WEBVTT - Body Language!

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Square Space. Start

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>building your website today at square space dot com. Ter

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Offera code stuff at checkout and you'll get ten percent

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>off square Space. Build it beautiful. Hey, guys, we are

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be live in person, not just disembodied voices,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but just standing there, hair and all clothes on most

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>likely probably yes, from the waist down at least. Right

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>we're like reverse Donald Ducks. Yeah, are we going topless?

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll never forget. He just wore a shirt

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't have on pants. Wow. Anyway, we're doing

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a live show, that's right. We're doing several live shows

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for our Warmer Climbs Winter tour, and uh we're sold

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>out in San Francisco, San Diego, and Austin. So you

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>guys are on our Christmas list for next year. You are,

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>but there are still tickets available in Dallas and um

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta on a different list, Boom and Birmingham and Birmingham

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and New Orleans. You can see that there. Man, We're

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>all over the map, that's right. So just go to

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 1>s y s K live dot com powered by square Space,

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>as is our tour. Yes, and uh go check it out, man,

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see in January. Right, yes, you got any other tidbits? No? Okay,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>welcome to you stuff you should know from House stuff

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh Clark. It's Charles W. Chuck Bryant. Cherry's in the house.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>We're back to basics. Yeah, we're doing a social sciences episode. Man,

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're all right, man, we get to tear

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it apart. You you believe in body language? Sure, watch this.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>You're winking and shouldering and nodding your head and you're

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>loosening up and you're doing some weird biting thing. What

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>did I say? You said, I'm feeling silly. It's exactly

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>what it is. How about that? Yeah? It said I've

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>had a diet mountain dew and I'm pepped up. Okay,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was saying. Now I'm crashing and he's down.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you doing good? Yeah? I'm hanging on by a thread.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure we can make it through this? Man?

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You you can do this in your sleep? Okay, don't

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>go to sleep. Okay, it would be so boring. You

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>could theoretically do this in your sleep. Yeah, okay, I

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>got you. Yeah, um, so body language it is a thing.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>When I was researching, I was like, this is junk science.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>There's no way this is real. And I could not

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.919
<v Speaker 1>find anything that just said like, yes, body language is

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously junk science. Apparently it's very well established and well reputed.

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I understand, like, like, yes, there is such

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>thing as body language included in the evolution. It's basically

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>evidence of evolution from an animalian ancestor. But the idea

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that like you can read somebody, especially like that facial

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.359
<v Speaker 1>coding system, it just struck me as really like junkie. Yeah,

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>well we did Um I could have sworn we had

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>done this one when I did. Yeah, we did that,

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think two thousand nine, and I don't remember

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>how I weighed in on it back then. So I'm

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 1>just gonna start a new and maybe it may be

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a different take. I have no idea. People grow and

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>change their opinions evolve, you know. Well here's what I think.

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, body language is real and it can tell

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you a lot. I can tell you a lot, but

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it can also miss you can be misdirected very easily.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I mean we'll get to it. But I

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>found some stuff from a former FBI guy. Even uh,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't say it's junk science, but he's like, you

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>can fool somebody to if you're a sociopath. You know

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this about body language of expressions. Apparently it's a myth that,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>uh that's how I get by. Apparently it's a myth

0:03:54.680 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that uh ikon or not having eye contact means deception. Um,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>while it can. His whole point is they've done studies

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>over the years and habitual liars, h and anti socials

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in psychopaths have the most eye contact probably because there's

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that myth exactly. So it's like a self fulfilling myth. Yeah,

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Ted Bundy was probably like, I gotta make great contact

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with everyone into otherwise the jig will be up and

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I won't get to kill people any longer, my favorite thing.

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>And then so, yeah, there's a lot of myth. There's that.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>There's that one myth also where like you look up

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>into the right or up into the left of your

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 1>lying or recalling Yeah, I can't remember, we don't. We

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>debunked that and something here they're a while back. Yeah,

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I think body language is fun to talk

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about and study, but when you're convicting someone and as

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a jury based on micro expression. Yes, there's where the

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>junk science comes in from me, it gets a little dangerous,

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and not just with body language. Who we need to

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>do a whole episode on forensics in general and just

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>how junkie the science that most of it is based on.

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>It's basically the only thing that's that's less standing is

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.799
<v Speaker 1>d n A and even that can be wildly misinterpreted.

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And we're using this to like execute people, and there's

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a big problem with it. So I think we've arrived

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>at my problem with it. It's junk science when you

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>apply it for like law enforcement. Yeah as fact, Yeah, agreed, Okay,

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>So can we be done. This is the other thing

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that got me to um Albert uh Mehrabian. I totally

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>nailed that guy's name. I bet the h is silent

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Arabian Arabian. I bet it's just Arabian, not Arabian anyway.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh Dr Arabian back in said that in the first

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>four minutes of meeting someone, our facial expressions account for

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the impression we make. Seven percent of that impression comes

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>from our actual words, while the remainder of the information

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>from a tone of voice. Yeah, he does think is

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what made me think like, no, this is all Yes, Yeah,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.559
<v Speaker 1>because it sounds who can who can say that? You can't?

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe one you could get away with that crap not

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in two tho you lived in the past. Uh. Yeah,

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Morabian was he's He was probably one of the first

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>researchers to study this in the nineteen forties out of U. C.

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.119
<v Speaker 1>L A and UM. I agree, you can't just break

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>down percentages. I think what he really means to say,

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>if I may speak for him, is facial expressions in

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>tone of voice account for a lot of a lot

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of what you're getting out of a person. And I

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone would disagree with that. And the words

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>account maybe for even less than those two things combined.

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I think people would agree with that too. I think

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's when you quantify it seven. He just said that

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>just because it sounds authoritative. Yeah, because he like he

0:06:55.240 --> 0:07:00.039
<v Speaker 1>fed it into the percentage three maker three thousand and

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and it spit it out. Uh. But that is not

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to miss the point that communicating UM inadvertently is something

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.559
<v Speaker 1>that we all do through body lane. Sure. Yeah, there's

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a there's a great quote I ran across on a

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>psychology today post um it was. The quote comes from

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a sixteenth century Scottish mathematician named John Napier, and he said,

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>if language was given to men to conceal there, oh

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you found it too. Hunh. It's about as good a

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>quote of body language as you can come up with.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You do it, chuck now you you already do better.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Sixteenth century Scottish do Sean Connery reading this, man, if

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>language was given to men and shield their faults, then

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>gestures pish was to disclose them. That's perfect, it's not bad.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>That was dead on John Napier. It's not as good

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as my crystal fault. So Napier makes a pretty good point, like, yeah,

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you can. Language has all sorts of str sure and

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>can be mastered body languages. Much of it is is

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 1>just inadvertent and we don't even realize necessarily when you're

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>picking up on it. You just get this weird gut

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>feeling that uh no, I don't trust this car salesman,

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>or I want to give this car salesman all my

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>money depending on the body language. Yeah, and um, it's

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear that this started a long time ago, like

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it predates language because who wrote this By the way,

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a Patrick Kaiger joint. Oh kaigeru Kaiger says

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>um rightfully that it took took's age. You didn't have

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time to suss things out, like up

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>close and personal. You know, once you got close enough

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>within striking distance, you can be stricken. Yeah, you might

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>already have that club upside your head or that rock

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in your face. Yeah, so you needed to judge someone's

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>body language as they approach you to survive. Yes, you

0:08:57.280 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>know so, so body language makes sense. And you would

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>also presuppose that since we are descended from animals and

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>animals clearly do engage in body language. Um, that body

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>language would be older than language, although this this article

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>says that language didn't exist until about a hundred thousand

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago, so it's under dispute. Possibly as much as

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a million years ago, people were using some sort of

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 1>verbal communication. Yeah, and Neanderthals apparently also head language. Probably interesting,

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It is pretty interesting. I'd like to do one on

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>um animal communication, have we not? I think we touched

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on it here and there, But I know there's a

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of things like cats purring and tails wagging on

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>dogs that are misinterpreted. Um. Or like a wolf growling.

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that means compet me. You know, it's often

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>misinterpreted as a warning, Come take this stink out of

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>my mouth if you dare. Uh should we take a break?

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a quick one, and we're gonna

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>get back and explain a little bit more about what

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>one researcher calls thin slices of experience. So Josha said

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>something about thin slices of experience, And I'm not talking

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about the uh the roast beef line at the buffet,

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>which is great, thin slices. The carving station? Yeah? Yeah,

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Have you ever worked at carving station? Have I ever

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>worked one? Yeah? I've hung around one long enough that

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I basically should have been paid, But I was just eating.

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you wait for the next uh roast to

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>come out so you can get the incut? I know,

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I've never been into and cuts, whether it be a

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>loaf of bread or cut of meat. Oh really like

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a prime rib in cut? Yeah? No, daddy, that's good.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it all salt? Maybe that's why I love it?

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>You like the salt? Yeah? Yeah. To me, it's like

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the closer you get to the middle, the juicy here it, yeah,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and a little a little rarer in the middle obviously. Yeah.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's my problem with the end of anything.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It's undercooked. You know about White people don't like to

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>eat the crust because it's called crust, And that might

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>be part of it. If like a hundred years ago

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>they named it like the butterfly Yeah, the butterfly slice,

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>people would have been like fighting for it, like the

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 1>butterfly slice is delicious. Yeah. Have you ever heard George

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Carlin's little take on that end slice that everybody always

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>goes past. They're like, I'm not gonna eat that. That's

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the poison piece of bread. I'll leave that for my

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>family to eat. Wait, I guess the NPS didn't called

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the crust, so is it. The crust is what's around.

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>But it's all crust. That's the problem with you know

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, it's nothing but crust. Yeah, not butt crust,

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing but crust. I think the other weird man,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a jerus, This is a strange tangent um.

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the other problem with the bread end pieces

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>is that eating one end piece with a regular slice

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is a little weird, but getting that other slice off

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the tail end is not very feasible or efficient to

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>make two crust pieces. No, but that frequently is the

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>last sandwich that's made out of the loaf because that

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>one end piece has been hanging around. And then I

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>finally mate, yeah, and then you stick some turkey in

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it and weep quietly while you eat your terrible sandwich. Man,

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>thin slices. Where were we experience? Yes, this is a

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>professor of psychology name uh Nalini Embody and Batty from

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Toughs University. Shout out to my buddy Robert Shahade from

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>high school. He works at tough Speaking of you know,

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a kid with like a really huge hit single

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out right now from your high school. Really, I think

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>your high school is shown in the music video. It's

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>um watching Me whip watch Men. It's reed in weird silento.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm no longer the most famous person from high school.

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You were until about it six months ago, and I

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.599
<v Speaker 1>will be again in another six months. Maybe it's a

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty catchy single. It's a hot, hot, hot track. Now.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>We actually we had several professional athletes that are much

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>more popular than me. We had a professional punter actually

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe before Yeah, we haven't. We've had a few. There's

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a baseball player, uh in, a puncher. Travis Tritt went

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to my high school. Shut up really, see that's a

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>big nimee, Travis. Yeah, I don't have any like superstars.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Luke Brian went to UMIs High School. Man, you guys,

0:13:54.320 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>where'd you go Beverly Hills to uh? Oh boy, here

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we go again. Thin slices from tough University. Well, let's

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the thin slices thing, man, um the

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:14.439
<v Speaker 1>you said earlier that it would be very advantageous evolutionarily speaking,

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to be able to read maybe the rough intentions of

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some other hunter gatherer a hundred thousand years ago, read

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the room like from a distance before they could hit

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you with a rock, right, if that was their intent. Well,

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>just as much you want to be able to like

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>walk through the world and be threatened by stuff and

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to make snap judgments about it based on things like

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>body language. Same thing, and this this is what the

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>thin slices has to do with. Yeah, they're just those

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>first few seconds when you meet somebody. And I mean

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some people may just call it a gut instinct about somebody,

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but what you're probably doing is reading body language. That's

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>what that gut instinct is. Yes, and those things are

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>processed and generated. And I think the Olympic system where

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>emotions and feelings are processed in the brain. Yeah, Olympics system.

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>From what I understand, that's right, which um, she thinks

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with her. That might explain why we

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>have such uh, such like a powerful gut instinct about

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>some people when we first meet them, because it's tied

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to emotion. Yeah. And the whole point is is, uh,

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this guy will cut your throat if you turn your

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>back on him. Right, Probably not, but in our modern

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>context it's you know, this guy will inflate the price

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of the car you want to buy if you if

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not careful. It's it's this totally different things, but

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it's based on the same principle. It's all based on

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>body language, and we're able to make snap judgments that

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>we can't even stop and really analyze what it was

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that person did or what it was about him. We

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>just know that we trust him or don't, or we

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable aroun him or not, we fear them or

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't, based on this body language. And what this

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>professor is saying is we have a very ancient part

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of our brain that that is responsible for processing this stuff. Yeah,

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think, um, just for me personally, I think

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>if you try to focus on that too much, then

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not doing yourselves any favors. Like let it be anate. Well, yeah,

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some people who coach this kind of stuff that

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>apparently say no do all sorts of crazy weird stuff,

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>which we'll talk about later. Yeah, I agreed. But what

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at, um are There's three different categories I

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>guess um innate learned and some that are both hybrid. Uh,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>expressions and postures and things that you do and like,

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance, you're born with. Like you can blush, that's

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>an innate thing. You blush. You don't mean to blush,

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>especially when somebody's staring at your cheek. Yeah. I don't

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>think you can make yourself blush. Watch this, So just

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:55.479
<v Speaker 1>think about hot things in your mouth, tighten up your core. Uh.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's the innate side. Learned would be things like um,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>hanging someone the bird, Yeah, out the car window, because

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows what that means. You're depending on where you

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>are and you've learned it. Yeah, that's not something you're

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 1>born doing like, yeah, I got your typer right here

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to a photo of a baby accidentally shooting a bird

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of the great things can we agree? But

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>it's accidental, there's no meaning attached to it. That's what

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>you think. Um. And then there's hybrid hybrid gestures that

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>are like, um, shrugging is a really good example. It's

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>something you know you naturally shrug right, right, but it's

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not contextual until you learn what to attach attach

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>it to, Like I don't know, you're not born being

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like right or you or you you cry, but you've

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>also learned that crying can uh get you something maybe right,

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>or to get out of a traffic ticket or something sympathy.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>It can chase your parents off to the bar. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one of those. Um. And then Chuck I said something

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>about how you know, flipping somebody bird? Everybody knows what

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>that means. It does depend on where you are, because

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>there is especially with learned. So I think innate body

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>language is virtually universal stuff that you couldn't possibly control. Like, uh,

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember why I read it. But if you

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>take a bite of something putrid and you make that

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>horrible like disgusted face, like oh my god, I'm about

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to vomit everywhere everybody's watching you doesn't have to go

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>give me that and then take a bite and taste

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 1>it themselves. They can look at your face and be like,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going anywhere near that piece of feces that

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>guy just took a bite of. Or that's how we

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>all learned not to eat feces. Yeah, but there's also

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the human thing where you're like, oh God, smell this, right.

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>That's the person who wants everyone else to suffer like

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>they just did. But everybody else has just been communicated

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to by that innate face, that nasty face that you

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>would make when you eat something disgusting. And again that

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>evolutionarily that protects us than that respect and make stuff.

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's universal, but it's the learned stuff that's culturally dependent. Yeah, Like,

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>for instance, they have a few examples in the article,

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>um uh, smiling in the US might mean in the

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>United States might mean you're happy, apparently, in Asia it

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>might say I agree with you. It could also cover

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>up embarrassment if they're embarrassing for you or something that

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you might smile. Um, yeah, is that what everyone's always

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>smiling at me? They're embarrassed for me. Uh what else?

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Ie contact varies from place to place. Uh. Here in

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States, someone might think you're listening and uh

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>like very key to into what you're saying. Are you

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Ted Bundy or your Ted Bundy? Or if you're in Africa,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe it might be disrespectful to look someone right in

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the eye. Yeah, And I looked around and find out

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>what part of Africa because I hate to leave it

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>like that, you know, on this massive continent, do not

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>look people in the eyes? Yeah, I couldn't find any,

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And everyone said some parts of Africa everywhere I look.

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>No one specifically said. In the Congo, it's um considered

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>uh impolite or aggressive or something like that to to

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>maintain eye contact. It's definitely in in um Japan. If

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you make eye contact with somebody, you're saying, I'm your superior.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you are socially or say business wise and

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>inferior to somebody, you're you're averting your gaze and it's respectful.

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>In the US, you shake hands and you make eye

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.680
<v Speaker 1>contact and you just you know, climbed a wrong right there,

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>unless you're prince and then he's like nobody can hide

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>eye contact with me? Is that for real? Because he

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>likes to do things that just mess with people for fun.

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think of the stories you've heard about

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Prince are not true. What about him playing basketball? He's

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like a really good basketball player, though, says Charlie Murphy.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe that everything. Charlie Murphy says, I found some

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>more culturally bound stuff. Thumbs up in New Zealand does

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not mean like right on? Does that mean like a

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 1>thumb up your butt? Pretty much? Really? Yeah, you don't

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. Um. Similarly, when you make like

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the peace sign, as long as you're not showing the

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>people in the back of your hand. Yeah. And in

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, and I believe New Zealand too, like that

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>movie Bad Taste, the cover of It that I think

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Peter Jackson's first or second movie, the cover of It's

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like an alien going like that, and I'm like, what's

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the what's two? Why was he showing me the number two?

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Then as I grew up, I learned to understand what

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that was. What else you got? Uh? And some cultures,

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>nodding means no, like nodding yes actually means no, like

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in Grease and Bulgaria getting in trouble. Yeah, and in Mexico, Mexico.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>This is what I found. Mexico, Haiti, and Spain. It

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is perfectly normal to go to a waiter, which I do.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't do it to waiters, but I'm a kind

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>of person. That's how you call someone over and get

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 1>their attention. You may also make kissing noises at them

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to a waiter. Yeah. Really Yeah, So I go to Mexico,

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I need my check and I go. I guess according

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to this thing that I read, which seemed pretty legitimate. Interesting, Yeah,

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what was the website? I don't remember. I'll definitely send

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it to you to post. But it's it's um, it

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was like it was research material to be used by

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>business people around the world. If it was a hoax,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>then they did a pretty good job. Fool in me

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>got you. All right, let's take another break and we'll

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>come back and we'll talk about deciphering some of these

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>nonverbal cues right after this. Alright, So language is a

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 1>very precise thing, or it should be or can be. Um,

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>body language would you would think is just all over

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the at, but they're actually uh, some categories that some

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>brilliant social scientists have come up with yeah, and I

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 1>think they make sense. Yeah. Basically they've broken it down

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>into five categories or five types of nonverbal communication and

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>body language. Um, there's emblems. It's like hanging a bird, yeah,

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>or shaking your fist or something like that. Something that

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that um is very symbolic of something else that you

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>can also put into words, right, who shakes a fist

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>at someone? Some people do, Okay, it's a good it's

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a it's a good yeah. Yeah, because it's saying like

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that meddle finger and then you're that's that's very aggressive.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>That's very aggressive. I'm just kidding. And never flicked someone

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a bird? Oh oh yeah, like in a car or something.

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>No way, Yeah, apparently it's really dangerous. Yeah, and that's yeah,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>that's why I do it. I think it's just I mean,

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't get mad you didn't say things, but I

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>would never. I don't know who that person is. Yeah,

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it could be a psycho. Yeah. Then you're getting chased

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or you're getting shot at by someone because you you

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>just had to shoot a bird. Yeah. We talked about

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>this in the road Rage episode. Yeah. I wouldn't hang

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>people to the bird and that's not smart. By the way,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to update on that. I've I've been improving

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>more and more behaviorally even since the road rage episode.

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And I was already on the right path then. So

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you're doing good behind the wheelers are doing so good.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm about the same. Well, you've always

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>been that way. I get mad. One time you rode

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>with me. I think it was the first time you

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>ever rode with me, and I started yelling at someone.

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You're like, really, you seem genuinely surprised, and I remember

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking like abnormal. Uh, well that was probably because you

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>were like sending an email with your left hand and

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>driving with your knee and had a coffee in the

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>other I've gotten so much better because you value your life.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I do. It's great. UM emblems after emblem illustrators, which

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>UM like shaking your head to as far as emphasis

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 1>if to emphasize something you're saying, like like no, Sure

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you can just say no, but the person is like,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really mean that until you shake your head

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>but you say no slowly that you're really saying like

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 1>do not ask me again? Yeah, boy, I never thought

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>about that. The slow one really does mean something. Different.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>It does, it adds, it bulks it up, you know,

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>um regulators. Uh. I think this is in a conversation

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to let someone else know that maybe all right, it's

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>time for you to talk now, or it's time for

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>me to talk right, or it's time for us to

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>stop talking. Like looking at your watch and just getting

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>them walking away. That's yeah, that's body language. I guess

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>it is. It definitely speaks volumes. Um. There's adapters which

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess have to do with the person listening, or

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess anybody either one uh, making themselves more comfortable.

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, when you're in a conversation with somebody

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and they just kind of shift in their seat like

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>settle in. Yeah, now they could be doing it differently

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>where they're fidgeting, they're shifting in their seat uncomfortably, like

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>they can't get comfortable. That say something totally different than

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's just like settling in, just making themselves more comfortable.

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Or I guess if you like, if you're having a

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation and someone just sits up on the edge of

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>their seat, that kind of says we're done here, Sure,

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to get up. Yeah, so please say something enclosure. Yeah,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>especially if you sigh while you do that too, you know. Yeah,

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and then there's affect displaced. And these are the ones

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>that most people think of when they think of body language.

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>These are the ones that, um, you know, like where

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you make that that face when you eat something putrid,

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>or your shoulders go up around your ears when you're

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>scared all of a sudden, Yeah, if you're mad. It's

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>emotional based. Yeah, emotion based, yeah, like your your eyebrows furrow. Uh.

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:58.239
<v Speaker 1>There's just so much body language. I came across this

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>one guy from and m Argyle. No idea what the

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>M stands for, but in Professor m Argyle, a researcher

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of body language, said that there's probably something like seven

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand words in the body language human body language.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea how he or she came up

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>with that seems high, But it's fun to throw out there,

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>junk science. You could say anything back then. And it's

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>as far as like social psychology, um, misinterpreting body languages.

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We talked a little bit about that. That is very

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>easy to do. UM. They have one little anecdotal story

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about a woman who was a consultant that I think

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>she was pitching in the CEO of a big company

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and um, the guy just sat there basically with his

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>arms crossed and didn't emote. At the end, was just

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>like thank you, and she thought, well, I've blown this one.

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.159
<v Speaker 1>And turns out that is just the way that guy is.

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>He loved he loved the jerk, he loved the presentation,

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, if he hadn't liked it, he just would

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have left, is what the partner said. I think. Yeah,

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>so you can easily misinterpret body language. UM, I don't

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>know if it's I guess it could be dangerous and

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that well, I mean that's part of the problem. It

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>can be dangerous, especially when you apply it to law

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>enforcement like um. Paul Ekman. We talked about him heavily

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in the micro Expressions episode because he basically studied micro

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>expressions through facial movement, facial muscle movement, and figured out

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>what each one meant, and he came up with the

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Facial action Coding System the f a c S, which

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>apparently the FBI and other law enforcement agencies used to

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>tell whether you're lying or you're hiding something in an interrogation.

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Misreading that that's dangerous, that's when it becomes dangerous for sure. Yeah,

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this dude, I was talking about Joe Navarro, who was

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five year vett of the FBI. He's written

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot about body language, and he's one of the

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ones that warns about the myths and misreading things. But um,

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>his uh. He wrote a whole article on shoulders and

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>he said everyone's always talking about the face and facial expressions.

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>He thinks you can read a lot into the shoulders

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of a person, whether it's slumping or bowing up or uh.

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And then he actually talked to criminals over his entire

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>career and said, what do you look for in a victim?

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you're looking to not be victimized, you might

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>want to avoid these things looking frail or weak or

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>not athletic, work out, yeah, or just you know, try

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and carry yourself like you're not frail or weak, you know.

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a lot to do with the shoulders. Um.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Situational awareness, which is a big one. If you just

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>look like your have your head in the clouds, that's

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a target what you're in your head about something? Yeah? Uh.

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And then um, the way someone swings their arms, um

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>like vigor vigorously or real subdued, not at all like

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on on episode. Yeah, that was it was that Roquel Welch. No,

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it was um well yeah I ended up as Rockel Welts,

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>but it was Molly Shannon. Oh yeah yeah, yeah you

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>remember she like swept, Yeah, Elaine's desk just clean. Yeah, Shannon,

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and she's one of my favorites. She's fantastic. Um so

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>what was Yeah, the arm swing and basically what these

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>criminals would say to him over and over. As you know,

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>their silver Backs don't go after other silver Backs. They

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>go after the weak ones. And they said, it's the

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>same with criminals. So I keep those shoulders straight. And uh,

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what the silver Back? I forgot? It

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a criminal corporate buzz speak. Yeah, you know

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>silver Backs. It's the local soccer team. How do you

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not know what that is? Is it? Sure? That's what

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought? Yeah? All right? Uh? What else we got? Oh?

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>These uh, these people that try and coach you. We're

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna mention that not jobs. I don't think they're not jobs, dude. Okay.

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>The one, the one person who emerges as the hero

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>from this article says, be very careful in trying to

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to your body language and speak consciously through it,

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>because you're going to you're gonna have massive problems. That's

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not what body language is intended for. So the people

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>who say no, master your body language and use it

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to communicate, You're gonna come off as a creep, an aggressive, weirdo,

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>corporate creep if you do that. Well, yeah, I mean,

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're making a presentation, it's hard enough to get

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the words right. So if you start thinking like about

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>every single movement you make and what that conveys, don't

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I don't think you're doing yourself any favors.

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Or Like, if you go to again a car sales

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>car lot, right, and you're like, I'm going to make

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>sure I look very defensive and aggressive, so I'm going

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to go rigid and my shoulders are gonna go up.

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>The car sales is going to be like that. That

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>guy's walking like a robot, I'm gonna take him for

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a ride. You know, there's you, You just you could

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>conceivably speak through your body language more. I don't dispute

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that you can become more aware of your natural body

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>language too. I don't dispute that either, but when you

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>focus on it and use it as a technique to

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>manipulate other people, I have issues with that. Well, here

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 1>was one idea didn't think was terrible, like if you're

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>if you do a lot of public speaking, then um,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe watching yourself with the sound off. Sure. I didn't

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>disagree with that one. That's not a terrible idea, I

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>think as a matter of fact, I was like, maybe

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe I should try that. Uh. The other technique that

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>was brought up was called mirroring. That means, and this

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>just sounds crazy to me. This is when you actually

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>try and mimic the person you're talking to, mimic their

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.479
<v Speaker 1>body language and expressions too, I guess, to make them

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>feel more comfortable to you. People are attracted to themselves

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>as the basis of it, so when you uh mimic them,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.959
<v Speaker 1>they feel more relaxed around you. Like I really like

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that person. I like the cut of their jib. I

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I can't put my finger on it. But

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>they're actually mimicking your own body language. If you're leaning

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>leaning against the wall, they're they're gonna lean against the

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>wall too. That's disconcerting, it is, that's that's nuts. You

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't do that to people. That's manipulative and weird, and

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it just be yourself. How about that? Yeah, I think

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>this quote sums it up. I'm trying to learn. I'm trying. Sorry,

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Trying to use body language by reading a body language

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>dictionary is like trying to speak French by reading a

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>French dictionary. So you can list off all the nonverbal

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>cues in the world. But if you try and learn

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the body language quote unquote because of that, then you're

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just gonna end up confused or you're gonna miss something

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>actually said. Yeah. And plus also context is huge to Like,

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're just watching somebody's body language like a hawk

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and a conversation, you don't necessarily know that person's baseline.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So what is by definition is body language dictionary. A

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>red flag doesn't necessarily mean it's a red flag with

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that person, you know, like if they're yawning, are they

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>bored or are they nervous? Right, you gotta have context

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>and you can't just you can't just read people like that.

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It's stupid go with your gut um, But I don't

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>think you should actively try to read it. If you

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>want to go ahead, I don't care I'm not going

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to I did read an article with one um woman

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>who was an expert supposedly, and she did talk a

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>lot about the baseline. She's like, that's the most important

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 1>thing is you don't know. You gotta know how someone

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>normally is. Are they twitchy? Then? Uh, if you're they're

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 1>twitching a conversation, that's normal for them, right, So it

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that you can't trust what they're saying, right then,

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it just means that they're a little awkward. Yeah, like me,

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>You're not awkward. Do you got anything else? Nope? Friends,

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that is body language, and if you want to know

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>more about it, you can type these words body language

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>into the search bart how stuff works dot com. And

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>since I said friends, it's time for a listener mail. Uh,

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>this is from this is a question actually I said

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>we'd answer on the air. Hey, guys, been listening for

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 1>quite a few years, and you've seen me through a

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>lot of years of growth out of high school and

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>into my own as an adult. Of a question that's

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>been a challenge for me recently, I'm studying permaculture quite intensively.

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>In parts of the study are pretty depressing. My climate

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>change species lost in unfair trade. I try to reflect

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 1>positives only to my clients who are trying to grow

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>their own food, because they'd rather encourage them to sustain

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>themselves physically and emotionally than feel guilted or trapped into

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 1>changing a lifestyle. Realize that having the opportunity in time

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to focus on ethical choices the luxury, and want to

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>avoid shaming people. I think this approach is good for

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>my own well being because tackling issues bigger than myself

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>seems more harmful than productive. But like you, part of

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 1>my job uh is education. Um So the question is

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>how do you guys deal with darker topics that you cover.

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate the way you do it some uh

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and it would like some insight and advice. How prevent

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.439
<v Speaker 1>these topics from weighing too heavily on you and still

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>live a life of enjoyment yet conveying topics honestly? And

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that is from Annales in Australia. UM. I think my

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>answer is like when we cover something like dementia or

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>HIV like we recently did, we're always going to have

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>humor in there, respectfully and in the right ways because

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 1>that's what we do. Plus also it helps when we're

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>getting this stuff across. It's not like it's not like

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 1>we're causing dementia. We're just saying, like, here's all the

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>information that that we found on this, here's everything you

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>need to know about dementia. And I think the thing

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that that allows us to go from you know, lighthearted

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.919
<v Speaker 1>topic to a very dark topic to whatever is that

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we're we're putting it out there as objectively as possible,

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 1>as unbiased as possible, trying to we're not passing much

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>judgment on it depending on the topic, but for the

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>most part, we don't really pass too much judgment on it,

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that allows us to talk about anything. Yeah,

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>and as far as taking it home, Um, if we

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>do something that's a big bummer that it really impacts me,

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>it'll bump me out for sure. But I'm just like

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>anything else, I think knowledge is is key to Uh.

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>The more you know about something, less um scared you

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 1>might be of it. Yeah, you just go work it out,

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>you know. Definitely. Yeah, that's great answer you too. If

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with Chuck for me

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>or Jerry or anybody who we could conceivably pass a

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>message along too. All right, Yeah, you can. You can

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>tweet to us at s y s K podcast. You

0:37:44.040 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>can join us on Facebook dot com slash stuff you

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Should Know. You can send us an email to Stuff

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast the house. Stuffworks dot com and has always joined

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>us at our home on the web, Stuff you Should

0:37:53.280 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Know dot com. For more on this and thousands of

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>other topics, visit how stuff Works dot com. M