WEBVTT - Japan’s Difficult Choice Between Economy and Pandemic

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>There are five thousand, five hundred and forty one entrance

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in this year's Games, a near record as the hostation

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese enter last The Japanese have spent two billion

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars to welcome their guests and other taxpayers can play

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>out laugh, Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>brings the economy to you. Fifty seven years ago, Japan

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was bursting with pride to be hosting the Olympic Games.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Now of the country wants them to go away, but

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the government can't bear the thought of canceling because it

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>feels like an admission that they haven't beaten COVID nineteen.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.599
<v Speaker 1>This week, our Tokyo based economy reporter Yuko Takeo, has

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>a great piece for you, delving into the economics and

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the politics of Tokyo one. Later on, I'll be asking

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>our France economy reporter will Horror been about that landmark

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>agreement which the G seven countries have supposedly reached to

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>extract more tax supposedly out of big multinationals. At the end,

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm also going to play you part of a conversation

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about the work from Home revolution with Stanford University professor

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Blue. He says it could worsen inequality in the workplace,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>even as it also makes downtown apartments a bit more affordable.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So plenty to come, but first let's go to Tokyo.

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a sound that the International Olympic Committee wants

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you to hear over and over again. It's the theme

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>music that would play when athletes at the Tokyo Olympics

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>pick up their medals if the games go ahead, as

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>did he, I feel I can already hear the footsteps

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of athletes making their way to Tokyo from overseas. There

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>are people asking why we're holding the Olympic and Paralympic

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Games at a time like this, But I believe it's

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>precisely because we're in these difficult times that we should

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>hold the games. That's Japan's Olympic Minister say Ko Hashimoto,

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>who herself has competed in seven Games, first as a

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>speed skater, then as a cyclist. I was listening to

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>her speak in Ariak Arena in Tokyo Bay, one of

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>eight bleaming new venues built for the Games. She was,

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>therefore the unveiling of the award ceremony anthem. The medals

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>podium and the medal's trade, each item demonstrating Japan's tirelest

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>attention to detail and its government's dogged determination to press

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>ahead with the Games, come what may. It wasn't meant

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to be this way. The International Olympic Committee as the

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>honor of announcing that the Games of the thirty second

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Olympias in are awarded to the city of Tokyo. As

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it was in four when the first Tokyo Olympics became

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a springboard for Japan's emergence as a major manufacturing power,

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the Games were expected to give the economy a helping hand.

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>A country battered by a massive earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>disaster would use the event to drive its recovery. The

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Olympics would also help the country attract forty million visitors

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>per year. That inbound tourism would help sustain shops, hotels,

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and travel throughout Japan, or given the regions a boost

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as they struggle with the effects of a declining and

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>aging population. June Cito, an economist at the Japan Center

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>for Economic Research, believes that Japan needs to attract more

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>foreigners over the longer term, both for the tourism sector

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and make up for labor shortages in a declining, graying population.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Man trying to boost the economy by linking the goal

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of forty million visitors to the Olympics wasn't at all

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>unreasonable looking at the momentum before the pandemic. All of

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>this is connected with what kind of legacy you're looking

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to get from the Olympics. Still, the Games were never

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 1>expected to compete with the economic punching power of the

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety four Olympics. Those games marked Japan's return to the

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>international on stage from the destruction of the World War.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>A massive spending blitz built key parts of the capital's infrastructure,

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>including its bullet trains and the elevated highways that give

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Tokyo it's blade runner look. That ambitious national project also

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>got Japan hooked on the concept of the debt financing

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>government bond. In the decades since then, that addiction has

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>left the country with the developed world's heaviest public debtload.

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna taking me out of capital green. I you

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>donder that's weightlifter setting a new world record defend off

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>US challenger Isaac Berger. And when Japan's first gold medal

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>at the nineteen sixty four Games. Now A sprightly eighty

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>one year old Miak recalls the mood, hinting that the

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>public may still rally round in support of the games.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>You many sins over in Japan lost the war and

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it was trying to recover. The Olympics came around in

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.719
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty four and everyone was intent on making it

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a success. It wasn't quite like that at first, but

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.799
<v Speaker 1>as the Olympic came closer and closer, everyone started frying

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Olympic caras. By the time the game as it started,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>the entire country was duped up in moment. Today coaches

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>the Tokyo International University weightlifting team. When I entered the

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>training room with him, dozens of young men and women

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>line up to offer greetings the back to the Olympic legend.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>The room of sweat and toil fills the air. As

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the students return to training. My ears are pounded by

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>their pries and shouts and the sound of multi colored

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>weights crashing into the ground. Among those pumping iron is

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four year old Massacuro Miyamoto. He has one member

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of the team who's highly likely to qualify for the

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Olympics this year. Like he's feeling uneasy over the page

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Games. Well, I've been thinking about the Olympics

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as I've been involved in sport, and I've

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>always want to be a part of it. If the

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Games get canceled now, then everything I've dedicated myself to

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>who have been for nothing. It's not only some athletes

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>who are hoping the Games will go. For Prime Minister

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Yoshihida Sugar, staging the Olympics could be a prerequisite for

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>holding onto the pattern as Japan's leader. Eugi Zaka, an

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>academic at Narrow Women's University, has spent his career researching

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics. He says that for Japan's leaders, there's no

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>political upside from a cancelation, even with public opinion against

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>holding the games. Because the scrapped Olympics would symbolize the

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>government's failure to contain COVID nineteen, Staging the Olympics is

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>tantamount to having the virus under control. Together with getting

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines distributed faster, this could end up being a

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>plus point for the administration. Holding the Olympics has in

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a sense become a lifeline for the government, and that's

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>why they can't cancel that ditching the Games would all

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to be bad for an economy that's already teetering on

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.479
<v Speaker 1>the brink of a double deprocession on the emergency restrictions,

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>But staging the Games comes with obvious risks too. Bringing

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight thousand people to Japan from around the world

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>could turn the Games into a super spread event that

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>could have a greater cost for the economy in addition

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to the human consequences. One reason why many corporate leaders

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have joined medical professionals in calling for a cancelation. With

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>little more than six weeks ago, the national consensus in

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>favor of the games lies in pieces chattered by the pandemic.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Even Mia, our gold medal hero from four acknowledges that

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a late surge of support has yet to arrive. For

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>what you can do compre how people feel. But the people,

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>our citizens, even my friends and really in that one

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in big commodity. Yet I do say as that they

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>talk yoga, coredent's, they talk your clus Now there's a

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>nerdy topic which we've come back to a few times

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast, that actually made it to prime time

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>news this weekend when G seven finance ministers agreed on

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a deal to charge a global minimum tax on the

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>profits of big companies, so I think it's it's only fair.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>We get the low down on this from Bloomberg's France

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>economy reporter William Horribin, who has been dutifully following this

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>story from the beginning. Will and then we have we

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>have a few other things to talk about today. But

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you about all the headlines that we

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>saw at the weekend tax on on these big global companies.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that companies like Google aren't going to

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to do all these kind of fancy avoidance

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>operations anymore and end up paying no tax anywhere? I

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>guess the short answer is yes, they're not going to

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be They're not going to be able to do those

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>things anymore. Um. But what was really significant about what

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>happened happened at the G seven was in some ways

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>more political than technical. There is there's some detail in

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the in the final communicator that they've put down on paper, um,

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But what it actually happened is that they've resolved a

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>major divide between Europe and the US on who gets

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to tax the multinationals, how we share out the spoils

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.559
<v Speaker 1>of globalization if you like. Um, and if we remember

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that Trump always used to say his stance was America,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>America taxes it's companies, not anyone else. And europe response

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>was like, how on a second. These are huge up,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they have huge operations in our country. They're relying on

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>our infrastructure, our people. Um, but they're not paying any

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>tax here and we want a slice of that pie.

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So what happens at the G seven this weekend is

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 1>that everyone sort of recognizes, Okay, these multinationals, they need

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay more in the places where more of the

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>tax that they do already pay in the places where

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they're actually doing business. Um. So the home countries, if say,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for Google, for the US, need to share out some

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of the rights to tax the profits of Google. And

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it's worth pausing for a second there, because what they

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have essentially agreed to is to let other governments tax

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>their companies instead of them. And conceptually, even even materially,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>this may not be huge, but conceptually that's a that's

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a huge breakthrough. And for the purpose of these years

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>long negotiations that have been happening at the o c

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>D is also key. You know, people at the o

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>c D always said, we're doing all this technical work

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on lots of the nitty gritty of how to rewrite

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>tax legislation around the world, But what really, what really

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>has blocked us is this agreement on this willingness to

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>share out right to tax companies. And once that's resolved,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>they've always said, the rest will just flow from that.

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>On the face of it, it seems surprising that the

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>US would be willing to give up that right. They've

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>produced this big, these big, successful global companies. Surely you want,

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're the US, you want to keep as many

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of those tax revenues to yourself as you can. Well,

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>there's there's various elements to how to respond to that,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and why the US has shifted, the simplest way of

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>putting it is that they've realized that if they want

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to get what they want, they've they've got to cooperate,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and we've got to have a system that is stable

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, rather than lots of people threatening each

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>other with tariffs or putting in place taxes on the

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>revenue of American companies all around the world. Um. So

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's that sort of this moment that you realize, you know,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>these countries all countries around the world perhaps have been

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>competing on the basis of tax, and in some ways,

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they've decided actually with probably in our interesting

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we become more of a cartel and so then we

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>can start getting what we want. And what the US

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>really wants is the minimum tax part of this deal,

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>so that companies are not sort of going off to

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>tax havents and that they can make sure that they

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>pay their fair share, and that the US isn't isn't

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>losing tax revenues all around the world. And that's that's

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that minimum tax part of the deal is really

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that is read the thing that rather than sharing out

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the pie differently, it's a question of making a much

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>bigger pie for government to be able to fund all

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the spending that they need to do in the wake

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID pandemic. And I noticed, and we can't

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>afford too much time on this, but I noticed that

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 1>there had been this sticking point and it had come

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>up the last time I spoke to you. Around Amazon,

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of focus on which are the

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>companies that will have this sort of sharing of revenues

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>across countries was going to be just the big companies

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that have lots of profit. An Amazon, it's that frustrating

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>thing that although it sells an enormous amount in every country,

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems to have quite a low profit margin. So

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen specifically with Amazon. Well, yeah, as

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>as you say the Amazon, it would be it would

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be sort of crazy to create a global tax system

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and then say, oh, by the way, Amazon isn't part

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of this. It just wouldn't make any sense to people

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>who are pushing for such a change of the system.

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>So what they've got to do is find a way,

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're still working on this, is find a way

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of hitting a target without aiming for it. So they've

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>got to they've got to score a goal. An Amazon tax. Yeah,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they can't call it Amazon tax because otherwise that opens

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>up all the problems about taxing digital companies or targeting

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>certain things. So they're working on a way of of

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially chopping up conceptually Amazon operations so that they can

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>find bits that are really profitable and say, right, we

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 1>can share out some of that profit for taxing purposes.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>It's technically tricky because you open a can of worms

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that they thought they had closed. We have these G sevens.

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I always wondered why G seven still existed once they

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>created the G twenty, because the G seven is quite

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a sort of old fashioned group of companies. We've got

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the big the Heads of Government summit coming in Cornwall

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, but when you look at the countries around

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the table, it's it's most of the sort of new

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>world is not represented. Obviously, they can't just carve up

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>all these text revenues just for themselves. It's just not

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not a very good look. So how is this going

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to get sold to the rest of the world. How

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>are we going to how is it going to get

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>more sort of global buying. I think that the point

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we made right the start that actually what's happened at

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the G seven they resolved disagreement between the US and Europe,

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and so once that's done, they the rest of what

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is agreed at the G seven is actually leaves a

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>considered all amount of margin for everyone else to start

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>working on how to resolve how to find solutions to

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>their problems with this deal. The key really is that

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>G seven has lifted a problem that it had within itself,

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and so now we can get down to really working

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on all the exceedingly complicated issues that flow from and

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I noticed there's some of the issues that have to

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>be resolved pretty big, like how do you define profits?

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that seems to be there'll be a lot

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of accountants waiting to hear how they define so that

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>they can quickly find a way around it. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Well,

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the reassuring thing is that the O a CD has

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>been working on all these things for years, right, so

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they've they've got it all sort of lined up to

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go and they but it doesn't mean it's not complicated.

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of their work has already been done.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And also there's a sort of there's a big global

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>shift going on, and that is that actually everyone wants

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>a deal, even even the big tech firms. Right. What

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.199
<v Speaker 1>they want is some kind of stable mechanis and they

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be hit by tariffs or or very

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>unilateral punitive taxes and different countries. And they think they

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>also recognize and from from a more political perspective, all

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the governments realize that they have to make this work

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're at the point where they they need to

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>end the race at the bottom because they don't want

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to they need the money. They need money to be

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>able to invest in their economies. But also they want

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to be able to sell the notion of globalization to

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the middle classes and and and show that they are

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>taking back power from from the winners of globalization. And

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that they've got to they've got to make

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this work and keep the keep the accountants at bay,

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>if you like. So. I can't help thinking that we

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>will be returning to you at some point in the

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>next few months for the next exciting installment of the

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>definition of global profit for the corporate minimum tax. But

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it is actually as you suggest, there's a lot of

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>money involved. It's quite an important point of principle about

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.359
<v Speaker 1>whether you can make the global economy work work better.

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Will horrorb and thank you very much, Thank you, Sephanie.

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks now. If you think of all the changes called

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>by the pandemic, one that does seem to be here

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to stay is working from home. Companies such as Vanguard

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Group and Ford Motor Company are permanently adopting what they

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>call hybrid work schedules. Employee spend some of the week

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>at home and the rest of an office. But what's

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it going to mean for the rest of the economy?

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>While Stanford University economist Nicholas Blue has been researching the

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>impact of remote working for years, sin since COVID hit,

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>he's become the go to expert on working from home.

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>He's also co director of the Productivity, Innovation and Entrepreneurship

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Program at the National Bureau of Economic Research, and he

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>spent the last year surveying tens of thousands of US

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>firms and employees, asking them about their post pandemic work arrangements.

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>US economy reporter Olivia Rockman went to talk to Bloom

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>about the results of that survey and working paper he's

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just published, co author with his colleague Argent Romany. It's

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting stuff. Here's just a taste of their conversation.

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>It looks like the suburbs of large cities are the

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>hottest property markets. It's kind of odd that Central New

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>York has done really badly, but the suburbs of New

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>York had dined incredibly well. And then places further away

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>still like if you go to you know, very very

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>upstate New York. I'm thinking like Topeka, Kansas, or you know, Tulsa, Oklahoma,

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>or Hawaii, or you know, Mississippi or Alaska have done fine.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Because the whole U. S. Housing market is it's not

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like they've exploded, so we think of this is all

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>due to the move to hybrid. So the vast majority

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of sevent firms I've talked, you know, and you

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>see it in all the server data, I'm moving to hybrid,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 1>whereby basically most big American firms telling people post pandemic,

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>when you come back, you're going to be coming back

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>probably three days a week typically, and if you grow

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>up from home two days a week, it makes it

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>more appealing to live out in the suburbs. It should

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be clear that this is only half of people US.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Half of people, typically university grads, is going to go hybrid.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The other half but still, you know, on the business

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>premises every day because they're doing more physical manual jobs

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 1>than meeting customers, etcetera. UM, the richer educated half of

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>mostly the people buying houses. So that's why that's really

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>impactful for real estate. These folks are moving out. The

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>question as to what the long and impact will be,

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I personally think it's actually maybe positive. It's not. It's

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly not obviously negative. So to put it in context,

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the center of American cities have had a forty year boom,

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 1>so from about to two thousand and nineteen they've been

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>on a continuous upward swing. And so what's happened is

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>COVID is probably unwound, maybe ten to twenty years of that,

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but you know, probably no more. So you can think

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of city centers relatively going to be the still worse

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and five, which is expensive, but that

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>gap has narrowed a little bit. You know, as an economist,

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty clear the adjustment it's going to be on

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>many margins, maybe some bohemiums, maybe more artists will come

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>back from the city centers, folks that are driven out.

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, maybe people that need to work on the

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>business premises five days a week that were priced out,

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but actually the very people that should be living in

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the city centers for return. There was a mention in

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one of your papers about promotions, and I wonder how

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>some of this ends up, you know, making it harder

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>for some people to to move up, especially let's say,

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>if there's a parent that decides to work from home

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>five days a week. Yeah, you know, I think you

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>know what so this this kind of to managerial decisions.

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>One is what to do post pandemic, and I would

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>say most firms have gone to hybrid, and that seems

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like yesterday's decision quite frankly. So sure. But then the

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>big issue is on choice and do you set the

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>thing right at the top the firm what you said,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it right at the bottom and let people choose. I've

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>been against setting at the bottom because I think choice

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is actually problematic for three reasons. The first to are

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>quick and kind of obvious. What is mixed mode doesn't

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>work very well. So when some people in the office

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and summer our home, it just leads to a kind

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of in and an outgroup. So even if evan in

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the office joins meetings, you know on their own zoom screen,

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, as soon as the meetings over, they get

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>up and go chat. So people are home until left out,

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and that's almost impossible to deal with. There's a second

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>issue about if you let people choose. People say that

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of their two days they work at home, it will

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>be a Wednesday and it will be a Friday. So

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 1>if you let people choose, you're going to find the

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>office crushed on the Wednesday and empty on It is

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>like tumbleweed blowing through on the Friday, so it's very

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>inefficient and office space. And then the final reason that

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm against choice is the one you raise, which is

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the most subtle, but it's maybe the most pernicials, which

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is they're kind of the two facts us knowing. One

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is who who would choose to work from home? In

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>our survey we ask people what would you how many

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>days a week would you like to work from home?

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Post pandemic? And if you look at amongst college graduates,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>which is well but over half of our workforce, and

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.399
<v Speaker 1>you look at people with children under the age of twelve,

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>always said more women than men choose to work from

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>home five days a week. And yeah, that so already

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>amongst graduates with the young kids, there's a big gender

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>dividers to who would choose to work from home five

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>days a week. You hear it for people that disabled

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>people are living far out, etcetera. A group of people

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>who have given the choice to choose, you know, for

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>quite very logical and sensible reasons to work from home

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>more days. So that seems totally sensible. The problem is

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>the second factors. If you look in the data and

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>working from home in a team where there are other

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>people coming into the office is extremely costly in promotion.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you let people choose my theories, in some

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>ways the biggest cost in the long run, all the

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>single young men coming five days a week. College educated

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>women with a six year old and an eight year

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>old maybe come in two days a week and six

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>seven years down the road. There's a huge different in

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>promotion rates. And you know, you have a diversity crisis.

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, for companies, you have it like a legal

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>mind field of why justifiable lawsuits. I mean, you know,

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you would look at the data and you'd see lo

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and behold, you've got a gender divide in promotion, a

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>disability divide in promotion, maybe an income divicer's wealthy people

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>live near you know stuff that's just the nightmare for companies.

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So I have been advising that firms should probably harmonize

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>across the firm how many days people were from home,

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and try and harmonize which days is in each team

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of you know, people sacrifices that they're willing

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to make for flexibility. Did you did you serve anyone

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about that, Like, oh, I would be willing to take

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a pig cut for a hybrid model yes, so we

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we've I have really good data on this, So we

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>servey people a parish pandemic. If you're allowed to work

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>from him two days a week, would that would you

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be positive? Neutral? Negative? Then if you're either positive or negative,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we ask how much would that be equivalent to in

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of your current salary? And you tell your average

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>across everyone and you get plus and I've done the

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>same seven that you catch is that they come out

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>there six. So basically people value being able to work

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>from home to two days a week at something like

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>six of salary. So you can think of it as

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>equivalent probably to a pension plan or a kind of

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a mean healthcare plan. That raises why this is a

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of an inequality issue. Another management change is only

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>half your employees get this, nearer half don't, and the

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>half they get this are typically the higher earning, better

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>educated half that mostly have had a better pandemics have

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>worked home. Well, that's it for this episode of Stephanomics.

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>All be back next week with a lot more from

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>around the world. This episode was produced by Magnus Hendrick

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and the segment on the Tokyo Olympics was written by

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Yuko Takeo and edited by Paul Jackson. Metic special thanks

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>also to William Horrabin, Olivia Rockman, and Professor Nicholas Blue.

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sasso is executive producer of Stephanomics and the head

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of Bluebird Podcasts is Francesco leaving h