WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - A Deeply Fractured & Dangerous Moment For America + Why George Washington’s Farewell Address Resonates Today

0:00:04.920 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello, They're Happy Monday. It is September fifteenth, with another

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Chuck Podcast. I'll be honest, the last

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>five days have been quite difficult when just thinking about

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>American politics, thinking about the country, thinking about whether we're

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>going to bring ourselves together. Each day when I was

0:00:28.280 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for a glimmer of hope, I rarely found one.

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's even in the one person who seems

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to be meeting the moment, the governor of Utah, Spencer Cox.

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Even his comments today were sort of demoralizing. Understandably so,

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because I don't disagree with anything he has said at

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>this point, and in fact believe he is the leader

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. But when trying to figure out in

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.959
<v Speaker 1>some ways, it's easy to understand how we got here,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>there's so many forces against unity in this country. Right,

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there's so many forces for division. Right, there's there's you know,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like the system is rigged towards division. Right.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Our system is not rigged for unity. It is right now,

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>rigged towards division in how it works. And I think

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that's why it feels as if boy, there's I mean,

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that we don't have the president we need

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in the moment to meet this moment. I've been trying to.

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been hopeful, right, I think you give as much

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>grace as you can. Maybe more people will get to him,

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe he will see that this is something that he

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>cannot just use to exploit politically. But let's be honest.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>That hope is fading. And you can call me naive,

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>but I would have done it and said it the

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>same way before, because only we only have one president

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>at a time, and you know, hope springs eternal that

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that he'll see the light, but he is. He is

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly blind on this one. Let me give you a

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>quick little rundown of how I'm going to attack the

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>episode today. We're going to talk a little bit more

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>about where I think this is going short term versus

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>long term, how and what to watch for in the

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>two political parties here and how they handle this moment.

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I've got my It's Monday. We do every week. I'm

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>going to give you sort of a history lesson based

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>on something that happened in history. This week. It is

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>between September fifteenth and September twenty first, So I'll give

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you just a clue. It'll be I will tell you

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>what our moment in history, and then the dive we're

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>going to do. But as I said, are this day,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this week in history moment? I'll just give you a

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>small clue. We're going to go back to September nineteenth,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>seventeen ninety six. The real history junkies in my feed

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>here probably have an idea of what event I will

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>be doing a deep dive on, but I want to

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>keep a little bit of suspense until we'll do it

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>after the interview. For those of you that listen to

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the entire the entire episode in one download, of course,

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we do split it up into a couple of downloads

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to have the interview on its own

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and all of my work separately on its own. I'll

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>also do a little bit of what I learned this

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>week in my obsession of college football. In short, I'm

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how is it that both my

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>football teams seem to be playing so well, so methodically

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>well that it is, and just out physically, just physically

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>better than every team that they play right now. It is.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It is both exciting me and scaring me. I'm waiting

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for the other shoe to drop on one of my

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>teams if not both. But let me just say I

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>am enjoying this moment. It's great to be a Miami

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Hurricane and it's great to be a Green Bay Packer

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>fan in this current in this current time. But as

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>much as I would love to continue compartmentalizing as I

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>did yesterday and Saturday with football to try to not

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>think about our current state of politics, I can't help

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>but keep coming back to that and when thinking about

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>where to begin, you know, I had my new Sphere

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>show last night, and for that episode and I talked

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to an expert on political violence and an expert on

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of how do you you know is there such

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thing as is prevention in the political violence space? You know,

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>can interventions work? And the professor from American University is

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>someone that believes it. Believes that it can, and that

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>there's data to back it up, that there is ways

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>to mitigate the risk of violence down the road. But

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it does take It takes will, right, and that's ultimately

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the question I have is do we have

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the will? Do we have the guts to do what

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it takes to bring ourselves together when we're attacked by

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>outsiders like we were in nine to eleven. But we

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>unified pretty quickly, and we stayed fairly united for good

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>twelve to eighteen months. And even when we started dividing,

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>we didn't divide about the attack. We divided about the response, right.

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>We thought about the wars. But we did it politically, right,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>We did it the way you're supposed to do it.

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But every time we had a chance to remember nine

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>to eleven, even in the harshest presidential election years, the

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>two candidates at least in sixteen attended the same event, right,

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>So we have we have tempted to sort of grasp

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at that unifying moment. And the fact is, anytime we've

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>been attacked from the outside, it has unified us as

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a country. Our most you know, unifying period of American

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>history was during the Cold War because we had an

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>existential threat. And I think you've heard some of you

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>have heard my thesis quite a bit that I am

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>somewhat concerned that actually the only thing that unites us

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>are existential threats from the outside. We have threats from

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the inside, and they only divide us. And that's what

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it feels like today that all these threats that we're

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>dealing with right now are dividing us. Look, there is

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>some data here to back this up. In just the

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>first six months of this year, Okay, according to the

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some folks at the University of Maryland who tracked

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this very well, very methodically, in a healthy academic setting.

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>America has endured nearly a one hundred and fifty politically

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>motivated attacks in the first six months of this year.

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It's almost double. So it doesn't count the Charlie Cook

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk murder. It's almost double the number in the

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>same period last year. We've had twenty one people killed. Okay,

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>since January. That included what happened in New Year's Eve

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans when you had that radical radical extremists

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>attack Bourbon Street. We had a pro Palestinian activists killed

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>two Israeli embassy employees in Washington. We had eleven armed

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>militant storm Texas immigration ice facility. Earlier this year, we

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>had a gunman obsessed with COVID conspiracies spring gunfire at

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>CDC's headquarters in Atlanta, killed a police officer. Minnesota. Christian

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>nationalists went door to door trying to murder Democratic lawmakers

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and successfully did one and her husband wounding another. And

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of course now we've had the killing of Charlie Kirk

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in broad daylight on a college campus and a place

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that as a parent of two college kids that you know,

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we want college to be in a place. I know

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>what I to not put words in other people's mouths.

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tell you what I want college to

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>be and what college has been for me. It's about

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>exposing yourself to different people, different ideas, different ideologies, different experiences,

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>different everything. And it's about learning, right. But the only

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>way to learn is you need to be exposed to

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>good ideas and bad ideas. But the exposure is important.

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Trying to hide from ideas, even ones that you don't

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>agree with, doesn't do anything to help a situation. Hiding

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 1>ideas only can make things worse. But the fact is

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>where we are living in a tinder box right now.

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're at a fork in the row. And I

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>said that the other day, and you know, the hope

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>is that is, you know, when are we going to

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>have enough is enough? Moment? We've been We've had ten

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 1>years of this intense political division where it is where

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>awful rhetoric has turned into physical violence. I want to

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>quote Spencer Cox, who said on an appearance at NBC

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, he said, and I think he's right. Social

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>media has played a direct role in every single assassination

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and assassination attempt that we have seen over the last

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 1>five or six years. I don't think I disagree with that.

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's been you know, another thing that's been a

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>bit frustrating in what we've watched so far in the

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>reaction is that, again, outside of the govern or of Utah,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>outside of Governor Cox, nobody's tried to meet this moment.

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's tried to look at this as an American first.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>There are way too many people responding as a partisan first,

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>doing some yah butts. What do I mean by a yabbot? Well,

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there was an example of one, and it was by

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a reporter and it was Charlie Gasparino, and I want

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to quote him, and he said, because he's proud of

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>his point, he retweeted his point. He said, what he

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>said on Fox is what he believes that there are

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>violent loons on the right and the left, but a

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>certain type of violent rhetoric is totally accepted as morally

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>righteous on the left and the cultural institution that dominates.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>So this is where I want to and that would

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>include the university as well as most of the mainstream Meredia,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's where I want to stop right there. I

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>believe he believes this. I don't believe he's making up

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this mindset. I can tell you. I don't believe what

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>he says is true. That's not from my observation and

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>this idea, and I've seen it, you know where no, no, no, Yes,

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we have some loans on our side, but they're they

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>don't They're not representative of us, but your loon, the

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>loons on the other side are representative of everybody out there.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is the problem. You know. I would say,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>give yourself a test on this, because I've been doing

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it with myself all weekend. Like you know, I'm I'm

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty convinced. I know how we got here, and I

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>know that my definitive belief is not going to be

0:11:54.720 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>shared by everybody, but I'm sure that so a piece

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of what I believe would be shared by a lot

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of people. And that's sort of how you become I mean,

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>this is what politics is about. Politics isn't about I'm

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>right and you're wrong. Politics is about here are my ideas,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>here's your ideas. Are they compatible? And if they're at

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>all compatible, is there a middle ground? And elections decide, Hey,

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>does the middle ground? Fifty to fifty is the middle ground?

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Sixty forty is the middle ground? Seventy thirty right? Right?

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Elections are a tug of war in some ways about

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>where the middle is. But it's still supposed to be

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the middle on this stuff. And so I

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>think that is the the problem that we have is

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>that we're stuck. When you believe you're you're when you

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>when your beliefs are righteous in your head, then no

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>counter factual is going to convince you of you can't

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:14.599
<v Speaker 1>compromise on sort of righteous beliefs, right, And so it

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>becomes where there's just almost no You can't even put

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>yourself in the shoes of somebody who disagrees with you.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I imagine today that there are some on the left

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>who now understand a little bit better what folks on

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 1>the right have called said about cancel culture. That expressing

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>one's opinion, as vile as it may be to you,

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is simply that person's opinion. And is it enough if

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing that is illegal and it hasn't incited anybody

0:13:55.080 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to do anything violent or illegal, should it cost them

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>their livelihoods. And so, you know, we so badly want

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a virtue signal during any given moment, right whatever the

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>moment is. Whether it was virtue signaling right after George

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Floyd and what happened to him, you saw a lot

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of it virtue signaling right after we've seen with Charlie Kirk,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than sort of figuring out, how do I take

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>my idea in solving this problem? And I broaden the

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>appeal of that argument that I can persuade somebody who

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>mostly disagrees with my point of view to at least

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>not just acknowledge that my point of view's fair, rational,

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but maybe there's something to it, rather than being so

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>convinced that you're right and your political opponent is wrong

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's nothing to be learned from them on this

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>one iota. And I know that anybody here can practice

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what about is that the minute somebody? I mean, you know,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going through it now, right and and I've got

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to catch myself. I mean, I see so many one

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>sided conversations about violence right right now on the right

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>not acknowledging what happened at the CDC, or what happened

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to those Minnesota lawmakers, or or somehow marginalizing those events

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that they have nothing to do with this, when frankly,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they all have to do with this. It's all we have.

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We have we have we have created this information ecosystem. Uh.

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to quote Mike Johnson on this, who

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought said something that was worth quoting here. Uh

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>when he said this, people have to stop framing simple

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>policy disagreements in terms of existential threats to our democracy.

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't call the other side fascists or enemies of

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the state and not understand that there are some deranged

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>people in our society who will take that as cues

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to act. I know some of you are going to

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>be like Mike Johnson practices both ciderisms by using fascists

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and enemies of the state, right, the language that each

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>side is using these days to try to dehumanize and

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>de americanize somebody who has an opposing political view. But

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>good for him, because he's exactly right. We have gotten it.

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is is that when we're in person,

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't speak or behave this way. It's why so

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>many of the elected officials I talk to will say, oh, no,

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not that bad up here, when you know, there

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of people who are bad actors who

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>go out there to just be grifters. Right, they're just

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>playing to the algorithms, playing to the to the to

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the influenced peddlers. Who are you know, these these folks

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that that obsess with how much traffic that they get,

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and all of this play to the algorithms. For the

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>most part, when these elected ds and elected ours get together,

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they they don't speak in vile language to each other,

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>with the very rare exception of a couple. For the

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>most part, they interact with each other the way you

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>enact with average people at the grocery store, at the

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>post office. Right, you don't behave like an asshole. Well

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>ninety five percent of us don't want to behave like

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>an asshole in public. So I don't know why we

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>do this online. And then of course we have the

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>entire I mean, what's of all the frustrating aspects of

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the political response to the last five days, the lack

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>of focus and accountability on the on, on the UH, on,

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the information warpers of our time, the big tech companies

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and their algorithms who systematically surface information that gets you

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>angry so that you stand on a platform and you keep,

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, giving them the ability to sell ads based

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on your rage. They're the problem. They're destroying the information ecosystem.

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>They're the issue. I mean, what Elon Musk has done

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to ask, Mark Zuckerberg's done to Facebook, with the Chinese

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party has done with TikTok or who the hell

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>else runs it. It's amazing on certain days what it

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>emphasizes and what it doesn't. So we know, I don't

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>know if we do know. Actually I sit there. We

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>know that we're better in person than we are online,

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's hard to I think we all know.

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>When we're not online, we're a little bit better, and

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>when we're too much online, we're a little bit worse.

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason. Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact,

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars,

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>which was a staggering forty times minds the amount that

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the insurance company originally offered. That original offer six hundred

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred and

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars. So with more than one thousand lawyers

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>across the country, they know how to deliver for everyday people.

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>If you're injured, you need a lawyer. You need somebody

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to get your back. Check out for the People dot com,

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Slash podcast or Dow Pound law Pound five two nine

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>law on your cell phone. And remember all law firms

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>are not the same, So check out Morgan and Morgan.

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Their fee is free unless they win. I'm not sure

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>things will get super better in the short term. I

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think you have you have too many folks invested. We've

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>already seen some. I mean it looks to me like

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>President Trump and Stephen Miller in particular, view this as

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a moment to exploit for political gain. That is dangerous

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and that risks. You know, each side justifies their radicalization

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>based on the other side. I mean Donald Trump did

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it the other day when he was asked directly on

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Fox and Friends. Hey, we got there's some fringe people,

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>extremists on the right, and he said yeah. But he yeah,

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>butted it right, He said, but our extremists care about

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 1>law and or they're upset because of crime issues. He

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>just sort of manufactured some rationale. But again, he was

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>looking for a reason not to accept any piece of

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>this that somehow he has any responsibility here whatsoever or

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 1>has been a contributor to the violent climate that we

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>all live right now in America. And when you don't

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have a leader who even if he doesn't believe he's

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>as big of a contributor as others believe he is,

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 1>but if he doesn't have the ability to sort of

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He claims to be a Christian, so

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at least admitgift send because he has on this issue

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not tried to bring people together, and he doesn't

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's never pretended he was planning on doing it.

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, he says unity would be nice, by right,

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't know any other way. The politics of division

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have been extraordinarily successful. And this is what is very

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>frustrating is that those that have power right now may

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>believe they've got political power because of the politics of division,

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that the politics of division has been good politics for them,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>even if it's been unhealthy for the country. And that's

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>where we have to get. We have to change the

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>incentive structures. It's been fun to look up all sorts

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of new quotes that people have been throwing out there,

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's a Milton Friedman quote that I wanted to

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>share that sort of fits. I think that fits this

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>moment right now, and that is this issue of incentives. Right,

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>do you know our elected officials? Does it matter whether

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.959
<v Speaker 1>they're good or bad? Or does it matter more if

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the incentives are good or bad. Here's how Milton Friedman argued.

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>He says, what is important is not the particular person

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>who is elected president or the party he belongs to.

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I have often said we shall not correct the state

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of affairs by electing the right people. We've tried that

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the right people before they're elected become the wrong people

0:23:56.680 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>after they're elected. We've all seen that. Right, the important

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is to make it politically profitable for the wrong

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>people to do the right thing. If it is not

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>politically profitable for the wrong people to do the right thing,

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the right people will not do the right thing ever

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:23.400
<v Speaker 1>or either excuse me. Look, I think our own experiences

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>prove this our incentive structure. If there was a reward

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>structure in our politics that punished dividers and rewarded uniters,

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we would have two parties fighting to say, no, we

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>represent we are the better unifying vision for America. We

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>do not have two parties competing for a unifying vision

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of America. We have two parties competing that says their

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>vision is wrong, their vision is wrong, any part of

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it is un American. Sort of, we do two things

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to each other. We dehumanize and we de americanize, and

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of the same thing. But in our political debate,

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can make somebody seem on American, it gives

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you makes you look. I have used the phrase, hey,

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, and I will say that's on American,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and I mean it from a defense of the constitution

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of what I believe the American way is. But I

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that maybe the person I'm criticizing believes what they're

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>doing is in the what they think is in the

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>best interests of America. But the fact is we do

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>have a we do have this issue of a messed

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>up incentive system, and in fact, we don't have you know,

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we we have sort of a couple of problems. One

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is we have two parties who are not comfortable policing

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>their own sides. And the thing is is that we are.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>We never want the other side policing our side. Who

0:25:58.000 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the hell do you think you are? You don't get

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like you don't get to criticize a

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>family member if you're not a member of my family.

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I get to criticize a family member that is a

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>member of my family, right you know, we know that.

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, Hey, that's you don't do that. We're a

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>united front as a family. If we've got disagreements, we're

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>going to express them ourselves. But that also means policing

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>your side, and we don't police right now. There is

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a fear of policing your own side because it quote

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.160
<v Speaker 1>gives the other side of victory. Don't do that, then

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you're acknowledging that the criticism was correct. So you've got

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of muted Democrats and muted Republicans about the

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:48.199
<v Speaker 1>excesses of their political basis. Because there's fear right, the

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>information ecosystem rewards the extremes. The extremes are controlling the

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>political narratives of both parties more so than ever, because

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if you at all try to strike a moderate tone,

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're enabling the other side, you're enabling corporate interests,

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>or you're enabling the other side in some form or another.

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And it has led a lot of what I think

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it goes to the Milton Friedman quote. There's a lot

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of good people who are not doing the right thing

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>in this moment because there is no incentive to do

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the right thing. And if the right thing is to

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>speak out, the right thing is to vote against a

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>certain cabinet official here or there. The right thing is

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, not endorse somebody, not vote for somebody,

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>make it clear why. But there's this fear right, the

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>incentive is not there, and so we have to change.

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>We have to change these incentive structures. And it probably

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen without new leadership. So what I would say here,

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and before I get to them going to I'm going

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to do something here that's really a Hopefully we'll chap chap,

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>the ass of hard left and hard right equally, and

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be a defense of both siderisms.

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to that in a minute on this front.

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.959
<v Speaker 1>But look, I do think that you're gonna I do

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna see both parties divide loosely between the

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>peacemakers and the agitators on the right. I think the

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>agitators are in charge, right, that's President Trump and Stephen Miller.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I think many there are many in his orbit that

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>want revenge retribution in some form, and do view this

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>as some sort of ideological movement to be destroyed or eliminated,

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>which is not American right, and which is only going

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to serve to radicalize radically. You know, each side keeps

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>using something the other side does to radical to defend

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>their radicalism. I promise you, behaving that way is not

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>going to bring peace. If anything, it is going to

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>bring more division, and it's going to only divide and

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.239
<v Speaker 1>and and I think frankly, there are political actors who

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to see this as a feature, not a bug.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It's going to divide the left and divide the middle

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in ways that should just allow the right to keep

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>power because I think the Democrats are also going to

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be split between what I would call essentially your peacemakers

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and your agitators, and it is I don't see, you know,

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the correct end of this story is Spencer Cox becomes

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>president in the moment that we need in this moment,

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But I I don't know if where we are in

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>three years. I certainly don't think the party that he

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>belongs to wouldver nominate him, and I'm not sure the

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the Democratic Party whatever nominate him. He's quite

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>he's pretty conservative ideologically, but he's moderate in temperament, right,

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that we've been missing, his moderate temperament

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in our political leadership. I think Joe Biden was elected

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>because many people thought he was going to be moderate

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and temperament and he was. We don't know what he

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>was because he never really was an active president, right.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>That was the problem. He wasn't really out there and

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:39.959
<v Speaker 1>he governed. He didn't governed. He didn't govern as if

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the country was a divided nation that needed to heal,

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>which is what he said he was going to govern.

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>He instead governed pretty pretty progressively. He governed basically, he

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>governed for his base, just like Donald Trump is doing

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>governing for his base, making the middle uncomfortable, making the

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>moderates in his party uncomfortable. But there's you know, that's

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>our politics is controlled right now by the two political bases,

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and they have a lion's share of the media mouthpieces,

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and they will use use the algorithms to punish anybody

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that's daring to preach some form of moderation of any form,

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>whether temperamental moderation or policy moderation. So I do expect that,

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's likely that you'll see I mean, you know,

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not sure this is the correct, the perfect

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this is not the perfect analogy, but I do think,

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, after the death of George Floyd, there was

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a sort of collective breath we all

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>took together, and then it quickly quickly polarized. Right, things

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>quickly divided. This the division we didn't even really have

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a moment of coming together on this. After Kirk, we've

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of divided pretty fast. I don't think it should

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:24.239
<v Speaker 1>matter what more we learn about the gunman, right, I

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>think we know enough. We know enough that it's pretty

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>clear to me that anybody that chooses to shoot somebody

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>has been radicalized, and it's pretty clear where all the

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>radicalization comes from. It comes from our online discourse, does

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>not come from our face to face discourse, but it

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>comes from us. It comes from our political discourse. So

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>our political discourse radicalized this person, and that's what happened.

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I know others are going to be looking, you know,

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to scapegoat the trans community here. That's only going to

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>make things worse to try to go down that road.

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think we all know that's where that's where

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>many might be headed on the right, and that's likely

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to be met with its own set of resistance and

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>its own in a in a way that that is,

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, likely that we will spiral downward further. Rather

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 1>than trying to figure out how we how we can

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>stitch this back together. I think the place to start

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is obvious. It's big tech. It's the algorithms. It's how

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we share information. It's not just how politicians talk, it's

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>how the language is shared, it's how it's what's surfaced,

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's what's it's it's the whole thing, and it's pretty

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty hard to fix. I've been thinking about this

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>all weekend, and it's much as I feel pretty convinced

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that I know this is the core problem that this

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>really is. It's this good luck fixing it, especially when

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>there are people who have gotten political power based on it.

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think this is a you know,

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 1>until the voters. Ultimately, it's us that have to decide

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we want a different path. We have to decide that

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>we want that we're going to take the politics of

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>unity over that we're we're going to We're going to

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>take a breath from our own ideology for a two

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>year or four year period simply to bring peace and

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to try to to try to you know, I've said

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>we America needs a pastor for patriotism twenty twenty four.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I thought that person might be Bill mcgraven. Twenty twenty five.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>It looks like the pastor for patriotism might be Spencer Cox.

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But he can only succeed if we want to listen.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the ways to solve our information ecosystem issue

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is that we've got to we've actually got a We

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 1>do need to have a media that finds a way

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>two makes room for multiple ideologies and multiple sides of

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a conversation. You know, we we've we've gotten this shorthand

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>that the left and the right likes to use both siderisms. Right,

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit more of a criticism from the

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.920
<v Speaker 1>left than it is from the right. But what it

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>really is it's when when you know, nobody from the

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>middle ever uses both siderisms, it's usually an ideologue and

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a and a hard partisan on the left or right

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 1>that does because they want to disavow an argument. No,

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right, that's wrong, And they've accused people in mainstream

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>journalism or in what some of us call it independent journalism,

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:20.240
<v Speaker 1>however you want to describe it, that somehow it you're

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 1>equating it, and it's like, no, what you're trying to

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 1>do is bring everybody into the same room so that

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 1>everybody faces similar accountability tests. And I happen to be

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>somebody who believes that if you present here's what one

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.280
<v Speaker 1>side is saying, here's what the other side is saying,

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to treat you like an idiot. I'm

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do my best to test both theories of

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the case and let you come to your conclusion of

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>which path might be better. And so if you don't

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>take a competing perspective seriously in your news coverage. If

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you claim that you were doing journalism, you're not going

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to be seen as an independent referee number one, and

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be missing out on interesting arguments and

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 1>better ways perhaps to defend your beliefs. Journalism's credibility, doesn't,

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, come from pleasing one side. It comes from

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>proving fairness, proving that you will give every actor every

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 1>chance to be heard, even when their arguments are weak,

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 1>because in some ways that's the best way to expose

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a weak argument. How often you, oh, they have nothing

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to say. But if you don't give them a chance,

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>then people retreat to their corners and retreat to their corners,

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and everybody retreats to their corners. And when they think

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.399
<v Speaker 1>they're not getting a fair shot in either way, then

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody says, forget it, And I'm just going to to

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>preach to the my choir, and I don't even want

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>to tune in to listen to your other choir. But

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>here's why presenting, if you can be a place that

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>can get people from all sides to participate, it actually

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>forces more accountability, and it forces more collective accountability. If

0:38:20.560 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you have politicians, corporations, activists, and institutions all having to

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>go to the same places to talk and to make

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>their case. Then we'll have shared reality, we'll have shared debate.

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>This lack of a shared reality, this lack of shared debate,

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, a both sides framing actually ensures

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>that no one escapes scrutiny, even those aligned with what

0:38:52.680 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you may personally believe. True accountability means discomfort, and that

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>means you should be a little uncomfortable having to defend yourself.

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But if your ideas are sound, then you'll get more

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>comfortable doing And in a pluralistic democracy, which is what

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we claim to be, multiple perspectives have to be able

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to coexist. And if we try to create a situation

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>where we're going to get rid of an ideology because

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>we don't like it, you this radical ideology over here,

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>radical ideology over there. Do you think you can just

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>get rid of it, You'll end up perhaps giving more

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>attention to it and having it untested at the same time.

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's no better way to showcase America than

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>when you have people who disagree with each other appearing together.

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.400
<v Speaker 1>That's something we don't see as often as we used to.

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 1>It was a staple of political talk shows of the

0:40:06.360 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties, and for about eighteen months after nine

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>eleven that has completely and utterly disappeared. And do realize

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that if you hate our information ecosystem, it's because we

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have any both sides vehicles anymore in the mainstream.

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>We have outrage media, and outrage media thrives on one

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:38.959
<v Speaker 1>sided coverage because it deepens audience loyalty, pure and simple, right,

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Megan Kelly podsave America. They have a loyal audience. They

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>cannot ever veer from that too often. Every once in

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a while they can tell their audience what an uncomfortable truth,

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But if they do it too often, they'd lose their audience.

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're an activist and you're you're and you're organizing

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for a policeitical party, maybe you can rationalize that, but

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not journalism. And if you're doing both ciderisms right,

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it means you're listening to all sides and then you

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:24.800
<v Speaker 1>test the claims against actual evidence. Now, look, there's lazy

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 1>both sides isms right when reporters just lazily equate facts

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>with opinion. Sciences say climate change is real, critics disagree.

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that's stupid. Both ciderisms. What you do is you

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lay out the arguments. Here's what climate scientists are saying.

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's are those who think that this is they're making

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>an argument that says that climate science is overreacting. And

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 1>here's why. The question is what are we going to

0:41:54.360 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>do about it? But I'll tell you this, it's and

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>moments of this huge political division that I missed the

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>times when we had where both were people that regardless

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.399
<v Speaker 1>of the side of the aye you're on, you felt

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>like you were welcome pretty much in any political talk show,

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in any political green room. And I don't think anybody

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>thinks that right now. I promise you this. I'd like

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to think. I am we are trying here to make

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>this a home for that. I'm not going to sit

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>here and round the edges for you. You know, I'm gonna

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>speak truth to power in my own head, meaning what

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe. But I also I'm a I'm a stubborn incrementalist,

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>and I'm fully aware that we're three hundred and fifty

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>million people with three hundred and fifty million different opinions,

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and you've got or if you want everybody rowing in

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the same direction, you've got to do baby, steps, and

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be talking to each other, not past

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 1>each other. All right, I lecture over. I know I

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:14.399
<v Speaker 1>went long. I didn't think I had more to say,

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but yes, I just defended what some of you call

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 1>both siders journalism, and what I call is is creating

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle so that everybody is in the same room

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:29.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to make their case, and a good journalist is

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>there simply to test the premise of the cases that

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 1>they are making. And when we come back my history

0:43:36.280 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 1>lesson from seventeen ninety six, well, I hope you enjoyed

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>that conversation with my friend Frank lavin See and I

0:43:58.200 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>even threw in a question about last week's history lesson

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about Ford's pardon, and it actually, you know, his answer

0:44:05.800 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>about that about now Jimmy Carter was a cleansing that

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>country wanted, regardless of whether Ford had shown less contrition

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>towards nexton, which I thought was interesting because it did

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 1>make me think about the moment we're in, right and

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>if we're looking to cleanse ourselves right from this toxic

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 1>political debate that is just dragging our country down from

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>its pedestal. Is sort of you know, if there were

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>ap college football rankings about countries. I think we'd still

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:41.760
<v Speaker 1>be the number one country in the world, but my goodness,

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't have as many first place votes as we

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>used to have. And it's because of our internal strife.

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Right that is our biggest impediment in this country from

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>us doing better things, greater things, helping us advance this

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:02.359
<v Speaker 1>planet is literally our division is our political division on

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this front. So September nineteenth, seventeen ninety six, the Philadelphia

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Daily American Advertisers printed George Washington's farewell address. So, yes,

0:45:20.239 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that is the history lesson today. It's the George Washington

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:30.879
<v Speaker 1>farewell address, arguably one of are technically our only non

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>partisan president. Right, He was not a member of any

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>political party. In fact, he used this farewell address to

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>warn against political parties. I guess I would argue that

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if the closest thing we had to an independent president,

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:57.760
<v Speaker 1>since George Washington is probably Dwight Eisenhower, and they both

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>shared a title before they became an't didn't they essentially

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>general of our armed forces? Right? So perhaps perhaps there's

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a pattern here, right' It's you know, these are two

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>men who ultimately only had to see everybody as Americans first,

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.480
<v Speaker 1>not as Democrats or Republicans than Americans. Right, Democratic Americans,

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Republican Americans, no Americans. So a few things about his

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>farewell address, a few little history nuggets. By the way,

0:46:33.080 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the US Senate on Washington's birthday, it still has a

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 1>senator read Washington's farewell address, and it's written in some

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>older English, meaning doesn't necessarily translate as easily today. So

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 1>while I will give you a few quotes, I will

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>give you a more modern interpretation of said quote. So

0:46:55.280 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>there's a few themes you should know about his farewell address. Right.

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:01.400
<v Speaker 1>One of the number one thing he was preaching was

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:05.280
<v Speaker 1>unity above all else. In fact, it was the central

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>warning that Washington made in his address is that America's

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 1>strength depends on national unity. He feared factions, especially factions

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.479
<v Speaker 1>built on geography. At the time, it was North versus South,

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:21.920
<v Speaker 1>or identity. We were having new Americans come over with

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>part of Europe where you from, etc. He feared that

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was going to tear the Republic apart. This is in

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>seventeen ninety six, today's culture war politics. Our red blue

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>state divides right, our regional polarization, the kind of echo

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that concern and then some right. His prescription was, Americans

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 1>must see themselves as Americans first, not America first, but

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as Americans first, not as members of warring camps. So

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he wrote, the unity of government, which constitutes you one people,

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:57.879
<v Speaker 1>is also now dear to you. It is a main

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 1>pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad, of your safety,

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of your prosperity, of that very liberty which you so

0:48:09.680 --> 0:48:15.240
<v Speaker 1>highly prize. Indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every

0:48:15.280 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>attempt to alienate any portion of our country, from the

0:48:20.719 --> 0:48:24.560
<v Speaker 1>rest or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:29.280
<v Speaker 1>together the various parts. Please don't fragment the country. Please

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>don't factionalize us. You see where he was going. He

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.640
<v Speaker 1>also gave a warning he had issued on the dangers

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of partisanship. He called the spirit of party democracy's worst enemy,

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>predicting that it would lead to cycles of revenge, government paralysis,

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:55.600
<v Speaker 1>foreign manipulation, and eventually despotism. Is this familiar the dysfunction

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of modern US politics, The weaponization of investigations, tit for tat, impeachments,

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 1>shut down brinksmanship. Once again, our founding father pretty prescient

0:49:06.320 --> 0:49:09.959
<v Speaker 1>on this one. His advice was to discourage and restrain partisanship.

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Talk about a warning that was unheeded. Let me read

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you a quote here. I have already intimated to you

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the danger of parties in the state, with particular reference

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to the founding of them on geographical discriminations, i e.

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:26.480
<v Speaker 1>North versus South. Let me now warn you, in the

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 1>most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of party. Generally, the alternate domination of one faction over another,

0:49:34.160 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 1>sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension,

0:49:38.440 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is itself a frightful despotism, And essentially the end state

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of partisanship gets you further, much closer to authoritarianism than

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 1>your realize it. I mean, he continues, It serves always

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration.

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It agitates the community with ill founded jealousies and false alarms,

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>kindles the animosity of one part against another, and opens

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:09.919
<v Speaker 1>the door to foreign influence and corruption. He didn't even

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>know about the algorithms yet in seventeen ninety six, and

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:17.719
<v Speaker 1>he knew that foreign actors would be using bots or

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 1>TikTok or something else to stir a vision in this

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>country to weaken us. Washington knew then. He also called

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:32.839
<v Speaker 1>for respecting our institutions. Washington insisted that respect for the constitution, laws,

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and the separation of powers was the bedrock of liberty.

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he wrote. Respect for its authority, compliance with

0:50:38.880 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 1>its laws, acquiescence in its measures are duties enjoined by

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental maxims of true liberty. The basis of our

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 1>political systems is the right of the people to make

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution,

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which at any time exists, is sacredly obligatory upon all

0:50:57.560 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>follow the Constitution. And when you're doing something unconstitutional, that

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:07.160
<v Speaker 1>is un American, and it is against the rest of us.

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he also called for fiscal responsibility. He

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:17.080
<v Speaker 1>stressed that public credit was a national treasure, urging Americans

0:51:17.120 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to avoid excessive debt, to accept the taxes are necessary,

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and to think of posterity in an era of ballooning

0:51:23.160 --> 0:51:27.840
<v Speaker 1>deficits of polarized tax debates. Wow, Washington's sober call for

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>balancing prudence with preparation is a reminder of the stakes.

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he wrote as a very important source of

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>strength and security. Chairish public credit. One method of preserving

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it is to use it as sparingly as possible, avoiding,

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 1>likewise the accumulation of debt, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the burthen with which ourselves ought to bear. Don't pass

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the debt down to me or to my kids or

0:51:53.239 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to their group kids. Is also some hat tips to

0:52:05.080 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>morality and knowledge. He said, of all the dispositions and

0:52:07.680 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 1>habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are

0:52:11.440 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>indispensable supports. The mere politician, equally with the pious man,

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 1>ought to respect and to cherish them. Virtue or morality

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is a necessary spring of popular government. Now, some people

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>will say this that this means it has to be

0:52:23.640 --> 0:52:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a specific religious or a specific set of morals. We

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>are a country that was founded on a freedom of religion,

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:35.359
<v Speaker 1>which also means a freedom not to be religious. But

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:37.479
<v Speaker 1>it didn't mean we didn't want to have moral men

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and women serving in this country, and that morality and

0:52:41.600 --> 0:52:44.319
<v Speaker 1>I do fear that we have lost some way. I mean,

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we have got to figure out how to how to

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And again this gets it to my quote from Milton

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Friedman in the first part of my monologue today, which

0:52:56.239 --> 0:53:00.560
<v Speaker 1>is we need better incentives if you want people to

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:05.320
<v Speaker 1>behave with some sense of good morality when they're in office.

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>On foreign policy, many of you know this one. He

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>warned against entangling alliances. This is probably the biggest takeaway

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:18.360
<v Speaker 1>he said. Washington's most famous foreign policy warning was to

0:53:18.400 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>avoid permanent alliances. Here's what he wrote. Observe good faith

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:24.719
<v Speaker 1>and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all.

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Nothing is more essential than that permanent inveterate antipathies against

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 1>particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded.

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Don't get fall in love with one nation, Don't let

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>hatred of another lead you down a stupid policy path.

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The great rule of conduct for us in regard to

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 1>foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:49.719
<v Speaker 1>with them as little political connection as possible. It is

0:53:49.760 --> 0:53:52.200
<v Speaker 1>our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with

0:53:52.280 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>any portion of the foreign world. Well, we've gone back

0:53:57.680 --> 0:54:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and forth right on this one. I think that there's

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 1>we had a pretty good eighty year run when we

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:09.320
<v Speaker 1>had a like minded view with other democracy loving nations.

0:54:09.520 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Forming NATO. So I wonder what Washington would think of

0:54:16.160 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>NATO and whether he would still disagree with it. So

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting I think that's a that's an interesting

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that we would love to find out. What would

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Washington have thought of NATO? Now he would have to

0:54:28.640 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 1>then know that washing that America was the most powerful

0:54:31.120 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>country on earth, and of course when he died, it

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was still the country. The most powerful country was not

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 1>US at that time. It was the country that we

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>revolted against. But anyway, there's your history lesson today. I

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:53.839
<v Speaker 1>think the Washington Farewell address, his warning about parties, his

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:58.720
<v Speaker 1>concern about factionalism, his concern about what happens when unity

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:02.719
<v Speaker 1>is lost. Boy, I found it to be an elixir

0:55:02.960 --> 0:55:05.680
<v Speaker 1>when I was doing it again. This is you know,

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:08.320
<v Speaker 1>in case you're wondering, I look up, I go through

0:55:08.360 --> 0:55:11.440
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of different there's all these different history websites

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that have put together this day in history, this week

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in history, and all this stuff. So I do it

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for this specific window. And let's just say. You know,

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 1>when you see it, you're like, aha, the timing is perfect.

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:28.399
<v Speaker 1>All right. Let me squeeze in a few questions here,

0:55:28.480 --> 0:55:30.879
<v Speaker 1>because I know I've gone long today and then right

0:55:30.880 --> 0:55:34.640
<v Speaker 1>at the end, I'll give you my few quick thoughts

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on college football. But here we go, ask Chuck. This

0:55:42.719 --> 0:55:47.800
<v Speaker 1>one comes from j R. Khondur It Kundert from South Carolina.

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:50.439
<v Speaker 1>He says, he's originally from Iowa. Go Hawks. We don't

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:53.319
<v Speaker 1>need to talk about it. Oh interesting, he says. Hi, Chuck,

0:55:53.320 --> 0:55:54.920
<v Speaker 1>big fan of the podcast, and I appreciate how you

0:55:54.960 --> 0:55:57.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to champion thoughtful, fact based journalism. I'd love to

0:55:57.840 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>hear your take on a potential James tollerik Jeff Jackson

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:03.359
<v Speaker 1>ticket for president in twenty twenty eight. I know where

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:06.399
<v Speaker 1>you're going there. James tallerco's Jeff Jackson's the ag now

0:56:06.800 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in North Carolina. James Tyler Rico is running for the

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:13.760
<v Speaker 1>US Senate. I'll get to that in a minute. And Jr.

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Continues to me, both of these guys are explainers in

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the vein of Clinton and Obama, Smart, clear communicators who

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:21.200
<v Speaker 1>connect with people. You often mentioned how Democrats have largely

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>abandoned Texas, but wouldn't this be a unique opportunity to

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:27.000
<v Speaker 1>rebuild grassroots momentum there? And with Jackson coming from North Carolina,

0:56:27.239 --> 0:56:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a state you've identified as critical to reaching two seventy.

0:56:29.920 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a strategically interesting pairing. Thanks for all

0:56:33.040 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you do. Look, it's an interesting thought there. I know

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that Jeff Jackson built quite the following on TikTok when

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>he was a member of Congress. I think he's cut

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that back a little bit now that he's a law

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>enforcement officer, the chief law enforcement officer in North Carolina. Look, Tall,

0:56:55.040 --> 0:56:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Rico's fascinating to me in particular, And I don't disagree

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 1>with you on Jeff Jackson. And in fact, I I

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 1>admire that he's I admire that Jeff Jackson isn't in

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:08.799
<v Speaker 1>a hurry that you know, he he definitely seems to

0:57:08.800 --> 0:57:11.480
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty gifted communicator, and he is, you know,

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 1>one step at a time. There was he didn't want

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to get into a big primary fight with Roy Cooper

0:57:16.520 --> 0:57:19.240
<v Speaker 1>or you know, okay, you run for the Senate, I'll

0:57:19.280 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>run for a G. He didn't want to get in

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a big primary fight for governor. The ag ran for governor.

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:26.920
<v Speaker 1>He ran for a G. So I admire that he

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is sort of like you know, sees it as a

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not just going to race to try to you know,

0:57:33.920 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody's got ambition In politics, ambition is a good thing mostly,

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 1>not a bad thing. You have too much ambition to

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the point of where you don't do your job right,

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that's when ambition becomes a bad thing. So I definitely

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:50.120
<v Speaker 1>think that that Jeff Jackson is is definitely in the

0:57:50.320 --> 0:57:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in the a star pitch if this were baseball, a

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:58.680
<v Speaker 1>star pitcher in double and triple that you're very interested

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to see what happens when they come up to majors.

0:58:00.880 --> 0:58:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Question is what do you view as the majors running

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:09.400
<v Speaker 1>for president, running for governor, etc. Ezra tell Errico, I

0:58:09.880 --> 0:58:12.720
<v Speaker 1>would be a bit more intrigued with his candidacy in

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Texas if you were running for governor in that Senate.

0:58:17.160 --> 0:58:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm of a couple of minds here on this look.

0:58:20.360 --> 0:58:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think it goes to what I said earlier, right,

0:58:22.160 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we need a pastor for patriotism. In fact,

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I think if we had, you know, i'd like I

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can tell you that you know, the meet the Press

0:58:28.720 --> 0:58:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I would have done the day would have been James

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Langford and Ralphael Warnock, two pastors in the Senate, a

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Republican pastor and a Democratic pastor. But we kind of

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of need that mindset, right, who doesn't Immediately A

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>pastor's instinct is to look for good in anybody that

0:58:47.000 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>disagrees with them, right, is to look for good there.

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, it is sort of at least did good

0:58:52.160 --> 0:58:55.480
<v Speaker 1>pastors do this? Right? You know, no pastor wants to

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>shrink their flock. They want to expand their flock. And

0:58:57.440 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you expand your flock? You have an open mind,

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you have opened arms, et cetera. So I do think

0:59:02.400 --> 0:59:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the mindset of a pastor in particular is something that

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are unhealthy. Culture could use a little bit of. I'm

0:59:13.600 --> 0:59:15.640
<v Speaker 1>just don't know if he can win a center race

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in a red state, and I think it's easier to

0:59:18.080 --> 0:59:20.120
<v Speaker 1>win a governor's race in a red state. One two.

0:59:21.080 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're looking to build a larger movement,

0:59:23.760 --> 0:59:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you have more success. And if you're trying to speak

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to people in the middle, speak to independence and speak

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to moderates on the other side, you know, it is

0:59:33.040 --> 0:59:36.200
<v Speaker 1>easier to talk to those moderates as a governor candidate

0:59:36.240 --> 0:59:39.040
<v Speaker 1>than as a Senate candidate. We have so the Senate

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is so broken. It is as much as I wish

0:59:43.000 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>senators could go there and all behave like Lisa Murkowski,

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, who's kind of a free agent, but she

0:59:51.720 --> 0:59:53.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of has the political luxury of doing that because

0:59:53.920 --> 0:59:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the right tried to get rid of her and they couldn't.

0:59:55.640 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So she's she's got this, She's she has her incentive structure,

0:59:59.680 --> 1:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>which is the center and center right of Alaska politics.

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, the Senate is

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>turned into the House. I mean, in fact, I've been

1:00:13.200 --> 1:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>think about the following right as we're doing these redistricting wars. Now,

1:00:19.440 --> 1:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>originally the House was elected by the people, and the Senate,

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the US Senate was senators were elected by state legislators.

1:00:29.320 --> 1:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Well what if I told you that now our state

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>legislatures are essentially electing the House, and it's the people

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that are left electing the Senate. It is sort of

1:00:40.400 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>bass ackwards right from what the founders wanted on this front.

1:00:46.040 --> 1:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>But I do think because the Senate has become such

1:00:48.600 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a partisan body, and because they've the filibuster has been

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>neutered already, right, sixty votes only now matters in a

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:01.640
<v Speaker 1>handful of cases, but the votes to confirm people and

1:01:01.680 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty votes to you know, you can sort of get

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>out of the sixty vote trap by doing a budget reconciliation.

1:01:07.240 --> 1:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>You can now do that a couple times a year.

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And so the Senate itself doesn't lend itself to a

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to be persuasive anymore, doesn't lend itself to be a

1:01:18.760 --> 1:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>convener of to try to sort of be the cooling

1:01:22.600 --> 1:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>saucer of American politics. If anything, it is now the

1:01:25.400 --> 1:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>opposite of that. So I and I fear for Tallarico's

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>sake if his goal is to become more viable as

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a national candidate, that the partisan nature of the Senate,

1:01:40.000 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>partisan nature of Senate races, now partisan nature of Senate campaigns,

1:01:44.960 --> 1:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>will make that extraordinarily difficult, and that his he might

1:01:49.640 --> 1:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>have a hard time keeping the brand that he is

1:01:53.480 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>so well established, we're running for governor might seem harder.

1:02:00.080 --> 1:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Greg Abbott's got a boatload of money, but he's been

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>there a long time, and he he just got what's

1:02:07.240 --> 1:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Tallerico became national for fighting the governor, for going so partisan.

1:02:12.720 --> 1:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, you gave me a chance to sort of

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I do I think he is. You know, when I

1:02:18.800 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>look around, I put him in my top five of

1:02:21.480 --> 1:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>potential presidential candidates right now because he has that Jimmy

1:02:24.920 --> 1:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Carter Pete Bootage's quality too, that both of him had

1:02:27.800 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Carter in the moment back then in seventy five and

1:02:29.720 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy six. Hey, I've not heard of this guy, but man,

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I just feel better listening to him than any of

1:02:35.360 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the other usual suspects that were running back then. That's

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>how Pete Botage felt to many a Democratic voter in

1:02:44.040 --> 1:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, You're like, Oh, that's

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>refreshing younger, not sort of stuck in Washington speak and

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. I think he's now got a harder time.

1:02:53.960 --> 1:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>It's it's tough to do that twice, right, you can't

1:02:55.960 --> 1:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>do it a second time when you've served four years

1:02:58.840 --> 1:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in Washington as a cabinet secretary. But that's why I'm

1:03:04.520 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm constantly looking at these new voices. And the point

1:03:07.680 --> 1:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is is that I think you picked two really interesting ones,

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and if either one of them ever became the standard

1:03:15.040 --> 1:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>better for the party, it would tell me that the

1:03:17.360 --> 1:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>peacemakers were winning the not the dividers. Next question comes

1:03:23.680 --> 1:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>from Bryaness. Hey, I'm an avid listener and have a

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>question about your time hosting meet the press. I get

1:03:28.040 --> 1:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>frustrated when gets dodged tough questions and hosts let them

1:03:30.280 --> 1:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>pivots talking points. Both parties are skilled at avoiding direct answers,

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>leaving viewers without the clarity they need. How can interviewers

1:03:36.640 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>keep the focus on critical questions like deploying US troops

1:03:39.000 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and cities or accepting foreign gifts without losing control of

1:03:41.160 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the segment. So I think there's a simple way to

1:03:43.840 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>do it, which is one guest for the hour or

1:03:48.280 --> 1:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one guest for twenty minutes. I think when you, I

1:03:52.040 --> 1:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>think the flaw in all of the shows right now,

1:03:55.200 --> 1:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and this was a look. This was something I went

1:03:57.160 --> 1:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with. I wanted I want guests for

1:04:00.720 --> 1:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes and forty minutes. Most guests won't do it. Okay,

1:04:05.640 --> 1:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you know you can get the president and the vice

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>president to stick for twenty to thirty. You can get

1:04:10.880 --> 1:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>them to sit for thirty to forty. They accept that,

1:04:13.840 --> 1:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>especially if you have traveled to do the interview. But

1:04:17.440 --> 1:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>outside of them, you start to talk yourself, Well, does

1:04:20.440 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>anybody really want to hear thirty minutes with Chris van

1:04:23.120 --> 1:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Holland or does anybody want to hear thirty minutes with

1:04:25.440 --> 1:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>James Langford. Well, the problem is is that when you

1:04:28.600 --> 1:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>go down this road and everybody knows it's eight to

1:04:30.920 --> 1:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes. What you just described is why I prefer

1:04:35.720 --> 1:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>this medium right now then than had what has developed

1:04:41.120 --> 1:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>these days as for interview segments on what's left of

1:04:47.160 --> 1:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>traditional media, because everybody's figured it out. I've equated it

1:04:51.600 --> 1:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to baseball analytics. Everybody's got the same data. You know,

1:04:55.520 --> 1:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the interviewer knows that they only have eight to ten minutes,

1:05:01.200 --> 1:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>so and they and you know, and maybe you want

1:05:04.160 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to get that guest back. So then you did where

1:05:07.280 --> 1:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>am I going to ask the tough question? Do I

1:05:08.640 --> 1:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>do the beginning? Do I do at the end? And

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>then I got to ask these three questions. Maybe you

1:05:13.480 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>promised in order to book them that you would ask

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>about this one issue that they care about, and you're like, okay,

1:05:19.000 --> 1:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to do that. Well, if you agree to

1:05:20.560 --> 1:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes, then then everybody's happy. So I just think

1:05:24.160 --> 1:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the short interview it's advantage interview e, not interviewer. And

1:05:29.080 --> 1:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get control of interviews back, you

1:05:33.280 --> 1:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>got to limit the number of guests you have during

1:05:37.360 --> 1:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>your hour and and do as you know, give each

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>interview segment as long as you possibly can, because the

1:05:44.920 --> 1:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>longer you have somebody it is easy to bullshit you

1:05:48.000 --> 1:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for five minutes, it gets harder and harder every minute

1:05:50.560 --> 1:05:55.959
<v Speaker 1>after that. And so ultimately I think that the house

1:05:56.400 --> 1:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the glory days of the Sunday shows, they all had

1:05:59.240 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>one guest for twenty to thirty minutes, or you might

1:06:02.560 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have two guests on at the same time for thirty minutes,

1:06:06.120 --> 1:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>one D and one R. That was sort of kind

1:06:08.800 --> 1:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of standard in the nineties, you know, and you can

1:06:12.120 --> 1:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>say attention span. And by the way, I'd have producers

1:06:16.080 --> 1:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>tell me, hey, look that interview went too long. Viewers

1:06:18.640 --> 1:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>started to get tired and leave, right, So I have

1:06:22.960 --> 1:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>met the problem, and it is us, but it is

1:06:28.400 --> 1:06:34.439
<v Speaker 1>if that's that's the ultimately the issue. Everybody's figured out

1:06:34.440 --> 1:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that they can fill either they're not going to be

1:06:36.360 --> 1:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>up there more than eight to ten minutes, so you

1:06:38.400 --> 1:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can kind of fill a buster and kind of avoid it.

1:06:40.960 --> 1:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the few times you know, when I

1:06:43.680 --> 1:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>have when i'd have you know, i'd go down the

1:06:45.440 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>rabbit hole. I'd blow up a panel segment and it would,

1:06:48.440 --> 1:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and it would screw up the timing of

1:06:50.720 --> 1:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the show, and you know, a lot of producers work

1:06:55.320 --> 1:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>really hard on these other segments, you know, So it

1:06:58.160 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is it is the tyranny of time. But you know,

1:07:03.280 --> 1:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to to put on a show that

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you're getting as many people as you as you can

1:07:08.560 --> 1:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to watch it. But in this day and age where

1:07:10.920 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you can you know, I think I kind of I

1:07:15.240 --> 1:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of think now I would do if I in

1:07:17.640 --> 1:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>a perfect world, you do four long interviews and then

1:07:20.320 --> 1:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you may present the best ten minutes in a summary

1:07:24.520 --> 1:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>episode on that Sunday. But say, guess what, there are

1:07:26.800 --> 1:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>longer versions of these interviews available for everybody. I'm not

1:07:32.400 --> 1:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that that's a viable way to do it, but

1:07:36.160 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that would be the ideal way to do it, all right,

1:07:43.960 --> 1:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Last question, because it gets me into college football. This

1:07:48.440 --> 1:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>comes from Chase c from Little Rock, Arkansas. Chuck is

1:07:50.960 --> 1:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a lifelong arc Kans and Croud razorback fan here in

1:07:53.280 --> 1:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Little Rock. I've always felt our state punches above its

1:07:55.600 --> 1:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>weight politically. From Bill Clinton and Mikakabi to our current

1:07:57.880 --> 1:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>governor Sarah Sanders, Arkansas keeps producing leaders who shaped national conversations. Yes,

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that is true, whether it's on education, agricultural cultural issues.

1:08:06.080 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>From your perspective, what is it about Arkansas political culture

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that gives it such outsized influence and how do you

1:08:10.880 --> 1:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>see that playing out nationally in the years ahead? And

1:08:13.560 --> 1:08:15.439
<v Speaker 1>for your sports page, with all the changes in college

1:08:15.440 --> 1:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>football from nil deals to conference realignment, is a time

1:08:18.040 --> 1:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>for Congress to step in and help reform the sport.

1:08:20.439 --> 1:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Go Hogs love the show best regards. Well, look, I

1:08:23.920 --> 1:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think that I think the the both Mike Huckabee and

1:08:29.640 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Huckaby Sanders in some ways. Oh Bill Clinton right there,

1:08:36.080 --> 1:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks for making them national figures. Right he put Bill

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Clinton put Arkansas on the national map, and I think

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it didn't allow But but the fact is, even you know,

1:08:44.840 --> 1:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>before Bill Clinton, you did have it win Rockefeller. You

1:08:48.600 --> 1:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>know Rockefeller who was an elected official, Winthrop Rockefeller, I

1:08:53.400 --> 1:08:58.759
<v Speaker 1>believe from from Arkansas, David Pryor and Mark Pryor. David

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Pryor was considered one of those Southern lions of the

1:09:00.880 --> 1:09:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Senate sort of in that post Civil Rights era after

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the Civil Rights Actors passed on that. And then of

1:09:08.640 --> 1:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>course there's the Fulbright Program for J. William Fulbright and

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Arkansas senator who created the legislation that was about an

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>international exchange program. So the fact is Arkansas has elected

1:09:19.360 --> 1:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>some pretty impressive senators over the years. But there's no

1:09:24.320 --> 1:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>doubt I think the Huckabee family has Bill Clinton to

1:09:27.280 --> 1:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>thank for making it a little more of a national state.

1:09:31.320 --> 1:09:33.479
<v Speaker 1>As for the look, Congress is going to have to

1:09:34.080 --> 1:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>come in in some form or another, even if it's

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:39.599
<v Speaker 1>just to create an anti trust exemption, because I do

1:09:39.640 --> 1:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to get collective bargaining. I do think

1:09:42.080 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to have the athletes in each conference,

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>especially if the conferences can continue to cut their own

1:09:48.360 --> 1:09:51.639
<v Speaker 1>media deals on their own, Well, how are the quote

1:09:51.640 --> 1:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>players going to get a piece of that media deal. Well,

1:09:53.720 --> 1:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do it with collective bargaining. So then

1:09:55.680 --> 1:09:58.719
<v Speaker 1>we're also going to have like the SEC Athletic Union,

1:09:58.800 --> 1:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the ACC Athletic Union, right Player or Players Association, the

1:10:02.120 --> 1:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Big Ten Players Association. You see where this is going.

1:10:06.960 --> 1:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It's I still think this would all be better if

1:10:09.200 --> 1:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it were done more collectively. Maybe you know there's a

1:10:12.160 --> 1:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the big booster for Texas Tech Athletics has actually been

1:10:17.080 --> 1:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>paying for his own advertising. It's been popping up on

1:10:19.760 --> 1:10:22.519
<v Speaker 1>some college football games. I've noticed where he wants to

1:10:22.640 --> 1:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>essentially update the nineteen sixty one Broadcasting Act, which is

1:10:27.680 --> 1:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, is what prevents, for instance, the NFL from

1:10:30.720 --> 1:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>ever airing an AD after September, airing football games on

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Friday nights after September tenth. I think it is because

1:10:37.520 --> 1:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>from a period of time they cannot compete against high

1:10:39.680 --> 1:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>school football, and there's a bunch of windows where they

1:10:42.640 --> 1:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot hold games on Saturdays until a certain date in December,

1:10:47.360 --> 1:10:51.639
<v Speaker 1>and there's some other ways, and maybe updating that gives

1:10:51.680 --> 1:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>some creates a way, you know, I personally think that

1:10:56.120 --> 1:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>they ought to be negotiating their TV contracted collectively the

1:11:00.520 --> 1:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>entire FBS as one. I think everybody would make more money. Right,

1:11:06.200 --> 1:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you could certainly stagger it and you know, get more

1:11:09.840 --> 1:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>money based on you know, size of budget or something

1:11:15.200 --> 1:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>like that. But I definitely think Congress is going to

1:11:18.800 --> 1:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>come in because where there's where I where I think

1:11:23.280 --> 1:11:25.519
<v Speaker 1>you're going to see the most, you know, it's it's

1:11:25.560 --> 1:11:28.719
<v Speaker 1>when the football programs in your Dakota's right that don't

1:11:28.760 --> 1:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>have any football teams in one of the two or

1:11:32.600 --> 1:11:36.559
<v Speaker 1>three big conferences, those politicians are going to be, hey,

1:11:36.560 --> 1:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>we've got to save ours program. We've got to save

1:11:38.720 --> 1:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>our our our football around here, and I think that

1:11:42.280 --> 1:11:45.439
<v Speaker 1>that's they end up being the trigger to sort of

1:11:45.520 --> 1:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>getting getting something happened. It can't really be done on

1:11:47.800 --> 1:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the presidential level. There's not much. There's not much he

1:11:50.400 --> 1:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>can do. But for your hogs, you've got in the

1:11:55.280 --> 1:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>world of nil between Tyson's Chicken and Walmart. If your

1:12:02.280 --> 1:12:05.639
<v Speaker 1>friends in Fayetteville can't find the cash to build some

1:12:05.720 --> 1:12:10.839
<v Speaker 1>big time college athletics over there, it's on them, because

1:12:10.880 --> 1:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I've seen all that Tyson and Walton money that floats

1:12:14.040 --> 1:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>around the northwest Arkansas these days. It is created and

1:12:18.080 --> 1:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>developed a wonderful, huge new metro area. So it's a

1:12:25.120 --> 1:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty my guess, it's a pretty easy source of cash

1:12:29.920 --> 1:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for Arkansas athletics. I think that's why our friend mister

1:12:32.880 --> 1:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Calipari decided to go to Arkansas before he was kicked

1:12:37.400 --> 1:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to the curb by our friends in Kentucky. All Right,

1:12:40.760 --> 1:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>what we learned this week in college football, Well, I

1:12:45.439 --> 1:12:47.759
<v Speaker 1>was glad to see Miami as focused. I think Miami.

1:12:50.280 --> 1:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I don't I don't know if South you know,

1:12:52.560 --> 1:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this is always one of these tyranny. Here's a rhetorical

1:12:55.600 --> 1:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>question because I don't have the answer. If you beat

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a ranked team but that team isn't ranked at the

1:13:01.880 --> 1:13:03.879
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, did you beat a ranked team?

1:13:07.080 --> 1:13:11.719
<v Speaker 1>The point I'm making is, so South Florida beat Boise

1:13:11.760 --> 1:13:13.439
<v Speaker 1>when they were ranked, and they beat Florida when they

1:13:13.439 --> 1:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>were ranked. Neither team is ranked now. Well, Florida may

1:13:16.760 --> 1:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>not ever be ranked unless they beat Miami next week.

1:13:19.439 --> 1:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to that game. I sure as he hope

1:13:21.240 --> 1:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't beat Miami next week, but they may not

1:13:23.760 --> 1:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be ranked again. So did South Florida beat two ranked

1:13:27.760 --> 1:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>teams in a row or not? Right? And so this

1:13:31.479 --> 1:13:35.439
<v Speaker 1>is I know it's a small thing, but we think

1:13:35.479 --> 1:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we know who the good teams are, but we usually

1:13:37.360 --> 1:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know until the end of the year. Is you

1:13:40.920 --> 1:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>know it's South Carolina a good football team or not?

1:13:43.720 --> 1:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They were ranked in the top ten. They just got

1:13:46.360 --> 1:13:48.519
<v Speaker 1>wiped out by Vanderbilt. And you could say, well, they

1:13:48.520 --> 1:13:51.599
<v Speaker 1>lost their quarterback. They were losing that game with their quarterback.

1:13:52.439 --> 1:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And what Vanderbilt did the Virginia Tech versus what South

1:13:56.080 --> 1:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Carolina did to Virginia Tech on it's nine and day

1:14:01.160 --> 1:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and Vanderbilt was unranked. Now that I don't ranked anymore. So,

1:14:05.880 --> 1:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I am mindful that we still don't know.

1:14:08.600 --> 1:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, we think we know who's good. I'm impressed

1:14:11.840 --> 1:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with the ap pole that they kept Notre Dame ranked. Now,

1:14:15.000 --> 1:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>if it were any other school, the Notre Dame bias

1:14:17.160 --> 1:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>may have kicked in, which allowed them to be the

1:14:18.960 --> 1:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>first zero to two team in like thirty years to

1:14:20.760 --> 1:14:24.599
<v Speaker 1>be ranked still in the top twenty five. But if

1:14:24.640 --> 1:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you believe the polls, the two games they've lost, they've

1:14:27.880 --> 1:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>lost two games by total of four points to one

1:14:30.360 --> 1:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>team ranked fourth and another team ranked ninth. I believe

1:14:33.120 --> 1:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is where Texas A and M ended up, So, you know,

1:14:37.320 --> 1:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it's ten but either way, but are we

1:14:40.120 --> 1:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sure right now? It looks like Miami's legit. It looks

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:48.519
<v Speaker 1>like Notre Dame in Texas A and M are certainly

1:14:48.600 --> 1:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not bad teams. They're pretty good teams. I don't know

1:14:52.200 --> 1:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>if Georgia and Tennessee are good or if those are

1:14:56.920 --> 1:15:00.439
<v Speaker 1>two terrible defenses, because I also saw ten See give

1:15:00.479 --> 1:15:03.679
<v Speaker 1>up a boatload of points up against a Syracuse team

1:15:03.680 --> 1:15:06.479
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think is that good this year. So

1:15:06.640 --> 1:15:09.479
<v Speaker 1>is it possible that both Tennessee and Georgia have great

1:15:09.479 --> 1:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>offenses and not so good defenses. By the way, it

1:15:12.439 --> 1:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is striking to me that Kirby Smart doesn't have a

1:15:16.080 --> 1:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>great defense. I guess we're going to get another test

1:15:20.080 --> 1:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in two weeks when he plays Alabama. So look, there

1:15:24.080 --> 1:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't other than exposing. I think what we learned this

1:15:30.040 --> 1:15:34.519
<v Speaker 1>week is who's not who doesn't belong right. I think

1:15:34.600 --> 1:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>we know Clemson doesn't belong in the top tier this year.

1:15:39.600 --> 1:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of Clemson doubters that are that are

1:15:42.080 --> 1:15:49.479
<v Speaker 1>feeling their oats right now. Those of us that enjoy

1:15:49.600 --> 1:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Dabbo are enjoying this moment a little bit. Maybe I'm

1:15:52.720 --> 1:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna lie, but Dabo's on a warm seat, not

1:15:57.360 --> 1:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a hot seat, but he's on a warm seat because

1:15:59.840 --> 1:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he continues to sort of try to He believes his

1:16:02.960 --> 1:16:05.439
<v Speaker 1>way is going to still be able to win, and

1:16:05.479 --> 1:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a big bad start for him. As for

1:16:09.360 --> 1:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Tech, we know they're good. The question is are

1:16:11.360 --> 1:16:13.639
<v Speaker 1>they are top ten good? That we don't know yet.

1:16:15.320 --> 1:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say, considering the Miami's had problems with Georgia Tech,

1:16:18.240 --> 1:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad george Tech is not on our schedule this year.

1:16:21.320 --> 1:16:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Although I have this vision Miami's twelve and zero going

1:16:24.640 --> 1:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>into the ACC title game and has to play Georgia Tech.

1:16:29.479 --> 1:16:31.519
<v Speaker 1>Of course, if that's the case, maybe they rest their

1:16:31.560 --> 1:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>starters and claim they aren't really trying that hard. But

1:16:36.439 --> 1:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we know Clemson's not there, we know South Carolina doesn't belong.

1:16:42.960 --> 1:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where I'm at on Michigan yet. Oklahoma

1:16:47.520 --> 1:16:51.599
<v Speaker 1>I expected to play a bit of a letdown game

1:16:51.640 --> 1:16:54.439
<v Speaker 1>against Temple in Philadelphia, had a weird time start time,

1:16:54.479 --> 1:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and they didn't show any letdown that impressed me. Let

1:16:58.840 --> 1:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>me see what they do against all But I'm starting

1:17:02.200 --> 1:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to think that Oklahoma Texas is going to be is

1:17:05.800 --> 1:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be extraordinarily meaningful, Like not since both teams

1:17:09.800 --> 1:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>were in the Big twelve has this game been that important?

1:17:12.840 --> 1:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps onto where things go? I mean, put it this way,

1:17:16.439 --> 1:17:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Texas could afford a second loss at

1:17:19.880 --> 1:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>this point. And let me just do a little bias

1:17:25.479 --> 1:17:29.799
<v Speaker 1>commentary here. What's with the lack of interest in Carson

1:17:29.840 --> 1:17:33.559
<v Speaker 1>beck is a Heisman candidate. It's interesting to me that

1:17:33.600 --> 1:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>people are still insisting Arch Manning is just look at

1:17:38.040 --> 1:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the just do a blind taste test on that one.

1:17:40.960 --> 1:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Do your blind test, and Carson Beck, arch Manning, do

1:17:43.840 --> 1:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>your blind test on Frankly, Carson Beck and anybody you

1:17:47.040 --> 1:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>want to put in there. He's not being talked about.

1:17:50.880 --> 1:17:53.479
<v Speaker 1>He's sort of like in the he gets written up

1:17:53.640 --> 1:17:57.479
<v Speaker 1>as others receiving votes, you know, like you know, we're

1:17:57.479 --> 1:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>not ignoring him. But anyway, I think the guy deserves

1:18:03.479 --> 1:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a little more. But hey, in some ways, I don't

1:18:06.160 --> 1:18:09.559
<v Speaker 1>want Miami's heads to get too big. I can't believe

1:18:09.560 --> 1:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Game Day is going to Miami. It shows you how

1:18:11.400 --> 1:18:13.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of weak the college football slate is. Next week,

1:18:14.560 --> 1:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember the last time Game Day went

1:18:17.200 --> 1:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to a game where one of the two teams had

1:18:19.240 --> 1:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a losing record. Because Florida's one and two playing Miami,

1:18:25.280 --> 1:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>but they're coming down to the U. Let's just say

1:18:27.720 --> 1:18:29.839
<v Speaker 1>that there's a certain senior at the University of Miami

1:18:29.840 --> 1:18:33.519
<v Speaker 1>that's related to me that is ecstatic. She's been hoping

1:18:33.560 --> 1:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Game Day would come and out of for four years.

1:18:35.760 --> 1:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>She was bummed last year when they decided to go to.

1:18:38.160 --> 1:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>The only Miami game Day there was was the one

1:18:40.840 --> 1:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in Berkeley when they went there for cal I was

1:18:44.040 --> 1:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to think it was going to be Tallahassee, though,

1:18:47.000 --> 1:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I think because of the way ESPN treated Florida State,

1:18:49.760 --> 1:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure they would be very welcome they went

1:18:51.800 --> 1:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>to Tallahassee, considering how ESPN was arguably the reason why

1:18:58.720 --> 1:19:01.559
<v Speaker 1>Florida State got left out of the College Football Playoff

1:19:02.280 --> 1:19:05.799
<v Speaker 1>despite being undefeated at the time of the selection process,

1:19:06.200 --> 1:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So maybe they wouldn't be quite welcome for the Florida

1:19:08.439 --> 1:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>State Miami game, which is going to be in the

1:19:10.160 --> 1:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>first week of October, a natural potential place for game

1:19:13.479 --> 1:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>day to go if both teams are unfeeded. The only

1:19:17.000 --> 1:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>other game that would have competed with Miami in Florida

1:19:19.080 --> 1:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>is probably Indiana and Illinois, which just as a derivative

1:19:24.520 --> 1:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of family from the Midwest. I love that Illinois and

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Indiana is a meaningful game. I've googled it. I'm sticking

1:19:33.080 --> 1:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with signetti anyway. So there's my two or three cents

1:19:37.400 --> 1:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in college football this week. I'm just relieved Miami has

1:19:42.280 --> 1:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>survived and advanced, because that's the beauty of college football.

1:19:45.040 --> 1:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Every week. You don't get eliminated after one loss anymore,

1:19:48.960 --> 1:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but every week there are some teams that are eliminated.

1:19:53.040 --> 1:19:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And I do want to be careful saying Clemson's been eliminated.

1:19:55.680 --> 1:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>They can always backdoor their way in because they always

1:19:57.960 --> 1:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to back door. They weigh in. But

1:20:01.640 --> 1:20:04.479
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't look like uh, it just looks like a

1:20:04.520 --> 1:20:06.559
<v Speaker 1>team that feels like they're going to continue to come

1:20:06.600 --> 1:20:09.160
<v Speaker 1>up short. All right, with that, I will take a

1:20:09.240 --> 1:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hour break. We will upload on Wednesday. With that,

1:20:14.640 --> 1:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>just remember you don't have to be angry. Being angry

1:20:22.160 --> 1:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>is a choice. Choose grace. See you in a couple

1:20:27.560 --> 1:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>days