WEBVTT - Franchise Tag Candidates, Important Offseason Dates | Bucs Insider

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Um, hello, they are Buccaneers fans. This is Casey Phillips

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and senior writer and editor Scott Smith, and it is

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:12.799
<v Speaker 1>time for Buccaneers and Sideur Live, presented by Miller Lte.

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>As always, this is where we take your question. So

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're not already watching on the Buccaneers Facebook page,

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>you can head on over there and in the comments

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>section underneath our live video you can submit your questions

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>there for us. So I know as we give people

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a chance to do that. Now is the time of

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>year that there are a lot of things that are

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>going to start happening in terms of roster building looking

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>forward to the team. So first of all, just give

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit of an idea of a couple

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of things coming up on the calendar that Bucks fans

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>might want to watch. Well, the next I guess date

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on the calendar of some significance is the start of

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the two week window in which teams can use franchise

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and transition tags on their players, and that's next Tuesday.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>That's when that will begin. And then you have two

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>weeks leading up too close to free agency to do

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that if you soak shoes, and then the NFL scouting

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>combine is back and missed a year last year due

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic, but um, it's back in person and

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>that's always a big event that draws pretty much all

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the personnel people and coaches and media from around the

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>league to Indianapolis. So that would be March one to

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>March seven, and then the start of free agency, which

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is the new calendar year for the NFL, is March sixteen. Okay,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about the franchise tag

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>part Um, What are some of the potential options for it,

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>how likely it is the team uses it. Just kind

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of break down some of the things that maybe we

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>would want to know when it comes to the franchise tag. Well,

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the last couple of years, the big story

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for the Buccaneers and free agency was how well they

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>were able to retain all of their key free agents,

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>especially last year, and in both cases, one of the

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>key elements there was using the franchise tag, first on

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Shack Barrett in two thousand twenty and then on Chris

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Godwin last year, And in both cases that really helped

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>because that was one off the table that you didn't

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about. And in Shack's case, it d

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it end up leeding to a long term contracts to

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>keep around for a long time, which is great. That

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen with Chris Godwin, and so people are gonna

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder with the Bucks um tag Chris Godwin for the

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 1>second year in a row. The issues there are when

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>you when you do that a second year in a row,

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to give them one of what they had

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>last year, or if the formula works out to being

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>more than you've give them that. But it's gonna be

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>at least about nineteen point three million dollars for the

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver franchise tag for Chris Godwin this year. Obviously

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>he's probably worth that given what he does to the team,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but you're also talking about a player who is early

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>in the stages of recovering from a knee injury, and

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that always makes it harder for teams to make big

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>long term decision well not long term, but big decisions

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on right now, So that complicates matters. I would think

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>probably the most likely candidate if the Bucks decided to

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>do with three years in a row is Carlton Davis,

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>because the Bucks certainly think and I think a lot

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of people run the league think that he's a number

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>one caliber cornerback. He's also only twenty five years old,

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to hard to let that go, you

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm saying. So the franchise tag for a

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Corners about seventeen million dollars. That's a lot, but you

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>know that's market value. So we'll see. I would think

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>he's probably the most likely one, Okay. And we had

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a question um from Seawan asking what is your prediction

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of what position we will draft in the first round?

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>And uh, that kind of also links to what I

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was gonna ask next about the combine coming up and

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>just how we feel like the draft evaluation process itself

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 1>might be different this year compared to last year when

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you were bringing everybody back for sure, and you have,

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, just how things might be different terms of

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>how you're evaluating not only the first round pick, but

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>but the draft overall. And so yeah, for you first round,

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>what position seems likely and then overall, how you think

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be evaluating draft prospects this year. Okay,

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little tough that question right now in

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>mid February, and you kind of alluded to the reason

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>why there's a long list of free agents, and depending

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>upon whom the Buccaneers can bring back will really in

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>packed how they decided to go. Last year, we all

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>remember the story was the Buccaneers were in a position

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to draft just about anywhere they wanted to. Um edge

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>rusher did seem like the most likely candidate for a

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>clip position, and that's how it ended up being. But

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of a luxury draft in which you

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>could really go best player available. I don't think that's

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the case this year. I think the Buccaneers

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>are gonna have a hard time getting all of those

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>free agents back. Probably lose one or two of them.

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to predict predict two, but it's hard

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to imagine us getting all of them back. So if

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you lose Carlton Davis, quarterbacks suddenly becomes very important. Also

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>because Sean Murphy, Bunting and Javel Dean will be in

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>line to hit for agency next year. So depending upon

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 1>what you're able to keep out of all those guys,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>corner can become an issue really quickly. And Uh, I'm

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna fall back on the line that you've heard me

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>say a million times, Casey, you can never have enough

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>quality cornerbacks, So to me, I like that, Uh, the

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Bucks probably could use another edge rusher, who knows if

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Jpp is gonna be back. Um, you could always use

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>help on the offensive line, who knows if Ryan Jensen

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be back. So one of those three positions

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>probably would be at the top of my list. And

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>then running back. And I'm not a big proponent of

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>first round and running backs, but we were talking about

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the end of the first round around where the Buccaneers

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 1>took Doug Martin ten years ago and that worked out

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. So there's a lot of possibilities. But we'll

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have a better focus on that after free agency begins. Okay,

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and we asked me about evaluating players. I think the

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing about the combine, being back and in person

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is not the workouts, because the scouts and coaches will

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>always tell you they know what they know from film,

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and the pro days, they'll get plenty of time

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>to see the players work out there. What they value

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>most is those sit down meetings in the evenings, and

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>those obviously had to be conducted via zoom last year.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the fact that you'll get to be back

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>sitting down with all those guys for that whole week

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and just knocking out tons of fifteen minute interviews is

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest difference in the evaluation process this year. Right, Yeah,

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense alright. Our next question was from Eric.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>He said, do you see us getting a quarterback in

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>free agency? There's not a bumper crop of quarterbacks in

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>fre agency. I think the biggest names are like Teddy Bridgewater,

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Tyrod Taylor, Jamis Winston, which seems very unlikely, and that's

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably missing one or two of them there, but

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not It's not a really exciting group, I would say.

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's why there's so much speculation about every quarterback

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>who seemingly doesn't have does not have a totally solid

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>will to stay with the team he's with right now,

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 1>where the team may want to move on, like San

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Francisco may want to turn to Trey Lance and let

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo go. So that's why you're hearing all that.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And those names are a little bit more exciting because

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>their guys like Russell Wilson. So I don't know that

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the free agent market doesn't seem like a bumper crop

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. Right. Sean had asked if you see us

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>bringing back Richard Sherman as a potential coach, considering he

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>ended up being used in that role some this season. Well,

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that depends on if Richard Sherman wants to transition into

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 1>coaching right now. I know injuries kind of marred his

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>attempt to come back with us here last year and

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he ended up not playing a ton of games. But

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he might still want to play, you know what I'm saying. Um,

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean sure, he obviously is good at it.

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And and uh, we've seen Bruce Arians through the years

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>at times do that quickly. With some of these players,

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, they finished their career and they're coaching almost

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>right away, So it's possible. Sure, Okay, And I'm sure

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you're shocked that we've had a whole bunch of questions

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>about just the quarterback situation at large. Um. So we

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>will again run back what we can know at this

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>point in time. We know that we're gonna be talking

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>about this every Wednesday, as as we should. I know

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is a huge topic of discussion for all

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.239
<v Speaker 1>of the fans and everything going on. So I'll essentially

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sum up all the different versions of it, um, from

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>whether it's someone yelling at us who is going to

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be our quarterback? Always love the all Caps questions really

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>really fun, and then also the idea of just what

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely route we would go, whether it's

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in house, draft, free agency trade. Well, starting in house,

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>there's only one quarterback under contract right now. Well that's

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not technically true because Tom Brady remains technically on the roster,

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but he's retired. Um Kyle Trash, the second year guy

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>who we drafted at the end of the second round

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, didn't really get to see him play, so

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>it's really kind of hard to evaluate if he'd be

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>ready at the start of next season. Blaine Gabbert is

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>actually a pending unrestricted free agent again like he was

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>last year. But I believe that if the Buccaneers came

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to him and said we want to resign you and

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a real good job, just fight for the

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>starting job, he'd probably be pretty motivated to come back.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>So even though he's not under contract yet for two

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he remains one of the options. Uh. We

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 1>talked already just a minute ago about how the free

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>agency field isn't really strong at quarterback this year, so

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that one seems unlikely to me. So then you're talking

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>about possible trade acquisitions, and listen, we can be asked

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>this every week. There's no way we're going to have

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 1>an answer for that right now until things start happening.

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>But I kind of in a bigger sense, do think

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>that the Buccaneers will try to take a big swing

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>like they did two years ago with Tom Brady. You

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>can't take a bigger swing than Tom Brady, but you

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>can take a pretty big swing, and uh, I think

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll try. It. Doesn't mean it's not gonna be easy

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because there's salary cap considerations and what do you give

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>up in a trade? And does any team even want

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to trade their stud quarterbacks? So, but I just think

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>because this roster is still so so talented at so

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>many positions, uh, that the Buccaneers consider themselves contenders, that

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>window is still open. And so the first thing we'll

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 1>do is try to swing big and then if that

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work out, then you have to, you know, try

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>something like Lane Gabbard or somebody from the fage market. Okay,

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>well that is going to do it for us. On

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this edition of Buccaneers Insider Live presented by Miller Lte.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks as always for those great questions. We'll be back

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>here next week again to answer them, so we'll see

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you then