1 00:00:02,440 --> 00:00:09,119 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the 2 00:00:09,160 --> 00:00:13,280 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am 3 00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:15,800 Speaker 1: Eastern on Effo card Playing and broud Otto with the 4 00:00:15,840 --> 00:00:19,720 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, 5 00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:22,800 Speaker 1: or watch us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:23,720 --> 00:00:26,079 Speaker 2: Eco Go, folks. It's been busy here this morning. That 7 00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:28,880 Speaker 2: gives you all the economic data that's released by the government. 8 00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:32,400 Speaker 2: A lot of stuff here, jolts, factory orders, durable goods. 9 00:00:32,440 --> 00:00:34,680 Speaker 2: I mean I heard about all this stuff in economics class. 10 00:00:34,720 --> 00:00:36,880 Speaker 2: I didn't really know what it is, but I see 11 00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:39,640 Speaker 2: the numbers here. Michael McKee, he knows what's going on. 12 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:42,240 Speaker 2: He does all the economic stuff for Bloomberg television, radio 13 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:46,559 Speaker 2: and everything else. Actually, Michael, of all the economic data here, 14 00:00:46,560 --> 00:00:47,280 Speaker 2: what jumped out. 15 00:00:47,120 --> 00:00:49,000 Speaker 3: Of you today? What do you think the Fed is 16 00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:49,760 Speaker 3: going to focus on? 17 00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:53,600 Speaker 4: Maybe today, well, if it's going to look at jolts, 18 00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:58,080 Speaker 4: because it does show the labor market is in a 19 00:00:58,120 --> 00:01:01,480 Speaker 4: looser state, where pretty much back to where we were 20 00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:04,600 Speaker 4: pre pandemic in terms of the number of job openings. 21 00:01:05,040 --> 00:01:09,640 Speaker 4: It was a drop, a bigger drop than expected from 22 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:13,520 Speaker 4: last month, but the prior month June was revised lower 23 00:01:13,560 --> 00:01:15,600 Speaker 4: as well, and when you look at what we've seen 24 00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:20,920 Speaker 4: in the time series, we've seen job openings in the 25 00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:24,119 Speaker 4: seven million range for three of the last four months, 26 00:01:24,120 --> 00:01:27,520 Speaker 4: so it's not a shock. It's not a major change 27 00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:33,759 Speaker 4: in the overall outlook. These numbers are not necessarily super reliable. 28 00:01:34,640 --> 00:01:37,520 Speaker 4: The quits rate, which people take as an evidence of 29 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:39,759 Speaker 4: how people feel about the labor market and whether they 30 00:01:39,760 --> 00:01:43,039 Speaker 4: can continue to get jobs, still at two point one percent, 31 00:01:43,080 --> 00:01:45,919 Speaker 4: where it's been for a long time, so it doesn't 32 00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:52,720 Speaker 4: look like it's making major news today. Oddly enough, factory 33 00:01:52,840 --> 00:01:58,600 Speaker 4: orders come in up five percent now, durable goods up 34 00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 4: as part of that, a revised nine point eight percent 35 00:02:01,360 --> 00:02:04,480 Speaker 4: from nine point nine percent. We knew that, So what 36 00:02:04,640 --> 00:02:07,520 Speaker 4: that's telling you with a five percent gain after a 37 00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:10,160 Speaker 4: negative three point three percent the month before is non 38 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:14,200 Speaker 4: durable goods sales were pretty good, and that is good 39 00:02:14,240 --> 00:02:17,600 Speaker 4: news for the idea that the Fed doesn't have to 40 00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:22,640 Speaker 4: immediately cut rates or anything like that. Probably the most 41 00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:25,800 Speaker 4: interesting number of the day, though, trade ballance. The trade 42 00:02:25,800 --> 00:02:29,840 Speaker 4: balance at seventy eight point eight billion, widest the widest 43 00:02:29,919 --> 00:02:35,320 Speaker 4: in two years, up from seventy three point zero and 44 00:02:36,200 --> 00:02:39,240 Speaker 4: just a little bit lower than the forecast, but basically 45 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:43,520 Speaker 4: saying that we are importing a lot of stuff. Now, 46 00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:46,680 Speaker 4: there could be two reasons for that. One, the economy 47 00:02:46,720 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 4: is still in good shape and people want to buy. 48 00:02:48,560 --> 00:02:52,680 Speaker 4: Or two, retailers are stocking up for the holiday season, 49 00:02:52,760 --> 00:02:56,160 Speaker 4: which then becomes a question for your retail analysts of 50 00:02:56,560 --> 00:02:58,880 Speaker 4: are they making a bad bet or not? Is the 51 00:02:58,919 --> 00:03:01,520 Speaker 4: economy going to slower, Our consumer is going to stop spending, 52 00:03:01,520 --> 00:03:02,760 Speaker 4: and we're going to be stuck with a. 53 00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:05,320 Speaker 5: Lot of inventory. All right, So that's why it's an 54 00:03:05,360 --> 00:03:07,440 Speaker 5: interesting number. Put that in your hat, shake it up. 55 00:03:07,560 --> 00:03:10,119 Speaker 5: What a we what's the trajectory for the US economy? 56 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:11,400 Speaker 5: Based on what you've seen so. 57 00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,840 Speaker 4: Far, it looks like the trajectory is pretty much the 58 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 4: same as it was. That the economy has slowed, we're 59 00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:20,720 Speaker 4: not seeing it fall off a cliff, and therefore the 60 00:03:20,760 --> 00:03:24,560 Speaker 4: Fed is going to say we can cut rates, but 61 00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:26,840 Speaker 4: we don't have to do an emergency great cut of 62 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:28,520 Speaker 4: fifty basis points or anything like that. 63 00:03:28,639 --> 00:03:30,240 Speaker 5: We can do twenty five all right. 64 00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:31,760 Speaker 3: Mike McKee, thank you so much for joining us. 65 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:34,040 Speaker 2: We appreciate getting your expertise there on a bunch of 66 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:37,320 Speaker 2: economic data crossing the tape here this morning. 67 00:03:38,480 --> 00:03:42,360 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live 68 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,960 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and Android 69 00:03:46,000 --> 00:03:48,760 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen 70 00:03:48,880 --> 00:03:52,000 Speaker 1: live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station 71 00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:55,120 Speaker 1: Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty. 72 00:03:56,640 --> 00:04:00,600 Speaker 2: Yesterday, Nvidia suffered a record two and seventy nine billion 73 00:04:00,760 --> 00:04:04,120 Speaker 2: dollar route as AI worries sink stocks. They also got 74 00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:07,840 Speaker 2: a DOJ anti trust probe, a lot of headwinds for 75 00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:10,520 Speaker 2: that stock, a lot of issues for investors to figure 76 00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:12,760 Speaker 2: out for in Vidia stock still up over one hundred 77 00:04:12,760 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 2: percent year to date. Man Deep saying, he's the guy 78 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:17,839 Speaker 2: we talked about in video all the time. He's Bloomberg Intelligence, 79 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:19,400 Speaker 2: he's pretty smart. But the guy we really want to 80 00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:22,840 Speaker 2: talk to you today is Justin Teresi, Anti Trust Litigation 81 00:04:23,200 --> 00:04:27,000 Speaker 2: and Policy chanlest for Bloomberg Taligence. I've never met you before, Likewise, 82 00:04:27,400 --> 00:04:29,480 Speaker 2: I did hire you, So I'm just going to go 83 00:04:29,520 --> 00:04:35,080 Speaker 2: on Man Deep's recommendation. What's the DOJ saying here as 84 00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:37,679 Speaker 2: it relates to Nvidia and how concerned should in Vidia 85 00:04:37,720 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 2: and its shareholders be? 86 00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:40,880 Speaker 6: Yeah, so I think the real takeaway here. The most 87 00:04:40,920 --> 00:04:42,920 Speaker 6: important thing to keep in mind is the timing that's 88 00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:45,799 Speaker 6: associated with this. So news broke a couple of months 89 00:04:45,800 --> 00:04:48,719 Speaker 6: ago that DJ was looking into Navidia here and what 90 00:04:48,800 --> 00:04:51,120 Speaker 6: we think there are a couple issues they might be 91 00:04:51,160 --> 00:04:54,320 Speaker 6: interested in. One, market consolidation, maybe in the video is 92 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:56,479 Speaker 6: growing a little bit faster than the authorities would like 93 00:04:56,520 --> 00:04:58,840 Speaker 6: to see. The other issue they might be interested in 94 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:01,520 Speaker 6: is one related to how they're selling their products. Are 95 00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:04,920 Speaker 6: they tying things into anti competitive manner? Are they bundling 96 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:07,520 Speaker 6: products in such a way that it's really impossible for 97 00:05:07,560 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 6: other folks to compete. But really, this development yesterday in 98 00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:14,200 Speaker 6: terms of the subpoena really is something we were expecting. 99 00:05:14,279 --> 00:05:17,520 Speaker 6: And that's because what it lays a formality upon this 100 00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:21,800 Speaker 6: investigation that wasn't there before. Previously it was informal questionnaire. 101 00:05:22,080 --> 00:05:24,359 Speaker 6: Now NAVIDI is really going to have to certify that 102 00:05:24,440 --> 00:05:27,279 Speaker 6: the information it's handing over to DOJ is what they're 103 00:05:27,320 --> 00:05:29,880 Speaker 6: looking for and a true and accurate depiction of what 104 00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:30,839 Speaker 6: they want to know about. 105 00:05:31,279 --> 00:05:34,360 Speaker 5: Is there a political element to this? I mean, everybody's 106 00:05:34,400 --> 00:05:37,520 Speaker 5: got Nvidia in their four oh one K. Does the 107 00:05:37,560 --> 00:05:41,000 Speaker 5: Harris campaign pick up the phone and say, couldn't you 108 00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:42,520 Speaker 5: have waited till after November? 109 00:05:43,040 --> 00:05:45,039 Speaker 6: I think that might be the question of the day 110 00:05:45,080 --> 00:05:47,920 Speaker 6: with relation to this. So look, if I'm na Vidia's 111 00:05:47,920 --> 00:05:50,039 Speaker 6: attorneys right now, what I'm trying to do is to 112 00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 6: delay responding to this as much as I possibly can, 113 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:56,120 Speaker 6: right because there is that element of an election coming 114 00:05:56,200 --> 00:05:59,279 Speaker 6: up in November. Here, what does a new administration do 115 00:05:59,680 --> 00:06:02,440 Speaker 6: with the investigation itself? How hard do they go? Are 116 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:05,239 Speaker 6: they more open to a settlement than the current regime 117 00:06:05,320 --> 00:06:07,560 Speaker 6: might be? So that's really the name the name of 118 00:06:07,560 --> 00:06:09,520 Speaker 6: the game here. I think you're spot on there. That 119 00:06:09,760 --> 00:06:10,200 Speaker 6: really the. 120 00:06:10,160 --> 00:06:13,159 Speaker 5: Teacher and the question for Vice President Harris for me 121 00:06:13,440 --> 00:06:17,320 Speaker 5: is are you going to continue this aggressive anti trust 122 00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:23,080 Speaker 5: behavior in a new administration? Potentially? Right? So, you know 123 00:06:23,320 --> 00:06:25,279 Speaker 5: that becomes a real campaign issue, doesn't it. 124 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:26,960 Speaker 6: It does, and I think it has, right. I think 125 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 6: we've seen that already with a lot of rhetoric coming 126 00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:31,960 Speaker 6: from both the Harris camp and you know Trump camp 127 00:06:31,960 --> 00:06:34,760 Speaker 6: with Jada Vance on the issue too, right. So I 128 00:06:35,080 --> 00:06:38,080 Speaker 6: think moving ahead, we think there could be some softening 129 00:06:38,120 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 6: perhaps in some ways, or more measured or deliberate approach 130 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:42,679 Speaker 6: to things. If Harris were to win the White House. 131 00:06:42,839 --> 00:06:44,600 Speaker 6: But what we see from the Trump camp is Jade 132 00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:48,160 Speaker 6: Vance does have that rather strong anti big tech mentality 133 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:50,720 Speaker 6: when we ever we talk about anti trust with him 134 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:53,520 Speaker 6: as a candidate. So really we're not quite sure what 135 00:06:53,560 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 6: to make of the situation there. But delay is the 136 00:06:56,640 --> 00:06:58,880 Speaker 6: name of the game. If I'm the video right now. 137 00:06:59,400 --> 00:07:01,599 Speaker 2: When you talk to investors or we need to hear 138 00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:04,760 Speaker 2: from the company, what do investors think about this risk? 139 00:07:04,880 --> 00:07:07,560 Speaker 2: Is it just another big tech company facing some regulatory 140 00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:09,160 Speaker 2: headwinds like we've seen for years. 141 00:07:09,480 --> 00:07:12,120 Speaker 7: Yeah, I think in Nvidia now is part of that 142 00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:18,080 Speaker 7: club that Amazon, Google, and Meta which have faced regulatory 143 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:20,880 Speaker 7: scrutiny over the years. And look, in the case of Google, 144 00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:25,600 Speaker 7: it was fairly obvious that regulators doubled down on their 145 00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:29,560 Speaker 7: distribution agreements that they had with Apple and Samsung to 146 00:07:29,560 --> 00:07:32,080 Speaker 7: be the default search. So in this case, it would 147 00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:34,960 Speaker 7: be interesting to see DOJ's approach. What is it that 148 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 7: they really want to focus on in terms of how 149 00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:42,760 Speaker 7: in Nvidia is distributing their chips to the hyperscalers and 150 00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 7: their largest customers, Because clearly in Vidia has a lot 151 00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:51,000 Speaker 7: of interest from all types of customers. The market is undersupplied, 152 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:54,280 Speaker 7: so do they have an algorithm to say, Okay, I'm 153 00:07:54,320 --> 00:07:58,320 Speaker 7: gonna distribute X number of chips to customer A and 154 00:07:58,760 --> 00:08:01,440 Speaker 7: Y to customer B. And look it comes down to 155 00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:05,800 Speaker 7: in videos, how they have their relationship with their customers 156 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:07,320 Speaker 7: and they can distribute the chips. 157 00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:09,080 Speaker 2: Say why I know that's it seems like it's a 158 00:08:09,160 --> 00:08:10,720 Speaker 2: market operating efficiently. 159 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:11,320 Speaker 3: But what do I know? 160 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:13,280 Speaker 2: But what I do know is the beauty of Bloomberg 161 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:17,240 Speaker 2: Intelligence as we bring together industry and company specific research 162 00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:19,120 Speaker 2: analysis and Man Deep sing he's been doing it for 163 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:23,560 Speaker 2: years and Justin terrasa anti trust litigation policy analysts Bloomberg Intelligence, 164 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:25,880 Speaker 2: where you can bring these folks together, they can partner 165 00:08:25,920 --> 00:08:28,200 Speaker 2: their research and to integrate their research and give you 166 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:30,720 Speaker 2: a really good view of what it means for some 167 00:08:30,760 --> 00:08:33,480 Speaker 2: of these companies as they face some of this risk 168 00:08:33,600 --> 00:08:35,920 Speaker 2: from the regulators. And again it's great to have that. 169 00:08:36,000 --> 00:08:38,960 Speaker 2: It's part of Bloomberg Intelligence. B. I go on the terminal, 170 00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:39,920 Speaker 2: Oh and guess. 171 00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:43,679 Speaker 5: What videos shares seem to have bottomed out today? 172 00:08:43,720 --> 00:08:44,080 Speaker 3: Exactly? 173 00:08:44,080 --> 00:08:46,520 Speaker 2: All right, Man Deep seeing senior tech analyst, Justin Tracy, 174 00:08:46,559 --> 00:08:49,960 Speaker 2: anti trust analyst, Bloomberg Intelligence in our studio breaking it 175 00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:51,400 Speaker 2: down for it in video. 176 00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:56,680 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live 177 00:08:56,760 --> 00:09:00,160 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on afflcar playing right Oh 178 00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:03,160 Speaker 1: with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you 179 00:09:03,200 --> 00:09:06,880 Speaker 1: get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 180 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:09,600 Speaker 3: Let's got our next guest, Paul Carter. 181 00:09:09,800 --> 00:09:12,440 Speaker 2: He's co founder managing partner of twin Focus, joining us 182 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:16,679 Speaker 2: from Boston, Massachusetts via zoom. Paul, what are you telling 183 00:09:16,679 --> 00:09:21,079 Speaker 2: your clients these days as to where the best opportunities are. 184 00:09:21,080 --> 00:09:22,920 Speaker 2: We've got the S and P five hundred, you know, 185 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:26,079 Speaker 2: up eighteen percent. I mean that's pretty darn solid, but 186 00:09:26,160 --> 00:09:27,920 Speaker 2: yet I can still get a decent yield and to 187 00:09:28,040 --> 00:09:30,000 Speaker 2: your treasury at three point eight percent. 188 00:09:30,120 --> 00:09:31,520 Speaker 3: What are you telling your clients these days? 189 00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:36,080 Speaker 8: Paul, John, thanks for having me. You know here at 190 00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:39,800 Speaker 8: twin Focus, we've we've largely been invested according to our 191 00:09:39,800 --> 00:09:43,440 Speaker 8: policy benchmarks all year. You know, the expectation has really 192 00:09:43,480 --> 00:09:48,320 Speaker 8: been for soft landing, reasonable growth, low inflation, lower rates. 193 00:09:49,559 --> 00:09:52,120 Speaker 8: You know, before today, before the jolt's number that just 194 00:09:52,160 --> 00:09:54,319 Speaker 8: came out, the Fed funds were pricing in one hundred 195 00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:56,959 Speaker 8: percent probability of a twenty five basis point rate cut 196 00:09:57,160 --> 00:10:02,199 Speaker 8: in September, November, and December. With this most recent number, 197 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:06,520 Speaker 8: you know, bigger miss than expected, and it seems to 198 00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:09,960 Speaker 8: be signaling, you know, greater job availability out there and 199 00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:12,760 Speaker 8: kind of weaker job market. You've seen that that FED 200 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:16,920 Speaker 8: funds market respond with, you know, perhaps a greater chance 201 00:10:16,960 --> 00:10:20,000 Speaker 8: of perhaps fifty basis points cut at this next meeting. 202 00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:23,480 Speaker 8: Given all of this, you know, as mentioned, we've been 203 00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:26,120 Speaker 8: focused on remaining fully invested, and we have been able 204 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:28,920 Speaker 8: to take advantage of the run in risk assets. But 205 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:32,560 Speaker 8: we're looking to diversify our risk more broadly, and you know, 206 00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:34,880 Speaker 8: away from this, you know, purely the AI trade, if 207 00:10:34,920 --> 00:10:35,559 Speaker 8: you will. 208 00:10:35,400 --> 00:10:37,160 Speaker 5: All right, Paul and Paul, I think this is one 209 00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:40,000 Speaker 5: of those moments where I'm supposed to throw confetti in 210 00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:43,920 Speaker 5: the air. Sure the yield curve? Yes, this inverted? Oh wow, 211 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:48,960 Speaker 5: so two and ten's now well back, I spoke too soon, 212 00:10:49,040 --> 00:10:51,959 Speaker 5: But anyway, do you attach? I mean, Paul, they used 213 00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:56,920 Speaker 5: to tell me that inverted your curve preceeds recession. Well 214 00:10:57,120 --> 00:11:02,440 Speaker 5: didn't happen? Do you put? What's your significance of this? 215 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:07,160 Speaker 5: Do you think you know? Attention to the old curve. 216 00:11:08,120 --> 00:11:10,240 Speaker 8: We absolutely are focused on the yield curve. You know, 217 00:11:10,280 --> 00:11:12,760 Speaker 8: there's there's perhaps a number of reasons why we didn't 218 00:11:12,760 --> 00:11:16,200 Speaker 8: see a recession, you know, in part being this whole 219 00:11:16,200 --> 00:11:18,320 Speaker 8: AI trade. You know, the productivity that we've seen in 220 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:21,600 Speaker 8: the economy and the forecasted productivity that we will see 221 00:11:21,679 --> 00:11:25,160 Speaker 8: from AI that combined with a lot of the stimulus 222 00:11:25,160 --> 00:11:30,760 Speaker 8: that was still waning and in effect after COVID that said, 223 00:11:30,840 --> 00:11:32,839 Speaker 8: you know, a recession I think, you know, at some 224 00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:36,040 Speaker 8: point is not completely off the table. You know, hopefully 225 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:40,319 Speaker 8: we're able to escape with justice soft landing, but we're 226 00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:43,959 Speaker 8: nineteen years, eighteen, nineteen years into the business cycle here, 227 00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:47,280 Speaker 8: so it wouldn't be surprising to see something at some point. 