WEBVTT - The Joy Effect

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, peeps, and welcome to ookf Daily with Meet

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Your Girl. Daniel Moody recording from the Home Bunker. Folks,

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, why can't JD. Vance just go away?

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Every time there is leaked audio of this man, we

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just learn what a fucking weirdo he is. And now

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>he has turned his attention to childless women who happen

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to be teachers. He hates them just like he does

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>all childless women, but has a particular disdain. It's wild.

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>It's wild, and Donald Trump goes on doctor Phil and says, well,

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>you only need to vote this once and then you

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>never have to worry about voting again, continuing with his

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>line around being a dictator. On day one, we know

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>what the stakes are, we know what the narrative is

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that this party is offering. And I just pray each

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and every day that the excitement that we are seeing

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>is going to translate into the votes that are needed

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 1>in order to get Harris and Walls over the finish line.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>And I mean in an effing landslide, not just by

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the skin of our teeth. This needs to be a

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>decisive victory, one that will be written in the history books,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>because I want like you all to be done with

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump for once and for fucking all. Coming up

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>today my conversation with our friend, our in house doctor,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>doctor Jonathan Metzil. You'll be surprised by this conversation today

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>because Jonathan and I don't see eye to eye on

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>our thoughts around how the Harris Walls team is expanding

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Big Democratic tent. Jonathan offers some points as to

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think said he thinks could be done better, and we

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>challenge each other on seeing the other side. So that

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation is coming up next. Folks. You know that whenever

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we have the opportunity to speak with our in house doctor,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>doctor Jonathan Metzil, we are always always pleased and happy.

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And Jonathan, oh, we even't spoken in over a week

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>because I was at the DNC.

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 2>We did your snazzy podcast last week.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh we did. Yeah, we did the other one. We

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>did the other one, the New Abnormal. So Jonathan, I

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>want to get your thoughts even though we are now

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>days removed from the DNC, But I thought about you

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>while I was there because of the presentation around victims

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>of gun violence that brought me to tears and a

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people around me in the United Center to tears,

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and I just wanted to get your thoughts overall on

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>how again we talked about this, how this campaign is

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the gun issue, how you thought that it

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>was handled during convention and by the time that folks

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to this, we will be at less than seventy

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>days until the election, which is just extraordinary, And how

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling.

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>First, let me just say that I'm so honored to

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>be speaking with you here today because you're a star

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 2>of stage. On screen, You've been stripping it, spilling it

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 2>across every outlet, Like every outlet, I'm like, oh, there's

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Danielle on TV is spreading the love on everything. So first,

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 2>awesome job, and I will follow you anywhere whatever you

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>tell me to do. I am sucking.

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that.

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>Now. I have to say, on one hand, of course,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>that moment with the guns was incredibly powerful and well

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 2>it could have been totally cheesy, actually, but it wasn't.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 2>It felt very very powerful and very urgent, and so

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was handled very well at the convention,

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 2>and I think that the message at that moment was

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 2>spot on. But I think that there's two sides to

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>this coin and I'm really struggling with this, which is

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 2>that on one hand, I mean, I understand we're seventy

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>days out and that's huge. Is the issue to rally

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 2>our base? If the issue is to rally our base,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>then framing guns in that way is important with the

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 2>historical caveat that I write about in my book, which

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>is that Democrats will answer polls saying that they support

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 2>gun safety laws, but they don't vote based on them.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>And so if they think that there's a new entree

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>into getting people to vote, to mobilize our people to

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 2>vote based on background checks and red flag laws, it

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>would just be honestly, for a presidential election, like people

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 2>vote on a bunch of issues, but it's really Republicans

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 2>that vote out of the fear that Democrats are going

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to have the government take away their guns. That will

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 2>mobilize Republicans. And so it's a strategy. But my concern

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 2>always is that we're using a very saturated playbook that

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.839
<v Speaker 2>in a way, if we're saying all these horrible things happened,

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 2>which they did, just searing life changing, life ending, But

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>if the only conversation we're having about guns is to

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 2>talk about guns in relation to regulation, which is really

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 2>where that conversation ends, or to highlight people I call converts,

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>people who are like Tim Walls and other people like, Oh,

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm a gun owner, but I don't believe in the NRA.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 2>It's just that that's a very small sample of a

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 2>much bigger fraction, which is all gun owners. And so

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the question is are the bigger group of gun owners

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 2>going to be moved by this? And so again it's

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 2>just a calculated decision that I, honestly, as I've said

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 2>azillion times, have a tremendous amount of concern about because

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>just from my research and everybody else has other thoughts,

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 2>people who are going to vote based on guns are

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.039
<v Speaker 2>already voting for Democrats. It's not like you're going to

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 2>bring new gun owners into the fold, because I mean,

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.120
<v Speaker 2>it was great in my book. I interviewed a guy

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 2>and he said, people think, if you just say it differently,

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 2>or message differently to me, or say it louder, I'm

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>going to change my mind. But actually I know what

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the goddamn issue is, and I don't want government regulation

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 2>of my guns. He's actually somebody who said I probably

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 2>would vote for Democrats, but I don't want government regulating

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>my guns, and so just saying we respect gun owners

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 2>the converts are not representing those people, and so I

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I feel like i'm I know who's advising

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Harris on this issue. I know that they have a

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>very particular agenda which is not mine. I hope they're right.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>I hope they're right and I'm wrong. I would welcome that,

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 2>But I also think that there's another way to message, which,

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 2>as we talked about last week, has to do with

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 2>crime and the responsibilities of gun ownership and what it

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>means to own a gun and the right to own

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 2>a gun. That doesn't really change our platform at all,

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 2>but it does speak to those crossover people. And I

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 2>worry that if we're just doing every time for gun

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>safety and background checks, we're not speaking to those people.

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 2>And so the question is, will white voters who are

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>swing state voters, like, is that an important enough demographic

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 2>to speak to their concerns, because we're not doing it

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I wondered too, about how you felt about the law

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>enforcement officer who walked out on stage, gone on his

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>hip in full uniform at convention and what you thought

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of image was trying to convey as well.

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Was that them which was my assumption trying to take

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ownership of the law and order narrative as well.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's all about like permission structures. I mean,

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>the question is what does that person represent, right, does

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>that person represent the one cop who's willing to come

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>to our side, the one cop who's ex sceptible to

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>our side, or is it a sign of a bigger trend. Again,

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 2>that's why I worry about, Like, I know, it's a

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 2>big deal to have Republicans speak at the DNC. I

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 2>get that, But you know, the question is just what

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>bigger group do they represent? Is that a statistically significant

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 2>representation of a bigger group of Trump supporters? And I

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 2>just haven't quite seen that. And again, maybe that's not important.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 2>So maybe it's important for us to think that this

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>is important. But I mean, the Liz Chaneys of the world,

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>they're not seen as I mean, I just remember the

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 2>last time Trump was up for election, number like two

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.959
<v Speaker 2>hundred foreign policy experts wrote this guy's a danger to

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>national security and everybody said, look, these people are, you know,

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 2>coming over to our side. Again, I think if we

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 2>mobilize our base and broaden our base. To me, that's

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>a viable goal, and so I support that, But I

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 2>guess the question is does that represent a bigger cross

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>section of law enforcement or Republicans or gun owners. And

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I just think we have to be realistic, Like the

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 2>polls are very very tight right now, and so I

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 2>advocate for reaching out to people on the other side,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 2>but maybe mobilizing our base is a better strategy.

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there was a both and that was happening,

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there is a both and that

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is happening with regard to you know, you have two

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred sam odd Republicans that have come out in a

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>letter former Romney, McCain and Bush staff that are saying

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that they are voting for Kamala Harris, and they did

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>so in an open letter in the New York Times.

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times will get to in a moment,

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>because I have my issues with them, But you know,

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you have credible Republicans. And I use the word credible

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>because I'm just that's the synonym for not crazy. Who

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>were on stage at the DNC talking about their Republicanism,

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 1>like they didn't switch parties, right, but they recognize that

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>they want to put country over party and so like

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to me, I agree you to an extent with the

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>strategy that you offer in your book what We've Become,

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And I agree with the fact that the old tactics

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>are useful to a point, right, But I think that

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they are doing outreach in a different way. Maybe not

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>on this issue in particular, but I do feel like

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they're doing Republican outreach and independent outreach that shows how

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>big this tent is. And so the point of contention

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>may be guns, but they are reaching out to Republicans

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>on their belief in democracy, right, So like, how do

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you see that action, which is something that they've been

