WEBVTT - Fed Leaves Rates Near Zero

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. We're right here every day bringing you the

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>latest news from the world's of business and finance, plus technology, politics, economics,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>all harnessing the power of Business Week reporters and editors,

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and of course Carol that's part of a team of

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven hundred journalists and analysts and more than a

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty countries and Jason. You can download Bloomberg

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, blo Bloomberg dot com. You

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Bloomberg Radio every weekday, or watch us on

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News Live from New York.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>It is FED day. Let's get into it. The FED

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>coming out with its monthly meeting, FED extending Central Bank

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar ripo and swap lanes to March one, holds rates

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>near zero. This is the headline you want, says virus

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>poses considerable risk. Those are the red heads on the Bloomberg.

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna dig into it in death with our team.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Look at the equity reaction, the fixing, income reaction, everything

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you need to know about the underlying economy. And we're

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear from j Powell in just about half an hour,

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the FED Chair taking questions about where the FED goes

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>from here. It has been heroic in many people's eyes

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in fighting the effects of this coronavirus. All right, let's

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>break it down. Got the perfect experts to give us

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>all the context you need. Kathleen Hayes Gluble, Economics and

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Policy editor for Bloomberg. She's in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Studio home base. Dave Wilson, Stocks editor for Bloomberg. He

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>joins us from New Jersey, k h. I want to

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>start with you, Uh, what'd you see here? We see

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a feder reserve that is signaling what we expected, Jason,

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because look, there's a considerable risk to the economy from

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the virus. The Fed also saying again that they're gonna

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>keep rates very low until they're confidence that the recovery

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is under way. I think another more specific thing that

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is highlighted. In fact, it's even of our famous red

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>hot stickies. The FED is extending uh their dollar repo

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and swaplinds to March thirty one. This These are the

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the dollar borrowing lines that the FED sets up for

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>overseas central banks, right, so if you're leading liquidity in Japan,

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the UK, wherever, you can reach out to the FED.

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So again, I think it underscores that the FED is

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>saying what we think. The virus unfortunately has not really

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>lightened up its impact on the US economy, for example,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that much. In some cases, it's gotten worse in the

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>States where things are resurgent. New York of course doing

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit better. I like to always remind people of that,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>but uh, overall the impact is negative. I think what

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>markets are wanting to know is what did the FED

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>discuss about cementing, narrowing down, formalizing forward guidance. All the

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>reports are that they're talking about it now, they've been

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about this, and what it would allow them to

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>do is underscore that they've got an easy policy and

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>so that will keep bond yields low and you know,

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the whole, the whole, the you know, the businesses will

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be reassured, maybe even people want to get a mortgage

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>will be assured. Uh, and they can do that by

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 1>with their forward guidance. I think we're not going to

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>get anything specific on that until the press conference with J. Powell,

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 1>because every reporter who's asking questions is going to ask

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about that. But so far on the headlines and probably

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in the policy statement that was released, which is where

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we get these headlines, there's there's not too much. There's

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>not enough to be flashing it yet, right, all right,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So about twenty six minutes we expect to hear from J. Powell.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh So much more to dig into Kathleen Hayes, But

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>first let's get to Dave Wilson. Dave talked to me

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>about the equity reaction here. There was a nice run

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in the equity market ahead of this, some anticipation, and

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>then it popped. What did you see, right? I mean

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you saw, you know, in the first few moments after

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the headlines came out, the SMP five hundred hits high

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the day, and then it's sort of backed off a bit,

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>really and keeping with what it had been doing in

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the last half hour or so before uh the announcement.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And so what you're left with is a market that's

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>solidly higher, and as much as anything, the other big

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>event of the day is not really roiling stocks, and

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that would be the testimony of the four big tech

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>c e O S before the Half Judiciary Committee. Uh,

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jeff Bezos said Amazon, Tim Cook at Apple,

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook, and Sindar Pecai at Alphabet, the

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>owner of Google. All those shares are higher at the moment,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're helping stocks move up as they have for

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>some time now. So it's not like what we saw

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the FED really changed that equation. Interesting, and we're gonna

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot more about tech as we go throughout

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the afternoon, and uh this program, we're gonna hear from

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Tom Giles later in the show about what he heard

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:11.119
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill. Getting back to the Fed, Kathleen, what

