WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2018 NFL MegaPod Week 16 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man No Down Man Thursday Morning, decept

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>the Beating the Book podcast, Megapod Week sixteen in the

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>National Football League. Remember there's no guessing lines or megapod

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>next week in between Christmas and New Year's week seventeen,

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we never do either. Don't get mad at us, get

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>mad at Marco. You know you did. That was the

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>tradition every single year. And then the one year you

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>had this right idea, I just do a podcast and

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>none of the games meant anything. And the couple that

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>did the line was so high and you didn't know

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>who was playing, and it was, you know, no other

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>way to say it. It It was a clusterfuck of the show.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>It really, It really was how quickly did I throw

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you under the bus? There by the way. I was like, oh, yeah,

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know I could come you know, I

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>could come back and throw you under the bus and

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>tell people how close we were to ending this thing,

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>uh two years ago that but yeah, we talked about

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that on the show, didn't we. Like The joke was

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I took you guys to quick Yeah, we we glossed

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it over. But you know, people don't realize how close

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>that was. But the best part was You know, when

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you like almost break up with a girl and then

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you decide, oh, man, she is you know, she really

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is hot. And then you you know, you take the

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.839
<v Speaker 1>two of us to dinner, and you know, he pulled

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>out all the stops we went to. Uh it was

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>at the Aria, the all the name of the what

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>was it? Carbone? Yes, yes, and I got the bone

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in Bill Parmesan and uh, yeah, we made you pay

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>for We made you pay for that one. What do

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you mean you made me pay It was my my breakup, Like,

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not you guys, it's me. Well I know, but

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I I said, we we we didn't. We didn't go

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>soft on you do you were paying no question about that, dude.

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And then then and then the next morning, I'm like, yeah,

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>let's keep doing it. That's how it tear it out. Yeah,

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.239
<v Speaker 1>well that's a that's a great story, Marco. Probably a

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>little too in depth, but I appreciate it. So probably

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you know what, some of these games this week, don't,

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't deserve the time. So that pent right.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>As always, the show I should point out, brought you

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>by the score x dot com th h E S

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>c O r e X. It's that secret stock market thing.

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>We have the winner of the year long event coming

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 1>on our show for wild Card weekend. Two weeks left

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in that contest, the year long beating the Book Megapod

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>score X contest, who's got the biggest return on their portfolio?

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the leader remains profitable thirty four point eight percent,

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>but the lead is narrowing just a little bit. Snap

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>fade second place twenty nine and the week twenty eight

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>point eight percent in third place, So we'll see if

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>profitable can hang on and enjoined us the Megapod wild

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Card weekend. We look forward to that as always. That's

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the voice of Marco to Angela from Wage to Talk.

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't need to introduce him anymore. Aces here as

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>well on the left from out of the sports betting diaspora. Hello,

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>as here he is and joining us once again, kind

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>enough to join us from the power Rank dot com

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Ed Fang, Good morning, Ed, Good morning guys. Thanks so

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>much for having me on talks on the games. We

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Let's start. We always here's the thing we

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>always start in the format where we start with the

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Monday night game. This Monday night game sucks if you

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have a betting angle on it, though by all means,

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>feel free to extrapolate. If you don't, let's just move on.

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Denver three point favorites at Oakland Monday night. The game

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>means NATA except for perhaps draft position. Denver coming off

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a horrific loss to the Browns on Saturday, in which

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fans Joseph decided to kick a field goal to make

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it seventeen to sixteen as opposed to going forward on

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>fourth and one late. Oak Land. Well, they're just not

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that good at football. They're coming off You had another loss,

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Denver minus three at Oakland. Any thoughts on this one? Ed? Yeah,

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm gonna jump in here a little bit. Um.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to side on this game, just because

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to figure out where Oakland's mind is, whether

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna play. You kind of gotta think that you're

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be pumped up at home against the division rival. Um,

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not. I can't put numbers to motivation, so

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do that. But but one thing

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>I do want to point out out about this game

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>is that Oakland's fundamentals on offense have been pretty good.

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>On my side, I look at pass offense in terms

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of adjusted yards for play, Oakland ranks and ninth. And

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>remember they haven't had a Mark Cooper for the last

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>however many weeks. And I've also started looking at success

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>rate adjusted for strength of schedule this year. So success

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is simply if you get fifty yards on first down,

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on second down, and all the necessary yards on third

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and fourth down. Oakland's offense ranks tenth and uh so,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>so they're doing interesting things on that side of the ball.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>There awful on the other side of the ball. But

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>but does this does kind of point to the over

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>on this one? Um? I think it looked like it

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>opened at forty five. Um, it's down to forty three.

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I really can't understand that, especially since Chris Harris Jr.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Who's not playing for Denver Garyanne Connolly for Oakland cornerback

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is a little dinged up. So yeah, that's one thing

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I think Oakland's offense is possibly

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>is decent, and uh the over is something that you

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>should consider in this game. Yet three and a half

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in that pocket that's where the total is right now.

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Broncos and the Raiders on Monday Night, Marco, anything here Yeah,

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I like the Oakland side, Gil and this is what

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do the angle. By the time this game

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is played on Sunday, UM, Denver could possibly be officially eliminated.

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>They're still mathematically alive. But I'll tell you who also

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is just mathematically alive is Fance Joseph Because the minute

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this team is officially out of the playoffs, he is

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>also gonna be officially eliminated as coach of the Denver Broncos.

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And for the Oakland Raiders side, yes, what Ed said

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>about the offense, Derek carrs looked good in the last

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>three games UM Kansas City and Pittsburgh. They took both

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of those teams to the limit and got the win

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>against Pittsburgh. Yeah, where those teams looking past them? Probably?

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But last week they did losing Cincinnati committed a few

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>turnovers and it was a dead spot for them. Off

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Pittsburgh win and with this Monday night game

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on deck, traveling to the East Coast was a bad

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>spot for them. But let's throw in the intangible. This

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for all intents and purposes, is probably going to be

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the final game in the Oakland Coliseum, and the Raiders

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna play somewhere next year, but it's not gonna

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>be here. And as much as you know all of

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>this stuff in Gil, you you're more uh in depth

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>with in touch with the Bay Area. You know, the

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>players had nothing to do with this. This is situation

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with ownership and city officials couldn't get a stadium done

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and all that, and that's why they're leaving. They want

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to give their fans, I think will win sending it out.

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And there's no coincidence that this was on Monday night,

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>their last home game, the black Hole, Monday night, drinking

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>all day, them going out on a high note. I

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great situational spot, especially if Denver's eliminated,

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and even if Denver's not, they get to play spoiler

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.559
<v Speaker 1>and be the one that eliminates them. It's an interesting point.

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>One correction, the Broncos are already eliminated, Marco, they are

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>they are done with it. Ye goodbye man Um. But

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting point you make about Oakland Coliseum. I

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>had an experience with this at RFK Stadium in Washington,

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>d C. In nine seven. RFK Stadium, where the Redskins

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>had won three Super Bowls as their home, uh stadium,

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and they were moving, but they were moving, you know,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>just outside of the city to FedEx Field where they

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>play today, which is the worst state of experience it's

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in life. But it was a final game against the Cowboys.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>The Redskins destroyed the Cowboys that day. They weren't going

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to the playoffs, the Redskins weren't. It was just one

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of those days where you knew the Redskins were gonna win,

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>but they were still beloved, right and people's people ripped

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>chairs out of RFK. You know. The soccer team, the

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>d C United, was still playing there. So it's not

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like the stadium was going away or the team really

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>out of town. This is a little different, right, the

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Raiders are leaving again. Uh so it could be a

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>very how can I put this interesting scene in the

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>stands in this game? No telling what they're gonna do

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to that building in the black hole and otherwise, uh,

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the building is not going anywhere but final home game.

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>You never know what kind of shenanigans are gonna be

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>pulled out there. So it is a weird kind of game.

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm kind of with you on that, Marco. I

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think there is a strange kind of emotional edge to

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders in this ballgame. Should point out, by the way,

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>because Ed Brow Chris Harris that game against the Browns,

0:08:55.360 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos were down five cornerbacks, Like that's believable, Chris

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Harris Jr. Isaac Isaac Whiteham, Brendan Langley, Jamaar Taylor, even

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Bradley Roby was out for a bit. I mean, that

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>was just ridiculous. Broncos, though, had a thirteen play drive

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>eat up more than seven minutes, but after Philip Lindsay

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>laid that game of stuff for a no game on

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>third and one from the Cleveland six, that's when Vance

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Joseph sent in kicker Brandon McManus for a field goal

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of going forward on four down. Broncos did get

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball back at their thirteen with one forty nine

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>remaining after Greg Williams decided to go for it on

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>fourth down, which I think was the right call. Uh.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>They reached the fifty yard line with fifty two seconds left,

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but then a spike two in completions in a sack

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>by Jabril Peppers of case Keenum there that all but

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>ended Denver's playoff hopes and those playoff hopes are done

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>zo now thirty two rushing yards for the Broncos in

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Browns. Any thoughts on this, Yeah,

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't really surprised that the total drop, just because

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>historically this series has been an under series. Five of

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:58.959
<v Speaker 1>the last six have gone on there and they were

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>some pretty low totals forty one, couple, forty four, forty three,

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.239
<v Speaker 1>and it still stayed under the total, So I understood

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>why that moved. And then a couple that with the

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>fact Denver hasn't gone over in the game since early,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, mid October pretty much, so I you know,

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of the trend to the under, but I

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. I think this one sets up nicely

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for an over. I mean, we know when teams have

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing to play for, it tends to be more of

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a schoolyard type game. And more importantly, like we've touched

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on so many times with the podcast, it tends to

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>take more effort to play defense than the play offense.

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean we see it with you know, all Star

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>games and then Pro Bowls and stuff. When no one's

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>playing defense, it's pretty easy to put up points. Uh,

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So I agree. I think the overall for some voundary,

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>especially now they've dropped the forty three. As far as

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the sign, I simply tried to middle it. I thought

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>the line would go up. I'd laid two and a

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>half and I still have an outfit. Lets me buy

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a half a point on three for ten cents, So

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I knew I'd be able to take three and a

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>half at ten for only ten cents, and I figured

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll have action that way by possibly setting up a

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>middle um. But the only position I look to take

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is the under. I missed the forty five, so I

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>may be forced to sit it out um if it

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go back up, but it's a prime time game,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it may do so, especially as we approach game time.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You have an outfit, lets you buy off the three

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>for ten cents? Yea, yeah, three seven still ten cents, dude,

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And I just got to go really like, I can't

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>do it a lot, you know. And I never bet

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>limits with him, like if it's a nickel limit, I'll

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>put like three on stuff because his lines are sometimes

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 1>so far off, like he gives them to you and

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that's it, like barely ever even moves them. So it's

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those outs I just keep in that pocket man. Yeah,

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to abuse it either and anybody and

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>not take advantage exactly for stuff like this is what

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll use them, by the way. That's a that's the

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>point that we don't make enough. And that's like some

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of the complaints about like William Hill, people getting backed

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>off at like William Hill. If you know a company

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or if you know an out is capable of that

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of behavior, maybe kind of realize that that's how

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they are and don't push that game. Gil. I don't

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>even interrupt you. Honestly, I don't understand, and I you

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>could delete this from the podcast of us talking. But

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>all bullshit a sign. I get so sick of it

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing on Twitter. All right, it's it's bad enough the books,

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's that that post. Oh, we took a half a

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>million dollar money line bent, we took a three hundred

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>money line bet and all this stuff, and yet they

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>won't take a five thousand dollar bet from someone labeled

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a long term winner. I get it, Um, they shouldn't

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>advertise the three thousand dollar bet if you're not willing

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to take it from everybody. So I understand that argument.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>But on the flip side of that same coin. I

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>understand why all this bitching about they won't take a bet,

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>they won't take a bet, they won't take a bet.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Then open your own sports book and book all the sharps.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>If that's what you think the right moves to do.

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>There are a company, their corporation. Their job is to

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>turn a profit. That's it. Not if the market allows it,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's gonna happen, we decide it. It's kind

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of like blackjack went the six to five Why because

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone kept playing it. So if you're gonna keep playing,

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>stop bitching. And if you're you're gonna bitch about sports

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>books not wanting to take your action because you win

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>long term, then be fucking smart about it. Find more outs,

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>don't bet the limits what everyone so you get dropped,

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Put in some middles, put in some scalps, give them

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>some work. I mean, there's ways to keep accounts active.

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You're that sharp, and you're making that much money, and

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you're that great at this, that's the simple part. You

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>should have learned, probably ten years ago, how to keep

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>your ounce as long as possible. Getting in some cold stuff.

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>You can't just fire hot shit in there. All day,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>every day and think the guy's gonna keep taking it.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't take its different different, it's a ray skill.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't need a lot of them. If you have

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one guy that's going to give you all the moves,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>then why do you need the other fifteen guys piggyback

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in the sharp ship. Let him give you the stuff,

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>adjust your lines, and then screw everybody else. I'd be

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing, if you know what I mean.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not going to take all the sharp action

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>for what. Yeah, it's different from from you know, my

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>William Hill thing where they don't pay you once the

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>bets are made, they need to pay you. But but

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's different. It's the business model of some of

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>these companies. And it is always funny. After a while

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 1>you're like, you know how they are, Uh play the game,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>because they're not gonna let you play it at all

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>if you don't play the game, basically is what we're saying.

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>And they shouldn't. They shouldn't. That's what they're there for

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to turn a profit. And if you're I know, because

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of card counting, that was the job. It was a

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>cat and mouse game. Can we get in and how

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>many hands can we play before they throw a sound?

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But they're gonna throw a sout because they're supposed to,

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>because I would. That's again, why why the only sponsor

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I have here is Bookmaker? Because they're not like that?

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Right there, one of the few places on earth that's

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not like that. Uh, and those places are are rarer

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and rare. But anyway, we'll get to that later. Let's

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>do Sunday Night k C at Seattle. Unlike the Monday

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>night game, which has no implications whatsoever, this has implications

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>everywhere for both teams. One of four games this weekend

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that has implications for both teams of Old k C

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>loses to the Chargers last Thursday night in dramatic fashion.

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers. Don't get me started. We'll get to him

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in a minute when we talk about the Chargers. But

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs are now eleven and three. They have the

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>tiebreaker over the Chargers in the a f C West,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So if the Chiefs went out, they'll get the number

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>one seed in the a f C playoffs. But by

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday night game, twenty four hours before this, they

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>will know if the Chargers have won their game against

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens if the Chargers have, that will continue to

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>put the pressure on the Chiefs to keep pace in

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the a f C West. Otherwise, with a loss here,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>at a Chargers win, they will fall into wild card position. Obviously,

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>after a long season of just all of us talking

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about the Chiefs NonStop, that will be a shock to

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the system. Chiefs are at Seattle. Chiefs right now, as

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we look across the board, can census in this ballgame

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>are let's call it a two and a half extra

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>juice two and a half point favorite with extra juice

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>consensus at Seattle. The best thing that could have happened

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Chargers or people who are holding Chargers futures

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>tickets like myself, was for Seattle to lose to San

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Francisco last week. That was a big deal because that

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>puts Seattle at eight and six and really doesn't allow

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>them to coast into the postseason. Otherwise this would have

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit different motivation wise for the Seahawks. Instead,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they're eight and six, They're only a half game up

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Vikings in the wild card race. Seattle right

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>now at number one, the Vikings at number two, and

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Eagles right behind them. So This is big.

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Seattle's gotta win this. They gotta ensure themselves a playoff position.

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Seattle plus two and a half at home, tough place

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to play. You always got to check the weather in Seattle,

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly this time of year. Marco, your thoughts here, Yeah,

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you talk about pressure guilt. Two weeks ago, Kansas City's

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the number one seed, rolling law and now they're there.

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>They could be the five seed. They could go from

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>one to five in one game. And as you said,

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this game's all They're gonna know what they need to do.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think if the Chargers win, it's just put

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>so much more pressure on Kansas City. And I'm looking

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Seattle side. And last week the lost, Yeah,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>just throw it out the window because it was a

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>horrible spot for them. They beat Minnesota on Monday Night football,

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>which virtually assured them as a playoff spot. You know,

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it was just as now if they're gonna be the

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>top the wild card or the bottom wild card, they

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>are so tough at home. We know how good Kansas

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>City is at home and how loud it is the

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. I still say k C has the loudest

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>outdoor venue. Seattle is right there. Second, Uh, the twelfth man,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and then you throw in the weather. You never know

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what the weather is gonna be in Seattle and let's

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>face it, Kansas City. The last couple of weeks, offense

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>scores twenty seven points against Baltimore against the Chargers. Granted

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>they finally face some better defenses, but let's also point

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>out the other common denominator. Uh, you've got cream hunt

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not there. There's no coincidence that the offensive production went

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>down as good as Pat Mahomes has been this year.

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>When you have a solid running game, it's gonna make

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've always said it, it it will make a

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>good quarterback you know better, and it's gonna it's gonna

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>make a great quarterback sensational. And that's what we've seen.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes has played at a different level this year.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>But when that running games clicking, it's even tougher because

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 1>it changes defensive schemes against them. I like Seattle in

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this game, but I'm gonna go the safe route, Gil.

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>This is teaser city all over, sir. This is to

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>take it. This is the traditional grab that two to

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>two and a half point dog. Take him through the three, four, six,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and seven and sit back and relax because I don't

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>see Kansas City getting separations. That's where I'm at. Kick

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>your legs up. Watch everybody else do get out a

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>t s on a plink, oh finish while you can

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>kick your legs up. I'm all about that. Seattle for

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>game winning streaks snapped at San Francisco last week. It's

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so true. Do you ever remember a season like this

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>where there were three teams the Chiefs, the Rams and

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. And the Saints are gonna be okay because

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>despite five out of six bad halves, their last six

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 1>halves of football, five out of the the last six have

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>been dreadful offensively, despite that, they're in position to have

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>home field throughout the NFC playoffs. They're gonna be okay.

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>But you ever remember season where you had three teams

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like the Saints, Rams and Chiefs that were heading shoulders

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>above everybody else, and within a span of two weeks

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>where like, um, everything we thought we knew we kind

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>of don't know anything anymore. Um So this will be

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>very interesting and as Marco points out, feast or famine

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in many ways for the Chiefs. Here there's a lot

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of teams like that. The Steelers who we might get to.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>They're also in one of those positions where it's like

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>division win or out completely for the Chiefs, it's number

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.959
<v Speaker 1>one seed or a wild card team that's gonna fight uphill.

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the other common thread between these two

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>teams from last week Chiefs against the Chargers ten penalties

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>sixty six yards. Seahawks and Pete Carroll doesn't get enough

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>criticism for this because they're always being penalized. Fourteen penalties

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Seahawks against the Niners hundred forty eight yards

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in those penalties. ASA didn't mean to get you riled

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>up earlier before, but I think that's a point that

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>just came up that I think needs to be made

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>more often. So I'm glad you took the mantel there. Yes, sir,

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, speak for yourself, because I saw

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this coming somewhere around week five or six, if I

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>remember correctly. I'm not sure where the confusion comes in.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I gotta I got a briefcase full of three dollar

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>bills with a plane ticket to Missouri. That's the only

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>state I'll be cashing those. That team's as tony as

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a three dollar bill. Brother, I've said it before, I'll

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>say it again. They're they're that one possession team that

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to win when they have the win

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in their grass. That's well, I'm not even I told

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you if I could write a team, make money with them,

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and trust them, I'm all good. I don't I don't

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have any bias. I could care less. I'll bet you today,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>fade you tomorrow. My. You know, my only uh loyalty

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is to my pocket when it comes to betting. Um.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But but at the end of the day, I just

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>felt this team was way way over valued. We were

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>getting way ahead of ourselves based on the fact the

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>history of this team, the history of this head coach.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>That when it matters, when it really matters, when you're

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a foot away from grabbing that trophy of this that

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl trophy, that conference championship, that division, you're gonna choke.

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you just look at past history. You know,

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they always say tell me what someone did, I'll tell

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you what they're gonna do. You know, it's pretty much

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.679
<v Speaker 1>one of those human things that it's not even a

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>sport thing. I mean, at the end of the day,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't understand what all this hype was for

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. If they were getting it done on the

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the ball as well, I'd say you

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>might be right. But the fact they had to put

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>up forty points a game to win, to me, tells

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>me this is a you're not gonna be able to

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>sustain that throughout the entire season. I don't care how

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>much the NFL has changed and has become an offensive

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>type league. If you do not have a defense, you're

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>not bringing home that Super Bowl trophy. Find me a

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>team that's done it. I can't remember in the recent

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, UH history that that's done it. But as

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>far as this matchup goes, I'm going to tell you

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the truth. That has nothing to do with the bias

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>at Kansas City. UM. I had San Francisco last week

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>first half end game against UH Seattle. I hope the

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>listeners got down on that. But I think the wrong

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>team is favored. I really do. I think on a

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.479
<v Speaker 1>neutral field, if they were playing in your backyard, Kansas

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>City would not be more than a one one and

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorite over Seattle. The way they both

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>teams have been playing right now, and the fact they're

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>going into Seattle with with a game that's so meaningful,

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.959
<v Speaker 1>and that they're a favorite, to me, makes absolutely no

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>sense at all. That's nothing more than perception. That's nothing

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>more than than the betting market and overreaction. Um. And

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to me, I think you got to take advantage of it.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>There's just so much value on the Seattle Seahawks. If

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you look at Kansas City real quickly, match up wise,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>look over the last three weeks what they've done. They've

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>won two out of three, but they having covered why

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they've averaged allowed about five yards per carry over there

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>um and three straight games. And now you're going up

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>against the Seattle team that has been running the football

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>lights out in six of the last seven games. UM.

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>To me, that's the perfect recipe for for Kansas City.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be seeing old Patrick Johnny Holmes on the

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>sideline waiting to get in because they're gonna be grinding

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>that clock in Seattle. Baby, that much I can promise

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you they're gonna run, run, run that football and get

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the win. Give me Seattle all day. Like I said,

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong team's favored win or lose. I have no doubt,

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>zero none that this is as much lyne value as

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you could possibly get on a primetime game. So I'm

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>all over the Seattle Seahawks. Just push that line up

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the three for me, not like I'm gonna need it

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>because this has money line written all over it. Don't

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 1>even waste your teaser on the Seattle side. Just the

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>two and a half some more than enough, probably got

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown more than you need. We'll still tease it

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>just for the hell of it. How about that more

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>down just to get more action. Yeah? Uh so you

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are we sprinkling there, we're sprinkling in spring. That's the

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>reverse that's the pleaser whatever that Yeah, sprick sprickle s Yeah,

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the reverse teaser, which, by the way, reverse teaser and

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the term pleaser all invented by the great Christie Andrews.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>People don't know that, but that's the case. By the way,

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you can do those at the South Point. You know what,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you get twenty five to one on three team reverse

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>teasers and seventy five to one on four teamers. That's

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 1>some good ship right there. Now they limit you don't

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 1>get me wrong. Then they're not gonna let you do

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>more than like fifty bucks. But still, you know, um,

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Chris Felika hit a four team or the other day

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>last week for thirty seven hundreds. So it was a

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>nice little job right there. So you know, if you're

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in town, that's the place to go for those. So

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>remember the look the head on this game was Seattle

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>minus one, so that that kind of going towards what

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I was saying as far as the long team being

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>favored Seattle all day every day, we're unanimous. So far,

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>let's see what Ed has to say. Ed, what you got? Yeah,

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of thoughts. I mean I agree with a

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>so much about these three teams and and and seeing regression.

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about the Rams, talked about the Chiefs,

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about the Saints, and two of those

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>three teams of terrible defenses, mainly the Chiefs, uh and

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. So not not surprisitive to come back to

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.920
<v Speaker 1>earth and um, but I'm going to disagree with this

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>on this. I've not been excited about Seattle. I know

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>they've had won eight games, but my numbers have them

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>as a blow average NFL team. I thought they were

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a blow average NFL team coming into this year. Uh,

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 1>nothing except for maybe Russell Wilson once in a while. Uh.

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>To just that this is is a good team to me, UM,

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Kansas City by about two and a half

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is is right. I think the total of fifty three

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is about right. But what really fascinates me about this

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City team is the way they play defense. UM

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that you know, I I do my

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>defensive rankings in a couple of different ways. When you

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>look at past defense, UM, look at yards per tempt

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>adjusted for strength of schedule, they're twelve, so that would

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>be pretty good. But when you look at success rate

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>adjusted for opponent there and I think that's the more

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>important number here. And you can kind of see that

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>in the Chargers game. The Charges at eight drives in

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that game against Kansas City, they scored four touchdowns, they

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>threw two picks, and they punted twice. But but what

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Kansas City does is they just don't they

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>know they suck, and they just you know, play off

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the line of scrimmage and and and let you kind

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of do what you want. So the Chargers had a

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of drives in there. Clearly the charges are a

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>great offense, so that's part of that. But yeah, I

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>mean the Chiefs, uh, just I'm very fascinated with their defense.

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, mahomes can't win games for them.

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know, obviously the cream Hunt thing

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is probably affecting this offense. But but I think defensive

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>coordinators are probably starting to figure this guy out a

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit more and you're gonna start to see that

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>more and especially continuing into the playoffs. And I'm just

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>interested to see both how that plays out and as

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>well as just can this defense do anything. I mean,

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>even with Eric Barry back. I came back in that

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Chargers game Damian Williams last week against the Chargers in defeat.

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Ten carries forty nine yards, two touchdowns, six catches for

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>seventy four yards, again in defeat. And yes, Chiefs fans

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and Chiefs backers, when hearing Ace will be quick to say,

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and rightfully, so, boy, that Kareem Hunt thing really fell

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>into your lab, didn't it. Ace. They'll say that. And

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that there's still eleven and three, let's point

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>that out. It's not like they've fallen off a cliff.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>For god's sakes, Let's talk about Saturday's games because there

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are two games now I said earlier, there four games

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>that involve two teams that have to deal with playoff implications.

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It's actually five. I just didn't count the Redskins Titans

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as one of those games because the Redskins. Even though

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins are only a half game out of a

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>playoff spot, I would argue that there has never been

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a team that is only a half game out of

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a playoff spot with just two weeks remaining in a

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>season that has as feutal a chance as the Washington

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Redskins do. Because this just it's their fourth quarterback. For

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>god's sakes, Josh Johnson, I don't know how they beat

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars, yet somehow they did on a tipped ball,

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>largely in part because of a tip ball to Jamison Crowder.

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Josh Johnson, this is a true story. I am not

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>trying to be funny. Last week he actually played Madden

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>NFL nineteen to learn all of his new teammates names.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 1>That's just the truth that that actually happened. So first

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>victory of his career. But when you when you hold

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the opposition to less than a yard per path attempt, yeah,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you get yourself a chance to win the game. Cody Kessler,

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>For God's sakes, right, Cody Kesler, who uh ended up

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>with what was it total US nine completions. Yeah, when

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you factor in the sacks, it comes out to twenty

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>net passing yards. So uh, it's not gonna be Cody

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Kesler in the Jaguars. Is Marcus Mariota as uh Mike

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Jorico likes to pronounce that. They correct Hawaiian pronunciation Mariota,

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>who uh only through for eighty eight yards in victory

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>for the Titans in the rain against the Giants. Tennessee

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>blanked the Giants last week in the driving rain storm.

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't need to when Derrick Henry is going crazy

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>two hundred forty eight yards the week before, a hundred

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy on a career high thirty three carries against the Giants. Actually,

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>those four hundred and eight combined yards, what did I

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>say to forty eight? That means he rush for two

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight the previous game? Sorry about that, but four

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>oh eight over the last two games the best in

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the Titans era Earl Campbell. The Tyler Rose did run

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>for more than that over a two game stretch with

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Oilers. But you get the idea. Tennessee is

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>favored by ten in this game against the Redskins that's

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one game on atur Day. Let's call it ten and

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a half now in some locations, then super good game.

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore at the Chargers. Baltimore is eight and six. Like

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the Titans, Baltimore, Tennessee, and Indianapolis are all tied at

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>eight and six for the number two wild card position.

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is also just a half game behind the Pittsburgh Steelers,

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>as Marco knows very well in the a f C North,

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>so this is huge for them with Lamar Jackson under center.

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson's four and one thus far with the Ravens,

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and we'll never see Joe Flacco ever again in a

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Ravens uniform barring injury. And then there's the Chargers, who

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about all week on a numbers game

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 1>at Visa, UH, since that performance on Thursday, even before

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>when I was accumulating Chargers futures and I was telling

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody that I was. Philip Rivers is having one of

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the most spectacular careers you'll ever see when all his

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>contemporaries are going down by the wayside. Eli is Eli,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Drew Brees is having some some rough stars here late.

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben is making mistakes like he's never made before.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady is not the Tom Brady of old. All

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of these guys are suspect. And here's Philip Rivers having

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the best damn season of his career and he's just

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>not appreciated. He's going to the Hall of Fame. People

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>should stop with this debate and forgive me for those

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>who listen to the Visa show with me repeating myself.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But he's never had any offensive lineman of any repute.

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>He never gets hurt. He, unlike the Saints, the Rams

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and the Chiefs, never has receivers running wide open in

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the field. He's a pinpoint passers shot putting them the ball.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>He rarely uses play action, which I don't understand, which

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>would make those receivers that much more open. And yet

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>here he is and the Chargers with the best record

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in the a f C, gonna try to keep pressure

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Chiefs as we talked about earlier, for the

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.719
<v Speaker 1>number one seed, otherwise they will be the number one

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>wild card Chargers by four and a half. Ace. We

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>start with you on this one. Is there a game

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>here of the two that you like better than the other? Yeah,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to share info with our listeners. Washington, Tennessee, personally haven't

0:31:58.000 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>touched it a group. I provide accounts for it. They

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>took Washington plus ten and a half. Um, I always

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>take a percentage of the the account, so obviously I have

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>something writing on that sign. But I I piggyback the

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>ones that I like a lot and release them. You

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>know that the to my guys, um, and I haven't

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>with that Washington one at all. I just not confident

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in it. But personally at the side I like in

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>those matchups. I like, uh, the Chargers. I do in

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that matchup, but I think the line should be a

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit higher than it was. Um. You know, you

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>see this Baltimore team. I know Charges are coming off

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a big win, but I don't think this is a

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>leftdown spot for them. I mean they got Denver on deck, granted,

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but this is a team that that's been focused. Other

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>than that one point loss against Denver. I mean, they've

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>just been playing really good football, even when they turned

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball over their winning games. That's what's most impressive.

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I Mean they were minus two and turnovers that Kansas

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>City and won that game. You know when you can

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do that, uh, you're you're playing really well. I like

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, right now ride that momentum, something I don't

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>usually do. When a team looks that good, they're usually

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be over bound. You. I don't see it here.

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I really don't keeping it out at that price of four.

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I thought the line should be

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>closer to six. But I like the Chargers. Yeah, it's

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>actually more four than four and a half. I think

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers going to the Super Bowl. I really do.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Most balanced team in the a f C to me,

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Although if you talk to any Chargers fan, they will

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sit there and they will say to you, if the

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Chargers lose this, this would be the most Chargers thing ever,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So you never know. By the way the Charges. I

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>feel for old San Diego Chargers fans because they were

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>such a loyal fan base to this franchise and it

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 1>must be so conflicting for them now to see this

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>team that left San Diego to play at StubHub and

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>see their success now and wonder, really, after all these years,

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is this one you're really gonna put it together? So

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be tough for them. Ed any take on

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>any of these two games here Saturday? Yeah, I mean

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, I mean, I'm fascinated with the Chargers.

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I I do think they are should be a super

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>well favorite coming out of a f C basically because

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of balance on both sides of the ball. My numbers

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like both uh, the offense and the defense. UM. And

0:34:07.400 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>then you know, the this Tennessee Washington game kind of

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 1>cracks me up. We'll talk about this later, but you

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>look at these teams that are not very good but

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>favored by more than a touchdown at home to Tennessee, Dallas, Indy,

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>and Cleveland. Like, none of those teams kind of past

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the smell test for you know, being any kind of

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl contender. Yet they're big favorites. And I mean

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you can clearly see why for the Tennessee in Cleveland

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the opposing starting quarterbacks are out. Washington's

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>on their their fourth quarterback. UM. But yeah, that that

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>really fascinates me about this week in particular. Yeah, Redskins

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>on their fourth quarterback, on their makeshift offensive line with

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>skill players that have been mostly out of the lineup

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. Just a decimated offense, Marco either one of these.

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for me, the Tennessee lines too. You know, I

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>can't lay ten points with a team that struggles to

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 1>score your pay in a premium you want to take

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>them because of the must win. The intriguing game, obviously

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is Baltimore and the Charges. And I think what you're

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna get here is you're gonna get a mix from

0:35:10.680 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the betters, the guys that crunch the numbers and are

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>strictly numbers guys. They're gonna be on Baltimore because you

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>get a defense like Baltimore's getting points, they're always gonna

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>line up there. But for me watching these games, and

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this is where you gotta just you know, sometimes you

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 1>gotta set numbers aside and look and see what you're

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>seeing and understand what you're seeing. Lamar Jackson has more

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts a hundred and fourteen I believe it is

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to seventy three pass completions. That's not a formula that

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you can continue to keep getting away with. And you

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the teams that they've played during this streak.

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>He's been the starter for five games, their four and

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>one straight up with him at the helm. But they

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>beat Incinnati, who's decimated with injuries, Oakland pitiful defense, Atlanta

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>who this is a totally lost season. Kansas City doesn't

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>have a good defense, and then last week Tampa Bay

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst defenses in the league. We fought

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Kansas City game that if Baltimore fell behind

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>by two scores because of that Kansas City offense, what

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would Lamar Jackson do if he had to use his arms. Well,

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they never fell behind by two scores because their defense

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and Casey was so bad that Baltimore was able to

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>keep moving to football. Will they have that success against

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers. The Chargers have a decent defense. It's not great,

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's the best defense that Lamar Jackson will have faced.

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And they've got a very capable offense that is playing

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>well right now. I just think that this game gets

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to ten, a ten point lead for for the Chargers,

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and then Baltimore has got to push the envelope and

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>then we might see the turnovers by Lamar Jackson. I

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I leaned to the Chargers, but but it's a tough

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.759
<v Speaker 1>one because you look at the numbers, and I'm old

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>school and I believe in that you give me the

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>better defense getting points, I'm usually there of the time. Hey, Marko,

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I just gotta jump in real quick in as a

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers guy, I mean my numbers say he charges by

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>about three and a half, so not a ton of

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>value at four at all. Um, So, I mean maybe

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>lean Baltimore, but that's that's what my numbers that are

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>available to members of my side say. Lamar Jackson last

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>last week against the Bucks fourteen excuse me, fourteen and

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty three for one thirty one one touchdown, nose sacks,

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 1>sack two times, eighteen carries ninety five yards, averaging five

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>point three yards per rush. I'm with you, Marco on

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on everything you say about Lamar Jackson. I'm not buying

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it yet, that's for sure. Baltimore has hitched its wagon

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to him, though four point favorites are four point dogs

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>rather four and a half point dogs in some spots

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at the Chargers Saturday evening. All right, Sunday games, like,

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I have so much gold for this

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 1>is the hardest part of my job, narrowing it down

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>for winners, free for you guys. So yeah, here's what

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you something I already bet, um already

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>fired on. Uh actually bet the side and the total

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on this game, and that's Cleveland and Cincinnati. I can't

0:38:21.480 --> 0:38:23.439
<v Speaker 1>give you Cleveland because I gave it to my guys

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that mine is seven. It's now up the close to tents,

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>so no value there, but we could still get some

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>money on that on their guys because this game, I've

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>been given a total I don't think all season, maybe one,

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and I said, I gotta wait for one where I

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think five quarters could get the game over the total,

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is that game. Um. Cleveland's defense

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.439
<v Speaker 1>has really stepped up, man. Other than those twenty nine

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 1>points to Houston, over the last five weeks, they've been

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely phenomenal. And those twenty nine points they gave up

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to Houston, they gave four had four turnovers in that game. Um,

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's hard to keep a team out of the

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>end zone when you turn the ball over four time.

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give him a pass there. Then on the

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.360
<v Speaker 1>flip side, granted, Cincinnati put up thirty points, but that

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>was against Oakland last week. Again, beneficiaries up some turnovers,

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>were able to run the football for almost two hundred yards, um,

0:39:12.760 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>something they're not gonna do against the Cleveland Browns. And offensively,

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at Cincinnati over the last six weeks. So

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Oakland out the wind though they haven't been able to

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 1>put up more than twenty one any of those weeks.

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see this team crack in twenty UM, keep

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>them in those low teams. I think Cleveland gets into

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the twenties. This one barely cracks forty. Give me to

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>under forty four and a half. Uh, I feel better

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>forty five. It's one of those, you know, not maybe

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it goes back up, you get the forty five. I

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>bet it on their forty six and a half, forty six,

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half and on their forty five. UM,

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where I stopped. But I'd still forty four and

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>a half. No reason that to stop there. This game

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 1>don't crack the forties, all right, Cincinnati Cleveland under forty

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>four and a half? Right now? As we do this

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday morning, A saying even if it were five

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>quarters ed, what do you like on Sunday? Yeah, I

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>mean the game I'm looking at is uh Tampa Bay

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at Dallas. We already talked about these four teams that

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 1>are not very good and yet more than touchdown favorite

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>UM and Dallas doesn't. It doesn't impress me on either

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball when you look at their numbers.

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:28.160
<v Speaker 1>There my past offense ranking on defense, just just nothing

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 1>strikes out stands out about this team. And if you

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:32.439
<v Speaker 1>look at Tampa Bay, you know that we've talked about

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.799
<v Speaker 1>how their defenses is terrible, but but they've been able

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to chuck the ball around this year. I mean, I

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 1>know Jameis Winson got benched, but um, they throw the

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>ball around. And they are third in my past offensive breaking.

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's taking yards per past attempting and adjusting for

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule. My numbers, um would make uh. My

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 1>numbers would make Dallas at three and a half point favorite.

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So I would take the points with Tampa Bay in

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that game. Taking the Boys with Tampa Bay, that's a

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of points. Cowboys clinched the NFC East

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with the wind Tampa Bay always live. I will say

0:41:05.600 --> 0:41:07.719
<v Speaker 1>this the home road splits. I've been talking about them

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>all year long in the NFL. No season with bigger

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>chasms and home road splits than this one. Dallas the

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>quintessential home road team, just crushing it at home, uh

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and not getting it done on the road. Tampa Bay

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>also has some severe home road splits as well. Dallas

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>six and one straight up at home two and five

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>on the road. Uh, Tampa Bay four and three at home,

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>one in six straight up all the road. Obviously points

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>spread involved here. That is a lot of points for

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay Buccaneers to get though, that's for sure. Marco.

0:41:40.920 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking at on Sunday? Gil, Just a

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:47.320
<v Speaker 1>quick note for you. Just in Washington, Redskins, No, Jordan

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Read officially out for Saturday. Yeah, another blow to your team.

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Read, who had for much of the season being

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the only one that remained healthy on that offense, which

0:41:57.239 --> 0:41:59.360
<v Speaker 1>is funny because he was always the guy that was brittle,

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't quite make it through the whole season. So it

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't he wasn't even the backup quarterback in one of

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>those games. No, that was a Quinn. That was a

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver trade Quinn. Yeah, all right, thanks for that, Marco,

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. I'm sorry it came across my sad

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 1>was breaking news. I'm sorry. Uh you the one I'm

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:26.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna go to. And I love how people just they

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 1>jump on the bandwagon so fast, they jump off it

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 1>so fast. I don't know how people don't break legs

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>jumping on and off the way they do. I think

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I know where you're going. I think I know where

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going. I'm going Houston, Philadelphia. That's exactly where I

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 1>thought you were going. I've made this point all week. Yeah,

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia team, Okay, the Dallas game. Everybody wanted Philadelphia.

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 1>This was the fashionable play because after they had two

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 1>wins against I'm sorry, the New York Giants in the

0:42:55.400 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington Redskins no offense skill. But the Washington game, you

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>remember that game, That was the game with Sanchez, you know,

0:43:03.920 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>had to come in and everything. Forget those two wins,

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and then the Dallas game final and overtime was the

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 1>most counterfeit final score you will ever see. They went

0:43:16.920 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>up and down the field on Philadelphia. Now, there was

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 1>a couple of controversial calls that maybe he could have

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>changed things, but the fact was Dallas had their way

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>with this Philadelphia defense. I don't know what happened last

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>week with the Rams. I can tell you when I

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.879
<v Speaker 1>was watching the game as it started and saw all

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>week the way the line just kept going up and

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>up and up. It reminds me. And I don't remember

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>if it was last year or two years ago, but

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>do you remember the Sunday night football game that had

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants going to Denver, and the Giants

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>had all of those injuries, and that line just kept

0:43:55.000 --> 0:43:58.919
<v Speaker 1>rolling go ever nobody wanted them. What happened not only

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 1>did the Giants come or they pulled the upset. And

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I think the Rams was a combination of losing the

0:44:06.840 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Bear game twice because it was such a big game

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and they got there, they got a punch in the

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gut and a real dose of reality that they're not

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.919
<v Speaker 1>what they think they are because the Bears really intimidated them,

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 1>made them look bad. Jared Goff was horrible, four turn interceptions,

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think there was a carryover effect coming into

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the Philly game. And then WinCE is out. Oh, we

0:44:30.440 --> 0:44:32.919
<v Speaker 1>just gotta show up here and we're gonna win this game.

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember how bad Philly was at the beginning

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of the year with falls, Well, he had his good

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:40.839
<v Speaker 1>game the injured player theory. Now it's the second week

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they got to cover. I don't see him doing it again.

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:48.319
<v Speaker 1>This Houston team has done nothing wrong all season. Uh,

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.919
<v Speaker 1>since they lost the first three, they rolled off nine

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in a row and then they lose to one of

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the hottest teams in the league. That nobody wants to

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>play right now. That might not make the playoffs in

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the end. Annapolis Colts Um, they had a snooze fest

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday night against the Jets, so they get an

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>extra day's rest. That was basically just a scrimmage. Philadelphia

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>played on the West Coast on Sunday night. Travel back

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:16.160
<v Speaker 1>home with the East coast. You've got that advantage. They

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>had a late night, so lose if you want to

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 1>say half a day. Houston's got into dang. I love Houston.

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking them as the best bet. And you know what,

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>remember that teaser I said on were Seattle. Well, the

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:31.879
<v Speaker 1>other end of it's gonna be Houston right now while

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you're still getting points. I think by the time we

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>get the game time, it's not gonna be there. Do

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it now, guys, Seattle Houston in a teaser book. It

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like he says, free money. They're printing it. Just go

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.879
<v Speaker 1>pick it up. We're thinking along the same lines, Marco.

0:45:45.960 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing these teasers. I don't know if that's

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>good or bad. Gill, I think that's very good for you,

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.480
<v Speaker 1>young man. I think that's very good. I think you

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>know you asked. That's my answer. Um, I'm with you,

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>though I'm guessing lines on Monday, I thought Houston would

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be favorite in this game. I thought Houston would be

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 1>favorite in this game, only to find out that the

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>effects of recency are as real as ever. Uh, and

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Philly is the favorite now this does appear. So it

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>opened at Houston, I guess in some spot open at

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Houston minus one and a half, though I never saw

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>where that was, And then quickly it became a Philadelphia.

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>It was a pick them before you knew it in

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia was favored by as much as two and a half.

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 1>It has come down a little bit, it's like one

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and a half now consensus. It's even come down a

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>little today, So you wonder what's gonna happen between now

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and game time. But I'm very with you on the

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 1>overall sentiment that, uh, this is a line that surprises

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>me in in many ways minus wanted to have. Total

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>in this game is at forty six. All right, gentlemen.

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to the final two questions of the show,

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>a reminder as always that support for today's show as

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 1>always brought to you by Bookmaker dot eu. Uh. It's

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:54.759
<v Speaker 1>an industry leader. Bookmaker is for close to thirty years now.

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Pro players consider them a must because their first to

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>post odds take the highest limits and ride themselves on

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>never having kicked out a winning player. Based on the

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>discussion that I had with Ace earlier on this show, UH,

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that should resonate with you. Bookmaker is one of the

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>few places on earth that can say that, and it's

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the real deal, highest limits, never kick out anybody first

0:47:15.800 --> 0:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to post dots. Chances are that your book uh follows

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 1>their lines bookmakers model where the lines originate. It is

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>as true as ever, and Bookmaker a high volume sports

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>book best suited as always for the sophisticated player who

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.840
<v Speaker 1>understands sports betting, also caters to large recreational players. And

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if you visit Bookmaker dot eu slash gil that's Bookmaker

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>dot U S last g I l L. Visit it

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 1>today you can join and claim and exclusive welcome bonus

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of up to three hundred dollars. Plenty of time left

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:47.279
<v Speaker 1>before the playoffs to do that. It's Bookmaker dot eu

0:47:47.400 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>slash g I l L. To join and claim you're

0:47:50.239 --> 0:47:52.520
<v Speaker 1>welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars. You can

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it during bowl season as well. All the favorites

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>except for Georgia Southern. I guess they didn't close as

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a favorite. But so far in bowl season, every single

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite has come home. What a strange beginning to the

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 1>college football bull season. We'll see if that continues through

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the weekend before there's a mini break before bull season

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>really gets serious next week. All right, gentlemen, Then the

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>final two questions are as follows. As always, which of

0:48:14.840 --> 0:48:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the big favorites is the most likely to lose? Outright? Boy,

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>do we have a slew of them. In fact, we

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>have three games that are double digits. Well, actually, in

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>some places it's really five. There are five different games

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 1>where you're looking at double digits. Let's start with the

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 1>game we already talked about Tennessee on Saturday. Ten point

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 1>favorites at home against the Washington Redskins. New England thirteen

0:48:37.840 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorites at home against the Buffalo Bills. Obviously,

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the breaking news this morning, sad news, Josh Gordon taking

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 1>another leave, not expected to play again this season. Some

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>reports say it has to do with uh violating the

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>rules that were in place for him to join the Patriots. Uh,

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>your brain goes to certain things that have affected Josh

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and your brain also goes to, will

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we ever see Josh Gordon play football again in the

0:49:04.480 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>National Football League? Gordon who led the Patriots and yards

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:10.399
<v Speaker 1>receiving and yards per catch this year eighteen yards per

0:49:10.440 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>catch for Josh Gordon, Patriots favorite by thirteen and a

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 1>half in that game. Uh. Then there's the Colts nine

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 1>point favorites consensus right now hosting the Giants as the

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Colts try to shut out a second NFC East team

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 1>in as many weeks. Uh, Cleveland, we talked about them

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.280
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half point favorites somewhere in that pocket

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>hosting the Cincinnati Bengals, Arizona fourteen point dogs, the Rams

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen point favorites on the road at Arizona. Uh. Those

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are the big ones. Those are all the big ones,

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>either on the cusp of ten points are greater or

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in double digits comfortably, Which of those big favorites, ed

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely to lose out right? In your opinion?

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna I was gonna talk about Tampa Bay again,

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but I guess we're going with ten plus. I'll go

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 1>with the newer Giants here. Um, And I think this

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is you know, less about the Giants and more about

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.719
<v Speaker 1>my questions with the Colts and the to their defense, Um,

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 1>their last when I look at success rated justin first

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule, Uh, they're not doing much better on

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the past defense by adjusted yards per attempt one So

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, it's it's just a team that I'm

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:18.879
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not impressed with so far. I know they've

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>done on some decent side, decent things on the offense

0:50:21.400 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball with with Andrew luck and and

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack running the ball. But I'll take the New

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>York Giants. Okay, So the so the Colts most likely

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 1>of that group to lose out right, if given your

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:35.120
<v Speaker 1>druthers I love the word druthers, you would have taken

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Dallas as a seven point favorite hosting the Tampa Bay

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers seven seven and a half. Somewhere in that pocket

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Marco biggest favorite, most likely lose out right in your opinion, Yeah,

0:50:44.960 --> 0:50:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you didn't put the You didn't put any of the

0:50:46.560 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 1>six pointers in this week. No, I didn't because I

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't need to. But if I did, also you get

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 1>two tiers. Just like Ed just said, double digit tier

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:58.000
<v Speaker 1>would be the Colts. Then if you default, he went

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to Dallas, so you can get the same kind of answer. Yeah,

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>if I did this, um boy, I'll tell you what. Uh,

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be ball z. But I'm gonna look

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 1>at New England right now. This is you know, with

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the Josh Gordon and you know stuff. This team is

0:51:14.440 --> 0:51:18.359
<v Speaker 1>just I mean, they're You've got Buffalo. You're gonna see

0:51:18.440 --> 0:51:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen running all over the place. This guy has

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 1>been amazing the last several weeks. You know, down the

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>stretch in New England to me, looked like a tired

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>team last week, and this is team has played a

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of road games. You look at their schedule of

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 1>what they've done and the way this NFL put their

0:51:36.040 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>schedule up this week. I talked about it. It It was

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why, you know, one of the

0:51:40.040 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>many reasons that I had Pittsburgh last week. But uh,

0:51:44.120 --> 0:51:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I just they're not the same team, and that that's

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ball z. If you're making me go to

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the double digits because I don't want to go against Indianapolis.

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>They're just playing too good. Do I want to lay

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the points with them? No? But the one I was

0:51:56.400 --> 0:51:58.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw in if we go to the lower tier

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>minute soda. Laying six at Detroit as bad as Detroit is,

0:52:04.960 --> 0:52:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota is just they beat up on the teams that

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they can in. This line is absolutely ridiculous. Now, I

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 1>know Detroit's bad, but do you realize that when they

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:20.400
<v Speaker 1>played at Minnesota, the closing number was five and a half.

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:25.320
<v Speaker 1>They're playing six on the road. You're you're gonna tell me?

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I know, you know, Golden Tate's gone, there's you know,

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Stafford's banged up. But I'm gonna go with the

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:36.239
<v Speaker 1>misery loves Company, uh attitude here. The season's over for

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Detroit and it's been for a long time. But this

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is a division rival that you could put You know,

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you can play the role of spoiler. If you're not

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 1>going to the playoffs, why not try to prevent somebody

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:51.439
<v Speaker 1>else you know that needs this win bad. I got

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Detroit if we're gonna go, if we include the six.

0:52:54.880 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Agree with what you're saying there. This would be so

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:01.600
<v Speaker 1>like Detroit to show up for this game. And I

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 1>just don't know about Minnesota. I know everybody's excited because

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they went to the run last week. Uh. Some advanced

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>analytics guys like Laren Sharper will tell you that's exactly

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the wrong thing for the Vikings to do on a

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:16.399
<v Speaker 1>long term basis. Um, yeah that Edward, agree right there?

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.840
<v Speaker 1>All right? UM A same question. Two tiers of the

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>double digit ones are the ones that are flirting with

0:53:21.920 --> 0:53:24.360
<v Speaker 1>double digness and then knock it down to uh the

0:53:24.400 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 1>next year, who would be the most likely to lose

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>out right? In your opinion? Agree with Marco. As far

0:53:30.120 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>as the Minnesota Detroit, I made my line four. The

0:53:33.200 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 1>look ahead was three at open four and a half.

0:53:35.640 --> 0:53:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Now it's up to six. Um, that's way too high.

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I like Detroit, plus the point saying if I like

0:53:40.440 --> 0:53:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a dog, especially at home, I'm gonna sprinkle money line.

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So that has it. Um. But as far as value goes,

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 1>like last week's Eagles, UM, I needed a little more.

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted four to one, and I'd be on those

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Giants too. If it gets the four to one, that

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:56.279
<v Speaker 1>that's that's gonna be a bet for me, Like the

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Eagles at five to one. UM. Right now it's at

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:02.279
<v Speaker 1>like three seven d the highest I could find, UM

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>one a little bit more. Hopefully it gets there. I

0:54:05.840 --> 0:54:08.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're the Colts are a beatable Man. And more importantly,

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I love the how both these teams are coming off

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the opposite spectrum. You have the Giants

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>coming off being shut out, Colts coming off having shut

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:21.919
<v Speaker 1>out Dallas. Um, I mean, it sets up nicely for

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:23.799
<v Speaker 1>for the Giants to bounce back and get a win.

0:54:23.880 --> 0:54:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And prior to that game, let's not forget they had

0:54:26.200 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>one four out of the five their last five games,

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and more importantly, they were dogs and three of those

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:34.279
<v Speaker 1>five and the one they did lose was by a

0:54:34.320 --> 0:54:37.719
<v Speaker 1>field goal UM on the road to Philadelphia. And if

0:54:37.800 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you look at the splits, UM, I mean, Giants got

0:54:40.320 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>more wins on I mean a better record three and

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:46.359
<v Speaker 1>four on the road compared to two and five UM

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:49.319
<v Speaker 1>at home. So give me the Giants also, but let's

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>try to get four to one on our money, then

0:54:51.080 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that would definitely be worth the bet. A testament to

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:55.719
<v Speaker 1>what this week in the NFL is like the fact

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that we had a two tier answer to that question.

0:54:58.520 --> 0:55:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Rare that that happens, But lots of games with large

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>spreads of six points or more, many of which were

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:08.239
<v Speaker 1>double digits or flirting with that final question, you had

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to bet aside in each of these Bizarro exercise sixteen

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>games in the NFL you must bet aside and fifteen

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of them. Which is the game you want to pass on? Ed? Yeah,

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm passing on Atlanta at Carolina. Carolina has shut down

0:55:22.200 --> 0:55:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton for the year. I read it was shoulder fatigue. Yes,

0:55:27.520 --> 0:55:30.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems a little strange to me. Um, they're gonna

0:55:30.160 --> 0:55:37.239
<v Speaker 1>throw out Taylor. Yeah, Taylor Hideki Yeah from Dominion, undrafted

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with five career pass attempts. And uh, I do numbers,

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:43.720
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know how to do numbers on Taylor

0:55:43.760 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Heineke and and uh and you have all kinds of

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy things. On the other side of the ball. Atlanta

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:51.040
<v Speaker 1>has had a crazy season with injuries on the defensive

0:55:51.040 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. I'm looking at Desmond Trufon is questionable,

0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones. I just don't know what to do with

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that game. Yeah, I hear you. And on the shutdown

0:55:59.640 --> 0:56:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of Cam Newton, that spread shifts from Atlanta being a

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>three and a half point dog to Carolina being a

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>three and a half point dog. Some might quibble with

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the seven point move from Cam to Taylor. Heinarchy, uh, Marco,

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the game you want no part of. Yeah,

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the shutting down of Cam Newton. If you just looked

0:56:18.440 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at the last drive Monday night, the throws he was made. Dude,

0:56:23.440 --> 0:56:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it was sad. How did they lose that game? He

0:56:27.120 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>lost single handedly lost that game for him that I

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 1>felt so bad for that defense. I live bet that

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>last drive. Marco. It's funny you say that because I

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:35.880
<v Speaker 1>said to my buddy was sitting right next to me.

0:56:35.920 --> 0:56:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I go, I'm jumping in because there is zero chance

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:42.239
<v Speaker 1>that Cam Newton is going to be able to matriculate

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 1>this ball down the field, even into field goal range.

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Heavily bet against that happening. Anyway, Go ahead. I'm sorry,

0:56:48.160 --> 0:56:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna the game I don't want any part of.

0:56:50.040 --> 0:56:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Is the Rams in Arizona. You're laying fourteen points with him.

0:56:54.400 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 1>The Rams, you know they need to win if they

0:56:57.320 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 1>want to still try to get that home old advantage,

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:05.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, still away from the Saints. But what made

0:57:05.320 --> 0:57:08.480
<v Speaker 1>they look ahead line was eleven and a half. Okay,

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>they lost last week? How did this line go up?

0:57:12.840 --> 0:57:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Arizona did what we thought they would do. They'd lose

0:57:15.239 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on the road, but the Rams lost at home, and

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the look ahead line goes from eleven and a half

0:57:20.280 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to fourteen. Do I want to take the Rams? No?

0:57:23.280 --> 0:57:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Do I trust the Arizona? Hell no, I don't want

0:57:26.200 --> 0:57:29.360
<v Speaker 1>any part of this game. And the Rams need they

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:32.480
<v Speaker 1>need a confidence building win. So I think, you know,

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those ones where they could, if

0:57:34.480 --> 0:57:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they get a chance, just keep the you know, foot

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on the gas. But I really think the injury the

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Cup is hurt this Rams offense more than anybody that

0:57:44.240 --> 0:57:48.760
<v Speaker 1>was Um goff security blanket in my opinion. Uh, when

0:57:48.800 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 1>he needed to go to somebody on third down, he

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:53.200
<v Speaker 1>was the guy he went to. They're missing him in

0:57:53.200 --> 0:57:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this lineup. I was joking with Michael Lombardi several times

0:57:55.840 --> 0:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>on my show. I'm like, is Cooper Cup the m

0:57:57.840 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 1>v P of the National Football League? That I saw

0:58:00.240 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 1>him tweeting it the other day and I was like, Hey,

0:58:02.200 --> 0:58:04.920
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, you're stealing my thoughts. Um, But it

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:07.479
<v Speaker 1>really is. It's like, it's ridiculous how far they've fallen.

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Warren Sharp will tell you it's all about their going

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:12.960
<v Speaker 1>away from play action passes. Uh. Sean McVeigh, I was

0:58:13.000 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>at Sean McVeigh Truther. But there's a lot that's happened

0:58:15.880 --> 0:58:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the last few weeks where I like shake my head.

0:58:17.680 --> 0:58:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you, forget about Todd Gurley. You're not play

0:58:20.560 --> 0:58:23.960
<v Speaker 1>action passing. These guys aren't getting out of bounds when

0:58:24.000 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to. Like at some point, that's coaching, right,

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, even even Sean McVeigh is not impervious

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to criticism a same thing. Which game you want? No

0:58:32.040 --> 0:58:36.600
<v Speaker 1>part of this? This was tough. I'm honest. Pretty much

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:39.760
<v Speaker 1>all these games are bettable Denver Oakland most likely, you know,

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:41.959
<v Speaker 1>the Monday night game just the way when I haven't

0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:43.960
<v Speaker 1>bet yet, except, like I said, trying to set up

0:58:43.960 --> 0:58:46.200
<v Speaker 1>possibly a middle um. But that's the one that I

0:58:46.200 --> 0:58:48.320
<v Speaker 1>ain't really have any opinion on to do that like

0:58:48.360 --> 0:58:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I did. Okay uh? And I would say, Marco, to

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:54.480
<v Speaker 1>your rhetorical question, what happened this past week that made

0:58:54.480 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that line go to fourteen? I think people who were like, oh,

0:58:57.720 --> 0:58:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen is terrible at football were like, oh my god,

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:02.320
<v Speaker 1>he's even more terrible than we thought that would be.

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:07.200
<v Speaker 1>It would be my guess what would Tom Brady do

0:59:07.280 --> 0:59:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in that system? Though? Right? Is it all Rosen's fault

0:59:10.800 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 1>or no? Of course not. And I do agree with

0:59:12.960 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the sentiment because I I am famous for having said,

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:19.160
<v Speaker 1>if Peyton Manning were drafted by the Washington Redskins, Peyton

0:59:19.160 --> 0:59:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Manning would never have become Peyton Manning. I really believe that.

0:59:22.400 --> 0:59:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no sport like football in that regard.

0:59:26.160 --> 0:59:29.800
<v Speaker 1>It really is so dependent on where you end up

0:59:30.200 --> 0:59:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and is an organization stable, is their continuity from year

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to year. If Peyton Manning had a different o C

0:59:35.960 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>every single season in d C, I mean, he wouldn't

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have sucked, but he would never have become the Hall

0:59:40.480 --> 0:59:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of Famer. And there's no way to prove that. But

0:59:42.480 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I firmly believe that anyway, we've done all we could do. Gentlemen,

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for Week sixteen in the NFL, here's the deal. Once again,

0:59:48.600 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we're not here for weeks seventeen. We've tried it before,

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:53.760
<v Speaker 1>hadn't gone well. One day, I was like, Hey, let's

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:55.680
<v Speaker 1>try a Week seventeen, and so we did it one

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:59.200
<v Speaker 1>year and it was not fun because there's too much scoreliness.

0:59:59.440 --> 1:00:03.200
<v Speaker 1>And they've also taken away the uh, the many correlated

1:00:03.280 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>parlay opportunities. They've reduced those by making a lot of

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the game's concurrent The final week of the season, So everybody,

1:00:10.400 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>just enjoy your Christmas holiday. The weekend between Christmas and

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>New Year's will be back for Wild Car weekends. So

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>happy holidays, Merry Christmas, Happy New Year to everybody. Marco,

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Ace and all of you and everybody who listens to

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>this show so loyally, not just this year, but through

1:00:26.760 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the years. We cannot express our appreciation enough. And I

1:00:30.240 --> 1:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>know I speak for Marco and as on that as well. Indeed,

1:00:32.840 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>happy holidays to everyone. Man, have a safe holiday season

1:00:36.560 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy yourself and your families. Man, be'st of luck ahead, health, prosperity,

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>all that good stuff. And appreciate you guys listening to

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>us each week. Merry Christmas, everybody we do, we appreciate it.

1:00:47.160 --> 1:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And guys getting close, it's gonna be about a month away.

1:00:50.400 --> 1:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You know what we'll be doing the lifestyle. Oh yes, boy,

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>do I have a topic we need to touch on?

1:00:56.760 --> 1:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh what do you care to Oh my god, it's

1:01:00.480 --> 1:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just there's that there's an insanity bruin on Twitter that

1:01:03.280 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we have to touch on. Oh wait, this companion nonsense

1:01:07.000 --> 1:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is really starting to rub me the wrong way. I

1:01:10.560 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what he's talking about. Oh, God, this

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is good. All right. That's the weekend between conference championship

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and Super Bowl as well. And for those who have

1:01:19.720 --> 1:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>never heard that show before, let me just warn you

1:01:21.680 --> 1:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in advance. Uh it is. It is a travesty. It

1:01:26.320 --> 1:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is a deplorable endeavor that we undertake every year. So

1:01:29.800 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll bring in meltzer. We'll do that one Eda from

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the Power Rank. Second appearance this year. Ed appreciate it, man,

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>always appreciate the insight. Hey man, thank you so much

1:01:37.560 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. And uh you know, here's the

1:01:39.560 --> 1:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple not kicking you guys off their podcast for the

1:01:42.120 --> 1:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>for the lifestyle episode. Thank you appreciate that. And by

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you have money in the stock market,

1:01:47.360 --> 1:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>go to your portfolios quickly. That's all I have to say.

1:01:50.120 --> 1:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, thanks everybody for listening. Good luck with all

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>your bets this weekend. Happy holidays. We'll see a week

1:01:55.080 --> 1:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>after days. Battle Botta ba Babble went Battle Bo