WEBVTT - From the Vault: Split Brain, Part 1

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My name

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Time for a vault episode, a classic episode of Stuff

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind. This is a part one of

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>our exploration of the split brain experiments. This episode was

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>originally published January. If you have not listened to these episodes,

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you've probably listened to episodes where we refer back to him,

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>or even older episodes where we kind of laid the

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>ground work for actually doing this exploration, because this is

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>an important topic. You know, how does our brain work,

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>What happens and what is revealed when there is a

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>division in the brain when hemispheres are separated from each other.

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>There's some groundbreaking experiments that we cover in these episodes. Yeah,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>this pair of episodes is one of my favorites, and

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoy it. The powers of Hide seem

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to have grown with the sickliness of Jackal, and certainly

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the hate that now divide did them was equal on

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>each side. With Jekyll, it was a thing of vital instinct.

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>He had now seen the full deformity of that creature

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that shared with him some of the phenomena of consciousness,

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and was co heir with him to death and beyond

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>these links of community, which in themselves made the most

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>poignant part of his distress. He thought of hide for

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>all his energy of life, as of something not only

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>hellish but inorganic. This was the shocking thing that the

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>slime of the pit seemed to utter, cries and voices,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that the amorphous dust gesticulated and sinned, that what was

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>dead and had no shape should usurp the offices of life.

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff to blow your mind from how Stuff

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>works Dot Carl, Hey, you welcome to stuff to blow

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>your mind. My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>McCormick and Robert. Why are you reading Robert Lewis even Sanadas? Oh?

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Because that's from the strange case of Dr Jackal and

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Mr Hyde from eighteen eighty six, and it concerns the

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>idea of there being two entities within the human skull,

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 1>two entities within the mind, indeed, two minds within the brain.

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is an interesting place to start

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>because while it presents a very erroneous vision of the

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>lateralization of human brain function, it also uh it gets

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>some of the same like hair standing up on the

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>back of the neck that the actual research we're going

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about today does, at least for me.

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean, Robert Louis Stevenson was a fabulous

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>writer and he's he's one of those authors that you

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>can read today and it holds up so well. Did

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>they ever make a good Jekyl and Hyde movie. It's

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>been a very long time since I've saw it, but

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>there was an adaptation and may have been a TV

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>adaptation with Michael Caine Michael Kine. Yeah, and I remember

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>really loving that and being quite disturbed by it as

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a child. Now, I was thinking there had to be

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a Jekyl and Hyde with Tim Curry as Jacky and Hide.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think maybe I'm confusing that with the Muppet

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Treasure Island where he's uh, you're thinking of the Muppet

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Jackal and high. He's long, John self man, that scene

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>where he tramples Kermit to death is brutal. Well, yeah,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so so we are. We are beginning with kind of

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>an erroneous model. But but I think helpful and because

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it is often easy to think of the brain as

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the thing itself, right, we fall into this center our

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mode of of of of you know, the thinking of

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the brain body relationship as being a rider and its horse,

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>when instead it is more this idea of a centaur.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 1>This this this one single entity, um, you know, and honestly,

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>we see this reflected in so many real and fictional scenarios. Uh.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Take for instance, the late physicist Stephen Hawking a brilliant

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>brain within a body that was gradually paralyzed by motor

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>neuron disease. Or just look to our dreams in which

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the inner world of the brain runs wild while the

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>body goes on lockdown. Uh, you know, think of our imaginings,

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>our inner thoughts versus our outer smile and then they're

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>all those disembodied brains and science fiction right from Crying

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and his robot body and teenaging Ninja Turtles to the

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Brain that Wouldn't Die Cane and RoboCop to one of

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the best I know that's one of one of your

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>favorites as well, greatest of all time Lovecraft, the Whisper

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and Darkness, and so many Doctor Who characters, is especially

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the Daleks brain guy from MST three K. We just

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.360
<v Speaker 1>keep keep coming up with these these visions of the

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>brain as they just sort of the central human thought experience.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I never thought of this until now, but

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>actually the brain guy from Mystery Science Theater is kind

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of a great illustration of Daniel Dennett's short story thought experiment,

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>where am I I wonder if there was any connection there,

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>so I gonna have to have to have to reach

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>out to the MST guys on that. You know, there

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>are those like plot lines where his brain gets separated

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from him as somewhere else. Um, of course, we know

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that things are not this simple. No brain is an island.

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>It's affected by a host of outside influences, including all

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>sorts of environmental nervous stimuli. And we're learning more and

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more about the role of our microbiome and various parasites

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in human cognition. But even if we're to to distrib

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>away all of that, even we're actually to become a

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>brain and a tank, you know, Kane's brain in RoboCop

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>two or or any of these sci fi visions take

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>out all that external stuff just the brain, we still

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>have to contend with the fact that the brain, like

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a government, is composed of different houses. The brain consists

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of two cerebral hemispheres connected by the corpus colossum. Uh,

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 1>each each hemisphere with many different modules, all of these

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>acting in concert with each other, all of it interconnected. Yeah.

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 1>One comparison I've seen in some of the neuroscience research

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.119
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at today is that the brain is often

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>described as a computer, you know, or by the metaphor

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>of a computer. You know. It's not that it is

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a computer, but that Yeah, there's the analogy that the

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>brain is like a computer in the different parts of

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the brain, or maybe sort of like different programs that

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>run on that computer. But at least to one researcher

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we were reading, I said, maybe it's more accurate to

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>think of the brain not as a computer running different software,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but as a vast network of computers that are each

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>capable of operating independently, but most of the time operate

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in in tandem. It's right. This is an example where

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>if you don't really have much of an understanding of

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>how computer works, the the the idea of thinking of

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the human mind as a computer as technology is more harmful.

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you have, if you have a better understanding

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>of how computer actually works, it could perhaps be a

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>more helpful metaphor Cuttle cat cuttle fish to the second

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:44.799
<v Speaker 1>oil Age Kingdom with or darkness. I don't dispute the eurostata,

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but if he's down here, we know not blood but darkness,

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the earth's black riches. No I could taste it on

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>my lips. Today, I want to talk to you about

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the science of transgenesis terms genesist show. Now. I wanted

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to to I thoink it would be helpful to just

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and consider one particular question right up top now.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And we've certainly received questions like this following episodes in

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>which brain hemispheres are discussed, such as our discussions on

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the bicameral mind hypothesis or the alphabet in the Goddess.

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Because there's this kind of pop understanding, right that each

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>side of our brain controlled certain aspects of being, and

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that certain individuals have certain leanings that you know you

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have right brain people, left brain people, and that when

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that we can reconnect with our less favored hemisphere. Now,

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there certainly are some pieces of evidence that we're gonna

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>look at in this episode that certain functions of human

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>life are strongly lateralized in one half of the brain

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>or the other, but they're not necessarily these functions or

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>personality traits that are understood in popular consciousness, like logic

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and creativity, right like taking or that you're gonna take

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a quiz online and find out if

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you're a right or lefty in terms of your brain. Now,

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these ideas apparently were popularized by nineteen

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine book titled Drawing on the Right Side of

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the Brain by Betty Edwards uh and and the downstream

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>myth that kind of you know, took over a popular

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>culture for a little bit. There is that, yeah, you

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>had left side logic, right side creativity, And even in

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>people who know better people, we still talk like this.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed that I use this metaphor even though I

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>know it's wrong. Like I will sometimes think of people

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>as being very right brained or very left brained, even

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>though that I know that that I've read before about

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>how that's not correct. Well, likewise, if I hear it

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned sanny yoga class, I'm going to be less inclined.

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to be the jerk in the yoga

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>class that like perks up and says, actually there's some

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting you know, I'm gonna set back and enjoy the

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>class because because it's one of those things that can

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>can feel true, right. But the idea goes back further

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>than this particular book. I mean, it goes back to

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the earlier discoveries that we're going to discuss

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>here about hemispheric division. Um. You know, the ideas of

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>neurologist Paul Broca who lived eighteen four through eighty French

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>neurologist or Carl Vernica who lived who live eighteen forty

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>eight through nineteen o five, a German. They studied patients

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>who had communication troubles due to brain injury um, such

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know, left temporal lobe injuries, and they figured

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that this was the language center. Thus language was left

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere focus. And this is one thing that actually has

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>been more born out by good research in in the

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>history of neuroscience, is that one thing it's very clear

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the left hemisphere of the brain does, is it is

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>dominant in language function. Yes, it's not that the right

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>brain can't do any language, but it can't do a

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of language certainly can't do what the left

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>hemisphere do. Right. Uh, now, we we kicked off the

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>episode with reading from Robert Louis Stevenson against Scottish author.

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>He lived eighteen fifty eight. And according to neuroscientist Elizabeth Waters,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>who's put together some you know, wonderful ted talks and

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>ted ed videos about this, uh this, this, uh this topic,

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>she points out that Robert Lewis Stevenson, in his book

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Strange Case of Dr Checkl and Mr Hyde, presented the

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>notion of a logical left hemisphere that is in combat

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in you know, in in in in this uh this

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>struggle with an emotional right hemisphere, and uh it's It's

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>also worth noting that Robert Lewis Stevenson was also inspired

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>by two popular French cases of individuals who exhibited dual personalities,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>uh their name. They were credited as being uh Felida

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>X and Sergeant Fay. And these were apparently cases that

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 1>were really you know, well covered in French and British

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>press at the time. You know, it's kind of popular

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>science influencing, uh, popular science fiction. Do you have any

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>sense of whether what was presented to the public about

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>these cases was largely accurate or was mis leading? I don't,

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'd love to go back and look at it,

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>because if you know, this is a case where you

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can the science influences the science fiction, and the science

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>fiction influences, uh to a certain extent, how the public

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>thinks about a given topic. Now, other another influence on

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Robert Louis Stevenson. Apparently he had a just a terribly

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>high fever uh at one point during which he claimed

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to have experienced a split into which he experienced quote

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>myself and quote that other fellow. Yeah, so this apparently

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>had a big influence on him. An according to biograph

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for Claire Harmon, author of Myself and the Other Fellow,

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>duality and the idea of the double self turn up

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>again and again in Robert Louis Stevenson's work. Well, maybe

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm over interpreting here, and this could be just kind

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of a mundane parallel, but I mean I see stuff

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>like that even in Treasure Island, you know, his adventure

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>where long John Silver is at the same time a

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a pay sand and sort of good father figure and

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 1>also an evil pirate. Yeah. Yeah, this is the the

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>argument here, is, yeah, that this is the type of

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>duality that that he was obsessed with, and and so

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>much of it, so many of his works, I mean,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially had a fever induced psychedelic experience and then this

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>lining up with various elements of his of his life.

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is the meat he chewed upon. But

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, this popular understanding of the left right division,

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that like the side ruled by passion and

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the right brain and the side ruled by logic and

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>reason and the left brain. That's not exactly right, right,

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we'll explore, doctors actually looked to patients

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>with missing brain hemispheres or separated hemispheres, and as appealing

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>as this notion, maybe it didn't really hold up. I mean,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they were all still logical and creative beings. You didn't

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>just end up with us, you know, a Spock or

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever the opposite of Spock would be in the Star

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Trip universe. To be clear, though, Yeah, the brain is

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>divided into two hemispheres and internal regions like the striatum,

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the hypothalamus, the thalamus, and the brainstem. They're also organized

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with left and right sides as well, despite appearing to

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be continuous when you when you sort of look at

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>illustrations of them. Yeah, and for the rest of the

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this episode, in fact, this is gonna be the first

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of two episodes we're going to be looking at ways

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that despite this uh, this like emotional versus logical split

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 1>being wrong, there are very interesting ways that the brain

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>hemispheres are different and do different things. In fact, well,

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we can start with the mundane ones I guess right,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>like mundane motor control differences. Exactly, we can look to

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the two arms and legs. For instance, the right hemisphere

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of the brain controls the left arm and leg, the

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>left hemisphere controls the right armand leg. Now I have

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>read that in a way like both hemispheres can in

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>some way to some degree control both arms. But that

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>when he gets done to like fine motor control of

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>like controlling the actions of the hand especially, that's where

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.079
<v Speaker 1>he gets really lateralized and like it's really going to

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>be your right rain that's controlling what your left hand

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>does with its fingers. Now, a more complex example is

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in but one that's extremely important is each eye has

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a left and right visual field, with the left visual

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>field sent to the right hemisphere and the right field

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>sent to the left hemisphere. Now, this can also be

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>misunderstood because I've seen it represented in the press in

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>places that where like the left eye goes to the

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>right hemisphere and the right eye goes to the left hemisphere.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's not quite right either, because both hemispheres can

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>get some information from both eyes. But it has to

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>do with the side of the visual field that you're

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>talking a right, So like stuff that you perceive over

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to the left part of what you're looking at that

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>goes to the right hemisphere, and stuff you perceive over

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in the right area of what you're looking at to

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the right of your center of vision that goes to

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the left hemisphere. And then our visual experience of reality

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>it comes together from these two feeds. Movement and vision

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>depend in on this uni hemispheric relationship. Now, why do

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>our brains work this way? Yeah? Why the crossover? Why

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>don't you just go straight up parallel? It's one of

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>those things about the humanivice. It seems needlessly complicated, right um,

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is we're not entirely sure. One theory

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that has been discussed is that animals developed more as

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>as animals developed more advanced nervous systems, there was an

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>advantage in escaping to the right if something came at

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you from the left. So these are examples where we

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>can actually look to specific hemispheres and say here, here

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>here's where they're most active. But we can't easily extend

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>this idea to other aspects of cognition, and certainly not

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to the overall human experience or things like pure logical

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking or creativity. No, not that. But there are some

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>cognitive functions that do appear to be pretty strongly lateralized

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in one way or another, and one of them, obviously

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is language. We mentioned this, Yeah, that's localized to the left,

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>especially complex language and the power of speech. There's some

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>research indicating that like the right brain might be able

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to have a sort of simple lexicon or understand very

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>simple bits of language, but if you want to generate

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a sentence like speak one out loud, or understand complex

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>instructions in language, this is usually going to be dominated

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>by processes in the left hemisphere. And we should also

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>say that everything we say about hemisphere is in this

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to be for most cases. There there

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>cases where this is reversed, where people have like the

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>switching of which hemisphere is dominant, but we're talking about

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the majority of cases here right now. Meanwhile, attention, we

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>see that more localized to the right hemisphere. Yeah, and

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this would be especially things like visual and spatial reasoning,

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like the right hemisphere is going to be very important

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>if you need to imagine a map in order to

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>give directions. So brain activity unbalancing, where one one side

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is more active in a given task than another. This

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this occurs based on which system is being employed in

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a given task, rather than anything about an individual or

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>their background of This is all, of course, assuming a

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>healthy brain. Obviously, if one side of your brain is missing,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be more activity beside it's there. Now,

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>no evidence suggests that individual individuals have truly dominant sides

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>of the brain when it comes to their you know,

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>their personality makeup, right, You're not like creative right brained

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>or logical left brain right And likewise that the logic

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and creativity split idea. Uh you know again, you'll have

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>individuals that are certainly more logical perhaps or more creative.

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But as as neuroscigned, as Elizabeth Waters has pointed out

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>among many others, logic and creativity are not these two

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>distinct notions. You know, they're deeply interlinks. Yeah, Like being

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>good at logic is in many cases being a certain

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>type of creative. Yeah, I mean, what you might dismiss

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>is just a really logical exercise, like safe solving a

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 1>complex math problem that may well require that will require

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>some creative thinking. Likewise, a creative endeavor like say, writing

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a poem, finishing a novel, coming up with a cool joke, whatever,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are gonna going to be activities that

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>also involve logic. In fact, some of what we're going

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to discuss in this pair of episodes in in the

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience research turns this whole thing on its head in

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a way, because the left part of the brain that's

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>more dominant in exercises involving speech and language often tends

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to be the more creative one in explaining behaviors. Right

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it's the one that tends to interpret and come up

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>with explanations for things, as will as well talk about

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>later on, which is a creative exercise, whereas the right

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>brain tends to more often be the part of the

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>brain that records experiences accurately without creating explanations for them exactly.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And but but certainly, if I'm gonna, you know, drive

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>home anything, we want to point out that that the

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>creativity logic anything that employs these these two loose idea,

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, buckets of of of cognition. You know, these

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.959
<v Speaker 1>are going to be products of whole brain cognition like

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>our our the brain is all these areas of the

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>brain are working together, uh to create this effect. Now,

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>ultimately in this episode we're going to be asking what

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>happens when you cut those two hemispheres of the brain apart. Yes,

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but I guess we'll have to get to that after

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a break. Than alright, we're back now. Before we get

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to the idea of severing the brain hemispheres, we should

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>probably talk about a little more about Broca and Vernica. Yeah,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>these are just two really key individuals to this whole

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>discussion and even just the idea of understanding the human brain.

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Um So Paul Broca will start with him again eighteen

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty He was a French surgeon, neurologist and anthropologists. And

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>he is also for anyone who hasn't read the book

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>but has seen the title, he is the namesake for

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Carl Sagan's book Broke His Brain. Sagan describes at one

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>point point holding a jar are containing the noted scientist's

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>brain weight like imagining doing this literally doing literally doing it? Okay,

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>holding holding the jar that contains his brain, and then

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about like what you know, talking He talks a

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>bit about Broca and and and you know, his his work,

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>his personality, but also just sort of meditates on what

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>you're doing when you when you hold this brain in

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>your hands. I want to imagine that, having not read

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this book, it is in fact just like a caper story,

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>with Broker's brain as the MacGuffin, and it gets traded

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>around and their car chases, Sagan's trying to get it

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>back from the KGB spies. Uh no, not quite, but

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Dante Skull shows up as well. Oh nice, so broken.

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Though he made important contributions to our understanding of cancer,

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the treatment of aneurysms and aphasia and his Sagan pointed out,

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Broca was also quite concerned with the medical care of

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the poor. He was you know, he was. He was

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a free thinker. He was a strong darwin supporter, and

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 1>above just about everything, he was the founder of modern

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>brain surgery. And Broco was influential in identifying regions of

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the brain as being especially responsible for certain cognitive functions. Right. Yeah,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>he investigated the rheinan cephalon the smell brain. But his

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>name actually goes to a small region in the left

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 1>frontal lobe of the cerebral cortex what we call Broca's area. UH.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>This is left hemisphere, third frontal convolution. To be specific,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the area where articulate speech is largely localized

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and controlled. And his Segan pointed out given the importance

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of language and articulate speech and human evolution, this portion

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of the human brain may be considered, in Sagan's words,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the seat of our humanity and some respects. And it's

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>also something anatomists have looked for in the remains of

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>our hominid ancestors, such as Homo habilists. Columbia University anthropologist

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Ralph Holloway Sagan sided us you know, studied and claimed

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to have found evidence for its development of a Broca's

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>area some two million years ago, and this would have

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.399
<v Speaker 1>been around the time early tool use was beginning. UH.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Also South African paleol anthropologist Philip Tobias also made this claim,

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>though according to Suzanne Kemer, associate professor of Linguistics at

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Rice University, quote, these claims have been controversial. Many see

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>no regular impressions that could be ascribed to brain structure here,

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I can imagine it's probably difficult to just look

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at skulls and figure out what brain regions were evolved when. Right,

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but Broke A's a discovery here, broke his namesake. Here

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is the first of many discoveries that illuminated hemispheric separation

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of function in the brain. And you know, and really

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>driving home the idea of the specific brain functions might

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>be isolated to specific parts of the brain. Yeah, if

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a certain part in the left hemisphere that seems

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>especially important for language, what else could be lateralized? Right now?

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Just to throw in the nowadays, you hear more talk

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of networks as opposed to regions again, getting in this

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that that that that we're looking at at a

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>network of of of different systems and not individual areas

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that are just doing all the heavy lifting. Yeah, your

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>brain is less like a computer maybe in more like

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the internet, right, but a conscious internet. That's scary. Uh

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>so horror movie pitch the conscious Internet. Uh yeah, and

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>then it takes physical form via three D printers. Right,

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But let's also talk about about the German Carl Vernica

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>okay live eight five a German. Yeah, both thus the Vernica,

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>uh he was he has another area of the brain

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that's name for him, the vernica area, and he first

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>described this area in eighteen seventy four, and it's found

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in the posterior third of the upper temporal convolution of

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the left hemisphere of the brain. It's close to the

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>auditory cortex and seems to play a unique role in

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the comprehension of sound and language reception and comprehension. So

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the stage is set to discuss the lateralization of certain

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>brain functions. But we mentioned earlier that this episode was

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>really gonna end up focusing on cutting brains in half.

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know you're out there saying, when are you

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>going to cut the brain in half? Robert, I think

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's time. We've got to make the incision. That's right,

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And what better time to just slice the human brain

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in half than the nineteen sixties and seventies. It's really perfect.

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you could really almost it's tempting to just

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>want to think like a left brain, rightlin brain, old

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>fashioned idea and have like the nineteen sixties hemisphere, in

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies hemisphere. Right, there's just something something perfect

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>about the post revolutionary hemisphere. Uh no, No, So we're

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about the research of neuroscientists named Roger

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Sperry and Michael Gazzaniga. And so actually the brain cutting

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>started in the nineteen forties, but it was in the

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties that the research on people with severed hemispheres

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>really got going, that's right. And they discovered something that's

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 1>that was seemingly amazing that if you split the brain,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>you that you essentially split the person as well in

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a certain sense and not in another sense. And we'll

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have to define that as we go on. But but

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but just think about it for a second. Just the

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the promise that the you know, the tease of this

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>idea that there would be one person per hemisphere of

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the brain, this division of the self. Getting back to

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>this idea in a certain sense of myself and the

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>other guy, right right, Oh, that's right. Uh, the Robert

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Louis Stevenson and uh. And this is work they would

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have eventually earned Sperry the Nobel Prize in Medicine in Now.

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>During this this these decades of research, Sperry performed experiments

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 1>on cats, monkeys, and humans and focus a lot of

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>attention on the neuron packed corpus colossum that bridges the hemispheres.

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>This is often described as sort of like a broadband

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>internet cable, like an internet backbone, fiber optic, or something

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>that connects the two hemispheres together and enables most of

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the exchange of information between them. Right now, with non

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>human animals, he surgically split the brains, producing what he

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>called a split brain, in which each side seemed to

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>function independently of the other. And he also found that

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>an animal with a split brain could memorize double the information.

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh I didn't read that. Yeah, that was a tidbit

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I ran across creepy now. Obviously him not being a

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>mad scientist villain in like a serial in a comic

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>book or something. He didn't split human brains just for experiment,

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Fortunately for him, there were already humans walking

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>around with split brains because they had had because there

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>were patients who had had their corpus colossum separated, uh

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>severed as a treatment for epilepsy, and so he was

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>able to get a number of these individuals to volunteer

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>for his experiments. Yes, so this procedure was not done

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for experiments, obviously, it was done as a medical treatment.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>And it's known as a corpus callosodomy, And so the

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>theory behind it was that an epileptic seizure is sort

0:26:56.920 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>of like a storm of activity in the brain with

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>too many neurons firing and triggering chaotic activity all throughout

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>both hemispheres, and the idea was if you cut the

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 1>corpus colossum, if you sever that broadband internet connection between

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the two hemispheres of the brain, you limit the ability

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of one of these seizures to spread from one hemisphere

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of the brain to the other. And in many cases

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>where severe epilepsy could not be treated by any other means,

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the surgery actually was considered effective, I think, especially later

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>versions of the surgery, less so in the forties, more

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>so I think in like the sixties on. But this

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>surgery generally isn't used today because we have on on

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the whole safer, better, less radical treatments for epilepsy now.

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>They're they're drugs that are pretty effective, and there are

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>less radical surgeries you can do. And it's not known

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly how many patients ever received a corpus colisotomy, and

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>history I've seen estimates including somewhere between fifty and a

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred total patients. I've read Michael Gazaniga estimated that there

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>were over a hundred patients who had received And now,

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously not all of these patients volunteered for split brain

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>neurology research, but some did. And one of the really

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting things to point out is that we'll have to

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>keep coming back to this is that despite the radical

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>nature of this surgical intervention, cutting the two hemispheres apart

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and basically preventing them from communicating with one another, most

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>patients reported that their lives were generally normal after the surgeries.

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Their families did not usually report any major changes in behavior, personality,

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>or cognitive ability. Uh. Michael Kazanaga says that generally, quote,

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't know it if you were talking to such

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a patient. Yeah, I've read that. The really the only

0:28:40.440 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>notable results of this, outside of, you know, perhaps some

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>experimental of the stuff that's gonna come up, was that

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have the seizures anymore. Yeah, like that. That

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>was the goal, and that was the the the primary

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of experiential difference. By and large, people underwent this procedure.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It cut the two halves of their brain apart, and

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they seemed mostly unchanged. Now. On the other hand, I

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>have read some anecdotes about changes certain patients faced, especially

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>right after the surgery, during like an adaptation period. For example,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>article in Nature News by David Woolman recounts the experiences

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of a patient named Vicky, who received a calasotomy in

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy nine to treat terrible caesar she was having.

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a story that her seizures were so bad that

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 1>one time she like fell on a stove and burned

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>her back while she was having one. Um. And so

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 1>she says that for the first few months after her surgery,

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>she would stand in the grocery store trying to pick

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>items off of the shelf, but having severe difficulty just

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>picking up items. She says, quote, I'd reach with my

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>right right hand for the thing I wanted, but the

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>left would come in and they'd kind of fight, almost

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>like repelling magnets. Uh. And she would apparently have similar

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>troubles when trying to get dressed in the morning. Wolman writes, quote,

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Vicky couldn't reconcile what she wanted to put on with

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>what her hands were doing. Sometimes she ended up wearing

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>three outfits at once and then Vicky says, quote, I'd

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>have to dump all the clothes on the bed to

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>catch my breath and start again. And I've read other

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>accounts along these lines that a few split brain patients

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>described things like that this was one image one hand

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>buttoning up a shirt and the other hand following immediately

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>behind it and unbutton ing all the buttons. But these

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of these type of descriptions are apparently not typical.

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Most reports indicate that people's behavior, cognitive ability, personality, all

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that is mostly unchanged. And even in Vicki's case, after

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>about a year, she was mostly back to normal in

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of everyday activities. She says, she could, you know,

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>slice vegetables, to cook and and operate machines and all that.

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And this is in line with other reports. Amazingly, you

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can completely sever the connection between the two hemispheres of

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the brain, and most of the people you do this

0:30:55.960 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to function normally in day to day life afterwards, before

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>even get to the other strange stuff we're talking about,

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that in itself seems crazy. Yeah, I am just always

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>amazed when you when you hear about the things that

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>can be done to the brain and the ways that

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the brain can can can bounce back and and behave

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>just relatively normally or just or seemingly completely normally. Even

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the face of catastrophic injuries, the brain can often

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 1>find a way, the mind uh finds a way. But

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, despite these reports that people are generally unchanged,

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:32.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're about to talk about is that if you

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and what Sperry and Gazaniga discovered is if you apply

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>some special conditions in the lab, you can see some

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>really strange and thrilling things at work in the split

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>brain patients. Yeah, the crux of this comes down to

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the very visual processing we discussed earlier. Left visual field,

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>right side of the brain, right visual side field, left

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>side of the brain. So in a split brain, the

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 1>left side of the brain can't see the left field

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of vision and the right side of the brain can't

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>see the right visual field, or generally can't generally, Yeah,

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, and we'll we'll get into the meat of

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>this in a minute. But but it's going to lead

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to split brain cats with eye patches and split brain

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>monkeys with memorization. Because, as we mentioned again, he did

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>conduct animal experiments to see how this UH to to

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to reveal what was going on. And the animal experiments

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were very they produced very strange and fascinating results. But

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you always wonder, well, okay, you know, animal brains are

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.719
<v Speaker 1>just different than human brains, so so what happens with

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the actual human So I was reading an account of

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>their very first patients, very in Gazzaniga's very first split

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>brain patient, uh in that that David Wollman article, and

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a man known as w J. A lot

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of times these patients are known just by a first

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>name or by initials, you know, to protect their their identity.

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And apparently w J had served as a paratrooper in

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>World War Two and he suffered a head injury. During

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the fighting, a Nazi had smashed him in the head

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>with the rifle butt and afterward he experienced severe seizures

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and was treated with the callisotomy. And so in nineteen

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty two, after the surgery, Kazaniga ran visual field experiments

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>with w J. And what he found was amazing. So

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the standard set up of one of these experiments is

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that you have the patient focus on a dot in

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a screen, and then you flash a

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>visual stimulus in the peripheral visual field on one side

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>or the other. And the scientists knew from previous research

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that this would mean stimuli shown to the left visual field,

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>as we've been saying, would usually be perceived only by

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the right hemisphere, and stuff shown in the right visual

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>field would be perceived only by the left hemisphere. But

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>now that the hemispheres can't talk to each other anymore,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what happens? So w J was shown images in his

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>left or right visual fields and then asked to press

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a button and then asked to say what he saw.

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And when an image was shown to his left hemisphere,

0:33:57.280 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the part we know is primarily responsible for language, he

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>had no problems at all. Right, you show the left

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 1>brain whatever you want, a cat or you know, show

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>him RoboCop, and then they'll press the button to indicate

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>they saw something, and he'll say, I saw a RoboCop.

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.160
<v Speaker 1>But when they showed an image to w J's right hemisphere,

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>what he said was that he saw nothing, But strangely enough,

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>his left hand, which remember, of course, the left hand

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is connected to the right hemisphere, his left hand pressed

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the button when he saw the image, even though the

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>part of his brain responsible for speech was saying out loud,

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't see anything. I mean, take take a second

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to think about that. Like when I first read that,

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, okay, oh, and then it hit

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>me and I got the chills. I mean, you know,

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the hair stands up on the back of my neck. Literally. Yeah,

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Because what we're imagining here is we we read this

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and discussed it is It's not a complete selex like

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>separation of self, right, It's like a temporary duality, like

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 1>a flash of duality, where in the very place where

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:04.359
<v Speaker 1>we we want and expect to find some sort of

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>continuity of self, well, it's yeah, it's like peeking in

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 1>and seeing a quick glimpse of a reality that may

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be far more true and accurate a description of how

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the brain is than we would like to admit, or

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that normally seems true to us, because again, we always

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:24.919
<v Speaker 1>feel unified and the split brain patients feel unified. Will

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>revisit this a little more, but they don't report feeling

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 1>like two different people. They just feel normal. This is

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>just how I am. And yet from an objective outsider's

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>point of view, it's almost as if you've got two

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>different people taking the test at the same time. One

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>is registering I see something with a hand and the

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>other is saying he doesn't see anything, and yet it

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>only seems this way under certain conditions and only from

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the outside. Now, if you want to see an example

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of this, you can actually see one of these experiments

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated on film. There's like a short documentary segment feature

0:35:57.120 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that I think he's up on YouTube. Still there's a

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>patient named to Joe who is working with Kazanega and

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>this looks like it's the nineties or so, and uh,

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it demonstrates the typical experiment. So you show either words

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>or pictures to the left brain only, and Joe can

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>name them out loud just fine. So he you know,

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you show him the word car or a picture of

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a car. He says car. Show him the word grapes

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>or picture of grapes. He says grapes. Everything seems normal

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's all going to the left hemisphere and that's

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the hemisphere that talks. You show a word to the

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>right brain only. In this case, the word pan flashes

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on the far left side of the screen and suddenly

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe is stumped. Uh. Just based on my read, it

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.879
<v Speaker 1>looks to me like he seems to be aware that

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>he saw something like there's a kind of recognition that

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks to me at least like he is aware

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>something appeared but can't say what it is. And with

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a little shrug and a shaking of his head, he says,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see it. But then Gazanega has him close

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>his eyes and draw with his left hand, which is

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 1>controlled mostly by the right hemisphere, and his left hand

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>draws a pan. Oh wow, again legitimate chills. And of

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 1>course after he draws it and looks at it with

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:13.359
<v Speaker 1>both eyes, he can say, yeah, I saw a pan,

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>But the part of his brain that talks didn't seem

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to know he'd seen a pan until after his left

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>hand drew it. Another type of experiment they carried out.

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 1>You take a split brain patient and simultaneously show two

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>different pictures on the two to the two different hemispheres.

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>You show a hammer to the left hemisphere and you

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>show a saw to the right hemisphere, and you ask

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what did you see. Of course, the speaking part of

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the brain says hammer. The person says, I saw a hammer.

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But then when asked to draw with the left hand,

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the patient draws a saw and you ask them why

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.280
<v Speaker 1>did you do that? And the patient in this one case,

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the case of Joe says I don't know. Now. In

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>other cases like this versions of this test, sometimes the

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>speaking part of the brain will not just say I

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but we'll actually see to make up stories

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about why their brain produced a certain output that the

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>left part of the brain, the speaking part, doesn't seem

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to understand, and they'll just confabulate an explanation. Well, you know,

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they might say, well, because you know, I was thinking

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>about this other thing, or because you said this thing earlier,

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>or something, well that makes sense. I mean, it's almost

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like a supernatural experience, right, and uh, and you know,

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>logically you can, you know, try and find some sort

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of answer to it. But the answer you give, and

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>apparently the I mean, there's no indication that these people

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 1>were just consciously lying about their motivations. The answer you give,

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and apparently the answer you seem to believe is not true.

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Is just like you. You can come up with explanations

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>for your own behavior that are completely wrong, and we

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>can show why they're wrong, but you are not aware

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're wrong. You can be wrong about your own mind, right,

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and even without a split brain, of course, humans are

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are very capable of of of coming up with false

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.879
<v Speaker 1>reasons for whatever they believe or whatever they did. Oh, absolutely, yeah,

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's entirely correct. And that's sort of what

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I what I'm thinking we might be able to extrapolate here.

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So one of the most amazing things to me about

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this kind of research is, uh is that this can

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.280
<v Speaker 1>happen to the brain. For the most part, nobody seems

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 1>to notice. It takes a lab experiment like this to

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>draw it out like not the people who interact with

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the split brain patient. Remember that family members usually report

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 1>no major changes in personality or cognitive ability. As David

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Wollman points out in his Nature article, the patients themselves

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 1>say they quote never reported feeling anything less than whole.

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And in the words of Michael Gazaniga, the severed hemispheres

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>do not seem to notice that they have been severed,

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and they don't report missing each other. So this raises

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>so many questions. First of all, why are they connected

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. If they can be severed like

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>this and not seem to notice that, that's an interesting thing, like,

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what's the reason for this this connection? Second, how is

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>as possible? Like, how is it possible to cut a

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:04.320
<v Speaker 1>brain in half and have it not seem to notice

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>anything's different and not behave much different. Indeed, I mean,

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>even a light of everything we've talked about, it seems

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems kind of impossible. It seems seems like it's

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a like like like it's a magic trick, a grotesque

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>magic trick, but a magic trick in the west. Well,

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should discuss a possible explanation for this after

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a break. Thank alright, we're back. Okay, So we're asking

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the question of how is it possible given these split

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>brain experiments where uh, you sever the corpus closum, the

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 1>two hemispheres of the brain are separated, and now functions

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that are dominated by one hemisphere of the brain or

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the other can can take place, can go on independently

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:45.760
<v Speaker 1>without the other part of the brain seeming to be aware.

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:48.760
<v Speaker 1>And this even leads to stuff like the right brain

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 1>being aware of a piece of information that motivates action.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Like say you show the right brain a picture, the

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>left hand, which is mainly controlled by the right brain,

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>can draw a picture of that thing, and the left

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>brain doesn't know why it happened, And the person speaking

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>gives a maybe a made up explanation of where that

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 1>image came from. How is this kind of thing possible?

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Gazonica explains it in terms of what he sort of

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 1>calls interpreter theory. The interpreter is the idea of the

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>part of your brain. Gazaniga thinks this is localized in

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the left hemisphere that comes up with this contrived explanation

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for why your your brain did something that it doesn't

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.240
<v Speaker 1>actually understand. Uh. And we can know in many cases

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that this explanation is bunk because we know where the

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.760
<v Speaker 1>actual stimulus for the behavior came from. It was shown

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the other half of the brain that the speaking

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.359
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain doesn't know about. And so Gazanica's

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>idea is that this interpreter function, its main role is

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to create a sense of self, to sort of weave

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>an autobiographical narrative about the self that makes sense, even

0:41:54.080 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>if it makes sense in a completely false way, that

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>does not actually explain the real things that happened in

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the real motivations for behavior. It just comes up with

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>post talk explanations for behaviors. And you know, this reminds

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.720
<v Speaker 1>me of m I'm sure you've read about this before.

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>There's a metaphor that's often used. I don't know where

0:42:13.800 --> 0:42:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes from in the first place, but sometimes the

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>psychologist Jonathan Height invokes it of the elephant and the rider,

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, to explain the conscious and unconscious brain. So

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>in the case of the unconscious versus the conscious brain,

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the conscious mind is a person is like a person

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 1>riding on top of an elephant, and the elephant is

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the unconscious mind. And the writer thinks they are driving,

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:39.479
<v Speaker 1>steering the elephant around, but actually the elephant goes where

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it wants, and the rider is just riding right there

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>along for the ride wherever the elephant goes. Nevertheless, the

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>writer will always be able to come up with some

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>explanation for why they meant to steer the elephant in

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the direction it went right, like oh, yeah, yeah, I

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>actually wanted to go over to that mud hole and

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>get showered in mud because because I was hot and

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the mud is willing me off now. But in this scenario,

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the elephant, of course, is the one calling the shots.

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Actually right, I mean, yeah, elephants love mud holes right

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. Of course, not to be a stickler here

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to complicate the issue, but you could have a mahoot

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in there. I believe the term is is mahoot the

0:43:14.480 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 1>individual who who will sometimes stand to the side and

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>using a stick to touch different parts of the elephant

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>um naked go where it needs to go. Oh well,

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we know quite well that often the unconscious mind of

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a person can be controlled by manipulation from the outside

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>without the rider being aware that they're not driving. I mean,

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>think about the ways people are are manipulated in their

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:44.280
<v Speaker 1>unconscious drives and desires, by advertising, by media, by drugs,

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>by so all of these things are the stick of

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the mahoot, which I'm sure has a particular name that

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not aware of. And then the mahoot is represents

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the interests of corporations and governments and uh and religious

0:43:59.800 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>grew its, etcetera. It's driving somebody's unconscious mind around while

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>they think they're the driver. I mean, no matter you know,

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the elephant is going to be calling the shots. See

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's being manipulated or it's just following its nature.

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>But either way, the driver is always going to be

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>able to come up with the story saying, yeah, this

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is why we went over here. I have planned it

0:44:18.600 --> 0:44:22.719
<v Speaker 1>this way all along. I wanted to buy this product. Now,

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 1>this is a kind of different case, but the analogy

0:44:24.880 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>here is that the talking, explaining, interpreting part of the

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 1>left brain, according to Gazaniga's theory, is making up stories

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about why the now alien right brain does what it does, which,

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, it still shares a body so it controls

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the same limbs and stuff, when the interpreter

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 1>really has no idea why the other part of the

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>brain did what it did. Now, I think we should

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>probably take a minute to emphasize like the drawbacks and

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>limitations of split brain research, one of them is that,

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as riveting as I feel like, this kind of thing

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is um I think, for one, due to the necessity

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the small sample sizes and the unusual history of

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the patients involved. This is the kind of research that's

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 1>better thought of as a jumping off point to inspire

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>questions and hypotheses that you should really try to prove

0:45:15.320 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>through other means if possible. Like a lot of modern

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientists would probably say that you can learn more with

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>more confidence from brain imaging studies like f M R

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I and stuff, then you can from a very small

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>cohort of people with callis Otomy's right, right, but at

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the same time that that may be true. But I

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>do think there's real value in these kind of experiments,

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:41.040
<v Speaker 1>specifically mainly because you can see it like you can

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:44.080
<v Speaker 1>see the human behavior in reality. You can see the

0:45:44.080 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 1>implications of a strange discovery and neuroscience instantiated in the

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 1>real world. It's one thing to learn through FMR I

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that something like different brain regions can function somewhat independently

0:45:56.800 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of one another, almost as multiple brains within the same

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>head that don't understand what the other one is doing.

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 1>You could probably show that in some ways through f

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>m R I, but the split brain experiments show you

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the texture and the drama of the experience of a

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 1>real person dealing with these facts about the brain. Other

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>studies could probably find ways of indicating this, but but

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>it is I think valuable how these experiments show the

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>experience of it right, like you can actually see somebody

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in real time dealing with the fact that they don't

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>understand why their left hand just did what it did.

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a little a little bit about this.

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I ran across, uh some material written by a cognitive psychologist,

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Jaar Pinto, an assistant professor at the Psychology Department of

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. And uh Pinto

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and their team tested to split brain patients in to

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>see if they could respond accurately to objects in the

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>left visual field perceived by the right brain, while also

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>responding verbally or with the right hand control by the

0:46:59.040 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>left brain. And Pinto uh Pinto also wrote about this

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in a piece for Ian magazine as well. So Pinto

0:47:07.480 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>and the and and the team found that they could

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>be that the individual could perceive stimuli and presence in

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:15.320
<v Speaker 1>either side of the visual field, but that they couldn't

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.919
<v Speaker 1>compare stimuli across the midline of the visual field. When

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the stimulus appeared in the left field, they were better

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>at indicating its visual properties attention, and when it appeared

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:28.319
<v Speaker 1>in the right visual field, they were better at labeling it. So,

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming back to language, here's how Pinto summed

0:47:32.520 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 1>it up in Ian magazine. I just want to read

0:47:34.239 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a passage from this because I think it it punctuates

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what we're talking about here. Quote. Based

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on these findings, we have proposed a new model of

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the split brain syndrome. When you split the brain, you

0:47:44.680 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>still end up with only one person However, this person

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>experiences two streams of visual information, one for each visual field,

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and that person is unable to integrate the two streams.

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>It is as if he watches an out of sync movie,

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but not with the audio and video out of sync. Rather,

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the two unsinked streams are both video. And There's more.

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 1>While the previous model provided strong evidence for materialism, split

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the brain, split the person, the current understanding seems to

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:14.919
<v Speaker 1>only deepen the mystery of consciousness. You split the brain

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>into two halves, and yet you still have only one person.

0:48:18.000 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>How does a brain consisting of many modules create just

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>one person? And how do split brainers operate as one

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 1>when these parts are not even talking to each other. Now,

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this study, I think, does add some interesting nuance to

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.399
<v Speaker 1>what we've been talking about before. One thing, I feel

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:36.399
<v Speaker 1>like I don't maybe I'm just missing something. I feel

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like Pinto is setting up this model as like uh

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:44.360
<v Speaker 1>as like a counterpoint to the idea of of what

0:48:44.520 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Spery and Gazaniga discovered. But it seems actually to me

0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of in line with what they discovered, like the

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:53.879
<v Speaker 1>idea that that our consciousness is very mysterious. I mean,

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I think Spery and Gazaniga would say that despite being

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>able to produce these behaviors that look from the outside

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like as if they're from two different people. Uh, the

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 1>experience of the patient, as they've always reported, is that

0:49:06.040 --> 0:49:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they feel like a normal, whole person, that nothing seems

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to have changed to them. Right. I think in both

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 1>cases though, it just you end up in this weird

0:49:14.320 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>conundrum almost, this paradox, this idea that the single person

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:21.919
<v Speaker 1>we feel that we are is in some ways too

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And in these cases where we see evidence of of

0:49:26.640 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>seemed to see two evidence of what you could you know,

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>call two minds within one brain, they're still functioning as one.

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 1>They are still one. And so yeah, the paradox of

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that which is one seems too and that which is

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 1>too seems one or more than two. Yeah, I mean

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that we've got the two hemispheres of the brain. But

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:48.920
<v Speaker 1>remember that the hemispheres are each full of you know,

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>modules and the like. They're full of millions of neurons

0:49:52.160 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're that are working in different networks and modules

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish different goals. And so I think one of

0:49:57.840 --> 0:50:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the lessons is that definitely different parts the brain can

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:06.240
<v Speaker 1>behave and generate behaviors independently and somehow you are here

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and you end up thinking I am a person. There's

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>one of me, but there's a lot of different independent

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on inside whatever makes you. Yeah, I come

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.279
<v Speaker 1>back to that Hunter S. Thompson Warren Yvon quote, you're

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole different person when you're scared. Uh and in

0:50:23.360 --> 0:50:26.239
<v Speaker 1>because in some of because in to some extent, as

0:50:26.280 --> 0:50:28.399
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed, you are a different person. You're at least

0:50:28.400 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a different version of the person. Uh So, yeah, how

0:50:31.200 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>many how many you's are there? Really? Well? I think

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:36.399
<v Speaker 1>we can explore this more in the second episode, but

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this really should give us some questions to think about,

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 1>questions about whether our idea of a person or a

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>self is really an accurate understanding of what brains are like,

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>or is it just a is it just a convenient illusion?

0:50:54.920 --> 0:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And that is some stuff to blow your mind or

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:00.680
<v Speaker 1>minds if you will. Hey, if you want to check

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>out more episodes of the show while you're waiting for

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the next episode to drop, head on over to stuff

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your mind dot com. That's where we'll find

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>them all. That's what we'll find links to our various

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:11.839
<v Speaker 1>social media accounts. Hey and I want to mention again,

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>check out Invention at invention pod dot com. That is

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>our other show that comes out on Mondays where we

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:22.120
<v Speaker 1>discuss the crazy inventions and sometimes seemingly very mundane inventions

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:24.439
<v Speaker 1>that changed the way we live our lives, that changed

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the world. We just recently started a series on the

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Death Ray, which turned out to be far more fascinating

0:51:29.840 --> 0:51:32.600
<v Speaker 1>than we even imagined it would be. So don't just

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 1>check out Invention, subscribe, friends, subscribe that's right, and hey,

0:51:37.080 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want to help out the show that you

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:41.160
<v Speaker 1>already subscribe to, Stuff to blow your mind, rate and

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>review us wherever you have the power to do so,

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that really helps us out. Another way to help us

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:46.399
<v Speaker 1>out is if you want to check out our merch

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 1>store pick up some stickers or a T shirt with

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>our logo or some of these cool designs that have

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:55.760
<v Speaker 1>been spun off of past episodes. Huge thanks as always

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to our excellent audio producers Alex Williams and try Harrison.

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 1>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:04.239
<v Speaker 1>directly with feedback on this episode or any other, to

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>suggest a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you can email us at Blow the Mind at how

0:52:09.760 --> 0:52:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com for more on this and thousands

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is it How Stuff Works dot com