WEBVTT -  Week 8 Recap, Winners, Losers, EHHH 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find Sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:36.320 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Do do didnit? Yeah? Welcome your host Friday from Man

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>by God Bro say Francis Frank standfall ladies and gentlemen

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>your b and with that we want you inside of

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the studio thirty four. This is the BFF. He is

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stample, I am Greg Susman e y off to

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Ron on the Saunde Areva this week. So he is

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>gone all week long, which means it's you, it's me,

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's us here this week on the BFF. Frankie,

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, Bud Greggy? We got a lot going down

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>already Week eight, nearly in the books. We have a

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>monster matchup tonight between the Dolphins and the Pittsburgh Steers.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We also got a lot of trades going down. Gregg says,

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk about lots talk about are you going to uh,

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll be watching the game to night, sure, of course,

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>m you you won't be well. We have we have something.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I have some batchors in the balance right with James

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Connor and Jujue. I'll be checking it out. We have

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>one in the balance. We have the do It's also

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the season finale of Halloween Baking Championship. Goodness, it's the

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>season finale. First. There are things you just don't reveal

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>on the air, Greg Bet, and that was one of them.

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>It's I appreciate your transparency. I would appreciate if you

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>tell me that off the air. We could talk about it, sure,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and then break it down for you. Probably shouldn't have

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>told everybody that listeners. I want everyone to know the truth.

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll be watching football. I mean, as as ugly as

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be. I don't know what to expect. Nixon

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and Bulls will be just as bus Yeah, not a

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.399
<v Speaker 1>great one, one, all right. Let me get into yesterday

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>around the NFL, and let me begin in San Francisco,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>where the Four Nighters decimated the Carolina after yesterday, and

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>this style of offense, well, not exactly exciting, not exactly

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>game changing or a game breaking, but we said a

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>lot in fantasy football, when you know what you're going

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to get, makes the world a whole lot easier. The

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco four Niners, they run the football and play

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>great defense. That's all they do. And now we know

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>who those running backs are. It was Matt Brina and

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman. And when one of those guys go down,

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>as they did yesterday, it becomes all about one. And

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>now it's Tevin Coleman. He scored four times yesterday. He

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>looked fantastic against Carolina defense. Frank, that's been pretty good

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last month. They play on Thursday night. I

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>doubt Matt Brina plays. We'll see soon where he emotionally

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>was talking about him in a moment. But Tevin Coleman

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly was a winner yesterday. Yeah, absolutely massive winner. Eleven

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>carries a hundred and five yards, three rushing touchdowns average

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>nine point five yards per carrie. And you said it right, Greig.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The San Francisco forty Niners want to run the football.

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Entering Week eight, the highest rush percentage in the NFL,

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's not going to change it. At thirty eight

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts yesterday, why would it They just beat the

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Carolina Panthers fifty once a thirteen on the back or

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the legs rather of Tevin Coleman, of Matt Breda, of

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Raheem Mostard. So if it ain't broke, don't fix it work.

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>They're just gonna continue to roll out with what has

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>been working. And as also, as you mentioned Kyle Shanahan

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>running backs, no matter where he goes, you want his

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>running backs for fantasy. You have been saying it for years.

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.559
<v Speaker 1>You've been at Carlos Hyde guy for years. And although

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Carlo Carlos Hyde is not playing with Kyle Shanahan, he's

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>having a great years. That's a greggy guy. But ultimately

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Tevin Coleman has ascended into a high nd RB two.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I really do believe that the way that this offensive

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>line is playing right now, even without their tackles, they're

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the best offensive lines in the NFL. And

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>if Matt Breeda can't go on Thursday night because of

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the short week, he Mostard becomes one of the more

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting waiver wire pickups this week. Just he most is

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of sneaky weaver wire pickup right like he's not

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a starter. Everyone saw Tivin Coleman have those four touchdowns

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in this past week. I don't think most are cost

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you all that much on the waiver wire. And if

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you're desperate where four teams have a bye this week,

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you're in a good spot of h Mooster. Yeah, and

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Raheemoster has been really explosive so far in his career.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg his ninety five rushing attempts in the NFL, he's

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>averaging over six yards per carries, so all of those

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have all of those carriers have basically come with Kyle

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan again does a great job of scheming his running

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>backs to success. Raheem Mostart has been one of the

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>beneficiaries of that. And I think you know, if Matt

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Brina can't go on Thursday night, we just saw what

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Latavius Murray did against at Arizona Cardinals defense, where he

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>put up over a hundred and fifty total yards. He

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>had two total touchdowns, nine receptions. I have a feeling

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco forty Niners are gonna be playing with

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:42.559
<v Speaker 1>the lead, which means that they're going to be running

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the football, So I'm right there with you. Is Matt

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Brita the Anthony Davis of fantasy football? He leaves in

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the middle of every game, No, because he's not the

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>number one over Yeah, I mean he's not. He's not

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the best players. But in terms of this situation,

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>constantly leaving midgame and then coming back and playing the

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>next week, and I'm still being good. Yeah, he's Davis.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Euel Sanders got the end of yesterday for San Francisco,

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't do all that much other than that for Jimmy

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>g and the offense didn't have to pass the ball

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 1>all that much. Immanuel Sanders played a lot. As Kyle

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan promise, what's his value going vard, I think it's

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>still a wide receiver three. I said this on Friday

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>or whenever the trade was made that I didn't really

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>think that things changed ultimately for Emmanuel Sanders, Like he

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>gets a step up in quarterback play with Garoppolo, But again,

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the forty Niners run the ball so much, are there

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be enough targets to go around? So yesterday they

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>only had twenty two targets overall in this game, and

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>he had five of those. So that's the twenty three

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>percent target share, which is fine, but again it was

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>only five targets, so I would label this one of

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the situations. I'm not gonna say that he's a winner

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>just because he scored a touchdowner. He's not a loser.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>But they want to run the football and when they

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>throw it, George Kittle is still going to be the

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>leader on this team in terms of targets. So I

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>would say it's it's a pretty lateral move for Emmanuel

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Sanders again coming over from denvertson situation, There's is a

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>lot about the a lot of Panthers team. Yeah, I'm sorry,

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of alcol Cana Panthers. In a second, um,

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not they pettish your boy, Mark, He's Goodwin was a

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>healthy stratch. Not they had is still had the fourth

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>most snaps at wide receiver yesterday or this ports team

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>once again, not great Bob, Not great Bob at all, Greg,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for bringing up my boy Dante Pettis. Every

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>time that we can remind ourselves of being wrong for something,

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>we might as well do it right. So that is

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>coming into the season that has not worked out at all.

