WEBVTT - FOMC Minutes, Turkey & Syria, Markets

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel podcast. I'm Paul swing you

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. We are awaiting the minutes from

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the last f O MC meeting. They are due out

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>today at two pm Eastern time. Although we have a

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>good sense of what will probably be the headline here

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and will have to do with the expansion of the

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet that will not by any means be called

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing by Fed officials. Joining us here in our

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>interactive broker studios is Phil Blancado. He is chief executive

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>officer for Leidenburg Salmon Asset Management funds UH and I

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to start their Phil the idea that the

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Fed seems to be poised to expand the balance sheet

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>in short order, according to what j. Pali said yesterday,

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>but this is not necessarily part of any sort of easing.

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you buy that well? I think he said clearly

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this is not que profoundly more than once. Actually I

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with that for a minute. I would give the

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>FED credit on this front. That we took a three

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar balance sheet and reduced it down to one

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>point four and in that process there were going to

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be some hiccups along the way, and I think this

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>is the one thing we can point to that they

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>got to where they wanted to be. They want to

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>where they the right amount of cash on hand to

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>be backing up the reserves, backing up the banking system,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and now they've reached where Okay, we probably went a

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>little too far to tune of a hundred and fifty

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollars, and then that would solve this problem.

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a systemic problem. Also had a

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit of the calendar involved. Also had a little

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>bit to do with how much banks are going to

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>loan to each other. So the FEDS doing what it's

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do, which is fixed these disruptions in the market.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with what happened that. I don't think it's

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a big deal, so Phil, the expectation is that the

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>FED will continue to ease maybe at the end of

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this month. I kind of argument, however, might be, you know,

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>what do they really need to the economies? You know

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty doing pretty well. Yes, yes we know manufacturing this week,

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but the consumers still hanging in there. Isn't it better

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to save our ammunition for later if and when the

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:11.680
<v Speaker 1>economy perhaps weekends. Further to the Chairman's comments just today

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that the US economy is actually pretty good, there's nothing

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>hot in the economy, and I would agree on both fronts.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>When your consumer is gainfully employed at a historical level

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of loads of unemployment, you're seeing wages will be a

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>bit modestly but still going higher. It's hard for me

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to understand why we feel this dramatic need to cut

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to your points save it for later. Now, I would say,

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed funds rate is higher than the tenure.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>That concerns me. I'd rather see those flat. Why. I

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>want to see more stimulus on both sides of the curve,

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>not just a short end of the curve. So for

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that reason I could see another quarter point coming out

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense to me. But beyond that, why use

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>up that ammunition? Now use up that firepower when you

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 1>might need it if something dressed it happens down the road.

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:54.119
<v Speaker 1>So what are you buying right now? That's a great

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>question for me. I still want to rotate towards. For

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>First of all, in your equity portfolios, we're up over

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>near there on the SMP five D. Give or take

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a point or two. Take some profit. I think we've

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>forgotten about rule one on one. You're in October, you've

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of money. Take someone at the table.

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Then rotate towards two places. First, short term fixed income

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.839
<v Speaker 1>is yielding over two percent. That's a panacea. Right now.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>You're doing really well by hiding out in your shirt reserves.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Nothing wrong with waiting for this to resolve yourself, whether

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the tariff battle or something along those lines. But

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>add to that, where your opportunities are, you could still

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>go into that staple sector, albeit carefully, and find those

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>quality names they're going to earn your income. Whether it's

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a cost co, whether it's a Walmart. You could even

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>look at something like a tech company that's got a

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>value bent to it, like a Microsoft, or even to

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a degree to a degree, Apple, who has had really

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>spectacular that to come out recently. Where you're but you're

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>getting paid a nice dividend, So that's where your rotate now.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know the we have the trade delegation from

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>China coming into Washington, the negotiations start tomorrow. What do

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you think the market's kind of discounting right now? Is

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it released a trade because that's been one of the

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>big issues that that's been whipping the market around, one

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite topics. I think there is this expectation

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to get solved in the blank

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of and I I think that's really a reach. There's

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>just too many movies, too many people who are actually

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>expecting an easy solution at this point. Well, here's why

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that. Look at the market's reaction just today.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, grant the light volume day, but we watch

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>these crazy minuscule headlines and we're up two hundred, down

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred, and I'm saying to myself, there must be

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>some enigma of people out there that think that this

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to get solved instantly. That's just not gonna

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>work that way. Whether it's the election cycle, whether it's

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>China wanted to solve this on intellectual property issue, or

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just what the next president mayor man, all of

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>these components, I think This is a multi year issue,

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>not a multi month issue, and for that reason we're

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be stuck with this for a while. I want

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to ask you a question that I've been thinking about

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>all morning, which is at a time of an everything rally.

