Speaker 1: All right, thanks Scott Shannon, Thanks to all of you
Speaker 1: for being with us toll free. Our number is eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine for one Sean you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. I this literally broke like
Speaker 1: seconds ago. Was brought to my attention by sweet baby James,
Speaker 1: you know, people that are actually connected to the Internet.
Speaker 1: Not me any longer apparently. But anyway, Joe Biden, all right,
Speaker 1: so he's speaking again. Forgets what he's talking about. Then
Speaker 1: he tries to take credit for the Osama bin Laden rate.
Speaker 1: The problem is he opposed that rate. It's well documented
Speaker 1: he opposed that raid. Remember the mantra twenty twelve. Bin
Speaker 1: Laden is dead and GM is alive. With the gmpell out.
Speaker 1: Let's play this tape. I'm hearing it like you for
Speaker 1: the first time. We went for two reasons one one one,
Speaker 1: bring some of them Laden to the gates of Hell. Yeah.
Speaker 1: As I said at the time, the second reason was
Speaker 1: to eliminate Alkaita's capacity to deal with more attacks in
Speaker 1: the United States from that territory. We accomplished both of
Speaker 1: those objectives. You know, this is pretty bad. I can't
Speaker 1: joke about it anymore. And some people say Hannity you
Speaker 1: gotta joke about it, because otherwise you're gonna drive yourself crazy.
Speaker 1: It's too serious at this point. And again I did
Speaker 1: this at the start of yesterday's program. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to spend as much time on it today, but I'm
Speaker 1: just trying to make you aware of how dangerous this
Speaker 1: is for the world, not just the US. It's dangerous
Speaker 1: for us to have a president of the United States
Speaker 1: that such a cognitive mess. You know, listen to the
Speaker 1: Chinese where we will take out US military basis, we
Speaker 1: will take out Japan's military basis and support that they
Speaker 1: might provide the US. They're talking about reunification with Taiwan.
Speaker 1: We're their number one allied. They don't want quote reunification.
Speaker 1: That's basically a takeover, just like Hong Kong didn't want
Speaker 1: the oppressive you know, crushdown of the people in Hong Kong.
Speaker 1: That's happened too and no consequences. You know. Now it's
Speaker 1: you know where America is receding and China is on
Speaker 1: the move and their territorial ambitions know no bounds here.
Speaker 1: And add to that, China Russia giving the Iranian Mullah's
Speaker 1: weapons to fight proxy wars as the number one state
Speaker 1: sponsor terror, noticed that these terrorist attacks are not by
Speaker 1: the Iranians, are not happening in Russia, and they're not
Speaker 1: happening in China, just like Putin. You know, Joe gets asked,
Speaker 1: what are you gonna do now with the latest cyber attack,
Speaker 1: fifteen hundred new companies after colonial pipeline, after Joe hands
Speaker 1: putin the list of sixteen areas, after the meat shut
Speaker 1: down in this country. I mean, this is really scary.
Speaker 1: This is a scary time. And the and the and
Speaker 1: these hostile regimes are emboldened right now, and they see
Speaker 1: a weak American president and they're stating it all publicly.
Speaker 1: It's not good. It was really sad to see, you know,
Speaker 1: if we're gonna pull out of Afghanistan, why apparently sky
Speaker 1: News has videos showing the Taliban seizing abandoned US bases
Speaker 1: and quote a treasure trove according to zero Hedge of
Speaker 1: weapons and AMMO and then trucks and we left it
Speaker 1: all there. Why wasn't there some logistical planning to get
Speaker 1: this stuff out of there. Joe's had six months to
Speaker 1: do it. Joe Biden had nothing to do with the
Speaker 1: Ben Ladden rate. Nothing. He was against it. By the way,
Speaker 1: updates on the issue of election reform hang on one second.
Speaker 1: According to various accounts officials involved in Biden was one
Speaker 1: of the two main skeptics of the intelligence, suggesting that
Speaker 1: Ben Ladden was in Pakistan at the time, and he
Speaker 1: publicly even stated that he said, don't go until more
Speaker 1: intelligence was gathered. Okay, that pretty much puts that to rest.
Speaker 1: We've known that though for a long time. You know
Speaker 1: what update you? Why am I telling you that state
Speaker 1: legislatures now matter as much as the people in Washington
Speaker 1: because we needed election integrity measures. You know the fact
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden gets to call George's new inclusive and
Speaker 1: open voting laws and reform. You know where his state
Speaker 1: is the most restrictive Jim Crow two point Oh, it
Speaker 1: is beyond defensive. And I don't think anyone but us
Speaker 1: have really called him out on it every day, But
Speaker 1: a federal judge now is weighed in in favor of
Speaker 1: George's new election law. I would urge the legislature in
Speaker 1: Georgia to do one other thing, and that would be
Speaker 1: to add signature verification to the new voting law. I
Speaker 1: think that would be an important step the federal judge
Speaker 1: today refusing to block George's new election integrity law from
Speaker 1: taking effects, saying that a liberal group's request for a
Speaker 1: preliminary injunction failed to show immanent constitutional harm that would
Speaker 1: disrupt upcoming elections in the state. Well, you have seventeen
Speaker 1: days early in person voting. You have drop boxes in
Speaker 1: every district available. There is no early voting in the
Speaker 1: state of Delaware. No drop boxes in Delaware. You get
Speaker 1: you can get a mail in ballot. You don't need
Speaker 1: a reason in Georgia, just need an ID. In Delaware,
Speaker 1: you need to provide a reason and an ID. And
Speaker 1: it's outrageous what goes on here anyway, So the court
Speaker 1: was not persuaded by the argument. Remember this whole thing
Speaker 1: got started and now we've discovered, apparently with this audit
Speaker 1: going on in Georgia, that all the chain of custody
Speaker 1: documentation is missing. Well, that doesn't instill confidence and integrity
Speaker 1: in our election results, does it, especially when you have
Speaker 1: a close election. Pennsylvania GOP state senator is announced an investigation,
Speaker 1: they're doing their audit. They're now changing their laws in Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1: They're doing the same in Arizona. They're doing the same
Speaker 1: in Wisconsin. I believe they're doing it in Michigan as well.
Speaker 1: Now is the time to do it. That's got to
Speaker 1: get done now. Onto the economy. I mean, none of
Speaker 1: these numbers, none of what Joe's telling you is really
Speaker 1: truthful or any good. For the month of May, US
Speaker 1: job openings hit a record nine point two million. Businesses
Speaker 1: cannot find enough workers to fill these positions. They can't,
Speaker 1: they can't find them. They don't know where they don't
Speaker 1: know where the workers are. I mean, that's a record
Speaker 1: high nine point two million. Look at the price of
Speaker 1: everything buck twenty five more per gallum per gasoline, at
Speaker 1: filling your tank, heating and cooling your home. But it's
Speaker 1: also every product you buy and frankly every service that
Speaker 1: maybe is provided to you because it costs more to
Speaker 1: deliver it. That means it costs more. They're not going
Speaker 1: to take a lower profit as a result. No, they're
Speaker 1: going to pass that on to the consumer. That would
Speaker 1: be you. That would be a tax. And things are
Speaker 1: even so bad that you know, for example, if you
Speaker 1: have patio furniture, there's a shortage. Probably one way right
Speaker 1: now to make money is if you if you're willing
Speaker 1: to live without patio furniture for a year year, you
Speaker 1: can buy it next year, and you can probably sell
Speaker 1: your patio furniture for more than you're paid for it,
Speaker 1: or you feel like doing it, maybe you want to
Speaker 1: upgrade it next year or something. And meanwhile, Biden's out
Speaker 1: there did another verbal gaff, misquoting one of President Reagan's
Speaker 1: most famous campaign ads during his speech earlier today while
Speaker 1: promoting the potential economic benefits of his two prongs spending
Speaker 1: in infrastructure related projects, and he goes on to say,
Speaker 1: you know, swapping out mourning in America for an America mourning.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just so embarrassed. It's getting to the
Speaker 1: point it's so embarrassing. I can't even joke about it anymore.
Speaker 1: I can't. I mean, for a while, I'll make light
Speaker 1: of it, but it's just not funny. Then you add
Speaker 1: to the high cost of energy, the high cost of
Speaker 1: every good and service that you use. Then you look
Speaker 1: at people not wanting to go back to work. Then
Speaker 1: you look at shortages. You know, we're paying record high
Speaker 1: prices for meat, record high prices for energy, record high
Speaker 1: prices for lumber, basically everything that we want to consume
Speaker 1: and buy, costing more. And then Biden, who said, well,
Speaker 1: if you're not making more than four hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: a year, you're not gonna you're not going to be taxed. Well,
Speaker 1: that there's a lot of assumptions there. First of all,
Speaker 1: it was two hundred thousand dollars per person, four hundred
Speaker 1: thousand dollars for couple, So let's stop start there. That
Speaker 1: it's half of what he said. Biden now plans to
Speaker 1: raise taxes on corporations. How many more times do we
Speaker 1: need to go over the my speech about corporations don't
Speaker 1: pass taxes, don't pay taxes, they pass them on to you,
Speaker 1: the consumer. But Biden's plans. Thankfully, CNBC is even reporting
Speaker 1: to raise taxes on corporations and quote, wealthy Americans are
Speaker 1: losing momentum, and it should. It's not going to help
Speaker 1: the economy. It's not now one frightening development. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Jonathan Turley pointed out in a pretty interesting Zero Hedge
Speaker 1: article that there is a sharp rise in support for
Speaker 1: socialism among young people in America. Doesn't surprise me. The
Speaker 1: famous Churchill saying, you know, if you're twenty and not
Speaker 1: a liberal, you don't have a heart. If you're forty
Speaker 1: and not a conservative, you don't have a brain. But anyway,
Speaker 1: Axios does this poll, fifty seven percent of Americans thankfully
Speaker 1: still have a favorable view of capitalism. There's never been
Speaker 1: a system design that has produced more wealth that has
Speaker 1: advanced the human condition more than liberty, freedom, capitalism, and
Speaker 1: our constitution. No one not a perfect country, but we've
Speaker 1: advanced the human condition using our freedom, more recently giving
Speaker 1: our vaccine away for free to countries. The scary part
Speaker 1: is if you're between the ages of eighteen and thirty four,
Speaker 1: they're evenly split on negative and positive views of capitalism.
Speaker 1: Forty nine percent I believe are like capitalism, forty six
Speaker 1: percent don't. Well they what is their point of reference though,
Speaker 1: because I doubt they are thinking about. Well, the government
Speaker 1: they promised law and order. They're failing miserably, especially in
Speaker 1: blue states and blue cities. Obamacare, keep your doctor plan,
Speaker 1: and save money. That all those promises were a disaster.