228 00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:51,280 Speaker 8: You know, there is this talk of rate cuts become 229 00:11:51,400 --> 00:11:55,520 Speaker 8: obviously more prominent with some weakness and inflation, but I 230 00:11:55,640 --> 00:11:58,360 Speaker 8: think that, you know, it usually takes some time to 231 00:11:58,360 --> 00:12:00,959 Speaker 8: see those rate cuts impact the econom so we may 232 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:04,040 Speaker 8: not see that until Q one, Q two next year. 233 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:06,760 Speaker 8: Until then, you know, the market's going to try to 234 00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:09,199 Speaker 8: decide on the overall direction, and I think we're just 235 00:12:09,280 --> 00:12:11,840 Speaker 8: going to continue to see a lot of volatility between 236 00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:12,480 Speaker 8: now and then. 237 00:12:13,280 --> 00:12:15,360 Speaker 2: Paul, in terms of maybe trying to temper some of 238 00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 2: that volatility, what do you guys, or how are you 239 00:12:18,240 --> 00:12:20,200 Speaker 2: guys approaching the fixed income markets? 240 00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:21,080 Speaker 3: Are you? 241 00:12:21,080 --> 00:12:22,640 Speaker 2: You know, I'm content to sitting in a to your 242 00:12:22,679 --> 00:12:25,720 Speaker 2: treasury three point eight percent, but some people might want 243 00:12:25,760 --> 00:12:26,720 Speaker 2: to take some more credit risk. 244 00:12:26,760 --> 00:12:28,720 Speaker 3: How do you think about fixed income opportunities today? 245 00:12:29,679 --> 00:12:32,040 Speaker 8: Sure, so let's let's talk about credit and kind of 246 00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:36,280 Speaker 8: safe treasury allocations. You know, we've largely been barbelled with 247 00:12:36,360 --> 00:12:38,720 Speaker 8: perhaps a bit of an overweight towards the shorter end 248 00:12:38,760 --> 00:12:41,880 Speaker 8: of the curve. So when rates were up fours and five, 249 00:12:42,160 --> 00:12:44,720 Speaker 8: we were taking advantage of locking in some ten year money. 250 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:47,839 Speaker 8: Then you know, while it's compelling to sit in a 251 00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:50,079 Speaker 8: three and a half or four percent short term treasury, 252 00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:52,679 Speaker 8: you do have some reinvestment risk if you see, you know, 253 00:12:52,840 --> 00:12:56,199 Speaker 8: rates come down. So we have been starting to nibble 254 00:12:56,360 --> 00:12:59,800 Speaker 8: at some duration. On the credit side, you know, we've 255 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:03,600 Speaker 8: been less enamored with this whole private credit trade that 256 00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:07,480 Speaker 8: everybody seems to have fallen in love with, and so 257 00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:12,400 Speaker 8: we've been focused on really more idiosyncratic return streams or 258 00:13:12,440 --> 00:13:15,600 Speaker 8: areas of the market that seem to be more capacity constrained. 259 00:13:16,440 --> 00:13:18,439 Speaker 8: And they're harder to find today for sure, as there's 260 00:13:18,480 --> 00:13:20,800 Speaker 8: a lot of money out there chasing, chasing various trades. 261 00:13:20,840 --> 00:13:23,520 Speaker 5: So you see us softening in private equity. I think 262 00:13:23,520 --> 00:13:26,880 Speaker 5: in your investment Noe, you quote the great Proverto Durant. 263 00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:34,679 Speaker 8: No Moss, No Moss. Yeah, we've we've, like many institutional 264 00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:38,080 Speaker 8: family office investors, over the past decade two decades, we've 265 00:13:38,080 --> 00:13:42,160 Speaker 8: allocated significantly to private equity, which is which has served 266 00:13:42,240 --> 00:13:44,520 Speaker 8: us fine. But we think going forward the market has 267 00:13:44,600 --> 00:13:49,160 Speaker 8: completely changed and just there's just an enormous amount of 268 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:53,200 Speaker 8: market participants. Uh, there's just enormous amount of capital chasing, 269 00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:57,600 Speaker 8: and we've found more compelling returns frankly in public markets, 270 00:13:57,679 --> 00:13:59,720 Speaker 8: which you know, I would have never thought I'd say 271 00:13:59,720 --> 00:14:02,240 Speaker 8: that five years ago. That's where we are today. 272 00:14:02,520 --> 00:14:04,320 Speaker 2: Hey, Paul, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate 273 00:14:04,320 --> 00:14:05,480 Speaker 2: getting a few minutes of your time. 274 00:14:05,520 --> 00:14:06,000 Speaker 3: Paul Carter. 275 00:14:06,320 --> 00:14:08,920 Speaker 2: He's co founder and manager partner Twin Focus. Up there 276 00:14:08,960 --> 00:14:09,920 Speaker 2: in Boston. 277 00:14:11,520 --> 00:14:15,400 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live 278 00:14:15,480 --> 00:14:18,960 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android 279 00:14:19,000 --> 00:14:21,800 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen 280 00:14:21,920 --> 00:14:25,000 Speaker 1: live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 281 00:14:25,360 --> 00:14:29,080 Speaker 1: just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty. 282 00:14:29,760 --> 00:14:30,960 Speaker 3: Let's stick a look at Nordstrom. 283 00:14:30,960 --> 00:14:34,320 Speaker 2: The Nordstrom family bids to take the chain private for 284 00:14:34,400 --> 00:14:39,200 Speaker 2: three point eight billion dollars. Stock pretty much unched on 285 00:14:39,680 --> 00:14:42,840 Speaker 2: the day, so not a big deal here for most shareholder. 286 00:14:42,880 --> 00:14:45,280 Speaker 2: SOCCA is up twenty three percent year to date. It's 287 00:14:45,280 --> 00:14:47,560 Speaker 2: got a market cap about three point seven billion dollars. 288 00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:49,040 Speaker 2: You throw in the net debt, it's a little over 289 00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:53,320 Speaker 2: seven billion dollars total enterprise value. Let's check in with 290 00:14:53,400 --> 00:14:56,640 Speaker 2: Mary Ross Gilbert. He's Bloomberg Intelligence senior Acadanalysts covering the 291 00:14:56,680 --> 00:14:57,440 Speaker 2: retail space. 292 00:14:58,680 --> 00:15:00,440 Speaker 3: Mary Ross, thanks so much for joining. Make you sure 293 00:15:00,600 --> 00:15:02,440 Speaker 3: what do you make of. 294 00:15:02,280 --> 00:15:04,960 Speaker 2: What the Nordstrom family members are suggesting here? I know 295 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:06,280 Speaker 2: this has been in the news for a while, but 296 00:15:06,320 --> 00:15:07,280 Speaker 2: where do we go from here? 297 00:15:08,640 --> 00:15:12,480 Speaker 9: Yeah, so Nordstrom, the Nordstrom family has been wanting to 298 00:15:12,520 --> 00:15:15,360 Speaker 9: take the company private for some time. Right, We've seen 299 00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 9: this iteration before, but this time partnering with the Mexican 300 00:15:20,800 --> 00:15:28,080 Speaker 9: retailer El Puerto de Liverpool. They're they're in a good 301 00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:30,640 Speaker 9: position in terms of coming up with the financing because 302 00:15:30,640 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 9: they're going to pony up about one point two billion 303 00:15:32,840 --> 00:15:36,000 Speaker 9: in cash in addition to rolling over, they're about ten 304 00:15:36,040 --> 00:15:38,480 Speaker 9: percent steak in the stock. And of course the Nordstrom 305 00:15:38,520 --> 00:15:42,920 Speaker 9: family combined they own about you know, a third of 306 00:15:42,960 --> 00:15:46,040 Speaker 9: the shares, so you've got forty three percent wrapped up. 307 00:15:46,480 --> 00:15:48,840 Speaker 9: They do need two thirds approvals. We just need to 308 00:15:48,840 --> 00:15:52,080 Speaker 9: get another twenty three to twenty four percent on board. 309 00:15:52,480 --> 00:15:55,400 Speaker 9: And you look at the price, there's really no premium here, 310 00:15:55,640 --> 00:16:00,600 Speaker 9: and they're they're basically saying, well, if you look at 311 00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:03,680 Speaker 9: the time that we proposed this transaction, which was back 312 00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:07,880 Speaker 9: in March, the stock was trading much lower, somewhere around 313 00:16:08,120 --> 00:16:10,800 Speaker 9: you know, seventeen, So this is really a premium to 314 00:16:10,840 --> 00:16:13,200 Speaker 9: where the shares were then, and it's about a thirty 315 00:16:13,200 --> 00:16:15,920 Speaker 9: five percent premium. But if you look at how the 316 00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:18,720 Speaker 9: stock is traded over the last five years, it's pretty 317 00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:21,800 Speaker 9: much close to the average price, and over the last 318 00:16:21,840 --> 00:16:25,520 Speaker 9: ten years, it's at a steep discount, like forty one 319 00:16:25,560 --> 00:16:29,080 Speaker 9: percent discount, you know, over the last ten years. So yeah, 320 00:16:29,120 --> 00:16:32,000 Speaker 9: there's not a premium. Could another buyer step in here, 321 00:16:32,600 --> 00:16:37,960 Speaker 9: it's possible, but trying to piece together a transaction could 322 00:16:38,040 --> 00:16:41,560 Speaker 9: prove onerous and it's going to you know, involve debt, 323 00:16:41,680 --> 00:16:45,360 Speaker 9: as we know. But not as much incremental debt. The 324 00:16:45,360 --> 00:16:48,400 Speaker 9: company already has about two point six billion, so they'll 325 00:16:48,400 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 9: probably have to bring on another one point eight billion 326 00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:55,600 Speaker 9: UH to be able to complete this transaction, and of 327 00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:59,320 Speaker 9: course the transaction is contingent upon that deal getting done. 328 00:16:59,480 --> 00:17:03,640 Speaker 9: But with Shortstrom, what really stands out versus the other 329 00:17:03,720 --> 00:17:07,000 Speaker 9: department stores. Of course, we know that the Macy's proposed 330 00:17:07,080 --> 00:17:11,280 Speaker 9: buyout has con gone by the wayside at this point. 331 00:17:12,040 --> 00:17:16,240 Speaker 9: With Nordstrom, you've got a fast growing off price segment 332 00:17:16,400 --> 00:17:19,240 Speaker 9: and that's what's really exciting here. And their comp sales 333 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:21,719 Speaker 9: were up over four percent, their total growth was up 334 00:17:21,800 --> 00:17:24,560 Speaker 9: nine percent in the second quarter. And if you look 335 00:17:24,600 --> 00:17:28,959 Speaker 9: at their full line stores, this sort of traditional department store, 336 00:17:29,840 --> 00:17:32,680 Speaker 9: they were up almost one percent on a comp basis, 337 00:17:32,760 --> 00:17:35,080 Speaker 9: But if you look at their peers, they were all 338 00:17:35,119 --> 00:17:38,399 Speaker 9: down anywhere from down three percent for Go Forward stores 339 00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:42,840 Speaker 9: for Macy's to down five percent for Dillard's and Coals. 340 00:17:42,840 --> 00:17:47,240 Speaker 9: So Nordstrom sure looks like they're in a better position. 341 00:17:47,240 --> 00:17:50,919 Speaker 9: They're also much smaller, only ninety three stores versus you know, 342 00:17:51,080 --> 00:17:53,880 Speaker 9: close to five hundred department stores over at Macy's, which 343 00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:55,800 Speaker 9: of course that's why they're closing one fifty. 344 00:17:56,520 --> 00:17:59,639 Speaker 5: So when you're a company and you have problems and 345 00:17:59,680 --> 00:18:02,840 Speaker 5: you into deal making to try and solve those problems, 346 00:18:02,880 --> 00:18:04,720 Speaker 5: what does that say, it's got a bit of minute left. 347 00:18:06,400 --> 00:18:09,760 Speaker 9: Yeah, So in this case here, I think they they're 348 00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:13,840 Speaker 9: employing a number of news strategies. Let's say with the 349 00:18:14,240 --> 00:18:16,680 Speaker 9: full line store and with off price. I think they're 350 00:18:16,880 --> 00:18:20,639 Speaker 9: off to a good track there and big expansion. You know, 351 00:18:20,720 --> 00:18:23,400 Speaker 9: they're going to be opening like twenty two rack stores 352 00:18:23,440 --> 00:18:25,040 Speaker 9: this year, and I think they're going to continue that 353 00:18:25,119 --> 00:18:29,480 Speaker 9: pace going forward. So I think that the idea that 354 00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:32,840 Speaker 9: they don't have to be under the quarterly lens of 355 00:18:32,960 --> 00:18:37,200 Speaker 9: investors is probably a relief for them. 356 00:18:37,680 --> 00:18:39,919 Speaker 2: Right all right, Mary Ross, thanks so much for joining us. 357 00:18:39,920 --> 00:18:42,840 Speaker 2: Mary Ross Gilbert senior Eckery analysts covering the retail space 358 00:18:43,480 --> 00:18:46,280 Speaker 2: for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's based out there in Los Angeles 359 00:18:46,320 --> 00:18:48,840 Speaker 2: and Norstrom some of the family members offering twenty three 360 00:18:48,880 --> 00:18:51,680 Speaker 2: dollars per sharing cash to take the retailer private for 361 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:54,560 Speaker 2: three point eight billion dollars. 362 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:59,920 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live 363 00:19:00,119 --> 00:19:03,560 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar Play and androyd 364 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:06,399 Speaker 1: Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen 365 00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:09,600 Speaker 1: live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 366 00:19:09,960 --> 00:19:13,680 Speaker 1: Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty. 367 00:19:14,640 --> 00:19:17,320 Speaker 2: We need some perspective on this markets after yesterday's sell off. 368 00:19:17,400 --> 00:19:19,439 Speaker 2: I got a little bit of green on this screen 369 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:21,480 Speaker 2: here people trying to get a sense of how do 370 00:19:21,520 --> 00:19:25,160 Speaker 2: you factor in what was a decent earnings cycle for 371 00:19:25,320 --> 00:19:27,439 Speaker 2: most of the S and P five hundred plus what 372 00:19:27,480 --> 00:19:28,960 Speaker 2: they feder reserve that is likely to. 373 00:19:28,920 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 3: Begin cutting rates. 374 00:19:29,760 --> 00:19:32,159 Speaker 2: How does that factor into the outlook here for risk assets? 375 00:19:32,160 --> 00:19:34,359 Speaker 2: Margie Battel, she's got a lot of perspective, a lot 376 00:19:34,359 --> 00:19:37,639 Speaker 2: of experience. She's a senior portfolio managed all Spring Global Investments. 377 00:19:38,400 --> 00:19:41,560 Speaker 2: Joining us from Zoom on Zoom from Boston, and again, 378 00:19:41,600 --> 00:19:42,760 Speaker 2: if you're in Boston. 379 00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:45,400 Speaker 3: Our new home is ninety two nine FM in Boston. 380 00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:48,240 Speaker 2: MARGI thanks so much for joining us here. How do 381 00:19:48,240 --> 00:19:49,520 Speaker 2: you piece this all together? 382 00:19:49,600 --> 00:19:49,719 Speaker 7: Here? 383 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:53,400 Speaker 2: We're pretty much through the earnings season and investor conferences 384 00:19:53,440 --> 00:19:56,960 Speaker 2: are kicking in high gear here in September, September eighteenth, 385 00:19:56,960 --> 00:19:59,959 Speaker 2: the FED is going to meet and presumably start lowering rid. 386 00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:02,439 Speaker 3: So how do you put all that together and what 387 00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:03,159 Speaker 3: comes out for you? 388 00:20:04,480 --> 00:20:04,640 Speaker 1: Well? 389 00:20:04,640 --> 00:20:06,840 Speaker 10: I think right now we're in a period of cross 390 00:20:06,960 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 10: currents because the overall urns reports for the quarter were 391 00:20:11,359 --> 00:20:14,800 Speaker 10: once again pretty good. However, we did have some slight 392 00:20:14,920 --> 00:20:18,200 Speaker 10: weakness from expectations for some of the large tech companies 393 00:20:18,560 --> 00:20:21,520 Speaker 10: in contrast to the previous quarters where they surprised on 394 00:20:21,600 --> 00:20:25,480 Speaker 10: the upside. And since this group was so heavily over owned, frankly, 395 00:20:25,760 --> 00:20:28,640 Speaker 10: it was really due for correction. And we've seen that 396 00:20:29,040 --> 00:20:33,320 Speaker 10: over the last really since the end of July into yesterday, 397 00:20:33,320 --> 00:20:35,600 Speaker 10: where you just had this cascade of all the texts 398 00:20:35,640 --> 00:20:39,720 Speaker 10: going down and other economically sensitive sectors that have done 399 00:20:39,800 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 10: really well. So I think it's just really adjusting, waffling around, 400 00:20:43,600 --> 00:20:47,680 Speaker 10: waiting for the FED to once again come in and 401 00:20:47,720 --> 00:20:50,840 Speaker 10: be on the lakeside, frankly, and I think now we 402 00:20:50,880 --> 00:20:53,480 Speaker 10: have a news gap, So this is a seasonal slope 403 00:20:53,480 --> 00:20:56,199 Speaker 10: period of the year, and I think that by the 404 00:20:56,320 --> 00:20:59,359 Speaker 10: end of the year we should have a strong December, 405 00:21:00,080 --> 00:21:03,320 Speaker 10: a strong rebound after the election really no matter who wins, 406 00:21:03,400 --> 00:21:06,439 Speaker 10: because that's just really what happens in election years. So 407 00:21:06,440 --> 00:21:08,800 Speaker 10: a little more waffling around, and then I think in 408 00:21:09,160 --> 00:21:11,840 Speaker 10: maybe the stembers that you won't see the market moved up. 409 00:21:12,480 --> 00:21:13,960 Speaker 5: I got to get this one. By the way, put 410 00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:16,800 Speaker 5: your bond pat on for a second. Did you throw 411 00:21:16,880 --> 00:21:20,200 Speaker 5: confetti in the air when the curve disinverted between twos 412 00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:21,040 Speaker 5: and tens this morning? 413 00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:22,520 Speaker 7: Well? 414 00:21:22,800 --> 00:21:26,240 Speaker 10: Yes, it's really amazing how the curve has come down 415 00:21:26,320 --> 00:21:30,359 Speaker 10: and we're just about flat now, which I think is 416 00:21:30,880 --> 00:21:33,639 Speaker 10: a step and really to me. It says the market 417 00:21:33,680 --> 00:21:36,919 Speaker 10: is making the adjustment to interest rates that the fedruar 418 00:21:37,000 --> 00:21:39,280 Speaker 10: I should be doing, in other words, pushing down short 419 00:21:39,359 --> 00:21:42,440 Speaker 10: rates short rates compared to long rates. So to see 420 00:21:42,480 --> 00:21:45,000 Speaker 10: the two year come down so much over the course 421 00:21:45,000 --> 00:21:47,240 Speaker 10: of this year compared to the ten year and have 422 00:21:47,440 --> 00:21:51,639 Speaker 10: both of them really well under three eighty is pretty encouraging. 423 00:21:51,760 --> 00:21:55,040 Speaker 10: It says that we are in the middle of a 424 00:21:55,119 --> 00:21:57,600 Speaker 10: period of very very tight money. At all we need 425 00:21:57,720 --> 00:21:59,960 Speaker 10: is the Fed to come in and provide some stabuilt. 426 00:22:00,200 --> 00:22:01,960 Speaker 10: I think the Fed is really the one who's beyond 427 00:22:02,000 --> 00:22:05,440 Speaker 10: the curve. The market's really doing what the Fed should 428 00:22:05,480 --> 00:22:08,159 Speaker 10: be doing by bringing rates down and making putting a 429 00:22:08,200 --> 00:22:10,560 Speaker 10: little bit of a floor under how big of a 430 00:22:10,600 --> 00:22:11,359 Speaker 10: correction we'll have. 431 00:22:12,880 --> 00:22:16,680 Speaker 2: So, Margie, are you a proponent of kind of moving 432 00:22:16,720 --> 00:22:19,680 Speaker 2: away or de emphasizing or diversifying away from some of 433 00:22:19,680 --> 00:22:23,920 Speaker 2: the big techniques into this diversification trade, if you will, 434 00:22:23,960 --> 00:22:27,679 Speaker 2: the rotation into maybe some smaller caps, maybe some lower 435 00:22:27,800 --> 00:22:30,320 Speaker 2: valued sectors. Is that something that interests you. 436 00:22:32,640 --> 00:22:36,280 Speaker 10: I'm a little luke more about that, because you did 437 00:22:36,280 --> 00:22:39,399 Speaker 10: have some of those sectors, like small caps, have a 438 00:22:39,400 --> 00:22:42,280 Speaker 10: big jump up in price just because they had really 439 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:44,480 Speaker 10: gotten so out of whack compared to the rest of 440 00:22:44,520 --> 00:22:46,679 Speaker 10: the market. But if you think we're in a period 441 00:22:46,760 --> 00:22:50,719 Speaker 10: over the rest of the year of frankly slow economic growth, 442 00:22:50,800 --> 00:22:53,280 Speaker 10: maybe a GDP of one percent, one and a half 443 00:22:53,359 --> 00:22:55,879 Speaker 10: something like that, it's really hard to see how some 444 00:22:55,920 --> 00:22:59,760 Speaker 10: of those more value the companies that have slow growth 445 00:22:59,800 --> 00:23:02,399 Speaker 10: markets are really going to continue to shine. So I 446 00:23:02,440 --> 00:23:05,920 Speaker 10: think you really have to get through this volatility period 447 00:23:06,440 --> 00:23:09,359 Speaker 10: and then look for a companies that should have higher 448 00:23:09,359 --> 00:23:12,520 Speaker 10: than average growth, higher than a GDP backdrop we say 449 00:23:12,560 --> 00:23:14,920 Speaker 10: only one one and a half percent, So I think 450 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:17,240 Speaker 10: it's a short term move. The long term I still 451 00:23:17,240 --> 00:23:19,480 Speaker 10: think will be with the larger companies that have a 452 00:23:19,520 --> 00:23:22,760 Speaker 10: sustained growth path for cyclical growth. 453 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:27,560 Speaker 5: In video one on Waight forty ish, is that an 454 00:23:27,720 --> 00:23:32,000 Speaker 5: entry port a point for investors? Your thoughts just on 455 00:23:32,040 --> 00:23:33,919 Speaker 5: the tech space specific. 456 00:23:33,400 --> 00:23:37,879 Speaker 10: To in vidia, Well, certainly you've had a huge correction there, 457 00:23:38,280 --> 00:23:41,320 Speaker 10: and if you thought it was rather highly priced at 458 00:23:41,359 --> 00:23:45,760 Speaker 10: one forty very high pe, certainly with a about a 459 00:23:45,800 --> 00:23:49,400 Speaker 10: thirty percent or more adjustment and price, it looks much 460 00:23:49,440 --> 00:23:53,400 Speaker 10: more fairly priced compared to its growth. So I would 461 00:23:53,440 --> 00:23:56,240 Speaker 10: say that it's certainly better buy here than to sell 462 00:23:56,280 --> 00:23:57,280 Speaker 10: at these levels. 463 00:23:58,280 --> 00:24:00,639 Speaker 2: Fixed income, I see the best performance is in high yield. 464 00:24:00,720 --> 00:24:03,240 Speaker 2: Is that something of interest you or is it spreads 465 00:24:03,280 --> 00:24:03,640 Speaker 2: too tight? 466 00:24:05,280 --> 00:24:08,040 Speaker 10: Well, spreads are tight. Double bees are a little over 467 00:24:08,160 --> 00:24:12,399 Speaker 10: two basis points more than treasuries. Single bees maybe a 468 00:24:12,400 --> 00:24:16,439 Speaker 10: little over three percentage points, which is narrow historically. However, 469 00:24:16,560 --> 00:24:19,520 Speaker 10: defaults are very low. Defaults are on a hunder four percent, 470 00:24:20,160 --> 00:24:22,359 Speaker 10: and if you look where we are in the credit cycle, 471 00:24:22,400 --> 00:24:24,760 Speaker 10: the FED is now hopefully one of these days going 472 00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:27,240 Speaker 10: to be on an easing cycle where short rates come down. 473 00:24:27,640 --> 00:24:29,720 Speaker 10: So that says to me, that's a pretty good backdrop 474 00:24:29,760 --> 00:24:33,359 Speaker 10: for high yield. The big negatives, of course, the yields 475 00:24:33,359 --> 00:24:35,760 Speaker 10: aren't very high. You're looking at say six to seven 476 00:24:35,800 --> 00:24:39,399 Speaker 10: and a half percent for most issues. But really, if 477 00:24:39,440 --> 00:24:41,720 Speaker 10: you think the economy is going to be growing very slowly, 478 00:24:41,840 --> 00:24:44,840 Speaker 10: which I do, one and a half percentage. Say, then 479 00:24:44,920 --> 00:24:47,480 Speaker 10: that implies that the growth in the equity market over 480 00:24:47,520 --> 00:24:50,200 Speaker 10: the balance of the year may well be load of 481 00:24:50,320 --> 00:24:53,600 Speaker 10: in single digital return from here, which would really be 482 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:57,360 Speaker 10: about comparable with what you get from high old bonds. 483 00:24:57,480 --> 00:24:59,920 Speaker 10: So we may actually have high old bonds running no 484 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:02,679 Speaker 10: I connect with equities over the next few months. So 485 00:25:02,720 --> 00:25:05,360 Speaker 10: I think they're pretty good, especially if you are more 486 00:25:05,400 --> 00:25:07,520 Speaker 10: looking for income. Rayland capital appreciation. 487 00:25:08,000 --> 00:25:09,639 Speaker 2: All right, MARGI, thank you so much for joining us. 488 00:25:09,640 --> 00:25:12,280 Speaker 2: Always appreciate getting your thoughts and perspective. Market Betel, Senior 489 00:25:12,320 --> 00:25:16,119 Speaker 2: portfolio manager, all Spring Global Investments. Joining us from Boston 490 00:25:16,280 --> 00:25:17,159 Speaker 2: on zoom. 491 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:22,280 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live 492 00:25:22,359 --> 00:25:25,880 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecard Play and Android 493 00:25:25,920 --> 00:25:28,680 Speaker 1: Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen 494 00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:31,880 Speaker 1: live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station 495 00:25:32,280 --> 00:25:36,000 Speaker 1: Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty. 496 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:40,680 Speaker 2: Interesting story across the Bloomberg terminal here at John Tucker. 497 00:25:41,280 --> 00:25:44,080 Speaker 2: The Biden Harris Administration's big bet on Intel Corp. To 498 00:25:44,200 --> 00:25:47,040 Speaker 2: lead a US chip making renaissance is in grave trouble 499 00:25:47,080 --> 00:25:50,320 Speaker 2: as a result of the company's mounting financial struggles. Creating 500 00:25:50,320 --> 00:25:54,320 Speaker 2: a potentially damaging setback for the country's most ambitious industrial 501 00:25:54,359 --> 00:25:57,080 Speaker 2: policy in decades. I kind of forgot that. Five months 502 00:25:57,119 --> 00:26:01,080 Speaker 2: ago President Biden traveled to Arizona to unfail a pit that. 503 00:26:01,040 --> 00:26:04,680 Speaker 5: Was a big deal, a news conference, second standing there 504 00:26:04,720 --> 00:26:06,040 Speaker 5: with mister Gilsinger. 505 00:26:06,160 --> 00:26:09,520 Speaker 2: Yeah, twenty billion, and that is now in jeopardy. Perhaps, 506 00:26:10,000 --> 00:26:12,880 Speaker 2: Mackenzie Hawkins joins this Bloomberg News technology reporter. 507 00:26:13,520 --> 00:26:16,240 Speaker 3: She joins us. Mackenzie, you reported on this story. 508 00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:19,080 Speaker 2: Here, give us the latest year on Intel and the 509 00:26:19,119 --> 00:26:21,760 Speaker 2: ability of it to kind of fulfill its end of 510 00:26:22,000 --> 00:26:23,680 Speaker 2: the agreement with. 511 00:26:23,600 --> 00:26:24,320 Speaker 5: The US government. 512 00:26:26,200 --> 00:26:30,400 Speaker 11: So thirty thousand foot perspective here. The US government has 513 00:26:30,440 --> 00:26:33,919 Speaker 11: this thirty nine billion dollar program to issue grants to 514 00:26:34,080 --> 00:26:37,240 Speaker 11: chip companies and convince them to do manufacturing on American soil, 515 00:26:37,680 --> 00:26:40,520 Speaker 11: and Intel is supposed to be the biggest winner from 516 00:26:40,520 --> 00:26:43,520 Speaker 11: that effort. The package that you referenced that Biden went 517 00:26:43,520 --> 00:26:46,040 Speaker 11: to Arizona to announce was eight and a half billion 518 00:26:46,080 --> 00:26:49,080 Speaker 11: dollars in grants and eleven billion dollars in loans. Putting 519 00:26:49,119 --> 00:26:51,800 Speaker 11: aside the twenty five percent tax credits that Intel could 520 00:26:51,840 --> 00:26:54,960 Speaker 11: maybe get on what could be one hundred billion dollars 521 00:26:54,960 --> 00:26:57,760 Speaker 11: in US investments. So we're talking about massive, massive sums 522 00:26:57,800 --> 00:27:01,880 Speaker 11: of money here, but all of those are preliminary, and 523 00:27:02,160 --> 00:27:05,679 Speaker 11: right now the company is undergoing due diligence and hashing 524 00:27:05,720 --> 00:27:09,360 Speaker 11: out the finer details of its accord with the Biden administration. 525 00:27:10,040 --> 00:27:12,760 Speaker 11: That happens to be going on at the same time 526 00:27:12,920 --> 00:27:16,520 Speaker 11: as Intel is in dire financial straits. The company had 527 00:27:16,520 --> 00:27:20,560 Speaker 11: a pretty disastrous earnings report last month, sentence shares tanking 528 00:27:20,920 --> 00:27:24,680 Speaker 11: the worst route that it's seen in decades, and now 529 00:27:24,680 --> 00:27:26,800 Speaker 11: there are a lot of questions looming about whether Intel 530 00:27:26,840 --> 00:27:30,280 Speaker 11: can actually pull off this big US manufacturing expansion, and 531 00:27:30,440 --> 00:27:33,960 Speaker 11: given it centrality to what's called the Chips Act overall, 532 00:27:34,160 --> 00:27:36,439 Speaker 11: whether the Biden administration will still be able to achieve 533 00:27:36,440 --> 00:27:37,480 Speaker 11: its policy goals. 534 00:27:37,920 --> 00:27:41,000 Speaker 5: Now I'm no politician, but if I'm going to head 535 00:27:41,000 --> 00:27:43,520 Speaker 5: out to Arizona have a news conference as President of 536 00:27:43,560 --> 00:27:45,919 Speaker 5: the United States, I would think that somebody on my 537 00:27:46,080 --> 00:27:49,359 Speaker 5: staff has actually done the due diligence to make sure 538 00:27:49,440 --> 00:27:52,639 Speaker 5: that Intel, who I'm having a news conference with, is 539 00:27:52,720 --> 00:27:55,879 Speaker 5: actually going to be able to meet those milestones. Am 540 00:27:55,920 --> 00:27:56,720 Speaker 5: I too cynical? 541 00:27:58,880 --> 00:27:59,120 Speaker 7: Well? 542 00:27:59,240 --> 00:28:01,840 Speaker 11: The Commerce Department, which is running the Chips Act, has 543 00:28:01,840 --> 00:28:04,720 Speaker 11: actually set up this pretty intentional process from the outset 544 00:28:04,760 --> 00:28:07,600 Speaker 11: telling companies, you apply for this money, we reach a 545 00:28:07,640 --> 00:28:10,840 Speaker 11: preliminary memorandum of terms. That's what was announced for Intel 546 00:28:10,920 --> 00:28:12,960 Speaker 11: and all of the companies that are part of the program, 547 00:28:12,960 --> 00:28:15,600 Speaker 11: which includes some of the world's leading chip makers, Taiwan's 548 00:28:15,640 --> 00:28:20,359 Speaker 11: TSMC and South Korea Samsung, And basically the government is 549 00:28:20,440 --> 00:28:24,639 Speaker 11: agreeing to underwrite this program, but companies have to go 550 00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:27,520 Speaker 11: through due diligence and a sort of private equity type model. 551 00:28:27,600 --> 00:28:30,800 Speaker 11: After reaching that preliminary agreement, then they sign a final 552 00:28:30,880 --> 00:28:33,399 Speaker 11: term sheet, and then they have to actually hit the 553 00:28:33,480 --> 00:28:36,560 Speaker 11: milestones on their projects before they receive any money, and 554 00:28:36,760 --> 00:28:39,600 Speaker 11: the government has the ability to claw back money if 555 00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:42,040 Speaker 11: they hand it out. But the projects are never fully completed, 556 00:28:42,440 --> 00:28:44,840 Speaker 11: so there are a lot of guardrails built in place 557 00:28:44,920 --> 00:28:48,520 Speaker 11: to prevent the Biden administration or the next administration from 558 00:28:48,560 --> 00:28:51,760 Speaker 11: actually handing out money to a company that may not 559 00:28:51,840 --> 00:28:53,880 Speaker 11: be able to pull things off. If that ends up 560 00:28:53,920 --> 00:28:54,920 Speaker 11: being the case with Intel. 561 00:28:55,040 --> 00:28:57,280 Speaker 5: Intel's not even sharing all the information, is it. 562 00:28:59,000 --> 00:29:01,880 Speaker 11: Well, they're going through a pretty contentious due diligence process 563 00:29:01,960 --> 00:29:04,640 Speaker 11: right now. You know, the company and the Biden administrations 564 00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:07,000 Speaker 11: say that they're working hard to reach a final agreement, 565 00:29:07,040 --> 00:29:09,440 Speaker 11: but there are certain requests that government officials have made 566 00:29:09,520 --> 00:29:12,200 Speaker 11: of Intel that the chip maker doesn't want to deliver on. 567 00:29:12,280 --> 00:29:14,680 Speaker 11: I think the challenge for the administration is such a 568 00:29:14,680 --> 00:29:19,240 Speaker 11: big part of vetting a project's commercial viability is knowing 569 00:29:19,240 --> 00:29:21,880 Speaker 11: that they have customers that there will actually be demand 570 00:29:21,960 --> 00:29:25,160 Speaker 11: for the chips that they intend to manufacture, and in 571 00:29:25,240 --> 00:29:28,240 Speaker 11: Intel's case, the picture is a little bit bleak. The 572 00:29:28,320 --> 00:29:33,160 Speaker 11: company has secured some potential commitments from firms including Broadcom, 573 00:29:33,160 --> 00:29:36,280 Speaker 11: Media Tech, and Microsoft, but none of those have chosen 574 00:29:36,320 --> 00:29:39,280 Speaker 11: to go to full production with Intel's facilities yet. Commerce 575 00:29:39,280 --> 00:29:43,240 Speaker 11: Secretary Gina Raimongo encouraged leading AI chip makers in Nvidia 576 00:29:43,360 --> 00:29:47,560 Speaker 11: and AMD to consider manufacturing at Intel's Ohio facility, which 577 00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:50,280 Speaker 11: Pat Golsinger said could be the world's largest chip making 578 00:29:50,320 --> 00:29:52,840 Speaker 11: factory if it's fully built out, and neither of them 579 00:29:52,880 --> 00:29:55,960 Speaker 11: plans to do so. So this is putting the Biden 580 00:29:55,960 --> 00:29:58,719 Speaker 11: administration in a bit of a difficult spot, and despite 581 00:29:58,720 --> 00:30:01,080 Speaker 11: the fact that they haven't actually released any money yet, 582 00:30:01,520 --> 00:30:04,160 Speaker 11: it could become potentially a huge political liability. 583 00:30:04,840 --> 00:30:08,560 Speaker 2: What is the administration saying in terms of any backup plan? 584 00:30:10,800 --> 00:30:13,000 Speaker 11: So we have to keep in mind that Intel is 585 00:30:13,080 --> 00:30:16,280 Speaker 11: just one company that is supposed to benefit from the 586 00:30:16,360 --> 00:30:20,280 Speaker 11: Chips Act. There were hundreds of companies that expressed interest 587 00:30:20,360 --> 00:30:23,920 Speaker 11: in this money, and the Biden administration has announced investments 588 00:30:24,240 --> 00:30:27,520 Speaker 11: in the preliminary agreement form of north of thirty billion 589 00:30:27,600 --> 00:30:30,920 Speaker 11: dollars to around sixteen or seventeen firms in total, and 590 00:30:30,960 --> 00:30:34,280 Speaker 11: that includes commitments from all of the world's top ship makers. 591 00:30:34,360 --> 00:30:36,080 Speaker 11: Intel is one of them, but as I mentioned before, 592 00:30:36,160 --> 00:30:39,560 Speaker 11: TSMC and Samsung are also planning on producing leading edge 593 00:30:39,600 --> 00:30:42,840 Speaker 11: logic ships in the United States. Micron, one of the 594 00:30:42,960 --> 00:30:46,200 Speaker 11: world's top memory chip makers, is building factories in Idaho 595 00:30:46,280 --> 00:30:48,080 Speaker 11: and New York. So there are lots of companies that 596 00:30:48,120 --> 00:30:50,760 Speaker 11: are part of this program. At the same time, Intel 597 00:30:50,880 --> 00:30:54,600 Speaker 11: is uniquely important. The US wants to reach fifth or 598 00:30:54,640 --> 00:30:57,920 Speaker 11: twenty five sorry, the US wants to reach twenty percent 599 00:30:57,960 --> 00:31:00,000 Speaker 11: market share a fifth of the world's most advanced life 600 00:31:00,360 --> 00:31:03,320 Speaker 11: chips by the end of the decade. Intel's factories are 601 00:31:03,360 --> 00:31:06,040 Speaker 11: a crucial part of that effort, and the company is 602 00:31:06,080 --> 00:31:08,800 Speaker 11: also supposed to be the sole intended beneficiary of this 603 00:31:08,920 --> 00:31:12,160 Speaker 11: three and a half billion dollar program to make secure 604 00:31:12,200 --> 00:31:16,800 Speaker 11: semiconductors for the Pentagon, So there is a backup plan, 605 00:31:16,880 --> 00:31:20,360 Speaker 11: and so are there are other companies involved, but Intel matters. 606 00:31:20,040 --> 00:31:23,240 Speaker 5: A lot, and presumably this is to create jobs, and 607 00:31:23,280 --> 00:31:26,480 Speaker 5: it comes at a time when Intel's cutting around fifteen 608 00:31:26,520 --> 00:31:28,000 Speaker 5: thousand jobs. Exactly right. 609 00:31:28,120 --> 00:31:30,240 Speaker 2: I go, McKenzie, great reporting. Thank you so much for 610 00:31:30,280 --> 00:31:33,920 Speaker 2: joining us. Mackenzie Hawkins, technology reporter for Bloomberg News, joining 611 00:31:33,960 --> 00:31:36,000 Speaker 2: us from Washington, d C. 612 00:31:36,240 --> 00:31:36,880 Speaker 3: Appreciate that. 613 00:31:36,920 --> 00:31:40,320 Speaker 2: So Intel again, another day, another piece of bad news here. 614 00:31:40,360 --> 00:31:42,000 Speaker 3: And it just seems like and. 615 00:31:41,960 --> 00:31:44,040 Speaker 2: Again I don't follow the chip business day to day, 616 00:31:44,040 --> 00:31:47,480 Speaker 2: but it just seems like the technology to some degree 617 00:31:47,480 --> 00:31:50,560 Speaker 2: has passed by Intel and they missed kind of the 618 00:31:50,600 --> 00:31:56,520 Speaker 2: AI wave or evolution, whereas Nvidia boit right right. 619 00:31:56,440 --> 00:31:58,400 Speaker 5: Which in Vidia doesn't make chips, they just. 620 00:31:58,440 --> 00:32:01,040 Speaker 3: Designed them exactly right and exactly my understanding. 621 00:32:01,320 --> 00:32:05,800 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on apples, Spotify, 622 00:32:06,000 --> 00:32:09,200 Speaker 1: and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each 623 00:32:09,240 --> 00:32:12,640 Speaker 1: weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, 624 00:32:12,720 --> 00:32:16,120 Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. 625 00:32:16,240 --> 00:32:19,200 Speaker 1: You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube 626 00:32:19,480 --> 00:32:21,320 Speaker 1: and always on the Bloomberg terminal