Speaker 1: Oh, I believe that was the insufferable AOC whose voice
Speaker 1: you were hearing, you know, anti black administration, picking continence
Speaker 1: of I mean, please, she is nothing if not predictable
Speaker 1: and a nutball. But that's just my opinion. I'm Greg
Speaker 1: Jared filling in for Sean Hannity in this final hour
Speaker 1: of The Sean Hannity Show. We'll be getting to a
Speaker 1: lot of your phone calls. If you haven't called already,
Speaker 1: please do. I'd love to hear your comments or questions. Anything.
Speaker 1: Is game one eight hundred ninety four one seventy three
Speaker 1: twenty six. Again, that's one eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one Sean, which is seventy three twenty six spelled out digitally.
Speaker 1: We do have some callers standing by. I'll ask you
Speaker 1: guys to hang on because I'll get to you shortly.
Speaker 1: But I want to talk with my next guest, John
Speaker 1: Solomon about what happened yesterday because he broke the story.
Speaker 1: Former Cuban president Raoul Castro indicted for murder in connection
Speaker 1: to his alleged role in the nineteen ninety six downing
Speaker 1: of two planes operated by the Miami based exile group
Speaker 1: Brothers to the Rescue. Now The indictment, which a Florida
Speaker 1: grand jury issued in April, was just unsealed yesterday. It
Speaker 1: charges Castro with all kinds of crimes, conspiracy to kill
Speaker 1: US nationals, four separate counts of murder, destruction of an
Speaker 1: aircraft that goes on and on. Now, keep in mind
Speaker 1: this happened thirty years ago in nineteen ninety six. Four
Speaker 1: people were flying a civilian aircraft, two of them actually,
Speaker 1: when Cuban militaries shot down their planes in international waters
Speaker 1: kill them. The acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, and i'll
Speaker 1: quote him here, said this, they were unarmed civilians flying
Speaker 1: humanitarian missions for the rescue and protection of people flaming
Speaker 1: oppression across the Florida Straits end of quote. And of course,
Speaker 1: Raoul Castro, the brother of the infamous Fidel Castro, head
Speaker 1: of the communist regime, was Defense Minister at the time
Speaker 1: and allegedly ordered the attacks personally. But this indictment comes
Speaker 1: as President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio are
Speaker 1: aggressively pursuing regime change in Cuba, where the Communist Party
Speaker 1: has maintained this one state rule since nineteen fifty nine.
Speaker 1: They suppressed descent in prison and torture the opposition. They
Speaker 1: forced the island population to live in third world in
Speaker 1: poverished conditions. The Trump administration has recently instituted an embargo
Speaker 1: on fuel, crippling Cuba's energy grid, resulting in ruling blackouts,
Speaker 1: fuel shortages, price increases. And the goal, of course is
Speaker 1: to remove the communists and bring about political reform, freedom
Speaker 1: for Cubans which they so desperately yearn for, and eventually
Speaker 1: economic prosperity and America will help. You know, Cuba, keep
Speaker 1: in mind, has historically posed a threat to US national security,
Speaker 1: their ties to hostile actors like Russia, and of course
Speaker 1: I remember it well as a kid perilous apex in
Speaker 1: October of nineteen sixty two during the Cuban Missile crisis
Speaker 1: that is the closest the Cold War ever came to
Speaker 1: a full scale nuclear war with the Soviets. So Cuba
Speaker 1: is not just some you know, future holiday, you know,
Speaker 1: vacation spot. Now, it's strategically important. Joining me now to
Speaker 1: talk about it, it's my friend John Solomon, editor in
Speaker 1: chief of Just the News. He penned an exclusive story
Speaker 1: on this. John, thanks so much for being with us.
Speaker 1: As you point out, in your excellent reporting. Cuban exiles
Speaker 1: in America had been waiting thirty years for justice.
Speaker 2: So what changed, Well, first the administration changed, and then
Speaker 2: a certain thing happened. We began enforcing our border laws again.
Speaker 2: We cracked down on the legal immigration. And this Trump
Speaker 2: administration discovered that when Joe Biden was president, one of
Speaker 2: the Cuban Communist Air Force pilots who had been involved
Speaker 2: in this operation, involved in the flights that shot down
Speaker 2: those innocent American humanitarian flights thirty years ago, was in
Speaker 2: the country. Joe Biden led him into the country and
Speaker 2: he felt so confident. After Joe Biden leed in the country,
Speaker 2: he applied for permanent residency here, and the Trump administation said,
Speaker 2: not so fast, buddy, you killed some Americans or you
Speaker 2: were involved in an operation that killed some Americans. They
Speaker 2: arrested him. That led to a neutrons of evidence and
Speaker 2: this Justice Department treated like a cold case. The US
Speaker 2: attorney in Miami, Jason Canonez, who also is working on
Speaker 2: the weaponization case out of Fort Pierce, they brought up indictment,
Speaker 2: and a very strong indictment with a lot of detail
Speaker 2: that you understand why they could make these charges against
Speaker 2: Rold Castro. You're going to charge the former leader of
Speaker 2: a country. You're going to be pretty specific, lot of
Speaker 2: evidence of why they can prove that Roe Castro and
Speaker 2: the pilots and others were involved in this heinous crime.
Speaker 2: I was a young reporter at the AP when this happened,
Speaker 2: and I remember the anger of the Cuban American community,
Speaker 2: particularly in Miami, but all around the country. In the
Speaker 2: feckless response that built Clinton and Janet Reno and others
Speaker 2: gave to this. They simply couldn't react. They were afraid
Speaker 2: to go after the Castros, even though all the evidence
Speaker 2: made clear that Fidel and Raoul Castro were involved in this.
Speaker 2: But this Jrump administration, acting different than all the presidents
Speaker 2: since that time, got the break in the case, followed
Speaker 2: it and brought an indictment Esta and you saw the
Speaker 2: joy in Cuban when the prosecutors came out to announce
Speaker 2: the indictment. There were like hundreds, maybe a few thousand people,
Speaker 2: most of them of Cuban descent, outside the courthouse where
Speaker 2: the announcement was made. This is justice, long delayed, but
Speaker 2: finally served. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, And in fact, if I recall correctly, and I
Speaker 1: think one of your Just the News stories described as
Speaker 1: Fidel Castro in an interview, and of course he did.
Speaker 1: He's dead. He admitted they shot it down, shot the
Speaker 1: planes down.
Speaker 2: He did, he absolutely did. I think he implicated his
Speaker 2: brother too.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this has been a case that could have been
Speaker 2: brought there just was no courage to be brought been
Speaker 2: during the Clinton years and every successive administration it fell
Speaker 2: colder and colder into the cold case files. But Donald
Speaker 2: Trump never forgot. Tadd Blanche never forgot Jason conona Is, who,
Speaker 2: by the way, has several prosecutors on the staff who
Speaker 2: are Cuban expats. They fled Cuba or their parents or
Speaker 2: families fled Cuba, so they know the ruthless regime that
Speaker 2: the Castros have been. They worked this case. They started
Speaker 2: a task force in February. They're going to be other
Speaker 2: cases brought against the Cuban government in the next few
Speaker 2: months based on this task force. We had Jason Canonas
Speaker 2: on the show last night and he talked about the
Speaker 2: work of the task force and what is coming ahead.
Speaker 2: He's also the guy just to give you some fun
Speaker 2: history here, he's the guy yesterday that also announced that
Speaker 2: the longtime money launderer for the Maduro regime in Venezuela, who,
Speaker 2: by the way, Joe Biden partons. So think about this.
Speaker 2: Joe Biden pardons a money launderer for Nicholas Maduro, the
Speaker 2: drug trafficker, the qube drug trafficker. He lets into the
Speaker 2: country a Cuban Communi Air Force pilot involved in the shootdown.
Speaker 2: Well after the pardon, Jason Canonas and his team built
Speaker 2: a criminal case back finding that that money launder had
Speaker 2: continued moundy laundering since he got his pardon. They recharged him,
Speaker 2: they arrested him. They're not going to let him do
Speaker 2: any more drug morney laundering around the world. And then
Speaker 2: also yesterday that same prosecutor, Jason Canona's secured an indictment
Speaker 2: against one of his former prosecutors, yeah coecutor in Fort Pierce,
Speaker 2: because she tried to steal the secret Jack Smith report
Speaker 2: trying to make accusations against President Trump. Judge said that
Speaker 2: was sealed, can never be released. She was trying to
Speaker 2: steal it. What does Jason Canonas do. He uses the
Speaker 2: law and he punishes her. The charges against her carried
Speaker 2: twenty years in prison.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I was happy to see Conona's take action. Carmen
Speaker 1: Weinberger is the defendant in that case. She was the
Speaker 1: managing assistant US attorney down there. Yeah, I mean it's unbelievable,
Speaker 1: but underscores the depth and breadth of the deep state
Speaker 1: that have embedded themselves in all of this. Look, I'm
Speaker 1: itching to address what you alluded to, and that is,
Speaker 1: you know, the Grandeur in South Florida. They are looking
Speaker 1: into potential criminal charges against those who waged the long
Speaker 1: running law fier crusade against Trump and others. Bring us
Speaker 1: up to date on now what's the latest.
Speaker 2: Well, the latest is they are ramping up with some
Speaker 2: pretty impressive staff. Joe Degeneva, former US Attorney, former Special Council,
Speaker 2: former Independent Council. One of the few people I know
Speaker 2: they ever had all three titles in his career, Very
Speaker 2: experienced season prosecutor, a guy who took down Mayor Marion
Speaker 2: Barry and his administration back in the eighties under Ronald Reagan,
Speaker 2: took down Jonathan Pollard. Is ra at least five. He's
Speaker 2: building a quick right a strike force, rapid force team
Speaker 2: to get to all the documents, get all the CIA
Speaker 2: evidence and to build big cases. I think one of
Speaker 2: the you know, before Jeordia Jennova got there, I think
Speaker 2: they were the team that was down there was content
Speaker 2: and maybe bring small cases. Maybe we'll just charge John
Speaker 2: Brennan with making false statements to Congress in his twenty
Speaker 2: twenty three testimony, which is one of the things that
Speaker 2: Congress preferred John Brennan for, alleging that he made false statements.
Speaker 2: The Jennifa has stopped that small game prosecution plan, and
Speaker 2: he's now looking at hey, if John Brennan did lie
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty three because he was trying to hide
Speaker 2: what he did back when he was a CIA director
Speaker 2: and he was corrupting the intelligence can be putting out
Speaker 2: a false intelligence assessment, letting the FBI bring a false
Speaker 2: investigation against Donald Trump that they knew was false because
Speaker 2: they had intercepted Hillary Clinton planning the false allegation. Maybe
Speaker 2: we should just bring the big conspiracy case. So he
Speaker 2: has gone back to the concept that Cash Bettel, the
Speaker 2: FBI director, wrote, this is a grand conspiracy. Let's charge
Speaker 2: it as a racketeering and conspiracy case. He's not going
Speaker 2: to bring little tiny charges here and there. He's going
Speaker 2: to charge big conspiracy cases tell a story and have
Speaker 2: overwhelming evidence for a grand jury and maybe a jury
Speaker 2: one day to consider, and I think that will take
Speaker 2: a few extra weeks or months, but I wouldn't be
Speaker 2: surprised by the middle of summer that we start to
Speaker 2: see more of these indictments. Meanwhile, prosecutors who are trying
Speaker 2: to weaponize the law right now, they're getting caught and
Speaker 2: they're getting prosecuted, which by the way, didn't happen during
Speaker 2: the Joe Biden years.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, if anybody can do a joke, can
Speaker 1: I've known him for thirty years as you have, you know,
Speaker 1: top lawyer, and he I mean, he was a wealth
Speaker 1: of knowledge about the Russia hoax and I interviewed him
Speaker 1: for my book, the first one, The Russia Hoax, that
Speaker 1: came out in two thousand and eighteen. He's a serious
Speaker 1: guy and a fine lawyer, and he knows about things
Speaker 1: like conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy against rights, racketeering, obstruction, perjury,
Speaker 1: deprivation of rights under color of law. Those are the
Speaker 1: things that you know, Those are the charges that I
Speaker 1: think could be brought against defenders. The question is what defindant?
Speaker 1: So what are we looking at you mentioned John Brennan,
Speaker 1: what about James Comy.
Speaker 2: Sure those are all people who've either been referred for
Speaker 2: prosecution by Congress, who are clearly on the radar based
Speaker 2: on the evidence. Now in the public realm, I think
Speaker 2: there are agents and lawyers up and down the stream
Speaker 2: that we're carrying out the FBI seventh floor, the CIA
Speaker 2: headquarters plots. They would all be looked at analysts if
Speaker 2: they tried to corrupt an analysis and make it say
Speaker 2: something that the evidence and intelligence didn't because they had
Speaker 2: a political motive. That would be there if intelligence handles
Speaker 2: and this is I think an active area right now
Speaker 2: just from looking at the witnesses that are being called
Speaker 2: and the documents that are being discussed in the defense bar,
Speaker 2: you know, one of the easiest ways to cover grandeates
Speaker 2: find ut what the defense bar is, you know, getting
Speaker 2: what's going on, nervous about There seems to be two
Speaker 2: areas of interest. One is was Brennan really running a
Speaker 2: false intelligence operation? When President Obama said, I don't like
Speaker 2: the intelligence community's factual conclusion that Vladimir Putin didn't didn't
Speaker 2: try to help Donald Trump. I want a different conclusion,
Speaker 2: and they went back and gave him that even though
Speaker 2: that's not what the career people thought. Is that a conspiracy,
Speaker 2: Is that a fraud against the government. And that is
Speaker 2: a very active area, and that would be why three
Speaker 2: or four years later John Brennan would make a denial
Speaker 2: about something true. He might be trying to cover it up.
Speaker 2: So tie those two events together. The other active area
Speaker 2: was James Comey and the FBI and other people around
Speaker 2: him in the deep Justice Department. State, were they trying
Speaker 2: to lure the President Donald Trump into and trap him
Speaker 2: into an obstruction case, which is they do right away
Speaker 2: This Russia stuff was never true. It's bogus. But man,
Speaker 2: if we make him think it's true, maybe he'll do
Speaker 2: something and we'll charge him with obstruction. And I think
Speaker 2: beginning to look at certain events, the briefing that the
Speaker 2: president got, defensive briefing he got just before it became president,
Speaker 2: the leaking of memos, the leaking of information has possibly
Speaker 2: an effort to entrap someone and violate President Trump's civil liberties.
Speaker 2: We know they were trying to do that to Mike
Speaker 2: Flynn based on the FBI records we have a few
Speaker 2: years ago. I think that's a very active aarya the
Speaker 2: investigation right now, according to defense layers.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, you know I talked about a couple
Speaker 1: of hours ago when I was tackling this subject. It
Speaker 1: was classic and trapman and it didn't work. And James
Speaker 1: Comey's dirty fingerprints were all over at John Solomon. Many
Speaker 1: many thanks, talk to.
Speaker 2: You soon to be true with you, my friend. Thanks.
Speaker 3: Greg.
Speaker 1: All right, we're going to be back with your phone
Speaker 1: calls in just a moment. The number is one eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four one seven, three, two six, Give
Speaker 1: us a call.
Speaker 4: Thanks for listening to Sean Hannity.
Speaker 1: Welcome back to the Sean Hennedy Show. I'm Greg Jerry.
Speaker 1: We've been talking about the Department of Justice, lawyers and
Speaker 1: US attorneys taking action down in Florida with a grand
Speaker 1: jury that's been unpaneled. They are looking at potential charges
Speaker 1: against a variety of people who waged an unprecedented and
Speaker 1: corrupt lawfair crusade against Donald Trump and others. You know,
Speaker 1: there are a lot of bad actors here, and not
Speaker 1: just the more recent Special Counsel Jack Smith and his
Speaker 1: partisan team of prosecutors, but going all the way back
Speaker 1: to the Russia hoax. I wrote two books about it.
Speaker 1: Joe Degeneva is now taking charge of that investigation, and
Speaker 1: it looks to me like charges will be brought your
Speaker 1: thoughts one eight hundred nine four one seventy three twenty six.
Speaker 1: Love to hear your comments or questions. One eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine one seventy three twenty six year calls on the
Speaker 1: other side, Stick.
Speaker 5: Around information, download Sean Hannity and the breaking news you
Speaker 5: might have missed today. It's Shawn's insider information. Kennedy is
Speaker 5: on right.
Speaker 1: Now, well he's sort of on right now. I'm Greg
Speaker 1: Jared filling in for Sean Hannity. He's taking a few
Speaker 1: days off, and this is the last half hour of
Speaker 1: the program, So we'll be taking your phone calls. If
Speaker 1: you haven't called yet, please do so. I'd love to
Speaker 1: hear from you. One eight hundred nine four one seventy
Speaker 1: three twenty six nine four one seventy three twenty six.
Speaker 1: Let's go right to the phone lines. Calling from Nebraska
Speaker 1: is ed ed. Thanks for taking the time to give
Speaker 1: us a call. How are you.
Speaker 3: Doing well? Honor to speak to you, Greg, simple question, Uh,
Speaker 3: with all these indictments that you're talking about, does a
Speaker 3: man of your credibility demand results. Are Are you going
Speaker 3: to be satisfied with just putting call in the boys
Speaker 3: through the walk of shame.
Speaker 1: Well, it's tempting to say walk of shame is sufficient,
Speaker 1: but for me, it's not. No accountability in a court
Speaker 1: of law justice. You know, if you break the law,
Speaker 1: you know you you should be held to the same
Speaker 1: standard as anybody else who breaks the law. And it
Speaker 1: doesn't matter if your name is James Commy or James Smith.
Speaker 1: And you know, let's take the second indictment against him
Speaker 1: taking place in North Carolina, the whole Seashells alleged threat
Speaker 1: on the life of President Trump. You know, there were
Speaker 1: a lot of legal analysts, lawyers who were quick to
Speaker 1: say the moment the indictment was read and rendered that oh,
Speaker 1: this is this is absurd, it's ludicrous, it's a specious case.
Speaker 1: I'm not so sure, and I'll tell you why, because
Speaker 1: the acting Attorney General, whose fingerprints were all over the indictment,
Speaker 1: is a very smart man and a talented lawyer. He's
Speaker 1: the acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche. And Blanche said something
Speaker 1: that caught my attention. He said, we have witnesses and
Speaker 1: documents to prove our case against Comy, So that tells
Speaker 1: me something. You know, they spent a year investigating the case.
Speaker 1: They were able to successfully subpoena records, and I think
Speaker 1: interview people and they may have the goods on Comy.
Speaker 1: And there's something else that I saw in there. It
Speaker 1: was notable that people seem to skip over and the
Speaker 1: count at the end is for forfeiture and what does
Speaker 1: that mean? Forfeiture of assets? What are they looking at?
Speaker 1: I think they're looking at Comy's book sales, because it
Speaker 1: is no coincidence that he posted his infamous Seashell social
Speaker 1: media photograph eighty six forty seven, five days before his
Speaker 1: latest book was to come out, you know, a book
Speaker 1: of fiction, and Comey wasn't gaining any traction or attention.
Speaker 1: So was it his design, his intent to issue what
Speaker 1: would be perceived as a threat on the president's life
Speaker 1: to gain attention for his book sales? Because immediately after
Speaker 1: he did that, suddenly everybody wants him on his program,
Speaker 1: on their program, CNN, ANDSNBC and elsewhere to talk about
Speaker 1: the photograph. But Comy saws an opportunity to gin up
Speaker 1: his sales and it worked. And so it looks to
Speaker 1: me like Blanche wants to seize those assets, and if
Speaker 1: that was the intent all along, then trust me, prosecutors
Speaker 1: have a lot more evidence against Comy than Comy and
Speaker 1: his attorneys may even know, and the legal analysts who
Speaker 1: have condemned the indictment. So we'll wait and see. Ed,
Speaker 1: thanks for your question. Let's go to Jeff and Saint Louis. Jeff,
Speaker 1: how are you?
Speaker 6: Oh great? Greg? How are you?
Speaker 3: Thank good?
Speaker 6: So my question is about the filibuster, and my question
Speaker 6: is if they were able to get you know, the
Speaker 6: never trumpers along to kill the filibuster, pass the Save Act,
Speaker 6: pass any other legislation that they want to at the time,
Speaker 6: why couldn't they simply reinstate the filibuster when they were done.
Speaker 1: Well, they could, but you know, he's sort of letting
Speaker 1: the toothpaste out of the tube. You know, it's tough
Speaker 1: to get it back in because once you undertake a
Speaker 1: broad rejection of the film and get rid of it, yeah,
Speaker 1: you can reinstitute it. But it sets the precedence that
Speaker 1: if Democrats achieve their desired result of retaking the United
Speaker 1: States Senate, and I don't think they will, by the way,
Speaker 1: but if they do. Then they'll say, well, you guys
Speaker 1: killed the filibuster first, so now we're entitled to do it.
Speaker 1: So it's a question of precedent more than anything else. Well, look,
Speaker 1: you know, I blame John Thune, and I said this,
Speaker 1: what in the last hour or the hour before that,
Speaker 1: I placed blame on him. I think he has been
Speaker 1: a feckless majority leader in the United States Senate, a
Speaker 1: poor replacement for Mitch McConnell before him. He has been
Speaker 1: utterly ineffective on many fronts, but notably you know the
Speaker 1: Save America Act, and you know, requiring Commons sense voter
Speaker 1: ID when you cast a ballot to make sure that
Speaker 1: the person you say you are is indeed you. I
Speaker 1: mean you got to have ID for anything and everything.
Speaker 1: If you want to cash a check, if you want
Speaker 1: to buy liquor, if you mean, if you want to fly,
Speaker 1: I mean you got to have an idea, and everybody
Speaker 1: has an ID. And you know, the brainless Chuck Schumer
Speaker 1: when asked, well, seventy eight percent of Democrats want voter ideas,
Speaker 1: Oh it's Jim Crow two point zero. That's all he
Speaker 1: has to say. I mean he didn't know what else
Speaker 1: to say. Oh, is Jim Crow two point. Now, it's
Speaker 1: not it's common sense. And most Americans and a great
Speaker 1: majority of Democrats want what Chuck Schumer rejects. And John
Speaker 1: Thune is Schumer's enabler and frankly out to get of them.
Speaker 1: But that's not going to happen in the near future
Speaker 1: at least. Jeff, good question. Jeff from Saint Louis. Thanks
Speaker 1: very much. Let's go to Tennessee. James is standing by
Speaker 1: with a question or comment. Hi James, how are you fine?
Speaker 7: Thank you. It's pleasure to speak to you, mister Jared.
Speaker 7: Thank you. Opinion is.
Speaker 6: Okay?
Speaker 7: Greg that my opinion was in an opposition to earlier
Speaker 7: color that taking out parts of the infrastructure of Iran
Speaker 7: part of the time until they buckle would only harm
Speaker 7: the civilian population. It wouldn't do anything for the negotiations.
Speaker 7: The real power in Iran is the IRGC, and until
Speaker 7: the IRGC is rendered, you know, ineffective, that no negotiation
Speaker 7: is going to be effective. The theocracy is going to
Speaker 7: keep endless diplomatic treaty negotiations that they're not going to
Speaker 7: adhere to anyway. Right downgrade the higher GC where they're
Speaker 7: no longer a threat to their neighbors or most especially
Speaker 7: their servine population.
Speaker 1: Well, listen, James, I think it's a great point as
Speaker 1: to the first part, bombing infrastructure. As long as there
Speaker 1: is a dual purpose or a dual result, and one
Speaker 1: component of that is harming and deterring the military, then
Speaker 1: it's not a war crime. It's absolutely proper in a
Speaker 1: war conflict. You know, as I pointed out earlier, the
Speaker 1: Allies did in World War Two. Did it hurt the
Speaker 1: civilian population in Germany? Of course it did, but mostly
Speaker 1: it hurt the military and it helped win the war,
Speaker 1: and it was key to that. It was not then
Speaker 1: a war crime, and it's not now. So the people
Speaker 1: who howled, oh war crime, Yeah, don't listen to those people.
Speaker 1: They don't know what they're talking about. As far as
Speaker 1: the IRGC, I agree with you. The Revolutionary Guard they
Speaker 1: are the true villains in Iran. Why because they have
Speaker 1: the guns. They control the missiles, they control the launchers,
Speaker 1: they control the drones, they control everything. They got the guns,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, and it's it's a classic case
Speaker 1: or whoever has the guns is in power. The figureheads
Speaker 1: that you know, the Mullahs, the Ayatola, you know, they
Speaker 1: issue the orders, but the real power is the IRGC,
Speaker 1: And I agree with you. They've been bombs some important
Speaker 1: leaders of the IRG see have been killed in the
Speaker 1: US air attacks against him. But until you get rid
Speaker 1: of the IRGC, you know there's going to be a
Speaker 1: fail me and nothing's going to happen. And those are
Speaker 1: among the most untrustworthy people in a nation of untrustworthy, unscrupulous,
Speaker 1: unprincipled leaders. Well, good question, James, thanks so much for
Speaker 1: calling it. Let's go to David, who is in Nashville, Tennessee. David,
Speaker 1: how are you good?
Speaker 3: How are you?
Speaker 1: Greg Bine?
Speaker 8: Thank you great. So my question is fairly simple. It's
Speaker 8: always bothered me about the FISA judges. They've just it
Speaker 8: just seems like they've been given a pass on any prosecution,
Speaker 8: not necessarily prosecution, but attention. Having written many search warrants
Speaker 8: and being a detective, retired detective and all, I just
Speaker 8: can't understand why it was never discussed the return to
Speaker 8: search warrant right time. Like a Komi would go before
Speaker 8: a magistrate and sign that Affidavid and swear that everything
Speaker 8: within it was true. They were given a certain amount
Speaker 8: of time, and I know, you know this, They get
Speaker 8: a certain amount of time to do something called a
Speaker 8: return to search warrant and they have to bring that
Speaker 8: back and the judge signs off on it. So why
Speaker 8: is it that the judges were given a pass on that.
Speaker 1: Well, part of the reason is because the flys of
Speaker 1: courts are secret, right, so they get away with a
Speaker 1: lot of wrongdoing that occurs in front of them. And
Speaker 1: it's unconscionable that they allow that. But you've got you know,
Speaker 1: judges on the fires a court and they rotate. But
Speaker 1: one of them was James Bosberg, and you know that's
Speaker 1: a guy who is a chronic anti Trumper and has
Speaker 1: issued a lot of wrongful rulings against Trump. And there's
Speaker 1: been a movement of footdo impeaching, and there'd be grounds
Speaker 1: for that in my judgment. But you know, these judges
Speaker 1: in the Vice Accord, when they finally learned that Comey
Speaker 1: was deceiving them, he was promising to them that the dossier,
Speaker 1: which was totally bogus, and Commey knew it. He said, oh,
Speaker 1: it's reliable, incredible, and the author of the Christopher Steele,
Speaker 1: is reliable and credible. And Comey didn't tell them except
Speaker 1: for the fact that we fired him for lying to
Speaker 1: us as a confidential informant. He didn't disclose any of that,
Speaker 1: which is not just relevant, it's pivotal, it is essential.
Speaker 1: And so the judges were lied to. My goodness, if
Speaker 1: I were a judge who was lied to, I'd haul
Speaker 1: Comby back into the court. And you know, McCabe signed
Speaker 1: off on one of them. If I recalled Sally Yates
Speaker 1: on Rod Rosenstein, they all did the same thing. I
Speaker 1: would hauled them back into my court and held them
Speaker 1: in criminal contempt and told them I hope you brought
Speaker 1: your toothbrush, because you're going to be in the whoscal
Speaker 1: for criminal contempt. And you know this as a detective.
Speaker 1: That's how it works. And I blame John Roberts, the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court Chief Justice, because he is ultimately in charge
Speaker 1: of the FISA Court and he sets the standards. And
Speaker 1: it seemed to me that Roberts, when he learned of
Speaker 1: all of this, just didn't care. And maybe it's because
Speaker 1: he thought, well, I'm going to get the blame. I'm
Speaker 1: in charge of the Visa Court, so we're going to
Speaker 1: cover this up the same way I covered up the
Speaker 1: leaking of the decision. Dodd's decision overturned roversus weight. They
Speaker 1: know who did it, and he's covering it up to
Speaker 1: save his butt. We're going to take a quick break.
Speaker 1: We're going to try to get to a couple more
Speaker 1: calls on the other side. On Greg Jarrett filling in
Speaker 1: for Sean Hannity on the Sean Hannity Radio Show. Stick around.
Speaker 4: Three hours a day is all we ask on the
Speaker 4: Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 6: So please join us, but just don't be late.
Speaker 4: Sean Hannity is.
Speaker 1: On back now with a Sean Hannity Show. I was
Speaker 1: hoping to get to a couple of more phone calls,
Speaker 1: but as I look at the clock and math was
Speaker 1: never my strong suit. We've got to close out the show,
Speaker 1: run out of time, but I will be on Sean's
Speaker 1: television show tonight at nine thirty Lawrence Jones filling in.
Speaker 1: I'll be talking about that indictment against the former DOJ
Speaker 1: prosecutor charged with stealing confidential Jack Smith investigation documents about Trump,
Speaker 1: allegedly to vilify him. Think about that. This is a
Speaker 1: managing assistant US attorney whose duty is to put the
Speaker 1: bad guys behind bars. She is now looking at twenty
Speaker 1: years behind bars if convicted again. I'll be on Hennity's
Speaker 1: show tonight at nine thirty Eastern. That's it for now.
Speaker 1: I'm Greg Jarrett. I hope you all have a great
Speaker 1: long holiday Memorial Day weekend. Take care of the way