WEBVTT - Tristan Wirfs Selected to Pro Bowl Team, Previewing Week 16 | Bucs Insider

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in two Bucks inside or Live Casey Phillips. Here

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>was senior writer and editor Scott Smith, and as always,

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we're here to get you ready with all your Buccaneers

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>information leading up to our game on Christmas in Arizona.

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>What a festive weekend. We hope it is going to be. First,

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we already had some good holiday news yesterday. Tristan Worth's

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>has been named to the bro Pro Bowl. Tell me

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about in your mind why he was

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>able to get this honor, what's been so amazing about him,

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and just kind of what this this means to him

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in the team. I think the only thing I was

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>worried about was his injury, because you worried that was

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>just while voting was still going on. But apparently it

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter. Um, he probably got a lot of support

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>from the players on coaches, you know how. It's a

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>three way ballot. What's interesting about this is that's his

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>second Pro Bowl in three seasons, and that's already almost

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the most Pro Bowls that any offensive lineman and team

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Mystery has ever had. Tony Mayberry had three in a

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>row at the very end of his career, and Devon

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Joseph A guard had to um, but he he's got

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>two already and I gotta believe more are coming. Yes, Um,

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>he's he's working hard to try to play this week.

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>He's been champing at the bit to play the last

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. I think he's being held back, like

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>if it were up to him, and he probably would

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>have played last week. But when he's played, he's been

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.279
<v Speaker 1>as dominant as ever. He's one of the best past

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>blockers in the entire league. Um And and he's I

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>think he's allowed one sack all season, which is more

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>than he allowed in his rookie season. So he's just dominant.

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's all there is to it. And it's been recognized.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And there is a bit of a when you're a

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>good player, especially on the offensive line, it seems, and

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you make that Pro Bowl once or twice, you hit

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of momentum. So it's to the point

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>where a voter next year might be have to vote

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for a tackle. I don't really know who's been going well.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Tristan Horse is good, so I'll vote for Tristan And

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's and it's accurate, and it's it's also helpful to

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>get that Pro Bowl momentum. Yeah, that's very true. And uh,

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I know Buck fans will be excited that he also

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>returned to practice this week in a limited capacity. And

0:01:57.760 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>so what are your thoughts on do we think we

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>see him on Sunday and if not, what would that

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>look like? It's I think it's still a question mark.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Like I said before, I think he really wants to play,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and it will see how this week goes. If he

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>progresses from limited to full, then that will be a

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>pretty good sign. But there is that whole which games

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>is the most important to have him for kind of conversation, right,

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>if there's any chance that playing this week makes it

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>makes him less or has a chance of aggravating the

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>injury for the last two games against Carolina and Atlanta,

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that might give you a little pause. And Josh Wells

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>has played pretty good, but Josh Wells is also hurt

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>this week. So uh, you know, if I were a

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>bet man, I'd say he plays, but I can understand

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that they might want to at least think about exercising

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>some caution. And then Donovan Smith was also on the

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>injury report. So overall this offensive line, what are we

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about? How many how many people were going to

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>have out there that that fans were used to seeing.

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Donovan was getting treatment on the foot injury, and that's

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>why I wasn't in practice yesterday. And just knowing Donovan,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been an iron man throughout his career. If there's

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he go if he's not, and he'll fight

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>through injuries. He's done that his whole career. So again,

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that both Donovan and Tristan play, but I

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.679
<v Speaker 1>don't have any actual inside information that that's the case. Yes,

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, So we also want to talk about the

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>other side of things. You know, we're gonna We've talked

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>about how the offensive line and Tristan not giving up

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sacks, will another guy in the defense

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>getting some sacks. Lavante David had one this last week

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and that gave him a pretty cool statum in terms

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of this franchisees. You don't think of Lavante David as

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a top sack guy, right, but through his career he

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>generally gets, you know, three to six sacks the season,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's got twenty nine now and that passed Rande Barber,

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>who also, it's amazing, has twenty eight sacks for tenth place.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>On the team's all time sack list. But when you

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>look at players who are not supposed to be the

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>pass rushers, you know, not the outside linebackers or defensive ends,

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and not the defensive lineman like Vida Va or whatever.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Lavante has got the most sacks in team history, and

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>just above Rande, who's again sex for a quarterback. It's crazy.

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Roderick Thomas and Chris Washington were both before my time,

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and they may have had parts of their career where

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they were specifically edge rushers, but they also had big

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>sack total, I mean tackle total sort of tells me

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they both played in three four like we have now.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It tells me that they probably had sort of a

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>hybrid role. So you can quib about whether they should

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>be on this list, but it doesn't really matter because

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Levonte's ahead of them anyway. So most sacks in team

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>history by a person whose job really isn't supposed to

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>be getting sacks. So now I can can I make

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the joke about how if they were before your time,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>was that in leather Hill very much. I had to

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>do it. I had to do it. I did overlap

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with Rodric Thomas for one season. One season Okay, in

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that case, it was in the eighties. Um okay. So

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.239
<v Speaker 1>also we we've got to talk about Chris Godwin. This guy,

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I still just think it's incredible and I don't want

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>fans to take for granted that he's playing at the

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>level he is now and how it really still isn't

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that long ago that he had a really devastating injury

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and just how amazing it's been to come back for

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>week one and and progress the way he has. I

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's just pretty incredible. And so, um, tell us

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what he's been doing lately that

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is really incredible to you. Well, we had I think

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>we had a graphic last week about how he had

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a streak of ten which is now eleven straight games

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>with at least five catches because he had eight fine

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in this past game and this touchdown that we keep

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing here and what he's done most Reeks recently in

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of team history, is score that touchdown and move

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>into fourth place on the team's all time touchdown reception list.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting to me about this list is three of

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the top four on the team right now. Incredible. I

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>mean that that that says a little bit about the

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>evolution of the games at passing touchdowns now than before,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is kind of a concentration of talent that

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going to look back at five ten

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>years from ago. Wow, we had all those guys at

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the same time. But Godwin, remember his rookie season, his

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>very first touchdown was the game winner against New Orleans

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>in week seventeen. It took him his entire to his

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>last games workie season actually score a touchdown. But since

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>then he's been finding the enzone with regularity. Maybe not

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to the level of Mike Evans, which is hard, that's

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a ridicular And speaking of him, it was great to

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.799
<v Speaker 1>see he and Chris both have bigger games and games

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that are more reminiscent of what you're used to with them,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what the team is known they're capable of, and just

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in general the offense. At first half, it's like, this

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>is what the team has wanted known they're capable of.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>It felt like this is it, this is the moment,

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and then, of course we know the second half not

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so much. So what do you think the team learned

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>from that first half? What is it that they can

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>take from that to apply to these games moving forward?

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Where do you have a chance to see a repeat

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of that in Arizona. One thing that the Bucks did

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot in that game, especially in the first half,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>was used play action and motion, but in in particular

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>play action. On ten of his i think twenty two

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>three dropbacks in the first half, tom Brady faked a handoff.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>That's what play action is, and that resulted in seven

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>catches for nine yards and it was working, and I

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>believe they probably would have stuck with it in the

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>second half. But you know, you can't do anything well

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>when you're turning the ball over four times in like

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>eleven plays. You just don't. You're not You don't have

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>extended drives and times to get into all the things

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that you want to do. But the play action was

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>working in terms of buying Tom Brady time. He had

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of clean pockets and he was able to

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>let plays develop and look downfield a little bit more,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's when you get a lot more of these

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>big Mike Emmons plays. Right. So, now, looking ahead to

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals game, what are some of the things you

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think are going to be keys to winning this games?

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Things that you've noticed about the Cardinals team. We know

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's been a bit of a disaster of a

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>season for them. But any given Sunday, and we've definitely

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>seen that having a third string quarterback doesn't necessarily give

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.559
<v Speaker 1>you a win. So yeah, it's a very weird stat

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Buccaneers trace something storially is about to make

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>his first NFL start Weirdly, including just a couple of

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago against brock Purty, the Buccaneers have lost five

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>straight games against quarterbacks, making their first such a ridiculous stat.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>It's and and a lot of it is just doesn't

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>make sense. Like the Giants and Daniel Jones a few

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>years back, the Bucks win that game if that game

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>makes like a thirty two yard field. Are the Jets

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>in like two thousand thirteen or fourteen playing against Geno

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Smith and his first start who just made the Pro

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Bowl by the way, when rebound that guy's had, But

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we win that game if there isn't a highly questionable,

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>uh unnecessary roughness call on a late hit by Levante

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>David who does not do that, and the call was

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>highly questionable, which gave them fifteen yards allowed him to

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>kick a game winning field though field goal is time expired,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's a flukey, but it is a thing, and

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess the lesson from it is, don't assume that

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers are going to just easily roll the victory

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>because they're facing Trace mcstorlean's first start. That being said,

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals have had a rough season and we've had

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>some injury issues, but they've had I think even worse,

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and their offensive line has been just ravaged by injuries

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>all season, and you would think that there's some possibility

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>there for our pass rush to get to an experienced

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterback and force them into some mistakes. I think that's

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>probably the key to winning that game. And I think

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that for me, it's so interesting that they it feels

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in some ways like these teams mirror each other where

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the injuries have happened in different positions, and so I

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>know that in particular, they've been a little beat up

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>on their offensive line, have been beat up in their

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 1>secondary in terms of their corners a lot as well,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and so it's kind of interesting and to me, I

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is a game where it should be

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>so much like the Bengals, where if you can get

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>up to a lead, that this is going to be

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>so important against this team in particular, So get that

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>fast start. Yes, get that fast starting. Don't commit for

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>turnovers in a row that. I know, it sounds crazy,

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a crazy game plan. But yeah, and

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>do you feel like those turnovers was that just more

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of a flukey thing? I mean, when it is as

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>many in what is eleven plays as he'd had in

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven games, is it just a flukey thing? Is there

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>something obviously, but it doesn't excuse it, and nobody's trying

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to excuse it. There were some bad plays made. I

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think Tom Brady said in his Monday podcast that he

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>can't remember ever turning the hand the ball off and

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>just having to slip out of his hand, so that, yes,

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously a bit a little bit flukey, But also

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it happened, and he took responsibility for one of the

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>interceptions on a bad throw. Another one was tipped, but

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 1>that's because the pass rush was getting to him. I

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>think actually wasn't tip, but he was hit as Even so,

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>there are factors that go into these flukey turnovers that

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>you need to try to eliminate as much as possible.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean, I think if you look at

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the balance of the season, as you said he had

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>almost no turnovers to the first eleven games. So the

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Buccaneers have nine turnovers and that doesn't

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.319
<v Speaker 1>even account they messed up fake punt nine turnovers in

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the last three games after committing probably just that many

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>in the first eleven games. What what is more representative reality? Right,

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a bigger sample size that Buckner's being good at

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>not and Tom Brady in particular being good at not

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>turning over the ball. So I don't think you go

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>into this game thinking, well, we got a real turnover

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>problem tom Brady turning the ball over all the time,

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>because for the most party hasn't just did in that game, right, Yeah, well,

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be some interesting things to watch for sure

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on Christmas, And of course right after this, we're actually

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:50.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna shoot our path to the Draft segment where we

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>break down our path to the draft, path to the

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>playoffs for the love of fete. You know, it's not

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>like I get paid to talk hair path to the playoffs.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>We still have a while before we rattled one to

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>be the next three games to be a path to

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the draft. Yeah, you're right, that's the opposite of what

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do back to the playoffs. We're gonna

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>shoot that right after this, where we're talking about all

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of the different scenarios that the Bucks are going to

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>need to have happened, what wins they're going to need,

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>what other teams are going to need to cooperate potentially

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>or not. So make sure you stay tuned to that

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:23.959
<v Speaker 1>on Buccaneers dot com, and we'll be back here next week.