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a talented player, right like, there's no

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>doubt about that. We saw what he did as a rookie,

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>especially down the stretch last year. Just hasn't been able

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to find his footing so far this year. Really weird

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>starts of the preseason UH and training camp, and Kyle

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan was trying to kind of push the envelope with

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>UH with Dante Pettison get the most out of him,

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>but he has not responded well. Greg. Perhaps we talked

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>about this on the other side as well. The Carolina Panthers.

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the winners here, somebody who didn't even play,

0:07:55.640 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Ham Newton, absolutely Cam Newton finally could be coming and yeah,

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>starting job. Sneak, Yeah, I won't cost you that much.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, you really good. Everybody else not so much.

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a little sneak peek of what's to come

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>when we returned your winners, your losers, and the rest

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the next I want to be the next Daily

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season.

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com Optimizer

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>safe ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>code dunk. Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>learn more. I can promise you and nobody calls themselves

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>wrong and make fun of themselves as much as we

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>had as we do. You were sitting here during the

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>break going on owing our Fan Newel lineups in which

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I came in dead last, by the way, dead last,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a great job, Gregg. Thanks man, Pretty sure

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I was not far ahead of you. You look that

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>up of you like, yes, please do. But wasn't a

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>great week you came into fifteen? Well, it was ahead

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of you, So that's that's a moral victory. If I've

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>ever seen one. Twere points of me, man, you get

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>much more points. Yeah. Not the greatest Fan New Week

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for us, But shout out to everybody who participated and

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>for those who won. We were not one of them.

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>We were not. We weren't even close. We are You

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't get in the game, by the way, Yeah, it's

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>van New will be abo contest we do with our

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>friends and family each and every week. All you gotta

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>do is request to come in. FRANKI let you in,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, tweet at us at roto underscore Frank at

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>gregg Susman, give us your fanuel, use your name and

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll get you involved. You know, more people want to play.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We can expand it, we can make it. You know,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty people of concepts, whatever it might be. So hit

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.719
<v Speaker 1>us up, hit us up and follow us. Frankie was

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good insight, and I usually doesn't sell

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>frank so it's pretty good. I guess right events who

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>you ask? I think it's got. I enjoy it all right,

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>let's get into with Danny. Let's break it down the

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>winners the losers in from week over nine week the

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>BFFs presents winners I won, I won, Losers you suck.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>You are one pathetic loser and I have no idea

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going Winners losers and from a week number eight

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest losers, well they're in Arizona and they're really

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy owners that own the Arizona Cardinal running Backs.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Because things went from bad do a whole worse this morning.

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson didn't play yesterday Chase Edmonds got her yesterday.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals play on Thursday night. The only running backs

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>on the roster were Zack Zenner and Alfred Morris until

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>now Frank. They traded for Kenyan Drake this morning. Kind

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of surprise everybody because we thought Kenyan Drake would land

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Detroit Lions. We knew that he would be traded,

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>just didn't know where. And now is the Arizona Cardinals.

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I love to see what happens whether they place

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a David Johnson or a Chase Edmunds on I R.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would imagine that one or both of

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>their injuries are really bad for them to go out

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and make this trade for Kenyan Drake. Obviously here this

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>morning on it they jump in and it looks like

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake is probably gonna have to play on the

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>short week, I mean, not really knowing the playbook. Yeah,

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's just gonna be all right. We'll take

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the ball and run up the middle and try and

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>make the most out of it. And you know they'll

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they'll target him a few times as well, but they

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>just need healthy bodies. Chase Edmund's leave yesterday with the

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injury. It seems like it's gonna be pretty severe.

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>He's likely going to miss a couple of weeks. David

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Johnson still dealing with the ankle, still dealing with the back.

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And then when everybody's healthy, what do they do then?

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Kenyan Drake play wide receiver, David Johnson play a little

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of wide receiver. I would imagine that one or

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>both of these guys is probably going to land on

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I R. Gregg. I don't know why else they would

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>have made this move. I assume we'll find that out

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>later on today. Arizona of course out west, so they

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>have their press conferences and conference calls a little bit later.

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we'll get even more information there. Kennyan Drake's

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna play on Thursday night kind of like him. I mean,

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be at least a low end RB two,

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>high end flex. I mean, I don't know that he's

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna play a full compliment of snaps. It's still his

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>first game with the team, and it's on a short week,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>so you have to be realistic. And it's a bad

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>matchup going up against San Francisco, so all those things

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of playing against each other. He's probably more of

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a flex player than anything else. Greig absolutely a flexi

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>play here against San Francisco, the rest of the Cardinals

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>team yesterday and in a brutal loss to New Orleans Saints.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>What was all said and done? Larry Fitzgerald drops touchdown pass. Uh,

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Kyla Murray's worst game in a while. Um for

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy perspective, Christian Kirk great winner back, big winner,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>big winner yesterday. Um. Of course once again, once again,

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this team plays again on Thursday night football New Orleans Saints.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Drew Brees returned as a winner. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>he was awesome. I do want to start with Christian

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Kirk real quick his first game back, going up against

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it tougher New Orleans secondary where I don't know if

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>he was shadowed by Marshawn Laddimer. Will have to pull

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that up and check it out, but ultimately still a

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>tough secondary regardless. First game back. Leads a team in

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>targets with eleven, leads the team and receptions with eight.

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald over his last two games one reception for

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve yards, no touchdown on three targets two receptions for

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>eight yards, no touchdown, only four targets, So Larry Fitzgerald,

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we're getting into drop territory. He has been

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that bad recently, and I think with Christian kirk Back

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that obviously affects his targets share. Moving forward, Yeah, you

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Drew Brees first game back, forty three pass attempts

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>with the thumb. They clearly we're not worried about it.

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Looks like he's good to go. Three seventy three yards

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>eight points seven yards per attempts, three passing touchdowns. Taysom Hill, Greg,

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean they keep finding ways to get this guy involved.

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in the Super Flakes League, probably should be owned.

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Three receptions, sixty three yards and a touch down. He's

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>basically their pseudo tight end right now. Lottavias Murray massive,

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>massive performance, twelve targets, nine receptions, fifty five yards and

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. Michael Thomas just does what Michael Thomas does. Greg,

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw this back your way between Lettavias

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Murray and Alvin Camara. Moving forward, I think we might

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>have closer to the situation we thought coming into the season. Obviously,

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there was that low earlier on where Alvin Kamara was

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing all the work and the offense wasn't clicking as

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>much under Teddy Bridgewater and Letsavius Murray was not involved.

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think based on how well he's performed the

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>past two weeks, I don't think that he just goes

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>completely away after the bye week when Alvin Kamara is back,

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. So that is my first thought as well,

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>like I'm not gonna I don't necessarily want to buy

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Alan Kamara yet because Let'savias Murray is going to have

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a much larger role, at more Ingram like role in

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this offense. And then I thought back to Kansas City.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I know everything's not related necessarily, but I think that's

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City and Darryl Williams was awesome in the

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>games that Damian Williams and Lashaw McCoy left early, and

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Daryl Williams in this monster monster role, and then when

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Damian Williams got healthy, Lashaw McCoy's ankle got healthy, Nary

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>williamsn't play anymore because they wanted their better back on

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the field. Despite how good that Darryl Williams looked. I'm

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>taking this New Orleans opportunities one where I don't want

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to get fooled again. To me, I think Alman Camara,

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>who now has an extra week off because of the bye,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to get even healthier. He's going to be back in

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>week ten, and I think you see truly Latavia's Murray

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>go back to the role that he had of nothing.

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Almancamara shaw. I think the biggest difference

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>though between the Chiefs and the Saints is that it's

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>three as opposed to too, right, so I think that too.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>But but even yesterday right like Damian Williams barely still

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the feel until Shoa McCoy fumbled. But they have that

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>luxury because they do have three running backs actually produce,

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>so they can kind of pick and showing them are

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like Almn Kamara, No, absolutely, but I do think that

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>based on what le Tavi s Murray has shown us

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 1>again like he's not gonna get anywhere close to the

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>work he's gotten the past two weeks once Kamara is back,

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>but eight to twelve touches, eight to ten touches in

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Saints offense behind that offensive line, I think that's

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>still likely going to be in play for a flex

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>week in and week out. Alvin Kamara, you know how

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>good he is you know, if people are worried about

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>his injury, you go out and you could buy Alvin

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Kamara if you can. But ultimately, uh, would you be

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to trade Lettavias Murray too? Maybe an owner that's

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not paying his close attention. If you get like a

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three in return or a a r B

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>two that you can trust every single week, is that

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>something you would be doing? Absolutely absolutely trying to trade

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Letabas Murray away. Would you trading for Christian Kirk? Yes,

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's tough because they'll buy the week this week, right,

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It depends where you are in the standings. Crazy crazy

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>traded my Lea just went down Kenny Galladay from mark

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Ingram right up. It seems pretty fair and I'd probably

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>lean slightly with Kenny Golladay. I probably agree with that.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>The team that acquired mark Ingram had just lost Chase

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Edmunds and David Johnson felt the need to go out

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and get a running back. Okay, since um spelling well,

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers, let me go to the in the

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>City and Green Bay Sunday Night football from last night.

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Damie Williams after the Shawn McCoy fumble, he was a winner.

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>He gobbled up all those snaps. He looked good on

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the field. Uh, Matt Moore did his job on the

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in this Kansas City offense, got Tyreek Hill the ball,

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey scores the touchdown right like it was. I

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think as good of a outing you could have hoped

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>for from Matt more from a fantasy perspective, absolutely, And

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we said on Friday when we were pretty viewing the

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 1>games that if you lost Patrick Mahomes and you played

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in a super flex league, that Matt Moore would be

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sufficient in two quarterback leagues. And that's exactly what he

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>was six two d and sixty seven yards, two touchdown,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>seven point four yards per attempt. He was fine. He

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 1>got the ball in the hands of his best players.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>That's all I can ask out of a backup quarterback.

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Travis Kelsey had eight targets yesterday, scored a touchdown Tyreek Hill.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>While he did not have a massive game, he had

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>nine targets and a pretty consistent one six receptions for

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>seventy six yards. So in a PPR league, I think

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you feel pretty good about that. La Shawn McCoy

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>after he fumbled, did not see another carry or argut

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in that game yesterday for the Kansas City Chiefs. So

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 1>just kind of jumbles this situation up again. Up until

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that point, before Sean McCoy fumbled, Damian Williams was nowhere

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to be found. I mean I saw people tweeting, you know,

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 1>where's Damian Williams? Remember that guy, guy who was like

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a second third round pick this here in fantasy football.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>He was nowhere. But then once Sean McCoy fumbled, Damian

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Williams was in there. This is not a good run

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>blocking offensive line, so I really don't want to be

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>involved with any of these guys. And there's three different

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>running backs. So it's a very frustrating situation. But at

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>least Matt Moore showed that he can keep Travis Kelsey

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Entiree Hill fantasy biable, Greg lasera report, Chase Emmons gonna

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>miss a few weeks with a hamstring strain, David Johnson

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>banged up, not expected to go on i R. So

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>we'll see because the Cardinals take a break. He's the

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>green maside of things last night, and you around the

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>NFL here, I want to be the next daily Fantasy millionaire.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>com and dominate on Fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>with the pros Daily Rodal dot Com Optimizer and the

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support and much more safe ten

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash dunk to learn more

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>breaking news. We'll get to in just a minute, but

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>remember to get in the game of the Draftkickings sports book.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>You can get up to five hundred bucks when you

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>listen to the bf S. Here's how it works. Create

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a Draft Kings sports book account, make a depositive last

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>your first bet. DraftKings will match it with a fifty

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>percent bonus of up to five hundred dollars. This offers

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>eligible for all users, plus new users will get a

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>risk free bet of twos. Go to sports screed dot

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 1>com slash dk to play that Sports screen dot Com

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>slash d k. If you have a gabbling problem, cold

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>one hudred Gambler twenty one and over, New Jersey only

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>eligibility restrictions supply see website for Diesels breaking news Frank

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>on another injury. Joe Flacco, who was not happy yesterday.

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not not being able to be trusted to throw

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and he won't be throwing the ball this

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>weekend as he is out with a neck injury. Drew

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Lock not ready to go, which means Brandon Allen we'll

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>get the start for the never Broncos. Right. I really

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you much about Brandon Allen outside of the

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that he is a former sixth round pick out

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of the University of Arkansas. He was drafted by the

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Jaguars. So we'll see how Brandon Allen fares this week.

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately I'm gonna go on. I'm gonna go out there,

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg and I'm gonna say that Courtland Sutton loser and

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the running back to the Denver Broncos losers. Although I

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>guess it can't be much worse than what Joe Flacco

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is doing. Right, they were at least running the ball

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 1>um somewhat successfully between Phil Lindsay and Royce Freeman. We

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>saw Royce Freeman getting the end zone again, but Cortland

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Sutton was has been one of the most consistent wide

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>receivers so far to the season, no offense. Finally coming

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>off a game where he was targeted and had a

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of receptions, not a lot of yards, so maybe

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>this actually helps. I mean, Joe Flacco wasn't really doing much,

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>so we'll we'll have to see. Maybe he'll hopefully the

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterback relies on the tight end. No A fan who

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>had a nice day yesterday, and I want to get

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>into Denver in a moment um, but I want to

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>go back to Green Bay and go back to Sunday

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Night football where Aaron Jones Jamal Williams both getting dawn

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:29.160
<v Speaker 1>last night well winners. Absolutely, I mean specifically Aaron Jones.

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>His usage in the past game eight targets, seven receptions,

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty nine yards, and two touchdowns. On

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>that sixty seven yard touchdown, basically just went untouched and

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>ran past everybody. It was good to see that he

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.479
<v Speaker 1>was dealing with. I believe it was a shoulder injury

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>in the game. He left for a little bit, came

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>back and still had this massive performance. Played more snaps

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>than Jamal Williams yesterday. Jamal Williams most weeks will be

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in play as a low end flex option, maybe a

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>bi week replacement, but it's it's still very obvious that

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>even with Aaron Jones dropping a touchdown a couple of

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks to go, and yes, Jamal Williams kind of supplanted

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>him for that game, Aaron Jones is still the guy

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>here and is performing very well. Greg. Absolutely, Aaron Jones.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy, Frank, Like, you hit in this morning and

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, do you think God, we didn't trade Aaron Jones.

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the reason we won yesterday. That's the reason why

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we seemingly win most weeks. It's yeah, that's why most uh,

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones owners were winners yesterday, Greg, because ultimately had

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a massive performance even with leaving the game yesterday, ended

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>up playing sixty percent of the Packers snaps. So it's

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a good sign for Aaron Jones. He's a clue winner. Absolutely.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Jones and jama Williams though also winner. These wide

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.679
<v Speaker 1>receivers are game may none of them are winners. I mean,

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I know it was on Alon Lazard as a winner

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>because he played the same amount of snaps mvs and

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Jona wa Allison, But it's really a crapsheet right now.

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Until Davante Adams goes back. I don't really want to

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>own any of them, and I've said that. I've said

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that the past couple of the way that they've been

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>deploying these wide receivers and the way that they've been

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>targeting is they just spread the ball around, and they've

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>been using the running backs a lot more this year

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>under the floor than Mike McCarthy ever has really throwing

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the running backs as well. So the

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.920
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers are basically the Packers wide receivers are uh

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>into sent into obscurity right now, Greg, while there's no

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Davanta Adams, hopefully he's back for week nine. I believe

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>he's missed the past three weeks, so I think it

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>should be enough time for him to return. Hopefully, Devanta

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Adams is good to go. If he's healthy, you get

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 1>him in your lineup. Outside of him, can't trust any

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of these Packers receivers. Packers receivers have been a big,

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>big letdown in fantasy. I remember remember back in the summer,

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I drafted MVS and ger on him. Yeah, because it's

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a new offense, right, but everybody assumed that whoever emerged

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>as the wide receiver too, was gonna have value because

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we saw basically throughout Aaron Rodgers career that he consistently

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>produced another top thirty wide receiver, top twenty four in

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that range. But it's a new offense under Matt la Floor,

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and he's really is using these running backs more in

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the passing game, and that has really taken away any

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for another wide receiver to step up outside of

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Davanta Adams. Of course, so that neck injury UM hurts

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco. Going back to Denver hurts Courtland Suton running

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>backs Denver yesterday. Uh, they wound up losing uh in

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that in that contest, and as I said, you were

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>winning for most of it, they were. Joe Flacco not

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>happy about kind of playing conservative right running the football,

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and he expressed that after the game the Antholis Colts

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>came from behind. Jacobe Procette was al was sacked for

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>his safety to at the end of the game, he

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>was able to get the ball uh to t Y Hilton. Um.

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But the ragus and culture we want to say about

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this winner's losers stand out nothing exciting. Well, Joe Flacco,

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 1>first of all, you're an idiot because you threw the

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>ball thirty two times and you average five point four

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>yards per ten. Whose fault is that? Okay, maybe the

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>play calling isn't great, but I mean you could take

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it upon yourself too audible to a different play. You

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>can try and take shots down the field with Courtland

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Sutton and ultimately you average five point four yards per time.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So I I understand that you want the play calling

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to be more aggressive, but you know, take it upon

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself as well. You're a veteran quarterback. If you want

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>audible play, go ahead and do it. I mean the

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.479
<v Speaker 1>running backs. The past two weeks, it's been hard situation

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to figure out Greig because earlier on in the year,

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay was seeing a lot of the work inside

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of the red zone. But the past two weeks now

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Royce Freeman has scored inside that area of the field,

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so it looks like there really is no rhyme or

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>reason to what's going on. I still do like Philip

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay in that RB two kind of area low end

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>RB two and Royce Freeman is a high end FLEXI player.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>They have similar value, but Philip Lindsay a little bit

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>more valuable because he is a more explosive player. Overall,

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see, you know, what Brandon Allen can

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>can do in terms of getting the ball in the

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>hands of Quoteland Sutton and no a fan because again,

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 1>like you said, just get if you're a backup quarterback,

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>all we wanted to do is get the ball to

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>those guys and kind of let them do what they do. Um.

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, no offense did have it an eight target

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>game yesterday and hopefully, you know, a backup quarterback could

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to lean on that tight end position. So No offense,

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about him more tomorrow. Is the waiver wire pickup?

