WEBVTT - MLB Futures Bets You Can Still Cash (Ep. 1032)

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Everybody.

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome into Betting Pros and today we are going to

0:00:04.840 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 2>talk some baseball. I'm your host, Joe Rico, joined today

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>by Chris Welsh and Scott Bogman. And as long as

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I've known these two gentlemen, I don't think I've ever

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>hosted to both of them on the same show before.

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>So this should be very, very interesting. We're gonna talk

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 2>some Major League futures. We have just shy of two

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 2>months to go in the season and there's still some

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 2>bets to place. There is still money to be made,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 2>so today we're gonna break it down for you in

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 2>a number of different categories. Boys, this should be a

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun. Well, she how much has the landscape

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 2>changed since the last time you were thinking about MLB

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:34.959
<v Speaker 2>futures here on the Betting Pros podcast.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's trade. It's changed pretty significant, I think. I mean,

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 3>I mean even the last one was a little bit

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 3>wonky and like, you know, you're starting to get injuries

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>and stuff. But I mean we're gonna talk about it.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 3>But like the Red Sox, you know, the last time

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>we did this, it was like, oh, the lowly little

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox, and then now we're looking in and it's

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 3>like they're a really viable contender. But while things aren't definitive,

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I think there's some markets that are just kind of set,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, like especially if you look about like rewards

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 3>and stuff like that. I think, like summer set, there's

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 3>still a few spots that are open. But you know,

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>the biggest landscape changes have been that like the uh

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.479
<v Speaker 3>the what is it not? The Rookie of the Years,

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 3>but the nl MVP has really opened up. That's kind

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 3>of a new thing. And then the World Series has

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 3>like one big definitive push now after the trade deadline.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I mean, I do think the landscape where

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.199
<v Speaker 3>there is a little bit more definition in the things

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 3>that were locked, you know, the Mizerowskis and the Kevin

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>mcgonagall's of the world, a few other things have opened

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 3>up for some pretty nice opportunities, and the Red Sox

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 3>being one of them as well. I mean, how do

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 3>we been smart enough a month ago to talk about

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 3>and have the foresight of that garbage Red Sox team

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 3>at that time to have said, hey, you should you know,

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>bet them to make the playoffs That was probably like

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>five or six to one at that time. So that

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 3>would have probably been if we were looking at like

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>the biggest market movers would have been that.

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Bogs, I think it's thirty wins in their last

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty five games for the Red Sox. What do you

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>make of them in about the futures market in general?

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>How much has the landscape changed here over the last

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>month in your eyes?

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think it's really stupid that we didn't

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 4>know that the Red Sox were going to have their

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 4>longest win streak in franchise history for a team that's

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 4>lasted a million years here underable Yeah, yeah, shame on us.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 4>How could we not see that coming? But everything that

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 4>the well said is correct, right, Like, there are some

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 4>loopholes that close completely in the futures market the longer

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.119
<v Speaker 4>you wait, and some open back up. The MVP race

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 4>in the NL is open back up. I feel like

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 4>even maybe the NL Rookie of the Year has opened

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 4>back up with Seal Stewart having a massive year or

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 4>a massive like last month as well. So you know,

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 4>things change, some things get worse, some things get better,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 4>and we're here to talk about it.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>We are going to be breaking it all down and

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>we are going to start with the biggest team futures

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 2>market movers, Bogs. We're going to kick it back to

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>you and we're going to talk to Milwaukee Brewers. Now,

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not every day you see the World Series line

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 2>for a team that is currently the best team in

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Major League Baseball at eight to one, seems like a

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>pretty good number.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 4>Though. Yeah. Look, I know that we're limiting Mizerowski's innings

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 4>or starts or however we're doing it at this point

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 4>pitch pitches. But this is still the best team in

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 4>baseball right now. And they added a little bit at

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 4>the break as well by getting Dustin May, probably not

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 4>as much as we wanted. We know that they were

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 4>in on Trek's schooble, but it didn't work out. So

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 4>the bullpens still a little shaky. I do like them

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 4>adding Sensatela just get him out of Colorado. But you

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>know they're getting a little healthier as well, and you know,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Cherio's all the way back. So I just I think

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 4>that this team is really good, and I think eight

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 4>to one for the best record in the in baseball

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 4>right now is a little ridiculous. I know it's the Dodgers,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, show to lose and all of that, but

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 4>they've lost six in a row. They are stagnant right now,

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 4>and the Brewers are still winning games. So Brewers at

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 4>eight to one, like you said, I just don't think

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>you're gonna get a market like this in many seasons.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 4>So that's why I like the man. Eight to one.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the highest pitching war of any team in baseball

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>a top ten lineup to go along with it. Dustin

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 2>May's first start went very well since it tell us

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>should be a good addition. As much as I wanted

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>them to make, the Schooble package still feels like a

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>pretty good number. Welsh, what do you think about the

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Brewers as a World Series bet to make?

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Right now?

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, and I'll tell you this, bagman. How about we

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 3>take what you had and let's give you better numbers.

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Because if you go over to betting Pros and you

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 3>check out the MLB odds page, you can see the

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 3>odds across all the books that are out there, and

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 3>the best odds you can get are actually ten to one.

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>So you were selling yourself a little bit short that

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 3>you can get ten to one. I think this is

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 3>a fine one. I think the Dodgers side of it

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 3>is the really interesting one. The Dodgers have actually added

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more on the plus side. They were

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I think like plus one p thirty was the best

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 3>odds I saw a couple of days ago, right up

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 3>to the trade deadline. I think then, is we're recording this.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 3>They had lost six straight, you know, Schooble's first start,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 3>they got the loss. They're now pushing on the betting

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 3>pros future market here at like uh plus, like plus

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 3>one seventy. I'm seeing like plus one sixty one fifty

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>in a lot of different places.

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So like, if that.

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 3>Ends up pushing to two to one, that's kind of interesting,

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 3>But that also just shows this really big gap that's available.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.279
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like it's a Dodgers versus the world and

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 3>if you're gonna bet against or for someone else. I

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 3>do like the Brewers in this. I wish they we'd

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 3>have done more. I think they're kind of the I'm

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna say that they're like the NL version of the

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox, except they were never garbage, you know what

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:31.159
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying. Like you look at the team and on paper,

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 3>you don't quite vibe when you look at the line,

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 3>it's great, Like Misarowski is obviously like a high end guy,

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>but when you look across the board, you're like, man,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 3>if you were to stack their lineup paper for paper

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 3>against the Dodgers or I think the Phillies are a

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 3>sneaky team that's floating out there. They just don't quite

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.200
<v Speaker 3>fit on paper, but they just do it. It's like

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the collective pieces. They get the wins, you know, regardless

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 3>of the Dodgers getting all their Infinity Stones. You know,

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 3>the Brewers are Captain America and they're getting molnear and

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 3>they're just still making it happen. But like, just on

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 3>paper doesn't feel great. But I think this is great

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 3>at ten to one for the Brewers. If you want

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 3>to play that for a World Series, bet I'm totally

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 3>down with that. If you are on the everybody or

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 3>anybody but the Dodgers side, this is this would be

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 3>the place I would be going.

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I am certainly on the anybody but the Dodgers side,

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>but I won't get into that because then we'll end

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.560
<v Speaker 2>up being here all day long. Well, she you want

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the Cleveland Guardians who were kind of

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 2>surprised buyers In my mind at the deadline, maybe they

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>were always going to be buyers, but they went out

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 2>and got Jodell, they went out and got Nathaniel Lowe,

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and you are And actually I forgot the biggest one.

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Foster Griffin saw a young contender in the National League.

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 2>So what does your bet look.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Like here for the Cleveland Guardians going forward?

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, I will tell you this, My bet doesn't feel

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 3>super great after the last two days. So I'm gonna

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 3>give be a cavegat to that. The Guardians two nights ago,

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 3>as recording this, had an opportunity. They went to extra innings.

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>They blew it.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Today, Foster, as we're recording this, Foster Griffin had his start,

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't look good and they got kind of slacked by

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 3>the Mets. Again. That's not gonna move me off. If anything,

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 3>that's actually probably going to give me. I'm going to

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 3>take a look here on on bidding pros for division

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 3>winners and see if I got any better odds after

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 3>losing to the Mets, because I want to say, no,

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 3>it's about the same, just a little bit of a change,

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 3>But I like the Cleveland Guardians as a division winner.

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 3>I'd originally written this down as plus two forty. It's

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 3>now moved to about two seventy, so you are seeing

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of movement. Maybe that's even gonna go

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more as the Mets have taken a

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 3>couple of those games. But when you're looking at strength

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 3>of schedule, which is comparing like you know, winning percentages

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.119
<v Speaker 3>of teams and how they fared this season to what's left,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Guardians have the easiest strength of schedule the rest of

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the season. Now the White Socks aren't that much further

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 3>down because this division is the thing that stinks and

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 3>kind of helps in why it's a really high strength

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>of schedule. But you know, the White Sox are still

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 3>around three. They're gonna be anywhere from three to four games.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 3>As you're listening to this above, I just don't think

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 3>like the moves that they made that like, is this

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 3>sustainable for two more months?

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>It could be.

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to say it's not.

