, it was because the

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Taco holders, if you look at their logo,

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>just look at taco holder, a taco you know, the

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>taco shop they are. You know, yes, they brought in

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>all four guys, not not Nicks, not Caleb, but the

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>other four quarterbacks perspective quarterbacks in the first round Butterman

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>all together, and then and then Jayden daniels agent liked

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple tweets that were critical of that, including one

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>from Mike Florio. Also, Jayden Daniels apparently met with the Viking,

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>so that crashed the number. My thinking was this, Adam Peters,

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>this is more of a human thing than a football thing.

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>Adam Peters, while being the GM for a first time GM,

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and while working for a new owner, supposedly has carte

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>blanche there in Washington, do whatever he wants to do.

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>But he's also a human being. And in the end,

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the human element of you are motivated more

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>by just as much, if not more, by fear as

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you are by just being singularly in a vacuum for success.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if you draft Drake May and it fails,

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the repercussions of that are going to be far greater

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>than if you draft jayde and Daniels and it fails.

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think ultimately that's really my biggest point of it.

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>There's football ones too, which is if you believe Jade

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>and Daniels is going to be good quicker than Drake May,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>they're actually set up kind of nicely at wide out

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and at running back, and they have thirty six and

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>forty they could trade up and get an offensive lineman.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>So there's also that, But I just think it's the

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>human thing for me, where it's like, nah, I better

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of go with the safer in quotes of the

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>two because who knows, relatively speaking, how safe None of

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>us know really when any of these guys will be

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in the end. And then he doesn't have history with

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this team. I get that as well, but he also

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>has to be well aware of the muscle memory of

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the franchise itself and the fan base, which is we

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just drafted a UNC quarterback two years ago that didn't

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>work out so well. And the last time they had

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a number two pick and they drafted a quarterback, RG

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>three was great until the injury. So I just think

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that you put all that in the mix. I just

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's Jade Daniels Luke what happens at two and three?

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean right now, like I'm definitely leading Jaden to

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Drake three, and we've like, I mean, every year, it

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 4>feels like odds are just flipping on his face by

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 4>the hour, where we are just stuck in a loop

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 4>and Drake May has kind of felt like the CJ

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 4>strout of last year, where he's been here was the

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 4>consensus for so long, and then everyone was kind of

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 4>like beating him down where you might even see him

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 4>fall to like the eight range, which would be crazy.

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 4>And then of course he kind of like the levels

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 4>off and he goes back to where he's been projected

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 4>this whole time. And really like the reasons behind like

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Jayden not going to right now are just like between

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 4>like the agent on Twitter, or like the poor meetings

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 4>with Washington and if we don't think anyone knows anything

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 4>like those are the type.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 3>Of stories that are just yes to me, that like

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 3>how can you buy that?

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 4>So like I have no reason not to think it's

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Jade at two. But like Drew said, like as long

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 4>as these two go two and three, the rest will

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 4>pan out how we're projecting. There's not a lot of

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 4>chaos like a low levis falling to the second round

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 4>and everything is crazy after that. But I would say

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 4>Jade and two right now. But it doesn't take much

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 4>for me to put my opinion to Drake. There are connections,

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 4>like I think like Drake May's dad played for like

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 4>someone on the staff in Washington.

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I saw it.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 4>Yesterday like there's just narratives everywhere. No one has anything

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 4>better to talk about right now, oh quarterbacks.

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So I asked, I asked this question of everybody who

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I talked draft with, and I probably asked it of

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you two when you're on the radio side, which is

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you think you absolutely know for sure in

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the first round and where do you believe the chaos

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>might begin. Let's start with the first, which is what

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think you know for sure? Luke?

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 4>So I know what I think I know for sure

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 4>is four quarterbacks and three receivers go in the top ten.

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 4>And then in terms of chaos, I think the real

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 4>chaos can or two scenarios. One, if JJ doesn't go

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 4>top five, which I still think will go top ten,

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't go top five, that's one chaos scenario, which

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 4>would be like the Vikings not trading in. And the

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 4>second one would be at the Bears at nine, where

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a scenario, very likely scenario where the

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Jets trade into eight and maybe just like trade spots

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 4>with the Falcons which would only cost a third rounder

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 4>and a Dunees goes before the Bears what the Bears

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 4>do at nine is a chaos scenario that I don't

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 4>think really anyone knows, and everyone kind of just really

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 4>bows out to the question of what will happen and

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 4>just says they want to trade down, which trading down

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 4>is a lot harder than I think. It's way harder

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 4>than just saying it and hedging whatever analysis you have.

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 4>But four quarterbacks, three receivers, one offensive line. So that's

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 4>I think there's eight guys locked into the top ten

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 4>and the kass is nine if A Dunes doesn't fall.

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so not before that, because it's interesting because I

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 1>had someone on air today Mike Samitch, who thought the

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>chaos begins at three, So that's interesting. Drew, same question,

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you know for sure?

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I think the Pittsburgh Steels are going to take an

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>offensive lineman. I think the Cults are going to take

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 2>a wide receiver.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 5>I think no.

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 2>I generally agree that that's you know, the likelihood of

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>the top ten is pretty fixed, and then you know

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 2>the number of names and players is not that broad.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Brock Bauers is kind of interesting at ten if at

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>all they have chances that they're you know, if JJ

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>does not go in the top five, then things do

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>get interesting, and I guess I have a theory that

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>i'd like to float. This is entirely this is not

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>informed by information, And maybe it's important to qualify a

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 2>lot of this because you know, people will listen to

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 2>this and assume that, you know, maybe we're hiding the

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>fact that I actually know something that I honestly this

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 2>is just pure speculation. When the Vikings made the move

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 2>to get a second first rounder, this was now a

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 2>long time ago, and in the moment you did the

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>map and you're like, oh my gosh, that's enough capital

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 2>now with those first round picks in next year's one

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 2>to move up to three, like they could you know,

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>they're they're going for it, like they're setting up, you know,

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the chess pieces in order to make this move to

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 2>go get a quarterback, like you could see it all happening.

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>And I agreed, like, yes, that's clearly like that's what

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 2>was telegraphed. But it also had a secondary, you know,

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 2>secondary effect, which is anyone else kind of in their

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 2>range who might be interested in trading up for a quarterback.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Now you can't beat Minnesota's offer, right, And so to

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 2>a degree, it's like, well, you know, if you're if

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>you're the Raiders, if you're you know, the Broncos, you're like, well,

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 2>we're not beating that, so we might as well just

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of just figure out what we're going

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 2>to do here, as opposed to really kind of entertain

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 2>an idea of a trade up. And so it had

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>an effective effectively reading out anyone else who was in

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the market for QB four. Now they're just you know,

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll just sit here and see who's available. And so ultimately,

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 2>if they don't have to make that trade and they

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>get the guy they want at eleven, that would be

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>a pretty like kind of masterful, you know, kind of

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>way to manipulate the process.

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 2>And ultimately, if you know, somebody like the Broncos says, okay, fine,

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, we'll give you all of our picks and

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 2>all in all future rounds, blah blah blah, we we

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 2>want to come up. The Vikings still do have you know,

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the assets this year that are more appealing to teams

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 2>like the Chargers and the Cardinals and even maybe even

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots. And so just the fact that they have

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to first this year is enough, I think to trump

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>basically any other offer that comes to fruition. Uh. And

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>if ultimately you know the fact that the teams that

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 2>are interested in quarterbacks are NFC ANFC West teams, and

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, and and they're like, Okay, well, you know,

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 2>we'll just we'll just let this one go, then I

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 2>think maybe they're you know, there's a non zero chance

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 2>that McCarthy just falls much late and the Vikings get

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 2>him after all without giving as much capital up. And

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that actually makes the most sense considering where

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>talent evaluators have McCarthy.

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, the big quarterback prop that everybody leans on is

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the over under four and a half, Much like with

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 1>my Jade and Daniels number two, which I had no

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>intention of getting involved in until the market moved. I

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>had no intention of getting involved in the four and

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a half until the over got steemed north of three dollars.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>And I again, I didn't get it at its peak,

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>but I got the under at four and a half.

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I ended up at plus one sixty. Some people got

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>north of two dollars for the under. Are we convinced

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not obviously by that bed that beyond Caleb

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Jaden Drake may and JJ McCarthy that either bo Nicks

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>or Michael Pennix are absolutely going to be drafted in

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the first round. Are we convinced of that?

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 5>I think we can cost we can toss Boenix, right,

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 5>I think so?

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would agree. I think too.

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 4>I would probably say Panics is a better shot and

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 4>we are stuck in the loop. It's the same debate

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 4>every single year. I do think the need for the

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Broncos in Raiders is a lot higher than in years past,

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 4>or like the Broncos are rolling out with it, right

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Jared Stidham, Yeah, it's I think the needs compared to

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 4>years past are a lot stronger, that they're a lot

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 4>more desperate to maybe take a guy like Nicks or

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Pennix at twelve and thirteen. No shot, Like I don't

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 4>think it would be crazy, maybe the twenties trading in.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, like I have a lot

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 4>more interested in like the under six and a half

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 4>trades than I do under quarterbacks, which still plus money,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 4>but you couldn't pay me to bet the over.

0:18:55.119 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Couldn't pay the over on quarterbacks. Yeah, yeah, okay, I

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>mean maybe this is a good bit. By the way,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for the music. We do the show here

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>at the d and Bar, Canada, so we're not in

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the studio and so sometimes they get the audio wrong.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And so a little uh, little supertramp breakfast in America

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who may may know such things,

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>if I can put on my old DJ hat again.

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're working on that. Uh, this is a good

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>point before we get some other points. This is a

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>good point to say what we have bet already. Luke,

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with you, because they'll just give a sense

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of what you're thinking on some other things.

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't think we have enough time in this show

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 4>to go over what I've bet.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>A How about the biggest ones, the ones that you

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>like the best, that you wanted to throw out.

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 4>So so under six and a half trades is one

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 4>that I kind of just bet it every year. And

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 4>it does feel like you bet the under quarterbacks because

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 4>you're stuck in a loop and it's the hype of

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 4>the quarterback we see every single year. And it's the

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 4>same thing with the trades, and we see everyone speaking

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 4>to trades. Every team wants to trade down. You have

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 4>teams that want to trade up every single year. Doesn't

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 4>live up to the hype and this open at five

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 4>and a half, it's up to six and a half.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 3>It's even money on the under. I think that is.

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Wow, a great bet because I mean there's nothing to

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 4>go off of, like we don't know.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Anything.

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, like every team has x

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 4>amount of players craded on their boards as first rounders,

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 4>and things that I'm reading are those first round grades.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Is in the range of like twenty to twenty two

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 4>is like the estimate that teams probably have, which to

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 4>me feels low, which isn't enough players to create six

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 4>and a half trades.

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Teams are just gonna straight up Yeah, six and a

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 3>half trades is high to me.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so maybe it's just one Usually it's like four

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 4>and a half, five and a half. Maybe the JJ

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 4>McCarthy like assumed trade is just adding one spot and

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 4>it's really five and a half in the end. But

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 4>I would only bet this under the overs only plus

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 4>one thirty in the unders even money was draft odds

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 4>like aren't real.

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I like this under.

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 4>I think the Broncos positional defensive line is great. The

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 4>long shot that I like a lot that I bet

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 4>is lot too, a lot to lot too. Man, I

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.920
<v Speaker 4>put your every name, but I'm pretty sold on him

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 4>going to the Falcons. And at eight his ODDSCT like

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 4>plus one fifty and they were like seven to one

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 4>at one point.

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>He's the short shot now.

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Right. I think it's it's coming down. I'm very sold

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 3>on it.

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 4>I don't think his medicals are an issue, but I

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 4>think betting into scenarios that the Falcons trade back. Even

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 4>though I just like bet the under on trades, I

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 4>think the Falcons and Jets is a no brainer trade

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 4>for me, where the Jets jump the Bears to get

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 4>a Duneesa and the Falcons flip with them and take

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 4>a lot too at ten, which we're talking like twenty

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 4>to one now, so everyone's been betting assuming they're going

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 4>to take a lot too at eight. But in the

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 4>scenario which would only cost her third round pick, the

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Falcons taking lots to at ten at twenty to one,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 4>I think is a great bet with scenario that. Honestly,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 4>I think my issue is like it makes almost too

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 4>much sense that the Jets are just gonna jet and

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 4>they won't do it, but like you would have to

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 4>jump the Bears to go to Dunday, the Jets want

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 4>to do Inday, pretty sure, they're like number one on

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 4>their board costs basically nothing, and Douglas would be trading

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 4>a pick that he might not even be able to

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 4>use himself if he doesn't because he'll be out if

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 4>they don't win.

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So, just to clarify that bet is a lot to

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to go tenth is twenty to one. Correct, has nothing

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to do with the falcons. But that's your scenario where

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>he ends up at ten.

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so instead of getting at like even odds, now

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 4>go eight. Yeah, it's a likely scenario.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Got you. Yeah, I just wanted to clarify. So people

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>are going to be looking for that and they'll be like,

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>what are you talking about. No, it's just so a

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>lot to to go tenth would be twenty to one.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Drew, what do you What do you like

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>best that you bet?

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Luke pointed out actually one of the better

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>numbers on the board, which is the trades under six

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 5>I'm shocked that that's where that number is currently hanging.

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 2>And this is, of course, I'm assuming that the fine

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 2>print is this is draft day trade. So the fact

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 2>that the Vikings have already kind of made a trade

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 2>to procure that first round or.

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 5>It is not not included in the count.

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 2>But the yeah, that that I don't think that's gonna

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 2>sniff sniff's son, So that that under is awesome in

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 2>terms of other kind of positional bets that I have

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 2>in pocket, and I guess actually, let's talk about sort

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 2>of macro. This draft is very very offensive rich there.

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>But I do think that kind of there has been

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a general cooling on the wide receiver pool available this

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 2>year to where the you know, the likelihood of you know,

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 2>seven wide receivers going around one I think is low,

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think the offensive lineman though you know, nine

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 2>or ten is sort of a base line expectation, is

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 2>totally fair. Quarterbacks at least four and then you know,

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 2>did one tight end and zero running backs. I think,

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're kind of in the mix where when

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.239
<v Speaker 2>they originally opened, positional totals and offense and defense were

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 2>hanging in like the you know, eighteen and a half

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 2>nineteen and a half range.

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 5>Like that was a no brainer over for the offensive players.

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 2>And then ultimately once some of the larger pools opened

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>up and they were up to twenty one and a half,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.959
<v Speaker 2>like it was pretty obviously a good opportunity to come

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>back on the under for offensive players, I think the

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 2>sweet spot and what would make me the happiest on

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 2>draft day would be twenty one offensive players eleven defensive players,

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 2>because that.

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 5>Would threat a beautiful needle.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think to do that you really have to

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of zero in on the wide receiver pool because

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, again like Brian Thomas, who was the fourth

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 2>expected off the board, is kind of slipping because of

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 2>some health issues. Mitchell is slipping because of you know,

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 2>all kinds of you know reports about just his you

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 2>know care, and then you know you're you're making a

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a reach if you're taking Worthy in

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 2>round one just based on speed and not production.

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 2>And I think all the rest of the guys are

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 2>border lying around one anyway, like Mconkee and legged. So yeah,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I think if there's one bridge jumper that I'm going

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 2>to have a lot of in my pocket on Thursday,

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be under six and a half wide

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 2>receivers in round one, And I honestly think you could

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>see four or five, which would be you know, just

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful, no sweat, it would be I would be

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 2>so happy.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 3>But we we'll seal with you. Yeah, I would be

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 3>on that sold deal as well.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah if seven, Yeah, if the Chiefs take wide receiver

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 2>number seven and pick thirty two, it's going to be

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 2>a sad set stick of affairs.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 5>And you know, like you could like the question is

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 5>that Okay? Well, if the market thinks seven.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 2>Is possible, but you're saying it's more like five or

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 2>six at most, Well, where do the other picks go? Well,

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 2>offensive lineman, surely, so many teams in the back half

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 2>of the draft have needs it offensive and there are

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 2>blue chip Round one talent all across the board. The

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>guys that I've bet unders on kind of in that

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 2>range include Graham Barton, who I think has a very

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 2>clear home in Pittsburgh at twenty and I think the.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 5>Fella out of Arizona, Jordan Morgan.

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 2>Have heard a lot of positive things from teams who

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 2>are kind of in the late half of the first

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 2>round in terms of his fit and his versatility and

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 2>seemingly a huge positive character guy. So I have under

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 2>on Morgan at thirty two and a half. I think

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 2>he goes in Day one. I have under on Graham

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Barton at twenty three and a half twenty one and

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 2>a half and twenty and a half because I think

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>his floor is twenty and I think ultimately, you know,

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the other part of the vacuum and the long shot

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>that I'm taking swings on and again, like I like

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Luke's approach better if you can find if you have

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>pools where you can find twenty to one on random

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 2>stuff like a lot too landing ten, you know that

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 2>type of you know, swinging for the fence is my

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 2>more my style betting the draft, but I don't have

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 2>access to those pools. So in terms of long shots,

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 2>all I bet is over five and a half cornerbacks

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>because I think ultimately, like there are a lot of

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 2>team needs with cornerback in the light half of the

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 2>first round, and I think, you know, there's five likely

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 2>and a sixth being either Rake Straw or let me

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 2>see who else has kind of had some buzz really

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 2>but most mostly yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, Saints Trail and

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Rakestraw kind of being on the on the cusp of

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 2>round one one of one or both of those guys

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>landing on the Chiefs with pick thirty two would be

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>just sweet, sweet music. So yeah, let's get let's surprise

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 2>on the number of cornerbacks. Let's get a little bit

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of uh, you know, push up some of these guys

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 2>who think, we think are you know, kind of blue

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 2>chip offensive lineman like Graham Barton and Jordan Morgan.

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 5>And then let's have a.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Wide receiver, you know, kind of end in the five

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>to six range as post to some teams reaching. And

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I think everybody's gonna have a prett happy draft, at

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 2>least in my household.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 4>If you if you ask me like one guy that

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 4>I think no one is talking about, you haven't seen

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 4>any mock that could go in the first it would

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 4>be Saint Drel which is the nickel corner out of Michigan,

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 4>and I would be extremely happy about it. But Barton

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 4>is my favorite over under and it's not even close

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 4>betting the under that I'm on as well at Barton. Yeah,

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 4>I'm on the under twenty three and a half. It

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 4>should have opened at twenty one and a half or

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 4>at this point probably twenty and a half.

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 3>I think twenty and a half is what it probably

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 3>should be now. Yeah, but there's twenty and twenty one,

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty one and a half out there now.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for it right now. A lot too. By

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, the position number is under sixteen and a

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>half minus one thirty five, just looking at Barton twenty

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>one and a half under twenty one and a half

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 1>minus one forty five here at circa anyway where I

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>do this for him. By the way, the under six

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half wide receivers is minus two seventy but

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>still sounding like you still view that as value. When

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this show first started, I was going to ask the

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>way you got the way at least you were talking

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to you, I was gonna be like, well, so if

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I gave you like a small profit right now, would

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you take it? But as this has gone on, it

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you wouldn't take it, like you expect to

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>still make big time here, oh.

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Right where we're sitting right now. If I have a

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 2>losing draft day, I'll be very expressed.

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay. The other thing I said this this morning. I

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know that this point means anything in the scheme

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of things, because we're all just trying to win bets.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>But it just does occur to me that this point

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>never gets made about the NFL Draft. We are trying

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to hit where every draft room's brains are Thursday Night,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>April twenty six. So if we were betting into this,

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>if this was a week before or a week after,

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>five days before, five days after, two days before, two

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.239
<v Speaker 1>days after, the thinking for some of these teams might

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>be completely different, right, So we're just trying to hit

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a moment in time perfectly, Drew. Drew has made an expression.

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:04.479
<v Speaker 5>You don't like that, no, no, yeah, exactness of all

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 5>this as wild?

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, Like it's just that I don't think that

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>gets that point gets made enough, Luke.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I mean they're like betting the draft, like

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 4>there is it's like there's an answer to the test.

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 4>It's not like you're betting on a like volatile performance

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 4>or like someone can get hurt.

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Like the answer to the test is out there, and if.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 4>You figure that answer out, unless I guess things change,

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I guess trades, But there's an answer and that if

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 4>you know that answer, it will be right and really good.

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 4>I'll just have to take the card to the podium

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 4>and you're good. Josh Allen can't get hurt on the

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 4>first play of the game, and your BET's done. Figuring

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 4>out that answer, which is getting harder, but there is

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 4>an outcome that is written in pen somewhere, and I

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 4>think that is the biggest difference, Like minus infinity is

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 4>a good bet in the draft compared to minus infinity

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 4>isn't a good bet anywhere else Here.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Here Here the bets that I've made, in addition to

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the ones I already mentioned because I want to want

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to make fun of myself, because I have ones that

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I expect him to win. And then I have a

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>couple that I took fires on. I mentioned Jade and

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Daniels second pick, minus one twenty five total quarterbacks under

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>four and a half, Round one, I got a plus

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>one sixty. Those came to me. I wasn't gonna involve myself,

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but the way that the money moved, I bet into those.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I also have a position of the Jaguars first selection

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>as a cornerback. I got that an even money. Every

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>mock had a corner. Obviously they have more needs than

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that too, but I went with corner at even money

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Turner, which looked to be like it was going

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a lock at under nine and a half.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm not so sure about that. I got a

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>plus money plus one fifteen when it looked like Atlanta

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>might take Dallas Turner if they stayed to eight. Here

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>are the ones where I really got nuts on. And

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>this comes from one is intel, one is not. The

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>one that is not is Jim Harbaugh has repeatedly said

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>he wants to start the foundation of his franchise in

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>LA the Chargers with an offensive lineman. And Joe Alt

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>was plus four fifty. You can get him in a

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>better number like plus four seventy five to go number five.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I took Harball at his word, and I know you.

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Alt is slated to be drafted seventh by most for

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the Titans at seven, if all remains where they are,

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>if every team remains where they are. But I took

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a flyer at plus four fifty on Alt at number five.

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they stare him in the face

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and don't draft him, and then the other one is

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>by Intel. Our buddy Chris Philika mentioned that he has

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>heard that the Giants actually really like Roma Dunze more

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>than they do Malik Neighbors. So I took a Dunze

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>at plus three twenty five. At six, he's about plus

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>two to fifty. So I'm kind of all over the place.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>It gets back to, though I'm curious where we think, like,

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>let me go with the scenario we brought up this morning.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sanmichi brought it up this morning. So Caleb goes first,

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Jade and Daniels go second, and then the New England

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Patriots decide, you know what, we don't really like Drake May.

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And here's Marvin Harrison, the best player of any position,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>staring us in the face. CJ Strout, as old teammate,

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>by the ways, on record, is saying, if Marvin Harrison

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Junior is staring you in the face, don't be dumb.

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Was the quote draft him. What if the Patriots did that?

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>What kind of chaos does this set the draft into? Well?

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean that number one, they would no longer have

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 2>the thirty second best wide receiver room in football.

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>That's for sure, Yes, But I guess what I'm getting

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>at is, would this then make everybody who wanted Drake

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>May go crazy trying to trade up? Would it then

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>actually mean that JJ McCarthy would go much much later?

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Like right, the repercussions. All it takes is for one

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of these things to happen, right, Yeah.

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, j JJ bawing would be the biggest domino, because

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 4>like I'm convinced that Drake May is the Vikings guy

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 4>that they want the most. If Drake May all of

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 4>a sudden falls to four, I think the Vikings are

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 4>going to throw everything to get there, to get him,

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 4>and then it's really difficult to and then you can

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 4>basically just put it JJ McCarthy maybe twelve, twelve or thirteen,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 4>maybe eight. If either of those teams, I think would

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 4>probably trade with the Falcons. Falcons are going to get

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 4>the same guy at eight that they'll probably they can

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 4>get from ten to thirteen. But yeah, like I think

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 4>the Vikings would throw everything to get Drake May, and

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 4>then JJ would probably fall fall because yeah, there's no

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 4>reason to trade into four or five anymore.

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it sounds to me it sounds like the Cardinals

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 2>are they're no longer in the trade business. At four,

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 2>they just take they just take neighbors. If Harrison goes through,

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 2>for the Vikings trade up to five with the Chargers,

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 2>because the.

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 5>Chargers seem the most inclined to trade down out of

0:34:58.719 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 5>those guys.

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 2>And then yep, Drake mayoes five to the Vikings, and

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 2>then six is roma Dunes of the Giants, presumably because

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Giants really are in the quarterback market.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I think they were very much in the wide receiver market,

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 2>and so they take the third blue chip wide receiver,

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 2>so that hurts the Bears. Bears are now no longer

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 2>looking at wide receiver. They probably take an hedge, and

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the Jets are no longer looking at wide receiver. They

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 2>probably just take Bowers And yeah, then Chargers take the tackle,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Titans take a tackle, or the Chargers will take a

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 2>tackle down at eleven, Titans take a tackle at seven.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, But about that scenario is yeah, that scenario being

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 4>so crazy, like the same ten guys are probably going

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 4>to go in the top ten even if that wild scenel.

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Just shuffles it show.

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Which is the biggest difference this year compared to last

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 4>is pretty much, which is why it's kind of like

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 4>an NBA draft, Like assuming the same time.

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Guys are going to go yeah, yeah, but then I

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 3>think that drags a dunejay. Uh if like Neighbors goes

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.720
<v Speaker 3>or then Dunday's going away earlier.

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me go to some of these notes that

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you said before the show, Luke, which I think is

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>great because one of the things about this coming out

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the Monday before the draft is a lot of numbers

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to be gone, but there's a lot of

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 1>things that are still very betable. You put this note

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>in top three to three five exactas.

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so those are those are the fun bets, where

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 4>like scenarios we just went over are going to be

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 4>crazy and with such an uncertainty right now on two

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 4>and three because like truly, like we don't know, some

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 4>of these are still fun and really, like I if

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 4>you ask me right now, it's probably I would say

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 4>the chalk, the Kalo jayde and Drake Marvin JJ, but

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 4>you still need a trade for that to happen.

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 3>And like relying on trades or that's is like my

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 3>least favorite thing to do.

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 4>They too, which creates the opportunity of the exactness of

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 4>like if that trade doesn't happen or like Marvin goes

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 4>through or whatever, Like you're looking at some absolute bangers,

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 4>I gotta I gotta pull them out.

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah here I'm looking at it right now, Williams. Like

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.280
<v Speaker 2>if if Harrison goes through, your top four, is Williams

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 2>likely Daniels Harrison neighbors and that's.

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 3>One hundred to one exactly.

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 5>That's a big number.

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 4>It's like telling someone I'll never be against one hundred

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 4>to one bat Like, you don't want to be that

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:36.719
<v Speaker 4>guy that says no, and then it hits And.

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Where are you saying that? True? Where's that? Where's that

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>exact available.

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 5>Draft kings under the top four exact order? You have

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 5>to scroll well down?

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but yeah, but you're right, Luke, like the flyers

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 1>like that, Why not right at one hundred to one?

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>My god?

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 4>And these are what saved me last year, like with

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 4>everything of the chaos, like these, these, these long shots

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 4>are what how I came out in the grain. And

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 4>I have a lot less long shots this year right

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 4>now than I do last year. And that's kind of

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 4>just where we are with this draft right now. But

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 4>I would never be opposed to the exacts. And I

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 4>think FANDU has top all the way up to top five,

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 4>And as you get closer, I bet we'll start getting

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 4>even more. I see, I remember it was like top seven.

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 4>I would think it was the longest. Last year three

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 4>years ago. You could bet every single pick in the

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 4>first round, which was fantastic, Yeah.

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Till Twitter, till Twitter gave the answer before it added Yeah.

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So wait, so just to clarify that, I'll fee was exact,

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>is what is the chaos scenario long shot that you like,

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Williams going third? To pollute it in those long shot exactas,

0:38:49.600 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like what's the what's the thing where it changes? What

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>makes it such a long shot? Isn't Williams going third?

0:38:56.320 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 1>You mean Harrison, I mean harr Harrison saying Williams. Pardon me, Harris, Yeah,

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>probably right.

0:39:01.320 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean like that's because yeah, like I mean, if

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 2>we're if we step outside of what's going to happen

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and talk to just about the Patriots right now, Like,

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:10.320
<v Speaker 2>do we think that if they draft Drake May that

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 2>he's going to succeed, you know, in the first couple

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 2>of years with.

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 5>The talent on this roster, probably not failed.

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 2>So the Patriots are probably going to have a high

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 2>pick again next year. I don't know that there really

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 2>ought to be a premium for them to take a quarterback.

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 2>So if they you know, if they take a generational

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 2>wide receiver, so be it. I don't think that's necessarily

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:34.439
<v Speaker 2>bad team building. And uh, you know, I think, yeah,

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 2>if that happens to me, pretty pretty likely, Like it's

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 2>a core it's a high heightened degree of correlation that

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 2>if Harrison goes three, Neighbors goes.

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.640
<v Speaker 4>For Yeah, I think I think top five is where

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking for the chaos top four, it's it's tough

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 4>for like fandolished top five and like you spoke to

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 4>earlier about Joe Walt going five right now, Caleb Jayde

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 4>and Drake JJ joealt is forty to one.

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I would think it would be longer than that.

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>That's all it was. Wow, Caleb, Caleb Drake Wait, Caleb,

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>say again, Caleb Jayden.

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 4>Caleb Jayden, Drake JJ. That's hopmore and then Joe all forty.

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so not not as chaotic as I thought. Okay, wow,

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But that if you do think there's correlation between Harrison

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>going three and Molik Neighbors going forward, that's probably the

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>core of the bet you should make there.

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:26.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I should kind of explain why I think

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that's so highly correlated. Is I think it's pretty clear

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 2>that the Cardinals are you know, they're and they're they're

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 2>they're they're flirting with trading down and then but you know,

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 2>they don't want to go so far down that they

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 2>miss out on neighbors. And I think the real the

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 2>reason is from a fit and from a talent evaluation,

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.160
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like they don't have a huge separation between

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Neighbors and Harrison and I.

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 5>But if one of those guys is gone and the

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:52.439
<v Speaker 5>other guy they're taken.

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, boy, when when Nevada gets legalized sports betting, guys

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>and we can bet these things here? Man, is this

0:40:58.880 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be awesome?

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:01.959
<v Speaker 5>It's gonna be great.

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, what we do we do? Oh? Where you say, Luke?

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 3>Because uh, what is it? Just these types of bets?

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Because for what I thought you guys had over unders

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 4>out there, we have over runners.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>We have over unders on players.

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.840
<v Speaker 5>Yes, circa yeah, good old fashion.

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 5>Discovery this year, which was cool they did.

0:41:23.480 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>They put it out a week earlier than they won

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>than they did last year because they were only available.

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Circle only jumped in last two or three days last year,

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but they gave us a full week and two or

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>three days this time. Stations deserves the shout. They were

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the first to do it here. They are every year

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>always Stations. All right, there's a couple other things here

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that are that are pretty interesting to me. We already

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about the Jets and the falcons, You're a lot

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to swap. How about this one peak group think consensus

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>in top ten? What do you mean by that?

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so we've we've kind of been talking to it

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 4>this time, but like this draft right now, it is

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:00.720
<v Speaker 4>I can't remember a time that there.

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Has been such a consensus on the top ten right now.

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>But was that you who tweeted out tweeted out the percentages?

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, yeah, where every single picks one through ten

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 4>and out of like the forty mock drafts I track,

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 4>each guy has like sixty five percent or higher, which

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 4>is way.

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:26.439
<v Speaker 3>Above anything I've ever seen.

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and at one Domino can just throw this entire

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 4>thing off technically, like scenarios that Albert Breras brought up

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 4>as like three offensive linemen and going in the first

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 4>round that would be crazy, which to me, that would

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 4>happen if Chargers stay at five and take alt maybe

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 4>await them. But I don't know if it's more of

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 4>a consensus compared to just to mock drafts or such

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 4>a copycat thing where it's just everyone just copycatting every

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:01.720
<v Speaker 4>like ourselves. In Jeremiah Mayah I spoke to him about.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he is the best he's the closest thing

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 4>we have to what teams are thinking. And he's been

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 4>He's had Drake mayat two. It's entire process, and I'm

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 4>very interested to see if he switches in his final

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 4>knock draft because if he does, that is a huge

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 4>signal to me that it is Jayden because he's been

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 4>on Drake May the entire process. But you can start

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 4>to see like Lats who you're seeing a lot of

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:30.240
<v Speaker 4>to the falcons at eight from guys that you trust,

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 4>a lot that are starting to switch. But it is

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 4>the highest consensus I've ever seen in any draft in

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 4>a top ten.

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's pretty amazing.

0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 5>You're right, particularly the top eight, right or eight or nine?

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And the day when you were on a numbers game

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on Vson, you were talking about how Daniel Jeremiah had

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>his presser last week, and I guess it's Daniel's way

0:43:54.040 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of not having to do all of these individual interviews,

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>so now he holds court and people can jump on

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:02.719
<v Speaker 1>in and hear what he has to say. And you

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 1>were saying one of the nuggets was again a prop

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that we don't you know, it's like science fiction us

0:44:07.560 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>here in Nevada. Second tight end drafted. You might as

0:44:10.520 --> 0:44:13.800
<v Speaker 1>well have said, who's the seventh punter drafted? Right like

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it just you know, and you were saying it was

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>McLaughlin at Arizona might go number two. That was a

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:23.320
<v Speaker 1>big nugget. It got bet down tremendously. That was just

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>one of the nuggets from this thing. Do you still

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 1>buy into that happening or I mean certainly not at

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the price now you wouldn't bet it, I would imagine.

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:32.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean at the time it was one hundred to

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 4>one and now it's down to ten to one, which

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 4>was a great nugget. And like I said, he's the

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 4>close thing that we have to teams and maybe one

0:44:40.800 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 4>team has him too. And the tight end class is

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 4>so weak that you could probably make an argument for

0:44:46.280 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 4>any of them outside of burs who go second, which

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 4>would be like the third or fourth round. But I

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 4>would not bet MacLauchlan at ten to one at these odds.

0:44:57.280 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 4>It's just a great example of fake odds. Yeah, it's

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 4>a draft.

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think do you think Bowers goes ten to

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jets.

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm of the opinion that he doesn't.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 4>To me, like, I think it's either that I'm trading

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 4>over the Bears to go to Dunsa or taking Fatano

0:45:13.760 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 4>at ten, which is the offensive lineman out of Washington.

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 4>But there's some guys one specific beat reporter with the

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Cardinals names like Mike Jarecki, who's probably he's extremely accurate

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 4>on his tips.

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 3>He is Walter Football dot Com.

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:36.760
<v Speaker 4>Keith's track of tips on a year to year basis

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 4>like as a win loss record for every single guy. Wow,

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 4>like Matt Miller's three and twenty one over the last

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 4>three years.

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That's that good. I'm told that's not.

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 3>It's not great.

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 4>But Jareki's fourteen and oh so he hasn't been wrong

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 4>with any tips. And Wow, last night he tweeted out

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Bowers to the Jets. He had a picture of Bowers

0:45:57.800 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 4>and Gronkowski together and is that guy in the left

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 4>is a future Jet, which to me means a lot.

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:06.800
<v Speaker 4>But I'm still sticking to my guns. Every time I

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 4>got the Bowers over eleven and a half, someone comes

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 4>back back invest thee under love to know who that

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 4>guy is.

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 3>He's hit me off withsite you, but it just doesn't

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 3>make sense to me.

0:46:17.680 --> 0:46:20.919
<v Speaker 4>If you're going to get an offensive weapon, just trade

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 4>up for the round pick to get a Z or

0:46:22.760 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 4>take an offensive lineman.

0:46:24.840 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 3>But they are the Jets, and the Jets will jet, So.

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 1>The Jets will jet. Yeah, the Jets will jet, only

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>only trumped by the Raiders. Will raider when it comes

0:46:36.680 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to draft. All right, let me. I don't usually do this.

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You take a guest notes and run through it, but

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>yours were so great, Luke, that I wanted to actually

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>get through all of them. Exact picks odds based on

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>trade scenarios. What do you mean by that?

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that this is really the lat to swap

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 3>with the Jets.

0:46:57.680 --> 0:46:59.399
<v Speaker 4>So if like the Jets trade out, they could take

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 4>a Dunes eight, which the dunesy to go eight is

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 4>six to one, and then we're assuming Falcons take Latsu

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 4>at ten, which is twenty to one. And then I

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:10.759
<v Speaker 4>think scenario is like the other hotspot is the Eagles

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 4>trading into sixteen break corner with the Seahawks. I think

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 4>if the Eagles stay at twenty two, they take an

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:23.320
<v Speaker 4>offensive lineman, they trade up, which the reporters from the

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Eagles I trust Kapinski, who's out of the Philadelphia Inquire,

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:31.480
<v Speaker 4>is pretty strong on them taking a corner and them

0:47:31.640 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 4>being the most likely team to trade up, which historically

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:39.439
<v Speaker 4>they have been, which would be Eagles to take Terry

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:41.200
<v Speaker 4>on Arnold, which we don't have an exact pick, but

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 4>corner great odds for the Eagles, and then really like

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 4>the Falcons trading back. Is that hot spot whether in

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 4>the lat two is like the guy I'm sold on

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 4>and you're not going to get a lot better than

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 4>twenty to one for him, which he's almost even on

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 4>to go to the Falcons at eight right now.

0:47:58.080 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And then this other one. DK dropped a bunch of matchups.

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I saw that and it wasn't like too many matchups, right,

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it was like one page worth.

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're pretty I'll give him credit. They were pretty

0:48:09.560 --> 0:48:15.240
<v Speaker 3>good matchups in terms of not any no brainers.

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 4>But I don't think Xavier Worthy should be plus one

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 4>fifty to a d Mitchell. I'm on the Ady Mitchell over.

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually on the Xavier Worthy over as well, but

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 4>Ady Mitchell's a guy I feel like is slipping and

0:48:26.840 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 4>worthy of plus one fifty to him.

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Were really there?

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 4>EDP, which is estimated draft position between the mocks, is

0:48:34.960 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 4>so tight right now, and I think there's a lot

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 4>more scenarios where Worthy can go a lot earlier than

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Mitchell than there are Mitchell for Worthy, where Mitchell's like,

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 4>if he doesn't go twenty eight, he might go thirty two.

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 4>But you can see Worthy going twenty one. I mean,

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:51.399
<v Speaker 4>he's one of those speed guys that has a lot

0:48:51.480 --> 0:48:53.399
<v Speaker 4>more volatility that I think one fifty is a great

0:48:53.440 --> 0:48:56.319
<v Speaker 4>bet I would like. I think Terry and Irold over

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Verse is a good bet. Verse doesn't go nine, I

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 4>can see Verse falling into the twenties. Tarrann'nold is like,

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:06.920
<v Speaker 4>his range of outcomes is from pretty much like twelve

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 4>to seventeen, and if Verse doesn't go nine, he's in

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:13.840
<v Speaker 4>the twenties. I mean tarryn donald is. They're basically to

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 4>pick them between those two. Lat two is even money

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 4>over Murphy. Murphy's like that big name that we're hearing.

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:22.320
<v Speaker 1>That.

0:49:23.120 --> 0:49:24.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if I want to go against Murphy,

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:27.240
<v Speaker 4>But I like Fatano as well for the same reasons

0:49:27.320 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 4>I like Arnold, but Fatano basically pick them against Binion Mitchell.

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 4>Fatina's range is basically ten to sixteen. Mitchell, if he

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 4>doesn't go fifteen, he might get to the twenties. I

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 4>guess the Broncos were a hot spot, but they really

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 4>aren't now. But I like Fatana the same reasons, So

0:49:45.239 --> 0:49:47.440
<v Speaker 4>like Arnold, like the range of outcomes is so much tighter,

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 4>and I have a lot more confidence that you're really

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 4>betting on like one or two spots to go ahead

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:56.359
<v Speaker 4>of these guys are the versus Mitchell, all right.

0:49:56.320 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So what I'm hearing is the ones that the ones

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that you guys like the most under six and a

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 1>half wide receivers under On Murphy's draft position, Byron Murphy's

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>draft position.

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Barton Barton, pardon me.

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 1>On barn Ram Barton's draft position? What else did you

0:50:16.000 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what else did you have strong conviction on it?

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 4>I could just read off the over unders I have,

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 4>please right now? Yeah, I have Quinnion Mitchell over thirteen

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 4>and a half, Jared Verus over fourteen and a half.

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 4>All these numbers are going to be there, but this

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 4>is what I have. So Quintin and Mitchell over thirteen

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:34.719
<v Speaker 4>and a half, Jared Versus over fourteen and a half,

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 4>J C. Latham under fourteen and a half, Byron Murphy

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:41.040
<v Speaker 4>under eighteen and a half, Graham Barton over twenty three

0:50:41.080 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 4>and a half, Chop Robinson under twenty six and a half,

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 4>eighty Mitchell over twenty seven and a half, Dave You're

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Worthy over twenty nine and a half, Tyler Geiden under

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:53.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty nine and a half, and Lad McConkie under thirty

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:56.399
<v Speaker 4>five and a half, which I definitely will have more.

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 4>That's four overs and six unders. They usually try to

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 4>keep the overs and unders even it's a little bit

0:51:02.239 --> 0:51:06.439
<v Speaker 4>more difficult this year. But the first thing I learned

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 4>when betting the drops of years ago is I had

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 4>too many unders, and a lot of them were in

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:13.279
<v Speaker 4>the top ten and one domino goes off.

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:13.799
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah.

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 4>It basically comes down to you, like you need to

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 4>predict the top ten or top fifteen perfect in order

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:22.320
<v Speaker 4>to get all those bets right, which is impossible. So

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 4>you only have equal overs two unders, where I guess

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:28.760
<v Speaker 4>they can kind of be correlated where an over hits

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 4>the under is coming back because I means if this

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:35.720
<v Speaker 4>guy's not going, the guy you, but the under should

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 4>be going. But true, some of those numbers are still

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 4>out there.

0:51:40.560 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>So no thank you for those, drew. What did that

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:44.799
<v Speaker 1>leave out in terms of what you like best?

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, the British jumper, which is under six and a

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:52.359
<v Speaker 2>half wide receivers that is minus two fifty. I mean realistically,

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 2>like I'm trying. I'm not trying to be glib. I

0:51:55.200 --> 0:51:57.400
<v Speaker 2>think fair should be like minus twenty five hundred.

0:51:57.600 --> 0:51:59.880
<v Speaker 5>Business. I really am struggling.

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm really struggling to see how said, because like you know,

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:09.040
<v Speaker 2>certain guys are sliding Brian Thomas junior, Ady Mitchell, Like

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:12.280
<v Speaker 2>these guys are this is your fourth and fifth wide receiver.

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Like if those guys fall down into the end of

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:17.640
<v Speaker 2>the first round where number one, they weren't expected to

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 2>be there, so teams aren't even necessarily evaluating them. They're

0:52:20.239 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 2>looking at offensive linemen, they're looking at cornerbacks. Yeah, I

0:52:23.800 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 2>mean yeah, you only have one clear obvious team with

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 2>the Bills, as likely to take a wide receiver down there.

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 5>I just I'm not seeing anyway that the math works

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:35.359
<v Speaker 5>out that we're going to get to seven.

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:40.399
<v Speaker 2>So if there are seven wide receivers drafted, well, number

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 2>one that'll be part of the court. So far from

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 2>me in twenty twenty four, it's been a it's it's

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 2>been a rough couple of months here. But that said,

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:50.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I'm not seeing this as fair and the

0:52:50.719 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 2>minus two fifty range at all?

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>What is the sense By the way, Drew is very

0:52:55.400 --> 0:52:57.840
<v Speaker 1>very honest about tough stretch that he's been in. And

0:52:58.120 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>that's what we love. That's what we love about you

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>that you transparent about this stuff. What is the what

0:53:02.920 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is the scenario that happens or what's the first thing

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that would would happen in this draft that would indicate

0:53:08.880 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to you. Oh, dear god, I'm fucked. Like, what's what's

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the first thing that happens? Okay, what what was that?

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Like twelve and thirteen or Bonis and Michael Panics?

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I'm done. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:29.839
<v Speaker 3>It's like, okay, if.

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 5>In the first half of the draft, I'm in deep,

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:33.799
<v Speaker 5>deep trouble.

0:53:36.080 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then I think, yeah, quarterback, go twelve and thirteen.

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's but that's you know, the quarterback thing is

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:43.320
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating. It gets all the headlines and I know

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we get we're deeper into it, but like, you know,

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I get it. On the one hand, Right, you know,

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL team is anything unless you have a quarterback. Right,

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Washington fan. I can tell you that for years,

0:53:56.520 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you're you're nothing ultimately without a quarterback. So I get

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>why teams go quarterback crazy come first round of an

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 1>NFL draft, you want to believe, right, you desperately want

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to believe that this guy. There's Bo Nicks, there's Michael Pennix,

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:14.560
<v Speaker 1>there's JJ McCarthy. I me, mister quarterback, you know molder

0:54:14.920 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>can make this guy into a franchise quarterback. On the

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:20.320
<v Speaker 1>other hand, just to get a brief history of quarterback

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>drafts in the NFL, twenty twenty was the was the

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 1>draft that I think everybody is chasing that high burrow

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to a Herbert Love and hurts my god, right like

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:35.319
<v Speaker 1>they're all impact quarterbacks in this league today. But then

0:54:35.400 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 1>after that, twenty twenty one, Trevor Lawrence was the number

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>one pick in the draft. Okay, Jerry's still out. Some

0:54:41.480 --> 0:54:43.040
<v Speaker 1>people think he's going to be great, some people think

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>not so much. Since then, here are your quarterbacks twenty

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, Zach Wilson, Trey Lance, Justin Fields, Mac Jones.

0:54:53.960 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Twenty twenty two, Remember was the year there was only

0:54:56.000 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the one guy in the first round, Canny Pickett went

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>to Pittsburgh. The other name of quarterbacks drafted in that

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:07.520
<v Speaker 1>draft Ritter Willis, corral, Zappi Howell, A lot of con Skyler, Thompson, Purty,

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Purty saves the draft with the last pick twenty twenty three.

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, guys, this is just last year, right, last

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 1>year Young Bryce Young goes first. We did get Stroud

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and then we got Richardson. Jerry's going to be decided

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:28.839
<v Speaker 1>on Richardson still then since then after that, Levis Hooker, Hayner, Bennett, O'Connell,

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Tune dtr Clifford, Hall, Tanner, McKee, Duggan and actually two

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>guys who were undrafted, right, Bajen and Devido got more

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:40.400
<v Speaker 1>run than any of those names I just mentioned. So

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess, on the one hand, like I get why

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:45.160
<v Speaker 1>these teams go crazy because you're nothing without a quarterback.

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you look at the batting average right,

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:50.479
<v Speaker 1>and you're just like, God, is it bad?

0:55:51.800 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean, yeah, next year, the next year, next year's

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:58.879
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks is like all time dad boy.

0:55:59.520 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah.

0:56:00.360 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 4>And I mean I'm not thinking like I think shouldhar

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Sanders is right now like probably the top guy, but

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:11.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm of the belief in Mac Jones's kind of like

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 4>the poster for me on this. But this is your

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 4>franchise quarterback.

0:56:16.480 --> 0:56:18.439
<v Speaker 3>You're either to have a top four or five pick,

0:56:18.960 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 3>we trade up and get him.

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:23.480
<v Speaker 4>You don't hope he falls to like the Patriots did

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:26.080
<v Speaker 4>with mac Jones, because you truly believe he's the guy.

0:56:26.120 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 4>If you're just hoping he falls to you when you

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 4>get past the tenth pick.

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 3>And if the Vikings don't trade up two four and.

0:56:33.440 --> 0:56:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Five, that is also another chaos scenario that could create

0:56:39.000 --> 0:56:41.719
<v Speaker 4>some o gods because everything, every mark that you see

0:56:41.880 --> 0:56:44.839
<v Speaker 4>right now, everything you're reading, is based off of four

0:56:44.920 --> 0:56:47.080
<v Speaker 4>or five being in the Vikings, And if it's not them,

0:56:49.160 --> 0:56:51.000
<v Speaker 4>we could have all been around the entire time.

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>On everything, which wouldn't like shock you right, Like you

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:58.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be that shocked if we were all wrong about everything,

0:56:59.360 --> 0:57:00.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a scary part of this.

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 5>Obviously this year, this year, I would be shocked.

0:57:02.719 --> 0:57:02.839
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Last year, we shouldn't move. We kind there was so

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:08.440
<v Speaker 2>much smoke and noise and everything was nothing was connected.

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 2>It was all kind of contradictory, so you were it

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:14.000
<v Speaker 2>was a very uncomfortable feeling heading to the draft. This

0:57:14.080 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 2>year feels pretty different. But now the quarter the quarterback draft,

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 2>I haven't have a working theory. I haven't completely flushed

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 2>this out. So I'll get you guys take on this.

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.360
<v Speaker 2>But like I get it from a team building standpoint, right,

0:57:25.440 --> 0:57:28.120
<v Speaker 2>you have enough evidence now that you need a quarterback

0:57:28.160 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 2>on a rookie deal to you know, and you need

0:57:30.640 --> 0:57:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to be competitive in that player if that, if you

0:57:33.200 --> 0:57:35.280
<v Speaker 2>hit on your pick, you need to be competitive in

0:57:35.320 --> 0:57:38.560
<v Speaker 2>that player's windows years three, four, and five. And I

0:57:38.600 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 2>think that's what a lot of franchises are trying, you know,

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:44.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to accomplish. And I think you know, as with

0:57:44.960 --> 0:57:47.920
<v Speaker 2>like you know, with the Texans this year, once you

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 2>hit that, you know, once you hit your on your guy,

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 2>then yeah, chips on the table, like, go get stuff

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:56.520
<v Speaker 2>on dicks, go go get I forget who they traded,

0:57:56.560 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 2>who they got in free agency? Who is the pass

0:57:58.760 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 2>rusher from the Vikings, but Daniel Hunter. Yeah, so you know,

0:58:01.280 --> 0:58:02.920
<v Speaker 2>pushing chips on the table, like here we go, this

0:58:03.040 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 2>is our shot. And because realistically, you either you want

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 2>to be chasing a championship or you want to be

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 2>at the top of the draft. Taking your next shot

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:13.840
<v Speaker 2>out of quarterback purgatory is like the ultimate you know,

0:58:14.680 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 2>least desirable place to be, which is why it's weird

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:21.040
<v Speaker 2>seeing teams like the Falcons just capitulate and pay you know,

0:58:21.440 --> 0:58:24.000
<v Speaker 2>a guy like Kirk Cousins to just put them squarely

0:58:24.040 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 2>in purgatory, but so be it. And you know, I

0:58:26.960 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 2>think as far as like the batting average for quarterbacks,

0:58:32.360 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that there is a little bit of a

0:58:34.640 --> 0:58:37.400
<v Speaker 2>signal in terms of who ultimately succeeds at the NFL

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 2>level and who doesn't. And I think it's more looking

0:58:41.280 --> 0:58:43.480
<v Speaker 2>at the who doesn't, right, and what happened to those

0:58:43.520 --> 0:58:45.880
<v Speaker 2>guys in their development arc? Right, and if they have

0:58:46.000 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 2>a year of arrested development, where either their final year

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and I'm kind of looking at Caleb Williams when I'm

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:54.080
<v Speaker 2>saying this, right, if their final year in college was

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:57.360
<v Speaker 2>like a little bit of either a plateau or some regression, Like,

0:58:57.480 --> 0:59:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a it's a red flag. Like, I

0:59:00.440 --> 0:59:03.440
<v Speaker 2>think that that kind of tells tells you that, you know,

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the development arc stopped at some point, and that's potentially

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a problem. And if you come into the NFL and

0:59:09.560 --> 0:59:11.560
<v Speaker 2>you take over a team like the Bears that have

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 2>no wide receivers and the worst offensive line rostered in

0:59:14.920 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 2>the NFL, like Justin Fields took over, your arrested development

0:59:18.080 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 2>year is your rookie year as a quarterback?

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:59:20.360 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 2>And so the kind of the success stories to me,

0:59:22.880 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 2>all have continuity where you were playing your best football

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:29.440
<v Speaker 2>as you were leaving college and you went to an

0:59:29.560 --> 0:59:32.520
<v Speaker 2>organization that had you carried your development, you know, to

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:36.240
<v Speaker 2>where you could ultimately hit your ceiling right. And you know,

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:39.240
<v Speaker 2>everyone who has failed of the first round picks that

0:59:39.280 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 2>you just rattled off either had an arrested development.

0:59:42.000 --> 0:59:44.040
<v Speaker 5>Here in college or they had one in their first

0:59:44.080 --> 0:59:45.120
<v Speaker 5>couple of years in the NFL.

0:59:46.080 --> 0:59:47.880
<v Speaker 2>And so I think, you know, if we just look

0:59:47.920 --> 0:59:49.520
<v Speaker 2>at it, you know, if we if we do a

0:59:49.640 --> 0:59:53.440
<v Speaker 2>post draft kind of autopsy and you're like, okay, well,

0:59:54.640 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 2>what do you think Caleb Williams to the Bears, I

0:59:56.560 --> 0:59:59.280
<v Speaker 2>would say, I have reservations, Like his five year at

0:59:59.280 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 2>college was not as good as his junior year, and

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:04.000
<v Speaker 2>now he's coming into a situation where, yes, things do

1:00:04.120 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 2>look pretty good in terms of there is kind of

1:00:05.960 --> 1:00:08.440
<v Speaker 2>talent and the cupboard is well stocked, but it's not

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:10.120
<v Speaker 2>clear and obvious to me that he's going to just

1:00:10.320 --> 1:00:12.080
<v Speaker 2>jump right back on to the path he was in

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:15.720
<v Speaker 2>terms of development and progression. And then the same thing

1:00:15.760 --> 1:00:17.880
<v Speaker 2>would go with somebody like Drake May. Okay, you're putting

1:00:17.960 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 2>him on the Patriots, Like, I'm willing to kind of

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of strongly consider that's probably a wasted pick because

1:00:24.840 --> 1:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>that talent on that team right now is so poor

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>that him having arrested development year and as his rookie

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>year seems pretty likely. And then you know, let's assume

1:00:33.360 --> 1:00:35.600
<v Speaker 2>that JJ McCarthy goes to the Vikings. If you're like,

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, hey, of these four, you know Jaden Dalen

1:00:38.120 --> 1:00:40.240
<v Speaker 2>goes to the Commanders. Okay, of these four guys, you know,

1:00:40.320 --> 1:00:42.640
<v Speaker 2>who's who's likely to have the best career. I would

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>probably take the long shot price on JJ McCarthy because

1:00:45.160 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>he's he kind of did start to hit his ceiling

1:00:48.840 --> 1:00:52.120
<v Speaker 2>late in his college career, winning you know, the particularly

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>in high leverage games at the end, and then carry

1:00:56.040 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>that right onto a team and the Vikings that have

1:00:58.480 --> 1:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>a really good developer and O'Connell and exceptionally talented roster

1:01:03.040 --> 1:01:08.040
<v Speaker 2>for you pass catchers, outstanding pass protection like whoever ultimately

1:01:08.120 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings get would be my bet, too, will be

1:01:11.400 --> 1:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the success story of this draft class.

1:01:14.080 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the theory is in there, other

1:01:17.120 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>than I agree with everything you said, because this isn't basketball,

1:01:20.760 --> 1:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>right where talent wins no matter where you are, right,

1:01:23.320 --> 1:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan on the Wizards. That's about example, because he

1:01:26.040 --> 1:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>end up playing with Wizards. Michael Jackson on it, Mike,

1:01:28.080 --> 1:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Michael Jordan on any team is going to be great, right.

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Baseball is a individual sport disguised as a team sport.

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a great hitter, you're gonna be a

1:01:36.600 --> 1:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>great hitter everywhere. Same with a great pitcher football. As

1:01:40.200 --> 1:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you just displayed, right, there's so many moving parts to

1:01:44.040 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the system you end up in and how you fit

1:01:48.160 --> 1:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>into that system. There's no way to prove this, but

1:01:51.120 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I always use it as saying, if Peyton Manning were

1:01:52.960 --> 1:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>drafted by Washington, he would not have become the Peyton Manning.

1:01:57.000 --> 1:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We know he's got some pedigree because he's got family.

1:01:59.600 --> 1:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't he wouldn't have sucked, but he would never

1:02:02.000 --> 1:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have become the paid minute because we had a different

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>coordinator every year and a different coach every year. So

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I kind of I'm with you on all of that,

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's why that's where the cruelty is of the

1:02:11.040 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>economic system, right, Because then you can only win a

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl if you're a Hall of Famer, if you're

1:02:16.000 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a rookie quarterback over performing on a rookie contractor or

1:02:19.440 --> 1:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>guy overperforming on a rookie contract where you pay everybody

1:02:21.920 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>else and then you win and that's your window. And

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>then if you don't get it on that window, you're

1:02:27.720 --> 1:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>forced to commit nine figures to that player. And that

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>player is often it's never clear, right, It's never clear

1:02:35.880 --> 1:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be Tom Brady or Aaron Rodgers.

1:02:37.680 --> 1:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It's more like they're going to be Dak Prescott or

1:02:39.640 --> 1:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins or that kind of player where you're like, oh, well,

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:44.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess we got to give him nine figures because

1:02:44.480 --> 1:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>what's the alternative. So it's just so cruel, right. The

1:02:48.520 --> 1:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is just a what an inexact science when

1:02:52.040 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you put it all in the mix.

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially if you do hit on a guy like

1:02:55.320 --> 1:02:59.000
<v Speaker 2>a Josh Allen and you have some very close calls

1:02:59.320 --> 1:03:02.800
<v Speaker 2>while he's on his contract, and then that's right. Ultimately

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:04.960
<v Speaker 2>you are doing what the Bills are doing this year,

1:03:05.000 --> 1:03:07.439
<v Speaker 2>where you know, maybe they get the fifth best wide

1:03:07.440 --> 1:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>receiver in this draft as their wide receiver one next year,

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and that's a disaster.

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so true. All right, So I just want to

1:03:17.640 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>wrap this up by saying this, So if people are

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>people right now, they stop listening to this podcast and

1:03:22.240 --> 1:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they're going out and they're making a bet. Sounds like

1:03:24.560 --> 1:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>if they're fine with the minus two fifty on the

1:03:26.600 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>under six and a half wide receivers, that's the play

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the under on Barton, we feel you guys feel really

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>strongly about I feel super strong about Jade and Daniels

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>going number two. It's creeping back up by the way.

1:03:39.920 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It's about minus one fifty five right now. But I

1:03:43.200 --> 1:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>everything I my intuition and what I think I know

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about that franchise is they're going to go Jade and Daniels.

1:03:50.640 --> 1:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Did we leave out any other thing that is a

1:03:52.640 --> 1:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>must bet right now?

1:03:55.240 --> 1:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Trades under six and a half?

1:03:56.520 --> 1:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Trades that was the one I've forgotten, Luke, thank you.

1:03:58.560 --> 1:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Trades under six and a half. That's the one me personally,

1:04:01.280 --> 1:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>when I leave this that's the one I'm looking for

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to see if we have that anywhere in town. Trades

1:04:06.000 --> 1:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>under six and a half, because that is a lot

1:04:07.880 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of trades, right like, that's not gonna happen, okay, and

1:04:12.080 --> 1:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>then everything else we we hope for the best.

1:04:14.240 --> 1:04:18.240
<v Speaker 5>On but yeah, yeah, I picked something I find some

1:04:18.440 --> 1:04:19.760
<v Speaker 5>find some absurd lung shots too.

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's there's you want to be a fun experience,

1:04:22.960 --> 1:04:26.320
<v Speaker 2>and I don't know, there's like the Bridge Jumpers is

1:04:26.360 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>a rough sweat, I'll be honest, like sitting there and wait,

1:04:28.960 --> 1:04:31.160
<v Speaker 2>waiting and watching and counting as you're going through the

1:04:31.720 --> 1:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>late thirties where you're like, wait, did I really have

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>any idea what these teams were looking for looking at?

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:41.600
<v Speaker 5>Not really? Uh, and yeah, all of the all of

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:45.920
<v Speaker 5>the yeah. So yeah, sweating out the super uh, the

1:04:46.000 --> 1:04:50.000
<v Speaker 5>super juicy stuff is a little rough, so just be OneD.

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. But I think Luke made a little point of

1:04:52.080 --> 1:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there that I don't want to gloss over, which is

1:04:53.600 --> 1:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>with those exacts. Those exactas which you said saved you

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, I think are like one, there's that scenario, right,

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you can sort of bet against what your other conviction is.

1:05:05.480 --> 1:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But that is a whenever you have a correlation in there,

1:05:08.240 --> 1:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and Drew you pointed out that one between Harrison and

1:05:10.320 --> 1:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Neighbors back to back, I almost think that that's like,

1:05:14.080 --> 1:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if you have that available to you, you almost have

1:05:16.160 --> 1:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to include one or two of those because.

1:05:18.640 --> 1:05:21.520
<v Speaker 4>That's yeah, yeah, yeah, And a lot of the books

1:05:21.600 --> 1:05:27.000
<v Speaker 4>to offer parlays where you're parlaying round ones, or like

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:30.880
<v Speaker 4>on fandle, you can do cross, you can do first

1:05:30.920 --> 1:05:35.320
<v Speaker 4>defensive player, first wide receiver parlays where the parlays are

1:05:36.120 --> 1:05:39.440
<v Speaker 4>as well, just as good bets where parlaying five or

1:05:39.520 --> 1:05:44.080
<v Speaker 4>six round winners that are minus three hundred are greater

1:05:44.880 --> 1:05:45.400
<v Speaker 4>are great.

1:05:45.240 --> 1:05:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Bets as well. But yeah, definitely diversify yourself in scenarios

1:05:49.560 --> 1:05:51.560
<v Speaker 3>or you could have a really bad night.

1:05:51.880 --> 1:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Drew, would you like to talk about the parlays that

1:05:54.000 --> 1:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>were available off of distant offshore location that they didn't

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>they didn't turn off the button for well, yeah, I.

1:06:04.160 --> 1:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Mean off the top of you said, would you take

1:06:06.000 --> 1:06:08.320
<v Speaker 2>a small profit? Would you guarantee a small profit? And

1:06:08.400 --> 1:06:12.400
<v Speaker 2>I said no, Well, I know, I already know that

1:06:12.480 --> 1:06:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm there as of this moment, because correlated parlays were

1:06:16.600 --> 1:06:21.080
<v Speaker 2>available for a hot minute and you could play. A

1:06:21.160 --> 1:06:26.240
<v Speaker 2>good example was over over ten and a half defensive players,

1:06:26.360 --> 1:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>under twenty one and a half offensive players. And if

1:06:29.120 --> 1:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>you do the math right, unless there is.

1:06:31.000 --> 1:06:33.080
<v Speaker 5>A special teams player who gets after.

1:06:32.840 --> 1:06:35.320
<v Speaker 2>In the first round, or unless somebody, you know, unless

1:06:35.440 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>the you know somebody gets a last second penalty from

1:06:38.880 --> 1:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the NFL and they lose their first round pick, and

1:06:40.400 --> 1:06:43.040
<v Speaker 2>there's only thirty one for round one picks. Those are

1:06:43.080 --> 1:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>perfectly correlated and so something that you should be betting

1:06:46.440 --> 1:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>at minus one thirty, you're betting at a plus one

1:06:48.560 --> 1:06:52.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety and that's obviously a nice way to start the draft.

1:06:52.080 --> 1:06:54.400
<v Speaker 2>So appreciate, you know, have tip to those folks for

1:06:55.280 --> 1:06:58.120
<v Speaker 2>given us a chance. And I don't know other than that,

1:06:58.320 --> 1:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>it's been it's been very lean pickings in the offshore

1:07:01.160 --> 1:07:03.080
<v Speaker 2>space as far as draft liquidity.

1:07:03.160 --> 1:07:04.720
<v Speaker 3>And I get it, like you know, you don't.

1:07:04.720 --> 1:07:07.560
<v Speaker 2>They don't want to loan, likes to kind of just

1:07:08.040 --> 1:07:10.600
<v Speaker 2>give it all back for fun. And you're you're putting

1:07:10.600 --> 1:07:14.280
<v Speaker 2>your resources as far as uh running a high you know,

1:07:14.360 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 2>high limit book. You're putting your resources into the NBA

1:07:17.080 --> 1:07:18.360
<v Speaker 2>playoffs right now, And I get that.

1:07:18.600 --> 1:07:21.680
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, it is what it is. But yeah, it's

1:07:21.720 --> 1:07:23.480
<v Speaker 5>been it's been a lean it's been a lean draft

1:07:23.560 --> 1:07:24.520
<v Speaker 5>year ultimately for me.

1:07:24.720 --> 1:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>By the way, before we go n b A draft

1:07:26.800 --> 1:07:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, like the will there even be any draft

1:07:29.640 --> 1:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>props out there for the NBA draft this year? It

1:07:32.560 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is considered to be the worst, the worst NBA draft

1:07:35.920 --> 1:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in history. They say this year I.

1:07:38.440 --> 1:07:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Mean they have an over for Lebron's what it's worth.

1:07:43.640 --> 1:07:46.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, let's also remember we went, we went. I'm old

1:07:46.840 --> 1:07:49.200
<v Speaker 5>enough to remember. You're Anthony Bennett went first overall.

1:07:49.720 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>So let's let's let's uh, let's let's it's cool out

1:07:53.080 --> 1:07:55.600
<v Speaker 2>jets until you see these guys play. But you know,

1:07:55.840 --> 1:07:59.120
<v Speaker 2>I think the where what is true surely is this

1:07:59.280 --> 1:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is the worst crop of college players. Like if if

1:08:04.840 --> 1:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>you hung a college players to be drafted in the

1:08:09.120 --> 1:08:13.280
<v Speaker 2>top five prop right this minute, it's probably over half,

1:08:14.040 --> 1:08:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and it's probably juiced to the under because I think

1:08:16.960 --> 1:08:20.880
<v Speaker 2>it is the only guy, maybe the Kentucky shooter who

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:22.960
<v Speaker 2>goes in the top five, and even that feels like

1:08:23.040 --> 1:08:25.800
<v Speaker 2>a reach. So it could be all G leaguers and

1:08:25.960 --> 1:08:28.800
<v Speaker 2>international folks who fill up your top five or your board.

1:08:28.840 --> 1:08:31.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's a couple of difference makers in there,

1:08:31.280 --> 1:08:33.639
<v Speaker 2>but ultimately, yeah, probably no franchise changers.

1:08:33.760 --> 1:08:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That'll make for a fun night when we don't know

1:08:35.360 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>any of the players. That's awesome, sounds great, all right, guys,

1:08:39.479 --> 1:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate it. I think we touched on a

1:08:42.120 --> 1:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>lot here. May it all go well for us, may

1:08:45.760 --> 1:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not be last year draft is on Thursday Night. Got

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a few days to listen to this, Luke swaying that

1:08:52.320 --> 1:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Vegas refund. Luke, besides drafts, do you bet the rest

1:08:55.920 --> 1:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>of the year or you just a draft guy?

1:08:58.360 --> 1:09:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, NFL college football at all?

1:09:01.560 --> 1:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Okay, not at all, just making sure that people know

1:09:05.200 --> 1:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>at Vegas Refund and then Drew Dinsick of course at

1:09:07.960 --> 1:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Whale Underscore Capper, Deep Dove podcast again with Andy Moltor

1:09:11.520 --> 1:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and NBC Sports Bet the Edge with j Croucher. Love

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to both. Drew, you do a great job with

1:09:17.680 --> 1:09:20.639
<v Speaker 1>both of them. Man, Drew gets a little frisk ear

1:09:20.680 --> 1:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Deep Dive I noticed at times. So there's that.

1:09:24.880 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we have a Yeah, it's a it's a it's

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>a it's the Take Your Tie Off podcast.

1:09:30.160 --> 1:09:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's uh.

1:09:32.439 --> 1:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I like that kind of like this one.

1:09:34.120 --> 1:09:36.799
<v Speaker 5>Pour Yourself, Pour Yourself, an adult pepperage type of podcast.

1:09:37.360 --> 1:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, guys, I really appreciate it. Good luck, good

1:09:40.320 --> 1:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>luck to everybody with your picks in the twenty twenty

1:09:43.720 --> 1:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>four NFL Draft.