Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeart Radio app
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Team. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt Friday, April twenty ninth edition of the program.
Speaker 1: We have so much to discuss. The disinformations are is
Speaker 1: apparently a massive musical theater nerd, but we could forgive that.
Speaker 1: The part that we can't is that she's also a
Speaker 1: practitioner of disinformation. What a shock. Elizabeth Warren says there
Speaker 1: should be new rules to govern social media now that
Speaker 1: Elon Musk is buying Twitter and no one surprised on that.
Speaker 1: When we've got the latest numbers of gotaways at the
Speaker 1: southern border, Biden's approval numbers are in the dumpster. And
Speaker 1: also you have continued fights over the culture war and
Speaker 1: how it will affect the midterms. That's where we are heading. Friends,
Speaker 1: so much to discuss, But first off, I just gotta
Speaker 1: tell you I had a conversation with my brothers this
Speaker 1: morning because we are investors in realist through done for
Speaker 1: your real estate and the properties we've bought have all
Speaker 1: been doing incredibly well, and we've had really solid gains
Speaker 1: on them in terms of equity, and we're looking to
Speaker 1: buy another one because these guys know what they're doing.
Speaker 1: Done for Your real Estate will take you through every
Speaker 1: step of the process. Okay, I'm telling you if you've thought,
Speaker 1: you know, I want to own real estate. I want
Speaker 1: to own tangible assets and build financial security for myself
Speaker 1: through income that's coming to me every month, but also
Speaker 1: building equity and real estate over time. You got to
Speaker 1: call my friends at Done for your real Estate. Easiest
Speaker 1: things actually go to their website. Just go to Done
Speaker 1: for You Buck dot Com. That's done for You Buck
Speaker 1: dot Com. They'll take you through every step of the process,
Speaker 1: helping you pick the city you want to invest in
Speaker 1: or the area, the house you want to invest in,
Speaker 1: get you the loan that you need, get you the
Speaker 1: management team in place, get a tenant in that house.
Speaker 1: It's such a great process. Once you get going with it,
Speaker 1: go to Done for You Buck dot Com. Again, that
Speaker 1: is done for you Buck dot Com. Check it out today.
Speaker 1: Become a real estate investor. Nina Jenkowitz is the COVID.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, the general disinformations are not DISCOVID disinformation within DHS. Mostly,
Speaker 1: I think having to do with Russia disinformation. I really
Speaker 1: do think that one of the superhuman powers that the
Speaker 1: left seems to possess is that they have no ability
Speaker 1: to pick up on irony. There's no self awareness, and
Speaker 1: at a certain level, your lack of self awareness is
Speaker 1: a superhuman trait because it allows you to just do
Speaker 1: or say anything, whereas other people would say, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: I'm such a joke. The Left, the Democrat Party, these
Speaker 1: are the same thing now. By the way it used
Speaker 1: to be, there was a faction of the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: that was the left. Now that faction runs the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: Now that faction is the vanguard. They're in charge. So
Speaker 1: even Democrats who aren't hard left are moving in the direction.
Speaker 1: They're party is moving in the direction of the hard
Speaker 1: left because of the hard left. So they're people who
Speaker 1: went along with as a party, the Democrat Party went
Speaker 1: along with Russia disinformation ruses. You know, And here is
Speaker 1: the now Disinformation Governance Board head Nina Jankowitz singing, singing
Speaker 1: about disinformation online. She thought it was a good idea
Speaker 1: to post this. Okay, this is public this is public record.
Speaker 1: Informational launduring is really quite frus She sits when a
Speaker 1: huckster take some lines and makes them sounds for cose
Speaker 1: she's by singing. Then in congress or and mainstream up
Speaker 1: that soon disinformation's origins are slightly less atrocious. It's how
Speaker 1: you hidle the lighted lie. It's how you had a
Speaker 1: little lidled lie. It's how you had a little hidled
Speaker 1: line when Rudy Giuliani shared that in Tamsan Ukraine. Oh
Speaker 1: when TikTok and blue and sustay covid can cause pain,
Speaker 1: then laundering decinfo when we really should take note and
Speaker 1: not support lies with that wo voice? Have you had enough?
Speaker 1: Have you had enough? Are you crying yet? Are you
Speaker 1: crying on the inside from all of the city you
Speaker 1: should be? Was that rough? I put you through that?
Speaker 1: Just so you understand, this is what the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: has been reduced to. They're putting this person in charge
Speaker 1: of a disinformation board. Oh look, I you know, I'm
Speaker 1: a guy who does a lot of stuff in public,
Speaker 1: and some of it's some of it's meant to be
Speaker 1: comedic and other it's not. But the the bigger issue.
Speaker 1: So we could have something fun here with the musical
Speaker 1: theater nerd thing, but the bigger issue is that she
Speaker 1: was a big proponent publicly of the Hunter Biden laptop
Speaker 1: story is a Trump campaign product, as in, it was
Speaker 1: manufactured by the Trump campaign. It was a lie. Well,
Speaker 1: that's as we know, that's disinformation. That's just not true.
Speaker 1: I'm sure if you were to go back further into
Speaker 1: a public statement, see, this is going to be the
Speaker 1: problem that Democrats have to deal with. They used to
Speaker 1: be able to put these zealots, these ideologues, into positions
Speaker 1: where they would tell us, oh, no, but they're not
Speaker 1: super left wing. They're just a good old fashioned moderate.
Speaker 1: It's all fine, nothing to see here. Well, it turns out.
Speaker 1: It turns out that when you have a long history
Speaker 1: of writing borderline insane things online or saying things on
Speaker 1: TikTok or whatever, we can find that and know who
Speaker 1: we're really dealing with. So they can't get away with
Speaker 1: pretending people that are going to be in jobs where
Speaker 1: they're just referees, they're just bureaucrats obeying the law. No,
Speaker 1: they're actually activists. They're just activists that burrow deeper than
Speaker 1: the federal government. And that's the bigger concern here, whether
Speaker 1: there's any real power in this Governance, Disinformation Governance Board
Speaker 1: or not. And I think they're start out with something
Speaker 1: that sounds pretty benign, but it will grow, of course.
Speaker 1: And that they're doing this at a time when free
Speaker 1: speech is so at issue that this would even come up,
Speaker 1: it shows a tone deafness. If they really wanted to
Speaker 1: be supportive the Democrats want to be supportive of free speech,
Speaker 1: they don't. They don't believe in free speech. They believe
Speaker 1: in the right to say that is disinformation. The Democrats
Speaker 1: as a party have embraced you are not allowed to
Speaker 1: say that. You're not allowed to say that. You're not
Speaker 1: allowed to disagree with us on matters of judgment when
Speaker 1: it comes to policy policy. It's disinformation, you see, you're
Speaker 1: not allowed. Here's Jensaki being asked by Jackie Heinrich of
Speaker 1: Fox about Disinformation Board member Nina Jankowitz. She had previously
Speaker 1: called the Hunter Biden laptop a Trump campaign product, seeming
Speaker 1: to discredit its validity or validity of reporting surrounding that,
Speaker 1: how can you assuage concerns of people who are looking
Speaker 1: at this person who's been appointed to this position and
Speaker 1: wondering if she's going to be able to accurately judge
Speaker 1: misinformation now that a lot of that reporting has been
Speaker 1: proven to be factual in some ways. Well, I don't
Speaker 1: have any comments on the laptop, but what I can
Speaker 1: tell you is that it sounds like the objective of
Speaker 1: the board is to prevent disinformation and misinformation from traveling
Speaker 1: around the country and a range of communities. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure who opposes that effort I do. How about that?
Speaker 1: How about anybody anybody who has any knowledge of the
Speaker 1: history of government suppression of information and censorship in such
Speaker 1: broad terms. In this way, I just have to wonder
Speaker 1: what happened to all the civil libertarians that supposedly exist
Speaker 1: out there. There's silent on this stuff for the most
Speaker 1: but not all of them. There are some people that
Speaker 1: have spoken out, but very very few. And also, this
Speaker 1: is another moment where libertarians should be at def Con
Speaker 1: one over this right. But now, of course not, because
Speaker 1: as much as libertarians can be musing, and some of
Speaker 1: them are my friends, they're generally politically worthless. I'm just
Speaker 1: saying it's true. It's just the reality. I wish it
Speaker 1: weren't the case. Doesn't mean I don't like them, it
Speaker 1: just means they're not helpful when we need them to
Speaker 1: be helpful. And then there is just the general sense
Speaker 1: here that they are recognizing they can't win the argument anymore,
Speaker 1: so they're just going all out to shut it down
Speaker 1: going into the midterms because they are going to get
Speaker 1: annihilated and they're going to do whatever they can to
Speaker 1: try to stop the bleeding, so to speak, of the
Speaker 1: poll numbers that they're facing and the midterm election that
Speaker 1: they're going into. Right now here is Elizabeth Warren, you know,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, she's really pushing for social media
Speaker 1: to have new regulations. I wonder if the timing and
Speaker 1: Twitter and Elon Musk has anything to do with this.
Speaker 1: I see that we need to make two big changes.
Speaker 1: The first one is we need a wealth tax in America,
Speaker 1: and let's talk about how Elon's purchase here was subsidized
Speaker 1: by tens of millions of people who've paid their taxes
Speaker 1: every year. And the second part is we need rules
Speaker 1: of the road for big tech. But ultimately, what all
Speaker 1: this spoils down to is power. Who's going to have
Speaker 1: the power in our country? Are we going to make
Speaker 1: these decisions as a democracy or is this going to
Speaker 1: be Elon Musk all By himself off in a room,
Speaker 1: a bazillionaire who just plays by his own set of rules.
Speaker 1: That's really what's at stake here. He just plays by
Speaker 1: his own set of rules. I thought, it's a private
Speaker 1: company who can do what it wants. That's what the
Speaker 1: Left was saying for years, years and years. It is
Speaker 1: just about power. They have no principles, So whatever they
Speaker 1: think will adversely affect their power, they fight that. Whatever
Speaker 1: they think will enhance their power, they push for that.
Speaker 1: It's very straightforward. That's it. There's really nothing beyond that.
Speaker 1: They don't even pretend to defend free speech as as
Speaker 1: a principal anymore. And it is. It is the foundational freedom. Now.
Speaker 1: I know people will tell me, buck the Second Amendment exists,
Speaker 1: so we can have a first Amendment, and I can
Speaker 1: understand that point of view as well. But without free speech,
Speaker 1: I mean, everything else that we think we have, does
Speaker 1: it even really matter? Because how can you protect any
Speaker 1: freedoms if you can't speak out about what's important to you.
Speaker 1: This is foundational to our society. You know. They keep
Speaker 1: using terms like a threat to our democracy. The federal
Speaker 1: government and the apparatus of the Democrat Party's efforts to
Speaker 1: end your ability to share your thoughts freely is the
Speaker 1: actual biggest threat to this country and our way of
Speaker 1: life that you have seen in your lifetime. That's the
Speaker 1: real threat. That matters more than all this other crap
Speaker 1: that they're always talk oh climate change, all this other
Speaker 1: stuff they're talking about. It doesn't matter nearly as much.
Speaker 1: And you've seen with COVID, look what they're able to
Speaker 1: get away with and speech. The pression was a huge
Speaker 1: part of it. Not allowed to protests, remember that during
Speaker 1: the lockdowns, Not allowed to protests, not allowed to go
Speaker 1: to church, not allowed to say the wrong thing on
Speaker 1: social media. I mean, if it wasn't for Florida, I
Speaker 1: do think we would have turned into Australia in this
Speaker 1: country because the left machinery of hysteria would have just
Speaker 1: kept pushing and pushing and pushing. This is a real
Speaker 1: fight for freedom. This is not just in rhetorical terms.
Speaker 1: These people are nuts. They've embraced an ideology of absolutism
Speaker 1: and it runs their party and they've made because of
Speaker 1: all the cultural institutions that they have been able to
Speaker 1: seize control of over the years, Academia, Hollywood, social media companies,
Speaker 1: major corporations, etc. Because of all of that, they've gotten
Speaker 1: so close to being able to force people to bend
Speaker 1: the knee about obvious lies. And some people do bend
Speaker 1: the knee, but try to force all of us to
Speaker 1: bend the knee about obvious lies. That their absolute power
Speaker 1: grab was starting to feel like it was possible. Now
Speaker 1: you're seeing the backlash. Now you're seeing people finally say,
Speaker 1: I will not be forced to go along with your
Speaker 1: obvious lies. I will not be forced to say that
Speaker 1: a man can become pregnant. I mean, what could be
Speaker 1: more straightforward? This is why this issue is so central,
Speaker 1: because it really is about power. Do you think the
Speaker 1: Left cares that much about the trans community as individuals. No,
Speaker 1: they do not. They're just using them as part of
Speaker 1: this movement toward power, to censor power, to shut down power,
Speaker 1: to have you affirmed that which you know to be untrue,
Speaker 1: because once they do that, then they can force you
Speaker 1: to do whatever they want. You'll be confused, you'll be degraded.
Speaker 1: Your own sense of what is true and what is
Speaker 1: real is degraded when you have to affirm things that
Speaker 1: you know to be lies. They're aware of that live
Speaker 1: not by lies. As I keep saying, is and that
Speaker 1: is the Achilles heal of the Democrat Party today, that
Speaker 1: what will they be able to do? How can they
Speaker 1: go forward? If they can't make you say things that
Speaker 1: are untrue. They don't know, they don't know. Come back
Speaker 1: and say back into the latest at the border for
Speaker 1: deputy US marshals deployed under President Trump to protect the
Speaker 1: defend a federal courthouse back in twenty during the BLM riots. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they've been thrown under the bus by the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: Bid administration is not providing them with attorneys. They're being
Speaker 1: sued by the ACLU. Is DOJ wants to leave people
Speaker 1: who defend their communities, their country high and dry because
Speaker 1: of politics. These are officers who with stood physical harm,
Speaker 1: bottles of urine thrown at them, lasers directed in their
Speaker 1: eyes to try to blind them by anti fallunatics, and
Speaker 1: now they're going bankrupt because they have to pay for
Speaker 1: their own defense because the ACLU, which is also a
Speaker 1: totalitarian organization full of lies, is suing them. Do you
Speaker 1: want to help, You can help them. You can help
Speaker 1: these brave law enforcement officers. Right now, the Law Enforcement
Speaker 1: Legal Defense Fund is helping people learn about this case
Speaker 1: and others like it, to educate the public on the
Speaker 1: risks and threats associated with being an officer, and raises
Speaker 1: funds to alleviate financial burdens, in this case, hundreds of
Speaker 1: thousands in mounting legal fees and at risk of losing
Speaker 1: their homes. Help these officers today. Donate at police defense
Speaker 1: dot org. That's police defense dot org. Police defense dot org.
Speaker 1: Please do help these officers out if you can. Here
Speaker 1: is what's going on at our border. They're lying to you,
Speaker 1: that's obvious. The latest numbers on gotaways I think are
Speaker 1: fascinating because gives you a sense of the scale. In
Speaker 1: fiscal year twenty twenty one, three hundred and eighty nine
Speaker 1: thousand known gotaways. Now understand that that means that in
Speaker 1: fiscal year twenty twenty one, almost four hundred thousand people
Speaker 1: these are all These are going to be adults, overwhelming
Speaker 1: the almost all single adult males. That's what gotaways are usually,
Speaker 1: unless it's a truck full of different migrants or something
Speaker 1: that makes a break forward across the border. Almost one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand people got into the country. We have no
Speaker 1: idea who they are, and they're going to stay forever.
Speaker 1: That doesn't include the numbers of the you know, the
Speaker 1: percentage of the two million who came into the country
Speaker 1: were apprehended, and then almost half of them get to
Speaker 1: stay as well. But think about this. Four hundred thousand
Speaker 1: people roughly three hundred eighty nine thousand, one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty five is the official number. And there have already
Speaker 1: been in a fiscal year twenty two, three hundred thousand gotaways.
Speaker 1: So we're getting year in, year out right now, we're
Speaker 1: on track for four or five hundred thousand people who
Speaker 1: just make it in. They don't even get arrested, process,
Speaker 1: no idea, They just make it in the country. But
Speaker 1: may Orcas down on Capitol Hill wants you to think that,
Speaker 1: don't worry. This administration has got to handle on things.
Speaker 1: Here he is talking about there are people on the
Speaker 1: terror watch list. This is real. People in terror watch
Speaker 1: lists have gotten into the country. Where are they? Here's
Speaker 1: what my Orcas says, secret have any of the forty
Speaker 1: two illegal migrants on the terrorist watch list or no
Speaker 1: fly list encountered on our southwest border been released into
Speaker 1: the United States? Ranking Member Jordan as I mentioned before,
Speaker 1: I will provide that data to you with respect to
Speaker 1: the disposition of each one. I do not know the
Speaker 1: answer to your question. The second, Homeland Security does not
Speaker 1: know the answer to the status of forty two individuals
Speaker 1: who came to our southern border illegally are on the
Speaker 1: no fly list, and then and the and the terrorists
Speaker 1: Watched list. You do not know of whether they have
Speaker 1: been released or not into the country. That's your testimony,
Speaker 1: Ranking Member Jordan. As I've said before, I will provide
Speaker 1: you the data saying it doesn't no, not sure. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan understands what the game is here. Here he
Speaker 1: is laying it down. I mean, Congressman, of course they're
Speaker 1: not in the country. Of course we've sent him back.
Speaker 1: Of course they're detained. But when he didn't say that
Speaker 1: and indicated that they may in fact have been released
Speaker 1: into the country, that should be shocking, because I said
Speaker 1: in the hearing, you're the Secretary of Homeland Security. Your
Speaker 1: number one job, mission number one. You go to their
Speaker 1: website five mission mission number one prevent terrorism. That is
Speaker 1: shocking to me, but it shows you what I think
Speaker 1: we pointed out the front end of the hearing, pointed
Speaker 1: out throughout the hearing what they're doing to our border.
Speaker 1: What they're doing to our country's intentional. It cannot be
Speaker 1: anything else. It is intentional that this border is as
Speaker 1: wide open as it is. We know it, they know it.
Speaker 1: But we'll continue to follow with friends, speak the truth here.
Speaker 1: Have a great weekend. Thanks for hanging out. Make sure
Speaker 1: you check out the Clay and Buck Show today as
Speaker 1: well as always. I will talk to you Monday. She'll
Speaker 1: tie