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to that second redhead that

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you talked about, because if it's a redhead at Bloomberg,

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I've been here long enough to know it's important. It's

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>important to the broader world, is what I heard you say.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Help us understand from the an investor's perspective, why this

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is important, what this signals to the world and and

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.039
<v Speaker 1>maybe more importantly, the markets. Well, one thing I'd like

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to point out and remind us is yesterday was day

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the FEDS to day meeting. What did they

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>announce yesterday that they were extending until the end of

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the year. Seven of their nine emergency lending programs and

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the only two they didn't extend or weren't on the

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>list was that they were already going to go to

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year or beyond. So basically it

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>shows I think it shows us that the feder Reserve

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>is ready to do whatever he needs. And importantly, though

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there remember back in June, you know, April was a

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>terrible month, but a lot of people really thought maybe

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we'd be in a more of a recovery terrible second

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter rebound in the third quarter. That that has faded

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit, hasn't it. Maybe we'll get the three throw

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter rebound. But it doesn't feel like we're ready to,

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for example, not need more stimulus from the Fed, or

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for that matter, not to need more fiscal stimulus. That's

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>something else that J. Powell probably asked a lot about

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>at the press conference. And when we look overseas, even

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in countries that supposedly did better than United States, everything's fine, Well,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>there they have cases popping up. The virus isn't vanquished yet,

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's probably not going to be vanquished for

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a while. And so you never know what is going

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen again in one of the countries that has

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>access to the FEDS swap lines. It's it's like extending

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>credit to other to foreign countries. Uh. I think it

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>also shows this sense, well, let's extended to to March,

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>because we don't know what's going to happen. We're not

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in that position now where we think, oh, we're on

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the verge of you know, a lot better situation for

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy, or past the worst of the virus. We're

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>at a point where everybody is still responding to it,

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>locking down in some cases, reopening a bit in other cases.

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But consumers more than ever, of course, even though they

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot. I want to just segue a little

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>bit to this fiscal question, because she's gonna get pounded

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>with that. Uh. I was speaking to Patricia Mosster this morning.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>She was at the New York Fed for many years.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>She's at Columbia University Seepa now, but she's been there,

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>done that, you know, really hands on with the whole

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>bond market side of it and all. She says that

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the reason why, and I think a lot of people

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>say this one of the reasons the stimulus is so

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>important and giving people the unemployment checks is so they'll

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>keep spending money, because that's one of the things that

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>has responded better. And without that extra money, a lot

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of people are likely to say, well, I got some

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Now I better hold onto whatever I have, especially if

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment benefits I've been getting are going to get cut.

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.679
<v Speaker 1>So and again, same thing is gonna be playing out overseas.

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So to come back to your original question, I just

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think broadly this shows the FED is still in defensive

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>mode in the sense of waiting to see what the

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>virus does to us, but also an offensive mode saying, well,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to keep certain players on the field right

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to perform certain tasks because you know this game isn't

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>over yet. Yeah. Absolutely, And so Dave Wilson, I mean

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I turned to you and ask how much is the

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>market I'm glad you pointed out that the market is

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>looking and investors looking to Capitol Hill for the tech stars,

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the tech CEOs. How much is the market now looking

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to Capitol Hill for exactly what Kathleen was talking about,

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>which is some new fiscal stimulus. Well that really does

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>become front center, because I mean it's Kathleen's pointing out

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, monetary policy is sort of on a track

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point, so you know, it's a matter of

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>what's going to change, and we know that there are

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be changes in the unemployment benefits at the

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>end of this week. Uh, even potentially if Congress and

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Trump administration can get together on a

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>plan moving forward, so that becomes more of an issue,

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>just because you know, you have the potential to see

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>more of an effect from whatever they managed to agree on. Right,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>most important question, I think I know the answer, Kathleen

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>has most important question for j pow. Wow. Oh, it's

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>got to be for a guidance. I mean, that's gonna

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>guess that in so many ways, and I think that

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>might be part of the broader question. Look, there are

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>people right now who are very concerned that we again

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we make it a three quarter rebound because the numbers

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be so beaten up in the second quarter.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>What are Bloomer consensus for tomorrow for the second quarter

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>GDPs down? Some people have bigger numbers, some smaller, but

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>they're all terrible, right, So it's not too hard to

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, to get out of the deepest pit you

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>could possibly be in. But I think the question will

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>be if things get worse instead of better, what can

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you do? You've done everything? And in that context, how

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>much of a difference can forward guidance make? Uh? And

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of course the but but every Republican is gonna want

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to know is have we done? We have to make

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>do more? But don't we have to worry about that?

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But budget deficit every day? Democrats gonna want to know

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 1>why you know, no, we barely are going to get

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>do enough we get our three and a half trillion

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar bill passed. But again I think uh. And in fact,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>you know reporters may ask versions of that as well.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important one is are you guys done?

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything more you can do? And is the

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>ball in somebody else's court like Congress? And how prescriptive

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think he will be in terms of the

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>fiscal side, because I feel like he's pushed it a

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Maybe then we might have expected in terms

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of saying what at least he needed action obviously from

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Hill. Do you think he will be so forward

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>as to be prescriptive or no, he won't be prescriptive,

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>but you know you make I'm glad you mentioned that

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's very important. People who haven't watched the Federal

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Reserve as long as I have, or you have, or Dave,

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, think back, we back early for you got

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Bill Paul Volker, but think of Alan Greensman. He went

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>out of his way not even to say the word,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, fiscal or budget uh. And Jay Powell. I

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>think people were stunned, some a little bit precautiously and

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>some people gladly that he has been more willing to say,

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe not exactly what you need to do, but you

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>do have to spend more money. Congress has to do something.

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the worst crisis is economy has seen, at

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>least since the Great Depression, and that is where he

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>has he has stood out again. I don't know what

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>he'll be ready to say tomorrow, but I suspect that

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 1>will be. Whatever you do, just do it and do

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it fast. People can't wait, all right, Kathleen his Global

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>economics policyiator for Bloomberg. Great to get the instant context

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>from you back to the FED back in anticipation of

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:40.439
<v Speaker 1>hearing from FED Chair J Powell in roughly fourteen minutes.

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>We will take you there live. But in the meantime

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>let's dig in a little further understand what we have

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>heard from the FED so far and what it means,

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>especially in the context of everything going on, all these

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>negotiations on Capitol Hill, the role that FED has played,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the world that Congress will play, and the administration, and

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>what investors make of it. Delighted to have Ira Jersey,

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>chief US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>me from New Jersey and Dr Steven Skanky back with

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the chief economic advisor for Keel point of course, former U. S.

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and White House National Security Council staff member, just

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy that we want to talk to for all

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the context. This is a very holistic approach we're going

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:23.239
<v Speaker 1>to take to this, Ira. I want to start with you, um,

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>from your perspective, from what you watch when it comes

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to interest rates and the reaction of the market. What's

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the most important thing to read here? So so, I

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>think that there's two things that the FED continues to be,

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, hyper focused on the level of the coronavirus cases,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>so that they even added an entire sentence, which for

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>for the FED to do that, uh and make their

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>only significant change something to do with the coronavirus, I

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>think is very telling. And the second thing that I

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>think is generally important to the market is the fact

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed has extended their swap lines and their

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>UH dollar repo facilities with other central banks through the

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>end of March. And this is important because if you remember,

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of this crisis in March, you had

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of volatility with in the treasury market because um,

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>there was not enough dollars overseas. So this will keep

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>plenty of dollars overseas. So things like Lieboard, the London

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Interbrank Orford rate, as well as treasuries that are held

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>overseas are going to be easier to fund because of

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that for a long time. So that that gets rid

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of a potential worry that maybe some of the markets

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>would have had come September when these facilities were supposed

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to we're supposed to end, right, all right, Steven Skanky,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>come on in here. Um, let's take a step back

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>if we can, because you have said, I think among

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>a number of people, this seems to be the consensus

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that j Pal and his friends at the Federal Reserve,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>they've done a pretty good job. They have been on

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the front foot. They've been pretty active, they have made

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of moves, and yet they come into this

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>latest meeting. They came into this late, this meeting with

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the backdrop that they probably didn't anticipate or certainly didn't

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>want to anticipate. It is not an optimistic view of

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the world right now. Tell me about them. Well, the

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fan as you, as you point out Jason, has been preemptive, proactive, aggressive.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They they really are satisfied with all the things that

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>they've done. There are certainly not satisfied with what's going

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on in the world, in the US economy, and so

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>their bewilderment is is obviously something of interest. They got

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>things going in a good way. They promised that they

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>would do all that needed to be done, and with

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>their two point six trillion dollars in emergency credit facilities

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are ready to go. Uh, they found that they didn't

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>even have to use all that much of it because

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>once they said that they were there, and then they

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>extended credit a few times. Good example is the money

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>market mutual fun liquidity facility. Some money was extended, it

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>was paid back, the market understands the fet is standing by.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>All of that settled down Uh. And we were on

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a good trajectory from the end of April right up

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>until pretty much the end of June when the reopenings

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and almost a disregard for the virus in some locations

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>caught people by surprise. And all of the whole the

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>virus is back and people are sick, hospitals are filling up. Uh.

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>And that old concern comes back again. And even though

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect and no one expected that state and

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>local governments were gonna shut down the way they had

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in March. UH, people self shutter, self, shelter in place

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as a result of they're concerned about being in the

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>marketplace or the workplace. So the FETE is out there

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>doing what it can. You know, the fact that it's

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>added three threeion dollars would balance sheets since January. Uh, And,

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>as you rightly point out, is committed to using its

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>full range of tools doing all that it needs to

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>do to support the economy in this challenging time there

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>there and after ready. But as you also mentioned, uh, Pow,

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>unlike his predecessors, has been pretty straight, pretty straightforward about

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>their needing to be fiscal stimulus to do things that

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy cannot Uh. And that also is a source

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of disappointment that you know that here we are with

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a an immediate need for um extending some of the

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus programs that have been previously enacted, and uh,

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Congress is not encouraging that it's going to happen anytime soon. No,

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And that certainly is the viber getting in and and

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk if we can ira a little bit about

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that disconnect that and there are a number of disconnects

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're looking at, especially when we look

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 1>through the eyes of investors or look at investors actions here.

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Help me understand kind of what you see in the

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>numbers and in the data and as you talk to

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues and folks on Wall Street about how the

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>market broadly defined is reacting to this current situation, because

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>as Steven just pointed out, it's not looking great out there,

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and yet here we are in a fairly optimistic dare

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I say enthusiastic uh investment environment? Well we lost Ara,

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So Steven Skanky, I'm gonna turn to you and turn

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>back to you. Let's talk more about that. You talk

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to me about that disconnected if we can, because I'm

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I continue to be sort of bufuddled by it, do you?

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Or is this just how kind of markets work? That

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the the gap, the chasm between the kind of real

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>life and what investors seem to be uh investing against

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't add up to me. It is certainly perplexing,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of good reason to be skeptical

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and doubtful in all this. But but as we continue

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to watch it and look how the market reacts to

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>any particular news, it's mostly driven by an expectation of

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>getting the virus under control. Vaccines therapeutics. We saw good

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>news announced late yesterday about some vaccine results that all

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the market was off a little yesterday. It's it's vow

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>rebounding positively again today. The other thing that's been a

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of a surprise is the smp OR earnings so far.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>They're they're beating estimates, uh self identified estimates, guidance from

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>the companies, and bottom up calculations of earning estimates, and

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they're beating them at a rate that's greater than usual

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that we usually see in the second quarter. So so

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the the rebound seems to be greater than believed. Part

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of it is this this peculiar bifurcation that we have

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>going on, where the hardest hit companies are the smaller

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>non publicly traded companies that don't have access to the

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>credit markets that larger publicly traded companies do and UH

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and and some of those companies are are naturally benefiting

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>from smaller competitives competitors just not being able to UH

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to continue and to hold on UM even even in

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the earnings outlook it I mean, we're still expecting the

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty decline and earnings for the second quarter, which is significant, extraordinary,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what is better than forecast that was UM. There's been

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>trending out there. So the chasm, the gap, what do

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you do and something is to frightening really to spend

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>much time looking at it. You look beyond and sure enough,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 1>sure enough, they're they're looking to the other side and

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter economic rebound and some rebound in earnings

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in the third in court quarters and then on into well,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think there's this is I think there's a couple

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of things. I think one is that when you look

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>at the bond market, right the market that I focus on,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it's still telling you that there's going to be very

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>weak economic activity and relatively low inflation for years to come.