0:07:58.600 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>It could be.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>But I like the move that the Guardians made. I

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 3>thought Joey Dell was a great move. I like them

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 3>getting rotation help. Like I still see them as kind

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 3>of a complete ish team, and I think they're going

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 3>to make a really really good stand at this division.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 3>It looks really poorous right now, but I think it's

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 3>going to be extra opportunity because these couple games here

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 3>are going to get us that, you know, two seventy

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 3>or maybe three to one or something like that, and

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 3>they're still within h They're still within grounds to be

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 3>able to pull this. So this division is still wide open.

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 3>There's still too much time. This team always does it.

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 3>Get a healthy Jose Ramirez, get some of those new pieces,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 3>and close to three to one for the Guardians to

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 3>take this division over the White Sox is a smash

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 3>to me. So this is the one I'm going to

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 3>be jumping in on the future, whether it's you know,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 3>we're like, I love World Series bets. I think those

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 3>are like sexy and fun, but this one to me

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 3>has like high probability, higher probability of cashing than playing

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 3>the World Series one. So this one is why I

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 3>picked more of a division winner and I'm all over it.

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>So take that, Bogs. We're taking division winners here, not

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>World Series winners. But I got to agree.

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, so the Guardians are looking like a really good team,

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Like looking at their rotation, this is.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 3>As song as they don't play the Mets.

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 2>They don't play the Mets, which shouldn't happen too too

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 2>often without looking at the schedule. But Parker Messi Gavin

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.599
<v Speaker 2>Williams has been a stud can t o byby a

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit iffy. But as you're four and five that

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.599
<v Speaker 2>you'll take that. Foster Griffin is a nice addition. You

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 2>got arguably the best relief pitcher in all of baseball,

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and Kid Smith you helped out the lineup, so I

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 2>got to co sign this one. I really like the

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 2>guardians there. Go around, shop it on betting pros and

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 2>get the best number. And speaking of betting pros, you

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 2>guys should be checking out our new home run betting tool.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Stop guessing on MLB dinger props and head to bettingpros

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 2>dot com slash homers. Our model calculates a fair price

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 2>for every hitter on the slate line, shops across major

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 2>books and prediction markets, and hits you with a clear play,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>lean or pass grade. Stop betting into bad lines and

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>lock in your home run card today at bettingpros dot

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>com slash homers. All right, gentlemen, let's have some fun

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>and move into the awards futures. We're talking MVP cy

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Young Rookie of the Year. Whatever you guys like and Bogman,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 2>we will kick it to you first.

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Look, I think Welsh and I had a little

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 4>disagreement about this. We can talk about it here as well,

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 4>But the NL MVP race is hot right now. Right

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 4>it's minus one to ten for both show hay and PCA,

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 4>and I think with voter fatigue, with everybody hating the Dodgers,

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 4>right if the season ended today, I think PCA would

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 4>win the MVP over show Hey. Now it looks like

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 4>show Hayes probably not going to pitch again this season,

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 4>and if he does, it's going to be very light work,

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 4>not intent, so I don't think he's going to add

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 4>much there. The one danger I see in PCA is

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 4>how unbelievably streaky he has been in his short career.

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 4>So if he does have a down month, I think

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 4>it's in oh god, here it is. It's Otani again

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 4>crushing the ball, because Otani doesn't typically have down months.

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 4>So uh, that is my one fear. But I think

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 4>defensively and with what he is doing offensively, that this

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 4>is it's very very close right now, and I would

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 4>like to see PCA run him down and win the MVP.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 4>So minus one ten I think is very doable here,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 4>and then on the Rookie of the Year, give me

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 4>JJ Weatherholt plus or minus one thirty five. At this point,

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think the last time we looked is

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 4>that like minus one ninety year minus two ten or

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 4>something like that to when the NL Rookie of the Year. Obviously,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 4>south Stewart has had a surge which has brought this

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 4>back to closely even. But I still think Weatherhole is

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 4>the best rookie in the National League and we'll win

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 4>that award. So just a little bit of a buyback in.

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 4>We don't typically like to do a lot of minuses

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 4>on futures, but futures now mean eight weeks, not you know,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 4>five months, So right now I think these these bets

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 4>are definitely takable in the futures market.

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>The only downside potentially with PCA is what happened last

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 2>year is if he does happen to crater down the stretch.

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>And actually just talked about this on an episode of

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the Fantasy Pros Baseball podcast, that he's just a better

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 2>hitter than he was last year. He's walker is up,

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 2>his on base percentages, up one hundred points over last year.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>He looks like he's gonna blow through home run stolen

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>base totals, and even with Otani pitching and Otani pitching

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 2>really well when he's been out there, I mean, show

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Hey doing show Hey things has a one to seven

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 2>nine era, a point ninety five whip. You add the

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 2>pitching war and the hitting war, and he's still about

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>a full win shy of what PCA has done. He's

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>just that great on both sides of the ball, and

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to argue JJ Weatherholt as well salth Stewart's

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>had a bit of a resurgence, as says weather Hold,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 2>because Weatherholds kind of slumped a little bit there in

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 2>the mid months but has picked things up here. Welsh,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 2>any thoughts on either of those bets you feel strongly

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 2>about Otani versus PCA or weather Hold versus south Stewart.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps, Yeah.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's just gonna go into my bed as well,

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 3>so I can just jump in because I'm on the

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 3>opposite end of the Pete Armstrong one.

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Though.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 3>What I will say though is last year, if around

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 3>this time, if you remember, like ky Rally was going

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 3>ballistic though he was like slowly starting to fade a

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 3>little bit on the batting average, you know, the second

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 3>half struggled. But we're looking at him and we're talking

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 3>about the MVP race, and one of the biggest pieces

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 3>against him was the negative defensive rating. So you almost

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 3>have this this opposite correlation where if we're going to

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 3>hold the negative defensive rating against the guy that's hitting

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 3>sixty plus homers and you know, carrying this team, then

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't we vault up the positive defensive rating because no

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.559
<v Speaker 3>one has a better defensive rating out there than Pete Armstrong.

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 3>It so on fangrafts, it's like a twenty one point

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 3>five or twenty one point seven highest rating. No one

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 3>else is in the twenties. And as you mentioned, he's

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 3>got a seven point eight WARS we're recording this. I

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 3>had looked it was the day before I had an

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 3>updated Otani's but he was like a combined six point

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 3>four over three bottom line though over three wins above

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 3>replacement as a hitter and a pitcher. But I'm on

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 3>the opposite ends because when do you possibly get an

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 3>even money or a minus one oh five on Shohiotani.

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>You never see it.

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 3>The only time you could see it is before the

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 3>season starts. So to me, this is a just like

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 3>an incredible opportunity to jump on this. I mean, I

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 3>think even if he doesn't hit or it doesn't hitch

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the way, you're gonna go and look

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 3>at him as a hitter, and you're gonna see you know,

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 3>probably close to like one hundred hundred keep it three

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 3>hundred batting average, thirty homers. Like he's not quite the

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 3>same version we've seen with all the big stolen bases,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 3>but the Dodgers have been faltering and he's the guy

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 3>that has been carrying this team. But you have to

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 3>still consider even if he doesn't pitch the rest of

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the way through that this was a three plus win

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 3>war pitcher. He was one of the best pitchers in

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 3>the first half, and I think that's going to carry

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>in and because of the Dodgers' failure, you're gonna look

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>at who is the most valuable for their team, and

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that actually works well for shoheal Tani. It's

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>also kind of a there's a public you know, like

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 3>perception to it where it's like Otani is just like

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 3>just such a great player doing both sides continuously being

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 3>both sides? How do you not give him that award?

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 3>But I'm open to this being super close. If Peter

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong continues at his run, it's gonna be a really

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 3>tough argument against. If he's a three hundred hitter, probably

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 3>gonna fall short of the RBI marker. But if he's

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 3>like thirty five thirty five with an eight War nine war, like,

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>how are we gonna ignore that with the defensive ratings?

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 3>And if the Cubs make, you know, like a really

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>big statement. So I think this could be close. But

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 3>for me, this is just honed in on, like when

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 3>do you ever see this for Otani that I would

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 3>jump on this because I think there's just such a great,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 3>great pull for him to take this really no matter

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>what the rest looks like statistically the rest of the

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 3>way through. And I didn't really have anything on anything else, though,

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I would say with sal Stewart, I was tempted, and

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a guy because I do this all

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the time. I just like talk about World War War

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to MVP awards or any type of award.

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>But I think it matters. Sal Stewart is so far

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 3>behind JJ Weatherholt from a wins above replacement standpoint, JJ

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 3>is a top ten hitter in baseball over four. I

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 3>think salth Stewart's still at like one point nine, or

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 3>he'll be at two. But this is an instance where

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 3>you might categorically look and go, can we really not

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 3>give it to a thirty home run high batting average

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe leads the league an RBI rookie. I think he

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 3>really could make a really big play for it, But

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 3>the problem is is he's like minus money now, so

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't really want to do anything with either one

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 3>of those. I think weather Holt kind of like the

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Otani thing is a little bit sneaky because he looks

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>like the favorite still, but I just don't want to

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 3>touch it because I think it's gotten too messy over there,

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think south Stewart is going to really really

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 3>buy for it. But I'm Otani, MVP, Boggs is PCA.

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be really fun race the rest of

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the way through.

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 4>I really love the point that you made about like, hey, look,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 4>when are we going to get these good of odds

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 4>on show? Hey again?

