WEBVTT - 4/24, Part 1: Tuesday night recap, Mets pitching, return of Daniel Murphy,  and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. Do to Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:55.200 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Do do doo. Yeah, says the Fantasy Best Friends Forever

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>here in the Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Frankie Staffell.

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg Gregy reunited and it feels so good.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 1>It feels like we haven't started a show together forever

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at least like a week at least. You're busy, man.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't really like it though. I don't either, That's

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>why I'm bringing it up. Alright, I much I much

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>preferred not to be busy and just doing this and

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hang out all day. All right, Well, we got it today,

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>so let's enjoy all we have and great, how are you, man?

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>How did you sleep? How did I sleep? Uh? Not great? Man?

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>This uh this Yankees West Coast trip. I mentioned this

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>around this week. It's gonna kill me. Yeah, I've I've

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>stayed up late. I wasn't up to watch the end

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of the game, and I was watching the Damian Lillard

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>last second shot. I turned on that game with like

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 1>five minutes left. I watched him in the first half

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of it. And there's a crazy night in sports. I

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't watch hockey, but I kind of saw like Twitter

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>was reacting everything that was going on. And my condolences

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to anyone who was hurt last night regarding what happened

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in hockey. But I personally did not watch. But I

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>was watching some NBA, Dame Lillard, lots of baseball last night.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 1>It was just a crazy night overall. How do you sleep, Greg,

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>how's your night? I felt right. I went to bed

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later because I was watching the basketball game. Um,

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought we were blowing up your phone and you

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>were gonna wake up in the morning and say, guys,

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>stop texting me. Because Floria and I were just going

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. We were talking about a bunch of stuff.

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We actually took over first place in GSC, which is fine.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>That re fund this morning to that or responded last

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>night to that. I don't know, Oh my god, I did.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I saw all these text messages. Yeah,

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot. We were just we were going

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at I did see these. I did see these. I

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>don't remember it was this morning or last night I

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>saw them. But um, I have you this shadow. Do

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not disturb because we talk a lot, and that's true.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I have this chat on and do not disturb, so

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't so I wouldn't wake up. I did wake up.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know if you were one of those people

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that has like your phone right next to year bed

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking on and it vibrates constantly. That's why has chats

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>dude on this. Yeah, so I don't have any vibration

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>feature on my phone. It's just silent all the time.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you call me, I'm most likely not answering.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what? You know? What text woke me up?

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It was the twelve fortween you and Sandro about Mike Ford.

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what woke me up last Mike Ford, Like, what

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are these guys texting you out at a quarter to

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one in the morning like the Yankees. Oh gosh, Mike Ford,

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Sterling call you like that, Greg for the Yankee, Just

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a Ford in your future. Mike is Ford tough. It's

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>better than Attachman, Talkman and Stockman. The funniest part about

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that was so Michael Kaye is getting the report from

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Meredith regarding what the call is for Mike Ford, and

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they start joking on Sterling and like, well, it's better

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>than Talkman the Sockman, that's for sure. I want. I

0:03:55.920 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>watched that. I watched yep um anyway, did they could

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be the return of Daniel Murphy. Potentially we're winning on

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>news with that with Colorado, so we'll get you that.

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And I said this last night or this morning again,

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>when it gimes to the v F chat, I think

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Garret Hamson gets it down when where he was back

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Now they couldn't certainly just option Jeff Hoffman. But that's

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna depend on Kyle Freeland's availability going forward. We'll see.

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But Garrett Hamson last night against Left, he didn't even start.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Ryan McMahon and Mark Reynolds both started in that spot.

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Ryan McMann went to for four. Hampson didn't see the

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>field and that's even with David Donald not playing. I'm very,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>very worried when Garret Hampson on right now. Yeah, I

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think you have to be. I would imagine they would

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>keep Garrett Hampson around just because he's a super utility player.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And we're seeing now in baseball that versatility is key

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to your bench. A lot of teams

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>are only keeping you know, three maybe four bats. Most

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of the time it's been three bats on their bench,

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and they do that because they have players who can

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>play all over the field, and Garrett Hampson gives them

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that versatility. But regardless, you're right that we should be

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>worried about him from a fantasy and perspective, because even

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>last night against the lefty and Patrick Corbin, he wasn't

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup and Ryan McMahon was and he performed well.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So that would lead me to believe Ryan nick Mann

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to see the bulk of the

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>playing time now, especially against lefties two. So I do

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>worry about Garrett Hampson from a fantasy perspective, greg and

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance he gets sent down, but ultimately I

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>think that he'll stick around just because of his versatility.

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>But he's likely just a super utility bench player. That's

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the question, is he is he a super utility bench

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>player or is he a utility bench player. I think

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the question because well, they're they're not making a

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>concerted effort to get him in the lineup right now.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So I would imagine Ryan nick Man has to be

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>slightly older, and that's probably why they like him. Rockies

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just hate young players. Yeah, oh, the actually the same

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>as I mean, uh, look at that. Ryan McMahon is

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>actually two months younger. See they love young players. Oh man,

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here? This is so weird. The Rockies

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>love young players, Frank. But to be fair, Greg, you know,

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they gave Garrett Hampson a shot this year and it's

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, he hasn't been great. Twenty six point seven

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>percent ray, two point seven percent walk rady, he was hitting.

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>He's been terrible. He's been bad. Yeah, I mean, I

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>forgot hasn't been great. He's been terrible. Like we had

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that one breakout game where I think he hit a homer,

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you might have stole a base like all in the

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>same game and he only has one homer and he

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>always has one stolen pace. So it was really just

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that one game last night in Colorado, the Nationals were

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>able to defeat the Rockies six to three. As Patrick

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn went into course Field, it's pretty well six innings,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>oh to earn run ball, a lot of three runs, total,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>shrugout six, only walked one. I know you're taking you

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>already feel like you're taking the Ellen Patrick Corbyn. Yeah,

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much. Yeah, I can't. I can't really dispute that

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I did take Zach Wheeler over Patrick Corban in the

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>main event, which we'll get into Latron obviously. But Patrick

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn has been great. He's been great to to start

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the year. To go into coors Field, you know, I

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>did have my concerns. I haven't been one league. It's

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a home league, it's a head to head points league.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Definitely had my concerns regarding Patrick Corbin. But goes in

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:28.119
<v Speaker 1>there eleven swinging shrikes on a hundred pitches, two earned

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>runs against a Rockies lineup that had been coming around

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in coors Field. Obviously a strikeout for ending. I think

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>if you drafted Patrick Corbyn the two point four eight

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>e ar a, you feel great about it right now.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I I he was not an active target of mind,

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we went over that. You know, I would have I

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>would have personally went with guys like Wheeler. I would

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>have went with James Paxton over him. Jack Flaherty, I

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>would have went over him as well, And I think

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>better days are coming for Flaherty. But uh, for the

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>most part, you know that Tier has has been pretty

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>good or at least had some signs of coming around.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Corban has probably been the most consistent to start the season,

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>but obviously were with our huge game. Paxton back to

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>back huge games. Jack Flaherty has been a little bit

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>up and down, but you know the Brewers lineups he's

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>been facing. And then Jamison Tyne has been okay, Okay,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's been okay. Sean Doolittle probably know what was consistent

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he has, and he's been He's been really really good.

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Sean Doolittle picks up his third save, stuck strikes at three,

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>got four outs for the saves. A nice job there

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>by Doolittle. Uh, you had a second stolen base of

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this season, I'm sorry, the fifth, fourth and fifth stolen

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>basis of the season for Victor Roeblason this one. So

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's nice to see him running. It's also nice to

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>see him continue to back at the top of the order.

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>He was in the second hole here um eight on

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the year for our guy, Victor Robles. Adam Eating By

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, we haven't talking about Adam Eating at all.

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>He's been over three hundred no b P at three

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>eight six. What do we need to know about Adam Eating?

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I realized that this is obviously in Colorado yesterday, but

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just a name that we haven't talked about because

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that we weren't on him. Do you start off the

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>season which fan as the players know about Adam Eaton?

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Is what he's doing real or is this somebody that

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>you don't believe in? Long term, it's real for Adam

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>eat and it's just how long can he stay healthy

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to continue doing this, Greg, Because we've never doubted that

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Adam Eating is a good player, but last year games played,

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the year before that, twenty three games played. This guy's

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>barely been able to stay on the field as a

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>member of the Washington Nationals. Now he has done so

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>so far this season. Gregg. He's hitting three nineteen, He's

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>got around an eight percent walk great, the three six

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>O b P, all of those things are great. He's

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>got sixteen runs scored four sole on basis, this is

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you want Adam eating for batting average, solid

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>run scored, already has sixteen, already has four bases. This

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what you want, eating four and I think

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>he can continue to provide that as long as he's healthy.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>The problem is how long will he stay healthy? That's

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the question regarding Adamy. But I think as long as

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>he's on the field, especially leading off for this National's lineup,

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a great lineup. And you know that's even without

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Anthony wren Don in there yesterday, and Tray Turner has

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>been banged up as well. We know that he's out.

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Adam Eaton has been doing his job and I think

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>as long as he plays well, he's going to continue

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to lead off. I worry about once Trade Turner is back.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Is Victor Roeblis is all the way back down to

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>batting ninth's and I don't see how he doesn't. To

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, how do you how do you

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think people feel about Victor Roeblas overall to start the season, Greg,

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think that they How do you feel like

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you got? How do you feel I want to see

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I think over roll. He's been fine. You know, he's

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>been two. He's betting two seventy eight. He's got three homers,

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>fifteen runs scored, ten or ten RB, i's five stolen basis.

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>He's giving you production across the board. You know, I

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>want to see him cut down on the strikeouts. Obviously

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>near thirty two strikeout rate last year in twenty one games,

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>with the National's only eighteen percent strikeout right in the

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in the minor leagues, you know, triple A last year,

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent strikeout rate. In seventeen at double A thirteen

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>point nine percent strikeout rate. So I want to see

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts come down. Regarding Victor Roe was you know,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>right around thirty two. But if he cuts down on

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the strike out, he's already batting two seventy eight. This

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who if he brings it down to

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or even below Greg this might be a guy that

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>flirts with a three D batting average. He's giving you

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>across the board production. The hard hit rate is not

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>great to start the year, but I mean, with that

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>being said hard hit rate, he still has three home runs.

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, he still has ten RBIs, So overall, I

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's I think he's been great. I think the

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>stole the two Stoon bases last night help his overall line.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw his one and fifty game pace last night

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just from bat Flip Crazy on Twitter. Follow him on Twitter.

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.559
<v Speaker 1>He puts out great stuff. Six hundred played appearent pace

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 1>late appearance pace for Victor Roeblis on five runs, scored,

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>one one homers, seventy one RBIs thirty five stone bases

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and he's hitting two seventy eight. Remember the comp that

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we made for Victor Roeboys Starley Marte. That sounds a

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>lot like Stoley Marte, and you were getting him around

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>three four rounds later Starley Marte. And at least Victor

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Roeblays is healthy right now, so I think over all

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>he's been He's been pretty damn good. We haven't talked

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot about him, so I did want to hit

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on Victor roeblast a little bit today. I'm I'm happy

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 1>that we're able to do. Sure. The Brewers lost last

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>night in St. Louis four to three. And the reason

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>why I'm going here next rather than Zach Wheeler whatnot,

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>He's because the latest news from Milwaukee, and that is

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this team has signed Geo Gonzalez uh

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to a two million dollar major league contracts, so he's

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be right in that rotation. I think, is there

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>any interest in picking up Digital Gonzalez? Not really. I

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a fan of Geo Gonzalez the past couple of years,

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and I know it was either I believe it was

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. He definitely made me look bad, but

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the underlying numbers were not good. Yeah, it was seen

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>where he had a two point nine six ear a.

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>That was sandwich between two years where in he had

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a four or five seven ear a, and then last

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>year he had a four to one ear a. The

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts came down last year, the walks went up. Listen

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to this, Greg, I mean seven point seven nine case

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>per nine, four point to one walks per nine. It's

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>just not going to get the job done. And he's

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>going to a hitter's ballpark. Obviously in Miller Park, he's

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna face tough lineups with the Cardinals and the Cubs nationally,

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>only sure because he has a spot in the rotation,

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>but even in fifteen team mixed, Greg me, personally, I

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have any interest in Geo gonzalz all right, fair enough,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>are you anything not? Probably not? Probably not the bullpencoo

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>early for for me to be interested in Geo Gonzalez

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>here we get to booted from the rotation. Is it

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is it Zach Davies who's even in his rotation right now?

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>The other day was you know, Doobie Howser was They're

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to find anyone they can get right now, there's

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>any bodies to pitch um Chess Anderson is terrible. This

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is always the bug a boo with the Brewers. That's

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>why they signed Gonzalas. Yeah, they're pitching always sucks. But

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm a believer greg that you should build

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the strength of your team around your home ballpark. Right so,

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>they know that their home ballpark as a hitter's park.

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And what do they do. They put together one of

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the best lineups in baseball. I mean it's you know,

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it's top three in baseball right now. And you know

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>they have one of the best players overall right now,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Christian Yellows too, so they continue to add to the lineup.

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>They knew what they were doing when they signed Mike Mustakis,

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>who is now out for the third straight game. We'll

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>get some updates tomorrow from Dr A regarding Mike Mustakis.

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But they know what they were doing. They sign Mustakis

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna play second base, so they're sacrificing defense.

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>They know they don't have good pitching. They just want

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to score more runs in the opposing team. And that's

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's basically been the mantra for the Milwaukee Brewers.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And also for today, he's us out of the lineup again, Greg,

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that's the third straight day. It's it was Eric Thames

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>on Monday who started Jazz Monty Grandall last night, and

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>then it was Eric Thames again today starting that game

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>kicks off at one o'clock. But he's looks like they're

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>giving him a mental break, Greg, pretty long mental break here.

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Three games in a row for for Aggie that he's

0:14:55.880 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. The Brewers last night wound up in St. Louis,

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>falling to Upon State Leone four to three as Danny

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Poston won five things too. It's one run, he walked three,

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>he struck out seven in the spot start. Jordan Hicks

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of run picked up his sixth save of

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the season. A lot of homers in this one, including

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>once again Travis Shaw going deep in the ninth inning.

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul the Young has been been unbelievable man this year.

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>That was one of two Shaw home runs on his

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I one mentioned six and the ninth inning for him,

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul the has been incredible this year. Everyone that wanted

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to be things for him, you've gotten it over the

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks to start off the season, He's

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>fifth home run. Now batting up, fatting average is up

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to three thirty seven o BP is close to four hundred.

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely fantastic start for Paul de Young. Colton Loong over

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>three again, frank fatting average out of two seventy eight

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>by the o B p U still being over four

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred or then north Cia also hit his fourth home

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>run of the season in this one. Or Sea spending

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>too eighteen. Yeah, it's been a couple of years here

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for Orlando Arcia. Want to be the next Franciscodor Yes,

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I did. I not me. I was, I was too.

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the minor league numbers. I thought they

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>were similar. You know, they were regarded more so as

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>defensive first players coming up, and you know they had

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>similar numbers, and I thought Orlando or Cia can can

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>make that jump last year. Maybe he could be a

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen fifteen or even a player, but I just completely

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>bottomed out last year. And at least this season, you know,

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the power has come back a little bit. He's got

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>four home runs. He he had only three home runs

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>all of last year, so that's a good sign. But

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the batting average has been brutal here for or Orlando Orcia.

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot actually going on in this game. Travis

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Shaw with the two home runs, obviously you need to

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>see that as an owner, and I think better days

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>are coming. I said that yesterday. Don't give up on

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Travis Shaw. We come back, Greg. I do want to

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>hit on Daniel Ponst a little bit because he's great

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>minor league numbers. It's just are the Cardinals ever going

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to give him a shot. They have

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a run of players like this that a shuffle in

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and out of the rotation between the majors and the miners,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're all really good players. But I think pompsde

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Leone is a little bit better than some of you.

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>We'll find out what I gets to say that and

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>give it. Zot Wheeler next Daily Rodo dot Com Learn

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stop. Industry leading DFS tools and

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily Roado dot Com Optimizer.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>In minutes, build an optimized line of fast games and tourneys.

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Learn from the game's best DFS players joined Daily roado

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>dot com. The following ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is advised. Is someone in your family playing a dangerous

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand people die

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a year from drug overdose. A hundred and twenty people

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>a day, five people every hour, one person every twelve minutes.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Eight thousand people die every year from alcohol abuse. Over

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty people a day, ten an hour,

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>one person every six minutes. Somebody you know, maybe next

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>learn how to help someone you love get away from

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the drugs, alcohol and bad influences. With the f m

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>l A, people can take a leave of absence from

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>their job and still keep it. Call now and learn

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 1>how we can help you. Eight six six four eight

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>four nine six two one eight six six four eight

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>four nine six to one. That's eight six six eight

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>four ninety six one game time decisions. I think it's

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a pile of crap that Bouts of Godrey got suspected

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>over the entire shouldn't you should have been bruss What

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>what are the things he's doing? He's been hacked people's

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>ankles the whole series. Man, he's a cheap shot artist. Two.

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It was all really accessing the pedal of he's business.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Ben did five times five He doesn't learn would have

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>been five. Four weekdays, four pm e Stern one pm

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Pacific only on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Tack with

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>you on the Fantasy Best French Driver Fantasy Sports Radio Network,

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Frank Staffeld Gregg Sussman hanging out and Frank you wanted

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to dive into Danny Pones daey On a little more.

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a pretty interesting start last night against obviously

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a really good Brewer's lineup and five innings, just one

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>earned run, two hits. Sometimes can struggle with the walks.

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>You see that in the minors a little bit. Seven

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts and he had fourteen swinging strikes on just ninety pitches. Uh,

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>twelve swinging strikes on his fastball alone. Just really impressive.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Maxed out at ninety five miles per hour a few

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>times on the fast ball, uses a curveball and a

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>change up as well well. Just looking at the minor

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>league numbers of the past couple of years, last year

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the PCL, this is is the past three seasons in

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the pc L for him, which is regarded as a

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 1>hitter friendly. Um was that conference league league. But last

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>year in the p c L a two point to

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>four e r A strikeouts in ninety six and the

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>third d he's pitched one point to four whip again,

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>struggles with wall box at times. UH the year before

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>two point one seven e r A only six starts,

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>small sample size, but at the PCL. You know, this

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>season at three point to four e r A in

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the PCL, I think there's something here with with Ponce

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Daily on over the past couple of seasons, he's you know,

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>average over a strikeout per ending. You know, among the

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>group of him and and Gomber and Dakota Hudson, I

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>think he might have the highest upside greg and the

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>most staining power if something were to happen and they

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>actually need another guy in the rotation. So I have

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>modest interest and a guy like Ponce Daily On. I

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>think he's better than some of those other fifth starters

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Cardinals have been trying out. So remember the name,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>remember the name. Put him on put It's very hard

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to not remember the name. Sounds like an artist, do

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. Leon is Frank Okay, very famous name by

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, Like that he said, sounds like an artist.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>That was awesome, And you had absolutely no idea why

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>that mattered. So you're looking it up? Yes, I am

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.479
<v Speaker 1>looking it up. Is this something I'm supposed to know? Yes?

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Is one of those things? Yeah? Explore and conquistador for

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>leading the first official European expedition to Florida. Yeah, and

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the first governor of Puerto Rico. Yeah, how about that

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he found in Florida and Puerto Rico. He found it.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I've learned it at some point in my life. Greg.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>It's just, you know, things get flushed in and out

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of this brain. Man, It's like it only retained so

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>much information. He's like Christopher. He's like Christopher Columbus. Dude,

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>he yeah, I know Christopher Columbus. Wait year to Christopher Columbus, like,

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>come on, you don't need to know this? Of course

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>you do. I don't need to know this. Oh my god, Alex,

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea what your Chris Columbus sailed the

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Ocean Blue. I don't it rhymes correct, That's why I

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>said it like that. It was at sixty two sail

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ocean Blue fifteen sixty two and rhymes Greg. I'm sorry,

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, this is this is the worst one

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>we've had. This is the worst one we've had, obviously,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and know who he is. I don't know what year

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it happened. Oh my god, this is the chat killing

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you right now? Many chance, I think they should. They'll

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>give me the answer, saying Christopher Columbus sail the Ocean

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Blue in two. All right, I'm sorry, I'm sorry that

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it. Oh god, Look, if you if

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>there's ever a trivia night's specifically history politics, don't bring that, don't.

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I won't. But that's just like a base question. Sorry man.

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Kindergarteners know that, you know what else? They know that

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Levi on Bells on the Jets, Alex, So how about

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that Antonio Brown is on the Raiders? How about that?

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Kindergarteners know that, yes they do, and

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>they know the drama is out of Pittsburgh. They also

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>know that you're You could have just called you a

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Jets fan, dude, that's what you're. That's what we're gonna

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>talk throw back at Alex. Yeah, well, you know when

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>when Steelers finished third in a division this year, I

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>think when the Jets fans sucks back. You know, it's

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>draft season with the Jets fans talk smacks anybody but

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the Pats and anybody but the Pats. True but Alex

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>season O. There's like fifty different scenarios that can play

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 1>off for the Jets. It's insane. I have no idea

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen. That's kind of how it works. They'll

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>probably just take a quinnin Williams. Like, I don't know,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>there is really intriguing draft is overall. I know there's

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a franchise quarterback. Yeah, maybe you think Kyler

0:24:09.480 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Murray is that guy, but this really intriguing draft overall.

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what Jets are gonna do. It's crazy.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into the Mets and the Phils. Mets took

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this one nine to nothing. As Zach Wheeler, you took

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 1>him as your third starting pitcher when you're second. If

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you're Frank, you're feeling pretty good. Feeling pretty good as

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>he faced the Phillies last night and went seven innings

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a loud five hits, didn't walk anybody, and struck out eleven.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 1>That's started the season by far for Zach Wheeler. Leave

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it as the second, maybe third time in his career

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>he strugg out at least eleven batters. On the other side,

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>my guy, Zack Eflyn, pitch count was up, then got pinched,

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>hit four, and then well then it got broken open.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>He went four innings a lot of four hits, four runs,

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>three of them earned. The unearned run came when Caesar

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Hernanags just booted a ball that was embarrassed only struck

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>out of three he walked one, and of course reactionary

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Greg immediately said the text patches the Frank saying, can

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I drop Zach? Can I drop Zach Efflyn? He said,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>depends for who always the answer Greg, But my question

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>would be, like I have Lester coming off the d'El tomorrow,

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Can I just drop Zack Efflyn? Oh gosh, exact, Efflen

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>has more upside than not, so they don't. So the

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is no, I'm not gonna drop Zac effn because

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>he faces Miami on Sunday. I hope, yeah, well what

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>happened last time, effly face. I understand that. So we'll

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>see what the Alaska's does today. It gets to start

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for me. You're starting VideA Blaska's. Why not? Man, you're

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys video guy. You know what I mean.

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm normally in on start anybody at any point, But

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>in our pit league yesterday, I benched the bull against

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox and I benched my open yate against

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the Astros. I just I didn't feel good about either

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>of those starts. You benched the bull turn turned out

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to be regarding Zach Wheeler, though obviously awesome performance here

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>better at the better the plantant he was on the mound,

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't. I wouldn't say that double on a home

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>run pretty good. It is pretty good. I saw someone

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>say last night that it was he was the first

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>member of the one hundred club this season, Greg who

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>hit a home run with an with an exit hundred hour,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and then also was like the first Pitture to throw

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundreds. So do those two things in the same season.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And I also saw someone say that it was his

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>one hundred start, which it wouldn't really interesting if it

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>actually was just like al right, so that's really interesting.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest takeaway from me here, Greg is

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>zero walks. Zero walks for Zach Wheeler. I was talking

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>about this yesterday with Nick Pollock, the gains that he

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>made in the control department last year, finally lowering the

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>walks to under three per nine. That was the biggest

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>key for Zach Wheeler, especially down to stretch. I mean,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>he really really had good command last year over those

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>final love eleven twelve starts where he was just stellar.

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And we saw that again last night eleven strikeouts, he

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>had fifteen swinging strikes. He has it all, you know.

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We talked about Jacob Graham and Synder Guard what they

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.239
<v Speaker 1>can do, you know, throwing touching a hundred miles per

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>hour and they have, you know, the ninety mile per

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>hour slider. Zach Wheeler has all of that as well.

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>He averaged ninety eight miles per hour on his fastball

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>last night. He maxed out at he had a slider

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that average ninety one. He has just as much talent

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 1>as the rest of the guys in the rotation. That's

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why I was as high on

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wheeler as I was entering the short It's just

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>his command and control is not at the same level

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously as a guy like to Gram and it's probably

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>not even as good as synder Guard, even though Syndergard

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>has struggled to start the season. But if he can

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to build off this zero walk performance, he now

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>has three quality starts in a row. This is back

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to back games where he's gone at least an endings pitched.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 1>It seems like Mickey Callaway is giving Wheeler free rain

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>this year, letting him go over on pitches. Um, you know,

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they trust him. And as long as

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he continues to show up like this against the Phillies

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>two games in a row, now where you know he

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>he won this start. He didn't. He didn't win the

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>one before, but he this is two times in a row. Now,

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I got the Phillies where he's looked pretty good. He

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 1>faced the Washington Nationals twice, he faced the Phillies twice,

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he faced the Braves. We're just gonna have some starts

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>coming against the Miami Marlins, like he hasn't had an

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>easy schedule to start the season. Greg, I just really

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>like what I saw last night overall striking out seven

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>batters in a row at some point and just no walks.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the biggest key for Zach Wheeler in my opinion.

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Zach Wheeler, somebody has to limit the walks,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:52.959
<v Speaker 1>as Frankie in order to be successful. The Todd Father

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is even the story. Actually before I get in The

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>tod Father. So last night I'm watching this game because

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I have effeln and be there right So, so I

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have the game on and Judy gets home at like

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>eight o'clock and now is known whatever. So I'm watching

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the game and I was talking to her. I had

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the game out of the background at this point. I

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>was talking to her and all of a sudden, I say, hey,

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I hear Hey, I'm Maria Marino. Like, h that's awesome.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to take like a little video and

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sent it to Maria said hey, this is so cool

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>watching you just randomly popping up one S and why

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Like that was cool, you know, and we know she's

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>been an s y for a while, but just kind

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of seeing and the action was cool. So after like

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 1>han and fifteen minutes, talking to Judy. I went back

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>rewound it took the video Maria impress play, went back

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to hanging out with Judy. So at that point, Frank

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I like forgot that I was like a half hour behind.

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Now just let it play. So all these things that

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing are happening. I have a half hour ago,

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>and I had totally totally forgot until the BFFs lit

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>up my chat saying they're not todd Father, the todd Father.

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, he's like, he's not like for like another

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>eight guys. This is confusing. I'm like, wait a minute,

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>beast boarded like eatings Worth like I thought Zack Afflin

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was pitching really well, like mowing them down. Things are

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>going great, and he had a rude awakening. I'm sorry, Greg,

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, they find that interesting that No, normally I

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>noticed when it's behind. Normally I stream, so I use

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>like MLB TV, I use so I'm always like, you know,

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>five minutes behind anyway, right right, because it's just you know,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what comes with streaming services or whatever. But normally,

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if I posited or something that I remember too, I

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>tend to remember. Also, for whatever reason, this time, I

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't any interesting Todd Fraser. No, he had a Grand

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.959
<v Speaker 1>Slam this night. He stole a base the day before

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>great last year and nine stolen bases in fifteen games.

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>He what is with you? I was talking about bad medies. Man.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I cannot wait to get a Homer Valley.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be awesome. That's a great conversation. That's gonna

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have a right after this. But no, no interest. Todd Fraser,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm done, okay, looking forward. I went to before.

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Good to see him get back on track with the bat.

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>That was helpful deep mixed leagues, I would look at

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Todd Fraser. The other big story from this game from

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the mess perspective, Brandon Nima left this one with a

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>strained oblique. They said it's precautionary. Mets are nothing at

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the time, but he grabbed the side. You know, there's

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>an m r R R today. I'm very, very nervous. No,

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Nimo, of your Nimo owner, and the last New

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>York player to leave with an oblique was a There

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>was a severe It was a severe oblique and it's

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously because he lives too many weights, Greg and baseball

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>players shouldn't do that. I do want to note in

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>these game, given the injuries the Jeans, Cigar and Scott King,

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the girl Franco hitting fifth now for the Philadelphia happened

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the past, we have a we have a notity yet

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that so Franco all the way up to fifth in

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>this order? Good news, two more kids, he's I would

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>love for this to stick around because I have a

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>few shares of of Michael Franco. Took a shot on him. Greg,

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what else? You what else did you forget to mention

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Mets side? Huh? What else? If you get

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to mention, it's gonna call me out. You've been bashing

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>me for for Robbie Canopy. Hey, he gets two hits.

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.120
<v Speaker 1>He's on the board here, Greg. If anything happens with

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>with Brandon Nimoy, is there anyone that interests you here?

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>The Mets who overcentage owned is Jeff McNeil. I'll look

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it up. He had the second highest batting average in baseball,

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>right fifty two. Now he talked for us yesterday. That's

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy in least he's not owning the hesket picked up.

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>There was someone out, yes, yes he did? What a cannon?

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Then a second third base after the eligibility and like

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the answer easily. Yeah, but he's gonna play most

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of the time anyway, right, all right, so then if

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you want me, they're probably just gonna mix and match

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a ton because they have a lot of think most likely, Yeah,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>get some key On Roxon. You'll get some long with

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Garrison there, all right, you know, I just I'll always

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>go back to you know, if key On Roxton gets

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>playing time. He still has an interesting power. All right,

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I was grasping at. J. D. Davis is an interesting

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>name too. I like j D. D The battle buball

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>data has been really good this year. The average jax

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of velocity has been awesome for J. D. Davis. He

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>was one of the leaders in his expected batting average,

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>much higher than his actual batting average. I think there's

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a little something there with J. D. Davis. But now

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>with Todd Frasier coming back, and obviously Pete Alonzo playing

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>first base every day, I just don't know how J. D.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Davis is gonna get in there often unless they, you know,

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>start sticking him in the outfield, But then what are

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they Conforto and center field doesn't work. I don't I

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's gonna happen very often. Okay, so the you'

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that were barely conversation, let's just do it. Just drop him.

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 1>He sucks, I was wrong, It's fine, you're right. I look, no,

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>did you pick him up? I picked him up in

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the Great Fantasy Basble limitation. My team's crap anyway, I

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 1>think I'm in thirteenth out of fifteen. We sat here

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with Chris and we said, don't make the Jordansferman mistake again.

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>This is what Holmer Bailey is. That's what he was.

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I know. I asked you and you told me not to.

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I know. And he only did it in one spot. Thankfully,

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I could have done it more eight. Thankfully he went.

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>He made it to the second h and the immedily

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 1>immediately left. He sucks. What do you want he say? Greg,

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You're right, You're right. It's not tweeted at me. Last night.

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw that. I was saying, you know what he

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that happens from time to time, not very often,

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but from time to time. Great, What do you want

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>me to say? Bailey? I shouldn't have trusted it normally.

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>This is what I said regarding Bailey, and I'll stick

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>by it to a certain extent for and it's probably

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>more useful for younger starting pitchers, guys that haven't you know,

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>had an earray over six for the past three seasons.

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 1>When a picture or any player in baseball is doing

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>something different and they're having success while doing it, it's

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna intriguing me. You know, he was throwing the splitter more,

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>he's going to cut her more, he's using more breaking pitches.

0:35:19.360 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I was buying into it. And you know what, I

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the only one because there was a lot. I

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't say you were the only one. And I've just

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>said that those people were mistaken. I'm just look, when

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>it comes to people, you know, players who are doing

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>things differently, I'm gonna at least be intrigued and I'm

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay attention to it. So and I thought Homer

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Bailey was gonna have a double star, which I don't

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>even think he has a double star anymore now, and

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>it's probably for the best. So look, if you picked

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>up Homer Bailey, give yourself a big l on the forehead,

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>because that's what I'm doing, and go ahead and drop him.

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We're all idiots. You heard it here first Emilio Pagan

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>got his second save in two days for this raised

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 1>team is once again. Diego Castillo and Jose Alvarado had

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the day all So, was that planned? Was that pre planned?

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Likes to imagine it was right? It has to be normally.

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Do guys get two days off in a row? Greg?

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems a little weird to me. You know, you

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>hear of are you one guy will get a day off?

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 1>All right? They gave both guys a day off. You're

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>telling me both Alvarado and Castile weren't available last night.

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>This seems weird to me. Pick up anyone who could

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>get saves in these deeper leagues. You know, we're playing

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a few fifteen team mixed rohto and a lot of

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>people are starved or relief pitchers. And you know I

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>saw earlier in the chat people are talking about what

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can I drop Michael Gibbons If we're dropping to Anthony Domingus,

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 1>can I drop Michael Gibbons? Sure, that's fine. You know,

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea what's going on with the Orioles

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, and they haven't been in a position to

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>have a game saved in like two weeks now about it?

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if you're trying to find someone in

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a row, like, all right, if you have a reliever

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on your team, you're not giving you any saves or

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>holes at all. At least this guy's converted two in

0:36:58.200 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a row something. It seems weird that they eat both

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>of these guys two days off. It's all right, let's

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 1>take a break, we'll come back. I want to get

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>into Luke Weaver. We'll do that next. The Fantasy Sports

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Network is ready to take you out to the ball game.

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Our experts and analysts are following the Boys of Summer

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>through all one, d and sixty two games of the

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen MLB season with the best fantasy baseball

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>analysis in the industry. Catch the latest news and notes

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 1>every day to help you win your fantasy leakies, end

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>your dat best tournaments. Will always want you back listening

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and watching the Fantasy Sports Network on the f F F

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and T s Y Radio app and the FVN T

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>s Y YouTube channel. The Fantasy Sports Network where we're

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>root root route reading for your fantasy baseball team. Warri

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Sale two thousand and fifteen, two thousand and sixteen European

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen World number one.

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Me personally, I keep my game face on me all

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the time, especially coming out with the bucker, leaving the

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>range or even leaving the ports. What's your still learned?

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Go to game face grooming dot com for all all

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:15.400
<v Speaker 1>your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs. Fantasy sports today,

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was freaking out and I'm still freaking

0:38:17.880 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 1>out because Chris Sale has been garbage so far, and

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>in our draft that Joe and I are in the

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>same league, and and I picked Sale and then went

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.959
<v Speaker 1>one behind me, So there was a lot of consternation

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>for me as to whether or not I made the

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right decision to Sale has been off to a bad start,

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but the start wouldn't be He hasn't hit the eye

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>l yet, so in that sense, it's a positive. Saturday's

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 1>eight am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>popular podcast providers Can't Get enough Fantasy Football. Rhoto Experts

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>has launched their NFL three Fantasy Football package, which includes

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the best math based seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet, and Davis Maddick and the Ruto Experts

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball and NFL

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Draft content every day of the year to give you

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>an edge regardless of what type of fantasy football you play,

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>say Timber at Roto Experts dot com with the promo

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 1>code Evans's why it's the NFL three Fantasy Football package

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>only at Rhoto Experts dot com. Back with you with

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Frank Stample

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gregg Susman. Daniel Murphy has been activated for the Colorado

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:33.239
<v Speaker 1>Rockies in the lineup and is in the lineup third

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>third and playing first base for the Rockies. According to

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>our own Frank Staff and Ryan Meekmahen, it's Ryan McMahon

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>adding sixth playing second base. Now, what is the corresponding move, Greg,

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>That is a million dollar question right now, and once

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we have the answer, we will let everyone know. But

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 1>once again, no E Desmond in this lineup as Ryan

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mel Toppi is playing center with Dolin left Lackman in right.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>He has been hot at least homeward in three straight

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 1>games for the Rockies. Yeah, he homeward lefty on left

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:06.240
<v Speaker 1>yesterday too, which is huge for him. And he actually

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:10.479
<v Speaker 1>made a diving catch falling into the stands last night too.

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>So also once again, great game for Rymel Tapia. Then

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Nationals lineup, sorry interrupting, you know Anthony Rendolin

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 1>once again? Yeah, that sucks too because this is what

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>probably their only trip to Colorado this year, or one

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>of maybe two, probably the probably the only trip, and

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:29.319
<v Speaker 1>so you miss out on Anthony rendone games here in

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>coors Field. Um. I saw this as a topic of

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>conversation on Twitter the other day too, because an NFBC

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you can actually set your hitter lineups on Monday and Friday,

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>so it kind of goes based on series. You start

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>your hitters based on, you know, whatever series you want

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to get them in for, and a lot of people

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>were talking about, you know, do you take the chance

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>on putting Anthony Rendon in your lineup just because he's

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>playing in corps Field, And a lot of people said yes,

0:40:53.640 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately he hasn't appeared in any of these games.

0:40:56.480 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Another player similar to Mike m stockins that will get

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>an update from dr tomorrow regarding their injuries. I did

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>put him on the list, right, I believe you did. Greg, alright,

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 1>just make it sure, um, even down, you just made

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.919
<v Speaker 1>the list beautiful, beautiful. I mentioned Luke Weaver before the break.

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Let's break it down. It was Luke Weaver versus Trevor

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Williams last night. Both pitch really well as Luke Weaver

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 1>went six and a third, allowed seven, allowed one run,

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 1>six hits, walked one, struck out seven. Trevor Williams also

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:29.240
<v Speaker 1>pitched well, but he went seven innings, four hits, two runs,

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>he walked one as well, and he struck out just four.

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I know he keep waiting for this bottom to fall

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:38.399
<v Speaker 1>out for Trevor Williams and Luke Weaver. It hasn't. It

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>has not. And Luke Weaver interested me a little bit

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>more is because there's some prospect pedigree and at least

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:45.440
<v Speaker 1>he gets you strikeouts. But I don't want to downplay

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Williams too much, and I'll get into that. But

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Luke Weaver, now, this is three starts in a row.

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Greg and I tweeted this out last night. Drink seventeen

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds innings pitched over his past three starts,

0:41:56.560 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hits, only two walks. It's a huge key for

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Luke Weaver. Just two walks over his last three starts

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty four strikeouts over his last three in seventeen and

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>two thirds endings pitched during that span a one seven

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>e R A a one zero or whip. He's been spectacular, man.

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And he started working in the curve and the cutter

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more last night. The curveball through the

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>season high twelve times. I know that's something that we

0:42:24.160 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>were interested in in the off season when we read

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the Athletic article regarding Luke Weaver. So he throws the

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>curve a season high twelve times, also had a season

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>high six called strikes on said curveball, So he's mixing

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.799
<v Speaker 1>it into his pitch repertoire. He's he's clearly throwing it

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>um in counts when hitters aren't expecting and kind of

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>keeping them thrown off. If he's getting six called strikes

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on these curveballs and he's throwing them for strikes, that's

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.239
<v Speaker 1>what I like to see regarding these breaking pitches. So

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>these are lots of like here with Luke Weavery at

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>twelve swing strikes one pitches. I'm buying in, man, I'm

0:42:57.160 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>buying in on both of these guys, specifically Luke Weaver.

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>If you're able to pick him up, um, you know

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>he got off to a slow start to the season.

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I know one of those starts was against the Red Sox,

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but overall, I feel very good about Luke Weaver. This

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that was being drafted the top thirty

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher last year. I wasn't you know, Matt Gregor.

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:18.759
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was overvalued last year, but this season great.

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>During drafts it went too far the other way. So

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>last year it was and he's drafted too early. This

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:25.439
<v Speaker 1>year he was going. He was just going too late

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 1>based on the pedigree that he provides. And you know,

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:30.960
<v Speaker 1>he's starting to show up a little bit here at

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the major league level. And that first story is the

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers alloted five runs to earn and the second story

0:43:36.560 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>against in Since then two zero and one, he's been

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>really good. Hasn't got all that deep, just no longer

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>than six and a third. We'll take that from Luke

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Weaver at the moment. What about Trevor Williams, Franks, Trevor Williams,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>You know what, this reminds me a lot of greg

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Exactly Yeah, it's exactly right, because Marco Astrada, that he

0:43:57.520 --> 0:44:00.080
<v Speaker 1>was a guy for years would outperform his periphic r.

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:02.799
<v Speaker 1>He was. Basically he was the anti John Gray. He was.

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>He would pitch to mid three z r A and

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 1>his exit would be near five. Trevor Williams. Now, we

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>have data almost a full seasons where the data we

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>have over two pitched of data. Now with Trevor Williams,

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>he picks one and to third, seventy and two thirds

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>endings pitched last year, thirty one in the third this season,

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg and over the past few years. Last season at

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>three eleven ear A this year a to five nine

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>ear A last season. His ex fit four point this

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>season is x fit four point five two. And he's

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>just severely out pitching the peripherals here, Like he doesn't

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:43.279
<v Speaker 1>get a ton of strikeouts. He didn't get a ton

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of swinging strikes last night either. Overall on the season,

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 1>his swinging strike rate is actually up. He's at ten

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>point two percent this year. Last year he was at

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>he was below eight percent per nine is down though

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>from six point and I said this last week regarding

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Williams, So the swinging strike rate overalls up, but

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts are down. That tells me there should be

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>some positive regression coming. I'm not saying he's gonna, you know,

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>start striking everyone out, but you know he probably struggles,

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 1>you know with two strikes, being able to put put

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>batters away with with swings and misses. But still you know,

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>gets a decent amount of groundballs. He he induces um,

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 1>he induces soft contact hard hit rate. This year it's

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the low league average. Last year it was nine percent

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight percent first pitch strike percentage, getting hitters to

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:36.720
<v Speaker 1>chase more often this year by seven percent, eight percent

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:40.840
<v Speaker 1>oh swing percentage. So there's lots of like with Trevor Williams.

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I know the peripherals say that he's going to regress

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point, and he probably will. Is he gonna

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pitch to a two five nine r A. I don't

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>think so. But and he pitched too in e ar

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>A mid threes to high threes with a good whip.

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Because he hasn't walked at me guys, I think so.

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he might be able to pull that off.

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Greg The Sevor Williams is he's never going to be

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a sexy fantasy baseball pick because he doesn't striking enough

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>guys out. I think he's a fine player, especially leaves

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>where you're you're getting the quality starts. He's just gonna

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>go deep in the games and he's just kinda gonna

0:46:14.280 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>do his thing. I don't see him getting bombed. I

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:19.200
<v Speaker 1>given you a quality start every start the season, five

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:22.399
<v Speaker 1>quality start machine, like I like I mentioned, he's gone

0:46:22.440 --> 0:46:24.759
<v Speaker 1>at least six. He went seven yesterday, which was the

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>further this. He's gone into a game the first four

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>all six and he and he's done it. You know,

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>he's he's done it against Washington in Washington, how was this?

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Holid starts six and a third innings pitch only two

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>earned runs yesterday against the d Backs. They're the best lineup,

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>but to start the year, they've they've been solid offensively

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the other three starts against Detroit, in two against Cincinnati.

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>So all right, he's supposed to perform well in those,

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but I think against Arizona against Washington, those are two

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the top half offenses so far this lead this year,

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he's performed well. You know, most people might say, oh, well,

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>do we try and sell Trevor Williams. The thing is,

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:05.880
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna get? You know a lot of

0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 1>people are going to look at him and say, this

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is similar to Jacob Junas last year, remember Jacob Junas,

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 1>he had a great e r A the first half

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season, but the peripherals kept saying, all right,

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna regrests, he's gonna regrets, and he did. But

0:47:19.160 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for Trevor Williams, now it's two seasons in a row

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and it's over two an pitch now that he's outperforming

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:29.239
<v Speaker 1>his peripherals. So he's not a He's not gonna pitch

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to a two five nine year ray. But can he

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>pitch to a sub four e r A and be

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>solid and give you a good whip because he doesn't

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:41.479
<v Speaker 1>walk a lot of guys, are you leaned towards Yes,

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you can try and trade him if someone else in

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.480
<v Speaker 1>your league is willing to buy in. But personally, I

0:47:47.520 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think a lot of people are going to give

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you much for Trevor Williams, so I just ride it

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>out with him. Gregory Planca once again two for four yesterday,

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in the second consecutive game that he had that line.

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>He had cold Tucker once again batting uh eighth in

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>this lineup, he went over three. They got pinched hit

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 1>four by jung O Gong. Other than that first game,

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>could Tucker hasn't done all that much as he continues

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to bat eighth in this lineup. Four Arizona Edwardo Escobar

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>once again three for four, average up to seventy. You did,

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>he's getting hot, man, He's getting hot if he's still

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>available as a free agent um, especially with his versatility

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>shortstop in third base. He give you middle infield, corner infield.

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>He's not a guy that's gonna hit, you know, thirty

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 1>home runs, but if he's twenty five home runs, he

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 1>hits a lot of double so he's good for points leagues,

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's batting in a good spot in this lineup.

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>He's batting second, just ahead of David Parulta, Adam Jones,

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Christian Walker. He's gonna score a decent amount of runs too.

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a solid player. He's fine, and he's starting to

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 1>come around. So I think you should pick him up

0:48:47.000 --> 0:48:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna he's gonna continue to perform similar to this.

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>He's you know, he's got the batting average all the

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.719
<v Speaker 1>way up to two seventy. On the other side, right uh,

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:56.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, second game in a row, Gregory Planco two

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>hits and so far he's made me look bad because

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was gonna get off to a slow start,

0:49:02.239 --> 0:49:04.720
<v Speaker 1>more so in the power department. So you know, maybe

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we see some solid batting average from Gregory Planco here.

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I still think it's gonna take some time for the

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 1>power to come around for him, though perhaps bearing lead

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as we tend to do. As Carlos Carrasco left last

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:18.800
<v Speaker 1>night's game early with an injury, had an m R.

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I things are Okay's expects to make his next start.

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:23.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. You know, his teams are very cautious with

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>their pictures of Pablo Lopez and another side. Well, he

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:27.959
<v Speaker 1>did his thing. It was a great pitching matchup between

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Lopez and Carrasco. Krasco only lasted four innings, allowing two hits,

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:33.879
<v Speaker 1>struck out four and walk anybody or allowed any runs.

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Pablo Lopez went into Cleveland and

0:49:36.280 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>pitched six and the third only allowed one run. It

0:49:38.840 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 1>was not earned. Uh, just on two hits, walked too,

0:49:41.520 --> 0:49:43.759
<v Speaker 1>struck out six only through EIGHTI six pitches. This is

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Pablo Lopez. I think fantasy youngers were waiting for absolutely

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 1>greg and I I never wavered. I haven't given up

0:49:49.120 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on Pablo Lopez because you look at the underlying numbers

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and the skills and they were still there. He was

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's getting a lot of swinging strikes. Um,

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 1>he has good command. There's a lot to like with

0:50:00.400 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with Pablo Lopez here, and his best start of the

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>season comes against an Indian lineup that included Francisco Lindor.

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:08.840
<v Speaker 1>This isn't you know, the same lineup that we were

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about a week ago. They had Hanley Ramirez and

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Tyler and Nay Quinn batting third. This lineup is getting better.

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kitness is now a part of it, and Francisco

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Lindora is part of it. And we gotta see Jose

0:50:18.800 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Ramirez start to pick things up. But overall, Pabo Lopez

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was facing a an improved Indians lineup and had his

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>best start of the season. Six and the third endings

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>pitch greg only two hits, allowed one run it was unearned.

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:35.320
<v Speaker 1>He had six strikeouts, thirteen swinging strikes on eighties six pitches.

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>He threw a season high thirties seven two seamers. Interesting.

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pay attention to the pitch usage here and

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:44.399
<v Speaker 1>see if he continues to build off this. Yet three

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:47.760
<v Speaker 1>swinging strikes on that two seamer and nine cold strikes.

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think Pavo Lopez is a talented picture. But what

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:53.759
<v Speaker 1>I've seen from him is from start to start, he's

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:56.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of changed up what pitches he uses often, and

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's still trying to figure out what works

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 1>best for him. So that's why you see Pablo Lopez

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of up and down here, but every

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:06.400
<v Speaker 1>start that goes on and he starts to figure it

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit more here, a little bit more,

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. He's gonna start to put everything

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>together and figure out what pitches he wants to use

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and in what order he wants to use them, and

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's kind of learning how to pitch on

0:51:17.960 --> 0:51:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the fly here. I think I think there's some good

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>days coming ahead for Pablo Lopez. And I've said that

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for him even when his arra was you know, up

0:51:27.080 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>far six and he was struggling. The skills are there.

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying it on Pablo Lopez absolutely, And we've said

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:34.359
<v Speaker 1>it for a while now. Why you can hang out

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>with with Pablo Lopez, Wait, why you can pick up

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like tay out Faulo Lopez and that that would be awesome. Um,

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:46.439
<v Speaker 1>hitting wise, who's al Faro had his fourth hole run

0:51:46.560 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 1>over the season? What do you want a far? So

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if you he was your late round catcher, pretty pretty

0:51:51.400 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>good about that? Pretty good man? I was. I was

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:57.640
<v Speaker 1>out on Jorge al Faro because he had a chance

0:51:57.680 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to play last year in a good ballpark and Citizens bang,

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know he was a right. He gives you power.

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 1>He hits the ball hard, but the strikeout percentage has

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:07.359
<v Speaker 1>been unreal in his career. You know, he's around thirty,

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so he strikes out a lot. And I still think

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that he can be an okay offensive catcher for fantasy.

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Is your catcher too? Maybe a guy that you know,

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in his prime approaches twenty home runs, albeit not with

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a good batting average. But right now he's been great.

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:28.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you have him as your second catchers

0:52:28.160 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>hit his fourth home run yesterday and that comes with

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:34.279
<v Speaker 1>his home ballpark as Marlins Park, So um, he might

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:37.399
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that has enough power to the point

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:40.399
<v Speaker 1>where it doesn't matter that his home ballpark is Marlins Park.

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Reg but has your second casher, he's been great and uh,

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you know he has the prospect pedigree. I've been wrong

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:50.240
<v Speaker 1>regarding Horey Farrow the story you have, Um, I wanted

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to know. It doesn't really matter, but as a gallowe

0:52:52.800 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 1>he did still a second base here. He's had an

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 1>eighth for this team in super deep leagues. Speak guy,

0:52:59.719 --> 0:53:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you know we talked about Terrence Gore. Is it worth

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:04.759
<v Speaker 1>mentioning as a Galloway at the same time of reason

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and only leagues like that? Definitely? And Only and mixed.

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I thought about putting in a few bids

0:53:12.840 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on Isaac Galloway. I actually thought he was younger than

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>he was. I thought he was a prospect, a kind

0:53:19.040 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of like lower down prospect in the organization. But actually

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:23.919
<v Speaker 1>he's one of these Quad A players. He's been around

0:53:23.920 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a wild like twenty nine years old. He's been in

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues for a long time. But you know

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:31.360
<v Speaker 1>last year he hit nine home runs, he had twenty

0:53:31.360 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases. You're right. I mean, he provides a little

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:37.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a little bit of speed here, and he's

0:53:37.560 --> 0:53:40.000
<v Speaker 1>shown some batting average of times in the minor leagues

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 1>this season he had to seven. I don't think he's

0:53:42.080 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be great, but again, if you're looking for speed

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and and Only and fifteen team mixed, I think at

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the least, Greg, He's going to play often for the Marlins,

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and they need to find ways to generate offense. And

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:57.799
<v Speaker 1>if it comes with Galloway stealing bases and doing so successfully,

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll let him continue to run. No reason

0:54:01.360 --> 0:54:05.200
<v Speaker 1>not to. They had They had to take a page

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>out of the Royals book here. They have to start

0:54:07.280 --> 0:54:10.839
<v Speaker 1>to let these guys run. Lewis Brinson is Lewis prison

0:54:10.920 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>heard or something? Greg like, why hasn't even playing the past?

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Because is that It's not like a good enough answer

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:20.319
<v Speaker 1>for you? Maybe maybe, but I mean he was. This

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 1>was the main piece that they got back. For reminder,

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Christian Yellis, you know this is the main piece that

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:29.880
<v Speaker 1>they got back, or Christian Yellows And I know they

0:54:29.880 --> 0:54:33.440
<v Speaker 1>have Monty Harrison in the minor leagues who an interesting

0:54:33.480 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>power speed combination. He has all the athletic tools, but

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:39.319
<v Speaker 1>he strikes out a lot. They'll probably be up at

0:54:39.320 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 1>some point for the Marlins, just because you know, they

0:54:41.200 --> 0:54:42.879
<v Speaker 1>want to see what they have in him. Obviously came

0:54:42.880 --> 0:54:46.040
<v Speaker 1>over in that trade as well. He san Diez another name.

0:54:46.120 --> 0:54:47.759
<v Speaker 1>He was a lower level prospect that they got in

0:54:47.760 --> 0:54:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that trade. But to this point, since he's joined the Marlins.

0:54:50.920 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't done anything at the minor league level, and

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Lewis Brinson has just been brutal. But they gotta let

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:58.880
<v Speaker 1>him try and figure it out. And you know, playing

0:54:58.920 --> 0:55:01.759
<v Speaker 1>guys like Martin p Greg what does that do for them?

0:55:01.840 --> 0:55:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Granderson? What does that do for the Marlins? Nothing? Actually,

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:08.800
<v Speaker 1>let the kids play, you know, let Louis Brenton play.

0:55:08.920 --> 0:55:10.719
<v Speaker 1>When he gets on base, let him run. I was

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:13.239
<v Speaker 1>going to generate off. What's the worst gonna happen? They

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:17.480
<v Speaker 1>lose again? They're terrible anyway. It's just very odd the

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:19.800
<v Speaker 1>way that things are going with the Marlins. And similar

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to the Orioles. You know, one of the words gonna

0:55:22.360 --> 0:55:24.000
<v Speaker 1>start calling up some of these kids, Greg, what is

0:55:24.000 --> 0:55:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the reason too? Right now? Right? But they've they've passed, Yeah,

0:55:27.920 --> 0:55:31.239
<v Speaker 1>the time right where where they can call prospects up

0:55:31.440 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and they have the extra year. It depends on when

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:37.560
<v Speaker 1>players like start their minorly career. But Ryan Mountcastle performing

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>well in the minors right now and a lot of

0:55:39.000 --> 0:55:41.319
<v Speaker 1>people are excited about him. You should be up sooner

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:42.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than later. For the Orioles, and that's a name

0:55:42.960 --> 0:55:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to remember when it comes up. You're looking at a

0:55:45.800 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>team that doesn't want to compete this year. That matters,

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:50.719
<v Speaker 1>But you I get what you're saying. It's a catch

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:54.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty two because you want them to be able to

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:57.480
<v Speaker 1>play every day and develop. I understand that. But at

0:55:57.480 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the same time, you want you want some of these

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:03.680
<v Speaker 1>young players, Greg to develop at the major league level.

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:04.960
<v Speaker 1>You want to see what they could do, how they

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:07.719
<v Speaker 1>handle major league pitching, so on and so forth. And

0:56:07.880 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I know Austin Hayes was hurt to start the minor

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 1>league seasons, so with him, it's probably a little bit different,

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think he'll be up at some point. But

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hayes, Uh, Cedric Mullins, I know they just sent

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:20.880
<v Speaker 1>him down because he was performing terribly, So I understand that.

0:56:20.920 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 1>But at some point he's got to be back up.

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Nowcastle. For the Orioles, these young teams that are

0:56:25.040 --> 0:56:27.280
<v Speaker 1>not going to compete this year, Greg, and they're gonna

0:56:27.320 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 1>be up at some point. I understand that. But right now,

0:56:31.120 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just what is Martine proto? What is you know,

0:56:35.200 --> 0:56:38.319
<v Speaker 1>whatever other schlove the other the Orioles are throwing out

0:56:38.320 --> 0:56:40.200
<v Speaker 1>in the outfield, What does that do for you to

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:43.399
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see some of these, Uh, younger

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:45.960
<v Speaker 1>prosperous to get the changes, he will, listen, Let's take

0:56:45.960 --> 0:56:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a break. We'll come back. Welcome in Chris venture upstairs.

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into Domingo, her mom and how

0:56:51.480 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>good you think he is or candidate or will sustained.

0:56:54.600 --> 0:56:56.240
<v Speaker 1>And we'll also get into all the games we missed

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:58.840
<v Speaker 1>more on the way our number two Fantasy BFS