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the bond market's not necessarily telling you

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that maybe the stock market might be

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on first blush. But I think one of the things

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that's happening with risk asset's generally everywhere is the reaction

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>function that that the Federal Reserve and other monetary authorities

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>globally are going to keep monetary policy easy even after

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>the whole COVID crisis has gone right, So that's one

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of the things that that the Fed reiterated today at

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>certain what you've seen in the dots back in June

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is the Federals are basically committing that they're going to

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hold rates where they are now basically zero until at

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>least and then the markets even thinking that if they hike,

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be like once every six months. So

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>you're not talking about monetary policy getting restrictive anytime in

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the next four or five years. So um, you know,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so it does make sense that valuations, maybe based on

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>current earnings, are you know, relatively high. But but like

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you're the other guest said, maybe over the next three years,

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>earnings wind up getting back to some level that they were,

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>say prior to uh, to the whole COVID issue. So

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's that that you're having this this

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>whole um, you know, systemic difference in what you're seeing

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>between different markets. Yeah, absolutely so, Steven Skanky taking this

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>from a policy perspective, because you know all the levers

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>in Washington that canon can't be pulled. Many have been,

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>but some are slower to to act, as you alluded

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to with the fiscal side, and maybe the frustration even

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>if he's not showing it on the part of j.

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Powell and his colleagues, what needs to happen here and

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>why isn't it happening? It seems that there's still a

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of denial about the seriousness of the virus.

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>If you even just look at the trend in and

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.239
<v Speaker 1>whether the presidents wearing a face mask or not. You know,

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for for three days in a row or three press

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>announcements in a row, he's patting the benefits of face

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>mask wearing, social distancing, washing your hands, uh. And then

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>we and then we get a turn where that doesn't

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>seem to be a priority anymore. I think there's an

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>internal conflict in the in the White House is to

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the policy that they want the fact that it's the

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>White House and the Treasury Secretary and really the White

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>House Chief and Staff Mark Meadows and Treasury Secretary Stephen Nuton,

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 1>who are negotiating with Congressional Democrats and not even including

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>UH Senate Republican leadership. So it seems whatever they might

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be doing to keep them informed, they're they're certainly not

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>part of the negotiations, and they just they just have

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a different view on this. They have a different perspective

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as to how they want to treat it, and whether

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>that's driven by information they think to be true that

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>others take issue with is not clear. I think the

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>other thing is that is they had originally resisted the

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>extra six hundred dollars a week in the unemployment insurance

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>assistance for people unemployed because of the COVID situation and

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the shutdown, and because they thought it was it would

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be a dis incentive for people to return to work

0:23:56.359 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and lo and behold. Some consensus is or round fifty

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of those receiving that benefit or receiving more

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and unemployment insurance benefits than they were when they were working.

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>UH and employers have complained, mostly anecdotally, but still low

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with lot enough voices that they've had probably getting people

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>back to work, and so there was that there was

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a season upon that issue and how do they fix it?

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>And regrettably, the way our unemployment insurance system has built

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>up and jerry rigged over the years as firstly impossible

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>to fax it in the short term. So they're trying

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>to thread through that UH and address and obvious and

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>obvious concern but in a way that maybe it is

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not really recognizing the urgency of extending those on insurance

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 1>employment benefits. Yeah, it is complicated and it is very political.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>As you say, Dr Steven Skanky, what a treat Thank

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.199
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Chief Economic Advisor keel Point and former U. S.

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and White House National Security Council staff member joining

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>me from d c our Jersey. Chief US interest rate

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence joining me on the phone from

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. Both those guys, I know are gonna be

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>tuned into Washington, as are we. So we just heard

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>from j Pal down in Washington. Let's understand what he said, because,

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>as Charlie said, the equity markets at least and specifically

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the SMP, they are close to their highs of the day,

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the major indices. Why is that so? What are we

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the broader economy that is continuing to give

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>investors a lot of confidence? Yelena Scholecheva, she is with us,

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>She is working hard today. I've heard her on our

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>era a number of times. Sior U s economists for

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Economics. She joins on the phone as to Steve

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's chief US economists for T. S. Lombard. He's on

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York City, Steve. I want to

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>start with you. What's the most important thing, j Pal

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>said beyond what we heard in the statement, Well, um,

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the most to me, the most interesting take

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>um was actually the question about loans, and he he

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>implied that the reason why there hasn't been much take

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 1>up in the loans is because the markets have done

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>well and he's got it backwards. Uh. The reason why

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't had a take up in the main street

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lending program, and that's really the lending program I'm focused

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>on here, is because firms don't feel confident in the

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>outlook because of the virus and and the and the

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>curves that it can throw in terms of having any

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of a plan about business activity going forward, and

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>small firms don't want to take on debt in that uncertainty.

