WEBVTT - TechStuff Takes Off The Training Wheels

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com. He there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer here

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and How Stuff Works. And yes, before I get into it,

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I still have a cold. I'm still dealing with allergies.

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I am recording an episode right after I

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>just recorded another episode, so you get the not at

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan's voice version of Jonathan today. I apologize for that.

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But today I've got the subject that I'm really excited

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about. Now. I've done episodes in the past

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>about electric bikes, but a listener recently pointed out that

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not yet actually discussed the bicycle itself. And so

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>today we're gonna take a look at the bicycle. We're

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna take off the training wheels, and we're gonna look

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>at this evolution and probably make some queen references. We'll

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>see how it goes. But yes, I like to ride

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>my bicycle. I like to ride my bike. So where

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>did the bicycle come from? We're gonna really focus on

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that today. We're looking at the birth and evolution of

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the bicycle as opposed to the latest engrazed in bikes.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll do another episode about that later on. Well, As

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.559
<v Speaker 1>is the case with many inventions, the answer of where

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the bicycle came from is not really that simple an answer.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The bicycle evolved from a series of different inventions, and

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it would be disingenuous to point to a specific person

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 1>as the inventor of the bicycle. Now, I should start

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all of this by talking about the earliest evidence of

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>wheeled vehicles in general, but I'm not gonna spend a

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of time on it, because come on, you

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>don't need a fourteen series episode about the invention and

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>modernization of the wheel. But the actual wheel dates back

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to at least in both Asia and Europe, and going

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>into more detail would be a bit much, even for me.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>The early wheeled vehicles used four wheels for the most part.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not a surprise, as it provides a stable base.

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Historians discovered a few early two wheeled vehicles dating from

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>around that same time, but these were carts and the

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 1>wheels were aligned side by side as opposed to front

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and back like a bicycle. Skipping ahead thousands of years,

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Geovanni Fontana. He was known as not

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>just a fifteenth century doctor of medicine, but also an

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>engineer and even in some circles, a magician, though he

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was using a proto form of the scientific method to

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>get results and didn't necessarily present his work as that

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of a magical nature. He was replicating what magicians claimed

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 1>they could do using scientific principles and saying, doesn't it

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>make more sense that it's done this way? Well. In

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>fourteen twenty five he published a manuscript that detailed a

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>self driving carriage. By that he did not mean an

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>autonomous car, though that would have been incredibly forward thinking

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>back in the fourteen hundreds. Rather, he had suggested a

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>vehicle that would be propelled by the people inside the

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>vehicle itself. Up to that point, land vehicles had to

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>be pulled by animals or other human beings. Fontana suggested

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that a hand powered vehicle could allow for a new

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>method of getting from place to place. His proposal included

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a brief description of a carriage that used ropes and

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>cogs to transform power from a writer or transfer power,

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I should say, from a writer to the wheels of

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle. So imagine sort of a loop of rope

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>wrapped around cogs like their pulleys, and if you pull

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on the rope, you transfer the energy needed to rotate

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the wheels of the carriage itself. But that's about all

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the details we have for this proposed device. If Fontana

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>actually ever tried to build one of these things, it

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>was lost to time. And on a tangential note, before

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I trend for away from Fontana, I have to also

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>mention that he proposed a sort of proto rocket car

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be fueled by gunpowder. Now I mentioned that

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>only because I love how crazy that sounds. I don't

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>think he ever made one of those either, because there

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>are no reports of Fontana having to be dug out

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of the side of a mountain. A French mathematician ended

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>up laying out the argument for human powered vehicles in

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a six nine six manuscript titled Recreations Mathematiques a physiques

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 1>because it's French. He hypothesized that such conveyances would be

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>much more readily available to the general population because you

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have to care for an animal. You wouldn't have

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to have the space to keep a horse, and you

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have to feed it. Plus you could even get

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>some exercise and some fresh air using such a vehicle. However,

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this was just sort of a armchair philosophizing kind of approach.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>He didn't actually build anything. There is interesting story about

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a sketch that was attributed to Leonardo da Vinci, and

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>supposedly that sketch dated back to fourteen three, and not

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>only was it a sketch of what looked like a bicycle,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.799
<v Speaker 1>it even had pedals like it was. It was pretty

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>much a modern style bike, uh in a in a

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 1>sketch format. It's it's undeniably that sort of thing, but

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it is a somewhat crude design. The sketch had remained

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>undiscovered and I say that in air quotes until nineteen

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.359
<v Speaker 1>seventy four, So it was attributed to fourteen but it

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>wasn't uncovered until nineteen seventy four. That was when there

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was an art restoration project. Experts were working on Da

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Vinci's Codex Atlanticus, and supposedly this particular design was part

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of that and just had not been seen for centuries.

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Historians debated the legitimacy of this sketch, and the general

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>consensus is that it's hocum. Here's the weird thing. This

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is not the only example of false attribution to the

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>bicycle's evolution. Another sketch, this one supposedly dating to fift

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty four and made by one of da Vinci's pupils,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>also appears to be a fraud. So what was going on?

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>There are these crazy fake sketches claiming to be the

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>proto design of the bicycle centuries before it was ever

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>really introduced. Well to understand, we need to take a

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>quick detour and then I'll get back to the actual

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>timeline of the bicycles invention. But I think this is

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty fascinating. So in the early twentieth century, European nations

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>were becoming increasingly isolated and jingoistic. It became a point

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of national pride to champion the various advancements and inventions

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>each country could lay claim to. I think of it

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot like the way we treat the Olympics at times.

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>How some people will reduce the Olympics to a discussion

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of our country took home twelve gold medals and your

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>country only took home eight. It's sort of a one

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 1>upsmanship tendency, which I think it's pretty darn tacky because

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it takes attention away from the actual accomplishments, but that's

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>just my own opinion. While his tensions in Europe built

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>toward World War One, more nations were getting involved in

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of this one upsmanship. They were scrambling to prove

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that they were the seat of ingenuity and innovation. And

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it meant that some rather um let's say, creative

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but undaunted by ethics sorts of people would fabricate evidence

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that clever inventions came from their respective homelands. Historians suspected

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that the alleged Da Vinci sketch is one of those examples.

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a forgery intended to give the honor of

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>creating the bicycle to Italians rather than to say, the Germans.

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Spoiler alert, Most historians agree that the bicycle really got

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>started in Germany first. Another bogus claim to the invention

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of the bicycle dates to See and a fellow known

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>as Compt. Deceive Rack. Though it maybe that this bogus

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>claim was arrived at honestly by mistake, as opposed to

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a hoax perpetuated by someone. The good Count allegedly developed

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle called the Salt Affair, which by a nineteenth

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>century historians description sounded a lot like the basic frame

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of a bicycle. According to the description, it had two wheels,

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one set in front of the other. It did not

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>have any pedals or brakes or handlebars. It was essentially

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a frame with a saddle on it, a leather seat,

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and you would sit on the saddle and you would

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>propel yourself with your feet pushing against the ground, and

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>you would steer yourself by leaning left or right, and

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that's as best as you could do. As it turns out,

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>there were vehicles sort of like this, but they were

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>all three or four wheeled vehicles, not two wheeled vehicles.

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Many people, particularly French people, adopted the belief that a

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Frenchman had come up with the idea for a bicycle.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But it appears that was not quite the case. It

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>may well have been an error in translation or transcription.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Now I prefer stories that actually have evidence to support them,

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and I am inclined to give the nod of the

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>invention of the bicycle, or at least the invention of

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a device that would evolve into the bicycle, to a

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>certain Baron Carl von Dreiss in eighteen seventeen. He was

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>concerned with finding a way for people to get around

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>due to recent unfortunate events see an eighteen fifteen. A

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 1>couple of years earlier, there was a volcano in Indonesia

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>called Mount Tambora, and it done blowed up. The volcano

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>ejected an enormous cloud of ash into the atmosphere. Now

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that ash cloud had a global effect. It lowered temperatures

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>across the world. It was kind of like a nuclear winter, except,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of course, this is a volcanic one. This in turn

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>led to massive crop failures in certain regions around the world,

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 1>like in Europe, and that led to other problems such

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>as animals like horses, dying of starvation. So there was

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a shortage of horses in Europe at the time. Dryce

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to invent a means of getting around quickly despite

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this lack of horses. The good Baron came up with

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a novel idea, assuming that the previous examples I mentioned

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>were in fact hoaxes and not just poorly recorded history.

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It was again a two wheeled vehicle, with one wheel

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>set in front of the other. It had a padded

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>saddle to sit upon and a set of handlebars for steering.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>There were no pedals and only a single wheel break

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>so again, and for real, the writer would push him

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>or herself along the ground with his or her feet.

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest, it was mostly hymns and he's that

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about because there were lots of laws about

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>what women could and could not wear, and most of

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>those were not conducive to riding a vehicle of this design.

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So what was this thing called? Well, it actually had

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>several names. Dryce called it the laos machine, which means

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>running machine. You gotta love the German language in which

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>new words are invented by just stringing existing words together

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and you just end up with a very long new word.

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>According to the sources I referenced, he used this name

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>originally for a four wheeled vehicle of his design, but

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>he later adapted the same name to the two wheeled model.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>It was known in English as the dry zine or

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>dry Zine d r A I s I n E.

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>In French it was the dry zen oh, and it

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>was also called a velocipede. Velocipede would become a generic

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>term for these sort of two wheeled vehicles for many

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.959
<v Speaker 1>many years. Uh In England, it was also sometimes called

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a hobby horse or and this is my favorite a

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>dandy horse because they were expensive, so typically only really

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>rich people in nice clothing were striding along with these suckers.

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>The word velocipede would be used for many such vehicles

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for decades until the term bicycle came around. Now people

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>liked these when they could ride them on nice, smooth surfaces,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>because a push with your foot would propel you much

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>further than just if you were to take a regular step,

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>so you travel more ground faster than normal, So you

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be going at ridiculous speeds, but you could certainly

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>get across a sidewalk area much faster than if you

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 1>were just strolling, and it had a certain appeal. Dryce's

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>invention was a hefty one. It was made out of

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>wood and brass and iron shod wheels, plus that leather saddle.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing weighed around fifty pounds or twenty three

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>For a few years, his invention was all the rage

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. Over in England, a coachmaker named Dennis Johnson

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>began to market his own variation of Dryce's invention, and

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the inspired a few seasons of vigorous sporting events among

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the aristocracy of London, but turned out to mostly just

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be a fad, and excitement died down by the eighteen twenties.

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So why did it go out of style so quickly? Well,

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it might have had something to do with writing conditions.

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>The vehicles worked best on smooth paved surfaces. Now, most

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>roads in Europe did not fit that description. They were

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>a cobblestone if you were lucky, But sidewalks were frequently

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>very smooth, so velocopied writers would stick to sidewalks and

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they would terrorize pedestrians. This might sound pretty familiar if

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you're a pedestrian out there, and I'm sure you've got

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>your own story or stories of crazed bicyclists barreling down

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>pedestrian walkways. Anyway, many places ended up passing laws that

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>would forbid velocipede writers to go on sidewalks, and since

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>they were incredibly uncomfortable to ride on rutted roads or

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a cobblestone streets, they faded from common use. Meanwhile, across

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the pond, the early invention had debuted in the United States.

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>There was a man named W. K. Clarkson Jr. Who

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>received a patent for a velocipede in eighteen nineteen and

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I would love to tell you more about mention, but

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>sadly all records of that particular patent were destroyed in

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thirty six and a fire at the U. S.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>Patent Office, And I may have to do an episode

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one day about that particular event, because it definitely had

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>a major impact on innovation and invention at the early

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century in the United States. Next, we come to

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>another possible hoax, or at least potential misinformation. There's a

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>story that a Scottish blacksmith named Kirkpatrick McMillan came up

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with the idea of attaching pedals to a bicycle in

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen thirty nine, which would be decades before anyone else

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>had thought of this. Now, these pedals didn't turn gears

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that were connected by a chain the way a modern

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>bicycle does. According to the story, they were treadle style pedals,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>so they were connecting to rods that were in a

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>position so that they in turn would rotate the rear wheel.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So solid rods as opposed to a chain drive. You

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>can kind of think of the way a locomotive uses

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>these sort of rods to turn wheels. If you've ever

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>seen pictures of that same sort of idea for these

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>particular bikes. The front wheel was steerable, so you had

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to have that be freely turnable left or right. That's

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>why it was a rear wheel drive. But some historians

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are skeptical of this account. The stories of McMillan's work

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>were first publicized in the eighteen nineties and they came

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>from a guy named James Johnston, who, as it turns out,

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>was related to macmillan. There is an account from an

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen forty two edition of a newspaper in Glasgow of

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a minor accident involving a quote velocipede of ingenious design

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>end quote, and Johnston says that article is all about McMillan.

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>But since there's no actual mention of macmillan's name in

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the article, nor a description of how the velocity design

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>was ingenious, the matter is not quite settled. In fact,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one bit of evidence arguing against this claim is that

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the article referred to the operator of the velocipede as

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman. Macmillan, who was a tradesman, would not have

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>qualified for that distinction in the extremely class conscious United Kingdom.

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So it may well be that McMillan was the first

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to attach pedals to a two wheeled vehicle in this manner,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but we just lack the evidence. There's a similar story

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that tells the tale of Gavin Dalzel of les Mahago,

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure I'm mispronouncing because you get to these

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>tiny English names and Scottish names and you get fourteen

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>syllables once written out, but you realize that when you

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>pronounce it it's Fanshaw. Anyway, Dalzel was a cooper in

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen forties. That means he's he made barrels. He's

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a barrel maker, and he was said to have made

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a rear drive bicycle in eighteen forty five based off

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of Macmillan's design, though again this is undocumented. Now his

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>son would go on to donate one of Dalzell's bikes

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Lasgow Transport Museum, but that happened several years later.

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>In eighteen sixty three, a French design changed the way

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>people got around on these two wheeled vehicles, another entry

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>into the velociped category. This design had pedals mounted to

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the hub of the front wheel, so there's no chain

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>drive or anything like that. The pedals were literally attached

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 1>to the wheel hub. Peddling would drive the front wheel

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and provide the power needed to move forward. It was

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a challenge to operate, and on top

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of that, most models were made of unyielding materials and

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>had steel wheels or ironclad wheels, so if you were

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to ride one of those on say a couple Stone Street,

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you'd be in for a pretty rough ride. As a result,

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>those sort of vehicles gained a nickname bone shakers. Some

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>large cities began to build special indoor writing academies were

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>well to do. Velociped owners could come together and ride

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>without worrying about shaking themselves to pieces. And it was

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>right around this time that the word bicycle began to

0:17:55.880 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>enter the common lexicon, slowly replacing velocipede and other names

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>for two wheeled human powered vehicles. Now I've got a

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>lot more to say about the evolution of bicycles, but

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a quick break to thank our sponsor.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>The first documented rod driven two wheeled vehicle might not

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>be the first one ever, but the first one that's

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>documented dates to eighteen sixty nine. Thomas McCall of Kilmarnock

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was the inventor, but his design didn't gain much popularity

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>as the front crank velocipedes did, which were mostly three

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>or four wheeled vehicles at that time, and they were

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>easier to operate. Also, in eighteen sixty nine, there was

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a Frenchman named Eugene Meyer who patented the wire spoke

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>tension wheel for bicycles. Wire spoke wheels were first proposed

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>decades earlier, back in eighteen o eight, in fact, by

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>George Kayley, but that was for a totally different type

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of vehicle. And this gives me a chance to talk

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>about how wire spoke wheels work. Only enough, it's more

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>complicated than you might imagine. All right, so why would

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we even have a wire spoke wheel? What? What's the

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>big deal here? It's largely to provide stability to the

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>wheel and connect the rim of the wheel, which is

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the outer edge, with the hub of the wheel that's

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the inner edge, the part that rotates around an axle.

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 1>The spokes help a wheel support a load such as

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a rider on a bike, without collapsing. Now, the wire

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>spokes are just what they sound like. They're spokes made

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>out of thin wire. You'll have a couple of dozen

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.160
<v Speaker 1>spokes connecting the rim to the hub, and each wire

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>spoke has to be tightened carefully in a process called

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:47.959
<v Speaker 1>pretension ing. Now, ideally, you want each of the spokes

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to create the same amount of tension on the hub

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in the center. They're all pulling the hub, but from

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>different directions and at the same strength. So let's make

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>an analogy to understand what's going on here. Imagine that

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>you are standing in the center of a circle of friends,

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and each friend is holding a rope, and that rope

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>connects to a sturdy hula hoop that's at your feet.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You're standing right in the middle of that hula hoop.

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>At a signal, all of your friends pull on their

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>ropes and they all exert exactly the same amount of force.

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>The hula hoop will rise up around you, but it

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>won't touch you because everyone is pulling on it from

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>all directions at the same amount of force simultaneously. So

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what a bicycle wheel is doing with the hub.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Those spokes are all pulling on the hub simultaneously and

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>with the same amount of force. Now Here enters a

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>tricky question when you place a load on a bicycle wheel,

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>such as you know when you get on a bike. Uh,

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>so you and your regulators all mount up on bicycles.

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>When you do that, that deforms the wheel slightly. The

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>increased weight causes the bottom of the wheel to flatten

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 1>out just a little bit. So the question is does

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the hub stand on the wire spokes that are below it,

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>as in the ones that lead straight down to where

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the ground is, or does the hub hang from the

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>spokes that are above it connecting it to the rim. Now,

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>remember each of those wires is tightened so that it

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>has tension, deforming the bottom of the wheel, which means

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're slightly pushing the rim inward. Reduces that tension

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>because you are applying a compressive force. If this were

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a table instead of a bicycle, and the spokes were

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the table legs, we'd say the table legs were experiencing

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>compression and we're holding up the table, and that the

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>table was standing on its legs. But with wheels it's

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>not quite so simple. The wire spokes beneath the hub

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>experienced compression, but it's not enough to return the wires

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to their pretensioned state. So, in other words, the wires

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>below the hub still have tension on them, just not

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as much as they did before the wheel had to

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>carry a load. Some argue that if the spokes still

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>have tension, which means technically they are still pulling on

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>the hub, they're just not pulling as hard as they

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>were before the compression was applied, they cannot be said

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to support the hub. So the hub cannot stand on

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>those spokes. You can't stand on something that's pulling downward.

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>It's because standing on references like a push, so you

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>can't push if the forces a pull. So these folks

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>argue you'd have to say the hub hangs in place

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>from the spokes around it, rather than stands on the

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>spokes below it. Other people argue that this stance doesn't

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>make any sense, and that the hub does in fact

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>stand on the wire spokes beneath it, and some of

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>them have used a lot of math and computer simulations

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to back up their arguments. In some cases, I think

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you could just say that this is semantics, that one

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>side and the other aren't really arguing opposites, but rather

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they are working from different perspectives and definitions in an

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>attempt to describe the same thing. I think it is

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>fascinating that something is seemingly simple as a wire spoke

0:23:22.680 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>bicycle wheel could evoke such a fuss in the first place,

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and there really is a fuss. If you want to

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 1>go down a rabbit hole, you can start doing searches

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>on how wire spoke wheels work and see the incredible

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>arguments between people who insist that the hub stands on

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>the spokes or that the spokes hang the hub. Now,

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>all we really need to know is that the wheels

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>work and that they made bicycles lighter. That's really important

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>because there using these thin wires, you don't have to

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>use massive amounts of materials to build working wheels. That

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>reduced weight of the bicycles and made them more attractive,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because up to this point you were still talking about

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>bicycles that weighed fifty pounds or more. I was incredibly heavy.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Reducing the amount of materials you needed to make your

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>bicycle was an attractive proposition. It brought the cost down

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and made them more practical, and so slowly we saw

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>bicycles become lighter, particularly as metallurgical sciences progressed and lighter,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>stronger metal alloys became available. Myer's approach led to an

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting trend in design known as the high bicycle or

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>high wheeler, sometimes also known as the ordinary and later

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>on known as the penny farthing. These are those old

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>timey bikes you've likely seen in photographs or maybe even

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in person. They feature a much larger front wheel than

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the rear wheel, sometimes significantly larger, and the pedals are

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>attached directly to the hub of the front wheel, so

0:24:55.680 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>when you pedal, your directly rotating that front wheel. Improvements

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in construction and design meant that you could have a

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>wheel with a sixty diameter. That's that's five ft or

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>one and a half meters diameter. Of course, to ride

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>such a bicycle, you'd have to have legs long enough

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to reach the pedals, so you were limited by the

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>length of your legs what sort of bicycle you could ride.

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But why would you even want a large wheel in

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the first place? What what was the deal there? Well,

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that has to do with wheel circumference, rotational speed, and

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>travel speed. So get out your pencils and paper. Let's

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>do some drawing. So first draw two circles and make

0:25:36.480 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the second circle about twice as big as the first circle.

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Then in the middle of those two circles, draw a

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller circle in each That inner circle will represent the

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>wheel hub and the outer circles will represent the wheel rims. Now,

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine you have pedals attached to each of those hubs.

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 1>One rotation of the petals will equal one full rotation

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of the respective wheel. Let's assume you've matched the revolutions

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>per minute on both wheels, so you're peddling the same

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.239
<v Speaker 1>speed on the small wheel as you would on the

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>big wheel. From that perspective, from just the revolutions per minute,

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you might say you're going the same speed on both wheels. However,

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the larger wheel will cover more ground in a single

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>rotation than the smaller wheel. So if you took those

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 1>circles and you straighten them out so that they were

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just straight lines, the circumference just becomes a straight line.

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>The larger wheel would be a longer line, and that's

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the amount of space you would cover in one rotation.

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So rotation speeds are the same, and you're getting maybe

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say, let's make it simple. We'll say one rotation

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>per second, so sixty rotations per minute. So both wheels

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>turn at sixty rotations a minute. But the larger wheel

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to cover more ground in that space, which

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>means your travel speed. Using a larger wheel is faster,

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>so that was why you started seeing penny Farthings. With

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>these larger and larger wheels in the front. It meant

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that rich people who had a death wish could ride really,

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>really freaking fast. So the Ordinaries and penny Farthings became

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>popular for gentlemen with long legs and a desire to

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>go quite fast and potentially terrifying pedestrians because we made

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.879
<v Speaker 1>our own fund back then. One big disadvantage of that

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>design was safety, or rather a lack of so the

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>writer had to maintain our position high up over the

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>front wheel to pedal properly. You know, you need to

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>be able to see where you're going, you had to

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to balance, and you had to be able

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to pedal that front wheel. The handlebars were typically directly

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>over the hub, and your legs would be snug underneath them.

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, most handlebars were designed in such a way

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>where there was a little bit of a bulge across

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the handlebars so that your your legs could move up

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and down underneath them, but otherwise it was really close

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to the wheel, so you're you're kind of sandwiched in.

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.919
<v Speaker 1>If you were to hit an obstruction like a rut

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>in the road or a rock or something, you might

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>find yourself flying over the top of the wheel quite

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>high up, in such a way that you're nearly guaranteed

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to land on your head. Those handlebars would prevent you

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 1>from flying straight off. You would end up following the

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 1>rotational direction of the wheel, and you would face plant

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in front of your bicycle. And remember you're potentially more

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:34.120
<v Speaker 1>than five ft up because of the size of those wheels.

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>This is where the phrase taking a header came from.

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>The scenario happened frequently enough for there to be a

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>phrase to describe it, and to this day, taking a

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>header means to experience a sharp and sudden decline. Writing

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>these things was really hard. You had to get a

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>running start, for one thing, and then you had to

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>jump onto the ordinary or penny farthing and hope that

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you did it correctly. When you came to a stop,

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you had to jump off again, as there was no

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 1>way to put your feet down to steady yourself. A

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>famous American author wrote about this experience, that author being

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Mark Twain, and he summed it up pretty nicely. I

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>think his is This is a quote from Mark twain

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>about writing an ordinary or penny farthing. When you have

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>reached the point in bicycling where you can balance the

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>machine tolerably fairly and propel it and steer it, then

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.719
<v Speaker 1>comes your next task, how to mount it? You do

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it in this way. You hop along behind it on

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>your right foot, resting the other on the mounting peg,

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and grasping the tiller with your hands. At the word,

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you rise on the peg, stiffen your left leg, hang

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>your other one around in the air in a general

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and indefinite way, lean your stomach against the rear of

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the saddle, and then fall off, maybe on one side,

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe on the other. But you fall off. You get up,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and you do it again, and once more, and then

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>several times. By this time you have learned to keep

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>your balance and also to steer without wrenching the tiller

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 1>out by the roots. I say tiller because it is

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a tiller. Handlebar is a lamely descriptive phrase. So you

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>steer along straight ahead a little while. Then you rise

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>forward with a steady strain, bringing your right leg and

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>then your body into the saddle. Catch your breath, fetch

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a violent hitch this way, and then that, and down

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you go again. Seems pretty accurate to me, Mr Twain. Well,

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot more to say about the evolution

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of bicycles, but before I continue, let's take another quick

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>break and thank our sponsor. Around this time when we

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>start to see the rise of the ordinary or Penny Farthing,

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>materials for bicycles were slowly changing as well. Wheels started

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to switch over to solid rubber wheel, so instead of

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>having iron sheets nailed to a wooden frame, you had

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>solid rubber that provided a softer ride, though obviously not

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>nearly as soft as the later pneumatic tires would. Ball

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bearings also became a thing that made wheel rotation along

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the actle much more smooth, as well as handlebar motions.

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So these are just ball bearings that that allow for

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a smoother movement between different elements. You just have to

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the fit is snug without being too tight,

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 1>because if it's too tight, then the balls will just

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>snug up against the edges and it will prevent any

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of turning at all. But it meant motions in

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>general on the bicycle became more elegant and less jerky

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and and violent and difficult to control. Oh and you

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>might wonder why these things were called penny farthings. Well,

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in England at the time penny coin measured either thirty

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>four millimeters or thirty one millimeters in diameter. That would

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>depend on whether it was an old carper copper penny

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>before eighteen sixty or a bronze penny. When they switched

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>over far things which were worth one quarter of a penny,

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>as in one fourth of a penny, we're twenty two

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>millimeters in diameter if they were made of copper, or

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty millimeters that they were made of bronze. So the

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>ordinaries wheels were similarly of different sizes. You had the

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.479
<v Speaker 1>larger penny and the smaller farthing. Well, that was kind

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of like the larger front wheel and the smaller rear wheel.

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>While rich men were causing themselves head trauma on penny farthings.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Groundbreaking work was underway in France as far back as

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty eight. A French watchmaker named Andre Gulime came

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 1>up with an alternative to the front wheel pedal mounts

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the ordinary bicycles. His design used a chain drive,

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, we didn't even learn about his contributions

0:32:53.240 --> 0:32:55.959
<v Speaker 1>to this uh. In fact, you could argue that there

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't contributions at all, because it was pretty much kept

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to himself when one of his relatives discovered one of

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Glum's old bikes in storage after Gloomy himself had passed away.

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>The simple chain right by the way consists of pedals

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>mounted to a crank. The crank has got a gear

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>wheel typically called the chain wheel, mounted to it, so

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>when you pedal, you turn the crank, and the crank,

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in turn is since it's mounted to this chain wheel,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>turns the chain wheel. The teeth of this chain wheel

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>fit into links on a bike chain. The chain is

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>in a loop, and the other end of that loop

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>is mounted around a second gear wheel. This one is

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>connected to the hub, typically of the rear bicycle wheel,

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:47.959
<v Speaker 1>although there were front wheel chain drives as well, UH

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in sort of a hybrid of this style and penny farthings.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you push on the pedals you would turn

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>this chain wheel. That would end up engaging the teeth

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>into the bicycle chain, rotating the chain loop anyway, and

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>then that would again transfer rotational motion to the back

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>gear wheel, which would in turn turn the that wheel.

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>The freely turning rear wheel most of the time. So

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:18.399
<v Speaker 1>the ratio of gear teeth between the rear wheels gear

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>wheel and the chain wheel would determine how fast you

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>would go per rotation of the pedals. So let's take

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a standard bike wheel so that I can explain how

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>chain drives work. It makes it easier if we just

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>work with an easily understandable standard. A typical bike wheel

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 1>might be twenty six inches in diameter. So if we

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>take the good old handy formula and we can figure

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>out that the circumference of this wheel is eight one

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>seven inches or so, meaning that if we were to

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>take the wheel and lay it out flat, you know,

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 1>un unwheel it. In other words, it would lay out

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to a length of eighty one point seven inches. One

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>full rotation the wheel would take you that far. But

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 1>how much pedaling is required to make one rotation that

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>would depend upon the gear ratio. So let's say that

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>the chain wheel, you know, the one that attaches to

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the crank that is attached to the pedals, has twenty

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>two teeth, and the rear wheels gear has thirty teeth.

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>That gives us a twenty two to thirty ratio. Also,

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a you could argue it down to a point seven

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>three to one ratio, which means if you were to

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.439
<v Speaker 1>do a full pedal stroke on the chain wheel one

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>full rotation, the rear wheel would only turn point seven

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>three times, so not quite three quarters of a rotation.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But if the ratio were different, let's say the chain

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>wheel has and the rear wheel has eleven teeth on

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>its gear, you'd see a lot more turning in that

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>rear wheel per turn of the crank. That would give

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>us a four to one ratio, which means every time

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the crank wheel turn once, the rear wheel will go

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 1>around four times. So if you tried it out two

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>bikes with the gear ratios I just mentioned, and you

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>were peddling those two bikes at exactly the same rate,

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you get on one and you peddle it where you're

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>again going maybe sixty revolutions per minute, and then you

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>get on the other one and you do it sixty

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>revolutions per minute. On the first bike, you'll find yourself

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.879
<v Speaker 1>ambling along at a leisurely pace, and on the second

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:31.719
<v Speaker 1>bike you'll find yourself zooming down at ridiculous speeds. The

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>gear ratios are what allowed bicycle manufacturers to create chain

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>driven bikes that could attain speeds of the high wheelers

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>without all those drawbacks. Remember the high wheelers. The reason

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>they kept getting taller and taller was that the taller

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 1>wheels would allow people to go faster as long as

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>their legs were long enough to pedal the pedals. Using

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>gear ratios with chain drives would allow the same thing,

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>although it would take quite some time to get there,

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and it would take even longer to get two bicycles

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that would have multiple gears and not just a single gear.

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Goolo May didn't really do anything with that bike design,

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, it just kind of sat in his workshop.

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It would take a few decades for others to kind

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of pick up this particular approach. It wasn't until the

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 1>mid eighteen eighties, well into the mid eighteen nineties that

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you start seeing chain driven bikes emerge and get some popularity.

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Some of them actually used chain driven front wheels like

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, and they still had a larger wheel in

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the front as well Penny Farthing style. But a British

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>engineer and entrepreneur named John kept Starley changed things with

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a bicycle called the Rover two. John kept Starley was

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the nephew of John Starley. John Starlely was a successful

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>businessman who had started off with sewing machines really and

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>had moved on to making ordinaries or penny farthings and

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 1>did quite well with them. So his nephew J. K.

0:37:58.760 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Starley picked up the mantle and his first bicycle was

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.879
<v Speaker 1>known as the Rover, and it featured a chain drive.

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It also had a larger front wheel, so still kind

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of penny farthing ish, uh, But because his design didn't

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>require the writer to perch at the top of a

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 1>precariously high wheel, it became known as a new type

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of bicycle. Instead of it being a velocipede or a

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>penny farthing or an ordinary or a bone shaker, these

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>became known as safety bicycles. That classification would be used

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.799
<v Speaker 1>for chain bikes for years, So the bicycle that you

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and I are familiar with is really an outgrowth of

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>these safety bicycles from the late nineteenth century. The Rover

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>two was different. It had two wheels that were more

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>or less of equivalent size, so no longer did we

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 1>have that larger front wheel. It also had a frame

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that looks a lot like the typical diamond shaped frame

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll see in modern bikes, although it lacked a few

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>things like the seat tube that modern bikes have. So

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a frame on a modern bike has a tube inside

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>which you can fit a pipe where the bike seat

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is mounted, and you can typically adjust the height of

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the seat. That was not a feature of the rover too.

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you take a look at a picture of

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>a rover too, you'll see the unmistakable features of a

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>modern bicycle. The fact that these style bikes were called

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>safety bicycles might have hurt sales a little bit. They

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>actually did have other names too that also seemed diminutive,

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.760
<v Speaker 1>like in France, they were known as bicyclets like little

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>bicycle essentially is what that means, and some people interpret

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.160
<v Speaker 1>this as meaning the vehicles weren't meant for big, old, rugged,

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 1>manly men who had better things to do than avoid

0:39:47.920 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>having their brains smashed in whenever they hit a small

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>rut in the road. Around the same time, other engineering

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 1>advances brought about features like caliber brakes, which made it

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>easier to control bicycles, and pneumatically inflated tires helped smooth

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>out the ride and made bicycling more comfortable, as well

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 1>as safe. The pneumatic tire was originally meant to help

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a young boy have a smoother ride on a tricycle.

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The inventor of the pneumatic tire was a Scottish veterinarian

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>named John boyd Dunlop. He had a son who was

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:22.479
<v Speaker 1>in poor health and Dunlop wanted to help his boy

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to play, and so he invented the pneumatic

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>tire in order to help his son have a good

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>time on his tricycle, and that would go on to

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>change bicycling and later on the car industry. In fact,

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the advancements made during this era with

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>bicycles would carry over into the automotive industry. By the

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>late eight nineties, mass production had become a thing, and

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that meant the bicycles could be made in greater numbers,

0:40:46.680 --> 0:40:49.359
<v Speaker 1>which brought down their cost and it made them more

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>easily accessible to a larger customer base. At the same time,

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>there were changes in the way women were allowed to dress.

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>I hate having to use that phrase that way, but

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that is how things were back then, and so there

0:41:02.520 --> 0:41:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are also changes in bicycle design that we're catering so

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.759
<v Speaker 1>to women so that they too could ride bicycles, because

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.439
<v Speaker 1>up to that point, the design of bicycles was such

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that women were unable to ride them while also uh

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 1>committing to the social morays of how they should dress

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in polite society. Women would typically ride larger, three wheeled

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that were similar to the penny farthing in design,

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 1>but didn't require you to sit astride an enormous bicycle, which,

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, is hard to do if you

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.959
<v Speaker 1>also have to wear an ankle length dress. I think

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a pretty good place to wrap up this episode.

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole lot more we could talk about, even

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in the evolution of the bicycle, and then, of course

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.479
<v Speaker 1>there's more to talk about with the future developments, things

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>like gear switching bikes, UH, the UH, the first appearance

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of the fix E and then the return of the

0:41:57.480 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>fix E, the evolution of materials like carbon fiber, and

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. So. Maybe I'll do a follow up

0:42:03.239 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>episode in the future where I touch on those. In

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, if you have any suggestions for future episodes

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff, you can get in touch with me.

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 1>My email address for this show is tech Stuff at

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com, or you can drop me

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a line on Facebook or Twitter. The handle of both

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of those is tech Stuff hs W. Remember I stream

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>live on Wednesdays and Fridays over at twitch dot tv

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>slash tech Stuff. Hope to see you over there and

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>join me in the chat room. Also, don't forget to

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>follow our Instagram account. And I think that's it. I'm done.

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go, uh go for a bike ride and

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. For more on

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics, is it how stuff

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 1>works dot com