WEBVTT - Hold The Line w/ Buck Sexton - 06-22-22

0:00:11.657 --> 0:00:14.937
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.937 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:17.977 --> 0:00:27.657
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to hold the line.

0:00:27.657 --> 0:00:32.457
<v Speaker 1>I'm Buck Sexton. The crime situation in America continues to deteriorate,

0:00:32.537 --> 0:00:37.657
<v Speaker 1>and it is directly attributable to progressive prosecutors, the BLM movement,

0:00:37.817 --> 0:00:43.857
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats overall move toward being soft on crime to

0:00:43.977 --> 0:00:47.417
<v Speaker 1>effectively decriminalize a whole range of crimes. And we are

0:00:47.417 --> 0:00:51.097
<v Speaker 1>now seeing mounting evidence, as if we didn't have enough already,

0:00:51.457 --> 0:00:54.497
<v Speaker 1>of just how catastrophic this is. Coast to coast and

0:00:54.617 --> 0:00:59.697
<v Speaker 1>all around the country. For one thing, the twenty twenty

0:00:59.697 --> 0:01:02.497
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty one crime surge and folved a thirty

0:01:02.497 --> 0:01:06.377
<v Speaker 1>percent national increase in homicide. But if you look year

0:01:06.497 --> 0:01:09.377
<v Speaker 1>over year, six months into this point, what you find

0:01:09.537 --> 0:01:12.937
<v Speaker 1>is that we are still not only at record high

0:01:13.017 --> 0:01:16.097
<v Speaker 1>levels of crime nationally. There are a number of cities,

0:01:16.577 --> 0:01:18.697
<v Speaker 1>they're all in the hands of Democrat, they all have

0:01:18.817 --> 0:01:23.457
<v Speaker 1>progressive prosecutors, they are a function of and a province

0:01:23.617 --> 0:01:30.017
<v Speaker 1>of Democrat governance, and thinking they actually have worse crime

0:01:30.137 --> 0:01:34.217
<v Speaker 1>year over year to last year, which was a catastrophically

0:01:34.257 --> 0:01:37.217
<v Speaker 1>bad year for them. Baltimore. This is from Fox News. Baltimore,

0:01:37.257 --> 0:01:41.297
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, Atlanta, and New York City

0:01:41.537 --> 0:01:43.777
<v Speaker 1>are all on pace to break their twenty twenty one

0:01:43.857 --> 0:01:46.857
<v Speaker 1>levels of violent crime halfway through this year. The nation's

0:01:46.977 --> 0:01:50.257
<v Speaker 1>largest city, leading the group Coordiny crime data compiled by

0:01:50.297 --> 0:01:53.417
<v Speaker 1>Fox News, New York City has seen a twenty five

0:01:53.417 --> 0:01:56.537
<v Speaker 1>percent jump in violent crime at this point in twenty

0:01:56.577 --> 0:01:59.617
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, six months in compared at the same time

0:01:59.617 --> 0:02:03.417
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty one, despite seeing a small decreasing the

0:02:03.417 --> 0:02:06.417
<v Speaker 1>amount of homicides recorded in the city. So violence and

0:02:06.617 --> 0:02:12.577
<v Speaker 1>lawlessness on the rise, and again in cities where democrats

0:02:12.617 --> 0:02:17.297
<v Speaker 1>just a few years ago we're touting their new no

0:02:17.617 --> 0:02:24.537
<v Speaker 1>cash bail policies, their lower prosecution rates and lower incarceration

0:02:24.657 --> 0:02:28.257
<v Speaker 1>rates for criminal offenders. Well, now we see what the

0:02:28.297 --> 0:02:31.577
<v Speaker 1>results of this are, and it's predictable and it's tragic.

0:02:32.217 --> 0:02:35.137
<v Speaker 1>Now there has to be accountability. Here's just to give

0:02:35.137 --> 0:02:36.777
<v Speaker 1>you a sense of some of the increases. Remember these

0:02:36.777 --> 0:02:40.177
<v Speaker 1>are year over year increases from twenty twenty one, which

0:02:40.217 --> 0:02:43.337
<v Speaker 1>is one of the worst years ever for violent crime,

0:02:43.497 --> 0:02:47.177
<v Speaker 1>at least in let's say thirty or forty years in America.

0:02:47.377 --> 0:02:50.137
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta is up five point five percent year over year,

0:02:50.177 --> 0:02:54.457
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore six percent, Philadelphia seven Los Angeles eight percent, Washing

0:02:54.537 --> 0:02:59.017
<v Speaker 1>DC twelve percent, New York City twenty five percent. Now

0:02:59.057 --> 0:03:03.057
<v Speaker 1>this is a particularly big problem. This is particularly a

0:03:03.057 --> 0:03:05.857
<v Speaker 1>big challenge for the city to explain because they have

0:03:05.897 --> 0:03:10.937
<v Speaker 1>a new mayor right here, they are looking at this situation.

0:03:10.937 --> 0:03:13.697
<v Speaker 1>Look at the circumstance where they the people of New

0:03:13.777 --> 0:03:20.497
<v Speaker 1>York elected a former police captain to become the mayor

0:03:20.537 --> 0:03:22.337
<v Speaker 1>of New York City so that he could crack down

0:03:22.377 --> 0:03:27.257
<v Speaker 1>on violent crime. And sure enough, it is actually going

0:03:27.417 --> 0:03:31.977
<v Speaker 1>in the opposite direction. And this is also for Fox News.

0:03:32.017 --> 0:03:37.097
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, Washington, DC, Baltimore, Milwaukee, and Atlanta have all

0:03:37.137 --> 0:03:40.497
<v Speaker 1>seen homicide numbers outpaced their mark in twenty twenty one,

0:03:41.017 --> 0:03:43.457
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee seeing the largest spike of the group, according to

0:03:43.537 --> 0:03:47.937
<v Speaker 1>crime data. So this is now specifically on homicide. You

0:03:48.017 --> 0:03:52.857
<v Speaker 1>have Los Angeles, DC, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Atlanta more murders this year.

0:03:53.537 --> 0:03:56.377
<v Speaker 1>Now I understand you look at this data and you say, well,

0:03:56.417 --> 0:03:58.777
<v Speaker 1>this is just a procious and everybody can understand that.

0:03:58.777 --> 0:04:03.297
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can see what an outrage this is. So how

0:04:03.337 --> 0:04:06.097
<v Speaker 1>do we change it well. One way to change it

0:04:06.137 --> 0:04:13.497
<v Speaker 1>would be to stop instituting maniacally reckless policies at the

0:04:14.617 --> 0:04:20.777
<v Speaker 1>level of city y police department policy, mayoral offices, prosecutors' offices.

0:04:21.097 --> 0:04:24.817
<v Speaker 1>Here's an example. The Chicago Police Department has unveiled a

0:04:24.897 --> 0:04:28.817
<v Speaker 1>new policy prohibiting its officers from chasing people on foot

0:04:28.857 --> 0:04:31.737
<v Speaker 1>simply because they run away or because they have committed

0:04:31.777 --> 0:04:39.057
<v Speaker 1>minor offenses. So now, if a officer in Chicago see someone,

0:04:39.137 --> 0:04:43.297
<v Speaker 1>let's say, steal a purse from somebody or run out

0:04:43.297 --> 0:04:45.737
<v Speaker 1>of a store with a bagfull of stolen goods, it

0:04:45.897 --> 0:04:49.577
<v Speaker 1>is now official policy, as it seems, from the City

0:04:49.617 --> 0:04:51.817
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago, that that officer should not give chase. And

0:04:51.857 --> 0:04:54.777
<v Speaker 1>by the way, even if under the rules and regulations,

0:04:55.177 --> 0:04:58.377
<v Speaker 1>the officer could justify giving chase, would he or she

0:04:59.177 --> 0:05:02.537
<v Speaker 1>want to knowing that that chase could result in a

0:05:02.577 --> 0:05:06.297
<v Speaker 1>physical altercation of some kind, and that if the basis

0:05:06.337 --> 0:05:10.777
<v Speaker 1>for the chase was ruled invalid under departmental regulation, there's

0:05:10.817 --> 0:05:14.937
<v Speaker 1>always the possibility of some kind of discipline being meted

0:05:14.977 --> 0:05:18.377
<v Speaker 1>out really, of course, for political reasons against that officer.

0:05:18.697 --> 0:05:22.177
<v Speaker 1>So what do you have. You have fewer people who

0:05:22.217 --> 0:05:25.737
<v Speaker 1>are carrying a badge and a gun in Chicago. And

0:05:25.897 --> 0:05:28.217
<v Speaker 1>this is true in so many cities who are willing

0:05:28.297 --> 0:05:34.657
<v Speaker 1>to do aggressive, effective policing against the criminal element that

0:05:34.737 --> 0:05:38.457
<v Speaker 1>exists in every society and that unfortunately has been emboldened

0:05:38.497 --> 0:05:41.937
<v Speaker 1>so much in hours. But there are some, I mean,

0:05:41.977 --> 0:05:46.537
<v Speaker 1>here's the Chicago Police superintendent who says that the foot

0:05:46.577 --> 0:05:50.737
<v Speaker 1>pursuit policy makes officers and the community safer. Why And

0:05:50.777 --> 0:05:52.937
<v Speaker 1>I just want to add as an overview for pursuit

0:05:52.977 --> 0:05:56.297
<v Speaker 1>policies have been part of law enforces over a decade now.

0:05:57.257 --> 0:06:01.097
<v Speaker 1>Just because Chicaglo PD is now implementing a permanent when

0:06:01.537 --> 0:06:04.017
<v Speaker 1>the impacts on crime has been studied and we can

0:06:04.137 --> 0:06:07.377
<v Speaker 1>look back at foot pursuit policies, it's made officers safer

0:06:07.657 --> 0:06:10.777
<v Speaker 1>and it's made the community safer in cities that's implementing

0:06:10.777 --> 0:06:13.817
<v Speaker 1>this so for a decade. So the expectation for us is,

0:06:14.617 --> 0:06:17.617
<v Speaker 1>like Bob mentioned, what we're learned and be informed by

0:06:17.617 --> 0:06:22.017
<v Speaker 1>our documentation and review of how to continue to enhance

0:06:22.097 --> 0:06:25.937
<v Speaker 1>officers safety as well as enhanced safety of our residents.

0:06:28.217 --> 0:06:30.337
<v Speaker 1>Fascinating that someone could say that and think that it

0:06:30.417 --> 0:06:35.577
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound utterly moronic. How does it make the city safer?

0:06:35.977 --> 0:06:41.497
<v Speaker 1>It may reduce officer involved officer involved altercations, of course,

0:06:41.537 --> 0:06:44.897
<v Speaker 1>because they're not enforcing the law. But what does that

0:06:45.017 --> 0:06:47.337
<v Speaker 1>do to the law in the city. What does it

0:06:47.457 --> 0:06:51.737
<v Speaker 1>do to criminality? What happens with those who are now

0:06:51.777 --> 0:06:53.777
<v Speaker 1>emboldened to break the law more than every because they

0:06:53.817 --> 0:06:56.697
<v Speaker 1>know they won't be chased. What we've seen is actually

0:06:56.737 --> 0:07:00.577
<v Speaker 1>these cities deteriorating from a safety perspective. What we've seen

0:07:00.697 --> 0:07:03.497
<v Speaker 1>is a massive increase in lawlessness. He's gonna say there's

0:07:03.537 --> 0:07:07.657
<v Speaker 1>a foot patrol policy that is provably better, just absurd.

0:07:07.737 --> 0:07:11.857
<v Speaker 1>It's just a stupid thing to say, and yet he

0:07:11.897 --> 0:07:14.697
<v Speaker 1>says it and people are going to go along with it.

0:07:14.737 --> 0:07:17.297
<v Speaker 1>You have to wonder, of course, there was a high

0:07:17.297 --> 0:07:22.257
<v Speaker 1>profile chase that did involve two individuals who had guns,

0:07:22.417 --> 0:07:26.017
<v Speaker 1>and there there were shots fired by police in response

0:07:26.057 --> 0:07:28.817
<v Speaker 1>to this huge political uproar of this. That's what the

0:07:28.817 --> 0:07:32.617
<v Speaker 1>foot chase policies all about, and that's why it's becoming

0:07:32.617 --> 0:07:34.817
<v Speaker 1>permanent right now. And then you also have it's not

0:07:34.857 --> 0:07:37.617
<v Speaker 1>just that at the command level of major police departments

0:07:37.617 --> 0:07:40.977
<v Speaker 1>in Democrat cities. You also have the progressive prosecutors like

0:07:41.017 --> 0:07:45.097
<v Speaker 1>George Gascon. As we know chessa Budan in San Francisco

0:07:45.417 --> 0:07:50.297
<v Speaker 1>is out because people got sick of stepping over needles

0:07:50.417 --> 0:07:53.737
<v Speaker 1>with their children in public parks, and their houses being

0:07:53.777 --> 0:07:58.737
<v Speaker 1>broken into constantly, their cars being broken into constantly, the assaults,

0:07:59.577 --> 0:08:03.617
<v Speaker 1>the constant threats. It was enough, right well, Los Angeles

0:08:03.657 --> 0:08:06.457
<v Speaker 1>has many of the same problems, and recently Gascone, the

0:08:06.577 --> 0:08:09.617
<v Speaker 1>DA came under a lot of well deserved heat because

0:08:09.617 --> 0:08:13.217
<v Speaker 1>he led gang member who under law, should have been

0:08:13.257 --> 0:08:17.017
<v Speaker 1>sentenced under a three strikes law let a gang member

0:08:17.097 --> 0:08:21.417
<v Speaker 1>out who then killed two cops. And Gascone, who is

0:08:21.697 --> 0:08:26.457
<v Speaker 1>the worst a disgrace to any prosecutorial outfit anywhere in

0:08:26.497 --> 0:08:29.577
<v Speaker 1>the country, is defending it, saying, yeah, we did the

0:08:29.657 --> 0:08:32.057
<v Speaker 1>right thing with that gang member who then killed two cops.

0:08:32.097 --> 0:08:35.937
<v Speaker 1>Watch this do the outcome in this particular case, given

0:08:36.057 --> 0:08:42.457
<v Speaker 1>what we knew then, no history of violence, very little

0:08:42.457 --> 0:08:45.257
<v Speaker 1>contact with a criminal justice system for nearly ten years

0:08:45.977 --> 0:08:54.697
<v Speaker 1>was appropriate. When people are arrested for serious crimes, we

0:08:54.737 --> 0:09:00.177
<v Speaker 1>work hard to ensure that there are serious consequences, including

0:09:00.297 --> 0:09:07.537
<v Speaker 1>lengthy periods of incarceration, But we have an imperfect system.

0:09:07.577 --> 0:09:13.737
<v Speaker 1>And that's not only hear in Laus everywhere. He's the disgrace.

0:09:14.297 --> 0:09:16.697
<v Speaker 1>He should resign, and the fact that he won't just

0:09:16.777 --> 0:09:20.617
<v Speaker 1>shows what an unethical piece of garbage he is as

0:09:20.617 --> 0:09:23.697
<v Speaker 1>a prosecutor. We'll have more on this with retired FBI

0:09:23.817 --> 0:09:28.697
<v Speaker 1>agent James Gagliano in just a moment. Let's talk about

0:09:28.697 --> 0:09:30.337
<v Speaker 1>protecting your home for a minute. You know that I'm

0:09:30.337 --> 0:09:32.497
<v Speaker 1>skeptical by nature, So when I first heard about home

0:09:32.537 --> 0:09:34.817
<v Speaker 1>tittle theft and the idea that thieves can literally steal

0:09:34.817 --> 0:09:37.777
<v Speaker 1>your home, I was like, really, and some cybercriminal really

0:09:37.777 --> 0:09:39.657
<v Speaker 1>forged my name off the tittle of my home and

0:09:39.697 --> 0:09:42.097
<v Speaker 1>takeover as the new owner. Turns out, yeah, he can.

0:09:42.257 --> 0:09:44.657
<v Speaker 1>It's not as rare as you'd think. According to the FBI,

0:09:44.737 --> 0:09:46.897
<v Speaker 1>this crime is growing faster than credit card fraud, and

0:09:46.937 --> 0:09:49.777
<v Speaker 1>you're not covered by homeowners insurance or comment at any

0:09:49.777 --> 0:09:53.017
<v Speaker 1>theft programs. Home tattle lock earned my trust. Home tittle

0:09:53.057 --> 0:09:56.017
<v Speaker 1>lock puts a virtual barrier around your home's title. The

0:09:56.137 --> 0:09:58.457
<v Speaker 1>instant they detect anyone tampering with their home's title, they

0:09:58.497 --> 0:10:00.777
<v Speaker 1>mobilize to help shut it down. Here's what I urge

0:10:00.817 --> 0:10:03.057
<v Speaker 1>you to do. Number one, go to hometetlelock dot com

0:10:03.257 --> 0:10:06.377
<v Speaker 1>and read the testimonials from FBI agents and government officials

0:10:06.537 --> 0:10:09.017
<v Speaker 1>number two. Register your home address to see if you're

0:10:09.017 --> 0:10:10.697
<v Speaker 1>already a victim and don't even know it. When you

0:10:10.737 --> 0:10:12.697
<v Speaker 1>protect your hometell them buck sex and send you to

0:10:12.697 --> 0:10:16.857
<v Speaker 1>get my listener discount hometutlelock dot com. That's hometutlelock dot com.

0:10:19.137 --> 0:10:21.857
<v Speaker 1>Support from my podcast is brought to you by Manscape,

0:10:21.937 --> 0:10:25.257
<v Speaker 1>the best and men's below the waste grooming. Their products

0:10:25.257 --> 0:10:30.137
<v Speaker 1>are precision engineered tools. Manscape's Performance Package is the ultimate

0:10:30.217 --> 0:10:34.457
<v Speaker 1>men's hygiene bundle. Join over four million men worldwide who

0:10:34.457 --> 0:10:38.017
<v Speaker 1>trusts Manscape with its exclusive offer for you twenty percent

0:10:38.057 --> 0:10:41.377
<v Speaker 1>off and free worldwide shipping with the code buck at

0:10:41.457 --> 0:10:45.417
<v Speaker 1>manscape dot com. The Performance Package four point zero includes

0:10:45.457 --> 0:10:48.897
<v Speaker 1>a ton of men's grooming products like the Lawnmower four

0:10:48.937 --> 0:10:53.937
<v Speaker 1>point zero trimmer, the weed whacker, Erao's hair trimmer, Performance boxer, briefs,

0:10:53.937 --> 0:10:56.537
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of other great men's hygiene products you

0:10:56.617 --> 0:10:59.337
<v Speaker 1>never knew you needed, plus a travel bag to hold

0:10:59.377 --> 0:11:02.177
<v Speaker 1>at all. The lawnmower trimmer is the best. It's got

0:11:02.177 --> 0:11:05.617
<v Speaker 1>a cutting edge ceramic blade to reduce grooming accidents, and

0:11:05.737 --> 0:11:08.657
<v Speaker 1>it's waterproof so no more messes on the bathroom floor.

0:11:08.977 --> 0:11:11.737
<v Speaker 1>You'll also get the water proof weed Whacker knows an

0:11:11.737 --> 0:11:15.857
<v Speaker 1>ear hair trimmer with proprietary skin safe technology which helps

0:11:15.857 --> 0:11:19.417
<v Speaker 1>reduce nick snags and tugs in all those delicate areas.

0:11:19.697 --> 0:11:22.137
<v Speaker 1>Get twenty percent off and free shipping with the code

0:11:22.137 --> 0:11:25.977
<v Speaker 1>buck at manscape dot com. That's twenty percent off with

0:11:26.177 --> 0:11:29.417
<v Speaker 1>free shipping at manscape dot com and use code buck

0:11:29.497 --> 0:11:32.537
<v Speaker 1>to unlock your confidence and always use the right tools

0:11:32.897 --> 0:11:40.457
<v Speaker 1>with Manscape. Violent crime is a major national news story

0:11:40.497 --> 0:11:42.697
<v Speaker 1>because of exactly the statistics we've been talking to you

0:11:42.697 --> 0:11:48.857
<v Speaker 1>about on this show. Unprecedented increases in shootings, in murders,

0:11:48.897 --> 0:11:51.577
<v Speaker 1>and this is across the country, major cities, and it

0:11:51.697 --> 0:11:56.137
<v Speaker 1>continued beyond the horrific year of a thirty percent nationwide

0:11:56.137 --> 0:11:59.577
<v Speaker 1>increase in twenty twenty to twenty twenty one. What can

0:11:59.577 --> 0:12:03.777
<v Speaker 1>we do to combat the situation, and also want to

0:12:03.817 --> 0:12:06.417
<v Speaker 1>talk about the latest updates from Uvalde. We're joined now

0:12:06.497 --> 0:12:11.057
<v Speaker 1>by James Gagliano. He is a retired FBI agent was

0:12:11.057 --> 0:12:14.497
<v Speaker 1>a member of an FBI hostage rescue team during his

0:12:15.057 --> 0:12:18.977
<v Speaker 1>time serving. James, thanks for being with us. Did join

0:12:19.017 --> 0:12:22.617
<v Speaker 1>you Buck as always, So let's just start with the

0:12:23.257 --> 0:12:28.697
<v Speaker 1>crime data. Looking at the numbers you have even compared

0:12:28.777 --> 0:12:33.737
<v Speaker 1>to last year was a terrible year nationwide, cities, towns, rural.

0:12:34.057 --> 0:12:36.857
<v Speaker 1>There were spikes in crime really all over the country

0:12:37.417 --> 0:12:40.897
<v Speaker 1>starting in twenty twenty and going through twenty twenty one.

0:12:41.057 --> 0:12:42.737
<v Speaker 1>But here we are in twenty twenty two in the

0:12:42.817 --> 0:12:47.217
<v Speaker 1>data in Atlanta, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, DC, New York

0:12:47.737 --> 0:12:51.457
<v Speaker 1>all showing year over year increases. So it's not like

0:12:51.497 --> 0:12:53.617
<v Speaker 1>we had a really bad year, We've got it under control.

0:12:54.097 --> 0:12:57.217
<v Speaker 1>It's actually continuing to get worse in these cities. First off,

0:12:57.617 --> 0:13:01.497
<v Speaker 1>is that surprising to you just from a criminal justice

0:13:01.497 --> 0:13:05.057
<v Speaker 1>statistical perspective? And what do you think is pushing these

0:13:05.137 --> 0:13:09.297
<v Speaker 1>numbers even higher than we've seen them. Yeah, it is

0:13:09.337 --> 0:13:12.617
<v Speaker 1>no surprise to me, Buck, absolutely not. There's two things

0:13:12.697 --> 0:13:19.137
<v Speaker 1>that drive this. One is a permissive environment, because criminals, evildoers,

0:13:19.537 --> 0:13:22.297
<v Speaker 1>they take the path of least resistance and they will

0:13:22.337 --> 0:13:24.937
<v Speaker 1>take what you give them. And when you have this

0:13:25.057 --> 0:13:29.817
<v Speaker 1>influx of progressive prosecutors. And we know that in San Francisco,

0:13:29.937 --> 0:13:33.697
<v Speaker 1>chase of Bodin was just recalled. We know that George

0:13:33.817 --> 0:13:37.737
<v Speaker 1>Gascone in Los Angeles is under fire right now for

0:13:37.777 --> 0:13:40.057
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he let out a felon who was

0:13:40.177 --> 0:13:43.777
<v Speaker 1>arrested with a gun and drugs and gave improbation, and

0:13:43.817 --> 0:13:46.737
<v Speaker 1>that felon went on to kill two police officers recently.

0:13:47.097 --> 0:13:50.657
<v Speaker 1>You've got Alvin Bragg in Manhattan. You've got Kim Fox

0:13:50.657 --> 0:13:54.657
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, You've got Larry Krasner in Philadelphia. These folks,

0:13:54.777 --> 0:13:57.497
<v Speaker 1>we live in a society where our criminal justice system

0:13:57.577 --> 0:14:00.377
<v Speaker 1>is imperfect, but it is the best in the world.

0:14:00.817 --> 0:14:05.017
<v Speaker 1>But it depends buck on an advertarial adversarial system where

0:14:05.377 --> 0:14:09.297
<v Speaker 1>the defense has an opportunity to make their case, but

0:14:09.377 --> 0:14:12.057
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutution represents me and you and the rest of

0:14:12.057 --> 0:14:16.177
<v Speaker 1>the public, and when the prosecution helps makes the defenses case.

0:14:16.737 --> 0:14:19.417
<v Speaker 1>That's why we're seeing all these numbers driven up right now.

0:14:19.697 --> 0:14:23.217
<v Speaker 1>There is no fear right now, there's no repercussions. That's

0:14:23.217 --> 0:14:27.017
<v Speaker 1>why smashing grabs are going on, grand theft auto is up,

0:14:27.337 --> 0:14:30.737
<v Speaker 1>robberies are up. It's because people understand there's a permissive

0:14:30.817 --> 0:14:33.417
<v Speaker 1>environment and they're going to do whatever it takes to

0:14:33.417 --> 0:14:36.617
<v Speaker 1>get away with things because they know there are no consequences.

0:14:36.617 --> 0:14:43.097
<v Speaker 1>But from a criminal justice perspective, how do you assess

0:14:43.977 --> 0:14:46.297
<v Speaker 1>new policies that have been put in place in cities

0:14:46.337 --> 0:14:51.097
<v Speaker 1>like Chicago, where they now have a no foot chase rule,

0:14:51.577 --> 0:14:54.057
<v Speaker 1>and that extent for for police, meaning that if police

0:14:54.137 --> 0:14:57.777
<v Speaker 1>believe that somebody is in the course of committing a

0:14:57.817 --> 0:15:00.217
<v Speaker 1>crime or has committed a crime and runs from them,

0:15:00.537 --> 0:15:03.497
<v Speaker 1>unless they think it's a serious violent felony that has

0:15:03.497 --> 0:15:06.737
<v Speaker 1>occurred or the person poses an immediate threat to the public,

0:15:07.137 --> 0:15:10.097
<v Speaker 1>the cops aren't even supposed to run after individuals. So

0:15:10.177 --> 0:15:12.737
<v Speaker 1>you see this, you say, okay, So, let's say a

0:15:12.817 --> 0:15:16.337
<v Speaker 1>group of organized retail theft and organized retail theft gang

0:15:16.417 --> 0:15:19.657
<v Speaker 1>goes into one of those fancy handback stores and steals

0:15:19.817 --> 0:15:22.657
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand dollars of stuff in three or four minutes,

0:15:22.697 --> 0:15:26.777
<v Speaker 1>as they've done in downtown Chicago, for example. Cops arrive

0:15:26.857 --> 0:15:30.377
<v Speaker 1>on the scene, those individuals run with those handbags. The

0:15:30.457 --> 0:15:34.177
<v Speaker 1>cops aren't allowed to chase them. How is there any

0:15:34.257 --> 0:15:37.457
<v Speaker 1>law and order when that's the policy of the city

0:15:37.457 --> 0:15:42.577
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago. Yeah. Again, it speaks to It speaks to

0:15:42.617 --> 0:15:47.737
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the criminal element understands and senses weakness,

0:15:47.817 --> 0:15:50.897
<v Speaker 1>and in this instance, that's what it is. Look Alvin

0:15:50.937 --> 0:15:55.297
<v Speaker 1>Bragg in Manhattan, the DA there put out a policy

0:15:55.337 --> 0:15:58.577
<v Speaker 1>memorandum right after he's elected and stated that he was

0:15:58.697 --> 0:16:03.177
<v Speaker 1>not going to be seeking prosecutions for resisting arrest. So

0:16:03.217 --> 0:16:06.337
<v Speaker 1>what does that tell the potential subject, Hey, I've got

0:16:06.337 --> 0:16:08.817
<v Speaker 1>a chance to get away, and if I don't get

0:16:08.857 --> 0:16:11.137
<v Speaker 1>away and I club police officer on the head with

0:16:11.217 --> 0:16:13.417
<v Speaker 1>a cudgel or punch him in the face, I'm not

0:16:13.457 --> 0:16:16.817
<v Speaker 1>going to be prosecuted for it. Same thing in Chicago.

0:16:17.257 --> 0:16:19.577
<v Speaker 1>Cops have a tough job. We all know that you

0:16:19.617 --> 0:16:22.657
<v Speaker 1>and I have discussed this many times before, but now

0:16:22.857 --> 0:16:25.497
<v Speaker 1>they have to make not just the snap judgments that

0:16:25.657 --> 0:16:28.177
<v Speaker 1>come with the information vacuum they're dealing with when they

0:16:28.217 --> 0:16:31.097
<v Speaker 1>respond to a crime in progress, but they've got to

0:16:31.137 --> 0:16:35.737
<v Speaker 1>determine was this an aggravated assault or simple assault. If

0:16:35.737 --> 0:16:38.777
<v Speaker 1>it's an aggregated aggravated assault, then I can take off

0:16:38.817 --> 0:16:41.817
<v Speaker 1>and try to catch this guy. If not, I might

0:16:41.857 --> 0:16:46.017
<v Speaker 1>be subjecting myself to some type of legal ramifications. At

0:16:46.057 --> 0:16:48.657
<v Speaker 1>the end of this, it's not worth it. And when

0:16:48.657 --> 0:16:51.857
<v Speaker 1>you sense that the police departments are having a tough

0:16:51.857 --> 0:16:54.497
<v Speaker 1>time now with recruiting, they're having a tough time with

0:16:54.537 --> 0:16:58.977
<v Speaker 1>retention that people are leaving in droves, and police departments

0:16:58.977 --> 0:17:02.297
<v Speaker 1>are having trouble recruiting young people men and women, to

0:17:02.417 --> 0:17:04.897
<v Speaker 1>come and be part of this. What does that say.

0:17:05.097 --> 0:17:06.937
<v Speaker 1>It means we're in a bad spot right now and

0:17:06.977 --> 0:17:10.177
<v Speaker 1>we've got to change this. But the pendulum always swing

0:17:10.297 --> 0:17:13.177
<v Speaker 1>back and course correct. We're going in a bad direction

0:17:13.257 --> 0:17:15.217
<v Speaker 1>right now, just like we were in the seventies and

0:17:15.257 --> 0:17:18.497
<v Speaker 1>the eighties and then broken windows became a thing. We

0:17:18.497 --> 0:17:21.097
<v Speaker 1>don't need to reinvent the wheel. We need to use

0:17:21.217 --> 0:17:24.377
<v Speaker 1>what worked, things like broken windows policing and I since

0:17:24.697 --> 0:17:26.417
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cities are going to be moving back

0:17:26.417 --> 0:17:29.577
<v Speaker 1>to that line of thought pretty soon, James warned to

0:17:30.097 --> 0:17:34.377
<v Speaker 1>switch to another really important and very difficult topic of

0:17:34.497 --> 0:17:39.657
<v Speaker 1>the latest on the Uval Day School massacre police response.

0:17:40.097 --> 0:17:45.177
<v Speaker 1>There is video now that shows individuals from law enforcement

0:17:45.737 --> 0:17:48.817
<v Speaker 1>essentially in a stacked position in the hallway and he's

0:17:49.377 --> 0:17:51.177
<v Speaker 1>ready to go in. They waited for over an hour.

0:17:51.257 --> 0:17:54.097
<v Speaker 1>Here's the Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steve McGraw

0:17:54.817 --> 0:17:56.977
<v Speaker 1>saying the suspect could have been stopped within three minute.

0:17:56.977 --> 0:18:01.217
<v Speaker 1>Why there's compelling evidence at the law enforcement response to

0:18:01.257 --> 0:18:05.057
<v Speaker 1>the attack at rob Elementary was an abject failure and

0:18:05.177 --> 0:18:08.697
<v Speaker 1>anathetical to everything we've learned over the last two decades

0:18:08.937 --> 0:18:12.577
<v Speaker 1>since the Call of Mine. Massacre three minutes after the

0:18:12.577 --> 0:18:16.017
<v Speaker 1>subject under the West Building, there a sufficient number of

0:18:16.137 --> 0:18:21.137
<v Speaker 1>armed officers wearing body armor to isolate, distract, and neutralize

0:18:21.177 --> 0:18:26.057
<v Speaker 1>the subject. The only thing stopping the hallway of dedicated

0:18:26.097 --> 0:18:30.017
<v Speaker 1>officers from any room one eleven and one twelve was

0:18:30.057 --> 0:18:33.657
<v Speaker 1>the unseen commander who decided to place the lives of

0:18:33.657 --> 0:18:37.337
<v Speaker 1>officers before the lives of children. I mean, that is

0:18:37.377 --> 0:18:40.377
<v Speaker 1>a stunning indictment to say that he placed the lives

0:18:40.377 --> 0:18:44.257
<v Speaker 1>of officers over the lives of children. Based on the facts, though, James,

0:18:45.057 --> 0:18:48.177
<v Speaker 1>is that just an honest assessment of what happened here?

0:18:48.577 --> 0:18:51.937
<v Speaker 1>Given that there's video, there's no question and the timeline

0:18:52.017 --> 0:18:55.417
<v Speaker 1>is not in dispute either, that you had multiple officers

0:18:55.457 --> 0:18:59.577
<v Speaker 1>in the hallway with long guns and tactical shields and

0:18:59.737 --> 0:19:03.617
<v Speaker 1>bullet resistant kevlar vests on who waited over an hour

0:19:04.057 --> 0:19:07.377
<v Speaker 1>while there were still active shooting going on in that classroom.

0:19:07.417 --> 0:19:11.817
<v Speaker 1>How did this happen? What do you think about this? Police? Well,

0:19:11.857 --> 0:19:15.257
<v Speaker 1>I agree with him right there. It was an abject failure.

0:19:15.497 --> 0:19:17.177
<v Speaker 1>And Buck, I think you know me well enough to

0:19:17.217 --> 0:19:20.897
<v Speaker 1>know now, I'm very careful on waiting to weigh in

0:19:21.417 --> 0:19:23.697
<v Speaker 1>until all the facts are at hand, and I know

0:19:23.777 --> 0:19:27.297
<v Speaker 1>that there is an ongoing investigation. Pieces are leaking out.

0:19:27.457 --> 0:19:31.257
<v Speaker 1>The things that are leaking out are beyond stressing. They

0:19:31.297 --> 0:19:35.577
<v Speaker 1>are it's unconscionable. Now. I think the biggest breakdown in

0:19:35.617 --> 0:19:38.657
<v Speaker 1>the incident command system here was the fact that you

0:19:38.737 --> 0:19:42.177
<v Speaker 1>had a police chief who had a six member police

0:19:42.177 --> 0:19:45.577
<v Speaker 1>department for the school district, and this police chief, Aridondo,

0:19:45.937 --> 0:19:49.497
<v Speaker 1>who was the unseen commander and making the calls throughout.

0:19:49.977 --> 0:19:52.777
<v Speaker 1>Now from the time the shooter entered the school until

0:19:52.857 --> 0:19:56.537
<v Speaker 1>the shooter was neutralized interdicted by a Customs and Border

0:19:56.537 --> 0:19:59.457
<v Speaker 1>Patrol TAC team I believe was the total of seventy

0:19:59.457 --> 0:20:04.457
<v Speaker 1>seven minutes. The fact that post Columbine Post Columbine, which

0:20:04.457 --> 0:20:07.497
<v Speaker 1>happened in April of nineteen ninety nine, we are twenty

0:20:07.577 --> 0:20:10.937
<v Speaker 1>three years past that where we learned ainful lessons when

0:20:10.977 --> 0:20:14.337
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement officers waited in the parking lot for homogeneous

0:20:14.337 --> 0:20:17.777
<v Speaker 1>tactical team to show up and gave the shooters forty

0:20:17.937 --> 0:20:23.057
<v Speaker 1>seven minutes from entry to commit heinous crimes killing people, teachers,

0:20:23.377 --> 0:20:26.857
<v Speaker 1>killing us students. In this instance, I think it was

0:20:26.897 --> 0:20:29.497
<v Speaker 1>a lesson learned for all of us here, but especially

0:20:29.537 --> 0:20:32.577
<v Speaker 1>a painful one in law enforcement. Someone from one of

0:20:32.577 --> 0:20:34.897
<v Speaker 1>the other agencies that respond, whether it was a federal

0:20:34.897 --> 0:20:38.057
<v Speaker 1>agency like Customs and Border Protection or the Department of

0:20:38.097 --> 0:20:42.057
<v Speaker 1>Public Safety for Texas, which is a much larger agency.

0:20:42.377 --> 0:20:45.097
<v Speaker 1>A sergeant or lieutenant there is the equivalent of a

0:20:45.177 --> 0:20:49.017
<v Speaker 1>police chief anywhere else, should have taken charge of the scene.

0:20:49.217 --> 0:20:51.737
<v Speaker 1>And yes, Buck, to your point, they should have gone

0:20:51.737 --> 0:20:54.697
<v Speaker 1>to the sound of the guns when young children who

0:20:54.697 --> 0:20:57.817
<v Speaker 1>are not outfitted in body armor and are covering up

0:20:57.857 --> 0:21:01.417
<v Speaker 1>with notebooks and chiefs of paper are waiting on the

0:21:01.457 --> 0:21:05.697
<v Speaker 1>perfect homogeneous tactical team to make entry. Buck, we're doing

0:21:05.737 --> 0:21:10.417
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. James, appreciate the expertise. Thanks for being with us,

0:21:11.217 --> 0:21:15.217
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, bubb Coming up, the Senate has

0:21:15.217 --> 0:21:20.697
<v Speaker 1>advanced a bipartisan gun control measure. What will this really do,

0:21:21.017 --> 0:21:24.217
<v Speaker 1>if anything. We'll talk to Cam Edwards of Bearing Arms

0:21:24.297 --> 0:21:28.137
<v Speaker 1>dot Com next. At first, I want to talk to you

0:21:28.097 --> 0:21:31.057
<v Speaker 1>you about protecting your online data. A lot of companies

0:21:31.097 --> 0:21:33.537
<v Speaker 1>promise your privacy is guaranteed, but we know that's not true.

0:21:33.857 --> 0:21:36.737
<v Speaker 1>That's why you need a new privacy and cybersecurity application

0:21:36.777 --> 0:21:40.417
<v Speaker 1>tool called Secure. It's spelled SEK. You are. Secure is

0:21:40.497 --> 0:21:44.497
<v Speaker 1>using proprietary encryption and offering secure instant messaging and email.

0:21:44.737 --> 0:21:47.217
<v Speaker 1>With Secure, all of your communications based on servers and

0:21:47.297 --> 0:21:50.377
<v Speaker 1>data centers hosted in Switzerland without using any of the

0:21:50.377 --> 0:21:53.217
<v Speaker 1>big tech platforms. Privacy is a big issue now. Without

0:21:53.217 --> 0:21:55.497
<v Speaker 1>real security, people can read your emails, your messages, even

0:21:55.497 --> 0:21:58.377
<v Speaker 1>your bank information. Secure will never mind your data, never

0:21:58.417 --> 0:22:01.417
<v Speaker 1>ask for your phone number. You can send emails your doctor, banker, lawyer,

0:22:01.497 --> 0:22:03.937
<v Speaker 1>or anyone else with total confidence you're not being spied on.

0:22:04.297 --> 0:22:06.537
<v Speaker 1>Secure is your solution to stop the constant theft of

0:22:06.537 --> 0:22:08.977
<v Speaker 1>your digital identity. Costs only five dollars to a messenger,

0:22:09.257 --> 0:22:12.177
<v Speaker 1>only ten dollars the messenger and email combination package. Go

0:22:12.257 --> 0:22:14.537
<v Speaker 1>to secure dot com and take back your privacy today.

0:22:14.577 --> 0:22:17.817
<v Speaker 1>That's sekuar dot com and use promo code buck for

0:22:17.937 --> 0:22:20.417
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent off. We'll be right back with more.

0:22:20.577 --> 0:22:28.217
<v Speaker 1>Hold a line. So the Senate has voted to advance

0:22:28.377 --> 0:22:34.017
<v Speaker 1>a gun control legislation that is going to do the following.

0:22:34.017 --> 0:22:37.697
<v Speaker 1>Expanded background checks for buyers under twenty one, provides grants

0:22:37.737 --> 0:22:40.897
<v Speaker 1>for states that implement their own red flag laws, etc. Etc.

0:22:41.137 --> 0:22:44.377
<v Speaker 1>A lot of things going on here. Fourteen Republicans, mental

0:22:44.417 --> 0:22:48.017
<v Speaker 1>health services, things like that. Fourteen Republicans went along with it.

0:22:48.457 --> 0:22:51.337
<v Speaker 1>Which a lot of people on the writers saying, what

0:22:51.497 --> 0:22:54.697
<v Speaker 1>the heck is going on here? Well, when we have

0:22:54.737 --> 0:22:56.737
<v Speaker 1>a question like that and it has to do with

0:22:56.777 --> 0:23:00.417
<v Speaker 1>the Second Amendment, gotta ask our buddy, dam Edwards, damn,

0:23:00.417 --> 0:23:04.417
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? Hey? Buck? Hey, why are you man? So?

0:23:04.497 --> 0:23:09.377
<v Speaker 1>First off, any surprises on the Republicans who went along

0:23:09.377 --> 0:23:14.217
<v Speaker 1>with this, Yeah, Tidy Young of Indiana was a bit

0:23:14.257 --> 0:23:16.097
<v Speaker 1>of a surprise, although I didn't see a quote from

0:23:16.177 --> 0:23:18.697
<v Speaker 1>him I think on Monday or Tuesday of this week

0:23:18.737 --> 0:23:21.097
<v Speaker 1>that indicated like he was, you know, looking forward to

0:23:21.137 --> 0:23:24.057
<v Speaker 1>seeing what they came up with, So he was a

0:23:24.097 --> 0:23:27.177
<v Speaker 1>bit of a surprise. Murkowski was not as much of

0:23:27.177 --> 0:23:30.097
<v Speaker 1>a surprise to me. And then you know, let's we've

0:23:30.097 --> 0:23:32.577
<v Speaker 1>had ten Republicans who sat all along like as as

0:23:32.617 --> 0:23:36.817
<v Speaker 1>long as the final legislation followed that basic framework that

0:23:36.857 --> 0:23:40.497
<v Speaker 1>they were in support, So I wasn't too surprised. I

0:23:40.497 --> 0:23:43.337
<v Speaker 1>actually predicted before a vote was held yesterday that this

0:23:43.377 --> 0:23:47.577
<v Speaker 1>would get sixty five votes and get in sixty four,

0:23:47.617 --> 0:23:50.657
<v Speaker 1>so I was pretty close. I was one off. So

0:23:51.737 --> 0:23:53.577
<v Speaker 1>now we are at this point where people of course

0:23:53.617 --> 0:23:57.097
<v Speaker 1>have been saying until today, well, you don't even know

0:23:57.137 --> 0:23:59.217
<v Speaker 1>what's in it. Because the text is in public, so

0:23:59.257 --> 0:24:01.817
<v Speaker 1>you're just going on you know, hearsay or whatever. Right,

0:24:01.857 --> 0:24:03.377
<v Speaker 1>this is how the people that want this stuff to

0:24:03.417 --> 0:24:06.897
<v Speaker 1>pass play games in the media. Now they've actually got

0:24:06.897 --> 0:24:09.417
<v Speaker 1>a text, now they've actually voted on it. They dropped it,

0:24:09.497 --> 0:24:13.977
<v Speaker 1>as i'ner stand it last night, eighty pages, so very

0:24:14.017 --> 0:24:16.537
<v Speaker 1>little time even for the Senate staffers, never mind the

0:24:16.537 --> 0:24:20.137
<v Speaker 1>senators themselves to go over this and see what's it

0:24:20.257 --> 0:24:24.057
<v Speaker 1>it based on what we know, Kim, what's in it?

0:24:24.257 --> 0:24:27.497
<v Speaker 1>And even more importantly, how do you see this actually

0:24:27.497 --> 0:24:31.137
<v Speaker 1>being implemented or what happens now if this gets signed,

0:24:31.137 --> 0:24:35.017
<v Speaker 1>which we believe it will by Biden in the law. Well,

0:24:35.097 --> 0:24:38.217
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest impact that folks are going to

0:24:38.297 --> 0:24:41.137
<v Speaker 1>see right away is going to be the expanded background

0:24:41.217 --> 0:24:42.897
<v Speaker 1>checks for eighteen, nineteen, and twenty year olds. So if

0:24:42.937 --> 0:24:44.817
<v Speaker 1>you're an adult under the age of twenty one and

0:24:44.857 --> 0:24:47.377
<v Speaker 1>you go to buy a firearm, you're going to see

0:24:47.377 --> 0:24:50.097
<v Speaker 1>an immediate impact, right because we're basically talking about a

0:24:50.497 --> 0:24:54.057
<v Speaker 1>three day waiting period, potentially as many as ten business

0:24:54.217 --> 0:24:58.417
<v Speaker 1>days while the FBI goes into your juvenile records to

0:24:58.457 --> 0:25:01.177
<v Speaker 1>see if there was any sort of juvenile crime that

0:25:01.217 --> 0:25:04.657
<v Speaker 1>would make you prohibit or promoning a firearm as far

0:25:04.777 --> 0:25:08.897
<v Speaker 1>as adults go. There's also a change in the definition

0:25:08.937 --> 0:25:12.057
<v Speaker 1>of who is is engaged in the business of selling

0:25:12.097 --> 0:25:14.857
<v Speaker 1>firearms right because once you're engaged in the business, you

0:25:14.897 --> 0:25:18.057
<v Speaker 1>have to be a federal firearms license. And it's still

0:25:18.097 --> 0:25:20.057
<v Speaker 1>not a hardened fast rule, like they didn't say if

0:25:20.057 --> 0:25:21.777
<v Speaker 1>you sell more than fifty guns a year you need

0:25:21.777 --> 0:25:25.417
<v Speaker 1>to get an FL. Basically, the new definition is if

0:25:25.417 --> 0:25:29.777
<v Speaker 1>you are selling guns primarily for profit, then you should

0:25:29.777 --> 0:25:33.457
<v Speaker 1>be getting an FL. So, you know, I could see

0:25:33.457 --> 0:25:36.617
<v Speaker 1>that some gun owners who have quite an extensive collection,

0:25:36.657 --> 0:25:40.057
<v Speaker 1>who may sell a arm from their private collection on

0:25:40.097 --> 0:25:43.337
<v Speaker 1>a semi regular basis, I can see that the ATF

0:25:43.377 --> 0:25:46.137
<v Speaker 1>would now consider them to be a firearms dealer and

0:25:46.137 --> 0:25:48.537
<v Speaker 1>they would need to get an FL. As far as

0:25:48.537 --> 0:25:51.297
<v Speaker 1>the red flag stuff goes, I gotta tell you, I

0:25:51.297 --> 0:25:52.617
<v Speaker 1>don't know that we're going to see a whole lot

0:25:52.657 --> 0:25:54.977
<v Speaker 1>of changes, because you know, this is left up to

0:25:54.977 --> 0:25:57.137
<v Speaker 1>the states as to whether or not they want to

0:25:57.177 --> 0:26:00.417
<v Speaker 1>implement these red flag laws. States are also eligible now

0:26:00.417 --> 0:26:02.777
<v Speaker 1>for the same pool of grant money for programs that

0:26:02.977 --> 0:26:08.697
<v Speaker 1>don't involve confiscating firearms without due process protection. So things

0:26:08.737 --> 0:26:11.657
<v Speaker 1>like veterans courts, another christ centtervenged programs. If states want

0:26:11.657 --> 0:26:15.297
<v Speaker 1>to adopt those strategies, they're still eligible for that pool

0:26:15.337 --> 0:26:17.937
<v Speaker 1>of federal grant funds. So I don't think we're going

0:26:18.017 --> 0:26:21.457
<v Speaker 1>to see an explosion of red states adopting red flag laws.

0:26:21.817 --> 0:26:24.057
<v Speaker 1>Most of the blue states already have them in place,

0:26:24.657 --> 0:26:27.697
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's actually well, it's a troubling

0:26:27.817 --> 0:26:31.617
<v Speaker 1>part of the bill. I don't know how much real

0:26:31.697 --> 0:26:34.017
<v Speaker 1>world impact it's going to have, at least right away.

0:26:35.537 --> 0:26:38.977
<v Speaker 1>Dam here's Senator Chuck Schumer. I mean, on this point

0:26:38.977 --> 0:26:42.617
<v Speaker 1>about what it does, the answer is obviously not a

0:26:42.657 --> 0:26:46.137
<v Speaker 1>lot that good. If anything that's good or useful might

0:26:46.337 --> 0:26:50.537
<v Speaker 1>annoy some people or create some hassle's delays for the

0:26:50.617 --> 0:26:53.457
<v Speaker 1>law abiding, it seems very unlikely this is going to

0:26:53.537 --> 0:26:56.297
<v Speaker 1>stop even one shooting. I don't know. I mean, I

0:26:56.457 --> 0:27:00.097
<v Speaker 1>suppose they're always going to operate under the theoretical premise that, well,

0:27:00.137 --> 0:27:05.097
<v Speaker 1>it could create a circumstance, right, we'll see. But also

0:27:05.137 --> 0:27:07.257
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the end of it either. I mean, it's

0:27:07.297 --> 0:27:09.897
<v Speaker 1>not like Democrats now are going to surround and say

0:27:09.937 --> 0:27:14.137
<v Speaker 1>we got bipartisan gun reform. We're good now. This is

0:27:14.217 --> 0:27:17.897
<v Speaker 1>just okay, step one in a much longer journey for

0:27:18.177 --> 0:27:20.977
<v Speaker 1>disarming the American people. I mean, here's Chuck Schumer saying,

0:27:21.257 --> 0:27:23.977
<v Speaker 1>this is just the beginning. Folks. Why while it's not

0:27:24.057 --> 0:27:29.097
<v Speaker 1>everything we want, this legislation is urgently needed. I'm pleased

0:27:29.297 --> 0:27:33.297
<v Speaker 1>that for the first time in nearly thirty years, Congress

0:27:33.417 --> 0:27:36.777
<v Speaker 1>is back on the path to take meaningful action to

0:27:36.817 --> 0:27:44.297
<v Speaker 1>address gun violence. What do you think, Yeah, listen, here's

0:27:44.297 --> 0:27:45.377
<v Speaker 1>the thing, and you're right. And this is where we

0:27:45.417 --> 0:27:48.297
<v Speaker 1>get into the politics right as opposed to the policy

0:27:48.777 --> 0:27:52.257
<v Speaker 1>of this legislation, and the politics I think are pretty

0:27:52.257 --> 0:27:56.057
<v Speaker 1>simple for both sides here. Democrats are looking for something

0:27:56.497 --> 0:27:58.737
<v Speaker 1>that they can call a win, that they can present

0:27:58.777 --> 0:28:00.897
<v Speaker 1>to their base and say, look, we're not completely inept.

0:28:00.977 --> 0:28:02.857
<v Speaker 1>Look we can actually get stuff done. Please come out

0:28:02.857 --> 0:28:07.817
<v Speaker 1>and vote for us come November. And this is it. Republicans. Meanwhile,

0:28:07.857 --> 0:28:09.257
<v Speaker 1>I've had a lot of folks ask me, Okay, well,

0:28:09.257 --> 0:28:12.377
<v Speaker 1>what are Republicans got out of this? I think you

0:28:12.497 --> 0:28:14.857
<v Speaker 1>have to look at the polls that we've seen, particularly

0:28:14.857 --> 0:28:18.897
<v Speaker 1>since Guivaldi, showing that crime and quote gun violence has

0:28:18.937 --> 0:28:21.297
<v Speaker 1>become one of the top concerns of voters. It's not

0:28:21.377 --> 0:28:24.257
<v Speaker 1>as high as inflation. It's not as high as the economy,

0:28:24.457 --> 0:28:27.577
<v Speaker 1>but it is on the mind of voters. And look,

0:28:28.097 --> 0:28:31.937
<v Speaker 1>this is a red wave environment for Republicans. They're looking

0:28:31.977 --> 0:28:36.657
<v Speaker 1>to try to increase their margins, increase their majorities, and

0:28:36.737 --> 0:28:40.777
<v Speaker 1>if they feel like they can win more votes by

0:28:40.817 --> 0:28:43.457
<v Speaker 1>approving this deal than they're going to lose from single

0:28:43.457 --> 0:28:46.737
<v Speaker 1>issue second amendment voters. Listen, you're going to see the

0:28:46.777 --> 0:28:49.937
<v Speaker 1>murder turtle, Mitch McConnell, roll the dice and take that bet.

0:28:49.977 --> 0:28:52.897
<v Speaker 1>I think that is the political calculation for Republicans that

0:28:53.657 --> 0:28:55.697
<v Speaker 1>most single issue two way voters are not going to

0:28:55.737 --> 0:28:57.777
<v Speaker 1>stay at home on election day because their matter Republicans

0:28:57.817 --> 0:28:59.897
<v Speaker 1>for voting for this deal. They still want to vote

0:28:59.937 --> 0:29:03.417
<v Speaker 1>Democrats out. They are tired of five dollars a gallon gas.

0:29:04.097 --> 0:29:06.697
<v Speaker 1>And Frankly, and I hate to say this, I'm not

0:29:06.737 --> 0:29:09.017
<v Speaker 1>sure how many single issue voters there are right now

0:29:09.137 --> 0:29:11.577
<v Speaker 1>unless that single is you is the economy or inflation.

0:29:11.977 --> 0:29:14.337
<v Speaker 1>You know that's impacting all of us. And I think

0:29:14.377 --> 0:29:17.777
<v Speaker 1>that it's given Republicans a little bit of wiggle room

0:29:17.897 --> 0:29:20.897
<v Speaker 1>to play for the middle as opposed to try to

0:29:20.937 --> 0:29:24.417
<v Speaker 1>appease the base. Yeah, it seems like I think that's

0:29:24.537 --> 0:29:28.497
<v Speaker 1>various student analysis. Mitch McConnell certainly has no fear about

0:29:28.497 --> 0:29:31.177
<v Speaker 1>what this will do to his reelection prospects. He put

0:29:31.177 --> 0:29:34.577
<v Speaker 1>out a statement, I support the bill texts at Senator

0:29:34.577 --> 0:29:37.377
<v Speaker 1>reported in our colleagues have produced. For years, the far

0:29:37.537 --> 0:29:40.817
<v Speaker 1>left falsely claimed that Congress could only address the terrible

0:29:40.857 --> 0:29:43.977
<v Speaker 1>issue of mass murders by trampling on law abiding americans

0:29:44.057 --> 0:29:47.657
<v Speaker 1>constitutional rights. This bill proves that false. Our colleagues have

0:29:47.737 --> 0:29:49.977
<v Speaker 1>put together a common sense package of popular steps that

0:29:50.017 --> 0:29:53.297
<v Speaker 1>will help make these horrifying incidents less likely while upholding

0:29:53.297 --> 0:29:56.417
<v Speaker 1>Second Amendment rights of law abiding citizens. I honestly just

0:29:56.497 --> 0:29:58.697
<v Speaker 1>don't believe they're going to make them less likely. I

0:29:58.777 --> 0:30:01.017
<v Speaker 1>think that's a huge leap. But even apart from that,

0:30:02.377 --> 0:30:06.177
<v Speaker 1>the notion that this in some way will result in

0:30:06.617 --> 0:30:10.217
<v Speaker 1>good faith from the Democrats. Now, okay, Republicans don't just

0:30:10.417 --> 0:30:13.337
<v Speaker 1>want to watch lots of people die in gun violence

0:30:13.337 --> 0:30:15.457
<v Speaker 1>all of the country and do nothing. We're not going

0:30:15.497 --> 0:30:17.977
<v Speaker 1>to use that talking point anymore. No, they're going to

0:30:18.057 --> 0:30:20.297
<v Speaker 1>use that talking point tomorrow. Cam You and I both

0:30:20.377 --> 0:30:24.897
<v Speaker 1>know it absolutely. But now Republicans can say, no, they're wrong. Look,

0:30:24.937 --> 0:30:27.017
<v Speaker 1>we took action right, So no, They're not going to

0:30:27.097 --> 0:30:32.697
<v Speaker 1>convince Democrats, but they may convince independence. Right, they may

0:30:33.057 --> 0:30:35.857
<v Speaker 1>be able to convince folks who were on the fence

0:30:35.937 --> 0:30:37.537
<v Speaker 1>or maybe not even thinking about voting this year. Although

0:30:37.537 --> 0:30:39.297
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any Americans, there are like that out

0:30:39.337 --> 0:30:42.937
<v Speaker 1>there these days. Again, I think this was a sort

0:30:42.977 --> 0:30:47.257
<v Speaker 1>of a political prevent defense move on the part of Republicans, right,

0:30:47.297 --> 0:30:52.377
<v Speaker 1>They're they're they're just trying to appear not crazy or

0:30:52.457 --> 0:30:56.137
<v Speaker 1>at least less crazy than Democrats, and to give that

0:30:56.377 --> 0:30:59.297
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of you know, moderate squishy middle another

0:30:59.417 --> 0:31:01.697
<v Speaker 1>reason to vote for them. And now when Democrats say

0:31:01.737 --> 0:31:05.377
<v Speaker 1>Republicans don't care about your kids, Republicans can say, yeah,

0:31:05.377 --> 0:31:06.977
<v Speaker 1>we do, because look at what we did. We just

0:31:07.057 --> 0:31:09.817
<v Speaker 1>spend seven billion dollars for school safety. We just know,

0:31:10.057 --> 0:31:13.217
<v Speaker 1>prove mental health access for adolescents who are at risk.

0:31:13.337 --> 0:31:16.137
<v Speaker 1>So you know, they checked the box here as far

0:31:16.217 --> 0:31:20.577
<v Speaker 1>as how effective these policies are going to be. Look,

0:31:20.617 --> 0:31:23.457
<v Speaker 1>Expanded background checks for eighteen, nineteen, and twenty year olds

0:31:23.617 --> 0:31:26.457
<v Speaker 1>might pick up some teenagers who were convicted of some

0:31:26.537 --> 0:31:28.857
<v Speaker 1>pretty aineous crimes who you know, are now free and

0:31:28.897 --> 0:31:30.377
<v Speaker 1>cleared to buy a gun as an eighteen year old.

0:31:30.417 --> 0:31:33.577
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that stops somebody. I'd like to think, you know,

0:31:33.617 --> 0:31:36.217
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to think that the additional mental health spending,

0:31:36.337 --> 0:31:38.337
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't stop a school shooter, maybe it stopped

0:31:38.337 --> 0:31:42.177
<v Speaker 1>somebody from killing themselves. Right, maybe it stops somebody from

0:31:43.017 --> 0:31:45.097
<v Speaker 1>bullying another kid. I don't know. Is that worth seven

0:31:45.137 --> 0:31:47.657
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars? I don't know. You know, again, I would

0:31:47.657 --> 0:31:49.897
<v Speaker 1>have preferred to have seen each and every one of

0:31:49.937 --> 0:31:52.777
<v Speaker 1>these things broken out and voted on on a standalone basis.

0:31:52.897 --> 0:31:55.177
<v Speaker 1>But Democrats every would have gone along with that because

0:31:55.217 --> 0:31:58.537
<v Speaker 1>then their gun control a part of the package would

0:31:58.577 --> 0:32:02.457
<v Speaker 1>have failed. Right, So this is the political calculation that

0:32:02.577 --> 0:32:06.137
<v Speaker 1>was made for Democrats and for Republicans. Am I satisfied

0:32:06.177 --> 0:32:09.897
<v Speaker 1>with the bill? No? Is that unusual for me to

0:32:09.937 --> 0:32:14.857
<v Speaker 1>be dissatisfied with Congress? No? So, you know, unfortunately, I

0:32:14.977 --> 0:32:17.137
<v Speaker 1>think even though you know, Chuck, she was talking about

0:32:17.177 --> 0:32:18.697
<v Speaker 1>how this is like the biggest thing to happen in

0:32:18.777 --> 0:32:21.137
<v Speaker 1>gun control in thirty years, I think this is still

0:32:21.137 --> 0:32:22.897
<v Speaker 1>gonna be status quo for a lot of folks who

0:32:22.897 --> 0:32:27.257
<v Speaker 1>follow politics closely. You know, we're watching watching NDC A

0:32:27.377 --> 0:32:30.857
<v Speaker 1>treat what is I think a very real problem through

0:32:30.897 --> 0:32:33.017
<v Speaker 1>a political lens, and I think that that stopping is

0:32:33.057 --> 0:32:36.497
<v Speaker 1>from actually reaching some of the real solutions that we

0:32:36.497 --> 0:32:39.977
<v Speaker 1>should be looking for. Damn, next time, you have to

0:32:40.017 --> 0:32:41.657
<v Speaker 1>give you the secrets of how to grow a beard

0:32:41.737 --> 0:32:43.537
<v Speaker 1>that long, so I can kind of up my game

0:32:43.617 --> 0:32:46.977
<v Speaker 1>here a little bit. But we appreciate you join Haitians patients.

0:32:47.137 --> 0:32:51.097
<v Speaker 1>That's all it takes. Yeah, thanks Bud, Thank you, my friend.

0:32:51.857 --> 0:32:56.217
<v Speaker 1>All right, coming up, Biden talks about a gas tax

0:32:56.977 --> 0:32:59.177
<v Speaker 1>Is that really going to do anything. We'll discuss that

0:32:59.377 --> 0:33:10.177
<v Speaker 1>with Jeff Dice of the Kneeses Institute. Thick around. You

0:33:10.217 --> 0:33:13.977
<v Speaker 1>were to decide to go for a federal gas tax holiday,

0:33:14.017 --> 0:33:17.017
<v Speaker 1>do you believe Congress would support that? And how would

0:33:17.057 --> 0:33:19.257
<v Speaker 1>you feel about the fact that Bose funds are used

0:33:19.297 --> 0:33:21.817
<v Speaker 1>for something that is a big priority for you to

0:33:21.937 --> 0:33:24.417
<v Speaker 1>pare of roads and infrastructure and all of that. Is

0:33:24.457 --> 0:33:29.297
<v Speaker 1>that word. Look, it will have some impact, but it's

0:33:29.337 --> 0:33:32.857
<v Speaker 1>not going to impact on major road construction in major repairs.

0:33:33.737 --> 0:33:36.417
<v Speaker 1>A decision, Well, let me put this way. I'm in

0:33:36.497 --> 0:33:38.817
<v Speaker 1>the process. I'll have a decision before the week is out.

0:33:40.817 --> 0:33:43.577
<v Speaker 1>President Biden saying we got to have a little gas

0:33:43.697 --> 0:33:47.057
<v Speaker 1>tax holiday because the price of gas is so high

0:33:47.177 --> 0:33:50.177
<v Speaker 1>right now, and the biggest problem for Democrats is that

0:33:50.377 --> 0:33:52.377
<v Speaker 1>they're getting blamed for it because you know, they're in

0:33:52.457 --> 0:33:55.697
<v Speaker 1>power and they've made a whole bunch of bad decisions. Well,

0:33:55.817 --> 0:33:57.697
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what this would actually mean. Join me

0:33:57.777 --> 0:34:01.137
<v Speaker 1>now as the president of the Mesa's Institute, Jeff Dice. Jeff,

0:34:01.137 --> 0:34:04.097
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being with us. Thank you very much for

0:34:04.137 --> 0:34:06.777
<v Speaker 1>having me, Buck. So let's just start with this, the

0:34:07.297 --> 0:34:12.057
<v Speaker 1>notion of a gas tax holiday. What would this mean?

0:34:12.137 --> 0:34:15.337
<v Speaker 1>How does it strike? Well, I wouldn't mean a lot

0:34:15.657 --> 0:34:17.777
<v Speaker 1>for average people. We're just talking about the federal end

0:34:17.817 --> 0:34:20.257
<v Speaker 1>of things. If you happen to live in California or Pennsylvania,

0:34:20.337 --> 0:34:23.257
<v Speaker 1>for example, you're getting charged more than fifty cents per

0:34:23.497 --> 0:34:27.577
<v Speaker 1>gallon at the state level, So this is eighteen point

0:34:27.657 --> 0:34:29.617
<v Speaker 1>four cents. At the federal level, it'd be a couple

0:34:29.737 --> 0:34:33.337
<v Speaker 1>dollars per phillip. Hey, I'll take it. You know, in

0:34:33.497 --> 0:34:37.097
<v Speaker 1>terms of revenue, it's almost meaningless. A few billion dollars

0:34:37.177 --> 0:34:40.977
<v Speaker 1>a month. The federal government sneezes a few billion dollars

0:34:41.097 --> 0:34:43.537
<v Speaker 1>a day. I mean. But what's so interesting about this,

0:34:43.577 --> 0:34:46.577
<v Speaker 1>Buck is Biden doesn't really believe in this. I mean,

0:34:46.697 --> 0:34:50.297
<v Speaker 1>he campaigned on getting rid of fossil fuels. So when

0:34:50.337 --> 0:34:52.217
<v Speaker 1>he talks about this sort of thing, it's just it's

0:34:52.217 --> 0:34:55.137
<v Speaker 1>an obvious political point. I guess we should appreciate that

0:34:55.297 --> 0:34:58.257
<v Speaker 1>he's actually sentient enough at the moment to make a

0:34:58.297 --> 0:35:01.177
<v Speaker 1>political calculation. It shows more spark than he's shown of late.

0:35:02.417 --> 0:35:04.937
<v Speaker 1>And one of the issues that the Democrats have right

0:35:05.017 --> 0:35:07.497
<v Speaker 1>now to tackle. There are a lot of issues, right, Jeff.

0:35:07.537 --> 0:35:09.697
<v Speaker 1>But one thing they gotta make sense of is that

0:35:09.737 --> 0:35:15.217
<v Speaker 1>it was it long ago that Barack Obama himself was

0:35:15.497 --> 0:35:19.857
<v Speaker 1>making the case that a gas tax change of any

0:35:19.937 --> 0:35:22.817
<v Speaker 1>kind really was a gimmick. This was the word that

0:35:22.897 --> 0:35:26.657
<v Speaker 1>he used back in two thousand and eight one. But

0:35:26.817 --> 0:35:30.617
<v Speaker 1>for us to suggest that thirty cents a day for

0:35:30.817 --> 0:35:35.857
<v Speaker 1>three months is real relief, that that's a real energy policy,

0:35:37.817 --> 0:35:41.297
<v Speaker 1>means that we are not tackling the problem that has

0:35:41.417 --> 0:35:48.617
<v Speaker 1>to be tackling. We are offering endemics, offering gimmicks. I

0:35:48.697 --> 0:35:52.417
<v Speaker 1>actually it sounds like Obama was right. Actually that's a gimmick.

0:35:52.457 --> 0:35:55.897
<v Speaker 1>Am I missing something? Yeah, this is gimmicky. It's it's

0:35:55.937 --> 0:35:57.337
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of money. But here's the thing. You

0:35:57.377 --> 0:36:00.137
<v Speaker 1>got to understand that their entire worldview is that this

0:36:00.297 --> 0:36:04.497
<v Speaker 1>is a cost to government. Everything implicitly belongs to the government.

0:36:04.537 --> 0:36:06.297
<v Speaker 1>When they allow you to pay a little less than

0:36:06.377 --> 0:36:09.097
<v Speaker 1>somehow they're giving you something. So that's I think first

0:36:09.137 --> 0:36:11.697
<v Speaker 1>and foremost, and I mean I would hate to see

0:36:11.737 --> 0:36:15.617
<v Speaker 1>Americans go through a really bad summer with exceedingly high

0:36:15.657 --> 0:36:19.297
<v Speaker 1>gas prices and god forbid, let's say, rolling blackouts in

0:36:19.377 --> 0:36:21.817
<v Speaker 1>the electrical grid when the whole country seems so hot

0:36:21.857 --> 0:36:23.937
<v Speaker 1>at you know, maybe this is what it takes. Maybe

0:36:24.017 --> 0:36:26.977
<v Speaker 1>that silver lining would be that we have to expose

0:36:27.097 --> 0:36:30.497
<v Speaker 1>Biden and these people for this absolutely insane idea that

0:36:30.617 --> 0:36:33.337
<v Speaker 1>we're going to stop burning oil and coal and natural

0:36:33.417 --> 0:36:37.737
<v Speaker 1>gas anytime soon and still have you know, reasonably priced

0:36:37.937 --> 0:36:40.577
<v Speaker 1>gasoline at the pump and air conditioning and all the

0:36:40.697 --> 0:36:43.377
<v Speaker 1>things we rely on every day. It's it's just unsustainable.

0:36:43.417 --> 0:36:46.097
<v Speaker 1>Green energy is not going to cut it here, and

0:36:46.257 --> 0:36:49.937
<v Speaker 1>so in that sense, you know, it's gimmicky, but it

0:36:50.097 --> 0:36:52.937
<v Speaker 1>maybe it helps us normal people start to see the light.

0:36:52.977 --> 0:36:56.417
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's be pro energy for God's sake. Well,

0:36:56.457 --> 0:37:00.297
<v Speaker 1>it's also fascinating that you're hearing more openly than ever

0:37:00.417 --> 0:37:04.897
<v Speaker 1>before the Biden administration essentially saying, hey, you know, look,

0:37:04.937 --> 0:37:07.617
<v Speaker 1>your gas price is high, but it's really a lot

0:37:07.657 --> 0:37:11.137
<v Speaker 1>of it Poutin's fault. And so this comes down to

0:37:11.857 --> 0:37:14.417
<v Speaker 1>you want to stop the war in Ukraine and stand

0:37:14.537 --> 0:37:17.497
<v Speaker 1>up for democracy and stand up against Putin or pay

0:37:18.137 --> 0:37:20.377
<v Speaker 1>high gas or you know, or pay low gas prices.

0:37:20.777 --> 0:37:22.977
<v Speaker 1>That's the choice that we have. Here's what Biden said.

0:37:23.537 --> 0:37:27.257
<v Speaker 1>For all those Republicans in Congress criticize me today for

0:37:27.457 --> 0:37:30.537
<v Speaker 1>high gas prices in America. Are you now saying we

0:37:30.617 --> 0:37:33.937
<v Speaker 1>were wrong to support Ukraine? Are you saying we were

0:37:34.017 --> 0:37:37.417
<v Speaker 1>wrong to stand up to Putin? Are you saying that

0:37:37.537 --> 0:37:40.417
<v Speaker 1>we would rather have lower gas prices in America and

0:37:40.577 --> 0:37:44.897
<v Speaker 1>Putin's iron fist in Europe? What do you make of that?

0:37:45.577 --> 0:37:50.457
<v Speaker 1>Putin's iron fist in Europe? Wow, the next hitler, I suppose. Look,

0:37:51.057 --> 0:37:55.297
<v Speaker 1>the gas prices were rising before Putin invaded Ukraine for one.

0:37:55.897 --> 0:38:00.657
<v Speaker 1>The second, an exceedingly small portion of US imported oil

0:38:00.857 --> 0:38:04.257
<v Speaker 1>comes from Russia, so it's not a key player. This

0:38:04.417 --> 0:38:06.737
<v Speaker 1>is a refining issue in the United States. Doesn't matter

0:38:06.777 --> 0:38:09.857
<v Speaker 1>how much oil we drill here or how much we import.

0:38:10.257 --> 0:38:13.257
<v Speaker 1>The bottleneck is refining because we haven't built any refinery

0:38:13.297 --> 0:38:15.697
<v Speaker 1>since the seventies, and the big oil companies won't invest

0:38:15.777 --> 0:38:19.097
<v Speaker 1>in them because it's a big capital investment, takes decades

0:38:19.137 --> 0:38:22.097
<v Speaker 1>to repay, and you know everyone's telling us we're going

0:38:22.137 --> 0:38:25.297
<v Speaker 1>to be electric, so you got to understand they're a

0:38:25.377 --> 0:38:27.377
<v Speaker 1>little reluctant to do so. The idea that this is

0:38:27.417 --> 0:38:30.177
<v Speaker 1>on Putin is just absurd. Now, if you live in

0:38:30.257 --> 0:38:33.417
<v Speaker 1>Germany where they shut down all their nuclear plants and

0:38:33.457 --> 0:38:35.857
<v Speaker 1>they impourt a hell of a lot of oil from

0:38:36.257 --> 0:38:39.017
<v Speaker 1>Russia as a result, I guess you could blame Putin,

0:38:39.097 --> 0:38:41.137
<v Speaker 1>but more likely you should be blaming Angela Merkel. But

0:38:41.217 --> 0:38:45.977
<v Speaker 1>either way, it's just an absurd statement by Biden. And

0:38:46.457 --> 0:38:50.177
<v Speaker 1>then you have the inflation situation, which obviously energy prices

0:38:50.257 --> 0:38:53.417
<v Speaker 1>play into this, and it's all interconnected at some level.

0:38:53.657 --> 0:38:58.257
<v Speaker 1>But you have a situation now of inflation that looks

0:38:58.297 --> 0:39:01.537
<v Speaker 1>like it is not only at a multi decade high,

0:39:01.697 --> 0:39:04.457
<v Speaker 1>but could stay there for quite some time. The FED

0:39:04.537 --> 0:39:09.017
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Jerome Powell was saying that it is demand, not

0:39:10.257 --> 0:39:12.537
<v Speaker 1>money printing, that has pushed us this point. Watch this,

0:39:12.977 --> 0:39:18.297
<v Speaker 1>I just would say, it's clearly both factors are principally

0:39:18.337 --> 0:39:20.657
<v Speaker 1>at work here. You couldn't get this kind of high

0:39:20.697 --> 0:39:23.497
<v Speaker 1>inflation without strong demand, and you certainly couldn't get it

0:39:23.537 --> 0:39:26.337
<v Speaker 1>without the kind of supply issues that we've had, both

0:39:26.417 --> 0:39:28.777
<v Speaker 1>in the labor market reflected in high wages, and then

0:39:28.857 --> 0:39:33.777
<v Speaker 1>in the goods market, reflected in what's happened with durable

0:39:33.857 --> 0:39:36.657
<v Speaker 1>goods and cars in particularly. Look there, there's it's been

0:39:36.697 --> 0:39:42.457
<v Speaker 1>this driven by semiconductor shortage. So nothing nothing about trillions

0:39:42.497 --> 0:39:44.937
<v Speaker 1>of dollars for people to stay at home, Nothing about

0:39:44.977 --> 0:39:48.617
<v Speaker 1>two trillion from Biden for the American rescue plan. Didn't

0:39:48.617 --> 0:39:52.497
<v Speaker 1>rescue the country. That's real dampture. Well, and the Fed

0:39:52.657 --> 0:39:56.177
<v Speaker 1>added over nine trillion in brand new money to the

0:39:56.417 --> 0:39:59.497
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet of commercial banks over this COVID crisis as well,

0:39:59.577 --> 0:40:03.897
<v Speaker 1>So they're basically recapitalizing banks on our backs in terms

0:40:03.937 --> 0:40:06.297
<v Speaker 1>of inflating the dollars. So he you know, most people

0:40:06.337 --> 0:40:09.217
<v Speaker 1>don't view gas and groceries as some kind of luxury item,

0:40:09.297 --> 0:40:11.417
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot more demand, I mean, demand for

0:40:12.017 --> 0:40:16.057
<v Speaker 1>calories and gasoline is pretty steady. People have to buy

0:40:16.177 --> 0:40:19.817
<v Speaker 1>those things. So I think Powell continues to sound pretty

0:40:19.857 --> 0:40:22.657
<v Speaker 1>out of touch and pretty aloof and maybe worst of all,

0:40:22.817 --> 0:40:25.577
<v Speaker 1>he continues to sound pretty political, like he's carrying water

0:40:25.657 --> 0:40:29.697
<v Speaker 1>for Biden. Yeah, thanks for being well, us appreciate it.

0:40:30.457 --> 0:40:34.297
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Buck all right, coming up. An Australian newspaper

0:40:34.497 --> 0:40:38.217
<v Speaker 1>says that not talking to relatives could lower your risk

0:40:38.257 --> 0:40:42.177
<v Speaker 1>of COVID nineteen transmission. You don't say, we'll get into that,

0:40:42.417 --> 0:40:52.497
<v Speaker 1>and quick hit, it's time for some of those important stories.

0:40:52.577 --> 0:40:54.017
<v Speaker 1>We haven't gotten to you yet, and we didn't want

0:40:54.017 --> 0:40:56.897
<v Speaker 1>to let you go to sleep tonight without at least

0:40:56.937 --> 0:40:59.497
<v Speaker 1>knowing what's going on with all of them. So quick hits,

0:40:59.977 --> 0:41:02.137
<v Speaker 1>line them up, knock them down. Here we have it,

0:41:02.897 --> 0:41:06.297
<v Speaker 1>Harold's Son newspaper. They tweeted this out. A study from

0:41:06.377 --> 0:41:09.177
<v Speaker 1>proceedings of the National Academy of Science, Giving your co

0:41:09.337 --> 0:41:12.217
<v Speaker 1>workers and found remembers the silent treatment and texting, not

0:41:12.497 --> 0:41:15.017
<v Speaker 1>talking it would be the key to getting the COVID

0:41:15.057 --> 0:41:19.217
<v Speaker 1>pandemic under control. Speaking just four words an hour increases

0:41:19.217 --> 0:41:22.697
<v Speaker 1>the spread of COVID nineteen ten times more than breathing normally.

0:41:23.417 --> 0:41:26.777
<v Speaker 1>So basically, if we're going to stop COVID, which we

0:41:26.857 --> 0:41:30.457
<v Speaker 1>are never going to do, which is impossible, which is

0:41:30.497 --> 0:41:34.217
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen now for two plus years, going on

0:41:34.457 --> 0:41:37.577
<v Speaker 1>three years, give me a break. There's no stopping COVID,

0:41:37.657 --> 0:41:39.817
<v Speaker 1>just like there's no stopping the common cold. This should

0:41:39.857 --> 0:41:43.937
<v Speaker 1>have been known all along, but they're telling you, well,

0:41:43.977 --> 0:41:46.137
<v Speaker 1>maybe if you just shut up and don't speak peasants,

0:41:46.617 --> 0:41:49.417
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a better chance of slowing down the virus,

0:41:50.217 --> 0:41:55.657
<v Speaker 1>which is absurd and insane, and you think yourself, they

0:41:55.737 --> 0:41:58.537
<v Speaker 1>can't really believe that this is the O. Don't know?

0:41:58.657 --> 0:42:01.297
<v Speaker 1>They do? They do? They think that this is good advice,

0:42:01.537 --> 0:42:03.617
<v Speaker 1>you know, they think that this is necessary for people

0:42:03.697 --> 0:42:06.577
<v Speaker 1>to hear at this point. And then, speaking of the insane,

0:42:06.697 --> 0:42:14.057
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of biser CEO named Albert Bula, he's out

0:42:14.057 --> 0:42:16.497
<v Speaker 1>there telling everybody what I've been saying now for over

0:42:16.537 --> 0:42:20.497
<v Speaker 1>a year is so it's gonna be a new vaccine

0:42:20.777 --> 0:42:23.977
<v Speaker 1>every year. And if you believe that the COVID vaccine

0:42:24.017 --> 0:42:29.057
<v Speaker 1>should be mandatory, it's mandatory shot for everyone, babies to

0:42:29.257 --> 0:42:32.377
<v Speaker 1>old people, everybody in between, every year and if you

0:42:32.457 --> 0:42:34.617
<v Speaker 1>won't get it, you should get fired. That's what the

0:42:34.777 --> 0:42:38.697
<v Speaker 1>Libs believe, which is appalling because they were wrong about

0:42:38.697 --> 0:42:41.497
<v Speaker 1>all this. It doesn't stop the spread. You need three shots,

0:42:41.777 --> 0:42:43.937
<v Speaker 1>and even with the three shots, you can still get sick,

0:42:44.097 --> 0:42:45.857
<v Speaker 1>and you know the whole thing, and even if you

0:42:45.897 --> 0:42:47.737
<v Speaker 1>get the three shots, you can still die. In fact,

0:42:47.817 --> 0:42:50.337
<v Speaker 1>you're less likely too than people who don't get any shots.

0:42:50.497 --> 0:42:53.417
<v Speaker 1>But if you're in the high risk category. Yeah, we

0:42:53.497 --> 0:42:56.177
<v Speaker 1>all know this right, But yet here's the CEO Fiser

0:42:56.217 --> 0:42:59.377
<v Speaker 1>tell on everybody you might have to get shots every year,

0:42:59.697 --> 0:43:02.457
<v Speaker 1>just like we said, do you think we're going to

0:43:02.577 --> 0:43:08.097
<v Speaker 1>get updated mRNA vaccines every season that will be directed

0:43:08.177 --> 0:43:10.697
<v Speaker 1>to each new variation of the Corona virus? And what

0:43:10.857 --> 0:43:14.657
<v Speaker 1>we have to take those shots every year? I'm almost

0:43:14.697 --> 0:43:17.257
<v Speaker 1>certain about it. And I say almost certain because of

0:43:17.377 --> 0:43:19.857
<v Speaker 1>course regulators can the final say in all of that.

0:43:20.177 --> 0:43:27.137
<v Speaker 1>But that's the beauty of mRNA, the beauty of mRNA. Yes,

0:43:27.417 --> 0:43:30.137
<v Speaker 1>you see, it's almost like a massive multi billion dollar

0:43:30.337 --> 0:43:33.937
<v Speaker 1>year annuity for companies like Fiser. Just have a little

0:43:34.017 --> 0:43:36.417
<v Speaker 1>tweaked to the mRNA for the new variant and then

0:43:36.497 --> 0:43:39.577
<v Speaker 1>make everyone get the shot. Does it help them make

0:43:39.617 --> 0:43:42.097
<v Speaker 1>a difference? This is just like the flu shot, folks,

0:43:42.177 --> 0:43:45.937
<v Speaker 1>which kind of works for some people. Sometimes. We didn't

0:43:45.937 --> 0:43:47.697
<v Speaker 1>make everybody get that because we know a lot of

0:43:47.697 --> 0:43:49.137
<v Speaker 1>times doesn't do a damn thing. A lot of people

0:43:49.137 --> 0:43:52.057
<v Speaker 1>don't need it. We already have the template for how

0:43:52.057 --> 0:43:53.937
<v Speaker 1>to go forward as a society. Forget about all this

0:43:54.057 --> 0:43:57.417
<v Speaker 1>not We already know treat the treat COVID like we've

0:43:57.457 --> 0:44:01.097
<v Speaker 1>treated the flu for the last fifty years, last hundred years,

0:44:01.657 --> 0:44:05.857
<v Speaker 1>but instead this is where we are more authoritarian, lunacy,

0:44:06.017 --> 0:44:09.057
<v Speaker 1>more madness from these people. At least we can have

0:44:09.257 --> 0:44:12.017
<v Speaker 1>some amusement by watching the White House continue to just

0:44:12.977 --> 0:44:18.697
<v Speaker 1>descend into the abyss of electoral destruction, which is going

0:44:18.777 --> 0:44:20.217
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of fun in this mid term.

0:44:20.857 --> 0:44:22.977
<v Speaker 1>The new White House Press relatively new White House Press

0:44:22.977 --> 0:44:26.417
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Karine Jean Pierre, said something, Look, I know it's

0:44:26.817 --> 0:44:29.857
<v Speaker 1>a little verbal slip up, but kind of funny anyway,

0:44:29.937 --> 0:44:32.697
<v Speaker 1>watched about I mean, the President has been very clear

0:44:32.937 --> 0:44:35.257
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that he does everything that he can

0:44:36.337 --> 0:44:42.097
<v Speaker 1>to elevate to alleviate the you know, the pain that

0:44:42.337 --> 0:44:44.697
<v Speaker 1>American families are feeling when it comes to gas prices,