WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend: November 7th, 2025

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:05.199
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week, Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business, finance

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and tech news as it happens. Bloomberg Business Week Daily

0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Hi, everyone, welcome to a special edition of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>We are looking at some of our favorite guests from

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the Schwab Impact twenty twenty five event held this past

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>week in Denver, Colorado. This event brings together advisors from

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 2>around the country and those in the industry that support

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 2>them with services and tools.

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we're going to hear from some familiar names

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 3>folks like Liz Anne Saunders and Kevin Gordon and more.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Plus so look at how AI is changing the investing landscape.

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to talk about AI a lot. We

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>begin with Schwab CEO Rick Wurster. Well some deal flow,

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Charles Schwab agreeing to buy Forge Global Holdings. It's a

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 2>marketplace for buying and holding shares at private companies. It's

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 2>about a six hundred and sixty million dollars deal we're

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about forty five dollars a share, that's about seventy

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 2>two percent above the closing price on Wednesday. So delighted.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I didn't expect to be talking to you so soon,

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 2>but I'm delighted that you made time for us. Rick Worster,

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>of course, president CEO of Charles Schwab here at Impact

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five. It is your annual event for independent advisors,

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 2>and I'm sure that they're kind of curious about this deal.

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Why now and why this company?

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're thrilled to be able to democratize access to

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 4>private investing. This is a market that forever has been

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 4>for the high net worth and the ultra high networth,

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 4>and with the acquisition of Forge, we'll be able to

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 4>bring access to private companies to every investor. And so

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 4>we're thrilled about that. Second, it continues our history of innovation,

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 4>and our innovation has always centered around what we what

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 4>can we do to provide more access, more opportunity to

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 4>our clients so they can grow and improve their net worth.

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 4>So we're just thrilled about this. And Forge was to

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 4>the firm we really wanted to work with.

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>It's been a lot of speculation about this company.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 4>Yes, as you know, yes, well, you know there's stock

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 4>who's down ninety percent off its highs and at the

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 4>same time, they're the leader in the private company marketplace,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 4>and so for us to be able to acquire the

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 4>leading company that has.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 5>The deepest relationships with the private.

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 4>Companies and who have the stock opportunity, it's just phenomenal

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 4>for us.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Rick, was it a bit competitive? And I'm just thinking

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>about the premium that you guys paid. I'm thinking of

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 2>was it Morgan Stanley just did a deal to buy

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>equity Zen, which is another similar platform, So it does

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 2>feel like big firms are jockeying to provide this access

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to their investors. So was there pressure to do this

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 2>deal and get it done now?

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, as a public company, Forge has to run a

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 4>process and so absolutely this was a competitive process.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 2>They've been pretty I think transparent about this.

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 4>From our standpoint though, we think we're paying a very

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 4>reasonable price where it's five times revenue less than what

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 4>we trade on a revenue basis, and the opportunity for

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 4>us in private markets is so much bigger than what

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 4>we're paying for the company. We're paying six hundred and

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 4>sixty million dollars for the company. This market could be huge,

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 4>and when we bring our forty six million clients to

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 4>this marketplace, I think the opportunity to grow our economics

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 4>is significant. But most importantly and why we did this

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 4>deal was not about making money.

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 6>Relative to the purchase price.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 4>It was about democratizing access to private investing and to

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 4>helping our clients grow their wealth.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Will this only be for accredited investors or what's the

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>plan in terms of new product placement or product offerings

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>to offer it up to the retail investor.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 4>What I'm so excited about is we're going to have

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 4>an opportunity for every type of investor to invest in

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 4>alternatives with this acquisition. Well, three ways that clients can

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>invest today. We already have for both our rias and

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 4>retail clients a menu of alternative managers, the leaders that

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 4>you're aware of, some of the big names in private

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 4>equity and venture capital. That's one way our clients can invest.

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 4>The second way is through this acquisition of Forge, which

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 4>owns an asset management company, we will in the first

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 4>core of next year, launch an indexed fund that is

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 4>an index of the sixty biggest private companies and any

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 4>investor with any wealth if they have interests in that,

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 4>we'll be able to invest. And then third, for accredited investors,

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 4>we will have a marketplace opportunity for those investors to

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 4>buy individual private companies and invest in those companies directly.

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 4>That does require you being an accredited investor.

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 2>A couple of questions I want to ask you, So,

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 2>how does it kind of improve your ability to win

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 2>more wallet share when it comes specifically to clients. We

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 2>know that retail investors have been clamoring for more access

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 2>to private markets.

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 4>I think we've gone I.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Know it's not about money, yeah, or I know it's

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>not about in terms of the price you paid, but

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 2>it is about right, Like you want to make sure

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 2>your clients are happy and they're getting all the offerings.

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just curious, how does it help you win

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 2>more share?

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Over the last ten years, we've become a premier destination

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 4>for high net worth and alternate high networth clients. And

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 4>the reason for that is we have a product offer

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 4>that can't be matched, whether it's access to privates, lending

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 4>capabilities that are straightforward, fast efficient with great rates, wealth

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 4>support on their tax, trust and estate needs, and access

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 4>to live individuals to speak to. They can walk into

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 4>one of our four hundred branches all across the country,

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 4>have a conversation with a real life person about their

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 4>financial needs, have a discussion about financial planning and what's

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 4>going on in their life. And so we really have

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 4>become over the last decade a premier destination for high

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 4>network clients. And this acquisition just adds to our capabilities.

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 2>What about from your rias? And I think about all

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 2>the independent advisors who are here. This is what this

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 2>event is all about. So how much does this kind

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 2>of help them in their pitch to clients? And I'm

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>just curious, is this to some extent in response to

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 2>what you've been hearing from independent advisors?

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 4>It absolutely is, And this is a game changer for

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 4>us in the RIA space. Today, we have five trillion

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 4>dollars of RIA assets that we custody. One point two

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 4>percent of them sit in alternatives. We know there's more

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 4>demand that number probably should be closer to five, six

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 4>or seven percent, And with this acquisition, we've now given

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 4>them three different ways to get invested, and I expect

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 4>over the coming years we'll see that one percent grow

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 4>more towards the five percent. So the rias are thrilled.

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 4>They've wanted us to do more and alternatives, and I

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 4>think with this acquisition.

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 6>We've nailed it.

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 2>And you said the new client offering, it's next year,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll see it early part of next year.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, Forge is up and going today, so hopefully some

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 4>of our clients will go find it and start getting

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 4>invested if that's what they want to do.

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>But but I.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Have non accredited I think about like.

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 4>That will We're going to launch the fund in the

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 4>first quarter of next year, that's the current plan, and

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 4>then we'll continue to roll out their services in the

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 4>coming months.

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Again, you know, the other side of this rick is,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, concerns about hurdles in terms of transparency and

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.119
<v Speaker 2>investors really understanding what they're buying when they tap into

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 2>anything in the private markets. So are there any kind

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 2>of hurdles that you anticipate, regulatory or otherwise.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 4>That's why we really wanted to work with Forge, Okay,

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 4>because Forge is the market leader in providing robust research

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 4>to clients, and so clients will be able to access

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 4>that level of research through four. In addition to that,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 4>we've also stood up a team of alternative investment experts

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 4>at our firm that any client can call and talk

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 4>to about, you know, a question they have about a

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 4>type of alternative or a particular investment that they want

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 4>to make. And so we really are trying to do

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 4>everything we can to support clients. This is a great

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 4>opportunity for clients to be diversified, to grow their wealth

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 4>in a new asset class. But at the same time,

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 4>we want to make sure we do everything we can

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 4>that they for them to be able to do this

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 4>in a thoughtful, well researched way.

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Is there a company you're most excited about that's on

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the Forge platform or that might be on the Forge platform.

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 7>At some point?

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there's opening, there's anthropic. Is there any company

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>that you're really excited about?

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Not a particular one I'm interested in, but I am

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 4>thrilled that there are a lot of people on our

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 4>platform and a lot of people that listen to your

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 4>show that are active in markets and they want to

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 4>get into cracking because they love crypto or you know,

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 4>they love el On Musk and want to get into SpaceX.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>So that sex is another one.

0:07:58.480 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that's what so interesting is that we find

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of our investors do have these passions and

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 4>now they're going to be able to invest in them

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 4>through private companies.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>So we know you took over in January, this is

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>your first deal. Is there more em and a to come?

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 6>Like?

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 2>How are you thinking about what else you need to

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 2>bring under the Schwab umbrella.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, with forty six million clients on our platform, we

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 4>have an incredible opportunity to continue to add capabilities to

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 4>serve and meet more of their financial life. The average

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 4>fifty year older than fifty year old client has seven

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 4>financial services relationships in their life, so we want to

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 4>add more and more capabilities so they can handle more

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 4>of their financial life at Schwab. And as we add

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 4>those capabilities, we'll either build them, we can partner, or

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 4>we can buy and so we'll look at all three

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 4>of those. But we want to round out our capabilities

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 4>and do everything we can to stand behind our clients

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 4>and make a difference in their financial life.

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And just one last question, mostly small, probably tack ons.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you guys already have digested a large company,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>so I'm just curious or could it be a pretty

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>significant and an a deal.

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 4>You know it's going to depend when again and we'll

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 4>look at build by partner based on what capabilities we

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 4>want to add, but I think we're open to just

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.559
<v Speaker 4>about anything. We want to grow our company. We want

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 4>to do the best job we can serve in clients.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 4>We want to make a difference in their lives, and

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 4>if there's a company or capability out there that we

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 4>can add to our platform that's going to make a difference,

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 4>we're going to do it well.

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 3>The market environment right now, we want to dive right

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 3>in there, because really this week we've heard from different

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street executives that an overdue collection of weighed on

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 3>the market this week so reduced expectations at that rate, cuts,

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>a prolonged government shutdown. Michael Burry added to the negative

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 3>tone with his disclosure of farish wagers on talent here

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 3>and Nvidia. How do you see today's environment from sort

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>of a risk reward perspective.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 4>We try to focus our clients on the long term.

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that owning securities and assets over long periods

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 4>of time will generally go up. It's really hard to

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 4>get the timing of markets down because you have to

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 4>make two correct calls.

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:54.320
<v Speaker 5>First.

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 4>You got to nail it to get out at the

0:09:56.000 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 4>right time, which is really hard. In the strength of

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 4>the kind of market we've had in the momentum, we've

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 4>had to get out at the right times incredibly hard,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 4>and then you've got to be able to get back

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 4>in at the right time or you miss out. I

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 4>was down in Charlotte, North Carolina, visiting with some clients

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 4>and I heard from one client who back in twenty

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>sixteen didn't like the presidential administration and so had sold

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 4>out of stocks. And this was back when we were

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 4>having a pullback, and they said, would now be a

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 4>good time to get back in the market, and they'd

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 4>set out a huge amount of gains over a short

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 4>term point of view. We try to have clients avoid that.

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Clients can stay in the market and tolerate some volatility.

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 4>We think over the long run that gets rewarded because

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 4>it is so hard to call the markets both when

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 4>to get out and when.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 3>To get back in.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 2>So as you walk around the floor and you're talking

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 2>to advisors, I mean, what are they talking about, you know,

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 2>in terms of timely advice that you're getting maybe from

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>the advisors and what they are kind of hearing from

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>their clients.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 4>I think one of the most pressing topics from investors

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 4>today is how to navigate concentrated positions, the S and

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 4>p's as it's concentrated, as it's.

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Ever been right, the mag seven, the big tech, Yes.

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 4>And it's created a tremendous wealth for lots of retail investors,

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 4>and now they're wondering how to diversify their portfolio and

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 4>to do so in a way to minimize their tax burden.

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 4>And there's all kinds of strategies that they can work

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 4>with their advisor on to create a more diversity portfolio

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.479
<v Speaker 4>without having to pay a tremendous amount in capitalating.

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 2>How hard is it, though, that when clients are like,

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>but why would I want to get out of Nvidia

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 2>when I've seen what they've been doing for how many years?

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 8>Like?

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 2>How tough is that? Because we constantly have conversations of

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 2>people saying it's time to you know, broad nab back

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 2>off the big tech, and then it's the big tech

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>with so much momentum.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, you're absolutely right, and it's a really hard conversation

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 4>to have and oftentimes we don't win it, but we

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 4>want to make sure the client is cognizant of the

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 4>risk and the choice that they're making and to be

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 4>fair to those investors, they've been right by sticking with

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 4>their concentrated position for the most part, because the names

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 4>that have driven the market higher have been the same

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 4>ones here for a while, and so many people are

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 4>stuck with it and they are sitting on more gains

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 4>and they might have anticipated.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 3>So let's go further into the retail trader, because they've

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>grown about twenty percent of the US equity market today.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious about sentiment trends, like how the structure of

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 3>this trend, how resilient are retail traders in an eventual downturn. Why.

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 4>I think retail traders have been the ones leading the

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 4>market higher and have been the ones buying the ditch.

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 4>And I think they were out actually in many ways,

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 4>out ahead of the institutional buyers. And so I think

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 4>you have a retail buyer that has strong hands and

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.319
<v Speaker 4>we'll stick through the market. So we'll see how it

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 4>all plays out. But markets go up and down, and

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 4>retail investors will inevitably, you know, make some decisions in

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 4>there that's best for them.

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 3>That's Rick Worster, president and CEO of Schwab, coming up

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 3>more from our conversations at the Schwab Impact twenty twenty

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 3>five events in Denver, Colorado.

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Up next, we hear from Schwab Chief Investment Strategist Liz

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Anne Saunders and what she expects in markets for the

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:57.319
<v Speaker 2>rest of the year.

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg.

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily with Carol Masser and

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 2>We are back here on a special edition of Bloomberg

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Business Week. It's all about some of the highlights from

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Schwab Impact twenty twenty five. It was held this past

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 2>week in Denver, Colorado. It's all about bringing together financial

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 2>advisors from around the country. Those in the industry too

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 2>that support them with various applications, services and tools. And

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>up next we hear from a voice that has followed

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 2>financial markets, Tim for a long long time.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Our conversation on markets with Schwab Chief Investment Strategist Liz

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and Saunders.

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 9>I'm so glad you're here.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 10>Thank you.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 9>Welcome to our cozy, little event.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Five people.

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 3>It's not cozy and it's not little, but we are

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 3>happy to be here. It's a huge event. It was

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 3>huge last year in San Francisco. It was huge before

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.559
<v Speaker 3>that in Philadelphia, you were shaking your head when I

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 3>was saying everything is awesome.

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's it's a.

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 9>Bit of a tale of two markets.

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 11>You've got cap weighted index returns and the lack of

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 11>any significant downside, particularly since the April eighth closing low.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 9>But here's an example.

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 11>The average member within the SMP just since April eight

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 11>has had a sixteen percent now actually seventeen percent draw down.

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 11>The average member within the Nasdaq since April eighth, when

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 11>the nasdac's up fifty some odd percent, has had a

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 11>average maximum drawdown of thirty six.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 2>So this breath isn't there.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 11>The breath isn't there, But there's a lot of churn

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 11>and rotation going on under the surface that you don't

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 11>pick up if you're only looking at the index level returns.

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Are we starting to see signs where investors are kind

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 2>of questioning some of the valuations that are out there,

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the AI spend and whether we're getting the return on

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>investment on it. Tell us you're thinking.

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 9>OK, I think the margin of era has narrowed a bit.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 11>There's obviously sensitivity, whether it is diminution in return on

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 11>US capital, whether you're seeing pressure on margins obviously, the

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 11>concern about the circularity of financing and the fact that

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 11>so far that's a real thing.

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we are kind of blown away. What feels

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 2>like it's all in the family.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, here's five billion dollars, so you can buy five

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars with the stuff from us, right, You guys.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 11>Like Bloomberg had this incredible visual that I think made

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 11>it on Michael Burry's post.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 9>Yes, but it's that is such a great visual.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 11>I've seen more simplistic ones of a power strip with

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 11>the plug plugged into the power strip.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's exactly true, right.

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 11>And I think you know, the boom so far has

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 11>been financed out of cash flows. It's been largely equity financed.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 11>But now you've got as to just pick on the

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 11>MAG seven cohort MAG seven free cash low growth has

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 11>gone from more than sixty percent year over year six

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 11>quarters ago to now two quarters in a row of

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 11>negative and so you're starting to see more deals financed

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 11>with that.

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 9>That's not necessarily a bad thing. It's just a different environment.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 2>But that I do want met in alpha that right,

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 2>didn't they just recently do with oversubscribe, Like there's lots

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 2>of investor interests, but I do like, I don't know,

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Liz what we just have to keep an eye.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 11>On it, or I think you evaluation is a is

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 11>a tough one. I think valuations and I'm going to

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 11>say this generally, not just specific to AI stocks or

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 11>Max seven. It's not a market timing tool. It's more

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 11>it's more a temperature gauge than it is a timing gauge.

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 11>It's almost an indicator of sentiment. There are times where

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 11>valuations can get stretched, and they can get more ridiculously stretched,

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 11>and the market still has a long runway ahead of it.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 11>So I think it represents some of the anks that's

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 11>coming into the.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 9>Narrative right now.

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 11>But it doesn't necessarily pretend impending doom. It's just a

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 11>it's a cost saver AI and it boosts margins. So

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 11>we had we had the really focus solely on the

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 11>hyperscalers and the chips, and then more recently it's gone.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 9>Into the energy usage in the data centers.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 11>Now, I think where you're actually getting meat on the

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 11>bones in terms of productivity statistics, in terms of the

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 11>beneficial to costs is the users of AI.

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 9>And I think that is likely to continue.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 3>But then does it create this destructive element in our

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 3>society as a result of those entry level jobs, those

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 3>white collar jobs, those blue collar jobs that end up

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>being completely eliminated. I mean, I know we're talking about

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 3>a future that none of us can see. But we

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 3>had an interesting conversation with David Weston last week and

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 3>he was basically like, how do we have this payoff

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 3>without the money savings from getting rid of all these employees.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 9>Basically, I think that we're.

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 11>In a moment of creative destruction to quote Trumpeter. Yeah,

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 11>and that happens anytime we have a major innovation or

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 11>we've shifted our economy from being an ag economy to

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 11>industrial industrial to innovate.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 9>And that happens. But ultimately new types of jobs are created.

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 11>I actually think that companies that don't adopt AI are

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 11>going to have more job losses. I think what we

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 11>need to bring in is what AI doesn't yet provide

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 11>and maybe won't ever, you know, the seeds creativity and

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 11>culture and community and connection context. So I think there's

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 11>still I still think AI. Yes, it is replacing certain

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 11>kinds of jobs, but I think it's replacing tasks more

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 11>than it's replacing full occupations. But I think workers have

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 11>to adapt to it and adopt it and bring it

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 11>into their lives or they will be left behind.

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 2>I pulled up my phone because someone came up to

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 2>us and Dwayne, who is a financial advisor, he's here,

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and he said, you guys did something on AI. I did.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 2>We did something at an event and we had somebody

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>who showed how to use AI and you said. After that,

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I went home and started playing machacchi.

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 3>Because I have the panel you did at this conference

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 3>last year in San Francisco.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>No, it wasn't. No, I don't think so.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well it was something, but anyway, there's a lot

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 3>of stuff.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 2>But what he said is he was able to ask

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 2>a questions. Do analytics so much faster? It was accurate

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 2>And he said it just took less time and I

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 2>actually produced better returns for my clients, which was pretty

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 2>cool stuff.

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 11>It is a game changer. But the hallucination rates are

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 11>still high enough. There are low school digits, but high

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 11>enough that I think it was Gene Munster, he spoke

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 11>right before me at a recent conference. Who who said,

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 11>you know, llms are like an intern. They do a

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 11>lot of them work for you, but you kind of

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 11>have to check their work.

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Got to keep an eye on them next six to

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 2>twelve months. What do you think the investment environment looks like.

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 11>I think these bifurcations that have pervaded the economy, even

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 11>the inflation data and obviously the stock market, I don't

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 11>see a.

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 9>Convergence to any significant degree.

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 11>I think you're going to still see those bifurcations, whether

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 11>it's from a capex perspective, AI or non AI, asset

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 11>owners versus non asset owners, high income consumers versus low

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 11>income consumers, tariff impact goods versus non tariff impact goods

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 11>from an inflation standpoint, and then obviously all those by vifircations.

0:20:22.440 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 9>What I would watch for that may be interesting is

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 9>we could have.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 11>A situation where if some of the megacap names, some

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 11>of the leadership names, continue to have some sort of

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 11>pullback phase, watch what the rest of the market does.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's going to be extreme as late

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 11>twenty twenty two. But what was interesting about that low

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 11>in October of twenty twenty two relative to the low

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 11>prior to that in June of twenty twenty two, is

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 11>that when you had the real crush, there was greater

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 11>participation under the surface.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 9>That's what you want to look for.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 3>That SCHWAB chief investment strategist Liz and Saunders. We turned

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 3>out to our common conversation with Schwabs Jelina Kerr, head

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 3>of Advisor Experience in Wealth Solutions.

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 12>My world is responsible for all things digital and investment products,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 12>banking solutions, and how you harness those together and help

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 12>advisors extend them into their client base, especially the ULTRAHI

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 12>network clients.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Who demand a lot of it a lot.

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 3>I was just I was shocked to see you've been

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 3>at SCHWAP for more than thirty years.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 9>I'm an old timer.

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 3>You're on the advisor services trading desks. The role of

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 3>an advisor thirty years ago versus now, I mean those

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 3>are like.

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>Two different jobs, vastly different.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what are the expectations right now versus what they

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 3>were thirty years ago?

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 12>The expectations are, frankly a little overwhelming due to the

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 12>complexity of AI technology. Trying to figure out how to

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 12>scale your business and still serve your clients. Those two

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 12>things don't always just flow together seamlessly, right, and so

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 12>the demands on advisors to really understand all the solutions

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 12>that are out there. I think can get overwhelmed. I

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 12>mean it gets overwhelming for me and I do it

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 12>every day in my day to day job. So I

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 12>think just their ability to think and learn on their

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 12>feet as they're talking to different clients who have different needs,

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 12>because that customization trend is no joke.

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Either does AI help with customization or does AI help

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 2>you in your world at all?

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 12>AI does help us in our world. We are taking

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 12>it more from an internal view right now. So think

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 12>about our service professionals trying to enable them, making sure

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 12>they serve advisors. We've got an a knowledge assistant that's

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 12>powered by AI note taking those sorts of basic tasks

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 12>we are using in house, and we are working with

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 12>advisors to make sure they know what's out there and

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 12>how they can take advantage of it right in a

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 12>safe way.

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 9>Right, you want to measure twice, cut once when it

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 9>comes to.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, we're still finding our way.

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 3>What about alternatives? This is not a world that thirty

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 3>years ago, you know, people were thinking about private credit,

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 3>venture capital, private equity in their portfolios. Yeah, now it's

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 3>like what that's table sticks, It's no.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Longer high yield as being like kind of something out there.

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 2>It's very different, it is, and alts are a huge

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 2>part of that.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 12>I think some of the complexity though, is how do

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 12>you connect the alts to the rest.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:12.719
<v Speaker 9>Of the portfolio.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 12>If you've got a sixty forty alts have a role

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 12>to play there, but it's not very seamless or operationally sound.

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 9>At this point.

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 2>What do they want in terms of alternative I mean,

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 2>when we think about alternatives, we think about real estate,

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 2>you think about some hard assets. I'm just curious, though,

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 2>in a world where crypto is a bigger part of

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 2>investing the private markets world, is it just it seems

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 2>like NonStop that people have talked about for the last

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 2>few years. What do they want in terms of alternatives?

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 2>It really runs the gammut. I mean, I don't want

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 2>to give you an answer that's a non answer.

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 12>But in a way, when you think about some advisors

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 12>who are just really wanting to start inserting it, but

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 12>they want to do it in a very well known

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 12>name way, then you've got all the other all the

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 12>way to the other end of the spectrum. Advisors who

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 12>are creating their own right alts and weaving that into

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 12>the platform. But what we're most hearing is they want

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 12>model flexibility and scale, so they want to be able

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 12>to pull the alts into the model, do all the

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 12>management and construction of all of those things in an

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 12>automated way. And with a liquid securities, that's a bit

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 12>of a challenge, but we're all working through it.

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 2>There's some great leadership with some of our partners.

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 3>But that's so important for your clients because those are sticky.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 3>Those are what cause clients not to move to a

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.239
<v Speaker 3>different RAA. That's right, because you can't just get out

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 3>of them.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 9>No, no, you cannot.

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 12>And I think that's why advisors are at their heart

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 12>right their fiduciary responsibility is to make sure their clients

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 12>know they are a liquid you're going to be in

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 12>this for a while, and they want to make sure

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 12>they're educating their clients so that they're not hitting a

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 12>point where the client's like, oh, yeah, give me.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 2>All that money.

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, can't do it right now.

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 5>So advisors have always been careful and cautious.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 12>But given the fact that these have now gone from

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 12>like a traditional five percent component of the allocation to

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 12>ten to twenty, like it's growing and it's out there.

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Chilia just got about twenty five to thirty seconds as

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 2>you walk the floor. What are you hearing from advisors

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 2>that you're just picking up on in terms of trends

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 2>with themes and just quickly yeah, really quickly.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 12>Automation which does tie back to the AI thing, but

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 12>automation of those tasks construction management, transactional things that are

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 12>not adding value and using API connectivity to do that.

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 12>It's table stakes, yet people need help implementing them.

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 2>That's Jillianna Kerr, Schwab's head of Advisor Experience and Wealth Solutions.

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Coming up more from Schwab Impact twenty twenty five held

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 2>earlier this past week. Up next, we move on from

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 2>equities to fixed income and hear from Schwabs Kathy Jones.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily with Carol Masser and

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenoveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to some of our conversations that were

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 2>this past week at the Schwab Impact twenty twenty five event.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 2>It was held in Denver, Colorado.

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>We turn now to our conversation on fixed income with

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Schwab's chief fixed Income strategist Kathy Jones.

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 7>You know, in general, the economy seems to be chugging

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 7>along great. Okay, it's not great for everybody, but in

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 7>aggregate it's good enough. Inflation is stuck at three percent

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 7>and kind of edging higher.

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 9>Where do we go from here?

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 7>If you've got inflation at three percent maybe moving up

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 7>in a four percent ten year yield, you know that's

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 7>equilibrium right now.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 9>We need something to change.

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 2>And do you think it's going to change?

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 7>I think in twenty twenty six we'll probably get enough

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 7>slow in growth and some easing and inflation that will

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 7>seeields come down. But I think the market was just

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 7>way over its skis expecting the FED to cut over

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 7>and over again. And it is very difficult to forecast

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 7>all the time. But now between Daras on tarosof no data,

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 7>policy shut down, policy making shut down, you know, I

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 7>think the market's just.

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 9>Kind of the bomb.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 7>Markets kind of just going going, WHOA, we're pretty well priced.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 7>Let's just sit here and wait for things to happen.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, So then does that increase the chances Kathy, you

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 2>think of the having a policy misstep here.

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 7>It's certainly a possibility, But I think my impression that

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 7>I get from Paul and from many of the other

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 7>members is look, we're back to that's navigating on a

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 7>cloudy night thing. Right, we don't have information, the Papa

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 7>head isn't clear, and we've taken a couple of steps.

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 7>We're not restrictive anymore. So now we pause and we

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 7>wait and see what happens. Would go slow.

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm a sailer and I've navigated at night and it

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 2>can be kind of not so great. You can hit

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 2>a rock, or you could hit something because you just

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 2>don't read something correctly, or things can be smooth sailing.

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>So is there a chance though that I don't like it?

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I think so many people are shocked at that the

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 2>economy is still growing and we're kind of doing all right,

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and the market continues, the equity market to hit highs,

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily what everybody was predicting a few months ago.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>But I just do wonder what's the thing we could

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>be missing?

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 7>Well right now, financial conditions have been very supportive, and

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 7>I think that's another reason the Fed can kind of wait.

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 7>They're saying, well, where there's no evidence that the level

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 7>of interest rates is holding back the economy, people can

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 7>borrow as much as.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Like housing still yeah, maybe, but I mean, you.

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 7>Know, even housing starting to kind of recover because prices

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 7>are adjusting.

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, what is the thing that gets us?

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 7>It's never the thing you're looking at in ther face, right,

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 7>it's the thing.

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>You don't know.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 7>I'm worried about the buildup of that, you know, behind

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 7>the scenes and the shadow banking.

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 6>System, private credit, you know, to some extent.

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 7>We know that the quality isn't great there, and we

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 7>know that some some firms are struggling.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 3>So how would how would a crisis like that in

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 3>private credit manifest?

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 7>You know? I think the issue is who's lending to

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 7>the private credit folks?

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Don't the banks lend to the private credit folks? Yeah,

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 3>so right, what's their exposure?

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, we don't know, you know it because private credit

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 7>is private. You know, it's hard to know the quality

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 7>of the assets in any given day.

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Your face is really telling. Are you concerned that the

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 2>exposure by the banks is a lot more than we know?

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 7>I think the banks, you know, no, I think the

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 7>banks are the major banks are fine because against their will,

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 7>they've been forced to hold a lot of capital since.

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 9>The Basil rules, And so I think the banks.

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 7>Are okay, but it does get to be sort of

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 7>a cascade, right, you know, one thing leads to another,

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 7>leads to another. A lot of interwoven lending takes place,

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 7>and there's hidden leverage, and that's where you worry about

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 7>things starting to change. I don't have any party to

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 7>be on the spot. I know, I don't have any

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 7>particular like this guy's gonna blow up.

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 2>We have a story to tell.

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm just these are the ways in the past we've

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 7>run into trouble. Somebody gets over leveraged, as the prices

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 7>get out of whack, people are over confident, and then

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 7>things change.

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Right. So it kind of brings us back to the

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 3>FED and how the FED works in an environment such

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 3>as this, in an environment where it's not getting much data.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 3>We did hear from Lisa Cook this week. She said

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 3>she sees the risk of further labor market weaknesses greater

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 3>than the risk of inflation. Will pick up. Chicago Fed

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Presidentcy Schools we said he was more nervous about inflation.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 7>Who's right, Yeah, we'll sign We'll find out.

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll find out when we reach our destination.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, I'm more in Goldsby's camp right now.

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 7>Although the labor market is clearly softened. Some of that

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 7>is supply side, right, So we got the ADP numbers

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 7>today is a positive number. Who's just saying that that

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 7>number isn't consistent with equilibrium in the in.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 3>The labor So were these numbers accurate now?

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 7>Because well, ADP is as accurate as we can we

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 7>can get right now. Yeah, but at the moment.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 3>But when we used to get government data, we used

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 3>to get the ADP numbers on you know, the day before,

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 3>a couple of days before, I don't even remember the world. Yeah,

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 3>we get earlier, and then we'd get the numbers from

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the government and they would oftentimes not even be close

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 3>to one another.

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and that's true. I think part of that is

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 7>ADP is private sector only. They didn't include government workers,

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 7>so there's that discrepancy, and you know, yeah, their surveys

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 7>are different, but it's all we've got to go on.

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 7>So it looks like that they're picking back up a

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 7>little bit and that's good news. The is M figures

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 7>of the man fractioning figures were okay today, with prices

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 7>paid continuing to fe that.

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Schwab's chief fixed income strategist, Kathy Jones. We turned out

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to our conversation with Sam Kang, head of Family Office

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 2>and Premier Wealth Group.

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 3>So you've got it's interesting because you've got a small

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 3>number of clients but a lot of assets. I mean

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 3>we're talking one hundred clients and two hundred billion dollars

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 3>in assets under management. Talk about these relationships because are

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 3>you working directly with the ultra high net worth individuals

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 3>or are their family offices serving as a conduit to you?

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, well we work with both, So updated numbers, we

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 13>are actually now at about one hundred and forty relationships.

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 13>We've now grown to two hundred and sixty billion just

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 13>within the family office, so thirty percent growth just this year.

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.479
<v Speaker 13>In terms of assets, we've grown by fifty percent year

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 13>over year, So there is a huge command to your question.

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 13>We work directly with single family offices as well as

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 13>professor managed multi family offices.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 3>What is the definition right now of both hind net

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 3>worth individual.

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so typically there's a wide range, but typically what

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 13>we see is twenty million in investable assets, which really

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 13>is about thirty thirty million in net worth.

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, is it often the case of just managing

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 2>everything and anything and then the past of that generational wealth. Like,

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>give us an idea of what this all entails, because

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a lot of moving pieces, if.

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 13>Correct, Absolutely, it's a lot of moving pieces. It is

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 13>beyond just financial planning and investments. It gets into reporting,

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 13>but it goes far beyond that. It gets into family dynamics,

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 13>family constitutions. Philanthropy that you just spoke about is a

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 13>key factor in terms of that estate planning. You set

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 13>family constitutions, meaning what so creating the core values of

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 13>a family to identify how you want to spend that

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 13>money down through in how you want to pass that

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 13>wealth bounty generations. So this is really critical, especially with

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 13>the wealth transfer that's happening. Latest reports roughly about one

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 13>hundred and twenty four trillion dollars will be changing hands

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 13>over the next two to three decades. That's roughly about

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:04.719
<v Speaker 13>two to three trillion per year for the next decade

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 13>or so. So what we see is a huge demand,

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 13>especially in the ultra high net worth to create these

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 13>family constitutions so that they have a plan of how

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:13.719
<v Speaker 13>they will pass.

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 6>On the wealth.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's fascinating because we always I think when

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 2>we talked about the passing on of generational wealth. We

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 2>talked about like your offspring right your kids basically, but

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 2>we've also had a lot of conversations about.

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 3>The way you're going sex spouses depending on the agreements anyway,

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 3>go ahead and make them tight.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 2>No, but passing on to women who tend to live

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 2>longer and maybe their spouse their husband dies. But so

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 2>talk to us about the specifics.

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 9>Is a lot of it.

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Big families, lots of family members, is a lot of it.

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Thinking about maybe the husband passing it off to the

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 2>way give us an idea of what so.

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 13>First of all, typically people just think it's passing down

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 13>to the second and third generation.

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 6>What's going to happen for us is the media passing

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:57.240
<v Speaker 6>down to the spouse.

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 13>So as you're saying, roughly about fort five percent of

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.399
<v Speaker 13>that wealth is going to go to that spouse first

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 13>and then it will get into the second and third generation. So, uh,

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 13>there's multiple families that will be involved in this conversation.

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 13>We also see, you know, when we think about the

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 13>transfer of wealth, there is a lot of conversations about

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 13>how you create the overall plan in terms of not

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 13>just the investments, how you think about that investments over

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 13>two to three decades. But what you want to do

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 13>with that money? And do you want to use the

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 13>fort philanthropy? Do you want to create other businesses? So

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 13>there's a lot of conversations along that line.

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's cut to the chase here, death, divorced taxes.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Those are the things that are you know, those are

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the things that are like on the redar of family offices.

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 2>We know that.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 3>But I've also heard stories of like, all right, we

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.320
<v Speaker 3>need the head of our family office to find a

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 3>new yacht captain right now, Bermuda. What's the craziest people.

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Who do that around?

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:35:56.120 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 5>So so what's that that?

0:35:58.040 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 7>That is?

0:35:58.400 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 14>That?

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 13>That isn't the actual We've heard stories where a family

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 13>fired their entire crew. One day, they come to the

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 13>family office and they say, I need a new crew

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 13>by tomorrow.

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 6>So this is the key distinction.

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 13>There are a lot of independent rias that want to

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:16.320
<v Speaker 13>get into the family office space.

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 6>What it really is, it's the very first call that

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 6>these families make.

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 13>So you not only need to be there for their

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:27.160
<v Speaker 13>financial planning, their investments, but you really need to be

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 13>thorough about all the capabilities that you need to be

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.319
<v Speaker 13>able to support our whole families so who are.

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 2>The people support that do that? So are we talking lawyers, Like,

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 2>give us an idea of who has to be all

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 2>involved in that?

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So at the center and think of it as

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:43.320
<v Speaker 13>a hubbet spoke model. Right, So if the center is

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 13>a trusted advisor, we call that more of an expert generalist.

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.960
<v Speaker 13>That person then would reach out to lawyers, it state planners.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 6>It could be.

0:36:54.480 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 13>Aviation loans, it could be bill paid, lifestyle constant services,

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:02.399
<v Speaker 13>healthcare conct of years.

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 6>So it really goes the complete spectrum.

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Hey, last question, our team reporting that at least a

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>fifth of the world's five hundred richest people now have

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 3>a family office helping preserve fortunes totally more than four

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 3>trillion dollars. That's according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. That

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 3>was surprising to me. Why don't they all have family offices?

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Only a fifth of them do?

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think there's more and more interest in creating

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 13>that family office. So along that lines, it's estimated that

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 13>seventeen trillion is within the ultra high network market, but

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 13>only about five to six trillion is managed by a

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 13>family office.

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 6>So I do think that there is a growing trend

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 6>for these services.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 3>That's Sam Kang, Schwab's head a family office and premier

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 3>wealth group that does it for this hour of the

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 3>special edition of Bloomberg Business Week, looking at some of

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 3>our favorite conversations from Schwab Impact twenty twenty five in Denver, Colorado.

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 2>We're not done yet, still to come. More on markets

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.359
<v Speaker 2>with Schwab's head of macro Research and Strategy. We're talking

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 2>about Kevin Gordon.

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Plus Fred Kaine, or managing direct of Relationship Management for

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 3>DAF Giving three sixty. We'll discuss the growth of charitable

0:38:05.520 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 3>giving and use of donor advised funds. You're listening to

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Business Week.

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tim Stenebek and I'm Carol Masser.

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:13.319
<v Speaker 9>Stay with us.

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Today's top stories and global business headlines are coming up

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:16.879
<v Speaker 2>right now.

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people,

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 1>companies and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business,

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>finance and tech news as it happens. Bloomberg Business Week

0:38:38.440 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Daily with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 2>We're back on a special edition of Bloomberg Business Week.

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 2>It's all about some of our conversations from the Schwab

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Impact twenty twenty five event held this past week in Denver, Colorado. Now,

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 2>this event, held every year, is all about bringing together

0:38:56.840 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 2>registered investment advisors, financial advisors from across the United States

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 2>and those in the industry that support them with services

0:39:04.440 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 2>and tools.

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 3>We begin with our conversation this hour Wishwab's head of

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 3>macro Research and Strategy, Kevin Gordon.

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 2>There's kind of this internal turmoil right now in terms

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 2>of the environment. Is it inflation we have to worry about.

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 2>We saw that companies announced the most job cuts for

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 2>any October and worth in two decades. This from Challenger,

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 2>Gray and Christmas, and they did talk about an AI

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 2>component to it. I can't figure out where we are.

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 10>What do you think?

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.399
<v Speaker 15>You know, It's like the flavor changes almost literally every day.

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 15>I mean it was much more labor driven. You had

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:39.520
<v Speaker 15>the Challenger data you mentioned, but you also had data

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 15>from Avellio Labs, which has become much more important to

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 15>look at in terms of private sector providers and what

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.959
<v Speaker 15>they're looking at for job growth. And what they showed

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 15>for October was the decline of nine thousand for payrolls.

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 15>But you know, for me, the labor market stuff is

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:56.880
<v Speaker 15>almost this hall of mirrors because all of the different

0:39:56.920 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 15>indicators tell you completely different things as to what's going

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 15>on the the labor market. If you look at claims data,

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 15>which we're not getting at the national level, but if

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 15>you aggregate everything at the state level, it still looks

0:40:06.320 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 15>relatively healthy. It's stayed relatively low and stable. If you

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 15>look at ADP for October surprise to the upside. If

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.680
<v Speaker 15>you look at something like Rebellio though week, if you

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 15>look at something like Challenger, also weak. The interesting thing

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:19.320
<v Speaker 15>with Challenger is, and we always try to make this

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 15>important distinction and emphasis for investors there layoff announcements. They're

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 15>not exactly cuts themselves. So there is a little bit

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:28.760
<v Speaker 15>of a lag there in terms.

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Of what you can expect. Yeah, oftentimes ninety days, right.

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 15>Plus I think the one thing that is I will

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.879
<v Speaker 15>say maybe a little bit more worrisome with the one

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:39.399
<v Speaker 15>for October relative to what we saw earlier this year,

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 15>because there was a huge pickup and Challenger job cut

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 15>announcements earlier this year, but most of that was at

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.239
<v Speaker 15>the federal level that was focused on what everything was

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 15>going on regarding do this one's a little bit more

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 15>broad based. As you mentioned, with the AI overlay, the

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 15>concentration for the sectors was mostly in tech and warehousing.

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:53.880
<v Speaker 6>So clearly this costs.

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Cutting going on by companies, which is never a good feeling, no,

0:40:57.120 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think what's what's been interesting so far It's

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 2>been relatively where it's gone sector by sector.

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 15>It hasn't been broad based across the economy, which I know.

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:06.320
<v Speaker 15>I've talked about this with you guys a lot and

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 15>Lazanne you know who I work with closely on this,

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 15>are the sort of this concept and thesis of rolling

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 15>recessions in the economy. You're still experiencing that to some

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 15>extent where it's not filtering up to the to the

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 15>surface and it's not aggregating together to give you a

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 15>full blown traditional recession. But it's still happening at pockets.

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 3>We know where as Lizan, we all call our Lizanne

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Saunders too. That's the Lizann you're referring to. So Kevin

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 3>going from the corporate world and thinking about, Okay, what

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 3>are companies doing with employees, How are they hiring, how

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.720
<v Speaker 3>are they firing, how are they announcing this to consumer

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 3>spending because the consumer powers this economy. Yeah, we're getting

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 3>some troubling anecdotes. What do you see?

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 15>You know, what's interesting is that when you look at

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 15>I mean, this is where the labor market's so crucial

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 15>to understand the differences between the stock and the flow.

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.000
<v Speaker 15>So the stock of labor is still relatively healthy. I mean,

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 15>you look at a mostly fully employed America and that's

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 15>where we're at.

0:41:57.840 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 6>Any of the layoff.

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:01.160
<v Speaker 15>Activity we've seen, it's just at the mark and relatively minimal.

0:42:01.239 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 15>So if you see relatively low layoffs despite a very

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 15>low hiring rate, which we're basically at cycle lows, the

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 15>fact that the stock of labor is strong means that

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 15>the aggregate income growth month to month, assuming you stay employed,

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 15>is relatively strong. So that's why real spending is still positive.

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 15>But to your point about some of these anecdotes and

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 15>some of these cracks under the surface, they are starting

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 15>to widen a little bit more, especially if you look

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 15>at that bottom half of the what everybody calls now

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:26.240
<v Speaker 15>the K shaped sort of economy.

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:29.319
<v Speaker 2>There are economists look at that bottom wrong.

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 15>You could break it down by wealth level, I like

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 15>the FED data and looking at sort of percentile levels.

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Of well in terms of overall economic growth and what

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the FED like, how do you think about This is

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the tough part because you know there's a social answer

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and then they're sight well.

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.720
<v Speaker 15>The multiplier effect up the wealth and the income spectrum

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 15>is just much stronger.

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:47.479
<v Speaker 10>That's just the math.

0:42:47.840 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 15>And when you look at how well asset markets have

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 15>done over the past couple of years, even this year,

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 15>the bounce from the April lows, I mean, if you're

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 15>benefiting from that as an asset owner, we have household

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 15>exposure to equities at an all time high, beyond where

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 15>we were just slightly, but still beyond where we were

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 15>at at the peak in two thousand. So the wealth

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 15>effect and the power of the market in terms of

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:09.280
<v Speaker 15>an economic driver has become quite strong and quite potent.

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 15>So I think when you add that together with what

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 15>is traditionally an economy that has become more or I

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.240
<v Speaker 15>shouldn't say traditionally, but over time has become more powered

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 15>by that wealthy cohort, then you've got a pretty strong effect.

0:43:20.080 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 3>When you say full employment, do you how do you

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 3>define that? And how does the FED define that?

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 15>Because relatively low and employment rate to history compared to history,

0:43:27.760 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 15>there has been a little bit of an uptick. But

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 15>you look at that and you look at overall payrolls

0:43:31.000 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 15>and we're still right around you know, all time time.

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.719
<v Speaker 3>But does it mean the person who's who's has the

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:39.360
<v Speaker 3>computer science undergraduate degree is working in computer science or

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 3>working at Chipotle?

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:41.680
<v Speaker 6>Oh yeah, exactly.

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:44.799
<v Speaker 15>Fully, the question just sort of in nominal terms, looking

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 15>at it face value, a job being a job, whether

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 15>that job is perfectly matched with what the person is doing.

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 3>That's a little bit of how do we measure that well,

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 3>because it doesn't that seems like a concern right now.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 15>Well, then I think is going to show up, probably

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 15>start to show up a lot more within the next year,

0:43:58.520 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 15>in a lot of the labor flows that we're going

0:43:59.960 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 15>to get because one of the you know, one of

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 15>the longer term concerns I have for the labor market

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 15>is what's happening right now in some of the churn

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 15>with the pretty significant decline in immigration, but also not

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 15>sort of the lack of replacement a lot of a

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:11.879
<v Speaker 15>lot of those jobs.

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:13.719
<v Speaker 6>We're just not seeing that happen. And you see that.

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 15>Happening in you know, youth unemployment, black unemployment, it's really

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 15>starting to spread in some of those pockets. So the

0:44:18.920 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 15>areas that were supposed to benefit, you know, throughout this year,

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 15>as you had more of a domestic strengthening in the

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 15>in the fate of born labor force, it's not yet happening.

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 15>So it's a little bit lagged. I hope it's delayed

0:44:29.120 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 15>and not completely derailed. But I think in the next year,

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:34.399
<v Speaker 15>figuring out replacements for a lot of those lost jobs,

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:35.000
<v Speaker 15>that's going to be key.

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:36.920
<v Speaker 3>And the reason I brought up the Chipotle computer science

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.879
<v Speaker 3>exactly well, always aungry, but that was what's be cited

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>in that New York Times article back in August. Yes,

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 3>computer science degrees having trouble finding those computer science jobs.

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of this interesting environment we are when we

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:49.399
<v Speaker 2>look at the labor force. Hey, one of the things

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:51.279
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you your team shared with us

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 2>that you believe Tina is back, and it's not the

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Tina that we think about. There is no alternative in

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 2>terms of like US difequities. Yeah, but it's something we

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:03.400
<v Speaker 2>started off with US government data. It is important no alternative.

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean the depth and the breadth of the government data.

0:45:05.200 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 15>You just can't imagine and I think, you know, so far,

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 15>thank goodness with the markets have been sort of, maybe

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 15>in a negative way, whistling sort of passed the graveyard

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:16.600
<v Speaker 15>of no government data, but you know, they've been able

0:45:16.640 --> 0:45:18.359
<v Speaker 15>to manage through with corporate earnings. I think that's been

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 15>a nice bridge to get us to when the shutdown ends.

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 15>I think though, you know, the longer this goes on,

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 15>I think what we have to keep in mind, and

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 15>what we've really been emphasizing to our clients is that

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 15>you know, when you don't collect this data, yes you

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 15>can go back and retroactively get it, but it's not

0:45:33.920 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 15>going to be clean. So you're going basically almost a

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 15>quarter without this really key data. So you're going to

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 15>have a delayed third quarter GDP report, you're going to

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 15>have missing data in a way for the fourth quarter,

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 15>and then you have benchmark revisions coming in February, which

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 15>kind of throws another wrench into this.

0:45:50.640 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 3>That's Kevin Gordon, Schwab's head of macro Research and Strategy,

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 3>on site at Schwab Impact twenty five.

0:45:56.600 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 2>We turned out to our conversation with Schwab's Lisa Salvey,

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 2>head of Bususiness Consulting in education. We held a Bloomberg

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 2>AI Finance summit. It was just last month. We asked

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:09.720
<v Speaker 2>attendees in financial services, which area do you believe augentic

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 2>AI holds the greatest potential to impact? And of course

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the agentic AI. We're talking about AI systems that can

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 2>autonomously and maybe sounds a little scary, but autonomously plan

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.920
<v Speaker 2>and execute multi step tasks with minimal human oversight. Yes,

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that's a definition.

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 3>That's great.

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 2>But I know, I know, take over my world. I'm

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 2>ready for it. So here's what the folks at that

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 2>summit said the findings. Sixty two percent, Tim said the

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 2>greatest potential would be an automating repetitive complex tasks and workflows.

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 3>Twenty three percent said generating alpha through faster deeper insights,

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 3>eleven percent supporting strategic decision making across the enterprise, and

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 3>then four percent Carol personalizing client experiences at scale.

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, so let's see what our next guest has

0:46:49.400 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 2>to say. She worked within Nebedda Advisors and their firms.

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Salvey's head of business Consulting and Education at Schwab

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Advisor Services. What did you think about those results?

0:46:57.480 --> 0:47:00.720
<v Speaker 16>They're interesting to me I'm I lead a marketing study

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 16>here for ORAS specifically, it's like industry leading amount of data.

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 16>We had about thirteen hundred firms participate this year. Sixty

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 16>eight percent of our firms are using AI in some form.

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:14.759
<v Speaker 16>Twenty twenty five obviously that was the year of the

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 16>note taker, right, so that's kind of the story. I

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 16>think it's on like a basic level, they're using it.

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 16>It depends, so basic is just not taking right. And

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 16>then now we're seeing more integration into the CRM system,

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 16>so we're starting to see that and it's starting to populate.

0:47:30.719 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Tasks and next steps.

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 16>So a lot of firms are saying that's saving them

0:47:34.960 --> 0:47:38.320
<v Speaker 16>thirty minutes per client meeting, so that's a real ROI

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.640
<v Speaker 16>we're seeing, which you don't always see with AI all

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 16>the time up to you know, I had one firm

0:47:43.560 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 16>last week tell me two and a half hours of

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:46.240
<v Speaker 16>time savings.

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 9>So that's kind of the year what we've seen this year.

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 16>I think next year is going to be more of

0:47:51.880 --> 0:47:54.160
<v Speaker 16>a two pillar type of year where you're going to

0:47:54.200 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 16>see a lot of bottoms up type of projects and

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 16>kind of citizen programming with the AI tools that are

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 16>available within firms. But We're also going to start to

0:48:04.000 --> 0:48:07.919
<v Speaker 16>see looking at larger scale projects that can actually build

0:48:08.000 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 16>a transformative change or time savings in the organization. That

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 16>will be approached more like a project agentic agents and agentic.

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 16>That's kind of we're we're just stepping into that.

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Pa're trying to play with that.

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 9>Some firms have it. Yeah, it's still very rare.

0:48:27.160 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 16>I think what I would like to see firms do

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:31.879
<v Speaker 16>is really start to focus on well, two things.

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:33.240
<v Speaker 9>The boring one the data.

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.320
<v Speaker 16>You got to get that data really good because AI

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 16>doesn't fix that data, it just amplifies it.

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh we know, yeah, I know, what about the finding

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 3>alpha part of this, because that's interesting.

0:48:46.040 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 16>I don't hear that very much from registered investment advisors.

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 16>I don't hear as much on the investment side. I

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 16>hear it more on reading research reports giving them something

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 16>to react to and on the poor fullio management site.

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 2>I will say one advisor came up to us and

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:05.640
<v Speaker 2>was talking about actually something I had done at a

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 2>different event where somebody showed a demo and then got

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.759
<v Speaker 2>into like AI in a big way and said it

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 2>did a lot of things like computations, different things and tasks,

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and he was able to create better performance for his

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 2>investors because it just happened quicker and there are things

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 2>he wouldn't normally maybe do or spend the time on

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 2>because he just couldn't, and that he did and then yeah,

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 2>it did create It's interesting, it's where are you comfortable?

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 9>So, yeah, a lot of advisors.

0:49:34.000 --> 0:49:37.839
<v Speaker 16>Are not wanting it to hit the client yet. Yeah,

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:40.480
<v Speaker 16>so that's where that's going to be where we see

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 16>some progression. But if you can create really comprehensive plans

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 16>and advisors need to be prepared to their clients are

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 16>going to start doing it and come in with something

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 16>and that they're going to have to react to.

0:49:53.280 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 3>When do you think we start talking about AI, Like

0:49:55.000 --> 0:49:57.800
<v Speaker 3>we don't talk about the Internet today, the idea that

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 3>it's just this layer of technology that we're all using.

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:04.800
<v Speaker 10>I think I think it's still changing so rapidly.

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:08.160
<v Speaker 16>We're still seeing so many changes that we're going to

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 16>be talking about it for a little while, especially as

0:50:10.440 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 16>we get to that agentic layer. So first we're going

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 16>to have projects. Then we're going to have agents that

0:50:15.800 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 16>just do things like one off tasks like read a

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:20.880
<v Speaker 16>research report on its own and email it to you

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 16>without you asking it to do it. Then we get

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 16>to what you guys were talking about at the beginning,

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 16>the agentic layer. We have a whole bunch of these

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:29.279
<v Speaker 16>like bots that are doing things on their own and

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 16>making decisions.

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 6>We have a ways to go that.

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 3>Schwab's Lisa Salvi, head of Business Consulting and Education. Coming up.

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:39.319
<v Speaker 3>More from our conversations at the Schwab Impact twenty twenty

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:41.280
<v Speaker 3>five event in Denver, Colorado.

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Up next, we hear from Omar Agular. He is the

0:50:44.560 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 2>CEO of Schwab Asset Management.

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:49.279
<v Speaker 3>That's next. This is Bloomberg.

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:58.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily with Carol Masser and

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenoveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 2>Back here on Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily, looking at some of

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:08.319
<v Speaker 2>our favorite conversations and highlights from the Schwab Impact twenty

0:51:08.400 --> 0:51:10.799
<v Speaker 2>twenty five event it was held to him this past week.

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:12.959
<v Speaker 2>Of course in Denver, Colorado. It was a little chilli

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:14.120
<v Speaker 2>out there, well it was.

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's Colorado. It's the foothills of the Rockies.

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:19.439
<v Speaker 2>That's so true.

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:21.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, three hundred days of sunshine a year though, so

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 3>it's not bad.

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:23.919
<v Speaker 2>No, it's nice to be out west.

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:27.360
<v Speaker 3>We turned now to our conversation with Omar Aguilar, CEO

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:30.399
<v Speaker 3>of schwab Asset Management. Well, let's talk about this year,

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 3>because as we were chatting ahead of this interview, you

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 3>made the joke, I wish we could just end the

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 3>year right here, because it's been a good year. It's

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:39.320
<v Speaker 3>been a good year, but what is that portend for

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 3>the next you know, two months.

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:44.000
<v Speaker 17>It's been great for investors. It's been great for investors

0:51:44.040 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 17>to actually see that. I would probably say there were

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 17>many points throughout the year where we all wish things

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:51.879
<v Speaker 17>were actually going to be different, and I don't think

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 17>anybody anticipated, you know, that we're going to be at

0:51:54.640 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 17>the stage, you know, so far into this year. You know,

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 17>from the beginning of the year, the uncertainty around administration

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:03.879
<v Speaker 17>to liberation day to recovery to you know, the rise

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:07.080
<v Speaker 17>of AI, to the economy, the consumer, all the way

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 17>to where we are now. It's such such as being

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:12.080
<v Speaker 17>a ride that I think investors have taken advantage of.

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was thinking about your background and I

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:16.759
<v Speaker 2>just want to lay that what you've got twenty five

0:52:16.840 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 2>years of investment management experience and equity markets. You've seen

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of cycles, and I know, I think I

0:52:22.200 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 2>often reach out to you guys to ask you about this.

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of some of the recent stress

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:28.320
<v Speaker 2>that we've seen omar whether it was concerns about credit,

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 2>some of the regional bank issues. Again, we've heard different

0:52:32.280 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 2>stories about whether or not credit concerns were something that

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:38.360
<v Speaker 2>might linger for a little bit. And then there's the private,

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, credit market. So how do you see it

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 2>and do you see it at all impacting kind of

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the tone of trade and activity on your platforms?

0:52:45.480 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it is.

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:49.520
<v Speaker 17>It is interesting because yes, I have seen a lot

0:52:49.560 --> 0:52:50.040
<v Speaker 17>of technics.

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.239
<v Speaker 2>I have too, So we're just like a good bottle

0:52:53.280 --> 0:52:53.640
<v Speaker 2>of wine.

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, my gray hairs, you know, you know I

0:52:57.120 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 3>take a pride of it.

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 17>But but yes, you know, it's interesting because you know

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 17>what we what I have seen historically, is you actually

0:53:04.160 --> 0:53:06.320
<v Speaker 17>go through the source of what is actually maybe the

0:53:06.440 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 17>reasons why something cracks. There will always be in every

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:12.680
<v Speaker 17>single cycle, you know, areas of rest that are what

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 17>we call ideasyncratic.

0:53:13.960 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 3>That's just such a fancy word, but you.

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:17.560
<v Speaker 17>Know what that means is that there will always going

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:20.840
<v Speaker 17>to be things that will happen that will make people nervous,

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 17>and we just need to understand whether it's systemic or

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 17>is just isolated to a certain area. Interesting enough, you

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:29.320
<v Speaker 17>mentioned about, you know, the particular the credit market. You know,

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:32.680
<v Speaker 17>the credit market has been incredibly resilient since two thousand

0:53:32.680 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 17>and eight, and I think when you look at the

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 17>current even the high yield market, you know, is not

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 17>as junky as it used to be. You know, I

0:53:40.320 --> 0:53:42.440
<v Speaker 17>remember back in you know, two thousand and five, two

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:44.799
<v Speaker 17>thousand and six or two thousand and you know one

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 17>in two thousand and two, those were periods where you

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:50.080
<v Speaker 17>will really feel that there was a lot of delinquencies,

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:51.440
<v Speaker 17>there was a lot of rest, there was a lot

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 17>of uncertainty around them. When you look at it today,

0:53:54.480 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 17>you know, the delinquencies are growing, but not outside of

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.720
<v Speaker 17>the normal you will have in this part of the cycle.

0:54:00.120 --> 0:54:01.399
<v Speaker 2>Is think that's not happening well.

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of that has to do with corporate America.

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:06.640
<v Speaker 17>You know, their balance sheets are fairly, fairly strong, and

0:54:06.719 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 17>the amount of leverage that you see in corporate America

0:54:09.160 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 17>has is basically to the lowest in many decades. So

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 17>what that actually means is that yes, companies that are

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:17.240
<v Speaker 17>taking excess leverage to steps risk and they're more risky

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 17>and the way they manage their business. You know, they're

0:54:19.800 --> 0:54:22.800
<v Speaker 17>clearly more at the risk end, but the majority of

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 17>America it's actually pretty solid in terms of how they

0:54:25.719 --> 0:54:27.759
<v Speaker 17>manage their balance sheets. And in fact, a lot of

0:54:27.760 --> 0:54:30.279
<v Speaker 17>the reasons we were talking about, you know, in other

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 17>forums about the reasons why tires have not been having

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:36.280
<v Speaker 17>the impact as big as it has been is because

0:54:36.400 --> 0:54:39.239
<v Speaker 17>profit margins have been very, very benign and have been

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:40.879
<v Speaker 17>not been affected as much.

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:45.120
<v Speaker 3>So does that mean that it's only a matter of

0:54:45.200 --> 0:54:48.719
<v Speaker 3>time before we actually see inflation as a result of

0:54:48.800 --> 0:54:51.359
<v Speaker 3>these carets. When these companies say we're not gonna we're

0:54:51.400 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 3>not going to pad the impact anymore with our with

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 3>our healthy profit margins, we're ready to pass these on, well.

0:54:55.960 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 17>We're ready seeing some of that. We're ready seeing two things.

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:02.000
<v Speaker 17>One is we're ready seeing companies that are they're not

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 17>going to have a choice, but actually passed through those

0:55:04.680 --> 0:55:07.439
<v Speaker 17>increasing process to the consumers. You know, we have seen

0:55:07.480 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 17>those companies that have the biggest you know, opportunities and

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:13.960
<v Speaker 17>the biggest, widest margins. They are they're already good, but

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 17>there are ones that are getting a squeeze and a

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:17.560
<v Speaker 17>squeeze we're already see some of that already in the

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 17>early parts of this earning season. The second part that

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 17>we're serving is consumption, you know, consumers and the demand

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 17>destruction starting to happen.

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 3>You're starting to see a little bit in.

0:55:27.719 --> 0:55:30.320
<v Speaker 17>Terms of like you know, airlines and the tickets and

0:55:30.719 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 17>you know, you see that actually on my way here

0:55:32.840 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 17>for the first time the plane was not full. That

0:55:36.360 --> 0:55:39.359
<v Speaker 17>that was unique because you know, for the entire year,

0:55:39.719 --> 0:55:41.880
<v Speaker 17>you know, you always go there and it's actually big,

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:43.719
<v Speaker 17>big chunk of it. So you can see a little

0:55:43.719 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 17>bit of that consumption starting to just get affected by it.

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:47.920
<v Speaker 3>This happened to us last month on our way back

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 3>from Los Angeles. The person at the gate said, this

0:55:51.840 --> 0:55:54.840
<v Speaker 3>is crazy. It's been full pretty much until now. The

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 3>flight was empty heading back.

0:55:56.040 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:55:56.200 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Again, it's an anecdote by hearing it from airlines yet.

0:55:58.960 --> 0:56:01.239
<v Speaker 2>But the airlines have and so smart about keeping those

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:03.520
<v Speaker 2>planes packed right, and so to me it seems like

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:06.239
<v Speaker 2>a clear indicator. I know, I said, you've seen a

0:56:06.280 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 2>lot of cycles, but I think about your background Lehman Brothers,

0:56:09.800 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Merrill Lynch. These are firms that are no longer around,

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:15.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, post GFC, the Great Financial Crisis, so I

0:56:15.040 --> 0:56:17.080
<v Speaker 2>guess I always try to think, you know, what are

0:56:17.160 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 2>we missing in an environment where so many people are

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 2>like it's okay, it's okay, it's okay, and I'm like,

0:56:22.719 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 2>what are the possible risks do you think for investors

0:56:25.680 --> 0:56:26.400
<v Speaker 2>in this environment?

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, we have seen and actually we saw this in

0:56:29.880 --> 0:56:30.920
<v Speaker 3>the last six weeks.

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:34.240
<v Speaker 17>If you if you look at the performance of those

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:38.640
<v Speaker 17>companies that did not do not have positive earnings, negative

0:56:38.680 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 17>earnings companies in small and MidCap sectors, they outperform by

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:43.719
<v Speaker 17>almost twenty percent in.

0:56:43.719 --> 0:56:45.640
<v Speaker 3>A short period of time. So what is called the

0:56:45.719 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 3>junk rap.

0:56:46.920 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 17>And in many cases, the concern is that this component

0:56:50.120 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 17>of excess goes into areas that goes like that, and

0:56:53.000 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 17>that volatility is not healthy.

0:56:54.640 --> 0:56:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Omar, thank you, always always appreciated. Omar Agailar. He's CEO

0:56:57.840 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 2>and CIO of Schwap Asset Management. All right, so let's

0:57:00.360 --> 0:57:01.320
<v Speaker 2>share some numbers with you.

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:02.319
<v Speaker 9>Check this out.

0:57:02.400 --> 0:57:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Sixteen thousand independent advisory firms, five trillion ten in assets

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 2>under management.

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:09.680
<v Speaker 3>That's the business that John Beatty overseas. He's managing director

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 3>and head of Schwab Advisor of Services. He joined us

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:15.879
<v Speaker 3>on site here at Schwab Impact twenty twenty five in Denver, Colorado. John,

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:18.560
<v Speaker 3>you've been at Schwab for close to thirty years.

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:21.160
<v Speaker 5>Let's say twenty eight, Just so tell myself too. Okay,

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:22.840
<v Speaker 5>it's twenty.

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Eight, twenty eight years. You've been a member of the

0:57:25.200 --> 0:57:28.360
<v Speaker 3>advisor services team for sixteen years. It's correct an ria

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 3>today versus what it was sixteen years ago. They want

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 3>different things.

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's amazing.

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 14>When I first joined Schwab twenty eight years ago in

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 14>the advisor business, we custodied a one hundred billion dollars

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 14>for assets. Now it's five trillion dollars.

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:44.439
<v Speaker 3>So that just gives you where is that in market share?

0:57:45.080 --> 0:57:48.000
<v Speaker 14>So advisor services Charles Schwab has about forty four percent

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:52.920
<v Speaker 14>market share of independent advisors, doubled the nearest competitor.

0:57:53.040 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 5>So we were first to the space back.

0:57:56.040 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 14>Then almost thirty eight years ago and have really focused

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 14>in on it and made a main priority here at Schwab.

0:58:03.000 --> 0:58:05.320
<v Speaker 5>And we've been rewarded by our clients with their growth.

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, my in laws are we're talking about their

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:12.200
<v Speaker 3>financial advisor, and I was telling about this conference that

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I was coming to, and they said, we had a

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:17.240
<v Speaker 3>choice when we signed up with this financial advisor who

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 3>we wanted as a custodian. We could choose Schwab, we

0:58:21.040 --> 0:58:24.440
<v Speaker 3>could choose another company. Is that that was surprising them.

0:58:24.440 --> 0:58:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I didn't know that RIA has had relationships with different custodians.

0:58:28.520 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 14>Yes, RA industry is the industry of independent advisors, and

0:58:32.480 --> 0:58:36.360
<v Speaker 14>independence means that they have choice is who their providers are,

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:40.200
<v Speaker 14>whether that's custodian or asset management, fintech providers in their

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:43.240
<v Speaker 14>back office. I think that is actually the secret sauce

0:58:43.280 --> 0:58:46.080
<v Speaker 14>in the RAA space and that everybody has to be

0:58:46.120 --> 0:58:48.440
<v Speaker 14>at their best every day to maintain their seat at

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 14>the table, whether it's us as a custodian against our competitors,

0:58:52.280 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 14>or a fintech provider in the back office an asset manager.

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 14>So everybody's at their best. That means consumers are getting

0:58:58.400 --> 0:58:59.080
<v Speaker 14>a great experience.

0:58:59.240 --> 0:59:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Keeps everybody lead me and competitive. So what do investment

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:05.000
<v Speaker 2>advisors really need from you guys today?

0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 14>So really, where the hallmark is, where the foundation and

0:59:08.320 --> 0:59:12.160
<v Speaker 14>relationship is our custody experience, which means opening accounts, moving money,

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:15.720
<v Speaker 14>doing trades. The basics that the advisors want to be

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:16.959
<v Speaker 14>brilliant in how.

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:19.440
<v Speaker 2>They serve their clients, so easy, secure, what.

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 14>Easy, secure, accurate, All of those things matter important and

0:59:24.640 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 14>the last thing an advisor wants to do is have

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 14>their custodia or any of their providers embarrass them in

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:32.680
<v Speaker 14>front of their clients. So we have to be at

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:35.600
<v Speaker 14>a ninety nine percent accuracy rate and everything we do

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 14>for advisors, and that's why we're winning in the marketplace

0:59:38.040 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 14>is those brilliant experiences that we provide.

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:41.760
<v Speaker 2>What's the toughest thing in making sure that you guys

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 2>are hitting on all those things, the accuracy, the security,

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:45.080
<v Speaker 2>all of it.

0:59:45.280 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's really the move from paper to digital and

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:51.480
<v Speaker 14>that's that's a change management thing in our industry. So

0:59:51.960 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 14>we've made great progress in the last five years on that. Now,

0:59:55.640 --> 0:59:59.920
<v Speaker 14>for example, moving money wires ACCH transactions, we're ninety three.

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 14>It's the ability to move money overnight without a wire,

1:00:04.440 --> 1:00:04.680
<v Speaker 14>got it?

1:00:04.760 --> 1:00:05.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, forget me.

1:00:05.920 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, it's an industry academ Sorry about that, but we're

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:11.880
<v Speaker 14>at ninety three percent rate there where just five years

1:00:11.920 --> 1:00:15.120
<v Speaker 14>ago that was less than fifty percent. So what what

1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 14>what digital brings is it brings faster, more accurate, less

1:00:18.680 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 14>errors in the ecosystem, new accounts. You know, we're opening

1:00:21.800 --> 1:00:24.600
<v Speaker 14>on a digital platform at about a fifty to sixty

1:00:24.640 --> 1:00:26.720
<v Speaker 14>percent rate. We'd love to get that in the eighty

1:00:26.800 --> 1:00:31.080
<v Speaker 14>to nineties, so that brings modern experiences for the investor.

1:00:30.920 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 5>As well as the advisor.

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I was talking to one of the independent advisors before

1:00:33.880 --> 1:00:36.040
<v Speaker 3>our program started and he was telling me, He's like, Okay,

1:00:36.400 --> 1:00:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I've got this whole machine that runs Linux, that just

1:00:39.480 --> 1:00:43.440
<v Speaker 3>runs my Bloomberg terminal, separate machine, separate keyboard. Then I've

1:00:43.480 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 3>got my other two monitors, so two monitors over there,

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:48.120
<v Speaker 3>and then I've got my other two monitors with basically

1:00:48.560 --> 1:00:52.480
<v Speaker 3>the Schwab dashboard and everything that that Schwab offers that

1:00:52.600 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I can then offer to clients.

1:00:54.280 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 4>What is that?

1:00:55.720 --> 1:00:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's what is that tool? What is that dashboard?

1:00:57.960 --> 1:01:01.400
<v Speaker 14>So our website is the place where we serve advisors

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:03.760
<v Speaker 14>digitally Schwab Advisorcenter dot com.

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:06.160
<v Speaker 5>In that tool, you'll find all.

1:01:06.160 --> 1:01:11.040
<v Speaker 14>The logistics of custody, moving money, opening accounts. We have

1:01:11.160 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 14>trading capabilities on that website and a lot of other

1:01:14.520 --> 1:01:17.440
<v Speaker 14>features that advisors can dig in. You know, the industry

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:19.600
<v Speaker 14>has changed over over the years, and now we have

1:01:19.720 --> 1:01:23.000
<v Speaker 14>our I rebounld capability, which is a is a automated

1:01:23.120 --> 1:01:24.080
<v Speaker 14>rebalancing tool.

1:01:24.400 --> 1:01:27.120
<v Speaker 5>We have model market center where advisors can tap into

1:01:27.280 --> 1:01:28.520
<v Speaker 5>pre built portfolios.

1:01:29.080 --> 1:01:32.600
<v Speaker 14>So advisors are really looking to outsource some of the

1:01:33.160 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 14>things that you used to do in house so that

1:01:35.080 --> 1:01:37.400
<v Speaker 14>they can use their time in other ways with investors

1:01:37.440 --> 1:01:41.400
<v Speaker 14>around planning a state tax, those value added places.

1:01:42.360 --> 1:01:44.520
<v Speaker 2>How much in terms of advisors from what you guys

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 2>are seeing, how much are they doing like face to

1:01:46.240 --> 1:01:49.480
<v Speaker 2>face or phone calls or actual conversations versus so much

1:01:49.520 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>that they can do either digitally, Like I'm just curious what.

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 5>That mix is.

1:01:52.800 --> 1:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, it has to be a combination that they want

1:01:54.920 --> 1:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>to free up time to do yes, yes.

1:01:56.600 --> 1:01:59.960
<v Speaker 14>And there's nothing that replaces being in person with your client.

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:03.720
<v Speaker 14>And we had Kesseleigh talking about the need for social interaction.

1:02:04.440 --> 1:02:06.880
<v Speaker 14>So what really advisors are trying to bring is a

1:02:06.960 --> 1:02:11.640
<v Speaker 14>recipe of digital experiences that take the less value activities

1:02:11.720 --> 1:02:14.560
<v Speaker 14>moving money and transactional work so that they can use

1:02:14.600 --> 1:02:17.600
<v Speaker 14>their in time person with clients on more of the

1:02:18.360 --> 1:02:24.840
<v Speaker 14>intellectual psychological aspects of investing. AI very briefly, Yes, going

1:02:24.920 --> 1:02:28.080
<v Speaker 14>to be really important as we go forward. Now, Yet, well,

1:02:28.120 --> 1:02:30.920
<v Speaker 14>we see advisors about fifty percent of advisors are already

1:02:31.000 --> 1:02:34.160
<v Speaker 14>using AI enabled tools in their back office. These are

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:38.720
<v Speaker 14>things like recording meetings with clients and taking notes. We

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:43.120
<v Speaker 14>see them using tools to read contracts and give summariason.

1:02:43.440 --> 1:02:47.080
<v Speaker 14>So it's basic AI, but it's the beginning. And you

1:02:47.160 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 14>know this is an entrepreneurial community and so they're leaning

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:51.480
<v Speaker 14>into these types of services.

1:02:51.560 --> 1:02:53.640
<v Speaker 2>How much back and forth is they're with advisors and

1:02:53.720 --> 1:02:55.919
<v Speaker 2>you guys about what we need in terms of AI.

1:02:56.120 --> 1:02:57.360
<v Speaker 5>It's about our ecosystem.

1:02:57.760 --> 1:02:59.960
<v Speaker 14>We want to AI enable them on the custody side,

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:02.240
<v Speaker 14>and then they need to AI enable their experience with

1:03:02.320 --> 1:03:05.200
<v Speaker 14>their clients related to the portfolio and other aspects. So

1:03:05.280 --> 1:03:06.920
<v Speaker 14>it's going to play a big role in this industries

1:03:06.960 --> 1:03:09.200
<v Speaker 14>we go forward, John, thanks so much for joining us.

1:03:09.240 --> 1:03:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Their chatbot that's like, hey, Chuck, how do I do this?

1:03:13.920 --> 1:03:16.520
<v Speaker 14>We have a knowledge center tool that our service reps

1:03:16.640 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 14>use that is a and I enabled that makes us

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:20.560
<v Speaker 14>smarter on the phones with advisors.

1:03:20.600 --> 1:03:22.439
<v Speaker 5>We'll turn that onto advisors at some point.

1:03:22.600 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, not yet, once the learning is done right, all right,

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>some baby, thank you so much, really appreciate it. Managing Director,

1:03:29.480 --> 1:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>head of Advisors Services at Schwab.

1:03:31.600 --> 1:03:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Coming up more from our conversations at the Schwab Impact

1:03:34.560 --> 1:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty five events in Denver, Colorado. Coming up Fred

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:42.080
<v Speaker 3>kaine Or, managing director of relationship management for DAFT Giving

1:03:42.120 --> 1:03:45.520
<v Speaker 3>three sixty talking about the growth of charitable giving and

1:03:45.600 --> 1:03:47.520
<v Speaker 3>the use of donor advised funds.

1:03:47.880 --> 1:03:50.600
<v Speaker 2>That's coming up next. This is bloomber.

1:03:54.280 --> 1:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily with Carol Masser and

1:03:58.560 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stenoveek on Bloomberg Radio.

1:04:02.080 --> 1:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>We're back here on Bloomberg Business Week looking at some

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:07.920
<v Speaker 2>of our favorite conversations. It was all happening at Schwab

1:04:07.960 --> 1:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Impact twenty twenty five, the event held in Denver, Colorado

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:11.919
<v Speaker 2>this past week.

1:04:12.320 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 3>We turn now to our conversation with Fred Knor, Managing

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 3>director of relationship management for DAFT Giving three sixty. We

1:04:19.360 --> 1:04:22.240
<v Speaker 3>talked about a lot, specifically the growth of childable giving

1:04:22.560 --> 1:04:25.200
<v Speaker 3>and the use of so called donor advised funds.

1:04:25.480 --> 1:04:27.920
<v Speaker 8>A donor advised fund is essentially an account set up

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:31.360
<v Speaker 8>to facilitate charitable giving. A donor advice fund is comprised

1:04:31.360 --> 1:04:36.120
<v Speaker 8>of three different components, contribute, invest, and grant, so a donor,

1:04:36.280 --> 1:04:38.240
<v Speaker 8>with the support of its advisor. His advisor or her

1:04:38.280 --> 1:04:45.560
<v Speaker 8>advisor contributes cash, securities, appreciated assets including real estate, collectibles,

1:04:46.440 --> 1:04:50.520
<v Speaker 8>private business interests, and alike. We accept those contributions, we

1:04:50.600 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 8>liquidate them. If they're appreciated assets, we deposit them into

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:56.560
<v Speaker 8>the account. They invest those assets for growth while they're

1:04:56.560 --> 1:04:58.479
<v Speaker 8>in the account, and then when they're ready to grant

1:04:58.520 --> 1:05:00.160
<v Speaker 8>them to the charity of choice, they can do so

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:02.320
<v Speaker 8>in a matter of a couple of days. And the

1:05:02.360 --> 1:05:05.800
<v Speaker 8>beauty of the account is from a contributions perspective, it

1:05:06.080 --> 1:05:09.360
<v Speaker 8>affords the donor and immediate fair market value tax deduction

1:05:09.480 --> 1:05:12.040
<v Speaker 8>at the time that the contribution is made, and they

1:05:12.240 --> 1:05:15.040
<v Speaker 8>potentially avoid capital gains tax that they would otherwise pay

1:05:15.080 --> 1:05:17.440
<v Speaker 8>if they were to sell those assets first and donate

1:05:17.480 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 8>the pro sits into the account thereafter.

1:05:19.200 --> 1:05:21.840
<v Speaker 3>Should everybody be considering donor advised fonds or do you

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>need to have a certain level of wealth for it

1:05:23.800 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>to make sense?

1:05:24.280 --> 1:05:27.440
<v Speaker 2>It's going to say yes, yes, really though really yes.

1:05:27.400 --> 1:05:28.479
<v Speaker 3>I mean now, it's a good question.

1:05:28.560 --> 1:05:30.160
<v Speaker 8>A lot of people think that, you know, a donor

1:05:30.160 --> 1:05:32.480
<v Speaker 8>advice fund account is set up for the ultra high

1:05:32.520 --> 1:05:34.360
<v Speaker 8>net worth and the ultra wealthy, and the answer is no,

1:05:34.480 --> 1:05:37.040
<v Speaker 8>it's not. There's no minimum to open an account. You

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 8>can have an account with effect a zero balance. Many

1:05:39.200 --> 1:05:42.640
<v Speaker 8>people open an account for testamentary purposes. They will fund

1:05:42.680 --> 1:05:45.760
<v Speaker 8>it upon their passing to fulfill their charitable legacy. When

1:05:45.800 --> 1:05:48.480
<v Speaker 8>you're young, you don't necessarily have a lot of assets

1:05:48.520 --> 1:05:50.320
<v Speaker 8>to give to charity. So you don't have to give

1:05:50.360 --> 1:05:52.440
<v Speaker 8>five thousand, ten thousand to open an account. You can

1:05:52.520 --> 1:05:54.439
<v Speaker 8>open it with a zero balance, and you can fund

1:05:54.480 --> 1:05:56.000
<v Speaker 8>it over time when you have the assets.

1:05:55.760 --> 1:05:56.240
<v Speaker 3>Ready to give.

1:05:56.360 --> 1:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>But why open it early if you don't really have

1:05:58.120 --> 1:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>anything to contribute to it.

1:05:59.320 --> 1:06:00.720
<v Speaker 8>It's a great question uestion. And they do it for

1:06:00.760 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 8>a variety of different reasons. Like I said, one is

1:06:03.080 --> 1:06:05.280
<v Speaker 8>when it's used for testamentary purposes. When a person is

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:08.560
<v Speaker 8>planning their legacy. When they're planning sort of they're trying

1:06:08.600 --> 1:06:11.200
<v Speaker 8>to think about what they want their legacy, charitable legacy

1:06:11.240 --> 1:06:14.320
<v Speaker 8>to be beyond their lifetime, they would fund upon their passing.

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 8>The donor advice Fund account would be named as at

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:20.120
<v Speaker 8>fishary of their trust or their estate, and an amount

1:06:20.120 --> 1:06:22.560
<v Speaker 8>would be put into that with the understanding of exactly

1:06:22.600 --> 1:06:24.760
<v Speaker 8>how and where they want that be distributed to charities

1:06:24.800 --> 1:06:25.240
<v Speaker 8>of choice.

1:06:25.400 --> 1:06:27.120
<v Speaker 3>So that's what I want to talk about is control here.

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:29.920
<v Speaker 3>How much control does the person who put the assets

1:06:30.000 --> 1:06:32.440
<v Speaker 3>in there, who had the assets who don'tate the assets

1:06:32.520 --> 1:06:35.080
<v Speaker 3>have where those assets go or where that money goes.

1:06:35.040 --> 1:06:35.919
<v Speaker 6>That's a great question.

1:06:36.000 --> 1:06:39.080
<v Speaker 8>So technically, when the assets are put into the donor

1:06:39.080 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 8>device fund account, they relinquish control of those assets because

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 8>those assets we are, as you said at the beginning,

1:06:44.360 --> 1:06:46.240
<v Speaker 8>we are a five oh one C three nonprofit. They

1:06:46.280 --> 1:06:49.240
<v Speaker 8>are effectively making a contribution to a nonprofit organization, and

1:06:49.360 --> 1:06:53.280
<v Speaker 8>at that time they relinquishly control those assets. However, they

1:06:53.320 --> 1:06:55.720
<v Speaker 8>are the ones that recommend the investment strategy when the

1:06:55.760 --> 1:06:57.440
<v Speaker 8>assets are in the account, because we want to make

1:06:57.480 --> 1:06:59.840
<v Speaker 8>sure that they're invested in a manner that's consistent with

1:06:59.880 --> 1:07:04.160
<v Speaker 8>their personal goals and objectives. And they recommend grants when

1:07:04.240 --> 1:07:06.520
<v Speaker 8>they choose to have grants go to the charities that

1:07:06.520 --> 1:07:08.480
<v Speaker 8>they choose to support. So in other words, it's not

1:07:08.720 --> 1:07:11.400
<v Speaker 8>them making the grant. They are recommending to us, as

1:07:11.520 --> 1:07:14.000
<v Speaker 8>the if you will, owners of those assets, where they

1:07:14.080 --> 1:07:16.400
<v Speaker 8>want those grants to be made and how, and so

1:07:16.920 --> 1:07:19.680
<v Speaker 8>while they reliquist the control for a variety of reasons,

1:07:19.720 --> 1:07:23.240
<v Speaker 8>when they actually make the contribution, they make the recommendations

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:25.080
<v Speaker 8>on how to invest and where, and they make the

1:07:25.120 --> 1:07:26.240
<v Speaker 8>recommendations on where to.

1:07:26.280 --> 1:07:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Grants and when so two questions, where do they Where

1:07:28.760 --> 1:07:33.480
<v Speaker 2>are folks often saying here's where we want those assets invested,

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>and then where are they saying they want to donate.

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:38.560
<v Speaker 8>That's a great question, and there are a number of

1:07:38.640 --> 1:07:42.080
<v Speaker 8>different investment options and it really is up to ultimately

1:07:42.160 --> 1:07:44.800
<v Speaker 8>the donor and the advisors supporting the donor on how

1:07:44.880 --> 1:07:47.320
<v Speaker 8>they choose to balance their portfolio in terms of an

1:07:47.320 --> 1:07:48.200
<v Speaker 8>investment strategy.

1:07:48.400 --> 1:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Many of because I wonder if it's about growth or

1:07:50.240 --> 1:07:52.280
<v Speaker 2>it's just about maintaining the principle or a little bit

1:07:52.320 --> 1:07:52.560
<v Speaker 2>of both.

1:07:52.760 --> 1:07:55.440
<v Speaker 8>Yes, it's both. Mostly it's both. People want to do

1:07:55.480 --> 1:07:57.560
<v Speaker 8>a variety of different things. They want to maintain the balance,

1:07:57.600 --> 1:07:59.560
<v Speaker 8>they want to grow it over time. And an interesting

1:07:59.600 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 8>is is we have seen almost four billion dollars in

1:08:03.800 --> 1:08:06.800
<v Speaker 8>growth and incremental growth as a result of utilizing a

1:08:06.960 --> 1:08:09.880
<v Speaker 8>very effective and prudent investment approach while the assets are

1:08:09.880 --> 1:08:12.840
<v Speaker 8>in the account, so above and beyond what they've contributed.

1:08:12.920 --> 1:08:15.360
<v Speaker 8>As a result of, you know, really effective and thoughtful

1:08:15.880 --> 1:08:19.160
<v Speaker 8>investment of those assets, we've seen about four billion additional

1:08:19.280 --> 1:08:21.479
<v Speaker 8>dollars ultimately made available to go to charities.

1:08:21.560 --> 1:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>So I interrupted you, so where are folks investing? And

1:08:24.080 --> 1:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>then where are they donating, so they're investing in a

1:08:25.720 --> 1:08:26.320
<v Speaker 2>variety of ways.

1:08:26.320 --> 1:08:29.360
<v Speaker 8>Some people want to invest around impact investing, for example,

1:08:29.400 --> 1:08:31.160
<v Speaker 8>they want to do things with SRI s G.

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 6>Actually that's even growing.

1:08:33.120 --> 1:08:35.439
<v Speaker 8>Impact is an evolving term and it means different things

1:08:35.439 --> 1:08:38.840
<v Speaker 8>to different people, but yeah, that's a big thing. Others

1:08:38.880 --> 1:08:42.040
<v Speaker 8>are investing in sort of much more conservative investment options

1:08:42.080 --> 1:08:45.120
<v Speaker 8>where they're much more focused on maintaining the balance and

1:08:45.160 --> 1:08:47.280
<v Speaker 8>making sure that you know, it's not subject to the same.

1:08:47.160 --> 1:08:48.519
<v Speaker 3>Investment volatility as others.

1:08:48.920 --> 1:08:51.640
<v Speaker 8>So it really the answer to your question is that

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:56.160
<v Speaker 8>they're investing in whatever way they feel most comfortable investing

1:08:56.200 --> 1:08:59.280
<v Speaker 8>those assets if it's for impact and that impact has

1:09:00.080 --> 1:09:02.559
<v Speaker 8>you know, as social returns in addition to financial return

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:05.320
<v Speaker 8>and in other cases it's just really maintaining the balance,

1:09:05.400 --> 1:09:07.000
<v Speaker 8>making sure that they have those assets there to be

1:09:07.040 --> 1:09:08.840
<v Speaker 8>able to grant a charity whenever they choose, and.

1:09:08.840 --> 1:09:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Then ultimately where does that money go.

1:09:10.720 --> 1:09:12.719
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, so then the third component is granting.

1:09:12.840 --> 1:09:17.240
<v Speaker 8>So we allow grants to any organization that is a

1:09:17.280 --> 1:09:19.519
<v Speaker 8>five oh one C three nonprofit and good standing with

1:09:19.560 --> 1:09:22.799
<v Speaker 8>the IRS. Our database. We rely on the IRS database

1:09:22.920 --> 1:09:25.840
<v Speaker 8>that is about two million strong right now. So really

1:09:25.960 --> 1:09:28.920
<v Speaker 8>it's up to and it's in the flexibility of solution.

1:09:29.040 --> 1:09:31.120
<v Speaker 8>It goes to wherever they choose to support it. It

1:09:31.200 --> 1:09:32.720
<v Speaker 8>could be their house of worship, it could be their

1:09:32.760 --> 1:09:36.160
<v Speaker 8>alma mater, it could be providing grants to disaster relief

1:09:36.280 --> 1:09:40.320
<v Speaker 8>organizations when floods occur in Texas or fires occur in California.

1:09:40.560 --> 1:09:43.240
<v Speaker 8>So it's really incredibly flexible in terms of where and

1:09:43.280 --> 1:09:43.920
<v Speaker 8>how they grant it.

1:09:43.920 --> 1:09:47.479
<v Speaker 2>Any place that they cannot donate just real.

1:09:47.439 --> 1:09:50.479
<v Speaker 8>Quickly, it's not really as long as it's a five

1:09:50.520 --> 1:09:53.160
<v Speaker 8>oh one C three a nonprofit organization and good standing

1:09:53.240 --> 1:09:57.840
<v Speaker 8>with the irs generally speaking, those that we fulfill those

1:09:57.840 --> 1:09:58.640
<v Speaker 8>grant recommendations.

1:09:58.640 --> 1:10:00.599
<v Speaker 2>All right, so appreciate this is really fun. Fred, thank

1:10:00.600 --> 1:10:01.000
<v Speaker 2>you so much.

1:10:01.040 --> 1:10:02.240
<v Speaker 6>Thank you guys very much for the time.

1:10:02.320 --> 1:10:04.920
<v Speaker 2>He is managing director of Relationship Management for DAFT Giving

1:10:04.960 --> 1:10:08.320
<v Speaker 2>three sixteen independent five oh one C three Public Charity

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>fully known as Schwab Charitable Tim and I here at

1:10:12.040 --> 1:10:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Schwab Impact twenty twenty five. Now you might recall over

1:10:15.280 --> 1:10:17.439
<v Speaker 2>the summer it was in August President Trump signing an

1:10:17.439 --> 1:10:20.840
<v Speaker 2>executive order directing the Labor Department to reevaluate guidance to

1:10:20.920 --> 1:10:24.439
<v Speaker 2>fiduciaries to get them more comfortable with including private credit,

1:10:24.560 --> 1:10:29.160
<v Speaker 2>digital assets, and other alternative assets in their retirement plans. Now,

1:10:29.240 --> 1:10:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the SEC may also issue some new rules or guidance

1:10:31.360 --> 1:10:34.720
<v Speaker 2>to change the definition of accredited investor or qualified purchasers.

1:10:35.040 --> 1:10:38.680
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot going on that could open up a

1:10:38.800 --> 1:10:41.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of different types of assets to retail investors. It's

1:10:41.360 --> 1:10:44.240
<v Speaker 2>something that we've gotten into with the Schwab CEO and.

1:10:44.320 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 3>Kind of on pause right now, at least at the

1:10:46.120 --> 1:10:49.479
<v Speaker 3>SEC level because the government shut down. Yes, but still

1:10:49.840 --> 1:10:51.320
<v Speaker 3>this seems to be the direction that things are.

1:10:51.240 --> 1:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Moving all right. We have a great guest to get

1:10:52.760 --> 1:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>into on all of this with some thoughts and here

1:10:56.080 --> 1:10:58.639
<v Speaker 2>at Denver in Denver at Schwab Impact twenty twenty five,

1:10:58.720 --> 1:11:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Kyla Culver, she's head of real and Controls for Schwab

1:11:01.000 --> 1:11:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Advisor Services. Good to have you here. There's a lot

1:11:03.880 --> 1:11:06.439
<v Speaker 2>going on that could change, or there's a lot that

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:09.760
<v Speaker 2>is going on that means we won't see changes. How

1:11:09.800 --> 1:11:12.960
<v Speaker 2>are you assessing kind of the regulatory environment and things

1:11:12.960 --> 1:11:15.760
<v Speaker 2>that could change what investors can be investing in.

1:11:16.240 --> 1:11:18.680
<v Speaker 10>So I feel like for advisors it's a lot of

1:11:18.920 --> 1:11:22.080
<v Speaker 10>whiplash right now. If we look at the prior administration

1:11:22.280 --> 1:11:27.120
<v Speaker 10>and SEC Chair Gensler, there was constantly new rules coming out,

1:11:27.760 --> 1:11:30.800
<v Speaker 10>and it was just like regulation overload for people. And

1:11:30.960 --> 1:11:33.960
<v Speaker 10>now under Paul Atkins, we're expecting to see a reduced

1:11:34.040 --> 1:11:37.000
<v Speaker 10>pace of regulation. So we see it as a good

1:11:37.000 --> 1:11:40.800
<v Speaker 10>opportunity for advisors to really focus on getting back to

1:11:40.880 --> 1:11:44.040
<v Speaker 10>basics and making sure that their compliance programs are up

1:11:44.120 --> 1:11:47.080
<v Speaker 10>to date, that all of their ADVs are accurate, what

1:11:47.200 --> 1:11:50.479
<v Speaker 10>are as they're disclosure documents that have to file with

1:11:50.520 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 10>the SEC. Really just making sure that like their house

1:11:53.320 --> 1:11:55.679
<v Speaker 10>is in order so that because if we're not under

1:11:55.760 --> 1:11:58.960
<v Speaker 10>a constant flood of new things coming out and then

1:11:59.000 --> 1:12:02.959
<v Speaker 10>you know, we heard you talking about about the executive

1:12:03.040 --> 1:12:05.960
<v Speaker 10>order related to four to one k's and being able

1:12:06.000 --> 1:12:10.040
<v Speaker 10>to hold alternatives different things in four to one K accounts.

1:12:10.520 --> 1:12:13.360
<v Speaker 10>That's something that you know, some advisors have interest in

1:12:13.479 --> 1:12:15.519
<v Speaker 10>for their clients, and it's going to really depend on

1:12:15.560 --> 1:12:18.040
<v Speaker 10>the plan, Like is this something that the plan chooses

1:12:18.160 --> 1:12:21.320
<v Speaker 10>to allow for that client or you know, for their

1:12:21.360 --> 1:12:23.400
<v Speaker 10>plan participants, or does the plan not want.

1:12:23.280 --> 1:12:23.760
<v Speaker 2>To allow that.

1:12:24.280 --> 1:12:26.120
<v Speaker 3>What direction do you see that moving in? If it

1:12:26.160 --> 1:12:28.120
<v Speaker 3>does get approved, if it if it happens, if the

1:12:28.240 --> 1:12:31.240
<v Speaker 3>SEC says okay, this is totally fine. Is everyone going

1:12:31.320 --> 1:12:32.519
<v Speaker 3>to be Is it going to be like us having

1:12:32.560 --> 1:12:33.640
<v Speaker 3>stocks and bonds.

1:12:33.360 --> 1:12:33.760
<v Speaker 9>In our life?

1:12:33.800 --> 1:12:35.520
<v Speaker 10>I don't think it will be for everybody.

1:12:35.720 --> 1:12:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I think that we see it well everybody at the option.

1:12:38.720 --> 1:12:40.840
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's going to be up to the plan administrator.

1:12:40.960 --> 1:12:43.960
<v Speaker 10>So who's ever sponsoring that plan. They're the fiduciary. They've

1:12:44.000 --> 1:12:48.640
<v Speaker 10>got the ability to say you're allowed to invest in X,

1:12:48.960 --> 1:12:51.360
<v Speaker 10>or you're allowed to invest in you know, not allowed.

1:12:51.479 --> 1:12:53.600
<v Speaker 3>So would I be at the company level for a

1:12:53.680 --> 1:12:55.760
<v Speaker 3>certain company and it's employees, or would it be at

1:12:55.800 --> 1:12:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the whoever they decide as the planned administrator like an

1:12:58.960 --> 1:13:00.759
<v Speaker 3>empower for example, it's.

1:13:01.160 --> 1:13:03.320
<v Speaker 10>Really like the planned sponsor who's choosing that.

1:13:04.680 --> 1:13:07.080
<v Speaker 2>So why would a plan sponsor say no? Why would

1:13:07.080 --> 1:13:08.439
<v Speaker 2>a plan sponsor say yes?

1:13:09.200 --> 1:13:11.439
<v Speaker 10>I think they would say yes if they wanted to

1:13:11.600 --> 1:13:18.160
<v Speaker 10>give their their participants, you know, additional choices. Some plan

1:13:18.240 --> 1:13:21.160
<v Speaker 10>sponsors may say no. You know, we see it on

1:13:21.320 --> 1:13:24.519
<v Speaker 10>the Schwab side where we've got some plan sponsors that

1:13:24.600 --> 1:13:29.280
<v Speaker 10>have opted into our Personal Choice Retirement account offering where

1:13:29.320 --> 1:13:31.439
<v Speaker 10>you can basically have your four oh one K and

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:34.400
<v Speaker 10>you know, self direct it invest in stocks and bonds

1:13:34.479 --> 1:13:37.320
<v Speaker 10>and things that are outside of the allocate the plan allocation.

1:13:38.080 --> 1:13:40.360
<v Speaker 10>It just really depends on their their comfort level. Like

1:13:40.439 --> 1:13:43.000
<v Speaker 10>from a conservative perspective, you might say, we want to

1:13:43.040 --> 1:13:47.040
<v Speaker 10>stick more with you know, these funds that we've chosen.

1:13:48.240 --> 1:13:49.559
<v Speaker 3>Is it a good thing?

1:13:51.680 --> 1:13:53.680
<v Speaker 9>I think it's you know, choice.

1:13:53.439 --> 1:13:56.479
<v Speaker 10>Is always a good thing. So more freedom of choice.

1:13:56.760 --> 1:13:59.519
<v Speaker 10>But as long as people are doing it smartly with it,

1:13:59.600 --> 1:14:02.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, the advice of an investment advisor. I think

1:14:03.000 --> 1:14:07.240
<v Speaker 10>it's a sparked decision, but I think there's always additional

1:14:07.360 --> 1:14:07.800
<v Speaker 10>risk there.

1:14:08.080 --> 1:14:10.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, the risks are right in terms of all assets.

1:14:10.760 --> 1:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Some things are not as liquid or as others, and

1:14:13.320 --> 1:14:15.760
<v Speaker 2>you need to understand that if YNGI to be able

1:14:15.840 --> 1:14:19.679
<v Speaker 2>to get out of something it's not liquid like stocks

1:14:19.720 --> 1:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>and bonds exactly in many ways.

1:14:21.320 --> 1:14:23.360
<v Speaker 10>And that's why I think doing things with the advice

1:14:23.720 --> 1:14:27.360
<v Speaker 10>of a professional versus just you know, your friend told

1:14:27.400 --> 1:14:30.880
<v Speaker 10>you this was a good investment, it makes more sense

1:14:30.960 --> 1:14:31.200
<v Speaker 10>that way.

1:14:31.400 --> 1:14:36.280
<v Speaker 3>On the regulatory front, and having advisors have less regulation

1:14:36.479 --> 1:14:40.240
<v Speaker 3>right now, does more fall on them in terms of

1:14:40.360 --> 1:14:43.840
<v Speaker 3>making sure that they're doing what's right because those those

1:14:43.880 --> 1:14:46.600
<v Speaker 3>regulations aren't necessarily in place, and I know kind of

1:14:46.600 --> 1:14:49.200
<v Speaker 3>a judgment for me to say, you know, quate regulations

1:14:49.240 --> 1:14:50.680
<v Speaker 3>with right, that's not what I need to do. But

1:14:51.680 --> 1:14:54.360
<v Speaker 3>we know, we know the DNA that that Paul Atkins

1:14:54.439 --> 1:14:57.000
<v Speaker 3>has the SEC chair when it comes to this stuff,

1:14:57.040 --> 1:15:00.320
<v Speaker 3>and he's much more laisse faire than other SEC in

1:15:00.360 --> 1:15:00.719
<v Speaker 3>the past.

1:15:00.880 --> 1:15:04.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So what what we keep reminding advisors of is

1:15:04.400 --> 1:15:08.080
<v Speaker 10>just because there's you know, all this noise about deregulation

1:15:08.439 --> 1:15:12.720
<v Speaker 10>and less new regulations, you still have to follow the

1:15:12.760 --> 1:15:17.560
<v Speaker 10>fiduciary duty you still have. You know, there's still regulations

1:15:17.600 --> 1:15:19.280
<v Speaker 10>on the books, there's still rules. Who still have to

1:15:19.360 --> 1:15:22.439
<v Speaker 10>do all the things and be making sure you're in

1:15:22.479 --> 1:15:25.800
<v Speaker 10>the best interest of your client. So just because it's

1:15:25.880 --> 1:15:30.120
<v Speaker 10>a more like laise fair kind of environment doesn't mean

1:15:30.160 --> 1:15:32.320
<v Speaker 10>you still don't have principles that you have to adhere to.

1:15:32.560 --> 1:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>That Schwab's Kayla Culver, head of Risk and Controls over

1:15:35.720 --> 1:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>at Schwab Advisor Services.

1:15:37.640 --> 1:15:39.959
<v Speaker 3>And that does it. For this special edition of Bloomberg

1:15:40.040 --> 1:15:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Business Week featuring some of our conversations and the highlights

1:15:43.360 --> 1:15:46.320
<v Speaker 3>from the Schwab Impact twenty twenty five from the Schwab

1:15:46.360 --> 1:15:49.679
<v Speaker 3>Impact twenty twenty five event in Denver, Colorado, this past week.

1:15:49.880 --> 1:15:51.439
<v Speaker 2>For all of them, be sure to check it out

1:15:51.479 --> 1:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg dot com and wherever you get your podcasts. Hey,

1:15:55.120 --> 1:15:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and also be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business Week

1:15:57.160 --> 1:15:59.639
<v Speaker 2>Daily Monday through Friday starting at two pm Wall Street

1:15:59.680 --> 1:16:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Time on Bloomberg TV, Bloomberg Radio, and on Serius XM

1:16:03.200 --> 1:16:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Channel one twenty one. And you can listen to us

1:16:05.840 --> 1:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto. It's freeing the Apple app

1:16:09.200 --> 1:16:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Store or on Google Play.

1:16:11.040 --> 1:16:13.800
<v Speaker 3>You can also watch our daily broadcast on YouTube. Just

1:16:13.880 --> 1:16:18.360
<v Speaker 3>search Bloomberg Podcasts, and we're simulcast on Bloomberg Originals available

1:16:18.400 --> 1:16:22.759
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg dot com, Slash Originals, and streaming platforms like Roku, Amazon,

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Fire TV, Samsung TV Plus and more.

1:16:25.479 --> 1:16:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Find our Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily podcast at Bloomberg dot com, Apple,

1:16:28.920 --> 1:16:31.479
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you get your podcasts, and the latest edition

1:16:31.560 --> 1:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>of the magazine. It is available on newsstands now at

1:16:34.000 --> 1:16:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot com and always always on the Bloomberg terminal.

1:16:37.240 --> 1:16:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Carol Masser and.

1:16:38.360 --> 1:16:40.759
<v Speaker 3>I'm tim Stenaveeck. Have a good and safe weekend, everyone,

1:16:40.880 --> 1:16:44.160
<v Speaker 3>stay with us. Today's top stories and global business headlines

1:16:44.280 --> 1:16:45.680
<v Speaker 3>are coming up right now.