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>doing since the beginning, since a month into the Harris

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall's campaign. Versus on this specific issue of.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Guns, it's actually a symptom of a similar kind of issue,

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>which is I hope we have the biggest geniuses in

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 2>the world. I hope there is a strategy. I trust

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 2>that there is a great strategy based on this. But

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>I tell you the times that I get nervous, it's

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 2>just we're too concrete and literal at times. And I mean,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 2>we like we maybe, but for example, I feel like

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the RFK going over to Trump is a really big

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 2>deal a much bigger deal than people have talked about,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 2>not because of the actual people who were going to

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 2>vote for RFK, but because RFK gives a permission structure

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 2>for people who are very wary of the government, government intervention,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 2>government intrusion to vote for Trump even if they don't

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 2>like Trump. And so for me, it's actually the downstream

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 2>effects of RFK among people who are skeptical or wary

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>of government because of COVID or because of guns or

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 2>things like that. And so I just know from my

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>own research that messaging about democracy saving democracy, if you're

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 2>in that camp of people, you actually don't hear, oh

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 2>my god, I'm going to save democracy. You hear these

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 2>fuckers are going to come and make more big government

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 2>and regulate my life. And so again the question, this

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>is the new statistical question, is how important are those

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 2>voters or can we overcome those voters. But I will

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 2>say that I just feel like I see a lot

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 2>of people underestimating the rfkju and your impact, in my opinion,

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 2>because there are a lot of people who have become

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 2>like deeply skeptical or deeply libertarian or deeply wary, and

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 2>what they hear I think and I'm not trying to

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>speak for anybody. I'm just going off of my interviews.

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 2>But what they hear is Harris, everything she's doing me

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 2>suggests building more government, more government for healthcare, more government

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 2>for gun regulation, more government for everything else. And if

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 2>you're in the camp of people who think that's a

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 2>really good thing because we should be sharing our resources

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and supporting safety nets and you know, moral imperative in

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 2>future of the country, that's amazing. And so I'm only

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 2>speaking for the people that I research, and I will

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 2>say that for the people I research, they don't think

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 2>that more government is the answer to a lot of things.

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And so even the issue of democracy, when they hear democracy,

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>they hear more government programs, more of my money going

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 2>to people that I don't think are deserving, etc. Et cetera.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>And I just really trust in the smart people who

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 2>are running that campaign to think we have a strategy

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>for that, and hopefully we do.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, Jonathan, what I will say

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>here is that, like, there are people that are just

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 1>not going to come over. Yeah, So I don't necessarily

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like I think that your gun strategy point makes sense

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of people believe in regulation, but they also

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>understand that crime is an issue, and so we want

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 1>to be in a place where we can both. I mean,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't personally and everybody knows that I don't want

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>guns in this country at all, So I'm not interested.

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I personally am not. But if we are never going

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to overcome that place, then like I want us to

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>live in a society where hunters in gun enthusiasts like

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>understand their responsibility to protect those around them, and so

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>believe in regulation and believe in the understanding that like

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>their ability to do what it is that they love

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 1>should not put communities at risk. That's my hope and feeling. However,

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>these libertarians who like, in my opinion, if you were

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>going to vote for RFK Junior, you're a nutjob. The

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>man is anti vax he is anti education, he is

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like anti thought, and so I'm not interested in a

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Harris Walls campaign that is trying to get the RFK

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Junior people over to their side.

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Right. But let me say, I'm not actually talking about

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the RFK Junior people, because I think there aren't a

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 2>huge number of them. I'm talking about potentially undecided voters

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>in swing states, which is not RFK junior supporters. It's

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>guys in rural Pennsylvania and their families, and guys in

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Georgia and their families, and so it's really and again

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying we should shift our messaging, but I

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 2>don't think what I'm suggesting is a huge shift. Like

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>last week we talked about how I think we should

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about crime because red flag laws and background checks

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 2>don't really dent crime. But if you talked about geop

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 2>policies that are raising crime and were anti crime, that's

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a different way to talk about the same thing with

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. A lot of the economic stuff, I

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>don't think it kills us to also talk about the

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>importance of entrepreneurialism and capitalism in a way that says

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>this is America, and we want people to be rich,

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and we want to help you, support you, all these

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of things like something like that. Because Trump is

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 2>saying the government's I'm not going to take your money.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 2>And if your answer is only people with more than

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 2>four hundred thousand dollars are going to blah blah blah,

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>people just hear that as like, man, that's a negative

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 2>incentive for me to get rich. And so Trump is

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of speaking to a thing. And so I'm just

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>saying and again, I research like the very very very

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>far right people don't talk to me, but the kind

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>of like not crazy about one issue or something like that,

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>who might come to our side. So that again and again,

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I hope I'm wrong and I'm just like wasting airtime

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 2>right now. But if you're not going to speak to

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 2>those people, which again is not a change in strategy,

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 2>it's a change in frame, then you better make sure

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 2>that like everybody in Michigan votes for Harris and everybody

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 2>in everywhere else votes for Harris, because you're making a

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 2>particular trade off. So do I sound crazy right now?

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm just right there.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that you sound crazy. I think that

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you're basically saying that like not to leave anything on

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the field, and like, if there are people to convince,

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>then think about the ways in which you can convince

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>those people that Trump is not for them. I'm just

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>not certain of the level of contortionism that this campaign

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>has to do to convince people that haven't voted Democrat

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in the last fifty years, and I don't think that

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>they're ever going to vote Democrat. So I would rather

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not waste energy on the white, rural male vote that

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>statistically has not voted for a Democrat since like the

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties. And then instead of trying to get those

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>who are aligned with Democratic values, making sure that you're

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>getting out the vote and inspiring those people to the polls,

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 1>that to me is an absolutely different strategy.

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 2>And again, I hope you're right now wrong, It's just

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 2>like I look at the polls, even after all the enthusiasm,

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 2>all the momentum the convention, North Carolina, toss up, Michigan,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 2>very very close, Georgia.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 1>But we're never going to see Jonathan. We're never going

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to see blowout polls Like that's just not the world

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that we live in. Like she's never going there's not

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be a Democrat that is going to be

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>up like ten percentage point five percentage points. That's not

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the world that we live in. But the fact that

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>those places that are notably read are now toss ups

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>shows us that momentum is in fact building because in

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, those places or blood red right. And so

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact is is that Biden turned some of those

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 1>places purple by a little bit of a margin because

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of COVID and so many people dying. But the fact

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that Harris, four weeks into this campaign, with seventy days

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to go, that those red places are toss ups is

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a win for Democrats. And you know me, I don't

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>love Poles. With a couple of minutes that we have left,

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I do want to switch gears and put on your

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>psychiatrist's hat, because I want to talk about the joy

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>effect and what it is that people who call themselves

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>opinion writers in the New York Times are doing this

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>week and what mainstream corporate media has been doing for

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the last several weeks, which is saying things to the

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>effect of joy is not a strategy. Donald Trump can

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>still win on character and attacking the joy angle, as

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>if joy alone is not what the American people need

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>according to Lindsay Graham, and Americans are not joyful according

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to Lindsay Graham, What do you make of the psychological

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>impact of joy versus fear and how people have been

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>reacting over the last month versus over the last eight

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>years of trump Ism.

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm all for joy, you know, bring on the joy.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 2>And I'm actually right now I don't want to see

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>any media outlets close right now, because we need everybody

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 2>on board to get the word out. I will say

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that what I think about is, on one hand, there

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 2>is something very positive about feeling like you're on the

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 2>winning team. You know, we see this in sports. People

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 2>have fewer heart attacks after their teams win and stuff

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 2>like that. And so, you know, we saw the Obama

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 2>effect of the message of hope as a mobilizing strategy.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 2>The caveat, I'm like mister Caveat today anays is that

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 2>we used to have this saying in psychiatry the negative

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 2>affect gets the energy. And it's basically, if you have

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty happy people in a room and one discontent person

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 2>in a room, and I know because I have dated

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 2>these people, I just have a very powerful, painful breakup

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 2>with somebody like this. But it's like if somebody's unhappy,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 2>it's our brain that works toward, oh, can we make

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>that person happy. So if there's twenty people in a

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>room at a party and one person comes in and

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 2>is miserable, that person gets the attention. You never remember

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the twenty happy people in the room. And so there

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 2>is something very powerful about constant grievance, which, as we

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>know from Trump, it just mobilizes people to, as I've shown,

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 2>act against their own self interests, et cetera, et cetera.

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 2>And so I hope that joy can carry the day.

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 2>But I think the point that some people are making,

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 2>which is joy as a general strategy is important, but

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 2>it's probably going to be important to tie it to

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 2>some very material gains for people or material realities. I think.

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 2>I think the concern people have is, you joy is

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 2>not sustainable in and of itself, but you know, you

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:15.200
<v Speaker 2>never know. I mean Obama showed differently, So I'm TBD

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 2>on this. I will just say that when you start

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.959
<v Speaker 2>telling people they're being ripped off or taken advantage of,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 2>and you're there champion that, and you're creating the conditions

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>of austerity where they actually feel they're being ripped off

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.920
<v Speaker 2>even though they're being ripped off by you. That's been

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Trump's game, and the question is can we overcome it?

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 2>And I'm curious to see how that plays out.

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm on the different side of the fence as

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody who has been living in existing in a place

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of darkness for a very long time and recognize that

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>fear mongering, even if it is about let's say lifting

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>up the horrors of Project twenty twenty five is not

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>as palpable to people as them feeling possible about their lives. Yeah,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>And what I think is happening is that one, I

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think mainstream corporate media does not want people to be

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>joyful because that does not drive clicks for them. And

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>so I think that there is a coordinated strategy that

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 1>is happening as a way to make it seem as

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if this campaign is somehow vapid in comparison to I

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the fuck Donald Trump is offering, and

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>they don't know because they don't ever ask him any

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>goddamn questions. But I also think that America has become

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>quite numb to the grievance politics. And by numb, I

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>mean like they're over it. It's been perpetuated over and

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>over and over again. It's the same bullshit, and I

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like now the American people have got reached a

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>place of exhaustion.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Well, there two less things. I mean one about the media.

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 2>Like for me, my critique of the media is a

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>little different. I watch MSNBC all the time, and I

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 2>don't get a picture of why non crazy Trump supporters

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 2>support Trump. I would love to hear more from the

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 2>other side in ways that it's not trying to talk

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 2>anybody out of it or trying to talk to anybody

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 2>on our But I found myself like watching Fox News

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 2>every now and again just to see what the script

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 2>other people are getting is, because I do think that

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 2>there's a level of like stereotyping the other side, and

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 2>so for me, the media quote unquote, it's falling into

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 2>like simplistic positions on both sides. I would just love

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to understand, like why do you support Trump? And not

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 2>in a way that I'm trying to talk you out

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 2>of it, but just so I can understand what drives

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 2>you in a way. And I don't feel like we're

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>getting that story. It's kind of like, oh my god,

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>you must be insane to vote for the other side.

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>And so I think that for me is part of it.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 2>And I do think the point about joy is just that,

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we know what Trump's going to do. He's

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 2>going to start hammering Harris about foreign policy Israel and Afghanistan,

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 2>I think is going to be huge issue and put

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 2>her on the defensive, and so I just think that

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 2>you know, how we respond to that. I think the

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 2>issue is Trump set the Afghanistan policy. He basically signed

0:23:58.200 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the country over to the Taliban.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Correct, So I'm like, I'm confused about why she can

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:04.439
<v Speaker 1>be put on the defensive about the fact that he

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>had five thousand Taliban members released that took the country back.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm not telling you what I believe. I'm telling you

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>what I think his strategy is going to be. Let's

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>talk in a week and see if I'm right, But

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I think he's going to start hammering stuff like that.

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:18.919
<v Speaker 2>And so the question is how are you going to

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 2>respond to that? And I just think that the retort

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 2>for what's coming from Trump is either to get dragged

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 2>down in the ditches or to take the high road.

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not sure which one is better. Obviously, I

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 2>just said I think Trump created a nightmare in Afghanistan

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that we walked into. But that's different from how he's

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 2>going to use it. And the question is how do

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 2>you do you have to go down and have a

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>street fight with him or do you want to stay

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 2>at a higher level. And I don't know the answer.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Well right now, he's too busy talking about how good

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>looking he is on the campaign trail, So I don't

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.880
<v Speaker 1>think that he's going to get around to policy anytime soon.

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>As always, my friend, doctor Jonathan Metzel, thank you so

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>much for making the time for wokf We always appreciate

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>your insight. That is it for me today. Dear friends

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:11.239
<v Speaker 1>on wok af as always power to the people and

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to all the people. Power, get woke and stay woke

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>as fuck.