WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - January 4th, 2020

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Hi, I'm

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly. Welcome to Bloomberg Business Week. Over the next

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours, we're gonna bring you highlights from our

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>daily radio show that's heard weekdays at two p on

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time, right here on Bloomberg Radio, and starting

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, you can also watch the show on YouTube.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>This week, we're gonna talk about how big tech betrayed

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>its founding principles, plus conversations on luxury. We hear from

0:00:29.640 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the CEOs of Zenith Watches as well as Ducati North America.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But first, by the end of the century, check this out, Jason.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>A third of the world's population and a greater fraction

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>of its young people will be African. It's why many

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>investors are eyeing the market not just for its size

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and potential, but also for its growing tech ecosystem. Back

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>with us to talk about just that is Jake Bride.

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>He's tech Crunch contributor. He's also author of The Next Africa,

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>an emerging continent becomes a global powerhouse. He joins us

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>back in her Bloomberg Interactive Broker Student, New York. Nice

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to be back with us. Great to be back. You know,

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>we do talk a lot about investment, and we talk

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>about specifically the raw materials or raw minerals, uh and

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of staking your claims to what's to come from Africa.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>You're taking a look specifically at the tech ecosystem. Are

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you talking about kind of the tech community overall? I'm

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>assuming it's a growing one in Africa. Yeah, Africa has

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>had a boom in UM tech startup growth, VC investment.

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>The time span has really been about five to seven years,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>so this is relatively new. It's not shaping up everywhere,

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but there are some tech hubs that are becoming notable

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>UM mostly Nigeria and West Africa. These are places are

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>becoming centers of startup formation, of entrepreneurs going home of

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>VC investments. So it's Nigeria the top hobbs in Nigeria,

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>South Africa, Kenya primarily, with some others on the side, Ethiopia, Ghana,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>UM and you know what types of kind of startups

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I know like I feel like the

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>financial industry finds a different way of you know, tackling

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the emerging markets and you can find some interesting things

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>in that arena. Well, the big spending has gone on

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in in fintech and e commerce and internet services. But

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>what you have right now is is you have these

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>formalizing economies in these in these hubs. And even though fintech,

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in e commerce and some obvious UM startups sectors have

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of money, you basically have this new

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>class of young African entrepreneurs that are descending into every

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.919
<v Speaker 1>possible sector you can imagine UM from ride hailing to

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:41.559
<v Speaker 1>education to multiplying you know, health services on mobile platforms.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>So UM, it's all wide open in every sector is

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>open right now in Africa. And so where does the

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>funding come from? Where they finding willing venture capitalists? Well,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>this is what's UM. You know. News over the last

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>week is that UM primarily a lot of funding has

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>come from European and US investors with some African angels.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>But over the last quarter I've tracked this, China has

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>come in to invest nearly a quarter of a billion

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars a VC in African fintech, almost all entirely in

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that are based in Nigeria with outward growth strategies

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>from there. And why this is notable is that UM

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that's roughly one fourth of all the venture capital that

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>went to startups. And previous to this, China has had

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>an elevated engagement with Africa, but it's been mostly related

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to trade in trade, finance and building things and bricks

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and mortar stuff. We've been waiting for China to go

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>all in on African digital in full. UH. And these

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>last several investment rounds in fintech UM kind of indicate

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that that's happened or happening. Why? Why is this? Is

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it of concern? Is it of interest? How would you

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>describe it? Well, it runs a gamut. I should say

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about their rounds. So you have

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>um On, a group of Africa Chinese investors who the

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest round is just recently into Opera, the internet company UM.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>They've started to launch services startups in Nigeria. So they

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>have a payment startup called Opae, which a group of

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Chinese investors Sequoia China UM source Code Capital invested a

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:24.159
<v Speaker 1>D twenty million in Opera's o pay Um just in

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this last month. UM. And what's happening is is you're

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing UM this start to expand into other areas. It's

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>creating different dynamics with competition on the continent with existing

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>players including Opera is gonna expand opay into Kenya, which

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 1>has been Africa's capital for mobile money. When it comes

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to I mean, when it comes to what what's the

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>look at here? UM One, there's more competition. Two, there's

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>more investment for African startups overall, and that all sounds good.

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>That all sounds good, but then it enters this complicated

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>part of Africa's involvement in um our. China's involved in Africa,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>which has been somewhat controversial. To be objective, UM the

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation around China and Africa runs kind of the The

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>extreme would be that it's neo colonialism and that China

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>is taking over Africa. UM. On the positive end, Africans

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>will often tell you that China is actually meeting us

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>where we want to be. They're offering us money, we

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>need infrastructure, they're building stuff. They're helping us with bridges,

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people bring lecture, but they don't

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>bring the funds. But there's concerns about data privacy. We've

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just got about five seconds. This pivot to digital creates

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole new topic in China and Africa. When you

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.600
<v Speaker 1>get to the concerns with Huawei. When you get the

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Chinese investors having major stakes and big consumer platforms that

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>run a lot of data and and fintech information. Um,

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the continent is still getting its hands around

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that now after just grasping the amount of investment and

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>who's doing what and where. And that's Tech Crunch contributor

0:05:52.480 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Jake Bright. If you think about those that have been

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>an advocate for better governance and accountability in the private

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>sector and in government, this individual definitely comes to mind,

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and not in Maddy's professor of Finance and Economics at

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Stanford Graduate School of Business based in Paladato, California, back

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, and you're nice to

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. Thank you. So I have

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to ask you, you're we're looking at Jason I reading

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>your latest post. You seem to be calling at your

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>own profession academia. What's going on? Well, you know, I

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>look around, and you know there are a lot of

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>problems in this world, and so we have an emphasis

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>like you had just now about the private sector, uh

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>for profit private private sector being e s G and

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>doing good and doing well and all this stuff and

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking what's the role of my tribe of the

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>academics in making a system work, capitalism, democracy, you name it.

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>We say, we're very privileged in academia. Let me tell you.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't make the money that some people

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>who come on your show do make. But uh, but

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we're okay, and we have tenure and so, and we

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>have expertise. So the question I have, what is it

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that you want? I want academics. So I I live

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in that bubble, and I've lived in that bubble for

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a long time until I came down from that eightie

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>floor of the Ivory Tower down to the ground. And

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>what I've seen, you know, it was pretty sobering about

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the realities of the kinds of assumptions, especially in my

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>tribe of economists make, and so we you know, we

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>became the field economics in particular of making assumption that

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>every other academic silo of different departments is kind of

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>living big gaps between them, and so you've got a

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>bunch of siloed academics. Universities basically allow us all you know,

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>free market of ideas to do what we want. And

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>somehow the assumption is that when all of that the

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>invisible hand of that happens the market for ideas for publications.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>However it works in academia that all of that produces

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of the best outcome of the world where nonprofit

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>institution well, I think I think it does, but I

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think it can do better. I think that in the

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>areas that I know about, in particular in business schools

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and in economics and in other areas including tech. I

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was recently involved in you know, even HBO Silicon Valley

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 1>series to kind of as a medium to get through

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to the public we can do better both to uh

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to kind of make sure that you know, powerful people

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>are accountable, including in governments, help the government, you know

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the words, the whole idea of private sector doing good.

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>As I described last time I was here, we discussed

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 1>my Harvard Business Review piece on on that was that

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>governments can't do stuff. And I'm saying, if government can't

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:46.239
<v Speaker 1>do stuff, then why is that? And did you contribute

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>to that in other ways? Did you steal their people?

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you know? Did you are you? Are we not

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>paying them enough? In other wads? Why is it that

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the governments are failing? I want that problem to be

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>more of our collective problem, including in particular academics. Well,

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and I do feel like the last time you were here,

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about the business roundtable, which came up

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>at our last segment as well, and this notion that

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>companies are having a moment where they're starting to think

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>more holistically about their responsibility to society. And I guess

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>what I would ask you is is it just a

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>moment or is this a secular change? And and if

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't know yet, when will we Now? I think

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty to do for everybody, So I think it's

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>all like welcome and find as far as it can go.

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we have a society in which we

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>don't leave it to people to decide how fast to

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>drive on the road. We have speed limited policemen and

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>all of that. So my question is what are the rules?

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, just last weekend over Thanksgiving weekends supposed

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a happy weekend, butt I happened to go

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>watch Dark Waters, what a movie about DuPont and the lawyers.

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So and these are unregulated uh chemicals, And so the

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>whole problem, the legal problem with DuPont was that it

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>misled people sort of to back go style about the

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>harm from those chemicals and people got sick. And this

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one lawyer you know over in this left twenty years

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're still here, and the actor producer now Ruffalo

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>are are going around, you know, advocating that people should

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>be aware of that. Then just to read something very comforting,

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I read a book called Bottle of Lies and Bottle

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of Lines is about the generic manufacturers that are I know,

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I was really like, why am I not reading something

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>more cheerful, But it's like, who's going to solve that problem?

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Who's going to make sure that the drugs we take

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that come from India are inspected properly? I thought f

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>F and then and then you're reading about Boeing. Okay,

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 1>so f A, F d A, these are the regulations

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that we're supposed to be on. It's interesting is we

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have an administration Medista in the Bloomberg that talked about

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more loveyist within the administration exactly. So okay,

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>So what fifth risk of Michael lewis right? So what

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>role does acadeb A play and kind of bringing to

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>light some of this because what's interesting is, and I've

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>worked at a business school, you know, you often have

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of professors working with the business community consulting,

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and so there's not a very black and white or

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>strong division exactly. So I'm here actually very related to

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this writing, and I just you know, got added in later.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh for this week is in a conference and academic

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>clabbing at Colombia tomorrow and Friday. That's why what brought

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>me to this city. So this is what needs to

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>be done. What I'll tell you what needs to be done.

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>The incentives of the academics are not right because their

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>incentives coming from the private sector expert witnesses, uh, consulting.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Now we have a story about Google funding research in

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal recently, etcetera, etcetera. So the private sector,

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, funds pharmaceutical research and you know, you just

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>you I was promoting Coca Cola for great e s G.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's a sugar, you know, manufacturers that distorted

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>nutritional research back then, and that was again academics, uh

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>for for sale, uh doing that, but lobbying for the public,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>which is really where the political problem is, where the

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>thin political markets is where only conflicted academic conflicted experts

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in general, not academic necessarily are involved in writing accounting

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>rules or whatever you know, is the underbelly of the

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 1>of the whole thing. Why don't we as academics do

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not have incentives to do that sort of pro bono work,

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the kind of thing I've been running around

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>doing and I'm reflecting and so alone and schools need

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to kind of set encourage that, encourage that to be

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>involved with our conflict. R So is it up to

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the university is then to set different rules? Well, we

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we we when we evaluate people for tenure or you know,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the people who do well in that profession, in the

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 1>academic profession, they publish papers and they teach, uh And

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>then what they else they do is usually you know,

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>consult If they do that or whatever, they can choose

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a cause, they can become involved in you know, school

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>board or whatever else like everybody else on the side.

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>But profess, what I think and what I've seen gaps,

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>huge gaps in the understanding of policy makers of issues

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that we know about that we have a lot of knowledge.

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's our duty, I think, and and responsibility to

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>help them and to hold him accountable. And that's a

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>not at Muddy, Professor of Finance and Economics, at Stanford's

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Graduate School of Business, the number one business school according

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to Business Week. Let's see, Yeah, let's see what's going

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to happen in twenty when it comes to venture capital

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>investing because I feel like Jason, we work, it's failed,

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>I p O and it's a ray of governance issues

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and really impacted the conversation around startups private markets, and

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that includes of course venture capital. Let's talk about the

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>VC world. David springs with us. He's founder and CEO

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>at Runway Growth, based in San Francisco, in our Bloomberg

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker studio here in New York. Nice to see

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you again. You too great to be here, So tell us.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder about the last to impact of we

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>work on the VC world. Has it changed things dramatically? Yeah,

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>it has changed things. I'm not sure how long that's

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna last, but it has definitely shifted from you know,

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>growth at any cost to like path to profitability. You know,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a big thing. But I do think

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, vcs really build companies so that they

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>can be exited. So they're building a company so that

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it will please the buyers, and whether the buyers are

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>institutions buying on an I p O which is very

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>very rare by the way, that gets all the attention

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>from the media. But on average there's only like a

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>d I p O s a year for the last

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>five years, so it's nothing um. But then on the

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>M and A side, they're bought by corporate buyers or

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>more and more PE firms are the buyers, and they

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>do not want to pick up a big burn. So

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, you really that path the profitability thing I

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think is, you know, is here to stay, but there

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>will be a growth at a measured or intelligent um

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you know spend if you David Wooden, thing that a

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists said to me in the wake of We

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Work was this notion that it has changed and made

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>much more sophisticated, maybe much more intense conversations between vcs

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and entrepreneurs around governance that essentially they're now able to

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>walk in and say, oh, you don't want to do that,

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't want an independent board, you don't want to

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>do this. Do you want to end up being we work?

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>You know that it's become really almost weaponized to some

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>extent in this conversation. Have you seen that, have you

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>seen more talk about governance at this point. So, first

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of all, the governance extremes that we saw at we work,

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, and they are present in a few other

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>really high profile deals that you know, we all know about.

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Those are not the norm in Silicon Valley. So and

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it never has been. You know, it's only the you know,

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the hottest of hot companies with the most aggressive CEO

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is that even ask for those things. So and you know,

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>really where I operate is in the you know, the

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>sung heroes, you know. And one of the things that

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk to you guys about is like

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this imbalance in the world of venture capital where there's

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>so few exits. We talked about I p o s.

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>There's only eighty. There's less than a thousand M and

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>A exits, and new companies come into the system every year.

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're building up this giant mass and now it's

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>up to about twenty five thousand companies that are you know,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>venture backed. They're not exiting and in a lot of

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>cases they're outliving the ability of their venture firms to

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>support them. And you know, dealing with how to fund

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>those companies that for lack of a better word or

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>good but not great. Uh, that's what we're all about.

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And to get your point, Jason, those people have never

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>asked for these crazy, interesting, crazy governance uh you know, uh,

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>abnormal requests. So among those you said, was it about

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty companies, did you say the true back companies in

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>existence today? How many of them will ultimately exist in

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>five to ten years from now? Because I do feel

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>like in the VC world, certainly in the early startup world,

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's angel investing, people throw a lot of money

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>at things that never come to fruition. So I do

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>wonder if those twenty five thousand that might be struggling

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to get capital that I love capitalism, maybe some of

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>them shouldn't be able to exist going forward. I mean,

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the system working correct, definitely, So this you know,

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>law of nature and survival of the fittest and all

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>of that, it definitely works. I'm more talking about the

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>people that deserve to survive and are not getting the

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>attention because the venture capital business is so geared towards

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>hitting home runs, not even home runs Grand Slam. Even

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with all that money that's lashing around, Jason, I constantly

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.239
<v Speaker 1>have conversation about whether it's private equity money, whether it's

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>family wealth offices, whether it's you know, institutional money. There's

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>so much money that's looking to go in that area.

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>You're saying it's not it's not very all want to

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>get into the unicorns, you know, the people that you

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>guys talk about, that's where they want to invest. And

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 1>there is a ton of money trying to fight their

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>way into those deals, but not the guys that are

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>doing our twenty or thirty or forty million that deserve

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to survive, but they're never going to be an I

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>p O. How do you solve that imbalance? Well, I

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to have a new class called distressed

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>venture where people will raise venture funds to come in

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and capitalize on the opportunity to build these companies and

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the weakness of or inability of existing

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>investors to continue to support those companies. And then people

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>like us that do venture debt, where we lend money

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>as an alternative or supplement to equity, we we can

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>help those companies. It does seem like we're in for

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of reckoning is probably too strong of a word,

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>but across the entire private capital spectrum totally agree and

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>that's David Spraying, the CEO of Runway Growth. Don't you

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>want to So what if our next guest picked this song,

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into I about being evil, Um, and it

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>speaks to a bigger, broader theme this year, and it's

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>been a theme this year, and it's no dabt going

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a theme in big tech, the regulation of it,

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.719
<v Speaker 1>what big tech stands for, what they're all about, how

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they're impacting our world. Let's get into it because Vinnie

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Calano is back with us, the chief market strategists at

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuyvesant Capital Management, global investment strategists at Dafoux Redmount uh

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And also with us is CNN global economic analyst Rona Faruhar.

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>She is also author of the book Don't Be Evil,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Hence the Evil, How Big Tech betrayed its founding principles

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and all of us. They're both in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studio. Nice to have you both with us, Um,

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Jason and I talked about this all the time. First

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.239
<v Speaker 1>of all, talk to us a little bit about the

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>premise for your book. Well, Um, you know I cover

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the markets and you just look at the numbers and

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you see that basically about eight percent of corporate value

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is living in ten percent of firms and other firms

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that have the most data the most intellectual property. So

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of a massive shift. That's really the

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 1>industrial revolution of our time. So the economic story is there.

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>The political story, I mean, we've been living this now

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for two years. The fact that the model of a

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Google or Facebook in particular is highly targeted advertising. It's

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>about targeting us down to the individual. But that split society.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it comes with side effects. It comes with

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great value, but it comes with side effects.

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Then there's the brain science, the social issues, and you know,

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I got into this topic in some

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>ways for a personal reason. I came home one day,

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at a credit card bill and there

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 1>were all these tiny charges dollar ninety three dollars and

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>I thought, my god, I've been hacked. And then I

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>realized my ten year old son has my passwords. Turns

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>out he had racked up nine dollars in a supposedly

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>free online soccer game that was tracking him and selling

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>him in app purchases. And I thought, you know, as

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a mother, I was horrified, but as a as a

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>business journalist, I thought, I want to know everything about this,

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.239
<v Speaker 1>So Benny, come on in here, because, as Ronna so

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>wisely noted at the top, I mean, there's a business

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>story front and center, and for investors, what's not to

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>love about tech? I mean, Carol just went through the

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers at the close of how well these big tech

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>stocks have done. Investors have made a ton of money here.

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Fair missing out too if you don't chep on the

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>on the investment training here. Sure, absolutely, I think I

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>think the listeners investors should know that there is an

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>investment paradigm here, uh, that they need to dig a

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit deeper into and understand. Ronna talks about it

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>with the the targeted ads and the revenue streams that

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>are coming from from this surveillance capitalism system that is

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>going on. Uh. And it's interesting when Ronna mentions about

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that she was hacked, she thought she might have been hacked,

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>And as I began to explore this area thanks to Rna,

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that I realized that, yeah, we're being hacked, but we're

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>not being hacked in the manner of you know, you

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>would ordinarily think about it the drill down into our behavior. Yeah, well,

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>so you really need to understand that it on on

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a whole range of level. Well, we talked about the

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>business we cover this week about Google and the generals

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>at Google. Right. You know, for a long time, Silicon

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Valley wars a badge of honor, kind of Washington hating them,

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and now all of a sudden that their middle age.

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these big tech companies, especially something like

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>a Google, you know, they want to be involved in

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.879
<v Speaker 1>those big government contracts and and they're doing so, but

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they've got a lot of their employees not happy about it.

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>This whole idea of you know, not doing evil like

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>this was something that they held as part of their

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>corporate culture and now things are changing. Yeah, and it

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 1>was always baked into the business model. Frankly, I mean

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 1>evil was was part of the business model. If you

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 1>think the term day one. From day one, I mean

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you go back to the very first paper that Larry

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Page and Serge Brand, founders of Google, wrote. Um. It

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>had a section at the bottom that said, if you

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>monetize a big search engine with targeted advertising, the interests

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of the users and those of the advertisers are going

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to come into conflict at some point. And so they

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>actually advocated for an open search engine, maybe something in

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the academic sphere. But you know, it's interesting that he's

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>making a fascinating point because this disruption is not just

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>about the four or five Silicon Valley giants. It's coming

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to every business model. So one of the things that

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I find so fascinating you just look at the insurance industry.

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>For example, you can now have sensors in your house,

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in your car that will give you a discount if

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you're taking care of your plumbing um

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>or you're stopping quickly, but you might get a black

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>mark if your kid is smoking weed in the bedroom.

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>What does that do? That disrupts the entire insurance business

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>model of pulled risk. Think about that, that's coming to

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>every industry. That the implications are really profound. And so

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we've only got about a minute left in this first segment.

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna keep you around for another what's the biggest

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>surprise to you writing this book? What jumped out? You know,

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>in some ways the fact that it would always there

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>was hiding in plain sight. You know that that paper

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, this goes to my point. I mean, one

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of the side and one of the social side effects

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of this high speed media landscape that we're in is

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that people don't read as much. And I gotta think

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that nobody read the initial paper because we kind of

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>would have known where we were going to be. And

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.159
<v Speaker 1>we want to continue our conversation. Still with us, as

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Vinny Catalano, chief market strategist of it, stuff Isn't Capital

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Management Global investment strategies to faux Red Mount. And also

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>still with us is ron book is Don't Be Evil,

0:24:28.720 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>how Big Tech betrayed its founding principles and all of us.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>This is great for your stocking stuffers this holiday season

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:40.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's okay, there's like this is like a must

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 1>read because it does um it is the story of

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>O and it impact no matter what industry you said

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>before the break. You know, one of the things we

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>need to get into is China's role in all of this.

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about that where you see

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>how that plays in right Well, this is the story,

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>the the economy story right now, tech trade wars. This

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is really about China and the US going different ways

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how the Internet is going to be

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>governed in terms of strategic technologies. I keep hearing from

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Chinese investors that they believe they're going

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to have their own ecosystem. They've already got their own

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>big tech players Ali Baba Tencent. But I do all those,

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but that they are going to actually have their their

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>own supply chains, their own consumer brands. I mean, a

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>company like show Me is already doing better in some

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in some areas than Apple in China. So this is

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a big split coming, and it's really interesting. It's provoking

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:33.679
<v Speaker 1>some fascinating, um uh, strange bedfellows in the US. You know,

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you see a company like Google saying, well, you know,

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should be a national champion here, um, you know,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>teaming up with a defense department, uh, thinking about how

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>to kind of ring fence the the ecosystem in the

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>US saying again with Amazon, they've tried to ring fence

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>government purchasing. My worry is the overall ecosystem, though. I

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>worry that you're you're gonna end up with a scenario

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>where four or five big players have the entire pie,

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't work. We've got to make room for

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>other other companies. Really, so four or five players sort

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of con notes that there would be a monopoly. Yeah,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and yet we seem to need a new definition for monopoly, right,

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>because monopoly pertains to price increases generally as a rule

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in an industrial economy, but in this kind of surveillance,

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:26.239
<v Speaker 1>capitalistic information economy, that's really not the case. Yeah, and

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know that the point about price is so profound

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>because you're absolutely right that the whole Chicago school, you know,

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>as long as prices are going down, everything's fine, doesn't

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>fit when you're you're not doing a transaction in dollars,

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>You're doing it in data. It's a barter transaction. So

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>that's not a that that's a very opaque market, and

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that's why you have this asymmetry and this kind of

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>superstar effect with an Amazon or Google. They've got all

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the information. You don't have any information. So I think

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we are going to need some regulatory ships to deal

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>with that. So as you sort of finished reporting and

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>writing this, and as you go out and talk to people,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as we've been saying, we're not just saying

0:26:57.920 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it because you're I mean, it is the story of

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>our time. It's in credibly timely. Are you more optimistic

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 1>less optimistic? Have you changed your own sort of behavior

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>or your thoughts about this through the process. Well, I

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely have. I mean I've done a digital detox.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of actually by force that I Um,

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>last Christmas, I dropped my cell phone on Christmas Eve

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>was a company issued phone, and I couldn't get a replacement,

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was like, you know, going off cigarettes or something.

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>For forty eight hours, I was twitchy. I kept reaching

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in my pocket. So, um, I do that regularly now.

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And I've actually cut down the amount of times that

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I check email, which, by the way, it takes you

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>five minutes to reset every time you interrupt. So your productivity,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a whole another topic. Lost product The

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>productivity conundrum probably has something to do with technology and

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 1>the effects of these firsts. No, I think that's a

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>really good point, and you see more and more advising

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, check your email certainly you know a certain

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of times to day not constantly letting it kind

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of interrupt your workflow. I do wonder though, in terms

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of regulatory oversight, where it's all headache. Yeah, Well, there's

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 1>there's two big schools of OOT. I mean, one is that, look,

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we can work within the existing system and just make

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>some small tweaks. The other thought, and this is more

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>of how the Europeans are going is we're going to

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>need a really profound reshaping. I mean, the Europeans are

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about public data banks, you know, where you would

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>be the public sector would own this this data. But

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, you've got California coming in saying, hey,

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>maybe we need a digital Sovereign Wealth Fund, because at

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, if data is the new oil,

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you have to make sure that that value can be shared. Well,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you can I just date something that run a set

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>earlier in regards to uh, the the capture of information

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and the and the anticipation of what is about to

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>occur and you know, dropping the phone things of that.

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So one of the concerns that's been expressed has been

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the machine learning will have accomplished so

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>much that it knows what you're going to do and

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>anticipation of and therefore it isn't you have free will

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't? It really does come down to that, it

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>really has It has a definitely Yeah that's correct as

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a matrix feel to it, for sure. Yeah, that's a

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>whole other level, and that's Benny Catalano, chief market strategist

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at Stuyvesant Capital Management and see ann global economic analyst

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Rana Faruhar, some Peking building, and perhaps some conversations we've

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>had as of late around this table in our Blueberg

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and Director Broker studio. UM. I want to get to

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>our next guest, because he has noted how dangerously disconnected

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the public is from our financial system. It is the

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>subject of his new book. Joining us on the phone

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is Chris Farrell as he's co founder of Riverwood Capital

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>his book How Money Became Dangerous, The Inside Story of

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>our Turbulent Relationship with Modern Finance. He joins us on

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Menlo Park, California. Hey, Chris, nice to

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have you here with Jason and myself. UM, tell us

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about I mean, you have an interesting background.

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>You understand the financial world. Yeah, Hi, Carol, thanks thanks

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. You has been thirty five years

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in the industry and has traversed many of the sectors

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>within the finance the world commercial banking, sales and trading,

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>investment banking, m and a private equity and uh, yeah,

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I've had a long, long career and been fortunate to

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>work on some of the more interesting transactions in Wall

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Street history. What's changed about maybe when you started on

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street and kind of where the financial community financial

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.840
<v Speaker 1>system is today, Well, so much has changed, you know,

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in just one generation. I like to say, my parents

0:30:41.440 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>only cared about two numbers, right, They cared and they

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>were both years. They cared about the year they paid

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>off their mortgage, in the year they qualified for their pension.

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 1>And since then, you know, so much has happened. The

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>complexity of the of the financial system has ground dramatically

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and so many different ways as we pushed for scale,

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>scope and a see at the expense of the you know,

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the personal, of the interaction of the of the knowing,

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the person, of of knowing who we're interacting with, even

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>having a person on the other side of that, and

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the complexity of this of the system has grown so much,

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>while our understanding of it really has gone in many

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>cases down. I think a lot of people have said,

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I can't possibly understand this, so I'm just

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>going to step back and sort of you know, disingage

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>me completely well. And I do wonder what the financial

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:37.959
<v Speaker 1>crisis did to either reinforce that or to maybe change

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the direction. What what impact ultimately did the crisis have

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on consumers and on behavior. Yeah, you know, it's a

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>great question, um, And we think about this a lot.

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So it initially inspired this sort of rage, right the

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Occupy Wallstreet movement. What people are like, this is not acceptable,

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we can't have this. We need to do something. But

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>because people couldn't articulate challenge and the problem, and therefore

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>if you can't particulate the challenge, you're not gonna come

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 1>up with solutions. And then it's sort of stated as

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>most you know, typically financial crisis do, and then you

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:10.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of said, Okay, I'm just gonna walk away. And

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in a sense it almost turned people more off and

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>more distant from it because I said, oh, this is

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>just one of those scary things I just don't want

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to like, tankle with. And now we see, we see

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that in all kinds of behaviors, you know, we see

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we see millennials wanting to trade off an

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>algorithm when you know, not even deal with people because

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the trust level is so low they'd rather trust an

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>algorithm than than a person. And you know that the

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>manifests itself in so many ways. I have to say,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think about the market all the time that how

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>much of it is now, you know, driven by computers,

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and what that means for the retail investor. UM. You know,

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes good when everything is going up, but you know,

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder when we get to a downturn, which

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately we will at some point, but I do wonder

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>about the impact on it. What are your biggest concerns here? Well,

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>my biggest cerns are we have a we have a

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of antiquated system. You know, at all levels we're

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about how money has managed um and then we

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have um, you know, people and complexity that that aren't

0:33:13.520 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>keeping the systems can't manage and we most do that,

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think in the in the pension system for example.

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So we have this, you know, we've have debt being

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>raised to fund you know, two fund pension deficits or

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>any actions that are taken, and the system is focused

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on this, okay, this annual budget challenge of how do

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I pay employees? And you know, look, let's see, like

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't meet my cash shortfall, I can't give them

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a race. So you know, let's let's sort of promise

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>more more benefits in the future that I won't have

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to worry about because it's beyond my term of office

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and so as a result, we have you know, people

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>disconnected where they're like, who's holding that system accountable for

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a mismatch and send the system where I can sort

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of make promises that I'm not going to have to

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>be responsible for being you know, being there when it happens.

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's one Another example is you know,

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we have the twenty anniversary of the e

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>T S, which a wonderful mechanism to democratize access to

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>market returns on a very efficient cost based system. And

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's been a wonderful development and a positive.

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 1>But when you have fifty plus percent of the market

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>who's completely you know, passively involved and doesn't doesn't actually

0:34:32.680 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>engage or care really you know what's going on in

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that system, you know, that does create the potential for

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>you know what happens when liquidity drives up and you

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:50.240
<v Speaker 1>know no one's really that invested in any particular ownerships there.

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>You know that there's there's it's pervasive throughout the system,

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>this challenge and that's that's the direction we're going. We're

0:34:56.360 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>going towards this efficiency scale, passive, this connective combination that

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that that just creates challenges histomic challenges that

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen. And that's Chris Pharrell as he is

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of Riverwood Capital. So, Carol, couple of

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.720
<v Speaker 1>stats for you that really surprised me. The worldwide market

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>size for type two diabetes seven billion dollars. One in

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>eight healthcare dollars just blew me away are spent on diabetes.

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>That's unbelievable. It's a problem. It's a huge problem, and

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, smart people trying to attack it

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of treatments and medicines and whatnot. Nadav K

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>drone is here with us. He is one of those people.

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 1>He's the CEO of or Med Pharmaceuticals based here in

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Great to see you, Thank you to

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>be here. All right, this feels like a big deal.

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>This feels like a big breakthrough. We're talking about a

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>new treatment for type two diabetes. Tell us about it. Absolutely,

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand and five to today, there was no

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>major breakthrough in the way we treat diabetes. Now. What

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>we do in Aura Med is we take the insulin

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>which currently can only be administered as an injection, and

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a technology to deliver it orally so imagine

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that the diabetics population can take insulin orally, which is

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>better from compliance and just physiologically a much better way

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to do it. So is it as effective? Where are

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you in that process? So we just finished a phase

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to be so basically with successful safe and efficacy was

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>great and we're now moving into phase three and then

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.840
<v Speaker 1>register it as a drug on the FDA. So what

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>have you seen though so far? Is it apples to

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.359
<v Speaker 1>apples in terms of injections. So it's a little bit

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of a different way of looking at it. The idea

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>is that with oral insulin, the patients are going to

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>start the administration of the oral insulin much earlier on

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and by doing so, you'll have the much better control

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of the diabetes. So if you're putting me much earlier,

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you mean in terms of having the disease, that they'll

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll start on insulin earlier, so they'll start with the

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 1>oral insult. Let's look how it works today. Okay, So

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>today you go to your doctor and tells you listen,

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry to tell you your sugar level is too high.

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>You start with diet and exercise. I'm talking about type

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>two diet and exercise. Then you move into different oral

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>agents that are not insulin, and eventually the last resort

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>is that you need to inject. We're going to change

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. We're gonna come and say, okay, forget it.

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Start with a diet and exercise for sure, best drug ever.

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>But then take Orment's oral insulin. Okay, and then you're

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:35.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in a much better control for so many

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>more years and you will benefit. And how do we

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.479
<v Speaker 1>know that because I've known a fair amount of people

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have had diabetes, and I mean, yeah, the insulin is

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not nobody looks forward to that. That's kind of considered

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the last step of having to do that. So if

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you can manage it up to that point. So my

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>concern is if you start with insulin early, how is

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that a good thing? So even today would be a

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 1>good thing, but many people are afraid of the needle.

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 1>The reason that it's a good thing is because if

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, how our body works. Let's go

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 1>back to our biology class from third grade. We have

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the pancreas making the insultly into the liver. The liver

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 1>takes it into the blood stream. When we give it orally,

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it goes into the liver, so we mimic the physiological

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 1>way that the body works, unlike the injection that goes

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>directly into the blood stream. That's why it's much more

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:25.720
<v Speaker 1>ad pretentious for us to use the oral insulin versus

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the injection in most cases. So you mentioned that there

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>has been no big breakthrough and almost fifteen years why

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>did this takes a Well, welcome to the world of

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the f d A. So even us that ornament that

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we're making, we're taking the same insulin that was discovered

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>almost a hundred years ago, and we just have a

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 1>safe technology to deliver it. Orally, we still have to

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>go through phase one, phase two, phase three, almost as

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>long as developing a new drug. And so why, I

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>guess I'll ask the same question in a slightly different way,

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 1>why did someone come up with this sooner? Because I mean,

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>like Carol and on a lot people had good friends

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in college, you know who as teenagers you know, had

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to inject themselves with insulin. It's really a very difficult

0:39:08.040 --> 0:39:12.319
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. Uh, why didn't this breakthrough happen decades ago?

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So you should ask yourself. There's so many injections currently

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that we take as an injection wouldn't you rather take

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>them as appeal. So the answer is that many times

0:39:21.760 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>when you take a small peptide, which is a protein,

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna swallow, If I will take the insultin

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>now without uraments technology and I will try to swallow,

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it will just break down. So we have a technology

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that knows how to protect it and how to come

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.839
<v Speaker 1>of the issue of the size of of the got

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>wall in order to deliver it into the into the liver.

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a delivery that you're you're essentially solving the

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>delivery problem exactly. And I can use it for many

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>other things. I can use it for insulin, for flu vaccine,

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 1>for many other things. But instutent is the holy grade.

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>You need the same dosage because I know some of

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 1>the concerns have been that if it's going to some

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>extent through your digestive system, that you kind of pull

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 1>out some of the insulin so that you're gon ultimately

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 1>need to to take more for it to be effective.

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So where are we on that? So we absolutely need

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to take more than an injection. But the most fascinating

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that we see over this the recent crown that

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we did less is more, meaning when we gave less insulin,

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it was even more effective than when we gave more insulin.

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>How is that? So? How do you explain that? We

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that what happens is the liver does an amazing job.

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It regulates the secretion of the insulin and regulates the

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>secretion of the glucos. By getting insulin directly into the liver,

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we signal to the liver, hey, here is insulin. So

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>it stops the excessive production of glucos by the lever.

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Hence the magic that with a small amount of insulin orally,

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you can reduce the glucose level drastically. So we talk

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot about sort of the health and well being,

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>especially here in the United States, and you know obesity

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>rates going up and and diabetes obviously is always tied

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:59.319
<v Speaker 1>into the sort of broader health and you alluded to

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this earlier. What else is being done? Do you feel

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>like sort of more holistically literally and figuratively to combat

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.960
<v Speaker 1>diabetes at this point? So let me start with the negative.

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we're just not doing enough to have a

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>holistic picture and to see how is the society We're

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>spending almost a trillion dollars a year on diabetes okay,

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's easier for the payers to get their money,

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's easier for for for the doctors to subscribe rade drugs.

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>What do we do as a society to look at

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the holistic picture and to make sure that we can

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have more healthier and a little bit less cost for

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 1>hans to keep ourselves as a healthy society. So let

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>me follow up on that, because it's it's a really

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>important point. I feel like we talked about it a lot. Uh.

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Is this just that the economics are, for lack of

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>better terms, sort of perverted across the healthcare spectrum that

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to essentially get everything paid for when it's

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>a treatment rather than if it's preventative. So I think

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a few things. I think number one, it's it's

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 1>each one looks. It's a don't perspective it. So if

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you were the insurance company, you want to make your

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>money the way you make it, and that's it. If

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you were the doctor and you were the patient, and

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:10.399
<v Speaker 1>each one looks at his own way, the government doesn't come.

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Nobody comes and say, wait, wait, wait a second, the

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:14.359
<v Speaker 1>whole thing doesn't make sense. I'll give you what one

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>quick example from South Africa a few years ago, and

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's coming to America as well. A guy

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>who started an insurance company in South Africa and you

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>basically said, if you can exercise, which is the best

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:26.320
<v Speaker 1>drug ever invented in the world, you know your insurance

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>coasts are going to cost less. So simple things like

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that will encourage people to keep them myself in a

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>much healthier position. So realistically, when do you anticipate that

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 1>this would actually be approved and on the market next year?

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Early next year, we're going to meet with the f

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:42.640
<v Speaker 1>D a start the phase three. Phase three should take

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>two years or so, another year of registration and then

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we should have it in the market. Here, I should

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>say that we already have the partner in China and

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it's probably gonna get registered in China before the United States.

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>The oral instulent we reached China first, and that's Nadav

0:42:56.280 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>kid Drawn. He is the CEO of Uramed Pharmaceuticals. Talk

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a little Startups BC and interestingly, king off something we

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier, healthcare and what maybe underneath some of

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the startups that we're seeing on the scene. Vanessa lu

0:43:18.800 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is here with us. She's vice president at SAP and

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the head of SAP Startup Accelerator. You may know it

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>as SAP dot io. She's here with the Snart Bloomberger

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Inactive Broker Studio. A native New Yorker, native New York City,

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe as well. So tell us what is going

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 1>on out there? You guys hosted UH an event with

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:44.440
<v Speaker 1>some startups that are in the healthcare space. What are

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you seeing out there? Yeah, that's right. So we just

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>had a demo day where we profiled seven companies we've

0:43:49.640 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>been working with. These are healthcare startups that are late

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.279
<v Speaker 1>seed to serious c that we chose out of a

0:43:55.360 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>field of over a hundred and fifty companies, and they're

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:01.360
<v Speaker 1>all in the space of health care, being able to

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:05.320
<v Speaker 1>work with healthcare providers to change the innovation that they're doing,

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and also working with corporates on employee health and wellness.

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Why health care And I'm curious that this is an

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>acknowledgement that this is one of the industries that has

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>yet to really be disrupted if you look at everything

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>else that's going on, and this is an opportunity essentially

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for SAP to maybe have some significance, say in that

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>disruption that's exactly right. That's exactly why we did this.

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>This is an industry that is right for disruption. There

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.799
<v Speaker 1>are so many unfortunately inefficiencies right now, especially in the

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>US market, So that means that pay especially US versus

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>other developed markets or other markets that have single payer structures,

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for instance, where then that becomes much more of a

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>government um controlled type of industry. And so over here.

0:44:48.760 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Because there's a lot of fragmentation, that means that there

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 1>are many different pockets where analytics are being done. If

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you think about how electronic medical records really first started,

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it was because there had to be systems in place

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>to track what people were doing. But because there's so

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:07.919
<v Speaker 1>many disparate players in it, it's now so all over

0:45:07.960 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the place. And that's why this whole entire idea of

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to create some type of centralized repository for data

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting. So half of the startups that we

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>were working with over the last twelve weeks have been

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 1>focused on that, using AI machine learning, thinking about ways

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:29.120
<v Speaker 1>where you can really just identify the unstructured text and

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.799
<v Speaker 1>finding the insights from that. So we've been talking a

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>lot lately when we've been talking to folks in the

0:45:35.840 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial and the venture communities, specifically about diversity or lack

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:44.800
<v Speaker 1>thereof in the founder class, in the investor class as well.

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>You have a lot of power in that world in

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>your selections and essentially you're championing there. What do you

0:45:51.880 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like you guys are doing and how do you

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>make a meaningful difference in that part of the equation

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and having candidly a much more diverse set of founders,

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we have a commitment where the founders we either fund

0:46:08.520 --> 0:46:12.560
<v Speaker 1>or we accelerate through our accelerators have to be founders

0:46:12.600 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that are underrepresented here in New York. Our programs are

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a percent focused on that. The reason why we're doing

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>this is because when we're saying we're going to make

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>technology better, technology for whom, how are you going to

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 1>be making that technology better exactly? And being stewards of technology,

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 1>we think that we have a critical role to play

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to say these are the types of companies we're going

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to work with. Startups come in so many different forms,

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>so many different types of innovations that are happening a

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of the times. What we're finding is that underrepresentative

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:49.120
<v Speaker 1>founders just haven't been provided the access to the right

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 1>networks to surface. What they're doing is not because they

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>don't have the great idea, because they do. So you

0:46:53.800 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>said globally, why not just go in I want to

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>make it fifty percent. I think it's just kind of

0:47:02.480 --> 0:47:05.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I think, you know the research that's been

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. You know, the more diverse and I'm not

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just talking men and women, but the more diverse you

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:12.719
<v Speaker 1>have a group of people, whether it's creating companies or

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>discussing certain problems that are out there, that you're more

0:47:15.680 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>likely to have a smarter solution. That's right, smarter solution,

0:47:20.080 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to also vial and more viable. It'll just

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 1>grow that much faster, better cultures. What is it in

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the healthcare that you think is very interesting and innovative

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that's happening right now. Is it just about kind of

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>getting the data to make sense and and organize it,

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:37.680
<v Speaker 1>or is there something else that's happening that that that

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:39.879
<v Speaker 1>would be like, wow, I didn't know that was going on.

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that we focus on the

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 1>other half of the cohort were actually corporates that are

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be every day linked to healthcare, but

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they have an important role to play. If you think

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 1>about the Fortune five companies out there, the number of

0:47:54.360 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 1>employees that they employ, what can you do if you

0:47:57.320 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 1>can tap into what they do with employees. So if

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you think about mental health and wellness, you think about

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how one in four people nowadays are battling some type

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of mental health condition. But yet if you look in

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the workplace, about sixty of people don't talk about it.

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:15.799
<v Speaker 1>They don't even talk about the fact that they are

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>struggling with something. Employers can have a very critical role

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to play because they are there with them. And so

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a shift that we see. It's not just

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>about providers, it's not just about payers, but it's also

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the role that companies can play. We think that that's

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a really really big innovation, really big area. That is

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to see a lot happening there in

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the next few years. And that's Vanessa Leeu, vice president

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of SAP dot Io. All Right, So Jason ma hade

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty cool conversation with the folks over at Zeneth

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>watches the companies a hundred and fifty years old. They

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>continues to innovate and think about how to attract customers,

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.880
<v Speaker 1>especially younger customers who increasingly have more and more choices.

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So we caught up with the CEO of Zedeth, Julian Tournaure,

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and check out what you have to say. Watches are

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>pardon the pun, sort of having a moment in a way.

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>People are rediscovering the sort of artisan nature in many ways,

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the craftsmanship that Carol was alluding to. What do you

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think that is? Why are people sort of pivoting back

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe away from the smart watch? Well, you know,

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 1>first of all, you don't have so many objects like

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a watch, and I think today we live in such

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a fast world. I mean between the Internet, between the

0:49:25.480 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>social media, and don't forget that to watch, a mechanical

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>watch is one of the few objects that will last forever.

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Right if in one thousand years you have a watch

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and you have a watchmaker able to put some oil,

0:49:36.200 --> 0:49:38.319
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to work. How many object in this

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 1>room we'll still work in one thousand years. So when

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you buy a cell phone, when you buy a smart watch,

0:49:43.120 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you know the minute you buy it, it's already obsolete.

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 1>So I think sometimes people need to attach themselves to

0:49:48.880 --> 0:49:51.359
<v Speaker 1>something that will that will last forever. I do wonder

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about and I think about the conversations we keep having

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:56.759
<v Speaker 1>about fast fashion and the pushback this kind of disposable

0:49:56.760 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>society that we've become where we used to old something

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or our dad would fix something that got broken. And

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder if we're kind of channeling back to that.

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And what are you seeing in terms of your consumer,

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>especially the younger consumer, because you talk about you've got

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>to invent to bring in a younger generation. What do

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:16.400
<v Speaker 1>they want? And watch I think they want. They buy history,

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they buy authenticity. That's what they want. Also because today

0:50:19.400 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>also we are bombarded by marketing, communication, publicity everywhere, and

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they want to buy something with substance, with content, So

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they often ask us questions about how it's made, how

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>long does it take, basically, what's behind the brand and

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>what's behind the price? What do I pay when I

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:36.359
<v Speaker 1>get a watch? So we have to to show them

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the savoi fare and how many hours of watchmaker is

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 1>working on a watch. So that's super important. But also

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to show them creativity and innovation. Let's not

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 1>forget that when that watch was made in the sixties.

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 1>These gentlemen that I met, actually they're all in their

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>mid eighties. They were so innovative passionate, creative, already having

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a startup spirit. So that's what we need to continue

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:00.799
<v Speaker 1>to do to build the legendary watch of tomorrow, so

0:51:00.840 --> 0:51:03.799
<v Speaker 1>that it's really connecting tradition to the future. Well, and

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:08.319
<v Speaker 1>you're not alone and identifying this opportunity. In many ways,

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a very competitive space. There's even some acquisitions obviously

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 1>going on. You're very familiar with that. How does that

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:18.799
<v Speaker 1>change the landscape from a business perspective, From a competitive perspective,

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a competition is pretty healthy, and I

0:51:22.200 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>think we are pushing each other, you know, whether it's

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:27.240
<v Speaker 1>inside our group, inside the VMH, or outside the group.

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 1>The more we create, the more we push the limits,

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the more we will go further. And I think it's

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:34.360
<v Speaker 1>very healthy. You know, it's very competitive, but in the

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:37.840
<v Speaker 1>watch industry, it's it's quite friendly competition. You know, we

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>do trade shows together, we share things, we discussed a lot.

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty friendly one, you know. It's a bit

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Swiss way, you know, compromise with I do

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>wonder about the benefits of being part of a conglomerate

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:49.399
<v Speaker 1>where there's a bunch of brands versus being on your

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:52.360
<v Speaker 1>own and when you're in a conglomerate, um, you know,

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:54.680
<v Speaker 1>how do you keep and maintain your identity. We talked

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to a little bit about that. Yes, of course that's

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a very important point. And I would say I'm

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:01.760
<v Speaker 1>lucky to to run a brand that's part of LVMH

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:05.320
<v Speaker 1>because LVMAGE culture is to leave independence to each brand,

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:08.239
<v Speaker 1>very vertical. So we share things, we work together on

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:10.799
<v Speaker 1>some projects, but each band is very independent in its

0:52:10.800 --> 0:52:13.600
<v Speaker 1>own development. And I think that's very healthy because you know,

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:17.000
<v Speaker 1>clients are not buying the conglomerate, the group product, they

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>are buying brand by brand. So if we want the

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>client to remain loyal to a to a brand, you

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:24.279
<v Speaker 1>need to keep its identity and that's super important. Let's

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>talk markets in terms of you know, emerging markets. We

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>know Asia, Hong Kong, these are important markets. What have

0:52:29.760 --> 0:52:31.799
<v Speaker 1>you seen specifically in Hong Kong, because we've talked a

0:52:31.800 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>lot about the high end luxury market certainly impacted by

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the protest there. I moved back to Europe two years

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:38.960
<v Speaker 1>ago after seven years in Hong Kong, so I know

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong quite well. And of course it had been

0:52:41.400 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>such a hub for Asia and mostly for Chinese clients.

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:47.279
<v Speaker 1>It became to a certain extent that was quite quite unbelievable.

0:52:47.600 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say now with the recent events, of course

0:52:50.200 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole industry is suffering, but I think it's also

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>rebalancing because Hong Kong now is not alone anymore. You know,

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>there is a tough competition. Plenty of cities, whether in

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>China and the rest of Asia Pacific, dat are basically

0:53:02.880 --> 0:53:05.359
<v Speaker 1>as a shopping destination as Hong Kong and Hong Kong

0:53:05.520 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>used to be a hub. Now it's just another destination

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:10.720
<v Speaker 1>among others. So I think it will rebalance, and hopefully

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:13.360
<v Speaker 1>these events will we'll go away and we can resume

0:53:13.400 --> 0:53:15.799
<v Speaker 1>normal business. But to that exact point, just to put

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit, we've heard a lot about the

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 1>rise of Singapore as an alternate. As an alternative, I

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 1>should say, what do you make of that? Yeah, I

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 1>mean you're totally right. Singapore is for me the Hong

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Kong or Southeast Asia. But you have also sold in

0:53:28.719 --> 0:53:32.000
<v Speaker 1>South Korea. You have a Japan that's really developing very

0:53:32.000 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 1>fast for us. And then inside channel also people talk

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>often about Shanga and Beijing, but if you go to

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:38.600
<v Speaker 1>hang Jo, if you go to shenz and if you

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:41.360
<v Speaker 1>go to Guangzho, these are cities that are developing in

0:53:41.680 --> 0:53:43.360
<v Speaker 1>such a fast way. And when I was there in

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven, you didn't feel like doing shopping there. You

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 1>go Now it's the best shopping all in the world.

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's it's really catching up on Hong Kong. Well,

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:53.279
<v Speaker 1>And I do wonder about because I think everybody has

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 1>been covering mainland China as well. I mean, what are

0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the big growth markets for your the big growth cities

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 1>right now? Definitely Greater Channel we remain and when I

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 1>say greater include Hong Kong and then Taiwan to a

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:08.239
<v Speaker 1>certain extent, we remained the growth engine because of its population.

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, still to the only four percent of the

0:54:10.960 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 1>people that have a passport they travel. And definitely I

0:54:14.719 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>believe for social um, for social peace, social developments, there

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 1>will be a development of the of the middle class

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>in China. So we have we have a huge growth

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:25.680
<v Speaker 1>engine upcoming. But I'm in countries like Indonesia are developing

0:54:25.800 --> 0:54:28.279
<v Speaker 1>very fast. In luxury Vietnam also we have more and

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:31.200
<v Speaker 1>more clients coming from Vietnam buying in Singapore. So I

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:34.319
<v Speaker 1>would say this region will remain the growth engine for sure,

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and and America as well. So a hundred and fifty

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:40.319
<v Speaker 1>five years and this brand is what happens over the

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:43.759
<v Speaker 1>next say ten That's difficult to say, but I think

0:54:44.080 --> 0:54:47.440
<v Speaker 1>again we will remain a Swiss watch brand in a

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:51.480
<v Speaker 1>very small city in Switzerland, which gives us the authenticity

0:54:51.520 --> 0:54:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I referred to before the long history. But we should

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>not sleep in the past, and that had been a

0:54:56.080 --> 0:55:00.200
<v Speaker 1>bit the tent tendency of Swiss watchmaking brand new to

0:55:00.200 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>repeat the past. We want to build the future. That's

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:05.000
<v Speaker 1>super important. If we want to keep again young generation

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:08.840
<v Speaker 1>interested into mechanical watchmaking, we need to be very dynamic

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and that's the mission of the brandan Jilian, Does that

0:55:10.840 --> 0:55:13.920
<v Speaker 1>conclude more watches for Zenith breaking auction records? Because you

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 1>just did right, Yes, we just did it. Was it

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>was a great thing and we we had with Philip's

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Philips auction House. We did that correct in Geneva and

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:25.759
<v Speaker 1>it's fantastic. I mean, we'll continue to do that. How

0:55:25.800 --> 0:55:30.279
<v Speaker 1>much did you come? Forty dollars? Wow? All right, that

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:34.440
<v Speaker 1>was Julianne Turner just slightly above what I'm looking for

0:55:34.520 --> 0:55:38.480
<v Speaker 1>when I'm shopping for a watch. But beautiful watches. I

0:55:38.480 --> 0:55:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have to say, check out the video of that once

0:55:42.040 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to we'll tweet it out because he does

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a nice job showing off to watch. It's two very

0:55:46.080 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>different watches. Love that he came in with. But he

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>did say he normally does not wear to watches. No, no,

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't, um but it was really fascinating and I

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:55.879
<v Speaker 1>think the insight that he had here here was somebody

0:55:55.880 --> 0:55:58.399
<v Speaker 1>who lived in Hong Kong is watching what's going on

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and really has a global perspective terms of certainly the

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>luxury consumer. What's going on? All right, So let's talk

0:56:09.960 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a little motorcycles. We have got just the man to

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:16.440
<v Speaker 1>do it. Jason Chinok is here. He is CEO of

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Ducati North America. And can I just start by saying

0:56:20.600 --> 0:56:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about new bikes and stuff like that,

0:56:22.120 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>But can I just say, this must be like the

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 1>coolest job in the world. Unquestionably, it's definitely one of

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the coolest. Your motorcycle guy, I mean you actually started

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>working behind the counter at a like doing motorcycle parts, right, Yes,

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:38.919
<v Speaker 1>I did. In fact, it was something that years ago.

0:56:38.960 --> 0:56:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I was following a different career path and I made

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the decision. I said, Okay, this is clearly not working

0:56:43.360 --> 0:56:45.840
<v Speaker 1>out for me this other way I was going, And

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:48.640
<v Speaker 1>so I decided, I'm going to follow another passion in life.

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And I started doing my homework, research, informational interviews with

0:56:52.080 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>executives in the motorcycling industry. And then I realized, I said,

0:56:55.239 --> 0:56:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the way for me to really learn this is just

0:56:56.800 --> 0:56:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to cut my teeth at the at the beginning, at

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the very bottom. And so I started it off as

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a parts guy at a motorcycle dealership. Men. I had

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:05.040
<v Speaker 1>an education, and I was way overqualified for like what

0:57:05.120 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I was doing, but I said, this is where I

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:10.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta learn. And I learned customers, I learned the product.

0:57:10.160 --> 0:57:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I learned how to work with manufacturers. I mean, like

0:57:12.800 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that was those those four years were probably the most

0:57:16.400 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 1>formative years of my career, uh, in terms of setting

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>me for my future. What's changed about the industry since

0:57:21.880 --> 0:57:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you've started, Uh, The industry is actually it's become a

0:57:25.040 --> 0:57:27.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit smaller than back then. I mean back then, obviously,

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:30.600
<v Speaker 1>back in the early nineties or late nineties, credit was

0:57:30.640 --> 0:57:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a little looser, uh, and so a lot of people

0:57:33.040 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>were getting finance from motorcycles that maybe weren't really in

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the position where they should be financing motorcycles, and so

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as a result, what we saw is we saw a

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of shrinking in the industry when the recession hitting.

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Credit dried up. But the good thing is is for

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:49.240
<v Speaker 1>brands like Ducati and where we're at, we really weren't

0:57:49.280 --> 0:57:51.880
<v Speaker 1>affected by that because we always sold in the premium

0:57:51.920 --> 0:57:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and we never had predatory lending or questionable credit practices,

0:57:55.760 --> 0:57:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and so as a result, we gained a tremendous amount

0:57:59.040 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of market share when the recession hit. Now, volumes did affect,

0:58:02.800 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we're effected a little bit as well, but and then

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 1>as the market came back, not to the same degree

0:58:07.480 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>as it was before. As it came back, we retained

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:11.440
<v Speaker 1>our share, increased our volumes, and so it's been quite

0:58:11.480 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>positive for us in that regard. All right, so let's

0:58:13.800 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about this new lineup. What's different? What can people

0:58:18.800 --> 0:58:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be looking for. Well, one of the flagship motorcycle that

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are getting really excited about is

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a new motorcycle that we have called the street Fighter.

0:58:27.000 --> 0:58:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And this know that it is and and it comes

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from the idea of somebody taking a sport motorcycle like

0:58:33.280 --> 0:58:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what you would see on the racetrack, removing the farings

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:38.280
<v Speaker 1>off of it, the body work and putting on a

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 1>really cool headlight in the handlebar, and that basically takes

0:58:41.640 --> 0:58:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a very aggressive sport bike. It makes it accessible for

0:58:44.120 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the street except for we've taken it and redone a

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:50.080
<v Speaker 1>completely beautiful redesign and it's built off of the V

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:53.800
<v Speaker 1>four platform and chassis which is UH which which is

0:58:53.840 --> 0:58:56.439
<v Speaker 1>a number one seller last year for us. So there's

0:58:56.480 --> 0:58:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that product and that that's on one end, and on

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the other end we find ourselves into the e bike

0:59:01.880 --> 0:59:04.080
<v Speaker 1>world as well. Well, that's no curious about tell us

0:59:04.080 --> 0:59:07.080
<v Speaker 1>how aggressively you guys are pursuing, I mean, how much

0:59:07.080 --> 0:59:09.800
<v Speaker 1>your customer wants this. Well, this is something they launched

0:59:09.800 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in Europe last year as a pilot project, and then

0:59:12.080 --> 0:59:13.960
<v Speaker 1>when I saw it come out on myself, being a

0:59:14.000 --> 0:59:15.960
<v Speaker 1>mountain biker, was like, I want that product, even if

0:59:15.960 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just to have one for myself. UH. And then

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we took the last year in taking feedback from our

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:22.600
<v Speaker 1>customer base, from our dealer network and just really to

0:59:22.720 --> 0:59:26.200
<v Speaker 1>understand and research what that markets like. And it's incredible.

0:59:26.240 --> 0:59:29.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a very fast growing segment. In North America. In Europe,

0:59:29.080 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it had actually been going for quite years. But our

0:59:31.960 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>customer base is our first audience for this product because

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's branded Ducatti. But there's also really unique technologies and

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the partnership that we have with the company that's making

0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the bikes with us, and that's Jason Chinek, the CEO

0:59:43.600 --> 0:59:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of Dukati North America. Well, that wraps up the weekend

0:59:46.560 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Thanks so

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:51.920
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. I'm Jason Kelly. Be sure to

0:59:51.920 --> 0:59:54.760
<v Speaker 1>tune into Bloomberg Business Week Radio Live Monday through Friday

0:59:54.760 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>starting at two pm Wall Street Time. And if you

0:59:57.240 --> 0:59:59.800
<v Speaker 1>get catch us live, get our daily podcast for the

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at home wherever you download your podcast. We'll be back

1:00:03.400 --> 1:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>right here next week at the same time. This is

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Whoober mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm