WEBVTT - McKinsey: Something to hide?

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, I want to take a minute to ask

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>for your help. This show is a labor of love

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>for all of us here on the team at calling BS.

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>We debate which organizations to investigate. We carefully consider how

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>to best tell these stories. Our goal is to create

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.759
<v Speaker 1>a show that exposes purpose washing and the real harm

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it does in the world. But we also want to

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>create a show that's fun to listen to and serves

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as a practical guide for entrepreneurs and leadership teams about

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>how to do purpose right. We're really proud of what

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we've made so far, and we're super excited about getting

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>season three into production so we can share it with

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>all of you now to the help we need. So far,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>we are self funded. We need a sponsor or sponsors

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to help us with the cost of production. But, and

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>this is important, we feel like it would be disingenuous

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>given the theme of the show to accept money from

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>just anybody. It's important to us that the sponsors of

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>this show shared of shows values. We're looking for partners

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>who are purpose lead themselves, Companies or organizations that truly

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>walk their talk. Companies who understand the harm that purpose

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>washing does and who understand how important it is for

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>all of us that more companies embrace the path to purpose.

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>If you're a part of an organization like that, or

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>you know one that seems like a good fit, don't

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>hesitate to drop us a line. You can reach me

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>directly at Team Montague at Calling Bullshit podcast dot com.

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and let's get on with the show.

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie the enigmatic global consulting firm. Their influence unrivaled, their

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>talent extraordinary, their allure irresistible, their bullshit undetected until now.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Calling Bullshit, the podcast about purpose washing, the

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>gap between what an organization says they stand for and

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>what they actually do and what they would need to

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>change to practice what they preach. I'm your host, Time

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Montog You and I've spent over a decade helping organizations

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>define what they stand for, their purpose and then help

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>them to use that purpose to drive transformation throughout their business. Unfortunately,

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>at a lot of institutions today, there's still a pretty

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>wide gap between word and deed. That gap has a name, bullshit. But,

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is important, we believe that bullshit is a

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>treatable condition. So when our bullshit detector lights up. We're

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>going to explore rethink the organization should do to fix it.

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>The campaign that Purdue launched when it put oxy content

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on the market was designed to make doctors I think

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that hoping it's rarely cause addiction. Now dozens of states

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and cities to filed lawsuits accusing Purdue of helping fuel

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the current health crisis with misleading marketing. I can't remember

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>last time the FDA was a friend or or the

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>spark for a rally for some of the tobacco stocks,

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's what we saw yesterday and Run ultimately filed

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for bankruptcy. Approximately twenty jobs and two billion dollars in

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>employee retirement funds were lost. Many executives were brought to justice,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and some of them ultimately ended up receiving prison sentences.

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Many Americans are struggling and barely getting by, but not everyone.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Into the Economic Policy Institute, American CEOs were paid three

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty one times as much as a typical worker.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>The Department of Homeland Security has redirected hundreds of millions

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of dollars to immigration enforcement, growing the size and scope

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of ICE. The government has pulled money that was supposed

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to be spent on the Coast Guard, on t s

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>A aviation security, and on FEMA hurricane relief. The U

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>S Intelligence report has concluded that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bin Salmon personally approved the murder of the exiled journalist

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Jamaica and Ron, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency a

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>k a ICE, Big Tobacco, the f d A, Perdue Pharma,

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Big oil, and the Saudi Arabian government. What's the thread

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that connects all of these controversial organizations, governments and industries.

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>They have all been clients of Mackenzie. Coincidence, bad luck,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>or is there something about Mackenzie that draws them into

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>these dark corners of capitalism? The story of McKenzie and

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the story of global capitalism are inextricably linked. The firm

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>consults with heads of state, boards of directors, and CEOs

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of most, if not all, of the most powerful corporations

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>and countries on the planet. You'd be forgiven for not

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>knowing much about Mackenzie. Secrecy is a precious organizational currency.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Few people outside the firm have a clear idea of

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the full scope of their activities. Few people inside the

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>firm know the full scope either. What is common knowledge

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is that for the past hundred years, McKenzie recruits elite

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>talent from only the top tier universities. Mackenzie also sells

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>these recruits. It's on the idea of wealth without guilt.

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>To the young, gifted, and ambitious, a job at McKenzie

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is the ultimate initiation into success, with alumni currently holding

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>high positions in government, as well as running companies like Google,

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley, JP, Morgan Chase, IBM, Disney, and Boeing, to

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>name just a few. They claim to be a values

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>driven firm. Values like practicing high ethical standards, having an

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>obligation to dissent, maintaining an independent perspective, and above all,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>serving the client first. If you were to visit their website,

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>you'd see they claim to be a purpose led company.

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Their purpose to create positive, lasting change in the world,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>although that purpose is a little vague. As you listen

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>to this story on old you'll begin to realize as

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I did, that because of their power to accelerate the

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>adoption of new ideas across their client base, there is

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>no company better positioned to create positive, lasting change to

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the system of capitalism than McKenzie. So do their deeds

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>back up their words. Does their value of serving the

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>client first mean that every other value comes second? Can

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>we trust any company to be purpose led when they

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>operate in almost total secrecy? Flip on your BS detectors, folks,

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and join me as I talk with three people who

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>are deeply qualified to help us discover the truth behind

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>these questions and more. A New York Times investigative journalist

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and co author of the new book When McKinsey Comes

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to Town, followed by two former McKinsey consultants who have

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>worked inside the belly of the beast. Folks, I am

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>very excited to welcome New York Times journalist and author

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Forsyth. Mike, thank you for being here today, and

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome to calling bullshit. I'm so happy to be here. Ti. So,

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you and your co author, Wolf Buck Danich have written

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating book about Mackenzie, which I found both fascinating

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and honestly a little bit scary. What what moved you

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to write about this topic? So all credit goes to

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>uh my co author Wald Buck dani He started looking

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>at Mackenzie back in because he saw that Mackenzie's work

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>was contributing to inequality and was it was such a

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>powerful secretive firm. So he was pitching two editors back then,

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>let's write about this firm. Our first bite of the

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>apple in was about mackenzie's work in South Africa. But

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in that story we also mentioned a little bit about

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie's work with ice. That led to, you know, another

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>chain of events, and we just kept writing and writing,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and we just kept writing. How would you describe what

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie does. So they're a management consulting company, so more

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>than thirty thousand people started in the US, but actually

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>most of their employees are outside of the US. Now,

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>when you say a management consulting company, they work for

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the C suite, the CEO, CFOs, CEOs, and a lot

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of the time their work is garden variety cost cutting recommendations.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what they're known for, probably the best. You know,

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>they're the people you fear when they come in and

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>they figure out where jobs need to be cut, you know.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's the efficiency experts, the efficiency experts, and they

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>have been for they've been around for nearly a hundred

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>years and they've always been the efficiency experts. But they

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>do a lot more than that, uh, you know, they

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>they help with refocusing companies focusing on new lines of business.

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:03.600
<v Speaker 1>They help governments reorganized departments such as the FDA for example.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>Uh And they also, I think, and this is really important.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Over the decades, and especially since the nineteen eighties, they

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>have been big propagators of ideas around the world, diffusers

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of knowledge, so they are very powerful propagators of information. Yeah,

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they're almost like the global nervous system for the business community,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 1>right like they are the behind the scenes transmitter of

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>vital information. McKenzie is an almost mythic brand in consulting.

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>They have a reputation for being incredibly smart, extremely effective,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and intensely secretive. My first question here really is how

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>did you get the access that you needed to even

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>tell this story. There's a lot of ways we did it.

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>One thing that surprised us early on was people coming

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to us working at McKinsey or had just left McKinsey

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to tell their stories. And it took a while, but

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we realized why because mackenzie is such a different company

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>from like say Goldman Sachs or some private equity company,

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>where you know, there's no pretense when you work there,

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>You're there to earn money, you're there to be part

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of unfettered capitalism if you're at Goldman Sachs, right. But

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at Mackenzie, they lure very idealistic, very intelligent people into

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the company. Their recruiting pitch is all about making a difference,

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and they talk inevitably in their recruiting pitches talking about

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>things you could do to make the world better, you know,

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>with climate or you know, with health, things like that.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's because of that that people when they got there,

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>realized they've been sold a bill of goods, and they

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>came to us, and some of them came with some

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary information. And this didn't surprise me, to be honest,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>because Mackenzie does use that technique of trying to trying

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to rude people who really want to make a positive

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>impact on the world, and they recruit from some of

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the best schools around the world. A large group of

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people both inside the company today and also people who

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have left the company who feel some loyalty to it,

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>right they joined it for the right reason. They want

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of protect it. You know. The impression I

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>get from your book is many of them hate seeing

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>when the company gets involved in unsavory things or things

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 1>that are, you know, they know are going to damage

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the brand. It almost feels like they come to McKenzie's

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>defense sometimes some people. The more senior the people are,

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the more they come to mckensey's defense, it seems. Uh.

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's the younger people that you know, haven't spent

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>their whole lives there are that the prime of their

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>lives there who can move on and do other things

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that are more likely to come to us. So it's true.

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the majority of the whistleblowers we had are

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the really good sources we had were on the younger side. Yeah,

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And it was over and over again in the book

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that the young can Sultan's kind of rose up when

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>there was, you know, malfeasance of of one kind or another.

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it's good to see that there are internal checks

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and balances as well. So you touched on this, but

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to dig a little bit deeper. The company

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>also claims to be purpose let itself and they say

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>their purpose is to create positive, enduring change in the world.

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And so right out of the gate, what do you

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>think about that purpose? Having written that this book, I

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very noble purpose. Agree, The whole point

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of the book is that they don't live up to

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that purpose in many important ways, and some of the

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>work that they do does real harm to the world.

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they also have values, and that's the

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>crux of the problem is that their number one value,

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the decades, has been to serve the

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>client first. So, um, let's get into some of the

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>things that really opened my eyes in this book. One

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of the many unexpected things that I got from it

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is mackenzie's role in a number of aspects of let's

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>call it lead stage capitalism. So, for instance, income inequality.

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I never thought about McKenzie when it came to that topic.

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about how the firm had a role

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in the you know now vast and growing divide between

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>workers and managers. There are so many ways that mckensey's

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>had a big role in this. But it started in

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty and McKinsey had been hired by General Motors

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to do a study about a compensation for its executives

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and and mckensey looked at compensation at many companies and

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>it was this hot shot partner, young guy named Arch

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Patton back in nineteen and he made an amazing discovery.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>He discovered that workers pay was catching up to executive pay,

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>or was growing faster than executive pay. So the game

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>between executives and workers was narrowing. Well wasn't big enough.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and this was a time when labor

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>unions were strong. There had been you know, something called

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the Treaty of Detroit, where you know, workers got all

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sorts of benefits, you know, so that they wouldn't strike.

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So this got spread around from company to company, and

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>some companies executives didn't like the fact that they were

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>ranked lower than other ones, and it started this race

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to the top where the companies would raise pay for

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>their executives based on these McKenzie studies. That happened year

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>after year after year, and this guy arch Patton would

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>publish these unfortunate he published these in the Harvard Business Review.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So company executives started knowing what people in other industries

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>were making. They didn't want to be behind. Stock options

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>started becoming in vogue. Mckensey did these compensation studies, you know,

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>for for individual companies and became a very big part

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of the firm's work. And this guy alone was billion

0:15:57.240 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about ten of all revenue at mckinn z at the time. Yeah,

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>so he built a huge practice and you could you

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of go, let's see, let's who are you going

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to call if you want to get a get a

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>raise and you're a CEO, call call our chip McKenzie,

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>right right. Yeah. Simultaneously though, McKenzie is as the efficiency

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>expert showing some of those same companies how to cut

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>costs by downsizing and then ultimately offshoring talent to other

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>countries to drive compensation of workers lower. That's right. So

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>offshoring was all the vogue at McKinsey in the nineties.

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>There were mckensey partners writing books about the benefits of

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>off shoring globalization. You know, McKenzie would just talk about

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>this with endless companies and they would put slides in

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>slide decks about the benefits of globalization, that benefits of

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>moving your work to China from the United States. And

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>so because of their reach and all these corporate ward rooms,

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 1>they were able to spread this gospel about the benefits

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of off shorey. So just to unpack this, McKenzie profits

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>by helping shareholders profit by firing American workers on mass

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in some cases, or firing them and moving their jobs overseas.

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And then they also profit by helping management profit by

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>starting an executive pay practice that drives CEO pay into

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the stratosphere. That's quite clever, and it leads to a

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.959
<v Speaker 1>second eye opening aspect of the book. I learned that

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>in multiple industries and engagements, mackenzie often profits from working

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>for both sides of an issue. I was really struck

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>by their relationship with not only Big Tobacco, who they

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>worked with for years, but also their relationship with the

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>FDA Center for Tobacco Products, which is responsible for regulating

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Big tobacco, and they worked with those entities, as I

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>understand it, simultaneously, they also consulted with Jewel, which at

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the time claimed to be a smoking cessation product, as

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Jewel wound up marketing their product to teens and thereby

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>addicting an entirely new generation to nicotine. And this strategy

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of working multiple size of the problem has has netted

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the company massive fees over the years, has it not?

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It really has. Almost since the beginning of McKenzie, they've

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>been happy, and they've they've made it clear that they

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>work for multiple companies in the same industry, so for example,

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>they could work for four GM and Chrysler at the

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>same time. But but what you said is on a

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>different level entirely when McKenzie is working for both the regulator,

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>with the FDA being the poster child, and then the

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>companies that are actually regulated. And as you pointed out,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the the idea that McKinsey was working um for big

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>tobacco and they only stopped working for big Tobacco in

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>one Yeah, and I guess somehow this is all legal

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>question mark, So that is a question. It appears to

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>be legal. You know, McKenzie had to pay more than

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>six hundred million dollars are settled with these states attorneys

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>general investigations last year into their work with opioid makers.

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 1>They write Perdue and oh Melon crossed several of the

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>opioid makers Jay and Jay that that they admitted no wrongdoing.

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's a constant theme. And you know, the certainly

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Congress has been really looking into this conflict as well.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>There were some very testy hearing back in April when

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>members of Congress were asking the head of mackenzie, this

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>guy named Bob stirred Fell's point, like, you know, how

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>can you work for the f d A and uh,

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the regulated companies like Perdue at the same time. Now,

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of course he would say, well, the work we did

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>for the f d A wasn't specific to any of

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>these companies, so there was no conflict, right, yeah, so

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>legal or potentially legal? Would you consider that to be ethical? No? No,

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>straight up no, yeah, you know, and neither right. And

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>one thing we discovered is we talked to some people

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>at the FDA or former people, senior people. Hey, did

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that McKenzie was also advising these drug makers,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>these tobacco makers at the same time they were advising you,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And they didn't know it was. They were surprised, which

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>is terrible. It's right, you know. And I've always thought

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>mackenzie's secrecy is a little bit of just a kind

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of marketing ploy to create mystique, but it does seem

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like it's it's actually a really important part of their

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>business model, because if you have total secrecy on everything

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that you're working for, both internally and externally, you can

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>get away with stuff like that. That's right. We only

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.640
<v Speaker 1>know what we've uncovered, but you know, there's lots more

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.239
<v Speaker 1>secrets out there, I'm sure. Uh, And You can do

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things if no one knows what you're doing. Right.

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>There was another story that you told in the book

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know whether this is working two sides

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of an issue, but I did find it cynical. You

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:10.159
<v Speaker 1>tell the story of Dixon Pinner, who is or was

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Mackensey's head of sustainability at the Aspen Ideas Festival, talking

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>about the pressing need for corporations to take quick and

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>dramatic action on climate change. That's great at the Aspen

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Ideas Festival. But this is a company that worked for

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>years and continues to work with some of the biggest

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel companies in the world. Right, So we called

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie out on this in a story in The New

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>York Times a year ago, and it's a you know,

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a big chapter in our book. Again. If mackenzie

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was working with big oil, you know, the gas companies,

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the coal miners, to reduce their carbon emissions, that would

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>be laudable. And Dick and Penner, he's like, he's head

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the sustainability for them. He he knows about climate change.

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>He he can really do a great presentation showing how

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>urgent the problem is. And he's done lots of great

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>report The problem is, I tell you, we did this

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>story a year ago, and McKenzie is unapologetic about its

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>work with these companies. What we tried to do, and

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>it's in the book, is to show that a lot

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of their work with these companies has nothing to do

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>with cutting their carbon emissions. It has everything to do

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>with making them a more profitable and more productive coal

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>mining company or oil company or gas company. In on

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.640
<v Speaker 1>their website, there all these studies of McKenzie is doing

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>all this, these words about, you know, committed to protecting

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the planet, committed to reducing emissions, and yet at the

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>same time, these big clients that they're working for are are,

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the world's biggest polluters. Yeah, some

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of the data that you have in the book is incredible.

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Let me just read a bit. Is a note I

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>wrote here for myself for a firm committed to protecting

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the planet. McKenzie counts seventeen mining and fossil fuel companies

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.640
<v Speaker 1>among its biggest clients. Collectively, those clients have earned McKenzie

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of dollars in recent years. Since two

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand and ten, McKenzie has worked with forty three of

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the hundred companies that have pumped the most carbon dioxide

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>into the atmosphere since nineteen sixty five. These forty three

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>companies were responsible for thirty eight percent of the entire

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>planets carbon dioxide output in and Chevron number three on

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the list, paid McKenzie fifty million dollars in fees in

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So they're hardly not in the carbon business and for

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>them to make any claims about being pro sustainability seems

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous to me and a little dangerous. It does. And

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I tell you, you know, they were apologetic about their

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>work with opioid makers, they were apologetic about their work

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa, but they are not apologetic about their

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>work with these carbon emeters. And that's not to say

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that mckenzy doesn't do good work, you know, on sustainability.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>They do some and uh and they do work with

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>some great green companies and and that's a fact, but

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>they also do you know what we outline that these

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>work with these big polluters. You know, one of the

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>things that you point out in the book is that

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie is really good at spreading ideas and they've done

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>it many times over their history, and we're now feeling

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>what I hope is a new day dawning in capitalism,

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and mackenzie could be tremendously powerful if they decided to

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>really get behind, for instance, conscious capitalism. I couldn't agree more.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the things McKenzie does really well is higher

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>really smart people who will work their butts off. And

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>if those people can be harnessed to consistently do things

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that are good and will make the world more sustainable

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and more equitable, you know, all within the free market framework,

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>which is not a contradiction, then hats off to them

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if they can do that. Let's touch on another topic

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>that is contained in the book which I did not realize,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>which is McKenzie's were with authoritarian governments. You tell two

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>stories about this, McKenzie's work with the Chinese government and

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>their work with the Saudi Arabian government, and it just

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 1>struck me that mackenzie is is very good at finding

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>growth industries and attaching themselves to them, and authoritarianism seems

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to be spreading around the globe. Is this the new

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>growth industry for mackenzie? So um, After we wrote about

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>their work in China, after we wrote about their work

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in Saudi Arabia. McKenzie did say that they've changed the

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>way they select clients and now they say they will

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>not work for the defense ministries, justice ministries, lease interior

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>ministries of authoritarian countries. Um. But a lot of the

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>harm and a lot of the power in authoritarian countries

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is not in those ministries. It's in the ministry of economy.

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 1>For example. If you're working to make an authoritarian country

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>like Saudi Arabia more robust that the theocratic autocratic House

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of Saoud, you know, more sustainable, you do, You're doing

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that through the Ministry of Economy. And that's what we've

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>found that that work is still continuing McKenzie still in

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia and in China. We also discovered that McKenzie

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>for a time was a real champion of some of

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>these marquee Chinese policies that were meant to burnish Chinese

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>power throughout the world. They have come out publicly and

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>said they've changed their ways with regard to, for instance,

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government. Are they explicitly not working with Chinese

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>government owned or run companies. No, no, no, they have

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>not said that at all, So they they are still

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>working with some of the biggest Chinese state owned companies.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>What we looked at in our book is the nineties

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>six Chinese companies, which are the centrally managed state owned

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>companies that they're called the John Young Ta. These are

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are the basis for Chinese state power.

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And so there are many of these companies that mckensey

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>works for. In fact, we never found them really working

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for the you know, the interior ministries the defense ministries

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in these countries, but they don't have to work with

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>those ministries necessarily to be engaged in work that's in

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>direct opposition to, for instance, the interests of the United States,

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So you know, one of the areas we

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we looked at was their work for a company called

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>China Communications Construction Company, which builds those artificial islands in

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the South China Sea that some people fear will turn

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that area into just a big Chinese lake. We know

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that the Pentagon is really concerned about this, and McKinsey

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously works for the Pentagon as well, And so there's

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>another contradiction there. Yeah, it's it's odd and I guess

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know this has to do with the perspective that

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you take my guests would be and and you keep

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>me honest here. The way they defend that is to say,

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>we're a global company, We're not a US come I.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>We don't have anybody's particular interests in mind. We want

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to help the people who pay us to advance their

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>their agenda, whatever that agenda is. That maybe so, but

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. You know, if you're working for one client

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 1>and the interests are opposed to another client, especially if

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that clients, you know, the US government, and if the

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>work in Mackenzie's doing is in contradiction to national security,

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something that they called out. Okay, so

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>other shocking stories, and we'll just touch on these. Mackenzie's

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 1>role in securitized debt. You know, this idea of turning

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>debt into essentially a stock that other people can buy

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or a security that other people can buy to get

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>debt off your books, which in many ways lead directly

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to the housing collapse and bankrupting at least tens, if

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not hundreds of thousands of Americans. They did of work

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>at Purdue literally using the word turbo charging sales of

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>OxyContin in the middle of the opioid pandemic. It was

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously already clear that this was a problem when McKenzie

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>stepped in and tried to help produce pharmacs sell more

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff. Which leads to the question that I

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have about this company, which is, is there a client

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you think they would not take on? Um? I am

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>sure there are clients they would not take on. And

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't hear about the clients they reject.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie says, they actually turned down a lot of work.

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that work is specifically. Yeah, okay,

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>So just to to round this up a little bit,

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I found myself as I read the book and listen

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to all these stories, having a lot of thoughts about this. Mackenzie,

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>in one way or another, has been at the scene

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of some of the most egregious examples of capitalism run

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a muck, and throughout the book you pointed out that

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in many cases the strongest criticism can from within, most

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>often from young consultants who joined to make a positive

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and lasting change on the world, Like the Sign says,

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're shocked by what they discovered when they got

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in there. And you know, this is part of a

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>broader movement among young people who are demanding change. And

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess my question is, how do you think mackenzie

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>stays relevant in that changing landscape and continues to win

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with talent. If you look at the mckensey website, you

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>could be forgiven for thinking that they are the poster

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>child for responsible capitalism, for ethical capitalism. It's all about

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>doing good, it's all about saving the planet. So on

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the surface, they seem like a very ethical company, but again,

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the work that makes them a lot of money oftentimes

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is in contradiction to their stated values as a company. Well,

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in addition to claiming to be purpose led themselves, they

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>also claim to be helping clients make the transition to

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>being purpose led today. It's a big way to make money,

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it is. Yeah, I just question their credentials. We

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly do. But you know they can make a lot

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of money helping companies with their environmental these e s

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>G goals or you know that that's that's a big

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>way to make money. And so advises on this. Yeah,

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>one other quick um area that I wanted to delve into.

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>His values. They have numerous values and they all sound

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>as values tend to really really great, But there are

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>three that I wanted to probe on. The first is

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>preserving client confidences. You know, their renowned for secrecy. They

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>claim that it's for their clients. But the other revealing

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>thing about your book is that this policy of total

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>secrecy has been incredibly profitable for them, and I guess

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>my question is do you think that can endure? You know,

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>secrets are just harder to keep these days, so do

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you think that policy is going to change. I don't

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to change. I think it's baked into mckenzy.

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And some of that is legitimate tie because, for example,

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>if they have trade secrets that they learned from a company,

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they can't reveal that, so they have to be trusted

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to keep those secrets. But it is becoming easier in

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>some ways, you know, through lawsuits, through whistleblowers, through very

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>idealistic young people who just they're not going to take

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it anymore and they want to work for an ethical company.

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So I do believe in you know that it does

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>depend though on continued attention by journalists. If there's not

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>attention paid to these companies, then I think that secrecy

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and especially the malign aspects of that secrecy will continue.

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Another value observe high ethical standards. How are they doing here? Yeah,

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>well I think, uh, you know, there's some there's some

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>issues there. I guess the real question is one happens

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 1>when this value contradicts either the secrecy value or the

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>firm's profitability. You know, lots of companies have values and

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>mission statements, and usually they they're really meaningless, right. I

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>do think mckensey is different. Um, they really take this

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff seriously. They you know that people are always talking

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>about values at McKinsey. They have a Values Day, you know,

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they stand down and talk about values every year, and

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you see it an email after email after email. The

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 1>another value I'll have to say is that the right

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to dissent, the obligation to dissent if you see something wrong,

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you say something, and that that is a value that's

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>invoked a lot, and that's helped us write our book

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>because of these incredible emails that these young mckensey associates

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>are writing, for example about their work with ICE, uh,

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, immigration and customs enforcement. And so there's that value.

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, kind of like with Lord of the Rings,

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>where there's one ring, you know, that rules them all,

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>one ring that binds them the the one value that

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is above all the other values is the client interests

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>come first. Client interests come first. And but that's a

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>If your client is a bad actor and you're working

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>unstoppably to help, what is your responsibility then in the world,

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>right do you have none? I mean so so yes? Um.

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:25.279
<v Speaker 1>The obligation to keep your client confidences and to put

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the clients interests above the firms can lead you to

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>basically doing things that, from a societal point of view,

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 1>are just unethical. Yeah. Um, okay, here's a here's a

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>really self serving question for you, Mike. You know, you're

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously a professional journalist, and we're obviously amateurs at calling bullshit.

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>We just follow our nose, and so far, our nose

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>has led us to do individual episodes on Jewel, BP, Course, Civic,

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>all of whom are mentioned in the book, and the

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>FDA also in the book. And I was just blown

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>away to discover that the common denominator between all of

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 1>those entities is mckensey. What do you make of that?

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 1>They're everywhere, They're they're absolutely everywhere. They work for all

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>these companies, and they work for all these government agencies.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you scratch the surface at a lot of companies,

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'll discover mackensey. Was there another thing that

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I found myself thinking over and over again, how little

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I understood about the ways in which the world that

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 1>we all live in today has been shaped by this

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>one firm. And it's easy to really make up a

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>fairly scary story about their impact by connecting a few dots.

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>If I told you the story, it would go kind

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of like, well, the relentless focus on helping corporations externalized

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:57.240
<v Speaker 1>cost like pollution, and also by downsizing and all shoring

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>talent and advocating for executive pay has led to the

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>climate crisis and also income inequality, as well as the

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>destruction of the middle class, which leads to depression and

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>anxiety in in the devastated middle class, and political polarization,

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 1>which leads to the opioid crisis and the rise of authoritarianism.

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So we can't blame McKenzie for this whole mess, of course,

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>But maybe we got started on this because of the

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling that that McKenzie, you know, had a role in this.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>What so many McKenzie consultants and former consultants say, is

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that McKenzie is an accelerant. Several people who used that word,

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:49.919
<v Speaker 1>they're an accelerant. They didn't invent assets securitization, but they

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>spread the gospel. They didn't invent offshoring, but they spread

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the gospel. They didn't invent shareholder capitalism, but they spread

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the gospel. Yeah, I think that's that's a great point,

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's a great way to think about them, you know,

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>for for better or worse. Okay, So just a reminder,

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>mackenzie's purpose is to help create positive, enduring change in

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the world. And so Mike, if you you know, we're

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>able to give them advice on how they could change

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to better live that purpose, what would you tell them?

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:28.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not a philosopher and I don't play

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>one on TV. But when you see unethical behavior, you

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>know it. It doesn't take a genius to know that

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:38.479
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't be working for a hospital to extract money

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>out of poor people. You shouldn't be pushing opioids. You

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be working for big tobacco. You shouldn't be working

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Saudi government to make them more sustainable, or

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 1>with Chinese government ministries. It doesn't take a genius. There

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are gray areas, of course, but they need to have

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot more of and I don't use this word

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but a lot more EQ a lot more

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>emotional quote that they don't have that now. They're so

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>focused on their spreadsheets and their slide decks than in

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>so many cases they lose sight of the big picture

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's the purpose of their work and the ethics

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of their work. So they need to be much more

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>conscious about that. Mike, last question on this show. We

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 1>have a tool, or to use a McKinsey ism, a

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>technology called the B S scale to measure the gap

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>between word. Indeed, it goes from zero to one hundred,

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>zero being the best zero b s and one hundred

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>being the worst total bs. So on that scale, how

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>would you rate mckensey. So this goes against all the

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>instincts as a journalist to give you this number, but

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna do it. I would have to give

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>them a ninety. So they're they're way up there on

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the BS. And you know, I think our whole book

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 1>has been calling out the b s at mckensey. They

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>do lots of great work, they have lots of great people.

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So many people at McKenzie I am their friends. I

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>would you know. They're great people, but on such important,

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>big issues around the world, they really fall short and

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it clashes so much with what they say in public

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>on their website. Mike, thank you so much for being

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>here today. This was an awesome conversation and thank you

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for the work that you're doing. Please keep it up.

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Time. It was a real pleasure, folks.

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It is time to make the call. Is mackenzie really

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>creating positive and lasting change in the world? Based on

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:41.399
<v Speaker 1>what I've heard so far, I gotta call bullshit. If

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>your purpose is to create positive, lasting change, then you

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>have to help the world think long term rather than

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:52.319
<v Speaker 1>continuing the fixation with the latest quarterly results. If you're

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 1>going to create positive, lasting change in the world, you

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have to decide that there are good client dollars and

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 1>there are bad client dollars, and you have to learn

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>to say no to the bad client dollars. And if

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to create positive, lasting change, you have to

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>have the courage to take a stand on issues that

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>matter to the next generation of McKinsey consultants and McKenzie clients.

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie has had multiple chances over the years, especially lately,

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to make some of these changes. So far they have

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:31.880
<v Speaker 1>completely failed. But as you know, we believe that bullshit

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is a treatable condition. So right after the break, we're

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>going to talk with two x McKinsey consultants about actions

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>the firm could take to turn things around. Stick with us,

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, folks. I am very excited to introduce today's experts,

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>both ex mckensey consultants, Rizwan Nave and Eric Edgstrom. We're

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>going to help us help McKenzie to better live their

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:08.879
<v Speaker 1>stated purpose. Welcome to calling bullshit. Pleasure to be here.

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be here. So Rizonant, please tell us

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your background, about your work at

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie and and also what made you decide to to

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>leave the firm. I'm a professional with about a decade

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of experience in the broader natural resources space. About half

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of that or five years at McKinsey, where I was

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a consultant and then an engagement manager in our Electric,

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Power and Natural Gas practice, which is a subgroup of

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:37.400
<v Speaker 1>our broader global energy and Materials group. My job at

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie as an engagement manager was to lead teams and

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.919
<v Speaker 1>work with the senior sea level leadership and board level

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.239
<v Speaker 1>clients and the power and sustainability space. I've worked on

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>both highly emitting and decarbonizing clients, but the latter part

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of my career I would say was almost exclusively focused

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on energy transition topics. At this point, maybe it's worth

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 1>talking a little bit about the context around in my departure.

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>For myself, I try to work within paras line trajectory

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to articulate a different way to help these clients decarbonized

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>into articulate that the firm should measure, disclose set and

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>aspiration for reducing its client emissions and take steps gradually

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:22.799
<v Speaker 1>over time to calibrate such that it's edging this portfolio

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>towards a Paris and line trajectory. I couldn't fully explain

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>why we were running into leadership not giving us time

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>or not fully engaging or various explanations as to why

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this is complex and needs a second look. And after

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of months of being stuck in this, myself and

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a few other colleagues were quite motivated articulated in a

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.479
<v Speaker 1>letter to senior leadership that we need to do more

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on our client emissions that we carry immense risk as

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>our clients irrevocably alter the Earth's environment with their emissions,

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and we, you know, open this to an audience inside

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the firm globally, We've got eleven signatures within a week,

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe, and then suddenly the same folks who couldn't

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 1>give us as much time were very attentive. Yeah, that's

0:43:08.880 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a huge number of people. Just contextually how many people

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 1>work at Mackenzie I would say around thirty. That letter,

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 1>in functional terms also went nowhere. After months of this,

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, having seen the frankly very uninspirational response, I

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>resigned and articulated in an email to senior leadership, copying

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the majority of our sustainability practice globally, where by I

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>essentially laid out the case that we do have some responsibility.

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>If we take credit for our impact, we are also

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>associated with the negative externalities of that impact, and we

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot profess to the world and shout to the rooftops

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that we are the greatest private sector catalyst for decarbonization

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>globally while continuing to serve easily the worst polluters on

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the planet that are not on even on a trajectory

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and essentially resisting or I'll try refusing to institute even

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the most basic modicum off measurement, disclosure, targets, setting and policies. Right,

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that context will be very helpful for people,

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's hard to argue with your logic. So, Eric,

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:25.120
<v Speaker 1>just as Raiswana has done, can you tell us a

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about yourself and also the situation that you

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:30.319
<v Speaker 1>found yourself in that caused you decide to move on

0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>from the firm. So I grew up in Massachusetts and

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 1>my first career was in the military. I attended West

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Point and deployed to Direct Combat where I led troops

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 1>in Kanadahar Province, Afghanistan, and after that was part of

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the Honor Guard, where I was the Presidential Escort platoon

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:55.520
<v Speaker 1>leader during the Obama administration. From I realized that the

0:44:55.560 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>military was not sort of the public service good, especially

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that particular mission, the War on Terror, since military service

0:45:02.920 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is not an absolute good, that I wanted to find

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a different way to apply myself to the you know,

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 1>my my vocation in the world. And so I attended

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Oxford and did a dual degree, doing an MBA in

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a Master science studying climate change, and I moved to Australia,

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 1>so I joined McKenzie in and while I was there,

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I found that the projects that were available were not

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>anything like what we're advertised, and rather than what you

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>might see on a mckensey website which talks about vaccine,

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>cold storage or renewable energy, that in practice is far

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 1>and few in between. The difference, of course, between sort

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:50.839
<v Speaker 1>of puffery of any business where they try to make

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:53.959
<v Speaker 1>themselves look like number one and we have the best

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:58.439
<v Speaker 1>flavor was very different with mckensey. You're you're actively saying

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're taking a very positive role and that they're

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>hanging their hat on the notion that this is going

0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to be something that we're going to work on. And

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to set the stage, you know, we went on a

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.360
<v Speaker 1>firm off site to Port Douglas in the Great Barrier

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Reef and the consultants would go out for a day

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>trip and go snorkeling to look at the coral reefs

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>which were actively dying, and then they would return back

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to work where they would help increase extraction at a

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:29.360
<v Speaker 1>thermal coal site. And I remember hearing people say stuff

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:30.959
<v Speaker 1>like well, at least you know, we got a chance

0:46:31.000 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to see it before it died out, and it was

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:38.919
<v Speaker 1>basically through our own work or the firm zone work

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>rather that it was making the likelihood of a sustainable

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 1>future ever harder to achieve. So that's sort of some

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that I was passionate about, and you know,

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>it was more than just the work and acknowledging that

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie is an a moral institution. They're only doing what

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>earns the dollars. That's not necessarily a bad thing if

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>they advertise themselves as such. Yeah, exactly. That's that's a

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>key belief that we have on the show is it

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.359
<v Speaker 1>just needs to do what it says on the label, right,

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and and if you're transparent about just wanting to make money,

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we're fine with it. But it's when you say that

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>your purpose is to help create positive, enduring change in

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the world, and then your activities belie another agenda. Absolutely.

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>So the apex of the experience of sort of descent

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>within Mackenzie to try to realign the values of the firm.

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 1>We're at Values Day in twenty nineteen, and so every

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>year Mackenzie gets together to take you know, a hot wash,

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 1>look at their values and say did we live them?

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>This last year, where did we fall down, where did

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we come short? And what might we do to improve

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 1>our values as a company, which is a great thing.

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I was in the audience and the senior partner responsible

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:09.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Asia PAC practice for Australia New Zealand came

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.719
<v Speaker 1>up to the microphone and said, like, our values need

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:15.239
<v Speaker 1>to continue to evolve as the sort of atmosphere and

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>what society expects of us continues to evolve. And he

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:21.720
<v Speaker 1>said something to the effect of we should no longer

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>be serving clients that kill people or cheat their customers.

0:48:27.320 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>And I raised my hand and amongst an audience of

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 1>five people, was like, how do you reconcile this with

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing with, for instance, the military, that these

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>actions would be considered state terrorism. We're not legally at

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>war with these countries that were actively bombing, and you know,

0:48:45.200 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I continue to serve these clients, and so I also

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that that didn't get me a lot of

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 1>UM positive attention, UM. And in my leaving email, I

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:01.400
<v Speaker 1>articulated these same arguments, not really seeing any client names,

0:49:01.440 --> 0:49:03.960
<v Speaker 1>as I have not mentioned any client names in this discussion,

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 1>and I was banned from the McKenzie Alumni network so

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:11.919
<v Speaker 1>this is a an act that I think has only

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>happened to other people that were insider trading, for instance.

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So I had the same level of response for challenging

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>McKenzie's client service record as would an insider trader, and

0:49:24.000 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that seems counter to McKenzie's culture. I mean, my culture.

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Can I hop in there real quick? Of course, it's

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>not discounter to the culture. The firm has a stated

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>policy two policies. One is the obligation to dissent, this

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>notion that if you are a dissenter, you're not only

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>should feel supported to speak up, but you have an

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:47.800
<v Speaker 1>obligation to speak up, which I presume Eric felt. And

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 1>then the second policy is, you know, this policy of

0:49:50.080 --> 0:49:53.439
<v Speaker 1>non retaliation, which also was not applied. And I think

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it's important to read the intentions in terms of the

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 1>actions and entity takes and not in terms of what

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it says. In this case and in this case, uh,

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>one can derive from the actions that you know the

0:50:08.719 --> 0:50:12.520
<v Speaker 1>firm is not open to certain types of descent and

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>does not see certain types of retaliation as inappropriate. That

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 1>that tells you a lot about the actual culture of

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the company. I appreciate both of those stories. A great deal,

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 1>and our our take on on that kind of thing

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 1>we call it bullshit, a gap between word indeed, and

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 1>we also believe that that bullshit is a treatable condition,

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but it has to be addressed through action. And so

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what we heard it really today to talk about

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:45.719
<v Speaker 1>UM is to get into some ideas to bring mckensey's

0:50:45.760 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>actions more closely in line with its stated purpose. So

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if I could ask you, riz want to

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>lead us off in in a couple of minutes or less,

0:50:56.520 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, what would you tell mckensey Global man partner

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Bob stern Fells or or other McKenzie leaders to change

0:51:04.560 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>at McKenzie to better live their purpose, which is just

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>to remind folks to help create positive, enduring change in

0:51:11.280 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the world. In my opinion, asking Bob, hey, you know

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you should do these things, we already did that. So

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, the question to ask really is what

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 1>will society do? What will states and regulators do? Is

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just trust us going to cut it? Should privately own

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 1>professional services firms be exempt from emissions measurement and disclosure

0:51:33.520 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 1>just because of their choice of financing? The question is

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>what will climate focused organizations do from the UN Climate

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Compact and nonprofits? Are they willing to continue to engage

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the services of firms knowing full well that they have

0:51:47.080 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>these contradictions and conflicts of interest in their portfolio? What

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>will governments do? What will new hires do? So to Bob,

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say what market signals as you're waiting for

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 1>what's more, surveys that show that this is the number

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 1>one concern across alumni, current students, current employees with regards

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to client emissions? Is he waiting for a lawsuit? Will

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that be too late? Like I would ask those questions

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>because in my opinion, society needs to subject the firm

0:52:16.040 --> 0:52:19.239
<v Speaker 1>to material consequences and disclosure and then the firm will

0:52:19.280 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>be incentivized to act. So, to paraphrase, you were reply

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to this question, McKenzie isn't or can't fix itself and

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:33.759
<v Speaker 1>so others must fix it? Is that fair? I mean

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 1>we can simply derive that from the actions they have

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:41.640
<v Speaker 1>taken thus far. Right. Okay, Um, that's bleak, But I

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>understand why you would take that position given the story

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:48.239
<v Speaker 1>that you've just told us. So fair enough, Eric, any

0:52:48.280 --> 0:52:50.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about that? I mean, I think riz one is

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>spot on that the firm is going to respond to

0:52:55.880 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the environment in which it exists. If it's no longer

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a profitable with the calculus that they do to continue

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 1>serving these clients, they will stop doing it. And what

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:12.160
<v Speaker 1>are the costs? Well, the firm doesn't manufacture anything. Mackenzie

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:15.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't produce any hardware. They rely on people to do

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the work. If people stop showing up to apply to

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:22.080
<v Speaker 1>mckenzy and say, like, I want to work at a

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:25.760
<v Speaker 1>top tier consulting firm that isn't turbo charging the climate crisis,

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Bob will get the message right now. The the book

0:53:30.480 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that was released by the two New York Times reporters

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is effectively a reputational hand grenade, and they pulled the

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:39.799
<v Speaker 1>pin and they handed it back to Bob. He has

0:53:39.840 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>decided to sit on it um. The question, now that

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the world knows some of the negative externalities that they multiply,

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is what are they going to do about it. One

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of the quotes in the book from a former senior

0:53:57.520 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 1>partner talked about it effectively being long term stupid to

0:54:03.200 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>continue these practices. I mean, this is the thing. Mckensey

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:08.719
<v Speaker 1>is a business consultancy and it says it's looking to

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.839
<v Speaker 1>make enduring change in the world. So it has this

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:16.800
<v Speaker 1>long term view, but it's it's it's giving clients bad advice.

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And when you're talking about being a great place to

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 1>retain exceptional talent um if you ask any gen z R.

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to work at a company that knowingly

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is making the most important issue facing the planet worse?

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>What are they going to do? So I I, you know,

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>hope that this gets out to all those undergrads at

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Princeton and m I T and cal Tech and University

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of Michigan and Georgia Tech. And when they're thinking about

0:54:43.440 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do, are they in the interview

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:49.319
<v Speaker 1>room going to ask that associate partner what are you

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:52.040
<v Speaker 1>guys doing about this? And are you continuing to serve

0:54:52.080 --> 0:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>these clients? They will get the message and they will change. Yeah,

0:54:55.560 --> 0:54:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree, thank you for that. And Eric, just directly,

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>would you do to fix mackenzie? What they will do

0:55:04.680 --> 0:55:07.359
<v Speaker 1>is respond to market forces. What I hope they do

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:11.800
<v Speaker 1>would be to fix themselves as you might um hope

0:55:11.800 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 1>for as well, independently and separate for starters in a

0:55:17.200 --> 0:55:22.160
<v Speaker 1>first responder sense, stop the bleeding, So stop serving clients

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>on topics and This is the big distinction. It is

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:30.440
<v Speaker 1>not an objection to serving fossil fuels and coal companies.

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It is serving fossil fuels and coal companies on things

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that will make climate change worse. And that is the

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>distinction that needs to be pulled out. Of Bob's straw

0:55:40.760 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>man fallacy that he published in the Wall Street Journal,

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>premise which no journalist has the courage to look at,

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:52.279
<v Speaker 1>is that in his comment, the snug premise is like,

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we go to the extractive industries because that's where the

0:55:55.200 --> 0:55:59.200
<v Speaker 1>benefits could be. The question within that is when you

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:02.319
<v Speaker 1>go to those science, what are you doing? And the

0:56:02.400 --> 0:56:06.520
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question is very unsavory. And so that

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is what needs to be pulled out. So stop the

0:56:09.160 --> 0:56:12.319
<v Speaker 1>bleeding in the sense of stop serving clients that are,

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we know, on a four degree trajectory. Stop serving them

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on either a business as usual projects to help them

0:56:19.520 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>enable that four degree strategy, or worse um have them

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 1>do basically work that is turbo charging the problem and

0:56:27.640 --> 0:56:32.239
<v Speaker 1>making it worse. I also want to make clear it's

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not that forces within the firm are not trying to

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>drive the change. There are many many people who struggle

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:42.319
<v Speaker 1>with this, who are advocating for the firm to do

0:56:42.400 --> 0:56:48.719
<v Speaker 1>more on this. So I am hopeful that this disclosure,

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>this attention provides them the fact base that they need

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to sort of progress things. Mckinseie does incredible mark helping

0:56:58.520 --> 0:57:02.520
<v Speaker 1>clients de carbonize. We are I would say the sustainability

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:06.239
<v Speaker 1>practice quite specialized in that the question is can we

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:09.359
<v Speaker 1>can we continue to be able to do that with

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>knowing what we know? As reported in the Times, The

0:57:13.400 --> 0:57:17.000
<v Speaker 1>points that riz One and I are making, if I

0:57:17.000 --> 0:57:20.880
<v Speaker 1>can put words in his mouth, is that mckensey does

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good and there is a lot of

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:27.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff that is not inherently immoral. You know, if you

0:57:27.960 --> 0:57:29.880
<v Speaker 1>look at if if you look at the portfolio of

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:31.959
<v Speaker 1>clients and the type of work that I would see

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:35.760
<v Speaker 1>coming across for projects, a lot of it is pretty

0:57:35.840 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 1>hum drum corporate stuff. How do you improve second line

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:44.440
<v Speaker 1>risk at a health insurance company? How do you offshore

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>pet food to another country so they don't have to

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:50.479
<v Speaker 1>pay high taxes in this country. So there's a lot

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in the middle that's just this is just business work.

0:57:54.680 --> 0:57:57.840
<v Speaker 1>But it is in some instances, whether we're talking about

0:57:57.840 --> 0:58:02.160
<v Speaker 1>opioid makers, whether we're talking about turbo charging the climate

0:58:02.200 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>crisis or helping the defense industry at times when the

0:58:07.120 --> 0:58:11.439
<v Speaker 1>wars in which they are fighting are indefensible. Uh, those

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>are the topics that they should take a harder look at.

0:58:14.360 --> 0:58:17.840
<v Speaker 1>So this isn't a wholesale you know, the consulting industry

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:21.640
<v Speaker 1>is broken completely, but there are aspects that are broken

0:58:21.640 --> 0:58:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and it leads to really horrendous and dreadful second and

0:58:25.520 --> 0:58:30.120
<v Speaker 1>third order consequences. All right, my turn, from the naive

0:58:30.200 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 1>perspective of not having been in the belly of the beast,

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I I truly believe this that we are at an

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>inflection point in capitalism. And I think that the form

0:58:41.840 --> 0:58:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism that we have practiced for you know, the

0:58:44.880 --> 0:58:49.760
<v Speaker 1>last I don't know, five decades, I call predatory capitalism,

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but a gentler name for it would be shareholder capitalism.

0:58:54.200 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, this idea that the sole purpose of an

0:58:56.160 --> 0:58:59.880
<v Speaker 1>organization is to enrich shareholders. That idea needs to go.

0:59:01.120 --> 0:59:04.640
<v Speaker 1>And I believe in a new form of capitalism that's

0:59:04.680 --> 0:59:09.080
<v Speaker 1>now referred to sometimes as stakeholder capitalism, that acknowledges that,

0:59:09.200 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>instead of existing exclusively to enriched shareholders, corporations actually exist

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to serve multiple stakeholders. Their employees, other members of their

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:22.480
<v Speaker 1>supply chain, the communities that they do business in, um

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:26.560
<v Speaker 1>as well as the planet and and I. It is

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>just a fact that there is no company better position

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to lead capitalism in this direction than McKenzie. Taking an

0:59:33.640 --> 0:59:36.680
<v Speaker 1>optimistic point of view here, McKenzie has the biggest opportunity

0:59:36.720 --> 0:59:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of the firm's existence sitting right in front of it

0:59:39.640 --> 0:59:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to truly live its purpose and help all companies everywhere

0:59:43.320 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 1>see that we are, like really at a turning point

0:59:47.280 --> 0:59:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for humanity, and the challenges that corporations face today to

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:54.640
<v Speaker 1>make the changes needed to save all of us are

0:59:55.200 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>really complicated and really difficult. Take for example, s an ability.

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Just the task of remaking global supply chains to achieve

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a truly circular economy is work that no single company

1:00:09.720 --> 1:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>could possibly take on alone. No client can do that alone.

1:00:13.960 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So who would you call to do that work? Only

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a company like McKenzie could help its clients, you know,

1:00:19.600 --> 1:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>truly collaborate to take that on. And so let's imagine

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for a second world in which in which McKenzie pivots

1:00:27.280 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to taking responsibility for helping all companies everywhere actually make

1:00:31.320 --> 1:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this shift. That would be positive. It would certainly be enduring,

1:00:36.120 --> 1:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and as both of you have pointed out right in

1:00:39.240 --> 1:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the War for talent, Mackenzie would win hands down with

1:00:44.000 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that strategy. And the alternative is for Mackenzie to cynically

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>continue to mouth the words about purpose and being purpose

1:00:51.960 --> 1:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>led while just continuing business as usual, helping companies maximize

1:00:56.000 --> 1:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>short term profitability. And that's definitely not positive and I

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't think it's going to endure either. Thoughts on that, So,

1:01:05.800 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>t I appreciate the framework, and I would say you're

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you're totally right right the sort of freedmanesque neoliberal era

1:01:14.320 --> 1:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have lived through that has wrought the things

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that we see today. You know, I don't talk to

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>many people who don't think that, you know, things are

1:01:22.040 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>working really well and like, you know, stuff is awesome, everything,

1:01:26.840 --> 1:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>everything is awesome. And I don't talk to a lot

1:01:29.600 --> 1:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of people like that. I think the vast majority of

1:01:31.160 --> 1:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>people I speak to, you know, more or less understand

1:01:33.840 --> 1:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that this this sort of system of incentives is not working.

1:01:37.600 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>It leads to a lot of the externalities you've spoken

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>about in this conversation, and you know, there's an awareness

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that is changing that said, I I take issue it's

1:01:46.080 --> 1:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of adding prefixes to the word capitalism as that

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>changing sort of the core structure of how we organize

1:01:52.600 --> 1:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>our society. Right, capitalism is capitalism. It operates under a

1:01:56.560 --> 1:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>system of incentives. Until you ascribe the incentive is it

1:02:00.440 --> 1:02:04.400
<v Speaker 1>cannot function. So to me, the question is what will

1:02:04.440 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>create the structural incentives. I'll give it a specific example.

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>There's quite a lot of bluster with regards to climate

1:02:11.280 --> 1:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and sustainability. You've talked sensibly on your show about greenwashing.

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>If you take, for example, the list of entities that

1:02:17.600 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>have committed to a science based target, just count the

1:02:19.880 --> 1:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of fossil fuel companies. I think you wouldn't even

1:02:22.320 --> 1:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>get to ten. The vast pority of those companies are food,

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:30.439
<v Speaker 1>beverage and consumer companies. Why because consumers are far more

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>aware and are creating the consequence where they're desiring this change.

1:02:34.800 --> 1:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I think such consequences do not yet exist in a

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>material fashion for fossil fuel industries. If, in fact, we

1:02:41.600 --> 1:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>see the opposite. You see the Ukraine War, you see Germany,

1:02:45.160 --> 1:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that sunset, it's nuclear plants in after for Kushima now

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>repowering coal plants. You see, you know, record profits being

1:02:52.280 --> 1:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>posted by all and gas companies. In fact, I would

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>say we're going in the opposite direction. Do we really

1:02:57.440 --> 1:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>expect a private sector professional services firm to go to

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the sea levels of hydrocarbon entities and to inform them

1:03:08.000 --> 1:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that they should decarbonized when they are posting record profits?

1:03:11.600 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Do not see all the prices going down? And McKenzie

1:03:15.360 --> 1:03:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or others entities like it, you know, have the chance

1:03:18.080 --> 1:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of making exceptional amounts of feast from such work. You're saying,

1:03:22.440 --> 1:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>my ideas is naive, and I acknowledge that. However, would

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you acknowledge that if McKenzie is in the business of

1:03:31.360 --> 1:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to help actually save the oil companies and the

1:03:35.960 --> 1:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>coal companies that they are consulting for, that it would

1:03:39.840 --> 1:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>be better advice to begin a transition away from fossil

1:03:44.680 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>fuels as fast as they possibly can, because it will

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>take them a long time to get there, and we

1:03:50.760 --> 1:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have a long time. And the alternative is that

1:03:56.240 --> 1:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>government steps in and buys them, you know, essentially turns

1:04:00.040 --> 1:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>them into government utilities and then shut them down, right

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like or or do you think we're just going to

1:04:06.000 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>spin off the edge of the cliff with capitalism running

1:04:09.160 --> 1:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>at full speed? Like what what is the alternative. I

1:04:13.000 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>do believe that a combination is needed. Um. I think

1:04:16.760 --> 1:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the private sector needs to see that eventually there are

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>things that they will have to contend with. So what

1:04:24.360 --> 1:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>position would they like to be in after those consequences

1:04:27.360 --> 1:04:32.400
<v Speaker 1>have occurred, and after there is some level of accountability held,

1:04:32.480 --> 1:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what side of the house would they like to be in.

1:04:35.280 --> 1:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I am hopeful that with increased awareness there is some accountability,

1:04:39.240 --> 1:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but in my opinion that accountability is highly unlikely to

1:04:42.520 --> 1:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>come from actors at the top that profit the most

1:04:46.040 --> 1:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>from the status quo. I think that accountability is far

1:04:48.840 --> 1:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>more likely to come through the bottom, through employees sort

1:04:53.920 --> 1:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of holding their leader's accountables, through public sector entities, through states,

1:04:58.520 --> 1:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>attorneys generals hold identities they work with accountable, through regulators,

1:05:03.000 --> 1:05:06.680
<v Speaker 1>so on and so forth. I would also disagree in

1:05:06.800 --> 1:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>part with the framework that we should put the onus

1:05:09.960 --> 1:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on business to make the changes that we need in

1:05:13.240 --> 1:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the world. They're not going to. And if you think

1:05:15.920 --> 1:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>about businesses as a bell curve of adoption, where there

1:05:20.440 --> 1:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>are some the frontier, you know, five percent of the

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:27.040
<v Speaker 1>company's let's just say, you know, the Patagonias of the world,

1:05:27.280 --> 1:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they are actively making it part of their business model.

1:05:30.360 --> 1:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It's also a type of good that is very visual

1:05:34.040 --> 1:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and that people want to present to the world as

1:05:37.280 --> 1:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to signal to you that this is what

1:05:39.320 --> 1:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I care about, therefore I buy this. Now, does that

1:05:41.520 --> 1:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>same person think about the installation that's in their home?

1:05:46.200 --> 1:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, all of the other sort of hum drum

1:05:48.640 --> 1:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>goods that you're buying. Are those looked at with the

1:05:52.080 --> 1:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>same level of scrutiny and the answers not. And therefore

1:05:54.960 --> 1:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>those businesses and those industries are not incentivized to change

1:05:58.560 --> 1:06:02.800
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as those that are more susceptible to not

1:06:02.880 --> 1:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>being purchased because of the way that things are made.

1:06:06.000 --> 1:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So in the bell curve of adoption, you will get

1:06:09.160 --> 1:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the front runners who will change on their own. There

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>will be others that will, you know, receive pressure because

1:06:15.720 --> 1:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>employees won't want to work for them because they care

1:06:18.240 --> 1:06:22.160
<v Speaker 1>about these issues. But that's still probably isn't the majority,

1:06:22.200 --> 1:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>at least not now, and so if you're trying to

1:06:24.680 --> 1:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>rely on that framework to get the change that we

1:06:27.680 --> 1:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>need in the world, it's going to fail. So, I mean,

1:06:30.720 --> 1:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>my perspective is that this is not a referendum on capitalism,

1:06:35.840 --> 1:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and that McKenzie shouldn't be held up as it is

1:06:39.480 --> 1:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>good or bad, because whether or not we like Milton

1:06:42.120 --> 1:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Friedman or not, it is that capitalism today does not

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>accept and acknowledge negative externalities and those need to be

1:06:50.240 --> 1:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>priced in in order to achieve wholesale change. So that

1:06:54.000 --> 1:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>is the carbon tax. You know, businesses that operates by

1:06:59.120 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>omitting a lot of cars are been and don't want

1:07:01.120 --> 1:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to spend the capex to completely overhaul their business are

1:07:05.720 --> 1:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>not incentivized to push that. And that's exactly what Rizwan

1:07:09.080 --> 1:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>was talking about. If you get in the room with

1:07:11.000 --> 1:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>someone who is not incentivized to make that change, will

1:07:14.120 --> 1:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be very difficult to change them from the outside as

1:07:16.840 --> 1:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a third party advisor. And so I mean, the the

1:07:20.360 --> 1:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>onus I believe is uh, you know, on government to

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>change the policies. If if McKenzie was as fearful of

1:07:29.240 --> 1:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>getting sued by Maura Healey and the Massachusetts State Attorney

1:07:33.000 --> 1:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>General as they as they were from the opioid crisis

1:07:36.920 --> 1:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and paying over six million dollars for turbocharging opioid sales,

1:07:41.160 --> 1:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>if that same risk applied for climate change, they would

1:07:45.440 --> 1:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>change very quickly. So, in a long answer, the market

1:07:49.440 --> 1:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>does what the rules of the game allow them to

1:07:52.640 --> 1:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>do so. If you change the rules of the game,

1:07:56.000 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are playing in the game will also

1:07:58.200 --> 1:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>change their behaviors. There are so many things I would

1:08:01.440 --> 1:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>love to ask you and continue this conversation. Has been

1:08:05.000 --> 1:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic conversation, but I have to wrap up with

1:08:07.760 --> 1:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>one last question for both of you. Mackenzie says that

1:08:12.320 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>its purpose is to help create positive, enduring change in

1:08:16.080 --> 1:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. And we have a tool on this show

1:08:18.200 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>called the BS Index. It goes from zero to a hundred, right,

1:08:22.320 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>zero being the best, zero bs being the worst. Total BS.

1:08:27.920 --> 1:08:32.639
<v Speaker 1>What score would each of you give Mackenzie, Eric, I'm

1:08:32.640 --> 1:08:35.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask you to go first. Well, I mean, Mackenzie

1:08:35.720 --> 1:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>loves a good twenty, so I'd give them an eight

1:08:38.400 --> 1:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>on this one. And the reason I would provide a

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>score of eighty is the asymmetry of the damage. It

1:08:46.560 --> 1:08:49.519
<v Speaker 1>is again not denying that there is a tremendous amount

1:08:49.560 --> 1:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of positive good that they have done and continue to do,

1:08:54.520 --> 1:08:58.639
<v Speaker 1>but on these this particular topic where they've been serving

1:08:58.840 --> 1:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the fossil fuel industry for reported seventy years, the magnitude

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>of that damage far outweighs and outpaces the benefits that

1:09:08.280 --> 1:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are provided to your local health insurance company or another

1:09:12.040 --> 1:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>financial institution. So to say that that is long term

1:09:15.920 --> 1:09:20.479
<v Speaker 1>positive um is hard to believe. Fair enough, thank you

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>for that, Eric riz One. Well, if you read my email,

1:09:24.760 --> 1:09:27.639
<v Speaker 1>you probably know the math. It's pretty similar to Eric's

1:09:27.720 --> 1:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>with regards to emissions. It's quite simple math. The six

1:09:30.880 --> 1:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred sustainability projects that Bob coded in his Wall Street

1:09:34.320 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Journal article. If you put those on one side, and

1:09:36.240 --> 1:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the emissions they abated, and if you put the emissions

1:09:39.720 --> 1:09:42.639
<v Speaker 1>that we have served even on the same time horizon,

1:09:42.680 --> 1:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>if we were to be charitable and then put the

1:09:45.760 --> 1:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>outlook forward looking for those entities and continue to serve them.

1:09:49.360 --> 1:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And however many projects m cain see holds and sustainability,

1:09:53.080 --> 1:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I would suspect any reasonable approach, any reasonable even the

1:09:57.280 --> 1:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>most charitable one, would show you the same outcome, probably

1:10:02.439 --> 1:10:07.479
<v Speaker 1>significantly worse. So what score does that lead to in

1:10:07.520 --> 1:10:10.320
<v Speaker 1>your mind? I would love for the firm to do

1:10:10.400 --> 1:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that accounting and tell the world what the score is

1:10:12.920 --> 1:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and be honest about it here too. Here I'm unfortunately

1:10:16.080 --> 1:10:19.479
<v Speaker 1>unable to say because I know exactly what that score is, right,

1:10:19.640 --> 1:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I'm asking you for a BS score

1:10:21.960 --> 1:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>for mckensey, like how big a bullshit or is mackensey

1:10:24.760 --> 1:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>when they say that they're out to create positive, enduring

1:10:27.360 --> 1:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>change in the world. With all the due respect to

1:10:31.000 --> 1:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>my colleagues, particularly in the sustainability practice, who would like

1:10:34.080 --> 1:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>to see that, I would suspect that many of them

1:10:36.479 --> 1:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in private would agree that it's a t percent bullshit.

1:10:40.479 --> 1:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm very inspired by both of you and and I

1:10:44.160 --> 1:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>very much appreciate your coming on the show today. So

1:10:47.439 --> 1:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you both for being here. Thank you Ti, Thank

1:10:50.800 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 1>you Ty. I'd like to end the show by giving

1:10:56.560 --> 1:11:01.519
<v Speaker 1>mackenzie an official bullshit score. McKenzie is saying their purpose

1:11:01.600 --> 1:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>led and clearly are not. That's bad. They also claim

1:11:06.320 --> 1:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to be in the business of helping other companies become

1:11:09.280 --> 1:11:14.639
<v Speaker 1>purpose led. That's even worse because they're getting purpose so wrong,

1:11:15.040 --> 1:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and because if they decided to get it right, they

1:11:17.960 --> 1:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>could do so much good. I'm giving mackenzie an that's

1:11:23.640 --> 1:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the highest score we've given to date. To weigh in

1:11:27.320 --> 1:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>with your own score, visit our website Calling Bullshit podcast

1:11:31.240 --> 1:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>dot com. We'll track McKenzie's behavior over time to see

1:11:34.960 --> 1:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if they decide to bring that score down you'll also

1:11:38.400 --> 1:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to see where Mackensey ranks on BS compared

1:11:41.320 --> 1:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to the other companies and organizations we featured on the

1:11:44.280 --> 1:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>show and to global managing partner Bob Sternfeld's if you

1:11:49.040 --> 1:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>heard anything on this episode that you'd like to discuss further,

1:11:52.360 --> 1:12:00.519
<v Speaker 1>you have an open invitation if you are starting a

1:12:00.560 --> 1:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>purpose led business or thinking of beginning the journey of

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>transformation to become one. Here are three things that you

1:12:07.080 --> 1:12:13.519
<v Speaker 1>can take away from this episode. One, purpose matters. It's

1:12:13.560 --> 1:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>not marketing, it's not fluff. It's not a cynical way

1:12:16.840 --> 1:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to trick young people into joining your business. Purpose is

1:12:20.760 --> 1:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>a key ingredient in driving a transition to a new

1:12:23.840 --> 1:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>and more sustainable global economy. It honestly hurts my heart

1:12:28.640 --> 1:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that a company like Mackenzie is using the term so cynically.

1:12:32.520 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Do not emulate them. Two, A principle isn't a principle

1:12:38.760 --> 1:12:42.519
<v Speaker 1>until it costs you money, and being purpose led means

1:12:42.520 --> 1:12:45.599
<v Speaker 1>you don't take money if it doesn't align with your purpose.

1:12:46.200 --> 1:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie has not gotten that memo, have you? And Three

1:12:52.960 --> 1:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>yeah worth repeating, don't talk it until you're willing to

1:12:56.800 --> 1:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>walk it. This is literally why we started this show

1:13:00.760 --> 1:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>saying it is so much easier than doing it, but

1:13:04.200 --> 1:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>saying it and not doing it is toxic to your

1:13:07.160 --> 1:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>business and to the world. Don't do it. If this

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>episode inspired you to create positive, lasting change in the world,

1:13:20.280 --> 1:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Calling Bullshit Podcast on the I Heart

1:13:23.439 --> 1:13:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to people

1:13:27.200 --> 1:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>speak into your ears and friends. I'd like to ask

1:13:30.680 --> 1:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for your help. If you enjoy the Calling Bullshit Podcast,

1:13:34.120 --> 1:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>please take a second to rate us on Apple Podcasts

1:13:37.320 --> 1:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or on your preferred platform. It helps more people find

1:13:40.920 --> 1:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the show and thanks to our guests today New York

1:13:45.120 --> 1:13:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Times journalist and co author of the new book When

1:13:47.600 --> 1:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>McKinsey Comes to Town, Mike Forsyth, and former McKinsey consultants

1:13:52.520 --> 1:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Rizwan Navid and Eric Edstrom. Learn more about them and

1:13:56.880 --> 1:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>get links to their work in our show notes or

1:13:59.400 --> 1:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>at our webs right Calling Bullshit Podcast dot com. And

1:14:03.960 --> 1:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>thanks to our production team Hannah Beale, Amanda Ginsburg, d

1:14:08.800 --> 1:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>s Moss Hailey, Pascalites, and Parker Silzer. Calling Bullshit was

1:14:14.880 --> 1:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>created by co Collective and it's hosted by me Ti

1:14:18.000 --> 1:14:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Mounting You. Thanks for listening