Speaker 1: Good morning, peeps, and welcome to Woke f Daily with
Speaker 1: Meet your Girl Danielle Moody reporting live from the Brooklyn
Speaker 1: Bunker today. I'm very excited to welcome back to Woke
Speaker 1: after an extended conversation our friend Ellie Mistol, who is
Speaker 1: a justice correspondent for the Nation, and of course you
Speaker 1: see him blowing full fire and truth on MSNBCC, SPAN
Speaker 1: and other outlets you know. Today I bring him on
Speaker 1: because I am moving to a place where I want
Speaker 1: Merrick Garland gone. I want full campaigns aimed at the administration,
Speaker 1: aimed at Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to
Speaker 1: get him out of the Department of Justice. Garland has
Speaker 1: had ten months, ten months to begin an investigation into
Speaker 1: one six to alert the public to the fact that
Speaker 1: it wasn't just a mantra that no one is above
Speaker 1: the law, but that he was going to see to
Speaker 1: it that no one was above the law, and that
Speaker 1: those responsible for trying to overthrow our government on January sixth,
Speaker 1: all of those involved, including from the President of the
Speaker 1: United States his entire fucking cabinet, to the insurrectionist members
Speaker 1: of Congress, to the motherfuckers that defecated on the floor
Speaker 1: of the Capitol building, that these people would be arrested. Right,
Speaker 1: It's been ten fucking months and only a handful of
Speaker 1: people have gotten light sentences for trying to overthrow our government.
Speaker 1: You have Condeliza Rice going on television last week saying
Speaker 1: that America wants to turn the page. No, they do not. Actually,
Speaker 1: everyone wants to know that the page is not being
Speaker 1: turned on our democracy. Americans want to know that they
Speaker 1: can have faith in the institutions right that are supposed
Speaker 1: to safeguard them from authoritarianism and fascism, that are supposed
Speaker 1: to safeguard them from other insurrections and coups that we
Speaker 1: are seeing happen all around the fucking globe. You know,
Speaker 1: you think that you watch the news and you see
Speaker 1: what is happening in these other countries, and you think
Speaker 1: to yourself, oh, that could never happen here. And you know,
Speaker 1: the only difference between them and us is that we
Speaker 1: are supposed to have systems of accountability. We are supposed
Speaker 1: to have free and fair elections. We are supposed to
Speaker 1: have representatives that put their country ahead of their party.
Speaker 1: But time and time again, over the last several years,
Speaker 1: we are seeing that that is not the case. And
Speaker 1: not only that, but when we ushered in a new
Speaker 1: administration that we also thought that we were voting for change,
Speaker 1: that we were voting for accountability. Wasn't enough to just
Speaker 1: say that Joe Biden wasn't going to be Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: We wanted him to be better, and we wanted him
Speaker 1: to hold Donald Trump accountable, to make an example of
Speaker 1: him so that it would be known that you try
Speaker 1: an attempt to overthrow and thwart our democracy, We're coming
Speaker 1: for you. But that's not what we're seeing, is it.
Speaker 1: There were two major articles that have come out, one
Speaker 1: in the Rolling Stones and another one in the Washington Post,
Speaker 1: both being done by investigative reporters that are uncovering through
Speaker 1: contact with both planners and people who were present during
Speaker 1: the insurrection about how they had not one, not two,
Speaker 1: but multiple meetings with members of Congress, multiple meetings with
Speaker 1: White House staff. Where do you think that the people
Speaker 1: got these plans in the Capitol building and knew exactly
Speaker 1: where to go? I have been saying this since the beginning.
Speaker 1: I worked on Capitol Hill right for many years. Even
Speaker 1: I don't know my way around all of the intricate
Speaker 1: turns and what have you. Indoors that are not marked,
Speaker 1: but they knew what doors to go into. They knew
Speaker 1: where Whip Clyburn's capital office was as opposed to his
Speaker 1: regular Congressional office, and how to get there. So these
Speaker 1: are the people that have been called out in the
Speaker 1: Rolling Stones article. Paul Gosser, who is a representative from Arizona.
Speaker 1: Now Paul Gosser. According to these two insurrectionists who the
Speaker 1: Rolling Stones has been in contact with, have said that
Speaker 1: when they spoke with his office and staff multiple times,
Speaker 1: that he talked about dangling and presenting them with blanket pardons. Right,
Speaker 1: providing people with blanket pardons. Just do our bidding, right,
Speaker 1: hang the vice president, do whatever needs to be done
Speaker 1: in order to keep Trump in office. You're doing your
Speaker 1: patriotic duty and we'll have your back. That's what Paul
Speaker 1: Gosser apparently was telling insurrectionists that he met with. Right.
Speaker 1: Then you have Lauren Bobert. You have Moe Brooks, who
Speaker 1: is already being sued. Right if you remember, he is
Speaker 1: being sued by another member of Congress for his involvement
Speaker 1: and his speech at the insurrection. Remember that Moe Brooks
Speaker 1: if I'm not if I'm remembering correctly, was the one
Speaker 1: that decided that he was going to attend the rally
Speaker 1: with body armor on underneath his clothes so that he
Speaker 1: could be, you know, quote ready for anything. He's being
Speaker 1: sued by Eric Swalwell. Then you have Madison Cawthorne, you
Speaker 1: have Andy Biggs, and you have Representative go mart Those
Speaker 1: are just the handful whose names. And by the way,
Speaker 1: these are people who also, following the insurrection, still voted
Speaker 1: to decertify the election. So we knew that these people
Speaker 1: have been involved. Where are the FBI investigations into them?
Speaker 1: Where's the DOJ's indictments? Not to mention the fact that
Speaker 1: these people in the Rolling Stones article also said that
Speaker 1: they met with Mark Meadows. We also know that there
Speaker 1: was a war room that was put together that Steve Bannon,
Speaker 1: John Eastman, Rudy Giuliani and others had activated at the
Speaker 1: Willard Hotel. So how is it that we have all
Speaker 1: of this investigative reporting, all of this information that is
Speaker 1: now being disseminated through our media streams, and yet I
Speaker 1: hear nothing coming out of the Department of Justice. We
Speaker 1: hear no indictments, and it's been ten goddamn months. You
Speaker 1: don't even hear this administration speaking in candid terms every
Speaker 1: single day about how justice will prevail and that we
Speaker 1: will ensure that the intended coup, or, as Bill Maher
Speaker 1: has said, this slow moving coup. Because here's the thing, folks,
Speaker 1: it's still actually unfolding and they are winning. That's the reality.
Speaker 1: They have already implemented hundreds of vote of suppression laws,
Speaker 1: They have installed new secretaries of States or getting ready to.
Speaker 1: They are running for school board and city council. They
Speaker 1: are doing everything that they can to make sure that
Speaker 1: once Democrats lose, because they will, because that's what Democrats
Speaker 1: are good at, its fucking losing any bit of power
Speaker 1: that the people give them because they're too busy trying
Speaker 1: to As my favorite movie says, the American president, too
Speaker 1: busy trying to hold onto their jobs instead of actually
Speaker 1: doing their fucking jobs. So whose problem is it going
Speaker 1: to be when Democrats lose in twenty twenty two and
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy takes the gavel from Nancy Pelosi? Where do
Speaker 1: you think they're going to be turning their investigations too?
Speaker 1: It's sure as fuck isn't going to be the insurrection.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what they're going to do. They're going
Speaker 1: to turn the investigations over to Afghanistan and turn that
Speaker 1: into Biden's Benghazi. That they are going to open up
Speaker 1: investigations into their political opponents in the same way that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was and wanted the Department of Justice to
Speaker 1: do on his behalf. And then when they regain the
Speaker 1: Senate and Mitch McConnell once again picks up the gavel,
Speaker 1: what do you think is going to be the number
Speaker 1: one thing on his mind? Oh, probably ending the filibuster.
Speaker 1: But he doesn't give a shit. He'll blow up whatever
Speaker 1: he needs to blow up in order to block justices
Speaker 1: from being sat so that he can finish the ransacking
Speaker 1: of America's judicial system. Folks. The writing is on the wall,
Speaker 1: and it is so fucking obvious to me what is happening.
Speaker 1: And all I can think of is is this Department
Speaker 1: of Justice in cahoots? Right? Like is Merritt Garland on
Speaker 1: the Joe Mansion and Kirsten Cinema train. And I'm not
Speaker 1: just throwing out bullshit theories, folks, but I have to
Speaker 1: ask for people who have spent their lives inside of
Speaker 1: the government system, inside of the justice system. How is
Speaker 1: it that you can be so so absolutely blind to
Speaker 1: what is happening in front of you. How is it
Speaker 1: that you can decide that you want to preserve institutions
Speaker 1: instead of the integrity of our democracy. How is it
Speaker 1: that we're the only ones woke f nation that is
Speaker 1: seeing the urgency of this moment, and nobody that is
Speaker 1: actually at the lever of power is doing anything about it.
Speaker 1: This is the conversation that I'm going to be happening
Speaker 1: with our friend Ellie Mistole coming up next, And folks,
Speaker 1: I want to know how you are feeling, and I'm
Speaker 1: going to be asking this every single day. Tell me
Speaker 1: what you are thinking about the moves or non moves
Speaker 1: that Merritt Garland has been making. And is it time?
Speaker 1: Is it time that we say we need another ag
Speaker 1: that this one is not it? You know, you would
Speaker 1: think that after having been denied a hearing to become
Speaker 1: the next Supreme Court justice, that Merritt Garland would understand
Speaker 1: what we are up against, that there would be some
Speaker 1: fire in his belly, and yet there is none. Coming
Speaker 1: up next is my conversation with our friend Ellie Misto. Folks,
Speaker 1: I am always so excited when I get to welcome
Speaker 1: back my friend and yours, Ellie Misto, who is the
Speaker 1: Justice correspondent for the nation and one of the most
Speaker 1: brilliant folks to go on television to tell us about
Speaker 1: our impending doom as it pertains to, you know, the
Speaker 1: fact that we don't have a Department of Justice that
Speaker 1: is working on behalf of enforcing what is that justice?
Speaker 1: An accountability and responsibility as it pertains to pretty much
Speaker 1: any god damn thing. Ellie, you've been doing your rounds.
Speaker 1: You have been MSNBC batten people down on c SPAN.
Speaker 1: I want to start with a article that came out
Speaker 1: from The Rolling Stones, which was basically an investigative piece
Speaker 1: covering two different participants and planners for the insurrection on
Speaker 1: one six who are have identified not one, not two,
Speaker 1: not three, but five different members of Congress that they
Speaker 1: say that they were in contact with as they were
Speaker 1: planning the insurrection. Not only that, but also talked about
Speaker 1: the fact that Paul Gosser, Republican from Arizona, was dangling
Speaker 1: around a pardon, a blanket pardon to those that were
Speaker 1: planning and working on behalf of the Trump administration, as
Speaker 1: well as said that they met with Mark Meadows. What
Speaker 1: did you make of this Rolling Stones investigative article and
Speaker 1: where we are right now with regard to persecuting everyone
Speaker 1: involved in trying to overthrow our government ten months ago. Yeah, Look,
Speaker 1: my first reaction was I told you so. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: that this was an inside job was obvious the entire time.
Speaker 1: There are lots of different ways that we can skin
Speaker 1: that pant. But when you look at not just the
Speaker 1: permissiveness of the Capitol Police, but when you look at
Speaker 1: how the rioters and insurrectionists knew exactly where we got. Remember,
Speaker 1: they ransacked the Parliamentarian's office. The Parliamentarian's office is one
Speaker 1: of those places that you can't get to unless you've
Speaker 1: been there already. That's not on anybody's you know, like
Speaker 1: general map of Capitol Hill. They had to know where
Speaker 1: to go. They had to know what they were looking
Speaker 1: for in the Parliamentarian's office. And that's just one example.
Speaker 1: They're all these, they're all there. There are other examples,
Speaker 1: you know. Jim Clyburn always bumps out to me where
Speaker 1: he talks about how they didn't go to his office,
Speaker 1: which is kind of well signed and very close to
Speaker 1: the entrance where they broke through. They didn't go to
Speaker 1: his well signed office. They went to some back office
Speaker 1: place where Cliburne usually works out of Only other congress
Speaker 1: people and their staffs would know that, no Rando insurrection.
Speaker 1: This would know that. So we already knew they had
Speaker 1: inside help, and we were already pretty sure who it was.
Speaker 1: Paul Gosser has been one of their biggest defenders since
Speaker 1: the attack. Neanderthal. Tara Green has been out front defending
Speaker 1: these people. We already know both Brooks told them to
Speaker 1: go to the Capitol to fight. Like, we already knew
Speaker 1: who these people were, and so it's not entirely surprising
Speaker 1: that now we have evidence that we have the testimony
Speaker 1: that they had help. Is disappointing to me is that
Speaker 1: this is coming out of the January sixth Commission, not
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice, that is where we need these
Speaker 1: investigations to be headed. Look, the January sixth Sunk Committee.
Speaker 1: That's nice, that that's great. Congress has a role in oversight.
Speaker 1: They have a role in legislating, understanding what happened and
Speaker 1: how it happened, and what laws we might need to
Speaker 1: pass to make sure it doesn't happen again that is
Speaker 1: totally and completely within the powers of Congress. The Department
Speaker 1: of Justice is where we go to get justice. The
Speaker 1: Department of Justice is where we go to get punishment.
Speaker 1: The Department of Justice is where we go to get
Speaker 1: accountability for the crimes that these people committed. And we
Speaker 1: don't see the Department of Justice taking a leading role
Speaker 1: in punishing criminals and their co conspirators. You know, I
Speaker 1: was one of those people. I would argue, probably you know,
Speaker 1: around the first quarter of this administration, saying that we
Speaker 1: needed to give folks time, right, because they were coming
Speaker 1: into a burning building with one fire extinguisher and every
Speaker 1: single room was on fire, and so we needed a
Speaker 1: moment to give folks a beat in order to get
Speaker 1: themselves together. It's been ten goddamn months, right, It's been
Speaker 1: ten months, and what we have seen out of this
Speaker 1: Justice Department is that Merritt Garland is an institutionalist that,
Speaker 1: during his time of having his own Supreme Court seat denied, right,
Speaker 1: that he still believes somehow that you know, Republicans are
Speaker 1: there to do their job, and you know that everybody
Speaker 1: is above board and we just have to you know,
Speaker 1: tighten a few screws in the Justice Department as opposed
Speaker 1: to Oh, I don't know get to the root of
Speaker 1: the root of how the Justice Department was used as
Speaker 1: an arm in and extension of the Trump administration. So
Speaker 1: my question here is that we have all of these
Speaker 1: investigative journalists, right, we have, you know, this kind of
Speaker 1: toothless one six commission. What if I mean, are we
Speaker 1: out of time? Like do you think that the Justice
Speaker 1: Department is working behind the scenes and then we're going
Speaker 1: to come out with a parade of indictments that we've
Speaker 1: been waiting for or is this just are we at
Speaker 1: this point frankly hopeless and only can understand that maybe
Speaker 1: I don't know, the DC District Attorney will decide to
Speaker 1: investigate these members that were named in the Rolling Stones
Speaker 1: article if the Department of Justice does not, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't want to say we're out of time, because
Speaker 1: there's always sign for dust. There's always sign for dust.
Speaker 1: But it does not appear to me that the Justice
Speaker 1: Department is working in secret. One of the ways that
Speaker 1: I know that is if you look at what's happening
Speaker 1: with Steve Bannon. Steve Bannon was a poenied by the
Speaker 1: House Select Committee. He refused to answer this poenots because
Speaker 1: Steve n is a lawless asshole, so he refused to
Speaker 1: comply with those subpoenas. The House then held him in
Speaker 1: content or sorry, voted to refer a criminal content, proceeding
Speaker 1: back to the Justice Department, which now has the option
Speaker 1: of going forward and charging Steve Bannon. You know what
Speaker 1: I didn't say in all that explanation about Steve Bannon.
Speaker 1: I didn't say that Steve Bannon is in jail because
Speaker 1: they aint because he hasn't been subpoena by the Justice Department. Right,
Speaker 1: So like if you if you defy a congressional subpoena,
Speaker 1: this is the process. It goes to the vote, and
Speaker 1: we have this and then we wait for it. If
Speaker 1: you defy a subpoena from the FBI, which is part
Speaker 1: of the Justice Department, you go to jail. You do
Speaker 1: not pass go you do not collect two hundred dollars
Speaker 1: from the Mercer family. You just go to jail. So,
Speaker 1: if Steve Bannon had been subpoena, had been investigated by
Speaker 1: the FBI and was pulling these shenanigans, he'd already had
Speaker 1: his gin soap at in jail, right, So That's what
Speaker 1: we don't see. We don't see people like Steve Bannon
Speaker 1: being in jail. We don't see that people like Mark
Speaker 1: Meadows have had documents or testimony requested for them from
Speaker 1: the FBI. If you want to find out who planned this,
Speaker 1: and you're the FBI, there's no way to do it
Speaker 1: without talking to Bannon and Mark Meadows and Kayley and
Speaker 1: you know that whole team. There's no way to do
Speaker 1: it without talking to those people. There's no way to
Speaker 1: do it without talking in a Donald Trump here, There's
Speaker 1: no way to do it without talking to mob Brooks.
Speaker 1: There's no way to do it without talking to Rudy Jillian.
Speaker 1: And yet we see that these people have not been
Speaker 1: interviewed by the FBI, which tells me that the Justice
Speaker 1: Department is doing nothing. And so is there going to
Speaker 1: be some day later in the future where they decide
Speaker 1: to do something. That's still a possibility. But from where
Speaker 1: I sit, I do not see the evidence of the
Speaker 1: Justice Department doing anything to prosecute those who are powerful. Look,
Speaker 1: they're willing to find the book it, you know, dude
Speaker 1: with the horse, all right, They're willing to go prosecute
Speaker 1: and with cattle pride, I get like, but people have
Speaker 1: to understand this is really one of the one of
Speaker 1: the bigger things. This is one of the things that
Speaker 1: distinguishes good prosecutors from bad prosecutors. Right. Look, I don't
Speaker 1: have any length of prosecutors. And let's be honest, right
Speaker 1: we look, there are good prosecutors. And one of the
Speaker 1: things about good prosecutors is that they will go after
Speaker 1: the powerful people responsibul. One of the things about bad
Speaker 1: prosecutors is that they only go after the low hanging fruit,
Speaker 1: the people who are easy to convict. Right, So it's like,
Speaker 1: it's the difference between, you know, difference between prosecuting body
Speaker 1: from the wire versus prosecuting stringer Bell. Right, Bodi is
Speaker 1: a hopper, he has no power in the system. It's
Speaker 1: easy to go find him and put him in jail.
Speaker 1: Prosecuting the kingpins, that's hard, and that's what a good
Speaker 1: prosecutor will do. They will do what is hard. They
Speaker 1: will take the challenge of bringing accountabilities too. The powerful
Speaker 1: Merritt Garland has shown no desire to do that now
Speaker 1: and not back when he was a prosecutor before people
Speaker 1: used when when Garlin was announced, I was not a
Speaker 1: fan but other people were and they were like, oh, look,
Speaker 1: he's strong on terrorism. He went and got Timothy mcveay.
Speaker 1: Timothy McVay, the Oklahoma Simy bomber, he planted the bomb.
Speaker 1: That's that's easy. That's I mean, it's not. I don't
Speaker 1: want to say it's easy in a flippant way, but
Speaker 1: from a prosecutorial perspective, getting the person who did the
Speaker 1: thing is easy. Getting the person who planned the thing,
Speaker 1: getting the co conspiras, getting the finance seer, that's hard.
Speaker 1: And that's not something that we've seen Garland. Do you know.
Speaker 1: Here's my problem, Ellie, is that one. I think first
Speaker 1: of all, when Biden decided to choose Merritt Garland, I
Speaker 1: thought that it was because I'm not a person like
Speaker 1: yourself who is inside of the justice system and knows
Speaker 1: these good people. From that I just thought that basically,
Speaker 1: if you had been snubbed for three hundred and sixty
Speaker 1: five days in getting a hearing, then maybe you would have,
Speaker 1: you know, a bone to pick with the party that
Speaker 1: denied you a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court. That
Speaker 1: being said, this toothlessness from this Department of Justice, tell
Speaker 1: us how explain how dangerous. This non move move by
Speaker 1: the Justice Department to not take action against these people
Speaker 1: is right now, not politically right, but in the sheer
Speaker 1: like understanding that our democracy is not hanging on by
Speaker 1: a thread like our democracy. In my humble opinion, people
Speaker 1: listen to wokaf on a regular fucking basis it you
Speaker 1: need to pull the plug. I don't believe that there
Speaker 1: is a resuscitation here without aggressive action, and we see
Speaker 1: no one that is actually aggressively taking any action of Note,
Speaker 1: you thought that that girl was going to come in
Speaker 1: for revenge. You didn't realize he was all about reconciliation,
Speaker 1: right Like, that's like Garland doesn't want that soil doesn't
Speaker 1: have that heat. The problem, and if I may put
Speaker 1: on my Sarah Kensan or hat, the problem is that
Speaker 1: when you try a coup and it failed and nothing
Speaker 1: happens to you, you try again. That's about hyperbole, hyperberly,
Speaker 1: that is history. The history of failed coups is when
Speaker 1: the people who planned it don't get punished. They try
Speaker 1: and try and try until they succeed overthrowing the government.
Speaker 1: So the stakes are no less than that. The violet
Speaker 1: over the throw of our government was planned and attempted
Speaker 1: it failed the first time. Either the people who attempted
Speaker 1: it and failed get punished for that, get dissuaded from
Speaker 1: trying that again, or they try it again and maybe
Speaker 1: next time it'll work, and they keep trying until it works.
Speaker 1: That's that's where we are. And the Garland and the
Speaker 1: Fundant administration doesn't seem to understand that, doesn't seem to
Speaker 1: get that. You know, my my, I've got family, you know,
Speaker 1: from all the world. The big part of my ancestry
Speaker 1: goes back to goes back to Haiti, a country that
Speaker 1: often struggles with democracy. And one of the things that
Speaker 1: you know, my my parents and my uncle have always
Speaker 1: told me is that one of the worst things about
Speaker 1: America is that it's never lost its democracy, so it
Speaker 1: has no idea how to defend it because it doesn't
Speaker 1: think it needs defending. You know, all these other advanced,
Speaker 1: you know, Western style democracies, they've gone through a period
Speaker 1: where they ain't got no democracy. They've gone through a
Speaker 1: period where where democracy was taken away from them. You know,
Speaker 1: in England, they were bolted against the king and chopped
Speaker 1: off Charles's head and you know, sixteen whatever, and then
Speaker 1: the king came back and lost it, you know, and
Speaker 1: it took them another couple hundred years to really get
Speaker 1: rid of their kings said that they're gotten rid of it.
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm gonna go on and say they've gotten
Speaker 1: rid of it. You know, no offense to Queen Elizabeth Um,
Speaker 1: you know, but that's that happened in England, That's happened
Speaker 1: in you know, countries in the West Indies, that's happened
Speaker 1: in countries in South America. They've had it, they've lost it,
Speaker 1: They've had to go get it back. That's the SI
Speaker 1: fans in America. We've never lost it, and so we
Speaker 1: have this unearned belief that we can't lose it. And
Speaker 1: so right now when it is being threatened, we are
Speaker 1: not fighting for it, we are not defending it. We
Speaker 1: have no clue how and you know, that's really troubling
Speaker 1: if you want to keep it. You know, one of
Speaker 1: the prevailing statements that is being made both by Democrats
Speaker 1: and by Republicans, most notably Condoleeza Rice last week, which
Speaker 1: was we need to just move on. The American people
Speaker 1: don't care about one six, they care about gas prices.
Speaker 1: They care about the fact that they are going to
Speaker 1: have to pay more money for goods and services because
Speaker 1: of a quote unquote labor shortage, which isn't a labor shortage,
Speaker 1: it's actually a shortage of employers wanting to pay people
Speaker 1: what they are fucking worth. But regardless of that, what
Speaker 1: is your response to politicians who are and I believe
Speaker 1: that this is also the feeling of the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: There were other attorney general US attorney general that you
Speaker 1: could have chosen, right, that had teeth and so, but
Speaker 1: you put up this guy, and you put you You
Speaker 1: don't do a press talk or press walk with regard
Speaker 1: to why it's important that we do not turn the
Speaker 1: page on this. So what do you think and what
Speaker 1: do you say to those that are like, oh, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: we just need to move on. It's been ten months.
Speaker 1: We just need to move on. So I break them
Speaker 1: up into two categories. Category A. If everybody who says
Speaker 1: we need to move on, who were a Republican and
Speaker 1: there at the time of Ben got when they had
Speaker 1: like eighteen billion hearings and hours of textimony on the
Speaker 1: people like Condoleeza Rice, Right, So I take all those
Speaker 1: people in column A and I say all y'all can
Speaker 1: shut the fuck up, can just get out of my
Speaker 1: damn face, because y'all do some hypocrites like that's that's
Speaker 1: just that's just, that's just what it is. Condoleeza Rice
Speaker 1: has absolutely no length to stand on. When she was
Speaker 1: one of the promoters of having more Bendadi hearing to
Speaker 1: say that now it has time to move on for
Speaker 1: an actual attack on the capitally United States, they can
Speaker 1: take all the seats. Then you've got the other people
Speaker 1: who are just like, well, we should move on because
Speaker 1: they personally are bored with it, right why they personally
Speaker 1: don't seem to worry about losing our democracy. They personally
Speaker 1: know people to care about insurrection. And for those people,
Speaker 1: I go back to what I already said that this
Speaker 1: is that you cannot move forward until you have accountability
Speaker 1: for the past, because if you don't have this accountability,
Speaker 1: then it's just gonna come back, right, And people don't
Speaker 1: always you know, read history or understand and it's lessons.
Speaker 1: But if you read any history and understand any lesson
Speaker 1: is that this is how coos work. If you don't,
Speaker 1: if you don't punish the people do it, they always
Speaker 1: come back. So whether that that's boring to you is
Speaker 1: kind of besides the point. It's what needs to happen
Speaker 1: for our democracy to continue going forward and worry about
Speaker 1: your gas prices and your infrastructure bills and whatever. Right,
Speaker 1: So it's it's, it's it's Those are the two sides
Speaker 1: of it. Why Biden isn't the one leading that charge
Speaker 1: is beyond me because it's his government they try to overthrow.
Speaker 1: And I don't understand why that's why that's something he
Speaker 1: doesn't want to talk about every single day, Like if
Speaker 1: it was me, ivery, if it were me, if anyol,
Speaker 1: there was some reasons why it's not me, but it
Speaker 1: was right. I have a purpo a week, Like every Friday,
Speaker 1: I walk one of these dudes out everybody. Here's an
Speaker 1: idiot person who tried to overthrow my government. He's going
Speaker 1: to jail for six years. Next week, here's another idiot
Speaker 1: person tried to overthrow my government. He's going to jail
Speaker 1: for three months because all he did was poop on
Speaker 1: the floor. Next like I would, I would have a
Speaker 1: god damn week so that the public never forgets what
Speaker 1: they did. Do you know why this is? I don't
Speaker 1: a little history lesson, Sorry to be nerdy here. Do
Speaker 1: you know why the Republican Party is their mascot as
Speaker 1: an elephant? During the Civil War. Before the Civil War,
Speaker 1: the Republicans were the pro abolition party to there was one,
Speaker 1: there were the pro union Party. They were the anti
Speaker 1: slavery party right. It was the Democrat who were pro
Speaker 1: slavery right, and so then there was a whole Civil War,
Speaker 1: and then four years after the Republicans were always like, remember,
Speaker 1: don't vote for the Democrats. They started the goddamn war.
Speaker 1: And so the Republicans got the Moniker elephant. It was
Speaker 1: a It was a it was a slam because they
Speaker 1: never forgot the Civil War. They would never let Democrats
Speaker 1: off the hook for the Civil War. The Republican never
Speaker 1: forgot the Civil War. The Democrats are already trying to
Speaker 1: forget the insurrection. There are already two Democrats trying to
Speaker 1: make it, trying to forget the insurrections. I would never forget.
Speaker 1: I would have that seared into the consciousness of every voter.
Speaker 1: These people try to overthrow the government. That is it
Speaker 1: for me today, Folks on woke after daily as always
Speaker 1: power to the people and to all the people. Power,
Speaker 1: get woke and stay woke as fuck,