WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Bret Barker & John Stoltzfus

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Single best idea, the last one of the year. We

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 2>will revisit in January to reframe what seems to be

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>an exceptional twenty twenty five. I just mentioned to Paul Sweeney,

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 2>I've never seen a holiday season with less focus on

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>how stores are doing. I don't know why that is.

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll pick up the pieces in January. One thing

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>I heard two or three days ago which I do

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 2>agree with, and I think it's important. We're setting ourselves

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>up for an exceptionally important earning season. Look for that

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 2>January twenty five ish. I think Apple's January thirtieth and

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 2>into early February with a frenzy JP Morgan I'm assuming

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 2>is I don't have it in front of me January fifteenth, seventeenth, whatever.

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 2>But the earning season I think this year, for the

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.639
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter will really be something on this final single

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>best idea for the year on what I watch most closely,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>which is the inflation adjusted rate tips piece tenure. Here's

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Brett Barker of TCW on the left coast. Brett Barker

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>on higher real rates.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 3>This is really reminiscent of fall of twenty twenty three.

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>If you remember back then, there was a lot of

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 3>talk of risk premium fiscal largess, right, and we had

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 3>real rates in the thirty yearth sector close to two sixty.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>We're not too far from there now, and the ten

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 3>year rates within twenty base points where we were there.

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 3>So I think we look at that. I think real

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 3>rates are restricted. So for us, I think you're getting

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>close to these points. I think people are talking about

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 3>how we can go. It's like, well, I think at

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 3>this point at time, you're basically back to almost PREGFC

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 3>levels on real rates, and we don't think the economy

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>is the same as it was in PGFC, so we

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 3>think these are pretty restricted real rates.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>That's really important statement Brett Barker TCW. Here, and this

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 2>is this restrictive or accommodative goes to the heart of

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>the matter. That's the debate that's engaged in economics, finance, investment,

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and indeed redounding over to international relations as well and

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the real rate. You know, but for those of you

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 2>that don't follow this, from a one point nine zero

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>ish out to two point twenty five ish is a

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 2>really significant move. TCW cautious there as well on a

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Christmas Eve, Benjamin Ladler then at HSBC. This is twenty

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 2>eighteen twelve, twenty four eighteen. Ben Ladler said, get on

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>board stocks. It's one of the great bullmarket calls of

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 2>all time. It's been a six year run EBB and

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 2>flow here COVID. I looked in two thousand and I

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 2>think twenty three. Maybe we had a draw down a

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 2>seven or eight percent. Whatever, the answer is, it's been

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a great bullmarket. And congratulations to strategists that have led

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:51.839
<v Speaker 2>on that. One who's led is from OpCo. His name

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 2>is John Stolfis. He writes a brilliant short accessible non

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 2>Mathey notes, and they talk about participation in the market

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 2>and participating with an optimism the corporations will adapt. He

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 2>has a stunning call out the SPX seven thousand ish

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 2>that gets you out near DOWBT forty nine thousand, Dow

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand, maybe with some optimism and a cup of

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 2>eggnag out to fifty one thousand on the doubt. John

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 2>STOFISOVOPKO the view forward.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>First thing, I've got to say that I think the

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>bears got it wrong and that they thought the FED

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>was going to blow up the economy. Push US into

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a recession with the with the Ray high cycle that

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>they started in March twenty two. Instead, the Fed was

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive in exercising its dual mandate. Then the bear's

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>been really bid wrong on the consumer. We always say,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>don't bet against the American consumer. The consumer discretionary, by

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the way, is the best performing S and P five

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred index since August fit which was the summer low,

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>which was when the market had that fullback of around

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>eight percent.

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweeney told me to buy Walmart. I didn't. I

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>guess that's consumer discretionary. John Stolphus of OpCo on your

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 2>community across the nation on Apple car Play worldwide, on

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Apple car Play and Android Auto, on Serius XM channel

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 2>one twenty one and from Nathan Hagars Washington in ninety

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 2>nine one FM, Tamal Kataden and Boston in ninety two

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>nine and on YouTube. All I can say is subscribe

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg podcast. It is our future and my future

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 2>here at Bloomberg Surveillance, and of course this podcast find

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 2>it a YouTube podcasts. This is single best idea by