WEBVTT - Here's Second Covid Wave We Hoped We Wouldn't See: JHU's Sauer

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, A, market pros, and

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news. Kind the

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts, and on Bloomberg dot com. Let's get straight

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to Lauren sour Johns Hopkins University System, Professor of Emergency Medicine.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>We're getting the numbers out of you know, you're right now,

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Italy recording a record new daily coronavirus cases of just

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>more than ten thousand, ten thousand and ten people in Italy.

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>On Thursday it was just eight thousand, eight hundred. We

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>have England, you know, fighting in terms of Boris Johnson

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>telling some of the districts to shut themselves down, places

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 1>like Manchester, you know, really reacting to this. So it's

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it's causing a lot of trouble around the world again, Lauren,

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>how much worse is this going to get? Once again?

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't think we know, but I think

0:00:57.320 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>all of the signals are indicating that we need to

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for it to be bad again. Um, even

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in places that we thought we had sort of passed

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the peak. I think a lot of us are starting

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to think that this is the second wave that we've

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>been hoping we didn't see, UM, and that some people

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>have dismissed as not coming, especially because it's aligning with

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>respiratory viruses and more generally so UM, making sure that

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have a sense of what cases are COVID cases,

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>what cases are flu and RSV cases, and really being

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>able to manage those patients appropriately. I think we're going

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to continue to see the numbers take up across the globe. Yeah,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and you have to worry about hospitals once again, you

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about senior homes and so on. Boris

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Johnson just saying about an hour ago that he doesn't

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>want new national virus lockdowns, and and there's many countries

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that don't. But you do see the likes of France

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>imposing curfews and the likes of Ireland saying that you

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>can't gather in people's homes anymore. Um. Is that what

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take? More complete shutdowns? Yeah? I mean

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone wants to see these lockdowns. I

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think that they are really challenging to implement and enforce

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and have can have you know, dramatic impacts on people,

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and particularly on the mental health space, and and the

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>idea that they impact the our ability to get people

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>back into schools, back into jobs, back into the economy. Um.

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But we did see the efficacy of these control measures

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>early in the pandemic, um, you know, and in the

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.920
<v Speaker 1>spring and summer, So they shouldn't be discounted for sure.

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>And while I'm sure they'll be applied regionally based on

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the way cases are moving, Um, they we definitely can't

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>discount them as a control measure at this point, Lauren.

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, after the President got sick and sort of

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically went on national television and radio for

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of four days straight and then appeared at a

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, a town hall last night and seemed to

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>be in good condition. Does it mean that therapeutics have

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>got that good that you could go immediately to hospital

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you feel symptoms and get these steroids

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.839
<v Speaker 1>and these drugs and be fine four days if you're

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the people that receives the virus in this

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>for a fairly generic way. Yeah, I don't think that

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that's what it means at all. In fact, I think

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>that the president received exceptional care as the president of

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and I think his case actually highlights,

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>UM the disparities of care across the nation, across our nation,

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and across the globe. UM that that many people who

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>had been infected with with oars kobe to like him, UM,

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.679
<v Speaker 1>but who are not the President, who don't, who won't

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>receive these exceptional standards of care, UM did not do

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>as well and continue to not do as well. And

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we still see people dying across the globe every day

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>because UM, they don't have this access to care and

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't have this exceptional management. But also because it

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>may be, you know, a one off case. We can't

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>learn anything from a single case. You know, there's so

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>many confounding variables in what happened to him and his

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>course of treatment and how his case was managed that

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to infer that it's specific to one

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>rug or one experimental therapeutic or one type one element

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of his care. UM, all those things combined probably created

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>an environment in which he UM received the best you know,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>had the best possible outcome. Anyone of his stats could

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 1>have expected. Yeah, and I think that bear is repeating.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>And Chris Christie spent a week in the hospital, for example,

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>he also got all sorts of drugs that you know,

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't know about. Possibly not as well cared for

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as the president, but probably very very closely, you know,

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the standard. But if you look at

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>England right now, we just heard that four thousand, six

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty seven people were hospitalized and new virus deaths

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>were up by one thirty six the day before. So

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>people are still dying daily from this virus. I think

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be underlined constantly. Is there any reduction

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in the fatality rate in terms of who's getting it? Yeah, UM,

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak to the actually like the specific numbers.

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of people working on understanding

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how we manage these patients and if mortality is decreasing. Um.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen the you know, the latest data on that,

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>but I can say that I think we're getting better

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>at managing, UM, how how we manage, how we ventilate,

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>how we take care of these patients and so um,

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we are able to get patients out of

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the hospital faster, which is always better. For people. UM,

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>we're able to keep people off mechanical ventilation, which demonstrates

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 1>that we're managing their respirations better. So we're learning a

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>lot more about the patients and how to manage um

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>these respiratory effects and that that always will lead to

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>improved outcomes. If you can keep people off mechanical ventilation,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's always better to keep people from

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>being intubated. So I think we are getting better at

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>caring for COVID nineteen patients. UM. I don't know if

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>we if we can say that we've reduced mortality yet. Um,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>but we ventilate less and we um and we get

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>people out of the hospital quicker, Lauren. Really just time

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>for yes or no answer. But at the beginning, people

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>were discouraged from going to hospital until they really felt

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like it was life and death. Now it seems like

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 1>people are being encouraged to go immediately. What's your advice,

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I would say, get tested. That's step one. So get tested. UM,

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you know your status, and if you're feeling unwell, then

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's time to call your doctor or go to the hospital.

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have a primary care doctor. Laurence, thank you.

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 1>We put you on the spot all the time to

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>try and give us answers. And we're fully aware that

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you all are learning about this day by day as well,

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and we appreciate that you keep up with all of

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the everything that's going on. Lauren sour Johns Hopkins University,

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, delighted to welcome kids Juke's

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 1>chief Global effects strategist for Associated General and so much more.

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's just the beginning of what he does

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for Associate A General Kit. Let's get straight into it.

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>The e C. S vonder Lyon is sending a team

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>to London next week to intensify talks. Why why is

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the European Union being so nice if you like, to

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Britain when Boris Johnson gave himself a self imposed deadline

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of yesterday, um I look, I think in the end

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's in the interest of both parties to get a deal,

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>at least a deal, not to add further disruptions to

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:25.239
<v Speaker 1>their economies. Remember, you know, these are big trading partners

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for the EU as a whole. The UK is about

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>number three or number two you know out there in

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of number three in terms of overall trade, So

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not negligible even for them. It's a

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>bigger relationship the other way around by without any doubt

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. But so they have an interest in getting

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>something over the line. You wouldn't want the negative hit

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>from a freeze on trade or a real major disruption

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>on trade between the UK and the EU to happen

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of a pandemic. He wouldn't want to happen, ever,

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>But it would be really dumb not to be able

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to get something cobbled together in the middle of a pandemic. Um,

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So I suspect that the EU will feel that they

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>have to keep on coming at it and going at it.

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>In my fifth suspect, but for all the rhetoric that

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the UK will have to stay at it as well, um,

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>trying as hard as it knows how to try to

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>make sure it gets you know, a better deal than

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the one that thinks it is inadequate. But but you know,

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's easy to make a mess of this from here. Yeah, no, absolutely,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure I hear what you're saying. But if

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Europe has already announced to it's sending a team next week,

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>then what's the incentive for Boris Johnson to back down

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on anything or to reach some kind of compromise on

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>anything before the weekend. I mean you say in your

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>note that you say it seems unlikely the UK side

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>will walk away. I guess that's something, But it also

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>means that the UK doesn't really need to come up

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>with some kind of solution. Well the UK, you know,

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean sort of. The facts are still that the

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>UK has more to lose economically, um, and perhaps has

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, look the more difficult job given the starting

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>point politically, that that the UK government may have a

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>trickier task in terms of selling failure to negotiate something

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>sensible to its own supporters. But um, you so the

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>UK needs to save face. But the UK also needs

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to limit the economic damage because there's there's no getting

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>away from fact that is that is bigger here. In

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that sense, the UK it still doesn't want to just

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>walk away, but it does want the European side to

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>understand we could. Um, the rest of us are looking

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there saying can you please all get you know, at

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>least something that avoids this cliff edge disaster in the

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>first quarter of next year. Little send the economy you know,

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>straight back into a deep recession again at exactly the

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>wrong time. Um, and and maybe that's still possible. I mean,

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say my my central assumption is that you know,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>at this point they're going to make a mess of it.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, at least, you know, while they

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:56.319
<v Speaker 1>still talk, maybe maybe sense prevails somehow. Yeah, Ki explained

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to us why Europe is not happy and why Britain

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is not happy. So on fisheries, for example, it's just

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>one one example, but there's also that have a playing field.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>There's also other items on the agenda, and Europe wants

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that the UK doesn't leave clauses open

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>such that it can decide on subsidies in the future

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>without Europe's input. I mean that seems reasonable now, Yeah,

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So the I mean, I think this is the nature

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of of all trade deals is they're very complicated in

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of people looking forward and trying to prevent someone

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>being able to cheat in the future. And part of

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the issue is that after you know, forty five years

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of a free trade area, neither side is very good

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>at working out how you untangle it. Equally, the purpose,

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>if you like, politically, was to be able to walk

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>away from the EU from the UK government's perspective, and

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not going to interfere in our domestic business,

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so they feel bound to that statement, whereas in practice

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>any trade deal involves a compromise on exactly that. Um.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So again, you know, they have to find the way

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to swallow some pride but get most of what they

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>want on both sides. And you know it's whether they

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>have the political will to manage that. And of course

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>all this is going on as lockdowns continue to increase

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in severity across Europe and in Britain as well, the

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>House gatherings even in barred in London at the moment,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and in other areas obviously across England. Kit what happens

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>to Sterling and the euro and this environment, and does

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>some of this depend on the dollar and what happens

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with general election here? Um it almost everything depends on

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>what happens with the dollar as well. But look, I

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>think the market I mean the last you know, I

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>threw out a Twitter pole lunchtime today when when Boris

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Johnson made his comments and about sixty four think no

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>deal is likely. So the market has something priced in

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for no deal. But if you if you do get

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a walk away, UM, I think we'll see, certainly we'll see, certainly, sir,

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Sterling lose UM five percent or so and more probably

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>between five and ten percent against the euro, and the

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>euro would lose something against the dollar as well, So

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>O cable on that basis if we just walk away

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>will be the wrong side of UM pretty quickly. I

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's you know, Sterling is so beaten up

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and historically so weak at these levels in trade weighted

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>terms that I don't think it's it's it's going to

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>send it dramatically further than that. I do think that

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the worst story will be, you know, we're we're likely

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to end up in a bad environment with negative rates

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>sometime next year of the Bank eng and feels they

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>need to do something that's not good for the currency.

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And we are likely to be the worst performer in

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of global growth of certainly of the kind of

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the G ten countries on the on the average growth

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of one and there's nothing, there's nothing terribly encouraging in that. Frankly, well,

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to watch the headlines as they come out. Again,

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still Friday, so something might still happen. Before the

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>weekend or into next week. Kid, thank you so much

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>for joining us this afternoon, London in time, Kitch you

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>associated general now very happy to welcome Meshu, senior editor

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>at the National Review and for Spoomberg opinion columnist. Mesh

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you, obviously about the Scotus hearings

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this week, but first we have to have to mention

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the dueling town halls last night. I wonder if you're

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>watching them in split screen and you know what your

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>lasting impressions were. Well, I preferred to go to the

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>transcript rather than watch it um to to compress the

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>time commitment. And I think we got a pretty good

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>picture of both of these men and what they're like.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 1>The voters were able to assess, for example, whether the

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>story of cognitive decline that President Trump has been telling

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.719
<v Speaker 1>about Joe Biden UH is accurate or whether it's overdrawn.

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>And I think that people could get a good perspective

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>on that. And with Trump, we've all seen a lot

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of Trump philosophy years and he was the same as

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>as usual. There was there and you know, and that

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 1>includes the combativeness, it includes the conspiracy theories UM and UH,

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and and it includes the uh, the kind of uh

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>rambling and disconnected sentences that we've come to expect, and frankly,

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>we get a little bit from both of these candidates

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole Q and on stuff. Does he not know

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>what it is? Is he lying to the public when

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>he says he doesn't know what it is, except that

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>he knows they battled pedophilia and are very against it,

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>as if anyone in the world isn't. Well, you know,

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point you have to say, given that

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>this has come up so frequently, um, maybe it's time

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>he learned something about it. You know. The the explanation

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that he gives is not an excuse. And when you, um,

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>say you don't know something about it, you don't then

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>follow it up with praise, which is what he has done. Um.

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's entirely possible that he is ignorant

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. But you know, I think at this point

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's part of his job not to be All right,

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>let's move to the course, because it's been a very

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>very interesting week in terms of Scota's hearings, but also

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Democrats will want to maybe make changes

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court if in fact it becomes more

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>plausible for the Democrats to do so. First of all,

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>on the hearings, Judge Amy Coney Barrs is all butt

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in at this point, did you learn anything that you

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't already know about this candidate for the Supreme Court? Well,

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, these hearings are not designed to shed a

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>ton of light on the judicial philosophy of the nominees.

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So uh so I can't say that I learned a

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>lot in that respect. Um, I did get a good

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>picture of somebody who is extraordin nearly adept, who was

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>who was pretty quick on her feet, uh and extremely

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable about Supreme Court case law, doctrines and so forth.

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>This is what we'd expected, um. But but she was

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>able to hold her own him, Etcender Feinstein, after asking

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>her some tough questions about the Affordable Care Act, for example,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>pronounced herself impressed by Barrett's answers. Yes. And you have

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a great column out on this, Judge Barrett's best ally

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>as Ruth Bader Ginsburg, And you point to the fact

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that not answering questions is a bipartisan tradition. But of

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>course senators are always within their rights to try and

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>change it, or try and you know, at least pressure

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the potential justice and see how they perform under pressure.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It is, you know, one of the last times you'll

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>hear from them publicly speaking like that, except the special

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>events and so on. Biden said last night that the

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 1>public with no around election time what the Democrats plan is.

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>If they do have a chance to impact the court

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>strategy around the country, what do you imagine the Democrats

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>will come up with? Is an injustices really something that

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>the public will want? So I think Biden has twisted

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>himself and not a little bit on this question. So

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>last night he said that voters deserved to have his

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>answer to it before they voted before election day. But

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of course people are already voting, and Vice President Biden

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly knows this. Uh So there's no real good justification

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>for waiting except to wait and see what the political

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>winds um deliver. I think that there's gonna be a

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of interest on the part of the left wing

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Democratic Party and expanding the Supreme Court and

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>getting more reliable liberals on the bench if they're in

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a position to do that. That is, if Biden wins,

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and if the Democrats have the Senate UM so far

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that has been an unpopular position in the polls. There's

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty long historical tradition of rejecting that kind of gift.

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>But Franklin Roosevelt failed at this in the nineteen thirties

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>after an election where he won forty forty eight states

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and his party had three quarters of the votes in

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the House and the Senate actually more. Um So, it's

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>historically been a pretty fringe idea in a way it's

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>been it's been an extreme and unpopular one. Uh So,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>we'll see whether Biden really decides that he wants to

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>lead off his first year in office, assuming he wins

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with such an idea. Remess, I can't let you go

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>without asking you a little bit about what you're making

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>off some of the Senate races around the country. I mean,

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're watching the Lindsay Graham, you know, very closely

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that race. But also there was a very sort of

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>odd and almost funny exchange between Mark Crk and Tommy

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>duck Worth for the Illinois seat. What's standing out to

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you and what are you most keeping an eye on? Well,

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that we're at a moment air. These Senate

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>races have very little independence from the presidential race, and

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the way people vote for the president is likely to

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>be the way they vote for the Senate as well.

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think that a lot of Republican Senate candidates

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of states are looking at how the

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 1>president's doing and uh and getting pretty nervous right now. Yeah,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And of course I mean that duck Worth Kirk thing

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>coming up again sort of this cycle, because we're seeing

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that around the country. And then finally,

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you know Ben sass comments about Trump and what they

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>said about the GOP and the election outlook. Did did

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>did that mean anything to you? Does it have any

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of wider implication or is it just the type

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>of chatter that's happening, you know, and say Lincoln projects circles. Well,

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I am sure that Senator Staff was accurately relating his sentiments.

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that he felt kind of buttoned up and

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>unable to express those kinds of view when he was

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 1>facing the prospect of a Republican primary in Nebraska and

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to spend pro Trump voters. That once he

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>won that primary, I think he's felt more liberated to

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 1>express his views. Remesh, thank you, throwing a lot of

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>topics that you want to get all of your opinions

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and your intelligence as we really head to the last

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks in this cycle. It's it's a fascinating

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>one and each time every four years there's always something

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>new that really makes us glued to our media entrepreneurs

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with the National Review and of course at Bloomberg Opinion columnist,

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us on this Friday. Now another

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>major story of the day, and for that return to

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:48.199
<v Speaker 1>George Ferguson of Bloomberg Intelligence. The Boeing Max has been

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>judged safe to fly by Europe's aviation regulator. This is

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a serious, serious decision. It's been in the wings, no

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>pun intended for a long long time, but it does

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like it might be a bit of a strange time

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to give Boeing the go ahead when account really put

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Max is in the air. Anyway, George, come on in

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and talk to us about this. What are your thoughts

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 1>on the timing of this good morning it Yes, so

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>our thoughts are that we actually thought the European regulator

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>would come in after the US regulator approved the airplane

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to fly again. But look, I think it's all fine.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it all of the information we're getting out

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of the f a A is that they're very happy

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>with the process so far. There's a couple more there's

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>a couple more parts of the process. The f a

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>has two complete order to reauthorize the MAX to fly.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's a it's a nice endorsement for

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the airplane that the Europeans feel it's safe enough to

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>fly in their airspace. It looks to us, like you know,

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.159
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year, early next year, the

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>MAX will be clear to fly in two of its

0:21:55.840 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>most important markets, Europe and the US. And so I

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>think if you're bowing, this is great news, and we're

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing it in the share place right now. Yeah, you

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder about orders though, and how much they'll

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>come back given the environment that we're in with pandemic

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and so on. George, we know that there were some

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>some bumps along the way, if you like, and there

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>were some setbacks, software setbacks and so on. Can we

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fully trust both regulators that they've seen everything, that they

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>followed all the processes, and when we do finally hear

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>from the f a A that the MAX is just

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely pristine and in great condition. I do think that

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the airplane has been poured over extensively, and so um,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's no such thing as any

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>airplane being pristine, and that may may concerned some of

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>your some of your listeners, but look, I think it's

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>as looked over as any airplane has been in modern history.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think you know, Bowing has been addressing the problems. Again,

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.199
<v Speaker 1>the regulators sound comfortable with it. Um. The airplane, I

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>think had some challenge leunges with the MCAST system, which

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't follow procedures correctly, you know, led to

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the crash of the airplane. But I think the airplane

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>still fundamentally is is a good airplane and these are

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>indicators that they fixed that problem with the with the

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>automated flight systems. Where will the max be flying if

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it is indeed in the air by the end of

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the year or early next year, who or what will

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>it be flying? And how will order is rebound? Yeah,

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>so flying the airplane is gonna take a little bit

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of time here, right once you get the new requirements

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>on flight training, which the f A has out for

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>commentary right now, you know, once once that's approved, the

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>airlines that fly the airplane no big operators are our Southwest.

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna need They've already said they're gonna need a

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of months to sort of get all their pilots

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>trained and flying the airplane again. Um. You know, I

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.920
<v Speaker 1>think we heard yesterday from the United the airplane is

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not even on the schedule through the end of the year,

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be into next year before you

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>really see it flown inside. You'll see it flown at again,

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>United American Southwest, the big customers and Ryanair um orders. Yeah,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a really rough year for order.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not even we're more worried about how much of

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the backlog goes away than we are how many new

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>orders come in the books. And some of the backlog

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>has gone away because Boeing has been so long in

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>fixing the problems of the Max. After you get past

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a year, adverse clauses set in on sales contracts and

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>allows your customer to cancel the order. So we're more

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>watching that. It was a really large order book for

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the airplane, you know, six or seven years large. We

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably dwindled and with the airlines that probably

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>want deferrals, probably you know, there's probably not many airlines

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that want airplanes next year. It's gonna be a challenging

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>year to get deliveries out. George, Thank you so much.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>George always keeping us honest on airline news. That's George

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Ferguson of BI. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio