1
00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:09,400
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

2
00:00:17,040 --> 00:00:20,200
Speaker 2: Hi Stephanie Flanders here with a bonus episode of our

3
00:00:20,280 --> 00:00:24,040
Speaker 2: Botonomics series, because well, we just couldn't resist. It's a

4
00:00:24,040 --> 00:00:26,200
Speaker 2: good one, and who knows, if you enjoy it, there

5
00:00:26,280 --> 00:00:29,000
Speaker 2: might be more to come. In this vein the focus

6
00:00:29,080 --> 00:00:32,599
Speaker 2: is trumpnomics, the economic world of Donald Trump, how he's

7
00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:35,360
Speaker 2: already shaped the global economy, and what on earth is

8
00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:38,080
Speaker 2: going to happen next. To help me tackle this subject,

9
00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:40,960
Speaker 2: I've recruited two of Bloomberg's finest, each with a unique

10
00:00:41,000 --> 00:00:45,360
Speaker 2: perspective on Donald Trump. Anna Wong, chief US economists for

11
00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:49,000
Speaker 2: Bloomberg Economics, and Josh Green, a national correspondent at Bloomberg

12
00:00:49,040 --> 00:00:53,760
Speaker 2: BusinessWeek based in DC who covers politics. Enjoy unless you've

13
00:00:53,760 --> 00:00:56,160
Speaker 2: been living in a very deep forest with bad WiFi.

14
00:00:56,240 --> 00:00:59,880
Speaker 2: You'll have noticed that investors have responded pretty favorably to

15
00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:03,520
Speaker 2: the reelection of Donald Trump. Stocks her up, so's the dollar,

16
00:01:04,160 --> 00:01:08,720
Speaker 2: Tesla stock, Bitcoin is way up. In general, You'd have

17
00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:12,039
Speaker 2: to say Wall Street seems to think that Trump two

18
00:01:12,120 --> 00:01:14,880
Speaker 2: point zero will be good for them, good for capitalists.

19
00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:16,640
Speaker 2: But at the same time you have a long line

20
00:01:16,640 --> 00:01:19,960
Speaker 2: of economists, sometimes working for the same Wall Street institutions

21
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:24,400
Speaker 2: telling us that Trump's economic policies, if implemented as advertised,

22
00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:28,039
Speaker 2: the stuff he promised on the stump, about tariffs on

23
00:01:28,319 --> 00:01:33,400
Speaker 2: all imports and mass deportations of illegal immigrants, all all

24
00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:38,440
Speaker 2: those things will raise inflation, slow growth, and stoke uncertainty,

25
00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:42,520
Speaker 2: which investors are supposed to hate. So I quite like

26
00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:46,600
Speaker 2: to tease out whether there's a contradiction between some of

27
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:50,520
Speaker 2: those beliefs. Helping me with that is Anna Wong, Chief

28
00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:54,200
Speaker 2: US Economists for Bloomberg Economics. Before that, she's worked at

29
00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:57,240
Speaker 2: the Federal Reserve Board, and while she was at the FED,

30
00:01:57,480 --> 00:02:00,680
Speaker 2: she served in the Trump White House and twenty nineteen

31
00:02:00,760 --> 00:02:04,840
Speaker 2: twenty twenty on sircumment at the Council of Economic Advisors.

32
00:02:04,840 --> 00:02:07,120
Speaker 2: She's also worked at the US Treasury. We also have

33
00:02:07,280 --> 00:02:12,400
Speaker 2: Josh Green, national correspondent at Bloomberg BusinessWeek, author of several books,

34
00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:16,120
Speaker 2: including I Guess, most relevantly for this purpose, the number

35
00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:20,840
Speaker 2: one New York Times bestseller Devil's Bargain, Steve Bannon, Donald Trump,

36
00:02:21,120 --> 00:02:24,800
Speaker 2: and The Storming of the Presidency. Anna I mentioned those

37
00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:28,640
Speaker 2: two beliefs often held by the same person. Trump's economic

38
00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:34,040
Speaker 2: policies would raise inflation, slow growth, stoke uncertainty, but somehow

39
00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:37,560
Speaker 2: he's still going to be phenomenally good for US investors

40
00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:40,440
Speaker 2: and companies. Am I right? There is a bit of

41
00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:41,320
Speaker 2: a contradiction there.

42
00:02:41,360 --> 00:02:44,600
Speaker 1: I think Wall Street economist and Wall Street traders are

43
00:02:44,880 --> 00:02:49,040
Speaker 1: two different animals. So a lot of traders are very practical.

44
00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:52,360
Speaker 1: So they're basing their bets, pouring all the money and

45
00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:57,480
Speaker 1: stocks right now on the experience from the first Trump administration,

46
00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:02,480
Speaker 1: And if you looked at the stock performance at that period, indeed,

47
00:03:02,600 --> 00:03:05,480
Speaker 1: it was quite phenomenal. So the S and P five

48
00:03:05,600 --> 00:03:11,080
Speaker 1: hundred rose fifty five percent from late twenty sixteen to

49
00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,640
Speaker 1: the end of twenty nineteen. Now, in terms of the

50
00:03:14,760 --> 00:03:19,440
Speaker 1: tension created by Donald Trump's threats on tariffs, indeed, it's

51
00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:23,400
Speaker 1: true that I think it's now well documented that every

52
00:03:23,480 --> 00:03:27,840
Speaker 1: time Trump tweets a threat on tariff, the stock market falls.

53
00:03:28,320 --> 00:03:31,640
Speaker 1: And if you add up all these tweets in his

54
00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:37,200
Speaker 1: first administration and looked at the cumulative stock decrease due

55
00:03:37,240 --> 00:03:41,080
Speaker 1: to his tweets, you actually would find that his tweets

56
00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:45,800
Speaker 1: are responsible for about ten percent lower stock market value.

57
00:03:45,920 --> 00:03:47,400
Speaker 2: Now that is news you can use.

58
00:03:47,400 --> 00:03:49,880
Speaker 1: I like that stat We actually did this when I

59
00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:52,360
Speaker 1: was at the CEA. In fact, that was one of

60
00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:57,960
Speaker 1: the study we undertook to document what has the impact

61
00:03:58,160 --> 00:04:02,920
Speaker 1: of all this tariff announcement. Overall? Stock markets still increased

62
00:04:02,960 --> 00:04:05,720
Speaker 1: by fifty five percent, but it could have increased by

63
00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:09,000
Speaker 1: sixty five percent. So I guess in that sense there

64
00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:12,360
Speaker 1: is some tension, but I think the traders are still

65
00:04:12,360 --> 00:04:16,080
Speaker 1: thinking that on net it will be positive. But let's

66
00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:18,520
Speaker 1: keep in mind that in the first Trump administration, a

67
00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:22,640
Speaker 1: lot of the stock market increase was due to the

68
00:04:22,839 --> 00:04:25,760
Speaker 1: tax cuts in TICCHA, and at that time that was

69
00:04:26,080 --> 00:04:29,520
Speaker 1: clearly a big reform in the text code. So corporate

70
00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:31,719
Speaker 1: tax rate fall from you know, in the thirties to

71
00:04:32,320 --> 00:04:35,840
Speaker 1: the twenties, and that is a very sizable increase that

72
00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:38,039
Speaker 1: they're not going to be able to replicate.

73
00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:40,039
Speaker 2: No, I guess the big thing we're talking about in

74
00:04:40,080 --> 00:04:42,839
Speaker 2: that front is just to prevent those text cuts from expiring,

75
00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:44,800
Speaker 2: which you would have thought could not possibly have the

76
00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:46,760
Speaker 2: same kind of impact exactly.

77
00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:49,440
Speaker 1: So I think in one calculus they have to think

78
00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:52,920
Speaker 1: about this time around, is well, suppose that all these

79
00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:57,159
Speaker 1: trade drama knock down, you know, ten to fifteen percent

80
00:04:57,200 --> 00:05:00,400
Speaker 1: of the stock market will a boost from the other

81
00:05:00,440 --> 00:05:04,120
Speaker 1: policies be able to more than offset that. I would

82
00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:07,240
Speaker 1: argue that right now, the stock market is already their

83
00:05:07,320 --> 00:05:12,159
Speaker 1: valuations are already very rich, and there's less upside, but

84
00:05:12,760 --> 00:05:17,240
Speaker 1: just more downside. But you know, I'm not equity a strategy.

85
00:05:17,440 --> 00:05:20,839
Speaker 2: No, Luckily, we don't have any equity statutist. In this conversation,

86
00:05:22,279 --> 00:05:25,560
Speaker 2: you've painted a fantastic sort of picture of people in

87
00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:28,680
Speaker 2: the Council Economic Advisors examining the tweets and then potentially

88
00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:30,520
Speaker 2: going to the President to talk to him about the

89
00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:32,440
Speaker 2: impact on the stock market. And I want to get

90
00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:34,640
Speaker 2: into that and his view of Tariff's in a minute.

91
00:05:34,640 --> 00:05:37,680
Speaker 2: But Josh, I mean you're someone who, in writing that book,

92
00:05:37,760 --> 00:05:43,280
Speaker 2: you were very close to Trump and Steve Bannon as

93
00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:46,520
Speaker 2: as the campaign unfolded and as they went into the

94
00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:52,000
Speaker 2: White House. When you see what's happening at mare A Lago,

95
00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:57,400
Speaker 2: now the dynamics of this potentially this new administration, and

96
00:05:57,440 --> 00:05:59,440
Speaker 2: then think about what Wall Street seems to think about it,

97
00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:01,120
Speaker 2: do you think there'd be hopelessly optimistic?

98
00:06:01,480 --> 00:06:03,720
Speaker 3: I do, and with a proviser that I too, am

99
00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:09,480
Speaker 3: not an equity strategistic your political reporter, I do think

100
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:11,279
Speaker 3: you know the way I think of it talking to

101
00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:13,479
Speaker 3: people down in mar Alago now, talking to some of

102
00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:15,520
Speaker 3: my Wall Street source. So it is clearly right now

103
00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:19,200
Speaker 3: Trump is in a honeymoon phase. Traders are exuberant. Everybody's

104
00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:24,040
Speaker 3: excited about tax cuts, the regulation mergers, the rise of crypto,

105
00:06:24,320 --> 00:06:29,480
Speaker 3: perhaps the fall of Lena Khan. Expectations are running sky high.

106
00:06:29,560 --> 00:06:33,159
Speaker 3: But I tend to analyze Trump like you have to

107
00:06:33,160 --> 00:06:37,080
Speaker 3: think about two categories. One is the expectations and then

108
00:06:37,120 --> 00:06:39,839
Speaker 3: there's the execution. I think what Wall Street might be

109
00:06:39,880 --> 00:06:43,320
Speaker 3: forgetting right now is that Trump always brings with him

110
00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:48,479
Speaker 3: a certain level of chaos. That means the expectation or

111
00:06:48,520 --> 00:06:51,280
Speaker 3: the execution is never as smooth as he'd like it

112
00:06:51,320 --> 00:06:55,880
Speaker 3: to be. He's an impulsive guy. He gets angry, things

113
00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:59,760
Speaker 3: go wrong, and I think that you know the fact

114
00:06:59,760 --> 00:07:02,039
Speaker 3: that he he's not president yet and he isn't running

115
00:07:02,040 --> 00:07:06,080
Speaker 3: the government yet, has led people perhaps to discount that

116
00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:09,119
Speaker 3: second part of the equation that once he gets in there,

117
00:07:09,720 --> 00:07:14,600
Speaker 3: especially given the types of people that he wants to

118
00:07:14,640 --> 00:07:17,920
Speaker 3: surround himself with in his new administration, things could go

119
00:07:17,960 --> 00:07:20,640
Speaker 3: off the rails very quickly. And that's something that every investor,

120
00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:22,120
Speaker 3: I think, is going to want to keep a close eye.

121
00:07:22,120 --> 00:07:25,560
Speaker 2: It's interesting that goes slightly against you know, the expectation

122
00:07:25,760 --> 00:07:31,840
Speaker 2: had been chaos Trump one point zero, and he's had

123
00:07:31,880 --> 00:07:34,480
Speaker 2: four years to know Licky's wounds, think about his mistakes.

124
00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:39,920
Speaker 2: This is this little storyline. Now he's back, he's less

125
00:07:39,960 --> 00:07:42,240
Speaker 2: constrained in all the ways that we know, lack of

126
00:07:42,240 --> 00:07:47,560
Speaker 2: guard rails, etc. So potentially more radical, but also more disciplined.

127
00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:49,120
Speaker 2: You know, he kind of knows his way around the

128
00:07:49,120 --> 00:07:51,680
Speaker 2: White House, he knows his way around government. You think

129
00:07:51,800 --> 00:07:53,200
Speaker 2: that's not going to make a difference.

130
00:07:54,600 --> 00:07:57,760
Speaker 3: That was the thought process going in. But I think

131
00:07:57,800 --> 00:08:01,640
Speaker 3: that the big revelation about Trump two point is that

132
00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:06,240
Speaker 3: he's not necessarily going to be surrounded by savvy veterans

133
00:08:06,240 --> 00:08:08,880
Speaker 3: of government. Look, the number that jumps out to me

134
00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:14,400
Speaker 3: is that Trump has nominated eleven Fox News personality to

135
00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:17,840
Speaker 3: serve in his administration, including his Secretary of State and

136
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:21,720
Speaker 3: Attorney General, although the Attorney General, Matt Gates, has now

137
00:08:21,800 --> 00:08:24,640
Speaker 3: bowed out. I mean to me, that raises the question

138
00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:27,760
Speaker 3: of who's actually going to be running the government and

139
00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:33,080
Speaker 3: what happens when a crisis inevitably hits. Is Trump's administration

140
00:08:33,320 --> 00:08:35,680
Speaker 3: going to be able to perform as well as an

141
00:08:35,760 --> 00:08:40,480
Speaker 3: ordinary Democratic or Republican administration, or even Trump's last administration

142
00:08:40,559 --> 00:08:44,240
Speaker 3: where you did have military generals, you had a segment

143
00:08:44,280 --> 00:08:47,720
Speaker 3: of the Republican Party that wasn't MAGA, people like Mitt Romney.

144
00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:51,040
Speaker 3: All those people are gone this type around, this time around,

145
00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:53,920
Speaker 3: and Trump has made clear that he wants to come in.

146
00:08:54,280 --> 00:08:59,080
Speaker 3: He wants to aggressively impose tariffs, cut taxes, toport millions

147
00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:02,559
Speaker 3: of immigrants. I was talking to a Democratic source yesterday

148
00:09:02,600 --> 00:09:05,160
Speaker 3: who said, the thing that people aren't thinking about is

149
00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:07,880
Speaker 3: Trump wants to drive one hundred miles an hour, but

150
00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:09,959
Speaker 3: this time there are no guardrails in the highway. I

151
00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:11,800
Speaker 3: think that's the right way to think about Trump.

152
00:09:12,120 --> 00:09:14,760
Speaker 2: Anna. The Council of Economic Advisors was perhaps it was

153
00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:17,040
Speaker 2: a haven of efficiency.

154
00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:17,040
Speaker 3: But.

155
00:09:19,559 --> 00:09:23,240
Speaker 2: Absolutely not all right, So, I mean, what does that

156
00:09:23,320 --> 00:09:24,400
Speaker 2: ring true to you? Anna?

157
00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:28,440
Speaker 1: I have to disagree a bit with Josh here. I

158
00:09:28,520 --> 00:09:33,080
Speaker 1: have only been focused on the economic personnel nomination, and

159
00:09:33,160 --> 00:09:37,200
Speaker 1: I thought that the economic nominees that Trump has announced

160
00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:41,840
Speaker 1: so far sounds like business as usual. In fact, I

161
00:09:41,880 --> 00:09:45,880
Speaker 1: think that the nomination of Scott Dissent and Kevin Hassett

162
00:09:46,400 --> 00:09:52,560
Speaker 1: actually felt more solid than the first administration and in

163
00:09:52,679 --> 00:09:57,600
Speaker 1: terms of chaos, Josh, you mentioned chaos, I think there

164
00:09:57,640 --> 00:10:02,400
Speaker 1: are other words to describe it. Maybe another you could

165
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:07,079
Speaker 1: think about it as a euphemism, but one word would

166
00:10:07,080 --> 00:10:07,840
Speaker 1: be a team.

167
00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:08,480
Speaker 2: Of rifle.

168
00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:16,000
Speaker 1: Because I so, while I have not briefed the president

169
00:10:16,559 --> 00:10:21,839
Speaker 1: uh a former president, I had briefed principles on these

170
00:10:22,080 --> 00:10:26,520
Speaker 1: potus meetings, and I got debriefed from it. And the

171
00:10:26,559 --> 00:10:30,319
Speaker 1: sense I got from it is that Donald Trump enjoys

172
00:10:30,760 --> 00:10:37,200
Speaker 1: seeing his economic cabinet officials debates or fights. I think

173
00:10:37,200 --> 00:10:40,400
Speaker 1: it's part of his style, this chaotic process, if you

174
00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:43,880
Speaker 1: want to describe it that way, is for him to

175
00:10:44,440 --> 00:10:48,360
Speaker 1: hear a range of views. So the idea that he

176
00:10:48,679 --> 00:10:52,840
Speaker 1: is a just this out of touch emperor only listening

177
00:10:52,880 --> 00:10:57,000
Speaker 1: to this that he wants to hear, I think that

178
00:10:57,120 --> 00:11:01,480
Speaker 1: is not accurate. The chaos I personally experience in their

179
00:11:01,520 --> 00:11:07,199
Speaker 1: first administration, outside of just being there during the thick

180
00:11:07,240 --> 00:11:10,360
Speaker 1: of the pandemic while it was happening and during the

181
00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:14,080
Speaker 1: trade war. Outside of those policy related drama, the drama

182
00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:18,320
Speaker 1: I experience is the leaks whenever there is a policy proposal,

183
00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:24,079
Speaker 1: and in all administration there will be crazy economic proposals.

184
00:11:24,160 --> 00:11:27,680
Speaker 1: I mean the the the objective of CEA is to

185
00:11:28,040 --> 00:11:34,400
Speaker 1: do an objective analysis on any kind of crazy economic

186
00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:37,920
Speaker 1: right and then shoot it down. We just shoot down

187
00:11:37,960 --> 00:11:40,520
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff, right. But then what what in

188
00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:43,319
Speaker 1: a Trump administration, what will usually happen is when a

189
00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:46,400
Speaker 1: proposals come in and suddenly the next day it would

190
00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:49,040
Speaker 1: it will show up in the media. And in fact,

191
00:11:49,120 --> 00:11:53,120
Speaker 1: I remember one very specific incident where it actually showed

192
00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:57,320
Speaker 1: up in the Bloomberg and then the next day the

193
00:11:57,400 --> 00:12:00,240
Speaker 1: Chao is a order.

194
00:12:00,280 --> 00:12:04,479
Speaker 3: I really did appreciate all the lead as an insider.

195
00:12:04,520 --> 00:12:09,560
Speaker 1: What happened is actually sow's distrust between everybody because there's

196
00:12:09,640 --> 00:12:11,480
Speaker 1: only a small group of people who are in the

197
00:12:11,640 --> 00:12:14,760
Speaker 1: in the no and then suddenly the story appears in

198
00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:18,240
Speaker 1: the media and the whole policy process just breaks down.

199
00:12:18,400 --> 00:12:21,520
Speaker 1: There's and then people started behaving in a way where

200
00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:24,080
Speaker 1: I don't trust you, you don't trust me. Let's control the information.

201
00:12:24,440 --> 00:12:26,520
Speaker 2: Okay, But you started off disagreeing with Josh, and then

202
00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:28,800
Speaker 2: you may seem to be coming back to a slightly

203
00:12:28,880 --> 00:12:29,839
Speaker 2: more chaotic vision.

204
00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:32,200
Speaker 3: And I made a great point there about the economic team.

205
00:12:32,240 --> 00:12:34,560
Speaker 3: That is the one exception to what I was talking

206
00:12:34,559 --> 00:12:36,959
Speaker 3: about earlier. And let me emphasize to Scott Bess in

207
00:12:37,000 --> 00:12:40,400
Speaker 3: his Treasury secretary, a story that Bloomberg News broke. By

208
00:12:40,400 --> 00:12:42,400
Speaker 3: the way, I think the most positive.

209
00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:43,880
Speaker 2: You may have been on the byline I seem to

210
00:12:44,240 --> 00:12:45,360
Speaker 2: I might have been. I might have been.

211
00:12:45,920 --> 00:12:48,360
Speaker 3: It's probably the most positive sign I think for Wall

212
00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:52,160
Speaker 3: Streets and Marcus. A universal praise among my Democratic and

213
00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:54,959
Speaker 3: Republican political sources that a quote unquote adult in the

214
00:12:55,040 --> 00:12:57,880
Speaker 3: room is going to be Treasury Secretary. To me, however,

215
00:12:57,960 --> 00:13:00,360
Speaker 3: as a political reporter, as somebody you know who writes

216
00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:02,760
Speaker 3: about all the backstabbing, is the recipient of some of

217
00:13:02,800 --> 00:13:05,640
Speaker 3: these leaks. The difficult thing is, at the end of

218
00:13:05,640 --> 00:13:08,200
Speaker 3: the day, Trump is still Trump, and the people around

219
00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:10,640
Speaker 3: Trump behave in a certain kind of way that I

220
00:13:10,679 --> 00:13:13,360
Speaker 3: don't think people like Scott Besson, who have no experience

221
00:13:13,400 --> 00:13:17,079
Speaker 3: working for Trump are necessarily accustomed to. So the big

222
00:13:17,200 --> 00:13:19,760
Speaker 3: question I have in my mind is I don't have

223
00:13:19,800 --> 00:13:23,360
Speaker 3: any doubt that Scott Besson would be a steady hand

224
00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:26,720
Speaker 3: on the tiller of the economy if he's allowed to

225
00:13:26,800 --> 00:13:29,160
Speaker 3: steer it. I want to know is what happens when

226
00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:32,120
Speaker 3: Trump decides he wants to do something that Besson doesn't

227
00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:35,360
Speaker 3: think is necessarily a great idea for the economy, for

228
00:13:35,400 --> 00:13:40,199
Speaker 3: global markets, what have you? Does he have the stature

229
00:13:40,320 --> 00:13:42,280
Speaker 3: and power and where we're all to stand up to

230
00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:46,360
Speaker 3: Trump and to convince him to do otherwise, or is

231
00:13:46,400 --> 00:13:49,040
Speaker 3: he in the position that a lot of Trump cabinet

232
00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:53,839
Speaker 3: officials have been historically where you either get steamrolled or

233
00:13:53,920 --> 00:13:57,240
Speaker 3: pushed out or layered over and aren't able to keep

234
00:13:57,280 --> 00:13:58,680
Speaker 3: the car on the highway. To go back to my

235
00:13:58,720 --> 00:14:00,000
Speaker 3: earlier metaphor.

236
00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:06,320
Speaker 2: When we think about whether this administration will be broadly

237
00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:08,320
Speaker 2: good for the economy, good for Wall Street, or not,

238
00:14:08,400 --> 00:14:11,280
Speaker 2: I think there's a sort of a big question to

239
00:14:11,320 --> 00:14:14,440
Speaker 2: be asked about one particular set policies, which is the tariffs.

240
00:14:14,520 --> 00:14:15,760
Speaker 2: So I just want to spend a little bit of

241
00:14:15,800 --> 00:14:17,839
Speaker 2: time on that. I mean, you're very interesting Anna on

242
00:14:18,480 --> 00:14:21,840
Speaker 2: how that panned out in the first administration.

243
00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:25,400
Speaker 1: Yeah, so, Stephanie. I think the main point that I

244
00:14:25,440 --> 00:14:28,400
Speaker 1: would try to make is that it's important to separate

245
00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:32,440
Speaker 1: the drama from the execution. As Sean Dannen wrote in

246
00:14:32,480 --> 00:14:35,000
Speaker 1: Our Big Take earlier this week, I think that's a

247
00:14:35,040 --> 00:14:38,720
Speaker 1: great way to describe how to think about the tariffs

248
00:14:38,720 --> 00:14:41,480
Speaker 1: in the next four years. If you were a person

249
00:14:41,640 --> 00:14:45,080
Speaker 1: who was in Mars in twenty sixteen to twenty twenty,

250
00:14:45,120 --> 00:14:47,640
Speaker 1: and you came back, and so you didn't live through

251
00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:52,040
Speaker 1: the Twitter all the tweets. I did watch TV at all.

252
00:14:52,480 --> 00:14:54,880
Speaker 1: And then they are just looking at the numbers, looking

253
00:14:54,960 --> 00:14:58,200
Speaker 1: at the escalation tranches of the tariffs, looking at the

254
00:14:58,680 --> 00:15:03,360
Speaker 1: CPI data, looking at the unemployment, manufacturing employment data. You

255
00:15:04,720 --> 00:15:07,520
Speaker 1: this person from MARS would think that, well, it turns

256
00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:10,640
Speaker 1: out that most of the tariffs had very little negative

257
00:15:10,680 --> 00:15:14,840
Speaker 1: impact on employment in twenty eighteen, and inflation in twenty

258
00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:18,400
Speaker 1: nineteen ended up even below two percent. And this person

259
00:15:18,440 --> 00:15:21,680
Speaker 1: would also look at the execution of the tariff and

260
00:15:21,720 --> 00:15:25,600
Speaker 1: thinking that there is an internal logic and strategy to

261
00:15:25,760 --> 00:15:28,360
Speaker 1: how they executed the tariffs. So if you look at it,

262
00:15:29,240 --> 00:15:33,200
Speaker 1: the first tranches of tariffs were on solar panels and steel,

263
00:15:33,520 --> 00:15:36,640
Speaker 1: and it happened in early twenty eighteen. And this was

264
00:15:36,880 --> 00:15:42,520
Speaker 1: after the Republicans passed the Text Jobs and Cuts Act

265
00:15:42,600 --> 00:15:45,800
Speaker 1: in December seventeen, right in the first year of the

266
00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:49,280
Speaker 1: Trump administration. There was no tariffs at all. And I

267
00:15:49,280 --> 00:15:52,000
Speaker 1: think there's a logic to why they want to sequence

268
00:15:52,160 --> 00:15:56,160
Speaker 1: the tariffs increase after the tax cuts was passed, so

269
00:15:56,160 --> 00:15:59,240
Speaker 1: that it could in case there was negative effect. So

270
00:15:59,360 --> 00:16:04,600
Speaker 1: that's what observation that there's a strategic sequencing to when

271
00:16:04,640 --> 00:16:08,920
Speaker 1: these escalation of tariffs will happen. The second part is

272
00:16:08,960 --> 00:16:13,160
Speaker 1: that you also look at how these tariffs trunches are designed.

273
00:16:13,440 --> 00:16:17,280
Speaker 1: It turns out that the first three trunches on China,

274
00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:21,520
Speaker 1: as well as the solar panel and the steel were

275
00:16:21,880 --> 00:16:26,840
Speaker 1: mainly on intermediate goods and capital goods. Economic theory actually

276
00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:30,600
Speaker 1: tells you that if of the tariffs is on these

277
00:16:30,680 --> 00:16:34,240
Speaker 1: type of goods, it tends to be not as inflationary.

278
00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:37,360
Speaker 1: So that's actually what the data was showing that throughout

279
00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:42,640
Speaker 1: the first four waves of tariffs and twenty eighteen, manufacturing

280
00:16:42,640 --> 00:16:47,320
Speaker 1: employment was climbing, and so I think Trump remember that

281
00:16:47,440 --> 00:16:50,880
Speaker 1: part of the data. But what also happened is when

282
00:16:50,920 --> 00:16:54,920
Speaker 1: he started imposing the really big Section three oh one

283
00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:59,240
Speaker 1: tariffs on China, and it starts getting into consumer goods

284
00:16:59,280 --> 00:17:00,840
Speaker 1: because they just ran.

285
00:17:00,720 --> 00:17:02,320
Speaker 2: Out, and those are the things that when you're putting

286
00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:05,600
Speaker 2: tarifts on consumer goods just to sort of that's it's

287
00:17:05,640 --> 00:17:07,880
Speaker 2: harder for the retailers to know, they end up having

288
00:17:07,880 --> 00:17:10,800
Speaker 2: to pass it on to consumers exactly.

289
00:17:11,160 --> 00:17:14,919
Speaker 1: So towards the last two waves, which are the Section

290
00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:18,199
Speaker 1: three or one tariffs on Chinese goods. That's when you

291
00:17:18,320 --> 00:17:22,440
Speaker 1: started seeing employment in manufacturing sectors dropping.

292
00:17:22,480 --> 00:17:23,399
Speaker 2: It's very clear the.

293
00:17:23,480 --> 00:17:26,680
Speaker 1: Moment three on one terrors are imposed, then you start

294
00:17:26,760 --> 00:17:29,120
Speaker 1: seeing the manufacturing employment going down.

295
00:17:29,320 --> 00:17:30,200
Speaker 2: Has he forgotten that?

296
00:17:31,080 --> 00:17:33,640
Speaker 1: So I was about to get there going.

297
00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:36,360
Speaker 2: Back, sorry, going back to.

298
00:17:36,440 --> 00:17:39,879
Speaker 1: Josh point about who is Trump? Like, what is Trump?

299
00:17:39,960 --> 00:17:41,840
Speaker 1: Is his own men at the end of the day,

300
00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:47,080
Speaker 1: And I totally agree, right, I would not rely on

301
00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:52,240
Speaker 1: the voice of Scott dissent as the sole countervailing voice.

302
00:17:52,240 --> 00:17:55,280
Speaker 1: And I don't think anyone would have the power to

303
00:17:56,440 --> 00:18:01,000
Speaker 1: like single handedly pull Trump away from whatever he decided,

304
00:18:01,040 --> 00:18:03,800
Speaker 1: because Trump, after all, is the president. But I think

305
00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:08,399
Speaker 1: Trump is a rational president putting outside the drama once again.

306
00:18:08,800 --> 00:18:11,800
Speaker 1: So what happened in twenty nineteen is as I was

307
00:18:11,840 --> 00:18:15,480
Speaker 1: saying that economic data start turning, business investments start flowing

308
00:18:15,520 --> 00:18:21,800
Speaker 1: down meaningfully, yield curve inverted, manufacturing employments start plunging, and

309
00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:26,720
Speaker 1: within the FED, there was a burgeoning body of literature

310
00:18:26,760 --> 00:18:31,480
Speaker 1: looking at trade policy uncertainty and clearly tracing the impact

311
00:18:31,600 --> 00:18:35,399
Speaker 1: of all these tariff announcements to lower investment. And so

312
00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:40,359
Speaker 1: we presented all this evidence to Jared Kushner and then

313
00:18:40,400 --> 00:18:44,080
Speaker 1: later to Trump, and he was actually quite receptive to

314
00:18:44,160 --> 00:18:48,159
Speaker 1: it that he does look at economic evidence. He cares

315
00:18:48,240 --> 00:18:51,399
Speaker 1: about the stock market, he cares about the performance of

316
00:18:51,440 --> 00:18:55,040
Speaker 1: the economy. So if you do show him evidence, clear

317
00:18:55,080 --> 00:18:59,400
Speaker 1: evidence that this is hurting the economy, then he will

318
00:18:59,440 --> 00:19:01,720
Speaker 1: pull back. And that was the one of the key

319
00:19:01,760 --> 00:19:05,919
Speaker 1: reason for why he decided to de escalate by accepting

320
00:19:05,960 --> 00:19:09,240
Speaker 1: the Phase one deal in December of twenty nine.

321
00:19:09,320 --> 00:19:11,520
Speaker 3: I actually spoke to Trump in July with some of

322
00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:13,760
Speaker 3: my Bloomer Business we colleagues for the cover story we did,

323
00:19:13,800 --> 00:19:16,520
Speaker 3: and we brought up the issues of terriffs, and to me,

324
00:19:16,720 --> 00:19:19,080
Speaker 3: the interesting tension in Trump's mind that Anna did a

325
00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:21,520
Speaker 3: really nice job of describing is that when we said

326
00:19:21,640 --> 00:19:25,439
Speaker 3: most mainstream economists agree the inflation or the terroiffsre inflationary,

327
00:19:25,760 --> 00:19:28,280
Speaker 3: Trump jumped in and said, no, they're not. And just

328
00:19:28,280 --> 00:19:30,760
Speaker 3: look at my last administration imposed tariffs, and we didn't

329
00:19:30,760 --> 00:19:33,679
Speaker 3: get the kind of runaway inflation that people warning about. Therefore,

330
00:19:34,040 --> 00:19:36,360
Speaker 3: this is not something I'm worried about in the next

331
00:19:36,359 --> 00:19:39,119
Speaker 3: Trump presidency. And I thought that was interesting. In speaking

332
00:19:39,119 --> 00:19:44,199
Speaker 3: to people around Washington policy expert types, everybody seems to

333
00:19:44,480 --> 00:19:47,480
Speaker 3: understand that this is Trump's belief, and so I think

334
00:19:47,600 --> 00:19:50,080
Speaker 3: one of the worries that people have that investor should

335
00:19:50,080 --> 00:19:52,760
Speaker 3: at least be aware of is that if Trump doesn't

336
00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:56,440
Speaker 3: believe the tariffs are inflationary or the expectation is that

337
00:19:56,480 --> 00:19:59,359
Speaker 3: he's going to push to impose them until the point

338
00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:01,960
Speaker 3: comes that we really do see inflation or that the

339
00:20:01,960 --> 00:20:04,240
Speaker 3: stock market falls. So I'd said earlier there really aren't

340
00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:06,320
Speaker 3: any guardrails around Trump, but I do think that that

341
00:20:06,440 --> 00:20:09,679
Speaker 3: one kind of guardrail, and alluded to was the stock market.

342
00:20:09,720 --> 00:20:12,560
Speaker 3: Are oddly enough that Trump has always viewed the stock

343
00:20:12,600 --> 00:20:15,400
Speaker 3: market as a measure, a gauge of his own success,

344
00:20:16,000 --> 00:20:18,400
Speaker 3: and if he shoots too far on tariffs or any

345
00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:20,560
Speaker 3: other kind of inflationary policy, if he does get a

346
00:20:20,600 --> 00:20:22,680
Speaker 3: negative reaction to him the stock market, I think the

347
00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:24,600
Speaker 3: evidence is that that he will pull back, or that

348
00:20:24,640 --> 00:20:26,640
Speaker 3: he's at least willing to pull back. But I think

349
00:20:26,680 --> 00:20:29,119
Speaker 3: what that means is we look ahead to a second

350
00:20:29,119 --> 00:20:31,640
Speaker 3: Trump administration, is that it's going to be a really

351
00:20:31,680 --> 00:20:35,240
Speaker 3: wild ride for either way, and like, really the smart

352
00:20:35,240 --> 00:20:36,919
Speaker 3: thing to do is just to kind of buckle in

353
00:20:37,600 --> 00:20:39,120
Speaker 3: and keep reading Bloomberg.

354
00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:42,160
Speaker 2: Well, I think you've already won the award for most

355
00:20:42,160 --> 00:20:44,360
Speaker 2: Bloomberg plug. Yeah episode.

356
00:20:44,600 --> 00:20:47,399
Speaker 3: I've actually had sources during the transition reach out to

357
00:20:47,440 --> 00:20:49,880
Speaker 3: me and say, hey, is it possible could you give

358
00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:51,679
Speaker 3: me this? In fact, one of them is your report

359
00:20:51,720 --> 00:20:53,800
Speaker 3: Anna and Bloomer Anna. Could you give me this Bloomberg

360
00:20:53,880 --> 00:20:56,240
Speaker 3: story or this Bloomberg report. It's great, it's wonderful for

361
00:20:56,359 --> 00:20:59,000
Speaker 3: source buildings. But it made me aware of just how

362
00:20:59,080 --> 00:21:02,560
Speaker 3: closely people in my world, the kind of politics and finance,

363
00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:04,960
Speaker 3: are paying attention to what's going to happen, what people

364
00:21:05,000 --> 00:21:08,160
Speaker 3: are expecting, where the various effects might show up, because

365
00:21:08,160 --> 00:21:09,480
Speaker 3: at the end of the day, none of us really

366
00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:10,280
Speaker 3: know what's going to happen.

367
00:21:10,960 --> 00:21:13,400
Speaker 2: Obviously, he cares a lot about the stock market. You've

368
00:21:13,400 --> 00:21:16,280
Speaker 2: talked in the past about his need to be a

369
00:21:16,320 --> 00:21:19,879
Speaker 2: plutocratic populist. You know, all these billionaires backing him, and

370
00:21:19,920 --> 00:21:23,479
Speaker 2: certainly a lot of Wall Street think individual capitalists on

371
00:21:23,520 --> 00:21:25,440
Speaker 2: Wall Street thinking they're going to be made better off

372
00:21:25,480 --> 00:21:29,080
Speaker 2: by him. But also the great achievement of his reelection

373
00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:33,199
Speaker 2: has been to bring into the Republican fold all of

374
00:21:33,240 --> 00:21:38,280
Speaker 2: these very angry working class people who may stay angry

375
00:21:38,400 --> 00:21:40,719
Speaker 2: if he's doing all the things he needs to do

376
00:21:40,840 --> 00:21:43,119
Speaker 2: to keep the stock market high. So how does that work?

377
00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:45,480
Speaker 3: I think the challenge for Trump is that he was

378
00:21:45,480 --> 00:21:49,920
Speaker 3: elected by a multiracial, working class group of voters who

379
00:21:50,119 --> 00:21:54,040
Speaker 3: very clearly sided with him because they were angry about

380
00:21:54,080 --> 00:21:56,800
Speaker 3: high prices and inflation and thought Trump could do a

381
00:21:56,800 --> 00:22:00,320
Speaker 3: better job than Joe Biden and Kamala Harris had And

382
00:22:00,400 --> 00:22:04,080
Speaker 3: if Trump is too aggressive with tariffs, with cutting taxes,

383
00:22:04,440 --> 00:22:07,400
Speaker 3: with doing things to drive up inflation, that coalition could

384
00:22:07,480 --> 00:22:11,840
Speaker 3: quickly fall apart. Looking at what Trump seems to want

385
00:22:11,880 --> 00:22:14,200
Speaker 3: to do in his first one hundred days, the focus

386
00:22:14,280 --> 00:22:17,080
Speaker 3: is going to be on extending those Trump tax cuts,

387
00:22:17,720 --> 00:22:19,600
Speaker 3: not the sort of thing I think that's going to

388
00:22:19,640 --> 00:22:22,280
Speaker 3: excite a lot of the working class folks that are

389
00:22:22,359 --> 00:22:25,800
Speaker 3: angry about prices at the grocery store. So the balancing

390
00:22:25,840 --> 00:22:28,280
Speaker 3: act for Trump is going to be to do these

391
00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:33,639
Speaker 3: exciting plutocratic things that have investors in Wall Street so happy,

392
00:22:34,800 --> 00:22:40,480
Speaker 3: while not angering the group of voters who moved from

393
00:22:40,560 --> 00:22:43,440
Speaker 3: Joe Biden to Donald Trump because they were expecting lower

394
00:22:43,480 --> 00:22:44,840
Speaker 3: prices in a stronger economy.

395
00:22:45,960 --> 00:22:47,800
Speaker 2: Do you think you can do it with this team?

396
00:22:48,680 --> 00:22:48,960
Speaker 1: Boy?

397
00:22:49,119 --> 00:22:51,520
Speaker 3: As a political reporter, I'm not supposed to.

398
00:22:53,760 --> 00:22:56,040
Speaker 2: What should we be looking for to get clues as

399
00:22:56,080 --> 00:22:57,240
Speaker 2: to how he's squaring this.

400
00:22:57,600 --> 00:22:58,800
Speaker 3: I would look at the feed, and I would look

401
00:22:58,800 --> 00:23:01,680
Speaker 3: at inflation, right. You know, if inflation continues to fall,

402
00:23:01,920 --> 00:23:04,280
Speaker 3: Trump will not hesitate to leap in and claim credit

403
00:23:04,359 --> 00:23:08,919
Speaker 3: for it. You know, if voters are happy, then I

404
00:23:08,960 --> 00:23:12,280
Speaker 3: think he'll be in pretty good shape. But with Trump,

405
00:23:12,320 --> 00:23:14,760
Speaker 3: there's always the risk that there's some kind of a crisis,

406
00:23:14,760 --> 00:23:20,320
Speaker 3: an economic crisis, a global crisis in his administration Stocked

407
00:23:20,359 --> 00:23:22,480
Speaker 3: with people it looks like who aren't going to be

408
00:23:22,960 --> 00:23:26,240
Speaker 3: veterans of government. You just don't know what's going to happen,

409
00:23:26,240 --> 00:23:27,920
Speaker 3: and there's a lot of chance, I think, for things

410
00:23:27,960 --> 00:23:30,399
Speaker 3: to go wrong. So certainly he could pull it off.

411
00:23:30,520 --> 00:23:33,280
Speaker 3: Everybody was worried in the first Trump administration. As Anna

412
00:23:33,320 --> 00:23:36,520
Speaker 3: said earlier, it wound up pretty good for the American economy,

413
00:23:36,760 --> 00:23:39,280
Speaker 3: and so I think the hope is that the chaos

414
00:23:39,359 --> 00:23:41,960
Speaker 3: will be contained and that we'll get another four years

415
00:23:42,160 --> 00:23:43,520
Speaker 3: of positive economic growth.

416
00:23:43,960 --> 00:23:47,919
Speaker 2: Anna, it's perfect symmetry. We've ended up with trusting the

417
00:23:47,960 --> 00:23:50,440
Speaker 2: FED as the answer to whether or not he's going

418
00:23:50,480 --> 00:23:52,160
Speaker 2: to pull things off. What do you think?

419
00:23:52,720 --> 00:23:55,160
Speaker 1: I don't think clearly sho doing that.

420
00:23:56,000 --> 00:23:58,280
Speaker 2: I think you know, I think you don't think so

421
00:23:58,840 --> 00:23:59,960
Speaker 2: you don't think we should be trusted.

422
00:24:01,280 --> 00:24:06,879
Speaker 1: I would rather not answer that question. Yes, some of

423
00:24:06,920 --> 00:24:10,800
Speaker 1: the things that Trump wants to do create a tension

424
00:24:10,840 --> 00:24:15,320
Speaker 1: between Wall Street and the working class multiracial working class

425
00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:18,679
Speaker 1: coalition that Josh mentioned. But there's one thing that's not

426
00:24:18,760 --> 00:24:24,280
Speaker 1: intention which is growth. If he manages through his deregulation,

427
00:24:24,359 --> 00:24:27,440
Speaker 1: for example, because deregulation is almost like a free launch,

428
00:24:27,480 --> 00:24:31,640
Speaker 1: it does not really increase the federal deficit and actually

429
00:24:31,840 --> 00:24:36,479
Speaker 1: lower prices. It could lower prices. In fact, I just

430
00:24:36,720 --> 00:24:40,639
Speaker 1: came across a very ancient document last week that it

431
00:24:40,720 --> 00:24:43,320
Speaker 1: turned out that in nineteen seventy four, when inflation was

432
00:24:43,400 --> 00:24:47,240
Speaker 1: running a double digit in US, the CEA pulled together

433
00:24:47,359 --> 00:24:51,320
Speaker 1: a coalition of half Republicans have Democrats to come up

434
00:24:51,359 --> 00:24:55,160
Speaker 1: with solutions for dealing with inflation. And the one agreement

435
00:24:55,320 --> 00:24:59,160
Speaker 1: that both sides of the aisle come to is deregulation

436
00:24:59,240 --> 00:25:03,080
Speaker 1: and energy and also financial sector. And that led to

437
00:25:03,160 --> 00:25:07,400
Speaker 1: two decades of wave of deregulation. So I think if

438
00:25:07,400 --> 00:25:11,640
Speaker 1: Trump manages to work that very narrow path where he's

439
00:25:11,680 --> 00:25:16,480
Speaker 1: able to boost growth without increasing inflation, then there will

440
00:25:16,480 --> 00:25:19,960
Speaker 1: be no tension between the stock market and the working

441
00:25:19,960 --> 00:25:20,840
Speaker 1: class people.

442
00:25:21,240 --> 00:25:24,800
Speaker 2: Fantastic note, optimistic note on which to end optimisty for

443
00:25:24,840 --> 00:25:28,720
Speaker 2: all of us, let alone, Donald Trump, Anna Wong, Josh Green.

444
00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:37,919
Speaker 2: Thank you so much, thank you, thank you, thanks for

445
00:25:37,960 --> 00:25:40,720
Speaker 2: listening to this bonus edition of voter Nomics from Bloomberg.

446
00:25:40,880 --> 00:25:43,679
Speaker 2: This episode was hosted by me Stephanie Flanders and was

447
00:25:43,680 --> 00:25:47,159
Speaker 2: produced by Summer Sali, with production support by Moses and

448
00:25:47,240 --> 00:25:51,200
Speaker 2: Dam and sound designed by Blake Maples. Brendan Francis Newnham

449
00:25:51,240 --> 00:25:55,200
Speaker 2: is our executive producer, and Sage Bowman is Head of Podcasts.

450
00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:58,920
Speaker 2: Special thanks obviously to Anna Wong and Josh Green.

451
00:26:17,280 --> 00:26:17,720
Speaker 3: Umb