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 4>I think that is the best point you can make

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 4>if you're pointing out why you should be invested in show. Hey,

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 4>I would say, like, just get invested in one of them.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Pick the side that you like the best, because I

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 4>think the numbers are good for both. For either of them,

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 4>obviously only one will win, even though that's minus money.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 4>But like, if PCA is still good through the end stretch,

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 4>has a higher war and doesn't beat Otani, we can

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 4>just officially say that defense does not matter for the

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 4>MVP award, just making it, just making an offensive ward

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 4>because it's Dan because he was bad and then PCA

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 4>was good and they don't give it to him, So

0:16:59.240 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 4>what do.

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 3>We Yeah, I think one of the things you get

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 3>a factor though, too, is like if he does stuff,

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 3>if he does get back in pitch, like.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm assuming prognosticated.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, we're future casting that he just will not

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 3>pitch at all. But then all of a sudden he

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 3>pitches through September getting for the playoffs and carries this

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 3>team and fights off and fins off. I mean, it's

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 3>going to catch him, but you fend off the Podres

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 3>and you continue rolling and you catch up with the Brewers.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Like that's that's something that's on the table that will

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 3>just completely decimate any of the defensive rating that Pete

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Crow does or anything like that. Is that he pitches

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 3>for a final month and then all of a sudden

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 3>it's like, oh, yeah, by the way, it's the best player.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Like in the war, the war.

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Will be much closer to if and it just won't

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 4>yeah if show he pitches, so yeah.

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I think show Hay also has public favor on his

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 2>side over PCA. He is the boy wonder. Everybody loves

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 2>show Hey. MLB posts about him every chance they get,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think there is a little bit more of

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 2>a negative spin with PC eight. How much that impacts

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>the writers and the voters, that's up to you to decide.

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:56.719
<v Speaker 2>But something else, well, it's up to the writers, it's

0:17:56.760 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 2>up to the right.

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 3>That's that's the thing. This isn't like a system play.

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 3>This isn't like AI is going to just put it

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 3>into a thing, scramble it out and throw it out

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 3>to us. These are like people that are going to

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 3>have their public perceptions.

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's a cup.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 3>I didn't mean to interrupt you, by the way, but

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 3>like to your point, these are going to be We've

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 3>seen guys in like Hall of Fame voting who was

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't like Levitard that was famous for like not

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 3>putting anybody on it, taking a mockery of it, yeah,

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 3>sold it or whatever. So it's like they're going to

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>just have their perception. You might not be able to

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 3>change anybody's mind right now. It doesn't matter what statistically happens.

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 3>There might be people that are pissed off about Pete

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 3>crow Armstrong and maybe some unlikability or yelling, you know,

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 3>in that situation he had early on. But there also

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 3>might be some people with a tany that still float around,

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 3>like passing was doing all these reports about you know,

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 3>the epay stuff and the gambling stuff still floats around.

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 3>But there's the human element of it muddies it. And

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 3>if you do have one that has more of a

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 3>negative connotation, that can work against them. And that is

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 3>peak ro Armstrong. Weirdly, because I don't have any issue

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 3>with I don't know what people are like so weird

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 3>about him, but there are really people that just do

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 3>not like him, and that's something that could carry over

0:18:57.320 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 3>in this. You know, I say public, it's not public,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 3>but it's like writers, writers putting in the vote.

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 2>One thing I'd say too is just keep locked into

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 2>betting pros over the next couple weeks, and there's a

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 2>decent chance that these odds get swayed ever so slightly

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 2>by a hot show hey game, or PCA hits two

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 2>homers and steals a base it makes a great play

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 2>in center field, and you might be able to get

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>both at plus money at some point over the next

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks if those odds are shifting up and

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 2>down a little bit. So is just something to keep

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 2>an eye on over on Betting Pros. We're going to

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 2>keep it going in just a second, but first I

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 2>want to remind you guys about our presenting sponsor, hard

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Rock Bet. Some fans call this the slow period. There's

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>no hockey on, there's no basketball. Football is just slowly

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 2>ramping up. But here at hard Rock Bet, we call

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 2>it baseball season. And this summer, hard Rock Bet has

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the hottest betting odds in Florida. They're introduced in the

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 2>ten cent summer sale, big juice fee, whatever you call it.

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 2>We're cutting our cut on winners spreads and over under

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 2>pregame baseball bets. There's the same bets as ever, but

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 2>better odds. If you're ready to step into the batter's box.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Sign up with hard Rock Bet today in place a

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 2>five dollars bet. If it wins, you get one hundred

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 2>and fifty in bonus bets on top of your winnings.

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right next, one hundred and fifty into your account

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 2>and sure. Hard Rock Bet is Florida's only legal sportsbook,

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 2>but you don't have to be in Florida to join

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the party. Hard Rock Bet is also live in Arizona, Ohio,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.719
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado, and Michigan, with

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 2>more states on the way. So grab your bat and

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 2>swing for the fences all August long during hard Rock

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Bets ten cent Summer Sale, Download the hard Rock Bet

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 2>app today and roll with us. Payable in bonus bets,

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 2>not a cash offer offered by the Seminol Tribe of

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Florida in Florida, offered by Seminole hard Rock Digital, LLC.

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>In all other states.

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Must be twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one a

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 2>three to three play wise. In Indiana, if you are

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 2>someone who knows a gambling problem and wants help, call

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 2>one eight hundred and nine with it. In Arizona, Ohio,

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 2>and Virginia, call one eight hundred mis reset gambling problem

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 2>called one eight hundred gambler. All right, let's shift now

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 2>to post trade deadline strategy. How does the trade deadline

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 2>impact our bets? We're gonna hear about that in a second.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 2>From Bogs, we're gonna talk about the Seattle Mariners. What

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 2>do you expect to happen with them over the final

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 2>couple months of the season.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Bugs, Yeah, look this the AL West is wide open

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 4>right now, a lot like the NL Central that we

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 4>just are, the AL Central that we just mentioned with

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 4>the Guardians and the White Sox. Like you know, the

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 4>Twins are in there. Everybody except the Royals are within

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 4>four and a half games with the White Sox, so

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 4>it's all very doable. In the West. The Astros are

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 4>leading by a game and a half up on Texas

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 4>or two and a half up on the Mariners, and

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 4>the Minnors still have a losing record of fifty six

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 4>and fifty nine and they didn't do a ton at

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 4>the deadline, but they did more than Texas. Texas sold,

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 4>So I think this is a two horse race between

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 4>the Astros and the Mariners, and I think if you

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 4>get into the playoffs, the Mariners are gonna be one

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 4>of the teams to beat in the AL because of

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 4>this pitching staff. Right You're gonna add Kate Anderson in

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 4>here within the next week or two or so or

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 4>whatever it is, so he's gonna be in this rotation.

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 4>You're gonna have wu Miller, Gilbert, and you did add

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Ward at the end of this. Maybe Cal Rowley can

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 4>get something back together. I just really like this pitching

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 4>staff in the playoffs, and they're ten to one to

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 4>win the AL right now. So maybe you get in

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 4>there and you get beat down by the Dodgers. Maybe

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 4>you get in there and get beat down by someone

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 4>from the NL. But they were, you know, a couple

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 4>outs away from getting to the World Series last year.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 4>So I do think that this team has experienced through

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 4>the playoffs. They have a very good pitching staff, and

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 4>I think they can get through the playoff rung. If

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 4>they can get there, that is a big if, but

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 4>it's very doable in this division because this division, no

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 4>one has pulled away and no one made any major

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 4>game breaking moves. You know, the Astros adding varshow is nice,

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 4>But is that does that shift all the odds towards

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 4>the Astros? I would not say so. So Seattle will

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 4>make make it to the World Series win the al

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 4>at plus one thousand is a bet that I like,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 4>if it.

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't for a George Springer home run that I was

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>there to witness last year, then Seattle would have been

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the team that probably would have beat the Dodgers in

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 2>the World is because that's just the way things work. Well,

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>So you're also looking at a futures bet in the

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 2>American League and it's a team that we mentioned earlier

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 2>on in this show.

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear about the Boston Red Sox.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, and this is like floating a little

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 3>bit around, like the concept of what you were talking about.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 3>You're like the trade deadline, what's the aftermath in the

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 3>betting strategy? I think one of the most interesting things

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 3>because the Seattle one is interesting to Bogmin's point, because like,

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 3>no one really did anything, so there's still this wide

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 3>open market. So if I were to give it a narrative,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 3>I would say that no one did anything of significance

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 3>that I think it makes that open for them. Now

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 3>that bet is to win the entire AAL. The division

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 3>might be an interesting play, but I'm going in the

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 3>same direction and I'm going to get worse ods. But

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.400
<v Speaker 3>I think if we want to look at the aftermath

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 3>of the trade deadline, what is the biggest impact that happened,

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 3>how about the Boston Red Sox. It's not necessarily the

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 3>trade deadline, by the way, and more of the path

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of them winning games. But the last time we did

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 3>this show, twenty to one, thirty to one or something

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 3>like that to win the AL, I mean was astronomically ridiculous.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 3>You're now looking at around five and a half to

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 3>six to one for the Red Sox to take the

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 3>AL as a whole, and I think that's an interesting bet.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>It's risky in that, like you know, this team again

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 3>coming back to it, like on paper, it just looks weird.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.640
<v Speaker 3>But I just don't think there's a stranglehold in the AL.

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 3>And that's the thing that I kind of keep coming

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 3>back to. I mean, in the NL, it's tricky because

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 3>it's like Dodgers and Milwaukee have been crazy. Like I'll

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 3>be honest with you, one I would kind of float

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 3>out as the Phillies. I still think the Phillies are

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 3>a dangerous team and they're like, you know, around ten

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 3>to one to come out of the NL and go

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 3>to the World Series. But you know, I don't think

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 3>New York is a complete team. I don't think Tampa.

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Tampa is just they're kind of like the

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Milwaukee of the AL. They're just like this cool group

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 3>that works really well. I don't think they're this dominantly

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 3>crazy big team. And then it's a Boston Red Sox

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>who also don't have that, but they've got momentum. They're

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 3>adding ADLEI Ritchman, They've got their bats that are hot.

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 3>They're starting to hit for power, and just what if

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 3>if Garrett Crochet does come back, because he starts to

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 3>he's starting to throw and starting to warm up, and

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 3>what if that happens into the playoffs. They've already got

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 3>a great rotation, they've got an absolute shutdown closer, and

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 3>they've got bats that are live. They've got that momentum.

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 3>So you know, five and a half, if I'm going

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 3>to play something like this. You know, I would love

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better odds, but I do think the

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Red Sox are not just like on paper, the hottest team,

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:22.439
<v Speaker 3>but I think they're the most dangerous team in the

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 3>AL right now because they have every facet clicking for them.

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Can you keep doing that for two or three more months?

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 3>That'll be the big question. But I don't think these

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 3>odds are going to get much better unless they go

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 3>into a huge losing streak. So I'll take that five

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and a half or six to one for Boston to

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 3>come out of the AL and surprise everybody.

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to totally co sign this, which you guys

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>can see.

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm wearing a blue Jay's had. It hurts me dearly

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 2>to co sign a Boston Red Sox futures bet. But

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to argue they are on all cyllolders firing

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 2>right now. The lineup looks great. Rotation is really really solid,

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 2>even if Garrett Crochet doesn't come back. But I heard

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 2>a report the other day that he'd started a throwing progression,

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 2>so you might get Garrett Crochet back for a few stars.

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 2>They added Eric Miller in the bullpen, and in the

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 2>long run, does that work out with Marcello Meher in

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. Who knows, but Miller's a good arm to have,

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 2>another lefty, high leverage arm to have for the stretch.

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 2>And another point here that was made to me the

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 2>other day looking back in twenty twenty five, George Springer

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 2>came out of nowhere had the third highest WRC plus

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 2>and baseball amazing season. This year, who has the third

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 2>highest WRC plus and baseball? It's Wilson Contrera's. They have

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 2>their own version of George Springer this year, the veteran

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 2>righty bat who just goes nuclear for a season. The

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 2>only guys who have better offensive seasons this year are

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Wan Soto and Jordan Alvarez. So I could see the

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Red Sox making a deep run going all the way

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to the World Series here if they keep this up,

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 2>and I kind of expect them to a couple more

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 2>bets we are going to get to in a second.

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 2>But first I want to remind you guys about the

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 2>betting pros discord. Futures markets move fast after the deadline.

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 2>You do not want to be betting in a silo.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Joined the betting pros discord completely free. Not only can

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 2>you connect with expert handicappers who provide free picks for NBA, NFL, MLB,

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 2>NHL player props, live betting, and more. But now you

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 2>can also participate in our weekly community picks. You can

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>cast your vote, see how your pick stack up against

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 2>the experts, and track your success. Join the conversation right

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 2>now for free at bettingpros dot com slash chat. Before

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>we get out of here, we want to hit you

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 2>on some bets that will be gone pretty soon. You

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 2>gotta bet these in the next couple of days to

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 2>get the value and bogs.

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>We're going to start with you and the Los Angeles Angels.

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, how about the Angels to have the worst record

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 4>in baseball at plus one thirty five. I like these

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 4>kind of bets because the Rockies, Like, look, the Rockies

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 4>didn't trade away a lot of that offense, so they're

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 4>bad right now, but I think they're gonna be a

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 4>little bit better. The Mets still only have fifty wins.

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 4>The Angels are sitting here at forty four and seventy one, though,

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 4>and they traded Soriano Adele Zephyr jan Yate silseth OHOPI

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.959
<v Speaker 4>like they traded away a lot of pieces from this team,

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 4>and I think it would behoove them to fall down

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 4>to the bottom to get those high draft picks as well. So, uh,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 4>plus one thirty five for the Angels to have the

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 4>worst record, boys, I mean, is there a strong argument

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.239
<v Speaker 4>against it? Would be my question for me.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 2>They're the worst.

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 3>They're the worst right now. Yeah, we're recording this. They're

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the worst team in baseball, and I don't see them

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 3>getting much better. So that this is an interesting market

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 3>that you pick. I'd love to play better odds on

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 3>something like that. But here's the fun reason why at

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 3>any plus money you could do that. It's a two

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 3>horse race. It is two teams. So if you're getting

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 3>plus money and it is just two teams going at it, like,

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that's the worst.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it might be three teams are pretty bad too.

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I suppose, like another run, I mean,

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 3>the Kurtz comes back, I suppose I guess I see

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 3>this dominantly as a two horse right. Well, I mean,

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 3>you're not making yourself anymore, but but but I'm saying.

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 4>That's why that's why the odds aren't like plus four

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 4>hundred or something, because it is you know, it's plus

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 4>one thirty five.

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 2>That's all so looking at it, the Rockies, surprisingly this

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 2>year offensively have been pretty good. I mean, they have

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the fifth highest OPS in all of baseball. If you

0:28:57.640 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 2>look at WRC plus, it kills them.

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.479
<v Speaker 1>They get they get screwed.

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Being at course, I think a little bit too much

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>with w RC plus and they're like twenty eighth in baseball,

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 2>but they have the fifth highest OPS. So I think

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>the pitching is obviously bad. But the Angels they don't

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 2>have the hitting or the pitching side covered. So I

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 2>like this bet a lot. The Angels are a dumpster fire.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 2>For Mike Trout's sake, I wish that he would get

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 2>out of there, but apparently he doesn't even want to

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>get out of.

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>There, so maybe this is all what he wants.

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna wrap it up with one more bet here.

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna look at home run leaders and we're gonna

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 2>come down to the wire here for the home run

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>lead in Major League Baseball. Jordan Alvarez is number one

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to thirty five. And then you have three names tied

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 2>for second of thirty three. It's Hunter Goodman, Junior Cameronaro,

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and then Kyle Schwarber, which is where.

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Wels is gonna be heading here.

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I'm gonna go with schwarbz that you're getting around

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 3>two and a half to one. Schwarber's two behind order

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 3>on Alvarez. He's doing it with a significantly low batting average, which,

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 3>by the way, could be the reason why that you

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 3>don't want to take this because Alvarez is hitting ninety

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>points higher, but he's hitting ninety points higher with two

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 3>more home runs. Kyle Schwarber is an absolute beast. I

0:29:58.080 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 3>think this Phillies team is gonna make a nice little

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 3>run here. I think he's going to continue to carry

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 3>He's doing this right now. He's too off with a

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 3>big struggle. He hit thirty two homers in the first half.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Since the post All Star break, he's only hitting one

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 3>fifty four. I do not think that is going to continue.

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Not that he's a big, strong second half guy. The

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 3>last two years he's hit like two thirty two to

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 3>forty in the second half, but I think the homers

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>are going to come in huge bunches, and it just

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 3>takes a little tiny run for him to get to

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 3>where Alvarez is at. ISO is closing into the three hundreds,

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and again I would just point it out that like

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 3>he's been able to do this with a subbish par

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 3>batting average versus where your Dona is. Jordne is a freak,

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>He's a superhero. But like I can see Jordan finishing

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 3>forty forty two somewhere like that. Also, not to dismiss

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 3>Junior Camenio. Junior Cameronaro has been fantastic with another ki

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 3>contact hitter. But Schwarber does one thing, and he does

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 3>one thing great and it's hit bombs. And I think

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Schwarber still has an opportunity after thirty two in the

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 3>first half to finish this year with fifty plus home runs,

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 3>so that I'm getting around two and a half odds

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 3>on that for him to lead the league in I

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 3>love that bet. So that's going to be my big

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 3>prop that I'm going to lock into as we come

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 3>to a close on the season.

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 2>It looks like a pretty good bet to make. If

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you look back over the last four seasons, the only

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>person who has more homers than Kyle Schwarber is Aaron

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Judge and the guy right behind him is show Heyo Tani.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I'd say that's a pretty decent company to

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 2>be at. He just keeps chugging into his thirties. Kyle Schwarber,

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if we'll see him hit five hundred, and

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 2>something tells me that we will. But what do you

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 2>guys think? Let us know down below. What are your

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>bets going forward? Do you like our futures? Do you

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 2>want to fade them? Let us know in the comments section.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, if you like Baseball Talk, you

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 2>can find all three of us over on the Baseball Podcast,

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 2>so make sure you guys are checking that one out.

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>But subscribe to Betting Pros and make sure you guys

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 2>are checking it out. For Scott Bogman and Chris Welsh,

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Rica. We'll talk you next time right here

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 2>on the Betting Pros podcast.

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros Podcast. If you

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 4>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 4>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:31:59.480 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 4>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros