WEBVTT - Chiefs-Bills: Patrick Mahomes vs. Josh Allen 10, Lamar RETURNS, Bo-Liever in Broncos? | Nick Wright

0:00:01.920 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Driving the Great Episode three eighty five.

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>As always, this episode is brought to you by our

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>great friends at boost Mobile. Demand's a great to see you,

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>great looking shirt. Weather must be gorgeous in La today,

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>even though I'm sure folks are going to be a

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>little down as the Dodgers might be frittering away this

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>world series. And I have the hottest take, the hottest

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>take about why the Dodgers are down three two to

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the blue Jays. Are you ready for it?

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 2>What's the what is that?

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>The blue Jays are better? Oh Goo days had a

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>better record by one game. The blue Jays don't have

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>a massive liability, that is their bullpen. The blue Jays

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are hot and confident and bad on ball. What'd you

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>say ball?

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>They're connecting?

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, exactly right, but the ball and play. And

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>here here's the other thing we were trying to figure

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:06.919
<v Speaker 1>out how to discuss this on for first things first today,

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>which is it is a clumsy if you will, almost topic,

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>not clumsy topic, but it's unwieldy, which is, how do

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you square this circle that we have seen this postseason?

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Shohei o Tani have arguably you, arguably the two greatest

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>games anyone has ever played in the history of playoff baseball.

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>The three home run ten strikeout game and then the

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:51.639
<v Speaker 1>two home run, two double five walk game. We've seen

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that just in the last week. How do you square

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that with? And other than those two games, he's been brewed,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like what do you what it is? It's and and

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>last postseason he was banged up, but he wasn't great.

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But you can't be like, oh, he's not a postseason

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>performer because he literally might have had the two greatest

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>playoff games ever played, uh, in the playoffs. But also

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>aside and this is kind of a reverse, yeah, but

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>aside from that, missus Lincoln, how was the play you

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to Yeah, but the two greatest baseball games

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>any of us have ever seen, arguably, But aside from that,

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been good. It's really weird. And so on

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>first things first, we determined the way we're gonna frame

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it is because Bruce been calling him the boat the

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>best of all time? Has this postseason helped or hurt

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>his quest for that title?

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 3>And he's hitting you know, it's the game. It's really

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 3>rough on the body, dude.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 1>So I do wonder how much of it is that

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is that of everyone, the eighteen inning game took the

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>most out of show hey, because the very next day,

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>after being on base nine times, he then also had

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to pitch. But it's listen. I think my prediction before

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the series was Blue Jays and seven. I think that's

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>still what's gonna happen because I think Yamamoto is going

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>to is gonna pitch a gym in game six. And

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, here is I wonder you throw in

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the doc if you guys could look it up for me.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>What Yamamoto's World Series MVP odds are. I think before

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the World Series he was thirty five to one. Yesterday

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>he was sixteen to one because if the Blue Jay,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>if the Dodgers do end up coming back to win it,

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>he's fourteen to one now, so maybe he was, you know,

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to one in some books fourteen to one. Another

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers come back to win it, and Yamamoto has two

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>complete games two of their four wins. With Shohy cooling

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>off a bit. I wonder if he could win World

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Series MVP. I mean, the smart money right now would

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>be on Vlad because it looks like the Blue Jays

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are gonna win it. But that is that is something.

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And I've been locked in to playoff to playoff baseball

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>in the World Series. I think it's been great and

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm thrilled we're getting at least six, if not seven games.

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So right now, Yamamoto's got the third best odds, but

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's Vladdie minus two hundred, show Hey plus two thirty,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and then Yamamoto at fourteen to one. All right, let's

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>get to straight the voicemail brought to you by our

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>friends at boost Mobile. One of those things straight to

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>voicemail was the Blue Jays Austin Reeves. Holy Molly, now

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw. I think it was. I don't want to

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>get it wrong. I think Kenny Smith last night compared

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>this him to Jared me Lynn, which is so wildly

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>insulting to Austin. Austin's a legit excellent player, and they

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>called me a madman a few years ago when I

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>said I'd rather have him than Bradley Beal. Austin's about

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 1>to get that contract Bradley Beal got in Washington that

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>immediately became an albatross. Austin's been great. I do wonder

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>this and this will tell you a lot about the

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Lakers priorities for the year, because when Luca is there,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Austin becomes less critical. When Luca and Lebron are both there,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Austin becomes almost wholly redundant. Do they consider selling super

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>high on Austin to try to upgrade their perimeter defense

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and shooting, or do they look at Austin as Luca's

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>running mate for the next five years. I don't know

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the answer to that, And a lot of that has

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with how good the Lakers think they can

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>be this season when they're fully healthy. So all that,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and then their Nick's Halloween costume. But I'm I'm not

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>dressing up for Halloween this year. Your little sister's going

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:17.119
<v Speaker 1>as a ghostbuster, so that's pretty cool.

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>And a little vacuum or something.

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I don't vacuum, but yeah, I mean I

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 3>think they.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like a ghost vacuum or something. I'm

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>not sure exactly what it is, but it's pretty cool.

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a good costume. I like it all

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>right to Mom's a reminder everybody like rate subscribe review

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to the pod. A lot to do today. I am

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>also a tad bit under the weather, if I'm being

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>totally honest, and so I'm going to power through. Let's

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>get to the annually the Bill's annual super Bowl, their

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>regular season game against the Chiefs.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah, it is super Bowl week over there in

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo and Buffalo's home dogs this time. I know, what,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 3>what do you think we're gonna learn more from? Or

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 3>which team do you think we're gonna learn more from

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 3>in this game?

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>So a lot here, right, and the Bills likely without

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Ed Oliver, which is brutal for them. The Chiefs definitely

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>without their starting left tackle Josh Simmons. I do expect

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>him back by the way in November, but he's not

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be there for this game. Trey Smith should

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be back, which is important. Those are the maybe most

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>noteworthy injuries or absences for the Bills. The real question

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to me is can this defense slow down what has

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>become the most pro with respect to the Colts, the

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>most prolific offense in the NFL. That is that that's

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the question for Buffalo and for Kansas. It is actually

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a similar question in this regard, which is the Chiefs

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>have the defense the last two weeks has been unbelievable,

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but you're playing Mariota and you're playing the Raiders when

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>they have played legitimate quarterbacks. Those teams have moved the ball. Now, listen,

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the Lions only scored seventeen points, but they moved the ball.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>The Prince and the Jags moved the ball. Baltimore in

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the three quarters, Lamar played moved the ball. Philly actually

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>struggled a bit moving the ball. But the Chargers move

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball. So this Chiefs defense can't generate enough of

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a pass rush without having to send blitz after blitz

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>after blitz to disrupt Josh Allen. So those are the

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>real The focus is going to be on Allen and Mahomes,

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>But as far as learning more about either of these teams,

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be more about the defensive side of the game.

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But I will also say this, if I were just

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to name a few Bill Simmons or Mike Greenberg or

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Jim Rome or Joe Montana or Steven Ruiz or Dominique Foxworth,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these people are my good friends or colleague

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>or Colin Cowherd might mentor and dear dear friend, any

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of a dozen people who in September or August definitively

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>declared that the best quarterback in football is Josh Allen.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd be a little nervous this week because twenty some

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>million people are going to watch the Chiefs go to

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo and what very well might be the last time

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and Allen ever play in that stadium, and I

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to watch Patrick put on an absolute masterclass.

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>And I understand that it was very in vogue, as

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 1>it is every September, and again I have been very

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>complimentary of Josh the last couple of years, but it

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>was very in vogue to just flatly assert, oh, Josh

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Allen's the best player in the league after the first

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>few weeks of the season, and since then he's been good,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but not great. The team has been just fine since

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that three and zero start two and two, and right

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>now this year, the only win the Bills have to

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>hang their hat on is a Ravens win. That Ravens

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>win that has not I guess I think it's fair

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to say aged amazingly because the Ravens were such a

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>mess the first six weeks of the year. And this

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>gets us to demands the rivalry questions. So go ahead,

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll let.

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 3>You yes, like like you said this is gonna be

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 3>the tenth time that they face each other, So what

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 3>would Allen need to do.

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 2>In this game for it to be considered a rivalry

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>or a true rivalry.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So I under it is a rivalry. I want to

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like I don't think it's not a rivalry. It's the

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>two best quarterbacks in the league, and it is two

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 1>of the three best teams in the league over the

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>last five years. I don't think you can call it

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the two best teams in the league because I think

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to get Philadelphia. It's credit. They've been to

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>two Super Bowls, they've won one, But it is It

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is unlike any rivalry we've seen in NFL history, where

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that the teams are you know, in

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>any given year, even or one guy just has a

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 1>slight advantage. Early on when they were playing, the Chiefs

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 1>clearly had the better offensive weapons, the Bills clearly had

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the better defense. The last couple of years, the Bills

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>probably had the better offensive weapons, offensive line, running back, core,

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, you know, and the Chiefs might have actually

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>had the better defense. And one team has consistently won

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the regular season matchups, and one team has won every

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>single one of the postseason matchups, and it is and I,

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, ranted about this on the TV show yesterday,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>so I don't have to spend too much time on

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it here. But people so badly want it to be

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Brady Peyton and it has just been nothing like Brady Peyton,

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's maddening to me. Brady Peyton.

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Was.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Peyton was the guy with the multiple MVPs. Peyton was

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the guy with the crazy stats, and Brady was the

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>one with the rings in this instance. And by the way,

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Peyton in their third playoff matchup beat Brady, and in

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>their fourth playoff matchup beat Brady, and in their fifth

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and final playoff matchup beat Brady. Fact that nobody seems

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to remember but me is Peyton finished the Brady Peyton

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>playoff rivalry with a winning record. He was one and

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>two with the Colts and two and zero with the Broncos.

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But set that aside Josh and Patrick, Josh is the

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Patrick is the one with multiple MVPs. Patrick is the

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>one with the gaudier stats, and Patrick is the only

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>one that's ever won. So it is far closer to

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Ewing or or lebron Toronto than it is bird

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>magic or Peyton Brady?

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 3>What do you like, bron Toronto is crazy.

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's what it's been. I mean, that's what

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that they even when Toronto had the better regular season

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>record than Cleveland, even when they were the favorite in

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the series, which people will pretend to said true twenty eighteen.

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Holmes has always had the gaudier stats. I feel like

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 3>some years Josh Allen has beaten Patrick Mahomes out on well.

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean last year Josh was literally League MVP,

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and the year before Josh had better individual numbers. But

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about for the totality of their careers, Patrick

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>has more passing yards, more touchdowns, fewer turnovers, a higher

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>passer rating, and no, no, no, the last two years Josh

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>has had the the better numbers, and the last two

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>years they've played in the playoffs, once in Josh's building,

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>once in Patrick's. The last two years, Josh has had

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball in his hands less than five minutes remaining

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>down three points, chance to go slay the dragon, and

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the last two years the Bills have walked off the

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>field getting zero points from those drives, and the Chiefs celebrate.

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just what's happened, and uh and so

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I just people so badly want Patrick dabber peer and

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't at this point. And as far as

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>can this game change that, no could. Would the Bills

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>beating the Chiefs in the playoffs finally change that? Sure,

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but we're far a long way from it. All right,

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>let's talk MVP. Uh yeah, how far.

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that this game will go into side

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 2>in the MVP?

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Well and also another follow up on this, could the

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 3>loser still be eligible for MVP?

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean again, we do too much. It's week

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>eight or we just finished Week eight. A lot of

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>people are still eligible for MVP. You're not knocked out

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of it here. But Josh's MVP case right now to

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>me is very shaky. And listen, I was on the

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>record throughout last season that I thought at the end

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of last season he was the MVP. But right now

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:46.479
<v Speaker 1>this moment, Josh's team has a good but not great record.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's the same with Patrick. They both have five wins.

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh is, however, twentieth in the NFL in passing yards.

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>He is tied for fourteenth in the NFL in passing touchdowns.

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 1>He is ninth in the NFL in passer rating, and

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you can say, well, you know, we've got to and

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we do have to give Josh credit for the rushing

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>piece of it. So he's rushed for two hundred and

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards and has rushed for five touchdowns. The touchdowns

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>more impressive than the yards. Obviously, on that note, Josh

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 1>has not up to this point played like an MVP,

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and the point I was making earlier after he was

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable in that Ravens game, and he was unbelievable in

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins game. That was the game after the Dolphins

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>game when Mike Greenberg said he's never seen anyone play

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the position better than Josh Allen. Since those three game,

0:18:53.359 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>those opening three weeks, he's been mediocre against the same points.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Threw for two hundred yards, two touchdowns and a pick

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>against the Patriots and a loss. Threw for two touchdowns

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>or two touchdowns, one pick and two hundred and fifty

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>three yards against the Falcons and a loss. Was bad.

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Two touchdowns, two picks at seventy three rating one hundred

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and eighty yards. I against the Panthers last week, didn't

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>have to do anything, and I mean they won forty

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to nine. You don't hold it against it. He threw

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred and sixty yards.

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 4>So it is.

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Right now if we were talking NFL MVP as far

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>as not projection demons on who's going to win it,

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>but on who if the award were given out, if

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we had a mid season MVP, better candidates than Josh

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>would be Drake May, who, honestly I think would be

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the mid season MVP. I think right now this moment,

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Drake May has you could argue, has been the MVP.

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Drake has a better case. Jonathan Taylor, if we're going

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to open it up to running backs, has a better case.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 2>That's Baker.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.199
<v Speaker 3>Like I know, he got knocked out, but given the

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:27.479
<v Speaker 3>totality his his season has been equal to, if not

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 3>better than Josh Allen's.

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Up to this point. Yes, I and so the right now,

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>if again, if we're voted on right now, my my

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>top five would be Drake, Stafford, Taylor, Baker, and Patrick.

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And then I think you well, I'm going with Jonathan

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Taylor as the MVP of that team. If it's a

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback only than Daniel Jones would have to be involved.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff some would argue, and Jalen hurts. I wouldn't argue,

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but the twenty touchdowns to two turnovers something else, and

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the insane passer rating, you know, with something else. It's

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 1>just his yards are so low. It's a tough one.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But all those guys set Jalen aside because it's such

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a unique case, have stronger MVP cases at this moment

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>than Josh. Uh. All right, let's a couple more questions

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>on this.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 3>You joked on Tuesday show that if the Chiefs lost

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 3>the or won the regular season matchup, that they might

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 3>be in jeopardy to lose the postseason matchup. Are you

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:45.719
<v Speaker 3>all worried about that with his game coming up?

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's what I find really interesting. This is the

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>first time these two teams since Patrick and Josh have

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>been there are playing in the regular season with neither

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 1>one of them in first in their own division. Usually

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>both are in first. This is the only time that

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>neither's been in first. And I do feel that the

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs historically have had an edge in the playoff matchup

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 1>against Buffalo Demonse because Buffalo goes all out for that

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>regular season game and the Chiefs, to me, have a

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty vanilla game plan. They obviously want to win, and

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>they've been important games, but a pretty vanilla game plan

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and try to use that regular season game as a

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>scouting opportunity for the postseason game. I don't know that

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City or Buffalo for that matter, really has that

0:22:54.000 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>luxury this matchup because neither one of these teams say

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it again.

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I was gonna assume with folks being hurt, like

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 3>you can't get but.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, it's because both of these teams are

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>in a real divisional fight. Neither one of these teams

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>wants to be a wild card. Since Josh and Patrick

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>have been there, they've never neither one of them ever

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>has been a wild card like and so that where

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to start the postseason on the road. Both

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of these teams, I'm sure believe they are still very

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>alive for the number one seed. The Chiefs get to

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>play the Colts that. I don't think the Bills and

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Colts play each other, do They're.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Both of them are going to be going going at again.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>I would think yeah, because it's the the Chiefs lose

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this game, I mean they'll be going into Week ten

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the seven seed. The Bills lose this game, and New

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>England takes an even stronger hold on the division, so

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you it's a super important spot for both teams. And

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I am pleasantly surprised that the Chiefs are road favorites,

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 1>like we've seen the Bills come to Arrowhead and the

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Bills be road favorites. The Chiefs being road favorites with

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>what people were saying about Kansas City just four weeks ago,

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>is pretty stunning. And if you want my full pick

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>for this game tomorrow's gambling show, this will be prominently featured.

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Today's show is brought to you by our presenting sponsor,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet. Week nine football kicks off tonight with

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Ravens Dolphins. Check out these streaks from hard Rock Bets

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>stats up. You can find odds to bet on all

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>these streaks right now in the hard Rock Bet app.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry has scored a touchdown in twelve straight games

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>against AFC East opponents. I didn't know. Miami has dropped

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>twelve in a row as underdogs against the AFC. I

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that either, and that is stunning. Devon a.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Chan has reached the end zone in eight straight home games,

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and the Dolphins have failed to cover the spread in

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>seven consecutive games as an underdog following a win. All

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>of that info available in the hard Rock Bet Stats hub.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>If you still haven' dried your first bet on hard

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet, there's still time for you to get one

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets if you win. Just

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>place a five dollar bet and if it hits, you

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>get not only your winnings, but also an extra one

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets. Plus. Tonight on hard

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Rock Bet, you can get a Thursday Night profit boost

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>for the game boost your same game parlay or SGP max,

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so your bet pays extra winnings. There's new promos every day,

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>so if you're listening to this later, just open the

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>app and check out what you've got in day of

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the week. Download the hard Rock Bet app today, take

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a look around and make your first deposit. Payable and

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>bonus bets not a cash offer offered by the Seminal

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Tribe of Florida in Florida, offered by Seminal hard Rock

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Digital LLC in all other states. Must be twenty one

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois Indiana,

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concern about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight. Admit it in Indiana. If you are someone

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know as a gambling problem wants help, call one

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem called one

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia. All right, demand, let's get to Thursday night

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>football as your Ravens once again try to keep their

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>season alive.

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I didn't tune in for the show when you said this.

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Did you give us like the tackle that turned the

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 3>tide like a little bit thing?

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>No, this is the our producers being funny.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 4>So after this one, after the spectacular go ahead, go ahead,

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 4>say it, spectacular season saving snoop start, the Ravens are

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 4>two and five and Lamar Jackson is officially back and

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 4>understands that every game is a must win.

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 3>At this point, we obviously need to win this game tonight.

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 3>What do you need to see from the Ravens to

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 3>feel like we can do something in the postseason.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You've got to show that this defensive improvement's real. They

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>played way better defensively against the Rams. They played a good,

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>very good to very good defensive game against the Bears,

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and now you have a Dolphins team that seemed just dead. However,

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>last week that Dolphins team tore up the Falcons, and

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that Falcons pass defense has been good and Tua had

0:27:56.119 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns and six incompletions. Uh, they ra and the

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>ball well Waddle got off like that's the best the

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins have looked in a year. And I do part

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of the Ravens playoffs, making the playoffs. Conversation to Mons

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is part of that's about the Ravens and part of

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that's about the Steelers and the Bengals, two of the

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>worst defenses in the league, both two teams starting forty

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>year old quarterbacks, one of them is now hurt. Say

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it again.

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean we're two and five right now, we're favorites

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 3>to win the division. So yeah, it's just a lot

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 3>of us, right.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And so it's kind of we can talk about the

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Ravens just by being mediocre, might be able to find

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a way to eight wins, and eight wins could win

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the division. And if you're and we can throw up

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens schedule. If you are a Raven supporter, you

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>have to feel like we are going to win our

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>next four Tonight at Miami, then on extra rest at

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota and JJ McCarthy, then at Cleveland and Dylan Gabriel

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>or Shadoor or whomever, and then home for the Jets.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You've got to feel like we are going to be

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>six and five going into our stretch run of four

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>divisional games, two against Cincy, two against Pittsburgh, plus New

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>England and Green Bay. So that is the math on

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens finding a way to make the playoffs. The

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>logic demands on the Ravens actually being dangerous in the playoffs.

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Involves the defense having a second half of the season

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>turnaround similar to last year, and we'll see if they

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>can do it. As far as tonight, tonight's a weird

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>spot because we have so little regard for Miami that

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it feels like any short of a thirty to ten

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>bludgeoning is going to feel unimpressive. Like, if you really

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>want to feel good about Baltimore, Lamar in his first

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>game back in a month, has to look sharp, and

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, the defense has to look excellent, Like, of

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>course you would take a twenty eight to twenty four win,

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think you'd feel great about it, if

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense.

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I mean I understand they just locked up

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the Falcons or they did what they needed to do

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 3>against the Falcons, but it would be a letdown if

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Miami came to hug around with the Ravens, given how

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 3>their season is gone.

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And let me throw another scenario at you of something

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially coming down the tracks here. Okay, let's just say

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that in these three games this weekend, the Vegas favorite holds. Okay,

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So the Patriots, who this weekend they're I mean they're

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>playing who are favored against the Falcons. The Patriots win,

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Ravens, who are playing the Dolphins tonight, the

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Ravens win. And the Chiefs, who are playing the Bills,

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs win. Okay, And I'll go ahead and add

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>again if we're just doing the Vegas favorites hold. The

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Colts who are hosting the Steelers at the Steelers. The

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Colts win, and we're staring at going into week ten,

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens are three and five. The Steelers have fallen

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to four and four. The Patriots have improved to seven

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and two, while the Bills have fallen to five and three.

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You would be staring at the very real possibility that

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the Buffalo Bills win eleven or twelve games and are

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the number one wild card in the AFC. And the

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve and five Buffalo Bills first playoff game is on

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the road at the number four seed, the worst record

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of any divisional champ and they are on the road

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at the nine and eight Baltimore Ravens, and Josh versus

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar in Baltimore is game one of the post is

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the you know, opening AFC crazy game crazy. But now

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>let me say something else. Let's say the Bills beat

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs this weekend and the Chiefs fall to four

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and four, they are then potentially looking at a wild

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>card and maybe they would have to go to Baltimore

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in the first playoff in the wildcard.

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Run, Well, that'd be good for Lamar.

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if we beat either one of those teams

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 3>going out the first round, I mean, that's the super crazy,

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 3>that's the super Bowl, I mean.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And so it's just if we assume the AFC North

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>winner is going to be eight or nine wins at

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this point, they are going to be hosting a really

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>good wild card team, because the best wildcard team is

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>either going to be Bills or Patriots or whomever comes

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in second in the AFC West. So Chiefs Bronco's Chargers, Like,

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a hell of a potential Round one matchup. All right.

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of the AFC West, we've got Denver facing off

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>against Houston.

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Two of the most unstoppable defenses are going head to

0:33:54.840 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 3>head this Sunday. The Broncos are playing Houston. We've seen

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 3>the last five quarters Broncos football, but somebody's been pretty

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 3>skeptical and kind of called the positioning that they're in

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 3>right now, we're gonna play it.

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We got a sound bite, got a sound bite, you guys,

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>all right, let me hear it. I think there is

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance the Broncos start like four and two, and

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm dealing with a lot of chirping because they go Titans, Colts, Chargers, Bengals, Eagles,

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>really tough, Jets, Giants, Cowboys. How many games that was that? Eight?

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>That's eight games? So I think they you know what,

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they might be able to even start six

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and two.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Don't care, Wow, I mean you kindled it, I.

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 1>See, but I didn't. I thought that in that clip

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I had said they might start five and three. I

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't know I said they might start six and two.

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>That makes me feel even better. Yeah, let's pave that

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>for a potential Broncos spiral. Uh.

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 3>You love that so so you're standing on it.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 2>You don't, You don't feel differently.

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>This is what I'm gonna say. Bon Nicks has been

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>awesome in the last five quarters. YEA, the fourth quarter

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Giants, which might have just wrecked the entire

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Giant season, and the whole game against Dallas, which obviously

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I got Stone wrong. That Dallas game, he's looked great.

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 1>If he plays anywhere close to that level, that team's awesome.

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>They lead the league in sacks and they allow the

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>few of sacks. The defense is great. Now, Sir Tans injury,

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>uh is a real one, and he's going to be

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>out a month and that's significant. But I do think

0:35:55.800 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Broncos Texans is a really good bone test because the Texans,

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for all their struggles, have a great defense, and if

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Bow looks now, I think the Broncos could win that

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>game in theory without Bowl looking good. And because I

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>think the Broncos defense. Yeah, I mean this such a mess,

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>right and so and Tunsl's injured Like that's a oh

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Tunsall's not on that team anymore. He is injured, but

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 1>he's on the Commanders, So ignore that piece of it.

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:36.720
<v Speaker 1>But the so, I think this could be an ugly

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen to thirteen game. But if bow looks good against Houston,

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>all have to take them far more seriously. I find

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>it very interesting that Vegas has no respect right now

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for Denver. The fact that they're one and a half

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>point dogs against the Texans team that's looked decent once

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>all year is really noteworthy to me.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 2>And so go the loss.

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 3>With the loss, Houston would drop to three and five

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 3>if they lost, Should they start selling some stuff with

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 3>the deadline?

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I think that's a good take. The if they win,

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>they're in it, like this is a fork in the

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 1>road game for Houston where they and Houston's weird because

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>their wins have been dominant wins. They shut out the Titans,

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they beat the thirty four, they handled the Niners easily

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 1>last week, and their losses have been frustrating, like five

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>points to the Rams, one point to the Bucks, touchdown

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Jags. The Seahawks game only eight, but they

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 1>were dominated in that game. They after the Broncos, they

0:37:56.480 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 1>have two divisional games Jags and Titans before the schedule

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>gets real. Tough Bill's Colts Chiefs. So Houston could be

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>an AFC playoff spoiler as far as making the playoffs,

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but they have to win this game in order to

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>do that. All right, let's go to Patriots Falcons.

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 2>So the MVP race.

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 3>We talked about this a little bit earlier, but it's

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 3>down to three guys, Mahomes, Allen, and Drake May.

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:24.160
<v Speaker 2>May and the Patriots are going.

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Up against the Falcons, and it seems like they haven't

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 3>exactly but on everybody's radar. But do you think that

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 3>this game has the potential to kind of put May

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 3>and the Patriots on everybody's radar.

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>For sure? And I I understand Mahomes, Allen and Drake

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>are right now the three MVP favorites. I do I

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>think at the midway point of the season, we can't say, like,

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just these three guys. I think the

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 1>MVP race can evolve over the course of the year.

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 1>And I right now, I you know, Stafford has a

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>great case, a great case and to me a far

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>better case than Josh Allen. Drake May has a great case.

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>And when you're a great quarterback and Drake May might

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>be that year two is not too early to be awesome.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And Lamar won an MVP in year two. Patrick won

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl second year as a starter. Burrow went

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Super Bowl second year as a starter. Russell

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Wilson won the Super Bowl second year as a starter.

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Like year two, you can be great already, and the

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Drake May has been since Week one, playing the position

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>as well as anybody in the league now. So I

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the Patriots are better than the Colts. I

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>think the Patriots are the third most dangerous team in

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the AFC. I think it was Chiefs, Bills, Pats, but

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they right now have that universal respect

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to your point, Demon's so yeah, I I think that

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be hard for them to get it, only

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>because they don't play anybody like all year long. They

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 1>already had the easiest schedule up to this point in

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the season, and they have the second easiest schedule remaining.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>They have I think, you know, three games left that

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>can be statement games at the Bucks home for the

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Bills and at the Ravens. Everything is the rest of

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it is Falcons, Bengals, Jets, Giants, Jets, Dolphins. So the

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Patriots should have a really, really good record. This is

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons I picked them to make the playoffs.

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 1>And credit to them that post Buffalo, they've really taken

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>care of business. Beat the Saints in a game that's

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>probably closer than they liked, and then blew out the

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Titans and blew out the Browns, and at Leana, I

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>just can't get a beat on whatsoever. Such a weird team.

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, you ever notice how everything keeps going up?

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Vents going up, Streaming services are going up. Favorite burrito

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>spots charge an extra for Salza. Boost Mobile, though you

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and your phone bill, don't have to play the will

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>this go up soon?

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Game?

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Why because boost Mobile has an unlimited talk, text and

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>data plan at a price that'll never go up. In fact,

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>same price you pay for life. So switch now for

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>unlimited wireless at a price that'll never go up. Only

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:28.720
<v Speaker 1>at boost Mobile. After thirty gigs, customers may experience low speeds.

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Customers will pay twenty dollars per month as long as

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they remain active on the Boost unlimited plan. All right, demons,

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:40.400
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Vikings Lions quickly.

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:43.919
<v Speaker 3>So the throwing JJ McCarthy in the fire, they kind

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 3>of did that soft benching and had him on the sideline.

0:41:46.880 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 3>And now he's facing the Detroit coming off a buye

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 3>with a paid Aiden Hutchinson who just signed a massive deal.

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:55.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you think this game is gonna look like?

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Detroit's gonna annihilate them. And I think that

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings are in real trouble. They clearly did not

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>want to play JJ until he was fully healthy. That

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>ankle's frame took a long time. They trotted Carson Wentz

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>out there week after week even though he was injured.

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that you know JJ McCarthy, we've seen

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>him play two games in the NFL in two years,

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's played one good quarter. Now again, the sample

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>size is nothing, and they have good weapons. But if

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm the Vikings, I'm very nervous about the way this

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>season could unravel on me. And I think it's already

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of unraveling.

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 3>And you see, I think Carson Wentz is gone, by

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:45.359
<v Speaker 3>the way, So it's it's just it's just JJ hare

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 3>right now right?

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>No, yeah, I mean Carson Wentz had surgery, like Carson

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Wentz is out for the year. Uh, but getting blown

0:42:55.160 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>out like you did by the Chargers is really disconcerting.

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And they their wins this year. They beat the Bears

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:08.279
<v Speaker 1>in Week one. In the game they were outplayed, but

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>JJ had that great fourth quarter. They beat the Bengals

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>by a million in Week three in the first game

0:43:14.600 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>without Burrow, and they beat the Browns in Week five

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>on a touchdown with twenty five seconds left. Was that

0:43:25.160 --> 0:43:29.279
<v Speaker 1>a London game? I'm trying to remember. Was that a

0:43:29.320 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 1>London game? I feel like that was a London game.

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that was up early in the morning,

0:43:36.239 --> 0:43:41.439
<v Speaker 1>London game, the Vikings, Vikings Browns. It was a London game.

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the Lions are gonna absolutely put

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it on them, and that might show up in tomorrow's

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>pick show. All right, demand they want me to do

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a Halloween bit.

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what they are Halloween version of writ ends.

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 3>We haven't done this in a while. We're bringing it

0:43:57.000 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 3>back from the dead, back from the tombstone Halloween bit.

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 3>So it's time for you to fill in the blanks

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 3>on the scariest team in the NFL, oh crap, scariest

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 3>team in the NFL, the scariest players in the NFL

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:11.960
<v Speaker 3>is and the scariest move a team could make it

0:44:12.000 --> 0:44:13.839
<v Speaker 3>the trade deadline would be.

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:19.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, the scariest team in the NFL. The scariest

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>team in the NFL is obviously the Chiefs, and the

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>scariest player is obviously Mahomes. So let me do non Chiefs.

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it just is like that's just it's not

0:44:27.960 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>even debatable, So let me do non Chiefs. The scariest

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>non Chiefs team in the NFL right now is the Packers,

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.280
<v Speaker 1>because if Jordan Love keeps up this level of play,

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that defense can be so good, and he's getting his

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>weapons back, their ceiling is crazy high. The scariest player

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL right now, I'm going to give again

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 1>non Mahomes category to Jonathan Taylor because it just seems

0:44:56.840 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>like he can pop for sixty yards at any given time,

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and that Colts offense has been unstoppable because of it.

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>The scariest move a team could make it the deadline

0:45:10.640 --> 0:45:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for me would be the Patriots trading for AJ Brown

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:24.320
<v Speaker 1>reuniting AJ with Mike Vrabel giving Drake May a legitimate

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>number one and really going for it. So those are

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.280
<v Speaker 1>my answers there. All right, let's do some listener questions

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 1>real quick.

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Scott asked, why didn't you go to Toronto for the World

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Series in the Buffalo game?

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>That that would be a nice weekend.

0:45:37.640 --> 0:45:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would have been sick. I'm not gonna

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that is true. Going up to Toronto tomorrow night for

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Game six and then seeing a potential Game seven, and

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>then on the way back home stopping by Buffalo for

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs bills. That would have been awesome.

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Stadium? Would you Yeah, it'd be bad.

0:45:57.320 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>It'd be bad. Yeah, I'd legit neate like Fox Security.

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:02.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, for sure.

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:05.280
<v Speaker 1>What's Stefan's question?

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 2>Uh?

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Stefan asked, can we get your trade deadline?

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Wishless for the Chiefs?

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I've wanted a chan for a while. It doesn't

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 1>look like they're trading him. I the Chiefs have been

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:22.439
<v Speaker 1>adamant they're not adding a running back. I'd still call

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 1>about Camara, but I think they're more likely to go

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 1>after a D lineman, particularly with the second round pick

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>Omar Norman Lott tearing his acl Let's go to.

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Indy Indie ask, is passer rating becoming overrated? Mahomes passer

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 3>rating in twenty eighteen was one thirteen point eight and

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 3>that was one of the best seasons in NFL history.

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Right now, Jalen Hurts is a better rating than that

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:48.760
<v Speaker 3>at one fourteen point four.

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing. The new style of play, which

0:46:53.520 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is shorter passes, very very good at a void interceptions

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and super high completion percentage kind of cracks the passer

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>rating code and it's made it. I agree, like it

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is insane that the number of guys that have a

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>passer rating above one oh five just totally nuts. And

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>so I still think it's a good metric, but it's

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:26.400
<v Speaker 1>not good to compare era over ERA at this point

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:33.280
<v Speaker 1>because to your point, to the uh, the questioner's point,

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the Indy, the no, no, no, the oh yeah the questioner, Indy,

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the high completion percentage low mistake but not a lot

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of boom plays is kind of a hack for passer rating,

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:49.759
<v Speaker 1>the way being a good rebounder is a hack for

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.720
<v Speaker 1>player efficiency rating in the NFL or in the NBA.

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, reminder, everybody like rate subscribe review huge thank

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you to Volume into Blue Duck and as always to

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>our wonderful sponsors, Harder that boost and of course Zen.

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:05.479
<v Speaker 1>We are back tomorrow with our Week nine can't believe

0:48:05.520 --> 0:48:07.799
<v Speaker 1>it's Week nine, Our Week nine gambling show, What's Right