WEBVTT - Netflix Beats Every Wall St. Metric, iPhone Demand Surges in China

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation of Money and Power Collie in

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.120 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Loved.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.759
<v Speaker 3>Love Live from New York and San Francisco. This is

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology coming up. Netflix and a record the King

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 3>of streaming, surpasses Wall Street's expectations on every major financial metric.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Plus after iPhone sales store in a major market oversees

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 4>a sign of success.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 3>And why Tesla is in the crosshairs of a federal

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 3>agency's investigation.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Ed.

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's get right to Netflix and this is the

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 4>stock right you can see on the screen, the story

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 4>on track for its biggest jump since January of this year,

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 4>trading at a record high overall, and subscribers beat revenue

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 4>beat And we always talk about earnings in the context

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 4>of beating expectations numerically on metrics. But I think we

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 4>both agree, right Caro, that the story was different to

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 4>what we were expecting. A slow down in streaming. No, actually,

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 4>things seem to be okay for Netflix. I think there's

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot to get into about what's happening with the

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 4>consumer's attitude towards streaming platforms and how we're watching content

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 4>right now.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the co CEO and sounding upbeat ted Surrandos really

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 3>talking about how the company beat those expectations, but also

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>what you can expect in twenty twenty five.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 6>Take a listen.

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 7>Let's start with you know, looking into twenty twenty five,

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 7>we're feeling really good about the business. We had a

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 7>plan to reaccelerate growth, and we've delivered on that plan.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 7>You can see that in our twenty twenty four financials.

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 7>We expect to deliver fifteen percent revenue growth and six

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 7>percentage points about brading margin and brooman and engagement, which

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 7>we view as our best proxy for member happiness, because

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 7>when people watch more, they stick around longer, so that's retention.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 6>Felix Jellette joins us and Felix.

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>It really was a case of even without the stellar

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 3>slate they have coming up in fourth quarter, they managed

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>to really build on that five million subscribers for the

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 3>third Yeah.

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 8>I think it was better than everyone expected. I think

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 8>it's particularly impressive because you have to remember this is

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 8>the year following the dual strikes in Hollywood, so there's

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 8>this huge production slow down. At the time, everyone was

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 8>speculating like, well, there's not enough new things to watch?

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 8>Why would people keep subscribing to the streaming services, including Netflix.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 8>There's going to be a lot of churn, a lot

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 8>of cancelations. And yet in spite of that, a year later,

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, Netflix adds another five million subscribers. This quarter

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 8>is up to two hundred and eighty two plus million

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 8>across the globe. So yeah, it's a very strong quorder

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 8>for Netflix. And like Sorrendo said, they have an even

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 8>better slate. I think you could argue coming up next

0:02:57.720 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 8>quarter and next year.

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.080
<v Speaker 4>So he talks about this interesting metric, which is I

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 4>think he called it engagement, right Felix and misterdirector, let's

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 4>bring Felix is shot back up because I don't think

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 4>he's had much time to watch Netflix. He's been too

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>busy reading the piles of books either side of his shoulder.

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 4>But there was a time where Netflix said, stop judging

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 4>us on subscriber growth, just look at our financial metrics.

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>Now they say, don't judge us on financial metrics. We

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.399
<v Speaker 4>really want to talk about this engagement number, what does

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 4>it mean and where is it going?

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 8>I think we do look at the engagement number. Part

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 8>of that is where is their future growth going to

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 8>come from, and a lot of that is advertising, right,

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 8>they said yesterday, you know, we're not where we're at

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 8>where we want to be out in terms of advertising revenue,

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 8>but we're investing in technology, and we're investing in better inventory,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 8>and what that means is investing in better live programming.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 8>And they just have a ton of stuff coming down

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 8>the pipeline, wrestling through our rest Live Wrestling. The week,

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 8>they're going to have NFL games, They're doing more comedy

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 8>live specials. Last week at our conference in LA, they

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 8>announced they're going to do this live variety show. And

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 8>I think that's going to be very appealing to advertisers

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 8>once they get a certain crucial number of viewers there,

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 8>and I think that's where the engagement comes from. And

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 8>I think that's what they're really excited about now. But

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 8>I think you can't separate that from their ambitions and advertising.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, maybe he's kind of excited about the next edition

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 3>of Wednesday because I can spot thing lurking behind your

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 3>right shoulder at the moment. It's amazing, Felix Jdette, We

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 5>Ed.

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's get some more data from branding Cats. He's the

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 4>senior entertainment industry strategist at Parent Analytics, And there's actually

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 4>a data point that you point to which I find fascinating,

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 4>and that is Netflix's share in corporate demand. Explain that

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 4>metric and why you think it makes Netflix a leader.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 2>So corporate demands share really looks at all the original

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>programming that a company creates, and it helps value their

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:12.160
<v Speaker 2>viability in the current media market and potentially the value

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 2>of that content on the opening market should they ever

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 2>want to license it. For the first time ever, Netflix

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 2>has leapbrogged a legacy media company by beating NBC Universal.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>And we have to remember NBC Universal's programming dates back

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 2>to the nineteen forties with NBC, whereas Netflix has only

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>been an original programmer for about twelve years. So the

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 2>fact that their library has grown this significantly this quickly

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 2>is a major testament to the amassed content that they

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 2>have built.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 3>They have had to spend a lot on that content,

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 3>and the point is now whether they have to spend

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot on live content on sports to really drum

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 3>up this advertising process that actually Amazon seems to have

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 3>nailed in many ways.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and with Amazon expanding its ads here next year

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 2>to five additional markets. The pressure is on on Netflix

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 2>to grow this advertising tier. It's been a slow but

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 2>steady first two years. But what's really concerning is that

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Netflix is you Can average revenue per user has dropped

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 2>for two straight quarters because of that ad tier growth.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's a little bit of a give and take.

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>I would not be surprised if, with the addition of

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 2>WWE and NFL games, we see a increase in the

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 2>price for the ad supported tier in twenty twenty five

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>five sometime.

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 3>What about price point of the service? More broadly, many

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 3>anticipating that we could get some price hikes.

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 6>In fact, they've just enacted some today.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, we're getting international price hikes. I would not be

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 2>surprised if another you Can price hike is around the corner,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>particularly off the back of their extremely strong anticipated Q

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>four content slate. And as they mentioned, the production logjam

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 2>is starting to normalize following the strike, so we could

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 2>probably expect a little bit more volume in terms of

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 2>new originals in twenty twenty five, which also bolsters their

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 2>case in raising prices yet again. Consumers, maybe I'll watch

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>that while on a little bit.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 4>More Okay, if you're just joining us here, on Bloomberg Technology.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Netflix shares are up more than ten percent, the biggest

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 4>jump since January. But they're trading at their highest level

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 4>ever on record, and I think a big part of

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 4>that is is there is still subscriber growth, Brandon, and

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 4>that was the story we were kind of considering with

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 4>this slow down. You mentioned a moment ago the live events.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 4>I want to go deeper into that. How much of

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 4>a feature this will be of the platform going forward.

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, live events has not worked seamlessly for any streaming

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>platform consistently. It's always been simulcast on these legacy media

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>distribution networks and their streaming services. So Netflix is really

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>trying to break new ground by making live entertainment on

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 2>a streaming only service work. And it is certainly a

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>huge point of focus for them moving forward to supercharge

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>their ads here, and I think them focusing the first

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>ten years of their kind of original content development around

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 2>building out the back end by licensing other content and

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 2>building up a massive library is the right way to

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 2>go about it. I think they're well positioned to dive

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 2>deeper into sports because of it.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 9>Now, nice we got some bridges in up on the screen.

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 4>That's a household favorite for us, what do you make

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 4>in management? We're kind of in deeper into this period

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 4>where you have the co CEO structure.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 9>You think they're doing a good job.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I think they're doing a fantastic job. And I think

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Greg Peters is one of the only Hollywood media executives

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 2>with actual coding and software experience. And I think as

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>we dive into an even more digital future trying to

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>capture gen V's atension and jen Alpha's attention, who are

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>digital natives, it's going to be very, very very important

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 2>to understand how the tech works and what the consumer

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>experience on that tech is actually like. And Netflix is

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>taking a step forward with that.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean they've really beefed out the ability to

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 3>carry live events. I mean we all think back to

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 3>The Lover's Blind disaster when they tried to carry that

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 3>live and the demand just to get down. But from

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>that just reflects a little bit on ultimately where else.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 6>Gen Z millennial are going.

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Because yes, you cite the old school that they've overtaken

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 3>in terms of just shared volume of content, but people

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 3>are spending their time on TikTok on YouTube.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 6>How are they matching up in terms of addiction there.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 2>The concern with Netflix is that it's a pure play

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>traditional entertainment service that is focused on film and TV,

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and yet video games, short form media via the creator economy,

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 2>and other new media are driving growth in the entertainment

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 2>ecosystem as film and TV endure a painful contraction. Yes,

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Netflix is building out a suite of video games, but

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>we've had no material updates on its impact as they

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>try to build an added value in house bundle that

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 2>goes beyond just traditional film and TV. So that's why

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I think perhaps Netflix is slightly overvalued at the moment,

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:56.719
<v Speaker 2>even as they clearly dominate in the traditional entertainment way.

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 3>I've got we've got to jump in on that that

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 3>gaming side of the equation and the lackluster I mean,

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 3>are they going to continue down the gaming path?

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 6>And wants to know.

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 2>The reports are that they are developing a triple A game,

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>which is what I think gamers most associate with those

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 2>big classic console games. Now, the success or failure of

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that will certainly say a lot about the health and

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>longevity of their video game efforts. Now, do they need

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 2>it to succeed, not in the interim but moving forward

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>long term? Yes, I think they need to branch out

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>beyond just film and television to create a stickier bundle

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 2>that solves for multiple consumer pain points.

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 4>Brendan Katz, Senior Entertainment Industry Strategies at parad Analytic, it's

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 4>great to have you back here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 9>Thank you so much.

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up, Apple sees unexpected demand in China. We

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 4>speak about that and the broader tech market with Angelo

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 4>kal Kafa, so Edward Jones that conversations coming up. This

0:10:51.440 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 4>is Bloomberg Technology.

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 5>The renaissance of growth has begun for Apple with iPhone sixteen.

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 5>I think China, Look, that was the biggest issue.

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 10>That was a headwind.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 5>Now it's a tell when they have mojo going into

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:15.839
<v Speaker 5>the next I think six to nine months. And that's

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 5>why I look, Wehi the Bears Vivey on fire and

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 5>a crowd theater for the last month, but I think

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 5>they go back in the hibernation mode.

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 10>In our opinion, that was.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 4>A very colorful Dan Ives of web Bush Securities on

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Apple's China turnaround as the data provider. Counterpoint Research says

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 4>iPhone sixteen sales saw twenty percent in the country in

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 4>its first three weeks for more, let's bring a bloomberg

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 4>to Mark German. Now, when we've discussed some third party data,

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 4>it's usually been negative and then Apple, with actual data

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 4>in the earnest context, has proven it wrong.

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 9>This is counterpoint research.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Data that is a surprise, and it's a positive surprise.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 4>What does it tell us about iPhone sixteen in that market?

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 11>Dearly think it tells us anything new, right?

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 12>I think it tells us that the first three weeks

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 12>of iPhone sales, as they usually are, were pretty hot.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 11>The issue was never the opening month of the device.

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 12>The issue was over the long term, right, three six,

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 12>nine months to twelve months, or the full cycle of

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 12>that device. I think some analysts have been a little

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 12>irrational or irresponsible in their commentary on the iPhone sixteen

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 12>over the last several months.

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 11>Some analysts have gone as far as claiming.

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 12>That this is going to create a supercycle, something we

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 12>haven't seen since the iPhone first launched on China mobile

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 12>with bigger screens a decade ago.

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 12>They've been saying that Apple Intelligence is something that is

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 12>going to drive a supercycle, despite the fact that Apple

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 12>Intelligence is not available in China, right, So you can't

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 12>necessarily have it both ways. You can't say that AI

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 12>is going to create a supercycle in China.

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 11>Well, AI is not available in.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 12>China, right, I'm not entirely surprise the iPhone sixteen is

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 12>doing well in the region.

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 11>There's a lot of pent up demand.

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 12>There's a lot of people in China who didn't upgrade

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 12>the prior to years, the iPhone fourteen Pro and the

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 12>iPhone fifteen Pro. The iPhone sixteen has some nice improvements, right.

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 12>I think the camera control interface is excellent, right. I

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 12>think the speed improvements in the battery life improvements are

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 12>really nice touches. I've enjoyed those personally, So I think

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 12>it's a good upgrade for people who haven't bought a

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 12>new iPhone in the past few years.

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 11>So I'm not entirely surprised.

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 12>And typically even when the data is negative, right, I

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 12>typically come on here and say is we're not going

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 12>to know the truth until Apple earnings. Right, That's the

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 12>case even when it's positive, And so at the end

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 12>of this month, we'll get a better idea of how

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 12>accurate this information is.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 3>Mark next time we are bringing you and Dan i'ves

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>super Cycle Man on together for some fighting talk. We

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 3>love it today, but more broadly when you think that

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 3>there is lot bits to love within iPhone sixteen, The

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 3>bit I'm just so questioning is the AI element. You've

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 3>told this story again and again on well your own

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 3>X platform in particular, who are they going to partner

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 3>with in China?

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 6>How are they going to really read the benefits of

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 6>the artificial intelligence?

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so there's two components really to the AI push

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 12>in the iPhone, right there's the in house large language

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 12>models and generative AI features.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 11>Those are using an Apple model, those are running on

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 11>Apple servers.

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 12>And then there's the third party component that's integrated into

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 12>Syria and other parts of the operating system.

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 11>In the US, they're using so far Chat.

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 12>GPT starting in December, and they're also planning to integrate

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 12>Google Gemini and to open it up to other lms

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 12>in the future. So you have an array of choices

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 12>in China. Most of those providers in the US are

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 12>not available, so they're going to have to partner with local.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 11>Entities by DO being one option.

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 12>Obviously you have Tencent, Obviously you have different bespoke llms

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 12>in the region.

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 11>But the other component is.

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 12>How is Apple going to get approval from the Chinese

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 12>government to use their server infrastructure to power their in

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 12>house generative AI models, which are in fact the bigger

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 12>deal right for Apple Intelligence, notification summaries, writing tools, image

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 12>generation gen moojis to create your own emojis. Right at

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 12>least for iCloud, they have to use a partner right

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 12>in China with government affiliation, and so they may end

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 12>up having to do something similar if they want to

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 12>get Apple Intelligence working in China, right, And China's one

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 12>of two major markets, the other being the European Union

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 12>where the AI features are not available on the iPhone

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 12>and there's no clear release date for one that will happen,

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 12>and I don't anticipate that happening for at least a year.

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Nice Bloomberg's Mark gun and keep your eyes peeled for

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 4>his power on newsletter this weekend, and Caro, as we're

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 4>showing clearly Apple and its gains are a factor in

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 4>the market this Friday.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 6>They are.

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about that about the broader market with the

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Angelo kokafas his senior investment stretches over at Edward Jones

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 3>and just let's dwell on Apple for a moment and

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 3>what it signals. But We've got UK retail data out

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 3>today that said it was buoyed by things like the

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Apple phone, but also Google's pixel as well. How important

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>is consumer to Apple right now and how resilient is it?

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think today's strength in MEGACAUP tech, including Apple,

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 13>is really a reminder not to dismiss technology, and technology

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 13>actually remains bright spot. The consumer clearly has been the

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 13>main driver for not only some of these technology names,

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 13>but for really the broader economy and the bullmarket. Fieceis

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 13>and we keep getting good news on that front. Economic

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 13>surprises are turning positive. Just retail sales this week express

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 13>some strength and resiliency. So the economy is nowhere near recession,

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 13>especially in the US, but the same applies to a

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 13>broad now. China is a complicated story to say the least,

0:16:45.960 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 13>but at the same time there's some signs of bottom

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 13>in that also feeds into the Apple story. We've had

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 13>plenses from policy makers to support growth. Many questions remain

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 13>what's going to actually be delivered, But at least from

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 13>a sentiment investors set perspective, it seems like the worst

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 13>is behind US Angela.

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 4>When you talk about profitable tech, historically it's like in

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 4>the context of having amazing balance sheet in trench market position.

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 4>But here on Bloomberg Technology we talk about innovation. That's

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 4>what Mark was reporting on. Which is the more important

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 4>factor to the investor?

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 10>I think it's both.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 13>You have that long term secular thesis and there's a

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 13>long runway for growth, especially on artificial intelligence, but also

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 13>you have the reality of market swings and rotations that

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 13>happen because of the interstrate backdrop in the more near term,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 13>and both materie based on your time horizon.

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 10>Think about the current backdrop.

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 13>We have an economy that is still growing at a

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 13>very solid pace. Verberate profits are on the rise, and

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 13>at the same time, interst rates are.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 10>Moving lower, and that backdrop provides a.

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 13>Little more tail winds for areas of the market that

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 13>have been really left behind over the past eighteen months.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 13>The big cap technology companies, they're in a NetCast position.

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 13>They have more cast than that, so they've been benefiting

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.160
<v Speaker 13>from the rise in interest.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 10>Rates, right, and other areas have been here.

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 13>But on the flip side, as interest rates move lower,

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 13>you are seeing really that broadening start to play out.

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 6>Angelo. It's been great having some time with you. Thank you.

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 6>Very much.

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, talking all through the valuation story Angelo kocafas his

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 3>senior investment strategist at Edward Jones.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 6>Let's turned to China.

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Now, investors are learning that Chinese stock ETFs are now among.

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:40.360
<v Speaker 6>The most risky. The performance over the long haul has made.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Some of the biggest wealth destroyers among us ets Isabell

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Lee reported on this and time time again, you've come

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 3>on to tell us about how China is faring in

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the macro context, and we're looking at Kweb in particular.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 3>It's got all of our Chinese tech names listed here.

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 6>It's been painful, very painful.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 14>So this is a story about how market timing is tough,

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 14>but especially tougher for other sectors, especially China. So we

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 14>looked at all ETFs with an AOM of above one billion,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 14>and we basically subtracted the assets and net inflows because

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 14>if net inflows is less than the assets, it means

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 14>investors lost money over their lifetime. And among that list,

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 14>Chinese ETFs were at the top, and Kathywood's ARC funds

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 14>a couple of them. So back to Chinese etf you

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 14>mentioned k Web over its inception since twenty thirteen, investors

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 14>ploued in twelve billion, but its assets right now is

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 14>just six point nine billion, so that's a valuation gap

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 14>of five billion. And after k Web, it is a

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 14>Kathywood's flagship ARC fund that also lost investors' money. For context,

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 14>you look at SPY, which is the biggest and most

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 14>liquid ETF investors plout in one hundred and sixty billion,

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 14>right now is around seven hundred billion, So you see

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 14>that investors were rewarded theirs. It's really hard for the

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 14>Chinese ETFs is bo you.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 4>Said, timing the market is hard, but more recently China

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 4>stimulus and then on the regulatory side, take video games

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 4>for example, signal that policy might support some of those names.

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 4>So now you're asking, okay, well, what's the trajectory.

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 14>From here exactly? So I want to bring it back

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 14>to twenty twenty one. So k Web saw fantastic INFLOWCE

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 14>then seven point four billion. That's when investors were kind

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 14>of optimistic that China will see a rebound from the

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 14>dull drums of the pandemic. But also that year, to

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 14>your point, we saw a deepening housing crisis, We saw

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 14>some industries being really cracked down on, and we saw

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 14>that ETF tumble fifty two percent.

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 6>Fast forward to today, we.

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 14>Saw a massive stimulus blitz in three weeks. We saw

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 14>a lot of indexes tracking Chinese stocks rice forty percent,

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 14>and we saw investors also plowing billions into the Chinese ETFs,

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 14>including k Web. But then now taking a step back,

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 14>Chinese shares are kind of faltering. We're seeing that rally

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 14>kind of fizzle. So it raises a question, well we

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 14>see something like that again, and China is really just

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 14>it's a very vulnerable vehicle.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 6>It's very volatile.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 14>So it's really one thing that investors to think about

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 14>when they invest in kind of ETFs.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Sisvali, it's one of the best read stories today

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 4>on the Bloomberg terminal and dot com and that's why

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 4>we wanted you on the program.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 9>Thank you very much.

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Caroline Hide, New

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 3>York and.

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 9>I med love Loo in San Francisco.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 6>Check on these markets.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Ed because we've had a volatile one, let's put it,

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 3>because the NASDAC has been pushed around by those chip

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 3>names that we're going to dig into in a moment.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 3>We're currently still holding on the ground four tens percent

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 3>for the last five training days. Tell you what, I's

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 3>had a nice little five day performance Crypto. Moving on

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 3>and have a look at what's happened with MicroStrategy Benchmark

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 3>also the analyst there raising the price target. But MicroStrategy

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 3>one of the biggest points contributors to the NASA one hundred. Today, Netflix,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean the standout of the day, up ten percent,

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 3>record high five million subscribers being added in the previous

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 3>quarter and they're going to eclipse that in the fiscal

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 3>fourth quarter. And largely I look at ASML, this is

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 3>a recovery, maybe a buy the dip story. On this

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>particular day, we're up just three percent on the US

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 3>listed and European list, and I'm currently looking at the

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.880
<v Speaker 3>mv ones up some three percent. It has been sold

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>off fourteen percent over the course of the week. We

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 3>know why the war is on orders, the warriors on

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 3>everything else bar Ai chip equipment. Basically, when we got on.

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 4>The chip sector, let me take you on a journey

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 4>over just five days, there's been seismic shifts in semiconductor sentiment.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 4>It all started with chip equipment maker ASML surprising with

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 4>early release of results, cutting its outlook and injecting growth concerns.

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 4>But by week's end, TSMC chip contract manufacturers the world

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 4>settled nerves, boosting sales, growth predictions and spending plans, signaling

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 4>the AI investment cycle might be okay. In Nvidia is

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 4>flirting with some new record highs. Bloomberg's in King, who

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 4>lead semiconductor coverage, is here with us. And that's the point.

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 4>The AI bit of the semiconductor industry is okay. Everything

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 4>else I think we're still a little bit worried about.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, right.

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 15>The biggest concern, because that's what all the money's been

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 15>poured into, is is this AI demand that we've seen,

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 15>are these huge orders for Nvidia supported? Is this something

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 15>that can continue? And we got evidence that yes, that's

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 15>the case, at least for now. What investors turn their

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 15>attention to is that other areas automotive industrial PC maybe

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 15>not so good.

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's dwell on the automotive part though, in because you

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 3>had a great story with Mackenzie Hawkins talking about how

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 3>wool Speed is going to be getting money from the

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>likes of Apollo, going to be expanding its manufacturing for

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 3>EV chips.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 15>So why that, Yeah, I mean, this is the little

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 15>chip company that apparently now can. There were existential concerns

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 15>about this company. Literally it was running out of money.

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 15>It's had a lot of problems ringing online, some new manufacturing,

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 15>and you know, there are a lot of notes out there,

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 15>a lot of analysts saying maybe this company needs to

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 15>be bought, needs to go away, needs something. And now

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 15>it got this, you know, massive injection into its balance

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 15>sheet which should allow it to emerge from this dark

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 15>place that it's been in. Huge share reaction to that

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 15>that we've obviously seen this week, but still the stock

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 15>market does not love this company.

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 4>The funny thing is is that earning season is kind

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 4>of back again. And to go to your first point

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 4>on the everything else part, Texas Instruments is kind of

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 4>up first. It's the everything chips name. Just explain that

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 4>and why you'll be paying close attention.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, we're going to have them reporting on Tuesday, And

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.239
<v Speaker 15>like you said, they are everything else. Automotive industrial are

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 15>their two biggest markets. They make analog and embedded processes.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 15>These markets haven't been great. You know a lot of

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 15>the typical sort of everybody in everybody out cycle of

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 15>PC and smartphone, that kind of trend has kind of

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 15>gone away, and we've seen all of these individual markets

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 15>moving in different ways. Texas Instruments has been really struggling.

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 15>How they might change the narrative is if they give

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 15>us any hour kind of comments about what's coming in

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 15>the future that says maybe we're through the worst, that

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 15>could be a positive. But if you actually look at

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 15>the numbers, we're still struggling.

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Dombasi and King rest up we go again next week.

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much, Caro.

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Look, we've got to talk now about how politics plays

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>its role as well, the intersection of technology and politics.

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 3>A major decision facing whoever, of course, wins the White

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 3>House next month, how to regulate US chip industry, in

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 3>particular to stay ahead of global competition and stick into that.

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Michelle Grida, she's the Sea of Cratch Institute for Tech

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Diplomacy at Purging University. Michelle, the context with which we

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 3>talk about in Nvidia and some of the other key

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 3>players is the limitations are selling into China.

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 6>That was a key.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>Story for ASML for example. Going forward, is that going

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 3>to perpetuate itself?

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 16>Caroline, You're right, context is really important here, and when

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 16>you think about it, it's just reflective of the new

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 16>paradigm that we're in in which tech has to do

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 16>very much with the future of American prosperity in American

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 16>national security. So just as we have to scrutinize which

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 16>countries we're sending F thirty fives to, we also have

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 16>to scrutinize where we're sending our most advanced chips to,

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 16>which also power our F thirty fives. And these aren't

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 16>hair dryers that we're talking about. And why we have

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 16>to look at this is ultimately it comes down to trust.

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 16>Do we trust the companies? Do we trust the countries

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 16>that we're going to be sending our Nvidia chips and

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 16>our most advanced critical technology to with the understanding that

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 16>it's not going to end up in the hands of

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 16>some of our adversaries like Russia, like China and the

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 16>People's Liberation Army.

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a clear sense of any benefit being

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 4>derived from current and existing policy on semiconductors for the

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 4>United States.

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 16>Look, we've taken measures over the course of a couple

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 16>of administrations now to make sure that we're preventing our

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 16>most critical technology from going to our adversaries and specifically China.

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 16>But this is why tech diplomacy is also really important.

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 16>When I was Assistants Secretary of State, I was traveling

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 16>all across the world, and the number one thing that

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 16>you hear from our allies and partners is that they

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:09.439
<v Speaker 16>want US private sector investment. Well, it's really hard to

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 16>do that when you have Chinese technology, untrusted technology embedded

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 16>into your government infrastructure and across your country.

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 11>And so you want to make sure that you're.

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 16>Using trusted technology. If you look at the US and

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 16>twelve of our closest democratic partners, we make up twelve

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 16>almost two thirds of global GDP, China, Russia, Iron Venezuela's

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 16>less than twenty percent of GDP. So you want to

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 16>be a part of the big network. There's a lot

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 16>of financial opportunity, diplomatic opportunity in that. And so we

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 16>started to, through American policy, implement the right policies around

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 16>semiconductors to make sure that we are helping the partners

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 16>in that trusted network and not in the untrusted.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 9>Network, Michelle.

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.919
<v Speaker 4>Earlier this week, Bloomberg's editor in chief John Mickelfwaite spoke

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 4>to former President Trump and very directly tried to get

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 4>a sense of what his policy will be with regards

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 4>to China.

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 9>Let's listen to his comments.

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.479
<v Speaker 6>Well, the reason they're doing it now is they're not

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 6>going to do it afterwards.

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 9>Okay, you know, so they're doing it now.

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 6>They want to do a chain.

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 12>Now.

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 6>Look, I had a very.

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 9>I had a good relationship with President She. It's had

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 9>a very good relationship with Putin, and a very good

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 9>relationship with Kim Jong on, who has a nuclear force

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 9>that you won't even believe.

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:32.879
<v Speaker 4>President Trump discussed his good relationship with She, but I

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 4>think many agree that we didn't get an understanding of

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 4>whether he would continue with the existing stance of sort

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 4>of export control on leading edge chip. What is your

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 4>expectation if President Trump were to take office in November

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 4>or in January of next year.

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 16>Well, remember export controls on critical technology from China began

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 16>under President Trump, and specifically with Huawei. This was with

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 16>regards to five G. Huawei ultimately lost thirty billion dollars

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 16>in annual revenue because the United States under President Trump

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 16>worked with sixty countries and two hundred telecommunications companies to

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 16>only use trusted vendors in five G and that did

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 16>not include Huawei. We've seen those export controls continue now

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 16>under the Biden administration. It's been on chips lately, but

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 16>I think you can start to see this is American

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 16>foreign policy now. Not only that the Congress is very bipartisan.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 16>Just a couple of days ago that China Select Committee

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 16>called for putting more Chinese companies on the entity list.

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 16>Is his Huawei's network of clandestine companies which American companies

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 16>are sending semiconductor manufacturing equipment. So this is a very

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 16>bipartisan thing and we should expect it to continue.

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 3>And yet Michelle companies still want to access the Chinese consumer.

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Apple still wants to build its phones there, still wants

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 3>to access the consumer there. And Vidia still wants to

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 3>sell it's less sophisticated chips over to China too.

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 6>What is a CEO to do?

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 3>What is Jensen Wang or Tim Cook to do in

0:29:58.600 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 3>that situation?

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's really interesting.

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 16>Actually it was a Bloomberg reporter just a couple of

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 16>weeks ago had asked Jensen Huang his take on the

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.479
<v Speaker 16>China export controls, and he said he had to defer

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 16>policy making to the United States. Unfortunately, in the world

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 16>that we live in, when it comes to American national security.

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 16>That's not anything that any CEO of a critical tech

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 16>company can differ. We all have to be in this

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 16>together and in what's ultimately a technology race, American CEOs

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 16>and tech CEOs in particular need to make sure that

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 16>we are advancing our tech competitiveness at the same time

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 16>we're not giving that technology to our adversaries who are

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 16>dedicated to our demid So there's a very big leadership

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 16>role for CEOs.

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 6>Michelle Guida, fantastic to have some time with you.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, CEO of the Crash Institute for Tech to

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Premacy at the Purdue University. Coming up, why Tesla driving

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 3>a car program is the target for federal investigators. This

0:30:51.680 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 3>is pretty bad technology. That's optimisticals.

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 10>Okay.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 4>Last week's Tesla Robotaxi event was so underwhelming that Wall

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Streets questioning the stock's premium valuation. The so called robotaxi

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 4>has been crucial to keeping Tesla's stock at lofty heights.

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 4>It's trading at around seventy five times forward earnings on

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 4>hopes that AI will recreate the auto industry through Musque's vision.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 4>Here's a look at the stock since the event. The

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 4>next catalyst to watch is of course third quarter results,

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:34.760
<v Speaker 4>for which I will be glued to my desk along

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 4>with everyone else around the world.

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 9>Caroline, will you be, of.

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 6>Course what brutal chart.

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, we've got to be glued to something else. In

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, it's investigating Tesla's partial

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 3>AutoMotion system. They market it as full self driving and

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 3>following concerns it is defective after a series of crashes,

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 3>one which resulted in a fatality. The most Crowdrudell relentless

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 3>on this craig is with the weather.

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 17>Right, Yeah, this is at least sort of the grounds

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 17>for the investigation that NITZA is sort of narrowly looking

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 17>at the issue of, you know, when teslas are being

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 17>operated on FSD and in in an environment where visibility

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 17>isn't great, so think of like foggy conditions. But I

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 17>would point out that it's it's not necessarily the case

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 17>that these investigations would sort of stay in that narrow

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 17>scope where we've seen a precedent just with autopilot, this

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 17>sort of standard driver assistant system that you get when

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 17>you buy a Tesla that we saw NITSA open an

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 17>investigation after multiple crashes involving police cars or fire trucks,

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 17>and that investigation led to a much broader recall where

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 17>Tesla sort of, you know, came around to this idea

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 17>that you know what nitsa You're right, we will sort of,

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 17>you know, find that there's a defect with our that

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 17>people aren't paying enough attention while they use it, and

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 17>we'll do a remedy to try and address that.

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Craig, as you know, because you're one of the editors

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 4>on my reporting about Tesla, I'm an FSD user and

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 4>actually I've posted on x quite a lot about using

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 4>it in foggy conditions and some of the bizarre happenings

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 4>when using the technology. One question that I have and

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 4>many have, is about this probe and how it's different

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 4>from prior probes and why actually this time around it

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 4>may have teeth, so to speak, whereas you know, in

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 4>the past, we haven't seen much happen after the probe.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I think it's interesting. These defect investigations tend to

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 17>take quite a bit of time. I mentioned that Autopilot

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 17>wanted took you know, I think several years really for

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 17>anything to really to come of that. And you know,

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 17>so that is one thing to note that NITSA tends

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 17>to move at a speed that is no sort of

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 17>befiting of our you know, modern sort of daily drumbeat

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 17>of headlines age. I do think that what's interesting here

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 17>is that, you know, just with that that autopilot investigation

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 17>that precipitated or recall, Tesla was able to address that

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 17>with and over the air software update, or at least

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.919
<v Speaker 17>they tried to do so. NITSA has gone back and said,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 17>you know what, we're not sure that that went far enough.

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 17>So I think when you ask about, you know, whether

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.879
<v Speaker 17>or not this could have teeth, I think the real

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 17>question here if you're a Tesla investor, is you know,

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 17>will Nitsa get to the point where they say, you

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 17>know what, Tesla, we think that you don't have a

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 17>sufficient hardware too for people to be able to use

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 17>these systems safely. And do you need to do more

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 17>for you know, monitoring drivers better and install equipment to

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 17>do that. Do you need to put in sensors to

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 17>handle these these poor visibility conditions that would cost Tesla

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 17>some real money.

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 3>And does that question the pace, which is slower than

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 3>rivals of a cyber cab or fully independently driving car

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 3>that we already see on the streets in Weimar.

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I think it's it's key here that you know, NITSA.

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 17>I think NITSA is going to have to you know,

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 17>have some say in Tesla. Following through on what Musk

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 17>said last week about being able to offer a version

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 17>of FSD that doesn't have to be supervised, at least

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 17>in certain states, you know, Musk mentioned that in Texas

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 17>and California. You know, It's it just strikes me as

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 17>hard to sort of take him at his word that

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:38.720
<v Speaker 17>that timeline can possibly be achieved when we're seeing evidence,

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 17>you know, year after year of crashes involving people using

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 17>these systems and the end you know, them not necessarily

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 17>you know, being safe enough to regulators liking.

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Musk ambitious on timelines. Craig tell we thank you.

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. Let's take a look at

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 4>where Netflix is at right now. Earnings just beating investor expectations,

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 4>the stocks up ten and a half percent, biggest jump

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 4>since January of this year, and the stock is trading

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.399
<v Speaker 4>at all time highs. Let's go in house. Let's bring

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 4>in Gita Ranganathan Bloomberg intelligence and Gita your research you

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 4>published this morning, will get right to it. You look

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 4>at the subscriber gains, that was a surprise, but you're

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 4>also judging Netflix on its margins. And it's really interesting

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 4>to me because Netflix for ages was like, stop obsessing

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 4>over subscribers, judge us on our financial metrics.

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 9>Well you are why.

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely, ed.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it was really a broad based, very

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.919
<v Speaker 1>very good report, as you just pointed out. And yes,

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>this has shifted now from being just principally a subscriber

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>story to now more of an all rounded kind of

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.800
<v Speaker 1>financial story as well. So good top line revenue growth,

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly that top line revenue growth kind of

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 1>translating into very very solid bottom line growth, very solid

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, profitability, and we saw that yesterday and Netflix

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>almost flirting with thirty percent operating margin.

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 6>In the third quarter. And then look at their guidances.

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we came into twenty twenty four, they

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 1>were you know, expecting or they were guiding margins at

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.319
<v Speaker 1>about twenty two percent. Yesterday they lifted it again from

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty four, twenty five, twenty six and now

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven percent operating margins. And again the target that

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>they set for twenty twenty five looks really really conservative

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to us. But this is basically this goes back to

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the age old question of us always asking, you know,

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>do streaming economics really do they make sense? Can this

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>model be as good as the original traditional TV model?

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And Netflix has proven to us that it can be done.

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, though, is the previous chart we just showed

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 3>is strong subscribers still a slow in growth trajectory, and

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested by perhaps Latin America seeing no growth and subscribers.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 6>Why is that happening? Where is it happening.

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so you know, it is a little bit of

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>up and down. So they did talk about Latin America

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit of a timing issue. They're actually

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 1>now continuing to see good growth starting, you know, in

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the calendar fourth quarter. But you know, there are mature

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>markets and there are markets where there is going to

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of growth. So if you kind of

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 1>just look at it as US versus rest of the world,

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of subscriber growth comes from rest of the world.

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So the US obviously is the most mature market, but

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>there still are pockets across the world. Caroline, whether you're

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at Asia Pacific or India. India for instance, last

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>quarter for them was one of their most highest growing

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>markets in terms of a number of new subscribers as

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 1>well as in.

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 6>Terms of revenue growth.

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So they do have pockets all across the world, whether

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>it's an Eastern Europe, whether it's an Asia Pacific where

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they are going to try and reintegrate subscriber growth, and

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>those are going to be their biggest areas of opportunity

0:38:57.600 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>going forward.

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Giza, Bloomberg Intelligence House cool. Is Netflix still the number

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 4>one streamer and will it always be the number one streamer?

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 6>I think so, ed.

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they definitely have won the streaming wars right

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:14.839
<v Speaker 1>now as we as we kind of look at it

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 1>way ahead of everybody else, way ahead of the competition,

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>not just in terms of subscriber numbers, even if you

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 1>look at them in terms of engagement.

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 6>Remember they are just a smidge behind.

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 1>YouTube, and YouTube has over two billion viewers across the world.

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a free service, right and you're looking at Netflix

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>where you know you're it's a paying subscription service, a

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a different model, but they still have

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>almost close to ten percent of viewing time in the

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>US which is just a smidge again behind YouTube, so

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, definitely the number one service globally

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and they will consolidate that lead over all of their rivals.

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Great research, great recap, Ethan anging Atham, and we thank

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.479
<v Speaker 3>you from Bloomberg Intelligence and as IT for this edition

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.280
<v Speaker 3>and Blomberg Technology what we.

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was an astonishing week and now earning season

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 4>is back upon us so much to recap. You know

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 4>where to find the podcast. It is online on Apple, Spotify, iHeart,

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:10.360
<v Speaker 4>and we publish it.

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 9>To all the Bloomberg platforms.

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 4>Thank you to the team in New York City, Thank

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 4>you to the team in San Francisco. Happy weekends all

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 4>of you around the world. This is Bloomberg Technology.