WEBVTT - A Questionable Diebenkorn

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>The art world is an unregulated business billions of dollars.

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It is essentially a money laundering business. You're working with

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>an artificial scarcity of market, and so it's fraud, with

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>people cutting corners and things happening. It was when Ann Friedman,

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>then the newly minted director of the Knoedler Gallery, first

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>met Gafa Rosales had a soho art opening. Larry Reuben

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>had been pushed out of Knoedler a year earlier in

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a coup that ended with Ann Friedman being installed at

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the blessing of Michael Hammer. K Nodler's sales were flat,

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the clients were leaving in droves, and Ann Friedman needed

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>new work to help propel the gallery forward. The Knoedler,

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.639
<v Speaker 1>always one step behind the times, was hurtling towards the

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>art world of a new millennium. The galleries long time

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>assistant him Andrade, had introduced Ann to the soft spoken,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>polite woman of Mexican heritage. As fate would have it,

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Gfia Rosalez had two works of art on paper she

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:21.679
<v Speaker 1>wanted to sell. About. All that anyone could agree on

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>was that hime Andrade was a shy Ecuadorian man of

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>modest height. He was one of eleven children who had

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>come to New York in the early nineteen sixties and

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>found a home in a circle of artificionados. He'd made

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>his way to Larry Ruben's gallery one Street and worked

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>as the galley's driver. Reuben had then brought him over

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 1>to Knoedler as a sort of jack of old trades.

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>His job was to do pretty much whatever anyone wanted

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>him to do. As Anne put it in one of

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>her interviews for Vanity Fair, he would do everything from

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>changing light fixtures to running errands. But he always wore

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a blazer and a tie and went to fancy dinner

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>parties and escorted well to do women. He was like

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a mascot, but I mean that in a respectful way.

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>He epitomized the spirit of the gallery. Despite a faulty

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>grasp of English. After half a century, Hymie was perfectly

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.800
<v Speaker 1>capable of charming one of those women into buying a

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:27.839
<v Speaker 1>painting from Knodler. Andrade's greatest passion was Latin American art.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>As late as two thousand eleven, while the forgery ring

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>was metastasizing amid criminal investigations, the boyish Andrade gave a

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about Ecuadorian art and his fifty years of immersion

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in it at the mid Manhattan Library. The Knottler, in

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a press release for it, would describe Andrott's long time

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>friend and dealer David Herbert as quote one of the

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>best American portrait artists. Unquote that was patently untrue. But Herbert,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>upon his death, would be cast in another role as

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a central figure in the back story of Knoedler's conspiracy

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of fakes, possibly aided and embedded by hime Andrade, who

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>had just become David Herbert's executor. With boxes of documents

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>rich in art world lore, Anne would never quite come

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>out and say explicitly that him may have steered her

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to the papers that gave rise to a conspiracy ring

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of art forgers, but more than one Knodler's staffer would

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>take umbrage at the way Anne defended him less than

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>forcefully in Vanity Fair. Was Anne implying that hime Andrade

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>had introduced her to Glafia Rosales knowing the two works

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>at issue were fake, or had him done no more

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>than to introduce his boss to a Mexican woman who

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>shared his love of Latin American arts. Here again is

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>writer Michael Schneyerson. Leslie Feeley took a dim review of

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Anne and her treatment of Himie. She said Anne treated

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Himie more like a gopher than a mascot. Quote. He

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was a very kind, dignified man, but Anne would send

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>him out to get her tampons. Unquote. He had a

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>poor education the legacy of his childhood in Ecuador. Jimmy

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was a gopher. He that's he was. He was going

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and he got to know a lot of people in

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the art business. He had more aught in his home,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>but all South America. That's the Noteler's art handler Joe

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Stevens Andrade rented a ground floor apartment in an ornate

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>but musty rental building at seventeen East seventieth Street, literally

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>next door to the Noodler. He seemed to like being

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on call for whatever needs a rose. I used to

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 1>stay there whenever I had openings because I worked so late.

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.719
<v Speaker 1>And now I used to go and wife said, man,

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna come, I'm saying, Heimie's Chris, Jimmy. We'd go

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a call out and have you know, you know, at

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ten o'clock, ten thirty at night, after we locked up

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and tell me about the apartment that he had. There

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>was stuffed, like this place is three four times bigger

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>than his apartment. He had a huge and art work everywhere.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Fifty pieces on the wall is big. He had all

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this African South American sculptures everywhere, boxes everywhere. You couldn't

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>put another thing on that counter. That's a pack. He

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>had closets filled with this stuff. He was like, it

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>looked like aoid up who did everything. Rosales and Androde

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>had struck up a friendship based on Latin American artist

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sometime in the late es. At some point, Rosals mentioned

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>she was trying to sell two works on paper by

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Richard deepen Corn, the great abstract artist represented for years

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>by the Knodler Gallery until Larry reuben departure and Anne's

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>promotion did I may think Ann Friedman might take a

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>look and tell Glyphira what she thought. This was a

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>pivotal moment the first time Glypira Rosalee focused on Ann

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Friedman as her target for newly minted forgeries. Soon enough,

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and Friedman found herself looking at a pair of classic

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>deepen Corn drawings. Sadly, that great profusion of Ocean Park

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>paintings and drawings. All those Christmas mornings the staff had

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>described opening brand new deep In corn work had come

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>to an end. Deep In Corn had died in and

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>his daughter Gretchen and son in law Richard Grant, co

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>heads of the Artists Foundation, had ended the galleries long

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>association with Deepen Corn. They didn't much like Ann Friedman.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>They liked her even less after the coup that put

0:06:54.400 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>her in charge. Still, Nodler was widely known as Eben

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Corn's main gallery. There would be no more primary works

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>directly from the artist, but secondary works, those that had

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>changed hands at least once, were fair game for anyone

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>who wanted to buy or sell them, and Nodler could

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>put buyers and sellers together as well or better than

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>anyone else, given its history with the artist. So when

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 1>hera offered to show Anne too Deepen Corns, the Nodler's

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>director jumped at the chance. Days after Anne's coup in November,

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a certain calm had come over the Kndler Gallery. Larry

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Reuben had even agreed to stay on as director until

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the last day of the year. The old art world

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>War horse had recovered his spirits somewhat and shrugged off

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the coup. Perhaps it was time for him to leave

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Ndler after all. Gracefully, he even did Ann Friedman a

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>favor by agreeing to take a look at the too

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Deepened Corn works on paper. Like most of Deep and

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Corn's work since the mid nineteen sixties, these were geometrical

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>abstractions from his Ocean Park series. When Anne asked where

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they'd come from, Rosals demurred. Regrettably. She said her client

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to remain anonymous. That was hardly unusual for works

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>brought in by perfect strangers. Unfortunately, neither of the drawings

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>had identifying marks on their verso verso is what dealers

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>call the back of an artwork, no record of the

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>works tracing back to the artists studio. There was no

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>trace of later buyers and sellers, no auction markings either.

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>In a word, the drawings had no provenance. That was

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a problem. So what is provenance. It's the paper trail

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of what we know about an artwork, starting from the

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>time it was created. It tells us who owned it,

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>when it was sold, where it was shown, and so forth.

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Had Deep and Corn been alive, the issue of provenance

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for these works would have been moot after all, the

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>artist was the best judge of his own work. He

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>could say in an instant whether these two drawings were

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>done by his hand or not. When an artist died,

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the primary work he left behind in his studio or

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>home was easy to judge and usually genuine too, so

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't difficult for the artist's family or executor to

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>authenticate those works and record them for posterity. The challenge

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>came with secondary works sold after the artist's death, works

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>bought and sold and bought again, works that sometimes vanished

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and then reappeared. Were they real or not? An artist

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like Deep and Corn post a special challenge. His Ocean

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Park works were all beautiful, but also quite similar. Larry Reuben,

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>as it turned out, was underwell by the Ocean park

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>esque drawings, and Freedman showed him quote I told her

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I did not think they were good, Reuben later told

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Vanity Fair, which was to say, I thought they were fake.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>He said the gallery couldn't or certainly shouldn't sell them.

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Not long after, Deep and Corn's widow, Phillis, paid a

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>visit to the Noddler with her daughter Gretchen, and Friedman

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>had called the drawings to their attention. And the family

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>were worried about them. When Anne laid them out on

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a table at the gallery, Gretchen and Phillis stared at

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>those drawings for a long time. They looked quite good.

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>We really, we're pretty impressed. It was clearly a beautiful piece.

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I am Gretchen deep and Corn Grant. My father is

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Richard Deepon Corn. Despite the exceptional quality of the works,

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the family felt they were not authentic. You could see

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the hand of the forger in both of them. You

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>look at someone's work long enough in my entire life.

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm seventy six years old, so I was alive during

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>my father's career, and you have a sense of it.

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Not perfect, but you do have a pretty good sense.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>What I said to and at the time was that

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the problem for me was that they didn't have any soul.

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>They didn't seem to breathe. I just couldn't relate to it,

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>even though it was clearly a beautiful piece, and reactions

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>surprised them. She didn't even thank them for calling attention

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to what might be fake Deepen corns. Neither did she

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.959
<v Speaker 1>suggest she would hand them back to their owner, whoever

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they might be. The whole question of what the nobler

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>might do with them was simply not addressed. Of course,

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>she didn't say to in Freedman, I think they're fake,

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know, in the art world you cannot call

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>something a fake because if you do so, you might

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>be sued for defamation of property. So people are very careful.

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Just Seli Reggaeteo is a reporter currently with the Center

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for Investigative Reporting. She pursued the note of story for

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>several years and came up with a few scoops, starting

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>with the story of Dr Bernard Krueger. They might say

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't look right, but you don't quite say this

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is fake. So it's quite interesting that I talked to

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>both Russian Demonquirn as she was seeing this this pieces

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>as they were about to be sold, and then I

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>also talked to Bernard Krueger, who was looking at the

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>pieces from the buyer's perspective. And in both instances, you

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>see there were several things strange about this. You know,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>where they were coming from, how they looked, how much

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>they were being offered. All of those things adopts to

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's something strange happening here. Here's Francis Beatty again.

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I do remember going to a Deep and Corn show

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of Deep and Corn works on paper and someone saying

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to me, you have to be super careful because you

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure that you're not buying one of

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the things that the family has disavowed. And the idea

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that you would show something, let alone sell it, that

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the family of the artist has disavowed, is absolutely shocking.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have a responsibility to your client, and

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>if something has a cloud over it, the cloud is

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>never going to disperse. Since the drawings were secondary market works,

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the family couldn't keep Ann Friedman from doing what she

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted with them, which was, of course, to sell them,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>as Larry Reuben later told Vanity Fair, and Friedman could

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>justify selling those two drawings because the artist's wife had

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>not called them fake, nor had Larry Reuben. I wasn't

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one sure they weren't real, Reuben explained later. And you

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>can get into a lot of trouble by declaring something

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as fake when you don't have the hard evidence. And

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>since I was leaving, I said to Anne, fine, you

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>handle it, and she did. Despite the doubts expressed by

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the family, and Friedman sold the Deep and Corn drawings

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to the perfect buyer. More art fraud in a minute.

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Not long after the Deep and Corn Family's disconcerting visit

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to Knoedler, a doctor named Bernard Krueger received a phone

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>called he never expected to get. Krueger was a collector,

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps not a great collector, but an eager one, especially

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in regard to which your deep in Corn's work. He

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>liked to think he had an inside track. He was,

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>after all, and Friedman's doctor. He told me he loved

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Devon Coorn's work for many years, and at the time

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>he was alive in the nineties, and even before that,

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he started buying the first diven Corns in

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the eighties. He had to go through Knodler because at

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the time Richard Devon Corn was alive and Knodler represented him.

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And what Ben Krueger told me is that every time

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to buy a piece, it was not easy.

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You would think you have money, you want to buy

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a piece of art, You walk in and say, I

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>want this, But that's not how it works in the

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>art world. You know, there is no like free market,

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>or you know, they sell for whoever they want to sell,

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and they might give up price to me and a

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>different price to you. And the way that Bernard described

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to me is that Ann Friedman was quite difficult and

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>quite protective, and she would say to him, no, you

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>cannot buy this one. If you want, you can buy

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this other one. He said to me, I would need

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to beg to buy, and sometimes she would let me buy,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes she wouldn't. And I asked him why why

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>would she do that? And he said, well, that was

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>her way of having power and having control. Despite having

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>an inside track as Hans doctor, Bernard Krueger was having

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a difficult time purchasing a work from the artist he

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 1>most coveted. Surprisingly, all of that would change after Deep

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and Corn passed away in early and all of a sudden,

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Bernard Krueger gets a call from Knoedler saying, we have

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the two different corns for you to see. You know,

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they just came in. I think you would like it.

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>I was a ready, like, wait a minute, don't you

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>think that was change? For years you've been begging to

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>buy a dipping corn. All of a sudden they're calling

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.439
<v Speaker 1>you and offer you a dipping corn. And he said no.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was great. I thought I was finally

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>getting a good deal on a dipping corn, because he

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>bought one of them and that was one of the fakes.

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>If I remember the numbers right. He told me the

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>last deep and Corn he had bought for like a

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty five hundred thirty five thousand, and that one

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he bought for eighty thou dollars. So again he was thrilled.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>He's like, all of a sudden, I'd been offered a

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 1>deep and corn, and it's cheaper than the last one

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>I bought. Nadler did well by those two Deepen Corn sales,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>earning forty five thousand dollars on each. When word of

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the sale reached the Deep and Corn family, they were shocked,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>As the late artist's daughter Gretchen said, we thought, being

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the naive people we were and being honest, we basically

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>thought she would simply return them and that would be that. Instead,

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>she wrote a letter to my mother and to me

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that we had come to the gallery and authenticated these works,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and therefore she had sold them, and we were very distressed.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to write to Anne and tell her that

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this was not okay, and that we had not authenticated them.

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>She can sell whatever she wants, but she can't say

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that we authenticated it. And my mother was very shy

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>about being in an antagonistic position with anybody, and she

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>really didn't want me to write on behalf of myself

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>or on behalf of her, and so that was dropped. Later,

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Krueger would say he had sold the work and

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>had no idea where they were. Perhaps, But over the

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>next fifteen years, the Deepened Corns would routinely hear of

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>fake Deepen Corn works on paper popping up in the market.

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Each new appearance meant that some new owner was trying

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to unload his Deepen Corns, either with or without the

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>knowledge that they were fake. When the works once again vanished,

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the implication was just as clear. Some new owner had

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 1>been duped or worse, set out to con his own

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>next prospective buyer. In the years to come, stories like

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that would find their way to the Deepen Corn Foundation

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis. Eventually, the family counted some two

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>d and fifty deep in Corn images around the world,

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>submitted for authentication or just out of curiosity. They ranged

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>from the occasional top drawer forgery to when art students

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>homage for class credit left in a garage to be

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>celebrated briefly as the real McCoy. Times were tough in

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the art market of and few galleries were feeling it

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 1>as much as Noler, which had little to live on

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>after Larry Reuben's departure other than its reputation and venerability.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she wasn't making much money at I mean

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>business wasn't good, and so she needs something was needed,

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>something really special. Money was needed. Still, Anne seemed to

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>harbor lingering concerns about those works. Perhaps she was eager

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to prove their authenticity to herself and to pave the

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>way for more paintings from Glafira Rosales. Surely Coalfia could

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>share with Anna telling detail or two details to assure

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>her the works had some shred of provenance. Gently, but firmly,

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Glyphia declined to say anything about where the deep and

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:08.719
<v Speaker 1>corn drawings had come from. She would only say she

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>was representing a man she called Mr X Junior, whose

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>parents had passed on to their son more paintings by

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the best known artists of the post war period.

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Soon enough, Anne was calling him Mr X Junior too,

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and referring to his parents as Mr. And Mrs X.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It sounded a bit silly, but maybe a fan played

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>ball Glyphia might introduce Anne to Mr X Juniorphia did

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.120
<v Speaker 1>say that Mr X Junior had more works to sell

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>if they could be placed discreetly. These were works that

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>had been long stored by Mr X hermetically sealed. Even

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Glafira had said the paintings had been in storage for

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.199
<v Speaker 1>so long that critics and collectors would be thrilled to

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>see these lost masterpieces finally unwrapped. I have never, and

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't have any colleagues who I know, who

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>have regularly managed to obtain from a private person a

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>picture for let's say two hundred thousand dollars that then

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they could sell for eight hundred thousand dollars. I mean,

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it just simply doesn't happen. If somebody came to me

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and said, I want to sell you this Cliford Still,

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and I know that the Cliford Stills fair market price

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>would be a million, and they say to me, well,

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to sell it to you for two hundred thousand,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I would think immediately that it was hot. What other conclusion.

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the same in any business. I think if you're

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a diamond merchant, somebody comes to you with the diamond,

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're selling it to you for of its real value.

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You would assume that there was something wrong with it.

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You say no, thank you. And if you bought a

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>painting by mistake, letting your passions get the better of you,

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>what would you do when you came to your senses.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>These things once in a while happened to dealers. You

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>just you make a mistake, but the minute you do,

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you recognize it, you give the money back. You know you,

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you take it, and you learn from it. Otherwise you

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>lose your reputation completely and utterly. So that's one of

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the really key things. It wasn't long before fa Rosalez

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was back in the Nler, this time with a painting

0:23:55.160 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>by abstract expressionist Mark Rothko under her arm. It was

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful work, has Anne described it later, with dark

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>orbs against a pale pink peach backdrop, and like the

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Deepen Corns, it had no provenance other than the link

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to Mr and Mrs X. I think that they were

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the consortium, not just Cliff ear Right. They created paintings

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that were actually quite smart because they were very highly valued.

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Maria Condakova, I'm an author journalist and psychologist, the

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>author most recently of the Biggest Bluff and also most

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>relevant to this, the confidence game. I mean, let's be honest,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Abstract expressionism is not necessarily the most technically advanced paintings.

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm not saying that Rothco is not technically advanced.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>He is. He could paint anything. But for someone who's not,

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, incredibly technically advanced painters, probably easier to create

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a Rothco than a rum round one. That I think

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you said in your book, it's very important for the

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>con artists not to move too quickly. That was the

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.199
<v Speaker 1>whole part of the what I think you call the

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>long con. Something that con artists, the good con artists

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>have in abundance is patients. Some cons take decades to

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>play out all the way. So you really need to

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.479
<v Speaker 1>be able to see the long game and not just

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>be in it for you know, the immediate profit. You

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>need to be able to see how does this play

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>out over time? And one thing that you have to

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>hand to life Era is you know, she didn't just

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>do her homework on and she did her homework on

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the art mark and how that world works and what

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>people expect if you walk in right away with twenty

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>roth Goes and a few Pollocks in there, someone's gonna say, Okay,

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>hold on one second, we're gonna do some very heavy

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>duty analysis on this, but one at a time. Lost treasures,

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we really don't want to part with them,

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>but we're we're selling them piecemeal. That's much more compelling

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and invites less scrutiny. And she's also building the market

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>for herself because now, even though there was originally no provenance,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>now a lot of these pieces are in collections and

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>some end up making it two shows and to museums,

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and so that creates the provenance that this is the

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>collection of Mr. X. And some of these have already

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>been validated by some of the leading galleries and museums

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and collectors in the world. I think that if someone

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>brought me a Rothco who I didn't know and who

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>had no kind of bona fidees in the art world,

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I would be very suspicious. Where did this person get it?

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>And it was stolen? I mean, you don't just go

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>oneer around with Rothko's right, and did show the painting

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to Christopher Rothko, son of the late artist, who professed

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to find it beautiful That was enough for Anne. She

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>bought the painting for one dollars from Rosalis. She sold

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>it to the Michelle Rosenfeld Gallery for three thousand dollars

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for a gross profit of one hundred nine Later, when

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>she heard about the sale, Francis Beatty found Anne's strategy underwhelming.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>If she showed it to Christopher Rothko, I would say

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>that would be a good first step. But that doesn't

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you where it came from. That doesn't tell you

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>that the person has good title to it. You know

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that you would have to investigate. A few people knew

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that Nodler was starting to deal in works without any provenance.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>The circle had been confined to Glypha and any confederates

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 1>she might have, as well as the staffers at the gallery,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>who could gossip but hardly take on their imperious boss.

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Leslie Feely recalled seeing one of the Rothcoes brought in

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>by Gpa. I just walked in and saw this great

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>red painting, presuming to be a Rothco. I just couldn't

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>even look at it because it was so garish and

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:35.239
<v Speaker 1>so not by Rothko, and they were selling it for

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time million dollars. It was not that large

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was clearly a fake. None of these paintings

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>had any provenance, at least of the kind that the

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>art market expected, Nor were any in the catalog resume

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of Mark Rothko or the soon to be completed catalog

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>resume for the late Richard Diebencorn. How could it an

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>organization and not check the provenance. That's what you're supposed

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to do for an art fairy, supposed to check the

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>provenance on any painting, particularly a Rothco. And there it was.

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody took it out, just sitting there. But just to

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>play devil's advocate here, many paintings must meet the market

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>with no provenance because the artist has just finished them,

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or or maybe he put them aside and got bored

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>with his painting. In the old days, you had to

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>ask Jeane thaw On Francis O'Connor to write an attestation.

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean recently, there are lots of states that don't

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>want to write authenticity, which is very problematic. And so

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what you do is you get people in, you sit

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.959
<v Speaker 1>them down and you say, I'm worried about this. You know,

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a picture which has been offered to me.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it looks beautiful, but it has I have

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>no proven it's on it, and I really need to

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>know what you think about it. You ask a couple

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of people, and you do your due diligence because you're

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on the line for it. One of the most important

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>aspects of provenance is in an artwork by a great

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>established artist be readily found, and that artists catalog resume.

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>A catalog resume is done by scholars or a family

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in which they try to write down every single picture

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that to date has been attributed to this artist and

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that they think is legitimate. And typical catalog resume is

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>like the Pollock catalog resume. It says where the work

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 1>comes from in scrupulous detail. Sometimes it says whether it's

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>been repainted, whether it was in a fire. I mean,

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you try to get as much information as you possibly can.

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You try to document every single picture by that artist.

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You also have to be sure that you're passing something

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>that's legitimate or is considered legitimate by the authorities. Of course,

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it does sometimes happen that a painting lacks any provenance.

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>It's rare, but it happens. So what do you do?

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Start calling in the experts and hopefully get them to

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the actual work, Invite them to a gallery opening,

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Steer them to your newly acquired Barnett Newman A Rothko.

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything wrong with doing what she did? As

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>far as that goes, one could argue that Anne and

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>asking the depon Corn family to look at those two

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>works on paper was acting quite properly. No, there's nothing

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong with doing that. I mean, you want to know

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>what distinguished scholars and what people who are regarded to

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>have what we call the art business a good eye,

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in other words, they have, you have some reason to

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>believe that you would risk your reputation on their say so.

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess one important nuance of this is that if

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to get that expert's opinion, you are upfront

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>about asking him, rather than sort of inveigling him to

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>come into your office after hours while everyone's downstairs having

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a glass of wine, and you show this picture and

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the expert says, oh, that's a nice picture, how beautiful.

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>That is not the same thing as authentication, which is

0:32:49.960 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of the ultimate stamp of approval. This is just

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>an expert, perhaps caught a bit away from office hours,

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and saying that looks like a nice painting. It's not roof.

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Could there ever be a situation where you've got enough

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>signatures from experts that people would say, yes, that's real.

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now we all know you have it forensically tested.

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have such a picture that has

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>no provenance and you are very suspicious about you get

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it on consignment from whoever it is, and you have

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it tested, you have to get a complete consensus. You

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>have to have every single person who could question such

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a thing in line. And then of course you have

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the whole issue. Can you pass good title to this picture?

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Which is I think just as problematic and far more frightening.

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>You are passing good title and guaranteeing the authenticity and

0:33:55.640 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the title. That's what the uniform code said, as you

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>were doing if you write an invoice. The staffers learned

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep their distance when Rosaliss name was mentioned. Whenever

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 1>something about the Rosales works was discussed. One staffer said

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a closed door meeting for Anne. That was

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>unusual at all. Other times the door to Anne's second

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>floor office was open. Sign new House would step over

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a rope and come on in. A staffer recalls of

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the publishing mogul, so the door was only closed for

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>certain sensitive meetings. It was around this time that Anne

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>and Glepa held a staff meeting to discuss how many

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>paintings remained in the mysterious collection. Rosales identified approximately eight

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>works that were still available. There is another still a

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Gottlieb too, decoon ngs a motherwell a new whom in

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>one or two Caldlers. That's attorney Emily rice Baum. Over

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a decade later, at trial, attorneys Gregory Claric, Aaron Crowle,

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and Emily would present evidence of handwritten notes of this

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>infamous meeting. The lawyers noted something peculiar about cafe as

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>purported inventory, and then Anne asks is there a pollock?

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And lo and behold it all says I'll go check, yeah,

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>let me check. She was not on her list. You

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>would think if she had a Jackson Pollock, she would

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>come in and say she had a Jackson Pollock. And

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>then it's you know, two years later, having gone to none,

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>she suddenly has five. Did someone did discover a missing

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>pollock in their attic? Once every decade or so, does

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 1>something like that pop up? A Rothcoe that roughly traded

0:35:50.760 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>with his dentist for some dental work? Does that pop up. Sure,

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know there's one here and there's one there, But

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 1>are there three? Are there? Fo I from the same source,

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>are there eight? Are there twelve? Or there twenty? Are

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>there forty one? Literally? Never, Despite her initial estimate of

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>having eight paintings in the collection, Gafa would manage to

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>deliver over thirty more works to Knodler, including five supposed

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Pollock's, surprisingly and treated Kndler's own artists just as

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>harshly as she treated the galleries assistance and just trashed

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>her own artists, every single one of them. Knodler artist

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Donald Sultan later said she would never answer phone calls.

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>She was completely disinterested in the artist she had. She

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of ignored everyone who was there. All her dealings

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>were secretive, Sultan said. According to Sultan, and was out

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of her depth. After Larry Reuben's departure, Sultan said it

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>was as if the director of the Metropolitan Museum of

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Art was like Philippe de Montebelle, deciding that he's going

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to turn the thing over to the secretary. According to

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.800
<v Speaker 1>one staffer who worked closely with her, Anne was not

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>above dramatizing a story to sell a painting. There was

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>this painting by Helen Frankenthaler. We had hung onto it

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years, recalls a staffer. A museum

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:23.320
<v Speaker 1>director came into Anne's office and had the painting out,

0:37:23.719 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and the museum director said, where did that come from?

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>The staffer went on to say there had been a

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>woman killed in a hit and run. This was in

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the news. She had been an art collector and said,

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I can't really tell you, but there was a recent

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.399
<v Speaker 1>tragedy you might have read about in the news, very

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 1>sad story. The staffers said, in fact, we had bought

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the painting at auction in or whatever. An art net

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>search would have shown it hadn't come from this woman's collection.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>But Anne just lie to this director why we probably

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>got it on the cheap and Anne was marking it up.

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>On another occasion, Anne took in a double paneled Milton

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Avery painting, which was to say that there was a

0:38:06.560 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 1>painting on each side of the wood. Instead of showing

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it that way to the Averies, Anne reportedly had a

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>conservator split the painting down the middle and get two

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>salable works instead of one, a considerably greater profit to

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>her and the gallery. I asked Francis if this was

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>typical in any way for a gallery director. Never in

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a million years. I mean, I you know, you hear

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>these stories about people doing them in the kind of

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 1>olden days, but no one would imagine doing that in

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>my era. It's a kind of vandalization of an object

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that you certainly can't do without enormous thought, and I

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>would think, consultation with lots of other people. We'll be

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>right back. Sometimes Anne seemed drawn by the sheer challenge

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of a newly arrived work. Someone might come off the

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>street with a calder and a story, recalls one staffer,

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>it was my father's and he passed away. I'm trying

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to sell it. Inevitably, the owner didn't want to wait

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>long enough to put the calder up for auction. The

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>provenance sounded sketchy, but Anne went upstairs where the finances

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>were done, and ended up buying it for cash. The

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>staffer said, I was thinking, either there's something wrong, or

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 1>you're taking this painting and we'll sell it for two

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 1>or three times the amount. I was. Seeing this for

0:39:56.400 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the first time. It was an indication to me. Over

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the next year or two, other deep in corn works

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>on paper came in from Glyphra Rosales. Like the first ones,

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>they were ocean park abstracts, but they were different in

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>one sense. According to Rosales, they came from the the

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Honda Gallery in Madrid, indicated by the seemingly well worn

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 1>label on the back of each one. The Deep in

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Corn families doubts about those first two drawings seemed to

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have worried and Friedman to she had written a letter

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to Rosalie asking for at least some provenance on the

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 1>newly surfaced the Honda Gallery ocean parks. Leslie Feeley recalls

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and searches for provenance. She would be in touch with

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 1>people who used to work at the National Gallery, like

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 1>a Carmen. I mean, she tried to find names that

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.479
<v Speaker 1>would fool people, and she lied and lied and made

0:40:56.520 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>up these fake provenances. I believe from the beginning she

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>knew these were fixed, they had no provenances. She made

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>up provenances every day. The Honda Gallery works troubled the

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>deep and Corn family as well. We began looking up

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the Handy Gallery and it all seemed very strange because

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>all the work that they had handled. You can't talk

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to anybody, they're all dead. But the works that they

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>did handle when they were in existence, were very, very

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>different from the work that my father did, things like

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Picasso and some of the earlier abstract people. I just

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 1>remember thinking, Wow, that just seems odd. Apparently Rosalis had

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>made some calls and came up with provenance for the

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Honda Gallery. Deepen corns. The key figure was a Spanish

0:41:55.360 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>restaurant owner named Cesario Fontanella. Supposedly, he told Rosalez that

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he had owned a restaurant called Taverna says Are on

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Fleming Street, near Madrid's Castellana Plaza from the late nineteen

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 1>seventies until nineteen eighty five. The Taverna Cesar had been

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a hangout for artists. Everyone from Francis Bacon to Andy

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Warhol had frequented the place, or so Rosalez heard. Nearby

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>was the Jande Gallery, said Clario Fontenella, where many of

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:31.759
<v Speaker 1>those artists had shown. Fernando Vijande would often bring them

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 1>over to the Taverna Cesar. Deep and Corn had been

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the regulars, and in a time honored artistic tradition,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>had often paid off his bar bills with art or

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>traded his own art. The nimble says our Fontenelle had

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>procured his deepon Corns that way, and kept them for

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.919
<v Speaker 1>all those intervening years, he said, and was selling them

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>only now after deepin Corne's death. It was a fine story,

0:42:56.360 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 1>except that Rodrigo Vijande, the late gallery owner's son, found

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it preposterous. First, he had never heard of the Tavernas Caesar.

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He would have known it well if his father patronized it.

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:12.600
<v Speaker 1>He would have known which artists hung out there, too,

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>because Rodrico had helped run the gallery with his father

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and knew its artists upon his father's death. In the

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:27.439
<v Speaker 1>most off key detail of Caesar Fontendles's story was the

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Tavernas address. Even if it had existed, it wouldn't have

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:35.240
<v Speaker 1>been a hangout for artists from the the Honda Gallery

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 1>because it's supposed address on Fleming Street was two or

0:43:39.280 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 1>three miles from the gallery. Both galleries that my father

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>owned in Madrid were right where he lived, in front

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of his house on Nunez de Balboa in the center

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 1>of Madrid, Rodrico explained moreover, of the Hondai didn't drive, that,

0:43:56.000 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>declared his son Rodrigo, was why he lived some fifty

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>yards from his galleries at first, and Freeman may have

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>believed the the Honda Gallery story. Certainly she wanted to

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>believe it. If it was true, it might validate the

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>half dozen other such ocean parks that Rosalis was bringing

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 1>in one by one. With their now distinctive the Honda

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Gallery labels had cast a glow of authenticity over all

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the ocean park, Deepen Corns and over Glafira Rosalee herself.

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But a label isn't provenance. It's just a label. If

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the label had been part of a paper trail of ownership,

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the result would have been picture perfect provenance. In this case,

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the trail petered out as soon as it began. What

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>was it fair to say that every time you saw

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a deep in Corn ocean park that had a label

0:44:55.480 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>on back, that it was almost certainly fake. I think

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>one could say that, Yes, she swears that she didn't know,

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:13.040
<v Speaker 1>which seems hard to believe. That's k Noodler artist Michael

0:45:13.120 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 1>David Again, should she have known? Yeah? And is this

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 1>business fraud with people cutting corners with fraud? Absolutely? And

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Friedman had her Deepened Corns with the Honda Gallery labels,

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but she pressed Rosalees for more proof of the works

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>provenance If she wasn't going to uncover an actual paper trail,

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.960
<v Speaker 1>she could do the next best thing. She could find

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:47.399
<v Speaker 1>experts on the painters whose works were coming in from

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Mr x Jr. Already she had done that with Chris Rothko,

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the late artist's son. Since then another Rothko expert, David

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and Pam, had praised it too, and would do her

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>part seeking out more art world academics who might inspect

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the paintings as they came in and find that they

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:12.080
<v Speaker 1>were true. But couldn't Lafa do something to fill in

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the story of the ex family and arranged for Anne

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to meet Mr x Jr. At last, not yet, Rosavas

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:25.560
<v Speaker 1>deflected soon, she felt soon. But then came the most

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:29.880
<v Speaker 1>astonishing accident, one that seemed to prove beyond doubt that

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Mr X and his paintings were real after all. In

0:46:36.760 --> 0:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>their conversations, Lafra and Anne often talked about art of

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>the post war period. Lafia knew a lot enough to

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>impress Anne, and the two women share their favorite artists,

0:46:49.080 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>one of whom was Clifford. Still in most cases, Glafira

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>would go through Mr X's collection searching for a painting

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>by one of the artists and had spoken of with

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>great admiration. Miraculously Glafira would find one. Glafira Rosales told

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>investigators that the galleries would often ask her for specific

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>things without asking many questions where it came from. So

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>think about this. You are a gallery and you are

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:25.759
<v Speaker 1>buying painting after painting from this woman from Mexico who

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 1>sess was representing a famous collector. So then, as a

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 1>gallery owner, I turned to her and say, so do

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>you think he might happen to have some mother will?

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And then a few weeks later she comes with a

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>mother will. I mean, what is really the likelihood that

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this would happen, And would then ask her to send

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:50.400
<v Speaker 1>an image of the work if they'd met with her approval,

0:47:50.880 --> 0:47:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and would ask to bring the painting in. A standard

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>routine was followed. The painting was put in the trunk

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:03.400
<v Speaker 1>of Mr X Junior's car and transported to a photographer's studio.

0:48:04.600 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Pictures were duly taken and the painting was then put

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>back in the trunk of the car. The plan, as usual,

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 1>was to send the transparencies once they came back from

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:18.279
<v Speaker 1>the studio to Ann at the Knoedler and would then

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>decide if the painting met with her approval. Only then

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 1>would the painting be sent to the gallery. Rosalis soon

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>called Freedman with terrible news while the driver was bringing

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Mr X's Clifford Still painting from the photographer's studio. She

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>said there had been an accident. The car had a

0:48:37.800 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>rear engine and the engine had caught fire. The painting

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>was nearly destroyed, all but a fragment. When she got

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:50.320
<v Speaker 1>over her shock and told Rosalee to bring her the fragment,

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the painting was indeed badly burned. It would have been

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>two and a half feet by three feet, Freedman said later. Indeed,

0:48:58.760 --> 0:49:02.160
<v Speaker 1>nearly all of the paintings Rosalis would bring were of

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>medium scale. To Anne, it made absolute sense that the

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:10.879
<v Speaker 1>painting had been stored in the trunk, and was fascinated

0:49:10.960 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 1>with the fragment, and more so with the transparency that

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 1>accompanied it. The transparency, after all, showed the whole painting

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:22.879
<v Speaker 1>before it was consumed by fire. On the drive back

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to Mr X Junior's house, you could see the whole thing,

0:49:27.520 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and with a fragment you can analyze the front and

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>back differently. You can do a touch and feel about it.

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 1>And later said later in telling that story and would

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 1>beam with triumph. Quote would a con artist burn the

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:43.719
<v Speaker 1>painting and then save a fragment so it could be

0:49:43.760 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 1>forensically examined if the painting wasn't real, wouldn't that make

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it obvious? Unquote? Everything checked out and declared, including that

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in one of the pigments that Clifford still used in

0:49:57.480 --> 0:50:01.920
<v Speaker 1>many paintings, there's an oxidation that had proof positive the

0:50:02.000 --> 0:50:05.320
<v Speaker 1>pigment proved the painting was real, or so felt Anne

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:10.400
<v Speaker 1>as for the burned fragment and kept it as proof

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that the first Clifford still Mr. X Junior had sold

0:50:13.520 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>her had been real as well. One staff are recalled

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that the fragment was kept in a flat white portfolio.

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You could see the burn marks on the edges. It

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was an friedman's own shroud of Turin conveniently, Mr x Jr.

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Managed to find another Clifford still in storage and sent

0:50:38.120 --> 0:50:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it along and in turn took it to the annual

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Art Dealers Association of America show at the New York Armory.

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ruben came by in a wheelchair and said of

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the famous director of the Museum of Modern Art and

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:58.160
<v Speaker 1>brother of the Nler's former director, Larry Reuben whom Anne

0:50:58.239 --> 0:51:02.520
<v Speaker 1>had dispatched from the Notler. According to Freedman, Bill Reuben

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:06.520
<v Speaker 1>looked hard at the Clifford still and said, yes, that's

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:10.319
<v Speaker 1>a cliff painting. I turned it around for him and

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>he confirmed that it was a Clifford Still painting. Bill

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Ruben had been duped by the Rosava's ring too. In reality,

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 1>none of the details in as story of the burned

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Clifford Still painting were true. Now we know no fire

0:51:28.480 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 1>really happened, right did it did? Happened? Actually, Carlos was

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:35.879
<v Speaker 1>preparing the pieces and he was treating them with her

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>dryers and following them in coal and hot temperatures, so

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:46.279
<v Speaker 1>that one got burned because he forgot to turn the

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>hair dryer of, and of course it went in flames.

0:51:49.560 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And now Anne is waiting for the piece. And what

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is this planation I'm going to give Carlos Tom It

0:51:57.480 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>will tell them this. I want people to know that

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I have never talked to nobody. I have never been

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 1>interviewed about my life or about this case except for

0:52:08.640 --> 0:52:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the government of course. More from Glafira Rosale's herself next

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>time on art fraud. You have the cool, clear eyes

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of a seeker of wisdom and truth. Yet there's that

0:52:28.320 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>bob turned chin and the grin of impetuous youth. Believe

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you hard, Believeving you. Art Fraud is brought to you

0:52:50.080 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 1>by I Heart Radio and Cavalry Audio. Our executive producers

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 1>are Matt del Piano, Keegan Rosenberger, Andy Turner, myself, and

0:52:59.440 --> 0:53:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Michael Ayerson. We're produced by Brandon Morgan and Zach McNeice.

0:53:04.239 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Zach also edited and mixed this episode. Lindsay Hoffman is

0:53:08.800 --> 0:53:15.279
<v Speaker 1>our managing producer. How a writer is Michael Schneyerson. I

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>believe you and my faith and my fallow my