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Yet again, it's not a comfortable everything rally with a

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of rotation under the surface, but if you look

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>at the averages, it is a very strong performance nonetheless

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in bonds and equities. What's the argument as an active

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>manager at that point when the Fed's basically back stopping markets,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>suppressing volatility and forcing people to do things that they're

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable with and into assets that are going to keep

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.600
<v Speaker 1>rallying even if they shouldn't be. This is behavioral finance.

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>One oh one, my gosh. Rup now on the act

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>nearly on the SMP. Take your money off the table.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>We thrilled you made this kind of money this year,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and rotate to a neutral position because of the point

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you made. Whether you call this a potempan market, whether

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's financed by the FEB artificial earnings, it's time to

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>take some money off the table. Yeah, but the FED

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is still going to be back stopping the market over

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months and into next year. So

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>my question is you could take out you know, your money,

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but then when you put it back it might actually

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>be at an even higher point. Right, neutral not overweight.

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>There's the answer to that is don't go underweight, go neutral,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And by that you're right about the FED. But I

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>don't think the FED could stimulate enough to really right

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as is higher. The reality is that the Canarian coal

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>mine here is do we get a business procession that

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>impacts unemployment and causes consumer confidence to a road. So

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>far it hasn't happened, and if it doesn't happen, we're

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna trade along in this bound for a while until

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we get a catalyst higher or lower. And for me,

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to take that political or that economic risk,

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So neutral is a lot safer than overweight. We are

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up on earnings starting next week. It's something we

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about, probably for because there's been so much

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>more on the macro front to talk about. But earnings

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>outlook isn't that great. I don't think the earnings necessarily

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>are something that supports equities. How are you thinking about

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the echo markets going into earnings? The most important earning

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>season in three years. Simply put, this is the one

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>that matters. This is the guerrilla because the first two

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we got through, whether they ratcheted down expectations or we

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>somehow surpassed it. And I'm less worried about the e

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm more worried about the revenue side of the sales side.

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.679
<v Speaker 1>If we can get positive sales momentum plus two plus

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>three percent, we're going to survive this because then we

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>get into the fourth quarter of the year, we get

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in the last year the presidential cycle, which tendably stimulative.

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Fourth quote of tends to be a big buying season

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, Holidays, Santa clas Rally, blah blah blah.

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So if we can get through this earning seven, we're

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be okay. But the key is if we go

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>negative on sales and earnings, it could be very problematic.

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>From markets. I could see it's giving back a good

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>percent would not surprise me at all. Phil Blancada, thank

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Well. You apppreciate you

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>coming and sharing your thoughts. Fills the chief executive officer

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for laden Berg tom and Asset Management Funds. Braving the

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>rain here in New York City, joining us here in

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio giving us some thoughts on

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the markets. Yeah, I want to shift gears to the

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt utility in California, PG and E. It has come

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>up with a new defense against wildfires, simply shutting down

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>joining us now Kick Conneledge Senior Industrials and Utility is

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Is this a viable solution to

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>basically just say to everybody, Hey, guys, you know what,

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the risk of fire is high, So we're just gonna

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>shut down your energy for a couple of days and

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.119
<v Speaker 1>uh just you know, we're not responsible for any fires

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>because we're not operating. Well. We're going to find out

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>how viable it is, obviously, but I think it's to

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.559
<v Speaker 1>my mind, it's it's clearly in the context of uh

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we lost billions and billions of dollars and we went

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt by having the electricity on uh in in these conditions, right,

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so that you know, there's I don't think there's any

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 1>way to tell from the outside. Are they being quote

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>unquote too cautious or overly you know, aware of possibilities.

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Is there a one percent chance that something could happen

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>or a ten percent chance obviously that would that would

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>make a big difference. But they're clearly airing on the

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>side of caution and trying not to burn down the

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>whole counties the way they've done before. Well, I've seen

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the map of the the outage area, um and it's

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>just a huge part of the you know, the central

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>northern part of the state and impact a lot of people.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Is there any precedent for this happening before? I think

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>they're on on a smaller scale, There's definitely been these

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 1>kinds of situations. I mean, utilities do it to some

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.479
<v Speaker 1>extent a lot of the time when there are floods

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and other you know, problematic situations where there are live

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.959
<v Speaker 1>wires in you know that could really hurt people. Is

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it just the up to PGEN or the utilities to

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>decide when and how and they do it or do

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>they have to get approval from the regulators? It's almost like, hey,

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>who's watching out for the homeowners and who are people

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>who need electricity? Uh? My understanding is they can do

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it on their own. They're the experts. They have to,

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>but they certainly have people potentially second guessing them. If

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>they keep doing it consistently and enough people feel like

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a problem and they're making it a problem.

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>U uh. And especially if bad things happen to people,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>like medical devices go you know, go off and can't

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>be helped and so on, then they will have that uh,

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, that fallout from from other people. Yeah, and

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>then there is this that the director of the Climate

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Energy Policy Program at Stanford University estimated that the economic

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>impact could rise to as much as two point six

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars for PG and ease blackout for just two days.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So there is a sort of economic bleed through in

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>addition to just the inconvenience. I have to wonder, though,

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>why is it that they have to put the the

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the area at risk of a fire with their with

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>their infrastructure. I mean, I don't understand exactly. Are there

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>just live wires next to trees hanging out there? I mean,

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>that's basically it is that northern California is an especially

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>um problematic area to have big industrial operations. And there's

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of mountains, that's a lot of trees, there's

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, steep uh. There's a lot

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of of towns in remote areas, So there's a lot

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of wires going all over the place. If you want

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to have wires, you know that that go to where

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>people are as opposed to having people run their own

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>generator or their own rooftop solars. So arguably that would

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>be kind of a a better solution someday. But obviously

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about hundreds of thousands of customers, millions of

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>people being affected by this. It's not going to happen

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>overnight if they did fix it that way. So real quick,

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>um kid, just give us a sense of how pg

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>n E is doing right now. I know they're still

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in bankruptcy. How are they? You know, everybody um is

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>has their eye on June next year, which is when

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>uh they have to be out of bankruptcy if they're

0:11:55.559 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>going to take advantage of the multibillion dollar um fun

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that the state is set up. So they're going back

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and forth with the victims of the fires, with the

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>bond holders over potentially reaching some settlement at some point here. Uh.

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's an intricate uh process in bankruptcy. But

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it looks for now like the current shareholders of PGNI

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have the their own exclusivity still in place. But you know,

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the judge ultimately makes that decision, and that's coming up

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>judge any day. He's supposed to make a decision on

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>whether they keep exclusivity. Uh, and that would you know,

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>tend to lean in one direction or the other to

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>the you know, outside bondholders or the shareholders. Okay, kick

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of LEDs. Thanks so much for joining us kid

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>as a senior industrials and utilities animals for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio getting

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>update on PGEN and potentially and shutting down power for

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, half million homes. And there are all these

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>images of people going to grocery stores and wocking up

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>on flashlights. I was thinking to myself though, I mean,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>what if somebody lights a candle to get light during

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:10.839
<v Speaker 1>a high fire period because they don't have electricity. I mean,

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>my mind was going a little a little while exactly

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how this goes. I suspect that maybe a

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of an experiment here to see how it goes.

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>But clearly the liability has been major for those utilities

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>out there. Blimberg reported earlier today that Turkey did begin

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>their offensive into Syria after the US said that it

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was going to withdraw. Now there are reports that there

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>are rockets being shot from Syria towards Turkey. Joining US

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>now is Ali Cenar, president of the Turkish Heritage Organization, Ali,

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining US. I want to

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>just start with what has Turkey's role traditionally been with

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Syria and given some of the turmoil that we've seen

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in that nation. It's government. Sure, as you know, there's

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a war going on over six seven years in Syria

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>and Turkey is one of the country that's suffering from

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the Syria of war. Turkeys hosting over three point six

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>million Syrian refugees and ISIS attack fourteen times to Turkey

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and lost three hundred four lives by ISIS attacks. So

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Turkey is fighting against terrorism for many years and Turkey

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>at the national security concern from the neighborhood. That's why

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this operation was needed by the Turkish government and with

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration decisions, they gave the green light Turkey's

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>operation in Syria. Ali, you know, one, if you could

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>just give us a sense of what the goals are

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>are of the Turkish government with this operation. Sure, So

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the operation will NERA line is terror threats against Turkey.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>That me talk about terror threats. As you know, YPG

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is linked to p k K, which is a terrorist

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>organization recognized by United States and European Union. So Turkey

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is saying that suing course label as as Sarian course,

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's a terrorist organization. So Turkey feels the threat

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>from YPG, which is them two p k K. So

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the aim is to naturalize the terror threats in Syria.

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>The second objective is led to establishment of a safe

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>song they play that can be a facilitation the return

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of serial refugees to their host As I said, there

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>are over three point six million serial refugees and it's

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the cost of forty billion dollars to Turkey. So Turkey

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>wants the Sudian refugees to go back to their homeland.

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Therefore this operation will also help them to go back

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to their own country. How much involvement are you expecting

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>from some Turkish allies I'm thinking about, for example of Russia.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Any idea that there has been speculation that that that

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin will want to get involved and help Turkey

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>out in order to get sort of a foothold in

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a strategically beneficial area. I know today Present ar Don

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and Putting spoke on the phone and gave some information

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>about operation, but overalls, I mean lookated Turkey and Russia

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are not on the same page. In Syria. Russia is

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>supporting ASSAT and because of the crisis, Russian and ran

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>are behind of this IT disaster. So I think Turkyo

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and United States have more the same agenda in the region.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Russia is happy with the Turkey's operation,

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, Russian troops are not in

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that region. I'm we are talking about operation in northern Syria,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>which is domained by YPG, which is into p k K.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So as I said this, I think Russia and Turkey partnership.

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's working in Syria and which shouldn't be.

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>So I know Turkey informed Present Putting, but at the

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>same time they're not also happy with the operation. If

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the U. S And Turkey are more aligned when it

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to Syria than many people think, why hasn't this

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>happened earlier Because Turkey many times explained the concern about YPG,

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>which is linked to p KK terrorious organizations, and Turkey

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>as United States not support YPG or train them or

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>armed them. Turkey also offered to fight against ISIS in

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the region, but United States chose to work with YPG,

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and YPG is clearly working with p k K. They

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>are linked to each other. That's why Turkey felt a

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>threat and it didn't work out. But at the same time,

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>United States and Turkey wants are said to be removed

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and both countries, both NATAL airlines are also we're working

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>on it lit crisis, but unfortunately for the Northern Syria,

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>two NATAL allies didn't agree on YPG. It just quickly

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. What is the expected duration of this military operation.

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.399
<v Speaker 1>My expectation is at least two to three weeks. I

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>know President are Domb you'll be meeting President Trump on

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>November thirteen, So till then, I think we might see

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a clear outcome or some results out of this operation.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>But if it takes longer, it's it would be bad

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>for Turkey because there's a best semear champion against Turkey

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>for this operation. So I don't think it's gonna take

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>for many months to complete this operation. Alice, thank you

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Ali is a president of

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the Turkish Heritage Organization, joining us on the phone, giving

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>us his thoughts on the operation taking place just beginning

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>today Turkey entering Syria to retake some territory there. As

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Mr Senor explained to us, we are very lucky to

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>have with us here in our Bloomberg Gonna Active broker

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>studio studios. Noah Gottiner, Chairman and Chief executive Officer of

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Duff and Phelps, which advises the whole host of private

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>equity firms and is also a recipient, has been a

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.719
<v Speaker 1>recipient of private equity funding itself and has grown as

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a result of it. So uh a great bird's eye

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>view into the market at a time of growing emphasis

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>on it, certainly by way of the Business Week cover

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>feature on private this week. No, I want to start

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with the idea that we're seeing so many companies that

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>are going that are moving from private to public seeing

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a rocky road, and whether there's any significance to that.

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>What do you think the main takeaway should be? Well?

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that, um, you have seen some difficult situations, Lisa,

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>with public offerings that have not done well, and I

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>think that what the public has woken up to is

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 1>they want to see a path to profitability. It's no

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>longer great just to keep losing money. It's okay if

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a way to become profitable and to have a

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>profitable model. I think there's also right now, as the

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>exuberance has died down, a much greater focus on good

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 1>governance and transparency. Those things kind of got lost in

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>all the excitement of the heady public offerings, but now

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>people are focused on that. So no, when I look

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.639
<v Speaker 1>at the private equity business, UM, it seems to me

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been a Wall Street almost third earty years. It's

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of the one of the last bastions where you

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>can make outsized returns UM. One of the concerns, however,

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is there's a lot of money slashing around in private equity. Word,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 1>every time we open the paper, look at the Bloomberg terminal,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is another multibillion dollar fund being raised. My concern, I

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>think some concerning a lot investors is too much money

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>chasing too few deals, pushing valuations of how do you

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>view the market right now? Well, Paul, that's absolutely right.

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>More money has come into the industry. Private equity in

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in in a way is almost a victim of its

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.239
<v Speaker 1>own success. It's done well, it's generated great returns and

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>money has kept flowing into private equity. That's caused prices

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to go up, and that's put pressure on private equity

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>firms to really find different ways to create value on

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 1>their investments and really focus on growth. So the old

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>days of just cut cutting costs and getting the low

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>hanging fruit isn't sufficient to generate the returns that private

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>equity needs to generate today. So I want to dig

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:00.199
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit to some of the sect ers

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and where some of your clients are seeing opportunities right now.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I was speaking with James Gellard, chairman and CEO of

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Rapid Ratings, and he was saying that there are a

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>whole slew of companies that are probably overvalued in the

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>private space, particularly what within the energy sector. Are actually no,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say energy, tech and biotech. He said energy.

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>He actually sees an opportunity given how beating up it's gotten.

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Are you hearing something similar from your clients that they're

0:22:24.480 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to steer steer clear from tech and biotech names

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point? Well, listen, Whenever valuations begin to rise

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>dramatically in certain sectors, people become more cautious but the

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>realities there are opportunities in every sector, in every slice

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of the economy, and private equity guys are really good

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>at finding those areas where there there is the possibility

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of transformation and creating value. So I wouldn't rule out

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>any sectors, uh where where there may be opportunities for

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>private equity. One of things I noticed in the private

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>equity over over the years is only the big get bigger,

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, KKR, Blackstone or Carlisle Group. Is

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there is there still a market for kind of the

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 1>smaller private equity firms doing smaller deals or is it

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just all the spoils are going to the big players.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>That's a great question, Paul. I think it comes back

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to that to that earlier question, is there going to

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>be a shake up in private equity? And obviously, um

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the higher performing firms are always going to do well.

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>The lower performing firms are going to fall away or

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>may not be in business. But there's another um bifurcation

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say in private equity, which is firms will

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>either get very big like you described and have multi

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>strategies around capital deployment and become global, or if they're

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>smaller they'll probably be very specialized around certain industries and

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>create their competitive advantage through the intellectual capital they have,

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 1>whether it's financial services or technology or software or whatever.

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>One thing I wonder about with the big companies, the

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>big private equity firms is how difficult it is for

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>them to find big enough companies to deploy cash too.

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Because they have so much money, they have to do

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger deals in order to make a dent. Has that

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>been problematic it I you know, I would say maybe, Uh,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 1>they definitely have to write bigger checks. Uh, they have

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to find bigger companies to buy. But you know, it's

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a big, brave world out there. There's a lot there,

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of There has been talk that

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest private companies get the biggest amounts

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of money new money. Uh, they get flooded at them

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>just because of this dynamic, because they're big enough to

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>receive it. I mean, what's the fear that it sort

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of creates behemoths that aren't ready to be behemoths yet?

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I listen, I think that those those fears, I guess

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>are legitimate. Um, but there are opportunities for private equity

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>with big companies, small companies. There are ways to navigate,

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So no, one of the trends I thought was interesting.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I've seen a KKRS they've brought a lot of the

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>capital markets operations in house. Um, I just trying to

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>save fees on what they pay to the investment banks. Um.

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is a trend across the industry

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>because I haven't necessarily seen others do it to the

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>extent KKR has, But I would think it would create

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>some conflicts with their investment banking seal side, you know,

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>customers partners. However you want to terminate relationship. Yeah, listen, Uh,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 1>going back to the previous point, private equity firms have

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to find a way to distinguish themselves, to differentiate themselves.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>KKR has has, as you've described, used that strategy, which

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>actually has worked very effectively for them, and I actually

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>actually haven't seen uh that conflicts holding them up in

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>any way. And other firms like Blackstone have become sort

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of diversified asset managers and have done a fantastic job

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. So there are different ways of of skinning

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the baby. No, thank you so much for joining us.

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate your thoughts. No, it got Deaner, Chairman and

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Duffin Phelps giving us the lay of the

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>land in the financial services business. Business focusing on the

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.639
<v Speaker 1>private equity UH portion of the financial services industry, and

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>it continues to be an asset class that just really

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>attracts a tremendous amount of capital from all parts, whether

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it's pension funds or endowments. It just seems to be

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those asset classes I think as people look

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for yield and return increasing and looking to private equity.

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woyds. I'm on

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Lisa abramoy It's one before the podcast. You

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio