WEBVTT - Retail Stocks Jump After Supreme Court Strikes Down US Tariffs 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>One of the areas that was certainly impacted by teriffs

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>had been retail, and they import a lot of the

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>stuff we all wear from Asia, from China, from areas

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>of the world that are subject to teriffs. So we

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 2>can get a sense of how this might change the game.

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Here this Supreme Court decision today, we welcome put them Goyle,

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 2>she covers all the retail companies for Bloomberg Intelligence, put

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>on what's your I guess your initial thought here from

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 2>the retailer's perspective to the extent that these a lot

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>of these terrifts are going to be rolled back.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think. Look, it's good news for retail because

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 3>at the end of their costs will go down. These

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 3>tariffs caused unnecessary stress in the supply chains, caused retailers

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 3>to raise prices. It lowered their margins. So all that

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>is now set to reverse. We still don't know what

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 3>the magnitude of this will eventually shape out to be.

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's our analysts here on the government side

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 3>think that while these have been overturned, you don't know

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 3>what else could be added. So I wouldn't say we

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 3>go to zero. That's probably not happening. But I do

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 3>think that as these tariffs get overturned and as cost

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>drop for these retailers, we should see a pickup in

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>margins in twenty twenty six, and also a pickup in

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 3>demand because you know, the consumers for a long time,

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 3>or at least over the last year, have been very

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 3>concerned with inflationary pressures and just prices going up, so

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 3>all that will help hopefully ease demand too.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 4>You've mentioned prices going up. Do we know of any companies,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 4>any brands that raised prices because of tariffs where they

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 4>made that linked very explicit.

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, Snike was one of the retailer that had explicitly

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 3>said that it's raising prices not on everything, but on

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 3>goods that were over one hundred dollars, notably over one fifty.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 3>They had taken a mid single digit price increase. So

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>prices did go up across retail from tariffs. They didn't

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 3>go up twenty thirty percent, but they did go up

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 3>in the single digits, mid to high single digits.

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, the New York Fed is out with the

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 2>report recently saying that about ninety percent of the tariff

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 2>costs were born somewhere in the US chain, whether it

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>was the importers, the companies themselves, consumers, maybe only ten

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>percent by exporters.

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 6>Kevin Hasset disputes that, of course.

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course that he does. But I'll go with

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>the New York Fed. They're pretty solid in their numbers.

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So from your perspective and the perspective of the retailers, Punum,

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>how much did do you think, like the Nikes of

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the world kind of took in their margin versus passing

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 2>along to consumers.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would say that. I think there was a

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>shared cost across the tariffs between the suppliers and the

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 3>manufact So it wasn't ninety ten. I don't. I find

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 3>that hard to believe because if that was the case,

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 3>a mid single digit price increase wouldn't be enough to

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>offset the cost pressures. It'd have to be higher. But

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 3>that said, I do think that, you know, they did

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 3>see their costs rise and they did try to offset it,

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 3>not just through price increases, but also through efficiencies within

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>their organization, whether it was a cross payroll, whether it's

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 3>through technology. You know, we've heard a lot about these

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 3>AI investments, and they've really helped improve efficiency across the organization,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 3>but we haven't seen that in the numbers. And my

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 3>answer to that is it's not in the numbers because

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 3>it's really just been helping offset these incremental pressures from tariffs.

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 4>We've seen companies like PepsiCo moved to cut prices on

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 4>some of their products, their snack products. And I'm not

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 4>comparing snacks with clothing or sneakers, but if a company

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 4>like Nike raised prices because of the tariffs, is there

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 4>any world in which it might reduce prices or lower

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 4>prices because tariffs were removed.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 3>So I think the consumer is expecting prices to go

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 3>down when the tariffs are removed. The big question is

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 3>if prices went up, let's say ten percent, are they

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 3>going to come down ten percent? That typically doesn't happen.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 3>They don't necessarily drop to the same extent they went up.

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 3>But yes, would you have some relief from the cost increases? Sure?

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I think retailers like Walmart that really push the pedal

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 3>on price much harder in care about offering that incremental

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 3>value to their customers. That's what they stand for. Those

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 3>are the retailers that are probably going to push the

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 3>pedal much harder on price when they get the relief

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>from tariffs.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>So what's just broadly defined right now, step back a

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit, put them what's your view of the consumer

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 2>here based upon kind of the results you've seen from

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the retail companies you follow.

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 3>I think the consumer is stretched. I think they're under pressure,

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 3>but they're making choices. They're being selective. They're shopping at

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 3>retailers that offer them convenience, set off for them, speed,

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 3>and that offer them something differentiated. And I think that's

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 3>been the story for a little while now. I think

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 3>that continues. So retailers like Amazon have been doing well

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 3>because they offer both value, convenience, free shipping, and they've

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 3>done well Walmart, you know, we heard from they also

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>did well on their value proposition. So I think it's

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 3>those retailers that really stand out in the crowd, or

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 3>those that have a fashion element, whether it's urban outfitters,

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, with just the right assortments that's attracting these

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>younger shoppers. They're the ones who are doing well.

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 4>What does this mean for furniture companies like Wayfair? And

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 4>I recognize that Wayfair doesn't make a lot of its

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 4>own furniture necessarily, it's outsourced a lot of that.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 6>But have they been explicit in how.

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Much turffs have hurt them because most of their manufacturing

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 4>is not done in the United States. I'm guessing it's

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 4>done overseas.

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 3>It is done overseas, But I think with Wayfair it's

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>a little tricky because, as you said, they are a marketplace, right,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>So when you think about Wayfair, they have thousands of

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 3>suppliers to choose from our manufacturers or sellers, and if

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 3>the seller wants to make a sale, you know, they

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 3>can go from one seller who may say the sofa

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 3>is one thousand dollars and I have a fifty percent

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 3>margin on it. But then there's seller number two who says, well,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, I'll take a fifteen percent margin on it

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 3>because I want to get the sale. So the diversity

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and just the choice that they have on who they

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 3>bring on board to offer the compelling prices has helped

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 3>them offset a lot of these terraf folds that others

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 3>that are vertically integrated have to deal with directly.

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Put, we heard a lot of companies in re retailers,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 2>but just across the economy talk about shifting their supply

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 2>chains to maybe parts of the world that are less

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>encumbered by tariffs. Have you seen that in the retail space,

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 2>like as Nike making shoes in Vietnam and not China

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 2>or anything like that.

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, the supply chain shift has been going on since

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the first round of tariffs actually, and it's only been

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>pronounced since last year. Staff supply chains to continue to

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 3>be diversified. The only difference with this ruling being overturned

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 3>is the urgency has somewhat been moderated, so you don't

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 3>have to be as reactive as you would have been

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 3>last year. You can take your time and be more

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 3>strategic about where you want to be diversified. But I

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 3>don't think that just because the tariffs are overturned now

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 3>everything will go back to China. I think the diversification

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 3>step up is here to stay.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.239
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 4>As we look through the different sectors that are impacted

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 4>by this Supreme Court ruling basically determining that President Trump's

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 4>tariffs under the AIPA provision are legal, Let's take a

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 4>look at what this means for the auto industry. Steve

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Man is our global Autos and Industrials research analysts, and

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Steve I'm looking at the top live block that Bloomberg

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 4>makes available to our clients. And one thing that many

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 4>people may not realize is that the ruling does not

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 4>pertain to the main US tarffs affecting the auto industry.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Walk us through what is affected when it comes to

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 4>auto tarifs by this ruling.

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Yes, Karl it. The bottom line is there's no impact

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 5>on the auto industry, you know, the auto industry. The

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 5>terraces on the auto industry is under the Section two

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 5>thirty two of the Trade Expansion Act of nineteen sixty two,

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 5>so it's not put on in place by the emergency powers.

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 5>So the baseline of the twenty five percent tarraf on

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 5>auto imports is still there now. Trump did renegotiate with

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 5>countries like South Korea and Japan to bring it down

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 5>at fifteen, but for the most part, you know, consumer

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 5>will still feel the impact of these tariffs of you know,

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.959
<v Speaker 5>close to one thousand to three thousand dollars per vehicle

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 5>on average. The other thing that I want to highlight

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 5>is it's the steal and alutlum import terraff with fifty

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 5>that's also not impacted by the Supreme Court ruling today,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 5>and that also has a huge impact on, you know,

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 5>the cost for the automakers.

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 2>So, Steve, what have you seen so far for the

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 2>automakers and how they're dealing with these higher tearf levels.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Are they moving production, are they changing maybe some parts

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 2>of the supply chain. What have they been trying to

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 2>do to mitigate the terriff costs.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 5>That's a that's a good question, Paul. I think, you know,

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.199
<v Speaker 5>I think the reason why Trump went with two thirty

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 5>two Section two thirty two approaches is that the auto industry,

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 5>given its hue manufacturing base, is critical to the economy,

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 5>it's critical to national security. He does want to bring

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of that manufacturing back into the US. And

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 5>that's what we've seen with the US automaker For example,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 5>GM actually have shifted some of the Silverado production from Oshawa,

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Ontario back to the US. And you've seen Honda jun

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Day from South Korea making huge investments in the US

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 5>to set up manufacturing base. So I think I think

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 5>that's still a course for the administration, and I think

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 5>we'll still continue to hear more probably in the you know,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 5>in the next few years, more of that restoring auto

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing back into the US.

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 6>So how do you see this moving forward?

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 4>How does a Ford, how does a GM plan for

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 4>the next year, for the next four years, the next

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 4>ten years.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think they're going to have to revisit and

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 5>they're still doing that, and they have done that already.

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 5>Revisit the supply chain, right, I think the low hanging

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 5>fruit was moving some of the auto assembly back to

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 5>the US. But that's that's that's not enough. You know,

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 5>if you're if you're if the supply chain is not

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 5>close to where the cars are made, break costs will

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 5>go up.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 5>There will continue to be potential terrorists, uh in some

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 5>of the components. So you're starting to see you know, companies,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 5>especially from South Korea, automakers from South Korea and Japan

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 5>actually asking the supplier to shift some of that production

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 5>uh into the US, just to cut you know, some

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 5>of the freight and potential tear across on the auto

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 5>auto parts. So we're going to see a whole lot

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 5>of changes in the supply chain, uh and UH. You know,

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 5>I think one of the things that we also are

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 5>keeping an eye on, uh, it's the U S m

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 5>c A, the unit US Mexico kind of free trader

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 5>there that's up for review this year. That's going to

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 5>have a huge, a much bigger impact on the auto industry.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 5>So we'll see how that plays out.

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 6>Do you want to bring in Dan Ives?

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Dan, of course, is the noted analyst, the global head

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 4>of Technology research at web Bush Securities.

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 6>To get his.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Take on what we're seeing in tech and whether Dan

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 4>this SCOTUS ruling is kind of just risk on for

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 4>the market overall, and that means a big lift for

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 4>the biggest part of the stock market, tech or whether

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 4>this is specifically good news for tech companies.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, this specific good news for tech companies because of

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 8>the supply chain is the biggest worries at times what

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 8>that could do in terms of the data center build out,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 8>AI build out ships, everything that we're seeing with China. Look,

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 8>there's gonna be other ways that they're going to try

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 8>to go around this two thirty two, Section three oh one.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 8>The reality is a huge good the tariff policy, and

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 8>it's very bullish or tech coming out of the gates.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 8>That's going to be an official teach.

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>So Dan, it's been you know a little more than

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 2>a roughly a year that all companies have been dealing

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>with this terror fund journey. How have the technology companies

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 2>who do have a global supply chain rely a lot

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 2>on parts of Asia.

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 7>How have they kind of adjusted here?

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 8>Look at Minnapolis, removed a latta India, others have you know,

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 8>had to make significant investments in the US and all

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 8>who look at different spy their supply chain. But you know,

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 8>as we talked about a lot of the showing the

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 8>vast majority of the supply chain and will continue to

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 8>be samodnesia and where you had companies starting to look

0:13:55.840 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 8>at diversification. Increased cost was just going to potentially, you know,

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 8>impact the supply chain. That's off the table now and

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 8>that's something Look, big tech companies, they'll say publicly behind

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 8>closed doors, there are huge sense of relief right now into.

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 4>This interesting you know, given that so many of the

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 4>big tech CEOs have really aligned themselves with the president,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 4>what does this mean for the big chip makers that

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 4>are outside the United States, the tsmcs, the Samsung Electronics

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 4>of the world.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean, it's extreme positive for them because when you

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 9>think about each of them, the question there was how

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 9>is that going to impact there from a policy perspective,

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 9>from a tower in terms of coming into the US,

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 9>And then you start to think about manufacturing.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 8>You'll continue to have some manufacturer moved to the US.

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 8>But this is actually going to put the brakes on

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 8>some of the policies that some of these tech players had. Look,

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 8>there's going to be section two thirty two, Section three

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 8>or one, there would be other errors go about it.

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 8>But for big tech supply chain, ship players, memory players.

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 8>It's a clear positive. There's no way to really go

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 8>against that thesis.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Dan, your world has been ropped over the last several

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 2>weeks by AI and the impact some people are speculating

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>and may have on certain parts of the marketplace, including

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 2>software companies, particularly software as as service companies. Here, what's

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the current thinking as you talk to investors these days?

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, Paul, I'm kanna is the AI goost

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 8>trade because you're trying to fight a goose, because the

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 8>view that this is going to massively disrupt software, it's

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 8>going to massively disrupt cybersecurity, and I've talked about it's

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 8>the opposite. I think it's the most disconnected trade that

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 8>I've seen in my career on Wall Street in terms

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 8>of what's happened to software stocks now. But again, like

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 8>we talked about fighting a goost, there's going to be

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 8>like boxes that are checked. Whether it's open AI and

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 8>one hundred billion, there's zaven Air earning next week, where

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 8>there's app on AI, where there's circuit financing software companies

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 8>showing monetization. This is going to happen, But right now

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 8>you're fighting a ghost and the bears are loving it,

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 8>but again that will be short lived in my opinion.

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 4>That might be the case in the equity market, but

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing private credit leverage loans really come under pressure

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 4>because of all those loans to a lot of software companies,

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 4>many of which don't have investment grade ratings. Is credit

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 4>driving the concerns in the equity market?

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 6>What's leading?

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 3>What? Dan?

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean, look, if you get blue out right, I

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 8>mean obviously be like some concerns there. But then on

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 8>the other hand, look at A Powell and others. So

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 8>I think if you look relative to some of the

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 8>exposure and what the credit market's telling you, it's still

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 8>very healthy from a credit perspective, but no different than

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 8>we saw the banks a few years ago, a Silver

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 8>Valley Bank and others. There's going to be hyper sensitivity

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 8>to anything that happens here. But the reality is is

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 8>that these companies have more cash and a lot of countries.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 8>When you actually go through it, the point is like

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.400
<v Speaker 8>they're going to continue to do it. But look, it's

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 8>like you if there's five people trading CDs instrumental oracle

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 8>in their basement, that's going to be extrapoid, right, And

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 8>we saw that like a few weeks ago. It's just

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 8>a reality like we're going through a ghost trade. It's

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 8>an AI ghost trade and you got to navigate through it.

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 8>But net net today it's positive for tech and that's

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 8>one step forward.

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Dan, you spend a lot of time in Silicon

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Valley and it's just a great place to get a

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 2>sense of kind of where the you know, the tech

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 2>investment mindset is here. Has tariffs dialed back kind of

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 2>the risk profile of some of the good folks on

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 2>sand Hill Roads as they think about what technology is

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the fund is it tempered a little bit? And could

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>today's rule and be a major change?

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think temp and maybe have put like a

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 8>little question mark in the back of the mind in

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.479
<v Speaker 8>terms of what was going to be the next policy,

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 8>what was gonna be in next threat, specifically when it

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 8>came to supply chain, how companies are positioned. You can't

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 8>just snab the fingers and change your supply chain. Were

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 8>some about things that could take twenty four thirty six months.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 7>This ruin it does clear.

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 8>The path a little more, and I think that's something

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 8>that's a positive as you're in a unprecedented build out

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 8>A fourth industrial revenuetion and AI and for the first

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 8>time in thirty years, the US is a headed China

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 8>when it comes attack.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 7>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>F you're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:18:59.400 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 2>In the summer twenty twenty five, Barry Ridholts spoke with

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Neil Katie, the lawyer who argued the case against Trump's

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 2>tariffs in front of the US Supreme Court. Here's what

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 2>he had to say about their legality.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.479
<v Speaker 10>The President has an easy effects if he wants to.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 10>He could go to Congress and seek approval for the

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 10>tariffs that he wants. That's what he did the first

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 10>time around. And as we talked about last week, you know,

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 10>that's something that failed in Congress, and so maybe that's

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 10>why he doesn't want to do it. Obviously, these tariffs

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 10>are highly unpopular, but nonetheless, you know, the Congress is

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 10>controlled by his party, and you know that's the place

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 10>to start. Don't run to the federal courts to do

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 10>what you can't do in Congress.

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 2>That was Neil Katiell, the lawyer who argued the case

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 2>against Trump's terroriffs in front of the US Supreme Court.

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 2>You're speaking with Barry Ridtholts.

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 7>Barry Rudults joins us here.

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 2>He is the founder of Erdheltz Wealth Management and host

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>of Masters in Business. Here Barry, what do you take

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 2>away from the Supreme Court's decision here today?

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, long overdue, long waited. I think the market always

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 11>has a hard time digesting data inputs that are kind

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 11>of outside of their sweet spot. So when we get

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 11>an FDA approval or the announcement of a merger, or

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 11>corporate earnings or non finn payroll, hey, the markets are

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 11>really good at integrating that into prices. I suspect it's

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 11>going to take a little while for this to get digested.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 11>My personal expectation is there are a lot of winners

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 11>and losers from this. I think that the winners are

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 11>going to be obviously the retailers, because prices have gone up.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 11>We've seen a ton of different research that says somewhere

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 11>between ninety and ninety five percent of the cost of

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 11>tariffs falls on consumers, essentially making them a that tax.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 11>So not only retailers, but manufacturers like Caterpillar and Deer

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 11>what aren't affected by the Supreme Court ruling. And we

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 11>heard one of the prior guests this is all of

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 11>the tariffs on US auto manufacturers on steel on aluminum.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 11>That's a whole separate law. That's not the IEPA law.

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 11>That's the two point thirty two law, and that's still

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 11>up in the air. There's no resolution from this case

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 11>for GM Ford, US Steel, et cetera. But when we

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 11>look at companies like Toyota or Costco or Walmart that

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 11>Toyota filed a refund because all of the parts that

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 11>either Toyota proper ships to their US manufacturers that have

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 11>a big price increase, this is going to work to

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 11>those companies benefits.

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 2>So I guess the question is for the markets barrier,

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 2>is you know, how much of a profit impact could

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 2>the relaxation of some tariffs have on Corporate America? Because

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure we've got a great handle on how

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 2>much it impacted them on the downside in the last

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 2>several quarters.

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 11>Well, it just goes to show you the you know,

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 11>the counterfactual is always what would have been otherwise. And look,

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 11>the president inherited a strong economy, a robust economy with

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 11>markets at or near all time highs, and profits that

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 11>are near all time highs. And so even the pick

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 11>a number one seventy five, two hundred billion in tariffs

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 11>that have been collected already over the past ten months,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 11>you know, arguably a lot of that comes right out

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.719
<v Speaker 11>of the bottom line for Corporate America. So when we

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 11>see these tariffs get refunded, and I'm fighting my way

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 11>through the decision, reading the decision to figure out, all right,

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 11>if you're a big company, you certainly have corporate counsel

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 11>and resources to go through the process to apply for refunds.

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 11>If you're a smaller company, I'm trying to figure out

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 11>if how you go about this?

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 5>Do you have to.

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 11>Join some sort of consortium or maybe even a class

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 11>action suit, because it's not you know, it's not just

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 11>like doing an online tax form and getting refunds.

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 7>It takes a whole process.

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 4>It's definitely heavy lift for companies that you barely have

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 4>an HR department, barely have an in house lawyer.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm coming up with an app that anybody could

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 2>use wouldn't that be good some person.

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.959
<v Speaker 6>Solve this, So let's wait for AI to solve just that.

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Barrett, you are fantastic at kind of thinking ahead, thinking

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 4>around corners, looking around corners.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 6>What do you want to know?

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 4>What are the questions you're asking right now to kind

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 4>of help us get through this period of uncertainty, a

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 4>new period of uncertainty once we kind of get through

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 4>and start to understand how things move forward, whether the

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 4>president can move right away on the tariffs under the

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 4>different sections, or whether he's going to backpedal and kind

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 4>of rethink everything.

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 11>So yeah, I've been trying to think about second and

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 11>third order magnitude results from this. It's not just the

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 11>pebble you toss in the pond, it's the waves that

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 11>bounce off of the other waves and how this works.

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 11>You know, I'm not a political expert, so I'm always

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 11>reluctant to venture into that space. But staying with market

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 11>and economic factors. So a couple of things are very positive.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 11>The dollar in twenty twenty five had its worst year

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 11>since twenty seventeen, not coincidentally, two years that were both

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 11>first year of President Trump's tariffs, first year of a

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 11>new tariff program first year of a Trump presidency in

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 11>each of these cases, and the dollar fell nine point

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 11>nine percent in twenty seventeen nine point three percent last year.

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 11>This arguably could be very strong for the dollar, which

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 11>would begin to co into question the rally and precious

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 11>metals gold especially is kind of been trading crazy. You

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 11>almost have to look at it as a smaller, wackier

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 11>little brother of gold. But I wonder if this caps

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 11>the rally and goal. That's number one. Number two. I

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 11>have to think that everybody that's engaged in any sort

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 11>of tariff negotiation is gonna rethink it and decide, hey,

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 11>do we want to stick with these tariffs? Do we

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 11>want to see if we can press our hands. That's

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 11>gonna be kind of interesting it also, and perhaps most enthusiastically, look,

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 11>depending on which study you consider, tariffs have cost the

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 11>average American household anywhere between you know, nine hundred dollars

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 11>and three thousand dollars, and I suspect as you go

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 11>up the the economic strata, it's probably a whole lot

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 11>more than that that's gonna essentially get cut in half

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 11>or more, depending on you know what you're buying. If

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 11>you're eying burken bags and ferraris you're gonna see and rolexes.

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 11>You're gonna see your taft drop pretty pretty dramatically. And

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 11>so this is positive for inflation. This is positive for

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 11>you know, the Fed has been warning that, hey, rate

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 11>cuts are not a sure thing in the first half

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 11>of the year. This is this is very positive for

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 11>lowering CPI and lowering the possibility of rate hikes. All

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 11>of this could lead to a reacceleration of the economy,

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 11>and certainly in specific sectors. And I'm thinking in particular

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:46.640
<v Speaker 11>manufacturing and retailing and consumer discretionary. Those sectors can all

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 11>do really well. We may you know, a lot of

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 11>people have been talking about the possibility of a recession

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 11>in the second half of the year. I think the

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 11>Supreme Court just lowered the possibility of a recession by

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 11>a not insubstantial percentage. And again these are all second, third,

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 11>fourth order effects.

0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app Tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch US live every weekday on YouTube

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.479
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal