WEBVTT - Ken Griffin Talks Trump VP, Middle East Growth

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Ken Griffin, thank you

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here in Doha. Eric, it

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>is great to be here today. We have a lot

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about as usual, folks.

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I have been fortunate enough to have a long standing

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 2>relationship with Ken and have had the opportunity to interview

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 2>him many times.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I think of this as.

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 2>An evolution in so many ways, Ken, of things that

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.480
<v Speaker 2>we've touched on in the past. One of those things,

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of course, is geopolitics, a subject.

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>In order a graceful way to describe aging an.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 2>Evolution, geopolitics is a subject that has come up already

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 2>many times on this stage.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Ken.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 2>The world, as you know, is divided by conflicts. We

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>have hot wars in Ukraine and Gaza, and a cold

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>war you might say, between the United States and China,

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 2>and increasingly these conflicts are forcing states to pick sides,

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and thus they're realigning global trade and investment. What we'd

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>like here, Ken, is your perspective on the trajectory of

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 2>these geopolitical trends and your ideas as to how they're

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 2>shaping or perhaps reshaping the macroeconomic landscape. You have to

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.199
<v Speaker 2>navigate at your firm Citadel and citadel securities.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's a great question because it was just a

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 3>few years ago that I think most of us viewed

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 3>the world as heading towards geopolitical stability.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>A better place in other words, yeah, yes.

0:01:42.080 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 3>And a more integrated market, both financial flows of goods,

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>flows of services, and.

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Even the integration of labor markets.

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>And now with both the war and Europe, the tension

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>between the United States and China, and then in a

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 3>different way, what's on in the Middle East between Israel

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 3>and Hamas, it's very clear we live in a different

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>world than we had all experienced and fantasized about just

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 3>a few years ago. Now, the upshot of this is

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>that the traditional alliances post World War Two are regaining strength.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 3>You see the NATO countries coming together more tightly. You

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 3>see the United States trying to pull its allies closer together,

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Australia in the Pacific or our allies in Europe.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So there is definitely a reassertion.

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 3>Of the importance of global institutions, and in particular the

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 3>post World War two.

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Frameworks that are once again at play.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>As an investor, it's an interesting point in time because

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 3>if you are in the United States, there's a sense

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 3>that deploying capital in the markets of our clear.

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Allies is to say its path to go.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 3>In fact, you'll often hear American money managers, for example,

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>say that China is uninvestable because of.

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>The tension between the United States and China.

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 3>That's on clear display. And yet if you're here in

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 3>the Middle East, where China is an important importer of

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 3>oil and other products from across the region, it's a

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 3>very different story. China is clearly investible because of the

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 3>closeness form between China and this part of the world.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 3>So you do see both the restrengthening of historical relationships,

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 3>new ties being built, and capital follows.

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>The flows of these geopolitical arrangements. Are you worried about

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the world is headed.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Of course I am, and I'm willing to bet that

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 3>you are.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Also.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 3>This is not where we want to see the world

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>head for just a number of obvious reasons. I mean,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 3>first of all, global trade, which had adverse consequences that

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 3>we're learning about to this day, still unleashed an enormous

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 3>amount of gain for humanity. And with the rise of

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 3>global trade became the rise of information sharing, around the world,

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 3>which rapidly accelerated the trajectory of mankind. I mean of

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 3>note the Chinese, for example, our leaders in solar.

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Their leaders in EVS, their leaders in.

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 3>A number of emerging technologies, and a world which is

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 3>more splintered will see the gains that the Chinese have

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 3>achieved in these important areas not shared by the Western countries.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>And conversely, the United States is a clear leader in

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Ai along with a number of the European countries, and

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 3>those gains will not be shared with China and the

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 3>countries in its sphere of influence.

0:04:58.480 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Clear cut loss for all of humanity when we have

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:05.799
<v Speaker 3>the severing of ties between our countries.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 2>On a practical level, is it getting harder to manage

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 2>the risks you face?

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that one has to be aware that there

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>are more tail risks that are harder to ultimately manage,

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 3>and that goes with this rise in geopolitical complexity. So

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's certainly true, that there are just

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 3>larger tails today that didn't exist or we didn't perceive

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 3>them to exist seven or eight or ten years ago.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's that is intrinsic and money management today, and

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 3>that's the wit we think about each and every day

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 3>at Citadel is how do we mitigate the tail risks

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 3>in this world?

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>How do you mitigate the tail risks?

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, part of its sizing, so part of it is

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 3>how much exposure you have to a strategy or to

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 3>a particular sector of the economy or to a particular country.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>That's that is the go to playbook from manage in

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 3>your tails is just what's the most you're willing to

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 3>have exposed to a possible adverse event. And then the

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 3>other strategies to look for correlated payoffs that will protect

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 3>you in the event that.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The tail scenario occurs.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 3>So those are two things that you do in your

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 3>portfolio construction to manage against the.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Tail risk in this environment.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 2>Ken moments ago, you mentioned China and EVS. As it

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 2>happens today, the Biden administration is levying sweeping new tariffs

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 2>on Chinese imports, including on electric vehicles.

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>How does that change the picture.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of a continuation of the incoherent economic policies

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 3>of the Biden administration.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>We've seen this giant push.

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Towards green energy over the course of the last several years,

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 3>and at the same time, a set of policies that

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 3>run completely contrary to the stated goal of trying to

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 3>head towards the zero carbon world, and placing enormous tariffs

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 3>on Chinese evs, which are low cost, high quality, of

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 3>great value to American consumers is yet another part of

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>the incoherent bid economic strategy. The other part of the

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>strategy that I scratched my head about is the US

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 3>refusing to provide new LNG permits. Right, if you want

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 3>the world to head towards a lower carbon footprint and

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 3>move away from coal, access to LNG is a really

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 3>important part of the equation, and yet the United States

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>is refusing to permit new facilities in the foreseeable future.

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 2>And also to sell LNG to countries with which the

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 2>United States doesn't have a free trade agreement.

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a part of the equation.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Also that I said, the United States amazingly is a

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 2>bigger LG exporter than Kutar.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>We're and neck. We're neck and neck.

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's very important to understand that if you want

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 3>a country to base its economy on natural gas, they're

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 3>going to want two suppliers.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.559
<v Speaker 1>It's not a wind lose is dynamic between the United

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>States and Qatar. It's a win win.

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 3>If you look at any good that is required on

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 3>an existential basis, you're going to want dual source supply.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 3>And the rise of the United States is a major

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 3>lergy exporter only strengthens the position of this region of

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 3>the world in providing natural gas to other countries.

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Going back to China for a moment. We've talked about

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>China in the past. You have what I would call

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>a constructive view of China, certainly more constructive than many

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 2>people with whom I've spoken. There is, however, strong hostility

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>to China among both Republicans and Democrats. So how would

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>you explain the way you look at the opportunity and

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>the problem that China presents, particularly to the United States.

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 3>So that's a treacherous question to have to answer. Let's

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 3>take a huge step back. I think that my view

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 3>towards China is rooted in respect. It is rooted in

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 3>the respect of a country that has pulled more people

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 3>out of poverty in the last forty years than than

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 3>any country in the history of the world. It's a

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>remarkable economic achievement that they've unleashed in China, and it

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.199
<v Speaker 3>was an economic achievement that the United States firmly supported.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 3>We believed in America that the rise of a free

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:36.199
<v Speaker 3>market economy would lead to the rise of a liberal democracy.

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 3>It was an explicit calculation that happened in DC that

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 3>didn't actually happen to happen in reality. So it's important

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 3>to recognize that this was the goal of the United States,

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 3>was to see the economic rise of China, hoping it

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 3>would push it towards a liberal democracy.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It didn't happen.

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>The economy rose, did not become a liberal democracy. Having

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 3>said that, today, China is a powerhouse in research and

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 3>development in a broad number of fields, fields that are

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 3>very important to the future of all of us around

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 3>the world. And so long as we're able to maintain

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 3>a constructive relationship and we can share the best technologies

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 3>that are to countries and all the countries around the

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 3>world develop and build, there's an.

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Opportunity for gain.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we have in some sense a very muddled relationship,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 3>and it's almost as if we're trying to maximize the

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 3>opportunities for mutual pain. And that's a difficult place to be.

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 3>It makes the Chinese weary of trusting the United States.

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 3>It makes the United States wary of trusting China, and

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 3>there's just a lot lost in that equation.

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>It would make sense if what the United States wants

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to do is make an enemy of China, but that's

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 2>not clear.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I don't want to make this a

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 3>US only is going after China.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a two way street.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the Chinese for ample supporting Russia's ability to

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 3>wage warn Ukraine doesn't play well in the United States

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 3>of America. So there's room for both countries to take

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 3>definitive acts to just turn the temperature down. And well,

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 3>if it's a coal word, it's to turn the temperature up.

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure what shoy you go. But to improve

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 3>the relationships and the dynamic between our two countries, Ken

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Qatar is playing an instrumental role in the peace talks

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 3>or the effort to create piece as it were, between

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 3>the Israelis and the Palestinians and to resolve the situation

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 3>in Gaza.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 2>And with respect to Hamas, you've been outspoken about the

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 2>pro Palestinian protests back in the United States. They've royal

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 2>university campuses. You've been particularly critical of your alma mater Harvard.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Here's my question to you. When people here in the

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Gulf region and across the globe for that matter, see

0:11:55.440 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 2>the chaos at Harvard or Columbia or USC or MIT

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 2>and police and combat gear moving to clear accountments, how do.

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You think that shapes their view of America? Not well?

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Not well? And what is lost is that what's happening

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>on campus is not is not free speech. It's anarchy.

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, in Columbia, when they storm a building, they

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 3>vandalize a building, they're destroying property, and then they ask

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.720
<v Speaker 3>for humanitarian aid, which is the greatest of all ironies.

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just the wrong It is the wrong dynamic that

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing take place in American campuses. These are students.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Most of these students on campuses are trying to learn.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 3>They're trying to have an education, and the university should

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 3>be really trying to encourage a constructive debate between the

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 3>students of different backgrounds, whether they're from the Middle East,

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 3>whether they're of Jewish origin. It's really important that the

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 3>generation that will be the generation that runs the world

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 3>in forty years I still learn from this horrible moment

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 3>in history, and we're not fostering that environment on campuses today,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>and it's really it's a huge, huge disappointment that so

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>much what we see on campus. You've seen the video

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 3>footage of the kids interviewed, Why are you here? What

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 3>are you protesting about? Often they can't even answer basic

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 3>questions about what's happening in the region and why it's

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 3>taking place?

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Can people here?

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 2>And I suspect those watching us around the world are

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>eager for your insights into what might happen during and

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 2>after the US election.

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>How might US.

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Foreign policy and defense policy change if Donald Trump were

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 2>to return to the White House.

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 3>So if President Trump returns to the White House, I

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 3>think you'll see a global perception of a stronger America.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 3>The Biden administration's form policies, the actual policies are generally

0:13:56.240 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 3>speaking thoughtful, but to be blunt, America does not exude

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.720
<v Speaker 3>credibility or strength in its actions around the world today.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 3>That our positioning does not match the thoughtfulness of our policies.

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 3>That's a very difficult place to be in a world

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 3>which has the geopolitical cross currents that we spoke about earlier.

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 3>And it means that those who are willing to push

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 3>to see how far you can push America are willing

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 3>to push harder than we want.

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>To see happening.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think that anybody who knows President Trump knows

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 3>that is not somebody you just pushed to see what's

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 3>going to happen. That's the wrong strategy with President Trump.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 3>And so I believe that President Trump will have very

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 3>good people in foreign policy and in the Department of Defense.

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 3>But I think he will exude a level of strength

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 3>that will help to stabilize the world in this very,

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>very trying times.

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 2>There has been flagging support for aid to Ukraine. The

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 2>publican party with Donald Trump abandoned Ukraine.

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>No, he will not. You're certain of that. Well, this

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>goes back to my earlier statement.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>You could never be certain about President Trump, and that's

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 3>part of the reason that he is more intimidating to

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 3>our adversaries. You never know exactly what the response is

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be. But knowing a number of people that

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 3>he's close to, and having actually brought this topic up,

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that President Trump feels he can find an

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 3>off ramp towards peace by reaching across to Putin and

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 3>to the Ukrainian leadership. I believe he knows it's important

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 3>to American interests, that we do not abandon the Ukrainian

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 3>people at this very difficult moment, and that we keep

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Russian's territorial ambitions in check, and a strong pushback against

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 3>Putin will be part of the equation if need be,

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 3>to secure the peace in the Ukraine.

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think he'll do with economic policy. It's

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult to know.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>So neither administration gives me comfort in terms of a

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 3>willingness to reduce federal spending. But I have no doubt

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 3>that a Trump administration would be far less oriented towards

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 3>regulatory overreach and far more thoughtful about the role of

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.359
<v Speaker 3>the US government in the day to day US economy.

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 3>One of the reasons that American voters are so unhappy

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 3>right now is inflation is out of control, and inflation

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 3>is out of control because of the expanse of government

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 3>under the biod administration, the rate of spending, and the

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 3>degree of intervention in the economy. It's causing energy prices

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 3>to be higher, It's causing the cost of manufacturing to

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 3>be higher. It's impacting every part of the economy in

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 3>a way that the American voter is frustrated about. President

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 3>Biden doesn't understand you need to break the back of

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 3>inflation to give people the sense of economic security.

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 2>We have talked in the past about America's tendency should

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 2>we say to spend more money than it generates in

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 2>text revenue? And you have warned ken of some catastrophic

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 2>consequences if deficit spending isn't brought under control. What is

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.199
<v Speaker 2>the catalyst for an American debt crisis going to be?

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know what that moment will be when

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 3>there's an auction that goes awry, or when the markets

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 3>become dislocated. Financial markets, generally speaking, work very well until

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 3>they catastrophically come off the rails. You don't necessarily get

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of warning that there's about to be a

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 3>big event. The crash of eighty seven is a great

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 3>case study. You know, that day I woke up, I

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 3>was in my dorm room trading then, and the stories

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 3>on the of the day were about a small scream

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 3>to the Middle East of frankly no consequence, and the

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 3>health of First Lady Nancy Reagan. And yet we an

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 3>end of that day with the stock market down twenty

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 3>percent and a number of American institutions literally on life support,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 3>and your death happened in one day, one day. There

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 3>was no big story that morning that would make you

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 3>think that that day might have been the end of

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 3>the US.

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Capital markets as we knew them.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 3>There was no warning, And so I worry that the

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 3>debt crisis may have a similar construct, that they'll simply

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 3>be a day where a major auction fails and then

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 3>you see a panic start to brew in the treasury market,

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 3>and the question will be will be how fast will

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>the Fed intervene?

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:47.959
<v Speaker 1>What panic will that induce?

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Because government intervention under duress often just creates more panic.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And then do we see a flood of treasures.

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Coming back into the market from holders around the world's

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 3>frightening respect, it is back to politics for a moment.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You've been a prominent donor.

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.239
<v Speaker 2>I would say to Republican candidates, I'd like to know

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 2>how are you going to spend your money? How are

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 2>you already spending your money ahead of the election in November.

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 3>So I have been a significant supporter of Republicans that

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 3>stand for personal freedom, national security, and economic soundness.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>The United States.

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 3>That has been a big focus of mine in this

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 3>primary election or this primary cycle. I want to see

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 3>people in the House and in the Senate that represent

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 3>the best of American values and backgrounds.

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>That prepare one to serve in public service.

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 3>In the last election cycle, I supported a number of

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 3>people who were veterans just and who are now serving

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>our country in the House, and they do it with

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 3>the pride that our country deserves, and they do it

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 3>with the integrity that our country needs. So I've been

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 3>very focused on finding candidate who I think represent the

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 3>best of American values to be part of.

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>The future of the Republican Party.

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 2>People probably want to know, have you donated to Donald

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump's campaign, either directly or indirectly to a pack or

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 2>a super pack?

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>I have not, will you? I'm going to wait to

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>see what he picks his VP candidate. Is there anyone

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>whom you'd like to see him pick as his VP candidate?

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I know I don't. This is again like poking the bear.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Not sure which way my recommendation goes in terms of

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>helping that person's prospects.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that's wise position to take. Before we finish

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 2>ken This region is blessed with resource wealth and as

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>a result, sovereign wealth, so much so that pretty much

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 2>every major asset manager in the West sees the Gulf

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>as something of a honeypot and is trying to raise

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>money here. As someone who isn't raising money here, how

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 2>would you advise the sovereign wealth funds in the Gulf

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:06.080
<v Speaker 2>region to maximize their negotiating leverage.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 3>So either I'm going to be excommunicated from the circle

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 3>of my fellow money managers or never invited to come

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 3>back to the Middle East again?

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Is that? Is that the position E're putting me in?

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 3>So look, here's what I think is important to think about.

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 3>I think alignment between the interests of the money manager

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 3>and the sopoire well fund are very important. And I

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 3>think it's more important to have your money and trusted

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 3>with the firm that is going to act continuously in

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.959
<v Speaker 3>your best interest as an investor than it is to

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 3>try to pick somebody who simply has the lowest fees

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 3>or some other superficial demarcation of being open and transparent.

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's be clear, your money managers who have

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 3>really important intellectual property aren't going to be unduly transparent.

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 3>They're trying to protect their very intellectual property that they'll

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 3>share the benefits with you of with the client. Simply put,

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Coca Cola doesn't publish its recipe on the web. So

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 3>I think it's very important when you find a money manager,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 3>you're really asking what's their competitive advantage, what's their culture?

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>How aligned are.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 3>They with me and in both in the good moments

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 3>and the bad moments.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:28.239
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to put themselves.

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 3>In the shoes of their clients and make the right

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 3>decision by their clients.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>It's citing. I take great pride that almost over.

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 3>Twenty percent of the capital in our hedge funds is

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 3>the capital the partners and the team members at Citadel.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 3>We wake up every single day as co investors with

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 3>our capital providers, and I think that symbolizes what I

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 3>would think about looking for if I were a member

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 3>of the soccern wealth community here in the Middle East.

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>One last thing among the men, any distinctive qualities that citadels.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 3>Just by the way, when you're going to pick a

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 3>brain search, did you find the doctor.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>With the lowest feet? That's not what I would do.

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 3>No, Right, So you want to find somebody who actually

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 3>has pricing power because other people perceive them to be good,

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 3>it says something.

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Yet there's something to be said for that.

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 2>I was just going to say, because I think it

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.439
<v Speaker 2>would certainly interest people in this room and elsewhere in

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 2>this part of the world. One of the things that

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Citadel is known for is how seriously you and your

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 2>colleagues take the search for extraordinary talent. A number of

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 2>investment firms have opened offices in this part of the world,

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 2>whether it's in Doha, whether it's in Abu Dhabi, Dubai

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>for example, or Riad.

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Have you thought about expanding here?

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, we actually just recently did an analysis of our

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 3>competitor's footprints in a number of these cities as we

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>try to think about what is our strategy here in

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 3>the Middle.

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>East, and you landed on the right issue. It's about talent.

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 3>And when we think about our Middle East strategy, we're

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 3>going to think about where are we going to draw

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 3>the greatest amount of talent, both from the domestic country

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 3>and from the international community. Too often countries try to

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 3>attract talent by having very attractive tax attributes. That tends

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 3>to draw in a handful of senior pms, but doesn't

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 3>draw in the analysts and the associates who do the

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 3>day to day work that's required to be successful in

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 3>the markets. One of the reasons that I think CDELL

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 3>has been so successful is the intense collaboration that we

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 3>have within our four walls. A PM working side by

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 3>side with an analyst, with an associate working through a problem,

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Having a PM located in a low tax jurisdiction on

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 3>Zoom intermittently with a team back in London. That's not

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 3>a winning formula. So when we think about where we're

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be in the Middle East in terms of

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 3>our footprint for human cap it's going to be about

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 3>a holistic solution where we've got people who are in

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 3>the region, integrated tightly with pms who are here.

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The whole team is here and successful as a team.

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.719
<v Speaker 1>It explains a lot. Ken, thank you very much.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Ladies and gentlemen, please join me in thanking Ken Griffin,

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 2>thank you.