WEBVTT - A Commitment to Justice

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:24.316
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:24.356 --> 0:00:27.716
<v Speaker 1>where we explored the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:28.156 --> 0:00:33.476
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. John Lewis, the civil rights icon and congressman,

0:00:33.996 --> 0:00:37.956
<v Speaker 1>died last week at the age of eighty. He is known,

0:00:38.036 --> 0:00:41.396
<v Speaker 1>among many other things, for being one of the leaders

0:00:41.476 --> 0:00:45.156
<v Speaker 1>of the Selma to Montgomery Voting Rights March in nineteen

0:00:45.316 --> 0:00:49.116
<v Speaker 1>sixty five. On March seventh of that year, a day

0:00:49.196 --> 0:00:53.996
<v Speaker 1>now known as Bloody Sunday, Lewis and other marchers were

0:00:54.036 --> 0:00:58.756
<v Speaker 1>attacked by armed police on the Edmund Pettis Bridge, an

0:00:58.756 --> 0:01:02.596
<v Speaker 1>event that helped spur Lyndon Johnson into signing the Voting

0:01:02.676 --> 0:01:05.476
<v Speaker 1>Rights Act. Lewis then went on to have a long

0:01:05.516 --> 0:01:09.356
<v Speaker 1>and storied career in Congress, representing the fifth District of Orgia,

0:01:09.436 --> 0:01:13.316
<v Speaker 1>which included a great deal of Atlanta for seventeen congressional terms,

0:01:13.596 --> 0:01:17.236
<v Speaker 1>and always continuing to fight for voting rights and embodying

0:01:17.356 --> 0:01:20.996
<v Speaker 1>the tradition and spirit of the civil rights movement. Here

0:01:20.996 --> 0:01:22.916
<v Speaker 1>he is just a few years ago, speaking on the

0:01:22.916 --> 0:01:26.596
<v Speaker 1>floor of the House of Representatives about expanding voting rights protections.

0:01:27.236 --> 0:01:30.716
<v Speaker 1>In my hearts the heart, I believe that we should

0:01:30.756 --> 0:01:34.596
<v Speaker 1>make it simple and convenient for all of our citizens

0:01:34.756 --> 0:01:38.156
<v Speaker 1>to be part of the democratic process. It should not

0:01:38.396 --> 0:01:44.316
<v Speaker 1>matter well you're black, a white, Latino, Asian, American, Native American.

0:01:44.876 --> 0:01:48.596
<v Speaker 1>We should be able to participate in a democratic process.

0:01:48.916 --> 0:01:52.676
<v Speaker 1>To discuss John Lewis's legacy and voting rights as they

0:01:52.716 --> 0:01:58.036
<v Speaker 1>exist today, we are joined by Debo Adegbila. Debo twice

0:01:58.076 --> 0:02:01.396
<v Speaker 1>defended the Voting Rights Act before the Supreme Court during

0:02:01.436 --> 0:02:05.596
<v Speaker 1>his long career with the nuble ACP Legal Defense Fund. Today,

0:02:05.636 --> 0:02:08.436
<v Speaker 1>he's a commissioner on the US Commission on Civil Rights,

0:02:08.636 --> 0:02:11.916
<v Speaker 1>a position to which he was appointed by President Barack Obama,

0:02:12.076 --> 0:02:15.996
<v Speaker 1>and he's a partner at the law firm Wilmer Hale Deboth.

0:02:16.036 --> 0:02:19.196
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining me. I want to

0:02:19.196 --> 0:02:24.556
<v Speaker 1>begin with a reminder for listeners of just how central

0:02:24.636 --> 0:02:28.036
<v Speaker 1>the career of Congressman John Lewis was to the development

0:02:28.036 --> 0:02:31.756
<v Speaker 1>of civil rights, and especially voting rights in the United States.

0:02:32.956 --> 0:02:36.396
<v Speaker 1>He was chairman of the Student Non Violent Coordinating Committee.

0:02:36.396 --> 0:02:39.236
<v Speaker 1>He was one of the original thirteen Freedom Writers. He

0:02:39.236 --> 0:02:41.636
<v Speaker 1>was one of the organizers of the March on Washington.

0:02:42.396 --> 0:02:46.076
<v Speaker 1>When you think of his legacy, what elements stand out

0:02:46.156 --> 0:02:49.196
<v Speaker 1>most for you in terms of his inspiration When I

0:02:49.236 --> 0:02:54.236
<v Speaker 1>think of John Lewis, I think first of his exhortation

0:02:54.836 --> 0:02:58.436
<v Speaker 1>to his fellow Americans that you have to be prepared

0:02:58.836 --> 0:03:03.276
<v Speaker 1>to put yourself in the way to achieve justice. Is

0:03:03.356 --> 0:03:06.916
<v Speaker 1>literally somebody who, from the time he was a teenager

0:03:07.636 --> 0:03:13.796
<v Speaker 1>until his old days, was prepared to advance the cause

0:03:13.876 --> 0:03:19.156
<v Speaker 1>of the disenfranchised by literally putting himself on the front

0:03:19.196 --> 0:03:26.636
<v Speaker 1>lines of the public conversation, demonstrations, and issues of the day.

0:03:26.756 --> 0:03:31.916
<v Speaker 1>He was fearless, a fearless advocate for justice, and he

0:03:31.996 --> 0:03:36.556
<v Speaker 1>was motivated by an inner sense of moral courage that

0:03:36.636 --> 0:03:41.316
<v Speaker 1>made him unbowed even in the face of risks to

0:03:41.396 --> 0:03:45.836
<v Speaker 1>his life and well being. And that example of an

0:03:45.916 --> 0:03:50.316
<v Speaker 1>unyielding commitment to the notion that America can be better

0:03:50.396 --> 0:03:54.356
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow than it is today if we work at it

0:03:54.436 --> 0:03:58.516
<v Speaker 1>is something that all of us should aspire to. There's

0:03:58.516 --> 0:04:02.756
<v Speaker 1>something particularly extraordinary about the way that John Lewis, literally,

0:04:02.916 --> 0:04:05.716
<v Speaker 1>as you were saying, put his body in the way

0:04:06.236 --> 0:04:09.796
<v Speaker 1>of harm. And although he wasn't a murder like Martin

0:04:09.876 --> 0:04:14.036
<v Speaker 1>Luther King Jr. He was very very badly injured on

0:04:14.076 --> 0:04:17.676
<v Speaker 1>more than one occasion. That example, I think, is something

0:04:18.076 --> 0:04:22.596
<v Speaker 1>the power of which will never ever become old. It's

0:04:22.636 --> 0:04:26.156
<v Speaker 1>an example of moral courage that we should always return

0:04:26.196 --> 0:04:30.836
<v Speaker 1>to that I believe future generations will return to. We

0:04:30.916 --> 0:04:34.316
<v Speaker 1>know in so many ways we train people to be

0:04:34.396 --> 0:04:37.876
<v Speaker 1>on the front lines. There are soldiers who are trained

0:04:37.956 --> 0:04:40.916
<v Speaker 1>to be on the front lines. There is law enforcement

0:04:41.076 --> 0:04:43.516
<v Speaker 1>that is trained to be on the front lines. These

0:04:43.596 --> 0:04:46.756
<v Speaker 1>people we provide with weapons, and sometimes under the sanction

0:04:46.836 --> 0:04:51.036
<v Speaker 1>of the flag or under state organized authority, have the

0:04:51.156 --> 0:04:55.836
<v Speaker 1>right to defend themselves with deadly force and take people's lives.

0:04:55.876 --> 0:05:00.636
<v Speaker 1>In contrast, the civil rights marchers and John Lewis, they

0:05:00.676 --> 0:05:05.276
<v Speaker 1>had only the strength of their convictions and the understanding

0:05:05.516 --> 0:05:07.876
<v Speaker 1>that they were on the right side of history, and

0:05:07.916 --> 0:05:12.196
<v Speaker 1>they presented themselves without weapons, but only with the force

0:05:12.556 --> 0:05:16.356
<v Speaker 1>of their commitment to justice, and they did so in

0:05:16.396 --> 0:05:21.596
<v Speaker 1>the face of brutal forces on the other side. Lewis

0:05:21.716 --> 0:05:25.676
<v Speaker 1>was a deeply believing and committed Christian and had a

0:05:25.796 --> 0:05:28.836
<v Speaker 1>calling to be a minister already when he was a boy,

0:05:29.596 --> 0:05:33.836
<v Speaker 1>and trained then as a minister. Talk a little bit

0:05:33.876 --> 0:05:37.436
<v Speaker 1>about how that kind of religious faith and religious center

0:05:38.156 --> 0:05:42.116
<v Speaker 1>was so important to the moral message that he brought

0:05:42.196 --> 0:05:44.956
<v Speaker 1>eventually to the country. I'm so glad that you've asked

0:05:44.956 --> 0:05:49.356
<v Speaker 1>that Noah, because I do think that the religious grounding

0:05:49.876 --> 0:05:53.956
<v Speaker 1>that John Lewis had was part of the transcendence with

0:05:54.036 --> 0:05:57.516
<v Speaker 1>which he approached his life on earth. That is to say,

0:05:57.716 --> 0:06:02.116
<v Speaker 1>he organized his life around the concept that there were

0:06:02.196 --> 0:06:06.596
<v Speaker 1>things that were more important and perhaps a more meaningful

0:06:06.716 --> 0:06:09.916
<v Speaker 1>willing to sacrifice your life if need be, because there

0:06:09.996 --> 0:06:13.716
<v Speaker 1>was some moral imperative that was greater than the individual being.

0:06:13.836 --> 0:06:17.116
<v Speaker 1>And I think that this is something that derives from

0:06:17.116 --> 0:06:22.716
<v Speaker 1>many religious traditions, the sense of humanity perhaps rising above

0:06:23.196 --> 0:06:25.876
<v Speaker 1>the cause of the individual. And I think it was

0:06:25.956 --> 0:06:29.836
<v Speaker 1>part of this commitment that led him to understand that

0:06:29.916 --> 0:06:33.756
<v Speaker 1>his work on earth was dedicated to being that of

0:06:33.796 --> 0:06:37.076
<v Speaker 1>a servant, but he was in service of something that

0:06:37.196 --> 0:06:41.436
<v Speaker 1>was bigger than his own individual needs and commitments. He

0:06:41.556 --> 0:06:45.596
<v Speaker 1>was in service of the common humanity and dignity of

0:06:45.636 --> 0:06:48.316
<v Speaker 1>all human beings, and I think that was what made

0:06:48.356 --> 0:06:51.356
<v Speaker 1>him willing to put himself in harm's way. I think

0:06:51.356 --> 0:06:54.636
<v Speaker 1>a lot about our American civic religion. You know, we

0:06:54.716 --> 0:06:57.716
<v Speaker 1>have formal separation of church and state in our country,

0:06:57.756 --> 0:07:00.276
<v Speaker 1>and we have a First Amendment with a free exercise

0:07:00.316 --> 0:07:04.716
<v Speaker 1>clause and establishment clause, but we also have collective beliefs

0:07:04.716 --> 0:07:07.476
<v Speaker 1>and values about who we are that are in some

0:07:07.596 --> 0:07:12.436
<v Speaker 1>important ways connected to our collective conception of the divine.

0:07:13.196 --> 0:07:16.156
<v Speaker 1>Even if one is not a Christian, as I indeed

0:07:16.236 --> 0:07:19.316
<v Speaker 1>him not, I think it's possible to still appreciate and

0:07:19.356 --> 0:07:23.876
<v Speaker 1>recognize the Christian component in our collective civic religion, which

0:07:23.876 --> 0:07:26.436
<v Speaker 1>tries to be universal in a certain respect, but is

0:07:26.516 --> 0:07:31.116
<v Speaker 1>also in certain ways inflected by Christian tradition. And I

0:07:31.116 --> 0:07:35.716
<v Speaker 1>think here especially of sacrifice and of the willingness to sacrifice.

0:07:35.716 --> 0:07:37.436
<v Speaker 1>And this connects up to the point that you made

0:07:37.436 --> 0:07:41.596
<v Speaker 1>about John Lewis being prepared to give his body. That's

0:07:41.636 --> 0:07:46.196
<v Speaker 1>a deeply Christian idea, one that is then transmuted, I

0:07:46.236 --> 0:07:50.316
<v Speaker 1>think in our civil rights tradition into the idea of

0:07:50.836 --> 0:07:53.756
<v Speaker 1>people for the Constitution and for the values of the

0:07:53.796 --> 0:07:57.156
<v Speaker 1>Constitution and of equality and of equal justice being able

0:07:57.196 --> 0:08:00.836
<v Speaker 1>to sacrifice their bodies. I wonder if you think that

0:08:00.836 --> 0:08:05.196
<v Speaker 1>that resonance matters the specifically Christian side of what then

0:08:05.276 --> 0:08:08.676
<v Speaker 1>becomes a more universal American civic religion. I believe it

0:08:08.716 --> 0:08:10.956
<v Speaker 1>does matter. It matters to a lot of people, and

0:08:10.996 --> 0:08:14.116
<v Speaker 1>I think people may connect to the message or the

0:08:14.156 --> 0:08:18.956
<v Speaker 1>symbolism in different ways, depending upon the extent to which

0:08:19.316 --> 0:08:23.556
<v Speaker 1>they follow the Christian tradition or theology. But for those

0:08:23.596 --> 0:08:26.756
<v Speaker 1>who are thinking about the Christian traditions and the fact

0:08:26.836 --> 0:08:31.436
<v Speaker 1>that Christ bled and the Lord sacrificed his son on

0:08:31.556 --> 0:08:35.396
<v Speaker 1>a cross so that others may go forward and learn

0:08:35.516 --> 0:08:39.156
<v Speaker 1>from the example of sacrifice. And when you think about

0:08:39.236 --> 0:08:42.396
<v Speaker 1>John Lewis and the others who bled on a bridge,

0:08:43.076 --> 0:08:45.516
<v Speaker 1>laid their bodies down, and John Lewis used to say

0:08:45.516 --> 0:08:49.436
<v Speaker 1>when he gave speeches recalling his work and his march

0:08:49.516 --> 0:08:53.036
<v Speaker 1>with the other brave, nonviolent marchers on the Edmond Pettis Bridge,

0:08:53.036 --> 0:08:55.836
<v Speaker 1>he used to say, I shed a little blood for

0:08:55.916 --> 0:08:58.716
<v Speaker 1>the cause and for voting rights. I shed a little

0:08:58.836 --> 0:09:03.076
<v Speaker 1>blood on that bridge. And so there is certainly a

0:09:03.156 --> 0:09:08.796
<v Speaker 1>parallel in giving of the flesh and the body on

0:09:08.836 --> 0:09:13.196
<v Speaker 1>earth in support of something that is higher and that

0:09:13.276 --> 0:09:18.476
<v Speaker 1>has greater moral force and transcendence. And so I think

0:09:18.476 --> 0:09:23.596
<v Speaker 1>that those who attend to Christian teachings can see a

0:09:23.676 --> 0:09:27.996
<v Speaker 1>deep residence. But I like your point also about the

0:09:28.116 --> 0:09:32.716
<v Speaker 1>American civic religion as I think you called it, or

0:09:32.836 --> 0:09:38.556
<v Speaker 1>civic engagement, which means that whether you view the work

0:09:38.636 --> 0:09:43.796
<v Speaker 1>and the effort through a theological lens or through a

0:09:43.836 --> 0:09:49.076
<v Speaker 1>different democracy lens about we the people and what it

0:09:49.116 --> 0:09:53.636
<v Speaker 1>means to be engaged in the construction of a civic religion,

0:09:54.196 --> 0:09:58.596
<v Speaker 1>that is about the common aspiration of a people who

0:09:58.676 --> 0:10:02.396
<v Speaker 1>recognize that we can be better if we work at it.

0:10:02.636 --> 0:10:05.356
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that was also part of John

0:10:05.436 --> 0:10:10.956
<v Speaker 1>Lewis's Snicks Southern Christian Leadership Conferences as the NAACP le

0:10:10.996 --> 0:10:14.076
<v Speaker 1>ACP Legal Defense Fund that was also part of it.

0:10:14.116 --> 0:10:19.636
<v Speaker 1>They took the words of building a more perfect union. Seriously,

0:10:19.996 --> 0:10:23.556
<v Speaker 1>there was something that was aspirational in the founding vision,

0:10:23.836 --> 0:10:26.636
<v Speaker 1>not that we come as a perfect nation, but that

0:10:26.836 --> 0:10:29.756
<v Speaker 1>if we the people work at it, we can become

0:10:29.876 --> 0:10:34.196
<v Speaker 1>a better nation. And perhaps that is the heart of

0:10:34.236 --> 0:10:39.316
<v Speaker 1>the civic religion, if you will, of American democracy. Let's

0:10:39.356 --> 0:10:42.356
<v Speaker 1>turn a little bit to the question of voting, which

0:10:42.356 --> 0:10:46.076
<v Speaker 1>has been one of the central focuses of your career

0:10:46.236 --> 0:10:49.636
<v Speaker 1>as a civil rights advocate, and which was of course

0:10:49.676 --> 0:10:53.996
<v Speaker 1>so close to the center of Lewis's career and life.

