1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:12,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene 2 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:33,440 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg So. 5 00:00:33,560 --> 00:00:36,960 Speaker 1: Trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies intensifying, with 6 00:00:37,080 --> 00:00:41,360 Speaker 1: China vamuy to retaliate forcefully against President Trump's threatened tariffs 7 00:00:41,360 --> 00:00:44,479 Speaker 1: on another two hundred billion dollars in Chinese imports. Is 8 00:00:44,520 --> 00:00:47,560 Speaker 1: it an escalation or is it a war of proposals? 9 00:00:47,640 --> 00:00:50,560 Speaker 1: Joining us to discuss this. Torsten Slock, Deutsche Banks Chief 10 00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:54,240 Speaker 1: International Economists tossing. Always great to catch up with you. So, sir, 11 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 1: your view and what we're seeing this morning, Well, this 12 00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:02,240 Speaker 1: is basically a game of chicken, and it actually looks 13 00:01:02,240 --> 00:01:03,920 Speaker 1: a little bit difficult at the moment to see who's 14 00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:06,679 Speaker 1: going to deviate. What's pretty clear is that up to 15 00:01:06,720 --> 00:01:11,200 Speaker 1: this point, at least before the latest retaliation announcement, there's 16 00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:13,920 Speaker 1: the latest round, if you will, it has looked like 17 00:01:13,959 --> 00:01:17,520 Speaker 1: this was relatively small peanuts in terms of the awall 18 00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:20,880 Speaker 1: scheme of things. But the risk now with two billions, 19 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 1: that is, in particular going to be hitting Cochumer products. 20 00:01:24,440 --> 00:01:29,199 Speaker 1: Both opens up risks for equity markets. Equity investors we're 21 00:01:29,240 --> 00:01:32,360 Speaker 1: talking to, of course asking the question which companies will 22 00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:36,200 Speaker 1: get hit, which product groups will beget hit, and that 23 00:01:36,319 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 1: uncertainty is just not helpful at all at the moment. 24 00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:40,679 Speaker 1: And on top of that, of course, there's also racist 25 00:01:41,000 --> 00:01:43,800 Speaker 1: the reverse question, well, okay, but what is the Chinese 26 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,400 Speaker 1: retaliation going to look like, which also, of course and 27 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:48,960 Speaker 1: means and they said they will not only be on trade, 28 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:53,840 Speaker 1: it could also be other types of retaliation. So the 29 00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:56,280 Speaker 1: game is on and and again the game of chicken 30 00:01:56,560 --> 00:01:58,760 Speaker 1: is the full force ahead towards each other here, and 31 00:01:58,760 --> 00:02:00,600 Speaker 1: it looks very uncertain at the moment, so toast and 32 00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:02,640 Speaker 1: given the price action we're saying this Tuesday morning, I 33 00:02:02,680 --> 00:02:05,440 Speaker 1: think it's always easy for narratives just to sprint away 34 00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:07,360 Speaker 1: with themselves. I want to try and drain some of 35 00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:10,840 Speaker 1: the emotion away from this the story in the United States. 36 00:02:10,880 --> 00:02:15,400 Speaker 1: Does any of this derail the US economic story of 37 00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 1: growth and really strong growth, and does any of that 38 00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:21,880 Speaker 1: any of those concerns make the FED sit there and say, 39 00:02:21,919 --> 00:02:24,360 Speaker 1: you know what, we need to slow down well, the 40 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:27,840 Speaker 1: important thing here is that the US has still a 41 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:30,880 Speaker 1: significant tail when from the tax cuts for the corporate sector. 42 00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:33,440 Speaker 1: The Trump tax cuts are going to lift GDP growth 43 00:02:33,720 --> 00:02:36,120 Speaker 1: to about three percent. If you say, e c FC, 44 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:37,799 Speaker 1: going on your Googberg screen, you look at the quarter 45 00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:40,240 Speaker 1: of the profile, you could see that the consensuous expect 46 00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:43,200 Speaker 1: GDP to essentially be three percent for the rest of 47 00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:45,760 Speaker 1: this year. And with that backdrop, you're absolutely right to 48 00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:48,760 Speaker 1: day John that this is indeed a very very strong picture. 49 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:52,440 Speaker 1: So for now, this is uncertain stuff where we just 50 00:02:52,440 --> 00:02:54,680 Speaker 1: don't know how it escalates. But the problem is that 51 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:58,240 Speaker 1: there's no holding back. It didn't take many minutes before 52 00:02:58,280 --> 00:03:00,520 Speaker 1: the Chinese started announcing that they we're going to do 53 00:03:00,600 --> 00:03:03,560 Speaker 1: the exact same amount in return. So what really is 54 00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:07,079 Speaker 1: the becoming more uncertain areas Not so much the GDP 55 00:03:07,639 --> 00:03:10,280 Speaker 1: profile and touch here and now. It's really much more 56 00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:13,440 Speaker 1: the immediate financial marketing impact. And that is indeed the 57 00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 1: risk that if consumer companies in the US, if we 58 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:20,280 Speaker 1: have a broader impact on equities in the US, then 59 00:03:20,320 --> 00:03:22,919 Speaker 1: of course that would certainly lead the sad eventity to 60 00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:27,040 Speaker 1: look at maybe revising some of their forecasts, including of 61 00:03:27,080 --> 00:03:29,680 Speaker 1: course for what race will do, but it's still very early, 62 00:03:29,760 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: but so far it looks for a difficult who's going 63 00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:35,680 Speaker 1: to stand down in this standoff that we're having at 64 00:03:35,680 --> 00:03:37,920 Speaker 1: the toasting. It would be disingenuous of me to say 65 00:03:37,920 --> 00:03:40,200 Speaker 1: we don't see signs of fragility, and we certainly don't 66 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:41,680 Speaker 1: see many here in the United States, but we do 67 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:44,040 Speaker 1: see a lot abroad in the global equity market and 68 00:03:44,120 --> 00:03:47,960 Speaker 1: perhaps more specifically in emerging markets an emerging market foreign exchange. 69 00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:50,280 Speaker 1: Do you see a feedback loop into the United States 70 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:53,880 Speaker 1: anytime soon? Toasting? Or is everything okay for now? This 71 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:56,000 Speaker 1: is not helpful at all for the e M story. 72 00:03:56,160 --> 00:03:59,240 Speaker 1: The e M is always not only in this situation. 73 00:03:59,320 --> 00:04:02,480 Speaker 1: The e M is all always challenged when the raises rates, 74 00:04:02,560 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 1: even if it's slow and gradual and coastious. So adding 75 00:04:06,040 --> 00:04:09,960 Speaker 1: on top of that, at trade war, which with China 76 00:04:10,160 --> 00:04:12,760 Speaker 1: is directly related to e M, but also from a 77 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:17,720 Speaker 1: U S perspective, has been hitting indiscriminately emerging markets and 78 00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:22,360 Speaker 1: also its D countries, is indeed not particularly helpful for 79 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:25,120 Speaker 1: the e M outlook. So that's also why the e 80 00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:27,200 Speaker 1: M f X going down has been a team for 81 00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:29,480 Speaker 1: a while. It probably will continue as a result of this, 82 00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:32,359 Speaker 1: is it near a trip point? I mean, are we 83 00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 1: at a point? I mean on a large chart, it's 84 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:38,919 Speaker 1: got convexity, which means a curve, which means acceleration. We 85 00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:44,800 Speaker 1: are accelerating in our EM depreciation. That can't go on forever, Cannon, 86 00:04:46,240 --> 00:04:47,800 Speaker 1: you know. And the problem for E M is that 87 00:04:47,880 --> 00:04:50,440 Speaker 1: they also have their own problems, I mean, forgetting the 88 00:04:50,480 --> 00:04:54,200 Speaker 1: trade war on minute. EM already has some mediosyncratic stories 89 00:04:54,200 --> 00:04:58,520 Speaker 1: with Argentina, Turkey, Indudesia elsewhere. I mean, stories are beginning 90 00:04:58,560 --> 00:05:02,200 Speaker 1: to pop up that do look as slagly more worries, 91 00:05:02,279 --> 00:05:05,440 Speaker 1: and even at a longer term perspective. So you're right 92 00:05:05,480 --> 00:05:09,960 Speaker 1: to say that the tripping point here is probably closer 93 00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:12,480 Speaker 1: in the sense that the risks are higher than what 94 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:14,719 Speaker 1: they've been for a while. The good news, if you will, 95 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:17,640 Speaker 1: is that at some point we'll run out of stuff 96 00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:20,839 Speaker 1: to put terriffs on. In other words, there's a a 97 00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:23,680 Speaker 1: finite limit to the size of the U S trade episode. 98 00:05:23,920 --> 00:05:27,040 Speaker 1: So that's then then it will from a political perspective, 99 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:29,560 Speaker 1: both of the US and abroad, then policy makers need 100 00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:32,880 Speaker 1: to come up with whether they want to take this 101 00:05:33,040 --> 00:05:36,120 Speaker 1: to outside only the trade area or is this just 102 00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:39,039 Speaker 1: gonna stay only inside the trade realm of things? But 103 00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:41,320 Speaker 1: tourist done. This is important and Peter Hooper and your 104 00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:43,840 Speaker 1: work at Deutsche Bank has been frankly with Domini Constant 105 00:05:43,839 --> 00:05:46,960 Speaker 1: and Ellen Ruskin has been legendary on this. All these 106 00:05:47,000 --> 00:05:50,360 Speaker 1: institutional troops are saying, we're in control, we know what 107 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:55,680 Speaker 1: we're doing. You know, maintain calm, Remain calm, remain, calm, remain, calm, blowny, 108 00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:59,400 Speaker 1: these are big moves that we're beginning to see. Is 109 00:05:59,440 --> 00:06:06,960 Speaker 1: it the same remain calm is six which was before. Well, 110 00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:10,279 Speaker 1: it's clear that the tide is going out, if you will, 111 00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:12,880 Speaker 1: in many emerging markets that have been helped a lot 112 00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:18,040 Speaker 1: by commodity prices being high. Now commodity prices are, thankfully 113 00:06:18,080 --> 00:06:21,080 Speaker 1: for emerging markets because of course slowly moving high again. 114 00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:24,159 Speaker 1: But it's pretty clear that a number of emerging markets 115 00:06:24,200 --> 00:06:28,000 Speaker 1: have significant im balances on top of their political problems. 116 00:06:28,040 --> 00:06:32,080 Speaker 1: So the risks are beginning to appear most significant than 117 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:34,680 Speaker 1: they have been for a while, which also speaks to 118 00:06:34,720 --> 00:06:39,080 Speaker 1: being all worried as a globally in the time that 119 00:06:39,080 --> 00:06:41,800 Speaker 1: we've got left with you, Torsten Slock, Really nothing matters 120 00:06:41,800 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 1: here there's like important trade dates like I think July tenth, 121 00:06:45,160 --> 00:06:48,520 Speaker 1: John Ferrell is an important day. None of that matters 122 00:06:48,800 --> 00:06:53,840 Speaker 1: compared to ten am June, which is next Tuesday, which 123 00:06:53,839 --> 00:06:58,760 Speaker 1: Torsten is Denmark France. Does Denmark have have the chance Towardston? 124 00:06:58,839 --> 00:07:02,200 Speaker 1: Does Denmark you have half a chance against mighty friends? 125 00:07:03,080 --> 00:07:05,080 Speaker 1: I will be sitting with my head and my stamp 126 00:07:05,120 --> 00:07:07,440 Speaker 1: line and cheering them on. I think they did do 127 00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:10,880 Speaker 1: very well against the rule last element. But we'll see. 128 00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:12,680 Speaker 1: It's a very exciting. But even in the World Cup, 129 00:07:12,720 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 1: you know it's been games have been surprising both and 130 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 1: were still surprised to the DW side. So we'll see. 131 00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:21,440 Speaker 1: You see where we're going that front. I literally had 132 00:07:21,480 --> 00:07:23,840 Speaker 1: no idea where you were going with that date. There. 133 00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:27,760 Speaker 1: He was wondering. I was wondering what happens when you 134 00:07:27,800 --> 00:07:32,760 Speaker 1: were also playing John? Oh really, that's true. You did 135 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:34,880 Speaker 1: see the last few minutes were pretty good. Yeah, well 136 00:07:35,080 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 1: against Tunisia, Torsten, you'd hope that England beats Tunisia. I 137 00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:40,960 Speaker 1: think it's gonna be a completely different game against Belgium. 138 00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:47,840 Speaker 1: Does tunis you play Peru? Tunisi is not playing Tom Torsten. Honestly, 139 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:49,960 Speaker 1: don't get into it with Tom Kane. Otherwise you're going 140 00:07:50,000 --> 00:07:51,960 Speaker 1: to be here ages Torsten's look. It's great to catch 141 00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:55,040 Speaker 1: up with you, sir, Thank you very much. The Tigers 142 00:07:55,400 --> 00:08:14,000 Speaker 1: Banks chief international economist Vincent Reinhardt is a good person 143 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:17,240 Speaker 1: to speak to. He's with Standish. Part of B and 144 00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:20,280 Speaker 1: Y Melon was Standish as their chief economists and investment 145 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:24,920 Speaker 1: strategist Vince. The dollar on a blended basis, just one 146 00:08:25,000 --> 00:08:28,800 Speaker 1: quick look, d x Y is now out to standard 147 00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:33,959 Speaker 1: deviations strong, which is a measured move which clearly elicits 148 00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:39,120 Speaker 1: measured conversation from central bankers. And there'll be a point 149 00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:42,520 Speaker 1: where it's not how close are we to where strong 150 00:08:42,600 --> 00:08:48,040 Speaker 1: dollar dynamics begin to affect the model, the forecast, the 151 00:08:48,200 --> 00:08:52,960 Speaker 1: factors that major central bankers look at at this point, 152 00:08:52,960 --> 00:08:56,679 Speaker 1: they always turned to the syllogism, and the syllogism is 153 00:08:57,320 --> 00:09:00,920 Speaker 1: monetary policy has to be forward looking. You make an 154 00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:05,520 Speaker 1: outlook for the ecounomy economy. If you don't like those outcomes, 155 00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:09,640 Speaker 1: you change policy. Any variable that matters for your outlook. 156 00:09:09,640 --> 00:09:14,880 Speaker 1: There for influences policy, exchange rate, equity prices, interest rates, 157 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:18,440 Speaker 1: they're all things that matter for your outlook for really 158 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:22,480 Speaker 1: economic activity and inflation and so they have to pay attention. 159 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:27,400 Speaker 1: At the bottom line is when bull financial conditions actually 160 00:09:27,480 --> 00:09:31,679 Speaker 1: moved from accommodated, there are to tightening. Yeah, but syllogism, 161 00:09:31,679 --> 00:09:35,120 Speaker 1: I mean Miriam Webster's got it as a deductive logical scheme. 162 00:09:35,679 --> 00:09:37,600 Speaker 1: You know, Vince more than I mean. You saw this 163 00:09:37,640 --> 00:09:40,120 Speaker 1: as your as you worked at the FED for years. 164 00:09:40,600 --> 00:09:43,880 Speaker 1: All of a sudden, the deductive logical scheme doesn't work. 165 00:09:44,440 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 1: How close are we to wear drag? Your Powell's deductive 166 00:09:48,040 --> 00:09:55,319 Speaker 1: logical scheme doesn't work. So you want to separate management 167 00:09:55,400 --> 00:09:59,480 Speaker 1: of a macroeconomy and management of financial crises. I was 168 00:09:59,520 --> 00:10:02,920 Speaker 1: talking about the management of the macroeconomy. They think about 169 00:10:02,920 --> 00:10:05,560 Speaker 1: their outlook, they think about where they're sitting right now, 170 00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:08,520 Speaker 1: and then they go forward. In terms of management of 171 00:10:08,520 --> 00:10:13,319 Speaker 1: the crisis crisis. The first UH talking point in your 172 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:16,839 Speaker 1: playbook is try to keep a low profile if you 173 00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:20,440 Speaker 1: possibly can. J Pal has been pretty quiet over his 174 00:10:20,559 --> 00:10:26,439 Speaker 1: tenure in terms of UH intervening verbally to big swings 175 00:10:26,440 --> 00:10:28,839 Speaker 1: in markets. And indeed, you listen to him in his 176 00:10:28,960 --> 00:10:33,319 Speaker 1: press conference, you listened to him in in his congressional appearances. 177 00:10:33,840 --> 00:10:37,520 Speaker 1: He's got a higher hurdle UH for a financial upset 178 00:10:37,640 --> 00:10:40,440 Speaker 1: than I think his immediate predecessors. I think you've picked 179 00:10:40,520 --> 00:10:43,439 Speaker 1: up on something quite important, finns Um. I certainly witnessed 180 00:10:43,679 --> 00:10:47,719 Speaker 1: last week the most bullish, optimistic Fedshan news conference I've 181 00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:51,440 Speaker 1: seen post crisis. Um, do you think that was justified? Fins? 182 00:10:53,040 --> 00:10:56,400 Speaker 1: I think the you know, the plain fact is Jay 183 00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:01,000 Speaker 1: pal is uh overseeing an economy and it's doing better 184 00:11:01,040 --> 00:11:05,120 Speaker 1: than its advanced economy peers. He's looking at a lot 185 00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:09,080 Speaker 1: of domestic momentum. He remember, we have we have considerable 186 00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:14,120 Speaker 1: uh fiscal stimulus uh and uh so there and an 187 00:11:14,160 --> 00:11:18,760 Speaker 1: unemployment rate that is arguably well below its natural rate 188 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:23,199 Speaker 1: and head and lower with an employment gaining on average 189 00:11:23,200 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 1: something close to two hundred thousand, how long can it 190 00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:29,600 Speaker 1: go if the global economy is not doing well? As 191 00:11:29,679 --> 00:11:32,400 Speaker 1: a very open issue, how long can it know? If 192 00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:36,760 Speaker 1: financial conditions tightened considerably, that's an open issue. I think 193 00:11:36,760 --> 00:11:40,280 Speaker 1: the Fed has got a problem, perhaps not for this year, 194 00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:45,800 Speaker 1: unless obviously we go from macro management to crisis management. 195 00:11:46,000 --> 00:11:49,640 Speaker 1: But they got a problem two thousand nineteen about knowing 196 00:11:49,640 --> 00:11:52,360 Speaker 1: when to stop. And how do you think they tackle 197 00:11:52,440 --> 00:11:57,080 Speaker 1: that problem? Vince? I think that you you you nailed it. 198 00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:00,400 Speaker 1: When describing j Palet at the press conference, Well, what 199 00:12:00,200 --> 00:12:03,120 Speaker 1: are what are his favorite phrases? I stick to my 200 00:12:03,160 --> 00:12:07,240 Speaker 1: own lane. And let's not overthink this. Uh, he is going, 201 00:12:07,679 --> 00:12:09,920 Speaker 1: you know, three yards in a cloud of dust. Right, 202 00:12:09,960 --> 00:12:13,840 Speaker 1: He's just got to keep raising rates until uh it 203 00:12:13,920 --> 00:12:16,720 Speaker 1: seems like it's time to stop. And then they're hoping 204 00:12:16,920 --> 00:12:19,240 Speaker 1: that they'll get a sense of what the neutral rate 205 00:12:19,320 --> 00:12:20,880 Speaker 1: is when they're close to it. And and and Vince is 206 00:12:20,880 --> 00:12:23,400 Speaker 1: a chief economist and also an investment strategist and asked 207 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:25,880 Speaker 1: you to put the investment strategist hand on. Now. Do 208 00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:28,240 Speaker 1: you think therefore there is more juice to squeeze in 209 00:12:28,280 --> 00:12:31,160 Speaker 1: that flat of yield curve that we've just seen throughout 210 00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:34,319 Speaker 1: this year so far? It's there's a lot of reason 211 00:12:34,360 --> 00:12:38,800 Speaker 1: to be short duration. Why because the market hasn't yet 212 00:12:38,840 --> 00:12:42,440 Speaker 1: priced in enough of said tightening. I think they'll go 213 00:12:42,720 --> 00:12:46,080 Speaker 1: four times this year. Jpal T is pretty confident about it. 214 00:12:46,120 --> 00:12:48,880 Speaker 1: I think he owns a December move. He was he 215 00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:52,880 Speaker 1: was the shifting dot between March and in June. Uh, 216 00:12:52,920 --> 00:12:55,600 Speaker 1: And so I think short rates will rise some more 217 00:12:55,720 --> 00:12:59,559 Speaker 1: and more rates rise as much can we sustain that 218 00:12:59,600 --> 00:13:02,480 Speaker 1: you can grows when you look vince right hard at 219 00:13:02,480 --> 00:13:06,040 Speaker 1: the mix of economic growth right now? Is it more 220 00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:11,280 Speaker 1: sustainable than consensus beliefs? Uh So? The first thing to 221 00:13:11,360 --> 00:13:14,560 Speaker 1: remember is as you know come is is expansions don't 222 00:13:14,559 --> 00:13:18,040 Speaker 1: die of old age. The second thing to remember is 223 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:21,199 Speaker 1: the advantage of having gone through a severe financial crisis 224 00:13:21,240 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 1: and the wrenching recession is it takes a long time 225 00:13:23,960 --> 00:13:26,480 Speaker 1: to build up excesses, and we don't really have a 226 00:13:26,480 --> 00:13:31,120 Speaker 1: lot of evident excesses in the domestic economy. So in 227 00:13:31,120 --> 00:13:34,960 Speaker 1: that environment we could go for a while. But again 228 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:39,360 Speaker 1: we need a stable global backdrop and that and that's 229 00:13:39,400 --> 00:13:44,240 Speaker 1: what's at risk. What's at risk is is how economy 230 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:47,360 Speaker 1: is intersect the intersect in the foreign exchange market. And 231 00:13:47,400 --> 00:13:50,480 Speaker 1: if we're growing fast and our trading partners, aren't the 232 00:13:50,520 --> 00:13:53,319 Speaker 1: dollars going to appreciate? And I think the lesson the 233 00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:56,760 Speaker 1: two thousands, sixteen and seventeen for both the US and 234 00:13:56,800 --> 00:14:00,319 Speaker 1: Europe is foreign exchange. It really matters. It was bigger 235 00:14:00,400 --> 00:14:03,640 Speaker 1: drag on our activity last year. Who was a bigger 236 00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:07,080 Speaker 1: boost to the euro area last year and we're just 237 00:14:07,120 --> 00:14:10,600 Speaker 1: seeing that swing. Yeah, But I mean, just staying an 238 00:14:10,600 --> 00:14:13,240 Speaker 1: intra vandem at a great article in the Washington Post 239 00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:18,360 Speaker 1: this weekend on the ex percent of Americans who just 240 00:14:18,440 --> 00:14:20,840 Speaker 1: to seeing wages flat. I mean, I get it's to 241 00:14:20,920 --> 00:14:25,480 Speaker 1: make America great again economy, But from where you sit, Vince, 242 00:14:25,520 --> 00:14:30,040 Speaker 1: with your decades of of of of nitty gritty research, 243 00:14:30,880 --> 00:14:36,200 Speaker 1: is the dispersion of those benefits touching Americans. Well, the 244 00:14:36,840 --> 00:14:39,280 Speaker 1: first order problem is we're not generating in a heck 245 00:14:39,320 --> 00:14:43,640 Speaker 1: of a lot of productivity, and productivity allows firms to 246 00:14:43,920 --> 00:14:48,000 Speaker 1: share some of the games with workers. And an environment 247 00:14:48,000 --> 00:14:50,680 Speaker 1: in which output power isn't increase in there no games 248 00:14:50,720 --> 00:14:55,080 Speaker 1: to share. The second part is activity is more concentrated, 249 00:14:55,680 --> 00:14:59,920 Speaker 1: and that that's associated with declining labor share of an 250 00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:04,440 Speaker 1: come that's associated with strong earnings growth. Uh. It is 251 00:15:04,520 --> 00:15:09,560 Speaker 1: kind of striking how much better corporate America is doing 252 00:15:09,640 --> 00:15:14,280 Speaker 1: than than than workers. Uh. That that does suggest we 253 00:15:14,360 --> 00:15:18,280 Speaker 1: have some some medium and longer term problems. Vince, Thank 254 00:15:18,320 --> 00:15:20,400 Speaker 1: you so much, Vince Rhin, I greatly appreciate it. With 255 00:15:20,480 --> 00:15:37,000 Speaker 1: standards today on television and radio where this as well. Uh, 256 00:15:37,080 --> 00:15:39,040 Speaker 1: my interview of the day, without question was the Finance 257 00:15:39,160 --> 00:15:43,640 Speaker 1: Minister of Indonesia. It was important to speak with Mr Rody. Uh, 258 00:15:43,680 --> 00:15:46,000 Speaker 1: given what's going on in China and with trade. This 259 00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:48,400 Speaker 1: is the next one. This is Edward Alden quickly today 260 00:15:48,880 --> 00:15:53,000 Speaker 1: his wonderful book Failure to Adjust on Trade and is definitive. 261 00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:57,800 Speaker 1: And ed Alden just very simply here, what is the 262 00:15:58,000 --> 00:16:02,680 Speaker 1: difference in the scope of four factor I'm planned terrorists 263 00:16:02,720 --> 00:16:05,920 Speaker 1: from fifty to two d How does a guy like 264 00:16:05,960 --> 00:16:09,200 Speaker 1: you synthesize that? Well, I think you know. The key 265 00:16:09,200 --> 00:16:11,440 Speaker 1: thing here is a obviously it's a very big number 266 00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:13,320 Speaker 1: and it's going to force a Chinese response. But you 267 00:16:13,360 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 1: have to look at the size of the tariff. T 268 00:16:16,360 --> 00:16:19,760 Speaker 1: What this tells me is the administration very much intends 269 00:16:20,320 --> 00:16:22,440 Speaker 1: to put these tariffs in place and keep them in 270 00:16:22,480 --> 00:16:23,920 Speaker 1: place for a while. If you go back to the 271 00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:27,000 Speaker 1: fights with Japan in the eighties, the threat was always 272 00:16:27,000 --> 00:16:30,840 Speaker 1: a dcent tariffs prohibitive tariff would have blocked exports of 273 00:16:30,960 --> 00:16:33,400 Speaker 1: you know, Japanese machine tools or semi conductors or whatever 274 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 1: you have you in the United States, and the point 275 00:16:36,040 --> 00:16:39,280 Speaker 1: was to force a negotiated deal. This really appears the 276 00:16:39,360 --> 00:16:41,680 Speaker 1: ten really appears here to be to put that tariff 277 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:44,360 Speaker 1: and keep it in place in Trump's theory, and somehow 278 00:16:44,360 --> 00:16:46,720 Speaker 1: that will help rebalance the trade relationship with China's a 279 00:16:46,720 --> 00:16:49,320 Speaker 1: different strategy. Chapter one of your book, The End of 280 00:16:49,320 --> 00:16:53,520 Speaker 1: the World's Greatest Autarchy, and the basic idea here is 281 00:16:53,680 --> 00:16:57,600 Speaker 1: America goes it alone. That seems to be a foundational 282 00:16:57,680 --> 00:17:01,760 Speaker 1: belief of the president. Can we go it alone? I 283 00:17:01,800 --> 00:17:03,440 Speaker 1: don't think there's any way we can. But if you 284 00:17:03,480 --> 00:17:06,080 Speaker 1: look at his particular form of nostalgia for a time 285 00:17:06,119 --> 00:17:08,720 Speaker 1: when the United States dominated the world economy and really 286 00:17:08,720 --> 00:17:12,440 Speaker 1: didn't particularly need cooperation from his allies, that's what he 287 00:17:12,480 --> 00:17:14,040 Speaker 1: wants to get back to. It's just the world is 288 00:17:14,080 --> 00:17:16,520 Speaker 1: a very different place than it was fifty sixty years ago, 289 00:17:16,800 --> 00:17:19,600 Speaker 1: were much smaller percentage of the world economy, and our 290 00:17:19,600 --> 00:17:22,480 Speaker 1: ability to tackle these issues depends on working with like 291 00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:26,160 Speaker 1: minded partners. President has decided to go it alone. And 292 00:17:26,160 --> 00:17:28,480 Speaker 1: and and we are, you know, now on the verge 293 00:17:28,520 --> 00:17:30,200 Speaker 1: really of of a trade war with all of our 294 00:17:30,240 --> 00:17:33,520 Speaker 1: major trading partners, not just the Chinese. Edward Alden, How 295 00:17:33,560 --> 00:17:36,879 Speaker 1: does the United States stack up in terms of economic competitiveness, 296 00:17:37,720 --> 00:17:39,520 Speaker 1: You know very well. And some things you look at, 297 00:17:39,560 --> 00:17:43,480 Speaker 1: innovation and particular venture capital sector technology, we still have 298 00:17:43,600 --> 00:17:47,479 Speaker 1: some important advantages where we tend to fall down our 299 00:17:47,560 --> 00:17:50,800 Speaker 1: things that require sensible government of one sort or another. 300 00:17:50,800 --> 00:17:54,080 Speaker 1: You look at infrastructure, UM, you know, we're lagging behind 301 00:17:54,119 --> 00:17:57,800 Speaker 1: a lot of different countries. Our educational system has enormous challenges. 302 00:17:57,880 --> 00:18:02,880 Speaker 1: We're starving, you know, public univer cities increasingly UM places 303 00:18:03,000 --> 00:18:07,160 Speaker 1: where some sort of intelligent kind of government business cooperation 304 00:18:07,280 --> 00:18:10,600 Speaker 1: is needed. We really do lag other countries, and and 305 00:18:10,640 --> 00:18:12,760 Speaker 1: that's a challenge for variety of political reasons we do 306 00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:15,239 Speaker 1: not seem able as a country to address effectively. At 307 00:18:15,240 --> 00:18:18,600 Speaker 1: the moment, you've written about US trade and investment policy. 308 00:18:18,680 --> 00:18:21,520 Speaker 1: Give us an update if you can. Well, the update is, 309 00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:23,880 Speaker 1: you know, we're moving in a very different direction here, 310 00:18:23,960 --> 00:18:27,399 Speaker 1: so obviously much more kind of openly protectionist on trade. 311 00:18:27,400 --> 00:18:30,080 Speaker 1: We haven't really seen the shoes drop yet on investment. 312 00:18:30,160 --> 00:18:33,080 Speaker 1: But the forgotten part of this response to China is 313 00:18:33,119 --> 00:18:37,840 Speaker 1: going to be restrictions on Chinese investments, either through congressional 314 00:18:37,880 --> 00:18:41,479 Speaker 1: action or directly through administration actions. So you know, we've 315 00:18:41,560 --> 00:18:44,399 Speaker 1: kind of moved from a position of pushing for greater 316 00:18:44,680 --> 00:18:48,879 Speaker 1: openness two goods overseas, pushing for greater investment opportunities overseas, 317 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:52,760 Speaker 1: to restricting access here in the US market. That's a 318 00:18:52,800 --> 00:18:56,400 Speaker 1: big change in direction for the United States sed one 319 00:18:56,440 --> 00:19:01,880 Speaker 1: final question today, how should China respond? I mean, they've 320 00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:05,840 Speaker 1: got a cultural template that they will use to respond. 321 00:19:06,480 --> 00:19:09,199 Speaker 1: But if you were advising President she what would be 322 00:19:09,280 --> 00:19:13,760 Speaker 1: his best practice now? I would advise them to work 323 00:19:13,800 --> 00:19:16,280 Speaker 1: with other countries that fell agreed by the United States. 324 00:19:16,280 --> 00:19:19,840 Speaker 1: Go to Geneva, offered to restart serious talks in the 325 00:19:20,000 --> 00:19:21,399 Speaker 1: w T O say, look, there's got to be a 326 00:19:21,480 --> 00:19:25,560 Speaker 1: multilateral solution to this problem. China's benefited enormously from the 327 00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:29,119 Speaker 1: multilateral system, but so of other countries. We the Chinese 328 00:19:29,119 --> 00:19:31,879 Speaker 1: are prepared to address some of these challenges, but not 329 00:19:32,280 --> 00:19:35,600 Speaker 1: bilaterally with the United States. The problem for my conversations 330 00:19:35,600 --> 00:19:37,440 Speaker 1: with the Chinese is they want to deal with this 331 00:19:37,520 --> 00:19:39,680 Speaker 1: bilaterally with the United States, and I don't think that's 332 00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:41,760 Speaker 1: gonna work out well because I think Trump is going 333 00:19:41,800 --> 00:19:44,240 Speaker 1: to push harder and the Chinese are gonna feel like 334 00:19:44,240 --> 00:19:46,480 Speaker 1: they have to push back just as hard. That does 335 00:19:46,520 --> 00:19:48,720 Speaker 1: not end well. Ted Alden, thank you so much with 336 00:19:48,760 --> 00:19:51,080 Speaker 1: the Console and Foreign Relations. Can't say enough about his 337 00:19:51,119 --> 00:19:55,240 Speaker 1: book Failure to Adjust how Americans got left behind in 338 00:19:55,320 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 1: the global economy. It was prescient a year ago, maybe 339 00:19:59,480 --> 00:20:02,600 Speaker 1: it was four teen months ago, And now him it's 340 00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:05,200 Speaker 1: just lights out. It's one of those three or four. 341 00:20:05,200 --> 00:20:22,639 Speaker 1: It's gotta be my next book to read. I mentioned 342 00:20:22,640 --> 00:20:25,000 Speaker 1: earlier our interview of the day was the Finance Minister 343 00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:28,160 Speaker 1: of Indonesia that with all the tariff discussion and that. 344 00:20:28,720 --> 00:20:31,840 Speaker 1: But for our listeners Coast to Coast, Susan Tager is 345 00:20:31,840 --> 00:20:34,720 Speaker 1: probably our interview of the day because she is with 346 00:20:34,840 --> 00:20:38,600 Speaker 1: Baine and Company, like the management consultant crew, not the 347 00:20:38,640 --> 00:20:43,399 Speaker 1: private equity shop, and she is knee deep in the 348 00:20:43,520 --> 00:20:48,879 Speaker 1: Amazon effect. She is senior director Retail and Consumer Product Practices. 349 00:20:49,200 --> 00:20:51,399 Speaker 1: And I want to go to real estate first, Coast 350 00:20:51,440 --> 00:20:54,119 Speaker 1: to Coast. I get tons of mail about all the 351 00:20:54,240 --> 00:20:57,479 Speaker 1: empty real estate. And my econ one oh one, like 352 00:20:57,520 --> 00:21:02,359 Speaker 1: you took a duke years ago, is price adjusts and 353 00:21:02,440 --> 00:21:06,000 Speaker 1: rental prices come down because there's so many vacancies. Why 354 00:21:06,040 --> 00:21:08,840 Speaker 1: isn't that happening? Well, first of all, thank you for 355 00:21:08,920 --> 00:21:11,880 Speaker 1: having me. It's great to be here. And I think 356 00:21:11,920 --> 00:21:14,919 Speaker 1: you're right, and you've asked a great question. I do 357 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:19,919 Speaker 1: want to step back slightly just to acknowledge that consumer spending, 358 00:21:20,119 --> 00:21:24,240 Speaker 1: consumer sentiment, people are shopping, all of that is strong. 359 00:21:24,680 --> 00:21:27,800 Speaker 1: The stores are vacant New York every every place this 360 00:21:27,960 --> 00:21:30,720 Speaker 1: radio show is the stores are empty. So what I 361 00:21:30,720 --> 00:21:33,760 Speaker 1: was gonna say is the retail and consumer spaces are 362 00:21:33,760 --> 00:21:39,480 Speaker 1: seeing a massive amount of turbulence. Underneath that fairly buoyant perspective, 363 00:21:40,880 --> 00:21:45,359 Speaker 1: there's a lot going on. You mentioned Amazon. We're looking 364 00:21:45,400 --> 00:21:50,280 Speaker 1: at Amazon growing to be about fift of all online 365 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:54,080 Speaker 1: sales in the US. Uh No, when you look at 366 00:21:54,160 --> 00:21:58,159 Speaker 1: their gross merchandise value, which is the value of the 367 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:01,000 Speaker 1: products that they're selling, not just the portion that they're 368 00:22:01,000 --> 00:22:05,679 Speaker 1: taking it on, they're probably now in the of online sharing. 369 00:22:05,680 --> 00:22:09,360 Speaker 1: So you've got a model at forty that's amazing. It's 370 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:11,520 Speaker 1: going to go up to about fifty. We believe they're 371 00:22:11,520 --> 00:22:16,159 Speaker 1: continuing to outgrow other retailers in the online space, and 372 00:22:16,200 --> 00:22:18,960 Speaker 1: as you know very well, they're moving into brick and 373 00:22:19,000 --> 00:22:22,800 Speaker 1: mortar with their acquisition of Amazon, acquisition of Whole Foods, 374 00:22:23,240 --> 00:22:27,320 Speaker 1: they're opening of bookstores, which is rather ironic. But the 375 00:22:27,400 --> 00:22:33,720 Speaker 1: key here is in in Bain's belief is Frankly, stores 376 00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:37,359 Speaker 1: are not dead. The vast majority of retail sales still 377 00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:40,240 Speaker 1: takes place in stores, but the role of stores have 378 00:22:40,440 --> 00:22:44,320 Speaker 1: massively changed. What you're seeing is in retail is not 379 00:22:44,800 --> 00:22:48,919 Speaker 1: Amazon killing retail what you're seeing is lack of innovation 380 00:22:49,160 --> 00:22:52,520 Speaker 1: killing retail. And when you go to many stores today, 381 00:22:52,600 --> 00:22:55,119 Speaker 1: they're the same as when you and I were kids. 382 00:22:55,160 --> 00:22:58,600 Speaker 1: They look the same as many many decades ago. Yet 383 00:22:58,680 --> 00:23:01,840 Speaker 1: the retailers that are ng are thinking about the end 384 00:23:01,880 --> 00:23:06,320 Speaker 1: to end consumer journey shopper journey, which is both online 385 00:23:06,359 --> 00:23:10,600 Speaker 1: and offline, and using both physical and digital assets to 386 00:23:10,640 --> 00:23:13,520 Speaker 1: make that a great experience. Well, you know when Tom 387 00:23:13,600 --> 00:23:16,439 Speaker 1: used to shop, Mr John Wannamaker used to welcome around 388 00:23:16,480 --> 00:23:18,639 Speaker 1: the store, and you know one of the things he 389 00:23:18,720 --> 00:23:22,320 Speaker 1: did was he actually spent time with the customer. And now, 390 00:23:22,359 --> 00:23:25,600 Speaker 1: of course you have the introduction of electronic devices such 391 00:23:25,640 --> 00:23:29,399 Speaker 1: as Alexa with Amazon, and I'm wondering if you see 392 00:23:29,560 --> 00:23:34,800 Speaker 1: that as an opportunity for smaller retailers to now be 393 00:23:34,920 --> 00:23:39,159 Speaker 1: able to have a bigger relationship with the consumer in 394 00:23:39,160 --> 00:23:43,440 Speaker 1: a way that they could never have before. Exactly. There 395 00:23:43,680 --> 00:23:46,359 Speaker 1: is a tremendous amount that we talked about at Banting 396 00:23:46,440 --> 00:23:50,960 Speaker 1: Company in terms of the entitled consumer or the empowered consumer, 397 00:23:51,119 --> 00:23:54,679 Speaker 1: and a lot of that is fueled by technology. On 398 00:23:54,720 --> 00:23:58,920 Speaker 1: the flip side, you also see massive innovation and opportunity 399 00:23:59,000 --> 00:24:02,280 Speaker 1: for retailers to transform how they deliver could get an 400 00:24:02,280 --> 00:24:04,800 Speaker 1: example that because most of the retail cells side we 401 00:24:04,880 --> 00:24:07,480 Speaker 1: talked to it doesn't agree with that. In terms of innovation, 402 00:24:07,480 --> 00:24:10,439 Speaker 1: they retails getting crushed. They've tried this, tried this, tried this, 403 00:24:10,520 --> 00:24:15,679 Speaker 1: try this, and Amazon's cleaning their clock. But products CAI 404 00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:18,359 Speaker 1: come on these niche products. But what's an example of 405 00:24:18,359 --> 00:24:22,880 Speaker 1: a major department store innovation which is allowing them to compete? 406 00:24:23,160 --> 00:24:26,080 Speaker 1: Sure well, let me actually step back a little bit, 407 00:24:26,240 --> 00:24:28,600 Speaker 1: because there are lots of stores that are doing well 408 00:24:28,640 --> 00:24:31,440 Speaker 1: by combining what we could describe as omni channel or 409 00:24:31,480 --> 00:24:34,200 Speaker 1: the best of both worlds in terms of taking what's 410 00:24:34,240 --> 00:24:38,080 Speaker 1: great about digital. Earlier you were describing your experience of 411 00:24:38,600 --> 00:24:41,240 Speaker 1: eight clicks, I found what I wanted, It saved me time. 412 00:24:41,280 --> 00:24:46,080 Speaker 1: That's terrific with the best of physical, which, to to 413 00:24:46,160 --> 00:24:51,120 Speaker 1: your point, is sometimes that personalized service, that experiential opportunity, 414 00:24:51,200 --> 00:24:54,240 Speaker 1: that community environment. And so you do see a lot 415 00:24:54,280 --> 00:24:57,600 Speaker 1: of stores thinking about how do I use my space differently, 416 00:24:57,720 --> 00:25:01,000 Speaker 1: how do I create that relationship with a customer. We're 417 00:25:01,040 --> 00:25:05,439 Speaker 1: early days. Is anybody doing everything right? Absolutely not, but 418 00:25:05,520 --> 00:25:08,320 Speaker 1: we're working with lots of retailers that are taking small 419 00:25:08,359 --> 00:25:12,680 Speaker 1: bites at the Apple and truly transforming lots of different things. Okay, 420 00:25:12,880 --> 00:25:15,639 Speaker 1: I wanted to focus and I have no relationship with 421 00:25:15,680 --> 00:25:18,359 Speaker 1: the company. I don't even own their shoes. But All Birds, 422 00:25:18,400 --> 00:25:21,119 Speaker 1: I'm sure you're familiar with All Birds, and if people 423 00:25:21,119 --> 00:25:23,399 Speaker 1: are not familiar with All Birds, they should check it 424 00:25:23,440 --> 00:25:26,080 Speaker 1: out because if you go anywhere in Silicon Valley, this 425 00:25:26,280 --> 00:25:29,960 Speaker 1: is the shoe of choice. Correct, lots of people are wearing. Okay. 426 00:25:30,119 --> 00:25:32,480 Speaker 1: The reason I bring this up is because every sale 427 00:25:32,520 --> 00:25:34,840 Speaker 1: that they make is a sale that a major department 428 00:25:34,920 --> 00:25:39,280 Speaker 1: store didn't make with their own generic brand. It's a 429 00:25:39,280 --> 00:25:42,280 Speaker 1: different brand. You know that this All Birds is an example. 430 00:25:42,359 --> 00:25:46,119 Speaker 1: We recently did some research more in the consumer products side, 431 00:25:46,119 --> 00:25:49,119 Speaker 1: but the same is happening in apparel and footwear into 432 00:25:49,119 --> 00:25:54,359 Speaker 1: what we call insurgent brands. And insurgent brands are in 433 00:25:54,400 --> 00:25:58,679 Speaker 1: the consumer products world. They're only about two percent of sales, 434 00:25:58,880 --> 00:26:03,160 Speaker 1: yet they're capturing of that growth and when you project 435 00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:06,160 Speaker 1: that forward, we think that that's only going to increase 436 00:26:06,280 --> 00:26:10,120 Speaker 1: and capture about of growth. And part of what's happened 437 00:26:10,480 --> 00:26:15,080 Speaker 1: is some of the traditional barriers to entry or traditional 438 00:26:15,160 --> 00:26:19,680 Speaker 1: scale advantages that companies had, particularly in the consumer products space, 439 00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:24,720 Speaker 1: have changed. You no longer need scale advertising budgets to 440 00:26:24,800 --> 00:26:29,639 Speaker 1: reach consumers. You no longer need the the uh you know, 441 00:26:29,960 --> 00:26:33,280 Speaker 1: massive budgets to get the secure shelf space. To secure 442 00:26:33,560 --> 00:26:36,240 Speaker 1: you give them an email newsletter and you offer teen 443 00:26:36,280 --> 00:26:38,879 Speaker 1: percent off for the first purchase, and then you know, 444 00:26:38,960 --> 00:26:41,960 Speaker 1: you say, Tom, all right, you like these issues, will 445 00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:45,520 Speaker 1: sell you, will sell you some more. The trick here, though, is, 446 00:26:45,920 --> 00:26:49,800 Speaker 1: you know, all is not lost. There are new advantages 447 00:26:49,840 --> 00:26:54,160 Speaker 1: of scale that are emerging, and there are new opportunities 448 00:26:54,400 --> 00:27:00,320 Speaker 1: for some of the bigger brands to survive. So, for example, data, 449 00:27:00,680 --> 00:27:03,920 Speaker 1: you know, some of the larger companies have more access 450 00:27:03,960 --> 00:27:07,320 Speaker 1: to consumer data than you could ever imagine, and the 451 00:27:07,359 --> 00:27:12,760 Speaker 1: ability to use that technology to customize the experience is unprecedented. 452 00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:17,159 Speaker 1: So retail in particular has always been a blend of 453 00:27:17,280 --> 00:27:19,879 Speaker 1: art and science. That has always been the case. But 454 00:27:20,000 --> 00:27:24,280 Speaker 1: what we're seeing today is the science has elevated and 455 00:27:24,320 --> 00:27:27,920 Speaker 1: become more accessible and that's what's really going to make 456 00:27:28,119 --> 00:27:33,240 Speaker 1: a winning retailer. On an income statement of a major retailer, 457 00:27:33,359 --> 00:27:37,320 Speaker 1: where's their biggest headache right now? It's a great question, 458 00:27:37,760 --> 00:27:41,200 Speaker 1: I think, um I'd say it's actually perhaps on their 459 00:27:41,280 --> 00:27:44,760 Speaker 1: balance sheet in terms of capital interests that they need 460 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:47,040 Speaker 1: to think they too much capital, They've got to go 461 00:27:47,119 --> 00:27:50,800 Speaker 1: more to invest in technology versus the more traditional Amazon 462 00:27:51,119 --> 00:27:55,640 Speaker 1: out spends most traditional retailers in terms of technology by 463 00:27:55,640 --> 00:27:58,840 Speaker 1: a factor of five or six to one, and that 464 00:27:59,040 --> 00:28:04,040 Speaker 1: is creating a competitive advantage that retailers. I'm just gonna 465 00:28:04,080 --> 00:28:05,800 Speaker 1: ask one quick question that if you were reading a 466 00:28:05,880 --> 00:28:10,040 Speaker 1: due diligence report on any retailer, whether it's an established 467 00:28:10,080 --> 00:28:13,080 Speaker 1: retailer or someone that's brand new, if they don't have 468 00:28:13,119 --> 00:28:15,760 Speaker 1: a page that is specific to how they respond to 469 00:28:15,760 --> 00:28:18,680 Speaker 1: Amazon or deal with an Amazon world, do you kind 470 00:28:18,680 --> 00:28:20,280 Speaker 1: of give it back to them and say, go go 471 00:28:20,359 --> 00:28:24,679 Speaker 1: do your homework. I would do that homework for them, 472 00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:27,280 Speaker 1: to be honest. You know, Amazon is a big threat, 473 00:28:27,320 --> 00:28:29,600 Speaker 1: but let's face that they're not winning everywhere, and there 474 00:28:29,680 --> 00:28:33,040 Speaker 1: is a very proven understanding of where they are a 475 00:28:33,040 --> 00:28:36,560 Speaker 1: threat versus where they're not. You mentioned earlier, so of 476 00:28:36,560 --> 00:28:40,520 Speaker 1: of the market, and you're extrapolating out. We did that 477 00:28:40,560 --> 00:28:43,520 Speaker 1: on Google Search a million years ago and Google just 478 00:28:43,640 --> 00:28:47,160 Speaker 1: kept on going, granted incrementally, what's the ability to Amazon 479 00:28:47,200 --> 00:28:52,920 Speaker 1: to go? You know, it's a great question, and I 480 00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:56,840 Speaker 1: think the two things are happening. Um, in their early days, 481 00:28:57,160 --> 00:29:02,160 Speaker 1: they did not have the wrath of many other players, 482 00:29:02,320 --> 00:29:05,520 Speaker 1: and many of the big companies are are making bold 483 00:29:05,560 --> 00:29:08,760 Speaker 1: moves order to catch up, so there is more competition. 484 00:29:08,800 --> 00:29:11,880 Speaker 1: The second thing is they're moving into categories that are 485 00:29:11,920 --> 00:29:16,880 Speaker 1: traditionally more difficult. Susan Tager think please come back again. 486 00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:20,480 Speaker 1: She does a retail uh as the Salvation of retail. 487 00:29:20,520 --> 00:29:29,320 Speaker 1: She's vice President's Salvation of retail for Bain and Company. 488 00:29:30,840 --> 00:29:35,080 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and 489 00:29:35,120 --> 00:29:40,440 Speaker 1: listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast 490 00:29:40,480 --> 00:29:44,720 Speaker 1: platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before 491 00:29:44,760 --> 00:29:48,600 Speaker 1: the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg 492 00:29:48,680 --> 00:30:00,240 Speaker 1: Radio two.