1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,360 Speaker 1: Hundreds of homeless people, and Grant's Pass began setting up 2 00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:07,000 Speaker 1: encampments in public parks. In twenty thirteen, the city stepped 3 00:00:07,040 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 1: up its enforcement of anti camping laws, banning anyone from 4 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 1: sleeping outside with any kind of betting. Penalties included fines 5 00:00:14,680 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: starting at two hundred ninety five dollars or thirty days 6 00:00:17,560 --> 00:00:21,880 Speaker 1: in prison for repeat offenders, but with extremely limited public shelter. 7 00:00:21,640 --> 00:00:22,840 Speaker 2: Space in Grant's Pass. 8 00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:26,400 Speaker 1: The people affected by the fines sued, saying the tickets 9 00:00:26,480 --> 00:00:30,520 Speaker 1: violated their Eighth Amendment rights against cruel and unusual punishment. 10 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:34,880 Speaker 1: The lower courts agreed, blocking the city from enforcing the law. Now, 11 00:00:34,920 --> 00:00:37,640 Speaker 1: the decision is in the hands of the US Supreme Court, 12 00:00:37,960 --> 00:00:40,640 Speaker 1: and the court's ruling could impact how cities across the 13 00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:44,400 Speaker 1: country handle the homelessness crisis. The US Supreme Court is 14 00:00:44,400 --> 00:00:47,120 Speaker 1: expected to make a decision in this case by late June. 15 00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 2: Wow. 16 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:52,239 Speaker 3: So that ruling is in great part responsible for the 17 00:00:52,360 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 3: explosion of drug addicts laying about everywhere in a lot 18 00:00:56,440 --> 00:00:57,880 Speaker 3: of blue cities and states. 19 00:00:58,360 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 2: One hundred percent. Yeah, yeah, And as we discussed earlier 20 00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:03,480 Speaker 2: in the show, I'm a little troubled that's the Supreme 21 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:06,520 Speaker 2: Court seemed to be asking the question, do grants pass 22 00:01:06,560 --> 00:01:11,279 Speaker 2: his policies help the homeless as opposed to does grants 23 00:01:11,280 --> 00:01:13,479 Speaker 2: pass in every other city in America have the right 24 00:01:13,600 --> 00:01:18,880 Speaker 2: to crack down on criminal behavior if it affects the 25 00:01:18,959 --> 00:01:22,280 Speaker 2: quality of life and you know, the health and safety 26 00:01:22,319 --> 00:01:24,440 Speaker 2: of everyone who lives in that town. That's what we're 27 00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:25,280 Speaker 2: trying to decide. 28 00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:29,720 Speaker 3: Meanwhile, with that law in place, cities and states have 29 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:34,399 Speaker 3: spent billions upon billions of dollars on the whole homeless situation, 30 00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:39,160 Speaker 3: and it's only gotten worse. So as I always say, 31 00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:41,520 Speaker 3: show me a program that's going to make it better, 32 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:43,400 Speaker 3: because so far they've all made them worse. 33 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:46,920 Speaker 2: Well, many, many of those billions of dollars have been 34 00:01:47,120 --> 00:01:50,040 Speaker 2: spent in the state of cal Unicornia, home to half 35 00:01:50,080 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 2: of the bums and junkies in America, and Assemblyman Josh Hoover, 36 00:01:54,880 --> 00:01:59,480 Speaker 2: who represents the seventh District of California, joins us. He 37 00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:03,280 Speaker 2: has has requested an audit on homelessness spending in California 38 00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:07,960 Speaker 2: and the results have been almost hilarious. Josh, mister Assemblyman, 39 00:02:08,040 --> 00:02:10,600 Speaker 2: how are you, hey, guys. 40 00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:12,080 Speaker 4: How you doing? Thanks for having me on. I know 41 00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:14,600 Speaker 4: you love hearing this, but I started listening to you 42 00:02:14,639 --> 00:02:16,920 Speaker 4: guys in high school a little over twenty years ago. 43 00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:20,200 Speaker 2: Thanks for that. And you're now sixty seven years old 44 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:24,079 Speaker 2: and have eleven grandchildren. Yeah. Thanks, that's a great story. Well, hey, 45 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:26,480 Speaker 2: we appreciate it. We truly do it. And look at you. 46 00:02:26,919 --> 00:02:31,720 Speaker 2: Look at you trying to lead the state, a small minority, 47 00:02:31,760 --> 00:02:34,920 Speaker 2: a Republican in the state House. But nonetheless, so what 48 00:02:35,840 --> 00:02:40,000 Speaker 2: motivated you to request this audit? And what'd you find out? So? 49 00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:43,880 Speaker 4: Look, California is now home to forty nine percent of 50 00:02:43,880 --> 00:02:47,440 Speaker 4: the nation's unsheltered homeless. When I got elected a couple 51 00:02:47,560 --> 00:02:50,840 Speaker 4: years ago, I saw we were spending billions of dollars 52 00:02:50,840 --> 00:02:52,880 Speaker 4: and I wanted to know where the money was going, 53 00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:56,200 Speaker 4: and so I put forward this request to audit homelessness 54 00:02:56,240 --> 00:02:59,800 Speaker 4: spending in California. Turns out we have spent nearly twenty 55 00:03:00,440 --> 00:03:04,919 Speaker 4: billion taxpayer dollars to solve this problem, and it has 56 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,760 Speaker 4: grown statewide by over thirty two percent during that same 57 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:13,680 Speaker 4: period of time, our homeless population, and so absolutely devastating results. 58 00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:16,480 Speaker 4: And what's worse is we don't even know where any 59 00:03:16,520 --> 00:03:18,600 Speaker 4: of the money is going. I was hoping we would 60 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:22,200 Speaker 4: find maybe some places we could you know, improve our 61 00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:25,960 Speaker 4: investments and send money to programs that are actually working, 62 00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:28,240 Speaker 4: But instead we found that we don't even know where 63 00:03:28,240 --> 00:03:29,160 Speaker 4: any of the money is going. 64 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:32,880 Speaker 2: You want to improve our investments. That's hilarious. 65 00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:35,080 Speaker 3: I mean like I've I invested in some stock and 66 00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:37,320 Speaker 3: not only did it not go up, I lost other 67 00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:39,720 Speaker 3: money that I came into my account and took arb 68 00:03:39,760 --> 00:03:40,480 Speaker 3: my money. 69 00:03:41,840 --> 00:03:44,080 Speaker 2: Right right, You got to laugh to keep from crying, 70 00:03:44,520 --> 00:03:47,600 Speaker 2: So you know, it's funny. I so would love to 71 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:51,320 Speaker 2: sit down with the Supreme Court justices and say, look, 72 00:03:52,040 --> 00:03:55,600 Speaker 2: this is primarily a junkie problem. The junkies go where 73 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:58,880 Speaker 2: the benefits are the best and the hassling from the 74 00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:03,560 Speaker 2: police is the least. And you could make the argument, Josh, 75 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:04,720 Speaker 2: I've had this discussion. 76 00:04:04,760 --> 00:04:08,480 Speaker 5: Second, that flies in defiance of the fact that it's 77 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:12,720 Speaker 5: a housing problem. It's the cost of housing. California has 78 00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:15,560 Speaker 5: the most expensive rent in housing. Joe Getty does not 79 00:04:15,680 --> 00:04:18,880 Speaker 5: understand this. That is why these people are homeless. Joe 80 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:22,960 Speaker 5: is claiming that they're coming to California. What can't possibly 81 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:23,960 Speaker 5: be true because. 82 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:28,000 Speaker 2: Our rents are too high. Yeah, well, certainly within California, 83 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:32,839 Speaker 2: people are coming to wherever it's the cushiest. But I've 84 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:35,120 Speaker 2: had this discussion with my wife before. We call it 85 00:04:35,160 --> 00:04:40,000 Speaker 2: the the aspirin paradox. Where somebody has a headache, you 86 00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:42,920 Speaker 2: take some aspirin. Did it help? Nope, I still have 87 00:04:43,000 --> 00:04:45,760 Speaker 2: the headache. It could have been twice as bad though, 88 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 2: if you didn't have the if you didn't take the aspirin. 89 00:04:48,640 --> 00:04:51,680 Speaker 2: You don't know that, And so you could argue, well, 90 00:04:51,720 --> 00:04:54,920 Speaker 2: the homelessness wouldn't have grown by a third after spending 91 00:04:54,920 --> 00:04:57,320 Speaker 2: all that money, it would have grown by two thirds. 92 00:04:57,520 --> 00:05:00,400 Speaker 2: Except that's not been the experience of virtually any their state. 93 00:05:00,480 --> 00:05:01,080 Speaker 2: Josh has it. 94 00:05:02,120 --> 00:05:05,680 Speaker 4: No, No, California is by far the worst when it 95 00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:08,600 Speaker 4: comes to this problem. And you know, it's interesting. When 96 00:05:08,600 --> 00:05:11,880 Speaker 4: I was talking to the auditor directly, he told me, 97 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:14,560 Speaker 4: you know, the big problem at the local level is 98 00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:17,120 Speaker 4: the focus is on getting these dollars out the door, 99 00:05:17,520 --> 00:05:20,280 Speaker 4: meeting spending deadlines. They don't care if the programs are 100 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:23,599 Speaker 4: actually working. And we have seen tens of millions of 101 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:27,039 Speaker 4: dollars go to outside service providers at the local level 102 00:05:27,400 --> 00:05:31,039 Speaker 4: with zero accountabilities, zero expectations that they report back on 103 00:05:31,080 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 4: their results. And this is the problems that we're now 104 00:05:33,960 --> 00:05:34,720 Speaker 4: seeing because of it. 105 00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:34,960 Speaker 2: Well. 106 00:05:34,960 --> 00:05:38,279 Speaker 3: One one problem with this as a topic, and you 107 00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:40,360 Speaker 3: know this if you've been listening to us for years, 108 00:05:40,440 --> 00:05:44,080 Speaker 3: is practically all government programs do this. They don't keep 109 00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:46,360 Speaker 3: track of whether or not the education spending is doing 110 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:49,360 Speaker 3: any good either. So that's just you know, the way 111 00:05:49,400 --> 00:05:51,800 Speaker 3: government works kind of in general, and it can get 112 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:53,599 Speaker 3: worse and they keep throwing more money at it, so 113 00:05:53,680 --> 00:05:56,080 Speaker 3: that this is not the only time this has ever happened. 114 00:05:56,400 --> 00:06:00,479 Speaker 2: Yeah, So Josh, help us picture that here on here 115 00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:03,760 Speaker 2: in you know, any town California, we get a grant 116 00:06:03,839 --> 00:06:08,360 Speaker 2: ten million dollars to feed the homeless and and whatever else, 117 00:06:08,400 --> 00:06:11,760 Speaker 2: get them job training. So you're saying that like local 118 00:06:11,920 --> 00:06:14,719 Speaker 2: entities are hired, but then nobody ever asks whether anybody 119 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:15,200 Speaker 2: got fed. 120 00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:16,839 Speaker 5: Correct. 121 00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:19,640 Speaker 4: So the governor this week, you know, came out and said, 122 00:06:20,160 --> 00:06:23,000 Speaker 4: I'm tired of funding failure. That's what he came out 123 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:25,040 Speaker 4: and said this week, he said, had some really strong 124 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:29,560 Speaker 4: words about increasing accountability. But the reality is is that 125 00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:33,760 Speaker 4: his whole plan, his whole metric for success, has been 126 00:06:33,960 --> 00:06:37,800 Speaker 4: how many dollars are we spending? So he's you know, 127 00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 4: sent out billions of dollars. It gets flowed down to 128 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,920 Speaker 4: the county levels to the city levels. That generally goes 129 00:06:43,960 --> 00:06:48,160 Speaker 4: out to nonprofits and other service providers, and nobody asked 130 00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:50,680 Speaker 4: the question where is the money going. We've got some 131 00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:54,320 Speaker 4: legislation up in the Housing Committee tomorrow to require, you know, 132 00:06:54,800 --> 00:06:58,080 Speaker 4: that information to be collected. But the reality is is 133 00:06:58,120 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 4: that we should have been doing it all along. 134 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:01,760 Speaker 3: I don't want to hit you. I'm not trying to 135 00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:03,760 Speaker 3: hit you with gotcha questions. You know, off your top 136 00:07:03,800 --> 00:07:05,800 Speaker 3: of your head, what the raw number is how many 137 00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:06,640 Speaker 3: homeless people we have? 138 00:07:07,440 --> 00:07:10,440 Speaker 4: It's about one hundred and eighty thousand, a little over 139 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:13,560 Speaker 4: one hundred and eighty thousand homeless in California today. 140 00:07:13,680 --> 00:07:15,280 Speaker 3: Jeez, that's a lot of people, and it's half the 141 00:07:15,520 --> 00:07:17,600 Speaker 3: homeless people in the country. But has anybody done the 142 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:19,840 Speaker 3: quick math on the how many billion dollars it is 143 00:07:19,880 --> 00:07:22,040 Speaker 3: divided by that? Just to see how much we would 144 00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:23,480 Speaker 3: have if we just cut them all a check. 145 00:07:24,600 --> 00:07:26,600 Speaker 4: I don't have the number off the top of my head, 146 00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:28,920 Speaker 4: but you would be astounded. 147 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:31,240 Speaker 2: Yeah, it would be a lot. Yeah, I think we 148 00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:33,080 Speaker 2: could do that math easily. I think they would be 149 00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:37,640 Speaker 2: instantly quite well off. So, Josh, I'm struck. Josh Hoover's 150 00:07:37,640 --> 00:07:39,600 Speaker 2: on the line, he's a California assemblyman who's trying to 151 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:42,000 Speaker 2: figure out where the billions of dollars spent on the 152 00:07:42,040 --> 00:07:44,320 Speaker 2: so called homeless programs are going and whether they're doing 153 00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:46,600 Speaker 2: any good if you're just doing in. But Josh, I'm 154 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:50,560 Speaker 2: struck that. For instance, the Seattle City attorney wrote a 155 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:54,800 Speaker 2: Friend of the Court brief to the Grant's pass case 156 00:07:54,840 --> 00:07:57,080 Speaker 2: to the Supreme Court saying, Hey, we've got to be 157 00:07:57,240 --> 00:08:01,280 Speaker 2: able to enforce local ordinances or we're going to descend 158 00:08:01,320 --> 00:08:04,760 Speaker 2: into chaos and filth and misery. So a city like 159 00:08:04,840 --> 00:08:07,520 Speaker 2: Seattle is saying, oh my gosh, this has gone too far. 160 00:08:07,600 --> 00:08:10,680 Speaker 2: We've seen Portland turns somewhat to the right. Do you 161 00:08:10,760 --> 00:08:14,560 Speaker 2: feel like there's any energy in the incredibly one sided 162 00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:18,920 Speaker 2: California Assembly to actually get serious about bums and junkies 163 00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:19,920 Speaker 2: and decaying cities. 164 00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:23,840 Speaker 4: Well, I think people are waking up to it. So 165 00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:27,440 Speaker 4: Governor Gavin Newsom even urged the Supreme Court to take 166 00:08:27,480 --> 00:08:29,960 Speaker 4: this case. And the reason he did that is because 167 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 4: I think he sees this as a serious electoral ish. 168 00:08:32,920 --> 00:08:36,800 Speaker 4: Sure absolutely continues to, you know, to grow in California, 169 00:08:36,880 --> 00:08:39,679 Speaker 4: and eventually it's going to hurt, you know, his leadership 170 00:08:39,720 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 4: and his party. I think that's probably his main motivation. 171 00:08:44,640 --> 00:08:46,800 Speaker 4: But Jack, you also hit on an important point earlier. 172 00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 4: We have to acknowledge this is not just a housing 173 00:08:49,720 --> 00:08:53,440 Speaker 4: crisis in California. This is a drug abuse crisis. This 174 00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:56,360 Speaker 4: is a mental health crisis, and we have refused to 175 00:08:56,400 --> 00:08:59,400 Speaker 4: do that. Our state says that it's just housing and 176 00:08:59,520 --> 00:09:03,920 Speaker 4: all of our all actually require housing first methodologies. 177 00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:06,800 Speaker 3: The fact that they still lean on it being a 178 00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:10,440 Speaker 3: housing thing and not a drug thing is so crazy. 179 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:13,240 Speaker 2: Oh, you've probably heard this, Josh, if you've been listening 180 00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:15,640 Speaker 2: to the show. We've talked to multiple folks who've spent 181 00:09:15,720 --> 00:09:18,360 Speaker 2: time on the streets and we've asked them what percentage 182 00:09:18,360 --> 00:09:21,840 Speaker 2: of people in the various junkie camps are on drugs, 183 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:24,839 Speaker 2: and the number we get is usually somewhe around eighty 184 00:09:24,880 --> 00:09:28,600 Speaker 2: five percent, eighty five ninety percent. And to pretend that 185 00:09:28,679 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 2: it's not a drug addicts who don't want to work 186 00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 2: and like living outdoors situation is insane because, as we've 187 00:09:35,800 --> 00:09:39,040 Speaker 2: said a million times, if you separate those people out, 188 00:09:39,320 --> 00:09:41,200 Speaker 2: I think you're going to be surprised how many it is, 189 00:09:41,240 --> 00:09:43,240 Speaker 2: what a high percentage it is. But if you can 190 00:09:43,280 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 2: separate that out and then deal with the people who 191 00:09:46,040 --> 00:09:48,720 Speaker 2: came into the situation with a mental illness who don't 192 00:09:48,720 --> 00:09:51,440 Speaker 2: have the intellectual capacity to take care of themselves, are 193 00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:54,280 Speaker 2: trying hard but just don't have money. Then you can 194 00:09:54,440 --> 00:09:57,720 Speaker 2: minister to those people. But until you recognize that the 195 00:09:57,760 --> 00:09:59,920 Speaker 2: bulk of it is just a bunch of tweakers and 196 00:10:00,160 --> 00:10:03,320 Speaker 2: soon to be dead sentinyl addicts, you're just not going 197 00:10:03,400 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 2: to get anywhere. 198 00:10:05,679 --> 00:10:08,000 Speaker 4: Correct. And I've got some programs in my district that 199 00:10:08,040 --> 00:10:11,000 Speaker 4: are getting amazing results, getting people's lives back on track. 200 00:10:11,200 --> 00:10:14,120 Speaker 4: They don't qualify for a dime of state funding. Why 201 00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:19,080 Speaker 4: because they require sobriety as a prerequisite for participation, and 202 00:10:19,240 --> 00:10:21,199 Speaker 4: we don't fund those programs in California. 203 00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:25,200 Speaker 2: That's amazing. Josh Hoover is an assemblyman in the seventh District, 204 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:29,559 Speaker 2: California in the Sacramento area. Josh, keep fighting the good fights. 205 00:10:29,640 --> 00:10:31,440 Speaker 2: Let us know how we can help you. Great to 206 00:10:31,480 --> 00:10:31,840 Speaker 2: talk to you. 207 00:10:32,520 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 4: We'll do Thanks guys, nice job, Armstrong and Getty