WEBVTT - White Sox clinch season series vs. Kansas City

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Howard, They're over eight million drivers in the state

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of Illinois. With that many people on the road, accidents

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>are bound to occur. I'm Attorney Howard Ankin, and if

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you or someone you care about who's been involved in

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>an auto rideshare trucking accident, I'm here to help. Call

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>my office for a free consultation at three one two

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>six million. I'm Hero when you need me. Injury Law

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>made Personal. That's akin law.

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>From your favorite source for Chicago White Sox talk, delivering news, interviews,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 2>analysis and more. This is The Sox Machine Podcast with

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>your hosts Jim Margolis, James Began, and Josh Nelson.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Hello, everyone, welcome to you a new episode of The

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:03.279
<v Speaker 3>Sox Machine. I'm your host Josh Nelson, and we are

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>recording this episode Sunday night, June twenty eight, twenty twenty six,

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 3>as the Chicago White Sox wrapped up another series win,

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 3>this time against the Kansas City Royals. As they go

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>forward to in this homestand winning both series against the

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland Guardians and the Royals, the White Sox are now

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 3>forty three and thirty nine on the season, still tied

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 3>for first place in the American League Central. In this

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 3>show's rundown, we'll be talking about the White Sox twenty

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 3>two run rampage that they had on Friday. Miguel Vargas

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>had a big weekend Beyond just his Friday performance, he

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 3>also had another home run on Sunday. Chase Mydraft and

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Jacob Gonzalez also had bounced back weekends, and Sir Anthony

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 3>Dominguez gets an easy runway. Joining me on the Sox

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Machine podcast, The Sox Machines be reporter James Vegan and

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 3>managing editor Jim Margolis, and Hello gentlemen. The White Sox

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 3>had a successful home stand. Yes, it'd been great if

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>they would have found a way to sweep Cleveland, and

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>they had another opportunity to get another sweep against Kansas

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 3>City this weekend, but to go four and two against

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 3>the division foes be forty three and thirty nine and

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 3>still be tied for first place in the American League Central.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 3>I still view these outcomes for the White Sox as

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 3>a positive. But James, we saw one of the best

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 3>offensive explosions, especially in the history that we've been doing

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.359
<v Speaker 3>this podcast, and it looks like in our lifetime when

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox score twenty two runs on Friday. Ten

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.680
<v Speaker 3>of those came in the third inning, and it was

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot of fun to be in the stands to

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 3>watch that one unfold.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 4>What was it like for you, James?

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Then going into the clubhouse to talking to the White

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Sox players after they scored twenty two runs sounds.

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Like another game.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 6>There were reasons like it wasn't like all the way

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 6>like jacked up, I mean more than like just normal

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 6>like Samlin one, he now has like gotten thirty seven

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 6>runs of support and two home starts, so this is

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 6>normal for him, but also like he probably had been

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 6>told or had indications that he's getting optioned already, so

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 6>he was happy with his outing, but wasn't like over

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 6>the moon overall. Chase Mydrath, who was like playing all

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 6>out on the final out, was very much like, yeah,

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 6>this is what we do. We played the final out

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 6>out and kind of still in his Chase my Drath

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 6>intensity mode rather than like, wow, what a super fun

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 6>like night. There are no rules, We're gonna live forever,

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 6>anything like some new tone that he doesn't usually speak in.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 6>Tristan Peters was pretty like happy, but Tristan Peters was

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 6>like a subdue guy like him talking openly about hitting

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 6>for power and saying, like what was your goal and

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 6>that grand slam and just like hit it as hard

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 6>as possible. But I feel like that was even more

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 6>just indicative of what their approaches early in the counts

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 6>that they talk about. Then it was like, you know,

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 6>them feeling their oats in some big way. And you know,

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 6>Jacob Gonzalez is pretty happy to like have gotten out

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 6>of like he had just snapped an over twenty eight

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 6>not too long ago, so he was kind of spent

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 6>some more time like explaining like a little like guys

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 6>kind of like slip in and out of the mechanics

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 6>over the course of the year. So as much as

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 6>like his off, his whole season is defined by how

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 6>he figured out how to rotate his hips since and

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 6>like keep his weight back and then in a way

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 6>that he wasn't able.

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 5>To do before he had.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 6>He'd just like recently had some session with Ryan Fuller

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 6>where they had explained how he had kind of like

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 6>fallen out of his timing for it and corrected it.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 6>So he was like explaining that in terms of like

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 6>you know, obviously what we hope is, you know, a

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 6>recent upturn in the last couple of games that he's

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 6>shown or he hopes so it was not like super

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 6>like bouncy or like more aesthetic than any of their walkoffs.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 6>I think they all kind of I had like there's

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 6>been a general line of positivity throughout and they all

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 6>had kind of like maybe their individual reasons to be

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 6>what they were, but they weren't like, oh Man, especially

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 6>Will Venible is like super even keeled in the kind

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 6>of mirror him in that way. They were just like, yeah,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 6>that was a good night. If anything, kind of struggled

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 6>to repeat the same offensive, dominant dominance, you know, throughout

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 6>the weekend.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they could have bowled some of those runs.

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 3>A twelve to one victory would have been fine if

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>they could spread out the other ten runs over the

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 3>two games, but unfortunately it doesn't work that way.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 6>But well, I asked Will about that a little bit,

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 6>Like is their point of just kind of spreading it

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 6>on a little bit just because like you made them

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 6>use so many relievers. They use eight relievers that night,

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 6>and like ideally it would have but just like their

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 6>efforts to basically have Michael Waka stretch and cover the

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 6>whole bullpen on Saturday, work, and then pretty much everyone

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 6>or a lot of guys got a little bit of redemption.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 6>Maybe not Schreiber. I don't think he's going to be

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 6>looking at the series in any kind of fond way soon.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 6>But you know, guys like Alex Laying and Beckway came

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:05.119
<v Speaker 6>back to throw pretty well against them, and Stephen Cruiz

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 6>is pretty good against the Friday and Sunday So maybe

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 6>more some isolated guys having incredibly bad Friday nights more

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 6>than you know, total dominance of the Royals.

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, Jim. With this series win for the White Sox,

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 3>they also win the season series against the Kansas City

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Royals for the first time in six years.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 4>The last time the White Sox won a.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Season series against Kansas City was back in the COVID

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 3>season twenty twenty, when the White Sox were nine to

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 3>one against Kansas City. And the White Sox now against

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 3>American League Central opponents, they're sixteen to ten, which is outstanding,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's getting pretty close to already matching

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 3>their win total against division opponents even last year. So

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 3>great start for the White Sox in the division, and

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 3>with this early season success against the Tigers the Royals,

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the Twins and the Guardians. Does this give you confidence

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 3>ends that the White Sox won't fade in the second half.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 7>Guess we'll see how the road record goes. You know,

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 7>it's been pretty uneven in terms of especially how they

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 7>pitch home and away to know exactly what their staying

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 7>power is over the course of a season, over course

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 7>of a whole slate of opponents versus just isolated weekends.

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 8>Or three game series here or there.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 7>I will say that like they've with winning the series

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 7>against Kansas City, they've accomplished what they needed to and

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 7>that's like they have to topple their division opponents in

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 7>order to spring a surprise on the American League postseason picture.

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 7>And that, you know, baseball being a zero some game,

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 7>you got to win those games against the teams that

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 7>we're supposed to finish ahead of you. And basically the

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 7>entire Central was supposed to finish ahead of them. So

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 7>they are doing what they need to do to sneak

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 7>into a spot. Perhaps they won't even sneak into it,

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 7>maybe they'll win the division or you know, win a

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 7>second wildcard berth because right now the Ale West looks

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 7>like a mess. So I think it's a little premature

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 7>to say, like, yeah, beating the Royals means something greater

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 7>than just taking advantage of a bad team, while they're

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 7>clearly just trying to find anybody who can get out,

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 7>you know, late in the games and figure out a

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 7>rotation work around Bobby Wits injury. But yeah, I think

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 7>coming up this this series in Cleveland will be I

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 7>think a better series to hang.

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 8>This conversation on.

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, that's that's fair.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 3>They are halfway through their division games for the season

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 3>and being sixteen to ten. I think that again, it's

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 3>another good sign for the White Sox and it's a

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 3>big reason why there are already four games above five

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred this year. Hopefully that trend continues for the Chicago

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 3>White Sox. Now, Miguel Vargus had a huge weekend. There's

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>so many players to highlight, and if we did the

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 3>highlight on everyone that was successful offensively this weekend, this

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 3>would be a two hour podcast. But Miguel Vargas went

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 3>six four eleven against the Royals. He had two homers,

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 3>seven RBIs, he walked three times, he only struck out once,

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>and James, you have asked Miguel many times this season,

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 3>now that he has nineteen home runs in the year

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 3>about his power production, and he's been consistent. He has

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 3>said that he's not aiming or looking to hit for

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 3>home runs. He's just trying to make the best contact possible.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 3>But Miguel Vargas is now on base at thirty seven

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 3>home runs this season. Is this just Vargas figuring out

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 3>his own hitting zone or knowing his spots to maximize

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 3>his a swing.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean he's not hitting for home runs in

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 6>the sense that like no one just like swings and

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 6>like thinks home run please, Like what it's.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 4>More like who's got thirty now?

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Like I'm trying to drive the ball in the

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 6>air and like hopefully good outcomes will happen. Like he's

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 6>clearly taking like times, like a lighter rip that's like

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 6>entered into his game in early incounts and you know,

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 6>seeing his aggressive swings where like his bat speed spikes

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 6>over like maybe more two strikes where he's trying to

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 6>put them all in play like he's.

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 5>Trying to sluck. Now.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 6>He doesn't like want to define his success that way,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 6>and that's something that he says has been like actively encouraged,

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 6>like from you know, Showman and the Company for like

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 6>the whole season, So like there's certainly approach element to it,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 6>but obviously he also added like a ton of bat

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 6>speed in the off season was a result of, like

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 6>he thinks, mostly the conditioning and getting stronger, but you know,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 6>that was something that clearly was intentional and he's clearly

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 6>like seeing the results of that's given him just like

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 6>more capability to make more out of like the contact

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 6>that he you know, we obviously saw him starting to

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 6>make a little bit last year, and his approach has

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 6>only gotten better.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 5>He's chasing.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 6>He was already like a good like play discipline guy,

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 6>but like he's been top ten with the lowest chase

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 6>rate in baseball like all season. I don't know if

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 6>it's like exactly there now, but I bet it's probably

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 6>in that area. Like everything to him has like gotten

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 6>a little bit better and made him more capable. Like, yes,

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 6>he's a he's his approach has maybe shifted to maximize that,

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 6>but that's because these skills have grown up where there's

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 6>something to maximize, Like if he did this in twenty

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 6>twenty four, when it produced results, it's like building on

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 6>top of like the pillars to his game that he's

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 6>strengthened over the past two years.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 3>And I think the White Sox if Vargas it's another

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 3>home run, Jim, I believe that would give him three

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 3>players with twenty or more home.

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Runs before the All Star Break.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 3>And last time they did that was back in two

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 3>thousand and six, so that's pretty special. As far as again,

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 3>what's helping fuel this White Sox turnaround is the offense

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 3>and especially especially in the slugging side. And I guess

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 3>even from my perspective, I'm a bit surprised that Vargas

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 3>already has nineteen home runs.

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 4>He'd be great if he did get to thirty seven homers.

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 3>I didn't even think that was even a possibility for him.

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 4>And he's breaking all of the.

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Preseason computer projections. But at the preseason we were a

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 3>bit unsure about Vargas's future with the White Sox. This

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 3>was a big season for him for everyone to gain

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 3>some confidence that, yeah, you can count on Vargas being

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 3>part of the twenty twenty seven to twenty twenty eight plans. Now,

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 3>after the first half of the season, and even after

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 3>this big weekend against the Royals, are you more confident

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 3>to write Vargas's name in pen for future roster construction.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 8>Oh certainly. Yeah.

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 7>Before the season, he was a good player, like a

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 7>solid player. I would call him a second division regular,

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 7>and that like if he's starting for you, it's not terrible,

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 7>but you could easily upgrade. And also he's hard to

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 7>compliment on a roster, like he's not obvious platoon candidates.

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 7>He's not especially strong defensively. He's you know, good at

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 7>first base, I would say, but maybe doesn't hit like

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 7>a first baseman.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 8>He was below average a third base and maybe didn't hit.

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 7>So he's just kind of this like ordinary player who

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 7>is a major leaguer in some fashion, but maybe not

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 7>somebody can plan around. And like you said, like he's

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 7>blowing away projections, even like the ninety ninth percentile projection

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 7>in Pakoda nowhere close to what he's doing with the

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 7>White Sox. So really their best case scenario did not

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.119
<v Speaker 7>see this coming. And that's one reason I think why.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.359
<v Speaker 8>You know they're they have a winning record in first.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 7>Place when they had a single digits low single digits

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 7>percentage of making the postseason according to projections. You know,

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 7>with the White Sox probably likely drafting a shortstop of

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 7>some kind number one overall, you know, you have some

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 7>idea of like the infield might get crowded. But like

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:45.839
<v Speaker 7>as I wrote about the Minor Keys a couple of

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 7>days ago, Caleb Bonomer is having a really rough defensive season,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 7>both at shortstop and third base. Like he's already matches

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 7>air total with forty games fewer than forty games fewer

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 7>than he had last year. So it's case of maybe

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 7>it's like you know level or body, you know, athleticism,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 7>et cetera, that's uh, or maybe just you know, could

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 7>be in defensive slump. But if he moves to first

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 7>base or outfield, and all of a sudden, like there

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 7>is an extra a couple of years where you need

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 7>a third baseman and Vargas fits that bill. Uh, you know,

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 7>Murakami only under contract for another year and we'll see

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 7>what happens with that. But like you know, DHD first base,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 7>there's opening there so lots of room for him that

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 7>maybe didn't anticipates even before you get to his production

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 7>being you know, maybe the most valuable of the production

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 7>of the White Sox, you know, not only in terms

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 7>of war, Like maybe maybe Murakami's up there in terms

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 7>of his impact on power when he's healthy, but right

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 7>now he's not healthy, and Vargas is healthy and playing

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 7>damn near every day. So yeah, he's got the case

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 7>for the most valuable White Sox. And it's really interesting

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 7>that like his name hasn't really come up when it

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 7>comes to extensions. Like you hear all about, oh, they

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 7>got to sign Mooney, they got to make sure they

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 7>keep him around, like Colson, you know, what's his price,

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 7>And you really haven't heard much about Vargas, but you

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 7>look at the stat cast age and it's basically like

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 7>all red aside from like some you know, fiftieth percent

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 7>fortieth percent el for like defense, which is fine, like

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 7>you know, otherwise he's killing it offensively.

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 8>It's like really sturdy the way he's built this offensive profile.

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 7>Certainly a personality that James has spoken about that people

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 7>seem to gravitate around. He's like, guess, one of the

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 7>centers of the clubhouse and kind of a bridge guy

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 7>in the clubhouse given that.

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 8>He's bilingual, so he's got that going for him.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 7>So, like, I'm surprised that you don't hear much about

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 7>like extend Vargas the way that you do about a

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 7>couple other guys and maybe just kind of snuck up

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 7>on everybody. And it hasn't quite overwritten the kind of

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 7>ordinary he was last year in the disaster he was

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 7>yea two years ago that you know, it's you know,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 7>you have to update some priors, but yeah, it's he's

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 7>you know, it's rock solid the offensive production, and now

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 7>it's just a matter of like, is anybody gonna challenge him?

0:15:58.800 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 8>And you have to get to.

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 7>The point where you're teaming with shortstops in triple A,

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 7>probably in order to consider moving Vargas off third base

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 7>and figure out what to do with them or what

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 7>to do with anybody else.

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because with Vargas and Montgomery, to your point, Jim,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 3>they continued to raise the bar at the beginning of

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 3>the year, Like when the White Sox won the draft lottery,

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh, yeah, Rock Scholowski's got an easy path.

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 3>He might be able to join the White Sox. Before

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 3>the end of the twenty twenty sixth season, we have

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 3>no idea what the White Sox have at shortened third

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 3>and now it's like, oh, we have a very good

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>understanding of what the White Sox have at short at third,

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>they could have potential All Stars, like every year, could

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 3>be part of the All Star conversation. Every year they're

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna hit thirty or more home runs. And to Colson's case,

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 3>you know he's been playing. He had a tough series

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 3>against the Royalist defensively, I thought this weekend, But for

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>the most part, he's been very good defensively. And do

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 3>any of us want to envision a future of the

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 3>White Sox without Munataka Murakami And he's still got Sam

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 3>Antonacchi and Chase my draft that second, Yeah, Jim, the

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 3>bar continues to get raised for all these White Sox

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 3>prospects with how well Miguel Vargas and Coles Montgomery have played.

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I just now I feel like Jim. If Fargas doesn't

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 3>make the All Star team with the players voting, I

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 3>then I'm going.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 4>To be angry.

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 3>I am going to be angry about the All Star

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Game if Vargus is not on that team. Fair enough,

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I'll be angry if the White Sox just only have

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 3>one representative period.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 4>But I'm sure many.

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 6>Of you as well podcast investment reasons for that or

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 6>oh I do not.

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I do not.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Do not have any prop bets. I'm going to lean

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 4>off that because the Players Association doesn't want to James.

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 5>To travel budget expends.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes that, yes, it'd be great if James could talk

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 3>to someone.

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 5>You took it to level.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 4>That's true, I'm not crooked.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, in our previous episode, when we previewed this

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 3>series to the White Sox at Royals, we had a

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 3>segment about guys who needed a big weekend against the Royals.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 4>So let's recap that.

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 3>And this is a great way to set up the

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 3>stage for Sir Anthony Domingus.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 4>James did. The White Sox didn't really need Domingus.

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 3>On Friday, they didn't need much on Friday. Saturday, Grant

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Taylor was awesome. That's from the best we've seen Grant Taylor,

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, Sean.

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Newcome gave up a run. But you know that whole

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 3>bridge from Davis Martin, Sean Newcome and Grant Taylor. I

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 3>think it's probably the White Sox a game plan in

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 3>closing out games. So on Sunday, Dimingus comes in, the

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 3>White Sox are already down and he does pitch a

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 3>scoreless inning. How did you feel about the way that

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 3>he pitched on Sunday, And how did dimingus feel about

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 3>that particular situation that he pitched in.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean he looked a bit better.

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 6>He certainly wasn't falling behind as much, but yeah, it

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 6>was more that I mean, he in some sense he

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 6>pitched certainly as well as he had you know, over

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 6>a week he struck up Bobby wit So that looker,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 6>and he certainly feeled uppy about that. But obviously the

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 6>noteworthy part of it was that he came in the

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 6>sixth inning. There's really no dressing it up as even

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 6>like even medium leverage of what he entered into. And

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 6>Zach Bob kind of said it before the game in

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 6>a way that like we weren't sure, Like we asked

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 6>like could he appear in lower leverage and he didn't

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 6>like say like, yes, that's what's going to happen, But

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 6>he's like, eh, maybe in a way that we're like, well,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 6>it was that kind of a wires cross thing. But

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 6>then he appeared in the sixth and Will Venables said

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 6>postgame like, yeah, we told him was coming earlier in

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 6>the week, and Sir Anthony was around down with the

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, basically the same he confirmed the same version like, yeah,

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 6>I got told it. It seems like I think like

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 6>certainly anyone seen like the closer kind of complained or

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 6>the reliever kind of complained at all about like I

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 6>expect to be the closer as he did, though I

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 6>thought he did it like an even handed fashion, like

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 6>it was a surprise more than like I'm upset or

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 6>like I demand making demands to be back. He like

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 6>said multiple times like I'll do whatever it's needed for

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 6>the team. He just kind of I thought was honest

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 6>about being a little miffed, which I thought was like

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 6>he's reading the situation correctly. He's not being used as

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 6>a normal closer for this, I think, especially with the

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 6>way he spoke after the blown save on Monday, he

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 6>was very like, I have blown too straight saves. Sometimes

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 6>it's not a good moment for me right now, And

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 6>I think is what exactly what he said. He's responded

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 6>in kind like, yeah, they used me low leverage after

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 6>I blew like a couple saves. Like I think he's

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.679
<v Speaker 6>understanding it as something that you know, followed from his

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 6>performance and accepted it. At least from what he said

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 6>to us, is he's playing a good face about it,

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 6>and you know, he went out there and performed, So

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 6>I think he's handling it how he should be, or

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 6>you know how you'd want handy one to be, like

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 6>not to say what he should do. I think they're real,

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 6>you know, thing that's still has to be resolved in

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 6>or still provides anxiety. He's like, is he going to perform?

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 6>Is he gonna be insistent, like talking to Bob ahead

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 6>of time, like about his arm action and get him

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 6>on time. Like yeah, he's you know, super mobile and

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 6>and springy and like and loose and like this gives

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 6>him like extension on his pitches and like can make

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 6>like as part of why he throws hard and makes

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 6>them good. But it's a little tricky to get this

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 6>guy timed up. He can get out of whack kind

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 6>of easily. And I think that's kind of reflected in

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 6>Sir Anthony's career numbers for why you could scrutinize, like,

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 6>all right, maybe the highs are going to be high,

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 6>but he's never gonna necessarily be Is he ever gonna

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 6>be necessarily this close or consistent like Rock who's like

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 6>on his game for like six months straight. It's probably

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 6>gonna be down periods with that side of a profile.

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 6>They're betting on the stuff, And I get that from

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 6>a you know, is this really ever going to be

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 6>usable for two years philosophy? It's probably easier to you know,

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 6>get this guy in a in a good space of

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 6>command than it is to you know, bring back an

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 6>old reliever lo his fastball, like that's kind of doesn't

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 6>come back when it does.

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 5>But are there gonna be these.

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 6>Swings in his command that make him like just not

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 6>eighth and ninth inning suitable for stretches of time? And

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 6>are you going to want to grit them out for

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 6>the sake of like the guy you can talk yourself

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 6>into being a closer when he's on, or are you're

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 6>gonna look at Grant Taylor and look like, hey, that

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 6>looks pretty ready to go. Maybe that's who we're gonna

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 6>use in the biggest moments. And the how flexible Venable

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 6>is in his leverage use where he's often attacking the

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 6>seventh or eighth like it is a save I think

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 6>allows him to skirt by a little bit the idea

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 6>of like a definition closer because he's already like throwing

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 6>his best weapon too.

0:22:42.600 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 5>The situation and he can turn and.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 6>Be like, yeah, it's the ninth for you, Sir Anthony,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 6>have at it back up the save when his clear

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 6>preference for like his top right handed weapon still is

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 6>visible to us and you know, to the team as well.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 6>That's maybe a long term concern if this is the

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 6>they are taking it more of the immediate approach of like,

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 6>let's get Sir Anthony right. This is ideally one of

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 6>our four leverage arms. You know, Jordan Hicks looked pretty

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 6>good the last couple of times out, Chris Murphy had

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 6>been looking good as last few three four outings. I mean,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 6>I think you're still more like, is he gonna be?

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 6>That's probably someone who are hoping graduates the medium leverage,

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 6>not not even in this like kind of four person

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 6>conversation just yet. But they it's not really settled. There's

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 6>not a lot of obvious like here guys are going

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 6>to lengthen out our leverage group. Getting Sir Anthony back

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 6>is a project that they seemingly need to get grown

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 6>right at some point, if only to make the situation

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 6>tenable in terms of like having another year and a

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 6>half of like wanting to get value out of this

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 6>guy who signed to be a closer. Looks like a

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 6>step forward for that. As many wide ranging scenarios and

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, variables, I just threw into analyzing the four

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 6>hitters he faced on Sunday.

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 3>Grant Talor only threw one ball, right, like what nineteen

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 3>strikeouts or eighteen strikeout?

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 6>Nineteen strikes? I think it was like fifteen or sixteen,

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 6>because I remember like in the press box going no,

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 6>and it was like sixteen and nothing. But yeah, yeah,

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 6>he was on it.

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, strikes not strikeouts.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 3>I apologize, Jim, your guy, your victor click to have

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 3>a big weekend against the Royals was Chase my draft,

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and my draft had a huge Friday. He had four

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 3>hits and he walked. He went six for twelve against

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Boyles with two walks. That doubles his walk total from

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 3>his last fifteen games. So I view this as good

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 3>signs from Chase my draft this weekend, Jim, and hopefully

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 3>he gets on a roll. What did you think about

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 3>my draft this weekend?

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean he's striking out way more than he should.

0:24:44.000 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 7>And you know, it wouldn't be the first time that

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 7>somebody had an adjustment that.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 8>Was working for him and started not working for him.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 7>But still with some results to where when do you

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 7>start changing back versus when do you you know, keep

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 7>hacking through and you know figure out like where the

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 7>limit actually is. And you know you saw him, I guess,

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 7>easing up more, you know, using more of the whole field,

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.680
<v Speaker 7>not swinging missing so much. So that's probably more of

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 7>his game, is you know, moving the ball around.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 8>Certainly you don't want to do that on.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 7>A one zero count, you know, settling for opsonfield singles, Like,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, there's a balance still to strike. He's gotten

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 7>enough from these first eighty one games to where like

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 7>there's something here with hitting for more power and really

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 7>making himself a credible starting second basement on a good team,

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 7>to where like he shouldn't.

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 5>Give it up.

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 7>But yeah, probably a little bit of like toggling some

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 7>some dials a little bit to understand, you know, how

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 7>much can I possibly get out of the power game

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 7>and then how much is my swing miss actually costing me?

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Friday was a very impressive game. Great bounce back

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 3>by my draw. Then I think he even told you

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 3>James as well in the post game that he worked

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 3>with Derek Showman the White Sox hitting coach, just to

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 3>work on some mental things, waiting for the ball to

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 3>get deeper in the zone to make better contact than

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 3>what his plan was in the previous fifteen games where

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 3>he was in a slump.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 6>Just like kind of I think his season, especially the

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 6>first like success and he had in May, was about

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 6>like opening up and trying to drive the ball a

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 6>bit more and accepting more swing and miss. This is

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 6>catching the ball out front of with that too, to

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 6>elevate it. I think this is a bit more recalibrating

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 6>towards the contact. Shoot the ball to the right field

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 6>version of my drop we've seen before. And it's not

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 6>like he's giving up on slugging ways and he's come back.

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 5>He's straight and it will never go away again.

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 6>It was more just like, sure, all right, maybe I've

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 6>gone too far to one end a little bit, and

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to do back to basics to get some

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 6>feelings that I'm used to at the plate. So that's

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 6>generally the tone he was striking. I don't think it's

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 6>going to be like he'll never swing hard again. He's

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 6>sworn it off for good.

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 4>My vig was Jacob Gonzalez. He had a big Friday

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 4>he went three for four with a home run. He

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 4>had five RBIs in that game, and he had a

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 4>walkoff hit on Saturday.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 3>But I winna Tako Murakami sounds like he's running at

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 3>eighty five percent capacity right now, and if Munataka Murakami

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 3>gets healthier, could be rejoining the White Sox sooner than later.

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what the White Sox do with Jacob Gonzalez.

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I think this has been a nice cup of coffee

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 3>for Gonzales, so that if Murakami does rejoin the team,

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 3>if Gonzales goes back to Charlotte, I think, you know,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 3>there are some things offensively to be a little bit

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 3>more consistent that he could work on, especially on pitches up.

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 4>In the zone.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 3>But for a while I was thinking, guys that this

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 3>was going to be a bust. This was going to

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 3>be a first round pick that was never going to

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 3>reach the major leagues. And I give a lot of

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.959
<v Speaker 3>credit to Gonzales for keeping up with it and making

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 3>the adjustments. Jim, I know you've seen him more in

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 3>action than I have, and to be able to provide

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 3>these positive results. It's not just in Charlotte this year.

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 3>With the amount of home runs that he had, but

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 3>still having these moments as well in the major league

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 3>level with the White Sox. I've been impressed in the

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 3>turnaround of Jabon Gonzalez this season.

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 8>H Yeah, question for James.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 7>When Gonzalez is going into his hitting mechanics, was he

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 7>talking to you or is he talking to everybody?

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 5>Everybody?

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's what was surprising when I talked to him

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 7>in Charlotte the first time, like I'd never met him before,

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 7>Like he was getting detailed, uh with me in a

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 7>way that like a lot of guys don't see a

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 7>lot of guys will make offhand just kind of general

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 7>references to made some changes, and then you have to see,

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 7>you know, kind of follow up with a question two

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 7>to see how much they're willing to divulge, or how

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 7>much they're they have a vocabulary for it, or how

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 7>much they really care about, you know, giving information to

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 7>me specifically a guy they just met. And Yeah, Gonzalez

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 7>without like prompting, really detailed and telling me like what

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 7>he was doing with his weight, especially at that point,

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 7>it was more about, you know, keep trying to keep

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 7>his weight back in his direction and the battle between

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 7>uh going too far to right field and trying to

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 7>feel comfortable with that, and I was, yeah, I was

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 7>really surprised that he was uh so forthcoming, And yeah,

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 7>just seems like his default mode to open up whenever

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 7>somebody asked him a question, which could be worrisome in

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 7>a way, like the Paul Kinerko strain of constant tinkering

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 7>or constant like never feeling comfortable and hating it. But

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 7>certainly it seems like this year has been the one where,

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 7>like the the changes of changes have stuck and there's

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 7>actually been you know, the the kind of power, least

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 7>quality of contact that was expected from him on draft day.

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, he likes physical demos.

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean.

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 6>Like, well he'll he'll, he'll min it out and Okay,

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 6>it's mostly like swing but like in Detroit, uh you

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 6>know with his throw home and like he's sitting he's

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 6>standing like in this scrum and like all these like

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 6>dejected teammates are in the chairs around him, and he's like,

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 6>mind me out, like being up in the air to

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 6>get the and like throwing home and how much time

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 6>it would take if he got down and had to

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 6>fire and why he like just did it right off

0:30:06.440 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 6>the bat. And he's like reaching things, almost touching the ceiling,

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 6>and it's like this is very involved. Yeah, it's like

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 6>I still know like how you got to this decision,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 6>but like I kind of do, like you've walked me

0:30:18.080 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 6>through every step of it and now it has like

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 6>more credibility just because like you drew it out to

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 6>this degree. So yeah, he's enjoyable.

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 5>And I mean he just.

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 6>Did the thing on Saturday where he explained like why

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 6>he Chase My drop was like basically in his batter's

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 6>eye and the ball is coming out of nowhere. You know,

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 6>you you talked about like Paul can earic really like

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 6>I think it's not because it's not like super ponderous.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 6>It's just very matter of fact in a way that's

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 6>like not he didn't. He doesn't have like a hundred

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 6>words to tell you about why. Like the the like

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 6>the release point of John Schreiber was like in Chase's

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 6>Mitroosh Jersey and kind of move over. It's just like, yeah,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 6>he was taking a small lead, so you know, I

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 6>just waved him over. Yeah, it seemed like the thing

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 6>to do. It's like have you ever done that before?

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 6>It's like I guess not like he thought to do

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 6>that in the middle of games, like, well, I couldn't

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 6>see it.

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 5>So he's like very like just direct to communicator as pragmatic.

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's also kind of funny his walk off, they'd

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 3>be like, this is my first walk off ever. I

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 3>thought that was a great postgame press walk off.

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 5>Sack flies, walk off crowd, never walk off it.

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 8>So he had the.

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 7>RBI ground out highlight. Right is his draft season right

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 7>the White Sox shirt?

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah yeah, yeah, so that the line about like this

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 6>is my favorite birthday, well other than other than the

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 6>first one.

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, Well again, a good weekend for the White Sox.

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 3>Sure they had a chance to sweep the Royal Sales,

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 3>had a chance to sweep the Guardians, but in a

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 3>surprise of all surprise seasons for the Chicago White Sox

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six to go four and against the

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Visual Bonits in their home stand.

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 4>That got the job done.

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Howard, my husband fell at a construction site.

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I knew it wasn't safe.

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And Akin Lack, we're one of the largest filers of workers'

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>compensation claims in the state. If you've been hurt on

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the job, in a car accident, or suffered a medical

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>mistake called three one two six million.

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Now the Chicago White Sox head out east to the

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore to Baltimore, Maryland to face the Baltimore Orioles and

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 3>the American League East. If you are not the New

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 3>York Yankees or the tam Bay Rays, this season is

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 3>going to hell fast. The Orioles are thirty nine and

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 3>forty six. They're fourth place in the American League East.

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>There are eleven games back of first place. The only

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 3>reason why they have any hope is that there are

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 3>only four teams in the American League with a winning record,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 3>so they're three games back at the wild card right now.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 4>Even though they lost.

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Their last two games, they are four and six in

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 3>their last ten. Of course, like many teams in Major

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 3>League Baseball, they do have a winning record at home.

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 3>They are twenty three and twenty one at Camden Yards.

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 3>And for the season series, if you recall, the Baltimore

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 3>Orioles swept the Chicago White Sox at Rate Field, and

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 3>we'll talk a little bit more about that. The White

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Sox have lost nine consecutive games against the Baltimore Orioles.

0:33:16.520 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Your probable pitchers for this series. Monday nights five, thirty

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 3>pm Central Time. Sean Burke will take the ball for

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox against Shane Baz Tuesday night, Eric Betty,

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 3>unless the White Sox have an opener, could be Trey

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Gibson will take the ball for the Orioles. And then

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 3>on Wednesday, if you are working, this is a very

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 3>early start eleven thirty.

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Five am Central Time.

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 3>It is the two B determined verse two B determined

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 3>pitching matchup for the White Sox and Orioles. We'll get

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 3>into that pitching matchup in a moment, but Jim for

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 3>me coming into this series and it's one of those

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 3>that just sneaks up on you and just how poor

0:33:57.320 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the White Sox have played everyone poorly the

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 3>last three years, but especially Baltimore, having lost nine straight

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 3>games against the Orioles. What makes Baltimore so tough for

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox gym.

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 7>I looked into this because I was, you know, kind

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 7>of got into a rabbit hole. They went seven to

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 7>zero against Baltimore in twenty twenty one and are five

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 7>and twenty four since. So it's like you start with

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 7>like regression. Uh, first of all, you know, really painful regression.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 7>So start there, you have like they played a lot

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 7>of their games in September when the White Sox have

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.280
<v Speaker 7>traded their good players and kind of out of gas.

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 7>The Orioles are playing for something the White Sox are not,

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 7>so like it is a incentives maybe are mismatched.

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 8>So you have that.

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 7>Getting in the formula. But I think, you know, if

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:54.840
<v Speaker 7>you separate that out, I think probably the biggest factor

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 7>is the Orioles. I think you know, they've hadn't necessarily

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 7>had like the the deepest rotation, but they've gotten by

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 7>with like bullpens and like high octanded arms.

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 8>And I think the White Sox have just been.

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 7>Easy to game plan around, like in the past several years,

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:11.439
<v Speaker 7>just because they don't have left handed hitters, or they

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 7>have a very you know, outdated information that they're working

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 7>with or you know, training, et cetera, to where just

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 7>late game matchups are if not shooting fish in a barrel,

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 7>just very easy to kind of plan around in pregame

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 7>meetings and not really have to diverge from. And the

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 7>reconfiguration of Camden Yards also didn't help. Like if you

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 7>have right hand power and then you make left field

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 7>like four hundred feet deeper, They've hit like one homer there,

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.240
<v Speaker 7>I think in the last three years, so like they

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:47.240
<v Speaker 7>haven't been able to hit homers with the right handed

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 7>hitters at that park. And so if you're hitting fly

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 7>balls that aren't like if you have Andrew Vaughan pre

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.959
<v Speaker 7>Milwaukee form to where like he just he's not gonna

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 7>hit four hundred and forty foot blasts like he hits

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 7>tends to be like well struck fly balls that you land.

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 8>Three rows deep. You know, he's not rewarded for that

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:05.919
<v Speaker 8>in that park.

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 7>And then you just kind of go on and on

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 7>and on. So I think it's just kind of a

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 7>confluence of factors. But I think just probably the you know,

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 7>what I'm most looking forward to with this series is,

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 7>you know, one seeing like the Will Venerable versus Craig

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 7>Albernas matchups, since Alburnez.

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Was a.

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 7>Not quite finals so I guess he took himself out

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 7>of the running before he got to that point, but

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 7>the White Sox were interested in him, and I think

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 7>alburn has said no, h So you have that as

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of intrigue. But also just with how

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 7>frenetic Venerable is with mixing and matching and pinch hitting,

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 7>Will that make a difference when you have left handed

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 7>hitters who can counteract right a handed pitchers, and then

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.359
<v Speaker 7>you have right handed hitters who can when you bring

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 7>the lefty, you have an answer for them. Will that

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 7>make a difference in how these games haven't folded versus

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 7>the last three years?

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 3>And then four that Wednesday Pitchy matchup the morning special

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to be determined for the White Sox. James, is this

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 3>going to be another Bullbend game? Or could we see

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the return of Noah Schultz?

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 6>You will see the return of Noah Schultz. Like they

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 6>can't officially say it, they've all but said it. There

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 6>starts the slot. Last look, they literally had the rehab

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 6>in the Salem started the same day. They wouldn't have

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 6>sent Salem down if there was any real doubt in

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 6>their mind that shows will be ready.

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 5>It's gonna be Schultz.

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, what should we expect from Schultz?

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 5>I guess?

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, are they going to hope that he can

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 3>go at least five innings?

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 6>I imagine he'd be in the eighty five to ninety territory.

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 6>I think an It's seen by Anthony Kay on Sunday

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 6>is dictated by performance. You can't just force someone to

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 6>the five inning finish line, and generally just this management

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 6>group as coaching staff is not just going to be

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 6>forcing a struggling pitcher a third times with the order. Sure,

0:38:01.239 --> 0:38:03.839
<v Speaker 6>so I think that governor would be on it. But

0:38:04.560 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 6>as far as like building off like fifteen to twenty

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 6>from his last time out, when I talked to Noah

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 6>right before he went out and rehab, one was I

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 6>guess the testament to him feeling healthy that he like

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 6>was just talking about pitches he was working on more

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 6>than like my repeated like so you're feeling all right

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.439
<v Speaker 6>follow ups, But he was trying to work on kind

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 6>of a different version of a sweeper that would be

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 6>more vertical and does play better to right handers. That

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 6>he's shown the ability to kind of vary up shapes

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 6>of his slider in the past, trying to get back

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 6>to that he wants he's got the four seamer to

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 6>the add the north part of adding north south to

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 6>his east west attack.

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 5>He needs something that's south.

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 6>They're hoping the slider takes that burden up by showing

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 6>some ability to make it kind of like what anything

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 6>K was able to do to be better against right handers.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.839
<v Speaker 6>Obviously not a recent great example, but he's got kind

0:38:57.840 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 6>of a more true slider version of the sweeper that

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 6>he turns out to the opposite hand hitters. Seems like

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 6>Schultz kind of going after the same thing, but it's

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 6>also kind of shown it in the past, and it's

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 6>more just kind of getting him right and figuring out

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 6>how to throw it now that is me is hopefully

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 6>not going to bother him going forward.

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 5>So that's how that plays.

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 6>The right handers would be the thing to watch to

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 6>cover out.

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, so I'm going to look forward to

0:39:22.719 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 3>White Sox fans that Wednesday morning start with Noah Schultz

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 3>taking the ball right before the White Sox head to

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland for a very important four game series over the

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 3>fourth of July weekend. We'll see what the weather is

0:39:35.719 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 3>like in Cleveland as we are all getting heat warnings

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 3>in Chicago as a big heat dome is rolling through.

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 3>So probably good thing that the White Sox are not

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 3>at home this upcoming week. And before we conclude, as

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:52.879
<v Speaker 3>far as his series wrap and also this episode of

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 3>the podcast who Needs a Big Series against Baltimore Jim,

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 3>I'll start with you, who's your pick to click who

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 3>is when you'll be watching these three games against the Orioles.

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 7>Feels like Colson Montgomery is every other series at this point,

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 7>So just that seems like this is his time to

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 7>be on.

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 4>That's that is a good one.

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go with Tristan Peters if the White Sox

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.959
<v Speaker 3>are gonna be relying on these left handed hitters, If

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Tristan can provide those big hits, especially lad in games,

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 3>try and hit the ball as hard as possible, could

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 3>that be the difference in this series for the White Sox.

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 3>I have a feeling we could be seen some high

0:40:32.320 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 3>scoring games between the Orioles and White Sox this week. James,

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 3>do you got one who needs a big series for

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox against the Orioles.

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 6>I mean, the White Sox could certainly need Schultz to

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:46.120
<v Speaker 6>do well to stabilize their rotation, and they've kind of

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 6>obviously made this choice to option Sandlin kind of banking

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 6>on you Schultz is gonna hit the ground running or

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 6>less and maybe uh Sunday was a reminder of like

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 6>what it looks like when K's not on is a

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:03.800
<v Speaker 6>little bit of reiterating the need for another person to emerge,

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.359
<v Speaker 6>as like an above average consistent starter, Like they're kind

0:41:06.360 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 6>of really heavily protected, like Fetti obviously was a more

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.800
<v Speaker 6>effective June, but it was kind of a heavily managed

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.359
<v Speaker 6>and how it was effective. They're multiple outings where they

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 6>pull them shy of five innings, Like they're really kind

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 6>of targeted like where they use him, and it's not

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:24.480
<v Speaker 6>a lot of third trips to the order, and it's

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:28.240
<v Speaker 6>certainly not going to be against lefties, So you're gonna

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 6>need the other sides. You have Davis Martin, who you've

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 6>been trying to like give extra rest to, you know,

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 6>in light of how many innings he logged at the

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 6>start of the season. So having someone else who's delivering

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.960
<v Speaker 6>six innings on a regular basis certainly very necessary. I

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 6>know we just said Schultz, but I think that it's

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 6>not so much he needs because I think personally Schultz,

0:41:50.880 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 6>he's kind of like one of the comparisons of Randy

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:55.760
<v Speaker 6>Johnson would have is that there's a very long window

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 6>for Schultz to be awesome. He is like an outlier frame,

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 6>like he scuffled this whole year. I don't think it

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 6>would mean like his profile is never gonna work or

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 6>even be like impact. You know, he's ahead of schedule

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:10.839
<v Speaker 6>in many respects. Still, so the White Sox could really

0:42:10.920 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 6>use like No Schultz, like taking the ball and run

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 6>running with it going forward, like he's got a lot

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 6>of potential to help them in an area where they

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.200
<v Speaker 6>really need the most help, you know, going into.

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 3>The deadline, especially because when even though Sean Berke and

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Eric Eric Fetti are starting this series, they're going to

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 3>have to start the Saturday and Sunday games against Cleveland

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 3>right now unless the White Sox have other ideas in mind.

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 3>This is a big week for the White Sox, seven

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:40.399
<v Speaker 3>straight games, no days off.

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 4>We'll see on how they fare.

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 3>We'll have our next Sox Machine podcast episode recapping this

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 3>series between the White Sox and Orioles on Wednesday nights,

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 3>and also look ahead to that very important fourth of

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 3>July series between the White Sox and Guardians. But that

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 3>will do it for this episode of the Sox Machine Podcast.

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Thank you guys so much for listening. If you just

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 3>discover the Sox Machine Podcast, you can subscribe to the

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 3>show wherever you listen to podcasts such as Spotify and

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Apple Music.

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Also check out our videos.

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 3>We've been doing a lot of videos, especially when the

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 3>White Sox are at home. At YouTube dot com slash

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 3>sox Machine. If you do watch our videos, please subscribe button.

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 3>We've gained a lot of subscribers this month and a

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 3>lot more views, so thank you to everyone that's taken

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 3>time to watch our videos on our YouTube channel at

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:26.879
<v Speaker 3>YouTube dot com slash socks Machine. You can even watch

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 3>this show now on our YouTube channel, so please do

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 3>so and again hit the subscribe button. Follow us on

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 3>social media. We're on all the social media platforms at

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 3>sox Machine. You can follow James at j rfigan. You

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 3>can follow me at sox Machine, Underscore, Josh and Jim.

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to sox Machine subscriptions, do we still

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 3>have the sale going on?

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 8>Certainly do?

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 7>And with them being four games of five hundred, do

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 7>you have at least three more games to where the

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 7>winning record sale will still be in effect? Yeah, still

0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 7>fifty two cents because they keep hovering around there, that's

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 7>mark be it rounding up and rounding down.

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 8>So yeah, come onboard, we're expecting you.

0:44:06.760 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so your first month fifty two cents. Every month

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.800
<v Speaker 3>after that may be part of the five dollars subscription

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 3>they get to the ad free version of the podcast.

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 3>The website unlocks the comments section as well. If you

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 3>want more, you can get more. We have additional tiers

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:23.200
<v Speaker 3>of support, including our Veterance Committee, which our VC members

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 3>are part of our group chat and they get to

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:27.719
<v Speaker 3>hear everything that's going to be coming to sox Machine

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:32.240
<v Speaker 3>and also all the gossip whispers, the gossipers that's coming

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 3>out of the White Sox Clubhouse, that especially as we

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 3>gather more intel for the MLP draft.

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:39.480
<v Speaker 4>So if you want to be part of that conversation.

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 3>You get acquire within at soxmachine dot com Slash products.

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 3>The Sox Machine Podcast is a production of Soxmachine dot Com.

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 4>You're for Hall of Fame Chicago White.

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 3>Sox Baseball alongside James Vegan and Jim Margolis.

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm Josh Nelson. Thanks for listening and watching