WEBVTT - Wednesday's Debate: Bret Baier Talks To A&G

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>What a pleasure this is to chat with Brett Bear.

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Brett is the anchor and executive director of Special Report

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with Brett Baer, the best Damn newscast on the TV,

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>cable or broadcast. Brett is also co moderating the first

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Republican debate of the cycle with the fabulous Martha McCallum.

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Brett, how are you, sir, Hey, how are you warning?

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 2>We're pretty good.

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's get the big orange elephan in the corner

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of the room out of the way. Trump has announced

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he's skipping the debate in favor of an online interview.

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that says about his relationship with

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party at this point?

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't know if I can divine what he

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>thinks about the you know, the Republican Party or the relationship.

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 2>I do think that there's probably disappointment at the RANC

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>that he's not showing up. We were prepared either way,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and really this is about, you know, all of these

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 2>candidates getting a moment to introduce themselves and also to

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 2>talk about substance. You know, it's a lot of time

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>that now is the time that people start to focus

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 2>in a presidential year, the kids back in school, you're

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>done with summer vacation, and this is the first big event.

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>And you know, if you look at poles, some sixty

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 2>three percent say that they'll they probably or definitely are

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 2>open to voting for somebody else besides the former president.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 2>So you know, whether it's his relationship, eventually, he's probably

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to get on more of these stages.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would like to point out that that first

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 3>question was under protest from me. I didn't want to

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 3>mention Trump at all because it's driving me crazy when

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 3>I watched the Sunday talk shows that every candidate, many

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 3>of whom I don't know at all, they don't get

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to talk about anything except for Trump, I mean, on

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>face ination meet the presidenty of these shows, not the

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 3>same one Fox Sunday, but the other show. So I

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 3>look forward to some policy discussions other than that, for instance,

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 3>And I know you know this because you interviewed Chris

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 3>Christy a couple of weeks ago, and Chris Christie was

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>the most pro Ukraine person maybe of anybody outside of

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 3>President Zelinsky that I've heard, calling it a proxy war

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 3>against China and everything like that. Know where Ramaswami is

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 3>on that, and he's the flavor of the month, So

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean there's a great conflict there. Can you can

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 3>you poke them with sticks and get them going with

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 3>that that conversation.

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one hundred percent. And there's a number of those

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 2>issues where the stage is split in these different candidates

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 2>how they look at things. And this is not just

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>a Q and A. You know, a debate is a debate,

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 2>and so we're going to try to foster some of

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 2>that back and forth between candidates and we'll let it

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 2>free flow for a little while. We're going to try

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 2>to keep him in the guardrails. But you know, we've

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 2>done this kind of thing before and had some success.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 2>So we've been structuring questions like that so that viewers

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 2>at home really get a sense of the different sides

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 2>of the Republican Party on the same issue.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>We've observed on the show many times that this is

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of a strange time politically in that the party

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't set the platform and then choose a candidate to

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>reflect the platform. Often the candidate declares what the platform is.

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think these debates have elevated him importance. We

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 1>might hear what the Republican platform is likely to be

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday night.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, one hundred percent. And I mean you look at

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 2>controversial issues like Ukraine, as you mentioned, you look about

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 2>you look at abortion, which Republicans have been you know,

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 2>politically on the backside of as far as these referendums

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>around the country, and they haven't really talked with one

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 2>voice about how they're going to address that issue. And

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a few others and which these individual candidates have thoughts.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 2>And you're right, if they become the nominee, by the way,

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 2>on the same stage that we'll be doing the debate

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 2>on in July next year, they'll they'll take the party nomination.

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 2>If they become the nominee, they'd essentially become the party platform.

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I know you've done this a bunch of times. How

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 3>do you decide how closely to stick to the rules,

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>because I always feel like a lot of candidates are

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>rewarded for breaking the rules. You know, you're not supposed

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 3>to jump in or whatever, but you jump in with

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 3>your zinger in the crowd roars and it becomes the

0:03:57.480 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 3>clip of the night.

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to listen. It's it's you have to

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 2>see the moment and kind of feel the room. You

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 2>are trying to keep them to time. You're trying to

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 2>keep them by the rules. But there'll be certain times

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 2>when you're trying to foster that interaction you've got. You know,

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>we'll find out this morning eight or nine people on stage,

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>and that's you know, a lot of folks. It's spending

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of plates to make sure it's equitable.

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing that's always driven us crazy about debates,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>especially on some of the other networks, is every single

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 1>question is from a progressive point of view. Instead of

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>asking why is it important to reinstall fiscal sanity in Washington,

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>d C? They'll say, why do you want to starve

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>old people? We're looking forward to hearing questions from a

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>more conservative point of view. Are you conscious of that

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>as you prepare? Does that just kind of come naturally?

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a little bit of osmosis. After being

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 2>at talks for twenty six years, sure, and I get

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the other side. You know, there's always another side to

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the mainstream media's portrayal of some issue, and largely we're

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 2>we're doing that every day. But right you're gonna hear

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 2>questions that come from both angles, and definitely things that

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 2>conservatives you know, want to hear if you ask Republicans

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 2>in a separate poll what's most important to them, you're

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 2>going to see and hear the buckets of questions that

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 2>deal with those topics.

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 3>How are they going to be lined up on the stage?

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I are you gonna have since Trump's not there? Are

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 3>you going to have destantus in the middle and then

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 3>like Ramaswami next to him and poor Asa Hutchinson down

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 3>by the exit? Or how's that going to work?

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Basically it's the top percentage. She gets closest to

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 2>the middle, and then you go out from there. Uh

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 2>and yeah, I mean the stage is really great. It's

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>set up fantastic. It's you know, where the Milwaukee Bucks play.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a great impressive facility. And you know Fox, our

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 2>team does a really good job. So you'll be able

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to see it and hear it. That will look good.

0:06:08.279 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>The question is how the candidates do, and that's up

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 2>to them.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, and we're really looking forward to seeing it. But

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>just one more question about debates in general. We're both

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>anti audience. Well, we think it's a distraction people yelling

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>how about just let the ideas stand up for themselves.

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>But we're we're probably going to tiny minority, I guess,

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>because there's always an audience. Why is that, do you think?

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's a big event. The RNC is

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 2>in charge of this operation. So they bring in people

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 2>from around the country, all of their big donors, all

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 2>their big rigs, and they want to pack the stands

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and show them a good time, etcetera, etcetera. So it's

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity for them. We're not running that part of

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 2>the show, but I can tell you this that we're

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 2>not going to let the audience, you know, get out

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 2>of control. You know, I give a little speech before

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>we start. The more time that we have to stop

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>or audience applause or interaction, the left time you're going

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>to hear from these can of it's on the issues

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>that you want to hear about. Sometimes that works. Sometimes

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>you got to stop and remind them, but we'll keep

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 2>it going.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's worth mentioning all the time. You know, as

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 3>a moderator, moderators get beat up bad. I mean, you

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 3>know jankless task Yeah, no kidding, I mean I wouldn't

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 3>want to read Twitter that night if I were you.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 2>No, that's right. If I can get out of this

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 2>with Martha and I unscathed and not the focus.

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Right, We'll be a good thing, right, that's the goal, Brett.

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>We are a big big fans of yours. Keep doing

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a terrific job. You've got a great team there at

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Special Report. And I hope this isn't our last chat.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Good luck on Wednesday night.

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Well love it, Thanks, I appreciate it.