WEBVTT - How to say no to your boss

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 1>My colleagues will stop commenting on everything I get. My

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>assistant rolls eyes at people and meeting Why does my

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>coworker keep taking credit for all my ideas? Have any

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>wisdom for me? Hi? I'm Alison Green. Welcome to the

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Aska Manager podcast, where I answer questions from listeners about

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 1>life at work, everything from what to say if you're

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>allergic to your coworkers perfume to what to do if

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you drink too much at the company party. Let's get started.

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>My mail at the Aska Manager website is full of

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>letters from people who are really unhappy about something their

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>boss is asking of them, but aren't sure if they

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>can push back, or very commonly, are pretty sure that

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they can't push back because they've internalized the idea that

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you're never supposed to say no to your boss. They're thinking,

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is that part of the deal when you have a

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>job is that you're just supposed to put up with

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever is asked of you, or that if you do

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>push back, you look like a prima donna or difficult

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>or not a team player, or any of the other

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>weird words that we hagged people with. But the reality is,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in many cases, you absolutely can push back or say

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>no to something that your boss is asking of you.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just the weird power dynamics of work that are

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>making you think that you can't, but really you can.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>You just have to do it judiciously, not every day,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but you can do it. And on today's show, I

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about exactly how to do it and

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.399
<v Speaker 1>go through some examples of times where you might want to,

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about exactly how to do it, what

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, and what tone to use. The first thing

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to know about pushing back with your boss is that

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>saying no doesn't have to be a really aggressive or

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>hostile thing. In the vast majority of cases, it's not

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be no, I refuse to do that. It's

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about approaching the conversation in a collaborative way. There's a

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>problem and you're hoping that the two of you, you

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and your boss can solve it together. So that means

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to say things like we'd originally agreed

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to X, and that was important to me. Is there

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a way that we can make that work? Or I'm

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>concerned about why if we go that route, Or I

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>don't have time to do why this week, but I

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>could to X, or I have a lot of concerns

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about X. Could we talk about whether there might be

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>other options? So you see, it's not just no, it's

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>politely collaboratively conveying I'm not as on board with this

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>as you might have hoped or expected. What can we

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>do instead? And if your manager is a decent manager,

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>she's going to want to hear this when you're feeling

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that way. She might not be delighted about it, but

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>good managers don't want good employees to be miserable, and

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they want to know when they are risking that, and

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they want the chance to figure out if there's a

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>different approach that both of you can live with now.

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, they don't want to hear that every day.

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>And also, to be clear, the answer won't always be yes,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we can change it. But when you feel strongly about something,

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you can, and you should speak up. Plus, sometimes you

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>need to speak up when you disagree with something because

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the reason that you disagree is that you have information

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that your manager does not have. And this is something

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>that I think people really frequently don't realize, Like maybe

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>your boss is telling you to do X, and you

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>think the client will hate X, and the reason that

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you think that is that you have been in meetings

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>with the client where they have said that they would

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>hate X, and your boss hasn't. In a case like that,

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a professional obligation to speak up and tell

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>your boss to share the information that you have that

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't have, and that might change her perspective if

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>she did another way. I see this come up all

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the time is about workload. So so often people who

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are overworked think, well, my boss must know how high

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>my workload is. She's the one assigning me all of this,

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>after all, and if she keeps piling things on me,

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>she just must not care and she expects me to

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just somehow get it all done. When in reality, sometimes

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that's true. But sometimes oftentimes your boss doesn't realize how

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>overloaded you are. She is probably not paying nearly as

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>much attention to your workload as you are. She's counting

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>on you to speak up if it becomes a problem,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and when you don't say anything, she has no way

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of knowing. I can't tell you how often I've seen

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>this dynamic play out, with the employee becoming more and

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>more frustrated and demoralized and burned out, while the manager

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>has no idea and would step in and fix the

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>workload problem if she knew. Not always, of course, sometimes

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.799
<v Speaker 1>you get a manager who really doesn't care, but enough

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>times your boss would want to know, and so you

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>should speak up. And that could be anything from a

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>big sit down conversation about your workload overall, or it

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>can be a simple hey, to make sure that you know,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take me two days to do it

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>this way, but if we do X instead, it would

0:04:55.160 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>just take a few hours. So not adversarial, collaborate of

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>working together problem solving. Okay, that is the overall framework

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that I want you to have in your head as

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we talk about this, But let's go through some specific

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>examples so that you can see what it sounds like

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in a variety of different situations. I dug into some

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>past ask manager letters to find some examples of times

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>when people did need to say no to the brass

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>so that we would have some concrete scenarios to talk about.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I once had a letter from someone who had been

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in their job for a while but got a new manager,

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and the new manager kept asking them to do things

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that were really not their job and where there were

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>actually specific reasons for why it wasn't their job and

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>someone else was supposed to be doing those things. And

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the person writing to me, I didn't know if the

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>new boss was giving them these assignments just because he

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>was new and he didn't realize what the system had been,

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or if he was now changing things and specifically making

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>it this person's responsibility. And so the letter writer was

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how do I raised this without

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>sounding like I'm just flatly refusing to do it. So

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in a situation like that, you could say I wanted

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to check with you. You have asked me to do

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>some projects recently, like X and Y, and I was

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of course happy to help out in a pinch, but

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>because it's come up a few times, I wanted to

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>let you know that historically that type of work has

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>been done by the X department, and the reason that

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>people in my job aren't supposed to do it is blank.

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And I figured you didn't have that context yet, and

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:30.559
<v Speaker 1>so I should fill you in. So you're approaching this like, oh,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>here's this useful thing that you would probably appreciate, knowing

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you're not dancing around it or acting hesitant to say it.

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just, oh, here's this piece of info you probably

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have. And then if the boss pushes back anyway,

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you could say, well, of course, willing to try that

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>out if you want to change that, but I want

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you know it would be a pretty

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.799
<v Speaker 1>significant change to my role, which would concern me because

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>of blank. Before we make the change, could I tell

0:06:58.080 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you a bit more about why we ended up divided

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>things this way. But let's change the situation a little bit.

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's say that your boss is asking you to do

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>something that you really don't want to take on. If

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you are a good employee who is generally helpful and accommodating,

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>there is room for you to speak up. Now. If

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you are not a good employee, or if you have

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a track record of pushing back on everything, then no.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>But let's assume that you're in good standing. And let's

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>say that the thing your boss is asking you to

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>do is let's say heavy travel, and you don't want

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>to do heavy travel. And maybe you even took the

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>job in part because it didn't involve heavy travel. So

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you could say, you've been asking me lately to do

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>more traveling, and I get why it would be useful

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to have another person on the team who can travel.

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But I want to be honest, I really dislike every

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>traveling and I actually changed into this field to get

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>away from doing it. I hadn't realized it would become

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>part of my role here. Is it something that you're

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>committed to having the person in my job do or

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is there any flexibility? So, in other words, just be straightforward.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>You're not going at it like like you're the opposition

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to your boss. You're not the adversary. And you're also

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>not dancing around it and hoping they'll pick up on hints.

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You're just laying it out. The key to talking about

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>this without being insupportinate is that you're not saying that

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you won't do it. You're just giving your boss relevant

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>context that they might not have, some of which might

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>be that it would significantly change your job satisfaction, which

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is something that any good manager will want the chance

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to at least factor into their thinking, even if they

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately decide to make that change anyway. So, again, more language.

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I took the role in part because

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it didn't involve acts or to be upfront, it's not

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a change I would be thrilled about because of blank

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or so forth. Of course, whether and when to do

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this depends on things like how reasonable or unreasonable the

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>request being made of you, is how much your employer

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>values you and how much good will you've built up,

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and you do need to do it judiciously. If you're

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>pushing back on every request, you're going to pretty quickly

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 1>run through the political capital that you need. And of course,

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>ultimately your manager does have the ability to say, sorry,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the job, now take it or leave it.

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>If that happens, you need to decide if you're willing

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to stay in the job knowing that these are the

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>conditions you would need to accept. But much more often

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>than people realize, there will be room to push back

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>or renegotiate. Let's go to an ad break here, and

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>then when we come back, I'm going to have lots

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>more examples of times when you might need to say

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>no to your boss and how to do it. So

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you're in a situation where you're being

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>asked to take on something that you just don't have

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>time to fit in with the rest of your workload.

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>A decent manager is going to want to hear that

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you're concerned about it, so you should speak up. It's

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>possible that when you talk it through, you'll find that

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the deadline is not as firm as it originally seemed,

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>or that your boss is more open to pushing it

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>back once she hears that it's causing problems. You might

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>find out that it's fine to use shortcuts that you

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>had assumed wouldn't be okay, or that it's really just

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>one particular piece of the project that has to be

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>ready on time. Who knows, maybe none of that would

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be true, but it's worth having the conversation. The best

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>way to approach it is to explain what you can

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>do and offer some options for how to proceed. So,

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to give you an example, you could say, I can

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>have an outline and most of a draft ready to

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>go by Thursday. I probably wouldn't have it completely polished

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>until Monday. Would that work? Or so to get this

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>done by Thursday, I would need to push pretty much

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>everything else back, which means that I wouldn't finish up

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>X and Y until next week. Would that be okay?

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of times that's going to solve the problem.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes managers give deadlines that sound reasonable to them, but

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 1>they're very open to modifying them. When you explain what's

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>needed and why. But what if your manager tells you know,

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to stick to the original deadline with no

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>modifications and you can't push any of the other work

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>back if you really don't believe that you can meet

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that deadline. Sometimes it can make sense to say something

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like I hear you and how important it is to

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>get it done by that, and I'm going to do

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>everything that I can to make it happen. But I

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be transparent with you that I am concerned

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that factors X and why. I mean, I think it's

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>going to take longer. Let me really push on it

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>over the next day, and then update you once we

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>see where we are. So with that kind of language,

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you're showing that you get it, you're taking it seriously,

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>but that you also don't want to promise something misleading,

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to see what you can do and

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>come back and update her when you have a better

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>idea of that. Okay, let's get into some more specific examples.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's do one. This is the one that I hear

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>from people about a lot which is being expected to

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>you is your own personal cell phone for work. Some

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>people are fine with this because they don't want to

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>have to carry a work phone and a personal phone.

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of good reasons not to

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>agree to use your personal phone at work, especially because

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>some companies will have you installed an app which will

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>allow them to remotely wipe your phone when you quit

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>or your you terminate your employment for any reason, and

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that is not them just remote wiping their data. It

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>can mean wiping all of your data from your phone.

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you are using your personal cell phone at work,

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you read what you're agreeing to. And

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're not sure about the remote wipe, ask your

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I T people. Anyway, if your employer suggests that you

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>do this, that you use your personal phone as your

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>main work phone, and you don't want to do it,

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>you can just be very matter of fact, Oh, I'd

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>rather not use my own phone. Can I use a

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>company provided one instead? And if that doesn't work, then

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm not comfortable with the stipulations that are

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>attached to this, like the remote wipe. What do I

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>need to do to get a company phone instead? Okay,

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>how about a situation where you're being asked to do

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>something unreasonable. Let's say that you're being asked to work

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>around the clock day after day. Sometimes you can just

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>use a very simple statement that you just aren't going

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to do something the exact way that it has been requested.

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>So you might say, well, i can't work twelve hour

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>days every day this week, but I'll be able to

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>do A B and C this week, not D an E.

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 1>Let me know if you want me to prioritize those differently.

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So just matter of fact with that one and see

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens. Or how about a situation where your boss

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is asking you to do personal favors for her, things

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that really aren't your job or anyone's job, like running

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>personal errands or even leaning her clothes. I say that

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>because I've actually had a fair number of letters over

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the years about varieties of the situation. I once had

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>someone whose boss was asking her to write his papers

0:13:57.880 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for a class that he was taking on his own

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>time him and I had a letter from someone whose

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>boss would ask her employees to do really personal favors

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like driving her to the dentist or borrowing her shoes.

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>That shoes is a real example stuff that you might

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>ask a close friend, but which definitely isn't appropriate for

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a manager to ask employees. So with something like that,

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>where someone is so oblivious to boundaries, sometimes the best

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>thing to do is to just always have reasons why

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you're not available for the thing, like oh sorry, I'm

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>just about to get on a conference call, or no, sorry,

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got plans at lunch so I can't drive you.

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But you can also address it more big picture, if

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>you're up for that. You could say something like, you know,

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you realize that you often ask

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>us for pretty personal favors like borrowing clothes or driving

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you places, and because you're the boss, there's pressure to

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>say yes. That wouldn't be there if you weren't the boss,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's a tough situation to be in, especially when

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it would conflict with something work related. I figure you

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize how often it was happening, so I wanted

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to mention it to you. It can be a tough

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>one to pull off. You won't always be comfortable doing it,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on the dynamic with your boss, but some relationships

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to allow for it. Or with that boss

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>who wanted the employee to write a paper for his class,

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you could say, hmm, I don't really feel right doing

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>work for a class outside of the office, especially when

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I've got my hands full with X and have X

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be a work related project. If your boss then offers

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to relieve you of ex so that you have more

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>time for his paper, you could say, Oh, I'm sorry,

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I really don't feel right about doing that. Let's do

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>another weird one. I had a letter a while back

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>from someone who worked remotely but had to travel to

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the company headquarters once a month, and the company was

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to reduce expenses, and so instead of putting her

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>up in a hotel while she was there, they were

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>having her sleep in the office on an air mattress.

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And she felt awkward about it for all of the

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>obvious reasons, but that's not even why she was writing it.

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And she wrote in because for her upcoming trips, someone

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 1>else was going to be staying in the office, and

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>so they were going to have her stay at the

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>CEO's apartment. Well, he stayed in some other property that

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>he owned. And this wasn't even the first time they

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>had had her do this. They had made her do

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it one time before, and he would come by in

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the morning each day she was there to get ready

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for work. So super uncomfortable, not something that you should

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>expect when you're traveling through business. So let's say that

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you're in that bizarre situation. Sometimes it's almost harder to

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to say no in a situation like

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>this because it's so weird, and the fact that they're

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>asking you to do it like it's no big deal

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>tells you that they aren't playing by the same rule

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>book as the rest of us, which can make it

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>harder to know how to approach it. But you can

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>be pretty straightforward and assertive. So in this situation, you'd say,

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I understand that we're trying to save money,

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but I am not well rested when I sleep in

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the office, so I'd like to start booking an economy

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>price hotel instead. And when they proposed the CEOs apartment thing,

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.479
<v Speaker 1>you could say, you know, actually, I would prefer not

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to stay in his house because last time he kept

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>needing to come by to pick up his things and

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>get ready, which wasn't really conducive to having a comfortable

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>private place to stay. So I want to book an

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>economy hotel instead, and I'll keep the price as low

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>as I can. So just politely assertive, you know, this

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>won't work for me, but I hear your concerns. Let's

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>do this other thing instead. We'll do a final break here,

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and then when we come back. I want to talk

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>about a really big important category of times when you

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>might need to push back, and that is when your

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>employer is doing something that's illegal. Stay tuned. I get

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a ton of letters from people who are wondering if

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that's something their workplace is doing that is likely illegal.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>They're often wondering what their next move should be. And

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>because most people don't know what to do if their

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>employer is violating their legal rights at work, they often

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>either threaten legal action too quickly or they know what

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>speak up at all because they're not sure what to say.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So first, before anything else, you want to make sure

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that your employer really is breaking the law. People sometimes

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>assume that the law entitles them to things that aren't

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>actually enshrined in law, particularly in the US, like fair

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>treatment or paid vacation days, or a warning before being fired.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So first make sure that you really are facing a

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>legal violation. If you are, sometimes people think the first

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>step must be to talk to a lawyer and file

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit, but much of the time that won't be necessary.

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It might be, but jumping straight there can really poison

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>your work environment when you don't need to. To To be clear, it's,

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of course you're prerogative to talk to a lawyer and

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>persue legal action at any point if you want to,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but often you can get what you want in a

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>more low key way. Often the first step is to

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>just talk to your employer, because a lot of the

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>time they genuinely don't know that what they're doing is illegal,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>which I know sounds ridiculous, but it's often true, especially

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with smaller employers, and often they will back down when

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you point out the law to them. That even if

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't think that's the situation, you know, even if

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you're pretty sure that they are well aware of the

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>law and they just don't care about following it, it

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>can still be helpful to approach the conversation as if

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you're assuming that they don't know and you're just helpfully

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>bringing it to their attention, and that you're assuming that

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of course they would want to know if they are

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>breaking the law. Approaching it that way will usually get

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you a better outcome. Then, if you go in making

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>it clear that you think your managers are flagrant lawbreakers

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 1>right from the start. And when I say better outcome,

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that means not only the legal problem stops, but also

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that you preserve reasonably good relations with your employer. You

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>won't always be able to do that, but when you can,

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's usually in your best interests too. And I want

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>to be really clear, I'm not suggesting that you tolerate

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>illegal behavior in order to maintain good relationships. I'm saying

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that you can often get both things, the illegal behavior

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>stopped and preserving the relationship. Not always, but enough of

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the time that it usually makes sense to try, and

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 1>then if that doesn't work, you can escalate if it's needed.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>So let's take a really common example. In the US,

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>all jobs are classified as either exempt from overtime or

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>non exempt from overtime. If you are classified as non exempt,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>meaning that you are supposed to be paid overtime, and

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that is not up to your employer, it's based on

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the type of work that you do, then you have

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to receive overtime pay when you work more than forty

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>hours in a week. But a ton of people who

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>should be getting overtime paid don't. Let's say that that's you,

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>and that your company expects you to work overtime without

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>extra pay. You could say something like, you know, we're

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>actually required by federal law to pay over time to

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>people in my job category. I can definitely work the

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>overtime if you want me to, but the company is

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>required to pay for it, and I wanted to make

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>sure you knew that so that we don't get in trouble.

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Or let's say that you are religious and your boss

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>is requiring you to work on a religious holiday when

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>plenty of non religious employees would be available to cover

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that shift. You could say, Oh, that is actually a

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>religious holiday for me, and because I know we're required

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>by federal law to accommodate religious practices, could we schedule

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>someone else for that day instead of me. Now, note

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>that the tone here is collaborative. It's not adversarial, and

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that is important. Instead of saying you are breaking the law,

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 1>you're saying we could get in trouble for this, and

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that is because you're The tone you want is that

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you're looking out for the company's interests. You're not making

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a legal threat. It's the same tone that you would

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>use if you were advising your boss on some legal problem.

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Totally unconnected to you. There's no overt threat of legal action.

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just, oh, we could get in trouble for this.

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>The reason for doing it that way is that your

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>goal here is not just to a certain legal rights,

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>although that is part of it, but also to keep

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>a good relationship. And it is far less likely to

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>happen if you wield the law like a weapon, because

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>fair or not, the reality is that few relationships are

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>unaffected when you start making legal threats. You still have

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the option of taking legal action if you need to,

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but you're more likely to get a good outcome by

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>starting out this way. This actually came up on the

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Aska Manager website recently. Someone asked about the right tone

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to use when you're saying this kind of thing, and

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a commenter said something that I thought was perfect. They said,

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think in situations like this, it helps to imagine

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a situation where you would genuinely have the emotion that

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to convey and then mimic that tone. Like

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>if I were in a parking garage with my friend

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>who wasn't allowed to park there and they to leave

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the car in an illegal spot. My Oh, I'm worried

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>we could get in trouble would be very sincere. And

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. That's the tone. It says, I'm looking

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>out for everyone here, not I'm going to take you

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to court. At least that's where you start. You might

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>need descalate, but you start there. Now, what if you

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to your employer and you point out the law

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>but nothing changes. At that point, you have a decision

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to make about how far you want to push the issue.

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>One thing that you can do to explore your options

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>at that point is to just talk with a lawyer,

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't bind you to taking legal action. It's

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>just getting more information. And sometimes a lawyer can do

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>things that aren't bringing a lawsuit but still get the

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>problem solved, Like they can advise you to present things

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way, or they can write a letter

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in your behalf or so forth, and they can talk

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>through the options with you and the upsides and downsides

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.199
<v Speaker 1>of each. But in most cases it makes sense for

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>your first step to just be that straightforward conversation and

0:23:56.720 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that might be all you need. Okay, those were a

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of examples, and hopefully it helped to hear them

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>out loud. And if you have found this kind of

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>sample language esful. You might really like the Aska Manager

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Book because it is filled with sample language for all

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sorts of situations at work, including things like pushing back

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>with your boss. If you want to check it out,

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it's called Ask a Manager, How to Navigate Clueless Colleagues,

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>lunch stealing bosses, and the rest of your life at work,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and you can order it on Amazon or anywhere books

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are sold. Before we wrap up, I have an announcement

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>about the show. Next week's episode is going to be

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the final episode. I really loved doing the show, but

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I also need to make room for other things, other

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>work and things like seeing my husband occasionally and sweeping.

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm taking my own advice that I give to

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are overworked, and I'm cutting some things back.

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk a bit more about the decision on next

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>week's episode, which will also feature a bunch of Q

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and A with callers as well. Okay, that is it

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for today, Thanks for listening, and I'll be back one

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>more time next week and