Speaker 1: Millions lost doctors and plans, and we're all paying about
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty percent more. It's there's always been
Speaker 1: this this odd appeal that government is gonna we will
Speaker 1: take care of your childcare and early child education, and
Speaker 1: now college and loan forgiveness and guaranteed jobs and guaranteed
Speaker 1: wages and guaranteed healthcare and guaranteed retirement and guaranteed healthy food.
Speaker 1: Who's going to pay for all of that? The history
Speaker 1: of socialism. We got a caller yesterday and I thought
Speaker 1: about it after the show that maybe I should do
Speaker 1: a summary of my chapter and live Free or Die
Speaker 1: socialism and its history of failure for young people, And
Speaker 1: maybe I should do it and summarize it and explain
Speaker 1: it because whatever manifestation, name form it's taken on, it
Speaker 1: always results in the same thing, failure. And that is
Speaker 1: false promises, false hope, things that they never were ever
Speaker 1: going to be fulfilled. Then more poverty, and then a
Speaker 1: loss of freedom. It's a matter of calculating how much
Speaker 1: freedom you lost in the name of false government security.
Speaker 1: And I just would tell all of you that listen
Speaker 1: to the show, and this is me, your friend, offering you.
Speaker 1: I think what is good advice. Don't ever think or
Speaker 1: depend on the government for your future. Just assume that
Speaker 1: social security won't be there. Just assume that if the
Speaker 1: means test that they'll steal it after they had promised
Speaker 1: it to you. Just assume that their healthcare plan is
Speaker 1: gonna suck into your retirement Medicare, Social Secure already now
Speaker 1: headed from bankruptcy, and and try and be as as
Speaker 1: financially independent as possible. Money is freedom. The more money
Speaker 1: you can save, the more freedom you have. Now in
Speaker 1: these times, it gets hard, doesn't it. It's much harder anyway,
Speaker 1: eight hundred I rolled it along Sean Hannity Show. I
Speaker 1: also shouldn't surprise anybody. Just thenews dot com. Red state
Speaker 1: cities far outpaced blue state cities in economic recovery from
Speaker 1: the pandemic. You know, it's now July eighth in Florida.
Speaker 1: Schools have been open since last August. Still there talking
Speaker 1: about keeping school closed. Schools closed in some states. This
Speaker 1: is insanity. Finally, people are beginning to get it that
Speaker 1: the price of energy is directly related to Biden. In
Speaker 1: spite of what they're saying, Oh, Donald Trump, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: didn't cause this. Donald Trump brought America energy independence for
Speaker 1: the first time in seventy five years. All Republicans, they're
Speaker 1: the ones that want to defund the police. No, that
Speaker 1: would be the Democrats that wouldn't call riots riots all
Speaker 1: summer long, but want to obsess about something that should
Speaker 1: never happen again, and that is January sixth. That's only
Speaker 1: because they can use it politically. All the people shot,
Speaker 1: all the people shot and killed, you don't know their
Speaker 1: names unless it can be politicized. That is a sad
Speaker 1: state of affairs. But now seven year high, at gas
Speaker 1: price high. And what's Biden's answer. He's now pushing to
Speaker 1: end tax breaks for the fossil fuel companies when we're
Speaker 1: already feeling the paint at the pump. Okay, let's say
Speaker 1: that he ends the tax breaks. Who do you think
Speaker 1: is going to pay more? Do you think that these
Speaker 1: companies are going to eat that and that they're gonna
Speaker 1: lower their profit margins or going to keep their same
Speaker 1: profit margins and raise the cost of a gallon of
Speaker 1: gasoline higher. It's not hard to figure out than the
Speaker 1: ripple effect. Now we're back to oh, heating, cooling homes
Speaker 1: and everything you buy, everything you purchase, every service you have.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's seven year gas price high. That's a
Speaker 1: big deal. And by the way, there was a question
Speaker 1: by Congresswoman Staphonic, what is John Kerry doing as a
Speaker 1: climates are alwa's pushing the Green New Deal. I can
Speaker 1: answer that one because because that is every decision that
Speaker 1: they're making. Everything is infrastructure. Oh daycare is infrastructure, College forgiveness,
Speaker 1: loans for infrastructure, free college is infrastructure, government guaranteed jobs
Speaker 1: and food. It's infrastructure. No, it's not. It's a big lie.
Speaker 1: It's all the New Green Deal socialism. Twenty five till
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. You know, I never thought
Speaker 1: Lindsey Grant made the statement that he said he's amazed
Speaker 1: that Biden's presidency has been so bad. I'm not amazed, then, fairness.
Speaker 1: Maybe I didn't think it would happen this quickly, But
Speaker 1: this is predictable failure if you give up the lifeblood
Speaker 1: of everybody's economy in the world in pursuit of this
Speaker 1: radical New Green Deal socialism. And we saw the first
Speaker 1: attempts at this back when Obama was elected in oh
Speaker 1: eight and then starting at OH nine, and the first
Speaker 1: attempts at socialized medicine which Obama Care and the false
Speaker 1: promises falsehood. But I mean, it's all predictable. Socialism doesn't work.
Speaker 1: It's history of failure, is right, there in black and white.
Speaker 1: You can just read it and maybe I need to
Speaker 1: do a you know, four millennials for generations z version
Speaker 1: of socialism and its history of failure. But from the border,
Speaker 1: what do we have? Chaos? Oh, my god, Afghanistan, China, Israel,
Speaker 1: you'll take it right on down the line. Russia, who've
Speaker 1: given putin a waiver for a pipeline while firing Americans.
Speaker 1: I don't multaneously from building our own pipeline. How dumb
Speaker 1: is that, you know, getting rid of sanctions on the
Speaker 1: Iranian molls? What have they done to get rid of
Speaker 1: the sanctions? How much more money is Joe going to
Speaker 1: try and bribe the Iranians with? You know, China? Oh,
Speaker 1: anybody want to comment on the talk of reunification with Taiwan.
Speaker 1: It's not going to end well for the country of
Speaker 1: the world. And we're beginning to see the effects of
Speaker 1: the economy. As I was just discussing, you know, six
Speaker 1: months wall to wall positive coverage from the media mob,
Speaker 1: big tech mob, Joe Biden's approval ratings underwater. It's sort
Speaker 1: of like the poll I mentioned earlier this week, fifty
Speaker 1: seven percent of Americans see don't think that Joe is
Speaker 1: in charge of the White House, fifty eight percent of
Speaker 1: independence A thirty Democrats. And then it raises the most
Speaker 1: important question, Well, if he's not in charge, who is
Speaker 1: in charge? Just minor details not discussed by the media.
Speaker 1: But remember those numbers are. That poll is a snapshot
Speaker 1: knowing that the media mob is not playing and not
Speaker 1: showing Joe's cognitive decline. He was in the candidate protection program.
Speaker 1: Now it's the presidential protection program. Anyway. Raspbews some pole
Speaker 1: indicating majority likely voters disapprove of Joe's job performance and
Speaker 1: at forty nine percent likely voters approve, fifty disapprove. He's underwater,
Speaker 1: just the beginning. By the way, tell you the person
Speaker 1: with the worst polling numbers is Kamala Harris. You know,
Speaker 1: look at the border, look at energy, look at China,
Speaker 1: look at Russia, look at i Rand, look at look
Speaker 1: at the price of energy, look at every every single aspect.
Speaker 1: Look at even the handling of COVID and the mixed messaging.
Speaker 1: You know, Congressman Ronnie Jackson, God bless him. He was
Speaker 1: the doctor for both Obama and Trump in the White House.
Speaker 1: He's saying, he's warning these cognitive abilities will cause the
Speaker 1: US to pay a price. Joe's never going to take
Speaker 1: that cognitive time. I want to take a cognitive test.
Speaker 1: You know. That's like saying, did you do cocaine before
Speaker 1: this show? Come on, man, you junkie. You might remember
Speaker 1: that moment that went viral when Joe was asked because
Speaker 1: earlier he had said he'd take many cognitive tests. But
Speaker 1: please clarify specifically, have you taken a cognitive No, I
Speaker 1: haven't taken a test. Why the hell would I take
Speaker 1: a test? Come on, man, that's like saying you before
Speaker 1: you got in this program, if you take a test
Speaker 1: where you're taking cocaine, what do you think? Huh you're junkie?
Speaker 1: Huh huh. Come on, man. He does have this tendency.
Speaker 1: Even the mob and the media is recognizing that he
Speaker 1: has a quick temper m. Wonder what conditions that is
Speaker 1: often associated with um. You have a chapter of the
Speaker 1: group Black Lives Matter. Remember we make a distinction after
Speaker 1: George Floyd, those protesting say black lives matter. Okay, that's
Speaker 1: very separate and apart from the group. The group on
Speaker 1: tape that was chanting what do we want dead cops?
Speaker 1: When do we want them now and pigs in a blanket,
Speaker 1: fry him like bacon. But you have a chapter of
Speaker 1: BLM in Utah has called the American flag a symbol
Speaker 1: of hatred and only used by dumb racist. When we
Speaker 1: black Americans see that this flag, we know the person
Speaker 1: flying it is not safe to be around. Not safe
Speaker 1: to be around because you have an American flag. Black
Speaker 1: lives Matter, Utah wrote in a fourth of July post,
Speaker 1: alongside an image of the stars and stripes. We see
Speaker 1: this flag and we know the person flying it is
Speaker 1: a racist. We see this flag, we know the person
Speaker 1: flying it lives in a different America than we do.
Speaker 1: When we see this flag, we question your intelligence. We
Speaker 1: know to avoid you. It is a symbol of hatred,
Speaker 1: wrote the chapter, which founder Lex Scott says is not
Speaker 1: part of the National BLM organization. Okay, just to get
Speaker 1: clarification there, Pole finds more than three quarters of the
Speaker 1: American people want more police. Why is it all of
Speaker 1: a sudden the whole idea of Jim Crow two point
Speaker 1: zero and Jim Clyburne statement which we discussed yesterday, he's
Speaker 1: reversing himself. I've always supported voter right Dayton and not exactly.
Speaker 1: We've got your quote from the fourth of July, of
Speaker 1: all days, But why are Democrats now running away from
Speaker 1: HR one? Why are they running away from election integrity
Speaker 1: and confidence? Like for the five measures? How could it
Speaker 1: even be controval voter ID signature verification chain, the custody
Speaker 1: controls every party has has equal control to preserve the
Speaker 1: integrity of the ballots that they're not tampered with, or
Speaker 1: you know, clean bullet voting rolls, updated voting roles every election,
Speaker 1: which I think should be mandatory, partisan observers should be
Speaker 1: able to observe the vote counts start to finish. What's
Speaker 1: so bad about that? How is that unreasonable? Well, anyway,
Speaker 1: the same thing with defunding the police. That's not going over. Well,
Speaker 1: that's why Jensaki knows Republicans Republicans wanted to defund the police. Well,
Speaker 1: everybody knows that's a lie because we know it's the
Speaker 1: left that has been pushing this, including Joe when he
Speaker 1: said yeah, I would redirect funds and Kamala Harris that
Speaker 1: was advertising for the bail fund in Minneapolis. After the
Speaker 1: police station was burning to the ground and the riots
Speaker 1: that took place last summer seven out of ten American
Speaker 1: support increasing police department budgets. Seventy seven percent said they
Speaker 1: would like additional police officers deployed on street patrols. Sixty
Speaker 1: two percent said that the police budget should be used
Speaker 1: to fund community policing. The demand for an increase in
Speaker 1: police officers and budgets interesting comes as Democrats. And let's see,
Speaker 1: they've deepfunded the police a billion dollars in New York,
Speaker 1: New York City, Philadelphia, Washington, d C. Baltimore, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, Seattle, Portland, Oregon.
Speaker 1: Then of course you have no bail laws like they
Speaker 1: have in New York. And then you have promises that
Speaker 1: if you're involved in the rioting and the looting and
Speaker 1: the arson and pelting cops with bricks, rocks, bottles and
Speaker 1: molotov cocktails and worse, they're not going to prosecute you,
Speaker 1: even if we have pictures of you doing it, videos
Speaker 1: of you doing it. And in San Francisco, as long
Speaker 1: as you don't steal a thousand dollars, you now have
Speaker 1: a license to steal. Now, if you look at these
Speaker 1: cities in particular, crime is surging. It's happening mostly in
Speaker 1: Democratic run states and cities fifty eight percent increase in
Speaker 1: homicides and Democratic run Atlanta five and thirty three percent
Speaker 1: increase in homicides and Democratic run Portland thirty seven percent,
Speaker 1: and Democratic run Philadelphia shootings up fifty four percent, Democratic
Speaker 1: run New York City fifty one percent, in Democratic run
Speaker 1: Los Angeles eighteen percent. Democratic run Chicago already had a
Speaker 1: pretty high but still even higher than last year's record,
Speaker 1: and this now coming as polling is now showing that
Speaker 1: support for law enforcement matters. James Clyburne, so oh, I
Speaker 1: always supported voter ID, now admitted Democrats. Initiatives to defund
Speaker 1: the police in major cities are quote cutting the throats
Speaker 1: of the Democratic Party. Well, they gonna as anyone going
Speaker 1: to stand up to the squad because I haven't seen
Speaker 1: any signs of it. It's even so bad New York
Speaker 1: Post that a story today Congresswoman to leave proud member
Speaker 1: of the squad is calling for defunding of ICE immigration
Speaker 1: agencies like customers. The symbol answer answer to that question
Speaker 1: is we must eliminate funding for our cpp ICE and
Speaker 1: their parent organization DHS. Time after time, we have seen
Speaker 1: it as advocates on the ground, as human services agency
Speaker 1: on a ground to continue to see over and over
Speaker 1: again that these agencies are inet to humanely guiding migrants
Speaker 1: through our immigration system and further continue Instead, they further
Speaker 1: continue to terrorize migrant communities located within our communities. Terrorize
Speaker 1: migrant communities located within our communities. Okay, that is now
Speaker 1: the party in charge all branches of government. Washington Post
Speaker 1: even had to knock the White House for their claim
Speaker 1: that the GOP wants to defund the police. Even they
Speaker 1: called them out. I saw actor James Wood ripping Biden
Speaker 1: and lightfoot saying, as long as Democrats continue to defund
Speaker 1: the police, America's streets will run with blood. I wish
Speaker 1: you was wrong. I wish I could criticize him and
Speaker 1: say he's wrong. But I can't because it's inevitable. A
Speaker 1: license to steal, a license to commit crimes in New York,
Speaker 1: nobel license to steal in San Francisco, processing illegal immigrants,
Speaker 1: ignoring the laws of the land. God forbid. If your
Speaker 1: last name was Trump and you did that, or having
Speaker 1: to be a Conservative or a Republican, there's a whole other,
Speaker 1: entire unique justice system for you. Throw the book at conservatives.
Speaker 1: For Jaywaukee spitting on the sidewalk. Not that I don't
Speaker 1: think anyone spits on the sidewalk. I don't, I don't,
Speaker 1: I haven't seen it. Chicago shooting spree ends after a
Speaker 1: man with a concealed carry license took down the attacker. Oh,
Speaker 1: that would be John Lott's book, More Guns, Less Crime.
Speaker 1: They're gonna allow more people to protect themselves, innocent Americans
Speaker 1: that are that are helpless at an activist now in
Speaker 1: AOC's districts slamming the defund the police movement, citing the
Speaker 1: violent crime surge. In other words, it's not working. After
Speaker 1: July fourth weekend violence, California's officials are saying the city
Speaker 1: experiencing a safety emergency. You think, well, you've given them
Speaker 1: a license to steal out there in Oakland and San Francisco.
Speaker 1: You gotta be kidding me. This is as predictable as
Speaker 1: the day is long, just like socialism will always fail,
Speaker 1: just like border security is mandatory. It's like energy independence
Speaker 1: is one on one, just like you know strong piece
Speaker 1: through strength, tough military, and engage President Matters. By the way,
Speaker 1: an Indiana police officer was killed. Did you hear about this?
Speaker 1: Do you know his name? At a federal building. On
Speaker 1: the same day, two ATF agents were shot in Chicago.
Speaker 1: Does anybody listening to this program know the names of
Speaker 1: these officers. I can give them to you. You have
Speaker 1: Detective Greg Farrensee, thirty year veteran of the police forces,
Speaker 1: was shot outside a federal building in Indiana. Belief the
Speaker 1: officer was on assignment with the an FBI task Force.
Speaker 1: Look around the country. This is happening everywhere. You know,
Speaker 1: the same thing, and pretty much that's why we scroll
Speaker 1: the names of these officers. We're gonna we're having a
Speaker 1: record this year. Times Square suspects sixteen in custody after
Speaker 1: that marine injury. It was injured in the shooting. Remember
Speaker 1: we covered that story. And one congresswoman, a South Carolina
Speaker 1: congresswoman stocking up on firearms and taking target practice. Her
Speaker 1: home was vandalized. Congresswoman Nancy Mayce, we've interviewed her in
Speaker 1: New York. I gotta give Claudia Tenney's some credit. She's
Speaker 1: pushing for the Supreme Court to overturn New York's gun
Speaker 1: laws and has the support of a lot of House
Speaker 1: Republicans on that. I mean, these are two different Americas
Speaker 1: we're describing oh out in California. We'll get into this
Speaker 1: more in the final hour of the program today. They're
Speaker 1: offering cash, proposing cash for junkies. According to zero Hedge,
Speaker 1: California Democrats want to pay meth addicts to seek treatment.
Speaker 1: You've seen the one mile video we've shown from Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi's home in one direction, multimillion dollar neighborhood, gated mile
Speaker 1: on the other side, as her office in between is
Speaker 1: defecating in the streets, needles everywhere. Unbelievable. You know this
Speaker 1: is all preventable. All of this is preventable. We can
Speaker 1: save this country. We know what works. Curtiusly would implement
Speaker 1: New York, the policies of Rudy Giuliani. That worked. It's
Speaker 1: not hard to do. We know how to do it.
Speaker 1: There's a way to do it, but apparently the will
Speaker 1: doesn't exist. Our two Sean Hannity show gladuate with us
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety four one Sean, you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. It is inexplicable to me.
Speaker 1: The profound, obvious, clear, abusive bias. Corruption that is the media,
Speaker 1: the mob, big tech, that mob, how one sided they
Speaker 1: are advancing only a political agenda. If your last name
Speaker 1: is Trump, you treated one way. Your last name is Biden,
Speaker 1: you treated another way. If you're a hunter, you can
Speaker 1: You can lie on a gun application, dump a gun
Speaker 1: and a dumpster and nothing happens. You can make money
Speaker 1: from Ukraine with no experience, millions of dollars. Get money
Speaker 1: from a Kazakhstan oligarch, no consequences, a Russian oligarch, first
Speaker 1: lady in Moscow three and a half million to your company,
Speaker 1: no problem. Travel with Daddy to China and ten days
Speaker 1: later you have a billion dollars deal with the Bank
Speaker 1: of China, not deuts your bank, not Goldman, Sachs, JP,
Speaker 1: Morgan Chase. Now the hunter you know, smoke, crack, prostitutes,
Speaker 1: everything in between, and nothing happens. And when I say
Speaker 1: we don't have equal justice under the law, when I
Speaker 1: say that we don't have equal application of our laws,
Speaker 1: this is what I mean. And that's a danger to
Speaker 1: all in society. Now we have learned in the last
Speaker 1: couple of weeks thanks to the New York Post, great reporting,
Speaker 1: a lot of it by Miranda Divine, who will join
Speaker 1: us in a minute. We've learned that Joe when he
Speaker 1: said that I've never talked to Hunter, not one time
Speaker 1: about his foreign business dealings. Well, now we have pictures
Speaker 1: of him actually having dinner while vice president with Hunter's
Speaker 1: business partners. Now we know that Hunter is whining, complaining
Speaker 1: when Daddy's VP that he has to pay all of
Speaker 1: Daddy's bills and everyone in the family's pills, as he
Speaker 1: had other other ideas for that money. Anyway, and so
Speaker 1: I want to play Biden denying that. Now he's been
Speaker 1: revealed as a liar. Remember Tony bob Olynski revealed that
Speaker 1: Biden knew about Hunter's business dealings, the big guy. Remember
Speaker 1: that specific quote my interview with John Paul mack Isaac.
Speaker 1: That's that's the guy with the repair shop, the computer
Speaker 1: repair shop. Anyway, Listen, how many times have you ever
Speaker 1: spoken to your son about his overseas business dealings. I've
Speaker 1: never shoken my son about I have never discussed with
Speaker 1: my son, or my brother or anyone else can be
Speaker 1: having to do different businesses, period. And what I will
Speaker 1: do is the same thing we did in our administration genial,
Speaker 1: to be an absolute wall between personal and private and
Speaker 1: the government. Do you stand by your statement that you
Speaker 1: did not discuss any of your son's overseas business trot,
Speaker 1: and by that state, here are the facts I know,
Speaker 1: and everything I'm saying is collaborated by emails, what's app, chats, agreements,
Speaker 1: documents and other evidence. Now is the evidence that compelling
Speaker 1: that it was that relevant? I assume my interpretation is
Speaker 1: that you saw flagrant double standard existed? Am I writing
Speaker 1: my interpretation? What I saw was, yeah, to two young
Speaker 1: men that were definitely capitalizing off of at least one
Speaker 1: of their father's positions to drum up more value and
Speaker 1: their efforts to get more money, and it was it
Speaker 1: was definitely a pay for play scheme that yeah. Again,
Speaker 1: I got my law degree at Rodeo Clown School, so
Speaker 1: I'm not the Brian's better at the legal stuff. But
Speaker 1: it looked like this would be something that you would
Speaker 1: want to have a conversation with to another foreign leader
Speaker 1: about because this was a lot of money that was
Speaker 1: exchanging hands, like a lot of money. Miranda Divine New
Speaker 1: York Post columnists, she's got a book coming out. I'm
Speaker 1: looking forward to it. I want to find out when
Speaker 1: it's when it's when it's due to come out. And
Speaker 1: that is the Laptop from Hell Hunter Biden, big Tech,
Speaker 1: and the dirty secrets the President tried to hide. It's out.
Speaker 1: I guess sometime in November, if I understand her, sometime
Speaker 1: in the fall. Miranda, Welcome back to the program. These
Speaker 1: are massive developments. If Donald Trump were caught lying three
Speaker 1: times about his son's business dealings, foreign business dealings while
Speaker 1: he's the dealing with countries like China, Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan,
Speaker 1: I think there'd be a very different media reaction, big
Speaker 1: tech reaction. And yet that doesn't happen because we now
Speaker 1: have caught him in a lie, Hi Shan, Yes, absolutely,
Speaker 1: And you know the tragedy is that we've really known
Speaker 1: that Joe Biden didn't tell the truth about his knowledge
Speaker 1: of Hunter's business dealings and Jim, his brother's business dealings
Speaker 1: since before the election. I mean, Tony Bobolinsky really is
Speaker 1: a hero. He came at a great cost to himself
Speaker 1: to tell the truth. And he's not a particularly partisan person,
Speaker 1: but he had been in business with Hunter Biden, he
Speaker 1: had met on two occasions with Joe Biden. Jim Biden
Speaker 1: was part of this deal that they were trying to
Speaker 1: cook up with the Chinese, and Tony Bobolynski, who had
Speaker 1: a proper business reputation, was trying to do it the
Speaker 1: right way and he was getting instruction all the time
Speaker 1: from Hunter. They ended up Jim and Hunter ripping him off,
Speaker 1: he felt because the money that was supposed to go
Speaker 1: into this joint venture never adventuated. And then bob Lynsky
Speaker 1: realized when he saw the Johnson Grassley report and their
Speaker 1: access to these treasury suspicious transactions that are confidential, that
Speaker 1: six million dollars had flowed actually out of that Chinese
Speaker 1: company that was supposed to go into the joint venture
Speaker 1: that he'd spent all this time working on, and in
Speaker 1: fact it went elsewhere to other companies that were associated
Speaker 1: with the Bidens. So, you know, that's one aspect of it.
Speaker 1: The fact that Joe Biden had met twice with Tony
Speaker 1: bob Lynsky, and also we have, you know, the photographs
Speaker 1: of five meetings that Joe Biden had with Hunter's various
Speaker 1: business partners, and we have lots of other instances that
Speaker 1: are recorded on the laptop of other meetings. So he
Speaker 1: was pretty well involved with what Hunter was doing. He
Speaker 1: was at the very least using the perks of the
Speaker 1: vice President's office, such as Air Force two, such as
Speaker 1: breakfast at the residents for Mexican billionaires, such as meetings
Speaker 1: in the West Wing in his office. He was using
Speaker 1: those perks of office to assist his son in his
Speaker 1: lucrative business dealings overseas. Now, so when you really break
Speaker 1: this down, as Joe Biden lied on a pretty spectacular
Speaker 1: level about not knowing anything about his son's foreign business
Speaker 1: dealings or having spoken to his son when he's meeting
Speaker 1: with some of these characters, some of these players, then
Speaker 1: you've got Hunter complaining that he's paying all of Daddy's bills. Well,
Speaker 1: where does that money come from? Him? Cashing in on
Speaker 1: Daddy's name. If you don't have any experience in oil, energy,
Speaker 1: gas or Ukraine, how do you get millions of dollars?
Speaker 1: You know, nobody wanted to pay attention to the real
Speaker 1: quid pro quo, which is Joe bragging on tape that
Speaker 1: he leveraged a billion US taxpayer dollars to fire a
Speaker 1: prosecutor in Ukraine investigating his son. You know, the first
Speaker 1: Lady of Moscow three and a half million dollars in
Speaker 1: that deal. The Bank of China. Okay, Well, we now
Speaker 1: see the territorial ambitions unfolding of the communist Chinese Miranda.
Speaker 1: They're now talking about reunification their words with Taiwan. We've
Speaker 1: seen the crackdown in Hong Kong. We also see that,
Speaker 1: you know, Vladimir Plutin can pretty much and you know,
Speaker 1: the Russians can hack us here, there and everywhere, and
Speaker 1: nothing ever seems to happen. The iranium mullahs, They're getting
Speaker 1: everything they want enriching uranium. Nothing's happening there either. The
Speaker 1: Chinese and the Russians are now giving arms to Iran.
Speaker 1: And one has to now wonder is Joe compromised. Well,
Speaker 1: that is inevitably the question that he's going to be asked,
Speaker 1: and he's left himself open to that because of the
Speaker 1: way that he and his family had conducted themselves. And
Speaker 1: you know, I'll just point out you mentioned the money
Speaker 1: that Hunter was getting from Ukraine, from Barisma, the corrupt
Speaker 1: energy company there. His money. They were paying him about
Speaker 1: a million dollars a year. It was eighty three thousand
Speaker 1: plus a month to sit on the board. But just
Speaker 1: a few weeks after Joe Biden stepped down as vice president,
Speaker 1: Hunter's salary from Barisma was cut in half. So that's
Speaker 1: a pretty direct, circumstantial evidence there that what he was
Speaker 1: being paid for. But Miranda, when he went on Good
Speaker 1: Morning America, remember the questions he was asked, you have
Speaker 1: any experience in oil, energy gas at all? No, any
Speaker 1: experience with Ukraine? No? Why do you think you got
Speaker 1: the millions of dollars? Why why were you picked as
Speaker 1: a consultant? I don't know. Could it happened to be
Speaker 1: the fact that your father is in charge of Ukrainian policy? Probably?
Speaker 1: I mean he's you know, can somebody get me that
Speaker 1: deal in life? I'll take that deal. You'll take that
Speaker 1: deal right? Well? Yes, And he was sort of refreshingly
Speaker 1: honest there. He said, I don't think I would have
Speaker 1: had anything without my last name being Biden. And this
Speaker 1: is the truth. I mean, you look back at Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's career in Delaware, you look back at a Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: Ever since he graduated from school, he has had every job,
Speaker 1: every single appointment has been care of his father. And
Speaker 1: there was a reason for that. You know, Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and his late son, sadly Boe Biden, we're both going
Speaker 1: to be pure and go into politics, and so you know,
Speaker 1: even they had champagne taste. They were going to have
Speaker 1: these just regular political salaries. And Joe Biden frequently says
Speaker 1: I'm the poorest man in Congress as some sort of
Speaker 1: indication of how squeaky clean he is and how unsullied
Speaker 1: by money he is. And yet what he had going
Speaker 1: on with Hunter was Hunter had to be the family breadwinner.
Speaker 1: So he was tipped into these first of all these
Speaker 1: jobs through Joe's Delaware donors, a credit card company and
Speaker 1: VNA gave Hunter this job that was way overpaid, and
Speaker 1: out of that money, he paid off his own tuition
Speaker 1: and his brother's tuition, and you've told me also his
Speaker 1: sister's tuition. So you know, that's money that Joe, the
Speaker 1: normally a parent would pay. But no, poor old Hunter,
Speaker 1: who would have rather have been an artist or a writer.
Speaker 1: He is out there as the bagman, as the breadwinner,
Speaker 1: as the cash cow for the family. And that's gone
Speaker 1: on his entire career. And then it's when Joe became
Speaker 1: vice president he expanded that sort of Delaware the Delaware way,
Speaker 1: the influenced peddling operation that he had going on on
Speaker 1: a small scale with his Delaware donors, he expanded that
Speaker 1: to the world, and Hunter followed along in on Air
Speaker 1: Force two and to the countries that Joe had carriage
Speaker 1: four as vice president, such as China, such as Russia,
Speaker 1: such as Ukraine. And unfortunately that has put the America
Speaker 1: in a parlous state now that Joe is president, because
Speaker 1: at the very least, there's a perception that he's compromised.
Speaker 1: At twenty five to the tip of the hour, eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four one, Sean, you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. Let's go back to yesterday
Speaker 1: and Donald Trump and his announcement that a class action
Speaker 1: lawsuit against these big tech companies. We're asking the US
Speaker 1: District Court for the Southern District to Florida to order
Speaker 1: an immediate halt to social media companies a legal shameful
Speaker 1: censorship of the American people. And that's exactly what they
Speaker 1: are doing. We're demanding an end to the shadow banning,
Speaker 1: a stop to the silencing, and a stop to the blacklisting, banishing,
Speaker 1: and canceling that you know so well, if they can
Speaker 1: do it to me, they can do it to anyone.
Speaker 1: And in fact, that is exactly what they're doing. They're
Speaker 1: taking people off who don't even realize they were taken off.
Speaker 1: They'd have no idea why they were taken off, you know.
Speaker 1: So that's the president making the announcement. And so Bill
Speaker 1: O'Reilly sat down and his interview with Donald Trump talking
Speaker 1: about the lawsuit, and here's Trump's answer to Bill. So,
Speaker 1: the lawsuit against the social media companies is unprecedented, number
Speaker 1: one and could be a game changer for the country.
Speaker 1: Number two. Are your lawyers prepared though, for the war?
Speaker 1: Because it will be a war, you know that. Are
Speaker 1: they prepared for it? Everything's a war With me, life
Speaker 1: is a war. And yeah, we're prepared. And somebody had
Speaker 1: to do it. I made a big speech in Florida
Speaker 1: the other day. We had forty eight thousand people, and
Speaker 1: the people are screaming, when are you going to sue
Speaker 1: social media, big tech. Everybody's wanted me to do this,
Speaker 1: and they're bad. They're bad people, and they're doing bad
Speaker 1: things and they're really hurting our nation that maybe in
Speaker 1: the process of destroying our nation. We're not going to
Speaker 1: let that happen. Now. The question of if you listen
Speaker 1: to any of the coverage, but for shows like this,
Speaker 1: there aren't many of us in radio and a few
Speaker 1: of us in TV. There aren't many you would think
Speaker 1: that this lawsuit is frivolous. It is dead on arrival.
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett Alan Dershowitz said just the opposite last night
Speaker 1: on my TV show. Is this This is the most
Speaker 1: important First Amendment case in the twenty first century. Now,
Speaker 1: a lot of it deals with something known as Section
Speaker 1: two thirty. We've spent a lot of time outlining what
Speaker 1: two thirty is all about. If you are a if
Speaker 1: you offer editorial, your own reporting, and you're not just
Speaker 1: a platform for people to place information, you get liability protection.
Speaker 1: That is what Section two thirty is all about. But
Speaker 1: now we know these big tech companies Facebook for example,
Speaker 1: Twitter for example, Google for example, the ones being sued
Speaker 1: that in fact they do editing, editorial, They make decisions.
Speaker 1: It has a political impact, like spiking the story we're
Speaker 1: just talking to Miranda divine and in terms of the
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden laptop story before the election, and that has
Speaker 1: to be measured as an in kind donation to the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, probably worth so much it's incalculable. And now
Speaker 1: the question is, Okay, I agree with Bill. All lawsuits
Speaker 1: are hard. It is it's going to be a battle.
Speaker 1: These companies are well funded. They'll pay any amount of
Speaker 1: money to keep their monopolies. And where is this headed now?
Speaker 1: Craig Partial, This is what he does, this is what
Speaker 1: he studies. He is a special counsel for the American
Speaker 1: Center for Law Injustice, Senior adviser on legal policy for
Speaker 1: the Civil Liberty for American Principles Project, and he is
Speaker 1: incredibly versed on all of these issues. And if I
Speaker 1: listen to the liberal media, this case is frivolous. It's
Speaker 1: going to end in failure, and it's a disaster, and
Speaker 1: it's going nowhere. I don't quite believe that. Your thoughts, Sean, Yeah,
Speaker 1: we shouldn't believe it. Here's the intriguing, really interesting thing
Speaker 1: about this Trump lawsuit. And number one, can you blame him?
Speaker 1: Sitting president into the United States and he has taken
Speaker 1: off the world's largest social media platform on frivolous grounds
Speaker 1: allegations in the media that he incited violence on January sixth,
Speaker 1: But it was that was so untrue. Even Facebook didn't
Speaker 1: use that as an excuse to take him off its platform.
Speaker 1: They avoided saying that he inside a violence because they
Speaker 1: knew that he didn't so the charade is over. We're
Speaker 1: now getting down to the fact that, as Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: lawsuit says, there has been a level of cooperation between
Speaker 1: big tech companies, in this case, Facebook, Twitter, and Google's YouTube.
Speaker 1: All three got separately sued in three separate class action lawsuits.
Speaker 1: Unprecedented cooperation between them and the government of the United
Speaker 1: States and particularly one political party in cong as well
Speaker 1: as Anthony Fauci over at the CDC. And this level
Speaker 1: of cooperation, the Losses says, has transformed these platforms into
Speaker 1: not just private businesses, but into state actors, so that
Speaker 1: the First Amendment now applies to protect Donald Trump from them.
Speaker 1: So the question is now, and we brought this point
Speaker 1: up many times and again last night on TV and
Speaker 1: yesterday on radio, is it's okay that the Ayatola, the
Speaker 1: Aetola is an Iran that they get their Twitter accounts
Speaker 1: and Louis Farrakan gets to keep his Twitter accounts and
Speaker 1: Rohanna gets to keep his Twitter accounts, but a former
Speaker 1: president is canceled. And the idea that they're going to
Speaker 1: determine what is legitimate content which is abusively biased towards
Speaker 1: conservatives and get government liability protection in the course of
Speaker 1: doing this, What is the best way, in your opinion,
Speaker 1: for this to be argued, and how Congress should handle well.
Speaker 1: First of all, the Supreme Court has a long history
Speaker 1: on so called viewpoint discrimination cases. And if let's assume
Speaker 1: for a minute that the level of cooperation between Mark
Speaker 1: Zuckerberg and Facebook, you his company, and a Twitter and
Speaker 1: Google's YouTube, with all these federal agencies inside emails back
Speaker 1: and forth about we've got your back, basically we're going
Speaker 1: to suppress stuff that doesn't tell the orthodox, politically correct
Speaker 1: ideas about COVID or the election or whatever. Let's assume
Speaker 1: that for a minute. Now, the Supreme Court I had
Speaker 1: a long history of saying, if you treat all these
Speaker 1: other groups in one way with regard to their freedom
Speaker 1: of speech, but you target a person or a movement
Speaker 1: for discrimination because of their viewpoint, that is taste closed
Speaker 1: in terms of proving not only unequal treatment under the
Speaker 1: equal Protection Clause, but of violation to free speech. So
Speaker 1: that's what this lawsuit is saying. It is saying, look,
Speaker 1: you've given a pass to all of these other left
Speaker 1: leaning organizations and tyrants and dictators and terrorists, but now
Speaker 1: you pick up sitting president of the United States or
Speaker 1: others who support them. And by the way, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: has added private citizens as plaintiffs in his lawsuit as
Speaker 1: well to tell their stories. So this blanket anti conservative
Speaker 1: viewpoint discrimination is rampant. He's bringing it to the forefront.
Speaker 1: A judge is going to have to decided. I will
Speaker 1: guarantee that whoever the US district judge and the federal
Speaker 1: court who looks at this, that will not be the
Speaker 1: last word on this. This will go up to a
Speaker 1: Court of Appeals, possibly to the Supreme Court. It's going
Speaker 1: to be fascinating to watch. All right, Craig, any updates,
Speaker 1: Please let us know when you get them. Great job
Speaker 1: with the American Center for Law Injustice. Appreciate you being
Speaker 1: one of the Are were better shape to talk to
Speaker 1: you about it? Right? I'll tell you what they sent me. Thanks.
Speaker 1: Oh sure the idea. First of all, we're not sure
Speaker 1: who it is for sure? All right, back to our
Speaker 1: busy telephones. Debbie is in New York. I don't know why,
Speaker 1: I don't know why I'm here. Glad you called Tabby.
Speaker 1: How are you? Misery likes company? That's a good line.
Speaker 1: You're right, Misery likes company is right. We can't do
Speaker 1: this alone. Um yes, um my messages. I'm angry at
Speaker 1: the Republicans. I'm a Republican. My sister and brother in law.
Speaker 1: They switched to Independent after the election because of the messaging.
Speaker 1: You had Kevin McCarthy on your show the other night
Speaker 1: and you asked him straight out about Joe Biden's mental
Speaker 1: status do you think there's a problem with it? And
Speaker 1: he went around the blush. He said, well, I knew
Speaker 1: him was his vice president and now he is different.
Speaker 1: Now do you think Nancy Pelosi minced words about Trump?
Speaker 1: All they did was bash that man for four years.
Speaker 1: That's all they're doing today, you know. And I go
Speaker 1: through I go through my list. I mean, you take
Speaker 1: any of the issues with foreign countries and money, even Hunter.
Speaker 1: They get any of the issues of Hunter and drugs
Speaker 1: and prostitutes and gun applications and dumpsters and guns and
Speaker 1: put the last name Trump and something would happen. And
Speaker 1: that's how corrupt now things are. Institutional corruption is everywhere.
Speaker 1: It's scary. Actually, well, the Republicans need to stop recross
Speaker 1: the aisle to get along. There's not going to be
Speaker 1: getting along. This is a war. I don't know why
Speaker 1: they can't identify. If you can't, you're not going to
Speaker 1: win the war and get the twenty twenty two back
Speaker 1: the House if you don't identify the problem. I think
Speaker 1: that's exactly where. Look, there needs to be a message.
Speaker 1: I did ask the President at this town hall that
Speaker 1: we had on immigration about you know, what are the
Speaker 1: things that you need to do. I see three specific
Speaker 1: strategies that have got to be employed. First step is
Speaker 1: election integrity reform. And those are the five things that
Speaker 1: I've mentioned. I won't repeat them. Then, Republicans, you know,
Speaker 1: you've got to prosecute the case against how disastrous Joe's
Speaker 1: foreign policy is and his economic policies and his energy
Speaker 1: policies and his immigration policies. We all know that, but
Speaker 1: he's still got to let people know what it was
Speaker 1: like and what he's done and how bad the damage is.
Speaker 1: And the next thing is, you've got to tell people
Speaker 1: what it is you stand for. And I say it often,
Speaker 1: Debbie liberty, freedom, capitalism, our constitution, law and order, peace
Speaker 1: and security and safety and security, choice in schools, healthcare,
Speaker 1: free market, healthcare solutions, protecting pre existing conditions, constitutional justices,
Speaker 1: lower attacks, is less bureaucracy, secure borders, energy, independence, piece
Speaker 1: through strength, trust, but verify and free and fair trade?
Speaker 1: Am I missing a lot? Tell me no, no, and
Speaker 1: what I give? I missed Donald Trump? Everybody misses him
Speaker 1: and when our president by, you know, misses him the most.
Speaker 1: The liberal media, but going on their ratings have been
Speaker 1: a toilet um. But when he Biden went over to
Speaker 1: that meeting with Putin, I was embarrassed. I was embarrassed,
Speaker 1: you know, when he when he sat there and for
Speaker 1: you know, ten seconds, he can't give an answer. No,
Speaker 1: I was embarrassed. This weekend, he's asked a simple question.
Speaker 1: There's not a difficult question, and he starts answering the
Speaker 1: question about what are you gonna do about Russia's latest
Speaker 1: cyber attacks? And he goes, hum, that's um, that's why
Speaker 1: I was late getting off the plan. I was and
Speaker 1: briefed on it, and um, weekend, I'm not in the
Speaker 1: mood to aunt talk about that time. Well, it's worse
Speaker 1: than that. He had to take out the notes they
Speaker 1: wrote out for him because he didn't remember the briefing
Speaker 1: that took place five minutes ago. No, I mean you
Speaker 1: would think you remember one or two points, not not stammering, stumbling, bumbling.
Speaker 1: It's humiliating. I find it drum here because doctor, everybody's afraid, everybody,
Speaker 1: you know, and I know, I don't know why they're Listen.
Speaker 1: We've got a problem. We've got a president that is
Speaker 1: clearly struggling mightily cognitively. It's a big problem, you know.
Speaker 1: You know. When I hear China, I mean, I'm like,
Speaker 1: what is he gonna do about their talk of destroying
Speaker 1: American military basis reunification they're calling it with Taiwan. We've
Speaker 1: seen the crackdown in Hong Kong. What's he going to
Speaker 1: do about Vladimir and the cyber at tax? What's he
Speaker 1: gonna do about Vladimir and she partnering him and giving
Speaker 1: arms to the Iranians? This, these are not insignificant issues.
Speaker 1: Their territorial ambitions, I can predict right now, are going
Speaker 1: to be realized and by taking advantage of what they
Speaker 1: perceive as a very weak America right now. He sad.
Speaker 1: They're good people, they're good folks. When he was running
Speaker 1: for election, he wouldn't. He said, well, there we could
Speaker 1: eat China's launch, And then he said they're good folks. Everybody,
Speaker 1: so well, they've been good to the Biden family. I'll
Speaker 1: say that. I mean, how would you like a one
Speaker 1: point five billion dollars deal with the Bank of China
Speaker 1: for your company, even though you had no experience or Ukraine?
Speaker 1: How would you like all that money flowing into your family? Coffers, Well,
Speaker 1: his son's it's a sad story for that song. I
Speaker 1: feel I don't know what's going to happen with that son.
Speaker 1: It's a sad thing. Yeah, Rudy Giuliani was on with
Speaker 1: Mike Huckabee and actually he's sad that you know, he
Speaker 1: believes his child pornography on that laptop. We'll see Miranda's book.
Speaker 1: Would I would imagine when to reveal it. We'll see,
Speaker 1: all right, Debbie, appreciate the call. Thank you for being
Speaker 1: with us. Eight hundred nine four one sewn. You want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program quick Break Right
Speaker 1: Back coming up next our final News round Up and
Speaker 1: Information Overload hour A right News round Up, Information Overload
Speaker 1: Hour eight hundred and nine four one sean If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. They've been
Speaker 1: trying to play games out there with the California recall
Speaker 1: election against Gavin Newsom, and my sources on the ground
Speaker 1: are saying they're trying to time this and like a
Speaker 1: state like New York, they have a filibuster proof legislature.
Speaker 1: They're trying to time the recall election so it'll be
Speaker 1: prior to what will likely be the predictable wildfires and
Speaker 1: wins and power outages that California experiences every fall. So
Speaker 1: they're trying to move the data around as a means
Speaker 1: of benefiting Gavin Newsom there and then Gavin Newsom, interestingly,
Speaker 1: have a seventy five billion dollars surplus out there. They
Speaker 1: get another fifty billion from red states that are fiscally responsible,
Speaker 1: and Gavin is expected to give out checks to two
Speaker 1: thirds of the population of California, including the illegal immigrants,
Speaker 1: just prior to the runoff election, just prior to the
Speaker 1: recall election. And it's pretty unbelievable. And San Francisco, it's
Speaker 1: so bad that they're telling criminals, as long as you
Speaker 1: don't steal more than a thousand dollars, we're not going
Speaker 1: to prosecute you. And we see what's happening at these
Speaker 1: high end stores this most recent weekend. Neiman Marcus, the
Speaker 1: San Francisco mayoral candidate is saying the city is now
Speaker 1: governed by the radical left. That's to say the least
Speaker 1: Richie Greenberg. Listen, this is a far left wing governed city.
Speaker 1: There's virtually no conservative, even even centrist candidates that really win,
Speaker 1: especially on the city council or border supervisors. This city
Speaker 1: is controlled completely by left wing ideologs. Oh anyway, John
Speaker 1: Cox joins us. Now, sorry, welcome to the program. Thank
Speaker 1: you for being willis great to be with you, Sean.
Speaker 1: I appreciate the opportunity. I'm a I'm an outsider businessman
Speaker 1: who's going to shake up Sacramento and get this state
Speaker 1: turned around. My biggest worry is the first question. In
Speaker 1: other words, you know Gavin is going to have endless
Speaker 1: sums of money. We know about the Shenanigans going on
Speaker 1: in Sacramento to maybe give us more more context and
Speaker 1: texture and d tell to what they're maneuvering as a
Speaker 1: fate more favorable date for the recall vote. Yeah, they
Speaker 1: originally put in extensions of the day to protect a
Speaker 1: state senator who was getting recall because he raised taxes.
Speaker 1: Our gas tax is now the highest in the country.
Speaker 1: Our gas prices out here, Sean, are approaching six dollars
Speaker 1: a gallon in some spots. This is unprecedented. But now
Speaker 1: they're changing these recall rules because they want, you know,
Speaker 1: they think it's going to help Gavin. It's not, Sean,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you right now, we're already seen rolling electrical
Speaker 1: blackouts like we did last summer because we've only relied
Speaker 1: solely on wind and solar. We have we decommissioned gas
Speaker 1: and nuclear, so we don't have any electricity, or we
Speaker 1: already are in a drought water situation because they haven't
Speaker 1: built desalination plants. And now we're having fires all across
Speaker 1: the state because Newsom won't manage the forest and he
Speaker 1: won't put money into buying airplanes that would be able
Speaker 1: to put these fires out. Instead, he's wasting billions on
Speaker 1: this train the nowhere in the Central Valley that no
Speaker 1: one's going to ride. And I think, well, I mean,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm trying to understand why are they following
Speaker 1: the science of forestry, which is that you clean out
Speaker 1: the brush and the areas that kindle these fires to
Speaker 1: get so out of control where millions of acres are destroyed.
Speaker 1: What I mean, isn't that a science of forestry. Well, listen,
Speaker 1: Sacramento is a swamp only junior to the swamp in
Speaker 1: wash NDC that our former president had a wrestle with.
Speaker 1: And let's face it, Sean the environmental lobby in Sacramental
Speaker 1: controls it. And Newsom is a slave to that lobby
Speaker 1: and why because he's focused on running for president at
Speaker 1: some point he knows he's not going to be able
Speaker 1: to do it if he doesn't get the environmentalists, the
Speaker 1: teachers unions, and the trial lawyers behind them. So the
Speaker 1: French laundry dinner he did was really instructive because he
Speaker 1: violated his rules. But he violated his rules to go
Speaker 1: out to dinner with lobbyists. And there are the people
Speaker 1: that are controlling things, and they're the ones that prevent
Speaker 1: any kind of decent management of the forest as well
Speaker 1: as any energy sources that would help the state. Do
Speaker 1: you believe Sacramento and that's assemblymen and senators are purposely
Speaker 1: moving the election date, the recall election date, to prevent
Speaker 1: the news cycle from being predictable with rolling blackouts and wildfires.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that's their strategy? Yes? Because a year ago,
Speaker 1: which is by the way, when I put fifty thousand
Speaker 1: hours into the recall. Over a year ago, before the
Speaker 1: French Laundry Dinner, the state of California was in flames. Sean,
Speaker 1: I have friends in northern California that literally couldn't open
Speaker 1: their windows. They couldn't literally see the sun in the
Speaker 1: middle of the day because the smoke was so thick
Speaker 1: in all of northern California. That was about the middle
Speaker 1: of September last year. I think they're thinking that that
Speaker 1: may well be the case again this year, because they
Speaker 1: know that they haven't done anywhere near enough to do
Speaker 1: something to put out these fires, or to manage the
Speaker 1: forest or as you say, follow the science, and so
Speaker 1: I think that's in their minds. What they're not figuring out, however,
Speaker 1: is the fact that we're already seeing fires and it's
Speaker 1: only July. And we're also seeing the drought. The government
Speaker 1: made drought as well as the government made electrical shortage,
Speaker 1: and those things are and on top of that, we've
Speaker 1: got gas prices soaring. There's a lot of things in
Speaker 1: this state, along with homelessness and housing and rising crime
Speaker 1: that I think are going to sink mister Newsome's governorship
Speaker 1: and bringing a new regime here. What's the latest on
Speaker 1: the plan for or Gavin Newsom that I've been reading
Speaker 1: that he's planning to send out pretty hefty checks to
Speaker 1: significant portions of the California population. I've read as high
Speaker 1: as two thirds of the population. We'll be getting a check.
Speaker 1: And what is the timing that those checks will arrive
Speaker 1: versus the recall election? Well, there's a check going out
Speaker 1: actually right now. I think this is the last one
Speaker 1: as a matter of fact, So I'm not sure that
Speaker 1: there's checks that are going to go out right with
Speaker 1: the ballot. But you know, Sean, he's running commercials all
Speaker 1: over the place talking about you know, it's almost like
Speaker 1: a game show where he's handing out money and you know,
Speaker 1: eleven hundred hours for this family and five hundred hours
Speaker 1: for that family. And you know, I think the taxpayers
Speaker 1: of the state are looking at this and saying, what
Speaker 1: are you doing. You're buying votes with our money, and
Speaker 1: you're handing it out to people who certainly need it
Speaker 1: because the cost of living is so bad, and because
Speaker 1: Newsom crushed small businesses and restaurants and hotels is extended shutdown.
Speaker 1: In contrast to Ron de Santis, who kept the state
Speaker 1: open in Florida. You know, people need the money, but
Speaker 1: they're looking at the situation. They're saying, WHOA, what is
Speaker 1: five hundred hours going to help me with? If my
Speaker 1: rent has gone up five hundred hours a month here,
Speaker 1: which it really has in many parts of the state.
Speaker 1: Now there wasn't just restaurant hypocrisy of Gavin. Then then
Speaker 1: as kids they had in person learning because they don't
Speaker 1: go to California public schools, they go to private schools,
Speaker 1: and those private schools that in person learning. I sent
Speaker 1: the our Hannity TV show cameras to California numerous times.
Speaker 1: We've been to Los Angeles. We've been to Nancy Pelosi's district,
Speaker 1: in particular, one mile from where her gated home is
Speaker 1: with million dollars home multimillion dollar homes, and then a
Speaker 1: mile in the other direction is her office. And in
Speaker 1: between you have in San Francisco areas where all you
Speaker 1: see or people defecating on the streets, syringes everywhere, drug
Speaker 1: abuse wide out in the open, drug dealing wide out
Speaker 1: in the open. I mean, it is unconscionable. You know,
Speaker 1: I've often wondered why Nancy hasn't knocked on the door
Speaker 1: of our very wealthy neighbors and said, well, we're going
Speaker 1: to contribute a million dollars. We're going to build a facility,
Speaker 1: one that will provide showers and a meal and maybe
Speaker 1: drug counseling for people that are so inclined but rather
Speaker 1: that they don't even have a bathroom to go to
Speaker 1: and they're just defecating on the streets. And this is
Speaker 1: every day now, and it's gotten worse Sean, in the
Speaker 1: last couple of years, not better. And of course don't
Speaker 1: forget Gavin Newsom was the guy who initiated this as
Speaker 1: a mayor of San Francisco and didn't do anything about
Speaker 1: it there. I just released my homelessness Plan, which really, Sean,
Speaker 1: it's about common sense. You've got to treat the addictions
Speaker 1: and the mental illness. Most of these people are mentally ill.
Speaker 1: Most of them do have addictions, and they think it's
Speaker 1: fine to live on the street, but that's part of
Speaker 1: the mental illness. We've got to get people the treatment.
Speaker 1: Politicians like Newsom just buy hotel rooms. You're paying five
Speaker 1: thousand hours a month for hotel rooms, or actually buying
Speaker 1: motels at double or triple what they're worth. It's just
Speaker 1: a horrible waste of dollars. But importantly, it doesn't do
Speaker 1: the job, because just because you put somebody in a
Speaker 1: hotel room with beer and cigarette doesn't mean that they're
Speaker 1: going to actually get cured. You've got to get the
Speaker 1: cure going and get them job training and get them
Speaker 1: back into productive society. That's the compassionate thing to do. Sean, Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: you would think it would be the compassionate thing. More
Speaker 1: with California gubernatorial candidate John Cox, let me ask you,
Speaker 1: there's been a mass exodus out of California for the
Speaker 1: first time in California's history. This last year, you had
Speaker 1: more people leaving the state than coming to the state.
Speaker 1: To Sunshine State, I lived there at one point five years,
Speaker 1: just as a side note, in the mid eighties, and
Speaker 1: they were talking about desalinization plants then and they never
Speaker 1: built them because the same problems existed in the eighties. That's,
Speaker 1: by the way, there's my radio career thirty three years.
Speaker 1: That's where it started. But long story, but long story short,
Speaker 1: a lot of people have left the state, and the
Speaker 1: people that seem to be leaving the state are people
Speaker 1: that realize they're tired of the high taxes. You have
Speaker 1: the highest state income tax in the country, burdens some regulation,
Speaker 1: draconian shutdowns, and they're moving to states like Arizona, Nevada, Texas.
Speaker 1: To take a U haul out of California to Texas
Speaker 1: about twenty twenty five hundred bucks depending on the size.
Speaker 1: If you take it from Texas back to California, you
Speaker 1: can get it almost for free, Like yeah, like three
Speaker 1: hundred four hundred bucks. You're doing you all a favor
Speaker 1: bringing it back. I agree. What does that tell you?
Speaker 1: I mean, so now the question is of too many
Speaker 1: conservatives or people that would be willing to change the
Speaker 1: state of California. It once was a red state. Ronald
Speaker 1: Reagan was your governor. Richard Nixon was your governor. I
Speaker 1: know it's not anymore. Well, I think this recall is
Speaker 1: a great opportunity. The pandemic really opened people's eyes out
Speaker 1: here to the mismanagement because then it hit home their
Speaker 1: kids weren't in school, Sean. I have two nephews in
Speaker 1: Orlando who were in school the whole time, in front
Speaker 1: of a teacher, and parents here had their kids out
Speaker 1: for fifteen months and they're not even sure they're going
Speaker 1: to go back this September, small businesses were crushed, churches
Speaker 1: were shut down. The evangelical community, the religious community out
Speaker 1: in California, which is pretty large, believe it or not,
Speaker 1: is outraged and they're finally ready to take some action
Speaker 1: here because they saw that churches were shut down while
Speaker 1: strip clubs and pot shops stayed open. Uh, the pen,
Speaker 1: why would you ever call? Why would you? Why would
Speaker 1: you not? Why would you ever shut down a strip
Speaker 1: club and close the church. I'm trying to understrap my
Speaker 1: arms around that. You know where your priorities are. Pot
Speaker 1: shops are a priority and strip clubs are a priority
Speaker 1: for Gavin Newsom? Those aren't they going to spend one
Speaker 1: hundred million dollars to bail out the marijuana business out
Speaker 1: their recreational use marijuana? Well, the problem is is that
Speaker 1: Newsom led the charge to legalize it, and they were
Speaker 1: going to use it as a tax revenue raiser, and
Speaker 1: of course they taxed it so much that the black
Speaker 1: market is flourishing. It's it's it's you're you're right. The
Speaker 1: legal industry is floundering because they taxed it way too much.
Speaker 1: And you know why did they tax everything out here?
Speaker 1: Sean is because they have got these huge pension liabilities
Speaker 1: along with just the public unions that are controlling Sacramental
Speaker 1: and are continuing to get pays And why are they
Speaker 1: getting pay raises because the cost of housing is so
Speaker 1: significant Sean out here, out here, the cost of a typical,
Speaker 1: you know, three thousand square foot home could be a million,
Speaker 1: million and a a half dollars. It's insane level. It's just
Speaker 1: as bad in New York. It's insane. I gotta run.
Speaker 1: But there are a lot of good candidates, as I
Speaker 1: mentioned at the start of this half hour, that are running.
Speaker 1: I hope the people of California, and I have my doubts.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like I want Curtis Leod to win
Speaker 1: in New York as mayor. But you know, when you
Speaker 1: have nine to one registration Democrats to Republicans, it's tough.
Speaker 1: California is tough for any any Republican or even independent
Speaker 1: for crant out loud. But I hope people see just
Speaker 1: how damaging these policies have been and that they'll go
Speaker 1: out and vote. But John Cox, thanks for being well
Speaker 1: us well, I hope to be on again. And we've
Speaker 1: got nine million Independence as you know, I'm a businessman
Speaker 1: like the former president. He endorsed me in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 1: When I ran, I got a lot of votes and
Speaker 1: I built up name recognition, and I've had a business
Speaker 1: for forty years that I oh. I don't think there's
Speaker 1: any doubt. You and Caitlyn Jenner and if Larry got in,
Speaker 1: you would be the three top candidates. There's no doubt
Speaker 1: about it. Yeah. Well, I appreciate your help, and we're
Speaker 1: going to turn this state around, and we need an outsider,
Speaker 1: we need a business guy. Appreciate you being well us John,
Speaker 1: thank you. Eight hundred nine four one seun is our number.
Speaker 1: Quick break right back, all right, twenty five nowns at
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. Eight hundred and nine four
Speaker 1: one sean. If you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. I'm meant to bring this up earlier today.
Speaker 1: I didn't. I saw that somebody sent this to James,
Speaker 1: and James sent to me a tweet. But I guess
Speaker 1: the Virginia, Virginia Department of Health. Many are experiencing significant
Speaker 1: anxiety as the world slowly reopens. Joined VA copes Virginia
Speaker 1: Copes for a free virtual event. They give you the
Speaker 1: time coping with reentry anxiety. Look, I don't want to
Speaker 1: minimize any any Look, there are all sorts of illnesses, sicknesses,
Speaker 1: neurosis that people have in life. I don't want to
Speaker 1: I don't want to minimize it because, um, you know,
Speaker 1: people that have cancer, they're sick. If you have some
Speaker 1: type of of psychological issue, it's it's usually means you're sick.
Speaker 1: I get that part, and I want to take it
Speaker 1: very seriously. And I do take it very seriously. I'm
Speaker 1: you know, I'm just trying to put in perspective. Though
Speaker 1: maybe it's the way I was raised coping with re
Speaker 1: entry anxiety. I'm I'm struggling with it a little bit
Speaker 1: because you know, I think of America and Americans, and
Speaker 1: I think of real stress like my dad had to feel,
Speaker 1: you know, four years in the Pacific fighting in World
Speaker 1: War Two, or the real stress that a soldier felt,
Speaker 1: you know, lamming the beaches of Normandy, or what our
Speaker 1: soldiers felt in Iraq and Afghanistan and the many many
Speaker 1: tours that they took, and the real stress of the
Speaker 1: real world every single day. And I'm not minimizing it.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, Land of the Free, Home of the brave,
Speaker 1: and I just I don't see America or I don't
Speaker 1: really know many people that are struggling with re entry anxiety.
Speaker 1: And I asked my team about it, I mean, do
Speaker 1: you see this as a phenomenon, Linda. The response was,
Speaker 1: I don't think anybody knows anyone else. Everybody that I
Speaker 1: know is like, finally life is getting back to normal.
Speaker 1: That's what I'm seeing. I've been out in New York
Speaker 1: and I don't see any problem with people going out.
Speaker 1: People are all hell to get out. And the last
Speaker 1: time I was in New York, which was fairly recently,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of people wearing masks still, and I'm
Speaker 1: fine with that. If you want to wear your mask
Speaker 1: where every day of your life, I don't really care.
Speaker 1: But I mean, vaccine hesitancy, you know, this is I
Speaker 1: think a lot of it's created by the government and
Speaker 1: their mixed messages. You know, Biden's Health and Human Services
Speaker 1: secretary insisting the government as a right to know who
Speaker 1: refuses to get vaccinated. Now they're putting pressure. Now We're
Speaker 1: gonna go door to door and vaccinate people. Everybody's kind
Speaker 1: of made up their mind already. And again I'm urging
Speaker 1: people take this seriously. Take it seriously. I'm urging people
Speaker 1: do your research. There is a wealth of information out there.
Speaker 1: Know the difference between the m RNA vaccines Affisamderner versus
Speaker 1: A the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, which is the more
Speaker 1: traditional way of producing a vaccine, and know the differences
Speaker 1: of it. And you know when Joe Biden goes out
Speaker 1: there and he's fully vaccinated, etc. So I'm watching this
Speaker 1: and again I don't want to and I'm talking about
Speaker 1: the United States here. To me, it's sad that Olympic
Speaker 1: organizers now are banning all spectators from the Summer Olympic Games,
Speaker 1: Japan now declaring a state of emergency. Now America is
Speaker 1: doing And I said this from the very beginning in
Speaker 1: January or February January of twenty twenty, I said, I
Speaker 1: believe that modern medicine, medical researchers, our scientists will likely
Speaker 1: be the ones that save the world. Okay, well, they
Speaker 1: now have given people choices. We have therapeutics we've never
Speaker 1: had before. Turns out, many studies now says show taken early,
Speaker 1: hydroxy chloroquine is effective at mitigating some of the symptoms
Speaker 1: of COVID then you hear of medicines and therapeutics like ivermectin.
Speaker 1: Then of course there's regeneron the monocolonial antibodies that they
Speaker 1: infuse into people that have shown incredible recoveries and people.
Speaker 1: Then you got John Kerry caught maskless again, no mask
Speaker 1: a second time this year, or mixed messaging from them.
Speaker 1: Now Joe Biden walks outside, fully vaccinated, socially distant with
Speaker 1: a mask on. That makes no sense to me. Does
Speaker 1: a zoom call the only world leader with a mask on?
Speaker 1: Makes no sense to me. Vaccine hesitancy comes from moments
Speaker 1: like that the White House. Biden would certainly support states
Speaker 1: reimposing COVID nineteen restrictions. But what are you talking about.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows what's what the options available anyway, eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine for one Shaun is our number if you want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program. But it's and
Speaker 1: then they blame conservatives. I'm clear, do your research, take
Speaker 1: it seriously, talk to your doctor or doctor. I know
Speaker 1: nothing about your medical history. I am not equipped to
Speaker 1: tell people what to do, and I won't do it.
Speaker 1: All right, let's go to Travis Is in Arkansas, Travis
Speaker 1: High how are you glad you called. Yes, sir, I'm calling.
Speaker 1: A couple days ago, Biden administration, they were praising the
Speaker 1: eight hundred and something thousand job creation. My question is this,
Speaker 1: how many jobs were actually created versus how many jobs
Speaker 1: are actually recovered because during the pandemic we lost like
Speaker 1: twenty point six million million. Yeah, yeah, no, you're you're
Speaker 1: right now, right now, and this I reported this earlier. Today.
Speaker 1: US job openings hit a record nine point two million.
Speaker 1: Businesses cannot find enough workers to fill them. This is
Speaker 1: a you know, job opening stated or record high nine
Speaker 1: point two million. A third of former hospitality workers are
Speaker 1: not going to return to the industry during the labor
Speaker 1: shortage because they want higher pay, better benefits, and a
Speaker 1: new work environment. Many people don't want to come back.
Speaker 1: You know, look at everything. We're now paying more for
Speaker 1: one because of energy prices soaring thanks to Biden's stupid
Speaker 1: plans on energy and the New Green Deal. You know,
Speaker 1: up a bucket a quarter on average, a gallon more
Speaker 1: to heat and cool our homes. Every product we buy
Speaker 1: is costing more, and then then there's a shortage of
Speaker 1: so much. Lumber is through the roof, meat is through
Speaker 1: the roof, you know, I joke about going grocery shopping
Speaker 1: and I like my Oscar Meyer thick cut bacon. I'm
Speaker 1: paying eight bucks a pack for it. Now, it's a
Speaker 1: pretty hefty price. If you want patio furniture, you can't
Speaker 1: find it. You want to make money, I'll tell you what.
Speaker 1: Sell your patio furniture and then buy it in the
Speaker 1: next year or two, buy it back because you'll make
Speaker 1: a profit on it. But this is this is real.
Speaker 1: Then you've got a part of the country the believes
Speaker 1: in socialism, especially young people, have bought into the lie
Speaker 1: that the government will take care of them. You know,
Speaker 1: I'm a young person myself. I'm twenty twenty seven, twenty eight,
Speaker 1: three months and I disagree with the whole socialism and agenda.
Speaker 1: I mean, that is complete crap. The to me, it
Speaker 1: seems like the Biden aministration is trying to discredit our
Speaker 1: police force so that they might be able to initiate
Speaker 1: martial law. That way they can just rule forever. You know,
Speaker 1: I look at you know, look at hr SR one
Speaker 1: now that they have to back off of that. Look
Speaker 1: at the Democrats, you know, actually the ones that didn't
Speaker 1: recognize riots for being riots, that only want to talk
Speaker 1: about January sixth, which I said, can never happen again.
Speaker 1: And and but they ignored, and they even aided and
Speaker 1: embedded and promote to bail funds for people involved in
Speaker 1: writing and people responsible for hurling bricks and bottles and
Speaker 1: rocks and molotov coptails at cops. And they denied. They
Speaker 1: never mentioned it at the Democratic National Convention. They didn't
Speaker 1: want to alienate what they thought was the base of
Speaker 1: their party. I mean, now they're going to say, well,
Speaker 1: Republicans are for defunding. No, even the Washington Post says
Speaker 1: that is a huge lie. It's not true, and it is.
Speaker 1: You know, we're in the middle of and I don't
Speaker 1: know how this plays out what I'm calling irreconcilable differences.
Speaker 1: I don't know where I don't see any middle ground.
Speaker 1: Fund the police or defund the police, law and order
Speaker 1: or anarchy. You know, how do you compromise on that
Speaker 1: secure the border, open borders, amnesty, energy and dependence or
Speaker 1: new Green Deal and full dependence on countries that hate
Speaker 1: our guts? You know, how do you reconcile lower taxes
Speaker 1: versus total complete redistribution and the government provides everything and
Speaker 1: That's why twenty twenty two is becoming more pivotal and
Speaker 1: more important every day. Anyway, I hope that answers your call.
Speaker 1: Thank you, James North Carolina. Next Sean Hannity Show, How
Speaker 1: are you, James, How you doing, Sean? Thanks for taking Micole?
Speaker 1: Thank you sir. I just you touch from the aroarted
Speaker 1: sessterday and how do you thank Even if you know
Speaker 1: it was proved to be true that Trump wons Arizona,
Speaker 1: that nothing would come of it, And I think that's
Speaker 1: probably the biggest mistake we'd ever do, is to let
Speaker 1: nothing come out of it, because I think the word
Speaker 1: that really we need to take into mind here is accountability,
Speaker 1: because if we let this go, then the will of
Speaker 1: the people, which is the foundation of the country has
Speaker 1: been shattered and the establishment literally stole the government right
Speaker 1: in front of our eyes, which is something of foreign
Speaker 1: power could only dream of. People want to trick every
Speaker 1: Republican into any interview in the mainstream media mob and
Speaker 1: oh do you think the election was rigged? The answer
Speaker 1: is simple is the laws of many states were not followed. Constitution.
Speaker 1: The Constitution and states were not followed. You had a
Speaker 1: two tier voting standard in Georgia a very lack standard
Speaker 1: for mail in ballots at a very rigorous standard for
Speaker 1: in person voting. You can't have that in an election
Speaker 1: you had in Pennsylvania. You have a constitution and the
Speaker 1: state legislature. Rather than go through the arduous process of
Speaker 1: amending the constitution, which they would have the right to do,
Speaker 1: they decided to just ignore it and circumvented and circumvent
Speaker 1: it's very clear language that they only allowed very specific
Speaker 1: and very limited mail in balloting. That happened too. We
Speaker 1: read the four three decision. It was a stinging dissent
Speaker 1: by the Chief Justice in Wisconsin about how the laws
Speaker 1: of Wisconsin were not followed. Most of the states that
Speaker 1: we're talking about have laws statutory language that allows partisan
Speaker 1: observers to watch the vote count from start to finish.
Speaker 1: We're now learning that in Georgia there are counties that
Speaker 1: never accounted for the chain of custody as the law requires. So,
Speaker 1: you know, if we want integrity in elections and confidence
Speaker 1: in election results, you've got to at least implement the
Speaker 1: things that I've been talking about. I'll give you the
Speaker 1: last word. Yeah, and I understand that I wasn't to
Speaker 1: yourself all the time. But my thing is, I mean,
Speaker 1: you could put those the safeguards to place all day,
Speaker 1: but if you never hold anybody accountable for the previous wrongs,
Speaker 1: they're just going to do it again. It's just like
Speaker 1: you always talk about in New York. You get arrested,
Speaker 1: you get till you get put back. Well, if I'm
Speaker 1: the established man, I can see you and get away
Speaker 1: with it, well I'm gonna do it again. I mean
Speaker 1: we have well, well, what do you think the criminals
Speaker 1: out in San Francisco that are not gonna They're told
Speaker 1: they're not going to be arrested as long as they
Speaker 1: don't steal more than a thousand dollars, and they're just
Speaker 1: stealing nine hundred bucks worth of stuff and walking out
Speaker 1: of stores. I mean, that's my point. I mean, and
Speaker 1: that's a petty criminal. If you look at somebody with
Speaker 1: powerful connections, they get to get away with it all
Speaker 1: the time. I mean, I mean, it's Banana Republic stuff.
Speaker 1: And we got we got to stand strong and hold
Speaker 1: people account I've been telling everybody, talk to your state legislature,
Speaker 1: state Senate, get the laws, get the integrity measures I
Speaker 1: talk about. We have forty five seconds left. We're giving
Speaker 1: it to Michael and New York. Michael, you got to
Speaker 1: talk fast, Hey, Sean, thanks for taking me. I really
Speaker 1: loved your segment with Curtis yesterday. And living in Manhattan
Speaker 1: now for eighteen years, paying the type of taxes and
Speaker 1: watching my city crumble. We need someone like Curtis and
Speaker 1: leaderships and take us back to the Giuliani days where
Speaker 1: we felt safe to walk our streets and walk around
Speaker 1: and be able to go freely and not have to
Speaker 1: worry about mental health issues as you discussed, and about homelessness,
Speaker 1: especially in front of our small businesses that are dying
Speaker 1: out daily, and just something I wanted to say. I
Speaker 1: also really loved your town hall with President Trump last week.
Speaker 1: Thank you for doing that, and thanks for taking me.
Speaker 1: And I'll let you have the final word, all right, Michael,
Speaker 1: appreciate the call. Yeah, I mean, the only question I
Speaker 1: have is and the law and order got Julianni elected.
Speaker 1: Curtis is running as an independent. He's also on the
Speaker 1: Republican line too, and if those policies are re implemented,
Speaker 1: guess what, New York will come back bigger and better
Speaker 1: than ever. If they're not, it's gonna deteriorate daily. We
Speaker 1: see it every day. All right, that's gonna wrap things
Speaker 1: up at today. But Hannity Tonight, ninet Eastern on Fox,
Speaker 1: there is a group running a campaign multimillion dollars our
Speaker 1: ad campaign against woke corporations. We'll find out what that's
Speaker 1: all about. Also, Mark Meadows, Steve Miller, Greg Jarrett, Tonight,
Speaker 1: nine Eastern, Say DVR, Hannity, Fox News. We'll see you tonight,
Speaker 1: back here tomorrow. Thanks for being with us, and yes,
Speaker 1: we never forget. The show is made possible by all
Speaker 1: of you. We can't thank you enough. See you tonight,