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:56.879
<v Speaker 1>And I juxtaposed that against the fact that the market

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.439
<v Speaker 1>continues to go up, so it's wall streets moving in

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>one direction. But the fact that there's no take up

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in these loans tells you that on the ground level,

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>there is too much uncertainty about the outlook for people

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to be willing to take on get even in a

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>very very favorable terms. So you lena that data. What

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>is j Powell looking at, UH, because it's a lot

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of the same stuff you're looking at. How uncertain is

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy right now? Well, they have been talking about

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty for quite some time now, you know, Leo brainer

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed Governor mentioned that the outlook is UH

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the fog, the fog of uncertainty

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. So that's why they haven't taken any action

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>at this meeting. They're using this time to UH discuss

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>what they would like to do with the policy framework

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>UH and what they would like to do with forward guidance.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what really happened at this meeting because there's

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>actually nothing much they can do at this point in

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of immediate policy action, although there are some things

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>they can improve in terms of the main street lending

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>facility and so on. But they're using this time to

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of to come up to terms in UM in

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a sense of how they would like to improve forth guidance.

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Should they tie to UH calendar based UH kind of

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a statement, or should they tie to economic outcomes? So

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in our of you, what is happening is that they're

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>gearing up to publish something later on this year, along

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>with the results of the review of the framework UH,

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>something that states, Okay, we're gonna keep rates low until

0:28:55.440 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>an employment rate reaches five and until inflation and show

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>significant progress towards the two goal. Right, they will put

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of emphasis on what actually will happen, and

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>not only on expectations that inflation will at some point

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>reach there in send targets. So, Steve, the FED is

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously a very important input for anyone who's trying to

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>understand the economy. UH, But it is just one thing.

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think about what's going on just up the

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>street from where j Pal was on Capitol Hill, not

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>just with the tech executives testifying, but also with a

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>fight which j Pal alluded to between the two main

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>political parties over fiscal stimulus. He spoke more, maybe than

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>even we expected him to, about the need for that

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and some of the atmospherics around that. There's also a

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>political calculus that economists are taking into account, which is

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>an upcoming presidential election. How do you synthesize all that?

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you find the signal in the noise here? Well,

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that what he told you, uh and the

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>way I look at policy both have fed as well

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>as um Fiscal policy is this way. He talked about

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the two phases, the lockdown and the reopening. In the

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>lockdown phase, transferring income and supporting markets is paramount, and

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal policy and what he alluded to about the

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>virus determining and looking at the outcome and looking at

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on across the sun Belt and how that

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>is slowed the pace of economic activity. We're not really

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>fully into that reopening phase. And what does that mean

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>from a policy standpoint? It means that policy still has

0:30:54.920 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to transfer income and if you and if those in

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.840
<v Speaker 1>government and the fiscal side, I want to say that, well,

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to do that because it cons reopening

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and all that Okay, that's a that's a political view.

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not really backed by an economic reality, and they

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>risk the economy slowing down by undercutting that transfer of income.

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Um of course, all of this is extraordinarily uncertain. If

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody gets better in Texas and Florida starting tomorrow, everything

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>reopens and and everything takes off, or vice versa. Other states.

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>New York is doing well, it goes in the other

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>direction in the fall. So we're still we're not locked

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>down like we were, but the economy still doesn't have

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the traction. We're pure stimulus works, and the feat is

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>really out of bullets here in terms of transferring income.

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You as if the market goes down again or whatever,

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they he'll buy more treasuries though, expand the balance sheet.

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>They'll do what they can. But the market was even

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>more liquidity to help put a floor on the equity market.

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's still an income transfer program in effect, as

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a program that's going to stimulate and grow

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the economy. And the one thing I heard because is

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that on the policy framework and looking at it from

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of the minority employment and the fact and

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you're landed right well right, But I agree with in

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the U in the framework of letting inflation run a lot.

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Hot Hotter, I'll tell you what he's really saying, and

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the order he's giving things. Employment is the lead

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>dog here, and employment is going to be the lead

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>dog for a long time. And just because you know,

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>with the high class problem of unemployment being down to

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>four at some point, looking at and already unemployment, looking

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>at all these fraud things, they're not going to be

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>quick to start tightening in anticipation that that four percent

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate is going to create an inflation problem. They

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to let this employment go until they actually

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>see an inflation problem, and then they'll react to it.

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's really the framework. Yeah. Interesting, interesting, really interesting breakdown.

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>You'll in a final word to you, what's the most

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>important data point we need to be thinking about next.

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I was actually wanted to reiterate and the

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 1>FED put it in the statement, and that was quite

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>surprised they did. The path of the economy will depend

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>significantly on the course of the virus. They wanted to

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>reiterate that. And at the end of the day, Uh, yeah, Well,

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>fiscal measures aim to provide the necessary breach to whether

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>economic turmoil. The fit is keeping interest rate flow. At

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, the strength of the recovery

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>will largely be and on containing the spread of the virus,

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and at that point we will need further policy support,

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.399
<v Speaker 1>whether from the FED or from the fiscal authority. Yeah,

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's I'm really glad you brought that up,

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>because it is interesting to hear a policymaker essentially say

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a health crisis, folks. At its core, it

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is a health crisis, and I think sometimes we lose

0:34:21.560 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>sight of that. All right, thank you so much for

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that reaction, Elena Shall Let you have a senior US

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>economists for Bloomberg Economics and Steeplitz Chief US Economists fort T. S.

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Lombard a journal Now, but you let me drive. Oh no, no, no,

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>no home, honey, please, I'll do the right revel I

0:34:45.040 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>want to drive, just drive the questions trying drive to

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the close. Thanks well US Bloomberg Radio. All right, it's

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>time for the drive to close. Already here we are

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>at the close of trading on a very green day.

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>As you heard Charlie Pellett mentioned. Let's get into it

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>with Chuck Lieberman, co founder, chief investment officer of Advisor's

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management, twining us on the phone from Lovely Ridgewood,

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Chuck, how the heck are you? I'm doing well. Thanks, Yeah,

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>easy to do well. I feel like when the market

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is I was just saying to Dave Wilson, I don't

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>know if you heard me, uh SMP in the green.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>It looks like we're going to finish up in this

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>way that it is in the green for the year.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>That's got to feel a little bit surprising, right, Uh. Well,

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's really a mixed story because obviously the

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>tech sector things are related to UH, healthcare all or

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>recorded levels, but there are lots of parts of the market,

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, everything related to transportation, lee sure, um, vacations, entertainment,

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff is still down. So it's really a

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>tale of two cities. Yeah, it's such a good point.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, speaking with Steven Skanky earlier on in

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the show ahead of UH hearing from j Pale, and

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 1>notably j Pal himself mentioned some of those travel in

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>hospitality stocks as you said, and you know, Skanky made

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the really interesting point that you know, the stock market

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>really is driven, as you say, by not just a

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 1>small number of names, but also publicly traded companies that

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>probably are able to weather this a little bit better

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>uh than certainly some of the small businesses who have

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:41.879
<v Speaker 1>just gotten really really crushed, to say the least, amid

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>all of this. So what do you do as an investor,

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>knowing that bifurcation and that chasm that we talked so

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>much about between the real economy that we're all sort

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of experiencing and a pretty enthusiastic stock market. Well, you

0:36:57.719 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>gott have you gotta break it down. So in the case,

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 1>for example of technology stocks, the Amazons and Netflix, uh,

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 1>they have experienced a surge in the band and you've

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>got to adjust for that rise in demand and make

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a judgment do the stocks today represent value? Right? And

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>there there's a more difficult case to make because obviously

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>demand is accelerated by a couple of years, and a

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>case can be made that, you know, maybe Netflix is

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>now expensive. You have a much easier time on the

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>other side of the coin, where you look at companies

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that have been hurt by the pandemic and you can

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>see when some of those companies might start to see improvement. Uh,

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>They're all not gonna come back at the same time.

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Some will come back in the early phases, some will

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>come back in the later phases. We're not terribly interested in,

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, getting into some of the airline stocks quite yet.

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That will probably come back a little later. But there

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of other parts of the market, the parts

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, that will come back sooner, and that's

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>where we want to play, all right. Well, when it

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>welcome into the mix. My partner, Scarlet Food hustling over

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>from TV. She was watching the FED literally and talking

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>about it. Um, So scar bring it all together for us,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>you like me and like Chuck. Here, we were listening

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty closely to J. Powe. We're listening pretty closely, and J.

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Powill sounded a little more downbeat certainly than he was

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in June. Given how the COVID situation has worsened in

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States, one thing that's come up a lot

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is how debbish the FED is, And of course that's

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>what spurring stocks higher right now and bon yields lower.

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>The vet's been buying treasuries and all sorts of other

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 1>securities to ensure smooth market functioning. I wonder Chuck has

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>all this intervention led us to a point where we

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of market dysfunction, to market still serve

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 1>an important purpose in signaling anything about the economy. When

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the central mike is all in and providing tons and

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>tons of liquidity to push prices higher, well, you know,

0:38:57.120 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>their objective is not to push prices higher. The objective

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is to make the economy recover. And as J. Powell

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>himself said, you know, they have to hope for the best,

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but they have to plan for the worst. So that's

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>why he sounds, you know, kind of downbeat um and

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, given that he's FED chairman, it makes perfectly

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>good sense when you think about it. You've got to

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>think about where the opportunity is for recovery as an investor,

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and from our standpoint, we see, you know, the whole

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>sectors of the economy that have been hurt pretty badly

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>by the virus, by the pandemic, and their price for

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a horrible environment. But we think that some parts of

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 1>them are really cheap and very attractive because, unlike the

0:39:38.920 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>FED chairman, we can look ahead and think about the

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a vaccine coming this fall. He refuses to

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do that because again he's planning for the worst. We

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>can think about what's more likely, and there is a

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>good chance that the uh that a vaccine is coming

0:39:55.880 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 1>probably this year. Certainly by next year, it's doubtful we'll

0:39:59.880 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have enough doses to really help the economy on our

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>broad basis in but by early next year wouldn't surprise

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:08.800
<v Speaker 1>me if we have quite a bit of it. And

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we're thinking ahead, not about how bad

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>things can possibly get. So chalk love talking names, as

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. So let's talk about some banks, because you know, financials,

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it's been a little bit of a different crisis this

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>time around for them. Where do you find value and

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what do you like when it comes to the big banks? Yeah,

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>so again, as Powell said, our banks are in really

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>good financial shape. Uh. They've got a lot of capital.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>The FED change the stress tests at the last minute

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>because of the pandemic to stress them even more, uh,

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and even under those circumstances, our banks are in pretty

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>good shape. So we like the big money center banks

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, all of them. Uh. Even even yes, I

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>do like wells Argo because Will's Fargo is badly Wills

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Fargo got hit by the pandemic and their own personal

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:10.640
<v Speaker 1>uh problems, and one coming on top of the other

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>really depressed the stock price. I do think Wills Fargo

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is not only going to survive, they'll overcome it. Uh.

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>They obviously are going to engage in a major cost

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>reduction effort. Their costs are relatively high. They've got to

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>earn their place back with the regulators. They're working on that.

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>They replaced the senior management. New senior management has that

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>as a very primary mission. UH. And so if you're patient,

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Wills Fargo is a very cheap stock that

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 1>will come back very nicely. What else you like as

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>you look across the financials, maybe mortgages. Well, in the

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>mortgage space, you can pick up different types of exposure.

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>For example, the fet is going out and buying mortgages

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Fanning May Jenny May mortgagees. Those mortgages are very safe.

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>They sold off during the pandemic the market's panic. People

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 1>were dumping securities left and right, including government guaranteed mortgages.

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>But with a FED coming back in that space has

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not only stabilized, it's gone back to very healthy levels.

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Mortgage rates are now very low. People are refinancing a

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>company like American Capital Agency. UH. His trading at a

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>discount to book about book with a yield over ten

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.680
<v Speaker 1>in this environment where you know yet sixty basis points

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on a ten year treasury to be able to pick

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>up ten on a company that owns government guaranteed mortgages

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is very attractive. Absolutely, absolutely, we're going to leave it there. Unfortunately,

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Chuck to get to the clothes. We really appreciate you

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>joining us, Chuck Lieberman, co founder, chief investment officer of

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Advisor's Capital Management. Johnny's on the phone from Ridgewood. Thanks

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening to Blueberg Business Week. Download podcast

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, Southcloud, Bloomberg dot com, or wherever you get

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts. And of course you can always listen to

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News