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely certainly somebody all along the waiver wire that you

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>should consider picking up. Let's move on to Frank. I

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>want to go over to London where jacksonvill. They played

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>London this weekend. Cincinnati and l a go At went

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>at it and as predicting the Rams dominated, Cooper Cup

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>obviously does his thing. But there's a couple of things

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I really wanted to note from this game. The first,

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, Brandon Cooks is concussion. We'll talk about Josh

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds on the program tomorrow. And I'm not somebody that

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>even where I am in the standings that's going to

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>trade for Brandon Cooks because I'm really concerned about this

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.120
<v Speaker 1>concussion his second over the year. To be very, very

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>cautious when it comes to Brandon Cooks, but specifically on

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the rams side of the ball. I think you gotta

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>look at the running game where Todd Gurley scored. That's good,

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but he rushed for less yards than Darryl Henderson and

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe played less snaps than Darryl Henderson. He was

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>seen getting his knee looked at or checked out on

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the sideline. I understand the bye week is coming, but

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley, Frank you know going to you. We had

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Florio here in studio. He was Mr Todd Gurley. I

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>was kind of in between you guys. You were dead

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>right where the upside his cap for Gurly and as

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody that trapped him and training him away. I think

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>my lucky stars about that because Todd Gurley is not

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>even close to the player. He was a fantasy perspective,

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's been a disaster and trying to use yesterday's performance

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.479
<v Speaker 1>considering he scored a touchdown and try and trade him

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>now while you can't even if you have to pair

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>him with somebody else. I understand he's going into the

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>buy it's gonna be harder to do. Didn't play as

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>many snaps this today, but they were up big towards

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the end, and I think they just kind of started

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to hand it off to Darrell Henderson. But ultimately, look,

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a great matchup going up against the Cincinnati Bengals.

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>They allow a ton of fantasy points to opposing running backs.

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>They allow what is this four point nine one yards

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>per carry to opposing running backs this year. That was

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>fourth most heading into Week eight, and Todd Gurley has

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the modest game that he did yesterday. I just don't

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>think that it's going to happen for him. I think

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that he is still hampered by whatever was plaguing him

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in the off season the end of last season, this

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>knee injury, the authritis and the knee. He was also

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a quad issue a couple of weeks ago.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Try and trade him now while you can see what

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you can get for him, because ultimately I don't feel

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>great about him, and I would say the same thing

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on the other side here, Greg, we're Joe Mixon seventeen

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>carries for sixty six yards three point nine yards per carry.

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe after the bye week, the Bengals offensive line comes back,

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit healthier. They get Cordy gunnback. That

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>can't hurt Joe Mixon. But he was using the past game.

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday he had four receptions, he had a receiving touchdown,

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think that you can kind of use yesterday's

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 1>performance again like Girly, to try and sell him now,

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately, the Bengals offensive line is not a good one.

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Their offense is not a good one. And while Mixon

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>had four targets yesterday, that's his season high, they have

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not been throwing the ball to Joe Mixon enough this year.

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And I would try to sell him based off of

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.239
<v Speaker 1>yesterday's performance. I agree with you, Joe Mixon, Ti Girle too,

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>running backs that you should try to sell after yesterday's performance.

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>From the wide Receiver conversation, A J. Green says he

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>expects me ready to go after the excuse me, after

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the bye will he still be the Bengal will find

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>out trade deadline tomorrow. Obviously mentioned the Kenyan Drake trade.

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Williams also traded earlier today to the New York Giants.

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's speak about those New York Giants. Frank, New York Giants.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>UH covered the spread against the Detroit Lions. That's good.

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>They lost your Giants fan, that's bad. But Daniel Jones

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns he spots started against Detroit. That worked out well.

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Golden Tate in the revenge game had a golden date

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>day right eight for eight five also had a long

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>one called back take on Barkley found the end zone.

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>If you expect what if you and any yesterday's game

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>from the giant side of things, really reliant side of things.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Also with Kenny Golladay, you got exactly what you expected.

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>All those guys winners, one monsters loser in this game

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>though his name, Ty Johnson. Yes, and all the fantasy

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>owners out there that went out and spent a bunch

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of money in fab like this guy. We're huge losers

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>all together. Let's let's celebrate together. But ultimately, yeah, this

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>was a four headed backfield trade. Carson twelve carries thirty

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>four yards, Thy Johnson seven carries. Paul Perkins revenge game

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>against the New York Giants had three carries. Jade mckissic

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>had one carry. Jadi McKissick was using the past game,

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>he had three targets. Apperts said that he was gonna

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>use a running back by committee. He didn't lie, he

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>actually told the truth. This was a four headed running

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>back by committee behind an offensive line that cannot run

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>block right now. So if you spent money, big money

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>on Thy Johnson this week, you, my friend, are a loser,

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just like me. Tay Kwon Barkley, he's really good. He's

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a winner from yesterday. That's probably fine. Daniel Jones. Massive

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>performance here, Greg three twenty two yards, seven point nine

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. The offensive line did a better job

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of protecting for him yesterday through four touchdowns. And you

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>want to stream quarterbacks against the Detroit Lions right now.

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>They have allowed eight passing touchdowns over their last two games.

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a quarterback on buy in Week nine,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that's Drew Brees, Matt Ryan and or someone else that

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm forgetting right now. But Derek carrs Jared Goff is

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the other one. Derek Carr in this matchup against Detroit

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>next week is a great matchup and one that you

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>can actually stream. Matt Stafford also very good. Who's the

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>bounce back season coming, Greg, not most of us. Most

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of us we thought they were gonna run. They can't

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 1>do That'll take a bread, will come back well. His

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>many winners, losers and as we can coming up next.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot com

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and dominate on FanDuel and DraftKings this season. Compete with

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the pros with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer and the

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts,

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>breaking news, lake swap support and much more safe ten

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Visit Daily rodo dot com backslash Dunk to learn more.

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Jill Flacker's injury maybe severe enough and he goes on

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>i R because Drew Lock's time. He's coming. Brandon Allen

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>has never thrown it past in the regular season game.

0:32:04.640 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>He will start this Sunday. There's a chance Drew Lock

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is activated off the I R as the backup, and

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of course we'll start UH sooner rather than later. Joe

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Flacco's injury, Greg, if you play, I don't. I don't

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>know if it's an injury. Like the Broncos. They have

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Allen and in their second round pick is not healthy.

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>This is an injury, Frankie, is it or is it

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a reaction to him kind of calling out the team

0:32:30.160 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in that press conference? Your players call out their teams.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to one in a moment. But to me,

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>this is this is an injury for sure, as super

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>flexile U stashing Drew lock right now? Oh man, So

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on super flexingly looking nearly there

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>are starting quarterbacks that are out there. You know, only

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>match Hup was the only one available this week. But

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>you regret not having him, do I? You were like

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>five yesterday only one touchdown, one interception. I don't know

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>if that was better than Kyler Mury it probably was. Well,

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>here you go. Sorry, Sorry didn't pick up match Shop Greg.

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Was mat Shop picked up in your super flue league? Yes,

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we didn't think he was. We don't have to look

0:33:08.680 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>during the game yesterday to find out if he was.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>We didn't think he was, but he was. He still

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>mat Shop picking up? Are luck? No you're not? Maybe

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I will. We'll see, all right, find out all right?

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me let me move on to the team about

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy that always calls out he's coaching staff and

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the play calling whatnot. And that's Odell Beckham Jr. Who

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we keep pushing him down. You said yesterday last week, Frank,

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that maybe this is one of the situations where you

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta rid the name off the back of the jersey,

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and yet he faced Stepan Gilmore yesterday. Like, I understand

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that Odell Beckham has been very bad this year, especially

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>for where you had to draft Odell Beckham. And I

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>was actually thinking about this yesterday, how he's definitely gonna

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>be one of those guys where are you draft him

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>next year and like the third round and be like

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I got a first round of talent in the third round,

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I know all that already, but this year it's

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>not happening. I understand how good the New England defense is,

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>but Odell Beckham every shot and opportunity has had except

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for one against the Jets, it's been a complete and

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>under disgrace and a disaster. Nick Chubb yesterday, So Ode

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Beckham loser. Nick Chubb probably goes in the category because

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.959
<v Speaker 1>he was awesome going for way over a hundred yards

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>but had two bad fumbles, including one where was kind

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of marching in for a touchdown. That was frustrating. Baker

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield a loser on the season for this Cleveland Browns team.

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Jarvis Langery, well, obviously a loser. Nervis Landry has actually

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>been fine and he had ten targets is today five

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for sixty five against the New England Patriots. I think

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll take that out of Jarvis Landry, but Baker Mayfield

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely a huge loser on the season, a loser yesterday

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>as well. I mean that interception that he threw, if

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it an interception, it's like a

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>little like shovel pass. Why didn't you do it right

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>into the defensive line. I mean, that was one of

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the most ridiculous things I've ever seen. That's something that

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you would have saw from like the third string Cleveland

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Browns quarterback that was starting a couple of years ago.

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Baker Mayfield, who was their first overall pick

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 1>last year, who was so supposed to be their franchise quarterback,

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>making a mistake that bad that was really really tough

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>to watch yesterday. I would agree with you on Nick Chubb.

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I would put him in the category because he's still

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing a ton of volume and he ran for a

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty one yards. I mean that was the

0:35:12.760 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>most for any running back against the Patriots defense so

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>far this season. But he fumbled twice. And Kareem Hunt

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is looming. He will be eligible to return in week ten,

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>so not next week yet, but in week ten. If

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you are a Knick Chubb owner, make sure you own

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt as well. And Odell Beckham, Greg, don't what

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>if you don't mean you should still pick u Kareem

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Hunt if you can't? Oh? If you So you're saying,

0:35:35.520 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Nick Chubb owner, but you can't pick

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>up Kareem Hunt anymore? Yeah, probably because I'm assuming that

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>that's you. You might want to trade whoever is on

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the end of your bench to try and acquire Kareem Hunt. Right. Sure.

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>You just said that you're never going to play NBS,

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with you. So it's something that I

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>would do. Is a Kareem Hunt owner going to take that?

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Probably not. I'd imagine that they've been stashing him for

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a while. Odell Beckham huge loser, as you mentioned, Greg,

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>five for fifty two. It's guy has not scored a

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdown and since Week two, I was actually at that

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 1>game in MetLife Stadium. Maybe he only scores when I'm

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at the game, but whatever it is, Odell Beckham isn't

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown drought. He's got tough matchups coming up. Look

0:36:12.640 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 1>at this upcoming schedule, Greg, He's at Denver next week,

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 1>where if they don't trade away Chris Harris, he's one

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>of the best lockdown corners in the league. The week

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 1>after that facing treed Avious White and the Buffalo Bills.

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>The week after that facing the Pittsburgh Steelers and their

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>secondary has performed really well since they've acquired make of Fitzpatrick.

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins in Week twelve, pretty good matchup. Week thirteen

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers again, tough matchup. So four out of

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the next five games, you are not going to feel

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>great about starting Odell Beckham. They are not just force

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 1>feeding him the ball like was the case in New

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>York where he's getting a bunch of targets. He only

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>had seven targets yesterday. He's a clear loser, Greg and

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone who drafted him right now you actually have to

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>think about whether or not you're gonna start him moving forward,

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy because he was likely your first or

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>second round pick. Brutal, absolutely brutal Rodebecker Junior. And as

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Freight points out, he doesn't get better. That's the problem.

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 1>And I know I have I've said a lot that, Hey,

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>just because you're facing a good cornerback, well, he's a

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>really good WDE receiver, so you should be able to

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>take advantage. Not this version of Odell Beckham Jr. Let

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>me go to the other side with the New England

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and it was a very bad weather day, so

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you got kind of what you expected, right, You got

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>James White and you got Julian Edelman, and that's what

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this offense is now. Philip doors Set hasn't done all

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that much. Mohammed'san you got worked in the offense a

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but his offense really revolves around James White

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and Julian Edelman. Yeah. Edelman had a great game yesterday

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to eleven targets in the rain, a lot of short passes,

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 1>eight receptions seventy eight yards and two touchdowns. Greg Sony Michelle,

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about him and I'll put him

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>in the category because I like the volume that I

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:52.240
<v Speaker 1>saw here. Twenty one carries. Again, did not run efficiently,

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 1>only three point five yards per carry. The volume is

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a good thing. Normally I would just say that you're

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a winner because you're running back and you saw twenty

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 1>plus carry, but he didn't make the most of those carries.

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, with rex burkehead back, Tony Michell did not

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>have a single target in this game. So each of

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the past three games with with rex burkhead sidelined, Sony

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Michelle had seen at least two targets in each of

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>those games, and he was kind of getting worked into

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the past game a little bit. They were actually drawing

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>up place for him as a receiver. We saw last

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>week against the Jets he dropped the ball that was

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.800
<v Speaker 1>thrown right into his chest. This week, Greg zero targets

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 1>for Sony Michelle. With rex burkhead back in the mix,

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I put him in the category in need um. I

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>totally agree Toniy Michelle. It has not been the year

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that I hope for as someone I was thinking is

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna break out and really really build off this playoff

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>performance from last season hasn't happened. He's getting all the

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>red zone work, which is good. He's getting all this,

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.839
<v Speaker 1>but he had three touchdowns last week. He even coming

0:38:52.880 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>into this week, greg Tony Michelle had the most carries

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>inside the tent of any running back in the NFL.

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>So we remember that Brandon Bolden stole a touchdown here

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and and you know Rex Burke had stole a touchdown here.

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's crazy that when you look at the numbers,

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:09.959
<v Speaker 1>he still is number one in the NFL in red

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in rushing attempts inside the ten yard line, and those

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>are very valuable obviously for fantasy football. Let's chat Frankie

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about some of the young running backs who are winners yesterday.

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And we we knew that when you drafted them back

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in August there could be league winners for you and

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 1>go off to the second half of the year. I hope,

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we hope that. Hey, we wouldn't take eight weeks. I'm

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna go off. But you drafted them because you thought

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>they could win you a league, and that maybe what

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery winds up doing for you. The carries finally

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>went up for Dave Montgomery, and rightfully so. He was

0:39:39.280 --> 0:39:42.880
<v Speaker 1>awesome yesterday, scoring his first touchdown of his season. Rushing

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the football yesterday. Trek Cohen not you know kind of

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the three Cohen thing. David Montgomery first onto the scene

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.879
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and the Chargers actually defeat of the Bears thanks

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to what guess what a miss kick David Montgomery huge

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>winner from yesterday. The problem was he was on a

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people's benches and I can't fault you for that.

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.520
<v Speaker 1>The week before he only had two rushing attempts that

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>haven't been able to run block all season long the

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears. David Montgomery comes out yesterday, play seventy of

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the snaps, which was a season high. He had season

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>highs across the board, seven carries, a hundred and thirty

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>five yards, one touchdown, five yards per carry. He was

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>also used in the past game a ton here greg

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>five targets, four receptions, only twelve receiving yards. But you

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 1>like to see that type of usage in the past

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>game considering that Tarik Cohen only play of the snaps

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and he only saw three targets, So thirty one running

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>back opportunities for David Montgomery yesterday just massive. You want

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>to use running backs against the Los Angeles charters right now.

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Their entire defense is beat up, and I think this performance,

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Greig gives you confidence that David Montgomery goes back into

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>that RB two discussion. Uh, Missiles Robiski is not good.

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's obvious at this point. Um seven point

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>two yards for attempt yesterday, thirty five, missing a ton

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of throws, zero touchdowns, one interception. At least last year

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>he was running the football. He's not even doing that

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this year. He only had four rushing attempts yesterday for

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 1>ten yards. And think Matt Naggie really started to figure

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>out how bad Robinsky is and started to give David

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery that must work. So I think we could trust

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery once again as a low one nervy two moving forward. Yeah,

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and to that point, miss Robinsky, they asked the question

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 1>old Matt Neggie this morning. He's like, hey, is he

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>still here starting quarterback? It's like, yeah, we saw enough

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>good things where we think he could improve. Certainly not

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 1>a huge declaration yet, Yeah, of course not. Yeah, he's

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>our starting quarterback. It was like sure, why not? Well,

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>how would you feel if you had Missiel Robinsky as

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>your quarterback? Greg? I mean they drafted him with a

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>with the first round pick. That was before Matt Naggie

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was there. But much like we've kind of said about

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Wayne Haskins right and Washington moving forward, whoever was gonna

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>come in and take over the Chicago Bears. Job knew

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that Mistell Drabinsky had to be the guy and they

0:41:58.200 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>had to find a way to get the most out

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>of him. Now, Matt Naggie did figure that out last year.

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 1>This year it's been a lot tougher. He really is

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>showing a lot of his deficiencies as a passer as

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback in the NFL so far this season. Defenses

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>are taking advantage of that as well. Um so, yeah,

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's hard to have confidence at Trabisky, but

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I think moving forward, whoever comes in for Washington next

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>year is likely gonna have to do the same thing

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>with Dwayne Hasky. What category would you put Melvin Gordon

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and Austin Ekeler in from yesterday? I would put mm hmm,

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>probably both in the act category. May even maybe Melvin

0:42:34.120 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Gordon is is more of a winner than then you

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>want to lead on. But he still wasn't great. I mean,

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>three point nine yards per carry. He saw eight rushing attempts,

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler only saw three. Eckler had a receiving touchdown

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>in this one, and I knew coming in that the

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Beart struggled to pass catching running backs. But again,

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Eckler only had two receptions and three carries. He had

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 1>five total touches. Melvin Gordon had eight carries and he

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 1>had two receptions, so he had ten total touches, and

0:43:02.160 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 1>neither one of them was really effective. They were not efficient.

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>We know that this offensive line is really beat up.

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:11.280
<v Speaker 1>The entire Chargers team is beat up, so they're probably

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>just both in the act category. And Melvin Gordon a

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 1>probably slight winner compared to Austin Ekeler, because it's clear

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at this point Greg, unless they trade him away before tomorrow,

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon is their guy and they're sticking by him

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>right As two more running backs, I want to make

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>sure we hit that are young and that kind of

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 1>fit the same. David Montgomery narrative was in Buffalo yesterday

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>between the Bills and the Eagles, where Miles Sanders went

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>off before getting hurt. All indications are that he'll be

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:41.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, and Devin Singles are and it awesome run

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as he ran into the end zone as well. I

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Bills ever go away from Frank Gore.

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the eagle situation will always be muddled, but

0:43:47.920 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 1>both guys look good. Yesterday, both were winners. Yeah, Singletary

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.680
<v Speaker 1>played sixties seven percent of the snaps yesterday, Frank Gore

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 1>only played of those, and Frank Gore still used more

0:43:58.200 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in the run game, but once they fell behind, they

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:03.280
<v Speaker 1>started to use Devin Singletary. Devin Singletary six targets yesterday,

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.279
<v Speaker 1>four receptions, thirty receiving yards, and a touchdown as well.

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think Devin Singletary is a winner. We're starting

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to see them have a little bit more faith in

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary, and I think that, you know, as the

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>season goes along here, he's gonna probably see maybe the

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 1>same amount of work as Frank Gore, or maybe even

0:44:20.840 --> 0:44:22.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. I remember a couple of weeks ago,

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I filled in for the closer Chris Ventcher on the

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Frenzy. We were all in agreement that Devin

0:44:27.400 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Singletary was a good bye low candidate. Miles Sanders Greg

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>as much as I want to be excited about him,

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 1>three carry seventy four yards, had that sixty five yard touchdown,

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 1>showed off some of his speed and his explosiveness. He's

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.240
<v Speaker 1>being used in the past game. I saw Jim SNAs

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>tweeting about this as well, that they're really targeting him downfield.

0:44:45.239 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>His average depth of target is higher than that of

0:44:48.239 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 1>your your average running back. They are scheming plays for

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders to get him used as a receiver. The

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>problem is he still only had six touches compared to

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty four for Jordan's Howards. So I don't think Jordan

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Howard's going anywhere. And he ran well, he does what

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they want him to do. They need someone that runs

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>between the tackles, applotting running back that just holds onto

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the football that they can use inside the red zone.

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:13.879
<v Speaker 1>That's who Jordan Howard is. Just ran for another ninety

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:15.839
<v Speaker 1>six yards and a touchdown. I don't think that he's

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>going away. So I want to say that Miles Sanders

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is a winner, but I can't. He's in the act

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:24.320
<v Speaker 1>category for me, Greg a huge loser man. Over the

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 1>past three weeks, he has nineteen targets and eight receptions.

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard in the same span seventeen targets, twelve receptions

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns. He's really been eating into his accurates production.

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Couldo next wags your dog, followed by out of the window,

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>He's Frank, Oh, Greg, The Waiver Wire Show is tomorrow.

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you there. We hope. I want to be

0:45:46.480 --> 0:45:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:53.360
<v Speaker 1>competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel

0:45:53.440 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily

0:45:56.280 --> 0:45:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections in

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.479
<v Speaker 1>NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 1>support and much more. Save ten percent on winning NBA

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily road dot

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>com backslash dunk to learn more. So what did what did?

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's what you missed on the bf BPS. Kyle Shanahan

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs No matter where he goes, you want his

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.799
<v Speaker 1>running backs for fantasy for years, man, you have been

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 1>saying it for years. You've been a Carlos Hyde guy

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:35.879
<v Speaker 1>for years. And although Carlo Carlos Hyde is not playing

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>with Kyle Shanahan, he's having a great years. What was

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I doing? That's a greggy guy. But ultimately Tevin Coleman

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>has ascended into a high n r B two. I

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>really do believe that the way that this offensive line

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 1>is playing right now, even without their tackles, they're one

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of the best offensive lines in the NFL. And if

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Matt Breeda can't go on Thursday night because of the

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 1>short week, he Mostart becomes one of the more interesting

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire pickups this week. Just he most is kind

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of sneaky weaver wire pickup right like, he's not a starter.

0:46:58.360 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Everyone saw Timma Coleman have those four h towns in

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>this past week. I don't think most are cost you

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 1>all that much on the waiver wire. And if you're

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>desperate where four teams have a bye this week, you're

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in a good spot where Mooster Yeah, and Raheemoster has

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:10.400
<v Speaker 1>been really explosive so far in his career. Greig his

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>ninety five rushing attempts in the NFL, he's averaging over

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>six yards per carries, so all of those have all

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:17.439
<v Speaker 1>of those carries have basically come with Kyle Shanahan. Agan

0:47:17.560 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>does a great job of scheming his running backs to success.

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Rahee Mostart has been one of the beneficiaries of that.

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know, if Matt Brida can't go

0:47:25.239 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night. We just saw what Latavious Murray did

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>against at Arizona Cardinals defense, where he put up over

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty total yards. He had two total

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns nine receptions. I have a feeling in San Francisco

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners are gonna be playing with the lead, which

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 1>means that they're going to be running the football. So

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm right there with you. Is Matt Brida the Anthony

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Davis of fantasy football? He leaves in the middle of

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>every game. No, because he's not the number one over Bill. Yeah,

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's not. He's not one of the best players.

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of his situation, constantly leaving midgame and

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>then coming back and playing the next week and I'm

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>still being good. Yeah, he's Nanuel Sanders got the end

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday for San Francisco. Didn't do all that much

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>other than that for Jimmy g and the offense didn't

0:47:57.600 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>have to pass the ball all that much. Manuel Sanders

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it a lot. As Kyle Shanahan promised, what's his value, Gavard,

0:48:02.640 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's still a wide receiver three. I said

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this on Friday or whatever the trade was made that

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really think that things changed ultimately for Emmanuel Sanders,

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Like he gets a step up in quarterback play with Garoppolo.

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>But again, the forty Niners run the ball so much,

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>are there gonna be enough targets to go around. So

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 1>yesterday they only had twenty two targets overall in this game,

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and he had five of those. So that's the twenty

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>three percent target share, which is fine, but again it

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was only five targets. So I would label this one

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of the situations. I'm not gonna say that he's a

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>winner just because he scored a togginner. He's not a loser.

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But they want to run the football and when they

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>throw it, George Kittle is still going to be the

0:48:34.320 --> 0:48:36.320
<v Speaker 1>leader on this team in terms of targets. So I

0:48:36.360 --> 0:48:40.439
<v Speaker 1>would say it's it's a pretty lateral move for Emmanuel Sanders. Again,

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.760
<v Speaker 1>coming over from Denverson situation. There says a lot about

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers team. Yeah, I'm sorry, a lot of

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 1>alt Cain pathers in a second, um not they pettish

0:48:48.920 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>your boy, Mark, He's good. When was a healthy stretch?

0:48:50.760 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Not they've had is still had the fourth most snaps

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.440
<v Speaker 1>at wide receiver yesterday for this four Niners team once again.

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Now they'd not great Bob, not great Bob at all, Greg,

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for it up, my boy, Dante Pettis. Every

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:05.399
<v Speaker 1>time that we can remind ourselves of being wrong for something,

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:08.399
<v Speaker 1>we might as well do it right. So coming into

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the season that has not worked out at all. I

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:12.919
<v Speaker 1>think it's a talented player, right like, there's no doubt

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:14.239
<v Speaker 1>about that. We saw what he did as a rookie,

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>especially down the stretch last year. Just hasn't been able

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to find his footing so far this year.