WEBVTT - Tech News: LG Televisions and Targeted Advertising

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are you? It is time for

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Thursday, January twenty Twin D two,

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the Journal of Public Health recently posted a study that

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>shows anti vaccination groups on Facebook we're sewing the seeds

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of mistrust regarding COVID Night teen and COVID Night Team

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccines before there was even an organized vaccine development program

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>from the United States government. According to the study, the

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>groups were circulating misinformation about COVID nineteen and vaccines for

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen as early as February twenty twenty. And heck,

0:00:56.200 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's before we started seeing lockdowns in various cities around

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the world and in the United States. I was still

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>on vacation in February at the point where these stories

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>were starting to circulate, and in fact, I was starting

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 1>to wonder if I would ever get back home. But um,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>but I did. Anyway. The researchers identified the anti vax

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>groups that were most active on Facebook at that time,

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and they have some pretty remarkable names. You know, names

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like National Vaccine Information Center, which makes it sound like

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's some sort of official agency that focuses on vaccines,

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>but in fact, it was a disinformation campaign designed to

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>promote conspiracy theories and anti vaxx messaging and undermine confidence

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.919
<v Speaker 1>in vaccinations in general. Two of the other four anti

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>vax groups that the research report named have similar names

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to that. One is a Vaccination Information Network and the

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>other is Vaccine Machine. And the four groups that the

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>researchers identified had posted around two thousand sixty times on

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook from February twenty to May, and about half of

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:12.839
<v Speaker 1>those posts mentioned COVID nineteen. Uh, presumably the other half

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>were just kind of more generally anti vacs. The study

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>really pulls back the curtain on some important things. One

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>is that misinformation campaigns really got the jump on US

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>public health officials. Uh. Those deceptive posts came out well

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>before we started getting you know, reliable information from organizations

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 1>like the c d C, for example. Another is that

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>this is yet more proof of how Facebook facilitates the

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>spread of harmful information. I'm not saying that the platform

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>creates harmful information, but definitely facilitates the spread of it,

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and I know I'm beating a dead horse here. I

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>know I've talked about this countless times, but Facebook's entire

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>business model depends upon people spreading and engaging with content

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>on face Book. I mean that engagement is a commodity

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook sells to advertisers, so it financially benefits Facebook

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>when these things happen, and it was really only after

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 1>massive pressure that the company indicated it would do anything

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>about it. In fact, that's what a lot of those

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>internal papers that Francis Hogan leaked to the authorities and

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>pressed indicated that when there were voices inside Facebook that

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we're warning about stuff like misinformation campaigns, they were often

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>ignored or silenced. Anyway. The study is titled Faster than

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>warp Speed Early attention to COVID nineteen by anti vaccine

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>groups on Facebook. Warp Speed is a reference not to

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>star Trek, although I mean indirectly yes, but more directly

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to the United States government's uh project to fast track

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccine development for COVID nineteen. The big news and activision

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>blizzard this month has mostly been about how Microsoft announced

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it was going to acquire the company by the end

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal year twenty twenty three, assuming regulatory bodies around

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the world don't throw the deal off track. But there's

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>more going on at that company than a big acquisition.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Employees at Raven Software, which is a division within Activision Blizzard,

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>have formed a union. Specifically, the employees I'm talking about

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>our thirty four quality assurance or q A testers within

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Raven Software. They are the ones who have unionized. Now.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Part of the unionization process, which I've actually seen firsthand

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>now involves the union potentially reaching out to the company

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and asking that the company formally recognized the union, like

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially saying, hey, we have a threshold of employees who

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>want to unionize. Uh. And here's maybe some union cards

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that people have signed that we were hoping that you

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>will recognize this as a union uh. And and this

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can go a couple of ways. The company can choose

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to voluntarily recognize the union uh, and that process isn't

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily straightforward. There's usually some back and forth between the

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>company and the union organizers to determine who's actually covered

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>by the union, etcetera. Or a company can choose to

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>not voluntarily recognize the union, and that's the way Activision

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard chose. So now those QA testers at Raven are

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>going to have to file with the National Labor Relations

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Board are in l RB in order to get permission

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to hold a union election. So the election is a

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>more formal process. And ultimately what does is if the

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>election passes, If if a majority of employees vote in

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>favor of a union, that serves as evidence that they

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>do in fact want to unionize. And should the election pass,

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>then the n l r B will certify the union,

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and that means that companies are going to have to

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>deal with union representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for things like compensation and benefits and that kind of stuff.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Raven released a statement expressing disappointment that Activision Blizzard did

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>not voluntarily recognize their union, but expressed confidence that the

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>outcome will still be the same, that in fact, the

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 1>election will show that the employees wish to unionize. As

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for what this means when Microsoft takes control of Activision Blizzard,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>assuming that deal goes through well, Microsoft is also not

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>known for being super enthusiastic about unionization. It's a kind

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>way of putting it, but anyway, I just want to

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:43.799
<v Speaker 1>say I stand with the q A testers at Raven

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, solidarity. Speaking of unions, organizers at Amazon's JFK

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>eight fulfillment center in Staten Island, New York have reached

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the number of signatures they need in order to hold

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a union election vote. The group A previously attempted this

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, but they did not get enough signatures to

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>merit a vote on whether or not to form a union.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Organizers need to secure the signatures of thirty percent of

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the overall workforce that express interest in doing so. Unsurprisingly,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Amazon representatives have protested this whole move, and they question

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 1>if the signatures that have been gathered are even legitimate.

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>They argue that the previous attempt from last year shows

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that workers at the fulfillment center are not interested in organizing,

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and that besides, you know, quote, our employees have always

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>had a choice of whether or not to join a union.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>End quote. Now part of my skepticism here, But Amazon

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is also the company that got a slap on the

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>wrist in the wake of a different union vote, one

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that took place at a fulfillment center in Alabama. And

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in that case in which employees voted against forming a union,

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon was you know, really happy about that. The

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>organizers alleged that Amazon reps had interfered with the election process.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>That action was sustained by the National Labor Relations Board

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and they are n l RB authorized a new vote,

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and that new vote has not yet happened. But essentially,

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Amazon has a history that seems to indicate

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that the company is very keen on discouraging unionization. And

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>on a related note, Amazon made headlines last year when

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>journalists reported that the company had launched an influence campaign

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to make Amazon seemed like a super awesome place to

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>work and perhaps maybe as part of that too, you know,

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of discourage dangerous ideas like unionization. Essentially, the story

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>was that Amazon was paying employees to post on social

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>media about how much they lived working at Amazon, and specifically,

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>folks at warehouses and fulfillment centers were encouraged monetarily, that is,

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>paid to post positive stories about their work experience. This

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>program began in two thousand eighteen, during a time when

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>folks were kind of scrutinizing Amazon's working conditions, which were

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>reported to range from not so great to degrading and inhumane. Like,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the stories were pretty awful. I mean, if

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 1>my employer set performance targets for me that I could

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:18.840
<v Speaker 1>only meet if I were to pee in a bottle

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rather than take a bathroom break whenever I needed to go.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I would call that dehumanizing. And I work from home,

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not in a warehouse, and yeah, that's the kind of

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff that was being reported out of Amazon Fulfillment centers now.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>The program of promoting Amazon as a great place to

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>work consisted of more than fifty online accounts on Twitter,

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>all using the appended title of Amazon FC Ambassador, and

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>many of them using similar or sometimes identical content inside

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>their posts, all of which position to Amazon is a

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>hunky dory kind of place to work, almost like Willy

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Wonka's chocolate factory. The strategy did not work. Folks called

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it out right away, and it now appears that Amazon

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>has completely scrapped the program by the end of last

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>year and then got to work essentially wiping away any

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>trace that it was ever a thing. On a related

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>note and a peek behind the scenes, I recently went

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.719
<v Speaker 1>through some f c C and f TC training here

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>at work at I Heart, and that includes learning about

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>how the FTC and the FCC set out rules regarding

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>things like sponsored posts and and ads like content creators

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>were obligated to indicate when something is an ad or

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a sponsored piece of content. We are not supposed to

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>pass it off as if it's our genuine thoughts, if

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't have done that otherwise. And you've probably seen

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>this in online places like YouTube and Instagram and that

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, where you're supposed to make it it's

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>explicitly clear if the content you're presenting is sponsored or

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is an outright advertisement. Now I would not be surprised

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of Eventually we see similar rules applied to companies that

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:08.359
<v Speaker 1>are not directly associated with content creation, because what Amazon

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>did would be against the rules if it were to

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>happen on say a podcast or a radio show or

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>television show or online videos. So, in other words, if

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I had done something similar to what was going on

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at Amazon with this promotional program, and I did not

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>explicitly make it clear that this was a sponsored message

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I was sending out, I could be reliable. I could

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be fined an enormous amount of money, or my company

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>could be fined an enormous amount of money. And I'm

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>guessing that we will probably see a point where companies

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>in general will be held to that where they are

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to run these kinds of campaigns without it

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>potentially resulting in fines. I wouldn't be surprised to see that.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>And our last Amazon story for this episode is about

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the Companies Sold by Amazon program. In that program, Amazon

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>partnered with third party vendors and then would promote and

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>sell products from those vendors would be sold by Amazon label.

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>So uh, the vendors would enter into an agreement with Amazon,

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and that agreement would include a minimum payment rate for

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>stuff sold on Amazon, and then if sales went above

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that minimum, then Amazon would start taking a cut of

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the revenue. But the Attorney General for the state of

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Washington launched an investigation into Amazon and concluded that this

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>practice was anti competitive and included illegal price fixing, and

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that the program was meant to push Amazon sales numbers

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>up at the expense of independent third party vendors on

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the platform. Amazon subsequently discontinued the program and will pay

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a fee of more than two million dollars to the

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>office of the Attorney General, and reportedly that fine will

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>go to fund more anti trust enforcement efforts. We've got

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot more stories to cover, but before we get

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to that, let's take a quick break. Okay, we just

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>came back from ads and LG announced to advertising companies

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this week that it would offer guaranteed outcome AD services

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>through its connected televisions. So once you start cutting through

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the marketing speak, it appears that this really indicates the

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>LG is going to offer up stuff like targeted advertising

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>capabilities through its smart TVs. So if you buy an

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>LG television, then you should expect more targeted ads to

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>come through. Ads on smart televisions are not a new thing.

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>If you have a smart TV, you're probably familiar with this.

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of smart TVs will display an AD on

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>say the home screen for the television or within certain menus.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But LG has been particularly aggressive with ads and now

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>is looking to step up into that targeted ad game.

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>And according to digit A, LG will quote promise brands

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that their CTV that stands for a connected television video

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>ads running on LG smart TVs meet campaign goals across

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>multiple kpi s. KPI stands for a key performance indicators

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>such as video completion rates. Buyers only pay if videos

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>are played in their entirety, demographic targets, reach and frequency

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>goals etcetera. Conversion metrics for mobile are also offered, but

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>elements including tune in web visits, physical location visits, etcetera,

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>won't be available for another few months end quote. And

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that starts to sound a bit scary to me. I

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>mean from that, I infer that eventually LG connected televisions

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to share information with your smartphone, including any

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>location tracking that your phone uses, and share that information

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>with advertisers. So that let's say that you've got a

0:14:55.320 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>company that advertises mattresses and that company then sees that

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the targeted customers are actually visiting brick and mortar stores

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that the company operates. Because the LG smart TV is

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>sharing that location data between apps on the smartphone, the television,

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and the whole advertising campaign in the first place, starts

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to get a little invasive. Also, if we're talking targeted

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>advertising that takes into account stuff like your browsing habits

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that you know it's connected to an account that is

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>living on, say your computer or your smartphone, a lot

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of other red flags pop up For me. It could

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be a really big privacy issue. Just imagine for a

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>second that you're living in an apartment with a whole

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch of roommates, and you might happen to own an

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>LG smart TV and you offer to have that be

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the communal television in the living room space. So you're

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>living room TV is your smart LG TV. If that

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>television is connected to some sort of account on your

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>smartphone or laptop, it's possible that the ads that end

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>up being displayed are revealing information that you really didn't

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>want to share with your roommates. Maybe it's like medical

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>information or something. And that's just one hypothetical situation. I

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>can imagine where this is not a good thing, but

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see how it plays out. Today is

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Holocaust Remembrance Day. It's the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and today is also when the TikTok platform will begin

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>promoting a website called about Holocaust dot org. The World

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Jewish Congress and UNESCO created that site to educate people

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>about the Holocaust and to fight back against misinformation and

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>denial campaigns, which unfortunately proliferate across the internet. Advocacy groups

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>have long complained that TikTok was not taking enough action

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to curtail anti Semitic messaging on the platform, and Holocaust

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>denial in videos as well. In addition, several Jewish TikTok

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>creators have reported being the target of abuse. Sometimes they've

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>had their content mistakenly flagged or removed with no justification.

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And according to see net, there have been some trends

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok that I'm not even going to describe here

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>because I find them deeply upsetting and very sad. But

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I will say they are trends that minimize or even

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>celebrate the Holocaust, which is it turns my stomach now.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think TikTok is taking the right actions to try

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and push back against these trends on its platform and

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that people visiting TikTok have the opportunity

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to learn from reputable sources about the Holocaust and not

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>allow misinformation to run unchecked. Of course, it will remain

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to be seen about whether or not these efforts are effective.

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember way back in November two thousand nineteen,

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>when Tesla unveiled its design for the cyber truck. The

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>reaction to that unveiling was, I'll be kind, I'll say

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>it was mixed. Maybe part of that is because during

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a demonstration to show how unbreakable. The truck's windows were

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the windows broke? What sie? It also has a pretty

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>funky design, do it like? Some people just absolutely hated it.

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>A few people thought it was weird but kind of interesting.

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's interesting, but not It doesn't look practical

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to me, But what do I know. I don't drive anyway. Um,

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and we got reports late last year that an updated

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>design of the cyber truck was spotted driving around test

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>tracks in Fremont. Well, the cyber truck was supposed to

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>come out by the end of this year. Actually, I

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>think they were supposed to start shipping late last year.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>That didn't happen, and now it looks like it's not

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen this year either, because in an earnings call yesterday,

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk revealed that the production of the truck has

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>been delayed until twenty three. He also said that the

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>company would not be introducing any new models this year,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>and he also dismissed the idea that Tesla would pursue

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 1>producing a low cost vehicle in the near future. He

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>said there were no plans to design a twenty five

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar car, and he essentially said that the company doesn't

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>really need to make a low cost car, at least

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>not yet, because they'll end up selling every car they're

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 1>able to produce. Now, you could interpret that as being boastful, right,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's say like, oh, we don't need to have a

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>budget car in our lineup. We don't. It doesn't matter

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>what we charge, We're gonna sell every single car off

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the line, which is kind of how Musk said it.

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess, so we wouldn't be unfair to frame it

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that way. However, I don't really think of it as boasting.

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>I think of it more as an indication that Tesla

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't produce nearly as many vehicles as some of its

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>competitors do. For example, in one Tesla said that it

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>delivered nine thirty six thousand vehicles, so below one million,

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:07.959
<v Speaker 1>but ninety six thousand. Toyota meanwhile produced seven point six

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>million vehicles at the end of their last fiscal year,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 1>which was at the end of last March. So if

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at that level of scale, to me, it

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that that Tesla is not focusing on low

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>cost vehicles yet because it has not reached a scale

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 1>of production where it would merit. The move to making

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:30.239
<v Speaker 1>low cost vehicles in fact, it might not even be

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>financially feasible to make low cost vehicles right now because

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of those issues of the scale of production. Now as

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Tesla grows, that can very much change. But I think

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what Well, that was my interpretation of

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>what Elon Musk was getting at. I could be totally

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>off base. Now here's a question. If a self driving

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.719
<v Speaker 1>vehicle gets into an accident, whom do you find at fault?

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Is it the car's owner, was it the person who

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was in the vehicle? Was it the car maker? Well,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the Law Commission of England and Wales as well as

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the Scottish Law Commission released a joint report that suggests

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>people who are you know, in an autonomous vehicle should

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not be held responsible for road safety issues. Instead, the

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>car maker should be held accountable for any road safety

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>issues that that occur because of that car. And this

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>has been one of those areas of debate as engineers

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>get closer to producing what we might actually call a

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>truly autonomous vehicle. But the commissions also point out quite

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>correctly that there is massive confusion among the general public

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>as to what is and what is not a truly

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>self driving car. And we were just talking about Tesla,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to use them as an example of

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>how the public can get confused. Tesla refers to its

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, basic driver assist suite of features as auto pilot,

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would argue that sets an expectation that isn't

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>very realistic because the word autopilot seems to suggest, at

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>least to me, that the driver doesn't have to worry

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>about anything because the car is an autopilot. But arguably

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>worse than that, the company has uh the full self

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>driving mode, which is in beta. It's not a full

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>release yet, but I would say that's not really a

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>full self driving mode. Even though it's called full self driving.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's not full self driving. You still

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>have to have an owner prepared to intervene and to

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not supposed to take your hands off the wheel,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>You're supposed to maintain your attention. That to me does

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>not mean full self driving. So there's no wonder that

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the average person might have an unrealistic expectation as to

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 1>what a self driving car can and cannot do. Anyway,

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>should the UK adopt the recommendations these commissions have suggested

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and hold car makers accountable for any accidents that happened

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>with their their vehicles. We could see a precedent set

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in which governments around the world agree that car makers

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>are the responsible ones if self driving vehicles get into accidents. Now, personally,

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the most reasonable approach. Um. You know,

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you can even get more granular than that, if you

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>want to argue that the department in charge of whatever

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the the self driving system was at fault

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 1>really takes the blame. But I think that the car

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>maker is the one that makes the most sense. And

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I think when we start talking about stuff like insurance,

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>that's going to have to play a factor as well.

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Assuming we do get to a world where you know,

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you might own a self driving car, keeping in mind

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that most models I see suggest that self driving cars

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>will actually be owned by companies that are essentially right

0:23:54.880 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>hailing companies, not necessarily sold to individual customers. Um, but yeah,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this could really set a legal precedent that we could

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>see spread around the world. And unless we're talking about

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a case where a human is interfering with the autonomous

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>operations of a car, I think that that just makes

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>sense if you are talking about something where somebody I

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know, rests control of the car from the system. Uh,

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>then obviously you would be in a different case, and

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the car maker should be held accountable

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>in those instances. That's why I think a lot of

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.199
<v Speaker 1>car companies that have been kind of playing with the

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of autonomous cars have also floated the concept of

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that don't have controls in them, right, because then

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you take away at least human accessible controls them. You

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>take away the ability for a human to like turn

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the wheels suddenly when it should be under the control

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of the car itself. Okay, we've got a few more

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>stories to cover, but before we get to those, let's

0:24:52.119 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. Block Incorporated CEO Jack Dorsey is

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>probably sweating a little bit right now. Block inc Used

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to be known as Square, which is its famous product

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and service. You probably have encountered a Square dongle at

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>some point. These are typically it's a device that you

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>plug into something like an iOS device like an iPhone

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>or tablet iPad, and it allows you to process credit

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>card payments, and the tablet or phone acts as the

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>communications node that then works with the back end of

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the credit card companies and you can use the iOS

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>device as a point of sale, and it's very useful

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>for small business owners. Well, Apple has recently announced that

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it is working on a service that will allow those

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>small business owners to accept payments directly through their iOS

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>devices without the need for an additional piece of hardware

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>like a Square dongle. And so it's just saying, well,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to offer that as a native capability in

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>our devices, so if you want, you can use our

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>payment system and you don't even have to have like

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a Square account or anything like that. And uh, there

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't a whole lot of details here, but Bloomberg suggests

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that Apple is going to use NFC technology as the foundation.

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>NFC stands for near field communication that allows for the

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>wireless data transfer a very small packets of information across

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>small physical distances. Like you know, you hold two phones

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>up next to each other and they exchange contact information,

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing that's that typically uses NFC, and

0:26:41.720 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>modern credit cards typically have a chip that uses NFC

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for contact list payments, So for those where you can

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>tap the card against a point of sale, those kind

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of things, it'll work with that, at least according to Blueberg,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>And it will be interesting to see how block Inc

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>responds to this. I imagine there's going to be a

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>battle of of his fees to try and stay competitive

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>because usually on the back end of this, if you're

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a small business owner, you're having to pay a certain

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>amount of money or surrender a certain amount per sale

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to fund these services. Right, So, if block inc is

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>able to offer a more competitive fee versus Apple, then

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>it might be able to go toe to toe, but

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>it's too early to say here. In the United States,

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Internal Revenue Service or i r S, which is

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>already a super popular agency in this country, is poised

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to require taxpayers who want to use certain i r

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>S online services to first use a third party company

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>called i d dot me to verify their identity. And

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, it makes sense that the i r S

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>wants a way to authenticate that a person is whom

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they claim to be, particularly when you're talking about stuff

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that relates to taxes or accessing sensitive documents that relate

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to a person's income. Um, you know it makes sense

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure you protect all that well.

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I D dot me is going to require users to

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>submit some documents to prove they are who they say

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they are, as well as to submit a video selfie

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>as part of that verification process. So we're talking about

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition technology at play here, and for several reasons,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>many security and privacy advocates have criticized this announcement. For

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>one thing, it brings a private company into the citizens

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>interaction with the i r S, and there are worries

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that that alone compromises security as soon as the i

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>r S chose to offload verification to a private, third

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>party company. Then there are many of the same general

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>issues we've seen with facial recognition software that we should consider.

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>For example, we've seen time and again through various different

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition systems that many of them have a bias

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to them, and that this bias often makes them unreliable

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>when used with people of color, or with women, or

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>with people who are gender nonconforming uh. The critics also

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>point out that this can create a deeper digital divide

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>because it means that users who want to access those

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>online services will have to have a web camera or

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone with a camera on it in order to

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to do the video selfie thing and to

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>use facial recognition to prove they are who they say

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they are, and not everyone can afford that. Not everyone

0:29:35.520 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>has that at their disposal, but everyone has to deal

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>with the I R s Now. All that being said,

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I d dot me has claimed that it's technology has

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>shown no bias or inherent unreliability based on skin color. Uh.

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that there's any independent research into that,

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but I d dot me says it's not the case. Uh.

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And they also point out that the online services where

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this will apply limited to just a couple of features.

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:05.959
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know one of those features is checking

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>your account online. That sounds like a really basic action

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to me. Maybe I'm missing something here now. I RIS

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>has said you can still file and pay taxes without

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>going through the online route at all. And if you're

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>doing that, like if you're doing it in the old

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>fashioned paper and pencil way or paper and pen way,

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess you don't even have to worry about any

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of this, right. I d dot me is not at

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all involved with any of that side of things, and

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not a gatekeeper. Still, privacy advocates are concerned about

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>where this is headed. And finally, let's talk about secret

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>government agencies and how to uncover them. A researcher in

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:47.479
<v Speaker 1>Germany named Lilith Whitman says that she used an Apple

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>air tag to prove that a German government agency called

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Telecommunications Service is actually a cover organization for

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a secret branch of the German in Terior Intelligence Agency.

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Whitman was working on a computer program to evaluate this

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>telecommunication services work, and presumably that work is to help

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>telecommunications companies in Germany, but that department turns out to

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>have no official budget and that kind of sounds sus right. Well,

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Whitman looked into it further, trying to get to the

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>real story of what the supposed department really was all about.

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>She did online research, she made phone calls, she drove

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to offices or at least to what was claimed to

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.479
<v Speaker 1>be an office to check it out in person, and

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of other actions, uh, some of which just led

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to dead ends, And ultimately she deduced that the Federal

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Telecommunications Service is really part of Germany's Ministry of the Interior,

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>specifically the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution,

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of similar to the FBI here in

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the United States, with some pretty major differences. But you know,

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the realm this agency works in, and

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Whitman was told repeatedly that she was on the wrong track,

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>which obviously she would be right. If she was on

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the right track, she would still get that message. And

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>if she was on the wrong track, then she would

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>also get that message. So no matter what, she would

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>be told, you're not on the right track. So she

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 1>decided to try and experiment. She mailed a package containing

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>an Apple air tag to the supposed telecommunication agency's postal address. Now,

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:35.280
<v Speaker 1>air tags lets you track something right like, you can

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>connect it to pretty much anything. You can attach it

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to a bag. And let's say that you're going through

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>an airport and you're gonna check your luggage. You might

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>have an air tag in your luggage so that you

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>can make sure you know where your luggage is when

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you get to your destination. Maybe it doesn't pop up

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>at at baggage retrieval and you want to find out

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>where it is. Air tag can help you track it down.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So she puts one of these inside a package, and

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>she tracks it as it goes through the postal system,

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and she says that the tag went not to the

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>supposed address of the Federal Telecommunication Service, but rather ended

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>up being delivered to the Office for the Protection of

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution in Cologne, Germany, and that seems to support

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>her assertion that the Federal Telecommunication Service is just a

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>front for the intelligence gathering agency. Now you might wonder

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>why would she do this, Like, why would she do

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>uncover the secrets? Why would she share that information? Well,

0:33:33.640 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you can bet that if a security researcher has figured

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this out, the quote unquote bad guys also know about it.

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And if the bad guys know your cover story, then

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a cover story, right, Like it's like

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you're wearing wearing a Groucho Marx glasses and calling it

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a disguise. So this is one of those functions that

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>hackers fill that can easily be misinterpreted. You might say, well,

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>why is this hacker pointing out this big gap in security?

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that dangerous? If the hacker says, hey, here's how

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I hacked into the system, isn't that dangerous? Well, for

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing, when a hacker does this, it sends the

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>message that there is a gap insecurity, which really means

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>there's no security at all, because you can sure as

0:34:20.760 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>heck bet the bad guys are not going to let

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>on that the system has flaws in it until it's

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>too late to do anything about it. And for another thing,

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>it really is a message to whatever the agency or

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 1>organization or company or whatever it is. It's a message

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to them to say, hey, you're doing a bad job

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>with your security, and if you want to do what

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you're doing, you've gotta do it better. So you could

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>say that this is a way of doing quality control

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to gathering intelligence. Anyway, I thought it

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting story. I wanted to conclude with that one.

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Hope you are all doing well. If you have suggestions

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>for topics that I should cover tech stuff, whether it's

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 1>a company, uh, technology trend in general, a specific kind

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>of technology and how it works, maybe it's one of

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the tech stuff tidbits you would like me to cover.

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me know the best way to do that is

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:14.839
<v Speaker 1>to reach out on Twitter. The handle for the show

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.279
<v Speaker 1>is text stuff hs W and I'll talk to you

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. Y Tech Stuff is an I Heart

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.