WEBVTT - What Does Artificial Intelligence Mean?

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Alexa, what's the best science podcast on air? Hey? Are

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you trying to replace me with Alexa? What's going on here?

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you're replaceable? There's no way an artificial

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>intelligence could ever make jokes nearly as funny as I am.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there's no way an artificial intelligence would laugh

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at your jokes. I'm pretty sure I could. I could

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>program a pretty dumb computer to laugh at my jokes.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It's called the laugh track. But that's Hey, that's a

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>new challenge for for AI. You know, first chest then

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>go now science comedy. That's right, now, programs something that

0:00:43.800 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>can find humor in Daniel's ramblings him and I'm Daniel,

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and this is our podcast. Daniel and Jorge explained the Universe,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in which we try to download everything we know about

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the universe, episode by episode into your brain, whether you're

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a real person or an artificial intelligence, listening to our

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>podcast while trying to sound intelligent about it while writing

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>your own humor for the open mic AI Night. The

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>topic of today's podcast is what is artificial intelligence? And

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 1>very importantly is it dangerous? That's right? Should you be

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at your window for the first signs of the

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>robot revolution. Should you be afraid of your Alexa? Should

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you be worried about that robot vacuum cleaner getting resentful

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for having to do all the dirty work and eating

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>your face off in the middle of the night. That's

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit dark. It seems kind of sinister, doesn't it.

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like sitting there are circling, circling, circling, waning, waiting, waiting.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I think those things are creepy, right. Maybe it wants to,

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, clean your face, it wants see That's the question.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Does a robot vacuum cleaner want anything? What does it

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>mean for it to want? What is it like to

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>be a robot vacuum cleaner? The next great paper in philosophy?

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is kind of in the zeitgeist right now.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, people are really excited about artificial intelligence. But

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same time there are big names like Elon

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Musk kind of warning people like, hey, artificial intelligence not

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>such a good idea. That's right, it's a huge topic.

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you drive around like San Francisco, you see

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning. It's on billboards. Even

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know you want to get a million bucks for

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>your new company, you just say the words AI, deep learning,

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and boom people are throwing cash to right, people are

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>learning in the deepest learning. Um. It's definitely part of

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the cultural moment, and you see that reflected not just

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in like what deep thinkers are saying, but also in

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like science fiction. You know, a lot of the near

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.079
<v Speaker 1>term dystopian these days is about how AI will take

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>over and the dangers of AI. Another way, like thirty

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>years ago is about the dangers of UH of radiation. Right,

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that was the new dangerous thing physicists that invented. Now

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the new dangerous technology that we're all worried about is AI.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a new promise in peril. Um. Yeah. AI. Every

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>piece of technology is a double edged sword, right. You

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>can use it for good, you can use for evil.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>But AI is special because it's not just technology, is

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>not just a tool that people use. It's a tool

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that that has independence, that has autonomy. And that's why

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's such a vexing question. Well people, I'm sure people

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone associated with robots and machines and computers, but we

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>were kind of wondering if people actually knew what artificial

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>intelligence was, like, what makes it work, what makes it

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>different than than real intelligence? M I bet you that

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the people who say the phrase artificial intelligence don't actually

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>know what they're talking about, which is probably true for

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>most topics andology, it's true for me probably, I'm sure.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But we're wondering if you guys out there knew what

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence was. And so, as usual, Daniel went out

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and as people in the street, and here's what they

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>had to say. Um, it's the idea that we can

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>create some type of material thing that could think on

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>its own ultimately, And do you think it's something we

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>should be concerned about? Is it ever going to be

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a threat to humanity? I mean possibly, but I mean

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we never We don't know everything. We can know the

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>bounds of what could be a threat, we cannot be

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a threat. Yeah, it's AI, and it's the stuff that's

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>used in various technological applications basically just kind of like

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to make machines replicate certain aspects of human intelligence.

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuff like that. Okay, And do you think it could

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>ever be a threat to humanity? Is something we should

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>be worried about? I guess since I don't have a

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly strong opinion on it, I don't think so. So

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll say no for now. Um, I'm assuming

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the idea that computers or electronics can have like sentience. Right,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Are you worried that computers would when they take over

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and make us their slaves? And not really, I don't

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>think it will come to that point. All right. Those

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>are pretty sophisticated answers. I like the ones that said,

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>um oh, artificial intelligence, that's just AI, right, Like that's

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>an answer. So that's an answer to every question. You know,

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>what is Google blex Zavi Brown? Oh, that's just gens. Yeah, acronyms.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Acronyms can make you look intelligent, that's it. That's the

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>real artificial intelligence to speaking acronym acronym intelligence. Um. You know,

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but people had some sense that it's, you know, something

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that can think for itself, or something do something for you,

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or create something that can think by itself. There's definitely

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the nuggative idea is definitely out there. They use it

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>in relation to what it can do. That's right, yeah,

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly what what is what's the new capability that defines it? Yeah?

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Right yeah, and that it's it's a fascinating way to

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>think about it, you know. And uh, it's definitely a

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 1>tricky question, right because I guess we know it in

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the context of UM using them for things, right, Like,

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we're people, don't just create a I because we want

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to create artificial beings. It's like, so it can help us.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to create artificial beings. What's what's wrong with that?

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>That sounds pretty awesome. Create a whole army of physics

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>artificial physics grad students. It sounds pretty cool. Kids. Yeah,

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>you mean, are they worried about competing with my digital children? Natural?

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>They know you'd rather have artificial children. I didn't say

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have artificial that in addition to my beautiful,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>wonderful natural children, which I should not be talking about

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast. I'd love to have a whole, you know,

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>cadre of artificial children to do my bidding, unlike your

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>real children. If who won't do your bidding? So somebody

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>listening children? And that sort of goes to the heart

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of the question. You know, UM, if you created a

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>digital being with artificial intelligence, would it listen to you?

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Or would it make its own decisions? Right? And so

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why we thought it would be interesting to dig into,

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>like what is artificial intelligence? If it just did what

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you told that to do. It wouldn't maybe be in

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>an artificial intelligence you're saying nobody smart should listen to you,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>is what you're saying. I'm saying they should decide for

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>themselves whether I'm I'm worth following. So let's break it

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>down for people. Daniel, what is artificial intelligence? Well you

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>should listen to this podcast and that will give you

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the answer. Done. Um, Well, you know, I think to

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>understand what artificial intelligence is, we should think for a

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>moment about what do we mean by intelligence? Right? And

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>very simply intelligence. It's just the ability to learn, is

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to find patterns to extrapolate from them. Really, that's how you.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>But like a dog can learn. But a dog, you

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say it's intelligent, would you? Absolutely? I would say

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a dog is intelligent. You can teach a dog, you

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>can train a dog. It's more intelligent than a rock.

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But would you say by a lot, Oh my gosh,

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>if you like, never interact with a dog. A dog

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is like a living sension being. It feels that experiences,

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>It definitely learns. It can recognize you. I mean, dogs

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>can do complicated of think. The dog is a perfect

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>example it's you know, I wouldn't trust it to do

0:08:03.120 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>my taxes. You know, I don't know compared to our

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>tax accountant, did I do a pretty good job. I mean,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you can say that's an intelligent dog, but you wouldn't say, like,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the epitome of intelligence. I wouldn't say the dogs

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>are the most intelligent beings in the universe. But that's

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. We're talking about do they have intelligence?

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Pretty example, because they can learn, you can train them,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and you the cool thing about an intelligent being is

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that you can train it to do something even if

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't know how to do it. Say, for example,

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you want your dog to recognize you, right, but tear

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the face off anybody who tries to break into the house,

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>right guard dog. Okay, so you can train a dog.

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>You reward it when it does the right thing, and

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you punish it when it does the wrong thing. You

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to, like build a being that does that,

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that like recognizes your face and recognizes stranger's faces and

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>makes these decisions. That's hard task, you know, it's not

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>easy to do. But you can train a dog. A

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>dog can learn how to solve this problem and all

0:08:58.120 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to do to train it is to reward

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it and punch it. So you're saying, just the ability

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 1>to sort of learn from your mistakes or learn from

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>your surroundings, that's what you would call intelligence. Yeah, And

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>dogs have less of it than we do, and more

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of it than cats and mice, um. But they have

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>some of it for sure, which is what makes them trainable.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I wonder sometimes, because dogs can be trained, right,

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>nobody ever trains their cat. What does that say about

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a cat's intelligence. I've always thought I love cats, but

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I've always thought dogs are probably smarter than cats because

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you can train them, right, Or maybe cats are more

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>intelligent in that they're they're not they don't allow themselves

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 1>to be trained by humans, right. And rocks, by that metric,

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>are the most intelligent because they completely ignore you, right

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to see the fallacy of that argument right there. But

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe there's sort of sort of like a hump, right, like,

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>as you get more intelligent, you're easily more trainable, trainable,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.439
<v Speaker 1>trainable bout somebody. You get so intelligent that you rebel

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>against your masters, And so how do you tell the

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>difference between something that's totally unintelligent and something that's so

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>intelligent and completely ignores you. Yeah, I don't know deep

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 1>question or believes all the rocks are probably thinking about him.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Well sure, I mean if he used to use the

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>ability to listen to what I say as a benchpark

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>of intelligence and then yeah, there's, um, something super intelligent

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>could be just as smart as the rock. But obviously

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a cat is still making decisions and acting and you know,

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>doing things, so it's intelligent. But maybe it's much more

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>intelligent than a dog because it's it chooses not to

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 1>listen to us. All right, I think we need to

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.239
<v Speaker 1>have a whole other podcast on who's smarter cats or dogs?

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And before we do that, we will collect some data

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to answer this question. Um, but I think with the

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>question we're focusing on is what is artificial intelligence? So

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>natural intelligence just the ability of an animal to learn.

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Artificial intelligence would be if something artificial that we create

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has that same property, the ability to change the way

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it processes things in response to what it sees about

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the world. Yeah, artificial intelligence is a very broad field

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with lots of elements that we couldn't cover in just

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>one episode of a podcast. But let's just talk today

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>about one important sub field of AI, which is machine learning,

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>or more specifically, I would say, let's focus on training. Right,

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>can you build something or something artificial that can be trained? Right?

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And uh? I think, I think let's talk for a

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>moment about, you know, how how normal computers work, and

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>then we can talk about how computers, smart computers, computers

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that can learn, computers with artificial intelligence, how they work.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think what you keep talking about cats

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and dogs? All right, we'll talk about cats and dogs,

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but first let's take a quick break. Let's talk about

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what computers can do. Yeah, let's because computers are smart, right,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>you can program a computer to do smart things, but

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily mean it has intelligence. That's right. There's

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a difference between a computer that can do something and

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a computer that can learn something. Right. The way I

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>think about non intelligent computers is the way you sort

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of think about machines. Right. You can tell them what

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to do, and they do exactly what you tell them,

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>regardless of whether it's the right thing. You don't give

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>them like a goal and say, hey, I just want

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the house to be clean. Figure it out. You have

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to tell them exactly what to do. You say, step

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>over here, move the broom this way, step over there,

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and if it's not cleaning the house because

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're stuck on a corner or they're you know, fell

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on their on their butts or whatever, they don't care.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>They just tell you do exactly what you tell them

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to do. Have no sort of larger sense of what's important.

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>It just follows instructions, just follows the recipe you gave it.

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It's like a like a wind up toy,

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, you wind it up, you give it some energy,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and then it goes. And I really do think about

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.959
<v Speaker 1>computer programs the way you might think about little machines, right,

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>because that's exactly what they are. They just execute a

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>set of instructions. You know. It's just like a bunch

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of gears clicking into place, and they can't change the

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>way they do that. And they do it regardless of

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the right thing, or whether it's effective or whatever.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It just goes. Like your electric toothbrush, you know, you

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>switch it on, and it's just it has a circuit

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>that just has it moved the bristles back and forth,

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right, And it doesn't know if it's brushing your

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>teeth or just flailing around in midair. Right, has no idea,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't care, It doesn't think or feel whatever. It's

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>just a machine, right, Thank god, it doesn't know. It

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>would tell you to brush your teething like that's chocolate, Jorney,

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm tired of this? What is this gunk? Yeah? Exactly.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what a sort of a normal machine is.

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what a classical computer program is, right. I think

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of it just the same way as you think of

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a physical machine. Okay, it's just doing what you the

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>programmer told it to do. That's right, and it follows

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>your instructions exactly. Um. Now, a computer that can learn

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is different, right. A computer that has artificial intelligence is

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.959
<v Speaker 1>different in this really important way because you can train

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it right, and you can train it because you we

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>build these things to model the way that we work. Right.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So for example, an AI program is sort of like, um,

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>like a newborn baby can't do anything. Right. Say, there's

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a AI program, for example, that's supposed to recognize you

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>when you come in the door. Right, is this Jorge

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>or is this not Jorge? Right? Because it should only

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>open the door for Jorge and not open the door

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for not Jorge. Okay, So when you created a new

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>AI program, you would start out like just a newborn baby, okay,

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and like a blank slate, right, Like a blank slate,

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it would make random decisions, right you You you show

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it a face and it would say yes, it's Jorge,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you say no, you were wrong or yes

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you were right. And then you would reward it if

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>it does well, if it gives the right answer, and

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you would um, you would punish it if it doesn't, right,

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you would tell it. I mean, you don't actually punish

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it a reward. You just tell it, yes, you made

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the right um call this time, and know you made

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the wrong call this time this other time. But how

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is that different than the of calibrating something? Do you

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? Like is calibration than artificial intelligence? Right? Well,

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the difference is calibration is like here, I have a tool.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I know how to solve the problem. I just have

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to adjust it so that it does exactly the right thing.

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Um here, right, But you have a strategy that it's executing.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's like, uh, you have a drill and

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you want it to drill fast or slow, and you

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>know you know what how to solve the problem. You

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>just you know it has to spin and screw and

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>screw the thing in or whatever. It's just adjusting a

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>knob here. You don't know how to solve the problem,

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and so you've given it a very very very flexible

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>strategy on on the inside. You've given it like imagine

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>something has like a thousand knobs. If you twist all

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>these knobs, you could get all sorts of crazy um strategies. Right.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So back to the example of like recognizing Joge or

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>not when it when you tell it it's done, it's

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>given the wrong answer, then it it adjusts those knobs.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It says, well, let me try to tweak my strategy

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>for deciding is this Jorge, and then we'll see how

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that goes. I think that's a key difference. It's the

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>number of knobs, right, Like a drill with the knob

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for velocity. I mean, that is sort of trainable and

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you can set it up to be adaptive. But it's

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just one knob, and so it's not You wouldn't say

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's intelligent. It's not intelligent. The spectrum of things it

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>can do is very very seene right. But whereas like

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>something that recognizes a phase. It needs to evaluate like

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a million pixels in a photo, right, and so for

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you to tweak how it evaluates each of those pixels,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it would be really difficult for you to That's right.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So imagine you know the machine here is is a

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>camera in the door and takes a picture of who

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you got a million pixels and then it has to

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>look at those pixels and decide is this Jorge or

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>is this not whohe? And so there's does some calculation

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>on that picture, right, and that calculation has millions of

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>knobs on it, right, how much do I weigh this pixel?

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>How much I weigh adjacent pixels? Do I look for

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>his nose? Do I look for his hair? Do I

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>look for the eyes? Right? So it's got some very

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>very flexible thing inside of it that can do almost anything.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>And when you first start out, it's just random. So

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it's making ridiculous, terrible decisions. But the key the thing

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that models the learning, right, you know, just need artificial intelligence,

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You need artificial learning. The thing that models that learning

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is that when it gets the wrong answer, it knows

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>how to adjust those knobs so that next time it's

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.719
<v Speaker 1>more correct. By itself. That's the key thing is that

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it learns by itself. It doesn't need you. They're sitting like, oh,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you got this pixel wrong. You've got that pixel wrong.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>A tweak you know, tweak this one this way. It's

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>really more like an autonomous automatic learning. That's right because

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't know how to adjust it. If you knew

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>how to adjust it, you would just write that program. Right.

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>The key is artificial intelligence is excellent when you don't

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>know how to solve the problem, but you can define

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the problem. You can say, this is a picture of

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>or and this is not learn a way to tell

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the difference, right. So you give it a very flexible

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>strategy and then you try You let it try out,

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and when it gives it the wrong answer, you would

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>let it adjust itself so that it gets closer and

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>closer to giving the right answer right, And eventually these

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>things will find the right setting for those millions of knobs,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>so that it's doing the right thing. It's saying, oh, look,

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this picture is a picture of Horhey, and it gets

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the right answer at the time. And when you give

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>it a picture that's not a picture of Horne, and

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>you give it Daniel, it says no, sorry, you're not

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>getting in the house. Right. And I think a key

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is also that you, as a programmer, could not

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>have predicted what all those knobs are going to be

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end, right, Like, it's such a big problem.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a million knobs. There's no way that you can

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>predict what those knots are going to be set to

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 1>when it learns my face. That's right. It's perfect for

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>really hard problems where we don't know how to solve it, right.

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>We know how to describe the problem, but we don't

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>know how to solve it. You're right, So if I

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 1>already knew how to solve it, I could write a

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>computer program that that and and tell it just like

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>use this pixel, use that pixel, use this pixel. But

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to solve that problem. It's really hard, right,

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But I can train a computer to figure it out,

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>just the same way I can train a dog. Right.

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>A dog can learn my face. Right, a dog recognizes

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the owner, and you know, happily licks its face when

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes home, and recognize that that when somebody's not

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>its owner, and barks like crazy and choose its face

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 1>off when it's not its owner, Right, remind me not

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to visit your house, Daniel, seems a little dangerous. So

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.239
<v Speaker 1>then a big thing is programming a structure in the

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in the software that is kind of open ended and malleable,

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>do you know what I mean? Like, its something that

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is kind of unpredictable in a way that can learn.

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right. And that's the key thing is that some

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>people might be thinking, well, hold on, you said that

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the computers can just do what they tell you, So

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>how can a computer learn? Right? How is that possible?

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>And the key is that it's an emergent property, right.

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Like the way that you write a computer program that

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>can learn is you build all these little um calculating

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>bits with knobs on them, right, and each bit just

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>does what it's told. It takes some data, it makes

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>a decision based on the value of the knob, and

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it sends out some data. And together all these things

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>may a decision. Right. Each individual piece has no idea

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing. It's not smart or intelligent or making

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>its own decisions. That doesn't have free will, right, But

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>together they're doing something. And as you said earlier, they

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>can change the way they behave. They can adjust these

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>knobs themselves to improve their performance, and that's where the

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>learning comes from. It's from that training. It gets external

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>input and changes its behavior based on that expe. You're

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 1>saying that the way to program these AI s is

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>by h connecting a bunch of little simple things together

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to get something complex. Yes, And here it's important to

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>remember that we are using neural networks as sort of

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a standing to represent a big broad set of strategies

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that are part of machine learning, right, And you don't

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>know how to set them, how to put them together

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to get the right complex behavior. You just put them

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>together and then you train it. Right, You say, well,

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I have I have something that's dumb, like a newborn baby,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and I teach it how to do the thing that

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I want. But this really all sort of came about

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>from brain research, right, Like, people were studying the brain

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and they figured out that our brain vans are made

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>up of all these little simple units neurons, that's right.

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>And each neuron is pretty simple, right, Like, it just

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>takes a couple inputs and then it just outputs one signal.

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>That's the really fascinating deep part about it, right, is

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that the structures we use in computers are modeled after

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening in real brains. And when you say,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.919
<v Speaker 1>inside your brain are a bunch of neurons, right, and

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.440
<v Speaker 1>these neurons taken some input and then if the input

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is right or above some a certain amount, then they

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>send us some output, which is the input to the

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>next neuron. Right, and your brain is basically just a

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>big web of these things. Yeah, yeah, that's the right.

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>That's the key is that these neurons, they're simple, but

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>they're all sort of connected to each other. So it's

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge complex web going on inside your head. And

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>when you're learning, what you're doing is you're kind of

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>like shaping that web. You're saying, some connections. These connections

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:54.120
<v Speaker 1>are important for recognizing kore. Uh, these connections are important

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 1>when you want to when it's not where kind of think.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, your neurons can change. They have like basically

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>knobs on them. I mean not physical literal knobs, but

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they have they can adjust. And so if you feel pain,

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, or you have an experience, then that changes

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the way your neurons work and it changes a little

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>bit who you are and how you react to things.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you know, newborn babies when they're born,

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not very responsive to stimulan because they're just still

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>figuring figuring it out. You know, a newborn baby doesn't

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>even know like, this is my arm, and I know

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>how to control It has to learn all of these

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>things by being trained, by having experiences. You know, it

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>has the neurons, and the neurons are connected to each other,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>but it hasn't figure out how to use those connections.

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.479
<v Speaker 1>I try. It has to be trained to be useful

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and to interact with the world in any sort of

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>meaningful way. Right, And so that's exactly the same sense.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>And it's fascinating that if you build a mathematical system.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.959
<v Speaker 1>That's what a computer program is, basically a mathematical model

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the processes that are happening in your brain. It

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>performs in a very similar way, and it does this

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>amazing thing, which is it adjusts itself to improve its

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.199
<v Speaker 1>performance on the task you've given it. Right, So it

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>really is like a model of learning. And and when

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>people saw this, they said, wow, I mean you you

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>look inside the brain. You're wondering, like, how does thinking work?

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Where's the soul? Right? Where am I? You look inside

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the brain? All you see all these weird neurons connected

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to each other. You think, how could that possibly describe me?

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>But when you build a model in a computer and

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it can do the things that you can do, which

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is you learn and develop and react and be trained

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and make bad jokes. Not yet, we have not yet

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>solved the bad joke problem. Right, humans are still world

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>champions in terms of bad jokes. We can still beat

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.719
<v Speaker 1>them at something that's right. And you know, and this

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>is very useful because you want the systems around you

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to learn and to react, you know. And like if

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>your phone, for example, it knows, hey, every time you

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>open your phone, you start with Twitter, right, and so

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter goes up on there on the most used app list, right.

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's not very complex artificial intelligence, but it is.

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and these sort of things are very helpful.

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a break. So that's kind of what makes

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>AI is that a it can tackle complex problems that

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't wouldn't even know how to program something to do,

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and be that it changes and adapts and kind of

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it can get better, not just better, but also kind

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of adapt to the person using it. That's exactly right,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. And so for example, sometimes you know Netflix

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>uses AIS what program will you want to watch next? Well,

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, that's an AI. It's been trained. They

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>feeded a bunch of examples. They say, Bob watched these

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>five shows and then he watched this sixth show. But

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>they gave the AI just the first five and they

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>asked it predict what show he will watch next, and

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>then they see if it doesn't do a a good job,

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>and if it does a good job, you know, they reward.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>If it does a bad job, its its knobs to

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>do better. Then when you're sitting there watching five hours

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of Netflix, it can do a pretty good job of

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 1>predicting what you're gonna watch next because it's been trained

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of data. This is why people always

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about big data. Big data. These companies are gathering

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>data about you so they can train their aiyes to

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>learn your behavior and predict it. Except the problem is

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>me and my spouse we share the same account and

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the same log in, So that's right, So it's learning

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>some weird in your wife's brain. I have a very

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 1>confused Netflix. I can or maybe it understands your marriage

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.320
<v Speaker 1>better than maybe's trying to tell us something. It's like

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Should you guys? His wife is out of town,

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>he watches these shows. When she's in town, he has

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to watch these other shows. Oh alright, I know, break

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it down for us. How long before the aiyes take

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>over the world? Um? Not very long actually, But you

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>ask me different question earlier, which is is AI dangerous?

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that has the two different questions there, right,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean people are concerned. Some people are concerned. Yeah,

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think people are concerned, and they're a good reason

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for it to be concerned. You know, One question is

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>will AI develop its own autonomy and uh, and you

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>know take over. That's a different question from are they dangerous,

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know they could take over and then take

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>better care of the planet than we have, in which

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>case you know they're not dangerous. They're benevolent dictators. I

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 1>think the real question is will they take over? Will

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>they become autonomous? We lose control of them somehow? And

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>could they become smarter than us? So I see it's

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>two issues. One could it could have developed a consciousness

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on its own and be is that consciousness good or

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>bad for us? And it's an important question because as

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>soon as you identify learning with consciousness, right, then you

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder about that and and this connection between the structure

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of AI and the structure our brain begs that question.

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you created, for example, and artificial or

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>hate in the computer, if you built a set of

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>neurons that mimic your brain, you know, would that simulation

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>be alive? Would it be aware? Would it think I

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>would have a first person experience? You know, that's a

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>deep philosophical question, will never answer, right, And it's not

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>really the important question. The important question is would we

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>lose control of AI? Well? AI, because AI is something

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that can change and that can evolve, It can handle

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>complex tasks. The question is can we lose control of it?

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think the answer to that one is definitely yes.

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>We can lose control, meaning like, um, we'll give it

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>control and then not be able to take it back. Yes, exactly,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because the way AI is moving is that it can

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>handle more and more complex tasks so that you don't

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have to be super specific about what it's doing, you know,

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like we have amazing natural language processing. Now you can

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>say sort of vague things to your phone like hey, UM,

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>set me up an appointment for tomorrow afternoon, right, and

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>it will understand because it understands what your intent was, right,

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>has to judge your intent and then execute it. It

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>used to be you have to go into your computer

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and you have to press the keys in order to

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>create that in your calendar. Now you can sort of

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>talk to your phone and it will interpret what what

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you want and it will do that. And that's that's awesome.

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>That's wonderful for human computer interactions that we can use

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>our language to talk to them. We don't have to

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>write computer code. That's a huge step forward, right, that

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>people can construct machines using English rather than Python or

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>C plus plus. Right, it's a big step forward. I

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of what people find scary about a

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>is that you can't really predict what it's going to do.

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's sort of comedy gold when your kids

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are trying to talk to Alexa and ask it funny questions.

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's kind of what's fascinating about it, right, Like

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.479
<v Speaker 1>you ask it questions, do you give a task and

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you're so you really sort of don't know what it's

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>going to do. That's exactly right, because it's making higher

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and higher level decisions, which makes it much more useful

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:53.959
<v Speaker 1>and much more intelligent. The same way when your kid

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>grows up, right, when it's a When your kid is

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>for you have to be very specific. You have to

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 1>say things out loud which are ridiculous us, right, like

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>don't put that finger in your nose. You know, we're like,

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>uh oh, that's been on the floor, don't eat it. Right,

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to be really specific. When they're ten, you

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>can say more general things and they'll understand, right, and

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>learned their intelligence, like don't put both fingers in your nose.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Only put one finger in your nose at a time,

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>so you don't put your finger and your sisters and right, um,

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the same way as machines or artificial intelligence gets more intelligent,

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you can give it vagrant instructions and then it makes

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>decisions based on its training. Right, and you don't really know,

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>just like you can't really read what is in every

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>neuron in another person. And then AI you sort of

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what's gonna happen, what's gonna come out exactly,

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>So they're gonna start making decisions based on you know,

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>still what we tell them to do. But you know

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>what if you told your AI, you're like, hey, keep

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>my kids safe right. I mean, imagine some future where

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you have an AI robot it's really smart, and you say, hey,

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>keep my kids safe, and you come home and it's

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>like lock them in the basement, right, and like, well, okay,

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they're safe. But it's sort of a monkey pause situation, right,

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Like you got exactly what you asked for, but you

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't really labor the right way and made different decisions. Right,

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>So we still skip the question of whether aies can

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be you know, a chief consciousness and become its own

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of soul, have a soul. It doesn't seem like

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you think that's a relevant question. I think it's important

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>because when AI gets to be super intelligent, it's gonna

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>seem like it has a soul. They're gonna seem like people,

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and people don't wonder like do they have rights? Can

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you kill an AI? What? How can you just delete it?

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>You know? Um, that's going to be a really interesting question.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's again that's a whole question of philosophy that

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>we could we could easily spend an hour on things

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a much more practical question, which is will we lose

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>control of them whether or not they have first person

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>experiences so they just seem to. It's important to think

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>about whether we're gonna lose control. And there's two reasons

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>why I think that we will. One is, computers are

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>getting faster, really really quickly. Right, Every year, computers get

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>faster and faster and smarter and smarter, and the scale

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is is is growing, right, So this thing is happening

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. But we're not right. We're not getting smarter. Right,

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>human brain is not changing and evolving at a very

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>rapid rate. Computers are, So they're catching up and the

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>slope is steep. Right, you can just get bigger and

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>bigger computers and teaming together and paralyze them and you

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can just keep going right, So eventually they'll definitely have

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>enormous computing power with capabilities to do things we can't

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>even imagine. And also being faster doesn't necessarily mean being smarter.

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You also need like more dated to train on it.

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And also being twice as fast doesn't mean being twice

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 1>as smart. It's not linear. So you think that they

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 1>will get more capable than us. But do you think

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we will ever seed control of really important things to Aiyes, Like, hey,

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 1>here's the nuclear button, um only fire it if it's

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>necessary exactly, Let's talk about weapons. Weapons is going to

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>be what ends it because you know, for example, we

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>already have drones, right, and we have drones with missiles

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>on them, and these drones can kill people. They can,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>they can, you can. Some pilot somewhere is flying it.

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>He's making a decision and he's gonna shoot dismissile to

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>kill a person, right, right, But you know the enemy

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>has drones, and pretty soon it's gonna be drone on

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>drone warfare, right, And again, drones are gonna shoot each other,

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and at some point somebody's going to put an AI

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in their drone. Why because an AI can make the

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>decision about shooting much faster than a human can, So

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>which drone is gonna win? An AI will be a

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>better fighter than a human fire yes, And so eventually

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.959
<v Speaker 1>these AI will be making kill decisions, right because the

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>one that can make the decision faster, it's going to

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>be the one that wins. And so I don't think

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be very long before we have AI powered

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>drones that are authorized to kill people. Right. This is

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a clear next step for the military. You know, like here,

0:32:47.040 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>here's a picture of somebody we you think is a terrorist.

0:32:49.720 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>If you spot them, just fire the missile. Don't bother checking, Yeah,

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>don't bother checking with us. Right, that's a clear next step.

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So now you have AI that have the authority to

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>kill people, and why because they've been tasked to, you know,

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>take care of us or protect us or only only

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if you give it that permission though, right, Like, I

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 1>mean that's a big ethical step to say, like, if

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you see him, shoot him. Yeah, But I don't think

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that's a big ethical step for the military. You know,

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the protocols for shooting somebody in the military. I mean,

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an expert on military protocols, but you know,

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>our military kills a lot of people for you know,

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of civilians get killed, right, and we decide

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's okay. A lot of innocent people get killed for

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>military purposes. And so I don't think it's too far

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>before AI is making that decision. And then it's AI.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's weaponized AI, our weaponized AI versus their weaponized AI.

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And then it's an arms race, and then the most

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>powerful army is gonna be the one that just makes

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it all of his decisions, and the generals just say

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>defend us right, or respond if we're attacked, right, And

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>then you basically handed over control of the weapons to

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the AI because the enemy has weaponized AI. But that

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that they're trilling us. I mean, we use

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>them to protect us or to take away some decision

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>making for it, but that doesn't mean that they're necessarily

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in control of us. And let's make sure not to

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>be too alarmist here, of course, because people are working

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>really hard to make sure that there are always ways

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>for humans to override these systems. We would be different.

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That would be um, you know, it'd be like if

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a robot then turns the weapons inwards. That's another deal,

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess. Yeah. And of course AI researchers do their

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>best to make sure that the AI systems are very

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>well trained so that they do exactly what we want

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>them to do. But they are complex and unpredictable, just

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>like people are. Right, So this is a very interesting

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>topic whether AI is dangerous or not. And I know

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Daniel that you you're sort of an expert in artificial

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>intelligence because you use it in your particle physics research, right,

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>you use machine learning, that's right. I wouldn't say I'm

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>an expert I mean, I know something about it. Um.

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I've done some reading and I've used it, but I'm

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly not a deep expert in artificial intelligence itself, right,

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 1>But you you know experts in your department, right, and

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 1>you're in your campus, that's right. You see, I has

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>an amazing computer science department and experts in machine learning.

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of the folks I actually collaborate with. When we're

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>understanding the huge amounts of data from the large Hagon collider,

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>we train machines to sift through that data and like

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>look for the Higgs boson and learn to recognize new

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>kinds of particles. It's really fun. And these guys know

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot about artificial intelligence more than I do. So

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I went over there and I asked them if they

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>were worried about whether robots would take over the world,

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and what did the robots say the robots had taken

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.760
<v Speaker 1>over the professors and they answered for no. Um. First,

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 1>here's professor Pierre Baldi, he's a distinguished professor on campus.

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>And here's what he had to say. Potentially, yes, all

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>very powerful technologies I think can pose such a threat,

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and all depends how they are deployed, how they are used.

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Et cetera. Right, you can say that nuclear technology pulls

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is such a threat and continues to pull such a threat.

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think AI, if used in the wrong way

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to pose a threat to mankind. Yes, the potential is

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.399
<v Speaker 1>there and so we should be careful. Um, right, So

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>that was Professor Baldy, and then I also went down

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the hall and asked another colleagues cause I thought let's

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 1>get more than one opinion, and so this is Professor

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Park Smith, also a professor of computer science at U

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>c Irvine. I think the main threat with artificial intelligence

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:30.479
<v Speaker 1>going forward is not understanding how the black boxes work.

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I think not the typical sort of we're

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 1>going to have robots taking over the world, but more

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the use of AI and situations where we're extrapolating beyond

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>what it can do. And so I think we need

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to understand the limits of a I I think that's

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>a threat, all right, So the answer is yes, Well,

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I think they're cautious, right, both of them think it's unpredictable.

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>We don't know what's going to happen. We're creating a

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>whole new kind of system and uh, and we may

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>lose control of parts of it. On the other hand,

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know it's likely for that to happen. You know,

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are working really hard to make

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>sure that AI will be contained and that in the

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>end you can just pull the plug if the robot

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>revolution starts, and so it is unpredictable. But also you know,

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the future is unpredictable, is always going to be unpredictable. Yeah,

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I thought it was interesting he said

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it is dangerous, but not more so than any other

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>powerful technology. Yeah, that's a really interesting comment. It's true

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that any technology you can create could be used for

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>good or for even if it's powerful, like I mean,

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>not just like you know, wind up toy. Maybe it's

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not as dangerous. But but but I think that speaks

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to the kind of the power of AI, Like it

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 1>really is maybe more powerful than we can handle. Yeah,

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's powerful in a special way run like

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons are powerful. Right, But in the end, a

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>human is making that decision, and so you're giving humans

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a new kind of power, which is unpredictable. But here

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you're you're unleashing something, right, You're creating AI, and it's

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>making its own decisions. Of course, it's making decisions based

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>on what has been told to do. Right, you have

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to give it instructions. Still, you have to teach it um.

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But you can't predict what these complex systems are going

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to do in new circumstances and how they're gonna interpret

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your instructions. And of course there are a lot of

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:17.879
<v Speaker 1>AI supark people out there working hard to make sure

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that their boundaries and safeties um installed in all AI systems.

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I've seen Jurassic Park, you know, the

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>lesson there they had fences. Lesson there, they had fences.

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>We have fences. But then Jeff Goldbloom, you know, has

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a theory about chaos. Yeah, exactly. You know, these systems

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>are hard to predict, and so I think we should

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:39.240
<v Speaker 1>be worried, but then we should respond to that worry

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 1>with appropriate safeguards. You know, we should take this seriously,

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but not be overly alarmed. Right. Well, the other point

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.479
<v Speaker 1>that the other professor made is also interesting that he's

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>saying some of the danger is in the fact that

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like a black box, like we're trusting

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>these things, but we don't really know what's going on inside.

0:38:58.280 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it's so complex they we we can't predict what

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna do. We can't maybe even deconstruct how it

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>makes decisions. That's right, and uh, you know you train

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>these systems are very complicated and you don't know how

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna respond to new circumstances. Right. It's same as

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>when like training your dog, Like do you know how

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 1>your dog makes a decision about who to bark end

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>who not to. You try to train it, You try

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to give it instructions to try to make sure it

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>knows how to how to handle it stuff in a

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>new circumstances, but you can't honestly know what it's going

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to do at any given moment. Yeah, I'm definitely not

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>visiting your house if you have dogs. I think about

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I think about AI. Again, not an expert, so maybe

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 1>these are uninformed speculations, but I think about AI sort

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of like digital children. You know, like you raise your children,

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you know they're gonna take over one day because you know,

0:39:46.920 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you and I are going to get old and our

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>kids are younger than we are, so eventually they will

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>take over and you don't know what they're gonna do,

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and you raise them. You try to raise them in

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a way that they have values they make reasonable decisions,

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can sort of think about AI to same

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in way like you try to create this new generation

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of technology that's going to make its own decisions, but

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you try to teach it to make good decisions so

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that when you're in a home, right, it's making good

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 1>choices for you. And I know that some folks out

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there think, well, you know, AI is never really going

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to be separate from humanity. There's not this like cognitive separation,

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Like you can just be part of who you are,

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the way your iPhone feels like part of who you are. Um,

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>But we don't know necessarily if if that separation is

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be serious, you know, if these things really

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 1>would be separate from us, or if they always just

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like an extension of ourselves. Well, until then, I

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>think we should stick to regular dogs. Dogs. Yeah, But

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think about it sometimes the way I

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think about children, right, In the same way that you

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 1>raise your children and they're gonna take over, right, It's

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be some point when your children are in charge.

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>You raise them to have values and to make good decisions,

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and you hope that when they take over, they're you know,

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>looking after you. In the same way, we got to

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>create these digital tools, and we've got to teach them

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to be Hey, we got to teach them what's important,

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>and we got to teach them how to be responsible

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so that if they take over, you know that we

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>hope they treat as well. Yeah, daddy, good daddy. Your

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 1>parents don't put creator good Please don't bury me underground. Well,

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I personally am looking forward to a time when I have,

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.720
<v Speaker 1>like I don't have to think as much, where life

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit easier because we have these things

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.719
<v Speaker 1>making things easier for us. It could handle a lot

0:41:33.719 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of the drudgery and a lot of the logistics. You know,

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.839
<v Speaker 1>eventually you could have a car that drives itself and

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 1>obeys your instructions. You can say like, hey, go pick

0:41:41.000 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>up my kids from school, and he would know how

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to navigate and how to drive and recognize your children

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and how to get back home. And that's totally within

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the realm of possibility in a few years, right, And

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty awesome. It will offload a lot of work

0:41:53.280 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and logistics from beleaguered parents. I think you and I

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 1>are in a pretty good position career wise, you know,

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm a cartoonist in your physicist. These are not

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>um jobs that are going to be taken away by

0:42:04.280 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 1>AI anytime soon. Hopefully have you not seen a our cartoons?

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>They're pretty good man, all right, they you should like

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 1>start a podcast instead of wearing of relying on your cartooning. Well,

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>there is definitely that as a genre of humor. Like, hey,

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I put um so and so through an AI machine

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and look look at the crazy thing it came out with.

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Except those are all manufactured. None of those are no,

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>those are real, None of those are real. Those are

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:33.720
<v Speaker 1>all made up. Well, that's good for humorist. So artificial

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is certainly a revolution in thinking and in computing,

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and it will definitely change the world. And so check

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>back in in ten years to see if we've been

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>replaced by robot Daniel and robot Warhead. Maybe we already

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>are bump bump ball. So thanks everyone for listening to

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>this episode of Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe, and

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to listen tomorrow. Just say, Alexa, what's the best science

0:42:56.800 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>podcast in the world. What's the third best? It's not

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a Catherine the world. If you still have a question

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 1>after listening to all these explanations, please drop us a

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>line we'd love to hear from you. You can find

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 1>us at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at Daniel and Jorge

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>That's One Word, or email us at Feedback at Daniel

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge dot com