0:10:54.956 --> 0:10:57.676
<v Speaker 1>When you think about the Voting Rights Act of nineteen

0:10:57.796 --> 0:11:02.196
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, what do you think its core promise was

0:11:02.276 --> 0:11:06.956
<v Speaker 1>meant to be? I regard Voting Rights Act of nineteen

0:11:07.036 --> 0:11:15.076
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, as a national commitment to a minority inclusion

0:11:15.276 --> 0:11:20.276
<v Speaker 1>principle in our democracy. That is to say that for

0:11:20.556 --> 0:11:25.476
<v Speaker 1>the full sweep of American history, many people in our society,

0:11:25.556 --> 0:11:29.996
<v Speaker 1>African Americans, Latin X people, people in parts of the

0:11:30.076 --> 0:11:35.756
<v Speaker 1>country were excluded from the most basic principle of a democracy,

0:11:36.076 --> 0:11:39.956
<v Speaker 1>which is to participate in self governance. And that exclusion

0:11:40.036 --> 0:11:44.396
<v Speaker 1>happened on account of race and discrimination that was state

0:11:44.516 --> 0:11:50.516
<v Speaker 1>sponsored and enforced by state authorities at the barrel of

0:11:50.516 --> 0:11:55.836
<v Speaker 1>a gun, and or mob violence. And what happened on

0:11:55.876 --> 0:12:00.516
<v Speaker 1>the Edmund Pettus Bridge, and was followed closely by President

0:12:00.556 --> 0:12:04.916
<v Speaker 1>Lyndon Johnson's speech before a joint session of Congress. It

0:12:05.076 --> 0:12:11.716
<v Speaker 1>was a moment in which the gap between our promises

0:12:12.036 --> 0:12:16.996
<v Speaker 1>of equal protection of the laws and the practices on

0:12:17.036 --> 0:12:23.596
<v Speaker 1>the ground of exclusion and segregation was being intentionally narrowed

0:12:23.836 --> 0:12:26.356
<v Speaker 1>in a way that would change the nation. I view

0:12:26.956 --> 0:12:31.036
<v Speaker 1>the effort at civil rights as an effort to narrow

0:12:31.076 --> 0:12:36.876
<v Speaker 1>the gap between our high civic promises and constitutional promises

0:12:37.156 --> 0:12:42.156
<v Speaker 1>and what are too often low practices. John Lewis and

0:12:42.356 --> 0:12:44.996
<v Speaker 1>his brothers and sisters who joined him on that bridge,

0:12:45.356 --> 0:12:48.756
<v Speaker 1>and those who gave their lives before and after that march.

0:12:49.236 --> 0:12:52.716
<v Speaker 1>Many people may not remember that the march itself was

0:12:52.756 --> 0:12:57.196
<v Speaker 1>occasion because of military veteran Jimmy Lee Jackson was killed

0:12:57.556 --> 0:13:01.396
<v Speaker 1>in an earlier voting march by a state trooper or

0:13:02.036 --> 0:13:08.316
<v Speaker 1>police official in Alabama, and his colleagues were so upset

0:13:08.796 --> 0:13:12.276
<v Speaker 1>that Imi Lee Jackson had been killed defending his grandmother

0:13:12.316 --> 0:13:16.436
<v Speaker 1>and mother at a peaceful voting march that Josea Williams said,

0:13:16.436 --> 0:13:19.236
<v Speaker 1>we should take Jimmy Lee Jackson's coffin and we should

0:13:19.316 --> 0:13:22.236
<v Speaker 1>march it all the way to Montgomery, the point being

0:13:22.556 --> 0:13:26.916
<v Speaker 1>that we should put the body of sacrifice of our

0:13:26.916 --> 0:13:30.196
<v Speaker 1>brothers and sisters and lay it bare and expose it

0:13:30.236 --> 0:13:33.076
<v Speaker 1>before the nation so that the world can see what

0:13:33.196 --> 0:13:36.036
<v Speaker 1>we are prepared to give, what we are in fact

0:13:36.116 --> 0:13:40.756
<v Speaker 1>giving in service of equality, and that to me is

0:13:40.796 --> 0:13:42.956
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the Voting Rights Act. It was a

0:13:43.116 --> 0:13:46.276
<v Speaker 1>national commitment that said we are going to use the

0:13:46.396 --> 0:13:51.076
<v Speaker 1>power of the federal government and of state authority not

0:13:51.196 --> 0:13:54.796
<v Speaker 1>only to subjugate, and not to turn a blind eye

0:13:55.036 --> 0:13:59.396
<v Speaker 1>while state government subjugate, but to elevate the voices of

0:13:59.476 --> 0:14:04.036
<v Speaker 1>democratic participation in the polity and to stand for a

0:14:04.116 --> 0:14:07.836
<v Speaker 1>minority inclusion principle that we cannot turn back from. That's

0:14:07.876 --> 0:14:10.756
<v Speaker 1>how I regard the voting rights. We'll be right back.

0:14:20.916 --> 0:14:24.676
<v Speaker 1>The minority inclusion principle that you're talking about ended up

0:14:24.716 --> 0:14:27.196
<v Speaker 1>being embodied in different parts of the Voting Rights Act

0:14:27.276 --> 0:14:29.756
<v Speaker 1>of nineteen sixty five, but one of the most important

0:14:29.756 --> 0:14:35.836
<v Speaker 1>components was a practical process called preclearance, according to which

0:14:35.916 --> 0:14:38.076
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a part of the country with a history,

0:14:38.356 --> 0:14:44.636
<v Speaker 1>a demonstrated history of race based voting exclusion, before you

0:14:44.676 --> 0:14:49.676
<v Speaker 1>can change the way that you district and assign voters

0:14:49.716 --> 0:14:51.796
<v Speaker 1>to different districts, which of course is crucial to how

0:14:51.876 --> 0:14:55.396
<v Speaker 1>voting outcomes are produced, you had to go to the

0:14:55.436 --> 0:14:59.236
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice and get the Department of Justice to

0:14:59.436 --> 0:15:03.116
<v Speaker 1>review your plan, and then very probably you'd have to

0:15:03.116 --> 0:15:05.276
<v Speaker 1>go to a court and get the court as well

0:15:05.636 --> 0:15:07.996
<v Speaker 1>to have a look at that plan before you could

0:15:07.996 --> 0:15:13.316
<v Speaker 1>make a chance. That practice, which remained in place from

0:15:13.396 --> 0:15:16.596
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty five and was then renewed by Congress a

0:15:16.636 --> 0:15:20.796
<v Speaker 1>couple of times, came under attack in a very important

0:15:21.076 --> 0:15:25.476
<v Speaker 1>voting rights case, landmark case called Shelby County against Holder

0:15:26.076 --> 0:15:29.516
<v Speaker 1>that the Supreme Court decided in twenty thirteen, and you

0:15:29.556 --> 0:15:31.876
<v Speaker 1>were one of the people who argued that case before

0:15:31.876 --> 0:15:35.836
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court while working for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund,

0:15:36.596 --> 0:15:40.156
<v Speaker 1>tell us about what that experience was like, and then

0:15:40.436 --> 0:15:42.596
<v Speaker 1>through that maybe tell us about how the case came

0:15:42.596 --> 0:15:46.596
<v Speaker 1>out and what you feel about it. Absolutely, so, Shelby County,

0:15:46.996 --> 0:15:49.676
<v Speaker 1>I believe is rightfully regarded as one of the most

0:15:49.716 --> 0:15:56.316
<v Speaker 1>significant civil rights cases of this generation. Unfortunately, and I

0:15:56.356 --> 0:15:59.556
<v Speaker 1>will begin at the end, it stands in some ways

0:15:59.596 --> 0:16:04.436
<v Speaker 1>for the proposition not only that a particularly effective piece

0:16:04.956 --> 0:16:09.156
<v Speaker 1>of the Voting Rights Act has been rendered inoperable, the

0:16:09.236 --> 0:16:13.356
<v Speaker 1>preclearance provision of which you spoke, but also the case

0:16:13.396 --> 0:16:18.116
<v Speaker 1>stands for the proposition that there was a signal that

0:16:18.156 --> 0:16:23.596
<v Speaker 1>the country was again in retreat and stepping away from

0:16:23.876 --> 0:16:28.076
<v Speaker 1>the minority inclusion principle that had been so central to

0:16:28.156 --> 0:16:32.076
<v Speaker 1>our march toward justice and our march toward freedom. And

0:16:32.116 --> 0:16:37.556
<v Speaker 1>so Shelby County presented those issues. Essentially, the question before

0:16:37.596 --> 0:16:41.036
<v Speaker 1>the court, not the technical legal question, but the question

0:16:41.116 --> 0:16:43.716
<v Speaker 1>that I think people should understand was before the Court

0:16:45.236 --> 0:16:48.796
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that we have made progress in large

0:16:48.836 --> 0:16:52.956
<v Speaker 1>measure because we have had protections in place, and because

0:16:52.956 --> 0:16:56.996
<v Speaker 1>we turned away from a system of exclusion and discrimination

0:16:57.356 --> 0:17:00.196
<v Speaker 1>to a system of minority inclusion. Is the fact of

0:17:00.236 --> 0:17:05.716
<v Speaker 1>that progress evidence that we should abandon our effort to

0:17:05.756 --> 0:17:10.036
<v Speaker 1>continue to perfect the union to make more progress? Right? Essentially,

0:17:10.036 --> 0:17:13.116
<v Speaker 1>there were two roads that were diverging as the Court

0:17:13.196 --> 0:17:16.756
<v Speaker 1>was presented with Shelby County. Should the improvement that we

0:17:16.836 --> 0:17:19.916
<v Speaker 1>have seen from the time of nineteen sixty five until

0:17:20.276 --> 0:17:23.156
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen. Should that leave us in the position that

0:17:23.196 --> 0:17:26.316
<v Speaker 1>there's enough progress and when we can step away? Or

0:17:26.516 --> 0:17:31.036
<v Speaker 1>must we continue to follow consistent with the judgment of Congress,

0:17:31.156 --> 0:17:35.036
<v Speaker 1>including a unanimous United States Senate that voted ninety eight

0:17:35.116 --> 0:17:39.036
<v Speaker 1>zero in support of the reauthorization of the preclarance provisions

0:17:39.036 --> 0:17:41.716
<v Speaker 1>of the Voting Rights Act? Should we continue to do

0:17:41.796 --> 0:17:45.156
<v Speaker 1>more to do better to perfect the Union? As I

0:17:45.196 --> 0:17:48.556
<v Speaker 1>walked in the courtroom to argue the Shelby County case,

0:17:48.956 --> 0:17:51.276
<v Speaker 1>it was the second time that I had defended these

0:17:51.276 --> 0:17:53.996
<v Speaker 1>provisions of the Voting Rights Act before the United States

0:17:54.036 --> 0:17:58.996
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. The Northwest Austin case presented a very similar question.

0:17:59.396 --> 0:18:02.236
<v Speaker 1>It's my understanding that the first Supreme Court argument that

0:18:02.316 --> 0:18:06.796
<v Speaker 1>John Lewis ever attended was the Northwest Austin case. He

0:18:06.916 --> 0:18:10.156
<v Speaker 1>was there again on the day of the Shelby County argument,

0:18:10.356 --> 0:18:14.396
<v Speaker 1>to witness the defense of the statute that he literally

0:18:14.436 --> 0:18:17.156
<v Speaker 1>had given blood for, and that he knew people who

0:18:17.196 --> 0:18:20.156
<v Speaker 1>had died for. He wanted to be present. He wanted

0:18:20.156 --> 0:18:23.436
<v Speaker 1>to bear witness, to see our government at work, and

0:18:23.476 --> 0:18:26.556
<v Speaker 1>to stand again on the front lines of the fight

0:18:26.636 --> 0:18:30.716
<v Speaker 1>for equality, and to be in the courtroom. It was

0:18:30.756 --> 0:18:34.596
<v Speaker 1>a weighty responsibility. I said of the earlier case that

0:18:34.676 --> 0:18:40.436
<v Speaker 1>it was humbling, exhilarating, and terrifying all at once. All

0:18:40.436 --> 0:18:43.436
<v Speaker 1>of those emotions are coursing through your body as you

0:18:43.556 --> 0:18:47.036
<v Speaker 1>rise to the podium in some ways, to try and

0:18:47.156 --> 0:18:51.316
<v Speaker 1>speak what many people regard as a self evident truth

0:18:51.796 --> 0:18:56.236
<v Speaker 1>to power that discrimination continues in America, and that voting

0:18:56.236 --> 0:19:00.716
<v Speaker 1>discrimination continues, and that the protections that Congress had committed

0:19:00.716 --> 0:19:03.676
<v Speaker 1>to over a long period of time remained important and

0:19:03.756 --> 0:19:06.676
<v Speaker 1>were doing vital work. That was the self evident truth.

0:19:06.876 --> 0:19:10.156
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, you feel as if you and your

0:19:10.196 --> 0:19:14.276
<v Speaker 1>presentation is trying to prove that the sun will rise tomorrow.

0:19:14.636 --> 0:19:18.236
<v Speaker 1>It is that self evident. And it was difficult to

0:19:18.276 --> 0:19:21.476
<v Speaker 1>be there and to see the extent to which even

0:19:21.556 --> 0:19:24.796
<v Speaker 1>during the oral argument, the Court was signaling that it

0:19:24.876 --> 0:19:29.476
<v Speaker 1>was going to cast aside under our constitutional system, the

0:19:29.596 --> 0:19:32.956
<v Speaker 1>judgment of the Congress, and I think we have seen

0:19:33.036 --> 0:19:35.756
<v Speaker 1>on the backside what has happened in the wake of

0:19:35.796 --> 0:19:39.116
<v Speaker 1>Shelby County. That is, those things that were self evident

0:19:39.316 --> 0:19:41.956
<v Speaker 1>have proven to be true, and that many are taking

0:19:41.996 --> 0:19:45.116
<v Speaker 1>the signal that the federal government is in retreat from

0:19:45.196 --> 0:19:49.836
<v Speaker 1>minority voter protection and those who wish to win elections

0:19:49.876 --> 0:19:55.236
<v Speaker 1>through nefarious means are trying to have their way. The

0:19:55.316 --> 0:19:57.956
<v Speaker 1>day that the case came down, I remember very vividly

0:19:57.956 --> 0:19:59.716
<v Speaker 1>sitting at my computer doing what I always do in

0:19:59.756 --> 0:20:02.156
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court decides it's big cases, you know, they

0:20:02.236 --> 0:20:04.276
<v Speaker 1>come down, I get them on the computer. I read

0:20:04.316 --> 0:20:06.956
<v Speaker 1>them as fast as I humanly can. Then I sit

0:20:06.996 --> 0:20:10.276
<v Speaker 1>down and I write something for my my column about it.

0:20:10.436 --> 0:20:14.796
<v Speaker 1>And my opening line that day was the Civil Rights

0:20:14.796 --> 0:20:19.236
<v Speaker 1>era ended. Today. I wonder, looking back at this in retrospect,

0:20:19.276 --> 0:20:22.716
<v Speaker 1>if I overstated the case in your view. What I meant,

0:20:22.756 --> 0:20:25.956
<v Speaker 1>of course, was that symbolically, the Voting Rights Act was

0:20:25.996 --> 0:20:30.156
<v Speaker 1>at the very core of the civil rights movement, and

0:20:30.316 --> 0:20:35.236
<v Speaker 1>because it had been renewed by Congress, Congress had maintained

0:20:35.956 --> 0:20:39.556
<v Speaker 1>the momentum in some sense of the civil rights movement,

0:20:40.316 --> 0:20:43.596
<v Speaker 1>even in the face of conservative opposition to it sometimes

0:20:44.236 --> 0:20:48.236
<v Speaker 1>and that the Supreme Court, by this extreme activist decision,

0:20:48.996 --> 0:20:52.356
<v Speaker 1>was blocking the progress of the civil rights movement. When

0:20:52.356 --> 0:20:54.836
<v Speaker 1>you look back at it from a distance of now

0:20:55.316 --> 0:20:57.716
<v Speaker 1>just a little more than seven years, and you think

0:20:57.716 --> 0:21:01.036
<v Speaker 1>about the consequences of that decision, do you feel as

0:21:01.036 --> 0:21:03.316
<v Speaker 1>though the civil rights movement was in some important ways

0:21:03.356 --> 0:21:06.796
<v Speaker 1>stymied or blocked, or do you think that there have

0:21:06.836 --> 0:21:10.356
<v Speaker 1>been creative ways for activists and others to try to

0:21:10.396 --> 0:21:15.236
<v Speaker 1>continue to press for voting rights notwithstanding the great limit

0:21:15.436 --> 0:21:19.436
<v Speaker 1>that the Court placed on this extraordinary tool, the Voting

0:21:19.516 --> 0:21:23.996
<v Speaker 1>Rights Act. It's an important question, Noah, and I think

0:21:24.076 --> 0:21:28.436
<v Speaker 1>for the answer, I am reminded of the work of

0:21:28.716 --> 0:21:33.836
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Kasar. Alex Kasar wrote an important book about the

0:21:33.916 --> 0:21:35.956
<v Speaker 1>history of the right to vote, and one of the

0:21:36.036 --> 0:21:41.436
<v Speaker 1>central tenants of Professor Kaisar's book is that there is

0:21:41.476 --> 0:21:47.196
<v Speaker 1>a dominant and somewhat ubiquitous understanding or theory out there

0:21:47.836 --> 0:21:53.756
<v Speaker 1>that America and American democracy has been on a path

0:21:54.316 --> 0:21:58.596
<v Speaker 1>of unidirectional progress. That is to say, that things always

0:21:58.596 --> 0:22:02.676
<v Speaker 1>get better, we're always improving, and things are always moving forward.

0:22:03.276 --> 0:22:06.996
<v Speaker 1>What case are, among other things, added to the conversation

0:22:07.676 --> 0:22:09.596
<v Speaker 1>is that when you look at the story of voting

0:22:09.596 --> 0:22:14.076
<v Speaker 1>in America, what you see is not a pattern of

0:22:14.596 --> 0:22:18.676
<v Speaker 1>unidirectional progress, of a march that is ever forward. But

0:22:18.796 --> 0:22:22.796
<v Speaker 1>what you see is a history of ebbs and flows,

0:22:23.436 --> 0:22:27.796
<v Speaker 1>concerted efforts to push and expand the reach of the franchise,

0:22:28.316 --> 0:22:33.636
<v Speaker 1>and then reactions against those pushes for greater democratic inclusion,

0:22:34.116 --> 0:22:38.156
<v Speaker 1>and rearguard efforts that push back and try and limit

0:22:38.196 --> 0:22:43.116
<v Speaker 1>the franchise. And so, because I had the understanding of

0:22:43.156 --> 0:22:46.876
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the struggle for voting rights, perhaps for

0:22:46.916 --> 0:22:50.436
<v Speaker 1>civil rights more broadly, that it's action and reaction, that

0:22:50.516 --> 0:22:54.676
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a unidirectional march forward, I understood that

0:22:54.716 --> 0:22:59.836
<v Speaker 1>Shelby County was a very disappointing and important mark on

0:22:59.956 --> 0:23:03.876
<v Speaker 1>the course of civil rights and voting history, but would

0:23:03.916 --> 0:23:06.516
<v Speaker 1>not be the final word, would not be the end

0:23:07.036 --> 0:23:10.636
<v Speaker 1>of the nation's quest for civil rights, but was perhaps

0:23:10.716 --> 0:23:14.116
<v Speaker 1>the end of a chapter that signaled that there were

0:23:14.156 --> 0:23:17.556
<v Speaker 1>gathering clouds ahead, and that there were difficult days ahead,

0:23:17.836 --> 0:23:21.076
<v Speaker 1>but that those of us who remain, like John Lewis,

0:23:21.756 --> 0:23:25.236
<v Speaker 1>undaunted in the face of long odds, would continue to

0:23:25.236 --> 0:23:28.436
<v Speaker 1>put our shoulder against the Boulder and push for greater

0:23:28.516 --> 0:23:31.596
<v Speaker 1>inclusion and to try and move the country forward again.

0:23:31.916 --> 0:23:35.236
<v Speaker 1>So I bring that understanding to the fight for civil rights,

0:23:35.316 --> 0:23:39.396
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes it's faced with setbacks, and that what's important

0:23:39.876 --> 0:23:42.836
<v Speaker 1>is to be unyielding in the face of those setbacks

0:23:42.996 --> 0:23:47.436
<v Speaker 1>and to push and demand more. You yourself have had

0:23:47.476 --> 0:23:51.396
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinary career fighting those setbacks and trying to be

0:23:51.476 --> 0:23:55.036
<v Speaker 1>an advocate for and being an advocate for civil rights.

0:23:55.276 --> 0:23:58.076
<v Speaker 1>I know you went to Connecticut College, where my brother

0:23:58.676 --> 0:24:01.356
<v Speaker 1>teaches in the philosophy department, a college that is an

0:24:01.396 --> 0:24:03.836
<v Speaker 1>amazing place. Then you went to ny U Law School,

0:24:03.836 --> 0:24:07.876
<v Speaker 1>where I myself started my academic career, and then you

0:24:07.956 --> 0:24:12.636
<v Speaker 1>worked for many years CPLDF and then had various responsibilities

0:24:12.636 --> 0:24:16.556
<v Speaker 1>and positions in the Obama administration, and then working at

0:24:16.596 --> 0:24:19.396
<v Speaker 1>the Senate as well, and now you're a Commissioner of

0:24:19.436 --> 0:24:23.716
<v Speaker 1>the US Commission on Civil Rights. When you think about

0:24:23.756 --> 0:24:26.756
<v Speaker 1>what you can do going forward, and you're still very

0:24:26.796 --> 0:24:30.116
<v Speaker 1>young man, when you think about the next phase of

0:24:30.156 --> 0:24:34.036
<v Speaker 1>your own life and connect that to the cause of

0:24:34.076 --> 0:24:38.156
<v Speaker 1>civil rights, what strikes you as the biggest challenges and

0:24:38.196 --> 0:24:41.396
<v Speaker 1>where would you like to be able to make contributions

0:24:41.476 --> 0:24:45.396
<v Speaker 1>in the next phase of your own professional life. Thank

0:24:45.436 --> 0:24:49.516
<v Speaker 1>you for that question. And I think about the fights

0:24:49.516 --> 0:24:53.996
<v Speaker 1>for educational opportunity and the inequities that we see both

0:24:54.036 --> 0:24:58.316
<v Speaker 1>in K through twelve education and in higher education, and

0:24:58.396 --> 0:25:02.876
<v Speaker 1>how important education is as being a tool in some

0:25:02.956 --> 0:25:08.276
<v Speaker 1>sort of civic transcendence. It is a pathway to opportunity.

0:25:08.556 --> 0:25:11.276
<v Speaker 1>I think, of course, about the issues of criminal justice

0:25:11.596 --> 0:25:16.996
<v Speaker 1>and the relationship between minority communities and law enforcement across

0:25:17.036 --> 0:25:19.676
<v Speaker 1>the nation. I think about the path that the nation

0:25:19.756 --> 0:25:25.996
<v Speaker 1>has walked of increasingly militaristic policing tactics, but the opportunity

0:25:25.996 --> 0:25:31.036
<v Speaker 1>and the possibility that is there to revisit the relationship

0:25:31.116 --> 0:25:36.636
<v Speaker 1>between law enforcement and minority communities and all communities. I

0:25:36.796 --> 0:25:40.156
<v Speaker 1>remain committed to the idea that there is a way

0:25:40.196 --> 0:25:44.716
<v Speaker 1>to align our democratic institutions where we are not fearing

0:25:44.916 --> 0:25:48.196
<v Speaker 1>the differences that exist in our society, but are regarding

0:25:48.196 --> 0:25:50.796
<v Speaker 1>them as a strength that we can commit to and

0:25:50.956 --> 0:25:55.036
<v Speaker 1>lift up voices in service of the common idea that

0:25:55.076 --> 0:25:59.036
<v Speaker 1>we share that we are stronger together than we are

0:25:59.556 --> 0:26:04.116
<v Speaker 1>when we curry divisiveness in the people. And so I

0:26:04.156 --> 0:26:07.476
<v Speaker 1>hope to try and use the remaining days that I

0:26:07.556 --> 0:26:09.956
<v Speaker 1>have not feeling as much of a young man as

0:26:10.156 --> 0:26:13.236
<v Speaker 1>I once was, but hopefully there are some more miles

0:26:13.316 --> 0:26:16.196
<v Speaker 1>on the odometer to continue to work at these things

0:26:16.396 --> 0:26:18.996
<v Speaker 1>in large and small ways. And the last thing that

0:26:19.036 --> 0:26:20.716
<v Speaker 1>I would say on this point, because it's such an

0:26:20.716 --> 0:26:26.516
<v Speaker 1>important question you've asked, is that John Lewis understood that

0:26:26.596 --> 0:26:29.516
<v Speaker 1>he was able to be a catalyst for change. He

0:26:29.556 --> 0:26:32.116
<v Speaker 1>was able to put himself on the front lines, but

0:26:32.156 --> 0:26:36.756
<v Speaker 1>he was also able to recognize that there were generations

0:26:36.756 --> 0:26:39.516
<v Speaker 1>of people that were coming behind him, and that their

0:26:39.636 --> 0:26:44.316
<v Speaker 1>voices and contributions and ideas were no less valuable than

0:26:44.396 --> 0:26:47.276
<v Speaker 1>what his contributions had been in his day. And so

0:26:47.316 --> 0:26:49.596
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways that I have tried to carry

0:26:49.596 --> 0:26:53.156
<v Speaker 1>forward the lessons of the civil rights movement is that

0:26:53.236 --> 0:26:56.796
<v Speaker 1>piece of transcendence that when people are coming together for

0:26:56.956 --> 0:27:00.756
<v Speaker 1>collective aims, you should not feel that any leader or

0:27:00.796 --> 0:27:04.876
<v Speaker 1>any one person as all the right ideas or has

0:27:04.996 --> 0:27:08.316
<v Speaker 1>the single path to improve things. You have to make

0:27:08.396 --> 0:27:11.756
<v Speaker 1>space for those who come from different places and at

0:27:11.796 --> 0:27:16.556
<v Speaker 1>different times to try and advance the ideal of perfecting

0:27:16.556 --> 0:27:20.476
<v Speaker 1>the union. I want to thank you for reflecting on

0:27:20.556 --> 0:27:23.276
<v Speaker 1>the legacy of John Lewis so thoughtfully, and also for

0:27:23.636 --> 0:27:26.756
<v Speaker 1>picking up his torch and carrying it in your own career,

0:27:27.236 --> 0:27:30.436
<v Speaker 1>and for helping guide us in that direction going forward.

0:27:30.516 --> 0:27:33.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm really really grateful, not just for the conversation but

0:27:34.116 --> 0:27:36.476
<v Speaker 1>the work that you've been doing. Thank you all the best,

0:27:36.836 --> 0:27:46.516
<v Speaker 1>Take care. Talking to Dabo about the legacy of John

0:27:46.596 --> 0:27:49.636
<v Speaker 1>Lewis is a powerful reminder that we all deserve to

0:27:49.716 --> 0:27:52.916
<v Speaker 1>feel some pride in being citizens of a country that

0:27:52.956 --> 0:27:56.836
<v Speaker 1>could produce an extraordinary person like John Lewis, but also

0:27:56.876 --> 0:28:00.356
<v Speaker 1>that we bear responsibility as citizens to try to continue

0:28:00.396 --> 0:28:04.236
<v Speaker 1>the fight that John Lewis had to pursue in order

0:28:04.516 --> 0:28:08.876
<v Speaker 1>to try to achieve equal rights for all Americans. Our

0:28:09.156 --> 0:28:12.356
<v Speaker 1>legacy is a complicated and mixed one. The history of

0:28:12.436 --> 0:28:15.556
<v Speaker 1>racism is not merely in the past, but continues into

0:28:15.556 --> 0:28:18.836
<v Speaker 1>the present. The struggle for civil rights is not over.

0:28:19.436 --> 0:28:22.156
<v Speaker 1>People like Dabo are continuing to fight it, but that's

0:28:22.196 --> 0:28:24.636
<v Speaker 1>not enough anymore than it was enough for John Lewis

0:28:24.636 --> 0:28:27.556
<v Speaker 1>to do so. Dabo reminds us that we all have

0:28:27.676 --> 0:28:30.796
<v Speaker 1>to continue in that challenge, and that ultimately, if we

0:28:30.836 --> 0:28:34.716
<v Speaker 1>want to oversee and supervise all of the forces of

0:28:34.716 --> 0:28:37.956
<v Speaker 1>our government, including the police, we need to do it

0:28:38.196 --> 0:28:41.996
<v Speaker 1>via democracy. That means we need to speak, We need

0:28:42.036 --> 0:28:45.596
<v Speaker 1>to think, we need to vote. Until the next time

0:28:45.676 --> 0:28:49.396
<v Speaker 1>I speak to you, be careful, be safe, and be well.

0:28:51.436 --> 0:28:54.476
<v Speaker 1>Deep Background is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our

0:28:54.516 --> 0:28:57.836
<v Speaker 1>producer is Lydia Jane Cott, with mastering by Jason Gambrell

0:28:57.996 --> 0:29:02.156
<v Speaker 1>and Martin Gonzalez. Our showrunner is Sophia mckibbon. Our theme

0:29:02.196 --> 0:29:05.156
<v Speaker 1>music is composed by Luis GERA special thanks to the

0:29:05.196 --> 0:29:09.436
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Brass, Malcolm Gladwell, Jacob Weisberg, and Mia Lobel. I'm

0:29:09.556 --> 0:29:13.116
<v Speaker 1>Noah Feldman. I also write a regular column for Bloomberg Opinion,

0:29:13.356 --> 0:29:16.556
<v Speaker 1>which you can find at bloomberg dot com slash Feldman.

0:29:17.276 --> 0:29:20.876
<v Speaker 1>To discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go to Bloomberg

0:29:20.916 --> 0:29:25.156
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Podcasts. And one last thing. I just

0:29:25.156 --> 0:29:28.196
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book called The Arab Winter, a Tragedy. I

0:29:28.196 --> 0:29:30.636
<v Speaker 1>would be delighted if you checked it out. If you

0:29:30.676 --> 0:29:33.516
<v Speaker 1>liked what you heard today, please write a review or

0:29:33.636 --> 0:29:35.756
<v Speaker 1>tell a friend. You can always let me know what

0:29:35.796 --> 0:29:38.836
<v Speaker 1>you think on Twitter. My handle is Noah R. Feldman.

0:29:39.396 --> 0:29:41.036
<v Speaker 1>This is Deep Background.