WEBVTT - The Psychology of Genre - Lab 090

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm t T and I'm Zakiyah and this is Dope Labs.

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Dope Labs, a weekly podcast that mixes hardcore

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>science with pop culture and a healthy dose of friendship.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I had went with a friend to a workout class.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It was like, it was kind of like Orange Theory,

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't Orange theory, and everybody in the class

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it was basically a white woman over fifty five must

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>have been of the day then, I mean the day

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that tracks that tracks. Yeah. And so Kendrick and Siss

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a song Luther came on, you know and like it's

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>hot yeah, and I was like, oh, this is the

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>right vibe. Yeah, and they were like, oh my goodness.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>They were acting like the song was so vulgar. They

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>hated it. So one of them was exactly, and so

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the instructor was like, okay, let me change the song.

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>She hits next on her shuffle and the next song

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is Messy by Lola Young and that's that song about

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that British girls like I'm too messy and I can't

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>even say the word. She curses like twenty times in

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>the song, and so I was like, you know what,

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>let me look it up there are no curse words

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in Luther, but that messy song, I think she curses

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty times exactly and messy, And I was just like, so,

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not really about it's not really about the words, right,

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not, Yeah, because it's not really vulgar. And so

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that makes me have a lot of questions about how

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>our brains are processing these different genres. Mm hmm. That

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a little psychology. Genre seems to have control

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>over our minds, and we definitely need to take a

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>deeper look into this. Yes, let's jump into the recitation. Okay,

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>what do we want to know? I want to know

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>why we are like this is this biology or psychology? Like,

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what is listening? It's not just happening where you saw it,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's happening everywhere. It's happening. When it comes to country music,

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 1>it's happening. When it comes to rap, it's happening people.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't like pop songs, so it's giving. Everybody's got

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the same thing going on, whatever it is. Yeah, And

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and what are we trying to gain by boxing everybody

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>into these different genres? Yeah? I mean what qualifies as

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>hip hop or country or R and B or pop?

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, like what determines is it the person or

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>is it certain beats or certain instruments. And that's not

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>even just happening in music, because you remember when the

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Bear one for comedy, like for best Comedy, everybody was

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>up and our is not a comedy. Sorry yeah, but

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and they were mad. But I'm like, I mean, maybe

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's funny to somebody, not me, but yeah, I don't

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's funny. But I think people get really tied

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:04.639
<v Speaker 1>into like the music aspect of this kind of boxing

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in that's where I feel like the strongest feelings pop up.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And I also want to know if this is a

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>new thing or have we always been like this. M

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a very good question. I think that's plenty for

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>us to figure out. Let's jump into the dissection. Let's

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>start with why our brains group things in categories in

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the first place. It's actually evolutionary, that's right, come through biology.

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Human brains have evolved over time to categorize objects, people,

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and experiences, and that's just a fundamental cognitive process. Having

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the ability to group similar things together helps us navigate

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>complex environments efficiently. Think of it like a mental shortcut

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to get a response. Okay. So like if you think

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>back to the cavemen, they were able to categorize sounds

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and things that they saw in order to figure out

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>if there was danger, and they were able to figure

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that out really quickly. And ever since then, we've been

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>categor grising everything for the same reasons to create these

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>shortcuts in our brains. Yes, and that strategy is essential

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>for learning and memory, and it helps us easily store

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and retrieve information in our brains efficiently. But putting things

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in categories isn't always for survival. Like all things in

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this world, some people start making categories to box people

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in yep and box people out. H that's right. In

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.720
<v Speaker 1>social context, categorization helps people navigate complex social environments by

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>grouping people based on shared characteristics such as age, gender,

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>or ethnicity. While this can help us with social dynamics

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>like you knowing not to cuss in front of my parents,

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right, I love you at Vicky and Uncle Slug,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I would never that's right, it also has a potential

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.799
<v Speaker 1>lead to stereotyping and prejudice and discrimination in other cases,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is what we're exploring in today's lab through

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the music lens with genres today, we have our really

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>good friend Call, and Call is the host of the

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>critically acclaimed podcast Dissect. In Dissect, he takes an album

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and he dissects each song line by line. He's done

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to Pimp a Butterfly, Blonde, because the Internet, and most recently,

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Mister Morale and the Big Steppers. Back in twenty twenty,

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I had the honor of being dissects first ever co

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>host for his season on Beyonce's visual album Lemonade, and

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it was an amazing experience that I will never forget.

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>So I'm happy to have you here on the show.

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Call Finally, Yes, finally, I Ken, was I ever on

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the first iteration? No? Okay, too busy for us? In

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>burna Boy videos and things like that. So let's start

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>with the basics. When you think of music genres, what

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>are the broad categories that come to your mind? And

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>how do you personally group music that you're listening to

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or when you're exploring new music.

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think as a musician and as someone that

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 2>is formally studying music, I think I probably think about

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>genre maybe a little bit differently than the common listener,

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 2>just because with music, every genre or every medium that

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 2>has genres you can categorize. You can make the categories

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 2>based on an x amount of things, right, Like, so

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 2>with music, it could be instruments, it could be certain rhythms,

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 2>it could be certain dialects, you know, and so there's

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of an infinite amount of potential categorizations that could

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 2>happen within music. As much as genre is meant to simplify,

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 2>it also kind of makes things very complex, which is

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 2>kind of the the economy of a genre, right. It's

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>like it's at once very limiting but also very useful,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 2>and so there's this complex relationship with the new music.

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.799
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the interestings of things about genre

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.919
<v Speaker 2>is that each genre kind of has its own history.

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 2>And so when I'm listening to, like, say a new

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>hip hop song, I'm wondering, Okay, what is this artist

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>contributing to the genre? How are they adhering to the

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 2>tradition so that we think about it as a hip

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>hop song, but also how are they breaking from genre

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 2>or adding something new to the genre, Which is the

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 2>only way It's just like language, that's the only way

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>it's alive, is that if new things are happening within it.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>So as someone is that is kind of looking at

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>the history of music a lot and thinking about it

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>and where things are going, where things are being. Those

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 2>are the things I'm kind of thinking about as I'm

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>listening to new music.

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.239
<v Speaker 1>You kind of touched on like genres evolving and growing,

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and when we think about the evolution of rock and

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the rise of new genres, why do you think this

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>need I don't know if that's broadly by the listeners.

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if this is imposed from the music

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>industry itself, But why do you think this need to

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>categorize music is so like prominent?

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's hard to talk about it without getting

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 2>into deeper questions about humanity, to be honest, because it's

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 2>such a reflection of humans tendency to simplify. And I mean,

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>it's just easier to think about anything if you're able

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>to limit it the infinite into something that is you

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 2>can you feel like you have a grasp on right.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 2>And so I think it's a double edged sword in

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 2>that it's very useful to talk about genres. I think

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>it makes conversations easier, it makes it easier to study.

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>But we do get in trouble when we oversimplify and

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 2>when we use the genre or the category to keep

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 2>people confined, right, And I think that's where we get

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>into trouble with genre, is that there are certain unspoken

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>rules and expectations that come with it. There are certain

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 2>identities that are more prominently respected within it, and it

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 2>ends up getting tangled with in this country, the history

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of this country, and a lot of the genres, the

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>way history has been told in this country. It just

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>gets kind of tangled up in all of that just

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>by the name mature of just being what humans do

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>right across all mediums and categories.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Right. I think it's such a great point that you're

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 1>making about humanity because I think what a lot of

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>people forget when they're listening to music is that the

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>artists are people with very complex backgrounds that they're also

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>bringing to the table as soon as they step up

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to the mic. Yeah, Cole, you and I did a

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>few seasons of your show dissect on Beyonce's Lemonade Visual

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>album and also Black is King, and Beyonce is a

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>great example of being put into a specific genre where

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it would be like more popular pop music R and B.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And now she has gotten a Grammy for a rap,

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>She's gotten Grammys for country music. This isn't typical. Can

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you talk about artists that you've seen and kind of

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>your experience that have been able to push the bounds

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of their genre.

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think. I mean Beyonce is probably the best

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 2>modern example of someone that is actively in the moment

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 2>trying to break down barriers within genre and making a

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 2>real point about the limitations placed on her and her

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 2>being a representative of this larger thing that's happened in

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>this country forever, to the point where when she made

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 2>her Grammy speech about the country artists, she talked about

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 2>genre and specifically said how it's been used and kind

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>of weaponized against her and people like her and to

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>keep them contained. And when you study Beyonce's background, it's

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 2>not a surprise that she's making a country influenced album,

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 2>yet given her appearance or and her history in music,

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 2>there's just these unspoken rules and limitations placed upon her.

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>It's also restoring the roots that have been erased in

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>these genres and the contributions of black musicians to these genres,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to dance music to country, and then next everyone's predicting rock,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 2>which makes total sense. TT in our Lemonade season, we

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 2>talk talked about artists like sister Rosetta Tharp and these women,

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 2>black women, black musicians that made contributions to rock music

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 2>that often get overlooked. And so I think she's doing

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 2>a beautiful job at contextualizing so much about genre in

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the current moment.

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Cole, you have a degree in music theory, so I

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>know you can take us way back. Are there any

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>classical musicians that broke out of their genres?

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Classical musicians. It's interesting because literally named the great classical musician.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 2>We think of your Given, you know, your Mozart, your Beethoven,

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>All of them are great because they broke rules, because

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>they expanded the limitations of a genre. You know, like

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Beethoven really kind of got sh for we think of

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 2>like his famous Fifth Symphony, which literally everyone knows it's

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 2>like one of the most enduring pieces of music and history,

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 2>if not the most, and that specific symphony was like

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of backlash because it was so avant garde.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>It didn't adhere to the formality of classical music at

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the time. And so that's always the challenge of someone

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 2>that is defying genre and categorization is that in the

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 2>moment they typically get a lot of pushback and a

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 2>lot of resistance, and yet those are the ones that

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>typically make history ironically, right, it is the ones that

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 2>do kind of stick to their guns, believe in their vision,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and push the genre forward, keep things evolving.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>One of our favorite people right now is Doci. She

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is really doing some amazing things in hip hop. Her

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>sound is so unique and she's bringing something different and

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>exciting to the table we've been waiting for that.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Give me any excuse to talk about DOCI and I'll

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 2>take it, because she's probably the most exciting artist working

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 2>right now. To me, I think her potential more than

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 2>any other young up and coming artist, is as high

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>as anyone I could remember. I'm putting her in the

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 2>lane of I don't want to put too much pressure

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 2>on her, but I think she has the potential to

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 2>reach a Kendrick Beyonce. I feel like the skill levels there,

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the work ethic is definitely there, and the innovation and

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 2>the willingness to push genre is clearly there if you

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 2>studied her career. Where As to the point now where

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 2>people there's like two dochies in that she has this

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>hip hop album that just one hip hop album of

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the year. But if you look at everything she's released

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 2>before this, there has been some hip hop songs, but

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 2>it's been a lot of pop, a lot of R

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and B. What it is is a straight up like

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 2>two thousand's R and B song that could have been

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 2>done by Destiny's Child, and people don't actually relate the two.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 2>And maybe this speaks to our mentality of putting people

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in these boxes to where we we think someone that

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>can make denialis is a river can't make what it is.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yet she's doing both and articulating and expressing them at

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 2>the highest level. She is making the highest level of pop,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the highest level of hip hop, the highest level of

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>R and B, and you're already seeing the backlash of

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 2>she's overrated and we can't put her into a box,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>and so it seems like there's some issues with her

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 2>becoming so popular more than anyone. I'm following her trajectory

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>extremely close because I think she's one of them ones

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>that we're going to remember for a long time, and

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 2>she's only getting started and it's very very exciting. Artists

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>like her don't come around that often. I'm very excited

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 2>to follow her next fifteen twenty years.

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, the things that I've been hearing about Dochi

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that have been really making me angry is that people

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, she's stealing so and so style. She

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds just like I'm like they said Nicki Mina and Dojacat.

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, first of all, okay, we have to understand

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're not aliens. We've all lived on this planet.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>If I started rapping, I would probably sound like the Jigaman, okay,

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>because that is the music that I was pumping into

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>my ears. So I might, you know, have a similar cadence.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>But Doji is sliding on these beats like you. That

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>is her. We can look back and see the day

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>where hip hop was started. Every artist that has come

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>after that has been influenced by the hip hop before them.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know why she's exempt from that and

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>why she can't be inspired and influenced like she's influenced

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>by so many hip hop artists, not just Nicki Minaj

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and Dojacat or whoever else. I mean. You hear Busta

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>rhymes in her music, and see, this is just another problem.

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just like what we talked about at the top.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, people don't want to expand their minds. They're saying,

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this is what it's like to be a female rapper,

0:15:57.080 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and it can only be one person. So if you're

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a female rapper, you rap and you sound good, you

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>must be like Nicki Minaj and y'all both can't exist

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in this box at the same time. It's crazy.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's two things there. I think too. It's like

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>one that female categorization and genre within hip hop is

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>a problem, like to the point where it's like, oh,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 2>this female talented female musician or rapper, Oh, she has

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 2>to sound like Nicki Minaj, you know, like because we

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 2>can't think of we can't think outside. And not to

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>say there's not she hasn't been influenced. She's been very

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 2>transparent about that influence. But it's like, if you're going

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 2>to call out the Nicki Minaj influence, also call out

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the bust of rhymes influence, also call out the when

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>she's doing the breathing and calling back to nineties hip hop,

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's a that's a direct citation of what

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>was you know, I'm forgetting the guys it was a

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Dougie Fresh forgot I'm figuring a guy's name that made

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>it famous. But like that was a direct nod to

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>closer to the roots of hip hop. So it's like,

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 2>we have to get out of this is a perfect

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 2>example of how categories and subgenres within a genre can

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:12.719
<v Speaker 2>really limit our experience of an artist, because yeah, it's

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 2>hypocritical to call out one when you're not actually seeing

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 2>the full breadth of what she's doing, which is doing

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 2>what every great musician has done before, which is assimilate

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>all the influences into something new. That's exactly how genres

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 2>are pushed forward, is that you have someone that understands

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and represents and embodies the history of the genre, is

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 2>able to essentially embody let's say fifty years of hip hop,

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 2>and then that's her starting point, and so now she

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>can add on to it because she so clearly understands

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 2>and embodies the history, the entire breadth of the history.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 2>The influences are going to be more apparent in your

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 2>earlier work. But just mark my words, listen to her,

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>listen to her next album or the album after that,

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>and I guarantee you and it's going to be so

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 2>innovative and brand new that this conversation will be mute.

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Those are strong words called, right you heard it here first. Okay,

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the genre bending is not new, and the genres and

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>categories the boxes we're using now aren't the same boxes

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>from before. They only exist because people way back stepped

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>outside of bounds. I'm curious you've kind of mentioned some

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>standout examples of people who are genre bending, But you

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>know now that we see more and more of this

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>end not just that we see it, but we see

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it being commercially rewarded. I think that's a key component

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. Do you think we'll see a shift in

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the way artists show up? And if we do, how

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>do you think listeners are going to respond? Are we

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated enough for that? Do you think? I think?

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think so. I always look to the

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 2>younger generation, you know, not to be like I mean,

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm a millennial talking about gen Z, which is just

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of cringe on its own, but like you look

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 2>at this, you look at the younger generation, and then

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:10.679
<v Speaker 2>like they're much more homogenized. They I don't feel like

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 2>they categorize themselves in the same way that even our

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 2>generation did, and definitely not the like ones before us.

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 2>And so I do think it's kind of the job

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of the youth to do exactly that is to push boundaries.

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>But what about specific genres themselves? What are the differences

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>in Western music?

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 2>It's all more or less kind of the same, especially

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 2>as someone that studies it. There's so many similarities within

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Western music where the common Western music listener doesn't even

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 2>know or think about any other type of music than

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Western music. We're so contained within the box of Western

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.640
<v Speaker 2>music that we forget there's this entire other world outside

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 2>of it, and so we're forgetting like how similar country

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 2>is to rock, and there's a lot more commonalities within

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the West during music genre then there are differences. We're

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 2>talking like minor differences to the point where the thing

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 2>that I always think is interesting about genre and the

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 2>way you can you can see the walls of genre

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 2>crumbled before your eyes is when a country artist covers

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 2>a hip hop song, or a or a R and

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 2>B singer covers a Beatles song.

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw a countryman on TikTok covering Jagged Edge and

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it was fire. We're gonna put that into stories on Instagram.

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Go check our Instagram.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>This is just a chord, progression and melody, and they're

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 2>all using the same twelve Western notes that we use

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 2>in our Western tonal system, and the genre is just inflection.

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>It feels like all this genre stuff is really only

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to benefit the award system machine, like they just want

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>to be able to put folks in a box so

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they can give out one award, Because, like you were saying,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>when we're looking at the US, there's all these different

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>categories even though they're similar. But then as soon as

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>you get out of United it they're like international pop.

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, it's world music, and I'm like, wow, yeah, there's.

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of world to cover and they're bringing their

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>own experiences and influences to the table. How can we

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.479
<v Speaker 1>just group them all as international? Right?

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.919
<v Speaker 2>And especially when we're talking about art, which is self

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 2>expression and artists being traditionally a little bit weird, right,

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Like like you just have to you just have to

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 2>accept each expression on their own terms, I think. And

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 2>that's again it brings it back to genre in that

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 2>anytime we categorize or put people in a box, it

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 2>ends up just really limiting our perception of what things

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 2>can be.

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get too far ahead before we

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit more here about the Western tonal system.

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us more about that.

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I mean in Western music, it's like this,

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 2>we have a twelve tone system, which is just you know,

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 2>the frequency spectrum is infinite, essentially, right, We essentially have

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>picked out twelve symmetrical I guess you would say tones

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 2>that we then use as are essentially our color palette

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 2>when we're creating music. However, you think about Indian music,

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 2>they use a lot more tones than Western tones, and

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 2>so when you to our Western ears, that's what makes

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Indian music distinct is because they're working outside of our

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 2>tonal system, and so it sounds like there's all these

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 2>in between notes or like bent notes, or or it

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>could even sound like out of tune to us. So

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 2>when I say Western music is all essentially the same,

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 2>what I mean is like we're speaking the same language,

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and I think we sometimes forget that. It's like there

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 2>could be different dialects within us one language, but it's

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 2>still the same language and we all are fluent in it.

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I love this analogy with music and language because it

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>really makes you see genre for what it really is.

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>It's a marker for geography, a time in history, a

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>lived experience, a culture, a lifestyle.

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 2>Yes, if you listen to African drumming and they're doing

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 2>polyrhythms and way more complex rhythms than we're used to

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 2>with our Western years. It can kind of sound like

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:31.159
<v Speaker 2>off putting or we just don't understand it, in the

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 2>same way we wouldn't know a language. We couldn't understand

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 2>a language someone was speaking if we weren't fluent. Country

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 2>music will use more acoustic guitar. There are certain chord

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 2>progressions that are more common within country music. There's also

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 2>like the twang of a voice or vocal delivery or inflection,

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 2>but all these are just so micro when you're thinking that,

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 2>when you really think about it, it's just these are

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 2>micro differences where it's like hip hop is distinct because

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 2>it's spoken word mostly there's melodic and there's melody and

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>rhythm to it. But hip hop is distinct because it

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 2>is so many words and there's its emphasis on rhythm

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>more than melody. So what's the difference between country and rock, Well,

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 2>electric guitar. Essentially one has distortion, one uses acoustic guitar.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 2>But if you dissect the music theory behind a country

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 2>song and a rock song just on paper, what you're

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 2>gonna see is a chord progression and a melody on

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 2>top of it. There's literally no difference between them. They

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 2>use the same song structure, you know, verse chorus, verse chorus,

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 2>bridge chorus.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought Sabrina Carpenter was a country singer, not.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Dude, Okay, I think it's a Brea. Carpenter is a

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 2>great because Espresso could there's a world in which Espresso

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>is a country song. If you just there's a different

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 2>inflection or voice and the instrumentation was different, it could.

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it easily could be a country song.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, please, please please, that's a country Kelly was going

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>country and I was like, he barely. Yeah, maybe put

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>on a bigger belt buckle. That was it. That was

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the only difference. Still had all the diamonds. There was

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>no other difference. This episode gave me a lot to

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>think about. It made me think about all the ways

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>that I categorized things in my life that maybe just

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>limiting the way that I do things. So I need

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 1>to open up my mind a little bit more, like

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe pineapple does belong on. I don't know if I'm

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>going that far, okay, but I do think like I

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>found myself reflecting when we were talking to cold. It

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>made me think about when we first started Dope Flaps.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of people that were in the

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>scientific space that knew us were like, y'all gonna do

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, and they had put us in this box

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of like, we are just scientists. We only do this

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>thing the same way that people are like, oh, you

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about science on your podcasts, they wouldn't expect us

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk about doci and genre. But what we're doing

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is taking a scientific lens and so I'm hoping that

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a new box. If people won't think outside the box,

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so they'll create a new box that's the scientific lens

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and put Dope Labs right in there. I love that

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you can find Cole on Instagram and X at Dissect podcast.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can find us on X and Instagram at Dope

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Labs podcast. Ct Is on X and Instagram at dr

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Underscore t Sho, and you can find Zakiya at z

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>said So. Dope Labs is a production of Lamanada Media.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Our senior supervising producer is Kristin Lapour and our associate

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>producer is Ysara Svez. Dope Labs is sound designs, edited

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and mixed by James Farber. Lamanada Media's Vice President of

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Partnerships and Production is Jackie Danziger. Executive producer from iHeart

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Podcast is Katrina Norvil. Marketing lead is Alison Canter. Original

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>music and produced by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex sugi Ura,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>with additional music by Elijah Harvey. Dope Labs is executive

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>produced by us T T Show Dia and Takiya Watley