WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend: Speaker Battle, CPI, China

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio on demand and in your podcast feed.

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:09.040
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 2>We begin today's program with a look ahead to the

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>latest inflation data in the wake of that September jobs

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 2>report out last week. For more, we're joined by Bloomberg

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 2>International Economic and Policy correspondent Michael McKee. Michael, thanks for

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>being here again, Always.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Happy to be here.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk first about this past Friday September jobs report.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Would you I've described as quote the mother of all

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>upside surprises.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Not bad, you know, we had a kind of unusually

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.279
<v Speaker 3>high jobs report with for the month three hundred and

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 3>thirty six thousand jobs being created. Were also one hundred

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 3>and nineteen thousand added for July and August, so you're

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 3>well over four hundred thousand. The labor market has not

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>gone away, at least not through September. Now, there's a

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 3>lot of caveat to this, but it just tells you

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 3>that the economy still remained strong or remained strong through September.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>And so the question is now, is that inflationary. See,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm setting you up for.

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Your next question. For the next question, well, well we

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 2>did see wages rose again. That is inflationary, you know,

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>So that is the question. This is a good news

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 2>bad news situation.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 3>But well, let's talk about the wages. They rose two

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>tenths of a percent. The forecast was for a three

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 3>tenths rise, and some economists had forecast a four tenths rise.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 3>Because this all relates to the survey week, the week

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>that includes the twelfth and then the day. The months

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 3>and weeks between the two surveys, and there was a

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 3>longer time between the surveys, so people thought maybe we

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 3>would see higher wages this time. Instead, we saw a

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 3>lower than expected wage gain and that pushed the year

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a year number down to four point two percent. That

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>is still higher than the feds three to three and

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 3>a half percent they'd like to see, but it is progress.

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 3>So it's hard to argue that the three hundred and

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty six thousand jobs created was a inflationary event in

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>and of itself.

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 2>But it was a surprise, and we also saw a

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 2>revision one hundred and nineteen thousand jobs added July. In August,

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 2>ADP predicted just eighty nine thousand private sector jobs. Boy

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>were they wrong.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they were quite different. They would argue they're not

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 3>wrong because they they're not predicting, but the economists were

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 3>wrong too, in the sense that the change in private

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 3>payrolls forecast was one hundred and sixty thousand and we

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 3>got two hundred and sixty three thousand. So nobody has

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.799
<v Speaker 3>covered in glory with the forecast this time.

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, real surprise. Now you brought up inflation this week.

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll be looking at inflation PPI for some Tember out

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>on Wednesday, CPI for the same month out on Thursday.

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 3>What do you expect to see, Well, the forecasts are

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see a real slowing in inflation. With

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 3>the PPI for final demand that's kind of the main

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 3>figure that people look at up just three tenths that's

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 3>less than half of what it was the prior month

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 3>because we saw energy prices sort of flatten out. Oil

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 3>prices didn't start to go down until October. But we're

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 3>not going to get the same upward pressure that we did.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 3>If you look at the core PPI just up two

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 3>tenths of eight percent, which is also lower than the

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 3>previous month, so it would suggest that progress is still

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>being made in the pipeline. CPI is also expected to

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>be good news. The headline up only three tenths. It

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 3>was up six tenths in August and that was largely

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 3>because of energy, so hopefully the drop in energy is

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be good news. The core rate up is

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 3>expected to be up three tenths, which is unchanged from

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 3>the prior but both the year over year CPI and

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the CPI core will go down and they keep moving

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>towards two percent, not at an enormously fast pace, but

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 3>fast enough that it suggests we are still seeing progress.

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 2>And we could see more. As you said, in October,

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.279
<v Speaker 2>just the first week, oil down ten percent West Texas.

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 3>And gasoline prices never really went up when oil went up,

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 3>and they're going down still, so that will really register

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 3>in the October CPI if that trend continues.

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, also on Wednesday, we get minutes from the fed's

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 2>latest meeting, and obviously this is leading into the next

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>meeting October thirty first, November first, so let's talk about

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 2>the minutes, what we should expect, what we should look for,

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 2>what the FED was thinking, because I'm sure they're all

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 2>as surprised as anybody else about that September jobs report.

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, most of the fedspeak that we've had since their

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 3>last meeting has been on the order of, we could

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 3>do one more if we need to. So how do

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 3>you define if we need to? And that's what people

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 3>are going to be looking to in the minutes is

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 3>what kind of economy would cause them to raise rates

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 3>another time? Is it the three hundred and thirty six

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 3>thousand jobs created in September or does the average hourly

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 3>earnings take some of the edge off of that. Is

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 3>it something to do with retail sales or the outlook

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 3>for GDP growth which in the third quarter is very

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 3>very strong, somewhere between three and five percent. So that's

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I think what people in the bond market especially, and

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 3>in the stock market are going to want to look

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 3>at is what would be the trigger for the Fed.

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 2>And we still have a couple of weeks before the

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Fed had to make this decision. But what is it

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 2>looking like all these You know, as far as I

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 2>can remember that past year, we've been calling for a recession.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Before now we've been calling for There were economists saying

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>this will be the last good Jobs report before things,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, take a nose dive.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>I think what we're likely to see in terms of

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the recession forecasts is keep the forecast, just push the

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 3>date out. Because the feeling is, with rates where they

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 3>are and the economy as hot as it is, that

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 3>this can't continue. They call that Stein's law after Herbstein,

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>is that which cannot continue will stop. And there's a

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 3>feeling and maybe that has to happen, but a growing

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 3>feeling that maybe not. This is not what you would

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 3>call a sustainable level of hiring that we saw this

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 3>past week. But if we can continue to see job

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 3>growth that will continue to power consumer spending, if prices

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>are coming down, then the G word comes into play goldilocks,

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.799
<v Speaker 3>and so we'll see. And you saw in the reaction

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 3>to this the jobs report on Friday, we saw the

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Fed Funds futures only price in a thirty two percent

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 3>chance of a rate increase on November first. Now that's

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>up from twenty two percent, but it's still only you know,

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 3>a one third chance that the Fed will raise rates again.

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>So the markets are waiting for additional data as well.

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Everybody's data dependent.

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Now, speaking of data, let's talk more about

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the rates, because in housing now we have a seven

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>point five percent rate, and even that is not affecting

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 2>housing like it should. It's more that there are not

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 2>enough houses for sale. So you're right, the consumer is

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.239
<v Speaker 2>still strong, Consumers still spending. People still have this demand.

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 2>We saw autos and we know those auto loan rates

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 2>have gone up Toyota and GM fifteen percent increase in

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the last three years in auto sales leading up to

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 2>last month. So you're right. The consumer keeps spending, keep

0:07:57.560 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 2>making more money. Who knows when it could end?

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, the old saying is it doesn't have to.

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>And the expansions don't die of natural causes. The FED

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 3>kills them. And so that's kind of the playbook people

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>are working from that. If the FED gets rates up

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 3>too high, it will kill the economy. But we don't

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 3>see signs of that happening necessarily right now. The neutral rate,

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 3>the rate the Fed funds rate would be at that

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 3>doesn't stimulate or hold back the economy is obviously higher

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 3>than the Fed or anybody thought at this point. For

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a year, I think, yeah, if you're looking at housing,

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 3>they are having an impact because there's no houses for

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>sale because people don't want to trade in their three

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.959
<v Speaker 3>percent mortgages for seven percent mortgages, and that's going to

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 3>be a problem down the road. It is going to

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 3>be an issue.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 2>And how's the.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 3>FED get out of that? Because if they don't bring

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 3>mortgage rates down significantly, people won't go back into the market.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 3>The new homes are selling like hotcakes because you don't

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 3>have anybody in them, so you don't have to worry

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 3>about selling it, and a lot of the all builders

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 3>are offering credits or financing that brings that mortgage rate

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 3>down some. So we're still seeing strong growth in that,

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 3>which actually has They both have a big Existing homes

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 3>and new home sales have a big impact on the

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 3>economy in different ways. The new home sales a lot

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 3>of construction materials obviously, and new appliances things like that,

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 3>whereas the new homes the existing homes, people tend to

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 3>replace the carpets and buy furniture, and that's our thing.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.679
<v Speaker 3>So we lose one, we gain the other.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 2>And you build it, someone will buy it no matter

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>where it is, where you put it, how big, how small,

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>someone's going to buy that house. Bloomberg's International Economic and

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Policy correspondent Michael McKee. Coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend,

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 2>we head across the Pond and look at Ireland's upcoming

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 2>budget with the country's Financial Services Minister. I'm Tom Busby,

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 2>later in our program, the race for House speakers heating up.

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>But first, while many countries in Europe are struggling with

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>large budget deficits, Ireland is forecasting a run of big surpluses.

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>That's thanks to buoyant corporate tax revenues. The Irish government

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>unveiling its budget for next year in the coming days

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and for more, let's go to London and bring in

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Daybreak Europe Banker Stephen Carroll, Tom.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 4>It's an enviable position for any government to be and

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 4>to have a surplus of income to spend on tax

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 4>cuts or increased public spending. Across Europe, It's a pretty

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 4>unusual occurrence. In Ireland. It's sparked massive political debate about

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 4>how the money should be spent, especially as the country

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 4>faces issues including an acute shortage of housing. The Finance

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 4>Ministry in Dublin is expected to see a surplus of

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 4>billions of euros this year and as much as sixty

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 4>five billion by twenty twenty seven. The government, though, is

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 4>conscious that the boom in corporate tax receipts, a big

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 4>driver of that extra income, won't last. In fact, figures

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 4>released in recent days showed the tax take from companies

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 4>was twenty three percent lower in the first nine months

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 4>of this year compared to last year. Add to that

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 4>a warning from the ESRI think tank that the Irish

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 4>economy will contract for the first time this year since

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty twelve. Now, while the domestic economy is growing, Ireland's

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 4>headline GDP figures are distorted by the outsized nature of

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 4>major international companies that operate there.

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 4>I've been discussing all of these issues with Ireland's Financial

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 4>Services Minister Jennifer Carroll McNeil. We started by talking about

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 4>the much debated choices the government is making in its

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 4>upcoming budget.

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 5>We're very curful about managing the projections there. We're very

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 5>careful about how we may use that. We've obviously a

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 5>commitment to put quite a bit of that aside for

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 5>a pension reserve fund, for sovereign Wealth fund, different types

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 5>of longer term investment in infrastructure, which is a really

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 5>important piece for Ireland. At the same time, recognizing that

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 5>our construction unemployment is two percent, our unemployment generally is

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 5>four percent, we're absolutely at full employment. We've never had

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 5>more people working in Ireland. So we have this very

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 5>strong domestic economy from which a lot of our tax

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 5>receipts are being generated, also corporation tax. But we're mindful

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 5>that you look, Ireland has been through the mill in

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 5>fifteen years. We've been up and we've been down, and

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 5>we've worked very very hard to recover our economy make

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 5>it resilient and strong. Yes, we're benefiting from significant surpluses

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 5>at the moment, but I think we take a very

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.560
<v Speaker 5>curful view about how we may invest that we don't

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 5>want to do anything that's inflationary, and we're very careful

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 5>about protecting ourselves for the future. So we feel that

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 5>it's the product of a lot of hard work, but

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 5>we're very careful to try to manage that for the future.

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 4>So when the conversations running up to the budget, then

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 4>how much of the surplus is going to go to

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 4>those sort of precautionary measures, or how much we'll go

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 4>to other measures like tax cuts.

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 5>It has been very significant already. We've put four billion

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 5>across into one fund. We may very well put it

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 5>put a great deal more. We've identified a billion for

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 5>tax cuts, and I think at a time of full

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 5>employment that's particularly important. I think in Ireland we hit

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 5>the higher rate of tax too soon and I think

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 5>we're a bit of an outlier on that. And when

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 5>you're looking at marginal decisions in relation to going back

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 5>to work or perhaps working more in a very tight

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 5>labor market, those sorts of decisions around tax policies, they

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 5>become quite important. And so we are trying to make

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 5>sure that our very very skilled workforce is able to

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 5>work as much as it can, as much as it

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 5>wants to. You might recognize that there's a lot of

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 5>people taking a step back from work for a period,

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 5>potentially with childcare costs, and so we're trying to adopt

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 5>an approach of putting money back in people's pockets through

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 5>tax cuts, but reducing a lot of structural costs in Ireland,

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 5>So reducing the cost of childcare by twenty five percent

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 5>last year and hopefully more this year. Reducing the cost

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 5>of a child going to college, reducing upfront structural costs

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 5>and health and making it easier to access services more

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 5>cheaply transport costs. What can you do at a time

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 5>of inflation. You can cut the costs that you can control,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 5>and you can give people back money back to a

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 5>point with at being inflationary, and so we're trying to

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 5>approach it from those perspectives. We also have a very

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 5>significant capital and you know, investment project. We have a

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 5>lot of infrastructure that needs upgrading. But we do face constraints,

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 5>employment constraints, particularly in the construction sector, which I think

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 5>are reflected right across Western Europe. But are you know

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 5>they are as acute in Ireland as anywhere else.

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 4>What is the concern about what the drop off and

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 4>the tax receipts could be given that so much of

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 4>that corporate tax money comes from a very limited number

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 4>of companies in Ireland.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, I think it's fair to say that any

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 5>sort of sexual specific challenge could have a very significant yeah,

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 5>tech or even an individual company. And of course you

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 5>know there are different intellectual property issues. You know about

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 5>about derogations running out and so on, and so we

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 5>are very fortunate to have this position, but we are

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 5>very careful to manage it. Obviously, Ireland is part of

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 5>the OECD, the new tax framework. Ate please to be

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 5>part of that looking forward to that, and we have

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 5>to manage that transition now over the next period. But

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, I'm looking at my tax tax receipts just

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 5>this year. You know, income taxes up, the at receipts

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 5>are up all of your domestic you know, all of

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 5>the indicators of a really strong domestic economy. So we're

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 5>generating very significant receipts from that as well. It's not

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 5>just corporation tax, it's income tax, it's that it's activity

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 5>in the employment sector. We have never had more people

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 5>at work in Ireland and we have a very highly

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 5>skilled labor force. So it's a good time for us

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 5>considering where we were ten years ago. We're very excited

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 5>to be here, but we take a careful pause in

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 5>our approach to it. You know, we recognize that we

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 5>want to be in as resilient a position ten years

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 5>from now, and of course there's going to be ups

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 5>and downs. Of course, there's going to be retrenchments in

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 5>different sectors. Earlier this year, for example, there was a

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 5>slight retrenchment in tech in employment. We have a very

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 5>strong financial services sector, as you're aware, and we found

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 5>that a lot of that skill was absorbed immediately by

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 5>financial services in fintech, in sure tech. Great innovation that's

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 5>coming out of Ireland because we have this juxtaposition of

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 5>tech and financial services right beside each other. We're doing

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot of very interesting, exciting things there. So I

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 5>think it's a good moment. But I think in Ireland

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 5>we will always adopt a sort of curfl pause. We've

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 5>come back from a really disastrous financial crash to a

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 5>balanced budget to an interesting surplus.

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Some of the changes that we've seen post Brexit in

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 4>the UK has been to move away from some of

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 4>the mifit to regulations, particularly around funding for research. Is

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 4>that giving the UK a competitive edge when it comes

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 4>to attracting financial services companies versus Ireland.

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 5>It's not what I'm hearing. I think what I would

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 5>reflect is that I think we're at a point where,

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, I became Minister for Financial Services in December

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 5>when we hadn't the Windsor Framework agreed and we were

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 5>in a very different place in terms of our conversations

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 5>in our dialogue. It's now the beginning of October, and

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 5>I'm so pleased that that has been agreed and that

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 5>we can have really constructive conversations about what we do

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 5>together in the future. And I don't think that we

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 5>need to approach it in an overly competitive sort of way. Obviously,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 5>Ireland is at the center of Europe is going to

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 5>continue to do everything it can to protect and develop

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 5>the Single Market and the opportunities within that. But we're

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 5>so very pleased to have this closural close relationship with

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 5>London as financials are services. You know, Okay, find.

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 4>There's some frantation competitors, friendly.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 5>Competitors, and do you know what, there's nothing wrong with that.

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 5>It does both of us well. London has been and

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 5>always will be a major financial center of for the world,

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 5>and you know, we benefit very strongly by London doing

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 5>well and we will do well from that. So I

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 5>approach it in a very collaborative way.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned the Windsor framework. Are you disappointed there hasn't

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 4>been restoration of the executive since the winds Are Framework agreed?

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 4>I should point out you also used to be a

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 4>member of the Parliamentary committee that looked at the implementation

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 4>of the Good Variety Agreement.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 5>I am really disappointed. I am really disappointed because, you know,

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 5>for so many reasons, it's a major democratic gap to

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 5>have political institutions that were voted in by the people,

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 5>where you have free and fair elections, which is, you know,

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 5>a privilege and a luxury that most people around the world,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, do not. In fact, have you free and

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 5>fair elections in the opportunity to represent your community and government,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 5>it's an extraordinary privilege and an extraordinary opportunity. And nowhere

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 5>is that more important than trying to build a reconciled

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 5>society in Northern Ireland. Northern Ireland has the most exceptional

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 5>opportunity being both part of the UK and in many

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 5>ways the access to the Single Market. Also, we want

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 5>to see Northern Ireland doing well. We want to see

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 5>the ministers in place making decisions. We want to see

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 5>collaboration in the way that we can between Dublin and Belfast.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 5>We want nothing but good things for Northern Ireland. But

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, the political institutions have to run. And I

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 5>would say that of the twenty five years of the

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 5>Good Friday Agreement, Stormant hasn't been an operation for I

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 5>think close to ten of those, if not slightly more,

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 5>and that's a major gap and I think that that's

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 5>going to require reflection over the next period.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 4>That was Ireland's Financial Services Minister Jennifer Carol McNeil speaking

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 4>to me here on Bloomberg Radio ahead of the budget

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 4>announcement coming in the coming days. Also very interesting to

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 4>get her views on the political stalemate in Northern Ireland,

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 4>where an executive hasn't functioned for well over a year

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 4>and a half at this stage due to political disagreements

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 4>over Northern Ireland's post Brexit trade rules, so good to

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 4>get her perspective on those issues too. I'm Stephen Carroll

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 4>in London. You can catch us every weekday morning here

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 4>for Bloomberg Daybreak. You're beginning at six am in London

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 4>and one am on Wall Streets.

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 2>Tom, thank you, Steven. And coming up on Bloomberg day

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Break weekend, we head to the nation's capital and look

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 2>at the race for Speaker of the House. I'm Tom Busby.

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Bloomberg Radio on demand and in your

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 2>podcast feed. I'm Tom Busby in New York with your

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. One of the biggest political stories we're

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>watching this week is the race for Speaker of the House.

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Republicans will host a candidate forum on Tuesday, and the

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 2>closed party election will take place on Wednesday. There's no

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 2>timeline for electing a speaker on the House floor. Now

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 2>for more, let's head to our Bloomberg ninety nine one

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 2>News from in Washington and Bloomberg Sound On co host

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Kaylee Lines.

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Tom, that's right. After an historic week in the

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 6>House of Representatives that saw the ousting of Kevin McCarthy

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 6>as speaker through a motion to brought by Republican Congressman

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 6>from Florida Matt Gates, this coming week promises to bring

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 6>drama all its own as the House attempts to decide

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 6>on who the next speaker will be. Here with me

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 6>for more is Megan's scully, who leads Bloomberg's Congress coverage

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 6>here in Washington. So, Megan, this is promising to be

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 6>kind of chaotic. Chaotics seems to be the status quo

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 6>in the House of Representatives at the moment, and there's

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 6>a lot of individuals to talk about, so I'd like

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 6>to take them kind of just one by one, beginning

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 6>with one individual who this past week got the endorsement

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 6>of former President Trump, Congressman Jim Jordan from Ohio, the

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 6>chair of the Judiciary Committee. What are his strengths and

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 6>weaknesses as a speaker candidate?

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 7>Sure, so, Jim Jordan is probably best known for being

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 7>a bomb thrower within the caucus. He doesn't like to

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 7>wear a jacket. He's very sort of anti establishment, and

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 7>he is one of the lawmakers who's leading the impeachment

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 7>inquiry against President Joe Biden. This all plays very well

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 7>for as does Trump's endorsement for the hardliners in the party,

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 7>many of the same who had issues with Kevin McCarthy

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 7>and really worked against him during his very short term

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 7>as Speaker and ultimately ousted him. So that's all good

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 7>for Jim Jordan. The downside, though, are the moderates, particularly

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 7>the eighteen House Republicans who are from districts that Joe

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 7>Biden carried in twenty twenty. These are very very purple

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 7>areas and they're not terribly supportive of the impeachment inquiry,

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 7>and this makes Jim Jordan a very difficult and problematic

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 7>speaker candidate for folks like Mike Lawler and Mark Malnaro

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 7>from New York. There's several in southern California as well.

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 6>Okay, So knowing that whoever ultimately is going to be

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 6>speaker needs to get the majority of the caucus, be

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 6>that two hundred and seventeen or maybe lower. If there's

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 6>some people that don't show up, the math's going to

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 6>get very hard, especially when also in the mix is

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 6>someone like Steve Scalise, the majority leader, kind of maybe

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 6>the continuity candidate. You could see in that way, he's

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 6>likely to appeal more to some of those moderates, some

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 6>of those more endangered individuals, right, Yes, Steve.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 7>Scalase is sort of the safer candidate for those individuals.

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 7>He is very conservative, you know, he's definitely not a moderate,

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 7>but he is not one to be particularly polarizing to

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 7>the American public. He's definitely more of the same mold

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 7>as Kevin McCarthy in his well known entity, someone that

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 7>the moderates I think feel like they can trust. He

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 7>is not as problematic as Jim Jordan, for sure, and

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 7>I think you're going to see those folks really rally

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 7>behind him, although it remains to be seen whether he

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 7>can get the hard right who's going to support Jim Jordan?

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 6>Again, it comes down to the math. The math is

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.679
<v Speaker 6>just really tough. And there's other people kind of floating

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 6>out there as well, like Congressman Kevin Hearn from Oklahoma.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 6>What's his deal?

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 7>So, you know, I'm very curious to see what happens

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 7>with him and whether he emerges as a consensus candidate,

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 7>somebody who the hardliners can begrudgingly get on board with

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 7>and the moderates can sort of hold their nose and

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 7>vote for. He is the chairman of the largest ideological

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 7>group in the House, the Republican Study Committee, and they

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 7>are a conservative group, although they tend to be less

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 7>bombastic than the House Freedom Caucus. So while folks like

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 7>Mike Lawler might not be on board with Kevin Hearn's policies,

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 7>his approach and his strategy is something that they can

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 7>tolerate much more so than a Jim Jordan.

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 6>And of course, the other individual here who is technically

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 6>the one who interim is Speaker Congressman Patrick mckenne of

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 6>North Carolina. He is acting in a pro temporary position

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 6>right now. It kind of our understanding is he doesn't

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 6>really have that much power other than to preside over

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 6>a speaker's vote. And on the idea of when this

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 6>vote's actually going to happen. Are the Republicans going to

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.719
<v Speaker 6>try to sort them out, sort all this out themselves,

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 6>understand that someone is going to get the requisite majority

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 6>vote before they actually take it to the floor, remembering

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 6>it took fifteen rounds over the course of four days

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 6>to get McCarthy the speaker's gavel in the first place

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 6>in January.

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 7>That is certainly the big question. My money is on

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 7>them not being able to rally behind a candidate. That

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 7>is what party leaders are going to be trying to

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 7>do on Tuesday before this goes to the floor on Wednesday.

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 7>They don't want a whole messy spectacle on the floor

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 7>on Wednesday. But looking at how things went with McCarthy's ouster,

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 7>which was the first in US history, I find it

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 7>very difficult to believe that this is going to be

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 7>clean and short and be a show of unity for

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 7>the GOP. I suspect that when this goes to the floor,

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 7>it is going to be a very divided Republican conference,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 7>and I think that Democrats, just like they did with

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 7>the vote on McCarthy, are going to watch from the

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 7>sidelines and cast their no votes against whoever it is

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 7>and vote for Remember Jeffries. Actually, how came Jeffreys, the

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 7>Democratic leader, had the most votes of any candidate going

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 7>into that fifteenth round because Democrats really united behind him.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 7>So we're going to see that, and it's just it's

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 7>going to continue you to be extremely messy. We thought

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 7>that the fifteen rounds that McCarthy went through was long

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 7>and drawn out. It was certainly extraordinary, if not a record,

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 7>I suspect this could go much longer and be far

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 7>more bruising.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 6>So buckle up everyone, exactly. That's what's going to come

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 6>on the floor potentially this coming week. I also want

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 6>to talk about a letter of that forty five Republican

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 6>members of the House wrote about what happened this past week.

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 6>This includes the likes of Mike Lawler, who you've mentioned

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 6>a few times. He signed this letter along with forty

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 6>four others. Part of what they wrote this is a

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 6>quote ashamed and embarrassed by what happened on the floor

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 6>this week. We refuse to allow the eight members who

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 6>abandoned an undermined or conference to dictate every outcome in

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 6>policy and personnel for the remainder of this Congress, including

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 6>the upcoming selection of the Speaker of the House. They're

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 6>talking about the motion to vacate, Megan, is it going

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 6>to go away? How hard will that be?

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 7>Extremely hard? This motion to vacate was something that Kevin

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 7>McCarthy had to agree to to be elected speaker. And

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 7>what that is essentially, and how we saw that play

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 7>out was it only took one member to bring that

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 7>to the floor and then it required only a simple

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 7>maturity of the House law makers present and voting to

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 7>oust the speaker. That meant that McCarthy threw out his

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 7>again very short term nine months. I think it was

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 7>the third shortest in US history. Throughout his term as speaker,

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 7>essentially had this gun to his head where he was concerned,

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, with every twist and turn that he could

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 7>be ousted.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 3>Getting the.

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 7>Hardliners to relent on that will be extraordinary difficult. Extraordinarily

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 7>difficult because that is what gives them their power. So

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 7>why would they let that go.

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 6>They want to hold on to the leverage absolutely so

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 6>much to look forward to Yes, just more paradise here

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 6>in Washington. Really looking forward to your coverage of this

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 6>over the coming week. Megan Scully, the leader of Bloomberg's

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 6>congressional team here in Washington, thank you very much in

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Tom buckle up.

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Kaylee. That was Bloomberg's sound on co host

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Kaylee Lines reporting from our Bloomberg ninety nine to one

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 2>newsroom in Washington. And you can hear sound on weekdays

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 2>one to three pm on Bloomberg Radio and coming up

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 2>here on Bloomberg day Break Weekend. After China's Golden Week,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 2>we look at the holiday's impact on the country's economy.

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Tom Busby

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>in New York. Will China's seven day Golden Week holiday

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 2>be a hope for the country's economy to reset? Let's

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 2>get to Brian Curtis, co host of Bloomberg's Daybreak Asia

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 2>radio show, to find out more.

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom, China markets reopen in the coming week after the

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Golden Week holiday, what might we expect? We're joined by

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca Chong Wilkins, Bloomberg Asia Government and Economics correspondent. So

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, Rebecca, what you're hearing from investors now because

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.479
<v Speaker 1>this has been a critical time and do they need

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a catalyst to come back in.

0:29:24.400 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think the big story for them is watching

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 8>whether or not the Chinese consumer has come back during

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 8>the Golden Week holiday. So this is a long stretch

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 8>eight days where typically we see Chinese people going out, traveling,

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 8>spending and buying more. Obviously that has been severely dented

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 8>by sort of waning confidence, the property crisis and so on,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 8>And so that's really where investors are focusing. Are we

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 8>seeing an improvement in sort of services, in consumer spending

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 8>and tourism, And then the other part of this is property. Now,

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 8>I think the prevailing feeling is that for property there's

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 8>still some of that pessimism there. Just looking at the

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 8>first four days of the month in thirty major cities,

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 8>the data looks really weak. We're seeing this big decline

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 8>again year over year. We hardly are their way through

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 8>the month, but you know, even when we compare to September,

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 8>marginal improvement there month over month. But you know, more broadly,

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 8>it doesn't look like we're seeing a bottoming out, so

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 8>that pessimism is prevailing. But in the consumer sectors and

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 8>in the services part, we are maybe seeing these pockets

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 8>of positive signs and that might be enough to start

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 8>bringing some traders back in.

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>You cited some numbers from the Golden week holiday, and

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>we know that Golden weekend has historically been a key

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>test for the property sector. Is there any possible catalysts

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>there that investors might seize upon, and if so, what

0:30:53.160 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>would it look like. Would it be like dramatic sales

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in Shanghai or in Beijing, or would be in the

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>outlying areas. What would they be feasting on.

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 8>I think there are a couple of elements there. So

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 8>the first is and just say we're not really expecting this,

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 8>But the first would be to see a more comprehensive

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 8>approach from the government to try and support the sector.

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 8>What we've seen so far has been very piecemeal, very localized,

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 8>and pretty focused on specific regions or specific cities. Now,

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 8>if we saw some kind of bigger restructuring program or

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 8>bigger supportive policy program that we saw, for example in

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 8>twenty fifteen, the regeneration of the slums, anything that was

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 8>more comprehensive from the central government. I think that certainly

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 8>would be a sign of a different mo from Beijing

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 8>that would be taken very positively. We haven't seen signs

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 8>that that's coming, but of course it remains an option,

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 8>depending on how long this sort of how much in

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 8>economic pain that Beijing can be willing to endure.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You had oversupply and you had property developers get in trouble,

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>but then you also have a big fall off in demand.

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>What is the main cause of the drop in demand.

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 8>Well, it is the crack down that Beijing has rolled

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 8>out into the property market, which is specifically focused on

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 8>this idea of cracking down speculative buying of property market.

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 8>That speculative bet is what has driven the production of oversupply,

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 8>particularly in those smaller cities that you know that if

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 8>you bought a second, third, maybe a fourth or a

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 8>fifth property, it was a guaranteed way to increase your

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 8>wealth because the value of those markets was just going

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:27.959
<v Speaker 8>up and up and up and up. Now that trend

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 8>has stopped. Not only has it stopped, but the demand

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 8>for buying, the demand for renting has fallen and prices

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 8>have fallen off. This sort of scary part. I think

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 8>for long time watches of the market and for you know,

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 8>investors who are thinking about where they want to be

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 8>in China long term. Two and its economic growth model

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 8>is that some estimates say that we are only about

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 8>seventeen percent of the way through fixing that oversupply product.

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Rebecca, thanks so much for joining us. Great

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>insights there, Rebecca Chong Wilkins wlohenbrig Asia Government Economics correspondent.

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Brian Curtis along with Doug Chrisner. You can catch

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>us every weekday here for Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, beginning at

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>six am in Hong Kong and six pm on Wall Street. Tom.

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Brian, and that does it for this edition of

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 2>five am Wall Street time for the latest on markets

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 2>overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>business headlines are coming up right now.